►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - August 28, 2019
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - August 28, 2019
A
Gentlemen,
we'll
call
this
meeting
of
the
Planning
Commission
to
order
a
couple
of
housekeeping
items.
If
you
would
please
turn
off
your
cell
phones,
if
you
need
to
take
a
call,
take
it
outside
if
you're
here
to
speak
on
a
topic
one,
the
public
hearing
opens
I'll,
invite
you
up
and
you
will
have
two
minutes
to
speak.
You
need
to
introduce
yourself
into
the
microphone
for
the
public
record
and,
let's
be
considerate
of
everybody
else
in
the
room
and
hold
your
personal
comments
until
you
get
a
chance
to
speak
at
the
microphone
with
that.
C
D
D
A
E
E
E
E
You
can
see
it
outlined
in
green
on
this
map
and
it's
located
on
the
north
side
of
Associated
Avenue
and
then
more
broadly,
it's
shown
in
in
blue
on
this
map,
and
you
can
see
that
it's
north
of
SR
201
and
that
it's
east
of
i2
15,
so
the
existing
zoning
is
a
corridor
commercial.
The
properties
surrounding
it,
the
properties
to
the
west
are
m1
to
the
south
is
a
parcel.
That's
on
public
lands,
it's
a
post
office
facility
and
then
to
the
east
and
the
north
is
also
corridor
commercial.
E
There
are
a
few
photographs
of
the
site,
and
so,
as
part
of
this
proposal,
we
review
whether
the
proposal
to
rezone
is
compatible
with
a
master
plan
and
in
this
particular
case
the
proposal
is
compatible
with
plan
Salt
Lake.
It's
compatible
with
several
policies
that
are
in
the
economy
section
of
the
plan
and
it's
also
compatible
with
the
West
Side
master
plan.
E
The
west
side
master
plan
recommends
that
about
a
hundred
feet
of
commercial
zoning
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
redwood
road,
and
so
with
the
proposed
rezoning
about
a
little
over
two
hundred
feet
would
remain
without
commercial
zoning,
and
then
this
would
be
to
the
west
of
that
and
for
the
areas
west
of
that
it
encourages
business
or
industrial
park.
Industrial
park
district
in
that
area,
and
so
that's
consistent
with
their
proposed
rezoning.
E
A
G
Reis
I'm,
the
president
of
standard
plumbing
supply
company
and
our
family
is
owned,
this
property
since
the
mid
early
60s,
and
we
would
appreciate
the
support
of
the
Planning
Commission
in
approval
of
our
rezone.
Some
things
have
happened
over
the
property
when
it
was
originally,
let's
call
it
up
his
owned
or
whatever
might
call
change
of
Zoning
1995.
G
It
was
all
owned
under
one
parcel,
and
so
the
division
of
the
parcels,
which
has
happened
within
the
last
ten
years,
is
allowing
us
to
keep
the
property
on
redwood
Road
in
line
with
the
commercial
corridor
requirement,
while
the
property
in
the
rear
that
has
always
been
used
for
manufacturing
to
be
able
to
continue
not
only
just
at
grandfathered
status
from
an
existing
use,
but
now
we
can
be
legal
conforming
and
it
will
give
us
an
opportunity
to
seek
permits
for
expansion
in
the
future.
So
we
would
appreciate
your
support.
G
A
H
Madam
chairman
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
thanks:
Brenda
mm-hmm,
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
and
the
staff
report,
testimony
and
discussion
at
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
City
Council
approved
posed
zoning
Mack
amendment
a
map,
amendment
file,
pln
PCM,
2019,
zero,
zero.
Five,
four
zero
proposed
zone
changed
from
CC
corridor
commercial
district
to
m1
light
manufacturing
district
in
order
to
allow
for
an
expansion
of
the
existing
manufacturing
use
on
site,
which
is
non-conforming
with
the
current
zoning
I'll.
J
Okay,
as
you
noted,
this
is
a
zoning
map
amendment
it's
for
four
parcels,
contiguous
parcels
about
2.8
acres
and
it's
located
approximately
at
2200
West
and
then
206
for
north.
