►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Formal Meeting - 5/21/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
we'd
like
to
welcome
each
of
you
to
our
formal
meeting
tonight,
and
we
appreciate
that
you
have
taken
time
out
of
your
schedule
to
attend,
participate
and
see
your
local
government
at
work.
I'd
like
to
highlight
that
we
have
business
tonight
as
the
local
Building
Authority,
the
Redevelopment
Agency
and
as
the
City
Council
I
want
to
make
that
distinction
for
the
public's
understanding
and
to
ensure
that
we
have
a
clear
record.
A
A
A
So,
to
start
the
meeting,
we're
going
to
go
over
some
guidelines
that
we
go
over
at
every
meeting.
Just
to
make
sure
that
we
maintain
civility
and
decorum,
please
be
respectful
to
other
people's
comments,
avoid
jeering
or
cheering
because
it
could
cause
someone
to
feel
intimidated.
Please
also
take
care
of
this
historic
meeting
room
by
not
standing
on
furniture
or
leaning
against
the
decorative
paintings.
This
is
the
only
room
in
the
city
and
county
building.
That's
still
used
for
the
original
purpose,
which
is
lawmaking.
A
If
you
have
a
sign
prop
or
other
piece
of
equipment,
video
equipment
or
signs,
please
make
sure
that
it
does
cause
disruption
or
block
other
people's
views.
Signs
that
are
wider
than
your
chair
will
need
to
be
displayed
in
the
hallway.
Also,
items
like
sticks
and
gals
are
not
allowed.
Please
do
not
approach
the
Dyess.
If
you
have
something
that
you
want
to
pass
out
to
the
council,
a
staff
member
can
assist
you.
Our
staff
is
here
to
help
you.
A
If
you
need
any
assistance
or
have
any
questions,
please
raise
your
hand
and
they
will
come
and
assist
you.
We
also
recognize
that
two
minutes
of
comment
may
not
be
long
enough
to
get
all
of
your
thoughts
outlined
in
one
speech.
So
please
visit
our
website,
SLC
Council
comm
or
refer
to
the
contact
information
sheets
by
the
speaker
cards
for
information
about
other
ways
to
share
your
comments
with
the
council
via
email
phone
or
mail.
A
B
A
All
those
in
favor
aye
all
opposed
all
right,
seeing
none
then
that
passes.
Okay.
We
are
at
the
item
for
public
hearing
portion
of
our
local
Building
Authority
agenda,
which
is
item
b1,
that
is,
regarding
the
budget
for
capital
projects
fund
of
the
local
Building
Authority
for
fiscal
year,
2019
2020.
B
B
A
E
A
Now
we
will
move
on
to
oh,
we
have
no
other
business
and
tonight
as
the
local
Building
Authority.
So
this
local
Building
Authority
meeting
will
be
adjourned.
That's
right!
You
hear
that
gavel.
Okay,
so
we
will
move
on
and
now
we
are
convened
as
the
Redevelopment
Agency
board.
As
the
RDA.
We
have
one
public
hearing
and
that
will
be
a
budget
for
the
redevelopment
agency
of
Salt
Lake
City
for
fiscal
year,
2019
2020,
a
resolution
adopting
the
final
budget
for
the
Redevelopment
Agency
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
I
have
one
comment
card,
so
George
Chapman.
F
Okay,
first
of
all,
before
my
comment,
I
need
to
point
out
that
there
should
be
a
whole
lot
more
than
one
card
commenting
on
a
big
budget
at
the
RDA
18%
of
your
budget
is
going
to
the
Depot
district,
which
is
been
going
around
in
circles
for
decades,
and
you
own
lots
of
vacant
properties
there
that
actually
encourage
criminal
activity.
So
I'm
concerned
that
you
need
to
have
more
public
engagement,
somehow
to
encourage
the
public
to
comment
on
RDA
matters.
I
mean
come
on
me.
That's
it.
