►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session 1/9/2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
B
Go
ahead
and
kick
it
off,
I
thought
it
might
be
beneficial
just
to
take
a
one
minute:
recap
of
the
Housing
Trust
for
trust
fund
board
and
how
the
process
came
here.
How
we
got
here
to
today
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
board
has
traditionally
been
Salt,
Lake,
City's
main
funding
source
for
affordable
housing
throughout
the
city.
There
were
many
years
that
this
mechanism
was
not
used
very
thoroughly
or
properly
some
years.
B
We
did
zero
loans
some
years
we
did
one
and
over
the
last
few
years,
as
you
can
imagine,
especially
with
Micah
Carlos
leadership,
we
guarded
a
lot
more
interest
and
we
understood
developers
needs
and
really
they
began
to
engage
with
us
and
that's
been
very
productive
and
we've
truly
appreciated
the
council
support
over
this
time.
We've
traditionally
functioned
as
a
gap
financing
mechanism.
That
means
when
loans
generally
arrive
at
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
board.
They
have
the
majority
of
their
financing
in
place.
So
for
a
deal,
that's
30
or
50
million.
B
All
of
that
financing
is
in
place
and
then
they
usually
ask
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
for
a
gap,
financing
piece
to
that
end.
Most
of
the
deals
and
I
would
say:
90%
of
them
are
tax
credit
deals,
and
that
means
they
get
most
of
their
equity
most
of
their
cash
in
the
deal
from
a
tax
credit
source,
either
4%
or
9%
and
I
won't
go
into
the
details
of
either
of
those
but
just
to
provide
some
context.
B
Housing,
a
neighborhood
development
under
rights,
each
transaction
make
sure
it
complies
with
ordinance
and
then
with
the
developer.
They
present
that
transaction
to
the
board,
and
then
it
goes
through
an
administrative
approval
and
then
here
for
you
for
final
approval,
and
we
make
it
very
clear
to
our
community
that
this
is
the
place
for
that
final
approval.
So
I
just
wanted
to
provide
that
as
a
basis
and
then
allah
lilly
kick
us
off
on
me
actual
transaction.
Thank
you
for
letting
me
do
that.
So.
D
Yeah,
I
will
just
provide
a
short
summary
of
the
loan.
That's
before
you
today
and
we
are
available
for
any
questions.
This
project
is
called
liberty
Uptown.
It
is
part
of
the
larger
violin
Commons
development,
which
consists
of
several
properties
which
create
a
true
spectrum
of
housing.
Affordability
from
permanent
supportive
housing
to
market
rate.
Liberty
Uptown
is
a
project
that
applied
for
a
Housing
Trust
Fund
loan.
D
The
Housing
Trust
Fund
Advisory
Board
reviewed
this
proposal
in
September
and
recommended
approval
of
a
million
dollar
loan
to
the
project
which
is
before
you
guys
today
for
approval.
The
property
has
a
mix
of
one-bedroom,
two-bedroom
and
three-bedroom
units.
It
will
also
have
ground-floor
active
retail
use.
D
E
B
B
D
D
B
Was
pivotal
for
the
city?
We
really
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
had
the
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
so
I
think
that
the
developer
was
sensitive
to
making
sure
that
they
could
deliver
on
that
critical
piece
before
moving
forward
all
of
the
other
pieces,
and
so
thanks
to
the
advocacy
of
the
community,
we
were
able
to
get
the
permanent,
supportive
housing
allocation
from
Utah,
Housing
Corporation
and,
as
a
result,
I
think
the
project
was
awarded.
Based
on
its
merits.
You.
A
Good
Rogers
I,
could
you
build
a
little
bit
more
context
for
us,
and
perhaps
we
should
invite
our
applicants
up
for
this
piece
of
it,
because
I
have
met
with
each
of
you
separately
and
over
the
years
now.
It
feels
like
about
the
different
pieces
of
this
project
and
what
it's
important
to
me
that
we
flesh
this
out
in
the
public
realm
right
now,
because
to
read
this
as
a
single
project
in
a
high
opportunity
area.
This
is
really
for
this
one
building
a
fairly
low
amount
of
affordability
at
40%.
A
If
you
look
at
it
just
as
this
building
we've
said
time
and
again
that
we
want
to
support
projects
in
high
areas
of
higher
opportunity
that
have
a
higher
ratio
of
affordability.
So
we
need
to
contextualize
this
piece
of
the
project
amongst
the
Magnolia.
And
perhaps
if
you
want
to
talk
about
any
of
the
other
pieces,
then
it
really
becomes
a
high
opportunity,
high
investment
in
affordability.
Thank.
B
F
A
F
The
project
overall
is
called
violence.
School
common
in
that
name
is,
is
a
nod
to
the
violence
school
across
the
street.
It's
when
you're,
trying
to
contextualize
the
site
to
people
and
have
them
understand
where
we're
at.
If
they
don't
know
the
Public
Safety
Building,
they
do
know
the
violence
school,
so
we're
borrowing
a
little
bit
of
the
soul
of
that
particular
icon
within
the
neighborhood,
and
it's
also
the
name
that
we've
given
to
the
open
space.
That
is
really
the
anchor
for
this
particular
project.
F
Liberty
uptown
is
the
large
building
to
the
east
and
we've
designed
it
in
such
a
way
that
it
is
wrapping
a
parking
garage
that
is
shared
amongst
both
Liberty
uptown,
the
metropolitan,
the
site,
retail
and
so
forth.
So
the
Metropolitan
is
our
new
name
for
the
old
Public
Safety
building
the
Northwest
pipeline
building.
We
are
doing
a
full
historic
rehab
to
that
building.
It's
one
of
only
two
international
style
buildings
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
and
it's
on
the
National
Register.
F
F
We
have
been
working
with
shelter,
the
homeless
and
the
Road
home
is
the
owner
and
operator
of
that
particular
building.
It's
also
envisioned
to
have
a
social
enterprise
space
which
will
have
some-some
community
neighborhood
retail
aspect
to
it,
and
that's
something
that
we're
gonna
be
working
both
with
hand
and
other
individuals
from
the
city,
with
the
road
home
to
find
out
what
the
right
concept
is.
The
Metropolitan
and
Liberty
uptown
have,
as
was
stated,
neighborhood
retail
and
commercial
space
that
will
both
energize
the
street
and
activate
the
common
and,
to
your
point,
councilmember
Mendenhall.
F
The
we've
really
been
looking
at
the
project
as
a
whole.
You
know
the
the
buildings
are
individual
to
themselves
and
they're
designed
individually
as
well,
but
they're
also
we've
envisioned
them
and
we'll
be
designing
them
and
the
site
is
being
designed
as
a
whole
and
so
in
our
original
response
to
this
RFP.
F
Our
point
was
to
take
what
is
now
an
empty
building
and
an
empty
lot
and
repair
the
neighborhood
fabric,
and
we
think
that
all
of
the
aspects
here,
the
market
rate
units,
the
workforce,
housing,
the
permanent
supportive
housing-
are
really
reflective
of
both
the
city
in
that
particular
neighborhood.
The
uses
that
we're
putting
in
there
the
open
space,
the
retail,
the
residential.
All
of
those
things
are,
you
know
very
home
in
the
Central,
City
neighborhood
and
very
much
a
part
of
that
place
and
a
part
of
that
neighborhood,
and
so
we
think
as
a
whole.
F
D
A
All
permanent,
supportive,
yeah,
the
depth
of
affordability,
with
that
chunk
of
this
project
is
a
it
balances
the
scale
a
little
differently
than
just
those
numbers
of
a
hundred
and
eleven
versus
just
so
it's
just
under
50%.
If
you
look
at
the
total
number
of
units,
but
the
depth
of
affordability
and
I.
F
F
B
B
Interesting,
we
had
a
lot
of
worries
actually,
as
you
can
imagine,
with
the
administration
on
this
administration,
but
the
u.s.
administration
at
the
end
of
the
year,
with
the
threat
of
tax
credits
going
away,
and
we
were
scrambling
very
thoroughly
to
determine
what
the
impact
would
be
on
this
project
in
particular,
because
it
is
wholly
reliant
on
tax
credits,
and
so
we
feel
very
fortunate
to
be
at
this
place
today.
B
Moving
forward
with
a
plan
I
think
it's
important
to
also
note
that,
while
they
got
4%
tax
credits,
which
generally
support
sixty
percent
area,
median
income
they've
also
chosen
to
maintain
more
about
40
or
50
area.
Median
income
are
on
those
units
as
well,
even
though
they
could
go
up
to
60%
ami.
So
again,
it
is
a
they're
targeting
lower
incomes,
and
we
traditionally
see
in
these
tax
credit
projects
and
4%
in
general
I
would
say,
are
hard
to
finance.
E
A
G
G
A
D
Similar
to
before
I'll
just
give
a
brief
summary
of
the
request
and
what
was
approved
by
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
Advisory
Board
first
step
house
submitted
an
application
for
acquisition
financing
through
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
for
a
property,
and
that
is
right
next
door
to
where
they
currently
have
a
treatment
facility
and
are
also
have
a
pipeline
development,
which
is
a
9%
tax,
credit
project,
75
units
of
permanent
supportive
housing,
which
also
was
awarded
9%
credits.
This
round
so
we'll
be
moving
forward.
This
property
is
envisioned
as
new
construction
with
40
permanent
supportive
housing
units.
D
They
are
in
the
early
stages
and
the
housing
trust
fund
loan
served
as
acquisition
will
serve
as
acquisition
financing
for
them
to
be
able
to
proceed
with
this
property
and
moving
forward
in
the
development
process.
Their
goal
is
to
apply
for
9%
tax
credits
in
October
of
2018,
and
should
they
be
awarded,
they
would
move
pretty
much
on
schedule
for
a
2019
construction
start
for
that
property.
