►
From YouTube: 2020-06-30 Rook Community Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
the
recording
has
started-
and
this
is
the
june
30th
2020
brook
community
meeting.
I
don't
believe
we
have
any
1.2
releases
planned,
but
we
do
have
some
1.3
release
of
upcoming
patch
release
and
there's
a
specific
fix
that
I
would
think
we
would
like
to
get
in
there
as
well.
So
let's
take
a
look
at
the
1.3
project
board
and
get
the
latest
status
on
that.
B
Yeah,
well,
I
think,
first
of
all
to
continue
with
our
pattern
of
a
patch
release
every
other
week.
This
thursday
would
be
the
next
one,
and
so
we'll
pick
up
a
few
fixes.
The
yeah.
I
don't
know
that
the
cassandra
ticket
made
it
into
this
board,
but
we
should
definitely
add
it
to
get
it.
Oh
yeah.
Let
me
do
it.
B
B
C
No,
I
haven't
received
any
response
from
them
back
because
I
tried
to
run
trivia
and
anchorage
engine,
but
well
it
showed
no
cves
like
none,
basically
for
the
old
and
new
image,
and
that's
where
more
or
less
was
like
hey.
Can
you
tell
us
which
tool
you
ran
so
we
can
just
well
use
the
same
tool
to
check
and
I
have
not
received
any
response
yet
so
well,.
C
But
well
just
from
well
just
from
the
standpoint
of
the
versions
of
alpine,
it
should
fix
that
because
I
said
like
I
think,
if
we
were
on
1.8
or
something
and
1.8
is
not
even
shown
as
a
tag
like
on
the,
if
you
go
to
docker
up
to
an
image
and
like
the
official
images
always
have
like
the
only
use
those
text
encodes,
you
know
tags
in
the
readme
section
and
the
1.8
1.8
attack
is
not
even
there
anymore.
So
well,.
A
Alexander,
I
was
just
checking
too
on
the
security
mailing
list
to
see,
if,
like
one
thing,
I've
done
before
on
the
cncf
mailing
list,
ui
is
that
it's
does
it
by
default.
Do
a
group
reply,
so
you
could,
like
you
know,
reply
to
something,
and
it
only
goes
to
the
mailing
lists
and
go
back
to
the
original
sender.
A
So
I
was
trying
to
see
if
that
was
a
case
of
that,
if
we,
if
you
just
essentially
posted
to
the
mailing
list
itself
and
not
included
the
sender
as
well,
so
I
I
didn't-
I
didn't
look
at.
I
didn't
see
that,
but
if
it
might
be
something
as
well.
C
C
A
C
A
Yes,
that
or
or
like
in
your
email
client,
when
you
do
reply
all
like
make
like
add
the
person's
email
list
to
the
cc
line
or
whatever
so
they'll,
see
it
too.
That's
that
could
be
the
reason
why
they
didn't
see
it.
C
Yeah,
that
makes
sense.
I
said
I
just
checked,
and
it
was
just
the
second
person
I
think,
which
was
cc'd
by
the
initial
person.
So.
A
Okay,
that's
that's
good!
That's
good!
Okay,
cool
yeah,
but
yeah!
Please!
Please
do
follow
up
with
them,
so
the
original
reporter
knows
that
we're
we're
taking
steps
to
fix
it
and
planning
to
get
a
release
out
apache
release
out
this
week.
C
A
Thank
you,
alexander.
Okay,
any
other
notes
on
the
1.3
board.
B
A
B
Yep
yeah,
those
tentative
dates,
I
think,
are
still
good.
I
haven't
heard
any
other
perspective
or
feedback
or
pushback
on
it,
so
the
project
board
probably
needs
another
round
of
update
as
far
as
what
needs
to
be
in
versus
what
might
be
nice
to
have
or
not
even
planned.
A
All
right
that
sounds
good,
then
to
me,
and
then
you
said
that
you
don't
know
of
any
pushback
or
complaints
about
these
suggested
or
proposed
for
these
states,
so
we'll
keep
those
we'll
hold
those
in
then
all
right.
So
that's
everything
on
upcoming
releases
for
1.3
patch
this
week
and
then
a
1.4
release
by
the
end
of
july.
B
Yep,
so
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
that
merged,
and
it
was
done
in
a
way
that
hopefully
is
easy
for
other
other
operators
to
also
create
their
mission
controller.
There's
a
new
admission
controller
package.
B
Basically,
that
yeah,
that
the
other
providers
can
implement
so
yep
glad
to
add
that
in
there
and
there's
still
some
follow-up
work
to
do
there.
As
far
as
you
know
what
we
can
do
to
simplify
certificates
because
right
now,
it's
an
optional
component
because
of
the
self-signed
certificates.
