►
From YouTube: Planning Commission - 04/10/2019
Description
Planning Commission - 04/10/2019
A
A
A
Let's
not,
we
don't
need
any
cheering
booing
clapping.
That
kind
of
thing
when
you,
if
you
want
to
speak,
you
can
give
me
a
card
and
they're
out
by
the
door
and
then
I'll
put
you
in
the
queue
or,
if
we'll
call
for
whoever's
in
the
room
when
you
come
up
be
sure
to
state
your
name
in
the
microphone,
and
you
have
two
minutes
from
that
point.
A
C
C
D
A
C
F
Just
a
few
quick
things,
one
thing
that
Planning
Commission
should
know
is
that
the
City
Council
a
couple
I,
don't
know
if
they
updated
you
at
your
last
meeting,
but
they
adopted
the
changes
to
the
design
review
ordinance
recently,
and
so
any
application
that
comes
in
I
think
from
this
point
forward
is
going
to
be
under
a
new
process.
The
that
process
basically
means
that
all
of
the
new
construction
that
is
subject
to
that
ordinance
is
kind
of
come
through
the
Planning
Commission.
F
F
So,
for
example,
a
recent
project
that
has
gotten
a
lot
of
media
attention
is
the
convention
center
hotel
that
actually
was
eligible
and
met
standards
to
be
approved
at
a
staff
level,
and
so
it
they
need
to
make
a
few
corrections
to
their
plans
to
meet
zoning.
But
it's
essentially
approved
at
this
point.
If
that
were
to
come
through
in
a
month
from
now,
it
would
have
to
go
through
the
early
engagement
process
and
of
the
Planning
Committee.
F
So,
just
to
give
you
guys
a
heads
up
we're
seeing
a
big
increase
in
the
number
of
those
applications,
so
we're
gonna
kind
of
monitor
that
to
see
how
what
it
means
to
the
workload.
The
workload
of
the
Planning
Commission
over
the
last
few
months
has
been
relatively
light,
but
we're
in
this
kind
of
weird
period,
where
a
lot
of
our
total
applications
for
the
year
up
28%
over
last
year,
which
means
they're
up
about
pushing
40
percent
from
five
years
ago.
So
we're
trying
to
figure
out
what
that
means.
F
F
So
it
depends.
We
have
probably
a
dozen
different
types
of
applications
that
could
potentially
come
through
the
Planning
Commission.
Some
are
required
by
ordinance
two,
so
zoning
amendments,
Street
closures,
all
of
those
things
that
you
know
about
are
required
to
come
here.
Others,
like
special
exceptions,
most
well
subdivisions
unless
they're
associated
with
something
else
like
a
plan
development.
F
Up
until
recently,
all
of
the
design
reviews
were
eligible
for
staff
level.
The
other
thing
that
we
do
and
all
of
our
historic
preservation
items
that
wouldn't
come
through
the
Planning
Commission
that
makes
up
about
35.
40
percent
of
our
total
workload
is
preservation
work.
So
a
lot
of
those
things
are
things
that
just
right
now,
they're
minor
one.
F
One
thing
that
we've
seen
a
huge
increase
in
our
what
we
call
zoning
verification,
letters
and
those
are
almost
always
done,
because
a
property
is
going
through
some
transaction
or
getting
ready
to
develop
and
that's
where
we've
seen
the
biggest
increase.
Most
of
those
are
downtown
properties,
and
we
know
that
we're
seeing
a
huge
increase
in
potential
downtown
development,
meaning
people
are
coming
to
meet
with
us
about
their
projects
figuring
out
what
they
need
to
do.
What
the
rules
are,
what
the
process
is
and
we're
gonna
start
seeing
some
applications,
so
I
mean
we.
F
F
Yep,
it's
it.
It
depends,
as
varies
from
zoning
district,
so,
for
example,
downtown
a
building
on
the
corner
over
three.
If
it's
under
375
feet,
it
meets
standards,
it's
just
just
approved
at
the
staff
level.
If
it's
over,
then
it's
coming
to
the
Planning
Commission
on
the
new
ordinance.
If
it's
mid
block
that
goes
down
to
100
feet,
if
it's
in
sugarhouse
it's
depending
on
the
use
and
square
footage
things
like
that,
so
we
we
do
anticipate
that
our
work.
Clothes
are
gonna,
be
fairly
heavy
over
the
next.
F
F
The
big
one
of
the
big
things
is
the
rezoning
of
the
city's
fleet
block.
This
has
been
a
project
that
has
been
out
there
for
at
least
ten
years,
but
we
are
finally
at
the
point
where
we're
writing
a
new
zoning
code
that
would
apply
to
the
fleet
block
and
then
eventually
be
transition
to
other
parts
of
the
granary
because
of
the
unique
nature
of
the
uses
that
are
there
and
the
the
desire
to
maintain
some
of
that
light.