The
terms
of
this
loan
are
different
than
the
last
one
we
discussed,
which
is
serving
as
permanent
gap
financing.
D
B
Part
of
the
federal
funding
log
process,
the
council
approved
the
board's
recommendation
to
have
a
fund
that
was
available
for
projects
that
were
leading
up
to
construction,
and
so
this
is
an
example
of
how
that
fund
is
being
used.
So
it's
home
dollars
that
are
being
exercised
in
this
capacity.
Yeah.
D
A
D
So
the
applicant
has
been
working
through
this
process
and
they
there
are
not
historic
restrictions
on
the
site.
I
think
that
they
can
correct
me
with
details
I'm
wrong,
but
I
believe
that
there
was
significant
renovation
that
was
done
to
the
property
a
while
back,
which
actually
took
away
the
significant
historic
features
of
significance.
Okay,.
B
Chair,
that's
a
great
question
and
if
that
is
the
risk
of
this
transaction,
what
I
would
say
is
that
first
step
house
is
actually
a
very
fiscally
healthy
agency,
and
so,
if
need
be,
they
could
repay
the
loan.
I
think
that
we
hope-
and
it
is
our
anticipation
as
a
community-
to
continue
to
encourage
Utah
Housing
Corporation
to
do
another
round
of
permanent
supportive
housing
to
meet
the
needs
of
our
community,
and
so
that
is
the
path
we
are
going
forward
on.
B
But
there
is
a
risk
for
that,
absolutely,
and
not
just
for
the
Housing
Trust
Fund,
but
also
the
home
dollars,
because
we
would
also
have
to
end
up
returning
those
dollars
as
well
if
this
did
not
go
through.
So
this
is
also
sort
of
the
balance
between
ideal.
That
comes
in,
like
the
previous
one,
where
all
of
the
financing
is
in
place
versus
an
early
deal
where
you
don't
quite,
have
all
the
pieces
to
the
puzzle
and,
in
fact
presents
a
greater
risk,
but
we
felt
comfortable
taking
it.
D
A
B
A
Anybody
else,
okay,
thank
you
very
much.
We
will
be
also
looking
for
a
council
action
next
week
on
this
one
so
item
3
is
a
resolution
for
the
public
benefit
analysis
for
financing,
315,
East
and
2nd
south
that
a
very
same
development.
We
just
talked
about
in
item
1
and
it's
the
three
of
you
they
get
to
stay
here
with
us
for
one
more
item
who
wants
to
start.
F
A
E
B
B
The
teams
worked
very
hard
and
I
would
say
very
affectionately
that
we
had
some
productive
but
intense
meetings
around
the
expectation
of
what
should
be
built
and
purchase
price
and
all
of
the
above
and
I
feel
like
what
we
have
come
out
with
here
is
a
really
great
solution
to
a
difficult
transactions.
What
we
know
about
affordable
housing
is
it's
not
easy
and
no
two
deals
are
the
same,
and
so
that
makes
it
difficult
to
continue
to
hold
each
standard.
So
as
we
thought
about
bringing
this
public
benefits
analysis
and
working
with
finance
and
legal.
B
B
I
think
one
thing
to
make
really
clear
about
the
public
benefits
analysis
and
thank
you
to
the
council
staffer
for
doing
a
great
job
on
the
staff
report
is
that
it's
not
a
decrease
in
sales
price,
it's
the
actual
terms
of
the
loan,
and
so
when
we
were
evaluating
whether
or
not
a
PBA
was
required.
We
all
felt
like
it
merited
a
review,
because
it
is
still
unusual
as
most
of
our
affordable
housing
transactions.
D
A
portion
of
that
would
come
in
at
closing,
but
a
portion
of
that
appraised
value
would
come
in
over
time
through
payments
to
the
city
structured
through
a
seller
note,
and
what
particularly
the
public
benefit
analysis
is
considering
is
terms
of
that
seller
note,
which
are
deemed
to
be
below
market,
and
those
terms
that
are
deemed
below
market
is
what
the
analysis
is
remember.
Regards
to.
D
One
of
those
is
the
interest
rate
for
the
first
five
years
of
the
loan
at
zero
percent,
and
then
the
other
is
the
payment
structure
whereby
some
of
the
payment
comes
through
surplus
cash
and
what
we
wanted.
The
reason,
the
rationale
for
those
terms
really
is
what
melissa
was
getting
at,
which
is
these
below
market
terms,
help
to
expedite
and
ensure
the
delivery
of
those
affordable
units.
So
the
city
will
be
repaid
over
time,
as
opposed
to
all
upfront
for
a
portion
of
the
appraised
value,
purchase,
price.
H
B
Well,
I
would
say
that
the
loan
as
it
stands
is
going
to
make
the
city
whole
in
terms
of
appraised
value.
I
think
is
we
really
worked
with
the
developers,
one
of
our
main
concerns
and
our
main
risks
is.
Is
it
going
to
get
done
timely
and
is
it
going
to
come
online
in
a
way
that
is
going
to
help
meet
the
city
goals
of
affordability?
They
have
a
permanent,
supportive
housing
project,
a
mixed
income,
Liberty
uptown,
which
we
just
talked
about
and
then
a
full
market
rate
and
I.
B
In
this
scenario,
it
was
more
about
how
do
we
ensure
absolutely
that
we
get
those
units
online
in
a
timely
manner
for
a
period
of
four
debility
that
is
meaningful
to
the
city,
and
so
that's
the
way
we
structured
it,
and
if
forum
and
develop
and
forming
cowboy
were
up
here,
they
would
tell
you
they're,
taking
considerable
risk
in
the
market
as
well,
by
delaying
some
of
the
building
of
metropolitan
and,
of
course,
the
the
influence
of
the
market
in
general
on
housing.
Talk.
D
So
I
think
that
that
is
that's
a
challenge.
I
think
that
exists
in
all
projects
where
you
have
this
level
of
complexity
and
different
elements
that
kind
of
have
to
coincide,
particularly
when
they're
shared
infrastructure
like
the
parking
for
example.
So
they
were
going
to
be
linked
regardless
and
I.
Think
that
the
the
challenging
piece
is
just
getting
all
of
that
to
line
up
and
move
forward
at
the
same
time
by
enabling
portion
of
the
purchase
price
to
come
in
over
time.
D
D
It
would
it
would
start
construction,
they
would
be
in
construction
at
the
same
time,
but
Magnolia
heard
that
purchase
agreement
needs
to
be
the
initial
phase,
so
it
could
be
all
the
phases
are
under
construction.
At
the
same
time,
we
just
wanted
to
ensure
that
the
permanent,
supportive
housing
was
going
to
be
built
great.
H
You
to
be
back
so
one
of
my
questions
is
you're,
doing
a
historic
rehab
of
what
will
be
the
metropolitan
at
this
point
either.
Second
phase
or
third
phase.
Is
that
accurate,
yes,
likely?
The
third
phase
like
third
okay?
Is
that
a
standalone
sort
of
a
financing
deal
for
that
building
itself,
or
is
that
tied
together
to
the.
H
Because
my
question
is
that
okay,
worst-case
scenario,
the
stock
market,
tanks
and
a
lot
of
things
go
downhill,
the
next
few
years
prior
to
being
able
to
get
in
the
middle
of
that
particular
project.
So
that's
standalone
that
wouldn't
be
contingent
on
these
other
projects
or
in
the
financing
as
an
intermingled
that
way
or
no
okay,
cuz
I
can
see
sort
of
getting.
This
is
a
massive
project.
F
Any
project
involves
risk
and
timing.
Risk
I
mean
that's
part
of
part
of
our
job,
the.
As
a
lily
noted,
we
are
looking
to
the
Magnolia
to
get
that
done
as
soon
as
possible.
The
Magnolia
is
a
standalone
building.
The
Magnolia
actually
doesn't
need
parking.
You
know
the
other
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
projects
in
in
town
have
very
little
demand
from
the
tenants
for
parking,
and
so
the
Magnolia
is
fully
funded
and
ready
to
move
forward
and
we
are
going
to
move
forward
with
haste
and
getting
that
started.
F
Liberty
Uptown
is
likely
to
be
the
second
because
it
has
a
shared
parking
garage
and
it
has
the
longest
construction
timeframe.
So
we're
gonna
want
that
garage
to
be
on
line
to
serve
both
Liberty
Uptown,
the
metropolitan
all
of
the
surrounding
commercial,
so
we'll
be
focusing
on
getting
those
two
in
the
ground
together
as
soon
as
possible
and
designing
the
site
and
and
building
the
site.
F
So
certainly,
as
we've
mentioned,
the
complexities
of
this
particular
project
or
many
and
financing
is
certainly
chief
among
them,
which
is
why
we've
had
so
much
discussion
and
so
much
work
with
with
hand
and
with
the
city
and
finding.
You
know
the
right
mix
of
tools,
so
I
think
part
of
the
conversation
has
been.
How
do
we
try
and
mitigate
that
timing
risk
as
much
as
possible
by
getting
to
a
point
where
the
financing
is
secured?
H
F
They
were
actually
the
owner,
the
applicant.
We
were
the
developer
and
the
development
consultant
for
their
9%
applications,
so
we
will
be
doing
all
of
the
pre
development
and
construction
and
getting
the
building
to
delivery.
But
the
eventual
owner
of
that
building
will
be
shelter
the
homeless
and
the
operator
will
be.
The
road
home
is.
F
A
If
there's
nothing
else,
while
we
have
you
here
and
we've
been
talking
about
two
items
with
the
Housing
Trust
Fund,
thanks
Chris,
you
or
you
may
sit
down
if
you'd
like
to,
could
I
ask
you
for
a
little
status
update
on
the
Housing
Trust
Fund.
We
have
some
very
simple
graphs
in
our
packet
items,
but
I'm
wondering
about
some
whether
there's
some
projects
in
the
pipeline
that
you
could
yes
I.