B
A
It
travis
is
that
is
that
using
the
built-in,
the
controller
runtime
implementation
of
the
val,
like
a
validation,
book
server,
stuff.
B
So
that
that
one
is
not
so
that
that's
another
area
for
investigation,
because
I
know
sorry
was
it
what's
his
name,
that's
working
on
the
nfs
controller,
yeah.
A
Yeah
ahmad
he
he
has
an
implementation
using
that
it's
super
simple.
I
noticed
that
there's
a
lot
of
code
that
went
into
you,
know,
logic
and
stuff
that
went
into
the
implementation
here,
but
the
controller
runtime
implementations.
You
know
it
does
all
the
setup
and
handling
and
reconciliation
and
all
that
stuff
with
fairly
simple
inputs
required
to
it.
So
that's
something
that
I
would
definitely
recommend
looking
at
further
to
refine
this,
to
remove
maintenance,
our
maintenance
on
our
on
our
plate.
For
for
the
implementation
that
we
currently
have.
A
Awesome
yeah
yeah,
I
I
have
reviewed
and
tested
the
controller,
runtime
implementation
and
the
webhook
validating
admission,
webhook
and
stuff
from
controlled
runtime
that
ahmad
is
using
and
it
all
looks
pretty
decent.
So
I
think
we'll
talk
more
about
it
when
we
get
there,
but
it
looks
like
it's
pretty
simple
way
to
do
it
so,
which
is
always
nice
to
reuse.
The
upstream
community's
efforts
cool.
B
A
Yep
coco
sounds
good
okay,
then
we
can
move
ahead
on
to
an
update
on
the
cncf
graduation
proposal,
so
we
got
in
the
due
diligence.
We
got
in
the
official
sig
recommendation
and
so
assad
our
toc
sponsor
opened
up
the
public
comment
period
five
days
ago,
maybe
up
to
one
week
ago,
so
we're
into
that
com.
A
Public
comment
period
right
now
officially,
but
you
know,
there's
been
a
ton
of
discussion
over
the
past
few
months
of
this
thing
being
opened
anyway,
so
I
don't
think
there
I
haven't
heard
yet
any
more
feedback.
Pushback
we've
already
talked
to
the
sick.
The
tfc
already
knows
about
everything
I
don't
you
know.
B
A
Expecting
too,
because
it's
you
know
all
these
conversations
have
already
been
had
with
people
that
are
involved
in
you
know
in
the
toc
and
the
storage
sig
and
all
that
stuff.
So
I,
unless
it
was
a
random,
not
a
random,
but
somebody
who
is
a
a
member
of
the
ecosystem-
and
you
know,
subscribe
to
the
cnc
mailing
list
etc,
which
a
lot
of
people
are,
this
being
the
first
they've
heard
of
it
and
then
wanting
to
dissent
or
ask
questions,
but
that
I
don't
think
that's
super
common
for
that
to
happen
necessarily
right.
A
Yeah
I've
subscribed
to
the
toc
mailing
list,
so
any
any
post
that
does
come
in.
I
I'll
see
it
and
you
know
I'm
planning
on
responding
to
any
others.
If
they
come.
A
And
then,
when
that's
over,
we
will
we'll
gently
remind
sod
to
call
the
vote.
Maybe
maybe
provide
some
gifts
or
some
some
incentives
to
make
that
happen,
but
we'll
make
it
we'll
make
it
happen.
A
Okay,
I
can't
wait
yeah
and
but,
as
a
side
note,
I
thought
it
was
a
little
funny
that
the
you
know
graduation
is
taking
quite
a
while,
but
the
sandbox
got
the
sandbox
level
gotta
update
to
the
process,
to
streamline
it
significantly
and
like
ten,
eight
or
nine
or
ten
projects
got
accepted
into
the
sandbox,
like
just
you
know,
within
the
last,
like
two
weeks
or
so
so
they're
getting
they're
getting
in
in
there
pretty
quick
nowadays
with
that
new
process,
but
not
graduation.
A
Not
quite
but
it's
it's
streamlined.
A
Okay,
so
yeah,
so
then
virtual
kubecon
is
coming
up.
The
one
note
that
I
have
on
this
here
is
that
july
6th
is
the
recommendation
or
the
request
from
the
kubecon
organizers.
If
you
want
your
presentation
to
be
recorded
by
them
by
the
software
and
team
that
they're
contracting
with
to
to
record
presentations.
A
If
you,
however,
you
want
to
record
yourself,
then
you
have
a
much
later
deadline.
I
think
it's
like
july
20th
something
so
you
get
at
least
an
extra
about
an
extra
two
weeks
or
so,
and
then
you
can
also
use
any
format
you
want.
