►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - March 13, 2019
Description
Planning Commiossion Meeting
A
Meaning
of
the
Planning
Commission
I
have
a
couple
of
kind
of
housekeeping
things
for
you.
Please
turn
off
your
cell
phones
and
we'd.
Ask
that
you
not
cheer
or
boo
or
interrupt
other
people
when
they're
speaking
when
it's
your
turn
to
speak,
come
up
to
the
microphone
state,
your
name
for
the
record,
and
then
you
have
two
minutes
as
part
of
the
public
to
speak,
and
if
you
have
handouts,
you
need
to
have
paper
copies
to
put
with
the
record
and
let's
just
try
to
be
polite
and
succinct.
A
C
A
C
A
D
A
E
A
F
First,
sorry,
bringing
up
my
notes.
This
is
just
a
gentle
reminder
to
commissioners
to
please
refrain
from
using
your
cell
phone
during
the
meeting.
The
city
provides
iPads
for
use
during
the
meeting
to
access
reports
and
documents
associated
with
the
agenda.
If
you're
using
your
personal
phone
for
this
purpose
just
know
it
can
be
perceived
differently
by
the
public
applicants
and
staff,
and
that
is
actually
come
up
not
in
this
meeting
but
in
another
meeting
mm-hmm.
G
Good
evening,
I
suggested
to
give
a
brief
overview
of
what's
been
going
on.
If
you've
been
following
the
news,
you
would
have
seen
that
Salt
Lake
City
sued
the
state,
the
inland
port
board
for
the
inland
port
legislation
that
was
passed
last
interim
session
and
it's
not
related
to
the
proposed
legislation.
G
That
we
think
is
the
role
of
a
municipality
and
so
the
way
that
the
legislation
works
now
is
that
in
the
northwest
quadrant
are
in
these
jurisdictional
lands.
There's
a
land
use
decision,
that's
made
and
then
appealed
that
appeal
doesn't
go
to
an
appeals,
hearing
officer
it
would
go
to
the
inland
port
board
and
then
the
standard
is
different.
G
So,
instead
of
looking
at
whether
the
decision
was
like
consistent
with
the
ordinances
that
you
all
look
at
and
help
support
and
help
the
council
evaluate
instead
of
looking
at
that,
the
inland
port
board
will
then
look
and
see
if
the
decision
was
consistent
with
the
inland
port
act.
So
basically
it's
kind
of
ignoring
what
we
do
here
and
in
what
you
all
do
here.
F
Finally,
the
other
update
I
wanted
to
talk
to
you
about
was
the
conditional
building
and
site
design
review
text,
amendment
that
this
body
recommended
to
City
Council
for
approval
or
for
adoption.
Last
February
2018
and
the
purpose
of
the
changes
were
to
align
the
purpose
statement
with
citywide
livability
goals
specify
the
authority
that
determines
whether
or
not
an
application
can
be
approved.
F
Administrative
leave
IRS's
come
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
approval
and
to
modify
the
design
standards
to
remove
a
lot
of
the
vague
language
and
help
eliminate
duplicative
standards
and
clarify
how
to
implement
each
standard.
So
the
City
Council
is
considering
this
text
amendment.
Currently
they
will
have
a
public
hearing
on
March
26.
Then
we
anticipate
adoption
at
some
point
soon
thereafter.
A
H
H
Master
plan
and
I
really
appreciate
you
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
come
back
to
you,
two
to
hold
a
motion
and
come
back
to
you
after
we'd
have
the
opportunity
to
seek
a
formal
recommendation
on
the
Foothill
trails
plan
from
the
Salt
Lake
City,
bicycle
Advisory,
Committee
and
the
parks,
natural
lands,
trails
and
urban
forestry
or
peanut
board,
and
I
I
would
like
to
just
quickly
remind
all
of
you
where
we,
where
we
hope
to
go
with
this
process.
Why
is
this?
H
Take
it
ultimately
to
the
City
Council
this
spring
and
seek
their
formal
adoption
of
this
as
a
master
plan
for
Salt
Lake
City.
