►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 12/3/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
A
Do
see
the
RDA
people
here,
you
know
yeah
director
walls
is
over.
There
smiling
so
not
really
paying
attention
but
okay
and
for
those
that
are
following
along
also
in
our
written
briefing.
Is
the
council
District
five
vacancy
process
so
for
those
interested
in
filling
the
vacancy
seat
of
District
five
of
mayor-elect
Mendenhall's
area?
So
you
can
follow
that
and
look
at
that
and
look
at
the
process,
we're
anxious
and
look
forward
to
interviewing
those
candidates
and
and
we'll
talk
more
about
that,
come
January.
A
But
if
there
is
no
other
questions,
let's
look
into
the
first
item
on
our
agenda,
which
is
the
resolution
for
a
public
benefits
analysis
on
the
Magnolia
project
at
165,
South,
300
East-
and
this
is
a
follow
up
so
I
know
that
we
have
Allison
Roland
Roland,
who
is
our
council
office
of
policy?
Analyst
danrip,
JP,
goats,
Jennifer
McGrath
in
the
room,
Ken
deputy
director,
as
well
as
here
and.
C
One
of
those
is
that
if
there
was
a
question
regarding
the
Community
Land
Trust,
and
why
this
parcel
wouldn't
have
been
considered
for
that,
essentially
the
Community
Land
Trust
is
made
for
properties
that
are
structured
differently
and
for
different
uses,
because
this
is
considered
to
be
a
rental
rental
property.
It
doesn't
make
sense
to
put
it
in
the
Community
Land
Trust,
as
it's
currently
formulated.
C
C
C
But
essentially
one
of
the
big
differences
is
that,
under
the
terms
of
this
present
deal,
the
city
would
retain
the
ownership
of
the
Magnolia
portion
of
the
original
property
rather
than
selling
it
to
the
developer,
and
also
the
city
would
not
provide
a
seller's
note
to
the
developers,
so
that
does
turn
out
to
be
better
in
this
case.
For
the
city.
A
fourth
question
is
whether
the
road
home
would
be
able
to
increase
it
to
ending
a
fund
raising
to
the
amount
required
in
the
current
proposal.
C
There
were
also
questions
to
the
attorney's
office
about
whether
the
service
provider,
if
in
the
future,
the
service
provider,
is
not
able
to
raise
enough
funds
for
the
supportive
services
and
if
or
if
the
borrower
defaults
on
senior
loans,
what
would
happen
to
the
city's
investment?
Essentially,
it
varies
a
little
bit
depending
on
timing,
because
the
city
is
fourth
among
the
loan
in
line
for
repayment,
so,
depending
on
how
much
of
that
loan
may
have
been
repaid,
it
could
vary,
but
the
end
of
the
day,
the
1.5
million.
You
know,
I,
think
that
is
right.
C
1.5
million
housing
proposed
housing
trust
fund
loan
may
be
in
jeopardy.
If,
if
the
borrower
defaults
on
loans,
if
the
service
provider
doesn't
isn't
able
to
provide
the
supportive
services
required,
there
could
be
some
issues
related
to
that,
but
it
would
be
in
the
interest
of
the
both
the
other
loan
holders
and
the
city.
C
For
the
same
use
to
continue
whether
or
not
the
road
home
or
any
other
service
provider
is
able
to
provide
that
service
and
and
the
key
there
is
at
the
ground,
lease
and
restricted
use
for
permanent
supportive
housing,
our
senior
in
priority
to
the
rights
of
the
senior
lenders.
So
that
won't
change,
no
matter
what
happens
financially
in
the
future,
that
that
restriction
on
the
land
and
then
finally,.
C
Right
because
the
land
does
remain
City
property,
no
matter
what
and
that's
a
difference
from
the
255
State
Street
project.
That
was
the
question.
Sorry
I've
got
myself
tangled
up
and
that
the
city
would
write
that
the
city's
requirement
to
operate
permanent
supportive
housing
on
the
Magnolia
site
would
survive.
Developer
defaults
in
that
case
in
the
case
that
should
happen
and
the
land
would
remain
city
property.
C
So
those
that's
how
its
structured
differently
from
the
255
State
Street
project,
I'll
just
mention
one
more
thing:
there's
a
public
hearing
on
this
item
scheduled
for
on
the
public
benefits
side
of
this
item
scheduled
for
today
later
today,
and
then
the
council
could
take
action
either
today
or
at
the
December
10th
meeting.
So
that's
all
I
have
I,
don't
know
if
some
of
the
administration
folks
would
like
to
have
anything
or
correct
anything.
Now.
A
E
G
Provide
some
support
or
some
funding
for
the
supportive
services,
but
the
road
home
would
have
to
fundraise
either
through
applying
for
grants
from
the
state
or
the
county
or
the
city
or
by
doing
their
private
fundraising
that
they
do,
but
they
don't
anticipate
that
being
too
burdensome
for
them.
They
have
a
pretty
robust
development
team
and
feel
confident
about
getting
that
number
annually.
Okay,.
E
A
So
we've
got
this
on
the
like
Alison
said
potentially
on,
we've
got
a
public
hearing
tonight
and
we
could
take
action
on
it
tonight
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
coming.
We're
just
I
think
you
still
are.
He'll
are
on
the
same
same
item
you're
here
for
this
table.
We're
gonna
go
on
to
item
number
five,
which
is
the
resolution
for
the
housing
trust
fund
loan,
the
Magnolia
project
at
165,
South,
300,
East,
follow
up
and.
A
A
A
A
H
A
Of
no
looks
good
right.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
This
is
a
information.
