►
From YouTube: Community Call: Product & Protocol September 12, 2023
Description
This week's community call featured a demo of the Groups Module UI by Ryan Christoffersen and an exciting new launch from Kado for direct fiat to $REGEN onboarding.
A
Yeah:
okay,
let's
jump
in
so
today's
agenda,
we're
talking
we're
going
to
touch
on
the
normal
of
community
event
cycle
upcoming
events,
we're
going
to
talk
about
climate
week
and
then
Ryan
is
doing
a
demo
of
the
group's
module
we
have
Max
talking
about
the
Cato
launch
and
I.
Believe
Corey
will
be
on
later
to
talk
about
the
killer
sheep
hour,
which
passed
governance
last
week
and
then
just
a
reminder
of
regular
governance
happenings
okay,
so
September
is
actually
a
normal
month.
So
we
don't
have
any
weeks
off
this
time.
A
The
21st
next
Thursday
is
going
to
be
the
next
Virginia
Ready
News
hour.
Two
weeks
from
today
is
the
next
Community
call
for
registry
science
and
Foundation
that
same
day,
but
an
hour
before
is
going
to
be
our
environmental
stewardship
community
meeting,
which
is
led
by
Ned
and
then
the
week
after
that
we
have
the
next
rich
and
Ready
News
hour,
and
then
four
weeks
from
today
is
going
to
be
the
next
product
and
protocol
Community
call.
So
if
you
enjoy
this
one
be
sure
to
join
us
for
the
the
next
one.
A
A
B
B
A
B
Yeah
and
the
region
Network
Social
Hour,
it's
gonna,
be
really
mellow
super
laid
back
kind
of
like
a
safe
haven
for
for
folks
who
have
been
going
to
events
during
the
week.
It'll
be
really
lovely
just
to
connect
with
our
community
there.
So
there
will
be
more
info
about
all
of
these
events
on
our
Twitter,
so
you'll
see
that
coming
out
this
week
and
following
week,
so
just
stay
tuned.
C
C
Basically,
the
existing
multi-sig
was
known
to
have
a
bunch
of
issues
and
limitations,
and
the
groups
modules
developed
as
kind
of
a
advanced
multi-sig
in
in
a
lot
of
ways.
It's
it's
it's
a
foundation
or
framework
for
developing
and
building
davs,
and
we
just
call
them
groups
to
simplify
things
a
bit
but
yeah
group
module
is
basically
an
advanced,
multi-sig
or
or
a
tool
and
feature
that
could
be
used
to
build
a
dow.
C
We
received
a
grant
from
the
ICF
Foundation
interchange,
Foundation,
to
design
and
develop
a
user
interface
for
the
group
module
the
grant
when
the
grant
ended.
We
continued
work
on
the
group
module
and
this
has
kind
of
always
been
a
bit
of
a
side
project.
We've
had
basically
one
lead
Dev
working
on
it
over
the
last
year
on
as
a
side
project,
and
then
this
year
we
just
we
push
it
over
the
finish
line
and
basically
declared
what
is
an
MVP.
C
C
But
we
we
basically
Define
what
we
thought
was
a
critical
kind
of
first
milestone
for
you,
users
being
able
to
interact
with
the
group
module
using
a
user
interface,
so
the
V1
Zero
release.
You
can
check
out
the
release,
notes
I'll
share
those
here
in
the
chat
as
well,
and
this
provides
a
lot
more
information
basically
about
what
1.0
includes
I'll
just
Breeze
over
this
real
quickly.
But
you
should
check
out
the
link
if
you
want
more
information.
C
Basically,
multi-network
support
means
that
you
can
switch
between
networks
when
you're
using
the
groups
UI.
Currently,
the
deployment
that
regen
network
is
host
or
r
d
is
hosting
is
has
two
configured
chains.
One
is
regen
mainnet
regen,
the
other
is
regen
Redwood
our
stable
test
Network
and
for
creating
and
managing
groups.
Basically,
this
is
the
one
of
the
core
functionality
of
the
user.
C
Interface
is
basically
you're
able
to
create
your
own
groups
or
your
own
dials
and
you're
able
to
create
a
decision
policy
associated
with
that
group,
where
you
just
define
basically
the
requirements
that
need
to
be
met.
In
order
for
a
proposal
to
be
passed
within
the
group,
there
is
the
ability
to
create
multiple
decision
policies
sees
for
a
single
group
and,
and
that's
part
of
the
the
design
with
the
groups.