So
it's
right,
adjacent
to
highway
215n
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
change
from
the
AG
to
the
agricultural
zone,
to
the
m1
light
manufacturing
zone
and
stated
reason
was
to
accommodate
future
development
of
the
property.
We're
not
looking
at
a
specific
site
development
proposal.
At
this
time
locational
context,
it
was
in
your
packet
for
the
benefit
of
the
audience.
J
It's
kind
of
to
the
north
west
of
the
airport,
roughly
in
it's
kind
of
near
city
limits
a
little
bit
north
of
there.
It
becomes
Salt,
Lake,
County
property
and
then
eventually
Davis
County,
a
little
more
zoomed
in
view
it's
bounded
by
2100,
north
and
215.
The
direct
access
is
through
an
easement
that
goes
to
2,200
west,
so
it
doesn't
have
direct
access
to
2,100
north
and
it
is
within
the
inland
port
overlay
boundaries.
J
Surrounding
properties
are
zoned
m1
to
the
south.
There
is
some
there's,
an
agricultural
adjacent
to
the
west,
although
that
property
has
applied
for
a
rezone
and
has
been
moved
to
Council,
with
a
positive
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission.
So
currently
it
borders
on
AG
to
property,
but
that
could
change
across
the
road
north
of
2100
north,
its
BP
Business,
Park
zoning
and
to
the
west
of
2200
west.
You
get
the
airport
zoning.
J
Considerations
and
staff
analysis
in
the
report.
We
looked
at
the
nature
of
the
general
area
again
that
the
the
general
area
is
changing.
There
have
been
a
number
of
recent
AG,
2m1
or
P.
Changes
looked
at
also
the
master
plan
recommendations,
although
it's
not
strictly
in
line
with
the
master
plan,
the
master
plan
did
recognize
the
future
need
for
retail
type
and
business
type
services
in
the
area,
which
wouldn't
necessarily
be
accommodated
under
the
BP
zoning.
So
there's
a
number
of
with
staff
felt
that
generally
had
met
the
master
plan.
J
Intention
of
the
Northpoint
small
area
master
plan,
the
inland
port
overlay
regulations.
Although
the
property
is
zoned
AG,
since
it's
within
the
inland
port
boundary
overlay,
they
can
do
all
uses
that
are
allowed
in
the
m1
zone.
Already
it's
just
a
matter
of.
If
the
use
is
not
allowed
in
the
AG
zone
but
is
allowed
in
the
m1
zone,
it
would
have
to
go
through
a
conditional
use
process.
J
J
There
are
some
different
buffer
yard
requirements
that
increase
if
the
m1
Pro,
if
and
m1
property
borders
on
agricultural
zone.
So
as
far
as
setbacks
with
the
neighboring
property,
it
depends
on
if
that
neighboring
property
is
Riis
owned
or
not,
and
and
staff
is
recommending
that
the
Planning
Commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
City
Council
for
the
requested
zoning
map.
Amendment.
H
If
I'm
correct,
that
and
I
think
you
said
this,
but
let
me
make
sure
in
my
understanding
of
the
overlay
zone
for
the
for
the
inland
port
Planning
Commission
for
wordage
Council
I.
Think
council
approved
a
recommendation
that
if
it's
in
mm
to
zone,
it's
basically
does
not
have
to
go
through
a
review,
because
it's
conditional
use
following
is
that
right.
Property
within
the
conditional
within
the
inland
port
does
not,
if
that's
zoned
into
already,
doesn't
have
to.
J
H
J
So
we're
talking
about
m1
and
if,
if
the
use
is
allowed
in
m1
and
the
AG
zone,
it
would
just
be
allowed
if,
if,
if
it's
state
AG-
and
there
was
a
use-
that
they
want-
that
the
property
owner
wanted
to
pursue
that
it
was
allowed
in
the
m1
zone
that
wasn't
listed
as
a
use
in
the
AG
zone,
they
could
still
pursue
that
m1
use.
It
just
would
have
to
go
through
the
conditional
use
process
right.
H
F
No,
they
go
through
our
process.
If
there's
an
appeal,
that's
when
we
end
up
dealing
with
the
inland
port
appeal
board,
but
they
haven't
established
their
own
that
there's
no
different
set
of
land
use
regulations
per
se.
