►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
A
C
B
Afternoon,
I'm
here,
along
with
other
board
members
of
the
central
9th
community
council
today
we'll
be
today,
you
will
be
discussing
the
900
South
streetscape
improvements.
We
would
like
to
thank
board
members
for
the
time
they've,
given
in
meeting
with
our
board
hearing
us
out
and
engaging
in
discussion
regarding
this
project.
B
We're
very
pleased
with
the
numbers
you'll
be
reviewing
today,
particularly
with
the
much
lower
than
anticipated
annual
maintenance
revenue
from
proposed
parking
meters
would
likely
more
than
offset
the
projected
cost,
let
alone
the
increased
taxes
generated
by
the
higher
density,
housing
developments
and
new
local
businesses,
which
have
come
and
continue
to
come
into
the
central
ninth
neighborhood.
We
hope
you'll
agree
with
our
view
that
the
time
is
now
to
proceed
as
the
longer
we
wait,
the
more
expensive
this
project
it
becomes.
Thank
you
I.
D
My
name
is
Tim
funk
I'm
here
for
crossroads
urban
center,
we're
concerned
about
your
plans
for
block
67,
not
the
plan
itself.
There
are
things
in
the
plan
that
could,
you
know,
could
change
and
we're
we're
aware
of
that.
But
we're
really
concerned
about
is
the
Jackson
apartments
that
are
on
the
southwest
corner.
There
are
80
units
of
project
based
housing
there,
meaning
that
people
pay
30
percent
of
their
income
for
those
units,
people
are
typically
living
on
$1,000
or
less
a
month.
D
If
those
units
are
there
for
sale,
it's
not
widely
known
that
the
owner
of
the
property
is
trying
to
sell
it,
but
he
is
trying
to
sell
it
at
a
time
when
his
land
is
worth
more
because
there's
proposed
development
on
the
rest
of
the
block.
We
also
are
concerned
about
the
housing
to
the
on
the
block
south
of
it
that
belongs
to
the
Greek
Orthodox
Church,
and
they
are
planning
with
with
Woodbury
company,
to
expand,
r22,
probably
tear
down
the
existing
housing
and
to
put
in
new,
probably
more
expensive
apartments
or
condominiums.
D
That
amounts
to
one
hundred
and
fifty
units
of
low-income
housing
in
two
blocks.
That
are
in
jeopardy.
They
will
be
in
jeopardy.
You
will
be
seeing
the
planning
proposals
on
that
and
you
need
to
have
some
kind
of
a
city
policy
and
awareness
of
how
to
handle
that.
We
have
talked
to
a
couple
of
you
today
about
that,
and
there
is
something
that
can
be
done
with
the
Jackson
apartments
and
getting
the
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development
to
help
move
those
units
from
that.
D
If
it's
sold
and
the
the
those
units
don't
remain
section
8,
they
wouldn't
at
the
price
it's
selling.
For
now,
they
could
be
moved
to
other
projects
with
the
help
that,
with
the
with
the
agreement
of
the
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development,
so
that's
a
fair
warning
on
those
two
projects.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
Is
there
anyone
else
that
would
like
to
speak
to
the
board
today?
I
don't
see
any
hands
I
do
want
to
say
that
we
do
have
assisted
listening
devices
if
anyone
in
the
audience
needs
any
assistance.
Hearing
the
comments
or
discussion
by
the
board,
and
you
can
just
raise
your
hand
and
one
of
our
staff
members
will
help
you
out
with
that.
With
that
said,
we
are
going
on
to
our
public
hearing.
Our
first
public
hearing
is
the
block
67
Community
Reinvestment
area.
E
A
F
You
want
my
address
or
no
I.
Don't
need
that.
Okay,
so
we're
just
here,
because
we've
been
having
these
meetings
very
good
meetings
with
the
city.
Thank
you
very
much
and
and
we've
been,
we
had
some
separate
meetings
with
the
Ricci
group
and
on
the
development
and
have
come
to
you
know
we're
moving
ahead
and
we
just
want
to
tell
you
that
that
we
met
with
our
session
and
trustee,
and
this
is
Reverend
Brad
Kramer
at
our
church
too
he's
here
and
we
met
with
them
on
some
on
details
and
things
like
that.
F
G
C
H
C
F
I
just
want
to
say
too
from
jcpc:
we
represent
the
churches
in
the
Japanese
community
and
judges
here,
but
he
won't
come
out,
has
a
hard
time
hearing,
but
he's
really
strong
but
I.
Think
there's.
You
know
there
still
lingering
feelings
about
being
the
back
end
and
all
these
things
that
have
happened
but
we're
hoping
through
this
process
that
we
start
a
new
beginning,
you
know,
and
through
with
the
city
and
hopefully
the
county
too,
and
everyone
aboard.
So
thank
you
so
much.
A
I
Chair
fowler
members
of
the
RDA
board,
my
name
is
Samantha
Julian
I'm,
the
deputy
director
of
the
downtown
Alliance
or
Salt
Lake
City.
We
just
wanted
to
say
a
couple
words
about
the
project
and
its
impact
and
effect
in
the
area.
Potentially,
we
like
to
acknowledge
the
work
of
the
RDA
board
and
the
art
a
staff.
We
know
this
has
been
a
lot
of
complications
and
hurdles,
but
it's
an
really
great
job.
I
So
we
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
we
also
wanted
it
knowledge
to
the
japanese
community
for
really
making
an
effort
to
let
their
voice
be
heard
and
to
Conte
to
really
think
about
the
project.
And
what
could
it
do
because
the
Japanese
community
has
been
a
really
great
part
of
this
project
and
will
be
in
the
future.
So
we're
excited
about
that.
We
support
the
west
quarters
preferred
development
scenario.
It's
an
innovative
mixed-use
project
expands
the
residential
project.
We
have.
We
have
great
residential
products,
but
theirs
is
going
to
be
even
more
exciting.
I
It
will
enhance
the
city's
walkability
with
commercial
activation
in
a
mid
block
walkway,
which
we
all
love,
who
doesn't
love,
mid-fuck,
walkway
and
below-grade
parking.
Another
thing
we
love,
yes,
developers
preferred
development
project
fully.
A
fully
executed
brings
higher
tax
revenue
to
the
city.
Strengths
of
the
200
South
Corridor
builds
assets
that
Salt
Lake
City
needs
for
anticipated
growth.
We
believe
the
development
brings
attention
to
the
historic
Japantown.
It
also
improves
connectivity
with
between
Vivint
salt
palace
gateway
and
the
downtown
sports
entertainment
district
that
it
could
be.
I
A
A
K
A
M
Will
not
thank
you
anyway.
No
I
was
just
going
to
suggest
that
the
RDA
has
its
usual
presentation
ready
and
so
so
that'll
be
an
opportunity
for
board
members
to
refresh
their
memories.
On
the
details
of
this
large
and
complex
plan,
and
then
we
do
have
a
number
of
policy
questions
that
you
may
or
may
not
wish
to
entertain
later.
L
First
off
I'd
like
to
start
by
kind
of
echoing
what
everyone
has
said
prior
of
thanking
everyone.
Who's
been
involved
in
this.
Obviously,
the
patience
of
the
developers,
as
well
as
the
involvement
of
the
japanese-american
community,
which
has
been
vital
to
making
sure
that
we're
doing
this
project
the
right
way.
L
Also
I'd
like
to
thank
staff,
Jill
and
Kareem,
have
put
in
a
tremendous
amount
of
time
in
this,
as
well
as
Alison
on
the
council
staff,
who
has
been
really
patient
with
us
as
well
as
we
have
sorted
through
these
issues
and
and
communicated
information
back
and
forth,
and
you
also
hear
from
Ben's
Becker
from
Zions
today
as
part
of
our
presentation.
So
we
have
just
a
real
quick
set
aside
as
we
run
a
run-through
just
because
this
has
been
a
process.
L
It's
been
quite
a
while
to
get
to
where
we're
at
right
now,
and
so
we
felt
it
was
important
to
one
put
in
context.
What
is
being
requested
of
the
board
today
in
terms
of
approval
of
the
plan,
as
well
as
just
provide
a
little
background
on
how
we
got
here
so
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Jill
and
you'll
start
us
off
very.
F
Much
so
this
presentation
will
consist
of
three
parts.
The
first
is
just
an
overview
of
the
proposed
project
which
I
will
give.
Then
Corinne
will
give
you
an
update
on
the
CRA
plan
and
then
Benj
Becker
from
Zions
Public
Finance
will
discuss
the
financial
benefit
analysis
so
that
you
understand
the
benefits
that
this
project
will
bring
so
a
little
bit
about
the
proposed
project.
As
you
know,
this
is
called
the
West
Quarter
it's
between
the
Vivint,
smart
home
arena
and
the
salt
palace.
F
They
intend
to
build
a
large
mixed-use
project
that
will
be
kind
of
an
LA,
Live
sort
of
concept.
It'll
be
something
that
will
really
complement.
The
Vivint
solar
arena
will
have
jumbo
sports.
Trine's
it'll
have
a
rooftop
bar
as
part
of
its
hotel.
There
will
be
restaurants
and
shopping
on
a
mid
block
street
a
little
bit
about
the
project
elements.
This
project
will
be
done
in
two
phases.
F
The
first
phase,
which
is
actually
in
the
CRA
that
we'll
be
talking
about
today,
will
contain
a
residential
tower,
a
hotel,
a
mid
block
street
with
retail
and
restaurants,
and
also
part
of
an
underground
parking
structure
in
Phase
two,
which
is
on
the
south
side
of
the
block,
which
is
in
our
existing
CBD
project
area.
We
will
have
another
commercial,
Tower,
residential,
the
continuation
of
the
mid
block
street
with
retail
and
restaurants,
and
the
rest
of
the
underground
parking
structure.
F
Details
about
phase
one
which
is
in
the
proposed
CR.
A
the
residential
tower
will
be
240,000
square
feet.
It
will
contain
241
market
rate
units,
we'll
also
have
a
dual
branded
hotel
with
200,000
square
feet
and
272
rooms
will
have
retail
on
the
street
at
20,000
square
feet.
Also,
as
I
mentioned
will
have
it,
there
will
be
a
rooftop
deck
that
will
have
a
bar,
and
then
there
will
be
an
underground
parking
structure.
F
The
majority
of
the
underground
parking
structure
will
be
built
on
the
south
side
of
the
block
and
not
be
in
the
CRA,
but
the
portion
that
is
in
the
CRA
will
contain
to
it
and
350
stalls.
46
of
which
will
be
available
to
the
public
and
as
you
can
see
in
that
boundary,
that
is
the
boundary
of
the
CRA.
Yes,
do
you
mind
if
I
interrupt.
J
F
F
Is
something
that
is
under
discussion
and
I?
Think
we
don't
know
exactly
what
the
Jim
poundtown
improvements
will
be.
One
of
the
things
that
the
developer
is
discussing
is
grading
these
two
sites
that
they
own
adjacent
to
the
parking
structure
and
providing
knock-out
panels
to
the
parking
structure.
Okay,.
F
We
are
discussing
making
those
improvements
as
part
of
building
the
the
beginning
of
the
parking
structure,
so
the
developer
is
requesting
from
the
RDA
that
we
create
the
CRA
as
part
of
as
a
portion
of
the
overlay
on
the
central
business
district
project
area.
So
this
is
currently
located
in
a
non
collection
part
of
the
CRA
it
we
would
pull
it
out.
It
would
become
its
own
project
area,
just
kind
of
like
block
70.
F
The
use
of
the
tax
increment
proceeds
would
be
used
to
offset
the
cost
of
the
infrastructure,
particularly
the
parking,
and,
as
you
know,
the
county
is
offering
to
pay
funds
to
go
toward
the
parking
structure.
The
tax
increment
would
be
used
to
pay
back
the
county
for
that
portion
of
the
of
their
investment.
F
I
Touched
on
the
boundary
a
little
bit,
but
just
a
refresher
and
why
we're
on
the
half
block?
Basically,
the
original
proposal
by
the
developer
was
to
remove
block
67
from
the
existing
central
business
district,
but
because
of
the
current
tax
increment
collection,
there
was
40
percent
and
he
wanted
to
create
a
new
CRA
so
that
there
was
a
higher
tax,
increment
collection
and
the
south
side
of
that
block
is
already
committed
to
bonds
for
the
Eccles
theatre.
So
we
can't
move
that
boundary.
So
that's
why
we
have
the
north
block
at
this
point.
I
There
you
go!
So
that's
the
north
side.
So
that's
where
we
are.
The
developer
proposed
the
half
block
so
moving
on.
As
far
as
the
benefits
for
the
downtown
master
plan
is
per
the
requirements
of
17
C,
the
seer.
A
draft
plan
that
you
have
looks
at
you
know
how
the
project
lines
up
with
goals
of
the
downtown
master
plan.
So
some
of
the
ones
important
ones
here
are
increased
density.
