►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - 2/12/2020
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - 2/12/2020
A
I'd
like
to
welcome
you
to
the
Planning
Commission
hearing
February
12th
2020
before
we
get
started
I'd
like
we
have
a
lot
of
people
here,
which
is
great.
We
love
to
get
feedback
from
the
public
if
you
wish
to
speak
tonight,
if
you
could,
please
fill
out
one
of
these
white
cards
and
pass
it
to
the
front
here,
so
we've
got,
we've
got
it.
If
you
wish
to
deliver
comments
without
speeding,
you
can
speaking
you
can
do
so
on
this
card
as
well.
You
don't
have
to
do
this.
A
This
just
helps
facilitate
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
meeting
tonight.
We've
got
a
couple
of
items
to
discuss
that
are
more
business-related.
Then
we'll
get
you
the
then
we
will
get
to
the
public
hearing
the
pub
that
the
agenda
items
where
we
have
public
hearings
so
just
bear
with
us
for
a
few
minutes,
while
we
get
through
our
through
our
business
and
we'll
get
to
that
and
I'll
have
some
additional
directions
before
we
open
the
public
hearings,
the
mic
the
mic
is
on,
but
I'll
move
it
closer.
C
D
A
F
F
Okay,
but
maybe
we
can
talk
about
it
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
then
I
will
set
it
up
for
the
disc
for
a
decision
at
the
next
meeting,
and
that
way
we
can
potentially
incorporate
your
comments
and
suggestions
into
that
piles
into
those
policies
and
procedures
changes.
So
we
can
kind
of
do
it
all
at
once.
Next
week
or
in
two
weeks.
F
D
The
request
is
for
an
extension.
It
was
a
planned
development
that
was
approved
back
in
March
28th
of
2018,
the
Commission
granted
a
one-year
time
extension
February,
13th
2019,
there's
a
memo
in
the
Dropbox
with
all
the
information,
including
the
staff
report.
From
that
date,
the
pond
development
was
granted
for
creating
a
lot
without
street
frontage
and
rejections
of
setbacks.
So
the
Commission
we're
just
asking
that
the
Commission
granted
one
year
time
extension,
so
that
would
extend
the
approval
out
to
March
28th,
2021
and
I
can
answer
any
specific
questions.
D
If
you
have,
then
that
might
just
didn't
want
to
what's
been
the
delay
Amy,
the
applicant
indicated
that
they
had
some
issues
with
fire
requirements
and
then
they
also
recently
ran
into
some
issues
with
Rocky
Mountain
Power.
They
have
submitted
their
preliminary
plat
that
was
approved
and
now
they're
working
on
submitting
their
final
plan.
So
they
have
made
progress
since
those.
H
A
C
C
J
A
Yes,
okay
motion
passes.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Now
we
will
move
on
to
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
of
our
meeting,
just
a
couple
of
reminders
for
the
public
hearing
and
how
our
process
works
for
zoning
map
amendments
and
master
plan
amendments.
They
come
before
the
Planning
Commission
for
a
recommendation
to
the
City
Council.
So
we
are
not
the
final
decision-making
body
for
a
zoning.
A
proposed
zoning
map
amendment
change.
We
take
input
from
the
public,
we
get
feedback
from
the
planning
staff.
A
We
base
our
decision,
our
recommendation
to
the
City
Council,
based
on
all
of
those
factors,
but
primarily
based
on
planning
related
principles.
How
the
proposal
is
or
is
not
consistent
with
city
policies,
what
impacts
the
proposal
would
have
on
adjacent
properties.
Those
are
the
types
of
issues
that
we
take
into
account
when
formulating
our
recommendation.
A
So
during
the
public
hearing
portion,
of
course,
you
can
deliver
your
comments
as
you
see
fit,
but
those
are
the
issues
that
speak
to
us
when
we're
formulating
our
recommendation
as
part
of
the
process
tonight,
planning
staff
will
make
a
presentation
to
us
on
the
applications.
We
will
then
ask
the
applicant
to
come
forward.
Who
will
have
ten
minutes
to
present
to
us.
We
will
done
open
the
public
hearing.
We
will
ask
if
there
is
a
member
of
the
Community
Council
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
or
with
respect
to
an
application.
A
The
community
council
member
will
have
five
minutes.
We
then
will
open
it
up
to
the
general
public,
we'll
go
through
the
cards.
Each
person
will
have
two
minutes
to
deliver
your
public
comments.
We
asked
just
to
keep
the
the
process
moving.
If
a
comment
has
already
been
made
from
another
member
of
the
public
that
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
repetition,
you
can
simply
agree
with
what
has
already
been
said
that
will
just
facilitate
the
flow
of
the
evening.
H
Evening,
commissioners,
so
as
Madame
chair
explained,
this
is
a
zoning
map,
a
master
plan
amendment,
the
applicants
are
requesting
two
men,
the
Central
Community
future
land
use
map
and
the
zoning
map
for
the
properties
located
at
159,
South,
Lincoln,
949,
955,
959
and
963
East
200.
South
the
applicants
are
seeking
two
men,
the
master
plan
from
low
density
residential,
which
is
one
to
15
dwelling
units
per
acre
to
medium
density,
residential
which
is
15
to
30
dwelling
units
per
acre.
H
H
H
The
requested
amendment
to
medium
density,
residential,
which
is
15
to
30
dwelling
units
per
acre,
does
not
align
with
the
goals
or
policy
statements
within
the
central
community
master
plan.
The
proposed
amendments
would
double
the
permitted
number
of
units
under
the
future
land
use
designation
in
the
allotment
under
the
current
r2
as
evidence
in
attachment
F,
the
analyzed
adopted
master
plan
documents
provide
some
patrol
and
non-supportive
policy
statements
in
regard
to
the
proposed
amendments.
The
neutral
policy
statements
generally
support
growth
and
development.
H
However,
there
are
a
number
of
non
supportive
policy
statements
which
are
in
direct
conflict
with
the
requests.
The
conflicting
policies
address,
compatibility,
appropriate
density
for
specific
areas
of
the
city
and
preservation
of
existing
housing
stock.
As
noted,
the
applicants
are
requesting
to
amend
the
r22,
an
RMF
35.
The
zoning
varies
in
this
area.
There
is
higher
density
zoning
along
the
700
East
corridor,
however,
it
generally
reduces
in
scale
and
density
further
east
along
200
south.
This
is
evidenced
by
the
illustration
of
the
existing
zoning
map.
H
The
neighborhood
does
include
a
variety
of
residential
uses
which
range
from
single-family
detached
to
multifamily.
As
noted,
the
zoning
map
designates
the
subject
properties
as
r2
as
outlined
in
the
staff
report
and
found
in
attachment
a
the
following
are
the
comparisons
of
the
r2
and
the
arm
of
35
zoning
district.
The
primary
differences
that
are
discussed
within
the
report
are
permitted,
land
uses,
scale,
height,
massing
and
setbacks.
The
subject
properties
are
adjacent
to
low
density,
residential
to
the
east
west
and
the
north.
H
There
are
several
identified
issues
with
the
proposed
amendments,
as
outlined
within
the
staff
report.
They
identified
issues
include
the
existing
master
plan,
policies
for
the
area
and
the
proposed
zoning.
The
difference
between
the
r2
and
the
requested
are
MF
35
and
the
loss
of
the
structures
within
a
national
historic
district.
Additionally,
staff
provided
the
analysis
of
the
standards
to
amend
the
zoning
map
and
the
standards.
The
requested
amendments
are
not
consistent
with
adopted
standards.
Those
are
an
attachment
G.
H
Additionally,
the
public
has
provided
a
number
of
identified
issues
and
concerns
with
the
proposed.
There
are
concerns
that
reflect
the
existing
multi-family
use,
concerns
that
include
the
loss
of
the
existing
housing
and
replacement
with
market
rate
housing
and
a
fear
that
the
existing
tenants
would
be
displaced
by
the
amendments
and
that
the
redevelopment
of
the
subject
properties.
H
In
summary,
the
proposed
amendments
would
facilitate
the
development
of
a
multi-family
residential
building
on
the
subject
properties,
the
master
plans,
general
policies
and
objectives
for
this
area
do
not
support
the
higher
density
development.
The
plans
call
for
stability
for
the
lower
density
designations.
The
properties
are
adjacent
to
low
density,
residential
to
the
east
west
and
north.
As
mentioned,
and
the
proposed
zoning
for
the
RMF
35
could
result
in
a
development
that
is
not
compatible.
The
staff
is
recommending
that
the
Planning
Commission
for
de-
recommendation
to
the
City
Council.
H
A
L
L
So
the
content
of
what
I
will
talk
about
today,
I'll
talk
about
the
location,
I
know
Kelsey's
talked
about
that
a
little
bit
I
want
to
show
you
the
current
structures.
I
want
to
also
let
you
know
the
explore
considerations
that
we've
had
the
proposed
plans,
the
evaluation
criteria
that
I
think
you
should
take
into
consideration
and
then
the
benefits
that
we
believe
this
will
bring
to
the
community.
L
And
to
give
you
some
context,
this
is
949
here,
can
you
949?
Is
there
955,
959,
963
and
then
159
Lincoln
Street
is
behind
in
the
back,
so
the
current
structures?
These
are
pictures
of
the
current
structures.
Again,
the
White
House
is
949.
The
Brown
House
is
955,
the
blue
house
is
959,
the
smaller
red
home
is
963.
L
This
is
the
picture
of
159
Lincoln
Street
from
the
front,
and
then
the
bottom
picture
is
actually
it
looks.
A
little
weird
I
took
a
panoramic
photo
with
my
phone
and
that's.
Why
there's
that
weird
effect,
but
I
know
that
it
has
been
noted
that
there's
a
lot
of
small
low-density
single-family
homes,
but
this
is
the
this-
is
the
street
where
Lincoln
Street
is,
and
that's
one
certainly
much
smaller
than
200.
South
159
you'll
see
the
arrow
pointing
down.
L
So
excuse
me
some
of
the
things
that
we
have
explored,
so
we
we
are
experienced.
Homeowners,
we've
actually
had
a
home
in
the
area
since
2003
and
we
are
property
owners.
So
we
have
investment
properties
as
well.
I
also
have
a
certificate
in
real
estate
from
Cornell
and
we've
repaired
and
restored
three
homes,
specifically
in
the
university
historic
district
and
also
in
that
avenues.
Neighborhoods.
L
The
original
plan
was
to
remodel
and
repair
the
existing
five
structures,
so
the
nine
units-
and
it
was
to
do
it
to
have
a
more
family-friendly
floor
plan
with
environmentally
friendly
friendly
features
and
what
that
means
is
family
friendly
floor
pans,
which
parents
who
have
young
children.
They
can
always
have
a
line
of
sight
of
their
little
kids
because
they
need
constant
care
and
supervision
and
then
more
environmentally
friendly,
because
these
houses
were
built
in
the
1900s.
L
Nothing
is
energy-efficient
with
these
homes,
and
so
we
wanted
to
do
that
update.
We
immediately
ran
into
several
roadblocks.
The
first
was
the
scope
of
the
remodel
that
we
wanted
to
do
would
have
triggered
the
requirement
from
the
city
to
bring
all
structures
to
current
seismic
code,
which
led
us
to
talk
to
a
structural
engineer
and
ask
for
a
structural
engineering
report
based
upon
the
structural
engineering
report.
L
It
was
recommended
that
building
new
structures
would
certainly
be
more
structurally
sound,
but
also
more
financially
viable,
and
so
with
that,
with
that,
we
went
ahead
and
started
to
consider
well
what
what
is
something
new
that
would
work
within
that
neighborhood
and
immediately.
This
is
an
overhead
map
of
the
neighborhood.
The
area
in
red
is
the
reason
air,
so
the
five
plots
and
you
can
see
immediately,
there's
a
significant
amount
of
commercial
as
well
as
multi-family
like
large
multi
families.
Just
in
the
immediate
walkable
area.
L
And
so
with
that
again,
taking
a
look
at
what
we
had,
we
decided
with
this
plan,
so
we
had
some
careful
consideration
of
what
was
already
there
on
200
South,
where
most
of
the
public
interaction
would
be,
and
we
set
about
to
complete
to
create
a
comparable
structure.
And
so
we
also
made
sure
that
that
there
were
front
doors
along
Lincoln
Street
as
well.
L
So
the
proposed
plan
we
are
taking
from
nine
units
to
sixteen
units.
We
are
committed
to
energy,
efficient
appliances
and
efficient
energy,
efficient,
build
materials,
electric
vehicle
chargers
and
all
the
garages
bike
racks
and
a
designated
affordable
housing
unit,
and
we're
excited
to
say
that
we're
working
with
Pacific
core
power,
specifically
with
their
solar
panel
and
utility
controlled
battery
storage.
They
had
a
pilot
program
out
in
Harriman,
with
a
pro
with
a
complex
called
the
Soleil
lofts.
L
Our
project
will
be
the
only
in
Salt
Lake
City
and
the
first
in
Salt
Lake
City
at
this
point,
and
basically
so
with
standard
solar
panels,
while
they
do
generate
energy
for
the
homeowner,
there's
no
effective
way
to
store
that
energy,
so
that
at
peak
use
hours
when
there
isn't
necessarily
a
lot
of
light,
solar
paneled
homes
are
still
using
power
from
the
grid.
