►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - 01/22/2020
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - 01/22/2020
https://www.slc.gov
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
C
A
Yes,
Maureen,
yes,
John
abstain,
Brenda,
yes,
Amy,
yes,
okay,
motion
passes
next
is
the
report
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair
other
than
the
loss
of
yet
another
planning.
Commissioner
I
have
nothing
to
report
Brenda.
Do
you
have
anything
to
report
nothing
to
report?
Okay,
then
we'll
hear
a
report
from
the
director
you.
D
Sort
of
stole
the
words
out
of
my
mouth
as
well,
as
you
probably
know
during
when
I
was
gonna,
represent
district
5
on
the
City
Council.
So
congratulations
to
him
and
he
just
passed
through
so
he's
somewhere
in
here.
But
so,
if
you
know
anybody
who
you
think
would
be
a
great
planning,
Commissioner
districts,
five
and
six
would
be
ideal.
If
you
know
anybody,
please
let
us
know
as
we're
starting
with
a
blank
sheet
right
now,
so
you
would
love
to
find
someone.
A
E
Evening,
commissioners,
so
the
project
before
you
requires
a
planned
development
and
preliminary
subdivision
approvals
to
develop
six
new
lots
with
frontage
on
a
20-foot
wide
private
street.
So
there's
the
two
planning
petitions
associated
with
the
request.
The
planned
development
requires
any
creation
of
Lots
that
do
not
front
a
public
street.
So
therefore,
this
proposal
requesting
it
to
be
on
a
private
street.
This
is
the
preliminary
subdivision
for
the
consolidation
of
the
Lots.
E
There
are
two
parcels
and
then
therefore
to
create
six
new
Lots
for
the
constructions
of
six
new
single-family
homes,
so
the
existing
site,
the
proposed
site,
consists
of
two
adjoining
parcels
located
approximately
102
and
108
South
1100
East.
Currently
there
are
two
for
unit
residential
buildings
with
a
private
driveway
with
access
off
of
1,100
East,
as
you
can
see
here
in
the
project
site,
is
zoning
within
the
r15
thousand
zoning
district.
Therefore,
the
existing
residential
building
is
actually
a
Kanaan.
Conforming
use
the
adjacent
and
surrounding
properties
are
also
zone
r15
thousand
and
contains
single-family
structures.
E
The
Planning
Commission
review
is
a
similar
project
back
into
February
2017
and
denied
the
request,
but
the
proposed
project
today
has
been
revised
to
reduce
the
number
of
zoning
reliefs
and
to
include
the
reduction
of
the
number
of
Lots,
previously
seven
and
now
today,
you're
seeing
six
Lots.
In
addition,
they're
addressing
the
concerns
of
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhoods,
the
project
seeks
to
demolish
the
existing
structures
and
create
six
new
Lots
access
by
20
foot
wide
private
street.
E
As
you
can
see
here,
the
private
street
is
shaded
in
gray
and
each
lot
would
meet
the
minimum
requirements
of
the
underlying
zoning
districts,
as
you
can
find
an
attachment
F
at
this
staff
report.
So
with
the
exception
of
plot
one,
the
front
facade
of
the
proposed
single-family
residence
would
be
oriented
towards
that
private
street.
As
a
result,
the
proposed
development
has
designated
the
established
yards
to
ensure
that
the
orientation
of
the
building
when
they
are
constructed
would
front
the
private
street
and
establish
our
tables
is
actually
in
the
staff
report
in
Table
two.
E
In
addition,
the
plumeria
subdivision
plat
identifies
the
building
envelopes,
as
you
can
see.
Here
are
the
lot
coverage
compared
to
the
surrounding
the
proposed
envelopes
are
similar
to
the
adjacent
properties,
as
you
can
see,
ranging
between
26
through
36
percent,
where
the
maximum
coverage
is
40%.
E
The
applique
anticipates
that
the
average
building
height
would
be
approximately
24
feet.
As
you
can
see
here.
This
is
just
a
conceptual
elevation
where
a
maximum
height
of
28
feet
is
allowed
measured
to
the
top
of
the
ridge
and
on
average
the
building
footprint
would
be
approximately
1,600
square
feet.
Each
proposed
structure
would
provide
to
off
street
parking
within
the
attached
garage
and
to
be
entered
in
through
the
side.
Facade
not
through
the
front,
and
the
exterior
materials
proposed
would
consist
of
brick
or
stone
and
durable
materials.
E
So,
overall,
the
proposal
would
include
common
areas,
a
pedestrian
walkway
and
six
guests
parking,
as
you
can
see,
spread
throughout
the
development
where
the,
in
addition
to
landscape
buffering
with
fencing
along
the
perimeter
of
the
project
site.
As
you
can
see
here,
I
know
it's
a
little
bit
hard
on
the
screen,
its
adequately
landscaped
to
include
shrubs,
bushes
and
trees
that
are
strategically
placed
to
ensure
that
it
creates
privacy
for
the
development
and
also
to
lessen
potential
impacts
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
E
These
are
site
visit
photos,
so
starting
at
the
top
left
is
a
view
of
the
private
drive
from
1100
east
and
top
right
would
be
the
private
driveway
looking
on
to
1100
east
and
the
subsequent
photos
is
taken
from
the
interior
of
the
lot
and
facing
the
abutting
neighborhoods.
So
bottom
left
is
looking
at
the
northwest
corner
of
the
budding
properties
along
that
way
and
to
the
bottom
right.
You'll
see
the
northern
portion
of
the
Blessed
property
line,
and
then
here
is
a
southern
portion.
Top
right
top
left
would
be
sorry.
E
There
are
three
considerations:
three
key
considerations,
the
first
being
the
modification
to
the
street
frontage
requirement
where
it
would
allow
the
development
to
fully
utilize
this
unique
plot
at
the
mid
block
to
having
access
to
it.
The
private
tree
would
provide
two-way
access
to
mitigate
any
egress
and
ingress
issues,
and,
additionally,
the
private
street
would
provide
adequate
emergency
access.
The
approval
of
the
modification
request
is
necessary
for
the
design
of
the
development
to
compete,
compliant
with
a
zoning
district
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
E
E
Therefore
reducing
the
potential
buildable
area
of
the
lot
and,
lastly,
they
can
alter
or
modify
the
existing
structure.
But
since
this
is
a
non-conforming
use
within
the
structure
there,
they
are
limited
that
we
require
a
special
exception
process
which
would
limit
them
to
25%
of
the
gross
floor
area
or
a
thousand
square
feet.
Whichever
is
less
so
in
the
last
consideration
is
the
mitigation
of
the
residential
housing
loss.
E
The
proposed
development
would
result
in
two
residential
unit
loss,
but
the
demolition
of
the
existing
structure
being
a
non-conforming
use,
is
exempt
under
the
provision
in
title
18
and
while
the
proposed
development
does
not
increase
the
housing
stock,
the
proposed
development
meets
the
intent
of
the
our
plan
and
the
zoning
ordinance
as
discussed
an
attachment.
F
public
comments
were
received
in
generous
in
support
of
it.
Two
comments
that
were
received
during
the
early
notification
period
were
in
response
to
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighbourhood
and
the
potential
impact
of
an
existing
fence.
E
The
applicant
has
addressed
these
concerns
and,
lastly,
there
was
a
public
comment
received
from
East
Liberty
Park
community
organization,
it's
in
your
Dropbox
now,
but
it's
really
to
support
of
this
project
so
based
on
everything
and
presented
to
you
this
evening
and
the
information
the
staff
report,
planning
staff
recommends
the
Planning
Commission
approve
the
plan
development
and
the
preliminary
subdivision
request
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report.
Yes,.
A
Okay,
if
you
would
like
to
speak
during
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
meeting,
if
you
could
please
fill
out
one
of
these
cards
and
deliver
it
up
to
the
to
the
front
here.
That'll
just
help
us
organize
the
public
hearing
piece:
it's
not
required,
but
it's
just
helpful.
So
is
the
applicant
here.
