►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 3/26/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
The
Salt
Lake
City
Council
for
March
26
2009
teen.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
a
follow-up
discussion
regarding
the
Salt
Lake
City
residents
survey
discussion
that
we
had
last
week,
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
Libby
Stockstill
from
the
council
office
as
well
as
Kairi
and
get
from
y2
analytics.
Thank
you.
B
So,
following
up
on
last
week's
meeting,
the
council
members
have
the
draft
of
the
survey
questions
in
their
packets
and
also
print
it
off
in
your
red
folders,
with
page
numbers.
This
time,
so
we
haven't
received
staff
hasn't
received
any
additional
feedback
from
Council
members.
But
if
you
do
have
questions,
Kyrene
Gibb
is
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
y2
analytics,
who
has
created
and
will
be
conducting
the
survey.
I
do
just
want
to
note.
B
D
To
let
council
many
health
gather
her
thoughts,
mr.
job
I'd,
just
like
to
say,
I
support
it
I,
like
the
inclusion
of
the
question
we
talked
about,
the
inland
port
I
would
agree
with
the
policy
questions
to
publish
for
public
viewing
I'd
like
this
to
hopefully
grow
into
a
consistent
format,
to
gather
information
and
get
a
sense
of
public
perception
of
policy
and
also
maybe
execution
of
that
policy.
What
the
impact
is
on
the
public
so
I'd
like
to
set
the
precedent
now
to
make
sure
that's
consistent
and
public
and
clear.
Okay.
C
C
And
I
am
failing
to
remember
the
name
of
the
other
representative
from
y2
who
was
with
us
last
week.
Will
you
remind
God
Scott?
Thank
you.
He
seemed
to
understand.
Maybe
he's
just
a
really
good
listener.
An
affirmative
listener
seem
to
understand
some
of
our
concerns
about
the
way
that
it
was
worded
absolutely.
B
So
I
think,
given
those
concerns,
the
the
objective
here
is
to
replicate
research
that
is
being
done
by
other
entities
about
the
project.
So
our
proposal
is
just
to
replicate
those
questions
and
the
question
wording
so
that
we
have
a
representative
sample
of
Salt
Lake
City
residents
to
sort
of
compare
those
external
results
against.
If
that
policy
objective
is
not
the
direction
the
city
wants
to
go,
I
see
no
reason
why
the
questions
we
have
here
have
to
remain
as
they
are.
B
I
think
to
that
point
we
did
alter
the
question
wording
for
the
first
inland
port
question
to
be
how
well
do
you
understand
the
project
rather
than
just
baseline,
familiarity,
sort
of
as
an
attempt
to
raise
that
baseline
cognitively,
so
familiarity
is
a
little
bit
of
a
lower
bar.
We
we
altered
that
to
understanding
okay,
so.
C
B
C
Could
I
also
submit,
maybe
for
my
peers,
consideration
that
in
terms
of
ordering
so
I
I'm
looking
at
page
12,
the
bottom
of
page
12
is
the
first
one
and
then
on
13
I
think
that
it
would
be.
It
may
be
more
logical
for
us
to
reorder
and
do
the
the
favorable
to
unfavorable
rating.
At
the
end
of
the
question
about
the
importance
of
the
following
items.
C
Everyone
will
be
somewhere
or
RIT
will
evaluate
themselves
somewhere
on
a
scale
of
understanding
or
or
not
having
sufficient
understanding,
and
then
we
would
ask
them
about
that.
Well,
the
intro
has
quite
a
bit
more
text
about
what
the
port
concept
is,
and
then
it
would
go
through
some
items
related
to
the
port
and
allow
them
to
contemplate
their
prioritization
of
those
items
and
I.
Think
going
through
that
process
helps
the
mind
on
any
subject.
You
know
to
both
being
briefed
briefly
about
what
it
is
and
thinking
through
ones,
priorities
on
the
different
concepts.
B
A
A
D
A
B
Okay,
there
we
go
so
this
is
a
request
to
amend
the
zoning
map
of
the
property
located
at
2058
North
2,200
West
from
a
g2
to
m1
a
zoning
district.
The
applicant
is
seeking
the
amendment
to
implement
the
future
land
use
designations
noted
in
the
applicable
master
plan
and
the
m1
zoning
district
does
align
with
the
future
anticipated
use
of
the
property.
B
The
property
is
approximately
two
point:
six
five
acres
in
size
and
abouts
AG,
to
whose
zoning
to
the
east
partially
and
partially
on
the
west,
the
north
and
west,
are
currently
zoned
BP
and
the
properties
to
the
south
are
zoned
m1.
The
previous
map
amendments
took
place
along
2,200,
West,
Sandra's,
owned,
AG
properties
to
m1.
The
amendments
took
place
in
2017
and
incorporated
mitigation
measures
to
ensure
adequate
buffering
between
future
commercial
developments
along
2,200
west
and
the
remaining
agricultural
zoning
and
uses
the
proposed
m1.
B
D
This
is
a
really
hot
area,
currently
along
2,200
West,
especially
right
here
on
this
corner.
The
2060
is
currently
used
as
residential
there's
a
family
that
lives
there
I
understand
that
they're
in
discussion
with
purchasing
that
property.
Where
are
they
with
that,
because
I
don't
feel
comfortable
moving
forward
with
the
zoning
change
without
that
parcel
being
included?
Okay.
B
D
So
my
name
is
Nick
Smith
I'm,
one
of
the
owners,
representatives
for
salmon
investments
which
owns
a
property,
and
so
currently
we
have
been
in
discussions
on
and
off
with
the
with
the
person
that
we
horseshoe
the
property
around.
Currently,
it's
still
in
debate
as
to
you
know
how
much
and
and
things
like
that,
of
what
we're
gonna
pay
for
the
property
or,
if
you
know
things
seems
to
still
seem
to
be
moving
forward
with
that
currently
and
as
far
as
like
what
we're
seeking
to
Zona
m1.
D
As
you
see
and
there's
just
multiple
different
things,
we're
looking
to
possibly
do
with
the
property,
it
could
be
anything
from
the
house
storage
units
to
doing
something
like
like
the
development.
That's
gonna,
be
to
the
south
with
a
little
bit
of
flex
space,
so
there's
been
different
options,
entertain
their
owners
still
kind
of
making
a
final
decision
as
to
which
route
he's
gonna
go.