I
The
incorporation
of
mid
block
walkways
the
encouragement
of
mixed-use
development,
the
creation
of
a
sports
and
entertainment
area,
parking
for
Vivint,
Utah,
Jazz,
Salt
Palace
and
the
general
area
partnering
with
Salt
Lake
County,
to
ensure
the
long-term
viability
of
convention
space
at
the
Salt
Palace
and
providing
access
to
good
jobs
and,
as
far
as
participation
in
next
steps.
If
the
draft
plan
is
approved
by
the
board,
next
steps
would
include.
The
staff
begins
negotiation
of
the
terms
of
the
inner
local
agreements
with
the
city,
the
county
in
the
school
district
you'll
see
in
the
plan.
I
There
are
seven
taxing
entities,
but
there's
the
big
three
that
provide
you
know
the
biggest
amount
of
increments.
So
without
those
three
it
really
wouldn't
be
feasible
to
to
move
forward.
So
we
would
focus
on
those
three
first
and
as
far
as
the
next
step
would
be
negotiating
the
tax
increment
reimbursement
with
the
developer.
So
this
will
include
terms
such
as
developer
responsibility,
admin
fee
things
like
that,
and
you
can
see
on
page
14,
Table
five
there's
a
breakdown
of
how
the
budget
would
be
allotted.
A
B
L
That
is
one
of
the
questions,
for
the
board
to
to
address
is
to
what
extent
would
the
city
want
to
continue
to
parse
participate,
and/or
create
the
project
area.
If
we
do
not
get
significant
participation
from
the
other
entities,
we
suspect
that,
obviously,
the
county
is
interested
in
participating.
L
The
school
district
other
entities
would
be
based
on
those
conversations
and
negotiations,
and
so
the
issue
would
then
first
and
foremost
be
posed
to
the
developer,
that
if
we
were
not
able
to
participate
and
provide
a
reimbursement
amount
significant,
how
does
that
affect
both
their
level
of
interest
as
well
as
what
the
level
of
participation
would
be
from
the
county?
Has?
It
relates
to
their
fifteen
million
dollar
investment,
so
those
conversations
would
happen
as
we
reach
out
and
discuss
that
inner
local
with
those
entities.
B
L
Have
started
with
the
county,
obviously,
because
that
was
one
of
the
impetus
for
doing
this
project
area
with
the
school
district.
We
have
not
had
any
official
discussions
with
them
only
as
to
kind
of
inform
them
of.
We
are
working
on
this
process
so
that,
as
they
read
about
it
in
the
paper,
they
knew
what
what
we
were
doing.
Okay,.
B
L
A
B
L
The
the
involvement
of
the
entities
dictates
what
their
participation
is,
what
the
amount
of
increment
is.
So
you
absolutely
want
to
know
that
prior
to
entering
any
of
the
interlocal
agreements-
and
you
can
certainly
make
that
a
condition
of
an
approval
today
in
terms
of
finalizing
that
and
in
approving
the
plan
today,
based
on
knowing
what
that
participation
would
be.
N
N
So
one
of
the
things
that
I
really
like
about
this
project
and
we've
been
hearing
about
it
for
quite
a
while,
is
the
fact
that
it,
it
really
is
a
project.
It's
not
just
a
an
individual
development.
Unfortunately,
I
think
what
we
see
a
lot
of
in
Salt
Lake
City
are
just
building
specific
developments.
This
is
really
the
first
one
that
we've
seen
you
know
of
this
scope
since
City
Creek,
which
was
privately
funded,
the
the
you
know
there
wasn't
a
partnership
of
the
city
on
on
City
Creek.
N
The
work
that
has
been
done
with
the
japanease
community,
you
know,
and
I
and
I
to
this
I,
want
to
thank
not
just
the
developer,
but
I
also
want
to
thank
the
Japanese
community
for
being
as
involved
as
they
were.
What
has
happened
to
Japan
town
over
the
past
60
years,
frankly,
is
an
abomination.
Salt
Lake
City
is
not
the
only
one
to
blame
for
this.
Solid
County
also
holds
some
responsibility.
N
This
is
really
the
first
time,
though,
that
we've
seen
any
sort
of
an
opportunity
to
acknowledge
the
history
of
that
area
in
a
way
that
that
we
have
never
been
able
to
do
before
so
I'm
excited
about
this
project.
There
are
there's
one
hesitation
and
madam
chair,
you
raised
it,
you
know
and
that
that
is
what
happens
if,
if
Salt
Lake
County
rain
eggs
in
its
offer
to
stand
behind
the
ten
million
dollars
that
they've
committed
to
what
happens
of
other
taxing
entities,
you
know
back
away
or
don't
come
along
with
us
on
this.
N
N
Backing
the
ten
million
dollars,
if
Salt
Lake
County
chooses
not
to
do
that.
Of
course,
it's
going
to
have
you
know
massive
implications
for
us
and
for
the
developer,
but
I
don't
want
Salt
Lake
City
to
stand
in
the
way.
I.
Don't
want
Salt
Lake
City
to
hold
this
process
up.
We
have.
We
have
slowed
it
based
on.
You
know
the
work
that
took
place
with
the
Japanese
community
I'm
proud
of
that
decision
that
we
that
we
made
to
try
to
bring
both
of
those
groups
together
and
I.
N
Think
the
the
outcome
is
something
that's
very,
very
positive
for
everybody,
but
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
Salt,
Lake
County
doesn't
back
away
from
what
it's
committed
to.
So
you
know,
based
on
your
comments,
madam
chair,
if
we
could
look
for
a
resolution,
if
staff
can
work
on
a
resolution
that
we
could
adopt
today,
that
has
the
conditions
that
that
will
hold
the
county
accountable
for
the
commitments
that
it
made
and
also
be
contingent
on
on
the
work
with
the
other
taxing
entities.
A
You
and
Erin
I'll
get
to
you
in
just
a
second
Charlie
for
whip
for
that.
I
think
that
we,
you
know
sort
of
hearing
about
some
of
these
concerns
that
that
other
board
members
have
do
have
staff
working
on
an
updated
resolution.
So
just
to
kind
of
put
the
board
members
on
notice
of
how
this
plan
is
going
to
work
today,
at
least,
is
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
continuing
our
discussion.
A
A
And
don't
know
how
quick
it's
going
so
that
just
so
everyone
out
there
knows
and
all
of
us
know
we'll
continue
this
discussion
for
the
allotted
time,
that
we
have
and
then
we'll
just
kind
of
put
a
pin
in
it
for
a
minute.
Well,
on
a
it
goes,
and
then,
when
she
comes
back,
we
will
consider
taking
action
on
whatever
resolution
we
come
up
with
today.
So
with
that
I
know.
E
J
Madam
chair
and
this
that
gets
to
the
Polly
policy
question
number
four
I
just
was
hoping
that
we
could
maybe
work
through
some
of
the
policy
questions,
particularly
because
of
the
policy
question
1b,
which
brings
up
the
the
realities
of
evolving
pro
formas
and
the
ideal
of
the
scale.
It's
not
surprising
that
there's
a
lot
at
play
and
there's
some
shifting
and
moving
parts.
J
J
C
And
I
guess
and
you
can,
if
I
get
off
course
here,
just
steer
me
as
is
appropriate,
answer
this
question.
But
in
the
initial
look
at
the
gap
we
looked
at
the
developers
projected
cost
for
at
the
time
it
was
all
one
project.
Now
it's
been,
as
you
know,
separated
into
two
phases.
The
initial
gap
concerns
that
were
brought
up
to
us,
where
the
parking
costs
initially
were
represented
at
sixty
sixty
six
thousand
dollars
a
space
from
our
market
research.
We
found
a
number
that
was
moderately
to
significantly
lower
than
that.
C
After
meeting
with
the
developer
and
the
RTA
board
and
developers
construction
team,
their
number
was
shaved
down
a
bit
and
we
agreed
the
site
has
some
unique
characteristics
that
allowed
us
to
come
up
from
what
we
thought.
Our
average
parking
space
was,
but
nonetheless
we
still
felt
that
there
was
a
gap
there
based
on
what
other
construction
companies
had
told
us
from
looking
at
the
site,
and
that's
really
for
us
where
the
gap
was
notable
again
it.
C
It
is
a
unique
project
and
that
we
do
not
have
a
lot
of
underground
parking
in
the
Salt
Lake
metro.
So
true,
comparables
are
fairly
limited
for
that
purpose.
We
looked
at
other
markets,
Portland
Phoenix,
Denver,
Las,
Vegas,
quite
a
few
other
markets.
That
was
the
majority
of
the
gap
in
terms
of
where
we
felt
that
the
cost
appropriated
for
parking
were
significantly
higher
than
what
we
thought
the
market
would
would
bear.
J
When
we
go
down
to
policy
question
five,
which
talks
about
the
value
of
some
of
the
public
benefits
from
the
project,
it
doesn't
list
parking,
but
a
lot
of
things
that
take
place
when
parking
happens,
I'm
wondering
about
Benj.
If
you
can
talk
to
me
about
how
the,
if
there's
a
prioritization
of
these
values
in
your
analysis
process
or
let
me-
and
let
me
ask
that
and
one
other
way
to
try
to
be
more
clear.
J
C
I,
don't
know
that
there's
Nestle,
necessarily
a
matrix
that
suggests
that
placemaking
is,
is
greater
or
equal
to
parking,
but
the
way
that
we
look
at
it
is
we
look
at
two
ways
to
figure
out
if
for
essentially
two
ways,
if
there's
a
gap,
we
look
at
all
the
developers
proposed
construction
costs.
We
compare
those
to
the
market.
What
the
market
would
support
for
that
construction.
We
look
at
the
cost
of
land,
assuming
this
is
purely
a
market
play
here.
C
All
of
those
costs
creates
some
sort
of
value,
whether
that's
say,
let's
say
it's
a
million
dollars.
Then
we
look
at
what
the
future
market
value
of
this
project
would
be
when
complete
assuming
completion
of
construction.
Today,
we
don't
look
at
inflated
dollars
and
we
get
to
that
number
by
looking
at
what
are
achievable
market
rents
for
office
for
residential
for
hotel
and
where
some
of
those
elements
come
in
place
is
that
when
all
of
that
income
and
the
expenses
get
you
a
net
income
to
find
your
value
from
that
net
income,
it's
applied.
C
What
is
called
a
capitalization
rate
to
really
understand
the
developers,
first-year
rate
of
return
and
the
lower?
That
rate
is
the
lower
the
risk
associated
with
the
property.
So
it
suggests
that
it's
a
desirable
location,
you,
a
desirable
investment,
it
might
have
great
placemaking
opportunities,
might
have
great
parking
if
you're
looking
at
a
secondary
location
or
a
youth
type.
That
is
less
than
ideal,
or
maybe
it's
a
second-tier
hotel
flag.
C
C
Certainly
some
subjectivity
to
it
on
proposed
developments
and
I
will
admit
that
freely
that
the
all
of
these
amenities
end
up
creating
a
more
desirable
project
situation
where
we
think
the
amenities
have
value,
sometimes
there's
obsolescence,
but
some
of
the
amenities
and-
and
you
don't
see
those
incomparable
other
projects,
so
they
don't
create
value,
and
it's
like
putting
gold
handled
doorknobs
in
a
motel
6
cost
a
lot,
but
nobody
pays
for
it.
I
appreciate.
J
You
unpacking
that
and
I
think
what
it
does
is
reminds
me
that,
as
a
body
we
get
to
to
speaking
to
the
subjectivity
that
is
at
played,
we
are
human
beings
were
an
elected
body.
We
change
over
time
and
the
subjectivity
of
this
body
and
which
values
we
prioritize
and
what
kind
of
public
value
or
assets
we
can
gain
from
investing
in
a
project
changes
over
time,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
better
understand
how
how
much
that
that
shifting
value
or
that
relative
value
is
taken
into
consideration
in
your
financial
analysis.
Thank
you.
H
C
Originally,
the
project
was
proposed
as
as
one
project
and
then
once
it
was
realized
that
it's
part
of
the
central
business
district
and
a
CRA
could
not
cover
the
whole
area.
It
was
split,
so
the
costs
have
not
been
separately
split
out
into
two
a
phase
1
phase
2
phase
2
is
anticipated
to
be
down
the
road
enough.
The
projecting
now
construction
cost
is
a
little
a
little
bit
beyond
subjective.
C
H
My
next
question
comes
to
policy
question
number
2.
Essentially
they
they
dovetail.
If
something
happens,
haven't
forbid
and
phase
2
can't
happen
or
happen
in
the
way
it's
proposed
right
now
there
seems
to
be
a
drop
in
the
public
amenity
issue.
Public
benefit
right.
Does
it
also
mean
if
they
don't
do
an
underground
parking
structure,
for
instance
on
phase
2
now
or
in
the
future?