Like
everyone
else,
and
not
necessarily
solar
power.
L
So
I
want
to
give
you
the
site
plan.
It
does
look
a
little
bit
different
than
what
Kelsey
had
presented.
It
wasn't
the
big
you.
It
is
laid
out
in
three
separate
rows
and
we're
proposing
16
units,
three
of
which
are
3
bedroom,
2
car
garage
units,
which
one
of
them
will
be
the
affordable
designated
unit.
We
had
12
2
bedroom,
2
car
garage
units
and
one
one
bedroom
one
car
garage
unit.
In
addition
to
that,
we
have
four
parking
stalls
for
visitors.
We
have
significantly
more
green
space.
L
L
And
then
we
had
a
neighborhood
survey
done
by
the
architect
to
endure
that
it
does.
It
is
compatible
in
terms
of
aesthetics
with
the
neighborhood,
and
so
that
include
brick
exterior,
and
we
also
took
in
some
public
during
the
open
house.
We
had
some
comments
as
well
that
we've
taken
into
consideration,
and
so
that's
a
brick
exterior
the
mansard
roofs,
certain
architectural
elements
that
people
brought
to
our
attention.
We
did
want
to
make
sure
that
there
was
engagement
with
the
street.
L
L
With
the
evaluation
criteria,
there's
these
five,
these
five-
that
are
consideration
for
the
proposal,
and
we
believe
that
we
more
than
adequately
meet
all
five.
So
whether
they're
proposed
map
amendment
is
consistent
with
purposes.
We
think
that
it
does
I
know
that
Kelsey
had
cited
the
community
master
plan.
L
We
specifically
looked
at
plan
Salt
Lake
because
it
was
adopted
in
2015
rather
than
started
in
1994
nearly
3
decades
ago,
and
so
with
that,
specifically
with
the
RMF
35,
it
says
quote
by
creating
spaces
with
a
diverse
mix
of
use,
building
types,
so
people
have
a
choice
of
where
they
live
and
how
they
live.
Medium
density
because,
specifically,
density
and
compact
development
are
important.
Principles
of
sustainable
growth
and
I
have
limited
time
we'll
just
skip
ahead,
whether
or
not
it
furthers
the
specific
statements
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
L
We
believe
that
this
will
minimally
impact
adjacent
properties
again
to
adjacent
properties
or
commercial
properties,
one
which
has
an
underground
medical
facility
parking
garage.
All
the
all
the
proposed
dwellings
will
have
a
35
foot.
Her
mission
was
that
time,
this
time,
Oh
quickly,
yeah,
so
I'm
just
gonna
skip
over
to
the
benefits.
So
we
support
the
growth
initiatives
and
house
and
house
and
housing
initiatives
by
plan
Salt,
Lake
2015
by
adding
medium
density
housing
stock.
In
a
high-growth
area,
we
are
designating
a
unit
for
affordable
housing,
which
also
further
the
housings
initiative
housing
initiatives.
L
It
supports
plan
Salt,
Lake's,
first
guiding
principle
that
neighborhoods
provide
a
safe
environment
because
we
are
certainly
increasing
or
bringing
in
more
families
into
the
neighborhood,
which
is
the
goal,
and
that
was
part
of
the
four
floor
planning
that
impacts
walkability,
neighborhood
engagement
as
well
as
area
school
funding,
and
then
we
are
engaged
with
sustainable
green
building.
So
thank
you.
E
L
A
For
the
record
that
you're
not
proposing
a
specific
plan,
this
is
simply
a
zoning
amendment
for
consideration.
So
the
you've
presented
a
plan,
that's
a
concept
that
could
be
constructed
if
the
zoning
amendment
was
approved,
but
where
the
application
is
not
tied
to
your
presentation
of
your
layout,
we.
L
Are
also
happy
to
sign
a
what
was
that
called
a
memorandum
agreement
so
that
we
don't
change
the
proposal
and
the
plan
significantly.
Quite
frankly,
you
know
we,
we
are
private
homeowners,
we're
not
a
development
company.
We
don't
have
the
monetary,
we
don't
have
the
monetary
resources
to
continually
change
these
plans
with
an
architect.
You.
A
C
You
might
have
gotten
cut
short
and
so
for
me,
I'm
particular
interested
in
the
standard,
and
the
question
before
the
Commission
is
really
is
whether
or
not
RMF
35
is
more
appropriate
or
the
same
as
or
more
appropriate
for
this
site
than
the
current
zoning.
R2
and
I
I
mean
I
understood
how
your
plan
and
your
vision
for
the
project
I
just
wanted.
There's
anything
else.
You
want
to
say
kind
of
why
you
feel
that
this
site
would
be
more
appropriate
as
an
arm
of
35
I've.
J
E
I
have
a
question
for
Kelsey:
what
in
the
Archies
zone?
What
do
you
have
a
height
limit
on
that
I
believe
it's
28
feet,
28,
okay
and
and
and
because
there's
five
Lots
that
that
would
assume
five
unit.
Ten
units
could
be
built
there
correct.
If
everything
went
away,
ten
units
could
be
built
there.
That.
A
H
District,
it
requires
five
thousand
square
feet
for
a
detached,
single-family
and
eight
thousand
for
a
duplex,
and
so
with
that
I
think
they
have
twenty
seven
thousand
square
feet.
They
could
have
approximately
seven
units,
there's
a
process
that
they
could
potentially
go
through
to
keep
the
number
of
units
and
rebuild
the
structures.
H
L
H
A
Okay,
well
now
move
on
to
the
public
hearing
portion.
Thank
you
for
your
presentation.
Thank
you
just
a
reminder.
If
you
haven't
filled
out
a
card
and
would
like
to
speak,
please
bring
your
card
forward
and
we
will
call
your
name
as
part
of
the
hearing.
Everyone
will
have
two
minutes
to
present.
If
there's
a
representative
here
from
the
Community
Council,
he
or
she
will
have
five
minutes
and
then,
as
you
speak,
please
make
sure
to
state
your
name
for
the
record
in
the
microphone.
Please
also
try
not
to
talk
in
the
background.
A
It
creates
noise
and
it
makes
it
hard
for
us
to
hear
and
it
makes
it
hard
for
the
recording
to
take
effect
and
then
also
after
we
hear
from
everyone,
we
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
at
that
point
we
will
talk
amongst
ourselves
as
the
Commission.
We
might
ask
staff
to
come
back
and
ask
questions.
We
might
ask
questions
of
the
applicant,
but
at
that
time
we
ask
that
you
not
speak
from
the
audience
we've
heard
from
everyone,
and
we
will
take
your
comments
into
consideration.
B
My
name
is
Esther
hunter
I'm,
chair
of
the
East
Central
Community
Council,
and
you've
received
several
documents
from
us
in
your
packets.
This
was
the
largest
electronic
response
on
a
survey
as
far
as
impacts
from
the
community
that
ever
had
we've
had
700,
plus
responses
that
came
in
that
was
just
unbelievable.
B
This
area
is
significant
to
the
neighborhood
it's
significant
and
would
have
significant
impact.
It
change
from
the
our
this
is
the
heart
of
the
University
neighborhood
inside
of
East
Central
was
second
south.
It
leads
up
to
the
park
building
at
the
U.
This
is
a
significant
visual
impact.
We
have
these
particular
structures
were
built
in
1890.
These
were
homes,
they
are
significant.
We
have
a
historic
district
that
goes
to
you,
eleventh
east,
and
we
look
to
expand
it
down
to
nine
pieced.
B
These
houses
were,
in
fact
reviewed
with
intensive
level
surveys
for
the
five
are
considered
contributory
and
those
were
all
in
the
packet.
The
university,
neighborhood
and
also
east
central
strongly
supports
the
housing
plan
and
understands
that
we
have
need
for
housing.
We
have
dozens
and
dozens
of
properties
in
our
area
that
are
zoned
RMF.
Forty
five
sixty
five
35
that
can
easily
be
developed.
B
We
do
not
need
to
also
rip
into
the
neighborhood
into
the
houses
to
actually
tear
down
houses
and
develop
them.
We
included
those
maps
in
your
packets
and
we
hope
they've
had
a
chance
to
look
at
them.
This
is
a
difficult
particular
application.
These
folks
have
been
neighbors.
They
have
another
house
that
is
close
in
the
area,
but
what's
also
difficult,
I
guess
I
would
ask
you
to
consider
if
you
have
a
car
for
over
20
years,
and
you
fail
to
put
oil
in
and
then
20
years
later,
you
expect
it
to
actually
run.
B
B
So
the
amount
of
problems
that
we've
had
in
the
area
with
some
of
the
folks
that
live
there
and
that
real
concern
is
when
we
talk
about
low
income
housing
for
the
area,
I
was
invited
by
some
of
the
tenants
that
actually
live
in
these
houses
to
come
in
and
see
their
living
situation.
It
was
disgusting
black
mold
problems,
there's
no
good
egress
that
the
amount
of
living
problems
that
were
inside
were
crazy.
B
B
One
of
the
things
that
I
tried
to
do
for
almost
a
year
was
meet
with
these
applicants
to
talk
about
options,
everything
from
city
funds,
to
tax
incentives
to
developers
who
are
willing
to
buy
the
houses
and
give
them
funds
so
that
just
a
half
a
block
away.
There
were
five
properties
that
came
up
that
were
already
zoned
RMF
forty
five
that
they
could
develop
there.
We
tried
to
come
up
with
every
solution
that
would
be
possible.
B
The
concern
I
have
is
that
things
weren't
always
really
in
my
mind
and
I'm,
saying
this
for
me
honest
and
what
often
happened.
One
lady
who
was
a
tenant
from
California
three
kids
under
six
years
old,
was
told
that
it
was
a
two-bedroom
apartment
that
she
was
renting
for
what
she
was
paying.
When
she
came,
she
found
the
black,
mold,
etc
sewer
leaking
from
the
ceiling.
She
could
not
live
there.
B
She
went
out
to
the
back
lot
and
instead,
what
happened
when
they
found
out
that
I
had
talked
to
her
and
that
I
had
been
let
inside
she
was
evicted.
So
we're
talking
about
displacing
low-income
housing.
The
actual
count
that
I
keep
that
I
received
from
the
tenants
was
fifty
people
and
the
county
shows
nine
different
bedrooms,
whether
that's
officially
illegal
or
not,
but
we're
talking
about
displacing
people
who
have
the
need
for
this
level
of
rent,
but
they
also
have
a
right
to
a
clean
and
good
living
condition.
B
So,
but
that's
a
separate
issue
from
whether
or
not
we
should
because
they're
not
properly
managed,
we
should
tear
them
down
and
we
should
actually
cause
a
problem.
I
know
you're,
aware
of
all
the
things
that
are
available:
I
did
bring
a
handout
about
preservation
related
to
what
can
all
be
done,
related
to
foundations
and
water
damage
and
etc.
I
do
want
to
just
pass
that.
B
There
are
dozens
of
technical
briefs,
we've
all
done
it,
we
all
live
in
houses.
Mine
was
built
in
1888.
We
all
live
in
houses
in
the
area.
That
needs
substantial
work,
but
you
have
to
keep
it
up.
You
have
to
do
it
and
there
are
options
that
are
available
right.
Thank
you.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
me.
Thank.
F
D
Hoping
that
the
owners
of
these
properties
are
here
to
listen
to
the
community
sentiment
and
support
of
protecting
these
historical
homes,
several
of
us
here
own
homes
dating
to
the
early
years
of
the
20th
century,
and
we
all
have
had
to
make
large
investments
for
upgrades
and
maintenance.
None
of
us
have
been
allowed
out
are.
None
of
us
have
allowed
our
homes
to
fall
into
decline
over
30
years,
as
these
properties
have
all
the
while
receiving
large
rental
income
from
them.
D
D
A
You
I'm
gonna,
just
ask
everyone
not
to
applaud
we're
just
here
to
get
your
feedback
and
your
input
and
to
keep
the
process
moving
forward.
I
appreciate
that
you
all
are
out-
and
this
is
a
very
important
issue
to
you,
but
to
maintain
decorum
here,
I'd
ask
we
just
also
maintained
a
bit
of
silence
from
the
audience.
The
next
card
is,
did
Jena,
poin
and
I
apologize
if
I'm
butchering
your
name.
B
A
B
B
This
map
indicates
which
of
my
neighbors
have
signed
the
petition
pages
to
12
through
241.
Those
residences
not
highlighted
were
those
I
was
unable
to
contact
as
apartment
buildings
accessible
only
to
residents,
small
businesses
and
institutions
like
Salt,
Lake,
Regional
Hospital.
All
the
doors
I
knocked
on
only
two
people
refused
to
sign
pink
represents
three
more
signings
at
that
dress.
Green
indicates
two
signers
and
orange
represents
one
signature.
Many
of
those
who
signed
were
unable
to
join
us
tonight
due
to
work
and
other
commitments.