C
Ui
initially
only
really
supports
creating
one
decision
policy
within
the
application,
but
if
you
are
using
the
group
module
outside
the
application-
and
you
have
multiple
decision
policies,
it
does
support
viewing
those
multiple
decision
policies
submit
and
vote
on
proposals.
This
is
the
primary
function
of
the
group,
basically
based
on
the
decision
policies,
criteria,
you're
you're,
submitting
proposals
and
yeah
whether
the
proposal
passes
is
based
on
the
criteria
defined
by
the
decision
policy
and
the
members
of
the
group
are
able
to
participate
in
voting
and
submitting
proposals.
C
One
additional
feature
here
that
is
just
worth
mentioning
is
that
the
group
module
the
way
that
it's
designed
it's
designed
not
to
bloat
application
state.
So
basically,
you
can
imagine
a
Network
that
has
thousands
tons
of
groups
and
thousands
of
proposals
and
that
could
slow
and
affect
Network
performance.
So
group
proposals
are
actually
pruned
from
application
application
State
on
chain.
C
Obviously,
the
the
events
are
still
stored
with,
like
a
node
is
an
archive
node
and
you're
able
to
still
pull
that
information
out,
but
as
far
as
like
application,
State
current
state
of
the
block
blockchain
proposals
get
pruned
after
they
are
accepted
or
after
a
certain
period
has
been
reached
and
they've
been
rejected
in
the
voting
period,
has
ended.
So
we've
developed
basically
a
very
simple
indexer
that
works
alongside
the
group's
UI
and
preserves
those
historical
proposals
so
that
you
can
access
them
within
the
group's
UI.
C
C
If
you
get
a
chance,
so
there's
a
long
list,
I,
don't
think
we'll
actually
Maybe
cover
all
of
these,
but
I
want
to
kind
of
like
touch
on
a
few
of
them
and
or
maybe
maybe
we
can
get
through
about
half
of
them,
but
yeah.
Here's
like
kind
of
the
the
functionality
that
you
can
imagine
that's
available
within
the
groups
UI
and
we'll
we'll
try
to
cover
as
much
of
this
as
possible
and
yeah,
we'll
we'll
hop
on
to
the
next
slide
and
I'll
I'll.
C
C
That's
apparently
intended
at
the
MVP
in
the
sense
that
you're
only
going
to
view
groups
that
you're
a
member
of
so
here
we
can
see
that
I'm
using
one
of
my
test
accounts
and
I'm
on
regen
mainnet,
and
this
test
account
is
not
a
member
of
any
groups
on
regen
mainnet.
But
if
I
were
to
switch
to
regen
Redwood,
then
I
would
be
able
to
see
groups
that
are
associated
with
my
test
account
on
regen
Redwood,
and
you
can
see
here.
C
I've
got
five
groups
that
I'm
a
member
of
mostly
I
mean
all
these
are
being
used
just
strictly
for
testing
purposes,
but
I
can
click
on
any
one
of
these
groups
or
or
I
can
create
a
group,
and
you
can
see
here
yeah.
This
is
happening
on
regen,
Redwood
and
I
have
the
option
of
doing
that
on
mainnet
as
well.
C
The
group
like
just
is
a
quick
preview
before
we
do
any
functionality
which
I'll
actually
do
on
a
local
test.
Network
I
just
wanted
to
show
you
here
this
here's,
like
the
groups
page,
so
you
can
see
like
I've
got
this
group.
It's
called
core
Cooperative,
here's,
the
balance,
that's
currently
in
the
decision
policy
of
the
group-
and
you
can
see
here
if
I
go
to
group
details.
There's
this
group
policy
and
there's
two
members
in
this
group.
C
They
each
have
a
way
to
one
I'm
breezing
over
a
lot
of
stuff,
but
it'll
make
more
sense
as
I
I
go
through
creating
a
group
and
yeah
you
can
see
here.
There's
a
proposal.
That's
been
submitted.
This
proposal
says,
distribute
funding.
This
proposal
sends
regen
tokens
to
members
of
The
Cooperative
as
a
form
of
payment
for
their
contributions.
So
you
can
see
here
there's
a
couple
messages.
Two
different
addresses
are
receiving
one
region
and
one
of
these
addresses
voted
on
this
proposal,
which
is
actually
the
address.
C
That's
logged
in.
So
here's
like
a
brief
overview.