How
does
the
15
million
work
at
that
point
because
it
seems
like
it's
shared
between
both
phases?
Is
that
accurate.
L
Yeah
the
15
million
was
originally
proposed
was
as
been
said,
when
the
project
was
one
whole
project
as
it
split.
Obviously,
the
question
became
to
what
extent
would
that
15
million
dollars
be
invested
in
the
project
without
speaking
for
the
county
I'm,
not
sure
that
they've
necessarily
determined
that,
but
it's
our
understanding
that
the
developer
is
asking
that
the
15
million
still
be
invested
entirely
in
phase
1,
and
then
that
raises
your
concern,
which
is
what
happens
if
phase
2
doesn't
happen
in
those
stalls
are
never
realized.
L
That
is
kind
of
where
we
left
the
question
with
the
county
in
our
last
discussion.
As
to
what
extent
can
we
approve
a
project
area
and
enter
into
interlocal
agreements
and
who
is
going
to
be
responsible
if
their
phase
2
doesn't
happen
and
there's
an
obligation
to
repay
that
15
million,
and
who
does
that
fall
on
so.
H
I
mean
I'm
hopeful.
This
happens
all
the
way,
don't
get
me
wrong,
but
there
is
a
significant
risk
to
both
to
the
overall
project,
but
if
a
stir
doesn't
happen,
does
that
decrease
the
return
on
investment
at
phase
one
frankly,
and
our
economic
assumptions
are
based
on
phase
two
helping
phase
one
increase
in
value?
Is
that
accurate?
Yes,.
L
H
L
The
purposes
of
the
plan
right
now
we
have
provided
it
as
a
line
item
in
the
budget.
That
obviously,
can
be
a
point
of
conversation
for
the
board
in
terms
of
what
amount
the
board
would
like
to
see
as
part
of
phase
1
contribute
towards
those
infrastructure
improvements.
We
determined
that
we
felt
10%
was
an
adequate
level
of
commitment.
It's
the
same
as
what
we're
committing
towards
affordable
housing.
So
just
like
any
other
benefit,
we
would
expect
to
receive
from
our
project
area.
L
We
anticipate
that
the
use
of
that
1
million
dollars
will
come
out
of
the
study
that
we're
doing
right
now
or
that
we
are
working
to
engage
a
consultant
to
do
for
us,
which
would
identify
those
improvements
that
we
would
like
to
see
either
within
this
development,
in
terms
of
incorporating
and
integrating
the
surrounding
properties
where
the
the
japanese-american
community
priorities
or
if
they
would
anticipate
infrastructure
improvements
on
100
South
adjacent
to
the
project.
So
right
now,
it's
really
just
a
line
item.
L
I
I
H
I
H
B
B
A
Do
want
to
address
one
thing
that
real,
quick
that
Andrew
brought
up,
and
that
is
about
the
concerns
that
we
have
sort
of
about
the
county's
involvement
that
have
been
brought
up
by
other
board
members
and
sort
of
what
legally
we
can
do.
We
are
working
my
understanding
is
there
we're
working
on
a
resolution
that
addresses
some
of
this,
but
then
also
we
do
have
the
inner
local
agreements
there's
an
inner
local
agreement
that
would
have
to
come
back
to
the
City
Council
as
us,
wearing
our
council.
A
L
Yes,
that's
correct:
you
would
actually
execute
three
different
inner
locals
one
between
the
agency
in
the
school
district,
one
between
the
agency
in
the
county
and
then
one
between
the
agency
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
and
that
would
be
with
essentially
the
three
major
taxing
entities
for
their
participation
of
tax
increment.
And
then,
if
we
sought
other
entities
participation,
those
would
be
separate
in
her
locals
as
well
and.
B
B
O
All
still
hit
that
really
quick.
So
when,
when
the
project
was
one
project,
we're
gonna
do
the
whole
thing,
then
we
put
four
of
the
million
dollars
and
said
what
will
contribute
a
million
dollars
towards
the
japanese-american
community
improvements
along
and
it
was
we're
really
trying
to
improve
Japantown
street
and
stuff
along
there.
So
I
think
there
was
a
comment.
Form
I
think
believe
counts
when
Andrew
asked
about
that,
the
intent
is
to
make
sure
it
stays
within
this
working
group.
O
That's
been
created
by
the
RDA,
so
we
can
make
sure
that
that's
what's
good,
that's
what
gets
impacted
Tia
graphically
located
right
to
there.
We
actually
put
forward
several
measures
to
demonstrate
what
types
of
improvements
that
we
would
love
to
see
there.
As
long
and
I
know,
the
response
from
both
churches
was
very
positive.
There's
some
really
cool
stuff.
We
put
forward
and
press
that
images,
some
line,
work
that
we've
talked
about
doing
and
first
South.
O
That
would
wouldn't
prove
the
the
right
away
from
this
to
remove
the
streetlight
and
when
I
say
lying
improvements,
I'm
talking
about
the
right
away,
improvements.
Looking
at
your
paving
patterns
that
would
be
very,
very
different
from
what
cellex-c
has
ever
done
before,
but
we
create
a
specific
area.
This
is
what
I'm
pushing
not
with
current
pushing
heaven.
O
We
gotta
go
through
the
process
for
that,
but
we
have
some
great
ideas
that
are
coming
out
of
that
process
that
we're
excited
about,
but
I
want
to
remember
remind
everybody
that
the
million
dollars
we
offered
was
for
the
was
for
our
participation
in
the
whole
project.
So
that
was
phase
one
phase
two
at
the
time,
as
we
pare
it
back
now
to
a
much
smaller
phase.
O
To
put
a
million
dollars
coming
into
this
right
now
would
be
very,
very
problematic
and
the
quarter
million
that
we're
spending
a
quarter
million
dollars
to
improve
the
parking
lots
and,
and
that
was
included
as
part
of
our
million
dollars.
So
what
we
were,
what
we
were
hoping
to
do
was
to
pare
that
out
and
say
we'll
put
a
quarter
million
to
Phase
one
and
have
another
3/4
million.
O
If
you
know
we
can
talk
about
that,
one
as
we
through
this
one,
because
we
are
committed
to
the
million
dollars,
but
we
do
want
to
see
phase
two
come
through
this
as
well.
We
don't
we
don't
want
to
put
a
million
bucks
into
phase
one
that
have
problems
on
Phase.
Two
getting
you
know
the
economic
arrangement
worked
out
with
the
city
and
the
reimbursement
agreements.
O
Does
that
make
sense,
so
our
full
package
was
for
the
million
dollars
we'd
like
to
see
that
come
through
in
phase
one
and
phase
two,
and
we
were
looking
at
doing
and
the
reason
the
reason
the
improvements
we're
talking
about
the
quarter
million.
The
reason,
that's
improvement,
the
reason
that's
a
significant
amount
of
money
and
the
reason
why
should
be
included
in
the
improvements?
It's
not
just
the
improves
to
the
parking
that
we're.
Not
just
you
know,
donating
provements
that
the
grading
that
occurs
I,
don't
I.
Don't
you
have
a
slide
to
that
by
chance?
A
O
Sorry,
but
the
improvement
to
that
are
are
to
integrate
it
into
the
project.
That's
the
purpose
of
that.
So
it
is.
It
is
actually
one
of
the
improvements
it
makes
it
so
that
when
they
it's
gonna,
be
the
activation
potential
to
bring
along
first
shot
and
bring
it
into
the
project,
make
it
part
of
the
West
quarter
project.
So
that's
an
important
part
to
your
point.
The
guarantees
on
that
on
the
you
know
that
I
want
to
keep
one
point.
O
Also,
there's
there's
there's
ten
plus
million
of
increment
in
Phase,
one
that
gets
create
over
the
twenty
year
period
of
time,
so
the
15
million
this
comes
in
there,
there's
two
thirds
that
will
be
taken
care
of
by
the
tax
increment
I
believe
between
I've
had
lots
of
conversation
with
Benj
I'm,
very
confident
right
in
that
the
same
ballpark
about
creating
about
it.
Almost
a
ten
million
dollar
in
Korea
in
there.
O
The
last
five
importantly
is
a
personal
guarantee
that
we
are
on
the
hook
for
as
the
developers
that
includes
Kevin
garnet
me
and
my
brother
Paul.
So
so
there's
a
personal
guarantee
attached
that.
So
that's
some
data
from
Danny's
comments.
I
know
the
city
should
never
have
any
concern
of
that
cuz
that
last
five
minutes,
personal
guarantee
by
us
there'll
be
a
timeline
to
that
and
out
of
the
Phase
two
everybody
wants
to
know.
I
face
two:
how
faced
he's
gonna
happen?
O
Okay,
the
reason
faced
who's
gonna
happen,
probably
there's
three
critical
items:
I
think
they
need
be.
You
know
we're
me
and
Paul
have
signed
on
for
a
99-year
ground
lease
and
the
way
that
that
ground
lease
works
is
every
building
that
gets
built.
We
have
a
portion
of
that
ground.
Lease
comes
off
of
the
main
ground,
which
we
call
the
master
ground
lease
and
goes
to
the
to
the
level
of
the
project.
So
phase
one
gets
two
projects,
so
there
will
be
there'll,
be
35%
of
the
master
ground.
O
Lease
gets
a
portion,
two
phase,
one
that
still
leaves
65%
of
that
ground.
Lease
that
run
the
hook
for
499
years.
I
will
outlive
that
guarantee.
I
won't
allow
leave
that
guarantee,
hope
I
do,
but
I
will
not
live
that
guarantee
k.
But
it's
a
that's
motivating,
that's
extremely
motivating
to
say
this
has
to
continue
to
move
forward.
O
In
addition
to
that,
the
way
that
that
ground
lease
was
prepared
is
we
can't
just
take
that
last
65%
and
dump
it
into
one
project
and
let's
say
we
just
built
that
Block
C
and
said
well,
the
rest
is
you
know
we
don't
worry,
but
we
don't
care
anymore,
because
our
personal
guarantee
has
gone.
It
is
by
our
covenants
with
our
landlord,
it's
being
apportioned
individually
throughout
all
the
projects,
so
it
he.
The
landlord
wants
the
exact
same
thing.
O
He
doesn't
want
to
see
it
partially
done
block
he
wants
so
the
way
that
our
ground
lease
was
structured
was
to
make
sure
that
he
gets
a
portion
to
individual
blocks.
That
makes
sense
so
that
ensures
it's
also
important
to
note
that
the
public
benefit
of
the
garage
will
be
completed
upon
the
very
first
building
of
the
thick
of
the
second
phase,
because
the
garage
is
contiguous
and
it
supports
all
of
the
improvements
in
the
second
phase.
So
you
have
four
buildings
atop
of
parking
garage
that
will
be
completed.
O
The
very
first
thing
we
talk
about
sequencing
and
construction
and
in
when
you
sequence,
construction,
you're,
going
to
build
the
parking
garage
first
and
start
building
your
buildings.
Next
and
building
C
will
necessitate
building
the
entirety
of
the
garage.
So
there's
your
public
benefit
as
soon
as
we
build
Block
C.
The
whole
garage
is
now
completed.
So
that's
number
one
number
number
three
last
one
sorry
about
this
James
last
one
the
CBD
expires
in
2040.
O
B
I
I,
clarify
I,
think,
there's
confusion
about
which
million
we
were
talking
about.
So
you
were
talking
about
the
million
that
you,
the
Ricci
group
put
in
the
table
and
when
we
were
discussing
your
question
that
a
million
from
the
taxing
tax
increment
that
would
be
set
aside.
So
those
are
two
different
things.
So
the
helps.
H
I
H
O
O
H
L
I
mean
by
nature
increment
roles
and
slowly
at
first
and
then
builds
up
if
there
were
some
infrastructure
improvements
that
were
identified
early
on.
As
part
of
this
study
that
we
wanted
to
look
at
potentially
either
bonding
for
or
working
with,
the
city
to
do
as
part
of
a
bond,
and
that
could
be
something
we
could.
We
could
structure
and
look
at
doing
that
earlier
on
in
the
project
area
life
so
that
it
we're
not
waiting
for
the
increment
to
actually
come
online.
Okay,.
H
J
And
maybe,
with
Ryan
at
the
table,
I'm
wondering
about
in
looking
down
the
road
at
those
phase,
two
of
a
lot
of
the
public
benefit
and
the
the
economic
evaluations
we've
been
hearing
about
the
probable
downturn,
to
whatever
degree,
may
be
starting
at
the
end
of
this
year.
Who
knows
when
long
overdue?
Historically
speaking,
right?
How
are
those
probabilities
of
or
likelihoods
in
the
economy
calculated
in
or
taken
in
consideration
in
your
performance,
I.
O
Mean
they
have
to
be
right,
they
have
to
be
so.
The
benefit
we
have.
What
we're
excited
about
now
is
that
if
there
is
a
downturn
coming,
we
have
our
financing
is
in
place
right
now,
we've
signed
a
we
signed
our
loan
application
last
week
and
our
timing
I
think
it's
also
important
everyone
understand
is
it
is
that
we
are
planning
right
now.