At
this
time,
though,
okay.
A
D
Know
that
you've
presented
to
the
community
council
there
there
hasn't
been
a
recommendation
either
way.
I
just
know
that
this
family
has
been
there
for
generations
right
yeah
and
it's
just
75
percent
of
their
property
is
going
to
be
surrounded
by
you
know
manufacturing.
So
for
me,
it's
it's
gonna,
be
a
difficult,
sell,
I'm
gonna,
go
visit
them
and
talk
to
them
and
see
where
they're
currently
out
with
them,
and
but
that's
a
it's
a
really
difficult
situation
that
they
are
being
placed
in.
B
Them
yeah,
they
received
several
notices
truly
in
the
mail
mm-hmm
really
yeah
in
the
mail
and
then
about
the
this,
as
well
as
the
Planning
Commission
I
contacted
the
community
council.
They
also
didn't
request.
The
meeting
I
only
received
one
public
comment,
and
that
was
from
the
property
owner
to
the
east.
D
D
A
Are
you
under
a
time
crunch
I
mean?
Is
there?
Is
there
something
that's
imminent,
that
you're
planning
on
doing
with
the
property?
Is
there
if
we
were
to
self
councilmember
Rogers,
goes
and
and
meets
again
with
the
with
the
family
who
lives
in
that
area
that
you
horseshoe
with
that
in
any
way
hinder
what
your
immediate
plans
are
for
for
that
site.
Currently,.
D
B
A
Okay,
if
there
are
no
no
further
questions
council
members,
what
I,
what
I
would
like
to
do
and
I'll
look
to
the
applicants
as
well
as
I,
make
this
recommendation,
but-
and
so
we
have
on
our
consent
agenda
tonight,
a
motion
to
set
the
public
hearing
date.
I
would
I
would
recommend
that
we
remove
that
so
that
we
do
not
set
the
date
for
the
public
hearing.
We
give
councilmember
Roger
it's
time
to
go
and
meet
with
the
family.
A
Give
the
applicants
some
time
to
you
know,
continue
talking
with
them
and
see
if
there's
some
sort
of
consensus
that
can
be
reached,
and
then
next
month
we
can,
you
know
we
can.
We
can
follow
up
with
planning
staff
to
see
how
those
discussions
and
deliberations
go,
and
at
that
point
we
can
set
the
the
public
hearing
date.
I
just
don't
want
to
make
anyone
feel
like
they're
being
unnecessarily
rushed
or
that
they're
being
backed
into
a
corner.
You
know
on
with
regards
to
what
they're
gonna
be
doing
with
their
properties.
A
D
We're
currently
just
to
the
price
point
really
back
and
forth
if
they
/.
If
we
purchase
their
property
next
week,
then
what
would
that
do.
A
Yeah,
if
you
purchase
I,
mean
I'm
not
hearing
any
concern
about
the
rezone
or
the
project
overall,
it's
just
that.
You
know
we're
it's
horse,
shoed
around
that
residential
property,
I.
Think
if
you,
if
you're
able
to
you,
know,
purchase
that
you
know
and
that's
as
soon
as
that's
concluded,
just
let
the
planning
staff
known,
we
can
get
you
added
back
to
the
agenda.
The.
D
E
A
C
Oh
Kelsey
I'm,
looking
through
maybe
I'm,
missing
it,
but
if
we
bring
this,
if
we
end
up
doing
this
back,
I
know
that
the
future
land
use
map
for
the
area
yeah
contemplates
m1.
Could
you
give
us
a
little
bit
bigger
or
maybe
you
could
even
follow
up
with
an
email
perspective
of
the
broader
zoning
of
the
area?
Currently
I
know
that
often
when
there's
a
future
land
use
contemplated
that
we
haven't
yet
started
to
rezone
to
that
these
initial
conversations
of
rezone
in
an
area
can
feel
abrupt
and
councilmember.
D
B
D
C
A
The
next
item.
I
actually
want
to
shift
the
agenda
a
little
bit.
Cuz
I
know
that
Jen
Covino
is
here.
So,
let's,
let's
move
number
four
to
right
now
and
then
Jen
can
give
us
our
federal
legislative
update
and
then
she
can
head
out
to
dinner
or
do
whatever
she
wants
to
do
and
then
after
Jen
finishes,
we
will
talk
about
budget
amendment
number
five
for
fiscal
year.
2018
and
19.
F
F
As
you
can
see
in
front
of
you,
we've
had
some
changes
in
our
US
House
of
Representatives
in
the
US
Senate.
That's
really
important
to
understand
the
political
dynamics
back
in
Washington
DC.
We
still
have
one
House
seat,
that's
unresolved
and
we'll
be
going
to
another
congressional
election,
hopefully
in
the
next
month
or
so
over
in
the
Senate.
F
Things
have
largely
remained
the
same,
although
we
had
changes
in
the
House
of
Representatives
Majority
Leader,
Mitch
McConnell
is
still
controlling
the
agenda
in
the
other
chamber,
and
I
wanted
to
provide
an
overview
for
you
of
the
discrepancies
between
the
priorities
and
the
two
chambers
of
Congress
House
Democrats
got
to
action
this
year
enacting
a
new
rules
package
that
was
intended
to
create
greater
transparency,
greater
democracy
and
pursue
some
ethics
reforms.
We
anticipate
that
the
house
is
going
to
continue
its
oversight,
investigation
activities
of
the
administration.
F
Despite
there
being
a
conclusion
of
the
special
counsels
investigation
over
the
weekend
under
speaker,
Pelosi's
direction,
we
do
foresee
there
being
a
lot
more
space
becoming
available
in
terms
of
our
bandwidth
in
DC
to
focus
on
domestic
policy
and
changes
around
healthcare
immigration
gun,
controlled
the
minimum
wage,
equality
and
infrastructure.
The
House
Democrats
actually
today
introduced
a
new
health
care
bill,
I'm
glad
to
brief
you
a
little
bit
about
that.
F
F
For
the
time
being,
given
the
state
of
affairs
in
DC,
we
recommend
maintaining
a
focus
on
existing
formula
and
discretionary
grant
programs
that
are
available
to
support
your
local
projects
and
initiatives
as
necessary.
