►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 2020
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 2020
There were technical issues with the original live stream meeting. This is the archived full version of the meeting.
C
D
A
E
D
A
Okay,
okay
motion
passes
in
favor.
Next
we
have
the
report
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair.
I
have
nothing
to
report
brenda.
Do
you
have
anything
to
report?
I
do
not.
Okay.
Now
we
will
move
on
to
the
report
of
the
director
and
we
have
a
couple
of
items
on
our
agenda
under
the
director's
report
and
michaela
is
this
you
or
who's
who's
or
kelsey?
I
guess
is
doing
the
first
one,
which
is
the
union
pacific
time
extension
request.
I
I
You
have
granted
one
extension
for
the
plan
development
in
2019
and
they
are
needing
an
extension
for
the
conditional
building
and
site
design
review
now
just
design
review
as
well.
The
applicant
has
expressed
this
ex
needing
this
extension
due
to
the
current
economy
and
hotels.
So
it
is
mostly
coveted
related,
like
everything
else
right
now,
but
mark
sanford
is
the
applicant
and
he
is
available
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
any
this
time,.
I
A
D
J
A
A
A
D
A
D
A
J
A
L
D
In
your
dropbox,
as
well
as
the
planning
commission
website,
the
developers
are
requesting
a
one-year
extension
for
the
conditional
use
approval,
they've
actually
submitted
building
permit
plans
which
would
typically
validate
the
conditional
use
approval.
But
in
this
case
we're
trying
to
work
out
some
pretty
complex
issues
related
to
the
development,
and
they
just
want
to
ensure
that
the
conditional
use
permit
stands
while
they
are
trying
to
work
out
these
issues.
A
A
A
K
Madam
chair
yeah,
before
you
move
on
from
the
director's
report-
and
this
is
along
the
same
lines
of
these
extensions-
we
anticipate
a
significant
number
of
extension
requests
over
the
next.
Who
knows
how
long
everything's
taking
longer
for
for
obvious
reasons,
and
we
were
wondering
if
the
planning
commission
would
be
interested
in
at
your
next
meeting,
taking
action
that
would
provide
a
general
extension
to
anything.
K
I
think
if
the
commission
is
we'll
put
something
together,
that
outlines
those
reasons
and
the
time
frame,
and
then
we
have
because
it's
a
it
would
be
an
official
action.
It
would
have
to
be
posted
on
an
agenda.
So
we
would
do
that
at
your
next
meeting.
If
that's
something
the
commission
is
interested
in,
if
not
we'll,
just
bring
bring
them
back
as
they
come
up
and
either
way
we
just.
We
just
thought
it
might
be
an
opportunity
to
to
maybe
streamline
some
things.
K
J
I
do
kind
of
like
seeing
them
come
through
again
because
I'm
always
wondering
did
this
just
fall
off
the
map
and
it's
not
going
to
happen.
I
mean
I'm
glad
to
see
union
pacific
hotel
and
edison
house
both
that
they're
still
moving
forward,
so
I
kind
of
like
to
see
them,
but
I
don't.
I
agree
with
brenda
if
they're
all
on
a
big
list
together,
we
do
it
all
at
once
that
doesn't
break
my
heart.
O
D
A
D
K
D
K
But
the
the
consent
agenda
idea
works
well
too,
because
then
we
can
just
put
them
on
there.
It's
a
simple
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda
and
if
there's
any
dissent
or
anything
like
that,
that
item
can
be
discussed
and
everything
else
can
be
approved
and
that
that
that
would
I
mean
I
don't
imagine
many
of
those
would
have
a
discussion,
but
it
would
all
it's
a
matter
of
minutes.
K
G
The
other
thing
I
just
wanted
to
mention
is:
I
know
it's
such
an
incredibly
busy
time
and
it's
going
to
get
busier
and
we
want
to
be
sensitive
to
how
many
items
are
on
the
planning
commission
agendas
and,
as
you
know,
those
are
filling
up
towards
the
end
of
the
year.
Marlene
has
sent
out
a
doodle
poll
for
a
possible
december,
2nd
meeting.
A
A
You
all
right,
we'll
now
move
into
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
agenda
and
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
a
height
and
rate
change
special
exception
at
approximately
three
degrees.
North
federal
heights
circle
just
case
number
pln
pcm
2020639,
and
I'm
going
to
recuse
myself
due
to
the
potential
conflict
of
interest
and
let
brenda
take
it
from
here.
P
Yep,
okay,
I'm
assuming
you
can
see
my
screen,
but
please
let
me
know
if
you
can't
so
this
is
a
request
from
scott
and
jennifer
huntsman.
The
property
owners
to
construct
a
new
single-family
home
that
exceeds
the
maximum
permitted
building
height
and
maximum
allowed
grade
change
in
the
fr-3
12
000,
foothills,
residential
district
and
the
subject.
Property
is
located
at
333,
north
federal
height
circle
and
is
currently
vacant
in
the
fr3
zone.
P
P
The
subject
property
is
located
in
federal
heights
and
is
the
last
lot
to
be
developed
in
on
petrol.
Light
circle,
as
shown
in
yellow
the
property,
has
fairly
significant
slopes
with
most
of
the
site,
between
20
and
35
percent
slope
and
of
now
the
slip
the
site
is
also
fairly
large.
The
lot
is
just
over
31
000
square
feet.
The
subject
property
is
shown
in
this
photo
at
the
bottom
and
it
attempts
to
show
you
the
slope,
but
it's
kind
of
hard
to
see
unless
you've
been
out
to
the
site.
P
The
gray
changes
that
exceed
four
feet
in
the
rear
yard
are
intended
to
provide
for
a
flat
usable
lawn
area,
and
the
gray
change
will
go
from
approximately
two
feet
to
eight
feet
below
established
grade
and
will
require
an
eight
to
ten
foot
retaining
wall.
The
wall
will
not
be
readily
visible
from
the
public
way
due
to
the
location
of
the
gray
change
in
the
rear
yard,
and
as
mentioned
in
your
staff
report,
significant
grading
and
retaining
walls
are
very
common
in
this
area,
and
this
one
is
in
the
rear
yard.
P
P
So
the
requested
green
chains
in
the
buildable
area
that
exceeds
six
feet
in
dimension
are
located
to
the
rear
of
the
property
to
accommodate
the
slope
of
the
driveway.
The
proposed
driveway
closely
follows
the
existing
grade
and
maintains
a
manageable
slope
of
under
10
without
requiring
retaining
walls.
P
P
The
proposed
single
family
residence
has
a
roof
with
a
step
designed
to
include
a
lower
height
of
the
street
facing
elevation,
and
the
areas
that
exceed
the
height
limitation
are
at
the
corners
of
the
south
facing
roof
overhangs,
as
described
in
the
applicants,
the
middle,
the
south
facing
roof
overhangs
are
sized
to
allow
for
sun
in
the
winter
and
blocks
on
during
the
summer.
So
these
long
overhangs,
combined
with
the
sleep,
the
steep
slope
of
the
site,
caused
the
southwest
corner
of
each
to
exceed
the
established
grade
by
two
feet.
P
On
the
first
floor
and
four
feet:
nine
inches
on
the
second
floor,
as
highlighted
in
red
and
then
shown
it
above
in
this
image,
and
then
these
images
are
just
intended
to
show
you
the
street
facing
elevation
as
well
as
the
east
elevation,
where
visually
the
impact
will
looks
the
same
as
if
they
were
following
the
height
restriction
of
28
feet
and
the
home
does
fit
in
every
other
way
into
the
height
restriction.
Besides
those
two
small
areas
of
the
roof.
P
So
as
far
as
public
input
goes,
staff
did
and
some
background
on
this
request.
Staff
did
originally
approve
the
requested
special
exceptions
administratively,
but
then,
following
that
approval,
a
concerned
neighbor,
let
me
know
that
there
were
some
issues
with
the
noticing
because
of
delayed
mail
and
possible
power
outages
during
the
wind
storm
that
neighbor
requested
that
we
take
this
to
a
public
hearing.
O
P
P
J
Hi
there,
so
can
you
hear
this
is
jennifer
huntsman?
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
okay,
great,
I
think
you
know
mostly
we'd
like
to
address
any
questions
or
concerns
of
the
commission,
our
I'm
here
today,
my
husband
scott's
here
in
case
there
are
questions
also
our
architect,
richard
moore
is
on,
and
I
think
he
has
some
things
to
share.
I
just
want
to
quickly
say
thank
you
to
the
planning
staff,
especially
chrissy
gilmore,
who's
kind
of
taken,
the
labor
more
on
this.
J
The
staff
has
been
fantastic
to
work
with
very
professional,
responsive,
knowledgeable,
it's
been
great.
Thank
you
all
to
the
commission.
We
know
you
have
a
very
packed
agenda
and
we're
going
to
try
and
make
this
as
efficient
as
we
can
but
make
sure
we
address
any
of
your
concerns.
I
just
want
to
say
briefly
until
a
couple
of
years
ago,
I've
actually
lived
in
federal
heights
in
the
neighborhood,
where
this
lot
is
for
about
14
years.
J
J
For
most
on
most
of
the
lot
it's
substantially
under
the
maximum
height
restriction
in
almost
all
areas,
we
don't
have
any
soaring
scenes
or
anything
like
that,
and
we
think
it
stays
true
to
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
which
we
love,
which
is
why
we're
moving
back.
So
I
so
if
we
have
any
questions
that
we
can
answer
for
you,
please
let
us
know,
I'm
going
to
hand
this
off,
though,
to
my
much
more
knowledgeable
architect,
richard
moore.
So
thanks
thanks
for
your
time
on
this.
E
Okay,
thank
you,
jennifer
hi
everyone.
I
I
just
want
to
echo
what
jennifer
said
about
all
the
help.
Chrissy
has
really
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
the
phone.
Helping
me
understand
the
nuances
of
this
process.
I
just
want
to
thank
her,
and
every
everyone
from
the
city
has
been
really
great.
The
the
site
is
really
tricky.