O
We
are
inserting
a
little
bit
of
faith
in
this
process
here
and
believing
this
is
going
to
materialize
too
at
the
same
time,
but
we
have
made
the
loan
app
and
we
have
60
days
to
close
that
loan.
That
would
be
the
middle
of
May,
so
are
we've
we've
put
in
for
a
site
disturbers
permit
with
the
city
on
March
5th,
and
we
are
expecting
through
that
process
to
have
our
permit
for
site
disturbance.
That
disturbance
allows
you
to
start
all
your
grading
process
by
the
end
of
April.
So
so
what
works?
O
Well,
I'm,
sorry,
I'm
answering
a
question
around
about
way.
Phase
one
will
be
built
regardless
of
that
process,
and
so,
if
there
is
a
downturn,
of
course,
we
have
to
anticipate
and
contemplate
that.
But
what
does
help
us
is
the
fact
we're
also
an
opportunity
zone.
That's
that
something
is
a
I
can't
underestimate
or
overestimate
how
important
that
is
going
to
be
for
us,
but
we
will
always
calculate
if
the
market
is
that
if
lenders
aren't
lending,
it's
pretty
impossible
to
build
a
building.
O
J
C
C
A
A
Mr.
Richie
and
I
have
had
a
lot
of
conversations
over
the
last
year
regarding
this
project
and
it
has
evolved
a
lot
and
I
told
you
this
the
other
day,
but
I
want
to
say
it
again
publicly
that
I
really
appreciate
the
way
that
you
have
really
listened
to.
My
concerns
two
concerns
I've
heard
from
other
board
members
and
worked
through
those
concerns
and
really
have
tried
to
address
them,
and
that's
not
just
with
our
Japanese
American
community,
but
with
other
thing
of
areas
within
your
project.
A
You
know
we
talked
about
the
fact
that
you're
creating
an
awesome
luxury,
full-service
hotel
and
some
boutique
hotels,
I'm
fortunate
enough
to
get
to
travel
all
over
the
country
and
it's
always
fun
to
see
new
and
exciting
hotels
that
we
get
to
stay
in
and
I
think
that
you're
doing
some
of
of
those
things
and
creating
more
walkability
with
the
mid-block
walkway,
and
you
know
how
much
I
love
rooftops
and
especially,
if
there's
a
bar
attached
to
it.
So
you've
you've
really
taken
this
process
and
learned
from
it.
I
think
we've.
O
A
Of
learned,
the
RDA
together
and
I
appreciate
all
of
the
work
that
you've
done
to
address
our
concerns
and
to
understand
our
process
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
thank
you
for
working
with
our
Japanese
American
community.
But
thank
you
to
the
RTA
staff
who
said
hey.
We
better
do
something
to
to
make
the
board
happier
about.
J
A
This
process
is
going
to
go
and
I
know
Corrine
you
and
Jill.
You
guys
have
put
in
so
much
hard
work
and
so
much
time
in
a
creative
new
process
that
had
never
been
done
before
to
really
start
to
address
our
community
as
a
whole.
So
I
want
to
I
want
to
thank
everybody
in
the
room
that
continues
to
come
and
share
their
comments
with
us,
the
hard
work
of
our
RDA
staff
and
and
your
people
for
really
wanting
to
create
something
good,
that's
beneficial
for
our
entire
community.
E
A
L
I
will
get
started
and
I
anticipate
Ben
is
coming
while
Ben
is
setting
up
and
come
to
the
table.
I'd
like
to
again
just
start
by
thanking
staff,
especially
the
work
of
calories,
our
account
in
the
RDA,
as
well
as
Mike
burns,
our
RDA
financial,
now
Allen
list,
as
well
as
the
rest
of
Budget
and
Finance
staff.
They
have
done
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
to
get
us
to
a
point
where
we
could
present
this
information
to
you.
There's
there's
been
a
lot
of
understanding
of
numbers.
L
There's
been
a
lot
of
history
behind
these
numbers
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
just
trying
to
get
those
amounts
finalized
so
that
we
feel
that
we
can
speak
to
them
today
and
then
also
our
TA
staff
as
well.
We
did
a
lot
of
work
in
terms
of
determining
what
we
thought
were
the
needs
for
our
projects,
as
well
as
our
project
areas
and
coming
together
in
terms
of
Ana
identifying
how
we
thought
was
the
best
use
of
these
funds.
So
we.
L
We
are
happy
to
present
this
in
any
way
that
the
board
wishes
we
we've
submitted.
Our
information
council
staff
has
provided
a
list
of
questions
that
we
assumed
they,
you
have
the
answers
to
that
we
submitted,
and
so
we,
through
the
budget
per
fund
and
per
line
item,
or
if
you
like,
we
can
just
kind
of
jump
right
into
what
those
questions
are
and
identify
the
issues
and
the
projects
as
we
go
along.
A
B
A
L
Andrew
so
appreciate
that
we're
happy
to
go
through
and
in
any
level
of
detail,
I
just
wanted
to
provide
a
little
bit
background
that
the
amount
of
this
budget
amendment
is
is
fairly
significant
and,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
when
you
take
into
account
what
the
sources
are
of
the
funds.
It's
a
combination
of
seven
million
dollars
that
was
still
remaining
from
the
original
allocation
for
the
homeless
resource
centers,
as
well
as
a
significant
amount
of
money
within
the
RDA
fund
balance
and
that
fund
balance.
L
While
it
also
reflects
just
the
general
collection
of
funds
over
time
in
terms
of
unspent
project
area
allocations
or
cost
savings,
it
also
was
comprised
of
a
significant
amount
of
money
that
was
initially
allocated
towards
projects
and
was
never
really
formally
appropriated
to
those
projects.
And
so
the
reason
this
is
important
is
because
it
fed
into
what
we
are
proposing
for
the
uses
of
the
37
million
dollars
that
it
it
was
a
breakdown
of
priorities
for
us.
As
we
looked
at
what
we
really
wanted
to
accomplish.
L
With
these
funds,
and,
first
and
foremost,
the
priority
was
for
obligations
of
the
agency,
and
that
is
everything
from
contracts,
reimbursement
payments
as
well
as
obligations
that
we
have
as
a
property
owner
to
our
own
assets
and
then
also
project
requirements
that
either
by
design
or
default.
We
are
obligated
to
meet
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had
those
funds
for
them.
L
Our
third
priority
was
continuation
in
support
of
our
programs,
primarily
the
revolving
loan
fund.
Significant
amount
of
the
fund
balance
was
just
either
payoffs
of
loans
or
amounts
that
that
were
sitting
in
our
revolving
loan
fund
that
we
obviously
just
want
to
make
sure
they're
available
to
go
back
out
and
lend
the
other
was
our
NOFA
doing
another
allocation
of
housing
through
the
NOFA
program.
L
So
that
was
kind
of
how
we
broke
down
our
priorities
and
how
we
would
use
the
funds
and
how
we
would
allocate
them,
and
we
feel
that
we
came
up
with
a
pretty
good
equitable
balance
of
projects
that
spreads
the
money
throughout
the
project.
Areas
tries
to
identify
the
goals,
take
into
consideration
some
of
the
board
priorities
that
we
have
heard
and
in
sprinkle
and
a
few
new
projects
that
that
we
want
to
accomplish
as
we
move
forward,
and
so
that's
essentially
where
we're
at.
L
As
I
said,
we
we
have
provided
answers
to
council
staffs
questions,
we're
happy
to
go
through
those
in
more
detail
to
the
extent
that
the
board
wishes
we.
We
are
happy
to
go
through
our
staff
memo
and
talk
about
each
project
and
present
them
line
item
by
line
item
and
also
give
a
description
of
how
how
those
sources
came
into
play.
It's
really
just
a
matter
of
how
you
would
like
us
to
proceed
into
what
level
of
detail
the
board
would
like.
Okay,.
A
So
one
thing
I
do
want
to
I
want
to
start
out
with.
Is
that
to
clarify
or
to
just
kind
of
hit
a
little
bit
further
on
the
nail
on
the
head?
Is
you
did
this
with
the
idea
that
many
of
these
projects
were
projects
that
had
already
been
sort
of
in
the
pipeline
somewhere,
but
didn't
maybe
have
the
funding?
Is
that
correct,
yeah.
L
Your
your
biggest
line
items
between
Station,
Center
and
900
south
or
projects
that
have
been
in
the
pipeline
for
a
long
time
and
and
obviously
now,
as
we
make
the
determination
of
how
to
proceed
in
those
projects
its
contingent
on
getting
that
funding
before
we
really
take
any
further
steps.
Okay,.
A
So
it's
certainly
something
that
the
board
passed
boards
had
talked
about
and
said.
This
is
important
to
us
and
now
you've
kind
of
said.
Well,
we
have
this
money,
let's
put
this
to
where
past
boards-
or
this
particular
board
has
said.
This
is
important
to
us,
correct.
Okay,
with
that
you
take
it
away
board
members.
L
Yes,
that's
a
great
question:
we,
as
staff
have
not
identified
any
bond
eligible
projects.
Obviously
I
will
admit
that
part
of
that
is
simply
that
until
we
actually
have
the
inner
locals
and
a
project
area
established
by
that
and
know
what
the
participation
is
of
the
entities
it's
hard
to
identify
and
determine
to
what
extent
we
could
actually
go
out
and
bond.
L
Have
a
status
update
I
can
give
that
an
hour.
We
can
discuss
that
later
in
our
project
area
creation.
So
if
that's
alright
and
then
the
other
is
simply
just-
we
have
not
sat
down
and
really
prioritized
kind
of
taking
that
project
area
plan
and
laying
it
out
in
terms
of
what
we
would
like
to
see
that
happen
as
part
of
action,
steps
and
projects
and
prioritize
those.
L
J
A
I
have
a
quote:
I
have
two
questions
regarding
streets:
one
is
in
the
greenery
district
for
400,
West,
oh
and
or
500
west,
and
how
we
think
and
if
we've
contemplated
this,
how
our
new,
the
86
million
dollar,
Street,
bond
and
or
sales
tax
revenue
would
affect
any
sort
of
would
affect
this
one
point:
seven
to
five
million
dollars
over
to
the
400
West
500
West.
That's.
L
A
good
question,
because
that
is
one
that
is
partly
the
reason
why
we
have
not
identified
a
specific
project
for
those
funds
as
much
as
trying
to
understand
exactly
what
I
think
Ben
did
a
great
job
of
providing
in
his
staff
report,
which
is
really
taking
a
look
at
what
the
available
funds
are.
What
are
some
other
available
sources
of
funds,
they're
from
bonding
or
private
investment
and
where
we
essentially
could
get
the
biggest
bang
for
our
buck.
L
L
Industry
have
come
in
and
reached
out
about
trying
to
do
infrastructure
improvements
surrounding
their
project
and
so
really
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
look
at
what
all
the
options
are
and
the
priorities
and
what
the
timeline
is
for
either
bond
eligible
projects
through
the
city
and
or
if
there's
a
way.
We
could
leverage
these
funds
with
the
private
investment
and
see
what
makes
the
most
sense
so.
K
A
K
So
this
is
from
the
citywide
pavement
conditions
survey
done
in
2017.
This
is
the
fleet
block
in
the
lower
right
hand
corner,
so
this
is
400
west
and
then
a
block
to
the
west
of
that
is
500
west
and,
as
you
can
see,
on
500
west.
This
two
block
stretch
is
rated
as
serious
condition,
which
is
just
above
failing
so
one
of
the
lowest
rated
streets
in
the
city,
the
block
below
that
is
in
very
poor
condition
and
over
on
400
west.
K
A
So
now,
thank
you
for
that.
Back
to
my
hypothetical,
if
streets
were
to
come
to
us
and
say
you
know
the
this
is
the
next
street
on
our
list
that
we're
going
at
500
West
is
the
next
Street
on
our
list
that
we're
going
to
fix
and
we've
sort
of
earmarked.
This
1.7
I
mean
we
can
capitalize
on
using
both
of
those
and
maybe
fix
all
of
them,
both
400
and
500
right.
L
The
way
it
is,
if
you
approved
it
today,
it
would
basically
just
sit
in
a
holding
account
and
we,
as
staff,
would
come
back
with
those
options
and
we
would
reach
out
both
the
streets
see
what
their
timeline
is.
Availability.
We
would
come
back
with
the
information
from
the
developers
and
what
their
project
is,
and
we
would
identify
other
potential
uses
in
that
area
as
well.
Okay,.
B
About
that,
if
you're
looking
at
doing
that,
remind
me
since
we're
not
really
looking
at
transit,
you
know
streetcar
or
anything
like
that.
Are
these
roads
that
we're
looking
at
going
to
be
engineered
for
it
for
the
heavier
set
trucks
or
if
we
want
to
look
at
light
rail
in
the
future
or
streetcar,
is
that's
something
that
we're
looking
for?