D
Would
be
kind
of
great
able
to
leverage
our
funds
we
had
we
put
out
13.5
million
in
Housing
Trust
Fund
loans,
which
was
levered
to
leveraged
against
300
million
of
other
financing.
So
that's
about
a
1
to
22
ratio
and
that
created
about
1,400,
affordable
housing
unit,
some
of
which
are
still
under
way.
But
that's
that's
the
total
number.
So
that's
about
an
average
loan
per
restricted
unit
of
a
little
under
ten
thousand
I.
D
Think
what
we've
seen
in
recent
years
is
that
there's
a
rising
demand
for
our
funds
and
that's
coming
with
escalating
market
and
also
other
funds
for
affordable
housing,
either
staying
level
or
declining
and
I.
Think
those
are
trends
we'll
continue
to
see
the
majority
of
our
loans
as
melissa's
that
have
been
long-term
gap,
financing
for
multifamily
rental
and
these
projects
have
many
many
layers
of
financing,
and
we
are
often
the
last
missing
piece
to
the
puzzle
to
get
things
moving.
A
couple.
Other
statistics
that
we
thought
were
interesting.
D
You
know
over
over
two-thirds
of
the
developments
that
have
received
Housing
Trust
Fund
loans
in
this
period
were
mixed
income
and
the
remainder
that
were
not
mixed.
Income
were
primarily
permanent,
supportive
or
housing
that
served
very
special
needs
and
vulnerable
populations
where
mixed
income
is
harder
to
harder
to
achieve.
So
that's
just
a
high-level
overview
of
kind
of
what
we've
seen
in
recent
years.
What's.
B
Interesting
is
that
with
the
funds
dwindling,
and
we
really
actually
appreciate
the
recent
influx
in
housing
trust
fund
dollars,
because
we
actually
wouldn't
be
able
to
loan
any
more
money.
If
it
wasn't
for
that,
and
so
we
look
forward
to
being
able
to
leverage
that
and
in
your
future.
What
is
interesting
is
an
anticipation
of
dollars
being
minimized
or
minimizing
dollars.
B
And
so
as
we
learn
that
we're
trying
to
adapt
and
go
forward
as
well
in
the
pipeline,
we
have
one
coming
up
from
the
housing
authority
and
VOA
Volunteers
of
America.
That
is
a
much
smaller
acquisition.
Rehab
and
you'll,
see
that
in
that
coming
months
and
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
board
just
approved
that
I.
A
Appreciate
the
the
kind
of
10,000
foot
overview
of
what
has
happened,
I
wonder
if
the
rate
of
loans
has
increased.
You
mentioned
how
many
units
in
the
last
little,
what
year
in
2016
and
but
can
you
are
we
loaning
more
often
and
are
we
loaning
more
to
to
more
permanent
supportive
projects
than
historically?
We
were.
B
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
was
on
the
same
page
with
you,
council
chair,
you
know
in
the
past,
I
think
we've
only
you
know,
I
would
say
in
general.
It
has
to
be
a
couple
of
things.
We
are
doing
more
loans.
I
will
tell
you
that
two
years
ago,
when
I
started
here,
the
most
loans
we
had
done
in
any
annual
cycle,
I
think
was
three
and,
and
that
was
a
big
year
and
then
over
the
last
two
years.
B
B
We
haven't
seen
a
lot
of
permanent
supportive
housing
because
there
hasn't
been
any
tax
credit
support
for
it
until
recently,
and
so
it
will
be
interesting
to
see
as
those
projects
come
forward
if
they
will
actually
need
the
Housing
Trust
Fund.
It
isn't
looking
like
it
I
think
the
gap
for
permanent
supportive
housing
projects
is
not
in
the
build,
but
in
the
operations
and
maintenance,
which
is
entirely
different,
but
I
know
of
importance
to
this
body
as
they
think
about
how
households
are
supported
once
a
obtain
housing.
Different
fund,
though.
A
So
I
guess,
council
members
it
just
makes-
brings
up
the
question
also
with
the
administration
of
where,
how
do
we
maintain
the
fund
adequately
for
the
demand
that
the
market
has,
with
the
understanding
that
you
all
have
gained
in
with
the
reality
of
federal
influence
on
the
local
market?
But
are
we
funding
it
enough
and
if
not,
then
how
do
we
increase
the
funding
stream
here?
And
that
is
rhetorical
today,
unless
council
member
kitchen
wants
to
a
council.
B
Chair
could
I
just
add
one
more
point
of
context.
The
reason
we
were
able
to
loan
as
much
as
we
have
is
because
we
didn't
loan
for
so
long,
and
so
there
was
a
long
period
in
which
money
was
adding
up
and
then
was
able
to
be
deployed.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
known,
but
that's
the
reason
we
were
able
to
do
the
loans
that
we
have
been
able
to
do
in
the
past.
A
Thank
you.
So
we
have
this
up
for
a
public
hearing.
We're
gonna
set
the
date
tonight.
We'll
hold
public
comment
on
the
6th
and
we
can
take
action
on
this
one
on
the
20th
of
February.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much
next
is
number
four
on
our
agenda.
Is
the
resolution
arts
for
all
pilot
program
and
we
will
have
Sylvia
Richards
from
the
council
office
staff,
Lea
Somers
and
Sarah
Pierce,
or
is
it
it's
Sara
tonight,
okay,
great,
come
on
up.
E
A
E
I
Thank
you
thanks
so
much
for
taking
the
time
to
hear
about
this
today.
It's
this
this
time
he's
actually
pretty
critical
to
us,
starting
in
a
in
the
time
that
we
had
originally
planned.
So
we
really
appreciate
it.
Thank
you
for
that
recap.
Silvia
I'll
just
go
over
the
overall
details
of
the
program
really
quickly
and
then
welcome
any
questions
if
that
works
free
long.
I
So
as
Sylvia
mentioned,
the
arts
for
all
program
is
a
program
of
the
Eccles
theatre
that
allows
for
income
qualified
residents
of
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
Salt
Lake
County
to
attend
performances
at
the
Eccles
theater.
The
goal
is
to
distribute
1
percent
of
all
available
seats
for
every
performance
to
two
ticketed
events,
which
equals
about
25
tickets
per
per
performance,
which
adds
up
pretty
quickly.
As
you
can
imagine,
the
arts
for
all
tickets
are
free
to
income
qualified
residents.
Other
programs
around
the
country
sometimes
charge
a
small,
five
or
ten
dollars
for
this
program.
I
We
are
proposing
that
it
be
free
of
charge
to
city
and
county
residents
that
receive
SNAP
benefits,
which
is
food
stamps
or
for
those
who
qualify
for
free
or
reduced
school.
Lunch
the
program
the
as
Sylvia
mentioned,
is
funded
by
a
fee
that
is
tacked
on
to
every
ticket
sold
for
performances
at
the
Eccles
theatre.
I
It's
a
fifty
cent
fee
which
allows
this
program
to
pay
for
itself,
which
is
wonderful
and
all
of
the
funds
that
are
spent
through,
that
50
cent
fee
go
to
purchasing
tickets
and
distributing
them
to
residents
of
Salt
Lake
City
and
Salt
Lake
County
we're
hoping
to
have
this
begin.
February
2018
with
the
first
show
of
Sound
of
Music
and
right
now
the
tickets
have
already
been
purchased
for
the
very
first
Broadway
season
through
July
of
2018,
and
we
will
add,
shows
as
we
can
and
then
of
course
we're.
I
This
is
a
pilot,
so
we're
also
collecting
feedback
during
this
time
that
we
can
incorporate
into
small
changes
into
this
model.
The
tickets
will
be
distributed
through
the
ownership
structure
of
the
theater,
so
75%
of
the
tickets
that
are
given
away
will
be
to
Salt
Lake,
City
residents
and
25
to
the
greater
County
area
in
order
for-
and
this
goes
into
distribution
in
order
for
it
to
be
completely
fair
and
impartial.
I
I
I
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
eligibility
structure.
We
also
limit
tickets
to
four
tickets
per
person
per
year,
so
that
gives
an
opportunity
for
a
lot
of
people
to
receive
tickets
to
shows
if
we
need
to
adjust
that
number
to
allow
for
more
people
to
participate.
If
there's
a
really
high
demand-
or
if
we're
not
seeing
as
much
engagement,
then
we
can
mess
with
that
number
a
little
bit.
But
that's
where
we're
starting
I
talked
about
the
distribution.
The
7525
split.
I
Another
piece
of
the
eligibility
is
just
how
the
ticket
pickup
works.
I
talked
a
little
bit
about
that
it'll
be
at
the
ticket
box
office.
If
you
can
show
a
picture
ID
and
a
snap
benefit
card
or
you're
free
or
reduced
lunch
letter.
That's
how
you
pick
up
your
ticket,
we'll
make
those
those
requirements
very
clear
and
make
it
as
easy
as
possible
for
anybody
collecting
tickets.
I
The
communication
plan
has
been
really
masterfully
handled
by
the
mayor's
communications
staff
and
also
the
center
for
the
arts
communication
staff.
Our
goal
is
to
get
the
word
out
about
this
program
far
and
wide,
and
we
have
a
number
of
different
avenues
that
we're
working
toward
to
make
that
happen
like
working
through
title
one:
schools,
human
service
agencies
and
other
nonprofits
working
through
our
community
councils,
using
local
press,
TV
stations,
newspapers
and
then
developing
ongoing
partners.
That
can
continue
to
push.
Excuse
me
this
this
program,
opportunity
out.
I
And
then,
as
you
can
see,
a
number
of
communication
tactics
that
I
just
went
through
a
little
bit.
So
that's
in
a
nutshell,
the
components
of
the
arts
for
all
program.
Are
there
any
questions
or
thoughts?