We're
gonna
be
doing
a
bunch
of
funding
our
future
quarterly
updates
and
the
first
one
is
on
the
housing.
So
we
have
Alison
Roland
who's
still
here
and
we
have
a
representative
from
kin.
That's
to
be
determined,
I.
A
I
C
C
Now
we've
got
late-breaking
information
that
actually
it
may
be
slightly
less
than
that
approximately
28,000
dollars
less
than
that
was
not
spent
of
the
eight
hundred
and
seventy
eight
thousand
was
not
not
spent.
So
actually
what's
been
sorry,
but
the
bottom
line
is
that
so
it
will
be.
You
know
off
the
top
of
my
head.
Eight
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
right.
C
So
that
will
change
some
of
the
numbers
in
the
staff
report.
But
again
it's
a
it's.
A
relatively
minor
number
I
do
also
want
to
mention
and
as
a
reminder
that
fiscal
year
nineteen
was
actually
the
first
time
that
both
the
council
side
and
the
administration
side
we're
dealing
with
this
sort
of
arrangement
with
funding
our
future
funding.
C
That
goes
to
particular
programs,
and
that
that
has
to
be
essentially
reviewed
by
the
council,
reviewed
by
hand,
staff
and
then
also
can
staff
and
in
can,
as
well
as
the
finance
department,
so
there's
actually
a
lot
of
moving
pieces
in
these
things
and
in
terms
of
sort
of
timing.
So
both
in
terms
of
reporting
and
in
terms
of
the
actual
programs
that
were
able
to
be
funded
in
FY
team,
it
was
a
learning
year,
I
think
for
everybody,
and
so
I
want
to
make
that
clear
that
some
of
this
confusion
is
mine.
C
Actually,
I'll,
let
hand
speak
if
they'd
like
I
can
make
this
fit
this
spreadsheet
fit.
This
is
just
for
your
reference.
I
can
show
you
where
the,
where
the
number
is
that
we're
concerned
about
it's
this
28,000,
which
apparently
was
not
unspent.
It
was
spent.
There's
a
second
question
involving
how
this
was
encumbered.
So
it
looks
like
there
were
two
errors
and
and
we're
working
on
on
figuring
those
out.
So.
I
C
J
A
I
So
I
would
be
happy
to
speak
to
the
three
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
that
was
not
expended
was
potentially
toward
streamlining
of
permitting,
and
that
was
something
that
was
brought
to
Council
quite
some
time
ago.
I
believe
it
was
fall
of
last
year
and
that
at
that
time
we
received
direction
to
not
implement
that
type
of
a
fee
waiver
or
fee
streamlining
process
related
to
affordable
housing.
So
we
did
not
pursue
any
programs
or
policies
or
process
toward
that
with
in
hand,
so
that
money's
just
stayed
there.
I
We
didn't,
we
didn't
use
those
I
think
at
the
time
the
conversation
was
around
impact
fees.
There
was
quite
a
bit
of
conversation
around
impact
fees
and
at
the
time
there
was
an
appetite
from
my
understanding
to
move
forward
with
that
three
hundred
twenty
thousand
dollars
to
be
spent
towards
fee
changes.
I
B
Firing
questions
to
interns
do
I
want
to
go
back
and
and
I
would
ask
our
staff
can
I
get
an
update,
obviously
not
right
now.
I
can
an
email
would
be
fine
regarding
that
three
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
and
it
I
think
it
was
as
part
of
our
impact
fee
discussion
but
I
I
want
to
I
mean
we've
dealt
with
a
lot.
B
You
know
this
year,
and
so,
if
I
can
just
get
maybe
a
summary
reminder
of
that,
and
also
sort
of
maybe
of
hand,
can
provide
what
the
details
of
that
program
work
because
I
imagine
that
may
have
been
part
of
the
discussion
but
I'm
not
sure
so
again,
not
today.
We
have
a
lot
to
cover
and
a
lot
of
other
things,
but
maybe
if
we
can
just
get
an
email
summary
regarding
that
discussion
and
that
probe
that
particular
program.
I
The
other
dollar
amounts
our
first
census
coordinator
and
that
is
through
the
mayor's
office,
not
through
hand
also
for
planner
position.
That's
the
top
line
item
planner
and
that
is
also
not
within
hands
purview
for
that
funding.
Sorry
and
then
also
$175,000
at
the
bottom
of
the
list,
reallocation
of
those
federal
funds,
for
they
were
to
be
for
a
grant
administrator
and
those
that
position
was
funded
through
vacancy
savings
rather
than
using
that
amount.
So
that
accounts
for
six
hundred
thousand
and
then
the
Community
Land
Trust.
I
I
But
during
the
time
that
the
during
the
past
nine
to
ten
months,
we
learned
that
we
were
told
that
the
250,000
couldn't
be
used
on
property
that
was
already
owned
by
Salt
Lake
City,
and
that
again
is
a
finance
conversation
that
we're
still
trying
to
tease
out.
So
those
are
all
of
the
dollar
amounts
that
were
not
yet
expended,
and.
B
B
Right
one
other
question:
the
one
hundred
and
seventy-five
thousand
for
the
reallocation
of
the
federal
funds
do
those
that
doesn't
that
money
doesn't
have
federal
strings
attached
to
it
or
does
it
I
mean
because
usually
when
I
see
federal
funds,
that
means
we're
getting
it
from
the
feds
and
they
tend
to
have
lots
of
strings
attached
to
them.
So,
typically,
we.