You
can
kind
of
get
the
idea
that
there's
this
group
and
you
can
there
there
are
these
members
of
this
group
and
they
have
these
voting
weights
and
there's
this
group
decision
policy
and
basically
the
the
home
page,
is
showing
you
proposals
that
have
been
submitted,
ones
that
are
ready
to
execute.
Basically,
the
proposal
has
passed
the
voting
period.
C
It
was
accepted
I'm
able
to
execute
it
now
versus
proposals
that
are
currently
like
in
the
voting
period
and
as
well
as
historical
proposals,
so
proposals
that
have
been
executed
or
been
rejected.
They
would
show
up
in
the
historical
section
or
History
Section
and
I'm
gonna
go
over
these
actions
through
a
demo,
but
I
just
want
to
point
out
like
there's.
Basically,
three
functions
here,
there's
a
fourth
option
available.
C
If
the
decision
policy
is
the
admin
of
the
group
which
will
demonstrate,
but
just
giving
you
like
a
brief
dive
or
if
you
dive
into
kind
of
what
what
you
should
what
you're
seeing
and
experiencing,
you
can
also
see
that
yeah
group
The
it's
a
public
blockchain.
So
if
I'm
logged
in
to
an
account,
that's
not
a
member
of
a
group.
I'm
still
able
to
see
the
group
if
I
were
to
know
the
group
ID
and
go
to
the
group
page.
C
That's
it's
all
public
information,
but
when
you're
looking
at
the
initial
dashboard,
rather
than
showing
a
bunch
of
groups,
especially
like
test
groups
or
groups
that
aren't
relevant
to
the
user,
the
the
home
page
basically
just
displays
the
group
that
you're,
a
member
of
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
this
one
as
an
example,
because
one
I'm,
not
a
member
of
this
group
but
two.
You
can
also
see
like
this.
C
This
group
has
actually
deposited
or
sent
tokens
to
the
group
policy
account
and
not
just
regen
tokens
but
NCT
tokens.
So
you
can
see
you
can
imagine
that,
like
a
group
could
be
holding
funds
for
different
types
or
different
types
of
tokens
and
funding
and-
and
this
group
is
essentially
holding
ecological
assets,
which
is
yeah
very
relevant
to
me
again.
So
next
up,
I'm
gonna
switch
over
to
a
local
environment.
C
So
here,
if
I
click
that
create
group
button,
like
you
can
see,
I
have
no
groups
as
part
of
this
account.
I'm,
not
a
member
of
any
groups
that
is
I
can
go
to
create.
Group
I
have
a
couple
options
here:
initially
you're
going
to
create
a
group
and
in
so
doing,
there's
going
to
be
an
admin
and
the
admin
is
able
to
basically
update
information
about
the
group,
they're
also
able
to
add
members
or
remove
members
from
the
group.
So
you
can
see.
C
C
That's
the
admin
of
the
group,
meaning
if
I
wanted
to
update
members
of
the
group
I,
would
have
to
go
through
a
voting
process
within
the
group
in
them
and
based
on
the
decision
policies,
criteria
that
would
determine
whether
I
could
actually
yeah
whether
the
proposal
would
actually
pass
so
we're
just
going
to
create
a
group
named
Foo.
Sorry
for
the
lack
of
creativity
here
and
I'm
not
going
to
fill
out
any
of
the
information
in
order
to
save
time.
C
Yes,
it's
the
past
another
is
you
could
use
percentage
so
you
have
the
option
of
setting
a
percentage
rather
than
a
threshold,
so
the
accumulated
vote
weights
is
determined.
It
is
taken
into
account
when
determining
the
percentage,
whereas
the
threshold
is
more
of
just
like
a
single
value
and
so
yeah.
For
the
sake
of
this
tutorial
demo
I'm
going
to
set
a
vote
threshold
of
two
I've
switched
things.
C
This
is
why
I'm
using
a
local
environment
I've
switched
things
on
the
back
end
here,
so
that
this
is
not
days
but
rather
seconds,
so
that
we
can
actually
execute
a
proposal
I'm
going
to
set
it
to
30
seconds,
but
if
you're
using
this,
this
is
actually
days
on
regular
or
on
the
deployment
so
I'm
creating
a
group.
The
threshold
of
this
group
is
two.
That
means
both
members
need
a
vote
on
a
proposed
I'm,
creating
a
group
with
the
decision
policy.