That's.
L
A
good
question
I,
don't
know
the
answer
to
to
what
level
we'd
want
to
build
the
streets.
In
terms
of
you
know,
loading
capacity
I
do
know
that
in
our
conversations
with
transportation
and
one
one
of
our
items
later
in
terms
of
potential
project
areas,
that
granary
is
back
on
the
radar
in
terms
of
potential
streetcar
or
light
rail
extension
or
some
kind
of
transit
needs,
and
so
I
think
that
needs
to
be
part
of
the
conversation
as
well
that
we're
not
going
out
and
improving
a
street
that
we
plan
on
later.
J
K
A
point
of
clarification:
the
bond
is
first
Street
reconstructions,
which
of
course,
both
these
streets
are
in
need
of
the
sales
tax
increase
was
for
Street
maintenance,
but
that
was
only
for
the
first
year.
So
the
question
during
this
upcoming
budget
for
the
council
and
based
on
the
mayor's
recommendation
is:
do
you
want
to
continue
that
division?
Or
do
you
want
to
change
the
increased
sales
tax
to
be
for
Street
maintenance
and
other
uses?
So
just
putting
that
in
your
minds
on
your
radar
thanks.
H
H
When
you
do
are
you
gonna
have
discussion
about
the
development
patterns
around
both
of
those
streets,
I'm
familiar
with
them
and
fifth
dead
ends,
essentially
at
6:00
al
4th
goes
all
the
way
through
there's.
A
big
section
of
4th
has
been
cleared
out
in
the
last
year
right
by
six
out
right,
and
the
question
is
what
developments
are
planned
to
come
in
there,
because
this
we
don't
see
a
lot
yet
and
that
may
help
determine
this
yeah
I.
A
N
A
very
quick,
madam
chair,
so
with
the
with
the
money
that
you've
found,
you
haven't
identified
here,
four
different
things
that
we
can
allocate
it
for
one
of
the
things
that
that
I,
don't
see.
I
know
it's
mentioned
as
something
that
we'd
have
to.
You
know
have
a
discussion
about,
but
that's
the
ongoing
maintenance
and
in
how
we
pay
for
ongoing
maintenance.
N
L
Did
not
to
be
honest
as
part
of
the
900
South
discussion
right
after
this
we've
talked
about
the
ongoing
maintenance,
either
being
a
function
of
city's
general
fund,
an
essay
a
or
parking
revenue
where
that
project
area
is
expiring.
We
did
not
necessarily
identify
an
ongoing
commitment
by
the
agency.
The
other
project
within
this
that
would
have
an
ongoing
maintenance
question
would
be
Station
Center
as
part
of
our
overall
maintenance
discussion
that
we
had
a
couple
months
with
the
board
one
of
the
ideas
for
that
was
proposing
to
do
an
essay,
a
that.
L
We,
as
the
agency
put
on
the
properties
now
prior
to
selling,
and
so
the
new
owners
would
be
conditioned
upon
that
and
then
the
other
outstanding
item
for
ongoing
maintenance
is
Regent
Street,
which
we
are
currently
funding
through
the
RDA
until
we
do
find
a
long-term
solution
that
is
appropriate.
So
none
of
the
other
projects
proposed
within
this.
We
anticipate
an
ongoing
maintenance
question,
but
if
we
do,
we
anticipate
solving
that
as
part
of
any
future
allocation
of
the
board.
So.
L
At
this
time,
because
I
think
the
only
one
that
has
potential
of
hitting
the
general
fund
in
the
short
term
would
be
900,
south
and
I
think
that
would
just
be
a
question
as
we
presented.
To
what
extent
would
the
City
Council
want
to
put
forth
a
funding
mechanism
for
that
and
not
have
that?
Be
the
RDA
station
Center
I
think
we
find
a
solution
that
removes
it
from
general
fund
and
limited
and
Regent
Street.
We
hope
to
have
a
proposal
that
doesn't
impact
the
general
fund
significantly.
Okay,
all.
N
Right,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
to
that.
To
that
point,
I
anytime,
we
have
are
gonna,
have
discussions
about
potentially
using
general
fund
money
to
fund
RDA
commitments.
I'm
gonna
have
some
heartburn,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
our
DEA
benefits
and
those
benefits
should
have
been
included
in
the
planning
in
the
long-term
planning.
For
for
this
and
I
know
that
there's
been
a
change
in
administration
in
the
RDA,
so
I'm
not
faulting.
N
It's
shorting,
the
rest
of
the
city,
who
have
not
been
seeing
some
of
the
the
benefits
of
tax,
increment
redistribution
and
and
the
RDA
tools,
and
so
what
I
would?
What
I
would
like
to
see
is
us
use
any
of
the
available
money
to
shore
up
those
commitments
that
we
have
made
as
an
RDA
on
for
in
an
ongoing
basis,
so
that
we
don't
end
up
having
to
poach
from
the
general
fund
to
subsidize
a
cherry
on
top
of
the
sundae
project
and
in
some
of
these
other
areas,
I.
A
Appreciate
that
I
have
some
I
think
that's
a
you
know.
Last
month
we
had
the
idea
of
putting
the
maintenance,
the
ongoing
maintenance
policy
on
the
agenda.
We
took
it
off
because
there
were
some
issue
we
wanted
to
talk
about,
900,
south
and
and
9
central
and
I
think
that
you
bring
up
a
really
good
point
Charlie,
but
at
the
same
time,
at
some
point
the
that
asset
then
becomes
a
city
asset
and
is
no
longer
an
RDA
asset
and,
and
so
I.
Think
part
of
the
question
is
at
what
point
does
the
city
say?
A
J
A
Think,
there's
a
balance
for
sure
and
I
think
it's
a
discussion
that
we
should
continue
to
have
of
does.
Does
the
RDA
pay
for
the
maintenance?
Well,
this
is
an
RDA
area
and
then
at
some
point
does
that
wean
off
and
become
a
City
benefit.
We're
in
the
general
fund
of
the
city
would
be
responsible
for
it
right,
I
mean
I,
think
I,
think
you're,
right
and
I
think
we
can
certainly
put
it
on
a
future
agenda
item
because
it's
it's
a
policy
discussion
that
both
the
board
and
they
think
the
council
need
to
be.
A
N
And
I,
but
I
think
that
that
would
that
would
also
I
mean
if
that's,
if
that's
the
you
know,
discussion
philosophy,
moving
forward,
I
think
that
that
would
have
to
also
inform
whatever
decision
we
make,
because
if
we
are
going
to
go
above
and
beyond
and
do
something
that
is
going
to
be
much
more
maintenance
intensive
in
these
areas,
with
the
assumption
that
the
general
fund
is
going
to
have
to
pay
for
it,
you
know
that
would
that
would
certainly
inform
my
decision.
I
would
be
less.
N
I
would
be
much
less
inclined
to
do
something
that
would
be
you
know,
above
and
beyond
what
we
normally
do
if
the
intent
is
to
have
the
general
fund
subsidize
it
in
the
future.
Now
I
do
think,
though,
that
there
are
other
projects
that
you
know,
for
example
the
street
reconstruction.
That
is
something
that
you
know.
That's
totally
different.
Well,
if
we
want
to
look
at
that
and
using
that,
as
you
know,
based
on
on
the
bond
that
we
just
passed
because
those
are
you
know,
regular
city
streets,
I
would
be
much
more.
N
A
Agree
and
I
think
as
Danny
mentioned,
though,
through
these
new
a
lot
of
what
we
are
seeing,
and
you
know
this
has
happened
well
before
any
of
us
were
sitting
here
and
now
we're
committed
to
picking
up
the
pieces
and
trying
to
to
get
to
follow
through
with
premises.
We
didn't
make.
But
I
think
as
we
move
forward.
N
A
J
J
We
did
this
on
purpose
and
we
put
our
tax
increment
investments
toward
supporting
local
business
as
this
particular
central
ninth
area,
and
it
is
not
apples
to
apples
for
us
to
say
you
know
the
downtown
business
district
pays
for
their
extras,
and
so
now
that
we've
created
this
to
cultivate
local
businesses
and
small
business
types,
we
are
gonna
shift
the
same
formula
onto
you,
I'm
not
saying
that
we're
doing,
but
I
think
we
need
to
be
cognizant
that
we
built
local
business
in
here.
I'm
perfect
on
purpose,
and
we
should
be
considerate
of
that.
B
B
L
B
Was
just
gonna
hi
like
that?
You
know
we
do.
We
do
go
through
these
and
we
we
go
through
and
if
you
look
at
North
temple
and
300
West,
we
do
promise
you
no
extra
amenities
and
I
just
feel
like
it's
put
so
much
pressure
on
the
general
fund
to
do
it
and
I
Lisa
Schaeffer
bless
her
heart.
She
has
done
an
amazing
job
with
stretching
those
dollars.
I
saw
the
third
hundred
West
three
hundred
West
Street
scapes
getting
done
last
week.
B
So
fantastic,
but
you
know,
North
temple
needs
work,
and
so
you
know
it
was
when
we
move
these
deals
forward.
We
have
got
to
really
talk
to
not
the
business
owners
but
the
property
owners,
because
there
are
the
individuals
that
are
benefiting
from
these
improvements
as
their
property
values
go
up.
So
you
know
central
ninth
for
me.
You
know
that
I
pushed
back
on
these
underground
because
I
don't
think
that
there
were
other
options
put
in
for
and
informed
us
of
it
where
they
were
just
told
yeah.
This
is
what
you're
gonna
happen.
B
Have
it
happen
and
that's
not
the
truth,
because
there
were
other
options
out
there
that
we
can
see.
So
as
we
move
forward,
we
need
to
have
these
policy
discussions
before
we
start.
You
know
integrating
new
project
areas,
because
if
we're
gonna
look
at
the
betterments
for
the
city,
I
see
where
Charlie's
coming
from
where
we
should
not
continue
to
put
that
stress
on
the
general
fund,
unless
it's
apologies
policy
discussion
and
then
we
fund
it
through
the
general
funds.
So
that
leads
to
say
Schaffer
can't
have
those
things
taken.
Care
of
and.
J
K
J
A
If
there
are
questions
beyond
West
temple
gateway,
because
that
West
temple
Gateway
discussion,
I
think
will
really
kind
of
be
more
on
our
900
and
our
next
agenda
item.
Are
there
any
other
questions
on
the
budget
besides
that
sort
of
West
temple
gateway,
because
we
will
be
getting
into
that
in
a
little
bit
more
depth
in
the
few
minutes
we
have.
Madam.
A
H
H
I'm
still
a
little
confused
about
the
actual
funding.
That's
set
aside
for
that
versus
which
being
used
on
3rd
north
for
the
pedestrian
bridge,
I
think
the
the
funds
were
Co
sorta
mingled
in
that
Tiger
grant
and
split
out
so
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
written
sort
of
diagram.
What's
in
the
Folsom
trail
itself
budget,
where
it's
coming
from,
so
we
can
discuss
a
future
right.
We.
K
Can
followup
with
a
clear
delineation
of
what
the
existing
funding
is,
what
the
sources
are
and
what
potential
funding
gaps
might
be.
We
also
learned
that
the
Tiger
grants,
since
it
was
less
than
the
amount
UTA
originally
requested,
that
there
have
been
scope,
reductions
and
some
project
removals
and
so
we'll
follow
up
with
UTA
since
they're
the
lead
agency
to
get
the
latest
update
so
on
both
projects.
H
A
G
G
I'll
say
it's
been
a
while,
since
we've
talked
about
the
big
picture.
How
about
that?
And
so
what
I
wanted
to
do
is
start
today,
just
with
a
couple
of
slides
and
kind
of
pull
back
and
look
at
the
forest
instead
of
the
trees
and
talk
about.
Why
we're
doing
this?
What
it's
all
about,
so
that
when
we
dig
into
some
of
the
particulars
which
we've
already
started
doing,
we
all
have
that
shared
point
of
reference,
and
so.
G
The
project
is
really
just
based
in
this
notion
that
great
cities
are
made
of
great
neighborhoods
and
I
think
as
an
extension
of
that
great
neighborhoods
have
a
heart
or
a
center,
and
the
street
plays
an
important
role
of
as
the
public
space,
and
so
we
have
examples
of
those
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and,
and
there
are
many
of
them,
but
you
know
we
frequently
talk
about.
Ninth
and
ninth,
we
frequently
talk
about
15th
and
15,
but
there
are
others
and
the
redevelopment
strategy
in
central
Minds
has
been
to
create
a
neighborhood
center.
G
It's
got
all
the
ingredients,
it's
got
a
light
rail
station.
