►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - February 13, 2019
Description
Planning commission
Salt Lake City
A
Find
some
people
about
things
that
sometimes
need
to
be.
They
need
to
be
reminded
of
in
the
process
here
we
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
gets
a
chance
to
speak.
That
wants
a
chance
to
speak,
but
let's
be
respectful
of
each
other.
If
you
turn
off
or
silence
your
cellphone's
don't
interrupt
or
cheer
the
person.
Speaking.
A
E
A
A
C
F
F
The
planned
development
was
for
creating
a
lot
without
frontage,
it's
in
a
historic
district,
so
for
those
of
you
that
were
on
the
Commission
at
that
time,
there's
an
existing
historic
duplex,
located
a
setback
pretty
far
and
so
they're
creating
a
separate
lot
without
frontage
for
that
existing
property
and
then
for
a
front
yard.
Setback,
relief
and
they're
just
asking
for
approval
for
a
one-year
extension
and
the
property
is
also
in
a
local
historic
district
and
the
landmark
Commission
granted
an
extension
on
that
approval
in
January
of
this
year.
I
B
B
This
a
particular
item
you've
actually
seen
before
back
in
August
of
last
year,
but
a
slightly
different
version.
Mister
Alfond
ray
intends
to
develop
some
property
in
the
900
South
area,
900
south
and
like
200
west,
near
the
tracks
line
and
as
part
of
his
project.
He
is
requesting
additional
building
height
back
in
August.
The
request
involved
a
a
corner
parcel
on
Washington,
Street
and.
B
A
B
So
the
area
has
expanded
now
with
the
parses
in
yellow
that
he
has
either
under
control
or
under
contract
in
some
form
and
is
back
for
your
recommendation
last
time.
The
recommendation
was
to
not
approve
the
zoning
change,
so
we'll
come
back
again
for
your
second
consideration
this
time,
just
a
refresher.
B
There
was
some
discussion
and
certain
intersections
were
allowed
to
go
one
additional
story,
and
those
intersections
are
highlighted
on
this
map
here
and
you
can
see
by
the
big
green
arrow
the
original
yellow
parcel
that
was
discussed
back
in
August,
so
a
portion
of
what
mr.
alejandra
owns
is
included
in
one
of
those
intersections
that
on
200
west.
B
The
question
becomes
then,
as
it's
shown
on
the
map
here,
that
that's
a
corner
parcel.
Could
he
purchase
more
property
and
expand
and
consolidate
those
Lots
and
create
a
larger
corner
parcel
where
the
building
height
would
then
you
know,
increase
or
extend
further
into
the
block
area
by
creating
a
bigger
parcel,
and
that
was
what
that's
what's
he's
doing,
acquiring
the
properties
there
to
create
two
parcels
separated
by
the
alley.
B
B
B
B
It
mr.
Alfond
ray
asking
for
a
number
of
properties
along
900
South,
almost
like
a
corridor.
He
shrunk
that
that
area
to
the
corner
parcel
that
we're
looking
at
originally
back
in
August
on
Washington,
Street
and
200
West,
but
now
he's
expanded
it
again
to
kind
of
be
closer
together
and
further
into
that
block.
B
The
other
point
is
that
again,
this
FB
un-to
zone
was
adopted
back
in
2014
that's
about
five
years
ago
and
we're
getting
a
number
of
projects
that
are
just
just
completed
or
are
mid.
Construction
that
comply
with
the
building
height
staff
would
prefer
to
hold
off
on
changing
building
height
until
there's
more
time
to
see
what
the
current
heights,
how
they
contribute
to
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
see
if
that's
adequate
or
see
if
we
need
more.
B
So
those
are
the
primary
considerations
that
that
staff
is
concerned
with
and
we're
recommending
that
the
proposal
not
be
approved
and
that
you
present
to
the
City
Council
a
recommendation
against
the
additional
building
height.
A
couple
of
questions
that
come
up
with
this
proposal
is,
if
it
were
approved.
B
Could
landowners
then
consolidate
land
and
apply
that
additional
building
height
throughout
the
entire
parcel,
or
we
do
have
an
ordinance
that
deals
with
the
downtown
districts
where
you're
allowed
extra
building
height
on
the
corners,
but
that
only
extends
165
feet
away
from
the
corner
and
then
you're
supposed
to
drop
it
down?
So
that's
the
experience
we
have
with
trying
to
regulate
a
corner
building
height
you
know,
would
that
apply
to
some
to
this
proposal.
I
mean
it
could,
but
that
would
be
a
question
to
consider.
K
B
D
And
then
my
other
question
is:
if
they
were
just
focusing
to
say
just
that
right
side,
just
the
everything
east
of
the
alley,
would
you
be
more,
would
you
would
you
have
a
different
recommendation
for
us,
or
are
you
still
because
of
the
fact
that
that
he
wants
to
expand
South
as
well
you
you
would
stick
with
your
recommendation.
I.
B
E
L
Was
that
we
would
allow
in
the
corner
lots
to
have
these
higher
sort
of
buildings,
but
it
seems
like
based
on,
what's
going
in
there?
Are
we
seeing
people
taking
advantage
of
this
additional
height
in
the
corner?
Lot
I
mean
this
body
sauce
by
hop,
which
is
on
the
opposite
corner,
and
that's
only
going
to
three
stories
and
then
across
the
way
and
the
old
Utah
first
thing
is
those
apartment
buildings
and
that's
three
or
four
I
think
like
it's
not
all
over
the
top.
Are
there
other
Lots?
B
L
H
H
A
M
M
M
Been
very
committed
to
that
neighborhood
for
a
long
time.
In
2011,
we
kind
of
spearheaded
the
revitalization
of
the
grainery
district.
We
did
granary
row
as
a
shipping
container
I've,
all
beautiful
pictures
here,
where
we
took
the
shipping
containers
to
put
them
in
the
middle
of
the
street.
Just
a
couple
blocks
from
here
to
revitalize
the
area
and
show
working
with
the
neighbors
of
what's
possible
in
this
area.
So
I
have
very
deep
roots
here
in
this
neighborhood,
so
this
has
been
a
very
unique
project.