B
B
Look
at
all
the
colors
representing
the
density
of
the
different
densities
that
okay,
different
density,
residential,
commercial
and
institutional
zoning,
along
with
easy
access
to
public
transit
and
bike
lanes
that
makes
East
Central
Community
unique
and
desirable.
It
is
a
thriving,
authentic,
walkable,
historic
community
that
allows
Aging
in
place
with
the
tenth
East
Senior
Center,
the
type
of
community
that
I
believe
the
city
is
striving
for.
We
are
already
the
most
densely
populated
community
outside
of
Central
City.
N
D
Hi
everybody,
my
name,
is
Madison
lemansky
and
I
live
at
146,
South
Lincoln
Street
I'm
here
today,
as
a
concerned
resident
a
neighbor
of
many
here
to
stand
up
against
this
area
being
rezone
for
the
profit
and
benefit
of
owners.
That,
from
my
perspective,
don't
appear
to
care
about
the
safety,
cleanliness
and
quality
of
life.
D
In
my
neighborhood
I've
had
the
unique
perspective
of
the
goings
on
this
property
is
I
have
a
bird's-eye
view
from
my
second-floor
apartment,
which
has
a
south-facing
window
and
as
as
mentioned
earlier,
why
high-quality
property
management
is
a
separate
issue
from
why
we're
here
today,
I'm
disappointed
to
share
that
I
in
fact
witnessed
a
drive-by
shooting
on
February
1st
2020
at
12:58
a.m.
on
Lincoln
Street
fired
directly
towards
949
East,
2nd
South.
D
One
week
later,
my
husband
found
a
McDonald's
cup
full
of
marijuana
on
our
front
lawn
and
it
is
unclear
while
it
is
unclear
if
this
was
a
drug
drop
location
or
simply
left
behind
by
a
person
that
was
too
intoxicated
to
notice.
This
is
these
are
issues
that
happen
on
an
ongoing
basis,
we're
on
while
we
are
unable
to
prove
that
these
drugs
were
associated
with
these
homes.
The
number
of
intoxicated
individuals
that
are
consistently
hanging
around
the
property
led
us
to
this
assumption.
D
On
a
recent
occasion,
I
found
a
woman
who
appeared
to
be
high
on
meth
squatting
in
the
corridor
of
my
building
when
I
left
for
work.
One
morning
from
what
I've
witnessed
in
the
six
years,
I've
lived
on,
Lincoln,
Street,
quality
of
life
and
the
good
and
safety
of
our
neighborhood
is
not
the
priority
of
this
property
owner,
as
they
have
lived
laid
out
in
their
presentation
today
to
reward
the
current
owners
with
a
huge
profit
and
build-out
of
apartment.
Buildings
would
reward
near
years
of
negligence
that
I
have
personally
witnessed.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
A
A
O
Couple
simple
comments
here
that
these
houses
are
currently
occupied,
there's
more
there's
well
more
than
20
people
living
there
and
it's
important
to
ask:
where
will
these
people
go?
If
this
proposal
is
approved,
where
will
they
go?
These
people
are
currently
paying
rents
which
are
within
their
means.
Barely
the
new
proposal
calls
for
one
affordable
housing
unit
out
of
16.
This
is
an
insult
to
the
people
currently
living
there.
It's
also
an
insult
to
a
city
which
is
looking
to
increase,
affordable
housing
units
not
decrease
them.
O
O
There
is
a
history
of
dilapidation
of
non
follow
through
there's,
been
non-compliance,
issues
with
city
code
building
code
and
sanitation
issues,
city
workers
have
come
to
meet
with
the
property
owners
and
have
had
no
shows
by
the
property
owners.
This
cost
the
city,
time
and
money.
This
has
been
the
history
of
the
ownership
from
these
people
and
to
allow
their
development
to
be
approved
would
basically
be
awarding
moral
negligence.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
A
O
O
O
So,
while
the
applicants
is
willing
to
provide
one
affordable
housing
unit
in
the
project,
where
are
the
occupants
who
are
presently
they're
going
to
live?
Well,
they're,
gonna
go.
We
feel
that
there
are
so
many
issues
that
still
need
to
be
addressed,
that
this
rezoning
is
just
not
appropriate
at
this
time.
D
Did
a
really
good
job
hi?
My
name
is
Christie
Perez,
Nick
and
I'm
here
to
support
the
staff
recommendation
and
oppose
the
rezoning
on
second
south.
Most
of
my
comments
have
already
been
made
so
I'll
just
say
that
maintaining
single-family
housing
and
our
two
zoning
would
support
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you
thank.
A
D
D
A
K
I
have
lived
next
to
the
property
they're
proposing
to
redevelop
for
approximately
twenty
six
years,
as
I
grew
up
there.
As
a
kid
I
was
told
not
to
go
over
there
because
of
the
danger,
because
the
it's
property
owners
lip
regularly
left,
building
and
materials
rusty
screws
and
that
kind
of
things
I
went
over
there
anyway.
I've
got
scars
to
prove
it
these
it's
an
insult,
but
it's
true.
They
are
slumlords
as
far
as
the
green
space,
they
don't
water,
their
own
lawns
or
mow
them
on
an
irregular
basis.
They
don't
care
about
green
space.
K
Also
they've
made
some
kind
of
misleading
statements
that
confuse
me
I'm,
not
even
quite
sure
that,
while
they
may
own
a
home
there,
I
don't
think
they
actually
live
in
it.
They've
got
the
location
of
the
Senior
Citizens
Center
wrong.
They
gay
the
nursing
home
is
not
around
the
corner.
Okay,
someone
who
actually
knocked
this
neighborhood
know
this.
So
this
is
not
a
community
resident
when
we
making
these
applications.
This
is
someone
else,
I'm,
not
sure
who,
but
they
don't
seem
to
be
neighbors
to
this
area.
K
They
talk
about
using
a
more
recent
document
from
2012
when
the
current
document
that
all
of
us
are
referencing
was
published.
2015
there
was
editing
done,
I.
Think
someone
paid
attention,
I
believe
the
city
is
able
to
do
that.
One
thing
people
haven't
mentioned
is
parking
on
Lincoln
Street
is
already
extraordinarily
limited.
Their
parking
proposed
again
they
could
build
a
giant
big
box,
like
is
on
elevate.
If
you
approve
this,
but
their
parking
as
proposed
empties
into
Lincoln
Street,
it's
already
hard
to
back
out
of
parking
in
there,
it's
going
to
become
a
congestion
nightmare.
K
A
A
O
My
name
is
Irina
zealot
now
and
I'm,
going
to
read
from
the
State
Historic
Preservation
Office
files
for
all
these
five
structures,
the
four
houses
from
200
South,
contributing
structures
based
on
an
intensive
level
survey.
The
house
at
one
hundred
fifty
nine
thousand
constrain,
is
considered
not
contributing
to
to
exterior
modifications
such
as
setting
applied
over
the
underlying
brick
structure
in
appropriate
replacement
windows,
but
may
still
have
important
local
historical
significance.
O
It
is
page
two
of
the
historic
site
form
State
Historic
Preservation
Office,
note
that
the
changes
appear
superficial
and
could
be
reversed
with
proper
restoration
and
rehabilitation.
Four
of
the
five
houses
I
designated
as
contributed
contributing
and
the
one
non-contributing
house
could
likely
do
it
and
be
restored.
All
of
these
structures
are
indeed
historic,
so
I
think
that
this
is
should
be
preserved.
O
A
D
I
purchased
my
home
at
10:58
East,
two
hundred
South
almost
40
years
ago.
I
got
it
for
practically
nothing
because
it
was
in
god-awful
shape.
The
man
who
lived
there
before
me
was
born
in
it
and
died
in
it.
I'd
almost
age,
a
hundred
and
he
had
been
senile
for
twenty-five
years,
but
I
didn't
have
any
money
so
I
bought
it
and
I've
spent
the
past
40
years.
D
Fixing
that
house
up
when
I
had
money,
I
paid
people
to
help
me
when
I
didn't
I
learned
to
do
it
myself
and
I've
watched
that
neighborhood
grow
for
almost
40
years
now
those
houses
that
are
in
dispute
here,
while
my
house
was
going
up
and
being
fixed
up,
have
been
going
to
wrack
and
ruin
through
negligent
landlords
who
never
did
anything
to
fix
them
up.
In
the
meantime,.
D
That's
my
house,
while
I
feed
your
dog
biscuits
and
we've
got
a
great
neighborhood
full
of
good
people,
we
don't
need
an
apartment.
Building
parking
is
already
horrendous.
I
can't
put
my
garbage
out
on
the
streets
without
somebody
hauling
the
full
cans
to
the
curb,
so
that
my
garbage
doesn't
get
picked
up
because
kids
parked
there.
There
are
too
many
other
buildings
that
don't
have
Ivy
house
has
24
units
and
only
six
parking
spots.
The
parking
is
abominable.
It's
a
good
neighborhood
full
of
good
people.
D
I'd,
really
really
like
it
to
stay
that
way
and
I.
Don't
trust
people
who
have
allowed
this
property
to
deteriorate
for
30
years
to
do
anything
to
keep
it
the
fine
and
good
neighborhood.
It
is
full
of
good
people.
Living
quiet
lives
to
the
best
of
our
ability.
We
just
don't
need
any
more
of
this,
so
I'm
completely
and
totally
opposed.
Thank.
A
D
Good
evening
my
name
is
Tim,
funk
I
work
on
housing
for
low-income
people
with
crossroads
urban
center
I've
been
in
this
neighborhood
all
my
life,
my
family
lived
on
eleventh
East
and
Fizz.
South
I
know
it
inside
out.
I
lived
there
as
a
college
student
I've
lived
there
as
a
resident
on
/,
South
I
know
the
neighborhood,
but
what
I
want
to
say
tonight
is
that
we're
glad
that
your
staff
has
recommended
that
you
don't
approve
this
project.
D
D
D
We're
requiring
we're
asking
her
to
Ritu
proposed
mitigation
ordinance
requiring
the
replacement
of
affordable
units
when
those
units
are
destroyed
by
new
development.
In
relation
to
that,
in
addition,
crossroads
wants
and
will
get
policy
and
procedures,
helping
lower-income
residents
find
an
affordable
place
to
live
when
displaced
by
new
development
or
renovation.
D
We
sent
you
a
prepared
statement.
We
say
that
this
is
unacceptable
and
we
think
it's
unacceptable
that
you,
as
the
first
seers
of
this
information,
don't
take
a
position
on
helping
the
people
who
are
there.
There
are
hundreds
of
properties
in
the
city
that
have
already
had
the
people
put
out
that
are
vacant
that
are
late
waiting
for
the
opportunity
to
develop
them,
and
that
can't
happen
anymore.
You
have
to
take
the
responsibility
as
we
do
to
make
displacement
stop
and
to
make
people
whole
before
they're
put
out.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
My
name
is
Jen
Colby
and
my
husband
and
I
have
owned
the
house
at
160
South
Lincoln
Street,
since
2002
I've
already
submitted
detailed
comments
in
writing.
Tonight,
I'd
like
to
emphasize
the
following.
First,
the
applicants
have
claimed
that
citywide
house
citywide
plans,
including
the
housing
plans,
support
their
rezoning
request
from
low
to
medium
density
on
these
five
are
two
Lots.
In
fact,
the
emphasis
of
specifically
the
housing
plan
is
to
preserve
and
enhance
affordable
housing
and
to
promote
and
enhance
fair
and
equitable
housing.
B
This
application
is
contrary
to
both
those
goals
and
is
not
supported.
Housing
plan
goal
to
Reed's
increased
housing
opportunities
and
stability
for
cost
burdened
households,
objective
5,
reads:
work
with
landlords
to
improve
their
housing
stock
and
rent
to
very
low
income
households.
According
to
the
plan
dashboard,
the
C
has
made
very
little
progress
on
getting
landlords
to
improve
their
substandard
rental
units.
Unfortunately,
this
is
certainly
true
here.
As
noted,
though,
the
poor
track
record
of
property
management
is
a
separate
issue
from
this.
B
B
Regarding
affordability,
the
applicant
has
told
us
that
target
rental
rate
average
is
$2,200
a
month
to
pencil
according
to
online
calculators.
This
requires
a
gross
annual
household
income
of
$82,000
for
the
same
housing
cost.
A
homebuyer
could
afford
a
mortgage
taxes
and
insurance
on
a
three
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
dollar
home.
B
Meanwhile,
truly
affordable
units
and
homes
for
purchase
in
our
city
remain
out
of
reach
for
most
you
tones
when
we
bought
our
house
in
this
historic
neighborhood,
we
didn't
realize
how
many
single-family
houses
were
sitting
on
RMF
zoned
Lots
due
to
previous
urban
renewals.
A
lot
of
those
structures
pointed
to
as
compatible
are
some
of
the
worst
examples
of
our
urban
renewal
from
the
60s
and
70s.
We
have
seen
how
this
affects
the
ability
of
individuals
to
compete
with
developers
for
properties
up
for
sale.
B
This
is
currently
the
case
with
a
house
and
lot
directly
to
our
west.
Upsetting
drives
up.
Prices
threatens
the
viability
of
our
homes
and
our
neighborhoods.
At
this
point,
we
could
probably
not
buy
back
into
our
neighborhood.