I
Would
our
grant
administrators
are
funded
by
HUD
dollars
right
federal
dollars?
So
maybe
the
words
are
a
little
confusing
here.
The
intention
was
to
have
a
similar
position,
a
grant
administrator
for
funding
our
future
programs,
and
so
we
probably
could
have
chosen
some
better
words
to
describe
that.
Okay,.
B
I
just
didn't
want
to
as
we're
talking
about
this
reallocation
of
money,
didn't
want
to
get
ourselves
and
do
a
position
where
we
think
we're
spending
all
this
money.
We
have
a
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand,
and
then
it's
like
oops
just
kidding.
We
have
to
spend
that
on
something
that
the
feds
tell
us
to
spend
it
on
right.
So
just
clarifying
that.
Thank
you.
Q.
C
Then,
for
FY
22
this
earlier,
these
are
the
first
quarter
actuals
on
this
spreadsheet.
It
reflects
a
relatively
small
number
for
this
first
quarter
because,
as
you'll
recall,
the
council
requested
that
hand
work
to
essentially
revamp
the
entire
process
of
getting
the
housing
program.
Money
out
to
the
community
and
so
I
know,
you've
been
updated
and
involved
in
that
process
from
the
outset.
So
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
slow
start
but
hand
has
been
working
to
to
get
everything
caught
up
so
that
the
FY
21
process
will
be
easy
in
comparison
right.
I
At
least
the
timing
will
be
aligned,
it's
still
better.
So
that's
our
hope
so
would
be
alright,
then,
if
I
step
forward
from
where
we
were
during
our
last
briefing-
and
we
identified
that
we
had
one
project,
one
page
item
that
was
not
included
in
your
packets
initially,
but
it
is
in
an
updated
transmittal
that
was
provided.
We
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
particular
questions
about
each
of
the
funding
requests
that
were
there
were
applications
on
each
of
those
that
we've
presented
very
quickly.
During
our
last
briefing,
we.
C
A
C
Making
sure
I
have
the
right
the
right
stuff
in
front
of
me
again.
Sorry,
yes,
so
this
is
the
current
state
of
the
program.
Applications
the
as
you
can
see.
If
we
just
look
across
these
columns,
the
first
the
first
column
is,
is
the
name
of
the
applicant.
Second:
is
the
amount
of
previous
grants
in
FY
nineteen
should
that
they
have
received
them?
The
third
is
the
application
request
amount
from
the
applicant.
The
fourth
is
the
mayor's
recommendation,
so
hand
staff
and
the
mayor's,
and
the
mayor
went
through
these
two
to
come.
C
C
Column
H
is
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
FY
20
program
category
as
you'll
recall,
that
were
program
categories
listed
for
the
for
many
of
these
items
and
that's
the
basis
on
which
the
council
allocated
amounts
of
money.
So
you
can
see
some
of
these
programs
are
surrounded
by
or
some
of
these
applications
are
surrounded
by
boxes
that
just
include
themselves.
Others
like
this
one
include
three
applications
for
rental
assistance
for
vulnerable
populations.
E
C
So
just
two
other
comments
I
want
to
make
on
this
before
leaving
it
in
your
hands.
One
is
that
councilmember
Johnston
may
recall
he
works
for
Volunteers
of
America,
and
so
he
may
want
to
recuse
himself
on
discussions
of
that
item.
The
second
is
that
councilmember
Mendenhall
suggested
in
our
last
discussion
that
she
made
a
proposal
to
move
them.
C
The
76,000
that
the
mayor
recommended
for
Community
Development
Corporation
of
Utah
for
their
program
to
shift
all
of
that
into
the
Salt
Lake
Community
Action,
application
of
citing
the
fact
that
they
seem
to
get
how
many
four
hundred
calls
a
month
asking
for
rental
assistance
through
their
programs.
So
those
are
the
two
items
that
are
marked
in
yellow
here,
just
as
a
reminder
other
than
that.
Unless,
unless
there
are
other
questions,
I
think
the
council,
can
you.
A
Know
I
guess
I'd
like
to
get
hands
take
on
the
programs
and
funding
from
inception.
Where
you
think
do
you
let
you
see
any
place
that
we
might
look
to
pivot
programs
or
where
we're
looking
I
mean
if
we're
looking
at
doing
that,
I
mean
some
sort
of
pivot.
At
the
point
where
you
can
say
yeah,
you
know
what
our
return
of
money
is
not
being
as
effective
here
as
it
could
be
somewhere
else.
We.
I
Haven't
really
seen
that
yet,
based
on
the
ask
or
many
asks
from
the
community
members
and
honestly
with
the
Community
Land
Trust,
for
instance,
we
are
still
working
on
making
sure
that
we
provide
the
the
funds
in
an
appropriate
way
for
homeownership
there.
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
masu
Minh
but
I
don't
feel
like
we
are
at
a
pivot
point.
Quite
yet.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
these
programs
that
are
active
and
want
to
be
moving
forward.
Doing
so.
J
She's,
looking
at
some
of
these
numbers
at
the
mayor's
recommendation,
which
the
issue
worked,
I
mean
through
some
huge
discrepancies
on
what
you
allocate
some
but
some
of
these
organizations
and
then
what
they
requested
and
then
what
you
recommend
it
to
the
mayor
and
she
has,
can
you?
Can
you
explain
that
a
little
bit,
for
example,
I
gave
you
an
example
here:
the
WIC
a
Vita?
They
asked
for
$275,000
an
emergency
rent
assistance
and
there
was
zero
allocated
versus
first
step
house.
J
I
Start
and
then
maybe
have
my
deputy
step
in
on
this
question.