Industrial
types
of
use
but
mix
in
residential
and
things
like
that.
F
That's
what
we're
looking
at
and
then
we're
also
looking
at
some
changes
to
other
ordinances.
You've
been
briefed
on.
Some
of
those
parking
is
going
to
start
this
summer.
So
we'll
start
breaking
that
up
and
briefing
the
Planning
Commission
on
the
new
parking
chapter
and
then
the
other
big
one
is
the.
F
We
have
what
we're
calling
right
now:
an
affordable
housing
overlay,
which
actually
is
more
of
an
incentive-based
type
of
thing,
near
transit
stations
to
kind
of
off
to
provide
incentives
to
offset
the
cost
of
creating
of
building
an
affordable
unit,
because
that
an
affordable
unit
cost
just
as
much
the
build
has
a
market
rate
unit.
And
so,
if
we
allow
things
like
additional
building
height
near
transit-
or
you
know
other
types
of
incentives
like
that,
then
hopefully
it
can.
F
It
can
tip
the
scale
so
that
we
can
start
getting
more
ease,
more
easily,
affordable
housing
projects
and
we're
also
working
on
an
adaptive,
reuse,
ordinance.
It's
gonna
be
pretty
big,
because
what
that
basically
does
and
I
think
you
guys
have
had
a
briefing
on
that
last
fall,
but
it
essentially
allows
existing
buildings
to
be
reused
for
basically
any
kind
use,
that's
otherwise
allowed
in
that
zoning
district.
If
the
building
systems
are
upgraded
to
be
more
sustainable.
F
So
it's
it's
an
it's
a
way
that
we're
reducing
the
demolition,
particularly
of
our
older
historic
buildings
that
may
not
be
otherwise
protected
in
a
historic
district
tourism
landmark
status,
but
offer
some
flexibility
from
zoning
regulations
so
that
they
can
so
there's
more
incentive
to
reuse
those
types
of
things.
So
it's
gonna
be
a
busy
summer
for
us
we're
already
looking
the
next
agendas
progressively
get
bigger
as
we
go.
F
A
D
Good
evening,
so
this
is
a
request
by
the
property
owners
of
538
East
14th
Avenue
for
the
city
to
vacate
a
portion
of
right
away
that
abuts
their
property.
The
purpose
of
the
request
is
to
reconcile
the
location
of
fencing
in
landscaping
within
the
city
on
Park
Strip.
In
this
aerial
photo.
The
yellow
box
highlights
the
property
lines
of
applicants
property.
You
can
see
the
fenced-in
backyard
area
extends
outside
of
the
property
bounds
into
the
right
away.
I
put
a
red
circle
around
that
area.
D
The
city
directed
them
to
pursue
a
revocable
permit,
which
legalized
the
encroachment
and
that
agreement
was
good
for
ten
years
and
there
were
no
costs
associated
with
it.
In
2008
teams
to
real
estate,
Services
Division
notified
the
applicants
that
their
permit
had
expired.
But
at
this
time
the
city
policy
regarding
encroachments
had
changed
in
the
city.
Does
now
charge
residents
with
encroachments
to
lease
the
right
away
on
an
annual
basis
at
fair
market
costs.
D
So
the
scope
of
requests,
the
current
area
of
encroachment
measures,
approximately
1,150
square
feet
and
the
applicants
originally
requested
that
that
entire
area
be
vacated.
But
when
I
routed
this
out
to
other
city
departments
for
their
review,
engineering
and
transportation,
both
did
they
had
concerns
about
selling
the
entire
width
of
the
park
strip.
Because
I
might
prevent
the
construction
of
the
future
sidewalk
in
this
area.
They
did
indicate
that
six
feet
of
width
would
be
adequate
area
if
they
did
ever
want
to
put
a
sidewalk
through
here.
D
So
actually
the
applicants
agreed
to
reduce
the
request
by
6
feet.
So
it's
now
17
feet
by
50
feet,
which
is
about
a
850
square
feet
of
area
all
within
the
park
strip,
and
if
it
is
approved
as
requested,
the
applicants
would
have
to
remove
all
improvements
that
fall
within
six
feet
of
the
back
of
curb
on
each
street.
So
if
you
look
at
this
picture,
it's
about
one
probably
about
one
fence
panel
of
what
they
would
have
to
take
out.
Basically
just
move.