The
first
rule
of
holes
is
stop
digging.
Please
vote
to
give
negative
recommendation
to
this
application.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
R
Thank
you
very
much
the
opportunity
to
appear
before
you,
though,
I
have
submitted
public
on
maps
like
on
February,
5
and
I
was
such
a
rush
to
get
him
in
last
Wednesday
I
felt
I
needed
to
make
some
revisions
and
Corrections,
which
I
submitted
last
Friday
I
hope
you've
had
a
chance
to
review
that
there's
no
way
I'm.
My
two
minutes,
I'm
gonna
be
able
to
really
air
it
out.
R
R
Thirdly,
the
petition
is
not
supported
by
the
Central
City
community,
historical
district
goals.
Fourth,
the
petitioner
owner
is
a
bad
neighbor.
I'm,
not
I,
am
reticent
to
say
they're
slum
Lords,
but
they
are
I,
wouldn't
want
to
be
called
one.
But
there's
no
question
about
it.
They've
been
a
problem
to
me:
I've
lived
in
my
home
since
1979
and
made
considerable
investments
in
my
home
I'm
very
proud
of
my
home.
It's
a
beautiful
home.
It
was
built
in
1905,
and
these
people
I
just
lived
three
doors
down,
basically
from
that
property
and
across
the
street.
R
Directly
next
to
my
house,
is
a
beautiful
Victorian
whorehouse
that
my
neighbors
gone
to
great
expense
to
dole
up
it's
a
real
gem
and
as
I've
indicated,
this
neighborhood
is
a
good,
unique
neighborhood,
it's
time
to
roll
back
the
clock
and
protect
it
with
more
low
density
housing,
which
is
the
overall
goal
of
the
master
plan.
Thank.
A
R
A
S
I'll
just
ad-lib,
while
those
are
coming
down.
My
name
is
Cindy
Krum
ER
and,
as
some
of
you
know,
I
rehabbed
buildings
like
this
and
I
want
you
to
know.
I've,
never
been
told
by
the
city
as
I
provided
new
plumbing
new
electrical
that
I
needed
to
provide
a
seismic
upgrade
ever
I
have
an
active
permit
now.
So
my
active
involvement
in
land-use
planning
in
this
neighborhood
goes
back
almost
40
years.
I
want
to
share
with
you
three
points
from
those
40
years.
First
of
all,
owners
control
of
multiple
contiguous
properties
is
not
a
consideration.
S
You
haven't
heard
about
that
tonight.
There's
a
tremendous
amount
of
land
banking
in
this
neighborhood,
it's
very
common
I
own
adjacent
properties,
on
the
blocks
immediately
to
the
south
and
to
the
west.
The
issue
is
not
about
ownership,
but
about
master
plan
and
zoning.
The
Central
Community
has
precipitated
more
neighborhood
plans
and
small
area
plans
than
any
other
part
of
the
city.
I
have
worked
on
all
of
them,
starting
in
the
early
1980s,
when
I
was
thirty,
something
this
all
began.
S
This
shift
for
this
neighborhood
all
began
with
the
east
central
neighbor
hood
plan
adopted
in
December
of
1984
and
all
of
the
planning
master
planning
that's
been
done
since
then
has
been
largely
consistent
with
that
1984
shift.
I
can,
of
course,
go
into
great
detail.
I've
listed
all
of
the
plans
that
I
consider
relevant
to
this
particular
proposal.
You
can
see
that
there's
not
one.
S
J
J
Hi
Zack
reduce
alt
I,
think
I'm,
the
only
one
in
this
room
who
supports
this
proposal.
Besides
the
developer
himself,
I
just
want
to
address
the
staff
report
and
their
negative
recommendation,
because
I
believe
they
were
handcuffed
by
the
central
community
planning
guidelines.
I
want
to
drill
in
on
two
specific
points.
In
the
century:
little
Community,
Planning
land-use
goals.
J
It
states
that
it
should
that
plans
should
ensure
preservation
of
low-density
residential
neighborhoods
and,
at
the
same
time,
encourage
the
creation
and
maintenance,
a
variety
of
housing
options
and
opportunities
that
meet
the
social
needs
and
income
levels
of
adverse
population.
Single
family
homes
are
not
going
to
do
that
in
salt
lake,
where
we
have
a
growing
population
density,
is
coming,
whether
you
like
it
or
not,
and
I
think
this
is
an
excellent
location
for
that
density.
The
proposed
site
is
two
blocks
from
tracks
rail.
J
If
density
is
going
somewhere,
I
believe
this
is
a
great
place
to
put
it
you're,
halfway
between
downtown
Salt,
Lake
you're,
halfway
between
the
you
and
if
this
is
redeveloped
under
current
under
the
current
zoning,
we're
gonna
lose
units
if
it's
developed
under
this
new
zoning,
we're
going
to
gain
units
and
I
think
that
should
be
the
overall
goal
of
the
planning
policies
of
the
city.
Thanks.
J
A
E
E
A
Okay,
oh
yes,
I
will
read
the
comments.
The
change
in
zoning
increases
the
value
of
the
property,
thereby
rewarding
the
property
owner,
so
the
city
is
rewarding
the
existing
property
owner.
Why,
with
the
city
reward
quote,
slumlord
unquote,
I
have
lived
in
the
immediate
area
since
1990
I
have
never
observed
pic
hoi
owner
hiring
a
licensed
contractor.
He
has
always
done
the
minimal,
typically
by
the
tenants
or
PCs
brother.
Why
reward
neglect?
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
E
A
A
D
Thanks
for
listening
to
our
comments,
my
name
is
Brent,
Burnett
and
I
know.
You've
heard
a
lot.
I
would
just
like
to
make
sure
the
following
items
are
included
on
the
record
for
today
number
one
preservation
experts
can
attest
that
no
modern
construction
can
ever
replicate
the
quality
in
appearance
of
historic
construction.
Number
two,
the
properties
in
question
have
been
designated
by
the
National
Register
as
architectural
contributors
to
the
historic
district.
D
It
is
important
to
recognize
that
any
construction
that
might
replace
them
will
have
absolutely
zero
historic
quality
and
will
thus
be
a
detriment
to
the
historic
district
and
the
property
values
in
the
neighborhood.
I
have
a
map
here
of
the
historic
district
I'd
like
interred
I
know
you
have
that,
but
I
would
like
that
in
the
record.
D
Thirdly,
and
asking
for
a
zoning
change,
the
owners
are
asking
for
special
treatment
as
if
they
shouldn't
have
to
play
by
the
same
rules
that
everybody
else
plays
by.
Finally,
my
fourth
comment:
it
is
important
that
the
neighborhood
retain
its
historic
character.
It
should
go
on
the
record
for
the
public's
knowledge
that
government
incentives
allow
homes
contributing
to
the
character
of
this
neighborhood,
a
full
refund
of
40%
of
construction
cost.
Thank
you
very
much.
All.
G
Hi,
my
name
is
Melinda
main
and
I've
lived
in
the
neighborhood
for
going
on
40
years
as
well.
I
do
live
on
2nd
South,
just
below
ninth
East.
The
one
thing
that
has
not
been
addressed
here,
I
think
is
back
in
the
early
90s
or
late
80s
traffic-calming
islands
were
placed
above
90
ston
ii
south
and
that
Lincoln
Street
and
second
south
there.
That
would
just
be
way
too
much
congestion
for
that
about
those
streets.
G
That's
my
opinion
on
that
and
as
a
real
estate
agent
in
the
area,
I've
sold
and
helped
many
people
buy
and
sell
their
homes
and
I'll
tell
you
there's
a
lot
of
gentrification
going
on
with
those
older
homes
and
people
love
the
character
they
come
in.
They
look
at
the
homes,
they
say.
Oh
my
gosh,
it's
a
lot
of
work,
but
eventually
they
find
a
way
to
figure
out
how
to
to
make
that
a
livable
home,
and
there
are
people
out
there
that
want
that.
G
I
do
understand
that
our
whole
valley
is
going
to
be
increasing
in
density
over
the
next
many
decades
and
I.
Don't
you
know
to
take
away
the
character
of
what
we
have
in
the
neighborhood
behooves
me,
because
it's
it's
the
home
owners
that
take
pride
in
their
surroundings
and
every
time
new
renters
come
in
it's
there,
it's
a
new
learning
curve
and
a
new
teaching
challenge
to
get
them
to
get
their
garbage
cans
off
the
road
out
of
the
street.
There's
a
pride
in
ownership.
G
We
do
know,
there's
more
congestion
with
parking
because
you
of
you,
students
come
and
Park
in
the
neighborhood
and
then
catch
the
buses
up
to
the
U.
That's
very
obvious,
and
the
other
thing
that
concerns
me
too,
is
that
the
the
city
is
increasing
density,
but
they're
not
providing
more
green
space.
We
need
micro-mini
parts
in
all
of
these
areas
and
so
that
that's
my
input
and
we
need
more
condos,
not
rentals.
Thank
you.
Thank.
M
Many
unfounded
and
then
I
did
a
little
research
went
around
the
block
over
the
last
month
and
I
found
that
that
block
largely
I
used
to
live
on
Lincoln
Street
at
the
Lincoln
apartments.
Actually,
when
Mark
hacking
was
the
landlord
and
it's
become
a
mixed-use
block
with
commercial
and
residential
and
in
fact
it's
shifting
more
towards
commercial
because
of
the
the
commercial
buildings
coming
along
and
I,
actually
think
that
their
plan
to
increase
residential
housing
actually
will
stabilize
a
balance
of
mixed-use
for
that
block
and
historically
as
much
as
I
did
love.
M
M
It
will
improve
and
stabilize
the
neighborhood
and
an
increase
values
for
everybody,
and
this
is
the
process
of
the
master
plan
of
higher
density
and
they
have
a
large
open
area
lot.
That's
not
being
used
to
its
full
potential,
and
my
understanding
is:
is
that
they've
worked
extensively
with
the
city
plan,
Commission,
trying
to
come
up
with
different
ways
and
the
the
determination
was
that
the
buildings
couldn't
be
saved
to
increase
the
use
of
them
as
multifamily
buildings,
and
thank
you
thank.
A
A
A
D
Hello,
my
name
is
Corinne
Cummings
I
used
to
live
on
Iowa
Street
in
the
early
1980s,
then
I
left
and
moved
to
Los
Angeles
for
21
years.
There's
a
lot
of
this
in
Los
Angeles
and
there
are
a
lot
of
homeless
people
in
Los
Angeles.
This
is
not
the
solution
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
one
of
the
things
about
Salt
Lake
City
that
I
missed
was
the
beauty
of
these
neighborhoods
I.
Don't
own
property
here.
D
I
would
like
to
but
I
can't
when
I
see
stuff
like
this
I
see
Los
Angeles
with
numerous
people
like
myself,
who
worked
in
a
university
and
could
not
afford
to
pay
to
live
there.
That's
why
I
left
this
to
me
does
not
look
like
a
solution.
I've
listened
to
these
homeowners
talk
about
keeping
up
their
homes
and
dedicating
themselves
to
a
good
process
of
life
and
living
and
living
well
and
living
with
integrity
and
living
with
purpose.
D
D
L
A
Okay,
seeing
none
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
hearing?
Thank
you
all
for
your
input
and
your
comments
and
I'm
bringing
it
back
up
to
the
Commission
for
discussion.
Do
we
want
to
bring
Kelsey
back
I've
closed
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
for
the
last
comment.
Well,
hot.
You
will
have
two
minutes.
Please
state
your
name
for
the
record.
R
My
name
is
Wayne
Sandberg
I
was
born
and
raised
in
Los,
Angeles
I
saw
it
grow
over
the
years.
I'm
70
years
old
and
I
spent
most
of
it.
In
LA,
I
watched,
City
Council
after
City
Council
obeyed
to
the
whim
of
the
money.
I
saw
Venice
Santa
Monica
destroyed
everything
there
and
turned
into
a
sterilized
City.
R
A
A
T
So
Kelsey
I
want
to
start
off
the
questions.
So
the
reason
the
most
recent
adoption
of
the
east
central
master
plan
was
in
2005
was
that
a
broad
adoption
of
like
looking
at
the
entire
plan,
as
we
don't
tend
to
do,
we
tend
to
pick
certain
parts.
We
don't
tend
to
do
an
overhaul
of
the
entire
master
plan.
At
least
we
haven't
in
my
community,
so
I'm
just
wondering
what
the
scope
of
that
revision
for
that
2005
master
plan
update
was,
if
you
know
so,.
H
T
I'm
wondering
when
you
do
a
future
land
use
map
in
those
updates,
particularly
this
zone
or
this
you
know
we'll
just
look
at
this
block
why
the
future
land
use
map
continues
to
show
RM
f-35
for
the
current
parcels
that
are
armed
f-35.
If
is
that,
then
the
vision
for
those
parcels
as
well
like
if
you're
gonna,
do
an
overhaul
of
your
master
plan
and
you
want
to
maintain
low
density.
Why
would
you
continue
to
allow
those
existing
RM
f-35
zones
to
exist
and
to
remain
that
way
in
the
future?
Land
Use
Plan?