We
will
also
have
a
feedback
loop
that
Center
for
the
Arts
is
developing
so
that
every
person
who
receives
a
ticket
has
an
we'll
make
a
point
to
touch
base
with
them
and
they
have
an
opportunity
to
talk
to
us
about
their
experience
from
registration
all
the
way
through
attending
a
performance.
G
Hi,
thanks
for
being
here
today,
two
questions
off
the
top
of
my
head.
The
first
is
on
the
budget
and
I
see
Danny
in
the
audience.
Can
you
I
see
that
there's
a
one-time,
RDA
contribution,
I,
don't
recall
where
that
fits
into
the
budget
and
it
looks
like
it
hasn't
been
disbursed.
Yet
do
we
have
any
insight
on
that.
G
I
A
funding
this
resolution
is
specifically
asking
for
the
city
council
to
approve
the
program
it's
listed
in
the
Eccles
ownership
and
operation
agreements
that
the
City
Council
body
needs
to
approve
the
program
before
it
can
begin
as
it
stands,
the
tickets
have
already
been
purchased
and
that
funding
was
intended
to
be
a
cushion
of
sorts.
So
if
there
are
lower
ticket
sales
and
the
fee
goes
down,
you're
still
able
to
purchase
the
same
number
of
tickets,
kind
of
a
safety
net.
Okay,.
J
K
G
G
C
The
software
that
we're
using
to
distribute
the
tickets
will
give
us
a
lot
of
data
analysis,
so
we'll
be
able
to
look
at.
You
know
how
many
registrations
are
we
getting?
Are
we
as
the
disbursement
working?
What
kind
of
feedback
are
we
getting
from
the
surveys
and
the
feedback
loop
that
we
put
together
and
also
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
clunky?
We
want
it
to
be
really
easy
and
accessible
and
explainable
to
people
so
that
it's
the
tickets
are
getting
in
the
right
hands.
So
I
think
it's
really
more
of
us.
C
Just
saying
you
know,
give
us
a
couple
of
shows
to
get
the
wheels
turning
and
make
sure
it's
running
smoothly,
and
we
may
come
back
with
some.
You
know.
Obviously,
of
course,
we'll
come
back
with
a
report.
Let
you
know
how
it's
going:
we've
purchased
tickets
through
July,
but
I
can
see
us
starting
to
purchase
more
between
now
and
July
for
the
rest
of
the
year,
because
we
want
to
do
way
more
than
just
the
Broadway.
Eventually
it's
going
to
be
every
show.
H
Thank
you
for
being
here
and
I'm
super
excited
about
the
program.
I
really
do
appreciate
it.
The
only
thing
I'd
like
to
look
at
and
your
evaluation
is
about
the
idea
requirements
and,
if
that's
a
problem
for
some
populations
of
kids
who
will
come
in
or
their
parents,
if
that's
gonna,
be
an
hindrance
to
them
actually
coming
in
to
get
the
tickets
or
obtaining
them.
So
I'll
be
interested
to
hear
back
about.
H
C
H
They
may
love
the
program,
but
are
hesitant
to
sort
of
go
that
route
because
of
the
ID
requirements
and
it's
particularly
perilous
right
now.
There's
a
lot
of
angst
has
been
going
on
for
a
couple
of
years
now,
but
I'm
looking
at.
Are
there
other
ways
to
verify
identity
and
eligibility
without
making
prohibitive
and
scary
to
sort
of
come
in
yeah.
C
And
those
are
I
mean
let's
I
definitely
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
a
comfortable
situation,
but
we're
also
dealing
with
scalpers
on
the
other
side
of
it.
So
we
just
it's
a
it's
a
balance
and
you
know
please
be
forthcoming
with
any
feedback
you
get
because
I,
you
know,
I'm
super
sensitive
to
that.
I
want
to
make
sure.
H
H
H
H
A
A
A
A
C
All
sorts
of
different
way
we
want
to
reach
the
people
directly,
so
we
want
to
go
through
schools,
libraries,
the
county
and
the
city.
You
know
Human
Services
departments
that
that
already
work
with
these
groups,
we
think
that's
a
great
way
to
be
more
direct
to
the
people,
but
we'll
also
have
you
know
to
traditional
print
and
online
advertising
as
well.
To
get
the
word
out
any
suggestions
you
guys
have
we'll
go
through
both
mayor's
offices
and
the
councils
as
well
would
be
sending.
I
I
A
I
A
That
to
our
office.
We
will
be
all
over
that
and
my
last
question
that
I
thought
of
after
I
appreciate
the
small
group
meetings
that
you
offered
to
brief
us
on
this.
After
that,
I
thought
that
with
the
10:00
a.m.
pickup
of
the
tickets
and
I
hope
the
strict
policy
around
validating
the
snap
or
the
free
reduced
lunch
eligibility
that
if
people
show
up
and
say
this
really
is
me
but
I,
don't
have
my
letter
or
my
card.
It
would
be
ashamed
to
have
the
tickets
not
be
used
and
yet
I
really
want.
A
There
I
hope
that
there
will
be
a
strict
policy
around
validating
the
eligibility
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
there's
a
plan
B.
If
there's
an
extra
five
people
that
lucky
seat
will
draw
that
you
that
the
ticket
office
could
contact
that
day
to
say,
I
know
it's
in
an
hour
to
whatever,
but
we
have
ticket
available
and
I.
If
the,
if
you
have
a
strategy
around.
C
C
A
From
there
and
for
any
anytime,
you
throw
any
party,
no
matter
how
fabulous
it
is,
everyone
shows
up
says
they
will
and
we
want
these
tickets
to
be
used.
So
if
you
can
alert
an
extra
five
or
ten
people
that
if
they
want
to
come
down
there,
they
may
get
a
ticket
I.
Think,
okay,
council
members,
anything
else.
This
is
so
awesome.
Fifty
cents
goes
a
long
way.
Oh
yes,
councilmember
Fowler,
please!
Madam.
B
E
K
A
I
A
Ladies,
that
takes
us
to
item
five.
Oh
my
gosh
were
on
time.
Look
at
that.
It's
five
o'clock,
almost
legislative
issues
of
2018
Lynne
pace
come
on
up
and
I
would
like
to
ask
our
mayor
to
come
up.
If
you
don't
mind,
so
we
can
talk
through
these
priorities
and
hopefully
come
up
with
a
City
priority
list
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
on
for
our
legislative
breakfast
Friday
morning,
thanks
thanks
for
being
Hugh,
so
Lynn
welcome
David
the
list
that
we
have
is
so
vague.
We
need
some
context
here.
Yes,.
K
K
And-
and
so
this
list
was
developed
primarily
because
we
need
to
have
among
the
hundreds
of
bills
that
we
will
be
tracking
and
monitoring,
there's
lots
of
stuff.
But
it's
really
an
attempt
to
focus
our
efforts
both
internally
for
our
lobbyists
and
for
our
legislators
to
say:
there's
lots
of
stuff
we'll
be
dealing
with,
but
these
are
the.
These
are
the
top
priorities.
K
Bearing
in
mind
that
we
don't
control
all
of
what
will
happen
during
the
session.
There
will
be
surprises
and
things
continue
to
change,
but
that's
how
we
have
come
up
with
this
list
because
either
because
these
are
the
things
that
we
have
heard
that
are
pending
or
because
they
are
priorities
for
the
city
notwithstanding
what
individual
legislators
may
be
pursuing.
K
So
if
I
can
just
I'll
just
work
through
this
and
we
can
go
into
as
much
detail
as
you'd
like
and
and
I
should,
I
should
point
out,
particularly
for
therefore
our
new
council
members
that
the
city,
it
is
very
important
for
the
city
to
as
much
as
we
can
present
a
unified
front
on
legislative
issues.
By
that
I
don't
mean
that
anybody
should
bite
their
tongue
internally
or
withhold
their
opinion.
I
expect
and
we
welcome
a
robust
discussion
internally,
but
it
is.
K
It
is
not
productive
for
us
to
have
that
public
dialogue
or
debate
up
on
the
hill.
So,
whatever
debate
we
want
to
have
internally,
that's
fine,
but
we
we
certainly
want
to
get
to
an
agreed
upon
list
priorities
and
an
agenda
that
we
can
share
as
a
unified
message
to
legislators
up
on
the
hill.
So,
madam.
H
Chair
one
point
on
the
list
itself
and
little
talk
about
this
I
bet,
but
when
it
says
no
legislation
like
in
northwest
quadrant
doesn't
mean
there's
not
going
to
be.
It
means
they
don't
have
a
definitive
bill
right
now
they
know
of,
but
there
may
likely
have
something
come
up,
so
don't
be
confused
by
that
language.
On
that
list,
correct
thank.
K
You
monitoring
yeah
so,
and
we
can
work
through
these.
But
really
our
reason
for
being
here
tonight
is
to
make
sure
that
that
we
discuss
this
list,
anything
that
you're
uncomfortable
with
on
the
list
or
anything
that
you
think
is
a
priority.
That
is
not
on
the
list,
because
this
is
obviously
the
starting
point
for
our
discussion
on
Friday
with
our
legislative
team.
So
the
first
one
is
affordable
housing
and
that
that's
obviously
a
high
priority
for
both
the
administration
and
the
council.
K
But
in
terms
and
there's
a
number
of
things
we're
pursuing,
but
in
terms
of
items
where
we
would
need
state
legislative
authorization
or
assistance.
We
really
only
have
two
things
that
we're
looking
at.
One
is
expanding
the
scope
of
the
authorization
for
design-build
projects
right
now,
there's
a
$250,000
threshold,
and
if
we
can
eliminate
that
threshold
or
at
least
eliminate
that
for
cities
of
the
first
class,
we
think
that
would
get
make
give
us
broader
flexibility
for
affordable
projects
and
it
doesn't.
It
doesn't
change
the
game
plan,
but
it
it
cuts
it.