D
The
fence
in
I
did
want
to
mention
that
we
explored
the
option
of
closing
the
entire
length
of
the
park
strip
on
the
east
side
of
the
parcel
to
try
to
maintain
a
rectangular
parcel,
but
public
utilities
told
us
that
there's
actually
a
water
main
that
cuts
through
at
an
angle
through
the
north
north
part
of
that
park
strip,
so
just
kind
of
the
northeast
corner
around
that
area.
There's
a
water
main.
D
So
we
we
decided
that
we
would
support
the
the
smaller
request
and
not
the
whole
park
strip,
because
public
utilities
couldn't
support
it
and
we
do
not
have
there.
Aren't
the
certain
ordinance
doesn't
have
specific
standards
of
approval
for
street
baking,
what
we
do
analyze
it
against
Utah
State
code,
City
Council
has
an
adopted
policy
related
to
street
closures
and
then
also
the
applicable
city
master
plans.
D
This
is
just
a
summary
of
the
findings
included
in
the
staff
report,
but
staff
finds
that
neither
public
interest
nor
any
person
would
be
material
materially
injured
by
the
street.
Vacation
would
not
deny
any
access
to
other
properties.
The
city
would
obtain
fair
market
value
for
the
land
which
would
go
into
the
general
fund.
D
Vacation
would
not
be
in
conflict
with
the
avenues
master
plan
or
the
Salt
Lake
City
urban
design
element,
which
are
the
two
relevant
planning
documents
for
this
area.
It's
also
highly
unlikely.
This
portion
of
each
Street
will
ever
need
to
be
widened.
I
pointed
out
on
our
field
trip
to
the
site
today
that
it's
at
the
very
top
of
each
Street
and
it's
kind
of
an
isolated
block
from
the
rest
of
the
avenues,
there's
no
cross
streets
that
run
through
and
it
does
dead-end
to
the
north.
D
So
traffic
in
that
area
is
probably
going
to
the
park.
That's
to
the
north,
where
it's
probably
residents
that
live
in
that
area,
using
that
Street,
so
I,
don't
think
a
tree
will
ever
need
to
be
widened
and
also
improvements
that
encroach
into,
and
also
prevent
access
to.
The
public
right-of-way
in
this
area.
They've
in
existence
for
at
least
20
years,
based
on
aerial
imagery
in
the
city,
now
has
an
opportunity
to
benefit
financially
from
the
occupation.
So
planning
staff
does
support
this
request.
D
F
A
H
I
actually
did
a
great
job
of
cleaning
our
case
for
us,
but,
like
she
said,
we
moved
into
the
house
in
2004.
There
was
already
a
fence
there.
As
far
as
I
can
tell
like
she's
like
actually
said
that
fence
has
been
there
for
a
very
very
long
time,
so
we
decided
to
tear
the
chain-link
fence
down,
build
a
wooden
fence
and
at
the
time
I
thought.
H
Well,
it's
let's
go
talk
to
the
city
to
make
sure
we're
doing
the
right
thing
and
we
did
and
we
got
the
permit
or
we
got
the
police
or
the
local
per
minute.
Then
10
years
later,
oh
by
the
way,
that's
not
free
anymore,
it's
actually
I
want
to
say
20,
some
one
thousand
dollars
a
year
so
or
not
a
year,
several
thousand
dollars
a
year,
20
some
odd
thousand
dollars
for
the
10-year
lease.
A
A
C
G
Yeah,
it
appears
I'm,
looking
at
the
aerial
view
on
page
four,
it
appears
that
across
the
street
from
this
property,
there
is
a
fairly
wide
park
strip
for
the
properties
across
the
street,
with
the
sidewalk
already
built
in
and
so
forth.
Is
that
correct
and
on
the
side
of
the
street,
where
the
applicants
are
there's
no
sidewalk
at
all,
at
least
for
their
of
their
house,
and
all
three
houses
below
them
is
that
is
that
true,
yeah.
D
C
G
And
so
so
is,
would
there
be
in
the
future
we
would
have
to
if
we
plan
to
do
the
to
do
a
sidewalk
through
here?
All
of
these
properties
would
be
disturbed
in
some
way,
because
they,
this
six
foot,
would
not
be
wide
enough
to
have
a
sidewalk
and
a
park
strip
right.
It
would
just
be
wide
enough
for
a
sidewalk
yeah.
D
That
was
just
the
minimum
possible
width
that
they
could
get
it
just
a
sidewalk
in
I'm,
just
assuming
that
if
they
did
build
a
sidewalk
on
the
west
side
of
each
street
in
this
area
in
front
of
this
encroachment
or
this
vacated
area,
it
would
just
be
sidewalk
and
there
wouldn't
be
a
park
strip
for
this.
Fifty
fifty
feet
of
length.
Okay,.
G
D
G
I
meant
the
part,
the
actual
physical
park
Shiva
that
I'm
looking
at
the
right-of-way.
