►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Her
noon
and
welcome
to
the
first
Redevelopment
Agency
meeting
of
2018
hello.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
again.
This
is
the
first
Redevelopment
Agency
meeting
of
2018
and
I
derek
kitchen
have
served
as
the
vice
chair
of
the
RDA
for
the
past
two
years
under
former
councilmember
board
member
Lisa
Adams
who's
no
longer
with
us,
so
I
will
conduct
the
meeting
to
begin
with.
Today
we
are
at
our
first
item
item
a
general
comments
to
the
board.
A
B
Okay,
I
have
to
repeat
myself
because
it's
really
important.
We
have
a
new
couple
of
new
City,
Council
members
and
I'm,
hoping
that
they
will
kick
something
loose
because
RDA
has
almost
100
million
dollars
worth
of
property,
some
of
it
vacant
for
ten
years,
and
we
also
have
a
problem
with
the
homeless
problem.
The
homeless
deserve
better.
They
have
no
place
to
put
their
pets,
they
have
no
place
to
put
storage.
B
There's
no
storage
and
I
know
Laura's
working
on
it
and
it's
a
problem,
but
you
as
the
RDA,
can
kick
something
loose
and
spend
a
little
bit
of
money
very
little
money
to
get
these
people
off
the
street.
They
shouldn't
be
walking
around
with
shopping
carts.
It
makes
our
area
our
city
look
really
really
bad
and
it's
disrespectful.
It's
a
sad
commentary
on
our
city,
but
you
can
do
something
about
it.
B
I'm
asking
you
to
so
I'm
asking
you
to
one
find
a
place
to
put
two
expand:
storage,
not
just
eight
hours
a
day
but
24
hours
a
day,
so
they
can
work,
those
who
are
homeless,
who
want
to
work,
can't
they
don't
have
any
place
to
put
their
stuff.
Now.
Some
of
you
have
heard
this
again
and
again
again,
but
you
have
a
chance
now
to
do
this.
This
is
really
important.
We
also
have
a
chance
to
find
a
facility
or
an
outdoor
area
for
them
to
stay.
B
So
they
don't
camp
out
all
over
around
our
city.
It
does
they
deserve
more
respect.
They
deserve
to
be
listened
to
and
that's
what
they
want.
They
want
a
place
to
stay
that
they
feel
comfortable
in
that
they
can
call
their
own
and
yeah
I'm.
Sorry
it
it
takes
you
giving
them
something
to
be
human.
So
I'm
asking
you
again
for
that.
I
have
a
question
since
the
next
item
is
public
comment
on
RDA
northwest
quadrant
can
I
speak
that
on
that
now
or
do
you
want
me
to
go
back
and
come
back?
The.
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
I'm
disappointed
in
the
northwest
quadrant
plan
for
RDA.
You
do
not
have
a
passenger
rail
line
put
in
and
it
can
be
paid
for
with
your
tax
increment
dollars
that
you're
getting
from
the
property.
You
need
a
that.
This
is
a
destination.
You
have
twenty
five
thousand
employees
at
International,
Center
you're,
going
to
have
tens
of
thousands
of
employees
more.
The
northwest
quadrant.
B
This
is
the
destination
destinations,
make
rail
system
successful,
so
I,
don't
understand
why
you
are
pushing
for
Green
Line
extension
to
Italy
5600,
West
and
I
need
to
remind
you
that
in
Seattle,
Amazon
helps
pay
for
their
rail
line.
Amazon
does
pay
for
it
and
they're
going
to
say
5600
West,
so
I
don't
understand
why
you
don't
put
in
a
rail
line.
This
is
your
best
chance
to
get
and
pay
for
a
rail
line.
The
airport
board
is
already
talking
about
it
and
I.
Don't
know
why
you're
not
so
you
should
be
talking
about
this.
B
The
airport
board
is
talking
about
every
other
line.
Every
other
tracks
train
going
to
5600
West
they'd,
like
that
it
makes
sense.
You
have
1,100
passengers
a
day
going
to
Airport.
That's
not
enough,
but
you
could
have
thousands
more
if
you
went
to
5600
West.
The
other
thing
is
on
the
northwest
quadrant.
B
You
only
have
minimal
amount
of
hotels
for
tens
of
thousands
of
employees
and
that
doesn't
make
sense
either
so
I'm
asking
you
for
more
hotels
in
the
northwest
quadrant
to
supply
all
these
new
businesses
that
will
rely
on
the
airport
and
business
from
the
airport
and
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
little
bit
of
flexibility
for
development
in
Northwest
quarter.
That's
it
thanks
for
listening.
Thank.
A
C
Thank
you
and
thank
you
board
members.
My
name
is
David
Ward
I'm,
a
partner
with
the
Boyer
company,
based
here
in
Salt
Lake
City
I,
am
here
to
follow
up
on
a
letter
smell
that
we've
provided
to
the
Community
and
Economic
Development
Department.
Regarding
the
project
area
boundaries
for
the
CRA
in
particular,
there
is
one
parcel
that
we
currently
have
under
contract
that
at
the
time
that
we
executed
a
purchase
contract
for
this
parcel
was
in
the
northwest
quadrant
overlay
district,
as
we
understood
it
at
the
time.
C
During
the
December
8th
distribution
of
the
CRA
plan,
we
notice
that
the
project
area
boundary
for
some
reason
had
omitted
this
parcel
that
we
have
under
contract.
Although
our
neighbors
just
down
the
road,
are
included
in
the
project
area,
our
concern
with
being
omitted
from
the
CRA
areas
that
this
our
parcel,
like
all
parcels
in
that
area,
including
where
project
husky
is
currently
being
developed,
will
require
a
significant
amount
of
infrastructure
upgrade
in
order
to
develop
those
parcels
for
commercial
uses.
C
Under
the
current
scenario,
with
the
boundaries
established
as
they
are,
other
parcels
would
receive
some
tax
increment
support
to
help
pay
for
those
infrastructure.
Upgrades
that
I
think
everybody's
aware
that
are
required
in
those
areas
where
the
parcel
that
we
have
right
now
would
be
omitted
and
we
would
end
up
having
fun
those
improvements
on
our
own.
C
A
F
Thank
you
board
members
for
the
opportunity,
I'm
John,
Burke
and
Sean
with
Rio
Tinto
we're
one
of
the
major
landowners
out
there
and
I'd
like
to
take
the
opportunity
just
to
provide
a
general
statement
about
our
feelings
with
the
northwest
quadrant.
The
northwest
quadrant
is
an
opportunity
of
the
grandest
scale.
We
could
ever
imagine
for
our
community
how
large
this
is
one
that
is
going
to
require
a
lot
of
coordination
and
a
lot
of
collaboration.
It's
one
that
municipal
boundaries
isn't
really
going
to
drive.