Yes,
okay,
we'll
now
hear
from
the
applicant.
F
F
There
were
the
the
planning
originally
was
set
up
to
try
and
maximize
the
space
and
after
spending
some
time
on
the
project
and
meeting
with
the
neighbors
and
deciding
if
we
were
going
to
take
over
the
project,
the
the
determination
was
it
was
too
dense,
and
so
we
removed
a
lot
out
of
the
project.
The
price
didn't
reduce,
unfortunately,
but
we
removed
a
lot
to
create
more
open
space.
F
We
met
with
the
neighbors
to
discuss
their
concerns
on
some
of
which
were
height
of
the
residents
raising
of
the
land
or
the
property
and
the
type
of
homes
that
would
be
built
in
this
location.
Other
concerns
were
related
to
traffic
flow
on
on-site
parking
and
we've
addressed
all
of
those
issues.
We
removed
all
the
setback
requirements
that
were
that
were
originally
requested
from
the
Planning
Commission
and
are
only
asking
for
the
fact
that
the
lot
does
not
face
a
public
street.
A
A
G
Good
evening
my
name
is
Jason
Stevenson
I'm,
one
of
the
co-chairs
of
the
East
Liberty
Park
community
organization,
also
known
as
Elko,
and
actually
live
just
about
a
half
a
block
from
the
property
as
well.
So
I
know
the
area
pretty
well.
So,
as
was
mentioned
in
the
staff
report,
East
Liberty
Park
community
organization
held
a
special
meeting
on
November
21st.
We
flyer
the
neighborhood
to
let
folks
know
about
it,
had
a
pretty
good
response
and,
as
you
might
see
in
your
staff
report,
I
believe
it's
on
page
38.
G
There's
the
Q&A
notes
that
we
compiled
from
that
meeting
based
on
the
questions
and
answers
that
were
had
what's
interesting,
is
that
this
is
not
been
the
first
time
that
we've
dealt
with
this
property
and
it's
kind
of
a
tale
of
night
and
day
in
terms
of
what
the
response
from
our
community
has
been
from
the
first
time
back
in
2017
to
the
response.
This
time
and
I.
G
So
the
East
Liberty
Park
community
organization,
sensing,
the
you
know
what
our
community
feels
is
in
support
of
this
project.
We
feel
that
it
does
add
to
our
community.
It
does,
you
know
fit
in
with
the
type
of
housing
and
density
that
we're
looking
for.
You
know
we're
so
more
concerned
about
the
loss
of
rental
properties,
especially
affordable
rental
properties,
and
something
that
I
think
we
are
going
to
be
looking
at
as
a
community
council.
G
Is
you
know
how
do
we
count
what
we
lose
versus,
what
we
gain
and
doing
a
little
bit
more
and
calculus
on
that
for
these
different
types
of
infill
projects?
But
that's
something
that
it's
discussed
is
not
sort
of
germane
to
the
topic
to
the
the
non-conforming
aspect
of
those
rental
properties,
but
it
is
something
that
we
do
want
to
look
at
more
carefully,
especially
in
in
our
neighborhoods.
G
Let's
see
you
know,
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
mention
as
well,
and
I
submitted
a
letter
rather
late
today,
I
apologize
for
that
too
Linda
was
the
sort
of
just
follow
through
with
many
of
the
you
know,
discussions
and
promises
that
had
been
made
about
this
project,
including
the
use
of
the
durable
building
materials
in
the
outside.
You
know
whether
or
not
that
could
be
a
part
of
the
I
think
what
is
the
technical
term
here?
G
The
design
review
committee
to
approve
those
so
whether
or
not
that
can
be-
you
know,
made
a
part
of
the
codified
design.
Covenants
are
I
trying
to
use
my
technical
language
here,
as
well
as
the
design
review
board,
whether
that
could
be
established
within
the
we
use.
The
other
technical
term
here
subdivision
plat
for
this
project,
just
to
make
sure
that
you
know
as
these
things
move
forward
and
take
time
and
that
we
ensure
that
what
the
community
was
promised
is
what
is
delivered
because
we
did
really
engage
on
this
and
a
lot
of
people.
G
A
H
H
I'm
Judy,
short
and
I
have
to
say
that
attending
both
the
first
and
the
second
meeting
with
the
neighborhood
in
the
two
different
developers.
It
was
like
night
and
day
to
see
the
first
one
is
a
very
hostile
meeting
and
the
second
one
was
like
wow.
These
are
cool,
so
it
was
nice
to
see
and
if
you
look
in
in
the
probably
in
the
staff
report,
the
price
point
just
for
the
loss
is
quite
a
bit.
So
it's
very
rare
to
find
an
empty
buildable
lot
in
that
part
of
town
and
I.
H
Think
it's
great
I
was
amazed
when
Linda
said
that
the
streets
are
40
to
60
feet
wide,
because
my
I'm
sure
my
street
is
maybe
30
if
I'm
lucky
27.
So
that's
pretty
wide,
and
this
is
really
just
like
having
a
little
cul-de-sac
off
of
11th
east
I
think
it
would
be
great
and
from
what
we've
seen
they
intend
to
build
houses
that
fit
into
the
neighborhood,
but
again
they're
going
to
be
sold
separately.
So
the
buyer
will
have
I
guess
the
final
say-so
we'd
like
you
to
approve
this
project
right.
A
I
Hi,
my
name
is
Zachary
Dussault,
just
gonna
echo,
with
what
the
previous
speakers
had
to
say.
I
think
that
this
project
should
be
approved,
I
think
it's
a
great
use
of
the
mid-block
space.
I
am
slightly
concerned
about
the
loss
of
the
two
units,
but
with
the
non-conforming
nature
of
the
plot
already,
this
seems
like
the
best
use
of
that
space.
Thank
you
thank.
A
K
F
Bill
Winston
again,
we
are
very
passionate
about
the
neighborhood.
We
would
and
don't
mind
if
it's
part
of
the
documents
would
like
to
build
traditional
style
homes
with
a
modern
flair,
meaning
that
they
would
be
constructed
of
mainly
brick,
that
there
are
some
styles
of
homes.
I
have
some
pictures.
If
you'd
like
to
see
some
general
ideas
of
homes,
we've
constructed
to
get
kind
of
give
the
flavor
in
the
feel
the
difference
between
the
traditional
style
of
homes
that
I
have
in
my
picture
board,
which
I
can
grab
real
quick.
F
A
Any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
or
staff
any
other
discussion
among
the
commissioners
I'd
like
to
commend
you
for
your
work
in
engaging
with
the
community
and
getting
feedback
and
addressing
comments.
I
think
it's
been
much
appreciated.
We
don't
often
receive
such
positive
feedback
firm
applicants
or
from
the
community
on
applications
before
us.
So
we
appreciate
the
time
and
effort
you
put
into
that
process.
Thank.
A
A
L
L
M
Good
evening,
commissioners,
this
is
a
request
by
Michael,
Militello
I,
hope
I
said
that
right
he's
here
to
correct
me.
If
I
did
not
representing
Kate
egy
architecture
and
planning
for
design
review
for
additional
height
at
approximately
255
South
State
Street,
the
proposed
mixed-use
project
consists
of
two
buildings:
a
North
Tower
and
a
South
Tower
with
a
mid
block,
pedestrian
walkway
that
runs
through
the
center
of
the
site.
M
The
walkway
will
provide
connections
from
State
Street
to
Floral
Street,
as
well
as
to
the
Cramer
house,
which
is
a
local
historic,
landmark
site
that
they're
incorporating
and
restoring
as
part
of
the
overall
project.
This
projects
before
the
Commission,
because
the
applicants
requesting
60
feet
of
additional
building
height
for
the
North
Tower,
the
property
is
located
in
the
d1
central
business
district
and
in
that
zone.
Areas
that
are
mid
block
can
go
up
to
a
permitted
height
of
100
feet
and
then
buildings
taller
than
that
go
through
the
design
review
process.