F
Okay,
I,
didn't
see
anything
in
the
budget
for
RDA
and
for
Salt
Lake
City
on
Georgia
apartments
and
I
thought
Salt
Lake
City
had
a
chance
to
buy
him
and
I
encouraged
you
to
put
that
in
the
budget.
Please
just
in
case,
so
you
don't
run
around
like
chickens
with
your
heads
and
not
know
what
to
do
when
you
get
a
chance
to
buy
it.
Please
put
it
in
the
budget.
F
The
RDA
also
needs
to
focus
more
on
mixed
use:
mixed
income
housing,
not
just
affordable,
housing
and
I'm
concerned
that
you
keep
pushing
the
envelope
into
too
much
affordable
every
time
we
look
at
this.
Your
experts
tell
you:
mixed
income
works
better
when
somebody's
invested
in
a
neighborhood,
and
they
want
to
live
there
for
a
long
time
that
makes
the
neighborhood
more
stable
and
it
makes
the
environment
better.
Please
mixed
income
should
be
your
policy
at
the
RDA,
not
just
at
the
city.
Thank
you
for
listening.
Mr.
E
G
B
A
Everyone
change
your
hat:
okay,
we're
now
convened
as
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council.
Our
first
council
business
is
item
a2,
which
is
that
the
council
will
approve
the
work
session
meeting,
minutes
of
Tuesday,
April,
2nd
and
Tuesday
April
23rd,
as
well
as
the
formal
meeting
minutes
of
Tuesday
May
7th
2019.
B
A
B
A
B
E
E
A
B
A
E
Because
we
it's
been
on
the
council
agenda
and
we've
talked
about
it
and
nobody's
here
to
talk
about
it
today,
and
so
then
we
can
move
forward
with
it
then
putting
it
on
a
future
council
meeting
where
we're
we
wouldn't
be
holding
public
hearing.
We
would
simply
be
voting
yes
or
no
on
adopting
it
at
that
time,
so
I'm
simply
expediting
to
remove
a
step
that
we
can
remove
at
this
point.
A
And
so
your
your
to
clarify
your
motion,
you're,
not
asking
for
a
vote
tonight,
you're
asking
that
we
just
vote.
Oh,
you
are
asking
for
the
vote.
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
that's
what
I
originally
thought,
but
then
the
explanation
need
a
little
less
sense:
okay,
councilmember
Mendenhall!
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
this.
G
A
B
E
I
mean
it's
not
a
rule.
That's
been
adopted
by
the
council.
It's
a
practice.
That's
been
adopted
by
the
council
that
you
act
at
a
future
meeting,
so
you
can
do
either,
but
we
typically
say
suspend
the
rules
just
because
it's
been
such
a
practice
of
a
council
to
do
it.
That
way.
So
it's
up
to
you,
okay,.
H
H
H
The
proposal
represents
one
percent
of
public
utilities
budget
for
the
coming
year.
It
did
not
even
make
the
list
of
upcoming
major
projects
when
you
received
a
briefing
last
year.
The
proposed
building
has
significant
consequences
for
immediate
neighbors
and
for
people
from
all
over
the
region
who
come
to
City
Creek
Canyon.
Some
of
those
consequences
are
aesthetic
emotional
and
social.
Some
of
them
are
financial,
because
you're
dealing
with
the
budget
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
financial
ones.
H
H
The
city
made
significant
investments
in
the
park
spaces
at
4th
Avenue,
starting
in
1912,
and
continuing
moving
forward,
repairing
damages
from
flooding
in
52
and
83
and
following
the
tornado
in
99,
although
Public
Utilities
owns
the
land,
Salt
Lake
City
has
made
the
investments
and
Parks
has
maintained
the
spaces.
The
proposed
facility
does
not
enhance
the
hundred
and
seven
years
of
investment.
H
In
fact,
the
proposal
compromises
it
then
I've
listed
for
unintended
consequences,
which
I
think
have
financial
ramifications,
spanning
from
the
youth
city
program
to
a
project
that
occurred
in
reservoir
park
that
had
very
different
outcomes
about
ten
years
ago.