But
at
this
point,
I
wanted
to
yield
the
rest
of
my
time
to
allow
Zach
and
Elliot
to
just
give
you
a
quick
synopsis
of
the
decision-making.
That
are
the
reasons
that
the
Bicycle
Advisory
Committee
and
the
peanut
board
made
the
recommendations
and
what
those
recommendations
are.
Okay,.
I
Okay,
so
just
a
quick
background.
The
Bicycle
Advisory
Committee
is
a
community-based
committee.
That
reviews
discusses
and
advises
Salt
Lake
City
on
bicycle
related
projects,
and
we,
as
a
committee,
have
given
unanimous
support
and
voted
to
unanimously
support
the
Salt,
Lake
City
foothills
trail
system
plan,
and
we
urged
the
Planning
Commission
to
also
do
the
same.
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
a
few
things
about
the
plan
that
mesh
well
with
the
bicycle
advisory
committees,
mission
and
goals.
I
The
proposed
trails,
as
well
as
draw
their
own
trails,
and
they
had
over
3,100
participants
so
and
then
presenting
this
plan
to
committees
like
the
peanut
board
and
the
Bicycle
Advisory
Committee,
as
well
as
a
number
of
other
committees.
So
a
lot
of
public
outreach
has
gone
into
this
and
we've
seen
that
with
the
evolution
of
the
plan,
and
we
really
like
that.
I
Another
thing
that
we
really
like
is
it's
a
multi-use
trail
system
and
it's
not
just
about
bikes,
even
though
the
Bicycle
Advisory
Committee
is
about
advising
for
plans
for
bikes.
This
trail
system
has
over
18
percent
of
proposed
trails
that
are
foot
traffic.
Only
we
like
it's
a
multi-use
trail
system
and
that
41%
of
the
trails
will
be
either
uphill
or
downhill.
Specific
trails
to
bicycles
and
the
use
of
directional
bicycle
trails
will
really
reduce
user
conflicts
between
pedestrians
and
bicycles,
and
we
think
that's
a
great
part
of
this
plan.
I
It'll
make
it
more
safe
and
enjoyable
for
everybody.
We
also
like
the
trail
prioritization
that
they've
put
forth
the
phase.
One
really
focuses
on
alleviating
traffic
in
part
of
the
in
the
heaviest
traffic
part
of
the
foothills
between
City,
Creek
and
Dry
Creek,
and
we
think
that
they've
just
nailed
it
with
targeting
that
zone
first.
And
you
just
want
to
reiterate
that
the
we
have
given
it
our
full
endorsement
and
we
hope
you
will
as
well.
J
All
right
I
will
hurry.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
For
the
time
again,
my
name
is
Eliot
Mott
and
I
chair
the
peanut,
Board
of
parks,
natural
areas,
trails
so
on
and
so
forth.
I'm
here
today
to
speak
to
you
as
an
outdoor
enthusiast
who
records
on
city
trails
and
also
to
voice
support
for
this
plan.
As
chair
of
the
by
the
peanut
advisory
board.
J
By
way
of
introduction,
I'm
a
longtime
volunteer,
organizer
about
tour
events,
open
call
group
events
outside
mostly
I
lead,
bike
rides
and
hikes
and
kayak
tours,
many
of
which
are
within
Salt
Lake
City
through
the
years
I've
organized
a
lot
of
these
counting
over
200.
Excuse
me,
860
of
these
things
so
far
and
Counting
this
weekend,
for
example,
we're
riding
into
town
to
enjoy
the
st.
Patrick's
Day
parade
on
trails.
J
The
foothill
plan
lays
a
groundwork
to
address
these
issues.
It
will
separate
trail
user
groups,
it
will
add
trail
patrols
to
police
conduct,
it
will
define
and
improve
trail
heads.
It
will
add
trail
signage,
a
regular
trainer,
regular
Ranger
presence
on
the
trails
will
help
combat
the
homesteading
our
homeless
population
currently
does.