M
So
that's
why
the
applications
before
you
this
evening
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
project
with
conditions.
Just
some
quick
facts
about
the
project.
The
North
Tower
is
a
13
story:
mixed-use,
commercial
and
residential
building.
The
11
stories
of
residential
includes
Studios
one
and
two
bedrooms
totaling
a
hundred
and
seventeen
units.
The
South
Tower
is
an
eight
story:
ninety
nine
foot
tall,
mixed-use,
commercial
and
residential
building
with
73
residential
units,
including
studios,
one,
two,
three
and
four
bedrooms.
M
It's
important
to
note
that
the
north
and
south
tower
are
actually
connected
underground
with
a
parking
garage.
The
South
Tower
meets
the
zoning
requirements
for
the
D
1
zone,
as
well
as
all
the
design
standards,
but
because
those
buildings
are
connected,
we've
brought
the
project
in
as
a
whole,
but
the
focus
of
the
staffer
or-
and
the
presentation
tonight
is
on
the
North
Tower.
M
The
design
incorporates
human
scaled
elements,
such
as
step
backs,
building,
articulation
material
changes,
transparency
at
the
ground
floor
and
the
massing
is
broken
up
into
smaller
components,
to
reduce
the
sense
of
apparent
height
and
to
mitigate
potential
negative
impacts
from
the
proposed
height
buildings,
step
down
towards
lower
scale
buildings,
as
well
as
they're
stepped
back
to
be
more
compatible
with
buildings
such
as
the
Cramer
house
and
the
one-story
buildings
along
Edison.
Street
planning,
staffs
recommendation
does
include
some
conditions
of
approval.
Most
of
those
conditions
are
related
to
some
final
design.
M
Details
associated
with
landscaping,
lighting
and
some
of
the
elements
in
the
mid
block.
Walkway
I
did
want
to
briefly
touch
on
one
condition
of
approval
that
we
are
recommending,
which
is
to
add
a
public
entrance
to
the
vote.
The
food
hall
commercial
space
along
State
Street
facing
the
public
sidewalk,
the
mid
block
walkway,
is
designed
to
have
entrances
off
of
that
mid
block.
M
In
terms
of
the
public
process
for
the
project,
we
did
send
out
the
recognized
organization
notice.
Those
councils
for
this
area
are
the
downtown
central
community
as
well
as
downtown
Alliance,
because
the
projects
within
a
certain
distance
from
those
community
councils,
a
city
open
house,
was
held.
We
had
two
public
comments
submitted.
Those
are
in
the
staff
report
and
again,
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
request
for
additional
height
with
the
conditions
in
the
staff
report
and
I
can
answer
any
questions
and
the
applicants
also
here
any.
M
So
we've
had
some
subsequent
conversations
after
that
I
think
you're,
referring
to
the
commercial
parking
or
the
non-residential
parking
requirement,
and
they
could
potentially
meet
that
with
some
transportation
demand
management
strategies
and
they're,
also
within
1/4,
a
mile
of
transit,
which
would
allow
them
a
50%
reduction
of
their
parking.
So,
at
the
time
those
comments
were
submitted.
K
M
K
You
know
like
five
different
materials,
and
you
know
eight
different
window
types,
and
things
like
that
is
that
is
that
something
that
we're
that
we
are
doing
or
you're
doing
or
the
design
guidelines
are
having
that
effect,
I
mean
it's
not
a
not
well,
not
what
I
would
call
a
classical
design.
It's
a
very
it's
a
very
jumbled
up
design,
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
broken
up,
stuff
and
I've
noticed
it
in
more
than
one
project
that
we've
brought
forward.
That's
why
I'm
asking
this
questions
really
not
directed
specifically
at
this
project?
M
K
D
J
D
The
D
1
zone,
you
would
be
shocked
at
how
few
there
are
it's.
Basically,
glass,
setbacks
and
height.
That's
actually,
hopefully,
if
we
could
keep
our
planners
and
get
fully
staffed,
it
is
definitely
on
the
priority
list
to
help
implement
the
downtown
restaurant
is
to
add
additional
design
standards.
Some
of
the
things,
of
course,
the
Design
Review
talks
about
are
more
general,
like
you
were
speaking
to,
but
there
aren't
any
standard
or
specifically
saying
you
must
articulate
the
building
at
this
point
or
this
point
or
this
point
we
will
look
at
those
in
the
future.
A
A
C
C
Good
evening,
Michael
Militello
I'm
the
architect
for
the
project
in
question
and
trying
to
thank
Amy
really
quickly.
You've
been
really
supportive
and
really
helpful
throughout
this
whole
process.
So
great
presentation
of
the
law,
I
just
had
a
few
slides
extra
slides
to
quickly
kind
of
go
over
and
I
think
it
kind
of
addresses
some
of
the
comments
that
have
already
been
brought
up
as
well.
So
if
you
bear
with
me,
I'll
just
go
through
these
really
quickly.
C
So
I
just
wanted
to
show
you
quickly
a
bit
about
the
process
that
we
took
to
get
to
the
current
design,
though
the
mid-block
standard
for
our
scientists,
the
heights
and
100
feet,
we
felt
our
specific
site
was
an
ideal
location
for
a
high-rise
Tower
that
could
complement
the
exciting
or
the
existing
skyline
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
As
you
will
note,
our
part,
our
parcel
is
sandwiched
between
the
Broadway
Center
tower
to
south
and
the
Parkside
Tower
to
the
north,
both
which
are
reaching
almost
200
feet
in
height.
C
We
wanted
to
replicate
those
same
moves
but
respond
to
the
specific
constraints
on
our
site
as
well.
We
decided
the
required
mid
block.
Walkway
should
be
in
the
form
of
a
pedestrian
paseo
that
would
bisect
our
project,
creating
two
towers
on
either
side.
Then
we
played
with
the
balance
of
the
program
and
density,
and
you
can
see
how
we
carved
out
certain
areas
and
positioned
certain
elements
to
achieve
a
certain
quality
of
space.
C
We
figured
the
shorter
Tower
would
be
ideal
on
the
south
side
so
as
not
to
block
as
much
solar
exposure
from
the
other
building
in
Paseo
and
the
northern
towers.
Placement
is
ideal
in
terms
of
looking
at
the
rhythm
and
spacing
of
the
tall
towers
along
the
block.
When
you
look
down,
State
Street
you'll
feel
these
three
towers
at
almost
the
same
height
framing
your
view
down
the
street
towards
the
Capitol
building.
C
As
for
the
massing
of
the
building
themselves,
we
didn't
want
a
simple
extruded
box.
We
wanted
to
introduce
unique
form
to
the
skyline
that
could
help
shape
future
projects.
The
lower
podium
building
actually
follows
the
geometry
of
the
diagonal
Paseo,
but
the
towers
themselves.
Then
reorient
themselves
to
be
perpendicular
to
the
street
grid.
This
allows
for
a
variation
in
massing
and
brings
enough
interest
for
the
eyes.
C
We
also
wanted
to
create
some
different
variation
in
the
articulation
of
the
facades
and
did
this
by
creating
some
ins
and
outs
or
slots,
and
the
fuller
plans
where
maybe
balcony
or
bathrooms
are
located
that
run
up
the
building
vertically
and
help
to
separate
the
different
facade
patterns.
We
came
up
with
three
different
types
of
patterns:
a
simple
corrugated
metal,
siding
with
a
punched
window,
an
angled
brief
Chalet
that
responds
to
the
path
of
the
Sun
and
a
sleek
larger
window
wall
element
that
accents
the
corners
along
State
Street.
C
These
three
patterns
vary
and
overlap
in
a
few
spaces
up
on
the
screen.
This
is
the
angled
bristle,
a
design
on
a
portion
of
this
facade
which
will
help
to
regulate
solar
exposure
for
the
living
and
bedroom
areas
in
these
units.
The
deep
recessed
windows
and
the
shadows
created
by
the
angles
help
give
it
a
very
dynamic
look
that
will
change
depending
on
the
time
of
day
and
the
seasons.