C
C
So
I've
signed
the
transaction
with
Kepler
I
can
view
the
group
page
now
so
here's
Foo
group,
it
has
no
proposals.
You
can
see
the
group
details.
The
voting
period
is
30
seconds,
but
this
is
a
typically
a
little
funky
because
the
seconds
is
not
supported
at
the
moment
and
the
so
the
group
policy
has
an
address
and
basically
a
group
policy
serves
two
functions.
It's
one
setting
the
criteria
for
proposals
to
pass
within
the
within
that
are
associated
with
this
group
policy
and
two.
C
It
also
has
it's
an
account
associated
with
it,
so
you
can
think
of
a
group
policy
as
both
an
account
and
a
set
of
criteria.
The
group
account
is
basically
the
account
that
is
executing
the
proposals.
So
if
you
submit
a
proposal,
that's
sending
tokens
from
one
address
or
sending
tokens
from
one
address
to
another
address
you're.
C
And
then,
and
then,
when
we,
when
we're
viewing
our
group,
you
can
see
here,
I've
got
five
million
view.
Regen
I
mean
yeah
and
that's
equivalent
to
to
one
regen
which
I
just
sent
over
so
now
we're
viewing
our
group.
The
group
decision
policy,
which
is
our
admin
of
the
group,
is
holding
five
regen.
You
can
see
here
there's
this
fourth
option
that
wasn't
available
when
I
was
showing
you
the
the
other
page
originally,
and
this
is
because
the
admin
of
the
group
is
the
decision
policy.
C
C
This
could
be
like
putting
in
a
new
process
or
or
a
signaling
proposal
before
making
a
larger
change
to
the
group,
so
I'm
yeah
I'm
not
feeling
too
creative
at
the
moment,
so
I'm
just
gonna
use
the
default
text,
but
basically
before
we
get
into
messages,
I
just
want
to
demonstrate
quickly
here,
there's
the
ability
to
create
tax
proposals
and
basically,
when
I,
when
I
go
through
and
I've
submitted
that
proposal.
You
can
see
here
this
this
proposal.
C
C
So,
basically,
if
I
were
Distributing,
funds
to
members
of
the
group
I'd
be
able
to
submit
a
proposal
here
this
time,
I'm
going
to
quickly
vote
on
this,
so
that
we
can
see
it
pass,
switch
to
Bob
Bob's
gonna
vote
Yes
as
well.
Sorry,
if
this
is
moving
pretty
quick
but
we'll
have
time
for
questions,
and
so
here
you
can
see
proposal
too
single
proposal
is
rejected.
No
one!
No
one
voted
on
it
within
the
30
seconds.
This
one
is
still
submitted.
C
The
voting
period
is
not
quite
over,
but
it
is
soon
to
be
over
and
if
yeah
we
refreshed
here,
you
can
see
it's
got.
The
voting
results
for
this
second
proposal,
which
is
sending
tokens
from
the
group
policy
account
to
Alice
and
basically
at
this
point
we
now
have
a
proposal
that
can
be
executed
and
if
we
execute
that
we'll
see
the
balance,
change
for
a
group
policy
account
and
the
balance
would
then
change
for
Alice
as
well.
C
So
that
was
just
a
quick
demonstration
of
send
I'm
not
going
to
do
this
for
the
other
proposals
to
save
time,
but
you
can
see
here
there
another
action.
In
addition
to
a
tax
proposal
and
a
send
proposals,
we
have
a
state
Proposal
with
the
state
proposal.
There's
multiple
options:
delegate
re-delegate
undelegate
claim
reward.
C
So
I
try
to
execute
the
proposal
as
Carol
who
was
the
new
member
being
added
to
the
group,
but
was
not
the
group,
so
you
can
see,
there's
there's
a
little
bit
of
knowledge
that
is
required
just
to
interact
but-
and
you
won't
be,
switching
between
accounts
like
I,
am
so
yeah.
Let's
make
sure
that
we
switch
back
this
time
not
to
local,
to
Alice
and
submit
the
proposal
and
yeah
now
I've
got
a
proposal,
that's
updating
our
our
group
policy
and
yeah.
C
You
can
see
here
the
we
don't
have
a
UI
to
support
this
quite
yet,
but
if
there's
no
UI,
this
actually
is
rendered
in
Json.
So
you
can
also
yeah.
This
is
actually
a
good
moment
to
share,
like
you
can
also
like
use.