We're
there
to
help
you
pursue
legislative
remedies
or
judicial
review
of
any
of
the
administration's
executive
actions
or
regulations
that
would
preempt
the
local
authority
of
the
city.
F
We
anticipate
that
the
congressional
habit
of
governing
by
crisis
or
immediate
deadlines
will
continue
as
we
move
forward
in
the
116th
Congress
and
just
an
update
that
earmarks
continue
to
be
banned,
as
have
been
since
2011.
We
got
updates
in
recent
weeks
from
both
Senate
appropriators
and
House
appropriators,
agreeing
that
the
FY
2020
spending
bills
will
not
contain
earmarks.
There
is
potential
for
revisiting
the
air
marks.
Conversation
looking
ahead
to
2021
in
looking
at
other
authorizing
bills,
and
so
in
terms
of
governing
by
crisis.
F
Here
are
some
authorizations
that
we
know
will
have
expirations
between
2019
and
2020.
The
fixing
America's
Surface
Transportation
Act,
which
is
the
Surface
Transportation
reauthorization
bill,
will
expire
next
September.
The
every
student
succeeds.
Act
of
2015
has
a
five-year
authorization
in
the
Workforce
Innovation
and
Opportunity
Act
will
also
be
coming
due
for
reauthorization
in
2020.
This
should
help
guide
some
of
your
engagement
priorities
for
the
years
ahead.
We
know
that
committees
are
going
to
start
their
work
on
in
earnest
on
these
few
bills
over
the
next
12
months
and
we're
here
to
help
you
engage.
F
If
you
look
moving
forward
with
FY
2019
appropriations,
some
of
which
were
just
finalized
on
February
15th,
because
we
waited
a
few
months
beyond
the
the
start
of
the
federal
fiscal
year
to
come
to
a
resolution.
Most
of
these
programs
will
see
level
funding
for
2019,
so
the
numbers
you're
seeing
here
should
be
largely
the
same
for
2019
moving
forward
in
2020.
President
Trump's
budget
proposal
once
again
seeks
to
eliminate
program
funding
for
both
CDBG
in
the
home
investment
partnership
program,
both
of
which
are
amongst
your
top
five
grants.
F
If
you
look
at
other
appropriations
for
housing,
which
is
one
of
your
top
priorities,
you
can
see
there
were
a
lot
of
plus
ups
across
the
board
at
the
US
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development,
and
these
are
a
number
of
federal
resources
that
may
be
available
to
support
your
initiatives
around
homelessness,
affordable
housing
and
building
density.
Mr.
C
Chair
can
I
interrupt
Jen
for
just
a
second
councilmember
mendenhall.
This
was
one
of
the
big
takeaways
and
I.
Think
that
there's
some
other
grant
opportunities
too,
but
from
our
trip
to
DC
that
Jen
shared
with
us
and
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
sit
down
with
the
great
budget
minds
in
the
City
Council
office,
leading
up
to
our
budget,
to
look
at
those
opportunities
and
then
just
to
help
us
be
able
to
identify
projects
and
programs
in
the
city
in
the
purp
mayor's
recommended
budget
that
we've.
C
C
B
F
So
we're
more
than
happy
we're
here,
24/7
to
support
any
of
your
staff
here
in
the
city.
So
if
it's
your
finance
folks,
you
might
have
concerns
with
cost
share
or
administration.
After
the
fact
we
have
technical
expertise.
There
then
also
your
your
program
managers,
so
folks
from
the
departments
who
might
be
overseeing
this
on
a
routine
basis.
I
highly
recommend
that
they'd
be
involved
in
any
discussion
as
well.
The
other
good
news
is
for
all
of
the
programs
listed
up
on
the
board
right
now
and
anything,
that's
included
in
this
entire
presentation.
F
So
circling
back
for
infrastructure,
there's
some
good
news
and
some
bad
news.
One
of
the
hopes
we
all
have
is
that
any
infrastructure
package
that
would
be
forthcoming
from
the
administration
from
Congress
would
be
comprehensive
and
large
and
full
of
new
funding
in
recent
months.
I
think,
given
the
discussions
in
DC
around
the
federal
deficit,
it
seems
as
though
both
the
house
and
Senators
are
gravitating
towards
a
surface
transportation.
Reauthorization
bill
for
2020,
rather
than
a
more
comprehensive
package
again.
F
The
highway
trust
fund
is
not
solvent,
and
so
at
some
point,
lawmakers
will
need
to
come
up
with
a
new
revenue
solution
and
it's
something
we're
very
seriously
contemplating
in
DC,
we've
been
engaged
in
a
weekly
basis,
with
both
the
House
Ways
and
Means
Committee,
the
House
Transportation
and
Infrastructure
Committee
in
the
Senate
Environment
and
Public
Works,
Committee,
and
so
right
now,
Senate
EPW
is
actually
soliciting
legislative
requests
for
2020
Surface
Transportation
reauthorization
bill.
We
assumed
that
they
will
largely
preserve
the
framework
of
the
fast
act.
F
However,
there
number
of
urgent
issues
that
will
need
to
be
addressed
this
time
around
that
affords
us
some
opportunity
to
think
big
in
terms
of
what
we
hope
for,
and
so
the
first
issue
will
be
addressing
the
solvency
of
the
Highway
Trust
Fund.
Right
now,
the
US
Chamber
of
Commerce
has
introduced
a
proposal
that
would
increase
the
federal
gas
tax
by
five
cents
a
year
for
the
next
five
years,
for
a
total
increase
of
twenty
five
cents.
There's
other
proposals
being
floated,
whether
it's
vehicle
miles,
traveled
or
other
fees
on
tires
or
imports.
F
Unfortunately,
it
doesn't
seem
as
though
there
is
enough
information.
That's
readily
available
on
those
new
approaches
like
vehicles,
vehicle
miles
traveled.
The
states
that
have
demonstrations
aren't
quite
far
enough
along
and
the
implementation
of
those
pilots
for
the
federal
government
to
feel
comfortable
going
to
scale
with
that
nationally.
So
I
do
think
that
the
most
likely
option,
we'll
see,
would
be
increasing
the
federal
gas
tax,
at
which
point
if
the
city
is
in
favor
of
new
revenues
for
transportation
and
infrastructure
projects,
the
next
few
months
will
be
a
critical
time
to
engage.