There
are
a
lot
of
constraints
that
are
sort
of
pulling
in
different
directions
and
we
try
to
find
the
right
balance
and
to
come
up
with
a
solution.
E
So
we
wanted
to
minimize
the
amount
of
grading
the
amount
of
excavating
the
amount
of
retaining
required
for
various
reasons,
but
so
because
of
that
the
the
first
80
feet,
the
the
front
80
feet
of
the
site,
that's
where
it's
steepest
and
we're
not
building
on
that
at
all.
So
so
the
house
is,
is
set
pretty
pretty
far
back
from
the
street
to
avoid
the
steepest
parts.
As
as
jennifer
said,
we
we
are
sort
of
it's
a
relatively
small
footprint.
E
We've
talked
scott
into
a
two-car
garage
rather
than
a
three-car
garage.
He
originally
wanted
a
three-car
and-
and
we
have
a
long
driveway-
that
does
sort
of
follow
the
grade
as
much
as
possible
again
to
to
minimize
the
amount
of
retaining
walls
and
the
amount
of
upgrading
that
we
need
to
do
so.
I
think
I
think
chrissy
did
an
excellent
job
at
covering
kind
of
the
three
main
parts
of
the
special
exception.
E
E
It's
not
prominent
on
the
front
of
the
on
the
front
of
the
house
and
as
a
result,
it
just
it
cuts
into
the
hillside
and
those
in
those
two
small
areas
and
the
the
retaining
wall
in
the
back
and
the
great
change
in
the
back
is
is
mostly
because
you
know
so
much
of
the
site
is
so
steep
and
we're
avoiding
it
that
we
just
wanted
to
level
out
the
backyard
a
little
bit.
So
we
have
some
usable
yard
area
behind
the
house.
E
E
We
have
a
good
buffer
of
trees
on
the
north
and
west
sides
of
the
property
on
the
on
the
south
side
or
the
side
facing
the
street.
We
do
have
some
tall,
mature
trees
and
we're
we're
hoping
to
keep
those.
We
are
planning
to
to
eliminate
one
of
those
for
the
driveway,
but
we
would
like
to
preserve
those
if
possible
and
on
the
east
side
this
was
the
neighbor
who
was
concerned
about
his
his
view.
I
mean,
and
we
we
have,
we
have
worked
with
well.
E
They
have
worked
with
this
neighbor
and
considered
his
his
view
corridors
and
made
sure
that
we
don't
that
we
were
respectful
of
of
the
view
from
his
property
from
his
property.
The
house
is
as
well
within
from
the
east
side:
it's
well
within
the
28
foot,
height
restriction,
it's
actually
at
the
at
the
least.
It's
four
feet
below,
so
we
feel
like
it
shouldn't
have
any
impact
on
and
on
any
of
our
neighbors.
But-
and
I
I
think,
that's
I
think-
that's
all
I
have.
C
C
O
E
C
D
C
A
P
Located
at
approximately
754
south
state
street
in
the
death
town
support
zoning
on
the
corner
of
800,
south
and
state
street
planning,
commission
gave
the
applicant
direction
on
september
30th
during
a
work
session
for
the
requested
design
modifications
before
the
applicant
finalized.
The
design
review
proposal
earned
to
planning
commission
the
applicants
with
kimball
investment
in
kolina
group
are
requesting
three
modifications
to
the
design
standards
in
the
d2
district.
P
The
first
is
the
modification
to
the
number
of
operable
building
entrances
along
the
street
facing
facades.
The
second,
a
modification
to
the
maximum
length
of
the
street
facing
building
facade,
and
the
third
is
a
request
for
additional
building.
Height
staff
received
six
comments
from
the
public
during
the
early
public
engagement
phase
and
included
those
comments
in
the
staff
report.
P
P
Staff
has
found
that
the
proposed
800
south
state
street
design
review
meets
the
intent
of
the
zoning
district
and
the
design
review
standards
with
the
recommended
conditions
lists
listed
in
the
staff
report
and
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
approve
the
design
review
with
the
conditions
one
through
six.
I
get
my
presentation
pretty
short,
so
that
you're
able
to
speak
with
the
applicant
and
address
the
recommendations.
The
planning
commission
discussed
with
the
applicant
during
the
work
session.
M
M
Okay,
awesome
well,
first
of
all,
thank
you
so
much
to
everyone
for
your
time,
and
especially
thanks
to
nan
for
all
of
her
late
nights
and
putting
this
report
together
to
get
it
to
you
all
in
time.
For
this
hearing
really
appreciate
all
of
her
work.
Also,
thank
you
to
the
planning
commissioners
for
the
work
session.
The
comments
were
really
valuable
and
I
think
we've
got
a
better
project
as
as
a
result
of
that
process.
M
M
The
reasons
for
that
are
that
we're
developing
a
greater
area
than
just
this
one
parcel
which
is
parcel
three
on
here
and
that
area
is
up
against
state
street,
which
is
a
udot
road
and
udot
has
some
strict
standards
on
how
many
public
streets
can
intersect
a
udot
road
and
so
based
on
that,
we
we
put
the
street
the
public
street
to
the
north
of
our
project.
That
aligns
with
the
mid
block.
M
Crosswalk
udot
told
us
where
that
street
should
go,
and
so
we
worked
with
that
to
try
to
see
what
we
could
do
to
break
up
the
facade
even
more.
What
we
ended
up
doing
was
we
inserted
a
private
service
alley?
We
know
it's
not
a
public
street,
but
it
is
a
private
alley
and
we
feel
like
that
sufficiently
breaks
up
the
facade
if
the
public
road
is
going
to
be
on
the
left
side
of
this
page,
which
is
the
north
and
then
you've
got
the
service
alley
in
the
middle.
M
The
facade
length
between
that
public,
road
and
the
service
alley
is
115
feet
and
then
the
facade
length
from
the
service
alley
to
the
end
of
our
building.
On
800
south
is
198
feet,
and
so
that's
what
we've
done
to
break
up
the
building
and
I
know
amy-
you
had
asked
kind
of
how
we
treat
that
service
alley
in
that
gate
and
I'll
I'll
walk
you
through
that
here
in
a
minute
as
well.
M
Let's
see
this
yeah
before
I
do
that
real
quick,
john.
You
had
mentioned
in
the
work
session
to
try
to
see
what
we
could
do
to
break
up
the
the
building
mass
up
above
the
ground,
and
so
we've
spent
a
lot
of
time
trying
to
break
up
the
building
to
make
them
look
like
different
buildings.
They
are
connected,
but
we've
got
this
interior
courtyard.
Here,
that's
pushed
back
so
from
the
street
it'll
look
like
two
separate
buildings
and
specifically
john.
M
We
address
your
comment
of
the
balconies
and
we
created
these
shrouds
around
the
balconies
that'll
not
only
give
pedestrians
but
also
vehicles
and
people
from
across
the
street
it'll
really
hopefully
break
up
this
facade
and
make
it
look
like
it's
a
separate
building.
So
that's
one
of
the
changes
that
we
did
now
getting
back
to
the
pedestrian
experience
which
amy.
That
was
one
of
your
concerns.
M
This
is
a
shot
of
our
new
street
and
and
state
street,
and
this
is
where
we're
going
to
have
two-story
retail
tenant,
we're
hoping
that
it's
a
grosser
but
we're
going
to
have
a
mid
block
cross.
That
comes
a
mid
crosswalk
that
crosses
state
street
here
and
what
we've
done
to
really
activate
this
is
we've
set
the
building
back
from
the
property
line
and
that
allows
us
to
have
outdoor
dining
that's
covered
and
really
have
this
active
edge.
M
M
It'll
also
turn
and
be
on
the
wall,
so
it'll
be
engaging
to
pedestrians
as
well
as
cars
that
pass
by
and
it
starts
us
to
the
transition
over
to
the
residential
portion
of
the
building.
We've
got
the
concrete
stair
tower
here,
which
is
board
forum
concrete
and
then
sarah,
you
had
made
a
comment
about
really
drawing
attention
to
the
residential
lobby,
and
we
heard
you
what
we
did
was
we
extended
that
expression
we
made
it
wider
and
we
created
an
illuminated
glass
element
to
really
highlight
that
entrance
to
the
lobby.
M
Once
you
move
further
south
from
makers
row
you
get
down
to
the
corner
of
eight
south
in
maine,
and
we've
got
a
two-story
retail
location
here.
I
know
there
was
a
comment
to
try
to
distinguish
that
from
what
we
had
on
the
north
side.
Well,
we
really
felt
like
we
had
a
lot
going
on
on
this
facade
and
we
wanted
to
make
them
look
similar
to
really
anchor
these
two
corners.
So
this
is
the
two-story
volume
of
retail
that
we've
got
on
eight
south
and
maine
and
then
moving
around
to
the
a
south
facade.
M
Again
there
was
a
comment
to
try
to
break
up
the
facade,
so
what
we
did
was
instead
of
that
brick
extending
in
the
middle.
We
have
this
break
and
that
break
is
doing
two
things:
one,
it's
drawing
more
attention
to
the
entrance
and
exit
of
the
parking
garage
and
the
other
thing
that
it's
doing
is
it
actually
gave
us
this
idea
to
extend
our
dog
run
up
there.
So
you'll
people
and
their
pets
will
have
the
ability
to
interact
with
people
on
the
street,
and
so
we're
really
excited
about
that.
M
And
then
you
know
brenda
you
you
had
mentioned
the
west
facade.
We
spent
so
much
time
talking
about
state
street.
Let's
talk
about
the
west
facade
and
so
here's
kind
of
a
shot
of.
What's
looking
on
the
west
facade,
if
you'll
remember
where
we're
showing
this
art,
this
is
our
transformers
are
behind
this
wall
and
that's
that's
what's
going
on
there.
M
M
But
the
comment
here
was
really
about
the
metal
screen
and
it
looked
like
it
was
one
long
metal
screen,
and
so
what
we
did
was
we
included
this
decorative
element.
That's
really
kind
of
spilling
down
from
the
amenity
deck
above,
and
it's
going
to
be
illuminated
so
it'll
draw
people's
attention.