F
It's
one
that
we're
going
to
have
to
reach
across
the
aisles
and
we're
going
to
have
to
work
together.
We
see
the
the
need
for
a
very
stable
environment
to
work
with
the
Salt
Lake
City
and
we're
really
strong
advocates
for
Salt
Lake
City
leading
this
effort,
but
at
the
same
time,
we're
also
going
to
have
to
work
with
the
county,
the
school
district.
This
and
we
want
to
deliver
the
message.
So
this
is
an
opportunity
for
all
of
us
to
come
together.
F
This
is
something
that
is
remarkable,
something
that
we
really
need
to
intensely
think
about
how
we're
going
to
execute
this
plan-
and
you
know
the
ultimate
prize-
is
something
that
that
will
be
very
you
need
to
this.
This
nation.
We
have
such
an
incredible
strategic
location
here
in
the
Intermountain
West,
with
our
connections
to
the
Seaport.
That's
not
all
about
just
simply
our
CRA
that
we're
talking
about
today.
This
is
a
much
broader
opportunity
that
we
need
to
be
able
to
to
to
put
the
spokes
together
in
the
hub.
F
We're
big
advocates:
we,
we
think
it
has
to
be
a
group
effort.
It's
it's
one,
that
the
the
the
cost
of
development
is
absurd.
It
is
it's
one
that
it's
going
to
take
a
lot
of
investment
to
bring
us
to
the
level
that
we
are
going
to
become
a
location
of
choice
for
business,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
kind
of
you
know
marching
to
the
same
drummer
here
and
you
know
we're
both
landowners.
I
think
I
can
speak
for
Lance
back
here.
G
You
know
in
the
state
of
Utah,
especially
in
the
city
of
Salt
Lake,
we're
never
going
to
see.
3,000
acres
of
land
in
the
city
of
Salt
Lake
come
into
fruition
again
in
our
lifetime.
This
is
kind
of
it,
and
so
I
have
taken
this
opportunity
very
seriously
and
really
given
us
a
lot
of
thought
and
I'm
excited
about
the
ability
we
have
to
work
with
you
guys
and
we
also
care
about
the
overall
environment
here.
G
This
is
something
that
says
a
lot
about
our
city,
embracing
rail
as
a
mode
of
transit,
is
a
really
important
attribute
in
an
aspect
that
will
cost
money
on
the
front
end
but
long
term.
The
payback
in
rail,
in
terms
of
what
it
does
to
the
environment
is
such
a
better
way
to
move
this
commerce.
We
should
not
be
trucking
everything
across
our
country.
G
We
should
be
using
rail
and
franchising
rail
as
much
as
possible
and
expansion
and
roe
and
fruit,
and
to
believe
in
that,
for
you
to
see
the
opportunity
that
rail
can
do
to
the
city.
I
say
this
statistic
a
lot.
You
can
move
a
ton
of
freight
400
miles
on
a
gallon
of
diesel
with
rail.
You
can
move
that
same
ton
of
Freight
13
miles
with
a
truck
so
which
is
friendlier
for
the
environment.
It's
nearly
30
times
more
friendly
to
to
use
rail
as
your
major
infrastructure
and
logistics
platform.
G
So
I
just
want
to
reiterate
how
this
is
a
partnership.
It's
gonna
require
the
city
and
a
working
relationship
with
the
state
and
all
these
other
constituents
long-term,
and
so
we're
excited
about
this
working
relationship
and-
and
we
want
to
spend
many
years
of
our
life
working
on
this
with
with
the
city
and
moving
forward
in
a
positive
fashion.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
D
A
H
A
Opposed
motion
carries
we
close
the
public
hearing
and
now
we
are
on
to
item
number
C
or
letter.
C.
Excuse
me
redevelopment
agency
business.
This
is
the
election
of
our
chair
and
vice-chair
for
calendar
year.
2018
I
think
we
have
ballots
we're
going
to
conduct
for
this
election
like
we
did
the
City
Council
chair
and
vice-chair
election
last
week.
A
You
board
member
Mendenhall
anybody
else.
Well,
I
would
like
to
speak
to
that
and
I
appreciate
the
nomination.
Erin
I
appreciate
that
as
a
friend
and
as
a
colleague
over
the
last
two
years,
the
board
of
the
Redevelopment
Agency
has
done
a
lot
with
our
staff
partners
in
the
administration.
We
have
seen
some
significant
changes
within
the
structure
of
the
Redevelopment
Agency,
both
at
a
staffing
level
and
organizationally
within
the
Department
of
Economic,
Development
and
I.
Think,
most
significantly
with
the
the
budget
and
the
way
that
we
go
about
budgeting
our
redevelopment
project
areas.
A
We've
done
some
really
amazing
work,
whether
it
was
the
participation
of
the
RDA
in
the
site,
acquisition
for
homeless
resource
centers
in
October
2016.
We
set
aside
21
million
dollars
of
affordable
housing
money,
including
four
and
a
half
million
dollars
for
affordable
housing
and
areas
of
opportunity,
which
you
really
let
out
on
that
board
member
Mendenhall
and
we
laid
the
groundwork
for
what
will
become
enormous
opportunity
for
the
board
over
the
next
two
years.
A
We're
looking
at
the
northwest
quadrant
we've
heard
some
from
some
community
members
about
the
opportunity
that
exists
out
there
and
we
are
in
the
process
of
finalizing
two
new
neighborhood
project
areas
with
State
Street
and
the
nine
line
project
areas.
And
so,
as
we
move
forward,
I
hope.
The
Redevelopment
Agency
can
flex
its
muscle
a
bit
when
it
comes
to
neighborhood
and
community-based
Economic.
A
Development
I
think
that
we
have
shown
in
the
past
that
the
Redevelopment
Agency
can
focus
on
housing
and
equity
at
the
same
time
as
well
as
granular
economic
growth
and
so
I'm,
really
looking
forward
to
participating
with
within
the
board
over
the
next
couple
of
years
to
drive
reinvestment
and
to
lift
neighborhoods
even
more
and
use
the
Redevelopment
Agency
as
one
of
the
greatest
promoters
for
economic
development
in
our
city.
So
I
really
appreciate
the
nomination
all
right.
Let's
vote.
E
E
A
E
I
Many
of
you
were
sitting
in
here
when
I
turned
over
to
councilmember,
Rogers
and
I
said.
Does
that
feeling
in
the
pit
of
your
stomach
ever
go
away
that,
like
you,
might
screw
something
up
and
when
you're
up
here
me,
and
he
said
no,
it
doesn't
so
we
might
as
well
jump
into
other
things
and
and
seek
or
hope
to
get
a
leadership
position
in
our
reality.
I'm
really
really
excited
for
this,
and
thank
you
for
the
nomination,
as
we
were,
transitioning
and
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
say
this.