F
The
House
committees
would
like
to
see
a
bill
passed
out
of
committee
before
the
end
of
the
springtime
to
allow
them
sufficient
time
to
get
to
a
full
floor
vote.
This
fall
because
I
think
the
assumption
is
that,
looking
ahead
to
a
presidential
election
year,
if
a
hard
vote
is
not
taken
before
the
end
of
2019,
it
may
not
be
taken
at
all
in
2020,
and
that
would
likely
lead
us
to
a
short-term
extension
of
the
fast
act.
F
I
know
chair.
You
had
asked
if
we
would
be
preserving.
You
know
traditional
programs,
as
they
currently
exist,
I
will
say
if
there's
an
interest
in
directing
more
funding
toward
local
governments,
it's
a
great
time
to
have
that
formal
policy
discussion
right
now
and
I'm
glad
to
work
with
you
on
any
legislative
language
that
might
create
a
pilot
opportunity
say
the
city
wants
to
explore
autonomous
vehicles,
for
instance,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
research
and
development
around
that
in
the
months
ahead.
F
There's
also
I
think
the
potential
to
have
a
climate
title
included
in
the
next
surface
transportation
bill
that
has
never
been
done
before,
but
there
is
a
willingness
on
the
part
of
both
Democrats
and
Republicans
to
have
some
policy
provisions
regarding
emissions
standards,
and
so,
given
all
that's
transpired
with
the
administration
in
recent
months
with
cafe,
standards
which
I'll
circle
back
with
and
in
another
second
I
think
there
is
opportunity
to
revise
policies
over
the
next
few
months.
If
you
want
to
engage
okay.
A
C
They're
there's
a
map
that
the
EPA
produced
when
tier
three
emissions
and
fuel
were
coming
out
that
looked
at
the
nation
and
there's
a
red
dot
over
Salt
Lake,
City,
Salt
Lake
County
area
as
the
and
it
was
the
only
one
like
that
in
my
memory
that
is
set
to
receive
the
greatest
benefit
from
those
emissions
reductions
and
through
that
so
I
mean
the
the
EPA
and
there's
plenty
of
documentation
that
we
wouldn't
even
need
to
produce
locally.
To
show
that
those
kind
of
policy
changes
would
be
hugely
beneficial
for.
F
F
When
we
get
into
that
moving
on
with
our
focus
on
existing
resources
to
build
transportation
discretionary
grant
program,
we
expect
another
round
of
funding
to
be
released
when
Congress
put
forward
HJ
resolution
31
the
Omnibus
to
fund
us
for
the
rest
of
fiscal
year
2019,
it
included
a
provision
that
said
to
the
US
Department
transportation
that
it
needed
to
get
out
the
next
solicitation
for
grant
applications
for
the
build
program
within
60
days,
which
would
put
us
around
April
15th.
So
we're
expecting
a
solicitation
any
day.
F
Now
the
city
applied
for
a
grant,
warned
the
last
cycle,
but
DoD
had
received
851
applications,
totaling
more
than
11
billion
dollars
in
federal
assistance.
When
there
was
only
one
point,
five
billion
dollars
available.
I
would
highly
recommend
that
the
city
receives
a
formal
debriefing
on
that
application.
F
F
So
we'll
see
what
a
judge
has
to
say
about
it,
but
it's
worth
noting
that
in
February,
the
white
house,
d-o-t
and
EPA
released
a
joint
statement
after
they
had
been
negotiating
with
the
California
Air
Resources
Control
Board
for
a
number
of
months,
saying
that
they
were
stepping
back
from
discussions
with
California.
The
only
reason
that's
important
California
is
one
of
the
states
that
had
a
Clean
Air
Act
waiver
in
which
it
was
able
to
pursue
its
own
more
strict
emission
standards.
F
This
one
is
basically
designed
for
you
in
just
a
handful
of
other
areas
that
are
in
a
non-attainment
zone
as
designated
by
EPA.
Every
year
they
limit
eligibility
to
perhaps
the
top
five
to
ten
jurisdictions.
That
would
be
eligible
according
to
the
greatest
number
of
pollutants
in
the
air
there,
and
so
if
there
was
ever
an
opportunity
where
you're
gonna
compete
well
automatically
because
of
the
limited
eligibility.
This
is
a
program
that
I
would
encourage
either
the
city
to
pursue
or
its
partners
at
the
state
level.
If
appropriate.
You
know
to
some.
F
F
Absolutely,
and
so
where
the
city
may
not
have
the
staffing
capacity
to
do
so,
I
do
recommend
you
know
having
a
level
of
engagement
with
other
jurisdictions,
whether
it
is
doubt
board.
I'll,
look
up
the
eligibility
on
this
for
certain
grant
opportunities,
it's
open
to
either
units
of
state
or
local
government.
Others
have
broader
eligibility
where
a
special
district
government,
such
as
a
Port
Authority
with
oversight
of
air
quality
control,
is
eligible.
So
I
will
refer
back
and
check
the
language
on
this,
but
I
do
believe
they
can
apply,
for
that
will.
F
Have
yet
to
be
released,
EPA
just
finalized
its
budget
for
FY
2019,
so
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
grant
programs
come
out
now
if
we
miss
the
cycle
for
2019.
The
good
news
is
that
we're
we're
already
looking
ahead
to
2020,
starting
on
October
1,
so
another
cycle
would
be
just
around
the
corner
and
these
programs
have
enjoyed
support
from
both
sides
of
the
aisle.
Historically,
that's.
C
F
Yep
and
just
to
make
you
all
aware,
if
there
are
any
programs
of
interest
right
now,
we're
in
the
middle
of
budget
and
appropriations
season.
So
if
you
want
us
to
submit
any
appropriations,
requests
informally
on
your
behalf,
the
subcommittee
deadlines
for
most
Committees
of
jurisdiction,
just
passed
on
March
28th,
but,
as
you
know,
from
making
the
rounds
on
the
hill,
we
had
the
opportunity
with
several
council
members
to
identify
some
resources
that
are
of
interest.
So
in
an
informal
way.