M
It's
a
what
I
think
what's
being
lost
in
this
discussion
is
this
is
a
former
dry,
cleaner
site
and,
as
we've
gone
through
testing
over
the
last
two
years,
contamination
is
not
just
on
the
site.
It
has
spread
to
the
parcels
to
the
west
most
of
the
parcels
that
we
own
now
and
there's
a
strategic
reason
why
we
did
that.
There's
also
a
reason
why
this
property
is
set
bacon
for
the
last
four
or
five
years
and
just
a
blight
on
the
neighborhood.
M
M
So
since
then,
so
since
I
was
here,
last
I
have
met
with
the
central
ninth
Community
Council
and
the
Ball
Park
Community
Council.
And
there
it's
a
very
involved
community
council
and
they
don't
take
things
lightly.
There
and
I
was
able
to
present
our
idea
our
reason
for
the
extra
height
and
it
was
very
warmly
received
and
we've
since
received
letters
of
support
from
both
community
councils,
which
we're
excited
about.
M
We
also
can't
excavate
or
remove
one
inch
of
dirt
from
that
site,
because
it's
so
contaminated,
so
we
have
to
remediate
it
all
and
then
recom
packed
it
and
then
built
and
then
and
then
build,
and
so
what
this
extra
height
allows
us
to
do
is
be
more
flexible
with
allowing
enough
on-site
parking
on
the
project,
while
fronting
all
of
ninth
South
with
retail
space.
Something
that
we're
really
we're
really
proud
about.
M
So
this
extra
height
is,
is
really
important
for
that
in
in
the
planning
documents,
especially
the
master
plan,
this
extra
height
is
very
compatible.
At
least
this
project.
We're
proposing
is
very
compatible
with
the
vision
of
the
master
plan,
which
is
higher
densities
along
Main
streets,
commercial
corridors
and
around
the
ninth
South
tract.
Stop
we're
literally
steps
from
tracks
enhanced
the
small
neighborhood
business
node
at
ninth,
south
and
2nd
west.
Now,
what
you
can't
see
is
in
between
these
two
buildings
I.
M
Fortunately,
my
renderings
aren't
coming
up,
but
this
alley
we're
treating
it
as
a
community
gathering
space,
we're
bringing
retail
back
into
that
alley
with
public
art
to
create
a
community
gathering
space
and
really
activate
that
alley.
So
we
feel
like
we
are
really
enhancing
that
node
on
9th
south
and
2nd
west.
We
are
also
preserving
the
scale
and
low
density,
residential
character
of
interior
streets,
Montrose,
Washington
and
Jefferson
streets
north
of
900
south.
M
Now,
that's
that
was
the
kicker
for
the
community,
because
the
community
doesn't
want
to
see
they
want
to
see
those
residential
streets
protected
and
maintained.
Well,
this
text
in
the
master
plan
does
that
by
calling
for
north
of
900
south
to
keep
to
keep
that
intact,
so
we're
south
of
900
south
and
if
you
go
on
Washington
Street
south
of
9
south
I've
also
a
lot
of
images
of
six
storey
buildings
and
multifamily
buildings
that
are
already
happening
south
of
Washington
Street.
So
we
we
had
to
get
this
vetted.
M
This
project
vetted
very
severely
by
the
neighborhood
and
it
passed
their
tests
and
they're
really
excited
about
it.
It
achieves
all
the
goals
that
they
wanted
to
achieve.
You
know
back
back
when
this
its
I
love
the
foreign
Bay's
zone,
I.
Think
the
Planning
Department
is
very
forward-thinking
on
what
they're
doing
and
how
they're
approaching
things,
but
sometimes
you
just
don't
know.
M
What's
you
know
you
can
designate
a
zone
on
a
specific
parcel,
but
you
don't
really
know
you
know
that
it's
very
often
those
parcels
and
their
life
cycle
of
those
buildings
and
they
have
to
rebe
repurposed
and
reach
in
and
and
and
revitalized
and
each
parcel
is
different.
Each
parcel
is
different.
It's
easy
to
look
on
paper
and
see
how
things
can
work,
but
you
know
with
the
drycleaner
site:
it's
it's
just
a
different
story.
M
Mr.
Lyon,
your
point
as
well,
you
know
there
in
the
staff
report
there
was
a
concern
for
a
corridor
effect
where
you
have
the
same
height
of
building
going
down
the
street.
Well,
you
know
on
the
main
commercial
node
of
ninth
West,
ninth,
south
and
second
West.
Those
buildings
are
three
stories:
spy
hop
and
the
the
condos
there.
M
There
are
three
stories,
so
they
didn't
build
up
to
their
full
potential,
which,
in
of
itself
with
all
the
different
kinds
of
building
Heights
that
are
there,
that
corridor
effect
really
doesn't
come
into
play
on
making
these
go
five
stories.
So
long
story
short
we're
we're
in
closing
we're
really
excited
about
this
project.
M
J
A
A
D
M
A
K
You,
my
name,
is
Cindy
Cromer
I
hope
that
there
are
some
people
from
the
neighborhood
here.
This
is
not
one
of
mine,
but
the
land-use
issues
are
mine,
so
the
history
of
the
F
be
un
to
zone.
It
was
developed
for
this
neighborhood
specifically,
and
then
it
was
applied
to
the
entire
city
and
that
created
all
sorts
of
heartburn
for
me
because
its
next
application
after
this
neighborhood
was
at
trolley
square.
K
It's
just
south
of
the
shopping
centre,
so
for
all
of
the
heartburn
that
the
FPU
and
has
caused
me,
the
intent
of
the
zone
for
this
part
of
the
city
is
I
believe
very
clear,
and
the
distinction
between
a
corridor
and
a
node
is
huge.
I
face
the
quandary
frequently
of
looking
down
400
south
and
being
thankful
for
drive-through
windows
and
gas
stations,
because
otherwise
we're
going
to
have
walls
on
either
side
of
the
street
that
go
up
to
the
maximum
allowed
under
stick
framing.
That's
what
we're
going
to
have.