This
log
that
you
have
in
front
of
you
is
a
simplified
version.
The
log
that
we
provided
at
the
last
briefing
is
much
more
detailed.
It
has
each
of
the
applicants,
requests
and
the
number
of
households
or
individuals
served
and
a
lot
more
detail
about
our
criteria,
for
the
applications
to
be
scored,
looks
like
this.
That's
that's
the
really
detailed
one.
B
The
YWCA,
although
it
would
only
be
reaching
three
households-
those
are
three
households
with
children
right
and
I-
recognize
that
the
first-step
house
does
an
amazing
job
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
they
have
their
funding,
but
they
their
population
that
they
reach
is
different,
very
different
than
the
YWCA
right.
So
these
are
single
men
that
are
going
through
substance,
abuse
issues
right.
So
those
are
the
two
different
populations
that
that
these
funds
would
be
reaching.
B
G
This
is
an
accelerated
process
and
the
realities
of
homelessness
are
very
real
today,
right
and
so
we're
looking
YWCA
has
two
applications
in
one
is
for
mothers
with
children,
and
the
second
is
going
to
be
targeted
towards
women
without
children,
as
we
think
about
the
state
of
homelessness
and
moving
folks
into
a
housed
space,
certainly
there's
a
greater
need
for
men
to
be
moved,
not
gender
specific,
but
because
of
the
number
of
men
and
the
space
that
we
have
available
for
men
in
the
community,
and
so
the
mayor
had
a
lot
of
conversation
about
that
as
well,
so
there
is
kind
of
that
balancing
act
in
terms
of
who's
being
served
and
what
other
services
are
available
in
the
community
to
meet
those
needs.
E
Could
you
maybe
explain
a
little
bit
more
about
that
process,
so
it
sounds
like
you're
saying
that
this
is
a
gap-filling
kind
of
funding,
you're,
looking
at
so
you're,
looking
at
the
community
state,
county,
private,
nonprofits,
etc,
and
evaluating,
what's
being
served
now
and
then
seeing
gaps
and
trying
to
target
these
funds
to
the
gaps
exclusively.
Is
that
accurate
or
is
there
some
other
nuance
there
to
help
counsel
understand
I.
G
E
E
I'm
thinking
about
laying
out
I
know
that
the
previous
one
up
on
the
the
table
right
now
gives
us
more
information
but
doesn't
necessarily
explain
the
prioritization
process
from
the
committee.
The
scoring
and
all
the
factors
that
come
into
play.
There
may
not
be
a
concise
way
to
do
that.
That
might
just
be
individual
meetings
and
those
kind
of
things,
but
I
had
to
ask
the
question
if
there
is
a
simplified
way
to
put
context
to
these
numbers
and
these
decisions
I,
don't.
C
A
I,
don't
have
a
problem
delaying
it
till
next
week,
when
they're,
both
here
and
I-
think
it's
appropriate.
Is
you
know
that
we
all
engaged
in
funding
our
future?
We
all
started.
We
made
those
silos.
We
were
part
of
it
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
finish
where
the
funding
is
gonna
be
allocated.
So
mr.
A
B
This
sort
of
goes
to
Andrews
point
and
I
know
it's
probably,
as
you
stated,
it's
not
necessarily
possible
to
have
this
concise
I
would
be
interested
in
this,
the
scoring
and
how
that
works,
and
what
criteria
are
being
looked
at
as
much
as
possible
that
you
can
kind
of
put
that
on
paper.
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
as
we're
looking
at
where
we're
putting
this
money
and
how
we're
prioritizing
this
money.
So
if
you
could
provide
those
criteria
as
much
as
possible
to
us
that
would
that
would
be
really
helpful
for
me,
easy-peasy.
J
Especially
because
I'm
doing
the
math
here
and
some
of
the
requests
of
certain
groups
and
then
the
mayors
and
administration
recommendation
I
mean
we
have
numbers,
some
organizations
are
getting
100%
and
some
of
the
other
ones
are
getting
11%
or
0%
or
I
mean
to
me.
That's
huge
and
I
think
all
of
them
are
important.
All
of
them
offer
really
good
services
to
our
different
populations,
but
I
am
not
understanding
why
somebody
will
get
0%
versus
the
same
organization
gets
100%
on
both
of
their
requests,
so
that
clarification
to
me
will
be
very
helpful.
E
Would
share
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
prioritize
certain
of
these
that
have
been
identified
as
questions
such
as
number,
seven
and
eight
CDC,
and
so
like
community
action
that
councilman
Mendenhall
talked
about
reallocating
some
detail
on
that
section.
The
reason
I
asked
us,
because
these
are
in
sections,
so
the
money
is
only
isolated
to
each
section.
It's
not
as
a
whole.
So
let
me
help
out
context
in
that
one.
It
sounds
like
context
in
the
last
three
twelve,
thirteen
or
fourteen,
and
then
are
there
any
others
that
you
have
question
on.
E
G
Sounds
like
just
number
one
and
number
two
we're
good
on
and
and
many
of
those
are
definitely
because
there
is
a
limited
dollar
amount
in
each
category
and
as
as
this
body
thinks
about
any
funding
from
fiscal
year.
Nineteen
that
they
that
you
would
like
to
allocate
to
those
efforts.
You'll
see
those
numbers
change,
and
so
that
does
provide
more
flexibility.
All.
B
Right,
I'm
gonna
add
one
more
thing
to
your
plate
if
I
may,
if
we,
this
table
is
really
great
and
helpful
and
kind
of
I
have
the
simplified
version
and
I
also
have
up
here
the
more
detailed
version
on
this
amplified
version.