F
Just
going
down
the
list
in
terms
of
other
items
of
concern
with
the
environment,
we
also
have
appropriations
for
both
clean
drinking
water
and
wastewater
infrastructure
projects,
and
so,
while
water
resources
are
up
there
for
you,
there's
also
with
EO,
which
is
a
revolving
loan
fund
for
waste
and
for
water
and
waste
water
projects.
If
that's
of
interest
to
you
or
your
partners
in
the
state.
E
So
I'm
looking
to
finance
a
little
bit,
but
it
really
depends
on
the
project
and
each
each
department
would
sort
of
evaluate
on
this
specific
project.
If
there
were
specific
things
that
fit
the
grant
criteria,
sometimes
we
miss
grant
opportunities
because
we
don't
know
about
them,
and
so
the
department's
don't
know
to
apply
for
them.
But
I
can't
think
off
the
top
of
my
head
about
these
specific
projects.
Any
that
would
qualify,
I
think
the
water
infrastructure
finance
would
likely
be
public
utilities,
but
we
have
such
favorable
bond
ratings
that
oftentimes
we
get
cheaper
financing.
F
C
F
The
burn
justice
assistance
grant
program
and
also
the
cop's
office
is
a
community
oriented
policing
development
grant
program,
meaning
that
jurisdictions
around
the
country
are
unable
to
access
any
of
those
federal
grant
dollars,
and
that's
been
the
case
now,
since
the
fiscal
year
2017
grant
rounds,
and
so
that
is
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
that
are
being
held
up
by
this
lawsuit.
Unfortunately,
there's
no
further
update
on
that
lawsuit
at
this
time.
F
Otherwise,
if
you
go
through
the
FY,
2019
omnibus
Department,
Department
of
Justice
did
well
in
terms
of
resources
for
Public
Safety,
the
burn
justice
assistance
grant
is
funded
at
four
hundred.
Twenty
three
point:
five
million,
which
is
a
slight
increase
over
enacted
funding
from
FY
2018,
there's
also
robust
investments.
If
you
look
down
the
list
here
for
any
of
these
opportunities
that
might
be
of
interest
to
you
of
your
Police
Department,
there's
funding
available
for
bulletproof
vests,
there's
funding
available
for
school
violence
prevention.
F
Here
the
cop's
office
has
25
million
to
give
out
for
activities
related
to
stopping
school
violence.
There's
an
additional
75
million
that
will
be
administered
by
a
separate
office
within
the
Department
of
Justice.
The
cop's
office
also
has
its
anti
methamphetamine
and
anti
heroin
task
force
programs
which
require
you
to
apply
through
the
state.
F
So
that's
one
important
thing
to
note:
if
there's
any
interest
in
that,
you
would
need
a
partner
with
the
state
agency
there's
also
ten
million
dollars
for
preparing
for
active
shooter
training
programs
elsewhere
in
the
Department
of
Justice
Second
Chance
Act
had
robust
funding
so
for
any
of
the
city's
efforts
involving
the
re-entering
population.
There's
good
funding
available
there
there's
three
hundred
forty
seven
million
dollars
available
for
different
grant
opportunities
to
address
the
opioids
crisis.
C
F
I
believe
that
either
the
city
or
a
non-profit
partner
at
some
point
has
applied
and
I
believe
been
successful
and
the
family
nod
behind
you,
yeah
I'm,
not
sure
which
fiscal
year
it
was.
It
was
not
2018.
I
know
that,
just
because
I
went
through
all
the
data
recently,
but
there
has
been
efforts
in
the
past,
especially
around
human
trafficking
and
women
in
families.
F
So
there's
actually
a
lot
of
different
programs
authorized
under
the
Act
in
the
office
on
violence
against
women
is
the
the
entity
that
directly
administers
those
programs
so
glad
to
flag
those
for
you
guys
when
they
come
around
this
thing,
yeah
and
DOJ,
just
in
general
right
now
is,
is
issuing
most
of
its
solicitations.
It
is
the
busy
season
for
grant
opportunities
in
DC
and
just
to
make
you
all
aware,
basically,
because
the
budget
got
backed
up
so
far
into
February.
F
These
funds
all
have
to
be
appropriated
before
October,
1st
and
so
to
get
the
funding
of
the
door
before
October
1st.
They
need
a
30-day
intergovernmental
review
in
September.
They
need
to
evaluate
over
the
summer.
So
all
the
solicitations
are
going
out
either
in
April
or
May.
So
it's
a
really
busy
time
into
one
way.
I
think
that's
helpful.
To
sort
of
manage
priorities
is
just
if
there's
good
work,
you're
already
doing
programs
you
already
find
effective
in
or
looking
to
expand.
F
E
I
have
a
quick
question.
It
may
seem
a
little
bit
random
and
you
may
not
know
the
answer,
but
I
know
at
the
end
of
last
year
the
Congress
passed
the
first
step
act,
yes
and
I'm
wondering
if
there
will
be
any
grant
opportunities
for
us
through
the
first
step,
act
to
look
at
our
prison
systems
and
some
criminal
justice
reform.
So.
F
So
during
the
process
of
implementing
that,
and
some
good
news
to
share
I'm
smiling
when
I
say
this-
is
that
some
of
the
first
inmates
who
have
had
their
records
expunged
under
the
first
step
back
are
now
reentering
society.
It's
really
exciting
to
see
some
good
federal
policy
taking
shape.
In
the
meantime,
I
will
say,
while
DOJ
and
other
agencies
are
standing
up,
those
programs
it
usually
takes
about
12
months
and
Congress-
needs
to
still
appropriate
funding
for
some
of
those
programs.
F
Yeah
thanks
Jen
just
rounding
out
our
public
safety
in
public
health,
the
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services
is
also
taking
a
lead
when
it
comes
to
addressing
substance,
abuse
and
mental
health
disorders,
including
the
opioid
epidemic.
So
in
2019
there
was
4.4
billion
dollars
of
total
funding
appropriated
for
programs
to
respond
to
the
opioids
crisis.
F
Samsa,
the
substance,
abuse
and
mental
health
services
administration
had
one
point:
nine
billion
dollars
for
their
Block
Grant
alone
in
the
state
opioid
response
grants
we
just
saw
about
a
week
ago
had
another
announcement
of
a
supplemental
funding,
availability
from
FY
2018
being
distributed
to
States.