It's
got
a
freeway
access,
it's
got
a
proximity
to
downtown,
it's
got
a
collection
of
small
old
neighborhood
homes
and
it's
got
a
growing
local
business
community
and
our
strategy
over
the
years
has
been
to
utilize
our
DEA
resources
to
bring
in
these
small
local
businesses
that
can
be
an
engine
for
redevelopment,
the
commercial
component
or
the
neighborhood
services
component
of
development
is
the
more
risky
side,
and
so
we
knew
if
we
could
take
care
of
those
things
with
our
DEA
efforts.
G
The
residential
stuff
would
largely
take
care
of
itself
and
I
think
that
largely
that
is
bearing
fruit
in
central
9th.
This
is
the
existing
Street.
This
is
900
south.
Looking
east,
you
can
see
the
Alinea
project
there
on
the
left,
which
is
now
completed,
so
this
photographs
a
little
bit
old.
You
can
see
the
Train
over
there
going
through
on
the
right,
a
standard,
132
foot
ride,
away.
G
Five
foot
wide
sidewalk
sidewalks
two
lanes
in
each
direction,
a
turning
pocket
kind
of
a
neighborhood
that
you
would
drive
through
or
pass
by,
and
the
neighborhood
vision
is
really
one
that
you
would
a
neighborhood
where
you
would
sit
and
stay
a
while.
It's
much
more
leafy
it's
much
more
pedestrian
friendly,
it's
the
kind
of
place
where
small,
local
business
would
thrive.
This
vision
by
the
way
is
not
my
vision.
This
isn't
the
RDAs.
In
2011
the
RDA
adopted
a
strategy
for
redevelopment
of
the
West
Temple
Gateway
project
area.
G
It
identified
a
lack
of
amenities
and
the
need
for
them
in
order
for
the
area
to
redevelop,
and
so
we
went
out
to
the
neighborhood
property
owners
and
the
residents
and
the
businesses
and
said:
what
do
you
want?
Is
it
a?
Is
it
a
park?
Is
it
a
community
garden?
Is
it
street
improvements
and
street
improvements
was
the
thing
that
they
wanted
most,
and
so
we
held
a
neighborhood
workshop
to
envision
those,
and
what
came
out
were
these
five
goals?
G
Those
goals
translate
into
these
items,
which
are
kind
of
the
physical
changes,
we're
proposing
widening
the
sidewalks
planning
as
many
trees
as
we
can
reconfiguring
the
street,
as
well
as
the
on
street
parking,
so
that
it's
safer,
calmer
and
more
efficient,
incorporating
the
nine
line
trail.
This
is
part
of
that
eight
mile
corridor
transact
across
the
valley.
One
of
the
things
that's
interesting,
I
think
about
central
ninth.
Is
it's
really
kind
of
this
connection
point
between
East
Side
and
West
Side
and
improving
the
crosswalks
a.
G
Companion
project
for
the
street
is
the
burial
of
the
underground
power
lines
and
that
is
in
the
scope
shown
here.
It's
a
two
block
stretch
of
900
South
from
West
Temple
to
300
West
and
then
a
about
a
block
and
a
half
or
two
blocks
north
and
south
from
eight
south.
To
about
tenth
so
the
what
we
found
is
we
were
working
with
developers
in
the
neighborhood.
Is
we
kept
hearing
about
this
30
foot
height
limit?
G
How
we
can
only
go
to
30
feet
court
and
then
we
got
to
provide
aerial
access
because
of
the
fire
department
rules.
And
what
do
we
do
and
if
the
parcel
is
not
big
enough
to
build
a
26
foot
wide
fire
lane
to
accommodate
the
fire
department,
you
have
to
underground
the
overhead
utilities,
and
so
we
identified
that
as
a
barrier
to
redevelopment
and
there's
a
secondary
benefit,
which
is
removing
the
poles
just
provides
greater
flexibility
when
we're
laying
out
the
street
improvements,
so
that
kind
of
became
part
and
parcel
through
the
overall
project.
G
That's
the
madam
chair.
That's
sort
of
the
big
picture
why
we're
doing
it
and
what
it
is
there
are.
The
board
has
supported
these
projects
with
previous
appropriations
of
3.6
million
for
the
streetscape
2.29
for
the
power
lines
and
there's
some
funny
contingencies
placed
on
those
and
I
can
give
you
a
quick
summary
of
those
things.
We
can
just
go
straight
to
questions
if
that's
helpful,.
A
G
G
There's
a
working
group
comprised
of
the
transportation
division,
engineering,
division,
public
utilities
and
they
have
a
host
of
projects
planned
for
900
south
and
they
asked
us
they
said.
Would
you
incorporate
the
streetscape
project
and
the
utility
undergrounding
in
with
these
broader
projects,
the
goal
being?
If
we
plan
all
these
things
together
and
we
implement
them
in
a
coordinated
fashion?
We're
gonna
get
more
bang
for
our
buck
and
we're
gonna
have
less
impact
on
the
neighborhoods.
So
we
like
that
approach,
I,
think
it's
going
to
be
a
better
project
for
the
city.
A
G
G
A
G
K
Just
want
to
say
for
your
reference
we
did
receive
as
part
of
the
transmittal
and
it's
up
on
the
big
screen,
the
ten
projects
that
could
be
consolidated
from
three
different
departments.
So
this
is
a
nice
summary
and
you'll
note
that
some
of
them
are
not
fully
funded
and
some
of
them
have
TBD.
So
one
of
the
questions
in
the
staff
report
is
identifying
what
those
funding
gaps
might
be,
but
this
I
think
is
a
nice
summary
of
the
the
scope
of
how
large
of
a
consolidation
this
could
potentially
be
Wow.
A
Let's
hold
there
sure:
are
there
specific
questions
about
this,
because
I
think
Ben's
right
and
that
this
does
give
kind
of
a
nice
summary,
and
maybe
it
might
be
more
beneficial
to
go
to
specific
questions,
knowing
that
this
is
kind
of
what
the
idea
looks
like
and
then
we'll
get
unless,
unless
very
you
can
address
the
timing
piece
first
like
when
we're
prepared
to
start
on
consolidating
these
projects.
I'm.
P
Yeah,
so
we,
as
has
been
mentioned,
we've
been
having
a
lot
of
internal
meetings.
I
think
the
team
has
done
a
great
job
of
including
all
of
the
players
in
this,
because
this
you
can
see
that
this
is
complex
and
there
is
a
lot
of
potential
here,
but
there
are
also
a
lot
of
moving
parts
that
we
have
to
think
about.
P
P
We
will
do
our
portion
in
conjunction
with
yours,
if
that's
what
makes
best
sense
for
the
city
and
if
that's
the
direction
that
we
want
to
go
so
there's
there's
a
great
partnership
in
place
here
and
there's
a
lot
of
desire
to
make
this
work.
What
I
will
say
is
we
are
committed
to
moving
forward
with
a
consolidated
program
and
we
are
committed
to
trying
to
meet
the
timeline
that
has
already
been
put
in
place
for
the
central
ninth
piece.
P
What
I
can't
say
is
between
today
and
when
we
get
through
design
if
there
isn't
something
that
comes
up
in
that
process,
that
might
delay
that.
So,
from
my
perspective,
what
we
need
to
understand
is
is
the
consolidation
and
the
potential
benefits
that
we
get
from
that
consolidation
worth
the
chance
that
we
might
have
to
delay
the
central
9th
piece
by
a
year
or
is
there
no
circumstance
under
which
that
would
be
palatable?
P
Because,
while
we
can
commit
today
to
say,
given
the
circumstances
we
understand
right
now,
we
believe
that
we
can
put
that
piece
in
with
the
timeline
that
exists.
What
I
don't
know
is
what
we
will
uncover
between
now
and
then,
and
so
for
me,
that's
what
I
see
is
kind
of
the
critical
question
to
answer
Jen.
A
H
Think
it
makes
sense
with
the
consolidation
concept
I
get
it
I
think
it
makes
sense
in
various
levels.
For
me,
my
bigger
question
is:
do
we
have
a
policy
or
a
matrix
in
which
to
view
the
city
I'm
an
evaluate
when
undergrounding
at
power
lines
makes
more
sense
than
others,
because
it
seems
to
me
this
is
a
hot
neighborhood
I
get
it
it's
wonderful,
I
love
the
sense
of
undergrounding
lines
everywhere
we
can
but
there's
clearly
a
cost
involved.
H
L
In
my
desk,
if
we
have
it
no
to
answer
your
question
you're
exactly
right
that
this
has
come
up
in
other
projects,
both
RTA
and
citywide.
I
mean
this
is
the
crux
of
the
grand
boulevards
question
in
terms
of
what
we
do
on
600
500
South.
This
is
an
issue
for
RTA
property,
both
in
the
station
center
and
and
on
100
South.
L
In
terms
of
to
what
extent
is
the
development
potential
of
a
property
limited
by
the
existence
of
those
power
lines,
and
and
how
do
you
determine
which
projects
warrant
under
grounding
it,
which
ones
don't
I?
Think
here
it's
it's
important
in
neighborhoods
like
this,
because
you
do
have
the
smaller
parcels.
You
don't
necessarily
have
the
consolidation
of
larger
parcels
that
can
provide
that
secondary
access
for
aerial
assistance
and
firefighting
and
I
will
tell
you
long-term.
L
Just
in
terms
of
what
we've
seen
with
RTA
I
think
it
is
very
much
something
that
the
city
does
need
to
look
at
and
prioritize
and
start
identifying
those
opportunities
to
work
with
Rocky
Mountain
Power
to
align
either
the
extension
or
burial
or
placement
of
power
lines
as
it
relates
to
future
land.
Use
plans
and
growth
of
the
city
that
that
is
something
we
are
not
really
actively
looking
at
right
now
from.
H
From
a
larger
a
larger
perspective,
what
I'm
concerned
about
long
term
is:
we've
got
some
great
areas
that
have
really
flourished
in
the
last
40
years.
Our
DA
areas
right
some
of
the
areas
we've
done
are
now
the
most
desirable
in
the
city
and
the
highest
property
values,
and
therefore
they
are
very
desirable
on
multiple
levels.
They're
also
the
places
where
you
get
these
amenities,
when
I
think
about
say
a
13
South
Corridor,
which
has
probably
as
much
if
not
more
pedestrian
traffic,
but
does
not
have
the
pull
of
an
area
like
this.
H
L
I
think
it'd
be
a
great
policy
to
have,
because
then
you
could
align
both
future
project
areas
in
the
city.
You
could
take
a
look
at
what
the
economic
impact
is
for
areas
as
it
relates
to
potential
for
land
development,
as
well
as
what
the
appetite
is
for
some
of
the
property
owners
to
maybe
participate
in
the
cost
for
undergrounding
and.
H
That's
my
concern
so
and
I
get
some
of
the
things
I'm
thinking
about.
Can
you
is
it
a
track
station
right?
That's
gonna
spur
a
lot
of
residential
development,
especially
high
to
residents
development
up
I,
get
that
piece.
I
get
the
small
lot
pieces,
and
so
there's
factors
that
I
think
are
totally
legitimate
factors
in
this
case,
but
we're
not
willing
to
do
it
elsewhere,
I'm
hesitant
to
sort
of
do
it
here.
B
Madam
chair
I
think
this
is
why
we
delayed
the
underground
is
because
this
plan
needed
to
come
forward.
I
love
this
idea,
I
think
it
connects
even
further
the
west
of
the
East.
It
just
makes
a
lot
more
sense.
You
know
we're
talking
about.
You
know
looking
at
streets
where
the
engineering
is
heavy
set
for
streetcar
or
rail
or
whatever,
looking
and
I.
Just
think
this
gives
us
every
opportunity
to
invest
with
a
policy
discussion.
You
know
for
future
areas
as
well
for
this,
so
I
I
really
love.
A
A
You
know
we
that
9
central
has
is
lucky
to
have
the
the
activist
community
that
they
have,
that
can
be
vocal
about
it.
But
I
don't
know
that
every
everywhere
would
have
and
wouldn't
be
getting
the
amenities,
because
they
don't
have
that
right
and
it
maybe
it's
worth
looking
at
it
from
a
council
perspective
and
I
would
look
to
the
chair
to
consider
that
request.
So.
N
N
Because
you
know
you
have
you
have
a
smaller
group
trying
to
represent
the
feelings
of
the
full
council,
but
on
something
like
this,
where
I
think
we
need
to
there's
a
lot
of
discussion,
I
think
that
needs
to
take
place
before
it
ever
comes
in
front
of
all
seven
of
us,
and
so
you
know,
maybe
what
we
could
do
is
have
you
know
two
or
three
people
you
know
from
the
council.
So
andrew
has
expressed
interest.
N
Probably
you,
madam
chair
and
and
Erin.
Could
you
know
make
up
that
group?
We
could
work
with
the
RDA.
We
could
work
with
kin
and
other
and
and
David
from
the
administration
you
could
be.
You
can
point
us
to
the
right
people
to
work
on
that
group
and
then,
of
course,
Rocky
Mountain
Power.