Could
we
add
a
little
column
that
says
how
much
is
available
in
each
of
those
categories?
C
Would
be
happy
if
any
of
the
council
members
have
a
have
you
know
want
to
play
around
with
this
spreadsheet
is
one
that
I
produce
to
try
to
put
everything
on
one
page
I'd
be
happy.
If
people
want
to
play
with
numbers
to
see
what
kind
of
things
you
might
be
able
to
do
with
the
funding
that's
available,
yeah.
E
A
C
A
I
G
K
A
Anyone
else
nice
thank
you
for
being
here
and
getting
us
situated.
So
we've
got
a
tentative
break
right
now.
Anyone
ready
for
a
break
okay,
nice,
we're
on
to
item
number
nine,
which
is
looking
at
an
ordinance
for
1760
in
1790
West
associated
Avenue
zoning
map
amendment.
We
have
nicked
our
bit
from
our
council
office
who's
coming
to
the
table
as
well.
Well
as
a
Senior,
Planner,
Sarah,
Sarah
I'm,
sorry,
is
it
javora
knock
pretty
close,
can't
do
it
I
know.
H
All
right,
Nick,
okay,
so,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
rezoning
request
at
1760
1790
West
associated
Avenue
standard
plumbing
helmets
from
commercial
corridor
commercial
to
light
manufacturing.
The
Planning
Commission
gave
a
positive
recommendation
on
this.
There
was
not
a
lot
of
public
input
received.
It
was
kind
of
a
straightforward
request,
so
I'll
let
Sarah
go
through
outlining
what
the
details
of
it.
F
She
said
is
fairly
straightforward
request.
The
reason
one
is
anticipated
to
allow
for
expansion
of
the
existing
manufacturing
use
on
the
site.
It's
located
to
the
west
of
redwood
road
on
Associated
Avenue,
just
to
put
in
a
little
broader
context
there,
the
major
street
to
the
north
is
2100,
and
then
you
can
see
sr
201.
F
The
applicant
is
standard.
Plumbing
and
they've
occupied
the
site
since
1965
and
the
property
was
owned
for
industrial
uses
until
1995.
The
1995
rezoning
affected
a
number
of
properties
in
the
area,
and
so
the
rezone
would
return
the
property
to
m1
and
would
allow
for
expansion
of
the
use
and
the
property
would
be
conforming.
That
proposal
is
consistent
with
planned,
Salt
Lake
and
also
the
Westside
master
plan
and
as
much
in
the
Planning
Commission.
For
it
a
recommendation
of
positive
for
de
positive
recommendation.
E
F
F
E
A
H
A
We
were
on
to
item
10,
which
is
budget
amendment
number
2
for
fiscal
year,
2019
xx
follow-up,
we
have
been
lucky
I,
think
has
been
hear
from
our
office.
Marybeth
Thompson
who's,
the
chief
financial
officer
for
the
city,
believe
she's.
Here,
yes
in
the
back
and
John
Mike,
who
is
the
city
budget
director
in
case
there?
He
is.
A
D
D
First
I
wanted
to
give
a
quick
update
on
fund
balance.
The
council
approved
spending
an
additional
twenty
seven
thousand
dollars
on
item
812.
This
is
a
new
FTE
to
focus
on
CIP
and
impact
fees,
instead
of,
as
the
administration
recommended
hiring
the
position
for
three
months,
the
council
supported
six
months
that
additional
$27,000
will
be
coming
from
fund
balance.
D
The
current
fund
balance
above
the
13
percent
target
is
one
hundred
and
fifty
four
thousand
five
hundred
and
eighty
one
dollars,
and
this
assumes
that
the
council
would
approve
the
five
items
in
the
budget
amendment
that
the
administration
recommends
coming
from
fund
balance.
This
does
not
include
items
a
ten
in
I
one,
the
additional
funding
for
police
officer,
overtime,
patrols
in
city
parks
or
in
hot
spots,
so
that
$154,000
item
when
you
consider
the
police
overtime
that
would
be
subtracted
from
the
hundred
and
fifty
four
thousand.
D
It
shows
that
if
the
ten
current
vacancies
were
immediately
filled
and
if
no
other
vacancies
occurred
through
the
duration
of
the
fiscal
year,
there
would
be
just
over
120
thousand
dollars
in
vacancy
savings.
However,
this
does
not
account
for
the
potential
to
handle
retirements
later
in
this
fiscal
year.
There
are
a
couple
of
employees
who
have
been
with
the
city
for
over
30
years,
who
could
retire
later
this
fiscal
year?
D
And
so
what
this
shows
is
each
of
the
ducked,
the
job
titles,
the
monthly
amount
of
vacancy
savings
for
each
title,
the
number
of
months
it's
been
vacant
and
then
notes
on
when
the
position
was
filled
or
if
it
is
currently
still
vacant
and
scrolling
down
to
the
bottom.
You'll
see
it's
a
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
two
hundred
and
twenty
eight
dollars
and
projected
vacancy
savings,
and
this
is
current
as
of
November
22nd.
D
Next
item
is
a
ten,
the
police
overtime
and
the
administration
sent
attachment
eight.
This
provides
five
different
plans
plan,
a
through
plan
II
each
with
an
increasing
level
of
service
for
police
officer
overtime
in
city
parks.
Until
the
park
squad
is
finished,
with
training
and
available,
they
are
anticipated
to
be
available
in
September
of
next
year.