K
So
you
will
certainly
see
more
requests
like
this.
If
you
approve
this,
one
I
don't
see
any
benefit
to
the
urban
design.
The
intent
of
the
urban
design
formula
for
this
zone
and
I
certainly
see
none
to
the
neighbors
to
the
south,
who
did
show
up
at
the
open
house.
Maybe
they
weren't
present
at
the
community
organizations,
but
you
do
have
in
your
packet
comments
from
them
when
this
went
to
an
open
house
format
before
so
I
refer
you
to
them
and
I
hope
some
of
them
are
in
the
audience.
Thanks.
Thank.
I
So
I
am
a
living
right
in
front
of
where
this
proposed
parcel
of
height
permission
is
going
to
be
at
I,
live
on
Washington
Street
next
to
the
club
triangle.
So
a
few
things
I
prepared
here
so
I'm
currently
being
asked
to
be
on
the
central,
nine
centric
community
council
on
the
board,
in
behalf
of
renters
at
ten
and
a
few
community
council
meetings,
so
I'm
just
waiting
to
be
approved
by
the
board
to
be
on
there
representing
Venters
I.
I
Don't
live
downtown,
downtown
Salt,
Lake
City,
but
live
more
of
the
outskirts
as
weas
as
we're
talking
about
and
the
reason.
Why
is
because
I
like
the
relaxed
view,
but,
like
you
know,
everything's
accessible,
but
it's
not
I'm,
not
bombarded
by
so
many
tall
buildings.
Giving
his
own
change
on
the
basis
of
a
new
apartment
will,
in
my
opinion,
like
precedents
in
that
area,
more
height,
more
units,
more
traffic,
and
then
that
means
also,
since
they're
not
required
to
have
parking
less
parking
already.
I
I
It's
interesting
that
they
were
saying
that
you
know
they're
doing
us
a
favor,
because
the
land
is
contaminated
and
you
know
we
don't
want
to
see
more
normals.
Take
upon
that.
But
I
think
it's
just
important
to
remember
that
there
are
people
out
there
who
want
to
best
for
those
living
in
that
area
and
see
and.
I
I
A
A
B
G
G
B
G
I
understand
that,
but
are
they
but
are
the?
Is
the
community
okay,
because
the
the
first
time
we
had
this?
It
was
an
expansive
piece
of
area
that
we
were
making
a
decision
on.
The
community
seemed
very
strongly
against
it
and
then
it
changed
and
in
our
request
last
time
was
go
back
to
the
community
on
this
scaled-down
version.
I
would
like.
G
We
would
like
to
know
what
the
community
wants
or,
if
they're,
okay
with
something
scaled
down,
and
then
it
just
seems
like
I'm,
just
having
a
hard
time
seeing
the
timeline
as
to
because
there's
some
some
of
the
comments
and
our
staff
report
are
from
I
believe
the
original
rendering
from
2017
and
then
there's
this
one
from
November
and
I'm
just
wondering
at
what
point
they
are,
what
what
rendering
or
what?
What
were
they
looking
at?
Are
they
okay
with
this?
Is
this
because
that's
my
biggest
concern
is
that
is
the
community?
G
Okay
with
this,
because
our
conversation
last
time
was
that
the
community
has
put
a
lot
of
work
and
energy
and
effort
into
making
a
decision
on
these
varied
heights.
You
know
in
the
nodes
and
that
sort
of
thing-
and
we
didn't
want
to
didn't-
want
to
disturb
that
without
their
general
approval
and
so
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
as
to
what
the
community
wants.
And
you
know
we
had
one
individual
speaking
from
the
neighborhood
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
you've
heard
anything
else.
Okay,.
B
So,
as
far
as
what
was
presented
back
in
November
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
parcels
were
included
in
at
that
discussion
when
the
City
Council
decided
to
send
this
back,
we
we
got
with
the
applicant
and
said,
let's
clarify
which
parcels
you
want
to
include
in
this.
We
did
the
ones
that
we've
shown
you
two.
B
Haze
was
provided
via
email
to
both
chairs
of
the
community
councils,
the
central
ninth
on
the
ball
park
back
in
January
and
said:
we've
received
this
revised
request.
Let
us
know
if
you
have
any
comments
or
you
can
come
to
the
Planning
Commission
hearing
in
February
and
speak
to
them.
I
have
not
heard
anything
from
them.
The
only
thing
that
I
have
that's
tied
to
one
of
them
is
that
email
that
you
have
in
your
packet
from
November.
G
B
I
did
receive
an
email
while
we
were
on
our
field
trip
from
a
Taylor
Anderson
I'll.
Just
read
this
for
you
as
I'm,
not
sure
I
can
make
it
tonight,
but
I
wanted
to.
Let
you
know,
I
think
the
proposed
development
from
urban
Alf
and
Ray
appears
to
be
what
the
central
ninth
and
frankly
much
of
the
rest
of
the
city
needs
more
of.
We
need
more
mixed-use
buildings
that
give
reason
for
people
to
stay
in
and
visit
neighborhoods
throughout
the
day
and
night
thanks
Taylor,
that's
from
Taylor
Anderson.
L
B
L
B
Most
of
the
zones,
maybe
like
one
stall
per
per
unit,
but
don't
quote
me
on
that
just
yet
and
then
for
the
retail
uses
it
would
be
based
on
the
size,
so
many
stalls
per
square
footage
of
retail
area
and
commercial
area.
So,
yes,
this
zone
does
have
a
reduced
parking
requirement
for
the
residential
uses.
Typically
and.
L
H
B
A
D
Our
discussion,
can
you
can
you
explain
to
me
here
again,
but
you've
got
in
in
the
text.
It
says
that
all,
but
one
of
the
parcels
is
allowed
a
maximum
of
50
feet,
but
then
down
in
the
table
it
says
30
feet
maximum
from
established
grade
for
cottage
developments.
Let
me
understand
what
the
what
the
difference
is
between
the
30
and
the
40
feet
and
which
properties
does
that
apply
for
so.