Let's
have
all
of
you.
Try
to
you
know,
make
a
run
it
at
figuring
out
what
we
you
know
would
then
bring
forward
before
all
seven
of
us.
That's.
J
G
So
there
are
the
proposed
improvements,
impact
three
intersections,
and
so
the
seven
hundred
eighty
thousand
dollars
is
a
worst
case
scenario
for
if
we
had
to
replace
all
of
the
traffic
signals
in
those
intersections,
and
so
we
don't
know
yet
we
have
50
percent
drawings.
Whether
or
not
you
know
how
many
of
those
poles
are
gonna
have
to
be
removed
and
replaced,
and
we
don't
know
in
our
conversations
with
transportation
to
what
degree
degree
we
can
actually
reusable
weather.
You
can
sort
of
unbolt
the
thing
and
use
it
again.
G
P
So
we
get
enough,
we've
been
historically
getting
enough
money
for
replacing,
maybe
two
to
four
signals
a
year
with
CIP
money
and
we've
prioritized
the
signals
that
you
know
like
the
old
span,
wire
signals
or
signals
were
that
are
deteriorating,
and
so
we
would
recommend
that
we
use
the
CIP
money
for
for
those
signals.
The
problem
with
these
signals
is
there
there's
well-functioning
operational
signals
and
the
only
reason
that
they'd
be
replaced
would
be
to
accommodate
changes
to
the
to
the
street
is.
P
P
J
In
looking
at
the
potential
for
seven
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars
as
a
component
of
the
streetscape
improvement
and
the
potential
to
save
that
that
that
builds
in
a
kind
of
contingency
so
to
speak,
but
when
we,
which
gets
to
I,
think
the
neighborhood's
concerned
and
my
concern
that
by
consolidating
this,
this
Herculean
task
that
we
bring
up
the
risk
of
increased
costs
by
waiting
right.
So
I'm.
Looking
for
ways
for
us
to
build
some
insurance.
J
C
P
And
that
is
very
much
the
the
attitude
and
the
approach
that
we
would
take.
Okay,
I
think
the
worst-case
scenario
would
be
that
we
get
into
it
and
beyond
that
we've
haven't
had
enough
budgeted
and
then
we
find
that
we
don't
have
enough
to
to
be
able
to
do
it
right.
You
know
one
example
is
the
signal
on
Highland
and
shoot
it's.
C
P
J
Other
question
is
around
asking
the
RTA
too
and
I'm
looking
at
Jennifer,
McGrath
I
know
that
it's
wonderful
that
we
have
projects
happening
in
the
central
ninth
area.
We
have
four
of
them
at
some
point
in
the
pipeline
and
I
would
like
to
ask
the
RTA
to
work
with
engineering
to
make
sure
that
we
are
consistently
applying.
J
What
I
hope
is
a
lack
of
requirement
for
these
conceives
F,
these
construction
efforts
to
immediately
put
in
their
pedestrian
infrastructure
improvements
that
we
know
will
be
ripping
out.
There
is
not
an
HRC
right
here
and
so
I'm.
Actually,
okay
with
us
delaying
that
investment,
it's
significant
cost
and
I'm
hearing
that
it's
not
being
uniformly
applied,
so
I
just
want
to
ask
that
RTA
and
engineering
can
work
together
to
solve
that.
That.
P
Is
an
issue
that
was
brought
up
to
me
late
Friday?
To
be
honest,
it
was
a
thing
that
just
wasn't
on
my
radar.
That
being
said,
we've
discussed
it
as
a
group
and
well
I.
Don't
have
the
answer.
I
hadn't
heard
about
any
inconsistencies
so
I'm.
Looking
into
that,
our
folks
are
looking
into
that
to
make
sure
that
we
are
being
consistent.
P
But
what
we
want
to
do
is
keep
in
mind
that
we
don't
want
to
make
people
put
in
improvements
that
we
know
are
getting
ripped
out
if
there's
an
turn
ative
to
that.
So,
like
I,
said
it's
new
on
my
radar
within
the
last
like
48
hours
of
working
night,
but
we're
working
on
it.
We
know
that
it's
a
thing
and
we
we
want
to
try
to
find
a
solution
for
that
and
I.
Ask.
L
P
E
E
Track
station,
we
have
been
working
in
collaboration
with
the
RDA
us
on
transportation
and
UTA,
as
well
as
private
developers
who
initially
requested
of
bill
Knowles.
Actually
they
approached
him
I
think
initially
and
then
have
kind
of
variously
approached
us
about
a
desire
for
a
track
station
at
6:50
south
there's
a
lot
of
development
on
the
order
of
magnitude
of
5,000
residents
and
jobs
within
a
block
of
that
location
over
the
next
two
years.
So
it's
significant
and
it's
an
opportunity
to
reduce
the
demand
for
parking,
as
well
as
just
to
offer
transportation
choices
here.
P
E
Believe
so
I
think
that
we
have
been
shuffling
the
information
back
and
forth
and
in
talking
with
UTA
here's
what
can
be
done?
We
have
an
agreement
we
can
use
as
a
foundation
that
was
used
for
the
central
ninth
track
station
with
the
RDA
previously,
and
so
we
have
an
agreement
that
can
be
at
least
used
as
a
basis,
and
we
could
develop
it
pretty
quickly
and
start
designed
this
year
and
we
could
build
the
station
next
year.
Wow
if
we
want.
We
just
need
agreements
with
those
private
sector
partners
and
they're.
A
A
So
we
as
a
council
or
as
a
board
and
council
to
be
fair,
could
kind
of
get
an
idea
of
what
we're
looking
at
with
this
consolidated
plan,
it
certainly
plays
a
role
in
the
RTA
budget
discussion,
as
many
of
you
were
sitting
here.
While
we
were
having
that
discussion,
because
we've
allocated
some
money
but
there's
also
potentially
some
money
to
allocate
as
well
or
utilize
and
capitalize
on
and
so
I
think.
A
L
I
think
the
first
action
needed
from
the
board
obviously
would
be
as
part
of
budget
amendment
4
and
allocating
those
funds,
because
then
that
represents
an
allocation
of
RDA
funds
that
can
then
become
part
of
the
larger
conversation
for
consolidation.
I
assume
at
that
point
or
parallel
to
that.
It
also
probably
needs
to
be
kicked
over
to
the
city
council
side
so
that
we
can
properly
address
the
issues
you're
bringing
up
in
terms
of
the
funding
the
timeline
and
how
this
would
mesh
together
and
I'll.
P
A
D
A
I
also
want
to
say,
I
understand
the
concern
from
the
community
I've
met
with
several
of
the
community
members
and
business
owners
of
the
delay
and
and
I
I
know
and
I
appreciate
you
Jen
kind
of
keeping
your
eye
towards
that,
but
I
I
really
want
to
say
this
is
awesome.
It
we've
been
talking.
I've
we've
been
talking
about
this
since
I've,
been
on
the
council
of.
A
Why
aren't
all
of
these
groups
and
business
and
and
departments
working
together
so
that
we
are
really
capitalizing
and
not
ripping
up
a
street
and
then
ripping
it
up
again,
and
then
my
constituents
call
and
rip
it
up
again
and
right
and
and
really
collaborating
and
working
together
and
finding
ways
to
capitalize
our
efforts.
Our
teams,
our
money,
is
awesome
and
like
yay
good
work,
everyone
so
strong
work,
team,
strong
work.
Okay,
next
item
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
get
rid
of
some
of
the
meat
and
go
to
something
a
little
less
meaty.
A
L
In
the
interest
of
time,
I
will
be
really
quick
but
obviously
open
any
questions
as
you
have.
This
is
a
request
that
has
come
to
the
city
in
terms
of
proposing
and
installing
a
statue
of
Vassiliou
Spruce
Goose.
That
would
be
on
the
walkway
south
of
the
echoes
theater
that
connects
to
Regent
Plaza,
and
the
request
before
the
board
is
because
the
RDA
does
not
have
a
formal
art
donation
policy.
To
what
extent
would
the
board
like
to
consider
how
to
proceed?
You
can
adopt
the
city's
policy
on
going
basis.
L
You
can
adopt
the
city's
policy
on
a
one-time
basis
and
then
direct
staff
to
kind
of
formulate
a
certain
one
for
the
RTA
and/or.
You
can
do
nothing,
which
would
then
mean
that
this
becomes
just
purely
an
administrative
function,
because
in
absence
of
a
policy,
that's
how
we
would
handle
it.
So
that's
a
very
high-level
request
before
you
happy
to
get
into
any
details
of
how
that
would
would
proceed
and
what
those
details
would
be
of
how
it
would
either
come
back
to
the
board
or
not
come
back
to
the
board.
B
A
L
The
mayor
for
approval
and
I
should
also
note
that
part
of
the
reason
this
is
somewhat
come
up
as
well.
It
is
on
agency
property,
it's
a
walkway
that
essentially
represents
a
public
easement
and
may
or
may
not
at
some
point,
be
transferred
to
the
city
and
so
I
think
it's
important
that
the
city
take
that
into
account.
As
we
look
at
what
direction
we
we
head
in.
B
A
L
A
L
As
Tammy
comes
up,
I
will
just
kind
of
set
the
stage
for
the
next
item,
as
we
have
looked
at
West
temple,
Gateway
expiring
last
year,
as
well
as
sugarhouse.
Prior
to
that.
What
we
realized
is
in
terms
of
state
statute.
It
is
very
clear
when
a
project
area
expires,
that
agency
no
longer
collects
tax
increment
that
then
funnels
back
to
the
the
entities,
and
then
it
is
up
to
the
City
Council
in
terms
of
passing
an
ordinance
to
officially
exterminate
a
project
area,
and
so
the
question
and
the
policy
discussion
before
you.
L
As
to
what
extent
does
the
agency
want
to
have
a
policy
or
set
terms
for
which
we
would
actually
take
that
action
after
a
project
area
expires?
And
to
what
extent
would
we
continue
to
operate
within
a
project
area
in
that
in-between
phase
of
no
longer
collecting
increment
and
then
officially
terminating
a
project
area?
And
so
I've,
probably
just
done
a
horrible
job
of
trying
to
be
quick
and
summarize
it
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Tammy?
Who
has
a
better
grasp
of
the
details
of
that
so
great.
M
I
can
be
quick
as
well.
I
know
we're
running
behind.
So,
okay,
as
Danny
stated,
it
is
up
to
the
City
Council
in
the
RTA
board.
When
a
project
area
is
officially
closed,
so
a
resolution
and
an
ordinance
needs
to
be
passed,
and
then
we
need
to
file
notice
of
that
with
the
county
and
other
appropriate
agencies.
So
we
do
have
three
project
areas
that
are
currently
transitioning
to
dissolution,
which
is
sugarhouse,
which
the
last
year
of
tax
increment
was
2016.
M
West
temple
gateway,
which
the
last
year
of
tax
increment
was
2018
and
then
that's
West,
temple
gateway
and
then
West,
Capitol
Hill
we're
still
collecting
tax
increment,
but
only
through
an
extension
for
a
limited
purpose,
which
is
to
collect
money
to
finish
the
300
west
streetscape
project.
So
once
that
it's
completed,
we
will
no
longer
be
collecting
tax
increment.
M
So
just
a
quick
update
on
those
three
project
areas,
so
the
RDA
will
remain
active
in
those
areas
until
all
projects
are
completed,
funds
are
expended
and
the
RDA
board
and
City
Council
take
steps
to
close
the
areas
so
in
sugarhouse.
Really,
the
outstanding
project
is
redevelopment
of
the
former
Deseret
Industries
site
in
West
Temple
gateway.
The
outstanding
projects
are
infinite
scale,
which
recently
broke
ground
directly
across
the
street
from
the
market
by
hop,
which
should
be
breaking
ground
later.
M
This
summer,
West
Montreux
site
redevelopment,
Jefferson
mixed-use,
which
is
directly
behind
the
market
and
the
nine
hundred
South
streetscape
project,
which
we
were
just
speaking
about
in
West,
Capitol
Hill,
there's
the
Arctic
Court
single-family
home
the
new
construction
home
that
we
will
be
working
on
this
upcoming
year,
Marmalade
block
mixed-use,
Marmalade
Park
and
the
300
West
streetscape
project.
So
just
a
couple
of
policy
questions
posed
to
the
board
the
two
main
programs
that
the
RDA
uses
are
the
tax
increment
reimbursement
program
and
the
RDA
loan
program.
M
So
the
tax
increment
reimbursement
program
precludes
any
future
tax,
increment
reimbursements,
if
we're
not
collecting
tax
increment,
but
there's
no
policy
that
the
board
has
with
when
we
shut
off
the
RDA
loan
program.
So
really
a
question
to
you
is:
how
much
longer
should
we
extend
that
tool
in
these
neighborhoods?
Some
policy
questions
to
consider
when
looking
at
the
RDA
program
is
program
need.