J
In
addition,
the
plan
will
reduce
outlaw
trails.
Minimize
Foothill
erosion
provide
for
trail
upkeep.
If,
when
viewed
in
aggregate,
these
are
all
significant
Lewis
Kogen
and
his
team
at
the
parks
department
have
done
a
superb
job.
Putting
this
plan
together,
they
perform
the
heavy
lifting
seeking
public
input,
consolidating
ideas
and
crafting
the
plan
before
you.
It's
an
excellent
start,
and
one
with
building
provision
for
updates
and
modifications
as
conditions
on
the
ground
change.
I
opine.
J
It
is
good
governance
for
the
city
to
have
a
plan
in
place
to
proactively
address
the
many
issues
we
face
in
our
foothills.
The
plan
will
help
us
do
this
appropriately.
It
will
roll
out
in
stages.
This
will
help
us
prioritize
expenditures
going
forward.
It
will
empower
us
to
better
address
the
many
management
challenges
we
face
in
our
open
spaces,
natural
lands
and
on
our
trails,
and,
finally,
let's
not
lose
sight
of
the
fact
that
a
trail
network
promotes
and
nurtures
active,
healthy
lifestyles.
J
After
all,
we
are
a
life,
elevated
state,
it's
our
convenient
connection
with
nature
with
the
natural
world
and
high
recreational
recreational
opportunities
nearby.
That
makes
this
all
possible
in
closing
I'm
here
tonight
to
voice
support
for
the
plan
as
a
trail
user
and
also
as
a
the
chair
of
the
peanut
advisory
board
and
I,
encourage
this
this
board
to
do
as
well.
Thank
you
for
the
time.
Thank.
A
B
Certainly
the
Nets
Museum
of
Natural
History
did
the
same
thing.
I,
don't
know
what
any
City
can
do
when
they're
up
against
the
state
institution
like
that,
but
that's
certainly
been
a
challenge
and
I
think
there
is
an
opportunity
down
the
road
for
a
little
bit
of
payback
in
terms
of
some
property
that
the
university
owns
a
long
red
Butte
Creek,
where
they
could
maybe
cooperate
more
than
they
ever
have
before
with
the
community
in
terms
of
a
trail
and
I'm.
B
Sure
Lois
is
aware
of
that
and
I
commend
Lois
on
the
work
that
he's
doing
and
and
I
think
the
master
plan
is
great.
I
also
worked
with
the
East
bench
master
plan
group
that
meets
in
every
month
for
on
the
last
Monday
of
every
month
at
Anderson
library,
and
this
is
of
course
been
a
subject
of
our
our
discussion
on
many
occasions.
So
so
I
just
think.
B
The
only
thing
we
can
really
do
is
is
hope
that
our
legislature
will
somehow
rein
in
the
University
of
Utah
on
these
matters,
where
the
public
good
has
certainly
been
jeopardized
by
crowding
out
of
trails
and
so
forth,
and
will
probably
continue.
You
know
probably
aware
that
Huntsman
is
going
to
expand
to
the
north
as
well
and
may
even
jeopardize
access
to
the
Jewish,
Community
Center,
so
I
think
that's
an
important
consideration.
Thank
you.
Thank.
K
K
H
Absolutely
thank
you
so
the
the
comments
that
we
are
getting
as
we
are
going
through
the
process
and
and
hopefully
approaching
City
Council
adoption
is
that
we
are.
We
are
seriously
taking
every
comment
into
account
and
then
and
then
aggregating
those
with
all
of
the
the
other
comments
that
we've
received,
on
whatever
the
particular
topic
or
topics
are
for
that
comment.
H
If
the
comment
is
something
that
we've
received
a
lot
of
other
feedback
on,
then
we
basically
view
it
in
light
of
all
the
other
feedback
that
we've
received
on
a
particular
topic,
whether
it's
a
trail
alignment
or
a
request
for
signage
design,
something
like
that.