I
All
of
these
projects
and
ice
was
staying
up
late
reading,
all
of
this
stuff
and
so
I'm.
Really,
looking
forward
to
all
of
the
opportunities
that
we
have
right
now
and
to
being
hopefully
being
a
part
of
those
opportunities,
as
mentioned
I,
think
there's
a
lot
a
lot
going
on
and
a
lot
that
this
city
has
to
offer
and
well
on
our
way
of
becoming
one
of
the
best
cities
in
the
nation.
I
By
far
and
with
having
a
lot
a
lot
of
different
opportunities
for
people
and
one
of
my
goals
as
a
city
council
person
is
to
may
ensure
that
people
across
the
board
have
access
to
opportunities
and
I.
Think
being
a
part
of
the
RDA
in
this
way
is
one
of
those
those
ways
to
ensure
that.
So.
Thank
you
for
the
nomination
right.
A
A
A
A
motion
by
board
member
Mendenhall,
a
second
by
board
member
Rogers,
all
those
in
favor
hi,
any
Bost,
all
right
that
carries
now.
We
are
on
to
item
c3,
northwest
quadrant
project
area
discussion
and
consider
approval
of
community
reinvestment
area
plan,
as
well
as
the
interlocal
agreement
now
I'd
like
to
just
say
that
this
community
reinvestment
area
outlines
the
development
and
framework
and
environmental
and
economic
development
standards
for
the
northwest
quadrant.
A
Just
by
way
of
reminder
in
2016,
in
the
summer
of
2016,
this
body
adopted
the
master
plan
for
the
northwest
quadrant
and
just
last
fall.
We
completed
a
good
chunk
of
our
zoning
changes
to
that
area
with
more
to
be
coming
down
the
pipeline
here
shortly
and
now
we
consider
the
adoption
of
the
CRA
itself,
as
well
as
the
interlocal
agreement
with
our
fellow
of
taxing
partners
and
so
I
will
look
to
I
believe
it's
Danny,
Danny
Walt's,
Tammi,
Hunsaker
and
Jennifer
Bruno
to
participate
in
the
briefing
for
this
body.
I.
A
J
J
It
is
my
honor
to
sit
here
before
you
today
at
this
RDA
meeting.
Some
might
say:
I
drew
the
short
straw
to
be
the
one
to
speak
to
you
this
today.
But
what
you
have
before
you
in
terms
of
the
agreements
and
the
plan
within
your
packet
for
consideration,
is
the
culmination
of
a
lot
of
work
across
the
entire
administration,
as
well
as
collaboration
with
the
City
Council
staff,
on
behalf
of
the
RDA
and,
more
importantly,
the
Economic
Development
Department.
J
This
represents
a
lot
of
work
that
we
have
done
over
the
past
several
months,
as
well
as
probably
better
part
of
year
and
a
half
and
beyond.
When
Tammy
Hunsaker
looks
back
on
this
part
of
her
life.
She
will
probably
title
this
chapter.
The
northwest
quadrant
because
of
the
amount
of
work
she's
done
and
I
would
like
to
say
special
thanks
also
to
Katy
Lewis
in
the
attorney's
office
as
well
as
Marshall
white.
J
J
Partners
and
start
that
side
of
the
process
as
well.
So
I
would
not
want
to
say
that
this
is
preliminary
as
much
as
this
is
just
the
beginning
and
as
we
get
through
this
you're
going
to
start
and
continue
to
see
a
lot
more
information
coming
your
way
in
the
forms
of
zoning
and
the
development
agreements
and
the
reimbursement
and
everything
with
the
RDA.
J
These
plans
and
agreements
that
we
have
presented
for
your
consideration.
We
are
spanning
across
both
the
RDA
meetings
and
consideration
of
the
RDA
board,
as
well
as
the
City
Council.
In
those
meetings,
and
so
many
of
these
issues
will
return
to
you
not
only
in
in
the
capacity
of
the
RDA
board,
but
also
in
the
City
Council,
as
we
get
that
information,
and
you
will
continue
to
have
approval
of
these
plans
and
agreements
as
that
information
comes
forth.
J
So,
having
said
that,
new
chairperson
kitchen
I,
would
defer
to
to
your
guidance
and
how
you
would
like
us
to
proceed.
I
am
happy
to
speak
through
the
outline
within
the
memo
of
the
the
items
for
your
consideration
and
speak
to
those
and
describe
each
of
those
in
terms
of
how
they
relate
on
the
larger
picture.
Tammy
has
done
an
enormous
amount
of
work
of
building
that
framework
in
that
structure,
in
a
way
that
we
hope
is
as
easy
to
understand
as
possible.
J
I
A
A
Sure
and
I
know
that
there
will
be
some
questions
tossed
your
way
as
well,
so
and
in
particular,
if
you
could
speak
to
the
importance
of
the
RDAs
role
in
developing
the
northwest
quadrant
and
if
I
just
think
that
it's
a
critical
component
here
that
this
may
not
develop
for
a
couple
decades
if
it
were
not
for
the
RTA.
So
if
you
could
speak
to
some
of
the
importance
of
that
as
well.
H
A
J
J
A
lot
of
that
comes
from
information
in
terms
of
the
cost-benefit
analysis
and
the
economics
and
the
justification
for
utilizing
tax
increment
that
plays
a
big
part
into
how
development
is
going
to
occur
out
there.
So,
speaking
to
that
behalf,
the
project
area
was
defined,
as
you
indicated
in
June
of
2016
in
terms
of
the
original
survey,
and
what
that
essentially
July.
Thank
you
can
see,
that's
why
and
as
part
of
that,
that
opens
the
door
to
doing
the
initial
cost-benefit
analysis
and
that
has
kind
of
started
the
process
for
all
city
departments.
J
To
look
at
this
area,
you're
familiar
with
the
area,
you
understand
that
it
currently
does
not
have
any
infrastructure,
it
has
considerable
site
conditions
in
terms
of
the
groundwater
and
soil
and
is
somewhat
was
prompted
by
the
decision
by
the
state
to
build
the
Correctional
Facility
out
there,
and
so
that
was
the
opportunity
for
the
center.
You
start
looking
at
it
can.
A
You
mentioned
the
original
survey
in
July
of
2016
to
answer
some
of
the
questions
we
received
from
the
stakeholders
in
the
audience.
Were
these
properties
included
in
the
initial
survey
because
we've
seen
a
couple
maps
floating
around
that
indicated
they
might
have
been,
but
we're
not
entirely
sure.
So.
Can
you
speak
to
that
Tammy
or
Danny
sure.
J
The
properties
were
not
included
in
the
original
RDA
survey
area
for
the
project
area
creation.
However,
they
are
included
in
the
city's
master
plan
and
overlay
of
the
northwest,
quadrant
and
the
zoning,
and
so
that's
where
I
think
there's
a
little
confusion
in
terms
of
where
they
were
out
in
the
process.