H
A
fair
question
from
what
I
understand
in
2005
when
planning
staff
and
the
community
mapped
the
future
land
use
map.
A
lot
of
it
was
to
reflect
what
was
on
the
ground.
So
the
subject
properties
were
mapped,
r2,
low
density.
They
reflected
single-family
detached
structures
that
had
been
converted
into
multi-family
some
of
the
neighborhood.
H
They
were
actually
quite
intentional
on
taking
the
commercial
uses
and
mapping
those
as
residential
uses
for
hope
of
a
turnover
of
those
non-conforming
uses.
So
that's
you
see
some
of
that
designation
of
the
RMF
zones
on
top
of
non-conforming
commercial
structures
in
that
neighborhood,
as
a
hope
that
they
will
turn
over
to
residential.
T
I
guess
that's
what
I
would
assume
would
have
happened
for
any
of
these
areas,
because,
if
a
future
land
use
map,
it
is
a
reflection
of
your
vision
and
your
hope.
But
if
that's
not
been
addressed
or
changed
in
that
massive
overhaul
and
I'll
tell
you
I
know
a
massive
overhaul
of
the
master
plan
takes
years.
So
it's
not
a
quick
thing.
I
guess
I'm
disappointed
in
that
I.
Don't
know
how
much
stock
to
put
in
that
vision.
If
there
is
no
hope
for
this
block
to
be
low-density.
T
If
we
haven't
addressed
those
RMF
35
zones
that
are
abutting
it
and
breaking
up
this
block,
I
mean
they
basically
dissect
this
block
in
terms
of
the
art
to
zoning.
That's
just
not
really
a
question.
I
guess
for
you
and
I
also
just
wanted
on
the
record
that
you
know
our
we're
looking
at
what
is
compatible
for
this.
This
area
that
the
Planning
Commission
has
no
role
in
demolitions
and
we
have
no
role
in
evaluating
the
would.
T
Yeah
I'd
like
you
to
just
because
some
of
the
comments
from
the
public
that
I
wrote
down
that
I
felt
were
important,
the
other
well,
the
other
one.
I
really
want
you
to
just
give
me
your
thoughts
on
is
the
components
of
the
housing
plan
because
I
feel
like
maybe
there
are
some
conflicting
things
happening
or
because
we
can
cherry
pick
out
the
parts
that
that
speaks
to
our
position
more.
T
H
So
if
you
actually
look
at
page
59
of
your
staff
report,
the
only
applicable
objective
in
the
housing
plan,
the
staff
found
applies
to
this
proposal
was
objective
number
one.
The
remaining
portion
of
the
five-year
housing
plan
addresses
affordability
and
city
policies
and
how
to
fund
those
affordability
in
the
city
policies.
It
wasn't
necessarily
tied
to
this
application,
I
evaluated
objective,
one,
which
was
to
review
and
modify
land
use
and
zoning
regulations
to
reflect
the
affordability
and
the
needs
of
a
growing
pioneering
city.
H
It
was
a
difficult
analysis
because
I
do
understand
the
sentiment
of
needing
additional
housing.
What's
existing
on
the
ground
and
balancing
the
city
needs.
So,
oh
and
let
me
just
touch
on
the
demolition
of
historic
structures
that
was
raised
quite
a
few
times,
and
there
is
a
distinct
difference
between
a
national
and
a
local
historic
district.
This
is
in
a
national
historic
district
where
it
is
with
the
National
Park
Service,
and
it
is
incentive-based.
So
essentially
it
is.
If
you
invest
in
your
property,
you
are
eligible
for
tax
credits.
H
A
H
Know
there
was
some
discussion
from
the
and
some
comments
that
I
received
from
the
community
that
there
was
an
intent
to
increase
the
university
district.
Further
west
yeah
expand
that
local
district
to
pick
up
I
think
tonight.
East.
However,
there
was
never
I,
don't
believe
there
was
an
application
or
momentum
for
that
application
and
I
haven't
read
anything
to
start
that
again,
local
historic
districts
can
be
quite
cumbersome
right.
Okay,.
C
Make
a
motion:
thank
you.
I
really
feel
a
need
for
more
housing
stock
in
units
and
to
help
grow
and
in
the
city,
but
at
the
same
time
I
have
not
heard
an
argument
why
this
zone
be
more
appropriately,
zoned,
armed
f-35
and
so
I'm
consistent
with
the
staff
and
their
recommendation.
So
I'm
see
where
am
I
looking
at
so
based
on
the
findings
in
NASA
and
staff
report,
the
testimony
discussion
and
the
public
hearing
with
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
the
City
Council
deny
the
proposed
zoning.
D
A
A
Sara,
yes,
andreas
a
motion
passes
to
forward
a
negative
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
again.
The
City
Council
makes
the
final
decision
on
zoning
map
amendment
petitions.
They
will
also
hold
a
public
hearing
before
making
the
final
decision.
So
thank
you
all
for
coming.
Thank
you
for
participating.
We
appreciate
your
time
and
your
comments
and
stay
tuned.
A
H
H
So
this
is
a
design
review,
review
requests
for
additional
height
in
the
d3,
which
is
the
downtown
warehouse
residential
district
buildings
taller
than
75
feet,
but
less
than
90
feet
are
required
to
go
through
the
design
review
process.
The
applicant
is
requesting
89
feet,
10
inches
through
the
site.
Average
staff
is
recommending
approval
with
conditions,
as
outlined
in
your
staff
report
and
the
motion
sheet.
So
the
proposal
is
located
at
approximately
355
South
200
West
within
the
National
Register
warehouse
district.
The
block
is
currently
typified
by
vacant.
Lots
and
surface
parking.
H
Existing
buildings
will
be
demolished
to
accommodate
the
proposal
and
the
building
will
approximately
occupy
an
area
that
is
currently
80
percent
surface
parking.
Two
driveways
will
be
removed
on
200
west,
which
will
increase
the
pedestrian
orientation
and
will
improve
the
functionality
of
the
protected
bike
lanes.
H
This
is
the
proposal
summary
it's
89
feet.
10
inches
is
mentioned.
There
are
no
provided
setbacks.
The
number
of
units
they
are
providing
are
142
within
the
5
stories.
The
parking
is
within
a
two
and
a
half
story
garage
and
will
total
194
on-site
stalls.
The
ground-floor
activity
is
approximately
900
square
feet
of
retail.
Space
includes
a
mailroom
entry,
Lobby
and
leasing
office.
The
exterior
materials
include
glass,
brick,
concrete
masonry,
block,
cast-in-place,
concrete
metal,
porcelain,
tile,
fiber
cement
board,
wire
mesh,
vinyl
windows
and
stucco.
H
In
addition,
the
applicant
proposed
public
art
both
on
the
northwest
portion
of
the
200
west
facade
and
along
the
mid-block
walkway.
The
first
consideration
for
discussion
is
the
additional
height.
The
request
supports
the
goals
and
purpose
of
the
downtown
community
plan
by
adding
residents
to
downtown
and
improving
amenities
in
the
Broadway
district.
By
adding
a
mid
block
walkway
the
building
has
greater
than
50%
residential
use
and
complies
with
the
design
review
standards.
The
second
consideration
is
the
mid
block
walkway.
This
walkway
has
improved
considerably
through
applicant
revisions.
H
It
initially
began
as
a
32
inch
walk
sidewalk
within
the
parking
garage
that
terminated
at
the
garbage
collection
area
and
its
current
iteration.
It
is
located
on
the
north
side
of
the
parking
garages
exterior
wall
and
will
connect
two
hundred
west
to
the
Fairfield
Inn
and
eventually,
through
the
block
to
West
temple,
the
applicant
has
entered
into
an
agreement
with
the
owners
of
the
Broadway
lofts
to
use
a
portion
of
their
property
for
the
mid
block
walkway
and
will
place
a
public
easement
on
the
walkway.
H
The
mid
block
walkway
has
constraints
in
this
location
created
by
the
ramp
to
Broadway
lofts
parking,
which
rises
eight
feet
on
the
north
of
the
walkway
and
30-foot
in
the
four
30-foot
wall.
The
Revival's
parking
garage
to
the
south
in
the
scale
and
massing
of
both
it
would
be
preferable
to
have
a
20-foot
mid
block
walkway
the
public
art
panels,
thus
rendering
shows
the
proposed
mid
block
walkways
and
with
the
panels
for
public
art,
located
approximately
20
feet
from
the
entrance
to
the
walkway.
H
H
The
existing
development
pattern
along
200
West,
is
typified
by
surface
parking
vacant
lots
so
making
the
evaluation
of
the
request
for
additional
height
was
somewhat
difficult,
as
there
is
little
context
for
comparison.
The
existing
simply
sushi
building
to
the
south
of
the
parcel
is
approximately
20
feet
tall
and
located
in
the
d1
zone.
The
parcel
is
currently
prevented
from
developing
to
its
full
by
right
of
a
hundred
to
375
feet
because
of
the
presence
of
a
billboard
which
is
located
to
the
east,
but
that
may
change
in
the
future
as
a
block
continues
to
redevelop.
H
Okay,
so
the
public
process
and
then
the
standards
of
review
were
the
design
review
which
was
discussed
in
the
staff
report
and
planning
staff
is
recommending
approval
with
the
conditions
for
a
public
easement
for
the
mid-block
walkway
doors
on
200
west
to
be
space
to
emphasize
pedestrian
orientation
and
then
the
final
approval
of
the
details
for
public
art
panels,
signage
sight,
lighting
and
street
furniture,
paving
patterns
and
landscaping
to
be
delegated
to
planning
staff.
I
can
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
C
Hello,
my
name
is
Matt
cram
Byul
I'm,
representing
peg
development.
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time
tonight.
We
wanted
to
thank
Kelsey
for
her
presentation
and
especially
want
to
thank
Laura
bandura
for
helping
us,
through
this
design,
review
and
refining
this
project
to
meet
the
goals
of
Salt
Lake
City.
We're
excited
to
do
another
project
here
in
downtown
Salt,
Lake
and
I'd
like
to
turn
the
time
over
to
you.
Brian
me
come
with
ffk
our
architects,
who
will
provide
you
a
little
bit
more
context
of
our
project.
I
So
here
you
can
see
another
rendering
of
the
project
as
we
considered
its
location
in
the
warehouse.
We
really
wanted
to
embrace
that
warehouse
idea,
as
in
2016,
the
area
was
increased
to
include
a
lot
of
the
warehouses
in
the
area,
including
some
of
the
precedent,
images
of
the
flour
mill,
the
Big
D
building
and
particularly
the
central
building
as
warehouse
inspiration.
I
This
is
the
existing
Nickerson
pump
and
machinery
company
building,
which
is
on
site,
as
you
can
see
with.
This
is
the
view
from
400
south
again
here
is
200
West
that
view
of
the
parking
and
werenäôt
building
of
the
glass
repair.
So
this
is
the
difference
of
where
that
is
located
on
the
property.
So
there
is,
as
it
was
mentioned,
this
is
actually
a
two
zoning
districts.
I
Part
of
the
site
constraints
is
agreements
with
multiple
adjacent
properties.
So
the
first
is
the
agreement
with
the
Vectra
property
to
the
south.
We're
simply
sushi
is
located
where
there
is
a
parking
easement
to
be
provide
parking
for
that
parcel
due
to
its
size.
The
second
is
for
the
Fairfield
Inn,
that
is
to
the
east.
There
is
an
existing
fire
lane
requirement
that
goes
from
200
west
through
this
property
around
the
Fairfield
and
reconnects
to
400
South.
I
That
also
needs
to
be
maintained,
and
so
there
are
fire
related
height
requirements
for
that
access,
which
kind
of
influences
the
height
and
floor
levels
of
the
building.
The
next
component
is
working
with
Broadway
lofts,
as
there
is
an
agreement
for
trash
access
and
loading
for
their
tenants
in
that
property.
So
here
is
highlighting
the
area
of
the
mid-block
walkway
and
the
requirements
of
that,
and
then
the
activation
of
the
first
floor
with
mixed-use
functions
off
of
the
sidewalk
for
that
activation
of
the
property.
I
I
The
building
itself
is
u-shape
in
form,
creating
a
secure
private
area
on
the
third
floor,
amenity
deck,
where
there's
a
lot
of
concept
for
oasis,
for
the
residents
being
able
to
have
a
high
level
of
landscaping
on
that
amenity,
deck,
festoon
lighting,
grills,
fireplace
spa.
To
add
to
the
amenities
of
the
facility
with
Fitness,
yoga,
business,
centers,
media
areas,
dog
and
bike,
wash
to
really
be
able
to
provide
amenities
here.
Part
of
what
we've
learned
with
the
housing
is,
even
though
this
is
in
an
urban
city
environment.
I
So
part
of
this
is
to
reclaim
and
salvage
some
of
the
existing
historic
building
components,
doors,
brickwork
and
reinstall
them
inside
the
building,
as
art
details
to
try
to
give
a
sense
of
place.
Some
of
those
components
have
been
there
for
a
number
of
years
decades
to
give
a
sense
of
what
this
building
is
and
where
it
came
from,
and
why
it's
there
part
of
the
reason
why
the
name
is
revival
reviving
that
component
and
giving
a
sense
of
place,
and
we
feel
that
this
is
providing
that
response
to
the
d3
design
standards.