The
horizontal
edges
that
are
created
every
other
floor
helped
to
break
up
the
height
and
make
the
Sun
not
seem
too
monumental
or
monotonous.
C
This
is
a
view
kind
of
looking
down
on
the
Paseo
in
between
those
two
brief
Chalet
areas.
This
is
detail
of
a
special
window
wall
corner
element
on
each
tower
that
are
highly
visible
from
State
Street.
The
effect
is
a
sleek
contemporary
look
with
a
smooth
combination
of
metal
panel
and
slightly
inset
windows.
We
thought
this
contrasted
nicely
with
the
deep
ins
and
outs
of
the
angled
breeze
away,
giving
the
eye
a
nice
variety
of
movement,
lighting
and
texture.
Again.
C
In
conclusion,
we
think
that
the
uniqueness
of
a
sight
really
lends
itself
to
wanting
to
be
a
tall
high-rise
building
that
makes
an
impact
on
the
city's
downtown
skyline.
The
different
moves
in
massing
and
facade
detailing
lend
themselves
well
to
a
tall
building
because
they
help
to
break
down,
would
otherwise
be
a
very
monotonous
tall
project
and
that's,
but
it.
C
A
A
O
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Scott
Sevilla
and
I'd
like
to
speak
against
the
granting
of
this
increase.
A
city
goes
through
a
significant
amount
of
effort
in
its
zoning
in
determining
what
works
for
utilities,
traffic,
all
of
the
other
things
charettes
bringing
experts
and
they
set
zoning
requirements
and,
in
this
case
a
particular
mid
block,
height
restriction
of
a
hundred
feet
for
a
reason,
I've
not
heard
any
reason
to
increase
this
by
sixty
percent,
and
it's
not
just
a
measure
of
what's
financially
viable
for
the
project
there.
O
There
needs
to
be
more
to
overcome
all
of
the
work
and
the
reasoning
that
went
in
to
setting
the
height
limits
that
were
already
there.
As
we're
all
aware,
parking
downtown
is
already
at
a
substantial
shortage
and
a
struggle
I.
This
project
does
not
meet
current.
You
start
talking
about
a
Tod
or
their
ability
to
reduce
it.
Further,
we're
all
familiar
of
what
happened
in
the
news,
with
sugarhouse,
with
the
substantial
reduction
there's
a
as
a
Tod
and
the
people
that
are
now
parking
in
driveways
and
all
over
and
saying
I
just
there's
nowhere.
O
I
can
bark
I'm
three
four
blocks
from
my
house,
I
I
didn't
realize
it
was
going
to
be
that
kind
of
problem.
We
already
have
a
problem,
parking,
downtown
and
I
think
this
fails
to
meet
it
and
saying
well
as
a
Tod
or
they
can
do
a
further
reduction
ignores
the
problem
of
parking.
I
have
a
problem
with
the
access
to
this,
which
is
on
Flower
Street
a
street.
That's
an
old,
essentially
an
alley
in
the
old
660
foot
blocks,
which
is
now
the
primary
Road.
O
It's
not
wide
enough
to
qualify
as
a
minor
collector
or
even
as
a
as
a
local
Road,
it's
too
small,
and
between
residences
and
businesses,
and
access
for
for
deliveries,
etc.
You're
talking,
cumulatively,
about
200
units
that
are
going
to
be
using
this
alley
is
their
primary
entrance
and
exit
on
the
south
end
eggs
onto
the
walkway,
the
pedestrian
diagonal
walkway
that
accesses
the
he
bore
wells,
building
I,
don't
think
it
can
meet
it.
There's
clearly,
no
lights
there
to
come.
O
I
Hopefully,
once
this
parking
revision
has
passed
by
the
City
Council,
which
we're
hoping
for
any
week
now,
that
requirement
will
be
zero
units
of
parking
for
this
first
project
and
I,
don't
know
what
phase
the
design
process
is
right
now,
but
I
would
love
to
see
that
because
this
is
a
very
pedestrian
oriented
development
and
would
bring
much
needed
density
to
the
area
and
I
honestly
think
the
design
is
great.
I
think
it's
it's
made
for
pedestrians.
I
D
D
A
L
M
L
M
Not
positive,
if
it's
wide
enough
for
two
directions,
I
think
in
their
site
plan
you
can
see
their
circulation
how
they
plan
to
do
the
site.
It
looks
like
they
plan
to
like
when
a
truck
pulls
into
the
loading
area.
They
would
back
up
and
then
go
out
forward,
I'm,
not
certain
how
wide
that
Street
is
I,
believe
it
used
to
be
a
public
street
and
it
was
vacated.
So
now
it's
just
a
private
right
of
way.
Okay,.
M
I
did
Rob
this
to
transportation,
and
their
comments
are
included
in
the
Department
comments.
I
asked
them
specifically
about
this
access
area
and
they
they
didn't,
have
any
specific
comments
about
it.
That's
not
to
say
that
they
might
not
have
other
comments
when
they
get
to
the
building.
Permit
phase
of
the
proposal
in.
L
L
M
L
C
So
we,
the
idea,
is
that
the
all
the
traffic
is
coming
off
of
floral
Street
yeah,
that
alley
in
and
out
of
the
project
into
the
parking
behind.
We
didn't
want
a
curb
cut
off
State
Street,
because
we
thought
that
it
would
ruin
the
frontage
would
ruin
the
pedestrian
experience
up
and
down
the
street
and
I'm
not
sure
if
transportation
looked
at
that,
but
we
didn't
receive
any
comments
from
them
about
that
either.
D
C
Think,
because,
right
now,
that
floral
street
has
better
circulation
as
there's.
Actually,
oh
there's
a
lot
of
shared
parking
lots
in
that
area
where
people
are
going
up
and
down
that
alley
right
now,
whereas
the
the
smaller
alley,
even
though
it's
a
little
wider,
it's
actually
there's
a
lot
of
trees
and
other
sort
of
infrastructural
pieces
that
are
kind
of
in
that
area
that
aren't
very
conducive
to
actual
circulator
driving,
vehicular
circulation.
C
L
I
mean:
is
there
any
way
you
could
tie
both
in
I
live
a
block
from
here,
and
we
have
four
entrances
into
our
parking
garage
and
we're
always
grateful
because
some
things
under
construction
over
here
or
something
shut
down
over
there
and
we
we
have
other
access.
If
you
have
just
one
tiny
little
road
I'm
worried
about
that
for
this
building.
So
is
there
a
way
that
you
can
tie
floral,
Street
in
and
then
this
unnamed
alley,
so
that
there
are
two
access
points
in
and
out?
We.
C
Could
look
into
it?
One
of
the
things
we
didn't
want
to
do
was
to
as
soon
as
you
start
to
do
that.
You
kind
of
you
conflict
with
the
in
front
of
the
Kramer
house.
We
kind
of
wanted
to
connect
that
whole,
but
you
know
pedestrian
wise
from
State
Street,
all
the
way
to
the
crane
brows
and
not
have
it
intersected
with
anything.
So
as
soon
as
you
sort
of
tie
the
vehicular
circulation
between
floral
street
and
another
alley,
you
have
cars
kind
of
coming
up
and
down
that.
L
L
Think
you're
going
I
can't
believe
par
the
parking
or
transportation.
Didn't
talk
to
you
about
that.
I!
Don't
understand
why?
That's
not
in
our
code,
it's
living
and
I'm
building
like
this
there's
no
way
we
could
get
along
with
one
entrance,
and
so
yes
I'm.
Is
there
a
way
to
give
yourselves
a
second
entrance?
We.
C
Looked
at
that,
we
also
have
a
commercial
tenant
that
we're
trying
to
introduce
into
the
bottom
ground
floor
of
that
South
Tower
as
well,
that
actually
wraps
around
the
back,
and
it's
related
to
the
film
society
that
actually
inhabits
the
Broadway
Center.