So
okay,
that's
that
I
guess.
My
only
sort
of
concern
with
this
be
be
that
we're
giving
up
the
opportunity
to
have
a
park
strip
on
the
east
side
of
H
Street
for
like
ever
so
I
am
wondering
I
mean
I.
We
could
always
have
a
were
setting
a
precedent
to
that.
That's
just
not
going
to
happen
and
a
lot
of
the
character
of
the
avenues
is
having
a
park
strip
with
large
trees
and
and
so
forth.
G
As
you
see
across
the
across
the
street
on
H
Street,
so
I'm
just
wondering
I'm
just
raising
that
as
an
issue
for
reducing
this
area,
I
mean
for
reducing
the
right-of-way
area
to
only
six
feet.
No,
that
wouldn't
be
that
wouldn't
bother
me
too
much
if
they
were
the
only
ones
on
the
block,
but
I'm
sure
that
if
the,
if
the
city
came
through
there
and
wanted
to
build
a
sidewalk,
a
proper
sidewalk
with
par
strip
that
the
other
neighbors
would
want
also
want
that
same
consideration.
C
F
City
does
have
master
plan
policies
of
adding
sidewalk
where
it's
not
currently
missing.
Obviously,
a
place
like
this
that's
kind
of
off
the
beaten
path
and
tucked
away
is
a
lower
priority.
So
I
think
you
could
read
the
tea
leaves
at
it.
It
would
be
a
very
long
time
before
their
sidewalk
can
install
them
on
that
street.
B
So
they
don't
have
to
move
their
fence
and
everything
else
was
it
ever
explored
to
just
lay
an
easement
on,
therefore,
a
sidewalk
in
the
future
that
then
the
city
could
come
claim
it
should
we
ever
want
it
in
the
future
and
they
wouldn't
have
to
move
the
fence.
That
would
maintain.
Does
that
ever
looked
at
as
an
option
or
no
reason,
that's
not
a
solution.
Do.
B
B
G
D
F
F
B
H
B
C
H
B
So,
basically,
the
information
and
the
staff
report
public
testimony
and
discussion
by
the
Planning
Commission
I
move
the
Planning
Commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
of
the
City
Council
to
approve
PLN
PCM
2018,
zero,
zero,
five,
six
one
Street
vacation
at
five,
thirty,
eight
East,
14th
Avenue,
and
with
this
recommendation,
though,
the
staff
and
the
City
Council
may
be
explore
using
an
easement
instead
as
an
option
easement
an
8-foot
easement
on
the
on
that
strip.
Rather
than
making
an
old
property
ten
feet,
nine,
whatever
a
normal
sidewalk
would
be.
B
B
E
C
A
A
C
A
C
B
A
I
All
right,
so
this
is
a
request
by
teams
day
representing
the
other
side
Academy
to
operate
a
large
group
home
on
the
property
located
at
661
East
100
South
the
site
would
be
an
expansion
of
the
other
side,
Academy's
campus,
located
adjacent
to
the
subject
property.
So
in
yellow.
You
can
see
the
property
being
requested
for
conditional
use
now
and
in
orange,
where
the
current
campus
is
the
other
side.
I
Academy
is
a
recovery
facility
that
offers
vocational
and
life
skills
training,
as
well
as
educational
programs
for
individuals
coming
from
incarceration
and
homelessness,
resulting
from
a
history
of
substance.
Abuse
residents
are
required
to
enroll
for
a
minimum
of
two
years
during
which
they
live
on
site
and
participate
on
vocational
training.
These
vocational
trainings
are
done
through
affiliated
business
entities
and
currently
include
a
moving
service.
A
thrift
store
landscape
maintenance
service
and
occasionally
a
food
truck.
I
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
house
164
individuals
in
this
group
home
without
any
modifications
to
the
building
or
the
site,
a
conditioner
uses
and
allowed
use
unless
appropriate
conditions
cannot
be
applied
to
mitigate
potential
adverse
impacts.
So
the
first
thing
we
considered
in
this
proposal
was
the
neighborhood
compatibility
and
the
potential
impacts
in
looking
at
the
surrounding
properties.
We
found
that
the
subject
property
is
surrounded
by
a
diversity
of
uses,
including
residential
institutional,
commercial
uses
and
vacant
properties.
I
The
staff
also
that
the
proposed
group
home
were
to
replace
use
of
similar
intensity,
which
is
the
assisted
living
facility
that
took
place
at
that
location.
We
also
considered
the
impact
of
the
vocational
training
business.
That's
part
of
the
group
home
program
and
on
this
subject,
property.
The
vocational
training
business
would
be
limited
to
administrative
functions,
so
the
bulk
of
the
operations
would
not
be
expended.