The
the
lights
will
be
focused
downwards:
part
of
the
city's
dark
sky,
ordinance
and
so
that'll
be
a
cool
element.
The
other
thing
that
we've
done
is
we've
put
marquis
signage
above
the
leasing
office
entryway.
M
This
is
one
of
our
primary
entrances
for
when
new
and
prospective
residents
come
into
the
building,
and
we
wanted
to
differentiate
it
from
the
other
retail
entrances
that
you've
seen
in
the
other
parts
of
the
building.
You'll
also
start
to
notice
that,
in
the
middle
of
the
image
we've
got
signage
for
parking,
so
cars
know
clearly
where
they
need
to
go
and
again.
M
Sarah,
if
you
go
a
little
bit
further
south
you'll,
see
that
iconic
glass
element
that'll,
be
illuminated
that
will
designate
the
western
resident
entry
and
on
here
as
well,
you'll
start
to
see
kind
of
the
connections
to
the
park
in
the
mid
block.
You've
got
that
mid-block,
crosswalk
and
and
the
connection
to
the
park
there.
So
that
starts
to
to
take
shape
on
this
side
of
the
building.
Here's
a
close-up
of
that
entrance.
You
can
see
how
we've
got
outdoor
dining
right
there
to
activate
that
space
as
well.
M
M
M
So
those
are
the
changes
that
we've
made.
We
do
have
a
short
like
walk
through
video
that'll
take
a
minute.
I
don't
know
if
people
can
see
this,
it's
going
to
be
a
little
choppy.
Forgive
me
because
of
the
the
internet
here,
because
we're
doing
virtual
meetings,
but
this
will
give
you
an
idea
of
of
what
it's
like
to
go
around
the
building.
M
Well,
it's
actually
very
choppy
sorry
you'll
start
to
see
some
wayfinding
that
we're
trying
to
incorporate
right
here,
you're,
going
to
start
to
see
the
entrance
to
the
residential
leasing
office.
The
outdoor
dining
you'll
eventually
get
to
you'll,
eventually
get
to
the
alley.
You'll
search
to
see
art
there,
the
western
residential
entrance.
M
It's
like
very
choppy,
but
here
you
can
start
to
see
the
residential
entry
and
the
really
cool
light
fixture
that
we're
thinking
of
and
you
go
back
to
the
service
alley
and
then
back
to
the
corner
of
our
new
street
and
a
south.
So
those
are
the
changes
that
we
made
again.
We
think
it's
a
net
benefit
to
the
project.
We
really
appreciate
people's
comments.
M
We
know
that
the
facade
length
is
a
concern,
but
we
feel
like
with
breaking
it
up
with
that
service.
Alley
really
accomplishes
that
goal
of
of
trying
to
break
up
that
space
and
we're
putting
in
a
public
road.
You
know
we're
going
to
be
putting
in
a
large
public,
accessible
green
space,
we're
going
to
be
doing
a
lot
of
things
that
we
think
are
an
overall
benefit
to
this
neighborhood
and
would
love
to
hear
your
feedback
on
the
changes
that
were
made
and
open
it
up
to
any
comments
that
you
have.
C
No
one
well,
I
appreciate
all
the
effort
that
you've
made
in
just
a
little
over
a
week
I
think,
or
even
less
than
a
week
so-
and
I
also
appreciate
the
and
maybe
the
public
should
know
that
we
did
have
a
public
meeting.
That
was
a
design
review
about
this
project,
not
that
long
ago,
and
that's
where
a
lot
of
these
changes
are
coming
from.
A
Okay,
well,
we
will
then
go
to
the
public
hearing.
Just
as
a
reminder.
We
allow
the
community
councils
five
minutes
to
speak
on
an
issue
and
individuals
have
two
minutes
to
speak
there.
There
are
ways
to
to
provide
feedback,
as
michaela
mentioned
initially
at
the
beginning
of
of
our
meeting.
So
at
this
point,
I'll
go
ahead
and
open
the
public
hearing
and
ask
michaela
if
there's
anyone
here
or
out
there
from
the
community
council
who's
indicated
an
interest
in
speaking
on
this
item.
G
K
K
I
think
this
is
less
than
three
minutes
long
and
I
request
to
be
read
aloud
and
then
my
first
point
is
that
I
hope
encourage
and
ask
that
you
read
all
the
many
emails
that
you
are
sent
sent
to
you
since
I
am
just
a
little
concerned.
That
might
not
happen.
I'm
asking
mine
to
be
heard.
Thank
you.
Second.
I
want
to
advocate
for
strict
adherence
to
construction
ordinances
and
the
avoidance
of
exceptions.
K
I
don't
know
where
ordinance
or
ordinances
or
building
rules
are
set
down,
but
from
what
I've
understood
you
have
the
power
to
make
exceptions
to
them
called
variances.
That's
a
question.
Maybe
those
are
part
of
a
master
plan.
Maybe
those
have
been
decided
upon
by
input
from
citizens
in
conjunction
with
city
planning,
the
developer
first
submits
a
billing
plan
to
the
city
planning
department
and
then
may
or
may
not
have
to
submit
the
plan
for
approval
to
your
commission
or
the
historic
landmarks
commission.
K
I,
along
with
most
people,
I
think,
am
concerned
about
parking
in
trees.
Others
might
be
more
concerned
about
design
issues.
I'm
of
the
strong
opinion
that
such
exceptions
should
not
be
allowed
at
all
or
else
very
seldom,
and
the
reason
would
need
to
be
really
compelling.
It
seems
all
a
developer
has
to
do
is
ask
the
variations
are
allowed,
then
an
already
somewhat
undesirable
building
becomes
even
more
disappointing
when
its
footprint
is
bigger.
Its
concrete
is
more.
Its
cars
have
no
place
to
go.
K
We
want
to
feel
that
you're
looking
out
for
us,
we
are
trusting
and
hoping
and
relying
upon
you
to
hear
our
anxieties
about
cars
and
density
and
other
things
will
you
please
be
conservative
about
the
exceptions
you
make
that
don't
serve
the
earnest
desires
and
concerns
and
needs
of
the
people
around
here.
Some
safeguards
have
already
been
put
in
place.
Please
do
not
diminish
or
remove
them
bit
by
bit
one
by
one.
Thank
you.
A
J
Madam
chairman,
I
have
some
questions
for
the
developer,
so
I
I'm
actually
really
excited
about
this
project.
There's
of
all
the
projects
we've
seen
recently,
this
one
I've
been
probably
the
most
excited
about
I've
been
walking
that
block
I've
been
really
researching
these
the
the
packet,
and
I
like
the
changes
that
you
made.
So
thank
you
for
the
good
work
and
the
thoughtfulness
that
I
feel
like
is
going
into
this
overall
project.
J
As
you
were
showing
us,
the
video
you
were
talking
about,
you
mentioned
wayfinding
signs
and
are
you
are
those
just
referring
to
kind
of
the
signage
that
you
pointed
out
over
the
entrance
for
the
where
people
can
rent
and
you
know
the
signage
for
a
long
makers
row
or
are
there
other
independent?
You
know
we
came
around.
The
northwest
corner,
I
think,
is
where
it
was
and
it
looked
like
there
was
a
sculpture
there.
What
are
you
using
so
that
people
can
really
identify
in
this
massive
space?
M
So
we
want
to
let
them
know
where
they're
going,
but
also
like
here's
the
park
and
here's
like
an
office
building
or
here's
something
else.
And
so
that's
the
idea
in
wayfinding
that
I
was
trying
to
talk
about
in
the
video.
In
addition
to
the
traditional
retail
signs
that
you'll
have
around
the
building.
J
J
K
Obviously
we
would
prefer
to
have
the
streets
that
have
the
same
coordinate
be
named
the
same,
a
continuation
of
those
streets,
especially
when
they're
public,
because
we
do
have
quite
a
bit
of
say
in
the
naming
of
the
streets
but
depending
on,
if
there's
there's
lots
of
things
that
actually
go
into
the
naming
of
the
street
and
it's
it's
something
that
we'd
work
on
with
our
engineering
division.
Actually
who
handles
all
that.
But
those
are
the
things
that
we
consider
normally.
If
this
were
a
brand
new
subdivision,
we
really
wouldn't
care.
K
The
only
thing
that
we'd
look
at
in
conjunction
with
the
county
is
making
sure
that
the
name
isn't
so
similar
to
another
named
street.
That
has
similar
coordinates.
So
it's
not
confusing
when
emergency
services
need
to
respond,
but
that's
kind
of
how
it
is
I
I
would
I
mean
I'll,
say
this.
I
think
that
we
would
prefer
to
see
the
streets
continue.
K
J
M
O
M
M
M
And
so
we're
gonna
have
art
that
goes
in
through
here
that
you're
gonna
be
able
to
not
only
see
on
the
gate,
but
you'll
see
art
as
you
look
down
into
the
alley
as
well,
and
we've
got
because
that's
where
a
lot
of
our
ventilation
takes
place
for
the
building
there'll
be
exhaust
going
in
there
and
from
our
generator
and
from
back
of
house
activities.
We
have
to
keep
some
open
air
in
there
for
air
to
pass
through.
So.
O
M
O
M
Building
that
originally
the
building
edge
came
out
to
those
columns,
our
architects
and
they're
on
the
line
as
well.
They
advised
us
to
keep
those
columns
there
because
it
starts
to
define
exactly
what
brenda
said
this
colonnade
and
it's
architecturally.
We
just
really
like
it.
It's
unique
and
it's
interesting
to
us
and
it
starts
to
define
the
space.
O
C
M
M
It
should
still
be,
it
should
still
be
open.
I
don't
know
if
structurally
we're
going
to
have
to
have
the
door
go
all
the
way
to
the
top,
but
I
I
think
that
our
structural
engineer
has
said
that
it
can
be
open
like
this
regardless
it
has,
we
have
to
have
air
pass
through
so
either
it's
going
to
be
open
air
above
or
everything.
Everything
has
to
be
perforated,
so
air
can
flow
freely
through
there
and
you're.
Also,
you
know,
because
of
the
perforations.