There
are
guidelines.
There
is
a
provision
that
indicates
that
we're
supposed
to
allow
light
manufacturing
and
in
the
important
jurisdictional
lands
but
yeah.
There's
they
go
through
our
process.
It's
once
somebody's
unhappy.
Then
they
can.
They.
F
J
F
H
H
J
H
H
A
H
A
E
C
A
D
H
And
I
can't
remember
exactly
what
it
was,
but
if
it
were
zoned
in
one,
then
there
was
very
little
that
we
could
demand
a
applicant.
We
were
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
could
demand
things
like
how
we
could
ask
for
environmental
impact
statements
and
so
forth
that
were
not
part
of
the
regular
that
were
not
part
of
the
them
won't
be
required.
A
lot
of
things
would
not
be
required
under
new
one
zone.
Is
that
gel
with
anybody?
I'm.
C
Turning
members,
it
comes
I
mean
I'm
vaguely,
remembering
it
I
remember
mainly
related
to
like
Freight,
like
so
trains
trucks
and
like
things
that
had
noise
and
moving
around
and
were
what
type
of
goods
and
services
were
moving
through.
Those
like
freight
entities
is
that
so,
if
you're
doing
a
rail,
a
rail
freight
interchange
or
a
truck
interchange
and
those
are
permitted
now
and
just
go
in
the
table,
all
those
are
committed
permitted
now
and
m1
I.
C
H
J
H
Mean
I
think
this
is
it.
This
is
this
this
case
personally,
it's
okay
with
me
because
it's
a
very
small
property
and
it's
already
surrounded
by
pretty
much
manufacturing
uses,
but
I
would
not
like
to
see
a
precedent
set
to
just
any
old
property.
That's
a
g2
in
that
in
the
inland
port
to
come
in
for
a
zone
change
because
I
know
that
that
really
affects
what
kind
of
what
kind
of
process
they
have
to
go
through
because
in
the
inland
port
you
have
to
at
least
I.
Think
that's
what
happened!
H
H
A
L
You
Kevin
qalaat,
see
I
recently
bought
this
property
and
when
I
was
looking
into
buying
the
property,
I.
Obviously
I
knew
I
was
kind
of
landlocked,
with
an
easement
and
I
reached
out
to
my
neighbors,
who
have
control
of
the
easement
just
to
figure
out
what
my
options
were
long
term
for
this
property
envisioning
that
there's
Business
Park
and
many
buildings
going
up
all
around
and
the
freeway
and
2100
North,
assuming
that
someday
someone
would
want
to
buy
this
property
from
me
or
develop
it.
L
I
began
to
find
out
if
I
needed
a
second
access
or
how
I'd
have
an
access.
I
would
need,
and
in
doing
that,
my
neighbor
to
the
south
wanted
me
to
go
to
em
one
for
boundary
issues
for
his
property
at
their
building
their
buildings.
If
I'm
changed
from
a
AG
to
2m,
one
that
allows
them
to
be
closer
to
my
property
line,
which
doesn't
bother
me
and
the
guy
to
the
west
is
in
the
process
of
doing
the
same
thing.
L
So
in
doing
that,
I
hired
a
lawyer
and
worked
out
some
concessions
with
them
and
their
agreement
was
for
me
to
get
em
one
within
two
years.
So
they
would
allow
me
to
have
a
second
access.
Wider
access
to
the
property,
so
future
buyer
of
the
property
wouldn't
be
those
two
land
owners
it
could
be
for
other
people
as
well.
So
that's
why
I'm
starting
a
plan?
I
have
nothing.
You
know,
I
bought
the
property
and
don't
have
the
money
to
develop
it
or
do
anything
different
putnis
lot
of
some
animals
on
it.
L
K
L
K
As
a
community
council,
we
have
been
inundated
with
zoning
changes
and
land-use
changes
of
that
and
as
a
community,
we
have
been
committed
to
work
with
developers
to
come
up
with
kind
of
a
model
process,
so
that
each
time
we
do
this
are
not
doing
it
over
and
over
and
reinventing
it
and
that
it's
a
process
that
is
based
upon
broad
involvement
of
everybody
who
lives
in
the
area
and
it's
based
upon
knowledge
and
facts
and
underlying
that
girding.