D
The
council
is
only
able
to
appropriate
funding
for
personnel
in
the
current
fiscal
year,
so
bridging
the
gap
until
that
September
date
when
the
Park
squad
is
available,
you
can
act
on
funding
for
overtime
this
fiscal
year
through
June,
but
the
July
and
August
dates
would
need
to
be
addressed
in
the
annual
budget
and
the
council
could
ask
the
incoming
administration
to
consider
this
in
the
mayor's
recommended
annual
budget
and
if
the
council's
interested
staff
can
also
track
it
and
raise
it
in
May
and
June.
When
it,
the
police
department
budget,
is
discussed.
D
When
you
look
in
the
far
right
column,
for
example,
plan
a
December
to
June,
seventy
three
thousand
nine
hundred
and
twenty
dollars,
the
forty
nine
thousand
four
hundred
and
forty
dollars,
you
would
subtract
that
from
the
amount
in
the
far
right
column
and
then
the
difference
in
this
case,
just
under
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
is
the
amount
that
would
need
to
come
from
fund
balance.
And
we
can
calculate
that
if
the
council
decides
which
you,
which
plan
you
prefer.
So
you
can
see
exactly
how
much
is
coming
from
fund
balance.
D
The
department
responded
to
council
questions
that
the
current
utilization
of
voluntary
overtime
shifts
and
there
are
unscheduled
overtime
shifts
as
well,
such
as
for
shift
extensions
or
blood
draws
of
suspects,
but
the
voluntary
scheduled
overtime
shifts.
Approximately
half
of
the
current
police
force
participates
in
and
the
median.
So
if
you
lined
up
from
the
least
to
the
most
usage
of
overtime,
the
midpoint
or
the
median
is
118
hours.
This
is
about
6%
of
the
total
standard
2080
our
work
schedule
that
a
police
officer
would
have.
D
D
It's
difficult
to
estimate
what
the
saturation
point
is
at
what
point
are
you
posting
overtime
shifts
that
are
voluntary?
That
would
mostly
go
unfilled.
That's
a
very
difficult
thing
to
estimate,
but
it's
likely
any
additional
overtime
would
not
be
a
hundred
percent
filled
based
on
the
current
utilization.
Mr.
E
D
D
The
staff
report
includes
the
table
shown
on
the
big
screen,
and
this
is
fiscal
years
2018
2019
in
the
current
fiscal
year,
and
what
it
shows
is
that
the
annual
budget
had
930
$1500
budgeted
for
overtime
in
fiscal
year,
2018
and
2019,
but
the
actuals
were
significantly
more
1.7
million
in
fiscal
year
18
and
just
over
2
million
in
fiscal
year
2019,
and
then
you
can
see
the
differences
in
this
far
right
column.
The
current
fiscal
year
there
was
a
slight
increase
in
the
annual
budget
to
nine
hundred
and
sixty-five
thousand.
D
We
we
are
currently
at
659
thousand
in
actuals,
so
there's
only
32
percent
left
of
the
remaining
budget,
and
if
this
trend
were
to
continue
based
on
just
the
first
quarter,
which
is
an
assumption,
it
would
be
a
significant
increase
over
the
last
fiscal
year.
We
would
need
additional
years
of
data
to
see
if
this
is
a
longer-term
trend
in
probably
five
years
or
more,
but
we
wanted
to
point
out
that
there
seems
to
be
a
difference
between
the
budgeting
versus
the
actuals
of
overtime
in
the
police
department.
D
A
A
D
D
It
also
includes
costs
for
the
different
levels
of
restroom
services
and
cost
estimates
to
keep
permanent
restrooms
open
during
the
winter
I
believe,
there's
only
one
restroom
in
Liberty
Park,
which
is
currently
built
and
designed
that
would
allow
it
to
be
open
in
the
winter
if
it
was
funded.
Otherwise
there
would
need
to
be
heaters
brought
in
to
other
restrooms
because
the
facilities
are
just
not
designed
to
be
open
in
the
winter
without
some
form
of
heat.
D
So
the
restrooms
that
have
parks
are
right
here,
and
these
are
portable
restrooms
available
through
the
winter.
The
cost
for
a
single
portable
is
estimated
at
$75,
and
this
includes
cleaning
once
a
week.
The
a
da
portables
are
slightly
more
expensive
at
130
dollars,
also
cleaned
once
a
week,
and
it's
the
Liberty
Park
tennis
court
Center,
which
has
a
restroom
that
was
built
with
heating
and
insulation,
but
it
would
need
additional
funding
to
be
open
through
the
winter.
D
And
then
the
total
cost
for
providing
the
park
restrooms
would
include
an
attendant.
Otherwise,
the
issues
of
individuals,
camping
or
using
the
portable
restrooms
for
shelter
would
likely
happen
again.
So
the
attendant
is
included
in
the
total
cost
here,
and
the
total
estimated
cost
is
four
thousand
dollars
for
the
initial
setup
for
each
portable
restroom
and
then
the
estimated
cost
ongoing
for
each
restroom
each
month
is
four
thousand
four
hundred
and
fifty
four
dollars.
D
So
with
that,
I
think
it
would
be
best
to
have
the
police
department
go
through
the
five
scenarios
that
were
provided
for
bridging
the
gap
until
the
Park
squad
is
finished.
Training
in
September
the
public
services
department
also
provided
a
fifth
plan,
Plan
F.
If
you
will
that
they'll
also
touch
base
on.
L
Well,
good
evening,
it's
good
to
see
you
again
I
apologize
again
last
time,
I
think
I
was
here.