M
Typically,
this
program
is
used
for
catalytic
projects
that
can't
receive
traditional
financing,
and
these
project
areas
are
taking
off
into
some
extent,
and
projects
are
happening
without
RDA
support
capture
of
tax
increment
from
new
development.
That's
limited
since
we're
no
longer
collecting
tax
increment,
limited
availability
of
loan
funds.
We've
recently
seen
an
influx
of
RDA
loan
requests
and
interest
in
applications
so
just
prioritize.
We,
the
board,
may
want
to
pray
active
project
areas
over
ones
that
are
phasing
out
and
then
just
another
policy
consideration.
M
B
L
L
Think
the
biggest
issue
that
we
probably
want
from
a
policy
decision
is
to
what
extent
would
we
want
to
continue
to
entertain
applications
for
loans?
Obviously,
is
a
project
area
like
West
temple
Gateway
expires.
There
are
a
few
property
owners
that
we
are
in
discussions
with
right
now
that
have
been
that
way
since
before
the
project
area
terminated.
But
you
you
don't
want
to
go
on
too
long
within
a
project
area,
because
at
some
point
you
just
accept
that
you're
done
and
you
move
on
and
so
as
a
staff.
L
You
can
certainly
make
the
program
that
has
a
hard
date
of
one
year
and
then
maybe
any
application
beyond.
That
is
with
the
consent,
approval
of
the
board
waiving
that
condition
being
structured
somehow
like
that.
But
it
definitely
is
helpful
for
us
as
a
staff
to
understand
when
we
are
done
receiving
requests
so.
B
Madam
chair
I
guess
my
my
question
would
be
in
here
on
our
staff
report.
It
says
for
West,
Capitol
Hill,
the
original
is
1997
to
2017
or
until
five
point
two
seven
million
is
reached.
Is
that
something
that
staff
would
look
at
is
saying
that
we
would
look
at
X
amount
of
time
frame
or
a
money
value,
seeing
whichever
comes
first
yeah.
L
In
West
Capitol
Hill,
because
it
has
that
conditions,
probably
a
little
bit
different
than
West
temple
gateway,
where
we
don't
have
that
I
mean
that
was
extended
strictly
until
we
got
that
dollar
amount
to
do
that
project,
and
so
we've
interpreted.
That
is
we're
not
doing
anything
else
except
collecting
money,
wrapping
up
our
projects
and
then
we're
going
to
do
that
as
one
of
our
final
projects
and
so
that
that's
a
good
example
of
one
that
we
had
a
finite
date
that
we
were
going
to
once.
M
J
I
was
wondering
about
this
reminded
me
of
one
of
the
budget
items
which
was
the
expanding
adaptive,
reuse
grant
program,
and
the
question
was
about
whether
or
not
the
staff
want
to
talk
about
the
adaptive
reuse
grant
program
to
other
project
areas,
and
that
also
reminds
me
of
the
building
facade
improvement
loan
fund.
Is
that
through
that's.
J
But
it's
limited
right
now
in
its
scope,
so
not
for
right
now,
but
I,
those
those
what
I
perceive
is
smaller
programs.
Loan
fund
programs
I
would
love
to
have
a
discussion
and
in
a
future
date
about.
Maybe
there
are
some
that
we
would
consider
maintaining
availability
of
through
the
life
of
the
project
area
and
maybe
there's
some
greater
scale
financing
that
we
don't
want
to
enter
into
late.
L
If
I
can
ask
a
clarification
on
that,
is
your
question.
The
policy
question
in
the
memo
that
says
have
we
looked
at
extending
that
to
other
project
areas,
or
is
your
question
that
you
would
want
to
have
that
and
other
programs
potentially
continue
in
project
areas
that
have
terminated
at
first?
Okay,
that's
what
I
assumed
what
I
wanted
to
make
sure.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
great.
H
Madam
chair,
yes,
I
would
encourage
us
to
look
at
adopting
some
policy
say
two
years
post
end
of
the
tax
increment
collection.
I
say
that,
just
because,
if
the
staffs
recommendation
is
somewhere,
one
two
three
seems
like
a
nice
fit.
We
can
always
change
it
in
the
middle
or
make
exceptions,
but
until
we
have
a
until
we
have
a
deadline,
developers
don't
know,
what's
a
gun
for
and
what
that
to
work
towards,
and
none
of
us
do
either.
It
can
be
open-ended.
A
A
A
Our
next
agenda
item
is
the
project
area
creation
priorities
and
we're
going
to
pull
that
one.
So
look
at
you
soon,
as
you
don't
have
to
do
anything
because
we
need
to
Anna
is
back
and
we
need
to
go
back
to
the
block.
67
creation
area.
Cra
I
would
invite
Katie
to
come
to
the
table.
There
may
be
some
questions
regarding
the
language
in
the
resolution
that
we're
gonna
go
through
real
quick
before
we
take
action
on
it.
A
E
M
M
The
second
would
be
verification
from
the
county
that
the
tax
increment
repayment
amount
will
be
used
by
the
county
for
a
relative
for
a
new
revolving
loan
program
and
a
description
of
the
county's
proposed
loan
program
and
associated
terms
for
the
reuse
of
the
tax
increment.
For
other
regionally
significant
transportation
projects,
including
parking
structures
items
see,
is
commitment
from
the
county
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
I'm.
Sorry
commitment
from
the
county
that
Salt
Lake
City
and/or.
The
RDA
will
have
the
right
to
request
future
funds
from
this
program.
M
In
its
pro
rata
share
of
the
tax
increment
repayment
amount
for
projects
within
Salt
Lake
City
D
would
be
commitment
that
the
RDAs
obligation
to
pay
the
county.
The
tax
increment
repayment
amount
is
contingent
on
the
developers.
Construction
of
phase
2
of
its
west
quarter,
project
on
block
67,
as
designed
with
underground
parking.
J
M
Would
be
clarification
on
the
limitation
of
the
RDAs
participation
or
the
increment
cap
and
that
the
RDA
is
not
obligated
to
reimburse
any
shortfall
in
the
tax
increment
generated
by
developers.
Phase
1
of
the
block
67
north
project
area
to
be
verified
by
the
city
finance
director
in
consultation
with
the
city
RDA
director,
and
clarifying
that
the
city
portion
of
the
increment
is
also
not
obligated
to
reimburse
any
shortfall
that
may
occur.
So
this
goes
back
to
the
question
of
the
15
million.
You
said
it
all.
M
Would
be
verification
and
oversight
of
construction
cost
estimates
as
they
relate
to
the
project
gap
and
public
benefits
and
potential
that
RDA
will
have
a
construction
oversight,
role
in
the
development
of
the
project
area
and
then
finally,
item
2
is
Salt
Lake
County
in
Salt,
Lake
City
and
Salt
Lake
City,
School
District.
Each
have
agreed
to
the
terms
and
conditions
of
an
interlocal
agreement,
allocating
a
percentage
of
tax
increment
from
the
block
67
north
project
area
to
the
RDA
for
reinvestment
in
the
block
67
north
project
area.
E
And
in
this
case
it's
sort
of
an
either/or,
so
either
the
green
or
the
yellow
in
if
the
board
were
to
go
with
the
green
highlighted,
that
would
essentially
make
the
participation
of
this
school
district
a
requirement
that
the
CRA
would
not
take
effect
unless
all
three
of
those
taxing
entities
participated.
If
you
remove
the
green
highlight
and
just
went
with
the
yellow,
highlight
it
a
little,
it
leaves
open
the
door
that
the
project
could
go
forward
and
then
the
RTA
could
negotiate
school
district
participation,
but
it
wouldn't
be
a
condition
of
the
CRA
existing.
A
B
There
you
go
yes,
Cindy,
just
a
quick
comment:
it's
we've
all
learned.
It's
easy
to
accidentally
offend
other
taxing
entities
when
you're
doing
these
agreements,
and
things
like
that
and
so
I
just
want
to
be
clear
for
the
record
that
what
the
I
think
what
the
board
is
intending
is
to
say
that
they
really
would
hope
that
Salt,
Lake,
City,
School,
District
and
Salt
Lake,
County
and
other
taxing
entities
would
be
partners
in
this
and,
if
they're
not,
then
this,
then
the
City
RDA
would
need
to
discuss.
This
further
is.
A
A
So
I
think
this
is
our
best
way
of
moving
forward
and
saying
yay,
let's,
let's
support
a
project,
but
we
also
need
to
make
sure
we're
protecting
our
city
and
our
residents
and
and
that
that's
our
obligation
as
elected
officials
right
and
and
that
we
hope
everybody
is
on
board.
And
we
want
everyone
to
be
on
board
and
if
not,
then
we
better
make
sure
that
were
covered
right
and
did
if
I
can
get
a
thumbs-up,
that
that
is
accurate
as
to
what
everyone
felt
during
our
discussion
or
not
Andrew,.
N
A
A
L
The
intention
at
the
time
of
executing
this
contract
with
the
developer,
was
that
the
agency
would
do
certain
components
of
the
project
in
terms
of
infrastructure,
as
well
as
assisting
in
the
construction
of
the
park
itself,
and
so
what
you
have
with
with
this
discussion
is
really
just
formalizing.
What
that
intention
has
been
we
as
an
agency
and
working
on
this
did
not
incorporate
these
in
the
agreements
at
the
time,
and
so,
as
per
our
land
disposition
policy.
L
The
idea
is
that
when
we
sell
a
property,
those
proceeds
would
go
into
a
holding
account
and
then
we
would
return
back
to
the
board
with
it.
A
budget
amendment
in
terms
of
how
to
allocate
and/or
dispose
of
those
funds,
and
so
as
part
of
that
property
closing
last
week
and
now
those
funds
will
be
held
in
a
holding
account.
We
will
return
to
the
board
with
requests
to
allocate
those
funds
for
the
construction
of
the
park.
L
Care
has
been
working
on
this
project
and
has
details
in
terms
of
the
park,
construction
and
the
costs
and
moving
forward,
but
essentially
this
is
really
just
kind
of
to
have
that
discussion
with
the
board
now
so
that
one
we
returned
with
it
as
part
of
a
budget
amendment,
we
can
make
sure
we're
addressing
any
issues
at
that
time.
Can.
L
B
A
A
B
L
L
A
Don't
care,
do
you
need
to
add
anything
I,
don't
think
so.
There
are
about
1.3
million
dollars
in
land
sale,
proceeds
that
are
in
this
holding
account.
So
that's
the
amount
that
will
come
back
and
ask
to
be
appropriated.
Okay
is
there
anything
else
on
this.
B
B
A
L
Two
quick
items:
if
I
may
and
I
apologize,
I'm
going
to
read
some
of
these,
so
I
can
make
sure
I
get
some
of
the
facts
in
detail
straight.
First,
it's
just
an
update
on
the
Technical
Advisory
Committee
for
the
Fair
Park
feasibility
study.
Earlier
this
month,
our
DEA
staff,
working
with
the
consultant,
facilitated
the
stakeholders
meeting
with
various
government
and
community
organizations.
The
purpose
of
that
meeting
was
to
provide
some
background
on
other
public
markets
in
their
various
forms
and
as
well
as
how
they
operate
in
various
locations.
L
There's
also
a
discussion
in
terms
of
identifying
the
strengths
and
weaknesses
of
around
the
to
potential
public
market
areas
in
the
Fair
Park,
and
it
is
proposed
that
the
consultant
is
going
to
return
in
May
for
a
second
round
with
the
Technical
Advisory
Committee
I
think
we
also
got
some
recommendations
on
other
members
to
include
in
that
stakeholder
group,
specifically
with,
as
it
relates
to
the
meeting
in
May
and
we're
still
hoping
to
complete
that
study
in
July
of
2019.
So
that's
the
first
item.
Second,
is
the
incremental
development,
education
series
and
I
hope.
L
Don't
know
if
I
have
to
leave
or
make
a
toast
one
way
or
another,
so
we
worked
with
them
when
they
were
here
about
a
week
ago
and
met
with
the
Alliance
to
kind
of
look
at
how
small-scale
development
could
maybe
be
incorporated
in
some
of
our
project
areas.
The
goal
behind
all
of
this
is
to
do
a
full-day
training
workshop
April
24th
at
the
Leonardo
to
kind
of
address
how
you
can
do
kind
of
grassroots
development
in
some
of
our
project
areas
that
provide
great
opportunities
for
that.
L
B
Just
for
the
record
and
I
think,
thank
you.
So
much
for
the
work
you've
been
doing.
We've
we've
met
with
you,
guys
and
and
in
the
companies,
are
doing
the
North
temple
market
study
just
a
reiteration
of
the
website
that
we
feel
strongly
that
you
need
to
connect
and
are
invited
are
the
businesses
along
North
temple
and
other
businesses
that
might
be
interested
in
in
this
market
and
in
the
past
there
was
a
lot
done
by
the
north
them
for
businesses
when
the
when
the
ura
was
created.