A
F
A
A
P
Hello,
my
name
is
Kirtland
I
own
and
operate
simply
sushi
when
I
moved
to
Salt
Lake
City
foreigners.
South
we're
where
we
are
located,
was
an
empty
shell.
I
designed
to
built
my
restaurant
and
have
dealt
with
all
the
hurdles
of
owning
and
operating
and
building
a
business.
I
was
the
first
tenant
here
and
now
have
been
here
for
over
eleven
years.
A
quarter
of
my
life,
everyday
I
have
40
people
that.
P
Work
for
me
and
depend
on
me
for
a
paycheck
and
for
a
job
and
their
families
depend
on
me
to
running
a
restaurant
is
a
tough
business.
We
have
survived
because
we
offer
the
best
product
we
possibly
can
at
a
reasonable
price.
No
one
is
more
affected
by
this
project
than
myself
or
Vladimir,
who
owns
a
Visa
Club,
which
is
part
of
our
building,
I'm,
very
frustrated
by
how
we
even
learned
about
this
proposed
project.
I
learned
of
it
from
a
city
flier
on
October
15th.
It
said
notification
of
project
to
your
neighborhood.
P
Then,
a
few
days
later,
I
came
to
work
and
paid
Construction
was
having
a
meeting
in
our
parking
lot.
I
still
had
no
idea
of
the
magnitude
of
this
project.
This
is
where
I
approached
and
met
a
Matt
Crandall,
who
just
was
speaking
and
scheduled
a
meeting
with
him
that
I
had
to
invite
my
own
property
managers,
vector
management
to
they
had
not
yet
mentioned,
or
informed
me
of
this
project.
At
the
median
in
the
following
week,
my
property
managers
told
me
they
had
knew
nothing
of
the
project
until
recently.
P
P
At
this
meeting,
I
learned
of
the
proposed
building
is
going
smack
dab
in
the
middle
in
my
parking
lot,
and
that
was
the
pictures.
I
showed
you,
the
property
line
has
to
be
moved
and
the
their
building
is
going
to
be
in
the
middle
of
the
parking
lot
and
we
would
lose
all
of
our
parking
in
front
of
our
building.
P
Matt
inform
me
of
the
following
that
would
take
place.
The
parking
spaces
would
be
removed
on
my
set
in
the
building.
They
would
move
the
entire
driveway
right
up
to
our
sidewalk.
The
new
driveway
would
pave
over
top
of
my
existing
grease
trap
that
I've
spent
fifty
thousand
on
installing
when
I
open
the
power
transformer
which
is
in
the
pictures,
would
be
relocated
in
interrupting
our
buildings
power
for
a
period
of
time.
They
were
planning
to
break
ground
this
spring.
That
was
my
meeting
with
him
like
a
like.
P
P
This
would
leaveth
us
with
a
handful
of
spaces
in
front
of
Ibiza
the
adjoining
nightclub
mind
you,
four
of
our
current
spaces
are
handicap
with
the
proposed
new
driveway
were
to
my
handicapped
customers
park.
Where
do
people
pull
up
to
pick
takeout,
which
is
the
largest
growing
part
of
a
restaurant
industry?
Currently
we
do
have
delivery
vehicle
semi
truck
sized
vehicles
make
delivery
as
their
daily.
How
does
that
work
with
the
new
ingress
and
egress
the
great
change
with
the
new
Drive?
They
would
prohibit
this.
Where
do
my
employees?
Where
do
my
customers?
P
Where
does
everybody
Park
during
construction
phase,
I'm
gonna?
Ask
you
to
rapid
rate
here.
Peg
and
Vectra
have
only
thought
about
how
to
maximize
square
footage.
They
have
not
thought
about
any
of
these
issues
and
how
they
will
impact
their
current
tenants.
We
have
not
had
any
follow-up
meetings
or
communication
to
address
any
of
my
concerns.
I've
recently
resigned
my
lease
just
prior
to
learning
of
this
project
after
three
months
of
negotiating,
this
project
was
never
brought
up
to
me,
even
though
I
have
expressed
the
only
reason
we
are
at
this
location
as
for
parking.
P
P
J
Reduce
all
you
probably
already
know
me
I
know
I'm
here
to
speak
in
support
of
the
height
variance.
My
only
concern
with
this
is
the
the
number
of
parking
spots
being
provided
here.
I
believe
it's
too
many
with
the
new
parking
ordinance.
That's
working
its
way
through
the
City
Council
I
found
correct
I,
believe
the
minimum
parking
would
be
zero
for
this
development.
I
understand
the
developer's
concerns
with
residents
who
want
to
access
amenities
outside
of
downtown.
That
doesn't
necessarily
mean
you
have
to
store
your
car
downtown.
J
A
A
C
So
the
existing
owners
vector
management
of
the
simply
sushi
building.
They
are
the
existing
property
owner
of
the
land
and
which
will
be
developed.
They
have
been
an
active
participant
in
in
in
relocating
or
performing
a
lot
line
adjustment
to
modify
the
building.
We
will
be
providing
approximately
48
parking
spaces
underneath
our
building
for
the
simply
sushi
restaurant
after
after
construction
is
complete.
We
will
be
providing
approximately
11
stalls
on
the
site
during
construction
and
vector
management
has
told
me
that
they
will
provide
additional
stalls
off-site
for
their
tenants.
Okay,.
C
P
You
know
you,
you
kind
of
mentioned
that
you
were
looking
at
warehouses
and
I'm
really
concerned.
Personally
with
how
spot-on
you
hit.
That
I
feel
like
this
looks
like
a
self-storage
building.
I
feel
like
the
windows
are
really
small
for
a
residential
project.
Almost
prison
like
with
the
the
way
you
did
the
mullions.
P
I
I
The
the
gridded
windows
was
that
something
that
you
often
see
in
a
warehouse
style
window
versus
just
having
a
blank
pane
of
glass
so
trying
to
embrace
that
in
the
lower
section
and
then
leave
more
of
the
modern
glass
at
the
penthouse
level,
where
there's
that
change
of
material
to
be
able
to
break
up
that
level
of
facade?
Okay,.
P
Well,
I'd,
I,
guess:
I
just
feel
it's
unfortunate
for
a
residential
project,
I
see
where
you're
headed
with
the
design
but
I
think
there's
elements
that
you
could
have
improved
where,
instead
of
having
a
different
color
of
brick,
that
could
have
actually
been
concrete.
If
you
really
want
to
mimic
that
style,
I
think
when
you
fake
a
style,
it's
actually
detracts
from
the
neighborhood.
Instead
of
adding
to
it
again,
I
can
see
where
you
were
headed,
but
I
think
you
missed
the
mark
on
it.
D
T
What
standards
might
be
applied
here
to
address
the
impacts
to
the
neighboring
buildings,
because
it
seems
like
the
parking
standards
and
that
are
all
for
this
specific
development
as
it
exists,
not
in
relationship
to
any
adjacent
properties
and
I.
Just
wanted
some
clarification
or
direction
on
what
we
could
be
looking
at
to
evaluate
that.
H
F
I
could
jump
in
a
little
bit
any
because
I
worked
with
with
Lara
on
this
application
and
the
applicant,
as
well
as
the
design
review
standards
so
in
in
terms
of
the
the
well
there's
the
base
design
base
design
standards
in
the
d3.
The
design
review
standards
talk
a
lot
about
compatibility
and
where
new
development
kind
of
meets
existing
development.
F
You
know.
Are
there
common
lines
that
are
carried
across?
You
know
with
cornices
or
other
design
details
it
talks
about,
but
specifically
it
talks
about
the
impact,
because
this
is
being
reviewed
for
height
talks
about
the
impact
of
that
height
on
adjacent
property,
but
more
specifically,
public
property,
so
you're
more
looking
at
impacts
from
shadow,
then
from
use
because
we're
talking
more
about
the
design
of
the
building
and
the
massing
materiality,
how
its
blocked
that
kind
of
thing
does
that
help
I
mean
we
also
talked
about
like
light
trespass
and
things
like
that.
T
T
E
Based
on
the
analysis
and
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
design
review
request
for
additional
height
Pete
on
PLN
PCM
2019,
zero,
zero,
six,
four
zero
for
the
project
located
at
approximately
355
South
200
West.
The
recommendation
is
based
on
the
conditions
of
the
approval
listed
in
the
TAF
report
and
final
details
regarding
the
conditions
of
approval
are
delegated
to
planning
staff.
T
A
A
N
You
stated
this
is
a
proposal
to
vacate
a
straight
beta
section
of
the
street
near
800,
north
and
Warm
Springs
Road.
The
request
is
to
vacate
in
approximately
1.3
acre
area
of
800
north
right-of-way,
that's
adjacent
to
a
former
overpass
from
800
West
to
Warm
Springs
Road.
You
can
see
on
the
aerial
the
proposed
area
to
be
vacated
in
blue
and
then
Warm
Springs
Road
is
shown
to
the
easter
to
the
right
and
then
I
15
is
to
the
west.
N
On
the
west
side,
you
can
see
the
Rose
Park
neighborhood
center
in
the
location
where
the
overpass
was
previously
located
and
there's
an
earlier
area
on
the
staff
report
that
shows
that
conditions
when
the
overpass
was
still
in
its
existence
and
in
these
two
photos
here
the
photo
on
the
left
is
facing
east
towards
Warm,
Springs
Road
and
then
the
photo
on
the
right
is
facing
west
towards
I
15.
As
far
as
the
proposal
itself,
there
are
several
key
considerations.
The
first
is
utah
state
code.
N
It
states
that
there
must
have
the
city
must
have
good
cause
for
the
vacation
and
that
no
members
of
the
public
or
persons
will
be
material
injured
by
it,
and
staff
finds
that
the
proposed
vacation
would
not
be
detrimental.
It
would
be
in
the
public
interest
because
the
city
would
be
compensated
at
the
market
rate
for
the
property.
As
far
as
the
second
one
city
master
plans,
the
Capitol
Hill
master
plan
was
completed
before
the
reconstruction
of
I
15
in
the
early
2000s,
and
it
does
not
discuss
the
overpass.
N
The
plan
does
discourage
the
expansion
of
industrial
use
in
the
neighborhood.
However,
you
can
see
in
the
photo
on
this
slide,
that
the
parcel
has
industrial
land
already
to
the
north,
east
and
south,
and
then
I-15
is
located
to
the
west.
The
proposal
is
also
consistent
with
the
cities
in
1890
urban
design,
in
that
there's,
a
potential
benefit
with
the
sale
of
the
right-of-way,
and
it's
also
consistent
with
planned
Salt
Lake,
since
it
would
assist
an
employer
and
allow
for
the
expansion
of
their
property.
N
As
far
as
city
ownership
and
use
the
city,
ownership
is
limited
to
the
one
hundred
and
thirty-two
feet
width.
The
sections
kind
of
shown
there
in
the
wider
color
are
owned
by
you.
Dot
were
considered
part
of
their
right-of-way
and
u
dot
has
expressed
a
willingness
to
sell
the
property
to
the
applicant
and
has
indicated
to
them.
They
did
not
have
an
interest
in
using
the
right-of-way
and
then
from
the
city
side.
N
So
the
staff
recommendation
is
that
their
proposed
vacation
is
consistent
with
the
adopted
city
policy
on
steep
on
street
closures
and
vacations,
since
it
wouldn't
not
deny
access
to
the
areas
and
the
city
would
obtain
a
fair
market
value
for
the
property
and
the
sale
also
provides
a
public
benefit.
So,
based
on
this,
information
and
planning
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
for
the
request
and
that
it
also
include
the
condition
regarding
a
public
utility.
Easement
are.
N
N
G
A
Hey,
so
the
applicant
is
here,
wish
to
speak,
nobody's
gonna,
be
able
to
answer
questions,
okay,
any
questions
for
the
applicant
okay
and
we
will
go
to
the
public
hearing.
Is
there
anyone
here
from
the
Community
Council?
Who
wishes
to
speak
on
this
okay?
Seeing
none
I
do
have
one
card
here
from
Lynne
wall.
Did
you
wish
to
speak
or
just
do
you
want
me
to
read
your
okay
sure?
D
P
E
On
the
information,
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
City
Council
for
the
request
to
vacate
this
section
of
800
north
right-of-way
from
I
15
to
Warm,
Springs
Road,
subject
to
the
following
condition.
The
city
shall
have
shall
record
a
public
utility
easement
in
the
vacated
area.
At
the
time
of
disposition,
a.
D
A
N
You,
as
you
stated,
this
is
a
request
for
a
conditional
use
approval
for
an
Adu.
The
proposed
ad.
You
would
be
located
in
the
northern
half
of
the
rear
yard
of
the
single-family
dwelling
at
ten
eighty
three
South
Blair.
You
can
see
that
property
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
Blair
and
there's
an
alley
to
the
rear.
This
shows
the
front
of
the
house
and
then
on
the
left
and
then
on
the
right.
You
can
see
the
front
and
the
side
in
the
ad.