J
So
to
that
extent,
while
they
were
part
of
the
original
master
plan
in
the
overlay,
they
were,
they
were
not
called
out
within
the
original
RDA
survey
and
we're
not
part
of
any
process
at
that
point
to
the
RTA
and-
and
we
can
circle
back
to
that
in
terms
of
ideas,
for
what
we
could
do
to
speak
to
that
request.
Yeah.
E
I
think
just
since
you're
covering
it-
and
this
gets
to
the
point-
that's
made
a
little
bit
in
a
policy
question
number
two
on
page
four,
which
is
that
the
budget
that's
proposed
in
the
CRA
plan
reflects
all
taxing
entities
participating
so
to
the
extent
that
either
they
don't
participate
or
they
participate
at
a
lower
level.
That
budget
will
be
smaller,
so
just
yeah.
J
However,
the
final
budget,
the
final
participation
of
the
taxing
entities
and
ultimately
the
final
amount
of
what
the
increment
is,
that
the
agency
will
get
comes
to
the
approval,
those
interlocal
agreements,
and
so
that
can
change
and
and
very
often
it
does
change
from
what
the
original
CRA
plan
is
to
what
the
ultimate
and
final
budget
is
for
the
project
area
based
on
those
final
negotiations.
So
thank
you.
J
And
so
the
way,
the
way
that
we've
done,
that
I
mean
number
one-
that's
typically
inherent
just
within
the
project
area
creation
that
it
doesn't
entitle
them
or
that's
them
in
anything.
But
what
we've
done
in
terms
of
our
individual
negotiations
of
the
development
agreements
with
the
the
majority
property
owners,
it
specifically
states
number
one
that
the
amount
of
increment
the
agency
can
pass
on
to
the
developers
is
only
what
we
get
out
of
those
final
interlocal
agreements
and
participation
by
the
taxing
entities.
J
H
For
future
public
benefit
analyses,
I,
I,
think
that
these
conversations
may
have
happened
without
me
already
leading
up
to
today's
meeting.
But
there
was
the
assumption
by
Jones.
Lang
LaSalle
in
their
public
benefits
analysis
that
we
would
be
contributing
75%
and
not
other
contribution
scenarios,
so
that
you
know
leads
us
into
a
binding
conversation
really
as
the
decision-making
body
to
have
fewer
decisions
with
our
partners
when
we
are
looking
at
development
agreements
and
putting
together
this
CRA
so
I'm
not
wanting
to
pull
that
apart
in
this
meeting
today
or
in
this
development
in
the
CRA.
H
J
J
And
that
is
actually
where
we're
at
right
now
as
well,
in
terms
of
having
the
ability
to
reach
out
to
the
property
owners
and
developers
in
terms
of
both
development
agreement,
either
between
the
city
and
the
developer,
and/or
a
reimbursement
and
participation
agreement
with
the
individual
property
owners
and
developers
as
projects
come
online,
and
so
the
framework
starts
with
the
project
area
and
essentially
authorizing
the
collection
of
increment
and
then
from
there.
It
trickles
down
to
what
the
actual
reimbursement
and
development
agreements
are.
J
At
this
point
we
we
are
kind
of
looking
at
those
both
together
and,
and
we
recognize
right
now
very
easily
that
the
projected
tax
increment,
probably
Falls
way
short
of
what
the
anticipated
cost
of
development
are
going
to
be
out
in
the
northwest
quadrant.
In
terms
of
reviewing
the
development
agreement,
you
will
probably
see
that
that
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
set
this
up
to
where
the
available
financing
tools
in
order
to
pay
for
those
costs
are
likely
going
to
be
a
combination
of
impact
fees.
J
That's
an
excellent
question
and
we
hope
to
be
able
to
address
that,
and
so
we
will.
Prioritize
obviously,
is
on
behalf
of
the
city
and
I
may
be
speaking
for
other
departments
here,
but
our
priority
obviously
will
be
the
backbone,
and
if
there
is
a
burden
that
falls
on
the
property
owners
and
development,
that'll
be
more
the
the
branches
that
are
more
individual
to
their
properties.
J
But
we
will
focus
more
on
the
backbone
and
providing
the
basic
level
of
infrastructure
out
there.
And
then,
beyond
that,
we
will
see
to
what
extent
we
can
also
offer
assistance
to
the
developers
for
the
portions
that
are
the
smaller
legs
of
that.
Even
to
the
point
it
takes
it
all
the
way
to
their
building.
Do.
J
J
We
would
anticipate
we
would
we
would
not
have
those
final
numbers
as
part
of
the
final
interlocal
agreements
with
the
entities
we
anticipate
having.
Some
of
those
numbers
won't
come
in
until
they're
actually
pulling
permits
and
and
that's
why
we're
we're
laying
the
foundation
by
which
that
they
can
come
in
and
have
those
conversations
with
the
city
depending
on
where
they're
at
in
the
process.
Obviously
the
backbone
infrastructure
is
something
that
we
would
probably
be
able
to
identify
much
sooner
in
the
process,
because
that
will
be
tied
more
towards
the
larger
yeah.
J
You
know
infrastructure,
but
you're
gonna
potentially
have
some
of
those
questions
that
aren't
addressed
until
they're
actually
ready
to
build
a
building,
and
they
know
either
what
the
capacity
is
or
what
the
extent
of
the
burden
cost
is
for
bringing
utilities
right
up
to
their
their
building.
So
as
far
as
the
city
is
concerned,
we
hope
to
have
that,
obviously,
at
some
level
that
we
can
make
determinations
for
the
impact
fee
study,
the
developers
obviously
want
to
have
that
to
a
level
that
they
can
start
discussing
about
getting
property
ready
for
marketing
and
developing.
J
So
that
would
be
a
conversation
that
could
also
include
pioneering
agreements
and
then,
as
far
as
the
RDA
goes,
that
will
be
information
that
we
will
have,
at
least
at
the
point,
that
we're
entering
into
the
individual
reimbursement
agreements
with
the
developers.
So
it's
a
multi-stage
approach
to
gathering
information
even.
K
The
public
utilities
is
working
on
the
master
drainage
plan,
which
I
believe
they're.
Anticipating
a
draft
will
be
done
in
later
this
month
or
maybe
next
month.
So
that's
looking
at
drainage
channels
and
also
fill
requirements.
So
a
lot
of
numbers
and
development
costs
will
come
out
of
that.
The
impact
fee
facilities
plan
so
there's
all
these
working
parts
that
are
currently
going
on
so.
K
J
J
J
Danny,
we've
done
a
good
job
of
teeing
up
all
the
policy
questions,
so
just
in
summary,
what
you
have
before
you
for
consideration,
both
from
the
the
RDA
board
and
the
city
council
side,
is
the
approval
and
adoption
of
the
CRA
plan.