So
I
know
that
Utah
has
already
received
more
than
5.5
million
million
dollars,
and
so
one
thing,
that's
important
for
us
to
just
be
aware
of
Samsa
has
been
having
some
issues
with
states,
not
getting
that
money
and
ministered
and
down
to
the
ground
fast
enough.
F
So
if
you
are
seeing
any
barriers
there,
please
make
us
aware
for
us
to
share
what
Sam
said
something
going
on
across
the
country,
but
also,
if
there's
opportunity,
to
engage
with
the
state
for
the
state
dollars.
There's
also
grants
again
for
local
jurisdictions
to
apply
directly
in
one
of
them
actually
right
now,
there's
a
comprehensive
opioids
abuse.
Site-Specific
grant
opportunity
that
just
was
released
in
the
Federal
Register
yesterday,
so
I'll
be
writing
that
grant
memo
on
the
plane
home
tonight.
We'll
get
that
right
over
to
you.
F
They're
entitled
to
the
city
of
San,
Jose
California
filed
a
lawsuit
on
behalf
of
more
than
20
local
jurisdictions,
and
it
lost
a
stay,
but
it
recently
wanted
to
transfer
from
the
Tenth
Circuit
to
the
Ninth
Circuit
Court
of
Appeals,
based
on
the
fact
that
the
Ninth
Circuit
had
ruled
on
this
in
the
1990s.
So
that
was
good
news
in
terms
of
a
local
perspective,
but
in
the
meantime,
congresswoman
Anna
Eshoo
of
California's
introduced
a
piece
of
legislation
that
would
prohibit
the
FCC
from
enacting
this
order.
F
F
The
administration
is
doing
a
good
job,
taking
a
comprehensive
inventory
of
all
of
its
smart
city's
resources,
I
sent
over
a
spreadsheet
and
want
to
make
sure
you
all
have
it
if
not
I'll,
send
it
again,
but
there's
about
30
different
programs
that
might
be
of
interest
to
you
all.
They
range
to
support
activities
ranging
from
energy
and
infrastructure,
to
intelligent
transportation
systems
and
resiliency.
It's
basically
a
bunch
of
different
grants
from
a
bunch
of
different
federal
agencies.
So
take
a
look
like
that.
F
If
smart
cities
are
of
interest
to
you
and
please
flag
for
us
anything,
you
want
to
pursue.
Finally,
just
to
close
out
my
update,
I
want
to
bring
you
or
want
to
share
some
news
on
Opportunity
Zones.
It
was
great
to
see
that
Salt,
Lake
City
has
seven
different
census,
tracts
designated
as
opportunity
zones
and
I
just
want
to
share
with
you
all
some
perspectives
from
around
the
country.
As
you
all
get
to
work
on,
the
implementation,
I
won't
go
through
all
of
the
the
regulations
with
you
guys.
F
If
you're
not
aware
an
opportunity
zone
is
a
federally
designated
distressed
community,
where
new
investments
can
be
made
for
preferential
tax
treatment
to
spur
economic
development
by
providing
benefits
to
investors,
and
so
the
state
or
the
governor
took
solicitations
of
interests
for
different
census,
tracts
that
would
qualify
and,
in
the
end,
passed
recommendations
along
to
the
Secretary
of
Treasury,
and
so
seven
zones
were
ultimately
designated
here
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
And
if
you
look
at
the
map,
not
sure
how
many
different
council
members
have
an
opportunity
zone
within
their
district.
F
But
for
any
of
you
that
do
have
one
I
want
you
to
know
that
you
may
be
playing
the
role
of
salesperson
for
your
opportunity
zone
in
the
months
ahead.
It's
interesting
with
opportunity
zones,
because
this
is
the
first
real
federal
program
where
now
there's
no
need
for
real
engagement
with
the
federal
government
anymore.
Now
that
you
have
these
zones
designated,
the
time
has
come
to
turn
to
the
private
sector
and
engage
with
them,
and
so
we've
had
our
first
batch
of
regulations
be
finalized
by
the
Department
of
Treasury.
F
Those
regulations
have
largely
governed
investments
in
real
estate
investments
within
the
opportunity
zones
we're
waiting
a
second
batch
of
regulations
to
govern
investments
in
small
businesses
and
other
enterprises.
One
of
the
things
I
want
you
all
to
be
aware
of
is,
as
of
this
point
in
time.
There's
no
legal
reporting
requirement
in
place
to
measure
long-term
impacts
of
these
investments.
F
How
do
you
work
to
ensure
that
those
developers
who
are
going
to
pursue
projects
within
your
zones
are
delivering
projects
that
have
a
community
benefit
and
serve
as
an
asset
to
the
community
and
improve
education
and
employment
opportunities
for
folks
located
within
those
zones?
In
one
of
the
ways
that
a
city
can
incentivize
those
types
of
priority
projects
would
be
your
additional
financing
incentive.
F
So
if
the
city
were
willing
to
provide
tax,
increment,
financing,
lytec
or
new
markets,
tax
credits
to
layer
on
top
of
those
opportunities,
own
benefits,
there's
nothing
to
preclude
you
from
doing
that.
In
fact,
a
lot
of
cities
are
establishing
principles
in
which
they
would
provide
these
additional
incentives
for
projects
that
drive
outcomes
they
want
to
see.
So
we
would
ask
you,
all,
in
the
weeks
and
months
ahead,
to
consider
what
types
of
policy
priorities
you
want
to
drive
in
your
opportunity.
Zones.
F
I.
Think
that
interagency
and
cross
sectional
collaboration
is
going
to
be
critical
here.
As
you
work
with
regional
partners,
I
will
say
that
the
state
helped
Shepherd
these
zones
into
fruition,
but
there
may
come
a
day
where
it
has
to
pick
its
favorite
child
and
so
I
would
encourage
every
unit
of
local
government
to
be
prepared
to
be
the
best
marketer,
the
best
advertiser,
the
best
salesperson
for
projects
and
those
zones.
F
We
also
work
with
Louisville
Metro
government
Mayor
Greg
Fischer
has
become
somewhat
of
a
national
leader
on
the
issue
he
developed
what
he
calls
an
investment
prospectus,
working
with
Bruce
Katz,
formerly
of
the
Brookings
Administration
in
Louisville
and
four
other
cities
that
went
ahead
with
developing
those
initial
investment
prospectus.