C
Yeah,
I
I
think
that
the
more
transparency
we
can
get
there,
the
better,
but
also
I
like
the
lighting
effect
that
you
have
shown
here
and
one
of
the
things
which
I
think
diminishes.
Our
sense
of
this
being
a
place
or
a
street
or
occupiable
is
the
fact
that
oftentimes
you
go
past
these
entrances,
even
if
they
are
quite
tall
to
accommodate
tall
trucks,
for
example,
they're,
often
very
dark,
and,
and
so
the
implication
that
this
is
going
to
be
well
lit
and
transparent.
M
Yeah,
I
agree
with
that
and
our
intent
is
to
have
it
is
to
have
it
well
lit.
I
mean
we
honestly
it's
going
to
be
closed
and
we
shouldn't
have
people
getting
in
there,
but
from
our
experience
we
want
it
well
lit,
so
it
discourages
people
from
trying
to
get
in
and
hide
out
in
this
in
this
alley.
So
we
echo
your
comments,
so
thank
you.
J
A
A
A
A
Okay
and
then
I
I
just
want
to
respond
quickly
to
the
comment
that
we
got
from
the
public
on
our
ability
to
grant
variances
just
for
those
out
there
who
are
watching
the
code
provides.
The
salt
lake
city
code
provides
for
certain
modifications
to
requirements
in
the
zoning
code.
There
is
a
process
that
applicants
can
go
through
to
request
a
modification.
A
A
Variances
are
a
very
specific
request
under
under
state
law,
in
fact,
so
there's
a
process
for
those
as
well,
but
I
just
want
the
public
to
understand
that
we're
not
here
making
changes
based
on
our
own
whims.
There's
a
process
for
this,
and
there
are
standards
that
apply.
Okay.
Editorial
comment
is
now
done.
A
R
R
R
R
There
are
having
some
technical
difficulties.
Staff's
recommendation
is
approval
with
the
conditions
as
outlined
in
your
staff
report.
This
is
a
mixed-use
multi-family
building
with
320
units.
It
will
be
approximately
67
feet
in
height,
which
is
I'm
sure,
as
you
are
well
aware,
a
very
different
scale
from
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
R
R
This
is
a
drawing
of
the
ground
floor
of
the
project.
There
will
be
an
entrance
to
the
parking
garage
on
the
north
side
from
200
north
here
and
then
that
will
service
this
level
of
parking
and
then
from
600
west
down
in
the
bottom
right
hand.
Side
of
your
screen.
There
is
a
second
entrance
to
the
parking
garage
which
will
lead
to
more
parking
stalls
below
one
of
the
items
that
staff
has
received.
R
R
Now,
additionally,
in
your
staff
report,
there
was
a
note
of
a
request
for
a
maximum
length
of
a
blank
wall
and
a
maximum
distance
between
doors.
However,
upon
further
discussion
with
the
applicants,
the
plans
that
were
submitted
as
part
of
this
proposal
were
not
permit
level.
So
the
applicant
is
not
requesting
those
two
modifications.
They
are
intending
to
add
louvers
and
a
treatment
to
the
blank
wall,
and
they
will
be
adding
more
doors
at
the
permit
level.
R
R
R
R
It
is
zero
feet,
so
the
building
is
built
to
the
property
line.
200
north
is
a
very
wide
right-of-way.
It's
about
130
feet
from
back
of
sidewalk
to
back
the
sidewalk.
So
it
looks
like
there
is
a
lot
of
space
between
the
building
and
the
street,
which
is
typically
utilized
with
the
landscape
setback.
However,
they
are
building
to
the
property
line.
C
H
H
C
H
H
110
of
them
will
be
one
bedrooms,
there'll
be
some
retail
for
at
least
three
commercial
units
is
what
we're
proposed:
a
local
grocer
or
similar
a
restaurant,
and
then
a
service
based
retail,
providing
147.
So
that's
one
clarification,
147
stalls,
electrical
electric
vehicle
car
share
program
and
some
bike,
storage
and
maintenance.
H
The
project
vision,
so
the
unit
mix
is
to
support
the
neighborhood
kozo
house
has
been
designed
and
programmed
to
meet
the
city's
master
plan
for
the
area
and
the
purpose
of
the
tsa
uct
zone.
In
contrast
to
what
is
traditionally
being
developed,
downtown
the
koso
house
unit
mix
focuses
on
studio
and
one
bedroom
units.
H
The
building
is
comprised
of
sixty
five
percent
studios
and
thirty
five
percent
one
bedrooms
attracting
a
transit
oriented
tenant,
which
is
is
contained
in
the
stated
purpose
of
the
utsa
uct
zone.
Concerns
have
been
raised
about
the
gentrification
to
address
these
concerns.
Kozo
health
studio
units
will
target
rents
at
a
70
ami.
This
is
really
important
to
us,
providing
a
more
affordable
option
for
tenants
who
rely
on
uta
transit
daily.
The
building
provides
much
higher
quality
units
at
rates
consistent
with
rents
that
are
currently
on
the
property
and
in
the
neighborhood.
H
The
design
modification
request
we're
requesting
the
building
facade
length
request.
As
caitlin
mentioned,
there
was
two
other
requests
in
there
that
we
were
actually
willing
to
comply
with
that.
We
didn't
realize
that
were
not
on
the
premise,
so
the
the
only
request
will
be
the
200
foot
facade
length,
there's
been
significant
thought
and
effort
went
into
the
building
and
landscape
design
associated
with
the
conditional
use
request:
local
landscape
architect,
loft
loft64
brought
wonderful
ideas.
H
We
worked
together
to
create
an
entire
break
of
the
building's
facade
at
the
200
foot
mark
it's
actually
at
160
foot
mark
as
indicated
in
the
code
and
introduces
the
articulation
of
the
building.
Above
with
open-air
balconies.
We
then
designed
a
ground
floor
solution
which
includes
public
outdoor
space,
to
gather,
work,
relax
and
meet
amphitheater
style,
seating
and
landscaped
areas
were
introduced
to
facilitate
and
facilitate
an
open
feel
into
the
building's
courtyard.
H
This
was
vitally
important
to
create
a
beautiful
and
usable
space
for
commercial
patrons,
as
well
as
the
local
neighborhood
to
engage
with
the
tenants.
We
also
went
to
great
lengths
to
design
and
invest
in
planning
to
invest
in
beautifying
and
maintaining
the
park
strips
with
new
plants
and
more
seating
for
public
use.
H
Here's
just
a
rendering
of
that
articulation
and
the
break
the
required
break
in
the
code
requires
20
feet.
We
provided
28
foot
of
a
break
here
and
it's
a
full
break
from
top
to
bottom,
which
allowed
us
to
have
an
opportunity
to
do
something
with
that
space
rather
than
just
have
a
break.
We
wanted
to
activate
it,
and
so
that's
what
we
came
up
with
this
publicly
used
kind
of
amphitheater
style,
seating,
co-working
for
the
local
coffee,
shop,
grocer
and
working
space.
That's
landscape!
H
H
Our
design
vision,
we
feel,
is
the
most
efficient
form
of
design
for
this
building
and
for
the
area.
The
reason
we're
requesting
the
design
modification
is
to
better
serve
the
neighborhood
and
tenants
if
the
request
is
denied
we'll
be
forced
to
redesign
the
building
into
two
separate
buildings
which
has
been
explored
and
results
in
the
following
detrimental
impacts
that
we'd
like
to
bring
to
the
commission's
attention.
H
H
This
design
allows
us
to
have
a
building
that
is
the
most
efficient
as
far
as
price.
The
resulting
new
unit
mix,
if
this
is,
if
this
has
to
be
broken
up,
would
result
in
more
expensive
units,
unfortunately
limiting
affordable
options
and
the
70
ami
target,
which
is
one
of
the
most
important
goals
of
the
project.
Just
talking
about
that
a
little
bit,
we
are
really
sensitive
to
affordable
housing.
H
We
have
in
our
company
we
focus
on
adus
as
well
with
modal
and
provide
affordable
housing
options
to
a
lot
of
different
people.
This
building
was
designed
in
full
emphasis
of
providing
affordable
housing
options
within
studios.
That's
why
our
unit
mix
is
different.
It's
very
different
than
the
standard.
H
The
other
thing
that
we
want
to
talk
about
is
that
decreased
public
use.
So
if
the
building
gets
split
all
the
way
in
half
as
the
build
by
right
states,
it
really
it
cuts
that
public
use
kind
of
amphitheater
style
seating
and
it
would
basically
make
it
have
to
be
a
driveway
or
an
alleyway
driving,
and
so
we
think
that
the
articulation
of
the
building
the
balconies
provided
above
the
open
air
space
through
and
the
amphitheater
style
seating
is
a
more
efficient
design.
H
O
O
H
now
that
can
be
brought
closer
to
the
corner,
but
we
we
have
to
be
sensitive
to
the
other
side
as
well,
not
to
not
exceed
the
200
foot
length,
so
we're
trying
to
position
it
as
close
to
the
mil.
We
can
move
it
slightly,
but
we
got
to
be
sensitive.
We
can't
move
it
all
the
way
to
the
corner,
because
then
we'd
still
exceed
our
maximum
facade
length
on
the
west
portion
of
the
building.
O
Yes,
I
I
still
think
that
we
are
missing
a
lot
of
opportunities
along
that
length
to
make
it
feel
more
open
that
we're
just
not
hitting
it
you're,
not
you're,
not
quite
you're,
not
there
at
all.
In
terms
of
why
I
would
want
to
approve
a
break
in
in
there.
I'm
not
saying
I
don't
want
to,
but
with
this
design
and
how
this
is
functioning,
I
don't.
I
don't
see
it
meeting
the
spirit
of
how
we
look
at
this
facade
length.
H
Yeah
yeah,
one
of
the
other
things
I'd
like
to
just
bring
up,
was
the
activation
of
the
retail.
So
we
the
reason
that
we
have
it
a
little
bit
further
down.
We
brought
it
as
close
as
we
could,
but
we
really
wanted
that
corner
to
focus
as
the
retail
activation.