The
group
like
see
like
using
the
CLI
and
submit
proposals
for
anything
for
the
Eco
credit
module
for
creating
a
new
project
or
or
updating
a
project
or
creating
a
new
credit
class.
F
C
C
The
remaining
members
would
still
be
able
to
use
the
UI
to
vote
on
and
execute
the
proposal,
so
that
actually
worked
out
well
in
terms
of
being
able
to
throw
that
little
piece
of
information
and
yeah,
and
so
you
can
see
here,
our
proposals
are
indexed.
So,
even
though
this
proposal
passed,
it
actually
no
longer
exists
on
the
network
in
application
state,
but
it
it
is
being
stored
in
a
database
off
chain
that
is
being
served
here.
C
You
could
verify
it
on
chain,
but
as
far
as
it
being
available,
it's
leveraging
the
indexer,
and
you
can
see
our
other
two
rejected
proposals
that
no
one
voted
on,
because
the
voting
period
is
super
short
yeah.
That
was
a
lot
of
information.
I
apologize,
there's,
there's
a
lot
of
also
Cosmos
SDK
terminology
and
things
that
I
could
dive
into,
but
I
think
at
this
point,
I'm
going
to
wrap
up
and
would
love
to
yeah
open
it
up
to
questions
comments.
C
One
last
thing
I
want
to
mention
too,
is
because
this
is
kind
of
was
always
like,
like
the
UI
itself,
not
necessarily
the
group's
module
was
always
a
bit
of
a
side
project
for
us.
We
are
hoping
for
community
members
to
kind
of
take
up
the
helm
and
help
us
out
with
building
this
out.
I
did
mention
in
the
release
notes
that
there
is
kind
of
this
alternative
option
rather
than
using
the
deployed
version
at
groups.regen.network.
It's
really
easy
to
Fork
the
code
and
to
add
your
own
chain.
C
You
could
even
set
it
up
so
that
it's
only
a
single
Network
for
your
deployment
and
then
basically
reuse
the
UI
as
for
your
your
own
chain,
but
if
you're
doing
that,
you'll
be
really
great
and
wonderful.
If,
like
this
UI
was
the
Upstream
version
and
new
features
we're
submitted
to
this
UI.
That
would
then
benefit
benefit
everyone,
who's,
basically
forking
and
and
deploying
their
own
for
their
own
chain.
There
is
also
the
option
of
adding
chains
to
our
deployment
at
R
D.
C
What
chains
we
would
support
would
probably
be
a
little
bit
challenging
of
a
question
to
answer,
but
I
I
mean
chains
that
are
very
aligned
with
the
regen
Network
Mission
would
be
a
pretty
easy.
Yes,
so,
and
people
that
chains
that
are
actually
actively
contributing
to
the
project
is
also
probably
a
criteria
that
would
take
into
consideration
but
yeah.
That's
that's.
That's
kind
of
it.
Lots
of
information,
so
I'll
I'll
leave
it
there
and
open
up
the
questions.
C
Yeah,
no,
that's
that's
that.
That's
a
really
really
great
and
exciting
kind
of
space
to
explore.
I
know
there
are
a
couple
other
projects
that
have
been
doing
a
lot
of
Explorations
around
that
are
more
integrated,
with
leveraging
the
group's
module
in
the
larger
Network
governance
side
of
things
as
well.
C
C
We
can
think
of
like
credit
types,
there's
there's
a
new
credit
type
that
was
added,
which
is
the
kiloshi
Power,
Credit
type
and
part
of
that
proposal.
People
were
kind
of
questioning
like
is
this
something
that
I
have
expertise
in
and
like
can
I
make
a
a
vote
on
this
like
with
without
yeah,
without
the
information
about
like
whether
this
is
a
good
credit
type
or
not?
C
And
you
could
imagine
the
group
The
gov
module,
basically
a
proposal
being
submitted
where
the
gov
module
would
become
a
member
of
a
new
group,
and
that
group
would
be
granted
the
authorization
of
adding
credit
types
and
then
basically
the
community
is
voting
on.
Who
are
the
members
that
should
decide
on?
Who
can
add
credit
types
and.
C
One
example,
and
then
yeah
also
I
mean
you
can
think
of
yeah
I
mean
there's
a
there's.