Want
you
all
to
know
that
it's
a
good
idea
and
they
want
you
to
rob
it
from
them.
So,
I'm
glad
to
share
that
investment
prospectus
with
you.
F
It's
basically
a
catalog
of
different
projects
located
within
each
of
their
different
19
opportunity
zones,
one
of
which
is
a
medical
district.
One's
a
university
district
one
is
a
place
where
they're
looking
to
create
more
dense,
affordable
housing.
Each
of
those
opportunities
owns
has
their
unique
assets
and
different
priorities
that
they
want
to
come
to
bear
in
those
opportunities
own,
so
consider
different
goals
for
each
of
the
seven
zones.
F
These
are
the
funds
that
have
been
established
with
the
national
focus,
as
you
can
see,
we're
not
talking
about
pennies
here,
we're
talking
about
five
hundred
million
dollar
funds
being
established,
and
so
in
the
weeks
and
months
ahead
when
you
all
feel
ready
to
go.
We
are
here
to
connect
you
with
each
of
these
folks
in
the
private
sector.
We
anticipate
that
they're
gonna
have
a
very
heavy
presence
in
New
York
City
Washington
DC
San
Francisco
Los,
Angeles
Seattle,
we're
already
seeing
funds
be
created,
keeping
an
eye
out
for
Utah
specific
funds.
F
Just
given
some
of
the
connections
with
Jim
Sorensen
here
I
would
think
that
this
market
will
be
well
well
represented,
but
in
the
meantime,
if
you
take
a
look
at
each
of
these
funds,
they
each
have
a
different
mission.
Some
are
affordable,
housing,
others
are
infrastructure,
some
are
energy
and
so
try
to
marry
up
funds
with
your
priorities.
So,
as
you
can
see,
there's
about
20
different
funds
here,
national
in
scope
recommend
engaging
with
them
as
soon
as
possible.
I
think
this
is
a
case
where
the
early
bird
is
going
to
get
the
worm
councilmember.
D
I
think
early
on
there
was
some
speculation
that
this
would
not
help
affordable
housing.
Very
much
based
on
the
terms
in
the
length
of
time
is
that
changing
based
and
the
funds
are
being
created
because
they're
bringing
other
money
in
or
something
as
fundamental
being
changed
in
how
that's
written,
I
think.
F
From
what
I'm
seeing
I
would
say,
nearly
half
of
the
funds
are
advertising
themselves
as
wanting
to
work
on
an
affordable
housing,
portfolio
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
things
that's
very
attractive
to
them
our
local
government
stepping
forward
and
for
projects
that
may
have
some
risk
or
not
enough
profit
associated
with
them
in
the
short
term.
I
think
that
local
governments
layering
on
additional
incentives
like
new
markets,
tax
credits
and
lytec
are
making
those
types
of
investments
more
I.
D
Think
that's
the
key
piece
for
us
is
the
opportunity
zone
itself
is
not
gonna
promote
the
housing.
You
have
to
have
the
lie,
Tech
or
other
things,
I've
Justin
Pence
a
lot.
It
doesn't
help
us
so
I'm
concerned
that
we're
we're
not
having
a
high
tech
period
or
other
things,
and
if
we're
relying
on
this
to
be
the
affordable
housing
piece,
we're
gonna
miss
out,
because
this
isn't
gonna
drive
that
piece
that
I'm
aware
of
so
yeah.
F
E
D
And
I
think
the
whole
point
was
that
affordable
housing
was
not
gonna
make
money
for
a
developer.
These
folks
are
investing
money
because
they
get
a
tax
benefit
long
term.
By
sticking
around
for
10
years,
plus
yeah
they're
not
gonna,
make
money
off
the
affordable
housing
piece,
they're,
making
money
off
of
something
that
generates
revenue
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
be
very
conscientious
of
that
and
if
we
want
housing
as
part
of
this,
we
have
to
layer
that,
in
on
separately
than
the
zone,
yeah.
F
And
I
will
say,
there
are
some
players
that
are
better
than
others:
Enterprise
Community
Partners,
which
is
a
major
player
when
it
comes
to
new
markets
in
just
Community
Development
in
general,
from
what
I
heard
they're
establishing
a
fund
of
their
own.
And
so
you
would
look
to
someone
like
enterprise
to
be
doing
the
right
thing.
F
So
if,
if
you
all
have
projects
in
your
portfolio
and
you're
wondering
where
the
interest
might
be
we're
here
to
sort
of
serve
as
your
matchmaker
again,
you
know
there's
not
really
any
more
role
for
the
federal
government
to
play,
but
there's
certainly
an
interest
in
seeing
this
program
be
successful
and
also
ensuring
that
it's
not
going
to
some
of
the
wrong
things.
Some
of
the
first
deals
from
what
I
saw
were
things
that
were
less
than
stellar
if
you've
seen
them
in
the
news.
E
You
help
us
think
through
from
a
process
perspective
based
on
councilmember
Johnston's
questions.
I,
think
the
city
is
often
in
the
role
of
facilitator
of
projects.
We
don't
we're
not
you
know
the
ones
putting
together
the
project,
so
we
don't
decide
the
lytec
that's
offered.
We
don't
decide
that
RDA
incentives
offered
we're
often
just
filling
the
gap,
and
so
looking
for
that
way
to
sort
of
through
a
process
sort
of
regularly
free
up
those
dollars
rather
than
just
sort
of
project
by
project
I.
Don't
know
if
you
don't.
E
F
So
I
think
if
you
were
to
develop
a
prospectus,
I
mean
it's
a
good
time
to
have
a
policy
debate
here
and
now
so
that,
if
you
know
your
top
priority
is
gonna,
be
affordable.
Housing
saying
that
we're
gonna
really
prioritize
our
lytec
investments
toward
these
types
of
projects,
having
a
clear-cut
expectation
of
what
you're
gonna
invest
in
as
a
city,
I
know
that
might
be
hard
and
but
putting
a
general
principle
out
there
to
the
private
sector.
Saying
hey,
we
we
want
to
be
as
attractive
as
possible
as
a
market.