Once
we
once
we
get
hopefully
passed
the
adoption
process,
we
are
intending
to
probably
take
a
year
or
two
off
and
then
and
then
look
at
and
an
update
of
the
Foothill
trail
system
plan.
Part
of
the
goal,
a
big
part
of
the
goal.
H
C
L
A
L
E
M
A
N
You
thank
you.
As
you
stated,
these
are
zoning
and
master
plan.
Amendments
were
504.
South
900
east
is
to
amend
the
zoning
from
RMF
35
and
rmu
35
and
amend
the
master
plan.
Land
use,
designation
for
medium
density,
residential
to
medium
density,
mixed
use,
you
can
see
in
the
image
on
the
left
the
property
outlined
in
yellow
it's
located
at
the
southwest
corner
of
500,
south
and
900
east,
and
then
on
the
right.
N
You
can
see
the
two
buildings
that
are
located
on
the
site:
the
property
was
historically
a
commercial
property
with
a
gas
station
it
converted
to
a
residential
use
in
the
early
2000s,
and
the
proposal
is
to
redevelop
the
site
with
a
first-floor
commercial
use
with
residential
above.
The
applicant
has
not
submitted
a
site
plan.
So
it's
not
that
as
not
being
reviewed
as
part
of
the
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendments.
N
On
this
slide
on
the
left,
you
can
see
the
future
land
use
map
with
a
property
outlined
in
yellow.
Again
it's
located
the
southwest
corner
of
500
south
and
900
East.
The
existing
future
land
use
designation
is
medium
density.
Residential
its
applicant
is
proposing
medium
residential
mixed-use
to
allow
for
the
residential
and
the
commercial
use.
There
are
three
different
land
uses
adjacent
to
the
site
to
the
north
is
medium
density,
residential,
mixed
use
and
then
a
low
and
medium
density,
residential
to
the
east
and
the
west
and
medium
doesn't
density
residential
to
the
northeast.
N
There
is
higher
density
residential
located
within
a
block
of
the
property
just
to
the
southeast
and
for
this
property.
Its
existing
medium
density
residential
induce
designation
is
more
intensive
than
the
other
properties
that
are
located
on
the
block
face
on
the
right
on
the
zoning
map.
You
can
see
that
the
property
is
owned.
Rm,
f35
and
the
adjacent
properties
to
the
east
and
west
are
zoned.
Rm
f30,
the
property
directly
to
the
north
is
own
TS,
a
UNT
and
then
the
property
to
the
north
in
East,
a
zone
RM
f30
as
well.
N
It's
just
to
the
north
of
what's
shown
on
this
map,
but
you
can
see
that
their
property
is
within
a
thousand
feet
of
the
track
station
on
400
South.
As
far
as
compatibility
with
the
existing
master
plans,
it's
compatible
with
planned
salt
lake
and
growing
SLC
plans.
Salt
lake
encourages
development
near
infrastructure
and
amenities
as
well
as
transit.
It
also
encourages
mixed-use
development
and
the
redevelopment
of
underutilized
land
and
growing
SLC
supports
a
variety
of
land
uses,
including
multi-family
houses
in
encouraging
housing
options.
N
As
far
as
with
the
conditions
right
now
right
now,
the
existing
zoning
makes
it
difficult
to
redevelop
the
parcel
due
to
the
small
size
of
the
site.
It's
too
small
for
multi-family
in
the
RMF
35
zone
or
a
planned
development,
and
so
the
proposed
changes
would
allow
for
redevelopment
of
the
site,
and
so
staffs
recommendation
is
to
recommend
ordering
a
positive
recommendation
for
the
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendments
to
the
City
Council.
Are
there
questions
this.
E
N
E
A
O
K
O
Want
to
thank
you
guys
for
your
time
this
evening,
I'm
gonna
just
scroll
through
this
myself
as
kind
of
a
bullet
points.