D
D
B
E
D
D
D
L
L
L
B
B
B
L
D
C
Go
with
what
Clarke
is
suggesting
for
this
reason
alone,
if
he
consolidates
those
into
one
parcel,
the
likelihood
of
it
feels
like
it
would
be
a
lot
of
work
for
somebody
to
keep
track,
of
which
part
of
that
parcel
gets
to
be
one
height
and
which
part
of
this
that
parcel
gets
to
be
another
height.
As
you
move
into
the
future,
I
mean
it's
one
thing:
to
build
a
building
now,
but
down
the
road
you
know
keeping
it
just.
It
seems
like
that
is
something
that's
hard
to
keep
track
of.
C
C
C
H
L
B
N
B
L
L
D
A
M
That
was
our
intention.
This
was
really
confusing
for
us
and
our
team,
as
far
as,
if
you
consolidated
lots
of
it
applied
over
that's
what
got
us
sent
us
back
to
this
Planning
Commission,
and
we
tried
to
specify
that
by
highlighting
specific
parcel
numbers
and
outlining
those
parcel
numbers
in
in
this
yellow
outline.
As
our
intention.
B
D
D
O
L
G
And
if
the,
if
the
Commission
is
now
in
favor
of
extending
the
height
on
Washington
Street,
then
we're
already
altering
the
project,
and
so
he's
gonna
need
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
anyway.
So
I
don't
know
that
tabeling
or
I
mean
without
that
direction,
so
that
he
understands
it
that
that's
not
going
to
work
either
or
couldn't
we
I
mean
if
the
Commission
wants
to
add
that
in
there
couldn't.
We
just
add
that
into
the
text,
but.
L
M
Weston
just
to
answer
one
of
your
questions,
I
met
with
the
central
Knights
Community
Council
presented
these
renderings
to
them.
We
had
a
big
open
house
over
25
people,
attended
common
cards
and
Mary
Gordon.
The
chair
wrote
a
letter
of
support
based
on
those
findings
and
the
positive
support
from
the
neighborhood
that
was
included
in
in
in
the
staff
room.
Okay,.
O
It
seems
to
me
that
we
need
to
send
this
back,
because
this
is
not
going
to
have
the
intent
of
create
a
creating
the
ability
for
you
to
build
the
buildings
you're
showing
in
your
renderings.
Let's
put
it
that
way,
you
won't
be
able
to
do
that
if
we
approve
this
or
if
we
send
it
to
city
or
FC
council
approve,
so
you
still
won't
be
able
to
do
it.
O
O
J
G
G
C
A
M
A
A
N
N
L
L
L
Casey,
maybe
because
Wes
and
I
were
talking
a
bit
at
least
let
the
applicant
know.
I
was
just
curious
before
he
comes
back
to.
If
there's
ever
a
case
where
we
are
like
naming
specific
parcels
in
a
zoning
ordinance
code
in
the
text,
no
no
I
mean
the
applicant
should
know.
I
would
like
to
ask
that
question
or
I
will
ask
that
question
just
to
keep
since
I
was
I
thought
of
it
here,
I'd
like
him
to
know
as
well.
If
he
comes
back.
L
L
L
L
E
E
P
This
is
on
three
contiguous
parcels
planned
for
three
parcels
right
now,
and
it
is
the
AT&T
store,
the
event
center
and
cheddar
burger,
and
they
would
need
to
consolidate
those
three
parcels
prior
to
pulling
building
permits,
as
I
said
it
about
sadi
to
zoning
district
they're
planning
a
mid
block
walkway
in
between
this
building
and
600
lofts,
which
is
directly
to
the
east,
and
this
is
also
located
on
a
grand
boulevard
which
is
600
South
the
proposed
uses.
This
is
a
mixed-use
building
with
ground
floor,
commercial
and
then
175
residential
apartments.
P
Analysis
of
staff
is
that
the
proposal
complies
with
master
plan,
implementation,
mobility
and
housing
objectives
within
the
planned
development
standards,
and
addition
to
that
due
to
the
proximity
to
the
d2
zone
and
for
the
active
ground
uses
on
the
ground
level.
Planning
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
plan
development
with
the
conditions
that
I
listed
on
the
first
page
of
the
staff
report.
J
P
N
N
Thank
you
for
the
time.
Thanks
Christopher
the
report
I
appreciate
it.
My
name
is
Ben.
Lo
one
of
the
principals
and
owners
of
low
property
group.
That's
developing
this
property.
We
were
before
you
a
couple
months
ago
for
a
project
in
sugarhouse
and
be
back
for
a
couple
more
soon.
So
anyway,
this
is
my
partner
and
brother,
Alex
Lowe
and
then
Peter
Berger
with
mV.
He
architecture,
and
he
was
he's
the
lead
architect
on
this
project.
N
N
But,
more
importantly,
I
think
for
the
city
is
down
on
the
main
floor.
It's
all
activated
uses
on
the
main
floor
and
glass
and
retail
spaces,
which
we
think
frankly,
that
you
know
right
now,
there's
not
tons
of
retail
down
in
this
part
of
the
city,
but
we
think
it's
a
great
location.
There's
big
traffic
cameras
to
go,
buy
it.
It's
part
of
the
entry
to
the
city,
and
so
we
really
focused
on
that
activation
to
the
street
on
a
Grand,
Boulevard
and
also
a
you
know,
put
a
lot
of
glass
onto
that
corner.
N
That
goes
up
multiple
stories
on
the
6th
and
main
corner
so
that
it's
just
as
you
come
up
sick,
south
and
the
entry
to
the
city.
You
know
it's
a
it's
a
project,
that's
impressive
and
has
a
glass
on
the
front
of
the
pool
where
you
can
see
into
the
you
know
into
the
front
of
the
pool.
Just
some
some
features
that
I
think
we're
excited
about.
It's
a
adjacent
to
a
future
track.
Stop
that
the
streets
already
been
widened
and
there's
a
truck,
stop
planned
adjacent
to
the
property
and
we're
excited
about
that.
N
We
did
plan
to
mid
block
alley
as
part
of
the
master
plan,
so
we
did
make
sure
that
we,
you
know,
have
that
prepared
as
well
and
generally
just
really
excited
about
this
project.