F
Here
are
the
conversations
we've
already
had
to
address
any
of
your
concerns
around
zoning,
for
instance
other
ordinances
you
all
might
have
in
place
and
again
on
the
flip
side
of
that
as
much
as
you
want
to
attract,
you
also
want
to
attract
the
right
types
of
projects
and
so
just
establishing
what
those
principles
are
for.
You
all
I
think
it's
a
really
worthwhile
conversation
to
have,
especially
even
at
the
end
of
FY
2019,
the
new
markets.
Tax
credit
program
needs
to
be
reauthorized
at
the
end
of
this
year,
and
so
there's
some
uncertainty.
F
F
All
right
so
just
about
finished
here,
I
just
wanted
to
make
you
all
aware
that
we're
there
to
support
you
all
24/7.
If
you
have
any
questions,
we're
looking
forward
to
just
working
on
your
behalf
and
we'll
continue
to
monitor
legislative
regulatory
and
grant
opportunities
for
you
all
in
the
weeks
ahead.
My
colleagues
and
I
truly
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
work
on
your
behalf
in
Washington
DC
grateful
to
have
the
time
to
spend
with
you
tonight.
This
is
my
cell
phone
number
I
understand.
F
There
are
timezones
I'm
available
24/7
I
used
to
do
grant
writing
myself.
So
if
you
guys
are
pursuing
any
grants
in
the
weeks
and
months
ahead,
tell
your
grant
writers,
they
can
call
me
any
hour
of
the
day.
I'm
used
to
deadlines
and
I
just
really
appreciate
your
time
tonight.
Any
other
questions
Jen.
A
F
A
Jen
we
are
going
to
bump
item
number
three
on
our
agenda.
The
budget
amendment
number
five
for
fiscal
year,
2018
2019.
We
will
talk
about
that
next
week,
so
we
will
go
to
board
appointments
right
now.
I
know
that
Jeff
Carlton
has
been
in
the
audience
for
a
bit.
So
we'll
have
him
come
up
first
Jeff.
If
you
could
just
introduce
yourself
and
tell
us
why
you
are
interested
in
serving
on
the
business
advisory
board.
D
A
E
Want
to
say
that
I
know
Jeff
for
a
little
bit
now
and
I'm
excited
that
you
are
going
to
be
on
this
board.
I
think
that
your
knowledge
of
small
businesses
and
how
to
work
with
them
and
make
them
grow
and
your
knowledge
of
the
city
processes
to
get
through
all
of
that
will
be
very
helpful
on
the
advisory
committee
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
it,
and
it's
good
to
see
you
thanks.
D
Very
much-
and
you
know
to
your
point,
starting
a
business
here-
we've
actually
availed
ourselves
of
quite
a
few
city
services,
and
you
know
for
the
most
part,
it's
working,
but
I
feel,
like
I've
touched
just
about
every
part
of
the
city
and
one
way
or
the
other.
So
that's
a
perspective.
I
hope
that
it's
helpful
right.
C
To
thank
you
for
your
willingness
to
serve.
I
think
that
the
boards
and
commissions
in
our
city
that
are
staffed
by
residents
as
volunteers
are
one
of
the
most
uplifting
and
inspiring
parts
of
city
of
our
city
and
the
your
willingness
to
be
civically,
engaged
and
I.
Also,
thank
you
for
the
products
you
produce.
Thank.
D
Obviously,
I
am
also
a
big
supporter
of
your
business
and
what
you've
been
able
to
bring
to
our
neighborhood
and
mighty,
and
it
you've
just
turned
that
area
into
a
real,
just
transformed
it
into
a
community
space
which,
I
think
is
great
I
did
want
to
ask
you,
given
your
experience,
both
as
a
your
corporate
experience
and
then
as
a
small
business
owner.
What
do
you
think
are
the
great
the
best
opportunity?
D
What
opportunities
does
Salt
Lake
City
offer
that
maybe
other
places
don't
you
know,
I've
lived
in
gosh
I
think
my
wife
and
I
counted
the
other
day,
14
different
places
throughout
my
professional
career,
so
10
years
in
Salt
Lake
is
you
know,
setting
the
roots,
and
this
community
has
so
many
attributes
that
you
know
we
moved
here
from
Philadelphia,
which
was
a
big
city
and
all
the
wonderful
things
about
a
large
city.
You
get
so
much
of
it
here
in
Salt
Lake.
D
If
you're
flying
in
for
a
meeting
you're
going
to
Park
City
because
you're
an
out-of-town
guest
and
attending
a
conference
somewhere,
you
know
your
best
impression
of
Utah
is
Salt
Lake
City,
and
to
that
and
there's
just
the
changes
I've
seen
in
the
last
10
years
or
have
been,
you
know
significant
and
magnificent,
and
the
changes
just
keep
on
coming
and
I'm
excited
to
be
part
of
that.
Well,
thank
you.
That
makes
me
happy.
That's
that's
exactly
yeah!
That's
so
great
Thank
You.
C
A
Carlton,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
willingness
to
serve.
You
will
be
on
the
consent
agenda
across
the
hall
and
our
formal
meeting.
You
don't
need
to
stick
around
for
that,
but
you
know
thank
you
very
much
and
we
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you.
Thank
you.
I
look
forward
to
working
with
you
too.
Mr.
William
is
here
for
an
appointment
to
the
housing
advisory
and
appeals
board.
A
A
D
D
I'm,
just
a
little
bit
shocked,
you're,
not
going
on
to
the
Arts
Council.
You
know,
I'm
an
artist
I,
know
and
and
I
applied
for
a
percent
for
Arts
grants
and
not
grants,
but
percent
for
arts
commissions
and
there's
very
little
money
and
I'm
getting
less
of
it.
I
wouldn't
I,
wouldn't
want
to
cut
myself
out
of
that
small
financial
stream
I
think
it's
a
great
board
and
the
Arts
Council
is
very
well
run.
Well.
District
one
has
a
lot
of
your
arts,
so
we
appreciate
it.
Okay,.
A
D
Two
quick
items
first
is
a
reminder
of
your
special
meeting
that
is
scheduled
for
Friday
at
10:00
a.m.
and
that
meeting
will
be
here
and
the
purpose
is
to
hear
from
a
property
owner
and
then
consider
whether
to
vote
up
or
down
on
a
particular
item
so
that
that
will
be
coming
up.
Friday
at
10:00
a.m.