If,
for
a
moment,
I
thought
that
the
proposal
was
essential
for
the
greater
common
good
I
would
accept
what
public
utilities
has
insisted
on
building
time,
but
I
think
there
are
other
options.
Thank
you.
Thank.
I
I'm
here
for
Crossroads
urban
center
we'd
like
to
call
your
attention
to
the
cities
to
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
for
housing,
with
the
special
assessment
money,
the
new
sales
tax
money
we've
met
with
a
couple
of
you
actually
three
of
you
to
talk
about
the
housing
specifications
in
the
budget.
We
would
like
you
to
look
at
that
and
really
ring
it
out.
We're
not
sure
what
it
represents
and
I'm
sure
that
some
of
you
don't
know
what
it
represents.
For
instance,
why
is
a
census
coordinator,
funded
for
$80,000
out
of
housing?
I
Money
census
concerns
many
many
things.
We
don't
disagree
with
the
idea
that
we
need
to
make
a
special
count
and
a
special
assignment,
but
why
is
it
coming
out
of
this
budget?
This
part
of
the
budget,
the
Community
Development
grant
administrator.
The
second
item
on
there
is
almost
$100,000.
Well
that
used
to
be
funded
with
CDBG
funds.
Why
are
we
funding
that
was
city
money?
Now,
if
there's
a
an
issue
there
and
the
money
is
going
to
be,
is
this
position
going
to
take
a
look
at
this
five
million
dollars?
I
Is
it
going
to
do
all
the
housing
stuff
and
it's
going
to
do
all
the
housing
stuff,
then?
Why
is
it
coming
out
of
just
this?
One
particular
part
of
the
budget-
and
one
thing
that
is
a
mystery
to
us-
is
the
landlord
insurance
pilot
for
three
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
What
is
that
is
that
a
bailout
for
the
landlords
that
can't
already
pick
on
the
land
on
the
customers?
They
have
the
tenants
they
have
the
renters.
They
have
that
they're
robbing
in
court.
I
If
this
is
to
back
up
the
landlord
program
that
was
talked
about
five
years
ago
and
the
crossroads
is
condemned
more
than
once
publicly,
we
would
say,
throw
it
out
and
put
that
money
back
into
the
trust
fund.
If
anything,
this
money
should
be
spent
on
housing,
the
Community
Land
Trust
and
the
Housing
Trust
Fund.
We
think
our
time
really
strong
items
in
this
list
and
that's
where
you
should
look
first.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
B
Yes,
my
name
is
really
wrong.
I
live
at
sixteen
Kings
Hill
Drive
in
Cottonwood
Heights,
but
I'd
like
to
speak
on
the
issue
of
adding
milk
returning
to
the
watershed
that
needs
done
bad.
We
need
to
get
those
dogs
out
of
their
dogs.
Those
horse
out
of
their.
They
can
go
to
the
windows,
then
go
to
American
for
canning,
then
go
out
west.
B
J
Thank
you
for
all
your
work
on
this.
A
name
is
Bernie
Hart,
I'm
being
coached
by
four
or
five
people
to
learn
how
to
be
kinder
and
nicer
and
still
I,
and
talk
and
start
polite
conversations
about
the
items
that
concern
me
and
I
struggle
with
that
for
a
number
of
reasons.
But
the
primary
reason
is
when
I
get
into
discussion
with
people
on
the
issues
that
concern
me
and
that's
homelessness
and
I.
Ask
people
to
have
a
data
base
reasonable
conversation
about
the
situation
as
it
actually
is.
J
It
exists
in
Salt,
Lake,
City,
I'm,
talking
to
public
officials
that
don't
have
any
data
to
support
any
of
their
positions
and
and
I
in
support
of
the
people
I
care
about
and
having
taken
their
perspective
to
the
table.
That
causes
me
deep
concern,
and
especially
when
those
kind
of
conversations
go
on
over
and
over
again,
it
troubles
me
and
I
get
angry
and
what
you
see
is
my
anger
and,
and
the
anger
reflects
my
frustration
with
a
system
that
doesn't
meet
the
needs
of
the
people
I
care
about.