I
think
this
corner
is
a
great
corner
for
the
city
and
we're
excited
to
be
a
part
of
it.
We
thought-
maybe
you
know,
Peter
I
flew
all
the
way
into
town
for
this,
and
maybe
I'll
give
him
just
a
minute
to
talk
a
little
bit
out.
The
architecture
and
I
will
pass
it
on
for
any
questions
they
might
have.
Thank.
R
You
for
your
time
tonight,
just
just
a
few
words
that
I've
been
just
stated,
but
what
we
really
try
to
do
from
an
architectural
standpoint
is
activate
this
building
on
various
levels.
It
is
such
a
key
intersection
in
the
city,
so
the
ground
floor
activation
was
such
a
key
thing,
we're
way
above
beyond
the
40%
requirement
of
glazing.
That's
required
on
these
edges.
I
think
we're
in
the
60%
range
on
both
edges,
but
that's
full
height
glass.
R
So
a
lot
of
visibility,
really
that,
speaking
to
people
approaching
the
building,
how
do
I,
how
do
I
get
there?
How
do
I
be
a
part
of
that?
How
do
I
you
know,
attend
that
retail
and
and
take
part
in
that
building
and
then
from
an
amenity
package?
Again?
How
do
you
activate
that
corner?
You
know
these
kind
of
three-dimensional
connection
of
open
spaces
so
on
the
third
and
fourth
floor
is
where
we
have
our
fitness
and
fitness
mezzanine.
R
So
again,
a
lot
of
active
uses
from
Anna
many
standpoint
right
on
that
corner
and
then,
as
Ben
mentioned,
the
rooftop
deck,
that's
going
to
have
just
fantastic
views
back
towards
downtown
and
actually
the
way
grant
America
is
sited.
It's
it's
back
almost
perfectly
so
when
you're
up
on
that
deck,
it
perfectly
frames
your
view
back
towards
downtown.
Looking
at
Main
Street,
it's
gonna
be
a
really
kind
of
incredible
moment
for
the
project,
so
yeah
very
excited
a
lot
of
great
amenities
and
a
lot
of
great
moments
on
this
project.
N
We
build
properties
and
we
hold
them
and
keep
them
we're,
not
somebody's
trying
to
sell
it
in
two
or
three
years
and
trying
to
build
it
inexpensively
to
try
to
kind
of
flip
for
profit.
We
try
to
build
properties
riot
that
we,
you
know
forever
and
and
that's
what
we're
doing
here
is
trying
to
build
a
really
property
that
we
can
try
buy
with
our
children
years
to
come
and
be
proud
that
it's
you
know
meaningful
to
the
city
and
something
we're
proud
of.
N
On
Main
Street
directly
west
right
there,
we
showing
the
cursor
the
city's,
already
widened
the
street
and
we've
been
working
with
multiple
members
of
the
city.
The
RTA
actually
has
some
funds
for
the
actual
track.
Stop
we've
already
met
with
the
UTA,
and
it
is
planned
and
happening
adjacent
to
the
property,
and
then
the
developers
in
this
area,
including
ourselves
and
some
other
developers
who
are
planning
buildings
within
a
few
block,
have
in
principle,
agreed
to
put
up
the
rest
of
the
funds
to
build
the
track.
Stop.
So
we're
really
excited
about
that.
Thank.
L
O
O
Okay,
so
in
it,
if
you
go
higher,
typically
in
a
place
like
Portland
or
some
other
places
where
they
do
have
taller
buildings
in
their
downtown,
it's
because
they
moved
to
steel
or
concrete
as
a
basic
structural
material.
So
at
some
point
we
do
have
to
have
we
we
do
have
to
move
to
that
kind
of
construction.
So
if
it's
not
here
right
on
the
edge
of
downtown
or
right
really
in
downtown,
then
we're.
N
Yeah
I
think
I.
Think
that's
a
good
comment.
You
know
there's
a
couple
of
things
here.
We
think
that
this
site
is
very
appropriate
for
this
out
of
building
the
building
to
the
east
of
us
on
the
same
block
is
is
not
as
tall
as
we're
planning
this
building
right
here,
and
so
it
kind
of
fits
with
that,
and
then
you
get
to
the
next
zone
literally
to
the
next
side
of
it,
and
then
it's
20
feet
less
is
the
maximum
height
and
the
next
zone
over.
N
So
we
think
it's
a
pretty
good
transition
spot
I
think
if
we
were
two
or
three
blocks
to
the
north,
that
would
be
you
a
different
story
and
you're
correct.
We,
you
know,
we've
actually
played
with
some
high-rise
plans
and
we
actually,
you
know,
have
priced
them
out
and
when
rents
get
to
$3
or
300,
you
know
three
dollars
and
fifty
cents
per
square
foot.
Then
we'll
start
seeing
a
lot
of
you
know
concrete
construction,
and
that
will
happen
in
this
market
at
some
point,
but
probably
also
doesn't
fit.
N
Did
you
know
that
I
guess
the
goal
of
affordable
housing
and
we
felt
like
that?
You
know
trying
to
build
a
product
where
we,
you
know
it's
three
dollar
ances,
you
know
a
not
feasible
and
not
something
I
think
the
city's
you
know
looking
for
on
the
down
the
fringes
of
a
downtown.
At
this
point,
thank
you
and
I
guess.
My
only
other
comment
on
that
too
is
I.
N
Do
think
that
the
mass
and
scale
the
building
like
this
part
of
it
is
trying
to
get
density
in
the
downtown
urban
core
and
get
people
onto
the
street.
It's
indexed
to
mass
transit
and
we're
you
know
here
we
have
175
unit,
it's
a
very
it's.
A
very
efficient
building,
175
units
on
one
acre,
so
I
think
we're
accomplishing
bringing
residents.
N
L
A
A
K
A
L
In
general,
I
say,
like
I
mean
I
do
think
this
is
a
nice
looking
building
I
appreciate
the
glasses
there,
though
I'm
getting
tired
of
seeing
the
same
style
of
architecture
come
through
and
dominate
so
much
of
our
city,
but
I
do
think
given
where
the
grand
America
is
at
and
right
across
the
street
and
how
that
how
the
grand
America
is
not
going
anywhere
for
a
while
that
I
think
it
is
appropriate
for
this
space
and
so
I'm
willing
to
make
a
motion.