I
Lastly,
we
look
at
the
conditions
of
the
existing
property
and
I
want
to
make
a
correction
in
the
staff
report
I
state
that
the
property
is
fenced
on
both
sides
in
the
rear.
It's
actually
just
the
west
side,
that's
fenced,
although
that
doesn't
really
have
a
lot
of
impact,
considering
the
adjacent
uses
to
the
west
and
the
north,
but
the
property
also
has
adequate.
Exterior
lighting
has
vehicular
and
pedestrian
access
and
in
sufficient
parking
for
staff.
I
We
also
consider
the
proximity
restrictions
for
group
homes
in
our
zoning
ordinance,
and
this
proposal
does
not
comply
with
a
zoning
requirement
that
a
group
home
be
located
at
least
100
feet
away
from
another
group
home.
However,
our
city
attorney's
office
has
identified
in
the
past
that
this
provision
is
unenforceable
due
to
its
potential
illegality
under
the
Fair
Housing
Act,
so
we're
not
imposing
that
restriction
and
then,
lastly,
we
consider
the
group
home
licensee
and
maximum
occupancy
of
the
building.
I
The
zoning
ordinance
requires
that
the
group
home
obtain
a
license
from
the
Utah
Department
of
Human
Services,
and
to
obtain
that
license.
The
proposed
group
home
will
need
to
comply
with
state
specific
standards
for
establishment
operations
and
physical
conditions.
These
standards
include
minimum
room,
size
and
number
of
toilet
and
shower
stalls
that
will
ultimately
determine
the
maximum
occupancy
of
this
building.
I
We
receive
a
total
of
five
comments.
Three
of
them
were
in
up
of
this
project
and
they
were
related
to
the
impacts
of
the
growing
campus
and
the
expected
number
of
residents.
The
staff
knowledge,
the
increase
in
density,
but
finds
that
the
impacts
created
by
the
group
home
will
be
no
greater
than
another
residential
use.
Giving
these
considerations,
planning
staff
finds
of
the
proposed
use
is
expected
to
operate
compatibly
in
its
location
and
with
minimal
impacts
to
the
surrounding
properties.
E
I
E
Theoretically,
if
we
approved
a
large
group
home
and
then
DHS
could
limit
the
number
it
would
in
may
or
may
not
be
164
if
DHS
says
no,
you
can't
accommodate
that
they
could
reduce
it.
That's
great.
Do
they
have?
Is
that
like
an
internal
application?
Is
that
a
public
process,
or
is
it
just
something
that
they
would
apply
for,
and
administrative
League
it
approved
or
denied
I'm.
I
E
I
E
C
I
C
A
B
J
We
recognize
that
we
took
a
significant
amount
of
time
on
our
last
conditional
use
permit
and
we
appreciate
the
tolerance
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
going
through
that
and
I
can
give
a
brief
overview
in
just
60
seconds
of
who
the
other
side
and
then
talk
about
the
project.
The
other
side,
Academy,
is
a
residential
life
skills
program.
J
Our
average
students
been
arrested
25
times
they
are
coming
off
the
streets
out
of
the
jails.
They've
been
a
nine
out
of
ten
have
been
homeless.
A
number
of
our
students
have
come
from
the
Rio
Grande
area,
where
these
people
are
coming
for
a
chance
to
change
their
lives.
We
currently
have
about
95
students.
You
know
on
our
existing
campus
that
we
have
both
men
and
women.
We
don't
charge
the
students
anything
and
we
don't
take
any
government
money.
We
run
out
vocational
training
schools
to
help
bring
our
revenue.
J
One
is
moving
company,
so
the
students
who
are
working
on
that
are
out
in
the
community
working
all
day,
they're,
not
back
on
campus,
we
run
its
top-rated
moving
company
and
in
Salt
Lake
City,
based
on
the
reviews
and
based
upon
the
customer
service
that
our
students
provide.
We
also
run
a
thrift
boutique,
it's
located
on
State,
Street
and
Murray.
So
a
number
of
our
students
travel
there
everyday
and
work
there
during
the
retail
hours.
J
J
95%
of
our
graduates
are
living
lives.
After
completing
the
two-year
program
our
drug
drug-free,
crime-free
have
stable,
housing
are
employed
and
we've
had
success
in
cleaning
up
the
neighborhood.
This
is
when
we
first
moved
into
the
area.
It's
now
been
cleaned
up
and
straightened.
We've
there
had
been
a
place
where
a
lot
of
vagrancy
and
homelessness
had
been
taking
place.
The
crime
rate
has
was
lowered
in
the
area
by
no
I'm.
Sorry
I
was
thinking.
You
could
see
all
this
I.