So
they
want
to
just
we
kind
of
agree
that
they
wanted
to
also
have
sort
of
a
pedestrian
environment
as
well
and
as
soon
as
you
start
to
introduce
some
parking
access
and
drives
there.
It
also
ruins
it.
C
We
wanted
to
try
to
do
as
much
as
we
could
to
keep
parking
limited,
but
still,
obviously
you
know
meet
the
requirements,
but,
like
ever
a
couple
people
have
said
this
is
really
just
the
perfect
spot
being
a
block
away
from
the
Gallatin
Center
train
station,
where
you
really
want
people
to
be
coming
in
and
out
and
and
not
limit
their
access
by
having
entrances
and
ramps
everywhere.
But
yeah
we
I
understand
what
you're
saying
and
I
know.
There's
parking
is
definitely
going
to
be
that
challenge.
G
J
P
J
L
There's
a
there's
that
walkway,
where
the
trees
are,
you
can
that's
where
the
pedestrians
are
gonna,
be
this
other
is
for
cars.
Why
not
use
the
cars
to
give
it
a
space?
I
mean
I'm,
very
selfishly.
Looking
at
this
I
use
this
block
every
day,
so
I
know
what
this
could
be
and
how
I
would
use
it
and
I'm
telling
you
what
cars
will
want.
What
pedestrians
will
want
from
personal
experience,
so
I'm
I
feel
strongly
about
that.
D
There's
one
thing
we
might
want
to
keep
in
mind:
it
does
appear
that
it's
probably
a
private
alley
and
not
a
public
alley
so
privately
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
everybody
who
touches
it
has
access
to
it.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
whether
the
RTA
or
the
applicants
have
actually
looked
into
the
ownership
they
may
have
access
to
it,
but
you
I
would
be
careful
if
we
were
gonna
make
any
conditions
upon
it
that
we
would
not
sure
that
as
an
ally
that
they
do
actually
have
a
right
to
utilize
and.
A
L
K
I
do
want
to
commend
you
on
the
massing
and
the
height
for
me,
it's
very
important
that
we
begin
to
have
a
taller,
downtown
and
so
I'm,
not
at
all
troubled
by
the
height
of
this
building
and
I.
Think
it's
clearly
related
to
the
other
building
surrounding
it
and
across
the
street.
I
also
really
appreciate
the
design
of
the
pedestrian
pedestrian
space
in
the
middle
and
I.
Think
that
all
have
been
handled
very,
very
well.
K
K
K
Don't
think
we
need
in
our
downtown
either
so
I
know
that
this
is
not
part
of
a
design
review
that
we
can,
that
we
have
a
guideline
surrounding
so
I.
Don't
believe
that
we
can
make
changes
required
for
it.
But
I
do
think
that
this
is
something
as
a
commission.
We
ought
to
take
into
consideration
and
I'd,
like
the
planning
staff,
to
look
over
to
make
sure
that
when
we
do
a
V
view
projects
like
this,
they
don't
this
stuff,
seeing
something
similar
to
this
on
another
project
that
we've
had
here
so.
D
Analysis
and
findings
in
the
staff
report
information
presented
in
the
input
received
in
the
public
hearing
I'll
move
the
Planning
Commission
approve
designer
view
request
for
additional
height
PLN
su
B
2019
926,
with
the
project
located
approximately
255
South
and
State
Street
recommendations
based
on
conditions
listed
below
and
in
the
staff
report.
Final
details
regarding
these
conditions
of
approval,
our
delegate,
the
planning
staff
give.
J
A
Q
A
P
Good
evening
planning
commission
these
items
before
you
tonight
are
a
request
from
olga
Crump
of
the
real
estate
services
department.
She
is,
she
apply
or
submitted
the
applications
on
behalf
of
the
parks
department
and
the
trails
and
natural
lands
Department.
They
are
seeking
street
closure
and
alley
vacation
within
rosewood
Park.
In
order
to
conserve.
P
Rosewood
Park
is
located
at
approximately
1400
north
and
1200
West
in
the
Rose
Park
area
of
Salt
Lake
City.
The
park
is
located
between
1200
West
and
I
15
and
encompasses
approximately
28
acres,
which
is
mostly
grass,
this
primarily
used
as
soccer
fields,
but
does
have
amenities
such
as
baseball
and
softball
fields,
a
playground,
tennis
courts,
a
dog
park
and
a
skate
park.
P
The
proposed
street
closure
and
alley
vacations
involves
six
unimproved
streets
and
five
unimproved
alleys
within
rosewood
park.
The
park
was
built
over
a
section
of
the
Kinney
and
gore
Lee's
improved
subdivision
plat.
The
sub
subdivision
was
plotted
in
1887,
but
never
developed
as
intended.
Development
in
the
area
did
not
follow
the
street
pattern.
The
plaque
created
leaving
the
dedicated
streets
and
alleys
within
rosewood,
Park,
disconnected
from
a
road
network
system
the
streets
and
alleys
within
the
park,
exist
only
on
paper.
They
were
never
constructed
as
as
intended
and
do
not
physically
exist.
P
There
will
be
no
physical
modifications
made
to
rosewood
Park
as
part
of
these
applications.
The
request
is
to
remove
these
alleys
and
streets
from
the
plat
in
order
to
consolidate
the
parcels
and
form
one
parcel
to
make
it
easier
to
obtain
building
permits
for
future
improvement
projects.
The
reason
these
processes
are
needed
is
because,
when
construction
occurs
on
any
property
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
a
building
permit
is
work.
Acquired
building
permits
are
issued
based
on
the
parcel
in
which
the
construction
will
occur.
P
Tracking
multiple
permits,
through
the
permitting
process,
as
well
as
the
inspection
processes
after
the
permits
have
been
issued,
can
be
a
pretty
daunting
task,
one
that
could
be
streamlined
if
only
one
permit
was
required.
If
rosewood
Park
were
to
be
consolidated
into
one
single,
singular
parcel,
it
would
greatly
increase
the
efficiency
of
obtaining
and
tracking
building
permits,
as
well
as
meeting
the
standards
for
zoning
CREP
requirements.
P
This
is
crucial
to
meet
the
goals
set
forth
by
the
Northwest
master
plan,
as
well
as
the
Rose
Park
small
area
plan,
which
emphasizes
the
importance
of
recreational
facilities
and
the
ability
to
maintain
and
improve
and
improve
the
facilities
to
match
city
growth.
This
is
just
a
depiction.
If
you
can
see
you
can
see
all
of
the
tiny
little
parcels
that
exist
within
the
park.
P
P
This
is
actually
the
Kinney
and
Gordy's
platform
1887.
You
can
see
how
the
all
of
the
parcels
were
originally
plaited.
The
little
pop-out
shows
where
the
park
is
located
now,
so
you
can
see.
Even
now,
those
parcels
have
changed
since
what
has
been
plaited.
There
have
been
some
streets
in
there
that
have
been
vacated
already.
These
applications
would
essentially
further
that
and
take
all
of
those
streets
and
remove
them.
P
As
far
as
public
process
notice
was
sent
to
the
Rose
Park
and
Capitol
Hill
community
councils,
early
public
notice
was
sent
to
the
property
owners
and
planning
staff
also
held
an
open
house
to
gather
public
comment
notice
of
a
public
hearing,
or
this
public
hearing
was
also
sent
out.
There
was
one
comment
that
was
received
mostly
in
support
when
the
original
notices
went
out.
A
lot
of
the
community
was
a
little
upset,
but
mostly
that
was
because
they
thought
roads
and
streets
or
something
something
was
happening
to
the
park.
P
They
didn't
want
the
park
to
change.
They
wanted
it
to
stay
the
same.
We
had
a
pretty
good
turnout
at
the
open
house
where
it
was
explained
to
them
that
there
you're
gonna
see
no
change
to
the
park
itself.
This
is
all
merely
an
on
paper
thing
and
in
fact
these
applications
would
actually
help
to
make
it
so
that
nothing
gets
developed
there,
because
it
is
an
open
space
by
moving
those
parcels
and
making
it
one
singular
parcel.