As
part
of
that,
you
also
have
the
approval
of
the
interlocal
agreement,
essentially
between
the
agency
and
the
city,
authorizing
the
tax
increment
from
the
city
to
the
Redevelopment
Agency.
And
then
you
have
to
development
agreements
with
two
of
the
majority
property
owners
out
there.
J
That
would
also
involve
approval
and
adoption
by
the
RTA
and
the
City
Council
for
tonight's
RTA
meeting.
You
have
obviously
the
hearing
that
we've
already
done
for
this
plan,
as
well
as
consideration
and
adoption
of
the
plan
itself,
and
then
you
have
consideration
for
adoption
of
the
interlocal
agreement
with
the
city
and
then
for
the
City
Council
meeting
this
evening.
J
Or
you
have
the
possibility
of
deferring
action
of
that
until
next
week,
which
is
also
going
to
be
a
doubleheader
of
the
RDA
in
City
Council,
where
City
Council
will
then
consider
anything
that
they
defer
from
this
evening,
as
well
as
consider
adoption
or
approval
of
the
each
of
the
development
agreements
with
the
to
property
owners.
And
then
you
will
follow
that
up
with
an
RDA
meeting,
which
would
be
the
final
piece
of
the
RDA
approving
the
development
agreements
with
each
of
the
property
owners.
D
Again,
just
clarifying
questions
for
people
who
ask
me
these
questions
about
the
boundaries
themselves,
so
another
boiler
company
asked
earlier
about
a
subject
property
which
I'm
still
a
little
confused
about
what?
If
this
is
accurate
or
not,
but
the
second
piece
is:
why
only
include
anything
north
of
I-80
versus
anything
south,
as
part
of
we
talked
about,
the
northwest
quadrant
is
defined
differently
by
a
lot
different
folks
and
times
it's
the
entire
west
side,
industrial
area,
north
and
south
of
I-80.
D
J
K
Originally
I,
this
wasn't
actually
my
project
when
the
original
boundaries
were
set
up.
It
was
at
Butterfield's,
but
from
my
understanding
the
focus
really
wanted
to
be
on
the
undeveloped
area,
where
there's
currently
a
lack
of
infrastructure.
So
that's
why
we
did
not
go
south
of
I-80
and
the
5600
West
line
where
the
boundary
currently
is
was
determined
just
because
we
didn't
want
to
go
into
the
international
center
where
development
already
occurred.
So
it
just
looked
like
a
natural
cutoff
at
5600,
West
and
700
North
for
that
corner
there.
K
The
project
area
is
quite
large,
as
it
is
I
think
at
74
or
800
acres.
I
can't
quite
remember,
but
keep
in
mind.
Half
of
that
is
within
the
undeveloped
area.
We
had
to
include
that
within
the
project
area
boundaries
just
because
we
can't
split
parcels,
but
that
being
said,
there's
3000
ish
acres
of
land
in
this
area.
K
K
A
E
Map
I
think
illustrates
the
challenge
of
having
different
maps
for
Zoning
actions
and
overlay
actions
versus
the
CRA.
So
if
you
look
at
this
other
map,
this
is
actually
the
map
for
the
CRA.
This
was
the
map
for
the
overlay
district,
which
is
essentially
as
a
planning
action,
not
a
redevelopment
action,
so
the
CRA
map
doesn't
exactly
mirror
the
zoning
overlay
map.
Why.
J
A
Let
me
just
say
how
I
would
like
to
move
forward
I'd
like
to
hear
your
thoughts
on
the
process,
but
I'd
also
like
to
imagine
here
from
our
legal
team
as
far
as
what
we
can
and
can't
do
just
so
that
it's
on
the
record
and
then
we'll
take
action
from
there
and
then
I
have
a
question
from
board
member
Mendenhall.
Well,.
H
H
H
H
H
H
C
J
J
You
cannot
make
it
larger
without
essentially
starting
the
process
all
over
again,
and
so
what
you
have
before.
You
is
a
cre
plan
that
reflects
that
original
boundary
description
and
these
properties,
for
whatever
reason
we're
not
included
within
that
original
boundary.
So
as
it
relates
to
the
the
two
properties,
if
we
wanted
to
adjust
the
project
area
boundary
to
include
them,
you
would
essentially
need
to
start
that
process
over
again.
J
You
would
need
to
have
a
public
hearing
to
consider
amending
the
project
area
boundary
to
include
them,
and
then
it
would
be
the
decision
of
this
board
of
whether
they
wanted
to
do
that.
Now.
You
can
do
that
after
the
fact.
That
is
a
process
by
which,
under
state
statute
that
you
can
have
an
existing
project
area
and
come
back
at
any
time
and
amend
it
to
incorporate
new
properties,
and
all
you
need
to
do
is
essentially
take
action
to
do
that
and
ask
for
that
as
part
of
the
RDA
board.
J
J
Not
with
the
plan,
as
proposed
in
the
legal
description
in
front
of
you
today,
because
the
original
survey
area
did
not
include
those
areas,
and
so
you
were
bound
by
that
survey
area
and
to
change
that
you
would
have
to
start
the
process
over
again
and
essentially
just
and
when
I
say
process
over
again.
That
really
is
just
starting
a
new
public
hearing
to
designate
a
project
area
boundary
that
incorporates
that
it.
K
Was
our
understanding
and
Katie
can
clarify
me
if
I'm
incorrect,
but
there
was
the
original
survey
boundary
that
was
adopted
by
this
body
in
July
of
2016,
and
it's
our
understanding
that
that's
the
survey
area
from
which
we
can
dezik
move
forward
with
designating
the
project
area.
So
we
actually
shrunk
it
and
the
current
plan
that
you're
considering
does
not
include
the
landfill,
because
there
was
a
deliberative
step
on
the
administration's
part
to
look
at
the
landfill
separately.
K
E
That
great
and
I
think
I
think
the
trigger
point
would
have
been
the
30
day
noticing
that
started
on,
ironically
on
December,
8th
I
think
had
the
board
noticed
before
December
8th
that
the
boundary
should
be
changed,
I
think
it
could
have
been
incorporated
into
the
CRA
plan
that
was
put
out
for
public
review
on
December,
8th
I
think
that
public
review
generated
this
comment.
So
in
a
way
it's
serving
its
purpose.
E
A
J
The
desire
of
this
board,
you
can
take
action
on
everything
you
have
in
front
of
you
this
evening
and
and
not
lose
any
options.
And
then
you
can
direct
staff
to
come
back
and
look
not
only
at
these
properties,
but
whether
there
are
other
properties
that
maybe
we
want
to
include.
We
can
obviously
reach
out
to
the
airport
and
see
what
properties
fall
within
their
jurisdiction
or
issues,
and
then
we
can
come
back
and
make
a
recommendation
to
the
board
as
staff
of
what
an
adjustment
to
that
boundary
line
could
be
a
board.