So
as
Sarah
noted
the
project's
located
on
fifth
and
ninth,
the
East,
it's
historically
a
commercial
property
that
had
a
small
little
gas
station
on
it,
the
owners
back
in
the
90s
cleared
it
with
the
EPA
and
the
DEQ.
O
So
it
has
been
kind
of
decontaminated
already,
there's
no
environmental
issues
with
it
and
their
intent
very
early
on
was
actually
to
open
a
small
little
community
barber
shop
and
maybe
do
like
a
residential
unit
above
that
they've
had
the
property
for
over
20
years
now,
and
because
of
the
current
zoning
situation,
we
can't
build
anything
on
it,
but
a
single-family
house.
So
it's
kind
of
out
of
alignment
with
the
current
zone,
which
encourages
like
medium
density
residential
but
because
of
the
lot
size
and
the
way
the
zoning
code
is
set
up.
O
We
can't
do
anything
so
the
reason
why
we're
rezoning
to
the
rmu
is
actually
more
to
get
some
medium
density
residential
on
there.
That
actually
fits
the
intent
of
the
code
and
then
yes,
we
do
want
to
do
a
small
little
kind
of
700
square
foot
commercial
space
that
can
help
to
activate
this
part
of
the
community.
We
did
work
with
the
East
Central
Community
Council
from
the
very
beginning
of
this
and
have
been
close
contact
with
them.
O
So
currently
the
commercial
use
we're
thinking
either
a
coffee
shop
or
maybe
even
like
a
small
bodega
that
serves
you,
know
fresh
sandwiches
and
soups
to
the
local
community
or
maybe
even
recently,
we've
talked
about
like
a
smoothie
juice
shop,
so
something
small,
non
intrusive
in
terms
of
you
know,
fumes
and
odors,
and
no
drive-through
coffees,
no,
no
like
residential
with
a
commercial
hood
or
a
commercial
hood
or
anything
just
basically
like
deli
style.
You
know
no
cooking,
but
I'm,
just
cold
cuts
and
things
like
that.
O
So
right
now
we
have
the
intent
to
do
actually
micro
units
on
it
to
serve
more
for
affordable
housing
in
the
Denver,
diversify
the
housing
stock
in
the
neighborhood,
so
we're
not
targeting
high-end
luxury
residential
with
big
unit
sizes,
we're
looking
at
kind
of
small
loft
spaces,
mostly
to
serve
like
the
lower-income
residents
somewhere
in
the
3
to
400
square
foot
range.
So
that's
pretty
much.
All
I
have
okay
any.
O
A
D
How
many
minutes
do
I
have
to
hurry
because
I've
been
on
this
property
for
a
long
time?
So
there's
a
very
solid
staff
report,
but
this
is
an
impaired
zone.
I
really
appreciate
the
staffs
reference
to
the
east
central
neighborhood
plan
adopted
in
1984.
No
one
cites
that
anymore.
Thank
you
very
much,
and
also
the
1995
determination
about
the
non-conforming
status.
I
can
support
a
zoning
change
here
at
this
location,
because
we've
gone
through
two
booming
periods
of
development
and
nothing
has
happened.
D
It's
very
clear
that
nothing
is
going
to
happen
unless
the
city
makes
some
changes.
However,
we've
got
this
impaired
zone,
so
the
rmu
does
not
require
housing.
If
you
make
a
positive
recommendation
and
the
City
Council
adopts
it,
there
is
no
guarantee
that
there
will
be
housing
at
this
site.
Despite
what
the
developer
has
said,
he
may
sell
the
property
or
the
property
owners
may
sell
the
property
there's
no
guarantee.
D
The
other
issue
that
you
need
to
look
at
is
that
this
is
not
an
underserved
area
in
terms
of
commercial
uses
of
any
size,
it's
located
between
400,
south
and
99th,
and
it
is
loaded
with
non-conforming
business
properties
and
the
non-conforming
business
properties
between
700,
south
and
900
South
were
brought
up
to
conforming
status
a
number
of
years
ago,
six
seven
years
ago,
so
we've
got
abundant
commercial
uses.