It
is
integrity
and
to
that
I
want
to
thank
mr.
qalaat,
see
mr.
Klotz.
K
He
did
not
have
to
come
to
the
community
council
and
he
did
and
he
presented
it's
what
he
wanted
to
do.
It
was
a
very
civil
discussion
and
that
people
had
different
points
of
view,
but
we
have
dealt
with
many
other
developers
who
have
not
had
the
same
level,
integrity
and
honesty
and
no
matter
what
happens.
Your
neighbors
know
that
you're,
an
honorable
man
and
that's
important.
K
The
other
thing
is
that
as
we
go
through
this
process,
we
asked
your
staff
to
identify
the
issues
for
us
and
are
the
major
concern
that
residents
have
and
I'll.
Let
them
speak
for
themselves
later
is
that
the
zoning
process,
by
its
nature,
looks
at
each
separate
parcel
in
a
limited
way,
but
we
are
looking
at
multiple
proposals
that
are
conflicting
and
the
impacts
are
cumulative,
and
so
we
have
been
repeatedly
asking
not
just
what
does
this?
Do
it?
Just
maybe
a
small
piece
of
property?
What's
the
implications
here,
you
know
it's
not
anything
personal.
K
It
has
to
do.
What's
the
precedence,
that's
being
said,
what's
being
gained
what's
being
lost,
this
is
two
points.
Some
acres,
you
can
say
gee,
that's
not
very
much.
It
won't
make
any
difference,
but
there
is
so
little
land.
That's
agricultural
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
In
fact,
West
Point
house
houses,
almost
all
of
the
agricultural
land,
that's
left
within
Salt
Lake,
and
that
agricultural
land
is
a
part
of
the
city's
cultural
heritage
and
its
diversity.
It's
who
we
are
and
losing
any
of
it.
K
K
At
this
point
we
have
had
a
tremendous
increase
in
the
amount
of
and
what
land
it's
almost
like.
You
can't
have
enough
of
it,
and
yet
I
was
unable
to
get
the
actual
numbers
of
the
increase
in
emmalin
land,
but
it
has
grown
immensely
and
there
is
no
more
agricultural
land
being
developed
in
salt
lake
city.
So,
as
you
look
at
this,
I
asked
one
that
you
look
at
the
values
of
the
city
and
of
the
planning
documents,
but
also
that
you
don't
try
to
second-guess
the
inland
port
because
you
can't
do
it.
K
If
you
think
you
don't
understand.
Sometimes
you
have
to
say:
maybe
you
don't
understand,
because
it's
not
understandable
and
we've
been
working
on
this
for
two
years
and
we
haven't
figured
it
out.
So
what
I
we
have
always
said
as
a
community
is
we
don't
have
to
figure
out
what
the
inland
port
is
doing?
K
D
You
so
my
name
is
Denise
Payne
I
live
at
2848,
North,
2,200,
West,
ok,
you'll
have
two
minutes.
Ok
right
now
and
I
would
love
it.
If
any
one
of
you
would
take
the
time
to
come
out
and
drive
up
the
road
on
2200
West,
we
are
losing
all
of
our
agricultural
property
out
there
and
it's
sad
because
the
em1
that's
already
been
built
out.
There
is
bringing
semis
down
my
little
two-lane
road.
That's
not
even
big
enough
for
me
to
ride
my
bike.
D
D
M
Hi,
my
name
is
Alma
Mendoza
I'm
at
22:40,
wes,
31,
30
north,
and
I
have
the
same
problem
here
where
we
have
livestock
and
we
have
a
few
Parcells
there.
You
know
cuz.
We
just
try
to
expend
a
little
bit
bigger
and
bigger.
So
you
know
what
I'm
saying
with
little
pieces
that
we
can
buy.
So
what
this
doesn't
change
into.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
like:
oh
and
one
zoning
B
P.
We
have
a
problem
with
that,
we're
being
invaded
and
so
we're
just
like
little
people.
M
You
know
what
I'm
saying
that
kind
of
mean.