J
J
Realistic
timeline
would
be
that
probably
out
one
of
your
next
RDA
meetings,
you
would
want
to
set
the
date
for
a
public
hearing.
That
would
initially
start
that
30-day
timer
for
receiving
comment.
We
would
essentially
amend
the
CRA
plan
boundary
and
make
that
available
for
public
viewing
within
that
30
days,
and
so
I
would
think
that
you
could
get
back
here
in
terms
of
the
dates
of
the
next
RDA
meetings,
you're,
probably
looking
at
March
that
we
could
be
back
for
action
or.
I
B
I
J
Adoption
of
the
plan
allows
us
exactly
to
enter
into
the
inner
local
agreements
with
the
different
entities,
and
it
also
allows
us
to
continue
to
work
with
the
developers
in
terms
of
you
know
their
due
diligence
of
looking
to
develop
the
property
and
then,
as
part
of
any
process.
We
run
concurrently
with
that
in
terms
of
amending
the
plan,
we
would
likely
be
refining
all
the
information
throughout
this
process
over
here
regardless,
and
we
could
easily
incorporate
any
changes
as
we
continue
down
that
path
and
in
catch
up,
jennifer.
E
Brunner,
just
from
a
procedural
standpoint
at
this
point,
it's
simpler
for
the
RDA
board
to
amend
the
boundary
than
it
would
be
say
a
year
or
two
from
now,
when
you
might
have
two
or
three
other
taxing
entities
that
you
would
also
have
to
get
to
agree
to
amend
the
boundary.
So
right
now,
the
only
other
taxing
entity,
that's
sort
of
on
the
table
is
Salt
Lake
City,
which
you
you
know
you
have
a
saying.
E
J
J
J
A
E
E
E
L
E
D
E
A
J
A
K
A
Transit,
the
transportation,
access
circulation
and
modes
to
serve
the
significant
growth
in
this
new
and
future
employment
base.
We
did
acknowledge
this
in
our
transit
master
plan,
so
it
may
be
worthwhile
to
incorporate
some
language
and
this
CRA
plan
as
we
move
forward.
So
does
anybody
have
anything
to
discuss
on
that
matter?
Just.
A
E
C
A
D
A
C
A
A
Motion
carries
unanimously
Carly,
Luke,
abstaining
from
or
absent,
I
should
say
from
this
vote.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
all
the
work
that
you've
done
and
we
look
forward
to
having
a
similar
discussion
with
you
in
the
council
meeting
all
right.
Moving
on.
We
are
now
at
item
C
for
a
resolution
to
discuss
and
consider
approval
of
the
terms
to
facilitate
redevelopment
of
the
Capitol
Motel.
A
E
K
I
was
saying
this
is
a
follow
up
to
the
December
12th
meeting,
in
which
the
board
voted
to
earmark
funding
for
this
project,
pending
an
RDA
loan
application
and
review
process.
Since
that
meeting,
we
have
carried
out
an
application
and
review
process.
So
as
a
reminder
that
applicant
is
housing,
assistance
management,
enterprise
hame
for
short-
and
they
are
an
entity
of
the
Housing
Authority
of
Salt
Lake
City.
The
request
is
3.2
million,
essentially
for
acquisition
for
the
capital,
Motel
property
assemblage.
K
K
During
this
time
and
I
know
Dan
Ackerman,
the
executive
director
of
the
Housing
Authority's
prepared
to
speak
on
this
more,
but
the
idea
is
that
it
could
provide
an
interim
use
in
the
short
term
before
the
property's
redeveloped
provide
vital
housing
opportunities,
but
also
it'll
provide
a
use.
That's
well-managed!
Well.
This
property
is
set
for
redevelopment
instead
of
leaving
a
vacant
and
blighted
parcel
that
could
attract
crime
and
people
breaking
in
and
other
unsavory
uses.
So
we
think
it
could
be
a
good
solution
as
long
as
that's
well-managed.
K
The
Housing
Authority
plans
on
moving
forward
and
applying
for
low-income
housing
tax
credits
9%
for
the
majority
of
their
funding.
That's
a
competitive
application
process,
so
they
do
have
some
backup
ideas
for
funding.
If
that
is
not
awarded,
and
we
really
in
structuring
these
loan
terms,
we
wanted
to
build
the
loan
terms
to
meet
RDA
program
policy
as
closely
as
we
could,
so
we
actually
are
proposing
to
structure
it
in
a
two
phased
process.
K
The
first
phase
would
provide
funding
in
the
amount
of
2.7
million,
which
is
90
percent
of
the
loan
to
appraised
value
which
follows
RDA
loan
policy.
We
felt
a
little
hesitant
with
providing
the
full
3.2
million
just
because
we
want
to
meet
our
loan-to-value
policy,
so
we're
proposing
2.7
upfront
with
an
additional
50
to
cover
the
housing
of
the
applicants,
hard
costs
that
they've
already
expended,
so
the
first
phase
would
essentially
be
2.75
million,
and
these
loan
terms
would
be
structured
very
close.
K
The
second
phase
would
then
provide
up
to
the
balance
of
the
phase.
1
would
be
rolled
into
the
second
phase
as
well,
and
then
an
additional
amount
up
to
3.2
million
to
cover
the
whole
cost
that
you
Vere
marked
or
the
whole
funding
amount
you've
air
marked,
and
then
that
would
roll
into
a
longer
term
permanent
financing
structure,
with
a
1%
interest
rate
and
deferred
payments
unless
there's
sufficient
cash
flow.
So
essentially
it
would
be
a
cash
flow
loan.
K
And
that
would
be
still
be
subject
to
coming
back
to
the
board,
but
if
there
are,
if
there
is
still
a
balance
after
the
20
year
term,
we
put
in
here
that
the
applicant
could
come
back
for
loan
forgiveness
if
there's
certain
affordability
requirements
that
are
ensured
after
the
20
years.
Also,
an
important
part
that
I
fail
to
mention
is
that
for
phase
1
to
roll
into
phase
2,
there
are
certain
contingencies
that
the
applicant
needs
to
meet.
K
So,
even
though
right
now,
they're
proposing
30%
market
rate
67%
affordable
as
the
project
moves
forward
and
they
get
their
financing
in
place,
the
parameters
of
the
term
would
have
the
one-third
one-third
minimum
ground-floor
commercial,
space
or
flex
place
space
is
a
requirement
of
the
Phase
two
and
then
in
our
loan
terms.
We
have
that
the
Phase
two
approval
could
be
provided
by
the
RTA
finance
committee
unless
the
RTA
board
would
like
this
project
to
come
back
to
this
body.
For
the
final
approval
of
Phase,
two.