J
So
what
I'm
going
to
encourage
is
that
the
homeless
coordinator
that
you're
looking
to
hire
the
city
that'd
be
a
non
homeless
person,
a
non
person
that
doesn't
deal
with
homelessness,
but
deals
with
data
and
statistics
and
looks
for
things
that
work
and
measures
and
measures
and
looks
out
dollars
are
being
spent
effectively
because
with
the
limited
fundings
we
have
available
to
us
for
this
issue,
we
need
to
find
programs
that
work,
not
the
programs.
We
say
they
work,
but
programs
that
we
have
data
to
support
that
they
actually
work
and
that
also
goals.
J
You
have
a
$500,000
item
on
VOA
outreach.
I
suggested
that
be
attached
to
the
new
effort
by
the
homeless,
Oversight
Committee.
That's
going
to
be
collecting
data
on
the
homeless
effort
in
Salt,
Lake
City
to
see
if
people
stay
off
fall,
stay
out
of
homelessness
or
they
don't
and
any
funding
that
the
city
puts
into
any
homeless
program.
I
think
should
be
reflected
in
in
some
kind
of
oversight
of
that
kind.
So
well.
A
K
K
Just
so
many
of
you
know:
I'm
a
land
planner
or
a
landscape
architect,
and
one
of
the
books
that
is
fundamental
in
our
profession
is
image.
The
image
of
the
city
by
Kevin,
Kevin
Lynch,
was
published
by
MIT
in
1960
I
like
to
talk
about
the
image
of
the
city.
With
respect
to
the
golf
enterprise
fund,
when
I
first
moved
here,
Bonneville
golf
course
was
one
of
the
top
ten
public
courses
in
the
country
and
of
those
ten
courses
includes,
of
course,
Pebble
Beach
and
a
number
of
others
that
are
considerably
more
famous
than
Bonneville.
K
K
K
B
F
Okay,
first
of
all
police
budget,
thanks
you
to
the
police
chief
for
providing
or
suggesting
five
park
rangers.
Please
support
him
on
that.
I
know
you
had
to
move
on
and
because
of
some
dissension,
but
Park
Rangers
have
been
asked
for
by
every
community
council
that
I've
attended
in
the
last
five
years.
Every
community
council
wants
Park
Rangers
67
parks.
We
need
Park
Rangers.
Please
support
it,
also
enthused
about
the
body
cams,
the
new
body
cams
that
activate
when
you
pull
the
gun
out
of
the
holster.
F
Great
idea
and
I
also
want
to
point
out,
though
you're
gonna
hire
27
cops
in
the
next
year,
they'll
be
online
in
ten
months.
In
that
time,
you're
gonna
lose
30
cops
minimum.
So
you
hired
80
cops
in
the
last
year.
You
lost
about
80
cops
in
the
last
year
and
you
promised
us
more
cops
with
the
sales
tax
increase.
Were
the
cops,
obviously
there's
something
wrong
with
the
public
safety
budget
and
the
salary
for
cops.
If
Salt
Lake
County
is
providing
or
suggesting
a
16
percent
pay
raise
for
cops,
why
are
we
doing
less?
F
It
doesn't
make
sense.
We're
gonna
lose
a
lot
more
there's
a
lot
more
competition
for
cops
in
this
valley
right
now,
you're
going
to
have
to
increase
the
salaries
for
starting
cops.
Please
consider
that
fee
waivers.
You
stop
the
discussion,
but
back
in
November
I
believe
you
need
to
encourage
that
and
increase
fee
waivers
because
we're
not
just
down
7,500
affordable.
You
know
just
like
we
were
five
years
ago,
we're
down
about
15,000.
Now
we
need
more
affordable
units
and
the
best
way
to
do
it
is
push
fee
waivers.
F
When
the
impact
fees
went
away,
we
doubled
doubled
our
construction
of
apartments
and
that's
important
on
the
water
issue.