P
A
A
N
I'm
sure
I'm
ready
to
make
a
motion-
oh
good
I'm,
normally
not
in
favor
of
Ally
vacations,
but
this
one
I
can
get
behind
easily
enough
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
in
the
staff
report.
The
policy
considerations
for
street
closure
and
Ally
vacation
and
the
input
received
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
forward,
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
for
the
street
closure
and
Ally
vacation
proposed
in
PLN
PCM
2019
2
0
1,
0,
3,
6,
+,
PLN,
PCM,
2019,
2,
0,
1,
0,
3
7,
with
the
condition
listed
in
the
staff
report.
H
A
J
A
D
A
Q
You
so
this
is
a
request
for
approval
of
a
10
lot:
townhome
development
at
905,
West,
Euclid
Avenue,
which
is
140
south,
approximately
the
applicants
seeking
approval
through
three
different
processes.
This
includes
a
planned
development
request
for
some
zoning
modifications
involved
lot
frontage
on
public
street
requirements
for
Lots
and
they're,
also
asking
for
a
modification
to
an
alley,
use
limitation
for
parking.
As
far
as
design
review,
modifications,
they're,
also
asking
for
some
modifications
of
the
stucco
limitations
and
a
modification
to
the
entry
feature
requirement.
This
proposal
also
includes
a
subdivision
plat
request.
Q
Q
This
is
the
elevation
or
rendering
of
the
development
and
a
site
plan
of
the
development.
The
two
homes
closest
to
Euclid
Avenue
have
their
entrances
on
the
street.
Have
the
windows
facing
Euclid
Avenue,
the
remaining
eight
units
that
are
behind
those
front
two
are
accessed
by
a
center
running
mid
block
walkway
through
the
walkway
through
the
middle
of
the
site.
That
also
goes
back
all
the
way
to
an
open
space
in
the
back
where
they
also
have
allocated
their
parking,
so
their
parking
will
be
accessed
purely
from
the
alley.
Q
So,
as
far
as
planned
development
request,
they
are
requesting
Lots
without
street
frontage.
Eight
of
the
ten
Lots
won't
have
street
frontage.
This
could
be
developed
without
this
process
as
apartments
or
condominium
units,
but
Lots
are
easier
to
obtain
FHA
Federal
Housing
Administration
financing,
which
has
lower
down
payments,
so
we
often
get
requests
from
developers
to
do
break
developments
up
by
Lots
rather
than
condominiums.
Q
Overall,
if
with
lower
down
payments,
it
helps
meet
city,
housing
goals
to
increase
affordability,
broadens
range
of
incomes,
the
housing
is
available
for
so
we
recommend
approval
of
that
modification.
They
are
also
asking
to
use
the
alley
to
back
up
their
vehicles
for
their
parking.
This
is
normally
allowed
for
up
to
five
stalls,
but
the
way
the
parking
code
currently
reads
would
apply
to
any
public
right-of-way,
which
includes
alleys
and
generally.
Q
This
five
stall
limitation
is
intended
to
reduce
the
impact
on
traffic
on
streets
or
potential
collision
points
between
vehicles,
but
alleys
are
much
slower,
speed,
right-of-ways
without
those
same
concerns
and
in
fact
the
new
parking
chapter
under
just
came
before
the
Planning
Commission
has
eliminated
that
limitation,
so
people
could
use
alleys
without
that.
Five
stall
limit
overall,
we
leave
this
results
in
a
more
efficient
use
of
the
property,
less
pavement,
fewer,
curb
cuts
and
fewer
pedestrian
conflict
points.
We
also
recommend
approval
of
that
modification
to
let
them
use
the
alley
for
up
to
ten
stalls.
Q
They
are
also
asking
for
approval
through
the
design
review
process.
This
is
partially
because
they
didn't
obtain
enough
TSA
points
for
staff
level
approval.
So
this
is
in
a
TSA
zone
for
TSA
development.
You
first
go
through
a
scoring
point
score
system
and
you
get
points
for
things
like
meeting
certain
density
goals
going
above
the
zoning
requirements
for
durable
materials
on
your
front
facade.
Q
In
this
case
they
didn't
quite
get
enough
points,
so
they
just
proceeded
through
the
design
review
process,
which
is
the
alternative
to
the
point
scoring
system
you're
not
required
to
go
through
the
point
scoring
system
and
you're
not
penalized
by
just
going
through
this
defy
design
review
process.
The
point
of
the
point
scoring
system
is
to
encourage
people
to
meet
those
points,
the
alternative
being.
You
have
to
go
through
a
public
process,
in
this
case
we're
already
going
through
a
planned
development
process.
So
they've
also
applied
for
design
review.
Q
You're
allowed
a
nose
stucco
on
the
ground
floor
and
up
to
ten
percent
on
the
upper
floors,
I'm
in
this
case
they're
at
five
percent
on
the
ground
floor
and
twenty-one
percent
on
the
upper
floors.
This
does
exceed
limits,
but
the
stucco
is
generally
meant
to
the
architectural
feature
that
breaks
up
the
materials
on
the
front
facade
and
the
roof
element
that
setback
from
the
primary
front.
Facade
generally
think
this
is
minimal.
It
adds.
Visual
interest
adds
a
contrasting
material
to
the
brick
and
the
fiber
cement
board,
and
so
we
recommend
approval
of
that
modification.
Q
It
still
meets
the
intent
of
the
stucco
limitations
and
when
we
impose
the
stucco
limitation,
this
TSA
zone
that
was
generally
in
response
to
large
buildings,
where
a
small
percentage
of
allowance
of
stucco
can
end
up
with
large
areas
of
blank
uninteresting
facade.
So
in
this
case,
this
stucco
usage
generally
adds
something
to
the
front
facade.
So
we
recommend
approval
of
that
modification.
Q
The
other
modification
the
requesting
has
to
do
with
their
entry
feature
requirement
in
the
TSA
zone.
There's
four
different:
you
have
to
have
an
entry
feature
on
a
front
facade
next
to
a
public
street
and
there's
four
different
options
that
are
very
specific
and
they
require
a
5-foot
covered
depth
that
could
be
a
canopy
or
inset
entrance
or
a
pet
porch
in
this
case,
they're
not
quite
meeting
that
5-foot
depth,
there's
a
three-foot
covered
depth,
but
they
also
have
a
two-foot
uncovered
two
foot
or
so
uncovered
area
in
front
of
that
covered
area.
Q
Additionally,
the
fence
projecting
beyond
the
front
facade
cause
additional
attention
to
that
entry
versus
the
alternative,
which
would
be
they
could
just
simply
push
that
green
portion
of
the
facade
back
two
feet
to
simply
just
meet
the
standard
generally,
it
meets
the
intent,
provide
a
visually
interesting
entry
feature
and
provides
a
street
precedence
with
an
alternative
design.
Despite
not
quite
meeting
those
specific
numbers
overall
on
plan,
development
generally
has
to
do
with
modifications
building
at
a
better
product.
We
believe
that
the
modifications
do
result
in
a
better
product.
Q
It
also
complies
with
the
master
plan
expectations
for
the
area,
this
just
as
a
transition
zone
and
transitioning
to
a
more
urban
neighborhood.
Additionally,
it
meets
the
general
design.
Standards
would
have
to
do
with
materials,
articulation
the
facade,
providing
transparency
to
provide
sufficient
pedestrian
interest
and
the
modifications
still
meet
the
intent
of
those
design
standards.
So
we
are
affecting
recommending
approval
with
the
conditions
on
the
front
page
of
the
staff
report.
N
R
Good
evening
my
name
is
Jared
Hall.
I
am
the
architect
on
the
project
and
also
part
of
the
ownership
team,
so
we're
the
axioms
sort
of
the
name
came
from
like
it's.
The
statement
you
have
to
agree
to
is
true
before
you
can
sort
of
make
arguments
about
other
things
and
we're
we're
really
excited
about
the
Euclid
neighborhood
I
live
on
the
west
side.