Nothing
to
you
know
big
people,
big
people
that
have
you
know
what
I'm
saying
or
that
have
the
money
and
kind
of
like
you
know
trying
to
get
us
out
of
this.
You
know
agriculture,
business
pretty
soon,
I,
don't
even
know.
What's
going
to
happen
when
you
know
what
I'm
saying,
how
are
we
going
to
be
eating
beef?
You
know
I'm
saying
when
you
can't
even
raise
you
know
what
I'm
saying
or
have
livestock
on
your
property.
M
You
know
you
can't
even
like
basically
have
your
neighbor,
like
you
used
it
before.
We
only
have
a
little
bit
where
they
can.
You
know
what
is
it
when
they,
you
know
roll
up
the
bales
of
hay.
You
know
with
their
machinery
really
yeah
when
they're
bailing,
you
know
it's,
it's
really
scarce.
It's
like.
We
can't
even
get
it
anymore
around
our
neighborhood
anymore.
You
have
to
go
out
really
all
the
way
out
to
Ogden.
M
You
know
kind
of
really
far
out
that
way
to
even
get
some
and
then
it's
so
expensive
and
then,
as
you
can
see,
we're
not
just
diversified
community
where
there's
a
lot
of
Hispanics
and
everybody's
hungry.
For
you
know
what
I'm
saying
the
agriculture
like
rodeo
or
you
know
what
I'm
saying
farm
festivals
and
we
have
that
we,
we
know
that
potential
there
and
so,
but
they're
trying
to
invade
us.
Like
you
know,
I'm
saying
we
get
hunted
down
by
Realtors
at
the
door,
mail
whatever
and
it
kind
of
just
needs
to
stop.
M
A
G
Yeah,
my
name
is
Sean
Johnson
I'm,
actually
from
the
property
that
is
land
walking
Kevin,
so
the
property
just
to
the
east
of
west
of
them
and
I
would
encourage
a
positive
recommendation
to
to
change
to
m1
for
a
couple
facts:
one
to
create
a
continuous
zone.
Is
this
little
small
little
AG
is
in
the
middle
of
all
this
BP
zone
and
m1
zone
and
just
doesn't
make
sense,
doesn't
make
it
continuous.
G
If,
if
we,
if
Kevin,
doesn't
get
approved
as
m1,
then
that's
going
to
create
a
double
road
right
next
to
each
other
because
of
the
buffers
and
stuff
that
are
between
m1
and
a
g2,
and
so
it's
gonna,
it's
going
to
look
horrible
and
then
the
third
reason
is
the
county
is
actually
already
charging
taxes
as
if
we
are
m1,
because
they
feel
that
as
the
highest
and
best
use
of
the
property,
and
so
it
just
makes
sense
to
continue
on
stick
with
the
master
plan
and
change
that
to
m1.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
C
J
B
Maybe
can
you
speak
to
I'm
just
looking
at
the
standards
for
the
zone
change
and
the
first
factor
is
the
whether
a
proposed
map
amendment
is
consistent
with
the
purposes
goals,
objectives
and
policies
that
the
city
has
stated
through
its
various
adopted
planning
documents.
So
can
you
just
talk
and
your
your
rationale
in
there
says
that
it's
the
proposed
light
manufacturing
zoning
district
is
not
strictly
consistent
with
the
future
land
use
designation,
as
stated
in
the
North
Point
small
area
plan.
B
J
So
one
of
the
things
that
was
highlighted
in
the
North
Point
small
area
plan
was
the
need
for
retail
and
service
uses
to
serve
some
of
the
future
employees
of
the
area
and,
again,
the
rationale
being
that
the
light
manufacturing
district
allows
singleton
and
retail
and
service
uses
which
could
serve
those
employees
of
the
area,
whereas
the
ok
heavy
manufacturing
isn't
allowed
in
that
zone.
So
it
would
be
similar
to
the
BP
in
that
sense,
but
the
BP
zone
requires
a
lot
of
those
uses
to
not
happen
on
a
single
parcel.
J
They
have
to
be
a
part
of
an
approved
business
park.
So,
given
the
acreage
wasn't
always
it's
not
always
practical
that
somebody
would
be
developing
a
big
business,
Park
campus,
to
provide
those
kind
of
uses.