On
that
side,
the
the
break
was
something
that
had
happened
after
the
design
that
we
wanted
to
design
in,
but
the
the
what
we
thought
was
the
most
important
was
the
activation
of
the
retail
on
those
sides
being
the
grocer,
the
tavern.
H
We
do
have
our
our
tenant
entry
for
the
leasing
office,
and
then
we
have
another
coffee
shop,
so
breaking
it
up
would
push
some
of
the
retail
because
we're
required
to
have
80
glazing
on
the
building.
It
would
push
a
lot
of
the
retail
to
the
west
side,
which
we
thought
would
be
better
to
have
that
activated
more
towards
the
corner
and
have
the
break
be
kind
of
at
the
essential
point.
So
I-
but
I
appreciate
that-
and
I
I
understand
that.
D
D
I
think
there's
some,
maybe
some
material
choices
that
make
it
feel
you
know
more
commercial,
but
I
think
my
bigger
problem,
I
guess,
would
be
the
the
retail
on
the
ground
level
is
pretty
generic
and
I'm
okay
to
sacrifice
personally
the
some
of
that
80
of
the
glazing
to
create
more
approachable,
storefronts
or
create
some
some
breakup
in
that
facade,
because
it
just
feels
very
monotonous
and
repetitive.
Have
you
guys
looked
at
anything
on
that
facade,
ground
level?
I
mean
how
can
businesses
customize?
H
Yeah,
no,
I
I
I
appreciate
that.
I
think
we
tried
to
introduce
as
much
glazing
as
we
possibly
could
on
that
side.
On
the
600
west
side,
you
can
see
that's
all
actually
one
tenant,
which
is
that
grocer,
besides
the
the
parking,
the
the
garage
entrance,
so
we
wanted
it
to
be
glazing.
Now,
that's
going
to
be
a
whole,
you
know
slew
of
things
from
from
signage
and
wayfinding
that
that
will
occur
there,
but
we're
open
to
exploring
that
again.
We
wanted
to
not
have
blank
wall.
H
H
D
C
D
So
I
mean
this
is
a
design
review
and
not
like
a
planned
development
or
something
else,
and
so
the
these
questions
about
their
target
of
reaching
myths
for
staff
reaching
70
ami
for
their
kind
of
rental
rates.
That's
not
really
attached
this
project
anywhere,
at
least
at
least
in
our
what
we're
doing
tonight.
D
D
A
K
Whether
it
have
to
be
one
of
the
design
review
standards
that
discusses
that
somehow-
and
I
can
look
real
quick,
but
I
don't
think
there
is,
if
there's
not
a
standard
then-
and
we
can't,
we
can't
condition
something
outside
of
that
standard.
If
that
makes
sense
now
there
might
be
a
little
bit
different
if
they're,
proposing
it
and
that's
their
plan.
C
I
Hi
hi,
I
also
sent
an
email,
but
I
just
wanted
to
address
some
of
my
concerns.
I
am
worried
about
the
parking
of
what
strain
this
is
going
to
put
on
the
neighborhood.
It
seems
like
especially
with
so
many
studios,
there's
a
lot
of
cars
that
are
going
to
come
along
with
this
development
that
don't
have
a
parking
space,
so
I
was
going
to
deal
with
that.
I
I
G
G
D
Project
come
in
the
houses
it's
replacing
have
been
in
not
great
shape
for
the
12
years.
I've
lived
here.
I
I'm
super
excited
to
see.
I
mean
some
potential
retail
coming
in
here
like
it's
great
to
live
so
close
to
the
city,
but
it
also
anytime.
I
want
to
go
anywhere
without
a
car.
It
feels
like
I
live
forever
from
the
city
and
seeing
these
sorts
of
businesses
come
in
here,
and
I
understand
that
we
need
a
certain
amount
of
density
in
order
for
those
businesses
to
survive.
D
For
me,
I
think
the
the
way
they're
breaking
up
the
200-foot
facade
length
is
a
pretty
great
solution
like
adding
that
sort
of
public
or
at
least
semi-public
space
that
connects
that
kind
of
provides
some
amenity
for
the
public
for
the
building,
I
think,
is
great
and
also
like
it
doesn't
show
much
in
the
rendering
that
is
shown
now,
but
looking
at
the
site
plans,
it
looks
like
they're
doing
a
really
excellent
job
with
the
park
strip
way
and
providing
a
lot
of
public
amenity
there.
That
is
not
typically
provided
in
apartment
complex.
F
G
Q
Yes,
my
name
is
max
guerra.
I
live
on
200
north,
which
is
just
across
the
street
from
where
this
project
is
going
in.
I
was
the
one
that
wrote
the
comments
with
the
other
five
owners
that
live
on
200
north.
Where
we've
raised
several
and
numerous
concerns
with
this
particular
project,
none
of
us
are
against
growth.
We
just
want
quality
growth.
Q
Q
Off
street
parking
so
what's
happening
right
now
is
basically
the
tenants
from
city
station
are
taking
up
all
available
parking
on
200,
north
and
part
of
600
west.
So
basically,
people
like
us
who
live
across
the
street,
which
are
basically
single-family
homes.
If
we
have
people
coming
over
to
our
house,
there
is
no
place
to
park,
usually
in
the
evenings,
and
that
is
one
of
our
main
concerns.
Q
Q
Where
are
all
these
residents
going
to
park?
Where
are
the
the
employees
of
these
retail
park
spaces
going
to
park?
Where
are
the
customers
going
to
park?
I'm
seriously
concerned
about
that?
The
other
item
that
I
have
is
we
believe
that
the
entry
points
to
this
particular
building
should
be
on
600
west.
They
should
not
be
spilling
out
through
200
north
remember,
200,
north
is
sort
of
like
when
people
go
in
there.
Q
Q
Q
C
T
Yes,
how
are
you
today?
You
know,
I
really
want
to
echo
what
the
guy
before
me
said.
You
know
I
live
on
356
north
600
west
and
you
know
the
parking
is
going
to
be
a
real
issue,
not
to
mention
when
the
rail
has
events
there.
You
know,
and
I
worry
about
the
safety
of
the
children
there.
You
got
a
boys
and
girls
club
right
next
door
and
I
don't
know
where
all
these
parks
can
go
and
I
really
don't
think
that
that
fits
the
neighborhood
you're
really
talking
six
stories.
C
T
T
I
did
not
know
that,
but
anyway
it
does
not
fit
this
neighborhood.
I've
lived
here
all
my
entire
life
and
I
can't
believe
the
city
is
going
to
let
this
project
go.
There's
no
mention
of
the
safety
of
the
boys
and
girls
club
next
door.
You
mentioned
there
was
going
to
be
a
tavern
there.
How
can
you
have
a
tavern
when
you
have
a
boys
and
girls
club
right
next
door.
T
D
D
D
We
know
that
these
very
expensive
apartments
are
a
contributor
to
gentrification
which
are
part
or
results
a
lot
of
times
in
police
brutality
such
as
in
racial
profiling
of
citizens
that
are
around
and
just
pushing
people
out
of
the
neighborhood
which
have
historically
been
here
for
a
long
time.
So
I
ask
you
to
oppose
this
and
to
listen
to
concerned
citizens,
not
just
ignore
them,
as
has
been
done
in
most
projects
on
the
west
side.
Thanks.
J
Garcias
commissioners,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
submitted
some
written
comments
that
that
I
am
sure
that
you
will
review
that
provided
some
some
detail
in
terms
of
neighborwork
salt
lake's
commitment
to
guadalupe
neighborhood,
which
is
the
gem
block
area
and
the
two
decades
that
we've
spent
revitalizing
this
area.
My
concern
with
this
particular
development
is
the
number
of
units.
312
units
is
just
way
too
much
the
scale
and
the
height
is
not
compatible
with
the
surrounding
developments
that
are
in
the
area.
J
J
These
three
hundred
units
will
continue
to
to
add
to
the
growth
of
affordable
units,
so
I
know
we
need
affordable
units,
but
they
should
not
be
concentrated
on
the
west
side.
So
please,
please
take
into
consideration.
The
height
of
this
building
is
not
compatible
with
the
other
buildings
that
are
in
the
area.
This
structure
belongs
on
a
main
corridor,
not
on
an
inner
block
area.
Thank
you.
C
L
Antonio
fierro
representing
rose
park
brown
berets,
so
I
just
echo
a
lot
of
stuff
that
that
a
lot
of
folks
are
saying
as
well,
and
we
want
y'all
to
oppose
the
causal
house
apartments.
You
know
this
is
another
gentrification
plan
that
is
forcibly
kicking
people
out
of
the
neighborhood.
You
know
seven
they're
planning
on
demolishing
seven
historical
houses
that
has
been
there
for
years.
L
All
right,
gentrification
is
violent.
Evicting
folks
under
a
pandemic
is
pretty
violent
as
well.
You
know,
gentrification
does
harm
to
marginalized
communities,
as
this
as
guadalupe
has
always
belonged
to
the
poor
and
working
class
and
there's
a
large
population
of
people
of
color,
and
we
have
seen
you
know
when
when
gentrification
occurs
in
this
area,
we
see
a
lot
of
police
harassment,
brutality
that
comes
along
with
it,
and
you
know
this
development
doesn't
even
fit.
It
doesn't
even
fit
well
with
this
neighborhood.
L
It
just
contributes
to
the
destruction
of
it.
So
why
would
you
all
be
okay
with
destroying
historical
homes,
trees,
shop,
just
right
there
as
well,
and
it's
just
right
next
to
a
boys
and
girls
club
like
like
that's,
that's
gonna,
put
a
lot
of
like
these
youngsters
in
danger
and
for
the
reason
to
have
a
story
there
as
well.
L
You
know
we,
we
have
a
watermelon
store
just
down
the
street
called
get
style
imports
you
know,
and
this
grocery
store
or
whatever
it's
going
to
be
a
restaurant.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
will
will
put
that
business
you
know
will
will
make
that
business
go
go
out.
You
know
so,
and
you
know
usually
like
these
apartments,
were
they
affordable,
they're,
not
affordable
for
poor
and
working
class.