Here,
I'd
be
much
more
enthusiastic.
If
this
was
simply
solidly
residential,
a
hundred
percent,
we
really
don't
need
another
coffee
shop,
they're
all
over
the
place.
D
So
the
only
way
out
of
this
is
for
the
City
Council
to
adopt
a
development
agreement
to
ensure
that
there's
housing
at
this
site
and
if
there's
not
housing
at
this
site,
you
certainly
shouldn't
rezone.
It
we'd
be
better
off
to
stay
with
the
current
situation.
The
three
units
that
are
there,
so
you
don't
have
the
authority
to
initiate
a
development
agreement
and
the
staff
I,
don't
know
a
single
planner,
I
respect
who
would
recommend
a
development
of
agreement,
they're,
just
bad
planning.
D
That's
the
only
way
out
of
this,
because
this
zone
is
dysfunctional.
So
you
do
have
the
authority
to
initiate
a
change
to
the
ordinance
and
you
could
bundle
it
with
your
recommendation
tonight
and
I.
Don't
know
why
you
don't
use
that
Authority
more
often,
because
if
I
were
in
your
position,
I
sure
Thank.
A
E
N
E
N
N
K
N
The
non
residential
and
multi-family
setbacks
are
the
same,
so
the
front
yard
would
be
a
minimum
of
5
feet,
a
maximum
of
15
feet.
The
rear
yard
would
be
25%
of
the
lot
depth,
but
not
more
than
30
feet
as
far
as
interior
side
yards.
There
would
be
non
unless
it
was
a
budding
single
family
or
two
family
and
then
there's
a
minimum
open
space
requirement
of
20%.
C
N
In
terms
of
the
history
of
the
site,
I
think
that
there
was
historically
a
commercial
use
there
and
the
different
zoning
that
it
does
have
right
now
being
RMF
35
rather
than
RMF
30,
and
then
also
the
master
plan
designation.
That
is
different
than
those
surrounding
uses.
I
think
there
was
some
consideration
giving
given
towards
it
being
a
little
bit
different
than
those
surrounding
properties,
and
it's
also
adjacent
to
the
TSA
UN
T
zone
to
the
north,
which
does
allow
for
a
much
more
intensive
development
than
the
zones
to
the
south.
C
M
N
M
C
Talk
me
through
a
little
bit
more
your
conversations
in
a
relationship
with
the
Community
Council,
because
they
write
this
letter
on
December
21st
that
they're
opposed
to
it.
I
mean
they
were
not
here
to
weigh
in
so
it's
hard
to
kind
of
really
get
a
sense
of
it,
but
just
but
you
kind
of
suggested
you've
been
talking
to
them
and
you
had
their
support
and
so.
O
C
A
O
On
that,
so
when
we
initially
submitted
a
site
plan
to
the
Community
Council
in
terms
of
what
we
were
looking
to
do,
our
biggest
feedback
from
the
community
preliminarily
to
submitting
this
application
was
that
they
were
concerned
about
parking,
as
most
residents
are
with
these
kind
of
tight
and
fill
properties,
and
so
we
were
actually
proposing
to
take
out.
Instead
of
replacing
the
curb
cut
to
the
north,
we
were
actually
proposing
to
do
more
striped
parking,
they're
angled
parking,
which
is
the
development
pattern
on
North
Side
and
the
Community
Council.
O
That's
actually
why
they
were
opposed
to
it
is
that
they
really
liked
those
corners
being
prominent
and
prominently
landscaped,
and
we
were
basically
proposing
to
take
it
out
and
put
more
parking
in,
and
so
in
part
of
our
discussions
with
them.
They
basically
said
we'd
like
to
see
that
actually
become
landscape,
again,
not
parking,
and
so
we
took
that
out
of
our
proposal
because
we
actually
put
it
in
there.
Thinking
that
that's
what
the
community
wanted.
It
turns
out.
That's
not
what
they
wanted,
so
they
wanted
landscape.