N
You
would
be
located
in
the
northern
half
of
the
side
yard
there
that
you
see
there
on
the
right,
and
these
photos
are
of
the
rear
yard,
where
the
ad
would
be
located,
which
would
be
towards
the
right
and
then
the
parking
would
be
located
towards
the
bottom
left
and
then
the
photo
on
the
right
shows
the
alley.
The
fence
is
the
existing
funds,
that's
on
the
subject:
property
and
then
the
garage
is
on
the
neighboring
property
to
the
north.
N
Here
are
renderings
of
the
property
and
would
have
a
lofted
area
and
then
also
have
a
patio
in
this
slide.
You
can
see
the
the
top
graphic
would
show
the
location
and
the
height
of
the
proposed
ad
you
in
context
with
the
existing
garage
and
house
and
then
on.
The
bottom
is
a
site
plan.
The
ad
you
again
is
located
on
the
northern
half
of
the
rear
yard.
The
proposed
parking
would
be
to
the
south
and
would
be
accessed
from
the
alley.
N
N
As
far
as
public
comment,
the
city
held
an
open
house
and
received
two
favorable
comments
from
people
who
attended
had
a
few
phone
calls.
One
was
from
a
neighbor
who
had
concerns
about
increased
development
in
the
area
and
the
potential
for
crime
and
another.
With
concerns
about
tree
removal.
You
can
see
here
on
the
screen.
The
staff
recommendation
is
for
approval,
with
a
single
condition
that
the
applicant
comply
with
the
registration
process,
nor.
A
K
The
applicant
was
actually
Mike,
my
colleague
Tom
candy,
but
he
couldn't
come
tonight.
We
just
tried
to
keep
this
very
modest.
We
tried
to
balance
privacy
with
development.
We
tried
to
create
something
very
small.
We
tried
to
focus
the
openings
on
to
the
immediate
yard
itself
and
the
patio,
the
balance
privacy.
A
J
A
C
C
M
Q
Good
evening,
as
you
noted,
this
is
a
conditional
use,
and
this
is
for
a
sacred
circle-
group
home.
It's
for
a
medical
detoxification
recovery
facility,
which
is
classified
as
a
dwelling
group,
home,
large
or
large
group
home,
which
is
a
conditional
use
in
the
d2
zoning
district.
So
the
proposed
facility
is
located
within
an
existing
office
building
and
it'll
take
about
17,000
square
feet
of
the
buildings
first
floor.
Q
It
does
have
the
the
proposals
for
24-hour
supervision,
security,
etc.
It
has
its
own
separate
entrance
to
the
parking
garage
it's
kind
of
an
oddly
configured
building.
It
has
numerous
parking
garage
entrances.
This
is
the
facade
you
see
on
200
East.
The
entrance
for
the
parking
garage
will
actually
be
on
700
South.
What
it
is
a
building
with
numerous
garage
entrances
and
the
facility
will
be
on
the
first
floor
of
the
building
and
will
have
its
own
entrance
as
well.
Q
Here's
a
picture
of
the
700
South
facade
of
the
building-
and
this
would
be
the
parking
garage
that
would
lead
to
the
use.
Key
considerations
in
this
proposal
were
the
neighborhood
compatibility
and
anticipated
impacts
and
master
plan
compliance
to
put
it
into
backing
up.
To
put
it
into
some
perspective,
that
office
building
is
located
at
the
corner
of
700
South
200
East,
it's
in
a
in
a
district
in
the
city
that
has
a
lot
of
social
and
health
services.
The
county
health
center
is
immediately
to
the
north.
Q
The
Geraldine
King
Women's
Resource
Center
is
directly
to
the
west
and
it's
across
the
street
from
the
Department
of
Workforce
Services.
So
it
is,
it
does
fit
with
the
neighborhood
character
of
the
kind
of
services
and
uses
that
are
occurring
there
all
downtown
support
kind
of
functions.
We
also
looked
at
Master,
Plan
compliance
and
again
the
plan
for
this
area.
Q
Downtown
plan
does
recognize
that
this
is
kind
of
the
the
outer
the
outer
edges
of
downtown,
where
you
have
a
lot
of
those
support,
functions:
staff
analyze
this
looking
at
the
conditional
standards
for
conditional
uses
found
that
it
met
those
standards
and
then
the
criteria
for
the
detrimental
effects
determination.
So
we
are
recommending
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
proposed
conditional
use.
C
Q
In
our
zoning
ordinance,
we
defined
dwelling
group
home
larger
residential
treatment
facility
occupied
by
seven
or
more
individuals
licensed
by
the
state
of
Utah
under
chapters
title
62
chapter
two,
and
it
talks
about
a
24-hour
living
environment
for
individuals
unrelated
to
the
owner
and
deals
with
specialized
treatment,
whether
that's
behavioral
modification
rehab,
and
then
it
goes
on
and
lists
a
number
of
those
things,
including
chemical
dependency.
So
it's
more
of
a
state
licensing
issue,
but
we
recognize
that
as
a
use
in
our
in
certain
zones
and.
C
M
M
The
question
regarding
the
the
VOA
Geraldine
key
Geraldine
eqing
Women's
Resource
Center-
we've
actually
worked
with
them
since
they
took
occupancy
over
at
that
facility.
We've
been
working
with
their
directors,
offering
them
not
only
a
medical
services
for
their
for
their
clients,
but
also
partnering
with
them,
in
any
way
that
we
can
to
offer
behavioral
health
groups,
as
well
as
any
other
services,
such
as
transportation
to
medical
care.
C
M
C
M
M
We're
making
sure
that
the
safety
of
others
is
first
and
foremost
the
most
important
we'll
be
able
to
plan
different
group
models,
not
just
one
type
of
group
but
social,
interactive
groups,
groups
that
allow
to
discuss
on
how
what
the
next
step
would
be
like
what
we
call
a
step
down,
method
and
then
also
meeting
with
physicians
group,
therapists,
individual
therapists
and
being
able
to
meet
those
needs
of
the
patient
so
feel
like
they
can
acclimate
themselves
back
into
society
without
without
the
need
of
the
addiction
or
the
the
want
of
it
to
relapse.
After.
C
M
M
M
E
A
B
M
M
Is
this
parking
garage
and
that's
the
gated
secured
parking
garage
that
we're
going
to
be
using,
and
that
goes
directly
into
the
first
floor.
If
you
wanted
to
get
down
to
the
first
floor
from
from
entry
level
from
pedestrian
level,
you'd
have
to
take
the
elevators
or
some
stairs
and
then
you'd
be
met
by
our
admissions
team,
and
our
security
team
wants
the
visitors.
A
O
C
A
O
M
Yeah
anyone
from
the
Salt
Lake
area
or
a
Medicaid
clinic
Medicare
clinic,
but
our
service
and
our
mission
is,
is
built
around
the
owners
of
of
why
we
got
started
and
that's
our
Native
American
population,
so
we'll
see
any
Native
American
tribe.
It
doesn't
matter
what
tribe
they're
from
we'll
see
them,
American
and
Indian
and
Alaskan
native.
But
then
we
also
open
up
to
the
public.
C
Last
question:
just
because
I
lead
someone
when
I'm
trying
to
think
about
make
sure
I'm
saying
in
a
sensitive
way,
inappropriately
of
it.
There's
MIT
was
a
lot
of
conversation
about
around
you,
know:
Pioneer
Park
and
a
concentration
of
homeless
services
and
the
people
preying
on
formable
populations
with
drug
dealing,
and
are
you
with
this
being
located
right
next
to
resource
center?
Do
you
see
that
being
an
issue
or
not
or
or
do
you
guys
address
that
or
not
I
mean
how
I
like
talk
me
through
this
yeah.
O
O
2012,
okay,
and
so
so
our
building
owners
are
currently
in
process
of
getting
more
police
services
around
that
area.
There's
some
certain
things
that
they
need
to
do:
I
guess
in
order
to
do
that,
we're
working
with
directly
with
them.
In
that
case,
I
don't
feel
like
this
will
there's
14
beds
in
this
facility.
You
know
there's
300
in
the
Women's
Resource
Center,
and
so
it's
a
lot,
it's
a
very
small
amount
and
and
this
this
is
going
to
be
very
secure,
going
in
and
out
of
that
building
through
that
through
that
gate,
and
so.
C
C
R
A
A
Q
A
A
C
A
E
Q
Won't
be
in
order,
but
I'll
point
some
things
out
on
them,
but
so
this
is
a
zoning
map,
amendment
request
and
the
two
different
ones:
the
first
one
PLN
PCM
2019:
zero,
zero,
nine,
two
three
it's
for
these
three
contiguous
parcels,
as
shown
on
700
north
just
to
the
east
of
redwood
road
and
the
other
application,
which
would
have
the
last
five
digits
of
zero
zero
986.
As
for
the
single
parcel
at
1612,
West,
seven
hundred
North
different
applicant-
and
it
would
be
the
mouse-
isn't
sure.
Q
Q
The
first
3-16-16
west,
seven
hundred
north
sixteen
thirty-two
west
and
1640
the
applicant
said
their
intent
was
to
consolidate
the
parcels
to
develop
a
commercial
use,
total
area
of
about
one
point,
one
four,
nine
acres
or
50,000
square
feet.
The
last
parcel
is
0.28
acres
or
about
twelve
and
a
half
thousand
square
feet
and,
as
I
said,
different
ownership.
Q
That
was
a
Planning
Commission
driven
petition
to
change
that
area
around
redwood
and
700
north
into
a
commercial
node,
with
recognition
that,
given
some
of
the
residential
in
the
area,
that
was
a
desirable
area
for
more
commercial
uses,
so
city
council
did
approve
those
changes
to
the
master
plan.
However,
not
all
the
parcels
were
Riis
owned
at
the
time,
so
the
the
change
is
asking
to
go
to
commercial,
it's
still
zoned
residential,
so
it
is
supported
by
the
master
plan.
That's
specifically
what
the
master
plan
had
envisioned.
Q
It
was
ruiz
owned
in
2014
by
the
property
owner
of
the
most
eastern
parcel
and
was
rezone
from
r1
5000
to
C
B,
and
they
developed
a
professional
dental
office,
use
on
it
across
the
street
typical
strip.
Mall
development
pattern
in
the
area
on
the
south
side
of
700
South
would
point
out
that
currency
B
zoning
regulations
wouldn't
allow
that
front
yard
parking.
So
it
would
have
a
more
attractive
street
face
and
also
concurrent
with
changes
to
the
C
B
zoning
district
that
were
enacted
in
2015
on
the
three
parcel
rezone.
Q
If
they
were
consolidating
those
and
making
a
larger
commercial
development,
you
would
have
to
go
through
the
design
review
process
if
it
surpassed
7500
square
feet
for
a
footprint
or
15,000
square
feet
overall.
So
there
would
be
an
additional
process
during
development
phase,
both
cases
we
looked
at
neighborhood
and
citywide
master
plans
that
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties,
the
housing
mitigation
loss.
Q
Is
there
another
zone
that
makes
more
sense
and
in
this
particular
context,
given
that
the
surrounding
parcels
are
all
zoned
C
B,
and
that
was
the
applicants
request,
it
didn't
seem
to
make
any
sense
to
to
look
at
another
zone
and
introduce
a
different
zoning
that
might
cause
some
incompatibility
in
the
development
pattern
of
the
block
face.
So.
T
Q
T
Is
there
a
requirement
that,
if,
because
we're
looking
at
activating
the
street
that
they
actually
need
to
have
some
entrances
on
this
street,
because
what
seems
to
then
happen
is
that
becomes
all
those
doors
get
locked?
Nobody
can
like
actually
walk
in
there.
You
have
to
access
it
via
the
parking
lot,
because
that's
what
they
end
up
catering
to.
So
how
do
we
combat
that.
Q
F
A
C
Hi,
so
my
name
is
hock,
dough,
that's
my
mom
and
she
owns
the
properties
there
too
I'm
here
to
help
her
interpret,
but
my
mom
wants
to
put
a
commercial
property
there.
She
wants
to
consolidate
all
the
parcels
like
he
was
saying,
but
we
just
feel
like
there's
not
enough
retail
in
the
Rose
Park
area,
and
so
that's
why
we
want
to
put
that
there,
the
three
houses
that
are
on
there
now
they
there's
I,
just
feel
like
they
are
getting
kind
of
old.
C
You
know,
so
we
want
to
replace
it
with
something
that
will
revitalize
the
neighborhood
a
little
bit
because
I
know
a
lot
of
people
have
been
investing
into
that
area.
A
lot
and
there's
a
lot
of
commercial
but
residential,
that's
being
built
in
the
area
right
now,
especially
by
north
temple
and
redwood,
road
they're,
building,
a
lot
of
high
multifamily
units,
and
so
I
just
feel
like.
C
D
The
owner
of
the
commercial
property
in
between
our
two
properties
and
I've
been
running
a
business
there.
Now
for
five
years.
We
rezone
the
that
property
about
six
years
ago
and
now
that
I'm
working
down
in
Rose,
Park
and
half
of
my
employees
are
from
Rose
Park
part
of
the
reason
I
did.
That
was
because
it
was
an
underserved
area,
another
dentist,
and
so
we
have
two
more
dentists
down
there.