You
again
did
not
cover
the
maintenance
issue
with
water,
we're
planting
more
greenery,
but
we're
not
providing
funding
for
public
utilities
for
water.
You
actually
are
lowering
the
higher
tier
water
rate,
so
we're
going
to
be
more
for
using
less
water.
Please
reconsider
that
put
in
maintenance
of
water
as
a
normal
budget
item.
Thank
you.
L
Touches
me
so
deeply
good
I'll
probably
start
crying,
but
it's
regarding
the
fourth
of
nuwell
and
the
proposal
to
make
it
above
the
ground
above
as
well
I've,
been
told
that
it's
going
to
be
a
water
treatment
facility
with
chlorine,
I've
lived
by
one,
it's
awful,
the
stench
that
pervades
the
whole
atmosphere,
the
buzzing
that
doesn't
stop.
I've
learned
that
this
will
be
active
from
the
months
of
April
through
October,
our
favorite
months
to
be
outside
City.
L
Creek
Park
is
beautiful
and
historical,
and
if
we
hear
buzzing
and
smell
that
chlorine
awful
stench,
it
is
not
pleasant
at
all.
It
stresses
you
out
you're
not
enjoying
nature.
As
I
said,
I've
lived
in
that
village,
a
historical
village
that
had
one
of
these
facilities,
I,
was
stressed
just
being
outside
and
instead
of
joint
enjoying
nature
and
the
birds
and
the
mountain
Greece
that
doesn't
it
does
matter,
it
was
historical
whitewashed
buildings.
Do
you
enter
the
village
and
there's
this
big
incompatible
eyesore,
the
ejects
emits
fumes
into
the.
L
Chlorine
and
that
buzzing
so
anyway,
please
find
a
different
solution.
I've
read
that
we
can
keep
the
well
submerged
it
won't.
The
well
needs
to
be
upgraded.
Definitely,
safety
is
huge,
very
important
and
I
think
all
can
be
met
if
we
rely
on
informed
scientific
evidence
that
can
help
us.
Please
time.
E
M
M
My
suggestion
would
be
that
we
take
a
new
look
at
the
at
the
at
the
design
of
that
water
rate
structure
and
and
do
two
things.
First,
we
need
to
tie
that
all
all
of
the
storm
and
the
and
the
and
and
the
drinking
water
and
everything
to
the
area
and
then,
of
course,
we'd
have
to
correct,
for
you
know
who's
using
that
area.
You
know
residents
versus
businesses
and
the
like,
and
then
the
other
thing
is.
Is
that
there's
no
reason
that
we
should
have
this
rate
structure
that
steps
up
like
that?
M
M
We
can
just
apply
the
matrices
of
land
area
to
the
correct
pricing,
for
whoever
the
user
is
and
and
and
that
could
be
done-
software
wise
in
seconds
in
this
day
and
age.
So
we
it
wouldn't
be
a
challenge
to
come
up
with
the
right
prices.
The
thing
is
that
it
would
be
fair
for
everyone.
It
would
certainly
promote
a
lot
more
water
conservation,
we're
not
doing
a
very
good
job
there
and
then
I,
really
important
I
think
it
will
meet
the
shortfalls
of
the
funding
more
quickly,
much
more
quickly.
Thank
you
and
then
I.
A
B
A
K
A
N
N
N
One
thing
that
has
occurred
since
the
last
time:
I
provided
an
update,
the
police,
mutual
aces,
PMMA
fired
the
one
staff
person,
so
it
has
been
temporarily
closed
to
the
public
because
there's
no
longer
a
staff
person
there,
but
we
are
still
working
with
the
stakeholders
to
try
and
figure
out
a
way
to
make
it
available
and
to
address
the
concerns.
But
we
have
not
reached
a
resolution
on
that.
I
wanted.
G
A
comment
that
the
the
fire
concerns
are
it's
disappointing
that
the
public
may
lose
their
access
to
the
range
when
the
fire
maintenance
and
the
some
of
the
issues
that
haven't
been
addressed
by
p.m.