K
It
makes
projects
it
makes
them
more,
affordable
and
reduces
the
cost
of
designing
and
developing
those
projects.
We
already
have
a
sponsor
for
that.
Senator
Mayne
is
working
on
that,
so
we're
hopeful
to
get
some
dialogue.
There
there's
also
a
bill.
This
was
not
our
request,
but
there's
a
bill
that
is
going
to
being
sponsored
by
representative
wild
and
in
he's
interested
in
taking
the
current
statutory
requirement
that
that
requires
every
municipality
to
prepare
and
file
a
moderate
income
housing
plan
with
the
state
every
two
years.
K
But
that's
all
that's
all
the
statute
says
you
have
to
have
one
and
you
have
to
have
to
update
it.
Every
two
years
he's
looking
to
put
to
beef
up
that
statute,
either
with
some
tools
or
enforcement
or
consequence
so
that
it
doesn't
just
become
a
wish
list
that
you
file
every
two
years
and
then
forget
about
so
we
don't
know
exactly
where
that
may
go,
but
he's
contacted
the
League
of
cities
and
towns
and
he's
contacted
us
to
say
what.
How
can
we?
K
K
League
is
open
to
open
to
the
discussion
and
what
you
know.
We're
certainly
want
to
know
what
we
can
do
now
bear
in
mind.
No
city
wants
the
state
mandating
land
use
right,
but
we
think
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
go
beyond
the
simple
preparation
of
a
study
without
anything
more
in
terms
of
particularly
for
communities
that
may
not
have
had
may
not
have
as
much
expertise
on
this
issue
of
Salt
Lake
City.
K
So
we
get
more
from
that
existing
statute
than
we
do
today.
So
those
are
the
two
there's
a
number
of
other
things.
As
I
mentioned
that
we're
working
with
on
affordable
housing.
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
using
tax
increment
I've
been
informed,
that's
a
tool,
that's
already
available.
We
don't
need
legislation,
but
it
is
a
tool
we'd
like
to
use.
You
had
a
discussion
last
week
on
inclusionary
zoning.
We
don't
need
any
state
authorization
there.
K
G
G
In
fact,
we
just
had
that
conversation
and
it
seems,
like
maybe
there's
an
opportunity
for
us
to
begin
to
begin
a
dialogue
with
certain
legislators
whether
it
goes
anywhere
this
session
or
not,
but
I
would
really
like
to
put
our
leg
out
and
test
the
waters
on
whether
whether
that's
an
impact
fee
or
something
else.
But
what
I
mean?
What
are
your
thoughts,
David
and
Lynn
the
mayor
on
this?
So.
J
K
G
K
J
It's
like
an
impact
fee,
but
it's
actually
a
model,
that's
used
quite
commonly
across
the
country,
and
it
is
what
the
the
an
item
that
we've
discussed
with
the
legislative
subcommittee
and
we
think,
there's
a
lot
of
value
in
that
as
an
ongoing,
dedicated
funding
source
and
we
are
starting.
We
are
initiating
that
conversation.
We
have
had
some
conversations
with
with
representative
Edwards
about
looking
at
that
and
possibly
studying
that
over
this
next
interim.
J
J
L
Can
say
that
in
the
meetings
I've
been
sitting
in
regarding
transportation
or
housing,
there
is
a
lack
of
desire
for
some
new
funding
to
be
on
the
table
and,
as
I
have
discussions
with
mayor's
across
the
Wasatch
Front,
whether
they're
from
Utah
County
or
in
our
area
or
or
north
of
us.
There
is
a
desire
to
push
the
legislature
for
some
new
tools,
but
we're
not
getting
much
back.
I
can
tell
you
that.
K
One
other
thing
you
should
be
aware
of
is
that,
unrelated
to
the
dialogue
on
affordable
housing,
there
is
a
separate
dialogue
that
is
being
pursued
by
development
interests,
who
have
based
upon
a
Gardner
Institute
study
determined
that
part
of
the
challenge
to
housing.
Affordability
along
the
Wasatch
Front
is
government
regulation
and
government
fees.
So
in
these
this
dialogue
sort
of
cuts
at
cross-purposes,
because,
while
of
course
we
want
to
inspect
buildings
to
make
sure
they're
safe
and
they
comply
with
zoning.
K
All
everything
and
the
bulk
of
the
cost
of
housing
is,
of
course,
the
land
value
and
the
construction
cost,
but
they
can't
control
either
those
so
they're,
focusing
on
the
third
leg
of
the
stool,
which
is
government,
regulations,
fees,
impact
fees
and
so
there's
a
real
push
to
say.
Part
of
what
make
will
make
housing
more
affordable
is
to
reduce
government
fees
and
processing.
Well,
if
we,
at
the
same
time,
have
a
discussion
about
raising
impact
fees
for
affordable
housing,
those
tend
to
be
competing
discussions,
so
you
just
need
to
need
to
be
aware.
K
K
K
That
homelessness
is,
in
fact
a
statewide
issue,
notwithstanding
the
fact
that
a
few
communities
are
hosts
of
those
facilities,
this
bill
is
intended
to
assess
the
costs,
or
at
least
a
portion
of
those
costs
statewide.
The
question
has
arisen,
however,
as
to
how
is
it
how
it
has
assessed?
How
much
is
assessed
where
how
the
money's
collected
where
it
goes?
K
So
if
a
community
has
a
lot
of
affordable
housing,
their
assessment
would
be
lower
than
a
community
that
has
no
affordable
housing,
but
all
those
factors
get
pushed
up
or
down,
depending
on
how
much
money
you're
trying
to
collect
and
how
its
assessed-
and
there
will
be
lots
and
lots
of
dialogue,
there's
already
lots
of
dialogue
among
the
various
communities,
because
some,
of
course,
would
prefer
one
method
of
collection
for
another.
Some
would
prefer
a
straight
head
tax.
Some
would
prefer
a
property
tax
assessed
to
the
county.
K
A
J
K
H
K
H
The
reason
I
bring
that
up
is
because
council
members
may
not
know,
but
the
the
men's
when
that's
scheduled
for
South
Salt
Lake
part,
it's
it's
a
little
behind
for
the
other
ones,
already
part
of
the
issue
there
is
the
infrastructure
build
up
on
that
road.
It's
on
is
not
there
and
there's
some
expectation
that
monies
may
be
from
this
source
would
be
used
to
build
that
or
at
least
reimburse
for
it
to
actually
build
that
facility.
H
K
Is
intended
to
help
the
communities
that
are
hosting
these
facilities
to
help
to
defray
the
costs
that
they
are
incurring
you're
all,
but
there's
there's
lots
of
people
pulling
this
in
different
directions
for
their
own
advantage.
There
are
those
who
say
well
if,
if
those
funds
were
collected,
some
portion
of
that
ought
to
go
to
the
homeless
providers.
K
K
H
My
question
is
not
necessarily
to
Selleck
City
question,
but
does
impact
us
that
if
that
funding
is
meant
for
a
variety
of
things
kind
of
open-ended,
it
could
be
infrastructure
upfront.
It
could
be
long
term,
police
presence
all
those
kind
of
things,
but
watching
the
specifics
of
that
bill
being
important
for
us
to
know
looking
forward
about
what
we're
looking
at
in
19
for
us.
So
yes.
E
E
K
J
Customer
Ward
no
I
will
follow
up
my
my
perception,
my
understand.
You
know
I'll
confirm
or
come
back
with
better
information
that
the
special
session
addressed
the
funding
needs
associated
with
operation
Rio
Grande
there
may
be
some
built
into
the
to
the
new
budget
and
the
funding
is
primarily
as
far
as
law
enforcement.
J
The
state
funding
is
primarily
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
and
Utah
Highway
Patrol
most
jurisdictions
are
not
are
no
longer
involved
in
terms
of
law
enforcement
entities
and
support,
but
I
will
I
will
double-check
too
as
to
whether
there
will
be
funding
associated
with
the
fiscal
year
19
budget
associated
with
operation
Rio
Grande,
but
most
of
that
my
understanding
was
addressed
during
the
special
session.
Okay.
E
L
C
E
K
E
L
K
L
E
As
well,
but
another
I
know
that
your
list
is
just
a
draft
and
a
couple
things
that
aren't
on
there,
Solar
I
don't
know.
What's
going
on
with
that,
as
well
as
billboards,
you
know
that
always
something
comes
up
at
the
last
minute
so
and
it
always
as
an
impact
in
Salt,
Lake,
City,
so
I
think
those
are
the
other
other
besides
clean
air.
For
me,.
A
You
so
we
could
have
I
think
instead
of
water
issues,
we
could
have
an
environmental
issues
and
maybe
some
breakout
sections
and
include
alternative
energy
or
solar.
However,
you
want
to
phrase
it
air
quality
and
we
got
a
bucket
of
water
issues.
Yeah
Cyril,
should
we
jump
in
there
since
apparently
there's
nothing
on
northwest
quadrant.
Let.
K
The
northwest
quadrant
our
goal.
Our
priority
is
to
have
no
legislation.
I
am
confident
there
will
be
bills
proposed,
but,
as
you
well
know,
from
what
you've
already
dealt
with
today
and
continue
to
deal
with,
Salt
Lake
City
has
been
very
aggressive
in
partnering,
with
the
state
and
with
the
private
landowners
and
other
interested
parties
to
move
forward
economic
opportunities
in
the
northwest.
Quadrant,
and,
to
be
quite
blunt,
we
don't
need
any
legislation
from
the
state
to
continue
that
process.
K
Our
priority,
of
course,
is
preserving
the
city's
land
use
authority
in
the
northwest
quadrant
and
our
taxing
authority
and
appropriation
Authority,
so
I.
Just
let
me
quickly
touch
on
the
airport.
We've
been
just
slightly
schizophrenic
there.
Our
priority
is
no
legislation
because
we're
in
the
middle
of
a
massive
rebuild
project.