J
Here
we
go
so
this
was
what
it
looked
like
when
we
first
moved
in
we've
been
able
to
clean
it
up
clean
up
the
area,
the
police,
the
report
we
had
gotten
previously
from
Salt
Lake
police
said
the
crime
in
the
area
had
dropped,
we're
helping
the
population
become
a
working,
healthy
population.
The
area
we're
talking
about,
as
you
mentioned,
is
the
avenues
you
can
see
the
area
in
yellow.
That
is
our
current
campus.
J
We
currently
are
housing
students
just
in
apartments
in
the
two
buildings
on
the
east
side
of
700
East,
the
plan
would
be
to
move
them
from
those
apartments
into
the
Avenue,
so
it
really
consolidates
our
campus
and
actually
lowers
the
traffic.
That's
going
across
700
East,
which
is
you
know,
a
busy
dangerous
intersection.
So
we
were
able.
J
We
would
be
able
to
consolidate
our
students
altogether
those
apartments
our
plan
is
to
make
them
available
as
supporting
affordable
housing
units
for
our
graduates,
so
that
they
can
have
a
transitional
space
once
they
graduate
the
program
they're
a
little
separated,
but
they
still
have
the
support
of
the
community
when
they
move
the
move
there.
The
apartment
building
is
a
three-story
building
and
the
main
floor
would
be
used
for
administrative
offices,
kitchen
dining
room,
recreation,
room,
laundry,
exercise,
offices
and
then
there'd
be
20.
J
There's
20
apartments
that
were
used
for
the
assisted
living
buildings
on
each
we've
had
local
support.
We
have
really
good
relationships
with
the
local
law
enforcement.
This
is
a
meeting
set
up
with
Fred
Ross
and
the
UTA
police
of
a
lunch
we
had
with
our
students.
We've
been
very
involved
in
giving
back
to
Salt
Lake.
The
the
mayor's
office
recently
called
us
to
help
move
the
people
out
of
the
georgia
apartments
when
it
was
red
tagged
they
needed
they
had
72
hours
to
move.
J
We
moved
many
of
them
on
a
volunteer
basis
at
no
cost
as
our
way
of
giving
back,
we've
moved
the
police
department
several
times.
We
recently
co-hosted
the
homeless,
candlelight
vigil
and
we
helped
with
manpower
needs
of
a
number
of
nonprofit
organizations
in
the
city.
We
feel
like
we're
making
an
impact
in
the
Rio
Grande.
This
isn't
a
through
our
private
initiatives.
A
number
of
our
students
have
spent
time
over
80
percent
of
spent
time
in
the
Rio
Grande
area
and
by
bringing
them
out.
We
think
we're
helping
reduce
that.
J
We
think
with
this
we've
invested
4.2
million
dollars
in
purchasing
this
building.
It's
a
private
money,
not
not
through
any
taxpayer
money
to
try
to
address
this.
This
chronic
problem
of
the
opioid
crisis
and
homelessness
and
the
criminality
that
is
involved
with
that
160
bed
beds
up
to
160
beds
would
be
added
to
the
solution
available
to
Salt,
Lake
City
and
we're
also
getting.
J
This
is
being
a
model
campus
and
we're
getting
regular
visits
from
around
the
country
of
people
saying
you
know
what
what
is
this
and
so
they're
getting
to
experience
what
what
great
things
are
happening
in
Salt
Lake
City?
So
we
would
ask
for
your
consideration
for
the
for
our
application
for
the
conditional
use.
Okay.
G
C
J
J
G
C
J
Really
the
the
plan
is
for
the
house.
The
buildings
on
the
west
side
of
700
East
would
be
considered
the
campus
of
the
other
side
Academy.
The
two
apartment
buildings
on
the
east
side
would
be
used
for
graduate
and
transitional
housing,
or
are
our
students?
Who've
graduated,
so
they'll
no
longer
be
in
the
program,
but
they'll
still
have
the
community
and
support
of
the
program
close
to
them
and
do.
G
J
Is
a
peer-to-peer
model,
so
our
staff
people
staff,
our
people
who
came
come
from
the
same
environment,
we're
based
on
a
model
out
of
California
called
Delancey
Street
Foundation
and
our
staff
have
gone
through
the
the
Delancey
Street
program,
so
they
have
lived
in
a
community
like
this
themselves.
They've
changed,
transform
their
lives
and
are
now
10
years
removed
from
that
lifestyle,
so
their
peers
and
examples
of
how
to
do
that.
J
J
J
K
J
About
the
the
rooms
/
or
the
space
/,
we
did
receive
a
variance
for
higher
density
from
the
Department
of
Human
Services,
with
the
recovery
residents
license
that
we
had
received
with
them
being
older
home,
so
you
don't
have,
and
some
of
them
are
smaller
than
then
you
might
want
in
a
home,
but
they
provided.