C
I
have
a
question,
and
that
is
in
regard
to
regards
to
the
commercial
sign
the
off-premise
sign.
That's
on
the
northern
part
of
the
property,
I
guess.
My
question
is:
we've
seen
this
happen
before
where
it'll
impede.
You
know
us
from
developing
the
property
I
know
in
the
report.
It
says
that
he
thought
the
land
owner
feels
comfortable
with,
but
you
know
Salt
Lake
City's
pretty
good
at
beating
commercial
signs.
So
if
they
have
that
opportunity,
our
DEA
staff
I
mean
our
attorney's
office
is
really
good
at
that.
E
L
L
L
Hamer
haman
HDC
are
two
501
C
3
nonprofits
that
are
really
affiliates.
I'm.
Sorry,
there
are
instrumentalities
of
the
Housing
Authority,
so
they're
not
completely
arm's
length,
but
they
do
operate
fairly
independently
from
the
Housing
Authority.
Can't
utilize
house,
HUD
funding
directly
fact
we're
even
adding
a
couple
board
members
that
are
not
on
the
Housing
Authority
board,
just
to
make
sure
they're
arm's
length,
great.
H
Thank
you,
Dan
thanks
for
coming
up,
of
course,
I'm
excited
about
this
project.
The
entire
community
is
excited
about
this
project.
We
hope
it's,
the
first
of
four
or
five
similar
projects
along
State
Street,
just
saying
the
one
on
the
current
use.
There's
a
single
family,
home
and
I
was
wondering
about
whether
or
not
it's
currently
occupied
or
not.
H
L
There's
actually,
between
all
of
the
parcels,
there's
actually
two
single-family
homes
and
they're
kind
of
quasi
occupied
by
some
of
the
business
owners
that
are
involved,
there's
a
tattoo
parlor,
a
shoe
shop
and
the
motel.
If,
if
you're
alluding
to
relocation,
we
we
do
know
how
to
handle
that
very
sensitively
and
and
I've
I've
had
years
of
relocation
experience
with
very
large
projects
at
five
other
housing
authorities.
I
would.
H
Like
if
there's
the
opportunity
for
this
board
to
be
appraised
of
those
activities
as
the
project
progresses
I
to
had
questions
like
board
member
Rogers
about
your
confidence
and
the
resolution
of
the
existing
commercial
sign,
but
I
like
the
way
you
said
it
better,
so
I'm
just
gonna.
Second
that
and
then
my
question
was
about.
H
If
you
could
talk
to
us
about
your
staffing
plan,
your
support
plan
for
the
interim
use
there
and
then,
when
we
get
to
the
part
of
having
25%
ami
and
in
that
range,
we've
talked
consistently
about
making
sure
that
they're
supportive
services
tied
to
that
level
of
ami.
And
can
you
tell
us
your
plans
in
the
permanent
realm
sure.
L
Beginning
with
the
interim
use,
we
have
kind
of
a
two-pronged
approach.
Right
now,
one
is
sort
of
a
single
room,
occupancy
or
SRO
type
of
use
that
have
been
all
over
the
country
since
the
1930s,
starting
in
New,
York
and
and
in
a
lot
of
West
Coast
cities
that'd
be
an
apartment
complex
with
common
facilities
and
by
the
way,
probably
management
and
and
common
use
in
the
single-family
homes
that
you
just
referred
to.
L
J
L
That
would
be
to
maintain
motels
status
with
really
shorter
term
rentals,
not
a
homeless,
shelter
I
just
want
to
say
that
over
all
and
over
again,
but
likely
geared
towards
either
previous
homeless
families
or
individuals
or
those
in
the
last
stages
of
eviction
or
rapid
rehousing.
Again,
the
adjacent
homes
would
be
for,
like
24-hour
on-site
management
in
one
case
and
the
other
home
would
probably
common
facilities
or
maybe
a
common
kitchen
dan.
Those
startup
costs
are
extensive
for
relocation
for
kind
of
facelifts,
but
that's
the
interim
use
plan
on.
A
D
L
Second
thing
is:
there
is
a
real
shortage
of
motel
rooms,
especially
since
the
relocation
from
Rio
Grande
off
families
and
those
are
those
are
in
short
supply
right
now,
there's
most
motel
and
hotel
owners
that
are
no
longer
wanting
to
participate
because,
as
somebody
alluded
to
sometimes
the
services
don't
come
with
that.
Oh
sorry
can.
H
I
ask
you
to
dig
a
little
deeper
on
the
staffing
piece
of
that
because,
as
our
chair
was
saying,
there
are
there's
probably
some
overlap
in
the
populations
that
are
there
today
versus
who
might
be
there.
When
you're
into
the
interim
use
face
and
I
guess.
It
boils
down
to
tell
us
how
your
staffing
and
oversight
is
going
to
make
the
environment
in
and
around
the
capital
Motel
different
under
your
authority.
E
L
I'm
not
going
to
mislead
you
to
say
we
have
it
all
perfectly
planned,
but
I
will
brag
about
how
well
we
do
it
at
other
sites.
We
have
a
hundred
units
site
sunrise
that
Zach
pie.
Yuma
is
the
director
of
who's.
Here
we
have
several
hundred
other
units
that
are
permanent,
supportive
housing,
usually
homeless
veterans.
We
have
staff
that
includes
LCSW
z--
m
SWS.
L
We
feel
like
we'll
be
able
to
really
manage
that
so
much
better
than
it
is
now
and
frankly
make
the
neighbors
and
the
ballpark
community.
Much
happier
on
your
other
question
on
the
longer
term,
when
we
get
down
into
after
the
new
construction,
when
we
get
down
into
the
25%
we've
added
fairly
high
expense
levels
to
our
internal
performance,
which
many
developers
don't
do
most
developers
plug
those
in
it
like
4,000
per
unit
ours.
L
Ours
are
in
the
5,000
per
unit
range,
knowing
that,
if
somebody's
in
the
20
25
30
percent
range,
there
may
be
services
but
again
kind
of
a
case-by-case.
Some
people
need
off-site
services.
Some
people
don't
need
any
at
all,
but
our
income
ranges
are
they
average
by
the
way,
the
in
our
performers
right
now
and
we're
we're
flexible
and
willing
to
take
policy
direction?
L
We've
been
trying
to
keep
up
with
it
and
and
adjust
to
it,
but
really
quite
proud
to
say
that
our
low-income
portion
of
the
units
which
are
about
seventy
four
out
of
a
hundred
and
eight
average
about
41%
ami,
that's
the
average.
So
we
kind
of
carried
this.
This
was
spawned
from
the
Blue
Ribbon
committee.
We've
tried
to
carry
part
of
that
mission,
even
though
it
won't
be
done
in
time
for
the
Rio
Grande.
The
34
units
in
our
market
rate
still
hover
around
80%
of
ami.