Folks,
you
know
they're,
usually
affordable
for
middle
and
upper
class,
so
to
preserve
the
integrity
and
culture
of
guadalupe
neighborhood.
B
Hello,
how
are
everyone
tonight
goodbye?
Go
ahead?
Great
thanks
for
having
me,
I'm
also
with
the
majority
of
the
previous
speakers.
I
live
right
on
600
west
we've
lived
here
since
about
2001.,
my
husband
and
I
have
raised
two
children
who
are
attending
local
schools,
and
what
struck
me
about
this
is
first
the
sheer
size
and
enormity
of
the
complex.
B
It's
not
it's,
it
doesn't
go
with
the
neighborhood
and
I
think
you
can
probably
have
an
argument
about
whether
the
old
houses
go
with
the
neighborhood,
but,
as
the
previous
person
stated
that
this
is
this
is
a
previously
poor
neighborhood
who
need
people
who
need
working
who
need
affordable
housing.
Second,
it's
I'm
sorry,
but
it's
a
little
hotel
six-ish
on
the
outside
and
I
think
that
the
quality
of
the
appearance
is
going
to
really
further
denigrate
any
of
the
neighborhood
as
well
as
the
size.
B
I
think
if
you
go
out
there
to
200
north
and
600
west
you're,
going
to
run
into
several
issues.
The
first
is
coming
off
of
the
north
temple
bridge
and
then
going
straight
to
200
north.
You
are
turning
right
over
the
train
tracks
of
the
tracks
lines
there
and
then
you're
doing
an
immediate
roundabout
to
get
into
the
apartment
complex.
B
If
the
builders
do
part,
put
a
parking
entrance
on
the
200
north
side,
so
for
oncoming
traffic,
you're
gonna,
who
are
trying
to
come
south
on
600,
west
you're,
you're,
creating
a
traffic
pattern
nightmare
right
there,
the
other
one
and
I'm
going
to
echo.
This
again
is-
and
I
sent
this
to
caitlyn
as
well-
is
the
amount
of
parking
look,
I'm
a
transit
oriented
person.
We
live
downtown
for
a
reason.
B
We
live
close
to
the
train
tracks
for
a
reason,
but
we
still
have
a
car
and
that
doesn't
neces
living
close
to
downtown
living
close
to
the
transit
does
not
negate
our
need
for
a
car.
We
still
use
it
on
a
daily
basis
to
get
groceries
to
get
furniture
for
kids
who
are
growing
out
of
beds.
So
I
oppose
this.
I
I
I
You
have
to
be
like
really
high
up
in
in
the
chain
to
actually
afford
some
of
these
quote:
affordable
housings,
because
I
have
been
there
and
I
I
didn't
qualify
for
cheap
housing
and
I
didn't
qualify
for
any
affordable
housing,
that's
right
in
the
middle,
so
that
raises
a
concern
on
top
of
this.
This
is
all
about.
Transit
and
transit
in
utah
is
inefficient.
I
K
K
C
R
C
R
K
So
this
this
is
nick,
I'm
just
going
to
jump
in
real
quick
here.
One
of
the
major
differences
between
what
is
identified
as
the
core
area
in
the
transition
area
is
building
height.
So
in
the
core
area,
you
can
actually
go
up
to
90
feet,
plus
get
the
additional
height
that
caitlyn
was
talking
about
related
to
the
to
the
development
score.
So
that's
the
primary
difference
in
this
location.
C
C
H
Yeah,
if
I
might
have
an
opportunity
to
respond
to
some
of
the
comments
made
okay,
thank
you
with
all
due
respect.
I
think
a
lot
of
these
brought
up
by
the
neighboring
community
is
are
not
really
issues
with
our
request
here
in
design
modification,
it's
really
with
the
zone
and
what's
allowed
in
the
zone,
we
are
designed
and
we
are
providing
the
density
and
the
building
and
scale
by
right
and
we've
actually
scored
238,
which
the
score
on
on
our
tsa
scorecard,
which
they
required
is
125..
H
H
I
wanted
to
address
the
historical
house
comment
and
remark
on
those
houses
that
are
there.
That
is
not
the
case.
Not
it's
not
in
a
historic
zone.
None
of
the
homes
are
in
a
historic
registry
and
and
to
be
quite
honest,
they're
in
really
poor
shape
and
they're
really
run
down,
and
this
is
our
approach
of
having
an
affordable
housing
apartment
come
here
that
allows
the
same
sort
of
tenancy
that
that
is
there
now
the
parking
was
obviously
sounds
like
it's
the
big,
the
biggest
issue
and
then
height
and
density.
H
The
parking
is
a
buy
right
parking.
We
would
love
to
provide
more,
but
there's
just
no
possible
way.
We
truly
have
maximized
it.
I
think
there
was
one
comment
about
seven
stories,
as
our
plan
currently
shows
it's
one
subterranean
parking,
then
one
main
level
parking
with
retail
and
then
five
stories
above
so
we
tried
to
hide
parking
as
much
as
we
can
in
the
subterrane
a
couple
other
issues,
a
couple
other
things
that
we
want
to
bring
up
with
parking
is
that
in
our
in
my
presentation
we
talk
about.
H
I
don't
know
if
we'll
let
me
here.
Oh
yeah,
we
talk
about
electrical
vehicle
car
share
program.
This
has
been
something
that's
done
in
higher
density
developments
in
los
angeles,
seattle,
san
francisco,
new
york,
where
we
actually
are
are
exploring
an
option
and
an
opportunity
to
provide
electrical
vehicle
car
ship
program.
I
think
one
one
lady
had
mentioned
that,
even
though
they
tried
to
be
transit
that
it's
still
salt
lake
city's
still
a
driving
city,
and
we
we
fully
are
aware
of
that
and
kind
of
be
sensitive
to
that.
H
So
we
want
to
provide
this
electric
vehicle
car
share
program
when
you're
going
when
you're
needing
to
go,
get
groceries,
go,
do
run,
errands
and
stuff
like
that.
That's
not
necessarily
transit
friendly,
but
we
do
want
to
incentivize
the
style
of
development
that
this
is
to
be
a
transit
oriented
development.
This
is
not.
This
is
not
a
development
full
of
one
and
two
bedroom,
two
and
three
bedroom
apartments
that
are
going
to
have
multiple
cars
and
and
more
of
a
higher
density
family.
H
This
is
really
focused
on
a
transit
oriented
tenant,
which
is
what
is
in
the
tsa
uct
zone.
We
are
trying
to
comply
with
the
master
plan
and
also
the
zoning
requirement.
I
think
there
was
a
couple
other
things
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
was
brought
up
was
about
kate
salle
imports,
I've
personally
resided
in
guadalupe
for
the
last
four
years.
That's
how
I
became
familiar
with
this
project
and
started
purchasing
these
parcels.
I
am
very
dedicated
to
this
area.
H
The
issues
that
are
really
being
brought
up
here
have
been
met
by
the
zone.
What
we're
asking
for
is
a
facade
reduction
or
a
facade
break,
which
we've
been
very
thoughtful
about
our
approach
there,
that's
what
we're
requiring
we're
requesting
in
our
proposal,
and
we
feel
like
that.
We
have
done
that
and
I
want
to.
H
I
want
to
kind
of
echo
that
that
is
what
we're
here
for
is
for
that
and
that
what
we've
done
and
when
the
design
of
the
building
is
providing
the
best
use
of
the
building
and
of
the
space
providing
that
we
are
adding
affordable
units
and
we've
tried
to
be
very
sensitive
to
the
park
strips.
I
know
that
was
one
other
thing.
The
park
strips
there
are
massive,
so
we
really
wanted
to
articulate
the
park.
Strips
add
bench,
seating,
add
landscaping
that
was
really
valuable
to
the
area.
I
think
that's
all
of
my
comments.
C
O
D
O
O
The
only
question
before
us
tonight
is
the
extensive
length
over
200
feet
and
I
think
a
lot
of
people
believe
that
if
we
oppose
this,
we
stop
this
project
and
I
hope
that
the
public
realizes
that
we
don't
have
that
power
and
we,
when
it
comes.
I
just
remember
when
I
started
as
a
community
advocate
feeling
very
frustrated
at
the
planning
commission,
because
I
never
got
an
understanding
of
why
they
didn't
address
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
we
would
bring
up
as
a
community
parking.
You
know
we
cannot.
O
We
cannot
demand
parking
levels
above
what
is
required
that
is
set
by
the
city
council,
and
I
encourage
every
member
of
this
community
to
talk
to
their
city
council.
Member
about
that,
we
cannot
make
them
do
more
than
what
the
code
dictates,
regardless
of
what
you
know
you
state
as
its
impact.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
comment
separate,
because
I
do
all
I
feel
I
I
leave
these
meetings
sometimes
feeling
really
really
badly
that
we're
not
allowing
the
public
to
feel
engaged
because
we
just
ignore
them,
but
we're
not
ignoring
you.
O
We
just
literally
don't
have
the
purview
to
address
the
things
you
bring
up
now
back
to
the
one
question
before
us,
and
that
is
the
extensive
length
beyond
the
200
feet.
I
personally
feel
that
this
project
has
not
is
not
meeting
the
intent
of
the
other
projects
that
we
approve
beyond
this
200
feet
length
in
terms
of
design
and
how
they've
traded
this
space
level
of
retail
along
second
north.
I
I
just
feel
like
it
is
monotonous
and
it
makes
it
feel,
even
though
this
break
happens
and
opens
up.
O
It
does
not
feel
at
all
like
it
is
meeting
the
intent
of
why
we
have
this
ordinance.
I
personally
would
be
in
favor
of
tabling
this
to
allow
the
applicant
to
get
some
focus
more
on
that
retail
level
and
and
make
it
more
inviting
so
that
it
didn't
feel
like
it
was
this
long
building,
but
if
it
if
it
goes
to
emotion
as
it
stands
now,
I'm
not
in
support
of
it.