AAA,
RP
mas
problem
and
not
the
public's
problem.
So
I
hope
that
you'll
be
able
to
find
a
way
to
maintain
public
access
and
have
P
maa
addressed
the
maintenance
issues
that
have
led
to
some
concerns.
In
my
understanding
about
the
fight
wildfire
potential
I.
G
D
D
N
D
The
PMA,
a
working
or
the
administration
is
okay,
because
my
understanding
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
this,
but
my
understanding
is
right
now,
since
the
city
has
already
contracted
with
PMA
a
and
they
have
the
PMA
has
the
contract,
we
don't
have
any
discretion
or
just
we
can't
go
in
and
tell
PMA
a
hey.
You
need
to
do
this
because
they
already
had
the
contract.
Is
that
right?
D
There's
really
no
I
mean
and
there's
even
less
that
we
as
the
council
can
do
because
you
have
an
existing
contract
with
PMA
a
so.
Maybe
one
thing
to
do
is
to
look
at
you
know,
facilitating
the
discussion
between
those
two
groups
to
get
it
open
and
then
how
long
is
that
contract
the
PMA
is
contract
next
year?
I,
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
So
right:
okay,
next
I'm,
seeing
I'm
seeing
library
for
nodding
that
it's
next
year
so
okay.
A
A
O
You
thank
you
City
Council
and
thank
you.
Constituents
and
also
citizens
for
coming
and
advocating
for
your
city.
I
always
appreciate
when
I
see
fellow
citizens
here
participating
in
their
local
government.
I
did
not
want
to
make
this
a
budget
question
because
I
know
it's
under
prossies
so
does
make
a
very
general
inquiry
and
it
got
brought
to
my
attention
that
this
is
no
walking
shop.
Rather,
my
intention,
outside
before
he
left
at
DC,
that
the
freeways
that,
under
the
freeways
were
maintained
by
you
dot,
he
said,
go
to
click
it
and
fix
it.
O
App,
which
I
think
the
general
public
does
not
know
exists,
or
at
least
I
do
not
know
where
you
dot
pose
a
problem
and
they
can
help
solve
it.
But
in
the
notes
it
says
you
dot
only
maintains
lighting
on
interstates
and
on
u.s.
4201
and
154.
So
my
problem,
or
maybe
a
problem
that
needs
to
be
resolved,
is
six
South
off-ramp.
When
you're
coming
off
the
city
underneath
600
South,
there
is
lighting
that
exists.
It
does
not
work.
C
C
C
B
C
C
A
B
C
A
C
K
K
The
last
time
you
heard
from
me:
I
was
here
talking
about
the
850
dollars
I
paid
to
the
city
for
a
permit
for
solar
and
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
the
mayor's
saying
yeah
we're
gonna
be
energy
independent
sooner
than
we
thought
and
all
of
those
things
are
great,
but
nonetheless
I
paid
$650
more
than
the
current
amount,
and
it
wouldn't
be
so
bad
I
guess
if
there
was
some
way.
I
could
feel
good
about
that,
but
I,
don't
the
other
thing
is
had
the
inspector
entered
my
house
to
look
at
the
wiring.
K
That
would
be
great,
he
didn't
have.
He
had
gone
up
to
the
roof
to
actually
look
at
the
panels.
That
would
have
been
appreciated,
but
he
didn't
if
he
had
gone
up
to
the
roof,
to
look
at
the
damage
that
was
done
to
the
roof.
In
terms
of
walking
on
valleys
and
so
forth,
where
leaks
have
subsequently
evolved,
that
would
have
been
great,
but
he
didn't,
and
so
currently
now,
I'm
not
only
looking
at
having
paid
650
dollars
in
excess
of
what
the
current
fee
is,
but
I'm
also
having
to
have
a
lot
of
roof.
K
F
Same
things
happening
99th,
it's
getting
really
serious.