K
The
current
statutory
structure
for
allocating
liquor
licenses
at
the
airport,
and
so
we
will
be
working
with
the
appropriate
legislators
and
lobbyists
to
and
the
reason
we
have
to
do
that
now,
even
though
we're
years
away
from
occupying
it
is
because
during
this
next
calendar
year,
the
airport
will
be
issuing
RFPs
for
the
providers
and
they
will
need
to
know
before
they
bid
on
those
RFPs
how
many
liquor
licenses
they
have
so
it
has
to
be
now
down
to
water.
Is
that
where
you
wanted
to
go
next,
let's.
K
The
the
first
two
bills
listed
there
are
bills
that
have
actually
been
filed.
We
opposed
both
of
those
bills.
One
of
them
deals
primarily
with
the
issue
of
extraterritorial
jurisdiction
under
state
law.
Today,
Salt
Lake,
City
cities
of
the
first
class
have
extraterritorial
jurisdiction
and
for
that
matter
every
city
has
some
extra
territorial
jurisdiction
cities.
The
first
class
have
it
to
a
greater
degree
that
bill
would
eliminate
extraterritorial
jurisdiction
for
cities
and
for
water
service
districts
in
a
way
that
is
the
biggest.
K
A
lot
of
this
is
aimed
at
Salt
Lake
City,
because
we
are
the
oldest
city,
we
have
the
oldest
water
rights
and
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
attention
to
what
Salt
Lake
City
does
and
when
we
make
decisions,
particularly
decisions
in
the
watershed.
Sometimes
there
are
people
who
are
unhappy
with
that,
but
the
the
real
challenge
here
is
that
Salt
Lake
City
under
the
Clean
Water
Act
has
the
obligation
to
provide
clean
drinking
water
to
its
citizens
and
not
just
Salt
Lake
City
citizens,
but
a
lot
of
the
east
bench
of
Salt
Lake
County.
K
If
this
bill
were
to
pass,
it
would
effectively
prohibit
Salt
Lake
City
from
protecting
that
water
source,
while
still
leaving
us
with
the
obligation
to
provide
you
the
clean
drinking
water.
It
is
untenable
to
think
that
we
would
be
left
with
the
obligation
without
the
ability
to
make
sure
the
water
is
clean,
so
we're
having
a
I
was
just
in
a
long
meeting
today
about
this
we're
having
a
dialogue
about
this
I
think
while
there
may
be,
there
may
be
merit
in
discussing
this
and
making
adjustments
to
the
scope
of
that
statute.
A
Councilmember
Wharton
and
then
councilmember,
Luke
and
I
want
you
to
get
more
specific
about
what
adjustments
you
think
might
be
appropriate
because
I've
been
in
meetings
with
you
and
I've.
A
pin
under
attack
many
times
in
other
capacity
for
this
and
I
didn't
seem
that
there
were
any
ideas
that
we
had
around
appropriate
adjustments
to
this
statute.
A
K
Me
want
me
to
speak
to
that
now
or
do
you
want?
Let
me
take
questions.
First,
go
ahead,
okay,
the
issue
that
has
come
up
and
bear
in
mind:
I
am
NOT
the
water
expert,
okay,
but
I've
gotten
educated
on
a
lot
of
this
as
I've
dealt
with
these
issues.
Salt
lakes,
cities
of
the
first
class,
have
extraterritorial
jurisdiction
from
ridge
line
to
ridge
line
and.
A
K
But
as
cities
grow
once
they
hit
that
hundred
thousand
threshold
there'll
be
more
so
one
of
the
complaints
is:
do
we
have
competing
jurisdictions
sandy
and
Salt
Lake
with
competing
regulations?
That's
a
red
herring!
All
of
us
have
the
same
interest.
We
coordinate
very
well,
that's
not
been
a
problem.
The
second
issue
that
has
been
raised
is
is
that,
because
that
jurisdiction
is
Ridgeline
to
Ridgeline,
there
are
people
who
say
well:
Salt
Lake
City
gets
some
of
their
water
from
Deer,
Creek,
Reservoir
or
even
from
strawberry
reservoir.
K
Does
this
mean
that
Salt
Lake's,
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council,
has
jurisdiction
over
what
I
do
on
my
farm
in
Joab
County
or
in
Wasatch
County
right
again,
I
am
NOT
the
water
experts,
so
I
don't
want
to
be
proposing
any
any
remedies
here,
but
I
have
heard
from
our
public
utilities
folks
that
we
have
never
exercised.
Nor
would
do
we
intend
to
exercise
extraterritorial
jurisdiction
to
protect
the
waters
to
the
water
quality
outside
of
Salt
Lake
County.
K
This
is
really
a
tool
that
we
have
used
in
the
Wasatch
canyons
to
protect
those
vital
water
resources
in
in
the
midst
of,
as
you
know,
exploding
public
use
of
those
lands
to
protect
the
water
quality.
So
we
think
the
the
risk
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
is
somehow
going
to
prohibit
a
farmer
from
grazing
on
his
lands
in
Wasatch
or
Daggett
County,
or
something
we
think
is,
is
really
far-fetched,
but
that's
a
fear
that
they
a
concern
that
they
have
so
I
guess
my
point
that
I
think
we
might
be
able
to.
K
A
M
K
If
I
can,
let
me
jump
to
that
issue
under
the
Utah
Constitution
cities
are
prohibited
from
selling
water,
okay
and
I'm,
assuming
that
was
designed
to
keep
some
misguided,
City
Council
from
selling
the
inheritance
right.
So
there's
a
constitutional
prohibition
on
selling
water,
but
lots
and
lots
of
cities,
including
Salt
Lake
City,
have
extended
water
service
outside
their
boundaries,
but
since
they
can't
sell
the
water,
the
state
law
does
allow
them
to
use
surplus
water
to
offer
those
those
residences
and
businesses
most
of
the
east
bench
of
Salt
Lake
County.
K
Our
service
area
is
serviced
on
surplus
water
contracts,
by
contract
and
by
law.
It
is,
by
definition,
only
surplus
water,
meaning
it's
available
as
long
as
we
have
enough
and
they
are
terminable
on
30
days
notice.
Well,
we
have
obviously
built
we.
The
the
county
have
obviously
built
millions
or
billions
of
dollars
of
infrastructure
on
these
surplus
water
contracts.
The
issue
that
has
been
raised
and
and
and
this
bill
by
representative
Coleman
is-
is
a
little
bit
muddled,
but
the
core
concern
is:
how
do
we
when
we
have
what
are
intended
to
be
permanent
improvements?
K
K
But
under
the
terms
of
their
contract
they
are,
you
know,
their
terminable
on
30
days,
people
would
like
to
find
a
solution
to
that.
One
solution
is
to
amend
the
Constitution.
Another
solution
might
be
just
to
amend
the
contract,
but
no
one
knows
yet
they've
identified
the
problem.
No
one
knows
what
the
solution
is,
and
my
experience
is
on
any
major
water
bill.
It
doesn't
happen
quickly.
It
takes
at
least
a
year
of
study
to
get
it
right
to
get
all
of
the
appropriate
interest
at
the
table.
E
K
N
N
Is
okay
on
the
on
both
the
extra
Torrey
territorial
and
the
surplus
water
contracts
have
we
talked
to
or
where
are
we
with
some
of
the
discussions
from
our
customer
base
outside
of
Salt
Lake,
City,
so
I
know
with
mayor
Silva
strany?
His
appointment
is
coming
forward
for
the
Public
Utilities
Board,
but
have
we
talked
to
and
and
where
are
these
municipalities
are
they
supporting
us
on
this
or
they
I
will
tell.
K
M
K
E
K
N
Because
I
think
that
I
think
getting
them
involved,
especially
on
these
two
bills
being
since
it
is
dealing
specifically
with
their
issues,
even
though
they're
not
the
ones
pushing
it
I,
get
that
it's
coming
from
outside
the
the
Wasatch
Front,
but
I
think
we're
gonna
have
much
more
success.
If
we
get.
N
N
N
With
representative
Coleman,
but
the
Jordan
Valley
Water,
Conservancy
district
would
be,
and
it
seemed
because
they're
the
ones
that
contract
with
West
Jordan
and
and
the
West
Side
for
a
lot
of
water
issues
there
so
I
hope
that
public
utilities
or
the
mayor's
office
is
also
reaching
out
to
both
of
those
water,
company
or
water
organizations
as
well.
On
the
reducing
the
current
water
requirements,
dude
there's
no
bill
there.
K
Not
a
worm
that
one
well
is:
you
know
it's
being
pursued
by
the
development
community,
home
builders,
primarily
and-
and
this
doesn't
affect
Salt
Lake
City
as
much
directly
because
Salt
Lake
City,
because
we
were
an
early
city.
We
have
water
rights
already,
but
in
most
high-growth
communities
you
can
only
build
if
you
bring
water
enough
for
your
development,
and
so
their
concern
is
given
the
most
recent,
the
audits
that
the
state
has
done
on
water.
K
They
think
that
400
gallons
is
is
higher
than
is
actually
needed,
and
so,
if
you're
building
in
Eagle,
Mountain
or
Saratoga
Springs-
and
you
want
to
build
a
hundred
homes.
If
you
lower
that
threshold
from
400
down
to
200,
it
costs
you
a
lot
less
to
build
those
homes
mm-hmm.
So
it's
it's
being
driven
by
the
cost
of
providing
water
for
new
homes
in
high-growth
communities,
but
that
same
threshold
wherever
get
that
get
set
today,
it's
400
gallons
a
day.
K
K
A
K
N
No
and
I
didn't
I,
didn't
take
it
as
you,
you
punted
on
it
ordering
getting
away
from,
but
I
do
think,
madam
chair,
that
that
would
be
very
helpful
and
again
with
our
lobbying
team.
That's
that's
great
and
we
have
a.