O
A
N
E
The
original
plan
doesn't
actually
get
through.
So
it's
that's
where
I'm
squishy
and
I'm
it's
hard
for
me
to
enthusiastically
be
one
way
or
the
other
and
I'm
I'm
trying
to
contemplate
what
the
implications
really
are.
If
that,
if
it
does
get
resound
and
and
say
you
did
sell
it
and
what
a
new
developer
find
it
financially
feasible
to
even
do
all
commercial
I
kind
of
think
No.
E
But
then
they
would
do
9
or
10
luxury
apartments,
and
we
couldn't
stop
that
either,
and
so
it
sort
of
really
want
to
maybe
hear
what
other
commissioners
are
thinking
regarding
the
potential
of
what
could
end
up
there
and
is
that
something
that
complements
the
neighborhood.
Based
on
the
plans,
the
area
plan
and
the
master
plan
that
the
community
have
been
part
of.
K
E
J
K
E
So
I
have
another
question
Sara.
If,
when
the
site
plan
is
given
to
you
and
say
it
meets,
it
doesn't
come
before
the
Planning
Commission.
Does
planning
look
at
and
make
recommendations
for,
say
how
they
would
access
this
like
encourage
them
to
access
it
off
the
South
versus
ninety
store,
the
vice
versa.
O
I
may
just
note:
the
property
actually
has
an
easement
on
the
south
side
for
a
shared
driveway
amongst
five
different
properties,
and
so
that's
what
our
intent
is.
They
use
that
shared
easement
and
actually
do
parking
stalls
off
of
that
easement,
which
is
it's
allowing
us
to
get
rid
of
both
of
the
curb
cuts
on
the
property.
So.
O
E
E
M
I
actually,
like
the
idea,
I
mean
so
it's
a
very
nice
presented
idea,
and
you
know
it
seems
that
it's
probably
needed
in
that
area
too,
to
have
a
nice
little
shop
that
people
can
go
on.
You
know
stop
by
for
a
few
minutes
or
something,
and
so
whether
you
want
to
add
any
type
of
thing
is
I
mean
I
like
the
idea
how
it
is,
but
if
you
want
to
add
something
to
it,
that's
up
to
you
guys
and.
M
I
do
believe
the
applicant
I
mean
he
seems
to
be
very
straightforward
about
his
plan.
To
do
to
do
something
like
this
to
do
it.
You
know
commercial
return,
you're
right,
there's
nothing
holding
them
to
it,
but
I
don't
see
something
that
would
make
me
doubt
his
his
point
of
view.
So
some
of
the
Woodward's
something
carefully
than
they
would
easily
that's
I.
Think.
C
There's
a
development
agreement
either:
okay,
I
think
it's
a
corner
lot
with
the
space
that
has
a
lot
in
the
area
and
I.
Don't
I,
don't
see
the
significant
expansion
I
think
the
market
probably
will
determine
I
mean
building
an
independent
commercial.
There
might
be
challenging
on
its
own,
so
I
don't
really
feel
the
need
to
yeah.
L
L
And
analysis:
okay,
I'm,
starting
again,
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
listed
in
the
staff
report
and
the
testimony
and
plans
presented
I,
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
forward,
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
for
the
master
plan,
amendment
PLN,
PCM,
2016,
zero,
zero,
eight,
nine
eight
proposed
amendment
from
medium
density,
residential
to
medium
density,
mixed
use
and
so
I
just
go
to
the
next
one
immediately
are
we
voting
on
these
together?
I
think.
F
K
A
A
E
A
L
Findings
and
analysis
in
this
analysis,
in
the
staff
report,
testimony
and
discussion
at
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
City
Council
approved
the
proposed
zoning
map
map
amendment
file,
PLN
PCM,
2018,
zero,
zero,
eight
three
nine
proposed
zone
change
from
our
MF
35
to
RM;
RM?
U
35!
In
order
to
allow
the
property
to
be
redeveloped
with
a
moderate
density
residential
use
with
a
commercial
component.