It's
there's
so
many
cool
things
coming
there.
The
Folsom
Trail
is
going
to
be
less
than
a
block
from
this
project.
R
There's
new
bars
and
restaurants
coming
we're
just
super
excited
for
this
and
for
our
project
to
be
on
the
leading
edge
of
what's
going
to
be
a
transform
transformation
or
the
next
few
years
for
this
neighborhood.
So
when
I
moved
to
Salt
Lake
it's
about
10
years
ago,
and
at
that
time-
and
it's
only
gotten
worse
like
when
you're
looking
for
a
house
at
an
entry
level,
you
get
an
old
broken-down
house
in
Salt
Lake,
which
even
now
is
not
affordable.
R
R
We're
we're
Euclid
neighborhood
is
one
of
the
few
neighborhoods
where
you
could
afford
their
houses
are
still
around
$300,000
for
kind
of
a
base
level
house
and
we're
doing
our
best
to
make
sure
this
project
meets
that
price
point
so
that
we're
densifying
the
neighborhood
but
we're
not
gentrifying
the
neighborhood
we're
just
providing
more
housing
at
the
same
basic
level
as
already
there.
So
to
do
that,
one
of
the
things
as
Daniel
mentioned
is
we're
asking
for
lots
without
frontage
and,
as
I'm
sure,
you've
seen
many
many
times.
R
That's
sort
of
one
of
the
best
tools
we
have
in
Salt
Lake
for
developing
infill
projects
in
our
giant
blocks
that
can
provide
some
sort
of
density
and,
as
Daniel
mentioned
developing,
that
way
provides
a
lot
more
financing
options
for
an
buyers
that,
particularly
at
a
lower
price
point,
are
generally
the
only
type
of
mortgages
they
can
get.
So
we're.
C
R
So
on
our
stucco
modification,
we
are
asking
for
the
stucco
to
continue
on
the
ground
level.
As
Daniel
mentioned,
it's
only
10%
and
we
feel
that's
appropriate
it.
It
keeps
with
a
sort
of
simple
basic
geometries
and
this
repetition
you
can
kind
of
see
down
our
internal
ally
of
these
use
that
wrap
around
the
building,
and
so
we
want
that
to
continue
to
the
ground.
R
R
We
also
like
using
car
ports.
We've
done
another
development
like
this,
where
we
use
carport
sort
of
set
away
so
that
you
have
to
get
out
of
your
car
and
walk
to
your
front
door
to
provide
even
more
opportunities
to
interact
with
your
neighbors,
like
I,
live
in
a
place
where
I
park
on
the
street
and
that's
90
percent
of
the
way
I
see
my
neighbors.
If
I
parked
in
the
garage
I
would
never
see
anyone
so
we're
sort
of
like
detaching
the
parking
from
the
actual
living
unit.
R
Like
it's
a
big
enough
porch,
you
can
sit
there
with
your
coffee
in
the
morning
and
say
hi
to
someone
without,
like
yelling
and
saying
hi,
to
someone
that's
40
feet
away,
we're
asking
to
have
a
small
portion
uncovered
and
fill
that's
generally.
Porches
are
covered
for
shade
and
in
this
case
it's
on
the
north
facade
of
the
building.
So
it
will
be
shade
virtually
all
the
time
and
from
my
experience
in
the
city
even
covered
porches
aren't
used
much
when
it's
raining
or
snowing.
Now.
R
So,
as
Daniel
mentioned,
where
we
have
10
units
per
acre,
which
gives
us
a
density
of
35
units
per
acre,
the
goal
in
the
master
North
Temple
master
plan
is
between
30
and
40.
So
we
feel
we're
really
hitting
that
it
I've
had
the
opportunity
to
go
to
Philadelphia
a
lot
over
the
last
year
or
two
and
that
a
lot
of
the
sort
of
periphery
of
downtown
is
right
around
that
35
units
per
acre
and
I
feel
like
that
density.
Just
like
is
so
awesome
and
something
we're
totally
missing.
R
In
Salt
Lake
we
have
sort
of
eight
units
per
acre,
single-family
houses
and
we're
starting
to
get
a
lot
of
hundred
plus
units
per
acre
and
denser
developments.
But
nowhere
do
we
have
a
consistent
35-ish
where
you
start
to
get
good,
neighborhood
retail
that
can
actually
survive.
So
we're
happy
to
start
doing
that.
R
One
of
the
issues
that
always
comes
with
density
is
open
space,
and
so
every
one
of
these
units
has
a
private
roof
deck
that
they'll
each
have
their
own
sort
of
open
space
as
long
with
a
really
small
backyard
where
their
mechanical
equipment
would
set.
We
did
in
talking
to
the
neighbors.
There
was
one
person
say
something
about
like
there
wasn't
a
amenity
space
on
the
project
and
like
yeah,
but
living
downtown
is
the
amenity.
R
You
have
Folsom
Trail
a
block
away
that
we
would
rather
the
residents,
go
there
and
provide
life
into
the
truly
public
spaces
that
are
really
great
and
really
close,
rather
than
provide
some
sort
of
private
open
space.
That
would
be
just
for
our
residents,
and
that
is
the
end
of
my
presentation.
So
I'll
take
your
questions.
Thank.
R
R
R
A
J
Name
is
Michael
Fife
I
live
at
974
Euclid
Avenue
I
just
wanted
to
speak
in
generally
in
support
of
this
project.
I
like
the
street
engagement,
I,
wrote
down
here,
I
hope
those
plants,
substantial
trees
and
I
sounds
like
they
are
planning
an
additional
trees.
That's
great
there's
not
that
much
traffic
on
Euclid
anyway,
so
the
alley
is
gonna,
be
even
less
and
since
they're,
just
a
you
know,
one
lot
in
from
900
West
I
think
that
the
parking
access
will
be
just
fine
off
of
the
alley.
J
Let's
see,
I
love
the
scale
of
the
project.
I
think
we
need
more
of
those.
If
I
don't
know,
if
you
guys
went
there
too,
but
they
just
finished
a
four-unit
kind
of
townhouse
project
on
the
other
side
of
the
street,
which
looks
pretty
good
and
they
also
access
their
parking
off
of
the
alley.
I
park
off
of
my
alley
and
I
have
never
run
into
any
other
person
coming
down
the
alley.
So
I
think
the
traffic
on
the
alley
is
pretty
low
and
actually
getting
more
traffic
on
the
alley.
A
A
I
A
K
So
the
point
of
discussion
is
I'm.
Thinking.
I'm
glad
you've
got
this
picture
up
here,
because
this
is
exactly
what
I
want
to
talk
about,
because
I'm
pretty
concerned
that,
although
we
have
all
of
these
regulations
about
entrance
entrances
and
so
forth
off
the
street,
we
don't
seem
to
be
concerning
ourselves
with
the
actual
entrances
of
the
units
in
a
in
within,
within
this
kind
of
narrow
space
and
I'm.
Glad
to
hear
that
it's
not
ten
feet.
J
K
That
way,
I
think
windows
would
not
look
into
each
other
across
this
I
mean
you're
talking
about
a
space.
That's
no
wider
than
this
desk
is
long
and
24
feet
tall.
You
know,
that's
pretty
that's
as
tall
as
this
room
is
that's
a
pretty
I
mean
it's
a
lovely
picture,
but
I
know
that
it's
going
to
be
a
pretty
daunting
space
to
be
in
intimate
a
little
a
little
too
intimate
yeah.
K
Safe
I
think
actually
I,
wouldn't
I,
wouldn't
worry
too
much
about
safety
here,
because
there's
so
many
quote-unquote
eyes
on
the
street.
Here
there's
quite
a
lot
of
eyes
on
this,
although
it
could
be
in
with
if
it
were
not
well
lit
like
this
and
I,
don't
know
what
the
lighting
is
on
the
outside
of
these
buildings.