We
have
a
very
good
lobbying
team
and
but
a
lot
of
these
other
municipalities
do
as
well
and
I
think
the
sooner
we
can
get
them
on
board
the
sooner
that
we
can
hopefully
engage
their
contract
lobbyist
as
well.
On
this
issue
and.
A
L
E
K
E
E
N
L
Dialogue
with
Cameron
has
been
very
positive
and
I
would
say
that
there's
a
strong
desire
under
his
leadership
to
look
out
for
the
bigger
cities
a
little
more
than
maybe
in
the
past.
You
know,
there's
a
heavy
driver.
That's
been
happening
with
rural
communities
about
how
the
league
engages,
but
it's
been
made
very
clear
that
are
the
cities
along
the
Wasatch
Front
need
better
support
from
the
league
and
he's
listening
to
that.
K
We
will
have
the
league's
support
Thanks,
the
last
one
I
wanted
to
mention
on
this
is
the
third
one
listed
there.
The
canal
relocation
bill
that
bill
number
is
from
last
year,
senator
Hinkins.
We
expect
he
will
file
a
bill
this
year,
but
is
we've
not
seen
it
yet
that
bill
will
be
up
and
likely
will
pass
this
year?
That's
a
significant
issue
for
Salt
Lake
City,
because
we
have
water
in
those
canals
we
own
some
canals.
We
also
so
sometimes
we're
the
owner.
K
Sometimes
were
they
were
the
water
user,
but
or
sometimes
we're
dealing
with
the
developer.
Who
wants
to
relocate
the
canal?
This
bill
is
intended
to
clarify
the
rules
for
the
various
parties.
When
development
happens,
that
either
necessitates
piping
the
canal
or
relocating
it
or
adjusting
status
quo,
and
we
tend
to
have
interest
on
all
sides
of
those
issues
so.
K
L
So
there's
a
new
bill
that
we
just
got
a
copy
of
I,
think
it's
HB
160,
it's
Mike
Noel.
He
has
a
piece
of
legislation
that
I've
asked
our
city
attorney
to
review
that
prohibits
local
government
from
advocating
for
any
sort
of
designations,
federal
designations
of
land,
and
so
we're
looking
at
that
to
see
if
it
has
an
impact
on
the
central
watch,
such
committee
and
the
work
that
we
are
doing
there.
And
so
it's
an
interesting
session
already
does.
L
K
L
K
K
A
K
E
K
K
E
A
K
K
K
First,
you
know
I
mean
the
tax
issues.
There
has
also
been
not
a
not
a
tax,
not
a
tax
reform
task
force,
but
the
revenue
and
Taxation
Committee
has
been
meeting
over
time
to
discuss
a
whole
list
of
tax
reform
issues.
When
we
met
as
a
subcommittee,
I
came
in
with
what
I
thought
might
be
the
ones
that
were
most
interesting
to
you
at
the
invitation
of
staff.
They
said
you
know
what.
Why
don't
you
give
us
the
whole
list
and
let
us
determine
what
you're
interested
in
so
on
this
part
of
the
list.
K
A
A
K
Of
course,
because
no
one
knows
the
full
impact
of
the
federal
tax
changes
yet
right,
and
so
everything
is
a
little
bit
in
flux.
But
just
so
I
can
walk
you
through
this
they're
talking
about
making
changes
to
the
newspaper
ad
for
truth
in
taxation,
what
those
exactly
would
be
and
what
they
look
like
we're,
not
sure
and.
A
K
Talk
about
the
fact
that
we
all
property
tax
entities
are
more
heavily
reliant
on
other
sources,
because
the
state
has
made
it
difficult
to
raise
property
taxes,
so
they've
said
well
what
if
we
changed
the
ads,
so
you
didn't
have
to
say
you
were
raising
taxes
or
what,
if
we,
you
didn't,
have
to
use
a
newspaper
ad.
What
if
we
just
put
it
on
the
website,
they're
thinking
about
that,
but
the
goal
would
be
to
make
make
it
make
property
tax
adjust
an
adjustment
in
property
tax
is
easier
to
do.
That's
the
goal
on
that.
K
K
K
M
K
Understand
that,
because
there's
an
element
of
double
taxation
in
that,
but
the
fiscal
impact
and
for
Salt
Lake
City,
would
be
significant.
So
sales
tax
of
streamed
media
and
amusement
devices
I
think
that's
a
fairly
small
item,
at
least
in
terms
of
fiscal
impact
but
they're.
Talking
about
that
registration
fees
and
Road
usage
charge.
L
But
preferably
this
is
not
the
time
to
push
back
on
electric
vehicles
and
so
for
me,
as
a
leader,
I
would
prefer
there
were
no
fees
at
this
point
on
electric
vehicles.
We
need
to
get
more
in
our
market
and
but
we're
pushing
for
at
least
a
much
more
reasonable
fee.
They
started
at
$200
and
something
a
little
more
fair
and
reasonable
is
like
$50.
So
we'll
see
what
happens.
K
Let
me
go
on
through
this
list:
certified
sorry,
property,
taxation
of
business,
personal
property
and
I,
don't
know
if
that
is
the
same
or
not
as
that
is
this
bill.
House
bill,
2105
tax
rate
amendments.
What
that
would
do
is
put
in
that
five-year
averaging
on
the
amount
of
new
growth
that
you
realize
from
increases
in
personal
property.
K
We
think
that
would
have
a
Jennifers
give
me
a
thumbs
down.
We've
talked
about
this
bill.
It
makes
it
harder
to
predict
and
our
finance
people
have
said
that
that
will
have
a
negative
in
a
fiscal
impact
for
Salt
Lake.
We
would
oppose
that
bill,
but
unless
you're
really
sort
of
a
tax
long,
most
people
won't
understand
what
that
bill.
Does
the
and
then
we've
got
a
couple
of
bills
here,
what
they?
The
exact
input,
impact,
various
local
option,
sales
and
use
tax
distribution,
formula
amendments
and
sales
and
use
tax
exemption
amendments.
K
One
of
those
is
essentially
extending
the
hold
harmless
for
very
small
communities.
There
are
three
or
four
around
the
state
that
will
never
grow
out
of
their
hold
harmless
city
of
Alta
in
a
couple
of
counties,
and
it
was
essentially
extending
or
removing
the
sunset
of
that
hold
harmless.
That's
that's
an
outgrowth
of
the
restructuring
of
the
property
of
the
sales
tax
redistribution
back
in
the
mid
eighties,
and
then
there
there
may
be
a
bill
talking
about
sales
tax
on
internet
purchases.
E
A
K
Ones
that
I
had
the
ones
that
I
had
highlighted
were
one
the
truth
and
Taxation
newspaper.
The
reason
I
did.
That
is
because
the
league
will
be
supporting
that,
because
many
many
cities
out
there
not
Salt
Lake
City-
have
have
been
reluctant
to
adjust
their
property
tax
rate
because
of
the
poison
pill
posting
an
ad
that
says
you're
raising
taxes
which
has
left
them
chasing
sales,
tax
dollars
and
retail
and
all
those
other
things.
So
the
league
is
supportive
of
something
that
will
make
it
easier
to
adjust
property
taxes
for
inflation.
K
There's
an
argument
that
if
we
have
this
discussion,
the
subcommittee
there's
an
argument
that
if
your
rate
is
0.15
this
year
and
next
year,
it's
going
to
point
1
4
and
you
want
to
take
it
to
a
point:
1
4
or
1
1
4.
To
that
there's
an
argument
about
whether
or
not
that
really
is
an
increase
in
taxes,
but
under
state
law,
you're
required
to
post
an
ad
that
says
we
are
proposing
to
increase
the
property
tax
rate.
K
So
in
many
communities,
that's
a
that's
a
death
sentence
and
they're
not
going
to
do
it
because
they
don't
want
their
next
opponent
to
use
that
as
ammunition
against
them
to
say
you
said
yourself,
you
were
raising
taxes
and
you
voted
for
it.
So
the
league
has
for
many
many
years,
been
anxious
to
soften
the
the
elements
of
the
current
law,
so
that
cities
can
use
a
broader
funding
base
for
their
operation
instead
of
relying
solely
on
sales,
tax
and
fees.
K
K
K
K
I'd
be
interested
to
know
what
you
think
about
that.
It
is
difficult
for
us
to
argue
in
favor
of
the
status
quo,
because
I
think
everyone
recognizes
that
the
current
model
has
some
challenges.
Having
said
that,
Salt
Lake
City
right
now
has
a
guaranteed
seat
on
the
board
statutorily.
Under
this
new
model,
there
would
be
a
three-member
Commission
with
membership
appointed
one
from
Salt
Lake
County,
one
from
Salt
Lake,
City,
Utah
and
Tooele
County,
and
one
from
Davis
and
Weber
County.
L
Commission,
though,
may
not
be
structured
that
way
either.
So
there's
a
lot
of
dialogue
around
how
you
determine
who
the
Commission
members
should
be,
but
the
advisory
board
today
has
a
seat
for
Salt
Lake
City
that
also
could
change.
There
was
some
dialogue
around
going
to
a
five-member
board
and
the
county's
really
controlling
those
seeds.
So
there's
some
differing
opinions
between
county
and
city
and
we'll
see
on.
K
The
funding
side,
the
dialogue,
has
been
about
taking
the
current
state
transportation
infrastructure,
feet,
TIF
and
opening
that
up,
so
that
some
portion
of
that
could
be
used
for
transit,
while
that
is
while
that
is
appealing
in
the
abstract.
One
of
the
questions
we've
wrestled
with
is:
where
would
those
transit
dollars
likely
we
spend
and
the
challenge
with
the
transportation
the
TIF
Tran
State
Transportation
Fund?