A
lot
of
opportunities,
I
think
that's
actually
probably
a
good
place
to
stop
I,
don't
want
to
go
too
far
down
the
rabbit
hole,
but
I
think
that
interaction
is
something
that's
really
interesting
to
explore
and
especially
as
we're
now
kind
of
facing
a
couple
problems
in
governance
or
not
problems
necessarily
but
challenges,
which
is
one
we've
kind
of
got.
C
This
kilo
sheep
hour
proposal
on
one
side,
which
is
very
like
scientific
Community,
Land
stewards,
Community
yeah,
climate
activists
Community
or
whatever,
and
then
we've
got
like
cosmosm
is
another
proposal.
That's
gone
up
for
in
discussion
more
recently,
which
is
very
web
3
developer
Technical,
and
we
could
see
this.
C
This
need
basically
to
have
governing
bodies
over
different
aspects
of
governance,
of
the
larger
Network,
where
everyone
in
the
network
would
still
be
able
to
vote
on
and
determine
who
should
be
the
acting
bodies
for
these
particular
decisions,
but
there's
an
opportunity
to
basically
trust
and
different
groups
to
execute
different
actions
on
the
network
and
so
I
think.
There's
a
lot
of
possibilities
and
definitely
it's
something
worth
exploring,
but
yeah
as
far
as
yeah,
how
gov
module
and
group
module
can
interact.
C
A
C
I
think
there's
a
there's.
A
couple
levels
of
Interest
I
know
I,
know,
there's
people
that
want
to
use
the
group's
UI
and
I
think
it.
It's
definitely
ready
out
of
state
for
anyone
to
use.
That's
and
but
I
I
would
yeah
if
you're
a
general
user.
Maybe
myself
and
the
foundation
I
don't
know.
I
I
I
probably
need
to
spend
some
time
discussing
and
working
with
them,
but
like
if
you're
a
project
developer
or
something
like
that,
we
should
probably
figure
out
a
route.
C
I
know
Sam's
actually
been
working
with
some
project
developers
and
setting
up
groups,
so
he
might
be
a
good
contact
there
as
well
Sam
and
Corey
I
guess,
but
if
you're
a
developer
and
you
want
to
contribute
Discord
or
making
a
comment
in
one
of
the
existing
issues
on
GitHub
would
be
great
but
yeah
any
further
General
discussions,
maybe
around
governance
and
things
like
that.
Discord
governance,
Channel
or
the
Forum
would
be
the
best
place
for
that.
A
G
Hey
everyone,
I'm
Max
I,
head
up
a
lot
of
the
engineering
efforts
over
at
icato
and
really
excited
to
be
announcing
this.
This
partnership
and
integration
here
so
forcato.
What
we
do.
Basically,
maybe
a
lot
of
people
in
this
space
have
run
into
the
issue
of
trying
to
trying
to
find
a
way
to
get
crypto
into
their
wallet
and
have
to
jump
through
25
different
hoops
and
figure
out
what
exchange
you
use
and
how
to
get
it
from
there.
G
So
we
just
try
to
make
that
that
process
a
lot
simpler,
the
onboarding
process
or
the
kyc
and
the
payments
and
getting
crypto
right
into
your
wallet.
We
take
care
of
all
that
and
just
try
to
make
it
as
smooth
and
and
quick
as
possible,
so
that
we
have
instant
development
right
right
into
your
self-custody
wallet,
with
no
holding
periods
so
yeah.
We
recently
launched
our
integration
with
regen
axle,
uscc
and
regen
on
the
regen
Network,
and
we're
really
excited
about
that.
G
G
We
have
the
bank
transfer,
Apple,
pay,
debit
and
credit
cards
available
for
purchasing
purchasing
options
and
we're
definitely
working
to
expand
as
much
as
we
can
there
a
lot
of
other
International
payment
methods,
we're
working
on
getting
as
well
and
and
coming
soon
so
more
to
come
there
but
yeah.
You
can
see
that
this
is
on
the
right
side
here.
This
is
our
widget.
So
if
there's
any
Builders
and
developers
in
the
space,
you
can
integrate
the
Kato
widget
and
the
API
directly
into
your
application
for
easy
onboarding.
G
So
it's
less
of
the
Kato
experience
and
more
of
your
own
experience
being
able
to
get
those
quotes,
show
them
on
your
site,
jump
over
to
the
Kato
widget,
just
for
payment
and
kyc
for
the
first
time
and
then
being
able
to
track
the
order
status
back
in
your
own
site
afterwards.
So
that's
sort
of
what
we
we
offer
as
the
the
API
solution
there
as
well
and
yeah.