If,
unless
there's
other
discussion,
any.
G
I
was
hesitant
on
that,
because
I
believe
that
you
know
we
are
densifying
and
we
have
to
add
density
where
we
can
and
if
we're
not
using
our
d1
zones
and
we're
not
using
spaces
right
next
to
a
track
station
or
proposed
track
station,
then
we
are
missing
an
opportunity
to
really
maximize
density
and
so
I'm
really
reluctant
to
reduce
height
in
a
spot.
That
should
be
absolutely
maximized.
I
mean.
L
I
would
agree
with
you,
but
if,
if
they
came
forward,
were
for
a
rezone
and
saying
this
should
be
a
d2
property,
I'd
probably
be
fine
with
a
rezone,
it
would
have
allowed
the
same,
because
the
way
I
have
always
thought
of
the
grant.
America
is
kind
of
the
edge
of
what
downtown
kind
of
is
and
then
even
where
we're
looking
at
development,
where
it's
happening,
it's
going
west
more
towards
the
Gateway,
and
that
seems
to
be
the
corridor
that
we
kind
of
have
I,
don't
see.
L
You
know
a
big
skyscraper
up
on
this,
like
as
far
south
as
six
south
is
being
where
it
would
fit
and
I
agree
with
you
mostly
and
I,
don't
no
on
the
other
project.
They
wanted
more
height
or
less
I.
I
do
feel
this
is
unique
because
of
its
proximity
to
and
where
it's
at,
and
it's
far
far
enough
out
and
give
one
else's
around
it.
It
seen
it
does.
You
know
appropriate
to
me
when.
G
A
G
C
O
I'll,
just
guess,
I
want
it
recorded
in
some
way
that
or
that
we
all
might
at
least
have
the
sensibility
to
understand
that
the
d1
zone
is
so
that
we
have
a
higher
density
in
our
center
of
our
city
and
if
we
willy-nilly
sort
of
let
it
go
everywhere.
That
is
not
the
intention
of
our
downtown
master
plan.
H
But
if
the
density
isn't
financially
feasible,
we're
not
going
to
get
any
density
so
I
think
part.
We
have
to
balance
the
priorities
here
and
I
think
in
this
location,
where
you're
right
on
the
edge
we're
right
next
to
the
d2,
where,
as
matt
said,
if
they
came
in
to
rezone,
they
would
have
a
compelling
argument
to
make
there
as
well
so
I
I.
Think
I,
echo
Sarah's
comments.
The
it
looks
like
a
great
project.
They've
worked
very
hard
to
comply
with
the
components
of
the
various
plans
that
apply.
G
H
G
H
Okay,
one
of
you,
based
on
the
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report.
The
information
presented
and
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
plan
development
petition,
PLN
se
bhi
2018,
0,
0,
9,
9
3
for
modifications
to
the
minimum
height
requirement
of
a
hundred
feet
on
corners
in
the
d1
zone.
As
indicated
in
the
staff
report
with
the
following
conditions
of
approval
1,
the
three
subject:
parcels
must
be
consolidated
prior
to
issuing
building
permits
to
an
easement
for
the
proposed
mid
block.
H
Walkway
to
the
east
of
the
proposed
structure
must
be
approved
by
Salt
Lake
City
and
recorded
with
Salt
Lake
County
3.
The
only
the
specific
changes
addressed
in
the
support
as
part
of
the
plan
development
or
preliminary
subdivision
review
are
modified.
The
applicant
must
comply
with
all
other
applicable
zoning
regulations
and
a
second.
H
M
A
E
A
E
J
A
K
F
F
This
is
a
request
from
Daniel
Schmeling,
the
architect
representing
the
property
owner
for
a
conditional
use
and
conditional
building
and
site
design
approval
to
construct
an
addition
to
an
existing
commercial
structure
at
approximately
ten
thirty
seven
and
ten
forty
three
East
nine
hundred
South.
As
you
can
see
from
the
vicinity
map
on
the
screen,
the
property
is
currently
two
separate
properties
and
those
would
be
consolidated
to
accommodate
the
proposed
addition.
F
So
the
proposed
addition
is
two
and
a
half
stories,
it's
four
thousand
two
hundred
and
seventy
square
feet,
and
it's
designed
to
accommodate
for
commercial
tenants,
three
on
the
ground
floor
and
one
on
the
second
floor.
The
primary
building
material
is
brick
and
the
windows
are
still
framed
with
steel
detailing
and
there's
an
existing
surface
parking
lot,
the
rear
of
the
property,
and
that
will
continue
to
be
used.
It
will
be
reconfigured
to
meet
their
parking
requirement
and
then
they
will
be
using
two
spaces
along
nine
hundred
South
to
meet
their
parking
requirement
as
well.
F
The
Jordan
and
Salt
Lake
Canal
runs
through
the
western
portion
of
the
properties.
So,
as
you
can
see
from
that
map,
it's
the
area
in
red,
so
they
have
quite
a
large
easement
on
this
property,
where
they're
not
able
to
build
any
permanent
construction.
We've
added
a
condition
of
approval.
Approval
noted
in
the
recommended
motion
related
to
that.
F
These
are
just
some
images
of
the
surrounding
development
on
the
north
and
south
side
of
900
South,
there's
some
additional
site
photos
and
surrounding
property
photos
included
in
the
staff
report
and
as
far
as
the
public
process,
the
city
held
an
open
house,
and
we
also
went
to
the
community
council
meeting
the
East
Liberty
Park
I
believe
it
was
community
council
meeting
and
we
did
receive
one
public
comment.
That's
in
favor
of
the
petition
and
that's
included
in
the
staff
report.
F
Staff
has
reviewed
the
proposal
against
the
standards
of
review,
which
include
the
conditional
use
standards,
the
conditional
building
and
site
design
standards.