K
Is
that
right
now
it
is
structured,
it
is
weighted
toward
congestion
and
and
growth,
and
so
allowing
greater
flexibility
in
the
funds
may
be
useful,
but
it
doesn't
increase
the
number
of
dollars
available,
and
so
it
still
depend
on
the
priorities
or
the
prioritization
of
those
funds
as
to
where
they
get
spent
and
obviously
Salt
Lake
City
isn't
one
of
the
high-growth
communities
where
we
have
I
mean
we
do.
We
have
our
congestion
challenges.
K
So
that's
what
they're
talking
about
on
the
funding
side
on
the
land
use
side-
and
this
is
all
they
all
interrelate
on
the
land
use
side.
What
they
focused
a
lot
of
attention
on
is
when
the
state
invests
millions
of
dollars
to
build
a
new
highway
corridor.
They
want
to
maximize
the
value
of
that
investment,
and
that
includes
getting
higher
density
uses
along
that
corridor.
K
But
there's
been
lots
of
fighting
and
quarreling
about
what
a
corridor
looks
like
how
wide
that
is
whether
it's
advisory,
whether
it's
mandatory,
is
it
by
mutual
agreement
or
is
it
by
mandate
of
the
state?
So
there's
lots
of
tug
and
pull
on
the
land-use
elements
of
this
transportation
task
force.
I
listed
them
not
because
we
know
what
the
bills
are,
but
because
we
know
there
will
be
legislation
in
each
of
those
areas.
Uta
piece.
We
have
a
pretty
good
idea
where
it
is
a
couple
of
other
pieces
that
I've
put
on
here.
K
B
A
A
K
We
don't
have
to
have
anything
there.
We
can
put
one
or
two.
Obviously
we
would
we'd
like
sales
tax
on
internet
purchases.
We
would
be
opposed
to
any
change
in
the
sales
tax
redistribution
formula.
But
beyond
that
I
don't
know
I
mean
those
have
been.
You
know
those
aren't
new,
that's
our
long-standing
position,
but
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
list
anything
beyond
those
two.
H
One
of
the
questions
on
the
truth
of
Taxation
newspaper
ad
changes.
We
will
probably
need
to
have
an
idea
of
how
we
want
to
take
that.
It's
I,
don't
know
the
specifics
of
the
bill,
but
it
sounded
like
it
was
about.
How
do
you
notify
the
wording
in
the
newspaper
ad
or
whether
newspaper
ad
is
required
anymore
period?
It
doesn't
mean
you,
you
can't
do
it.
It
means
you
wouldn't
have
to
do
it
now.
H
K
And
relative
to
that
I
think
since
we
don't
have
a
bill,
yet
it's
easy
just
to
say
we're
concerned
about
that
we're
interested
or
watching.
We
want
to
watch
and
see
what
the
bill
looks
like,
but
when
it
comes
out
our
delegation,
please
know
that
we're
interested
in
that
bill
and
that's
when
we
care
a
lot
about
and
we
can-
we
can
certainly
handle
it
that
way
if
you'd,
like
so.
A
H
Personally,
having
just
served
on
jury
service
and
seeing
how
few
people
actually
haven't
read
a
newspaper
I,
don't
know
it's
the
most
effective
way
to
do
this.
I
think
it
also
might
be
I'm,
not
sure
it
affects
us,
a
ton
in
telex
city
based
on
what
we
do
so
far,
really
I
think
for
other
cities.
It
might
alleviate
policymakers
from
avoiding
sort
of
a
good,
economical
policy
by
having
a
broad
base
of
revenue,
including
property
tax.
But
that's.
K
H
K
K
H
K
I,
don't
mean
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
we
will
have
to
say
water
matters
more
than
tax,
but
for
most
of
them
they
will
look
at
this
list
and
they'll.
Take
it
and
they'll
put
it
someplace
really
safe,
but
they
won't
be
able
to
find
it
when
they
need
it
right.
So
it's
really
just
a
list
of
topics
yeah
to
say
to
them.
G
K
L
K
I
will
just
say
our
delegation
is
so
supportive
they
are.
They
are
so
anxious
to
help
us
on
whatever
our
priorities
are
often,
they
say
to
me,
tell
me
what
your
position
is
so
I
can
you
know
so
I
can
go
advocate
and
if
it's
in
flux,
sometimes
I
say
I
I,
don't
know
yet
because
it's
still
in
flux
but
but
there
this
is.
This
is
really
to
help
them
to
help
and
you're
very
anxious
to
do
so.
Yeah.
So.
A
L
But
we
will
have
some
things
to
update
before
Friday
and
then
I
think,
just
if
you
and
I
can
work
out
the
details
of
that.
But
I
I
see
it
as
a
conversation
more
than
you
know
us
telling
right,
but
more
just
what
they've
also
heard
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
get
some
input
from
them
on
what
they're
hearing
and
then
allow
for
some
real
dialog
to
occur.
A
L
A
E
E
Robin,
would
you
add
that
to
the
calendar,
the
the
photo
and
also
whether
it's
indoors
or
outdoors?
Thank
you,
okay
and
then.
The
second
item
is
we've,
been
speaking
with
the
chair
and
vice-chair
about
the
council.
Retreat
had
reserved
the
date
of
Tuesday
January
30th,
for
that
it
looks
like
that
date
is
still
where
we're
headed
the
place
has
been
selected
at
see.
Leonardo
we
haven't
discussed
with
them
the
hours
and
the
council
chair
thought.
That
would
be
a
good
thing
for
this
group
to
talk
through.
E
A
G
A
A
Okay,
so
that
it
for
now
I'm
sorry,
I'm
still
learning
folks
no
report
from
the
chair
vice-chair.
Unless,
of
course,
you
have
anything
and
we
don't
have
a
closed
session
today.
So
we're
gonna
adjourn
until
our
formal
meeting,
which
is
a
very
brief
formal
meeting
at
7
o'clock
across
the
hall.
Thank
you.
A
L
E
Thanks
for
tuning
in
to
Capitol
City
news,
your
connection
to
Salt
Lake,
City
government,
I'm,
your
host
Poonam
Kumar,
and
to
get
things
started
off
in
the
new
year,
we'll
hear
from
Salt
Lake
City
Fire
Chief
Carl
liebe
about
how
the
city
scored
its
first
ISO
class
1
designation
in
Utah,
and
our
history
minute
is
about
Salt
Lake
City's,
first
Olympic
Committee.
Let's
get
started
with
our
legislative
update
and
look
back.
E
At
its
last
meeting
of
the
year,
the
City
Council
passed
growing
SLC
a
five-year
housing
plan
bid
farewell
to
council
members,
Stan
Penfold,
a
district
tree
and
Lisa
Adams
of
district
7
welcomed
new
council
members,
Chris
Wharton,
a
district
tree
and
Amy
Fowler,
a
district
7
and
returning
council
members,
James
Rogers
of
district
2
and
Aaron
Mendenhall
of
district
5,
new
and
returning
council
members
will
officially
take
an
oath
of
office
on
January
2nd.
This.
L
G
Is
the
first
fueling
station
that's
been
at
the
airport
in
the
history
of
the
of
this
particular
airport?
You
can
come
here
park
in
the
lot
come
inside.
We
have
flight
information
displays
around
the
building.
You
can
keep
an
eye
on
the
flight.
You
can
get
a
great
cup
of
coffee
here
at
beans
and
brew.
You
can
get
some
wonderful,
Mexican
food
or
a
hamburger
or
shop
in
the
convenience
store
and
be
warm
without
your
engine
running.
There's.
L
No
doubt
that
we
will
have
real
opportunity
for
people
to
turn
their
engines
off,
even
when
it's
super
hot
in
the
summer
or
very
cold
in
the
winter.
You
have
a
safe
space
here.
Where
you
can
get
warm
or
you
can
cool
down.
It
gets
you
out
of
your
car.
It
helps
you
turn
the
key
turn
your
ignition
off
and
help
us
clear.
The
air
even.
G
H
L
The
opportunity
to
have
the
chief
of
police
and
some
of
the
officers
from
the
area
here
to
come
in
and
and
read
to
the
kids
kids
were
thrilled
to
meet
the
police
officers
and
to
have
books
that
they
get
to
take
home.
There
was
a
lot
of
excitement
in
the
room
here
today.
We
have
emphasized
the
huge
importance
of
being
able
to
read
and
why
it's
important
in
our
lives
even
starting
right
now
in
kindergarten.
We.
M
G
Opportunity
for
our
task
force
to
come
together:
multiple
cities,
multiple
jurisdictions
throughout
the
state
we
arrived
in
California
to
open
arms
and
the
outreach
from
their
communities
to
us
was
wonderful.
It
was
a
really
humbling
to
see
the
damage
and
the
destruction
that
had
occurred
on
that
fire,
and
it
was
neat
to
be
a
part
of
trying
to
help
make
that
a
better
situation
for
them.
You.
M
Know
wild
last
season
now
is
12
months
out
of
the
year.
That's
just
the
way
it
is
I
was
very
important
for
us
to
participate
in
this
mutual
aid
request
from
California,
it's
great
for
the
esprit
de
corps
of
the
department
and
the
morale
we'd
like
to
contribute
when
our
neighbors
need
help
for
them
participating
was
an
honor
and
I'm
just
so
proud
to
have
more
people
than
I.
Can
that
I
could
ever
send?
You
know
out
of
Salt
Lake
City
to
contribute
to
events
that
are
going
on
in
California.
It.
E
E
M
M
All
these
things
they
analyze
to
determine
whether
the
department
is
capable
of
modifying
or
mitigating
the
risk
that
we
see
here
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
then
some
insurance
companies
will
look
at
that
and
let's
say
well:
there
are
class
one,
their
risk
is
reduced
and
that
manifests
itself
in
lower
insurance
rates,
potentially
big
win
for
the
city
and
the
fire
department.
It's
this
is
the
gold
standard
for
fire
departments.
So
we're
really
proud
to
be
a
class
one
city.
There.