I
may
have
looked
like
a
dog
hearing,
a
funny
noise
as
I,
maybe
not
have
interpreted
your
questions
as
you
had
expected
me
to
so
I.
Thank
you
for
having
me
back,
giving
me
that
Mulligan
I
do
over
or
another
swing
at
the
hit
the
ball.
So
thank
you
and,
in
the
spirit
of
being
an
overachiever
we're
trying
to
give
you
everything
you
wanted
and
more.
L
That
looks
at
closing
the
restrooms
from
December
through
June
of
2020,
but
no,
but
remember
we're
not
closing
restrooms
that
aren't
open
through
December,
January,
February
and
March.
So
really
it's
it's
for
three
months:
April
May
and
June.
The
cost
of
closing
those
restrooms
with
two
officers.
Four
hours
a
day.
Seven
days
a
week
is
73
nine,
twenty!
L
Okay,
that's
just
to
close
the
restrooms
plan
B,
which
we
think
is
a
better
option,
is
that
we
look
at
funding
for
officers
four
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week
at
a
price
tag
of
114
240,
that
if
you
there
are
a
lot
of
restrooms,
that's
a
that's
a
pretty
quick
pace
to
get
through
and
lock
them
up.
And
if
you
have
a
problem
or
an
issue
that
is
going
to
tie
up
your
officers
for
some
time.
L
L
Now,
when
you
look
at
that-
and
this
is
what
we
need
to
talk
a
little
bit
or
maybe
think
about
what
this
Park
squads
going
to
be
able
to
cover-
they
only
work
four
days
a
week,
10
hours
of
shifts,
so
you're
really
gonna
have
three
days
when
you'll
have
no
park
coverage.
So
Plan
C
looks
at
covering
exactly
what
your
Park
squad
is
going
to
cover
in
September.
L
So
one
Park
squad
in
September
you're,
going
to
have
three
days
that
are
uncovered
you're
gonna
have
no
bathroom
coverage,
and
so
in
and
I
perceived
in
that
the
the
Park
squad
is,
we
want
them
in
the
park
when
people
are
there
to
interact
with
the
people
to
have
that
community
interaction.
So
if
we
relegate
them
to
closing
restrooms
from
10:00
to
2:00,
that
is
the
time
when
people
aren't
in
the
park.
L
That's
not
where
we
do
our
best
work
so
that
Plan
C
is
just
using
overtime
to
fill
the
gap
of
the
Park
squad
until
June
30th
plan.
D
is
just
for
comparison.
If
you
had
two
squads
working
seven
days
a
week
or
four
days
a
week
with
one
coverage,
so
you
have
six
officers
working
ten
hours
a
week,
seven
days
a
week
with
one
over,
it
would
be
864
thousand
dollars.
L
L
That's
what
it's
going
to
take
to
hire
a
pilot
to
to
fund
another
Park
squad
for
an
entire
year,
so
you're
starting
to
bump
up
into.
We
probably
ought
to
look
at
that.
If
that's,
if
that's
the
level
service,
we
should
prove
up
be
providing
now,
there's
the
costs
of
outfitting
them
and
and
that
number
down
there,
four
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars,
that
is,
for
their
equipment,
vehicle
and
IMS
their
computers
and
different
things.
L
That's
an
upfront
cost
of
four
twenty,
but
every
year
after
that,
it's
about
ninety
thousand
dollars,
so
you're
really
looking
at
about
eight
hundred
and
sixty-five
thousand
dollars
a
year
for
an
additional
Park
squad.
We
funded
one
if
we're
going
to
to
really
fill
that
gap
and
cover
those
days
and
have
that
overlap
day
and
have
the
ownership
of
a
squad
working
these
different
parks,
and
that
is
probably
where
we
should
start
looking
now.
L
If
you
go
to
page
eight,
there's
that
second
half
that
we
don't
have
funded
or
that
is
not
in
this
fiscal
year
that
would
cover
July
in
August.
So
the
same.
The
same
exact
officers
work
in
the
same
hour
so
plan
a
to
cover
the
gap
between
July
and
August
of
next
fiscal
year
would
be
the
30,000
40
so
to
cover
that
entire
gap
to
September
you're.
L
Looking
at
about
a
hundred
and
four
thousand
dollars
plan
B
would
be
260
thousand
dollars
to
cover
those
two
months
of
having
four
officers
close
those
restrooms
from
10:00
to
2:00
in
the
morning.
So
if
you
add
that,
with
the
prior
months,
its
170
for
Plan
C
is
using
overtime
to
fund
six
officers
working
ten
hours
a
day
four
days
a
week
is
129.
Add
that
to
the
previous
slide
and
you're
looking
at
561
plan,
D
is
looking
at
two
full-time
squads,
so
you
have
seven
days
a
week.
L
L
That's
where
you
start:
that's,
where
you
I
mean
you're
really
starting.
Are
we
using
our
over
time
the
best
we
could,
if
that
is
the
service
level
and
and
and
I?
Really,
if
you,
if
you
really
think
about
it
counsel,
if
you
have
five
officers
in
a
sergeant
and
been
mentioned,
the
number
of
20,000
or
2080
hours
is
what
they
actually
work
in
in
a
year.
L
But
if
you
take
out
the
time
for
vacation
and
training
and
sick
and
leave
it's
about
1500
hours,
so
five
officers
is
really
three
or
four
and
if
you're
expecting
them
to
cover
81
parks
and
then
try
to
close
those
restrooms.
Just
the
serious
conversation
is:
if
that's
what
we
want,
we
should
look
at
another
squad
and
I
think
it
would
be
it
would.