K
But
if
it's,
what
you've
got
shown
here,
it
might
not
be
quite
enough,
but
I'm
not
talking
about
that
I'm
talking
about
trying
to
preserve
a
little
bit
of
privacy
for
people
as
you
go
down
as
you
approach
this
building
I
just
would
like
you
to
look
into
it.
It's
like
as
I
as
I.
Look
at
the
plans.
I,
don't
see
any
reason
why
that
wouldn't
be
exactly
the
same
cost
and
pretty
much
the
same
layout,
even
though
then,
even
on
the
upper
floor,
even
on
the
roof
deck,
it
might
be
better
if.
R
K
A
K
Q
A
D
And
we
can
look
at
other
portions
of
them.
We
don't
only
look
at
the
street
of
Korres
same,
but
if
we
wanted
to
make
conditions
or
changes
or
modifications
in
a
way,
we
would
need
to
go
back
and
at
least
we'd
have
to
base
it
on
a
standard.
So
we'd
have
to
look
at
those
standards
that
are
in
the
staff
report
and
so
find
one
that
that
modification
needs
to
be
related
directly
to
a
standard.
Okay,.
G
A
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
simply
a
public
hearing
and
there's
no
action
being
requested
on
behalf
of
the
Planning
Commission.
It's
this
proposed
city
property
disposition
that
approximately
1085
East
Simpson
Avenue,
which
is
case
number
from
the
L
&
P
cm
2019
0
1,
1,
0
7
and
who
is
Daniel.
Sorry.
Q
Again,
sitting
here
reading,
so
this
request
by
the
city
administration
for
the
Planning
Commission
to
hold
a
public
hearing
regarding
their
proposed
sale
of
the
city
property
to
the
RDA.
The
administration
would
like
to
sell
the
property
and
properties
like
this
one
required
that
the
city
that
a
city
board
hold
a
public
hearing
to
get
public
feedback
prior
to
the
sale.
The
property
involved
is
on
the
screen.
Q
Q
So
four
significant
properties,
the
city
again
requires
that
a
public
hearing
be
held.
Significant
city
properties
include
those
that
would
require
a
master
plan
amendment
in
this
case
the
shakur
ask
master
plan
calls
for
the
property
to
be
public
lands.
It
also
has
policies
that
they,
sugar
house
fire
station,
should
remain
where
it
is.
It
is
not
it's
moved
so
whether
that
policy
is
still
relevant
will
come
up
in
also.
Q
There's
no
standards
of
review,
there's
no
recommendation
by
the
board
or
Commission
required
public
comments
and
comments
from
the
Commission
will
be
sent
to
the
mayor
and
the
City
Council
after
this
can
also
require
an
additional
public
hearing
as
far
as
any
future
development
potential
of
a
site
right
now
it
is
own
public
lands,
so
you
could
do
an
institutional,
Street,
City
or
a
city
use.
But
if
you
wanted
to
do
a
residential
commercial
development,
it
would
require
zone
and
it
would
require
a
master
plan
amendment.
Q
A
H
A
H
H
We've
long
talked
about
this
Plaza
as
being
an
eventual
transit
hub
for
sugar
house
and
it's
exciting
to
think
that
this
might
actually
come
to
pass
for
us.
That
would
be
and
the
other
piece
of
it
is.
We
were
not
talking
about
it,
but
getting
the
streetcar
up
to
Highland
Drive.
That
would
really
make
a
difference
and
then,
who
knows
where
it
goes
from
there,
but
we
could
have.
H
H
Kind
of
transit,
stuff
and
I'm
sure
we
could
come
up
with
82
other
things
like
coffee
shops
and
bicycle
repair,
a
pump
to
put
tires
air
in
your
tires,
so
we
think
that
would
be
kind
of
fun.
The
other
problem
we
have
in
that
in
the
business
district
is
the
parlays
trail
goes
from
the
Bonneville
trail
down
through
you
know
along
the
freeway,
and
it
comes
under
hidden
hollow
and
it's
just
sort
of
there
and
then
it
starts
up
again
officially
at
the
streetcar
and
goes
to
the
Jordan
River.
We
have
no
official.
H
This
is
that
Bonneville
earth
that
parlays
trail
through
the
business
district
and
so
we've
talked
about.
This
is
a
spot
where
we
could
daylight
it
if
you
will
put
it
on
top
of
the
ground
paint
the
stripes
make
it
look.
This
is
the
trail
with
the
sign
and
perhaps
that
will
help
the
developers
finally
get
together
and
figure
out
where
it
needs
to
go
through
the
business
district.
So
we
can
mark
all
that
make
it
all
come
to
fruition
because
it
might
get
to
the
Jordan
River
before
it
gets
through
sugar
house
and
I.
A
J
Hope
that
the
city
uses
the
fact
that
the
land
has
so
increased
in
value
to
leverage
a
considerable,
affordable
housing
commitment
by
a
developer
by
selling
it
at
a
reduced
price.
There
is
a
dire
need
for
affordable
housing
in
the
area,
as
luxury
housing
has
pretty
much
taken
over
the
sugarhouse
community.
We
cannot
continue
down
the
road
of
luxury,
only
development
and
expect
the
affordable
housing
issue
to
solve
itself.
This
is
an
opportunity
that
should
not
be
passed
up.
We
have
to
start
to
walk,
affordable
housing,
not
just
talk,
affordable
housing.
Thank.
K
A
N
Do
go
figure,
go
figure,
I
know
it's
a
surprise
so
to
the
RDA,
whose
I
want
to
point
out.
I'm
gonna.
Take
this
opportunity
to
make
my
public
comments.
I
guess
I
want
to
point
out
that
this
would
be
the
last
RDA
project
in
the
sugarhouse
business
district.
We've
long
expected
this
lot.
Consolidation,
but
I
will
say
that
the
only
two
projects
in
the
sugarhouse
business
district
residential
that
have
a
modicum
of
affordable
housing
was
Wilmington
flats,
which
is
at
an
RDA
property
just
like
this
and
legacy
which
got
in
our
DEA
loan.
N
A
L
L
K
Of
what
you
can
expect
from
I
think
that
I
would
agree
with
that
and
I
would
also
be
concerned
about.
The
RDAs
reason
to
be
so
to
speak
is
is,
has
not
been
in
the
past,
affordable
housing
and
had
more
affordable.
Anything.
It's
been
in
redeveloping,
particularly
an
increasing
value
of
particular
areas,
and
so
I
am
concerned
that
there
might
be
a
conflict
between
the
RDAs
actual.
K
N
I
just
engage
your
end
on
that,
so
I'm
just
curious.
This
is
so
the
artis
goal
is
to
do
that.
The
RDA
zone
is
expired
in
this
area.
This
is
kind
of
a
leftover.
What
do
you
not
think
that
they
achieved
that
goal
in
the
sugarhouse
business
district
I
did
that's
probably
why
it's
why
it's
expired,
but.
K
N
K
N
B
I
speak
a
little
to
that
as
an
already
a
staff
person,
so
I'm
Tracy
Tran
and
with
this
Salt
Lake
City
read
of
online
agency
former
planning
staff,
so
it
I
do
want
to
say
that
it
is
the
intent
of
the
RDA
to
do
some
sort
of
affordable
housing
project
on
that
site.
So
I
hope
that
rest,
some
fears-
or
you
know
some
of
your
worries.
B
But
as
part
of
the
property
exchange,
so
the
already
provided
some
money
for
the
I
believe
the
homeless
resource,
centers
or
yeah
the
homeless,
Resource
Center,
so
that
that
money
came
out
of
our
affordable
housing
money.
So
it
would
be
our
intent
to
put
that
money
towards
some
sort
of
affordable
housing
project
within
the
sugarhouse.
A
B
There
is
quite
a
bit
of
a
process
and
once
we
do
obtain
the
property,
our
first
step
would
be
to
engage
with
the
sugarhouse
Community
Council
answer
of
that
dialogue.
So
we
are
excited-
and
we
are,
you
know,
afford
with
how
affordable
housing
is
one
of
our
main
goals
and
priorities
with
the
already
and
the
RDA
board.