If
you
go
with
cncs
recordings,
you
have
to
be
ready
by
july
6
and
you
have
to
only
use
powerpoint
as
well,
due
to
a
limitation
in
the
platform
right
so
for
doing
your
own
recording.
It
seems
like
a
better
way
to
go
if
you're
prepared,
for
it.
A
Alexander
was
mentioning
to
me
earlier
this
morning
that
he
has
some
tools
for
that.
The
osb
the
was
it
open
streaming
broadcast
obs.
A
Yep,
so
alexander
would
can
help
out.
I
assume
he's
I
mean
he's
obviously
gonna
help
out
with
this
recording
for
the
intro,
but
I
assume
that
alexander
is
a
swell
guy
and
he'd
be
able
to
help
out
with
the
deep
dive
as
well.
Surely,
yeah
that'd
be
awesome.
A
Yeah
exactly
so
I
so
I
I'm
gonna
add
a
note
to
that
real
quick
here.
It's
recording.
A
A
couple
weeks
later,
something
other
than
powerpoint,
okay,
so
alexander
and
I
will
follow
up
on.
You-
know:
updating
the
intro
deck
sending
that
out
for
feedback
and
comments
and
such
probably
on
the
maintainers
channel
and
then
we'll
get
that
recording
done.
B
And
actually
I
I
pinged
dimitri
today
just
to
start
coordinating
this
and
he
responded
in
the
maintainer's
channel.
Maybe
you
saw
it
that
quote,
we
might
need
to
remove
the
edge
of
s
part
from
the
presentation
at
this
time,
perhaps
substitute
it
with
another
operator
such
as
cassandra,
so
the
I
think
that
approach
for
deep
dives
we
had
started
taking
was
that
the
stable
providers
would
would
present
in
the
deep
dive,
because
there
was
less
content
for
the
other
ones.
B
A
He's
not
on
the
call
right,
no
okay,
yeah
yeah,
yeah
it'd,
be
it
might
be
good
to
ask
a
little
more
if
we
can't
ask
him
some
more
questions
about.
Is
that
a
final
decision,
or
you
know
if
there's,
if
there's
more
there,
just
to
see
if
that's
still
the
case
or
definitely
the
case,
but
yeah.
A
C
A
Can
open
it
up
to
you
know
other
storage
providers
to
see
if
there's
there's
you
know,
content
they're
excited
to
share.
B
A
B
A
Definitely
a
possibility
too,
to
you
know
that
he's
been
doing
some
more
work
on
that
and
has
some
probably
have
some
lessons
learned
to
share
about
controller
runtime,
and
you
know
admission
about
books,
and
you
know
the
latest
thinking
about
how
you
know
that
sort
of
those
that
design
architecture
and
implementation
can
go
back
into
the
storage
of
the
framework
and
stuff
too.
So,
there's
probably
probably
some
good
content
there
too.
A
Yep
sounds
good
to
me,
okay
and
then
so
speaking
of
google
summer
of
code
as
we're
just
talking
about
command,
you
know
has
a
pull
request
open
with
the
implementation
of
a
migrating
nfs
operator
to
using
the
controller
runtime
and
also
having
a
validating
admission
webhook
in
there
too,
and
updated
the
readme
and
everything
it's
been
reviewed
by
three,
the
ashish
rohan
and
myself
as
well,
and
then
I've
manually
tested
it
as
well.
He
is
a
mod
is
adding
unit
tests
for
it.
A
As
of
the
last
time
we
synced
up
last
week
and-
and
we
have
a
sync
up
a
wednesday
morning-
sync
up
every
week,
so
I
will
check
in
with
ahmad
tomorrow
morning
to
see
see
what
the
latest
status
that
is,
but
things
are
going
very
good,
ahmad's
doing
a
great
job
with
digging
into
the
code
and
making
things
happen
with
limited
oversight,
so
he's
a
mod
stuff
and
doing
a
good
job
and
evaluation.
A
One
of
three
is
will
be
done
this
week
and
then
we'll
submit
that
and
proceed
to
phase
two
of
the
three-phase
google
summer
of
code
program.
A
Okay,
we
got
some
ci
issues:
travis
yep.
B
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
for
awareness
or
most
people
on
the
call
already
know,
probably
but
the
last
few
days
since
about
wednesday
of
last
week
we
were
having
ci
issues.
Setting
up
coop
was
randomly
failing
and
then
a
couple
days
ago
it
started
feeling
really
consistently,
except
for
kubernetes
1.18
there.
There
were
some
changes
in
the
ci
image.
The
base
image
that
adam
had
made
a
couple
days
ago.
So
he
reverted
that
to
see
if
that
would
help
stabilizing
it.
It
has
helped
today.