D
D
I
understand
that
people
are
frustrated
with
the
added
density,
but
our
city
desperately
needs
that
whenever
everyone
thinks
of
los
angeles
it
it
it's
the
the
traffic
and
the
parking
and
all
those
issues
that
they
have
we're
really
headed
in
that
direction,
because
we
are
kind
of
up
against
the
mountains
and
there's
no
way
to
spread
out
even
further.
So
we
really
need
to
start
densifying
our
cities
or
else
we're
going
to
end
up
in
a
very
similar
situation,
pretty
quickly.
D
You
know
and
and
again
the
parking
they
meet
their
requirements,
and
so
that
is
a
bigger
question
of
what
are
the
studies
that
are
being
done
to
understand
that
a
little
bit
better
and
it's
you
know,
the
real
reason
for
less
parking
is
to
drive.
People
to
transit
and
our
transit
systems
will
get
better
if
more
people
use
it,
and
the
only
way
to
do
that
is
to
to
kind
of
incentivize
people
to
use
that
system
and
we'll
get
there.
So
those
are
my
comments.
Q
Oh
yeah
yeah.
I
also
wanted
to
kind
of
image
those
similar
comments
for
the
republic,
especially
there
are
some
things
that
we
can
do
as
a
planning
commission,
and
there
are
some
things
that
we
cannot
do
and
I
would
advise
them
to.
You
know
be
involved
with
their
city
council
person
just
like
it
was
mentioned
and
that
they
are
concerned
with
when
it
comes
to
this
project.
I
I
kind
of
have
similar
sentiments
to
me.
It's
a
very
it's
a
very
large
project.
Q
I
appreciate
you
know
the
the
enthusiasm
and
the
drive
to
to
help
with
density,
but
the
previous
project
seemed
to
have
a
different
flair
to
it
as
well
as
I
saw
it,
and
it
seemed
to
have
an
inviting
appeal
that
I
don't
quite
see
represented
in
this
particular
project,
so
I
would
be
in
favor
of
giving
the
upper
the
applicant
an
opportunity
to
go
over
those
again
by
tabling
it.
So
those
are
my
my
two
cents.
O
I
would
say
they
need
to
address
the
second
north
retail
frontage,
because
that
is
the
side
of
the
building
that
is
exceeding
the
length
to
give
some
better
articulation
and
give
some
better
treatment
to
how
it
is
interacting
with
that
pedestrian
level.
So
it
does
not
look
so
monotonous
because,
even
though
they
have
that
break
of
what
they're
calling
you
know
an
outdoor
amphitheater,
it
still
looks
way
beyond
200
feet
of
monotonous
design.
O
Borrowing
any
other
comments
I
can
get
my
work
thing
to
work.
I
would
make
a
motion.
I
move
that
we
table
this
particular
pln
pcm
2020-00258,
to
allow
the
applicant
time
to
address
our
concerns
regarding
the
200
north
ground
level
treatment
and
to
to
further
articulate
it
so
that
we
could
see
how
they
would
want
to
provide
differences
or
a
different
design
so
that
we
could
approve
something
beyond
that
200
feet.
C
K
O
K
O
K
I'll,
simplify
this
and
tell
you
what
my
preference
is.
Thank
you
reference
is
that
anytime
there's
some
missing
information
that
you
guys
can't
use
to
make
a
decision
like
in
this
case
that
the
design
of
that
ground
floor.
Personally,
I
think
the
best
practice
is
to
reopen
the
public
hearing,
because
we
don't
know
what
we're
going
to
get
and
we
don't
know
what
that
may
look
like.
So
I
think
that
would
be
the
best
practice
and
that's
up
to
the
commission,
though,.
O
A
C
J
C
A
S
Okay,
so
this
is
a
request
from
max
kreth
and
ian
percy.
The
west
end
llc
to
rezone
the
parcel
located
at
approximately
715
west
genesee
avenue,
a
landlocked
parcel
located
at
710,
west
900
south
and
a
portion
of
city-owned
public
alley
adjacent
to
the
property
located
at
approximately
740
west
900.
South.
The
properties
are
currently
zoned,
m1
light
manufacturing
and
their
request
is
to
rezone
them
to
rmu
residential
mixed
use.
S
The
reason
on
request
is
related
to
a
re-zone
request
and
two
la
vacation
requests
that
have
previously
been
heard
by
the
planning
commission.
Those
requests
have
all
received
positive
recommendations
from
the
planning
commission.
The
parcels
on
the
map
that
are
marked
in
pink
are
the
properties
that
are
requested
to
be
re-zoned.
S
S
The
intention
for
the
subject
area
is
a
commercial
multi-family
development.
There
are
currently
two
vacations
or
two
vacant
commercial
buildings
on
the
site
that
are
intended
to
be
redeveloped
for
restaurant
and
commercial
uses.
While
the
eastern
portion
of
the
subject
area
will
be
developed
as
multi-family.
S
Subject:
properties
are
located
west
of
I-15
between
700
west
and
800,
west
and
north
of
900.
South
several
community
uses
around
the
subject
side,
including
the
nine
line,
trail,
nine
light
nine
line,
dirt
jumps
and
pump
track
and
community
gardens
the
surrounding
properties
on
the
blocker
zone
m1.
However,
with
exception
of
just
a
few
properties,
the
primary
use
is
predominantly
family
residential,
there's,
also
a
religious
use
adjacent
to
the
east
of
the
subject:
property,
the
block
to
the
north
of
the
subject.
S
S
S
There,
these
are
the
keys
to
consider
when
reviewing
this
rezone
request.
First,
consideration
is
existing
city
plan
guidance.
The
property
lies
within
the
west
side
master
plan
area.
The
re-zone
request
aligns
with
many
policies
found
within
this
plan.
The
plan
includes
several
goals
for
increasing
the
community's
residential
density.
S
Considerations
should
be
given
to
permitting
residential
and
commercial
infill
on
vacant
parcels
in
the
industrial
corridor,
height
and
bulk
regulations
for
infield
development
should
be
as
flexible
in
order
to
achieve
high
density
development,
which
is
50
or
more
dwelling
units
per
acre,
identifying
underutilized
or
unmaintained
areas
within
large
residential
blocks.
In
the
west
side,
these
mid-block
areas
should
be
targeted
for
development
through
flexible
zoning
and
design
standards.
S
S
S
The
transit
master
plan
recognizes
the
importance
of
land
use
street
connectivity
and
place
making
to
implement
a
well
used
and
attractive
frequent
transit
network.
The
frequent
transit
network
must
be
supported
by
concentration
of
land
uses
connections
to
key
destinations,
a
rich
mix
of
uses
and
interconnected
streets.
The
proposed
development
of
commercial
and
residential
uses
that
can
be
permitted
with
the
approved
or
with
the
approval
of
the
requested
zoning
amendment
will
add
a
mix
of
uses
as
well
as
add
key
destinations
to
an
otherwise
unutilized
area.
S
S
Something
like
structure
parking
could
be
located
on
the
ground
floor,
which
would
not
be
consistent
with
the
active
pedestrian-oriented
design
envisioned
in
the
master
plan
for
this
important
gateway
master
plan
policies
in
the
area,
as
well
as
planning
best
practices,
suggest
that
a
new
development
in
this
area
would
be,
or
would
benefit
from
the
additional
design
standards
such
as
an
active
ground
floor
and
durable
building
material
requirements
on
ground
and
upper
floors
to
encourage
pedestrian
activity
and
the
vibrant,
active
mixed
use
gateway
into
the
west
side.
Neighborhoods
planning
staff
is
of
the
opinion.
S
The
design
standards
in
section
21a.37
applicable
to
the
d2
zoning
district
should
be
applied
to
any
new
project.
On
the
subject
parcel
developed
under
the
proposed
rmu
zoning
district,
one
way
this
can
be
accomplished
is
through
development
agreement
agreement.
Development
agreements
can
only
be
approved
by
the
city
council.
S
The
subject
property
is
within
the
boundaries
of
the
poplar
grove
community
council
on
within
600
feet
of
the
glendale
community
council.
Early
notification
was
sent
to
the
poplar
grove
and
glendale
community
council
chairs
requesting
comments
for
the
proposal.
Neither
the
applicant
nor
the
staff
were
asked
to
attend
a
community
council
meeting
early
notice
was
also
sent
out
to
property
owners
and
residents
within
300
feet
of
the
subject
area.
S
O
O
Yes,
okay
and
the
other
question
chris
I
have
so
I
wish
I
had
a
perfect
memory.
I,
but
I
know
we,
we
we've
seen
this
one
before
and
I
feel
like
in
addition
to
this
alley
issue.
We
talked
about
height
and
whatnot.
What
did
what
else?
Did
we
see
on
this
parcel
previously
that
wasn't
addressed
that
now
we're
seeing
this
request
for
a
rezone.
O
And
now
I
guess
the
applicant
can
address
this
a
little
bit
further
because
yeah,
I
feel
like
we,
we
had
huge
discussions
about
this
and
just
to
the
applicant,
maybe
address
a
little
bit
about
what
we've
seen
before
to
refresh
my
memory,
because
I
know
we've
talked
about
it,
but
I
I
need
the
details
again.
So
thank
you.
S
O
O
S
O
O
O
O
L
Can
you
hear
me
great?
Yes,
thank
you
good
evening.
Thank
you.
I
think
you
kind
of
took
the
win
out
of
my
sales
by
just
doing
all
that
stuff.
I
was
just
going
to
remind
you
on
on
kind
of
what
was
approved.
You
know
it
seems
like
yesterday,
but
I
guess
it
was
in
2019
the
rezone
and
really
why
we're
coming
back,
and
I
know
we've
come
back
a
few
times.
L
Unfortunately,
this
project
has
proven
to
be
a
little
bit
trickier
with
the
alley
and
other
things,
but
but
this
is
totally
unrelated
to
that
in
the
sense
of
we
just
had
the
opportunity
we,
you
know,
the
the
owner
of
that
house
came
to
us
and
said:
hey.
Would
you
buy
that
house
and
we
decided
you
know
we
decided
to
purchase
it
and
the
ability
to
combine
it
with
the
rest
of
the
site
to
sort
of
screen.