Those
conditional
use
standards
includes
specific
standards
for
this
type
of
request,
which
look
at
things
like
the
location
and
surrounding
structures
that
are
also
non-residential
and
how
those
impact
the
structure
and
again
we're
recommending
approval.
With
the
conditions
noted
in
the
staff
report,
I
can
answer
questions
and
the
architect
and
the
property
owner
are
also
available.
Thank.
F
S
S
Can
answer
that
so
when
we
bought
this
property
15
years
ago,
we
in
spite
of
doing
all
of
our
due
diligence,
the
Canal
had
never
that
runs.
There
has
never
been
recorded,
it
was
reported
and
originally
in
1884
and
had
never
been
seen.
So
all
of
our
title
work
never
showed
that.
So
when
we
started
this
process,
we
had
no
idea
that
for
15
years
we've
been
sitting
on
a
canal,
so
that
is
the
main
driver
of
the
design
and
the
reason
to
do
the
addition,
because
we
couldn't
couldn't
another
structure.
S
J
J
J
S
J
I
know:
we've
had
this
discussion
before
some
planning.
Commissioners,
don't
really
like
angled
parking
I
personally
do,
and
it's
also
literally
part
of
what
you
see
just
a
little
bit
further
west
and
this
area
is,
you
know,
really
popular,
and
so
you,
the
more
you
can
maximize
some
of
that
parking
did
not
be
parallel
plus,
nobody
knows
how
to
parallel
park
in
this
city.
So.
S
Excuse
me
to
Lincoln:
excuse
me
on
that
anyway,
so
Lincoln
up
to
11th
and
we
are
in
the
process
talking
with
Tom
Millar
about
that
angled
parking.
We
have
gotten
approval
so
far
from
urban
forestry
because
we
have
some
large
trees
out
front
and
we
have
you
know
we.
You
know
we're
still
working
through
it,
but
we
feel
exactly
the
same.
It's
very
important
to
have
that
angled
parking
right
there.
That's
great.
S
You
know
I,
wouldn't
mind,
you
know
making
a
comment
about
that
to
both
we're
sisters
and
we
own
this
property
together,
and
we
feel
really.
We
have
felt
strongly
about
the
architecture
at
ninth
and
ninth
and
when
we
first
went
into
this
project,
you
know
Dan
our
architect
and
we
were
like.
We
want
this
to
feel
you
know
very
9th
and
9th.
You
look
at
the
red
brick
buildings
down
on
the
corner.
S
Look
at
hip
and
humble.
This
is
what
we
want,
but
with
that
Canal
easement
it
has,
it
really
forced
our
hand
in
creating
something
a
little
different
than
what
maybe
our
original
vision
is.
The
one
thing
that
I
think
we
are
doing
to
kind
of
resonate.
What's
more
traditional
to
ninth
and
ninth:
is
the
steel
windows
with
a
heavy
still
over
the
wind,
the
windows
like
down
at
Mozza,
so
we
are
trying
to
bring
in
some
elements
that
are
very
reminiscent
of
that
architecture.
S
J
Appreciate
the
the
challenges,
the
canal-
this
is
not
the
first
person
in
that
area
that
has
had
to
deal
with
that
and
a
longtime
resident
I
understand
that
I
think
and
looking
at
the
rendering.
Now
there
are
just
certain
features
of
hip
and
humble
that
you
get
a
jet
out.
You
know
like
had
little
awning
kind
of
canopy
like
I,
don't
know,
I
would
just
I
get
what
you're
trying
to
do
I'd.
This
just
feels
again,
just
so
schizophrenic
about
how
to
complement
each
other
and
there's
really
no
real
one
vision
any
longer
there.
S
O
E
S
Separate
business
all
the
way
back
where
we've
designed
it
so
that
it
could
be
divided
up
into
as
many
as
three
small
retail
spaces.
So
if
you
kind
of
like
down
at
the
corner
just
next
to
the
old
great
harvest
that
building
that's
pizza,
no
no
is
in
how
there's,
as
you
go
back
through
that
lot,
there's
smaller
little
retail
spaces
back
there,
so
our
hope
is,
and
by
cutting
it
up
the
way
we
did
that
from
the
street.
You
can
see
those
additional
businesses,
but
they
could
be
combined
if
we
had
a
larger
tenant.
O
A
Q
My
name
is
Darrell
hi
I'm,
co-chair
of
the
East
Liberty
Park,
Community,
Council
and
Dave
Richards
is
with
me
and
he's
our
land
use
planning
chair,
so
we
invited
hip
and
humble
to
come
to
our
Community
Council
on
the
24th
of
January.
There
were
about
50
people
in
attendance.
At
that
meeting
anytime,
you
say
development
at
ninth
and
ninth.
Q
It
develops
a
substantial
amount
of
interest
as
I'm
sure
many
of
you
are
aware
from
actually
called
the
mutual
beauty
supply
development
and-
and
so
there
were,
there
was
a
lot
of
interest
in
our
meeting
the
overall
consensus
during
our
community
council
meeting
and
that
we
would
forward
to
you
this
evening
is
that
this
development
is
compatible
with
the
business
district
and
the
neighborhood.
There
were
comments
and
concerns
brought
forward
at
the
meeting
concerning
height
and,
of
course,
the
the
ubiquitous
parking
question
and
the
unique
design
of
the
building.
Q
So
some
of
the
some
of
the
comments
that
were
made
that
were
appreciated
by
the
residents
were
the
attempt
of
the
developers
to
reduce
the
mass
of
the
building.
They
also
like
the
the
efforts
to
adapt
to
the
constraints
of
the
McClellan
trail
canal
that
runs
right
under
the
property
that
was
that
area
in
red.
On
the
on
the
one
illustration,
the
residents
also
thought
there
was
a
thoughtful
use
of
exterior
materials
on
the
building
that
was
compatible
with
the
neighborhood.
It
represents
continued
investment
by
a
local
business
that
contributes
to
walkable
neighborhood
they're.
Q
Also
comments
appreciating
out
the
idea
of
an
outdoor
patio
incorporated
as
an
asset
hip
and
humble,
has
been
a
long
and
has
a
long
and
positive
history,
and
we
welcome
the
support
of
this
addition
to
the
fabric
and
character
of
our
neighborhood
and
and
I
appreciated.