B
So
it's
still
not
clear
what
the
cause
of
the
issue
was,
because
he
hadn't
made
changes
mid
last
week.
So
we're
following
up
to
investigate,
but
the
ci
looks,
looks
better
today
at
least.
B
B
I
think
that's
that's
about
it.
For
that.
B
A
B
A
A
Okay,
all
right
then
prs
or
issues
that
we
want
to
discuss
so
csi
snapshots
are
being
updated
from
alcohol
to
beta.
B
Yeah
madhu
was
on
the
call
dude
yeah.
B
B
A
Yep
is
there,
is
there,
is
it
possible
to
have
like
a
manual
migration
or
upgrade
steps
with
the
next
release?
For
this,
or
is
this
you
know,
have
to
delete
existing
snapshots
and
recreate
them,
or
something
like
that.
B
A
A
Okay
and
then
we
kind
of
talked
about
the
cassandra
base
image.
Having
so
many
vulnerabilities.
A
C
Yeah,
do
you
want
to,
I
think
we
said
mostly
everything
already
that
well
simply
well
to
summarize
there's
cves
in
the
base
image
that
we're
using
for
our
cassandra
as
of
right
now,
the
alpine
3.8
image,
and
this
pr
simply
push
it.
It
pushes
it
to
3.12,
which
is
the
latest
version,
and
I
think
also
due
to
the
uci
issues.
The
ci
is
currently
not
passing
or
has
it
passed.
I
think
I
just
saw
a
green
check
marker
at
the
bottom.
C
Oh,
wonderful,
so
I'll
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
measure
one
unless
travis
or
someone
else
wants
to
take
another
look
but
well.
The
image
has
changed
and
depending
release
notes
has
been
I've
added
an
entry.
C
C
Yeah,
that's
basically
the
story
there
and
now
with
that,
we
should
have
a
result,
and
I
think,
after
having
probably
cost
like
at
least
two
or
three
emails
to
every
person
on
the
security
mailing
list,
I
think
I
finally
got
the
email
out
to
the
initial
initial
author
of
the
email
thread
about
the
cassandra
issue
so
well.
Let's
hope
that
we
get
a
response
now.
A
Okay
and
then
the
last
item
here
is
about
the
nats
team
they
had
expressed
that
they
wanted
to.
They
had
some
use
cases
for
rook
and
wanted
to
meet
with
us
and
learn
more
about
it
and
kind
of
get
a
bit
of
early
support
to
help
them
understand
and
see.
If
that's
the
right
sort
of
storage
solution
for
them,
we
had
had
a
back
back
and
fourth
or
two,
and
I
didn't
see
any
follow-up
from
or
at
times
available
from
their
side.
A
So
I
guess
I
guess
we
should
ping
them
again
and
see
if
like
offer
some
times
for
them
to
be
able
to
have
that
conversation.
I
know.
Travis
you're
you'd
probably
definitely
be
a
big
important
part
of
that.
Do
you
have
certain
windows
of
availability
that
would
work
best
for
you
or
do
you
would
you
want
to
like
maybe
just
reply
to
that
email
with
some
of
your
available
times
just
to
kind
of
prod
them
along
about
when
to
meet
yeah.
A
A
It
was
written,
derek
collison,
who's.
The
founder
of
matt's
was
the
original
author
on
that
one.
A
I'll
respond
to
that
perfect
yep.
Thank
you,
travis
yeah
and
then
you
know
there's
a
couple.
People
on
that
email
thread
that
are
all
more
than
welcome
to
join
that
conversation
for
sure.
A
I
think
they're
north
america-
I
don't
know
which-
which
one,
but
I
do
not
believe
they're
well,
actually
derek
is
north
america.
I
don't
know
if
some
of
the
other
folks
like
ivan
and
wally,
I
don't
know
where
they
are
actually.
A
Cool
all
right,
thank
you
for
following
up
on
that
travis.
So
that
is
the
end
of
the
topics
we
had
in
the
agenda
for
today.
Were
there
any
other,
further
agenda
topics
that
folks
wanted
to
bring
up
that
were
not
in
the
agenda.
C
C
Well,
I
tried
to
send
it
like
to
reply
to
sender
and
it
didn't
fill
out
the
emails.
I
had
just
copied
the
one
that
was
there,
but
it's
saying
hey
this
message
because
the
address
could
not
be
found
and
then
it's
just
like
yeah
the
group
soon
so
like
I'm,
not
sure
if,
where
to
get
the
original
image
from.
A
Oh
okay
could.
A
Is
to
that
bounce
message?
Could
you
just
copy
and
then
paste
that
into
slack
and
a
dm
to
me
and
then
just
so,
I
kind
of
have
more
context
about
what's
bouncing
and
then
I'll
try
to
respond
back
to
include
everyone.