We
have
bathrooms
accessible
to
each
room
and
I
would
say
I
I
would
say
we
currently
have
space
for
about
a
hundred
and
twenty
with
our
current.
So.
J
J
J
B
J
J
A
B
J
B
J
J
J
J
C
E
C
E
J
K
J
J
We
also
our
students
have
get
tested
on
a
random
basis,
each
month
by
adult
parole
and
probation,
and
in
the
three
years
that
they
they've
been
doing.
We've
been
in
operation
three
and
a
half
we
haven't
had
one
student
fail
of
drug
test,
so
a
hundred
percent
of
the
students
have
been
drug-free
according
to
adult,
parole,
parole
and
probation.
J
A
A
L
Careful
lying
will
indent,
so
my
name
is
Cindy
Krum,
er,
I'm,
a
nearby
property
owner
and
I
followed
this
property
for
almost
30
years.
In
1981,
when
the
Central
City
historic
district
was
adopted,
there
were
three
contributory
buildings
on
this
property:
a
Victorian,
a
Prairie
School
and
a
Tudor.
They
were
part
of
the
armstrong-jones
Madison
compound
of
buildings,
which
dominated
this
portion
of
the
block.
You
can
see
Armstrong's
portrait
out
in
the
hall
by
the
way
he
was
a
mayor.
L
These
buildings
were
demolished
after
the
adoption
of
the
historic
district
to
make
way
for
the
assisted
living
facility.
What
has
transpired
then,
is
a
story
of
hazards
which
should
not
be
associated
with
any
facility
serving
a
vulnerable
population.
I
hold
irresponsible
property
owners
and
the
city
accountable
for
the
carnage
which
has
occurred
here.
There
have
been
two
fires
on
the
700
East
frontage
of
the
block,
both
in
group
homes
for
adolescents,
a
third
fire
destroyed,
an
historic
cottage
and
the
garages
behind
the
Matt
Sonia
Court.
On
the
100
south
side,
a
gas
leak.
L
Fourth
Lea's
evacuation
of
the
assisted
living
facility
on
a
cold
night.
Throughout
all
this
trauma,
the
city's
failure
to
enforce
at
the
multiple
units
known
as
Matt,
Sonia
Court
and
at
the
location
of
the
fire
on
700
East,
compounded
the
problems,
irresponsible
ownership.
Since
1991,
we
have
lost
five
contributory
buildings
on
this
quadrant
of
the
block.
The
indicators
of
vandalism
continue
to
accumulate,
especially
at
Matt
Sonia
Court,
evacuating,
vulnerable
residents
from
the
assisted
living
facility
during
the
gas
leak
was
frightening
to
watch.
L
There's
no
point
in
going
into
the
Fair
Housing
Act,
or
the
city's
failure
to
enforce
here
regarding
the
conditional
use
application.
What
is
important,
I
think
to
say
that
is
in
the
context
of
what
has
happened
over
the
past
28
years.
It
seems
reasonable
to
argue
that
the
people
who
live
at
this
location
need
to
be
able
to
take
care
of
themselves
in
case
of
emergencies
which
are
likely
to
continue
until
the
issues
at
MADD
Sonia
court
are
resolved.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
C
K
Lewis
I
am
an
another
student
at
the
other
side,
Academy
been
there
for
17
months,
and
this
place
has
changed.
My
life
dramatically,
I've
been
in
and
out
of
jails,
homelessness
at
the
Rio
Grande,
and
this
place
is
just
giving
me
a
hope
and
an
opportunity
to
go
out
and
work
hard
every
day
have
a
good
attitude
learn
how
to
get
along
with
people
there's
currently
90
students,
95
students
and
I'm,
just
I
get
to
save
my
life
first
and
then
I
get
to
save
somebody
else's
life.
That's
all
I
have.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
M
A
M
So
again,
my
name
is
Dave
I'm,
the
managing
director
at
the
other
side,
Academy
and
I.
Think
it's
really
important
to
note.
We
touched
on
a
couple
of
key
things
about
the
students
opting
in.
They
can
write
us
a
letter
from
jail
or
interview
them
there,
and
then
they
can
come
to
us
and
turn
their
lives
around
or
they
can
walk
in
off
the
street
and
take
a
seat
on
our
bench.
If
we
interview
them
and
accept
them,
they
start
that
day.
They
need
no
money.
M
They
don't
need
anything,
no
Medicaid
money,
no
rich
mommy
and
daddy
money,
no
city
county
federal
money.
We
do
it
all
ourselves
and
that
really
is
what
separates
us
from
all
the
other
programs.