So
so
we
were
looking
at
that
as
meeting
the
general
intent
of
the
plan
that
the
uses
in
BP
and
m1
are
very
similar,
but
it
would
allow
some
of
those
retail
and
single-use
kind
of
services.
B
J
B
Part
of
the
conversation,
okay
gotcha,
so
so
your
argument
is
that
the
the
land,
the
small
area
plan,
future
land
use
map
that
was
that
went
through
the
process.
The
community
process
to
be
developed
and
created,
saw
this.
As
BP
and
you're
saying
your
argument.
There
is
that
the
m1
doesn't
really
doesn't
really
or
is
relatively
consistent
with
what
the
BP
and
m1
BP
and
m1
have.
J
J
H
Well,
I'm
I
can
comment
I'm,
not
really
ready
to
ask
these
guys
questions,
but
I
can
comment.
I'm
opposed
to
this,
because
I'm
convinced
by
the
neighborhood
council
and
the
visitors
that
in
the
here
that
that
we
need
to
have
conditional
use
requirements
on
this
for
a
change
into
an
m1
zone.
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
a
BP
zone
would
do.
H
B
D,
whatever
Business
Park,
would
be,
but
it
certainly
doesn't
sound
like
light
manufacturing
to
me
so
and
I'm
also
concerned
that
any
time
we
turn
any
use
any
other
use
besides
M
1
into
M
1,
we
open
up
a
fast
channel
through
the
whole
inland
port
process
and
I
do
not
want
to
do
that.
So
that's
why
I'm
opposed.
G
Analysis
and
the
staff
report
testimony
and
discussion
at
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
City
Council
approved
the
proposed
zoning
map.
Amendment
file,
PLN
PCM,
2019,
zero,
zero,
four
one,
four
three
one:
four:
the
property's
located
at
2:06
for
north
2,200
west
and
two
zero
six:
six
north
2,200
west
proposed
zone
change
from
AG
to
the
zoning
district
to
m1
zoning
district.
That.
B
Just
want
to
say
that
I,
my
heart
goes
out
to
the
community
members
and
I,
understand
the
the
loss
of
community
and
and
what
your
your
neighborhood
looked
like
and
continues
to
look
like
and
how
you
envision
it.
But
the
explanation
for
me
about
the
the
small
area
plan
that
was
established
through
a
community
and
public
process.
I
think
that
justification
does
adhere
to
the
standards
that
we
have
to
make
our
decision
by
so
I
say.
Yes,
thank.
C
I
also
I
think
you
know
mourn
the
loss
of
these
agricultural
properties
and
what
they
kind
of
are
but
I
think
it's.
The
proposal
here
is
consistent
with
both
the
master
plans
and
I.
Don't
give
him
what
he
could
do
to
the
condition
use
process
and
the
limited
tools.
We
even
have
to
refine
that
that
I
think
I,
don't
think
it
really
changes
the
impact,
but
leads
probably
to
a
better
product
and
more
consistent
with
a
long-term
view
of
what
what
the
plan
was
for
the
community
in
those
master
plans.
So
yes
thank.
J
J
Okay,
so,
as
you
noted,
this
is
a
conditional
use,
application
for
the
new
Salt
Lake
City
Water
Reclamation
facility,
sewage
treatment
plan,
the
properties,
zoned
m1
and
a
sewage
treatment
plant
is
a
conditional
use
in
the
m1
zone.
The
site
itself
is
113
acres
in
size,
approximately
and
there's
numerous
buildings
on
the
site,
all
related
to
the
operation
of
the
sewage
treatment
plan.
J
The
proposal
has
a
five-year
construction
schedule,
so
the
applicant
can
explain
it
in,
of
course,
much
more
technical
detail,
but
basically
they're
rebuilding
the
sewage
treatment
plant
on
the
same
site
in
a
phased
construction
approach,
the
site
context
it's
located
between
PI
15
and
215,
on
kind
of
the
northern
edge
of
the
city,
there's
a
little
bit
of
property
before
you
get
to
the
Davis
County
Line,
again
adjacent
to
refineries
to
the
south.
It's
owned,
m2,
Tesoro,
refining
refineries
fuel
storage
facility
to
the
east.