Now
in
that
building
we
saw
we
had
4,000
dental
appointments
last
year.
D
Those
patients
would
have
had
to
have
they
couldn't
get
into
the
other
dentist
in
rose
park
would
have
had
to
go
to
go
to
sugar
house
or
downtown
or
West
Valley,
and
our
patients
and
employees
are
all
really
grateful
and
happy
to
have
a
community
dentist.
There
there's
a
lot
of
other
businesses.
We
have
on
our
list
that
we'd
love
to
see
there
as
well,
including
a
coffee
shop
and
and
with
that
a
candy.
D
Community
with
wonderful
people
and
they
love
their
community,
sometimes
they
get
overlooked
and
so
I
think
some
small
businesses
in
that
on
that
Street
would
be
really
help.
The
community
part
of
the
reason
I
bought
the
corner
property
is
because
I
wanted
to
clean
it
up.
I
would
like
to
do
just
whatever
it
takes
to
make
that
the
best
use
of
space,
because
it
is
a
corner,
it
will
have.
You
know,
access
from
the
Riverside
Drive
as
well
as
700
north.
D
A
A
Q
S
My
name
is
Cindy
Cromer
and
I'm
wandering
a
bit
far
afield,
but
I
think
I've
just
heard
something
that
I
need
to
address,
so
the
housing
mitigation
ordinance.
This
is
piece
of
junk.
We
haven't
been
able
to
fix
it
for
over
20
years.
It
was
developed
in
the
cordini
administration
and
it
makes
no
sense
because
it
generates
negative
numbers.
I've
asked:
does
that
mean
that
the
applicant
gets
paid
by
the
city?
S
So
what
I'm
hearing
from
David's
presentation
is
that
there
is
a
master
plan
here
that
calls
for
this
node
to
develop
and
be
CB
commercial,
because
the
neighborhood
needs
that
now
it
makes
no
sense
if
the
future
land-use
is
proposed
for
commercial
to
require
property
owners
to
pay
into
this
dysfunctional
housing
mitigation,
ordinance
that
generates
sometimes
negative
numbers.
So
I'm
just
asking
you
to
line
at
the
facts,
we're
just
kind
of
coming
at
me.
But
if
I'm
hearing
correctly
that
this
has
been
master
plan
for
commercial,
then
there
should
be
no
engagement.
S
J
Zachary
Dussault
I
actually
draw
or
ride
my
bike
by
this
property
every
day
to
and
from
work
and
while
I'm
generally
against
the
loss
of
housing.
I
do
think
that
that
intersection
is
a
good
spot
for
a
business
district.
Something
that
hasn't
really
been
brought
up
is
that
it
is
very
accessible
on
the
Jordan
River
Parkway
trail
and
I.
Don't
know
how
many
people
in
the
neighborhood
actually
use
that
to
access
this.
J
This
area,
but
I,
have
seen
a
lot
of
people
in
the
neighborhood
who
walk
ride
the
bus
ride
their
bikes
and
I
think
this
could
be
a
good
spot
for
them
to
have
some
additional
services
in
their
community
that
they'd
otherwise
have
to
travel
long
distances
for
either
to
downtown
or
others
in
the
city,
so
I'm
in
support
thanks.
Thank.
A
Q
A
A
T
Based
on
the
findings,
I
had
to
be
Sara
data,
something
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
in
the
staff
report.
Testimony
and
discussion
at
the
public
hearing
I
moved
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
City
Council
approved
the
proposed
zoning
map
amendment
file,
PLN
PCM
2019,
2,
0,
0,
9,
2
3.
T
What's
the
other
one
that
you
and
PLN
PCM
2019
2
0
0,
9,
8,
6
4,
the
property's
located
at
1616
last
700
Nora
1632
s,
700
north
1640,
west
700,
North,
1612,
West,
700
North,
respectively
proposed.
Don't
change
from
the
r1
5000
single-family
residential
zoning
district
to
the
CV
Community
Business
zoning
district,
okay,.
C
A
Agree
or
people
don't
know
your
inside
joke.
Okay
motion
passes
positive
recommendation,
we're
forwarding
to
the
City
Council
again.
City
Council
has
final
approval
for
zoning
map
amendments,
so
they
will
hold
the
public
hearing
at
a
later
date.
So
thank
you
all
for
coming
and
your
applications
we're
not
done.
A
F
F
So
you
know,
as
you
know,
we
have
a
higher
than
normal
volume
of
applications
and
as
we
develop
the
easy
sites-
and
there
aren't
that
many
left
of
those
ones,
the
more
complex
ones,
are
coming
in
the
door
and
they're
going
to
come
before
this
body.
And
then
we
also
have
a
lot
of
a
number
of
applications
that
maybe
aren't
so
complex,
but
they
still
require
a
public
process
and
and
come
before
the
Planning
Commission.
F
F
You
would
still
have
that
on
a
regular
public
hearing
agenda
section,
because
that's
something
that
we
need
record
that
you
discussed
in
your
making
a
recommendation
to
the
City
Council,
but
on
items
like
a
conditional
use
where
there's
little
or
no
public
opposition,
or
something
like
that,
for
example,
in
a
DUI.
No
in
the
recently
this
commission
expressed
interest
and
not
having
to
keep
reviewing
a
to
use,
or
it's
kind
of
the
same
thing
and
they're
all
meeting
the
standards,
and
otherwise
we
wouldn't
bring
them
before
you
anyway.
F
Our
fearless
leaders
and
you
had
a
recommendation
that
when
we
have
an
item
on
a
consent
agenda,
basically
it
would
be
a
unanimous
decision.
So
we
would
expect
there
to
be
no
opposition
even
from
within
the
Commission
on
one
of
those
items,
and
if
there
is
then
it
gets,
it
can
get
bumped
within
that
at
the
discretion
of
the
chair,
not
at
the
discretion
of
the
chair
at
the
discretion
of
the
Commission
to
the
regular
public
hearing
section
of
the
administrative
section
of
the
agenda.
F
C
H
C
F
Give
you
several
considerations.
One
a
public
hearing
has
already
been
held
before
the
Planning
Commission
and
no
substantial
changes
have
been
made
to
the
application
or
there's
been.
The
changes
that
have
been
made
have
all
been
in
response
to
the
Planning
Commission's
direction.
You've
seen
several
work
session
items
in
the
past,
or
things
like
that.
They've
come
back,
made
various
changes
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
discussion.
At
that
point,
no
comments
have
been
received
by
the
public
in
opposition
to
a
land
use
application
up
to
the
date.
The
agenda
is
posted.
Three.
T
So
I
guess
clarification
on
the
next
meeting
would
be
helpful
for
me
not
that
I
wanted
to
prolong
the
length
of
our
meetings,
but
there
is
often
times
when
there's
no
public
comments
given
and
in
our
packet
and
then
like
Cindy,
will
come
and
give
comments
that
night,
because
it's
something
that
triggered
or
something
but
there's
oftentimes,
no
public
comment
to
it.
So
you
may
not
think
there's
any
opposition
and
we
find
certain
things
that
are
important,
that
we
feel
need
to
be
addressed.
And
how
would
we
still
have
that
provision?
T
F
After
this
information
has
been
provided,
the
Commission
may
decide
to
move
an
item
to
the
regular
agenda.
The
chair
will
then
open
a
public
hearing,
so
you
still
have
to
have
the
public
hearing,
even
if
it's
on
a
consent
agenda
and
ask
the
audience
if
there's
anyone
in
attendance,
who
would
like
to
speak
to
an
item
on
the
consent
agenda,
if
no
one's
bees
up
the
chair
can
close
the
public
hearing
for
the
consent
agenda.
F
They
may
you
can
move
the
specific
item
that
the
audience
member
indicates
that
they
would
like
to
speak
on
to
the
regular
agenda
and
proceed
with
deciding
the
other
items
on
the
consent
agenda.
After
the
comments
are
presented,
the
Commission
can
decide
by
emotion
and
vote
to
move
an
item
to
the
regular
agenda.
So
let's
say
let's
say:
oh
you
Cindy
as
an
example
she's
our
great
example.
She
comes
up
and
she
said
you
know
this
is
an
isn't
a
good
idea.
Here's
why
I
think
we
need
to
talk
about
this
bubble.
F
F
E
Example
would
be
the
ad
you
actually,
and
so
what
you're
saying
is
that
it
would
be
on
the
consent
agenda.
The
chair
would
say:
here's
the
ad
you
it's
on
consent
agenda,
as
anybody
want
to
talk
about
it,
open
the
public
hearing
right
and
then
nobody
comes
close,
the
public
hearing
and
then
then
I
would
say.
E
A
E
F
C
E
T
E
F
A
A
M
P
F
How
can
we
take
that
burden
off
of
you,
as
a
commission
and
I
realized
word
still
debating
this
at
almost
nine
o'clock,
but
how
can
we
take
some
of
that
time
burden
off
of
you
to
say?
Okay,
some
of
these
should
be
a
slam
dunk.
You
know
we're
making
the
considerations
as
we're
preparing.
You
know
as
we're
reviewing
the
application
as
we're
preparing
the
staff
reports
and
meeting
with
applicants
and
things
like
that.
F
But
the
idea
was
to
try
and
like
move
the
meetings
along
more
smoothly,
try
and
cut
out
some
of
the
extraneous
stuff.
You
already
have
that
information.
You
know
in
your
staff
report.
Do
we
need
to
reiterate
it
all
again
with
a
staff
presentation
and
the
other
ten
minutes
for
the
applicant,
and
you
know
try
and
move
things
along
and
then
also
you
know
with
the
with
your
request
to
be
like:
do
we
need
to
keep
hearing
these
ATU
things?
F
C
J
C
C
It's
fine
like
we
all
know
each
other
one
points
and
we
and
we're
all
brave
enough
to
piss
off
the
rest
of
the
members
here,
like
we
all
just
each
other
off
at
some
point
and
so
like
the
thought
of
us
not
doing
it
cuz,
you
want
to
be
keeping
the
people
happy
like
no
one
here
in
this
body
at
least
my
two
whole
time.
Yes,
we're
always
it's
like
you.
Have
it
easy
for
Commissioner
to
move
something
off,
they
feel
strongly
about
it.
C
D
T
Might
not,
but
I
was
wondering
if
one
of
the
things
for
even
some
of
these
reasons,
like
the
street
vacation
is
it
is
there
a
way
that
you
know
we
can
say
we
don't
need
to
hear
from
the
applicant
like
I,
think
we're
gonna
be
good,
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know,
I
don't
want
to
take
away
their
voice.
But
what
happens
when
people
out?
T
Oh
I,
have
10
minutes
I'm
going
to
talk
for
10
minutes
because
they
just
fill
it
and
they
don't
realize,
and
so
I
think
there
are
some
time
issues
that
can
be
totally
taken
away
as
if
we
don't
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
on
these
slam
dunks,
but
we
still
have
to
vote
on
it
because
it's
a
rezone
and
we're
just
recommending
I,
don't
know
it's
just
a
thought
of
a
where
sometimes
I
feel.
Like
you
know,
this
is
gonna,
be
a
really
easy
one.
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to
hear.
D
T
D
D
T
E
A
E
T
T
Has
you
know
internal
criteria
of
like
what
category
this
one's
gonna
fall
in
and
then
you
can
adjust
the
staff
presentation
accordingly
like
oh,
this
is
a
slam
dunk.
What
do
you
want
to
know
or
something
I
don't
know
where,
where
sometimes
the
it
seems
to
get
long,
is
in
a
staff
report
for
slam
dunk
that
just
kind
of
really
keeps
going
on
and
on
and
then
ten
minutes
for
an
applicant
where
we're
just
like
we're
good.
This
is
a
no-brainer,
so
I
don't
know.
C
M
C
P
D
C
M
E
T
Am
personally
going
to
say
that
I
would
like
to
not
have
these
type
of
meetings
consecutively,
but
I
also
realize
that's
what
I
signed
up
for
when
I
volunteered
and
got
appointed,
and
so
it
is
what
it
is
and
and
I
so
I
appreciate
a
consideration,
but
at
some
point
I
feel
like
this
is
what
this
is.
What
our
job
is.
It's.
F
Think
one
of
the
things
that
were
you
know
struggling
with
too
is
City,
initiated
petitions
tend
to
get
pushed
and
pushed
and
pushed
because
we
know
we've
got
to
get
the
applicants
in
front
of
the
Commission
because
we
have
certain
standards
of
practice,
but
also
you
know
they
have
some
rights
to
get
in
front
of
you
in
a
timely
manner
as
well,
and
so
the
city
stuff
gets
pushed
and
we're
like.
Oh
now,
we
can't
address
you
know
the
fire
access
stuff
that
we
want
to
address
because
they
get
that
gets
pushed
out.
F
Or
you
know
the
parking
chapter
could
have
come
before
you
sooner.
But
you
know
things
like
that
that
we
would
like-
and
you
know
then
there's
like
big
ones
like
the
parking
chapter-
that
we
do
want
you
to
discuss
and
then
you've
got
a
meeting
with
six
or
seven
other
items,
and
you
don't
want
to
discuss
parking
at
that
kind
of
length
after
going
through
all
of
those
other
items.