The
minute
the
student
gets
there.
They
become
part
of
the
solution
rather
than
part
of
the
problem.
These
social
enterprises
work
as
the
petri
dish,
because
a
lot
of
of
our
population
have
been
to
some
of
the
other
programs
and
in
some
cases,
five
or
six
of
them,
and
it
didn't
work
well
for
this
particular
pop
elite
population.
M
We
are
two
years
long,
but
the
beautiful
thing
is:
sixty-five
percent
of
our
students
are
opting
to
stay
longer,
they're
in
their
third
year
and
in
some
cases
their
fourth
year,
because
they
love
who
they're
becoming
and,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
they
can
graduate
at
two
years
and
go
live
their
lives.
They
want
to
stay
longer
to
give
back
to
the
students
who
are
coming
in,
that
are
brand-new
to
be
able
to
be
of
service
to
them
and
to
become
better
human
beings
themselves.
So
it
really
is
more
than
just
a
program.
M
M
A
B
Think
would
you
say
that
that
locating
on
your
facilities,
I
think
the
engine
is
important,
conditional
use,
looking
re
facilities
close
together,
is
a
strength
of
your
program
and
that
there
are
benefits
and
you
actually
put
the
craw
mentoring.
That
kind
of
happens
in
the
close
proximity
actually
supports
and
causes
less
impact
on
the
community
or
not
I'm,
saying
yeah.
J
We
we
think
a
consolidated
campus
is
very
important
for,
for
us,
our
whole
process
is
one
where
we
build
community.
Our
students
have
disconnected
themselves
from
it
from
family
from
any
support
in
community.
They
burned
their
bridges
everywhere.
So
learning
having
them
learned
how
to
reintegrate
live
together.
Work
together,
really
operate
as
a
family
is
critical
and
having
it
having
it
being
able
to
use
this
building
will
greatly
enhance
our.
B
M
Yes,
that's
very
important.
That
is
exactly
what
we
do
is
we
call
it
200%
accountability.
Each
student
is
a
hundred
percent
accountable
for
themselves
and
also
100%
accountable
for
their
their
brothers
and
sisters.
If,
by
chance
somebody
does
something
wrong,
even
if
it's
insignificant
and
staff
finds
out.
M
Not
only
is
the
person
in
trouble
that
did
it,
but
if
somebody
else
knows
about
it,
they're
in
more
trouble
than
them,
so
it
doesn't
take
the
students
long
to
figure
out
that
I'm
no
longer
not
going
to
allow
other
people's
behaviors
to
impact
my
life
and
everybody
starts
passing
that
information
and
letting
us
know
what's
going
on,
and
then
we
have
a
twice
a
week,
a
group
setting
where
the
peers
get
to
interact
and
call
each
other
on
their
behaviors.
That
really
is
where
the
magic
happens
and
staff
also
lives
on
property.
J
J
C
G
M
Been
very
intentional
about
that
very
thing:
we
don't
allow
smoking
at
the
facility
nor
any
loitering.
We
don't
want
people
out
lore
during
we
have
small
areas,
as
Tim
was
mentioning
that
we
play
basketball
and
things
like
that
in
the
back
of
the
property,
but
no
one's
just
outside
low.
During
on
the
porches.
Thank.
M
C
J
Had
some
issues
with
with
fire
department,
we
had
a
hood
that
didn't
meet
code
and
we
had
to
stop
use
of
that
until
we
could
provide,
we
actually
were
building
a
larger
dining
hall
and
they
worked
with
us
on
variants.
They
also
a
preexisting
fire
escape
once
we
got
into
it
was
out
of
compliance,
and
so
we
re-engineered
that
and
rebuilt
that,
so
it
was
in
compliance
with
the
fire
department
and
I.
It
currently
I
think
we're
in
good
standing
with
all
of
the
fire
department.
C
J
F
J
Actually
had
it
under
contract
at
one
point,
but
because
we
couldn't
see
a
way
around
getting
the
Madison,
that's
the
apartment
part
demolished
and
we
didn't
feel
like
we
would
be
able
to
work,
get
it
in
an
appropriate
process
to
get
it
demolished.
We
we
pursued,
and
then
this
became
available,
I
I.
G
G
F
C
C
Do
okay?
First
of
all,
thank
you
all
for
coming.
I
appreciate
the
work
you've
done
on
those
properties,
they're
really
much
improved
from
what
they
have
been
for
many
years,
based
on
the
information
listed
in
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Commission
approves
a
request
for
conditional
use
for
a
large
group
home
at
661
East
100
South,
as
presented
in
petition
PLN
PCM
2019
zero
zero
one,
zero.
Four,
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report,
I
can't.