The
city
actually
did
a
pretty
good
job
public
outreach,
except
it
didn't
work
out
because
that,
when
push
come
to
shove,
they
started
with
a
loss
of
seven
parking
spaces
and
we
ended
up
with
38
about
a
month
ago,
and
that
was
a
big
surprise
to
everybody.
Now
the
city
took
it
down
to
20
still
some
issues,
but
now
we've
gotten
the
bicycle
community
against
the
business
community.
What
I'm
trying
to
tell
you
is
there's
a
big
issue
with
parking
and
I
hope.
F
You
don't
decrease
the
parking
standards.
We
still
need
to
release
the
downtown
sugar
house
parking
study.
It's
been
going
around
under
the
table
in
secret,
locked
in
a
big
safe
for
four
years
now
so
I.
Don't
understand
why
we
don't
just
release
it.
We
pay
for
it.
But
my
main
issue
is
this:
city
needs
to
step
up
and
use
the
Economic
Development
Department
business
retention
group
to
help
the
businesses
online
south
that
are
about
to
all
go
bankrupt.
F
These
are
small
businesses,
but
when
you
start
stopping
traffic
during
this
construction
on
ninety
nine
that
what
we
wanted,
but
when
you're
stopping
all
traffic
it
destroys
businesses
and
the
economic
development
group
should
step
up
and
do
something
about
that.
Nope
nothing's
been
done
so
far.
We
keep
asking
for
it,
nothing
from
the
administration,
nothing
from
the
council.
Please
help
this
community
I
also
want
to
reiterate
what
Jim
Webster
said:
the
city
decreased
significantly
the
solar
panel
fees.
H
L
L
L
Not
to
smell
that
stench
I,
reiterate,
I've
lived
with
it
and
it
is
so
hard
on
your
nervous
system.
You
get
so
stressed
to
go
outside
and
you
get
angry
at
this
and
once
this
is
built,
if
it
is
what
I've
been
told,
it
is
it's,
it's
pollution,
its
degradation
of
a
historical
community.
It
does
not,
it
is
not
compatible.
A
J
J
I
was
at
the
library
just
an
hour
ago
or
two
hours
ago,
and
they
have
buckets
that
under
stairs
it's
raining
out
so
I
know,
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
there
and
probably
there's
been
a
lot
of
funding
put
in
over
there,
but
I'm
hoping
you
have
enough,
because
we
see
a
lot
of
international
visitors
and
visitors
come
down
to
our
program
at
the
library
and
it's
not
good
for
the
embassy
search,
an
architectural
showpiece,
with
buckets
in
the
staircases
and
Rhonda.
Always
that's
just
an
observation.
J
I
hope
the
funding
is
already
there
and
scooters.
I
was
sitting
at
a
light
the
other
day,
and
it's
happened
twice
with
me.
Recently:
I
see
more
people
more
scooters
single
wheel,
whatever
you
call
those
balancing
things
and
electrified
skateboards
and
all
those
things
on
our
sidewalks,
then
I
see
pedestrians.
J
So
I
don't
know
it's
it's
it's
a
great
thing
because
it
saves
on
pollution
in
the
air
and
I,
see
love
to
see
people
outside,
no
matter
how
they
do
it,
but
it
is
gonna
cause
a
problem
over
time,
maybe
white
lines
on
the
sidewalk
or
something
you
know
we're
gonna
have
to
get
creative
and
how
to
deal
with
this,
because
it
really
is
a
solution
to
some
of
our
environmental
concerns.
But
it
is
a
concern
it
can
create
other
concerns.
So
just
an
observation.
Thank
you.
L
A
A
N
B
A
B
A
A
We
are
at
the
consent
portion
of
our
agenda.
I
will
look
for
a
motion
to
approve
I,
have
a
motion
from
councilmember
Luke
and
a
second
from
councilmember
Rogers
to
approve
the
consent
agenda
all
in
favor
aye
all
opposed
all
right,
seeing
none
then
that
passes.
This
concludes
our
formal
City
Council
meeting.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
attendance.
This
meeting
is
adjourned.