L
H
Just
think
Dan
and
for
my
closing
for
showing
up
to
the
ballpark
community
council,
as
often
as
you
have
and
I
trust
that
that's
the
kind
of
ongoing
relationship
that
your
organization
we'll
have
with
that
community,
you've
been
very
responsive
to
their
input
and
feedback
and
I
hope.
That's
a
continuing
relationship
that
we'll
see.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
L
D
So
when
you
talked
about
the
TANF
families
you're
talking
about
eight
of
these
units
that
might
be
applicable
to
that,
is
there
any
thought
about
making
flexible
kind
of
units
where
you
could
expand
to
news
together
to
make
it
larger
unit
or
retain
the
same
size
or
flexibility
and
the
type
of
families
you
bring
into
people?
The.
L
F
K
L
Call
them
Suites,
there's
39
existing
motel
rooms,
but
that
idea
for
the
permanent
is
an
excellent
idea
that
that,
if
these
units
are
too
small
or
if
we
want
to
be
more
family-friendly,
we
could
have
some
with
kind
of
a
flex
flex
joining
possibilities.
So
we'll
we'll
really
look
hard
into
that.
Unfortunately,
on
a
tan
of
some
people,
a
homeless,
single
parent
is
often
ready,
willing
and
able
to
live
in
a
very
small
unit
with
their
child.
D
Yeah
I'm
not
suggesting
the
right
ratio.
I
do
know
that
we
tend
to
see
a
lot
of
one-bedroom
units
in
the
city
which
isn't
a
it's
great
for
a
cost
benefit
right.
I
mean
you
can
build
a
lot
more
for
that
and
low
my
rent,
but
it
also
limits
who
can
live
here
anymore
and
so
now
that
your
responsibility
to
take
that
on
yourself,
but
if
you're
being
creative
and
looking
at
this
in
the
design
phase,
that'd
be
interesting
to
look
at
the
second
pedes
question
for.
D
L
L
L
We
thought
about
we,
we
renamed
this
so
far
for
tax
credit
purposes,
ask
capital
homes
just
to
keep
the
word
capital
in
there.
We
actually
thought
about
modifying
I,
know
I'm
an
I'm,
a
preservationist
as
well,
but
we
actually
thought
about
modifying
that
sign
from
Capitol
Motel
to
Capitol
homes
and
we're
developing
kind
of
a
logo
of
a
Capitol
building
that
that
fits
the
visuals
of
that
site
over
the
years.
I'm
just
glad
you're
thinking
about.
A
Board
member
wore
and
last
year,
I
went
out
on
a
tour
of
a
number
of
housing
authority
projects
with
Dan
and
a
few
members
from
his
team,
and
we
went
by
the
overnighter
motel
on
North
temple
and
they
have
a
really
cool
sign
as
well,
and
he
signaled
to
me
dan
signal
signal
to
me
at
that
time.
They
they
would
explore
incorporating
that
sign
as
well.
I.
E
L
J
Just
wanted
to
add
that
this
did
go
to
the
RDA
Finance
Committee
on
December
21st,
and
they
recommended
approval
of
the
terms
without
any
additional
considerations
or
contingencies
within
your
packet.
There's
a
supplemental
memo
on
that
and
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
one
of
the
reasons
they
really
chose
to
do
this
loan
was
because
of
the
track
record
of
the
Housing
Authority
and
the
partnership
that
they
have
with
Salt
Lake
City.
J
They
also
wanted
to
focus
on
the
neighborhood
terms
of
the
location
on
State
Street,
as
well
as
in
what
could
be
a
potential
RTA
project
area,
and
then
they
also
looked
very
favorably
on
the
way
that
the
loan
was
structured
in
terms
of
the
acquisition
loan
rolling
over
into
a
permanent
and
construction
loan,
with
the
ability
of
that
going
back
to
the
Finance
Committee
and
the
board.
If
the
board
chooses
with
the
contingencies
and
the
requirements
that
they
would
have
to
meet
so
overall
they
felt
very
comfortable.
They
were
very
supportive.
J
J
H
A
L
Stuff
but
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
our
really
progressive
chair
and
that's
Palmer
de
Paulus.
We've
had
to
take
quite
a
few
risks
financially
to
get
this
far.
Also,
the
Blue
Ribbon
committee,
which,
as
I
mentioned,
did
spawned
this
project
the
staff
at
hand,
the
council
members
in
particularly
who
now
kind
of
know
what
we
do,
and
we
really
welcome
the
new
council
members
to
take
a
tour
and
kind
of
the
overwhelming
support
in
general
of
the
ballpark
community
on
these
types
of
projects.
J
H
A
E
E
But
please
know
my
door
is
always
open
and
my
phone
should
be
on
your
speed
dial
for
anything
that
you
feel
like.
You
would
like
to
have
a
discussion
about,
but
I
look
forward
to
working
with
you
and
to
this
leadership
that
we
have
in
front
of
us
it's
exciting
time.
We
have
a
lot
going
on
and
a
tremendous
amount
of
opportunity,
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
already
the
work.
That's
getting
done
with
this
team
Thank.
J
J
A
You
very
much
Danny
report
from
the
chair
and
vice-chair
I.
Don't
have
anything
except
to
say
thank
you
for
your
support
and
confidence
in
both
myself
and
Amy
for
the
next
year.
I
guess
do
we
we
do.
Is
my
position
a
two-year
physician,
okay,
so
two
years
for
me
and
at
least
one
for
Amy,
maybe
more
I'm
really
really
looking
forward
to
the
work
that
we
have
in
front
of
us
on
the
redevelopment
agency.
So
I
appreciate
your
confidence,
anything
from
you,
Amy
I,
just.
A
Right
we
are
now
at
section
D
of
the
written
briefings.
Do
any
board
members
have
any
feedback
or
thoughts
to
offer
on
these
two
written
briefings,
nothing,
okay,
so
the
first
one
is
the
economic
development
strategy
for
the
northwest
quadrant
project
area,
and
the
second
is
the
potential
exploratory
trips
to
inform
the
proposed
State
Street
project
area.
This
has
popped
up
a
couple
times
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
or
so
and
I
would
like
to
note
on
that.
The
field
trip
written
briefing.
A
There
were
three
potential
field:
trips
highlighted
Colfax
Avenue
in
Colorado,
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
and
Austin.
Texas
I
would
really
defer
to
already
a
staff
on
which
one
is
the
best,
but
a
number
of
board
members
are
going
to
Minneapolis
with
the
downtown
Alliance
I
think
there's
four
of
us
in
total,
and
so
our
sakes
as
of
yesterday,
we
saw
say
or
four
but
maybe
there's
more
going.
At
any
rate,
a
good
number
of
board
members
will
be
a
visiting
Minneapolis
and
so
I
guess.
I
would
make
a
request
to
Danny
and
Sue's
on
this.