A
E
E
That
cat
has
been
working
on,
which
you
know
we're
in
dialogue
with
them
to
support
in
the
future.
That
would
drastically
improve
the
ability
for
users
to
even
potentially
have
a
direct
credit
card
purchase
to
as
part
of
a
Marketplace
purchase
experience.
That's
something
that
you
know
is
still
a
bit
out
both
on
our
Dev
road
map,
as
well
as
on
theirs.
A
In
the
same
vein,
I
I
reworked
some
of
our
documentation,
our
guidebooks
last
week
for
this,
and
it
was
crazy
how
much
I
got
to
delete
just
like
wild
information
about
what
a
centralized
exchange
is
and
what
a
decentralized
exchanges
and
just
replacing
it
with
you
can
just
go
to
Kepler
and
find
this
app
and
or
just
read
them
directly.
So
I
think
it's
very
exciting.
G
Definitely
definitely
something
that
we
are
focusing
on
and
it's
a
it's
a
cool
thing
that
we've
had
many
discussions
about
for
many
different
use
cases
like
that
right
now
we
have
the
off-ramp
solution
for
ACH
and
some
of
these
I
think
we
go
through
squid
and
Squid
just
announced
the
sort
of
the
cosmos
to
evm
side
of
the
integration.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
Cosmos
assets
to
be
able
to
integrate,
including
regen
on
the
sell
side.
G
Now
as
well-
and
that's
definitely
a
use
case-
we
imagine
it's
like
just
being
able
to
Auto
deposit,
regen
tokens
or
actually
OCC
and
just
to
some
address
every
week
or
something
and
just
having
it,
basically
Auto
transfer
to
some
to
some
bank
or
wire
wire
payment
or
something
that
you've
configured
ahead
of
time.
For
for
those
payments
to
go
to
so
the
the
sort
of
behind
the
scenes
you
don't
even
know,
you're
doing
it
type
transactions
is
something
that
yeah
we're
definitely
working
towards.
H
A
E
Yeah,
so
I'm
gonna
do
this
together
with
Sam
we're
here
with
Austin
from
the
regen
Foundation
spending
some
time
co-working
together
this
week
in
Colorado.
So
this
was
a
governance
proposal
that
passed
I
believe
it.
It
went
up
maybe
two
weeks
ago
and
it
passed
last
week
for
adding
the
first
non-carbon
credit
type
to
regen
Ledger.
This
has
come
up
a
bit
in
conversation
from
the
permissionless
credit
class
proposal
that
folks
remember
from
from
the
governance
Forum.
E
E
Once
those
credits
have
been
issued
as
well
and
we
can
communicate
kind
of
that
whole
story
together,
but
yeah
I
don't
know
I
think
Sam
wants
to
add
a
little
bit
more
color
to
the
background
context.
On
the
credit
too
feels
like
it
makes
sense
to
talk
about
a
little
bit
of
that
on
this
call
too
yeah.
F
So
just
to
share
a
little
bit
about,
like
you
know
what
is
the
kilo
sheep
hour?
So
this
is
the
first
one
of
our
environmental
stewardship
credit
types,
and
this
is
the
first
environmental
stewardship
credit
class,
we're
rather
than
crediting
for
outcome-based
metrics.
Like
you
know,
tons
of
carbon
or
improvements
in
water
quality
or
ecosystem
function.
We're
actually
measuring
the
successful
implementation
of
a
practice
in
in
verifying
that
people
are
actually
engaging
in
a
regenerative
practice
and
crediting
based
off
of
that.
F
F
So
this
is
really
exciting
for
us,
because
we're
able
to
create
you
know
a
credit
that
is
just
focused
around
people
engaging
in
a
practice
which
really
opens
up
the
doors
to
scaling
this.
This
crediting
program
in
a
very
quick
way
in
California,
where
we're
using
it.
So
you
guys
should
see
you
know:
credits
coming
Unchained
student
soon,
so
stay
tuned.
F
A
Awesome,
thank
you
any
any
questions
for
them
on
this.
While
we've
got
them,
I
assume
this
might
be
gone
until
like
a
little
bit
deeper
depth
in
the
next
call,
as
well
probably
cover
it
a
bit:
okay,
cool
cool.
So
if
you
guys
want
to
learn
more
about
this,
join
the
registry
science
and
Foundation
call
in
two
weeks:
oh
okay,
an
update,
discussion,
update,
I
think
this
is
also
probably.