Amy's
comments
about
zoning
and
so
I,
dug
through
my
folder.
R
R
It
works
well
over
on
eleventh
East,
which
is
also
in
our
in
our
district,
because
most
of
those
buildings
they're
converted
homes
that
look
like
homes,
but
the
north
side
of
nine
South
doesn't
have
much
of
that
left
anymore.
So
enforcing
those
kind
of
standards
makes
it
difficult.
I
think
they've
done
a
good
job
with
a
difficult
property
and
difficult
site
to
work
with
and
I
wasn't
able
to
attend
our
open
house
with
him.
But
from
what
I
understand,
the
comments
were
very
positive.
In
general.
J
J
K
My
name
is
still
Cindy
Cromer
and
I
want
to
say
that
there's
there's
no
collusion
between
Dave
Richards
and
myself
about
the
state
of
affairs
at
ninth
and
ninth,
but
we
have
both
been
around
for
a
while,
and
so
we
see
some
of
the
same
things.
First
of
all,
there's
a
principle
in
preservation.
That's
really
at
odds
with
the
requirements
of
the
ordinance
here.
The
principle
and
preservation
is
that,
if
you're
going
to
add
on
to
anis
toric
building,
you
make
the
addition
look
distinct
from
the
original.
K
K
But
we
need
to
talk
about
a
small
area
plan
revisiting
the
existing
small
area
plan
for
ninth
and
ninth.
So
the
what
is
called
the
East
Central
Community
small
area
master
plan
or
the
ninth
and
ninth
plan
was
adopted
in
1992.
It
is
now
over
26
years
old.
It
was
driven
by
problems
created
by
the
expansion
of
the
Smith
food
King
and
they're
totally
untenable
loading-dock.
It
solved
those
problems
and
didn't
address
others
that
are
now
in
front
of
us.
Thank
you.
T
There
are
five
different
buildings
that
have
been
constructed
in
the
last
three
years
that
have
changed
the
look
of
that
road
from
residential
commercial
to
pure
commercial,
and
all
of
them
have
involved
more
than
one
story,
two
stories
minimum
and
they
continue
right
now.
It
looks
like
the
easternmost
extent
of
that
goes
to
1,100
East,
which
is
proposed
to
have
either
a
circle
or
some
sort
of
interchange
that
would
allow
traffic
to
move
east
and
west
on
the
900,
South,
Corridor
and
also
north
and
south
on
the
1100
East
corridor
more
efficiently.
T
As
a
resident
I
would
like
to
see
that
900
South
Corridor
developed
in
a
commercial
manner.
That
makes
sense.
We
all
recognize
that
it
will
never
be
what
it
was.
It's
going
to
be
a
walkable,
attractive,
enjoyable,
mixed
use,
neighborhood
we
like
that.
But
there's
a
small
group
of
neighborhood
blocks
that
exist:
north
of
900,
east
north
of
900,
south
and
east
of
the
rowland
hall,
st.
T
Mark's
school
that
are
now
being
cut
off
by
this
900
South
development
from
the
Gilmer
neighborhood,
as
well
as
from
the
neighborhoods
that
exist
along
1,100
East,
and
we
see
the
Planning
Commission
take
that
into
account
so
that
we're
not
cut
off
like
like
a
finger
that
it
never
retains
its
original
look
and
feel
as
a
residential
neighborhood.
Thank
you
thank.
E
A
L
F
Don't
know
exactly
when
hip
and
humble
was
built,
but
I
want
to
say
it
was
early
1900s.
One
thing
I
did
find.
That
was
interesting
is
when
it
was
built.
It
was
identified
on
the
Sanborn
map
as
a
residential
structure
as
well,
which
none
of
us
would
look
at
hip
and
humble
today
and
think
of
it
as
a
residential
structure,
but
it
was
initially
built
as
a
residence
and
also
a
store,
but
I
don't
know
exactly
when
it
was
built.
C
I'm
ready
to
make
a
motion
I'm
effed,
based
on
the
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report.
The
information
presented
and
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
conditional
use
petition,
PLN
PCM
2018,
zero,
zero,
nine,
nine
zero
for
the
new
addition
and
the
conditional
building
and
site
design
review
petition,
PLN
PCM
2018,
zero,
zero,
nine.
Ninety
one
for
not
for
modifications
of
the
specified
design
standards
am
I.
L
O
The
city
I
actually
like
the
fact
that
both
of
them
are
quite
different
in
their
expression.
I
do
believe
in
the
in
the
secretary
of
standards
of
not
trying
to
duplicate
the
architecture
of
one
over
the
other
and
I,
really
like
the
way
it
steps
back
and
addresses
the
Canal
Zone,
so
that
there
is
an
opportunity
there
for
some
places
for
people
to
stop.
I
am
sympathetic
to
Amy's
question
about.
O
What's
the
ninth
and
ninth
becoming
and
I
do
think
that
it
would
be
good
to
have
a
master
plan,
but
I
think,
even
if
you
have
a
master
plan,
this
kind
of
project
which
is
kind
of
marrying
the
the
residential
to
the
or
the
older
but
type
to
a
newer
type,
would
would
still
be
something.
We
would
accept
the
kind
of
thing
that
really
bugs
me.
There
are
projects
which
are
the
five
storeys
I'd,
like
the
one.
We
just
saw
five
storeys
for
the
retail
on
the
ground
floor
I
mean
I.
O
C
A
C
E
A
E
J
J
That's
the
kind
of
this
is
what
kind
of
people
that
we
want
in
our
community,
so
I'm
really
glad
that
you're
sticking
around
and
working
with
these
challenges,
I
I,
just
yeah
this-
how
the
feel
and
how
9th
and
9th
is
going
is
just
so
convoluted
that
it
feels
makes
me
feel
disconnected
to
the
area
so
anyway,
I
totally
approve
it.
I
vote,
yes
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
you
knew
that
I'm
glad
you
guys
are
still
there
and
I
support
you
being
there.
So.