There
is
some
land
zoned.
J
J
It
mentioned
here's
a
little
bit
more
in
context
with
the
zoning
m1
surrounding,
except
to
the
South.
There's
m2
and
site
plan,
I
mean
it
it
much
more
make
sense,
probably
in
your
packet,
but
large
phase.
Construction
project
will
say
that
on
a
personal
note,
we
toured
the
facility
a
few
weeks
ago
and
it
was
absolutely
fascinating
to
you
know
it's
a
large
industrial
operation,
but
a
very
necessary
thing
to
keep
our
society
civilized.
J
Some
of
the
key
considerations
we
looked
at
there's
multiple
buildings
on
the
site.
It
doesn't
require
plan
development,
since
all
of
those
structures
relate
to
the
primary
use
of
the
property,
which
would
be
the
sewage
treatment
operation,
looked
at
compatibility
and
anticipated
impacts
again,
given
the
neighboring
properties,
whilst
the
zoning
and
the
intense
uses,
there's
and
there'd
be
no
more
impactful
than
what
is
currently
there
and
many
of
the
uses
around
this
site
are
a
lot
more
impactful
heavy
manufacturing,
refining
kind
of
uses
than
this
facility.
J
J
J
I
Good
evening
I'm
Laura
briefer
I'm,
the
director
of
Salt
Lake
City,
Public
Utilities.
We
are
the
water
storm
water
and
wastewater
provider
for
Salt
Lake
City.
This
is
a
very
important
generational
project.
For
us,
we
are
required
to
do
a
portion
of
this
project
due
to
the
fact
that
we
need
to
meet
updated
environmental
regulatory
requirements
specifically
for
the
discharge
of
nutrients,
so
we're
being
required
by
the
US
EPA
and
DEQ
to
meet
more
stringent
requirements.
Our
discharges
ultimately
ends
out
in
the
Great
Salt
Lake.
So
we
agree.
I
That's
a
good
thing
and
we
also
are
facing
critical
infrastructure
needs
at
this
facility.
It's
reached
the
end
of
its
useful
life.
It's
over
55
years
old.
It
doesn't
meet
current
seismic
standards
and
some
other
standards,
and
so
now
is
the
time
for
us
to
plan
for
the
next
50
to
75
years
of
the
lifecycle
of
this
function
of
the
city
and
I'm
here
with
Jason
Brown,
who
is
our
chief
engineer
and
also
charged
with
managing
this
very
large
project?
I
N
N
N
My
little
Wayne
Terry
yeah,
yeah
I'll.
Let
you
know
a
little
bit
more
than
you
want
to
do
here
on
the
let
on
the
west
side
of
the
our
campus
is
what
we
have
our
drying
beds
right
now,
all
of
our
waste
that
the
the
sludge
comes
out
and
it
gets
putting
these
drying
beds
and,
through
the
through
the
summer
months,
we're
able
to
dry
that
out,
then
pack
it
up
and
haul
it
off
the
site.
N
That
is
where
a
lot
of
the
odor
comes
from
from
the
destroying
process.
So
one
of
the
first
things
that
we
have
to
do
is
actually
install
a
dewatering
process
that
will
mechanically
be
the
water,
the
process,
the
sludge
that
comes
off
of
there,
allow
us
then
to
free
up
all
the
space
on
this
West
site
to
construct
the
the
new
plant.
We
can't
turn
off
the
flow
at
all
any
time
ever
so
this
plant
operates
365
days
a
year,
seven
days
a
week,
24
hours
a
day,
it
simply
can't
shut
down.
N
There's
four
major
components
to
the
process.
I
can't
quite
see
this
very
well.
The
mechanical
dewatering,
like
I,
spoke
about
the
first
phase
of
that.
It's
a
critical
piece
of
this
process
to
be
able
to
get
it
to
free
up
those
drying
beds.
The
second
part
is
the
the
bnr,
the
biological
nutrient
removal.
It
comes
out
of
the
liquid
train.
N
We
removed
the
nitrogen
and
phosphorous
out
of
the
liquid
stream,
and
then
the
second
part
of
the
third
part
of
this
is
the
solids
handling,
which
is
that
dewatering
also
and
then
the
administration
and
maintenance
buildings
that
will
be
coming
along.