E
A
E
H
With
I
was
that
directed
to
me
I
didn't
hear
yeah
yeah
okay,
I
mean
I
can
speak
to
it.
I
guess
I
I
think
probably
you're
a
better
person
to
talk
about
it
in
depth
Corey,
but
coming
out
one
of
the
core
decisions
that
we
need
to
make
as
a
community
is
what
the
credit
class
Creator
credit
class
creation
fee
is
going
to
be.
H
You
can
see
in
the
screenshot,
both
Sarah
and
I
just
ran
a
quick
informal
poll
to
see
what
people
who
happens
to
be
scrolling
on
Twitter,
so
I
thought
about
that
question,
just
to
sort
of
spark
conversation
really,
but
this
is
part
of
what's
needed.
You
know
we
need
to
either
leave
it
to
decide
to
leave
it
the
same
or
upgrade
the
credit
class
Creator
fee.
H
I
personally
tend
to
think
that
it's
actually
kind
of
this
is
a
good
point
to
have
a
little
bit
of
friction
and
a
little
bit
higher
cost,
because
the
creation
of
credit
classes,
you
don't
want
people
to
be
spamming.
It
you
want
people
to
be
serious
about
the
the
potential
value
that
they're
providing
for
other
Parties
By
by
going
through
and
creating
a
new
credit
class,
and
so,
from
my
perspective,
there's
a
case
to
be
made
from
that
perspective.
To
just
have
a
you
know,
a
little
bit
more
significant
fee
to
that.
H
That
Corey
did
that
Court
posted
around
permissionless
credit
classes,
I
think,
has
a
whole
sub
conversation
in
which
several
people
have
commented
specifically
about
this
topic,
and
so
we're
just
sort
of
continuing
to
farm
for
ideas
and
input
there
and
you
know,
and
then,
if
there
isn't
kind
of
a
clear
consensus
which
you
know
my
look
at
the
the
Twitter
poll.
It
wasn't
like.
H
G
H
We
just
don't
want
there
to
be
a
Hang-Ups
if
people
have
a
big
disagreement
about
the
fees
but
are
excited
to
move
forward
towards
permissionless
credit
classes.
So
that's
why
it's
kind
of
important
to
share
if
people
have
strong
opinions,
I
believe
that
the
default
at
this
point
from
an
r
d
perspective
that
most
of
us
are
on
the
page
of
hey.
H
Let's
increase
this
to
something
like
2000.,
so
if
it
was
just
going
to
be
sort
of
like
an
out
of
the
box
default
for
us
as
an
organization-
and
we
will
be
putting
up
this
next
proposal
for
the
community,
I
would
expect
something
like
that.
So
if
that's
very
exciting,
let's
hear
it
and
if
that's
like,
oh
no,
we
we
definitely
shouldn't
do
that.
Then
this
is
a
great
time
to
voice
those
concerns
so
that
we
can
really
dialogue.
And
then
you
know
kind
of
come
to
a
a
good
middle
ground.
A
A
H
Of
so
yeah
I
would
just
say
definitely
just
go
to
the
original
discussion
and
comment
there
and
just
say
you
know
I
think
we
of
course
we'd
like
people
to
comment
about
multiple
layers
of
that
proposal,
but
please,
if
you've
got
something
to
say
just
you
know
at
the
beginning,
say
I'm
commenting
about
the
fee
specifically
and
then
share
your
opinion.
I
think
that's
definitely
the
best
place
to
do
it.
A
Okay
cool.
Thank
you
guys
very
much
on
the
play.
Okay,
just
some
general
governance
updates.
Before
we
part
ways,
we've
got
that
signaling
proposal
cosmosum.
That
Ryan
mentioned
earlier
in
his
presentation
to
comment
on
we've
got
the
region
tokenomics
working
group
that
is
continuing
to
take
place.
We
actually
created
an
entire
new
category
of
our
governance,
page
on
Commonwealth
for
token
discussions.
A
So
hopefully,
all
of
our
token
discussions
are
now
categories
in
there.
If
you
have
an
old
one
that
I
didn't
get
put
in
there.
Just
let
me
know
I'll
get
that
added
and
then
yeah
upgrade
candidate
governance
processes
and
Community
sign
proposal
which
it
sounds
like
Loa
is
doing
a
talk
on
tomorrow
on
Discord
at
8
A.M.