This
was
was
really
attractive
and
then
we
we
got
the
little
sliver
from
from
the
you
know
the
county.
L
So
really
we're
just
in
front
of
you
guys
tonight
to
just
ask
to
sort
of
include
that
in
in
the,
in
the
reasons
from
so
one
two,
what
we're
what
we
had
you
had
previously,
I
want
to
keep
it
short.
I
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have,
but
I
think
that's
essentially
what
we're
asking
for
tonight.
C
L
L
C
S
A
A
K
Real
quick,
I
did
drop
to
put
that
letter
from
that
was
received
today
in
the
dropbox.
So
it
is
there
now
that
person
also
indicated
they
would
like
to
speak,
and
since
I
have
the
microphone
we
do
have
a
community
council
representative
dennis
ferris,
but
I
don't
have
the
control
to
unmute
them.
So
hopefully
michaela
can
do
that.
C
G
D
A
T
All
right
yeah,
I
I'm,
I
suspect
I
can't
see
what
letter
you're
looking
at,
but
I
suspect
it's
mine
since
I
submitted
it,
I'm
an
attorney.
I
represent
the
summum
church,
they
own
the
parcel,
that's
located
on
the
northeast
corner
of
this
block
that
you're
looking
at
there.
They
have
the
gold
temple.
That's
there,
which
I
believe
is
an
important
part
of
the
city's
cultural
fabric,
that
the
temple
is
where
they
they
worship
and
it's
a
important
and
significant
to
their
religion.
T
T
The
property
is
located
at
an
elevation,
much
lower
than
where
I-15
is
located,
which
is
right,
adjacent
to
it.
So
it's
below
the
freeway
noise
right
now,
if
75-foot
buildings
are
surrounding
its
property,
now
you'll
end
up
with
reflected
noise.
That's
going
to
essentially
make
it
difficult,
if
not
impossible,
for
them
to
have
the
peaceful
kind
of
worship
experience
that
they've
enjoyed
in
the
past.
T
Unless
the
government
demonstrates
that
imposition
of
the
burden
on
that
person,
assembly
or
institution
is
in
furtherance
of
a
compelling
governmental
interest
and
is
in
the
least
restrictive
means,
so
we
submit
that
a
lower
zoning,
the
rmu
35,
would
be
less
intrusive,
so
I've
submitted
that
comment.
That's
the
comment
from
the
sum
of
church
that
we
wanted
to
submit
to
make
sure
that's
part
of
the
record.
T
T
Thank
you
for
finally
involving
us
in
this
situation.
You've
got
going
on
we
personally
as
a
church
we've
been
here
for
over
40
years,
we've
been
visited
by
news
organizations
and
people
from
around
the
world
we've
been
presented
and
in
different
movies,
different
types
of
shows
from
from
national
geographic
discover,
channel
and
everything
else.
T
No,
we
do
not
worship
the
sun,
but
the
energy
from
the
sun
is
an
afford,
a
very
important
part
of
our
mausoleum,
which
we
have
here
on
our
property
as
well
as
our
temple,
and
we
feel
that
this
is
a
direct,
an
intentional
move
on
the
side
of
the
the
city
council,
not
the
city
council,
but
the
planning,
commission,
poplar,
grove
and
glendale.
I
mean
they
didn't
even
invite
us
to
participate,
and
I
listened
to
the
last
meeting
where
you
allowed
me
to
send
in
an
email.
T
Thank
you
which
was
pretty
well
dismissed
that
you
guys
didn't
even
include
us.
You
didn't
even
involve
us
new
york
just
decided
to
come
in
here.
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
they
live
on
nice
estates,
they're
out
in
new
york,
and
they
live
up
in
park
city
and
they
are
not
here
on
the
west
side
and
by
putting
like
over
200
people,
families
and
at
any
local
income.
We
know
that,
there's
in
the
next
10
years,
you're
going
to
have
lots
of
families
in
there
and
you're
going
to
have
the
same
thing.
T
That
baltimore
has
the
same
thing:
that
new
york
has
they're
very
good
at
making
a
lot
of
money
and
then
moving
on
down
the
road
except
for,
of
course,
collecting
rents.
It's
all
about
the
money.
I
don't
know
where,
where
you
people
stand,
but
this
is
our
religious
property.
We've
been
here
for
over
40
years,
we
meditate
here
and
they
plan
on
building
a
building
that
is
literally
going
to
block
the
sunlight.
T
All
winter,
long
from
our
property
literally
and
they
are
going
to
try
to
it's,
we
would
consider
this
a
direct
attack
on
our
religious
rights
and
we
plan
on
staying.
On
top
of
this,
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
new
york's
going
to
make
some
money
a
lot
of
contractors
here
in
town,
are
going
to
make
some
nice
money,
but
in
20
years
poplar
and
glendale
are
going
to
have,
as
they've
already
explained,
they
plan
on
going
west
with
this.
T
Nobody
got
us
involved,
we
put
a
little
thing
on
there,
our
thing
here
we
showed
up
at
their
meeting
and
we
waited
around
15-20
minutes,
nobody
showed
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
we
get
all
of
this.
So
we
know
that
they
don't
even
want
to
deal
with
this.
You
just
want
to
run
us
out
of
town.
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we're
not
part
of
the
majority
religion
in
this
town,
but
we
expect
some
sort
of
responsibility
to
our
religious
worship,
which
we
feel
has
been
completely
undermined
completely
overran
by
this
monstrosity.
T
A
A
About
youtube,
yes,
yeah,
we'll
bring
it
back
to
you
to
respond
to
the
comments
during
the
public
hearing,
but
I
just
want
to
clarify
for
members
of
the
public.
This
is
a
rezoning
request.
These
matters
come
before
the
planning
commission
for
a
recommendation
to
the
city
council.
This
is
a
legislative
decision.
We
make
a
recommendation.
We
are
not
the
final
decision-making
authority
on
what's
before
us
tonight.
A
A
L
Oh
no
worries
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
couple
comments.
First,
off
we
actually
made
quite
a
few
attempts
to
each
other
community.
We
had
a
community
meeting
about
this.
Everyone
was
invited.
We
we
sent
flies
to
everybody,
so
I
feel
terrible
that
that
the
gentleman
just
folks
thought
that
we
weren't
interested
in
his
opinion,
but
we
did
have
several
community
outreaches
to
talk
about
this
first
off.
L
And
thirdly,
I
think,
most
importantly,
you
know
the
current
zone
is
zoned
manufacturing
and
I
just
want
to
remind
everybody
that
you
can
build
up
to
85
feet
on
the
current
m1
zone
and
I
think
that's
the
one
thing
I
think
we
talked
about
a
lot
last
time
as
well.
Is
that
you
know
you
know
it's
not
like
this
is
zoned
as
a
single
family.
I
mean
this
is
m1
and
you
can
actually
you
know
under
the
current
zoning,
which
I
don't
think
anyone
wants
manufacturing
in
that
area.
L
I
think,
as
per
the
master
plan,
as
per
a
lot
of
other
things,
you
know
they're
looking
for
you
know
better
uses
for
infill
than
than
on
manufacturing
in
this
particular
area.
So
just
our
request
to
build
potentially
up
to
75
feet,
we
haven't
actually
come
up
with
anything,
is
actually
less
than
what
the
manufacturing
zone
would
allow.
Currently.
So
just
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
that
the
height
actually
is
is
actually
potentially
not.
You
know
we're
not
going
from
35
feet
to
75
feet
and
that's
that's
all.
A
C
O
D
A
A
A
A
I
N
So
when
a
decision
is
made
by
one
of
these
entities,
someone
could
submit
an
appeal
request
to
the
city.
The
peel
has
to
allege
legendary
in
administrating,
administering
or
interpreting
the
ordinance
rules
or
regulations,
and
then
the
appeal
would
then
be
heard
by
an
appeals
hearing
officer
and
that
officer
is
appointed
by
the
mayor
and
is
generally
an
attorney
with
land
use
law
experience.
N
So
there
are
a
few
main
changes.
The
first
is
to
clarify
the
authority
of
the
appeals
hearing
officer
in
the
code
itself,
so
the
city
appeals
hearing
officer
only
has
legal
authority
over
city
coding
processes,
not
state
code,
but
that
is
not
called
out
specifically
in
the
cities
of
teal
the
teal's
code.
F
So
that's
that's.
The
concern
that
we've
had
is
that
interpretation
of
state
code
is
squarely
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
courts
and
there
may
have
been
a
recent
matter
where
one
of
the
hearing
officers
might
have
disagreed
with
us,
and
there
have
been
other
issues
where
the
this
question
has
come
up
and
we
don't
think
it's
appropriate
for
hearing
officers
to
interpret
state
law.
That
being
said,.
A
F
A
G
F
Yeah
you,
you
generally
apply
the
plain
language
of
the
law,
so
if,
for
example,
subdivision
provisions
in
state
law
say
that
they
there's
some
provision
with
respect
to
when
you
do
or
don't
need
to
file
a
plat,
it
should
be
fairly
obvious
and
applying
the
law
is
just
taking
the
law
as
it
on
its
face
and
applying
it.
To
that
particular
case.
F
O
F
I
I
would
say
you
haven't
been
entirely
successful
in
that
endeavor
there.
There
have
been
some
issues
beyond
interpretation
of
state
code
where
we
have
given
our
opinion
to
the
hearing
officers
as
to
where
those
guard
rails
are
in
their
authority
and
they've
disagreed
with
us,
and
one
of
those
areas
is.
F
We
should
be
prevented
from
enforcing
an
ordinance
that
somebody
relied
to
their
detriment
on
a
representation
of
a
city
employee.
It's
happened
two
or
three
times
where
we've
told
hearing
officers.
We
don't
think
that
you
have
that
authority
to
determine
that.
Okay
and
and
twice
they've
disagreed
with
us.
G
O
A
C
I
will
make
a
motion
based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
recommend
that
the
city
council
approve
the
proposed
text.
Amendment
pln
pcm,
2020-00352
administrative
decision,
appeals
text,
amendment.