So
talking
about
each
of
the
each
of
the
little
pieces
in
the
the
south
portion
of
this
will
be
the
south
portion
of
our
campuses,
where
the
demand
mechanical,
dewatering
building
will
be
constructed.
N
The
the
bnr,
the
biological
nutrient
nutrient
removal
is
the
key
to
the
whole
process.
This
is
both
a
chemical
and
a
biological
process
in
which
we
recirculate
some
of
the
bugs
that
are
in
there
and
they
break
down
the
the
nutrients
that
are
in
the
the
stream
and
break
it
down
into
something
that
is
inert
and
that
can
be
discharged
back
into
the
environment.
N
N
N
The
solids
didn't
have
to
be
processed
because
that's
where
a
lot
of
the
nutrients
are
at
there's
a
process
in
here
that
we
break
it
down
into
pieces
that
are
stabilized
that
can
be
land
applications
Kennecott
for
a
long
time
was
using
it
on
top
of
their
their
pile
out
there
to
help
the
grass
grow
and
different
things.
We're
also
looking
into
being
able
to
land
up,
apply
it
to
different
farm
lands
or
different
things
like
that.
So
we're
trying
to
find
a
buyer
to
use
that
we're
in
the
process
of
that
right
now.
N
N
It
shows
the
administration
building
being
constructed
second,
but
we're
debating
on
that
one
and
letting
that
one
slide
a
little
bit
longer
into
the
future.
We
have
the
primary
the
head
works
is
where
everything
comes
together.
The
three
sewer,
the
sewer,
means
that
we
have
coming
throughout
the
city
come
together.
They
go
into
there
into
the
head.
Works
starts
the
first
process
of
filtration
and
separating
the
solids
from
the
liquids
the
next
pay
phase
of
that
is
where
you
see
these
three
are
the
site
of
these
four
clarifiers.
N
That's
where
we
again
start
settling
out
some
of
the
solids
from
the
liquids
the
next
rectangular
box.
There
you
see
is
the
bnr,
the
biological
nutrient
removal.
This
is
a
credible
process
that
works.
24/7
requires
very
little
energy
and
it's
a
great
process,
unfortunately
a
little
bit
different
than
the
process
we're
currently
using
so
we're
having
to
actually
train
our
operators
to
be
able
to
use
this
process,
which
is
exactly
what
we
want
to
do
to
get
them
engaged
and
understand
what
we
need
to
do
throughout
the
whole
year.
N
Because,
as
the
climate
changes,
the
warmer
temperatures
and
hotter
temperatures
affect
the
chemical
and
biological
process
at
the
at
the
far
north
end.
There's
the
file
of
clarifiers
that
help
purify
the
water
to
get
it
to
its
clearest
stage,
and
at
this
point
we're
dealing
with
just
water.
It
might
have
some
some
other
biological
agents
in
there.
So
it
goes
through
a
disinfection
process
and
then
finally
gets
discharged
into
the
city
drain.
N
Absolutely
on
the
located
on
the
north
of
this,
and
you
can
kind
of
see
it
here
and
get
my
mouse
back
here
up
in
this
area
and
the
admin
building
that'll
be
a
public
accessible
right
now,
much
of
the
wetlands
that
are
to
the
north
of
that
are
not
accessible,
and
that
happened
because
of
the
Olympics
that
it
was
a
security
issue.
So
we
had
to
fence
all
that
property
off,
so
nobody
has
access
to
it
anymore.
N
N
A
J
B
Had
a
question
about
your
crappy
old
building,
but
I
thought
that
was
maybe
a
little
too
far,
but
here
we
are
based
on
the
findings
and
information
listed
in
the
staff
report
and
the
testimonial
plans
presented
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
requested
conditional
use
application,
PLN
PCM
2019,
zero,
zero,
five,
six
conditional
use
for
a
new
assault
lake
city,
water
reclamation
facility,
sewage
treatment
plant
to
be
located
at
13,
65,
West,
2300
North,
subject
to
conditions
wanted
to
list
it
in
the
staff
report.
In.