It
would
cost
less
to
fund
the
squad
and
move
forward.
That
way,
any
questions.
Yes,
the
next
couple
slides.
L
If
you
look
at,
we
went
and
asked
public
services
and
they
gave
us
their
recommendation
and
that
is
page
10.
Then
they
were
asking.
They
were
looking
at
it
by
areas
area,
one
two,
three
and
four,
and
they
were
asking
for
two
officers
8.88
hours
a
day
and
so
area.
One
to
fill
that
gap
between
now
and
June
would
be
two
hundred
and
fourteen
thousand
dollars
in
area.
L
One
area
to
area
three
area
for
area,
for
they
were
asking
for
for
officers
at
eight
eight
point,
five
hours
a
day
which
is
really
17
hours,
so
that
was
428.
You
add
that
to
the
gap
and
you're.
Looking
at
almost
one
point,
one
point
almost
one
point:
four
million
dollars
to
fund
that
with
overtime.
This
is
where
I
think
we
may
be
bumping
into
the
saturation
point.
I,
don't
know.
If
our
officers
will
we
have
enough.
L
That's
a
lot
of
overtime.
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
fill
all
that
so
that
that
becomes
a
question
to
want
the
overtime
that
the
officers
really
do
like
is
the
department
sponsored
over
time
this
type
of
overtime,
so
other
over
times
would
probably
go
on
on
schedule.
So
we
might-
and
we
would
do
our
very
best
to
do
that,
but
again
I
think
it's
prudent
to
start
looking
at
if
we're,
if,
if
that's
the
expectation,
let's
let's
fund
another
squad
with
that
I'm
willing
to
take
any
questions,
you
may
have.
E
The
first
is
probably
a
statement
mr.
chair
I,
think
in
the
coming
year
and
our
priority
discussions,
which
I
hope
we
have
with
the
new
council
I,
do
want
to
push
for
a
discussion
about
parks,
oversight
overall
and
I
think
this
would
flow
into
that
discussion
as
far
as
funding
for
maintenance
of
parks,
expansion
needs
and
also
part
of
this,
that
be
oversight
yeah,
so
I
want
to
preface
what
I'm
going
to
say
by
that.
E
The
second
question
is
in
the
scenarios
they
sort
of
either
or
closing
bathrooms
only
and
it
sounds
like
you're
right
that
closing
bathrooms
through
the
wintertime,
it's
not
the
same
as
starting
in
April
or
May
whenever
they
open
again
right
what
okay.
So
the
question
I
have
is
based
on
any
data.
We
have
is
daytime
hours
in
the
wintertime,
I'm
thinking
so
December
through,
say
March,
when
daylight
is
only
daytime
hours
really
till
safe
six
o'clock
average
is
that
the
biggest
need
after
hours
is
the
biggest
need,
assuming
the
bathrooms
are
closed.
Already.
E
I'm
just
thinking
the
parks
in
my
district
and
when
is
the
the
need
greatest
there
for
supervision,
I'm,
not
sure
it's.
When
there's
a
lot
of
people
there
that
makes
sense,
I
know
for
community
policing
it
made
sense,
but
for
criminal
activity
it
may
not
be
during
the
peak
hours
that
people
using
the
park.
L
I
just
used
a
very
good,
that's
a
good
point.
I
think
we
should
very,
very
strategic
and
how
we
stagger
their
days
off.
L
We
keep
criminal
activity
down
during
those
times,
but
people
need
to
feel
safe
and
I
and
I
will
and
I
want
that
too
and
I
want
that
interaction,
but
also
strategically.
We
can
look
at
when
the
vandalisms
are
occurring,
and
things
like
that
and
and
part
of
this
plan
would
be
to
leverage
all
the
assets
of
the
police
department,
the
CI.
L
U
officers
our
host
officers,
our
Community
Connections
Center,
our
CIT
officers,
everything
that
we
can
do
to
provide
outreach
and
help
in
the
parks,
because
they
have
become
kind
of
a
place
where
those
that
are
experiencing
homelessness
may
go,
and
we
we,
through
our
Cobras
model,
was
responding
to
model
we
reach
out
and
try
to
help
those
folks.
So
I
think
we
should
be
very,
very
strategic
and
how
we
we
lay
this
out
when.
E
L
We
can
put
that
anywhere
wherever
we
need
to,
but
that
was
the
one
priority
of
the
parks
is,
if
you'll
help
us
close
those
restrooms
and
and
and
make
sure
people
aren't
in
the
parks
after
hours,
and
once
we
continue
after
we
change
the
culture
that
you
can't
be
in
the
parks,
I
think
that
will
make
it
that
will
pay
dividends
for
us
as
to
the
vandalisms
and
things
that
are
occurring
at
night.
Okay,.
L
A
Council
member
Johnson
I
think
that
what
might
actually
help
us
with
all
of
this
scenarios
is
bringing
up
public
services
to
discuss
what
they
actually
need
with
the
parks.
So
I'm
wondering
I
know
that
Lisa
Schaeffer,
the
public
services
directors
here
I,
don't
know
if
she
wants
to
come
up
or
wants
to
send
her
deputy
director
up
because
I
think
for
me
personally.
If
we're
looking
at
funding,
Park
Rangers,
let's
find
exactly
from
the
parks
department
what
they
need
and
what
they're
looking
for
well,.
D
She's
walking
up
the
city
has
81
parks,
half
of
them
are
smaller
mini
parks
or
pocket
parks.
There
are
47
miles
of
paved
and
unpaved
urban
trails
and
just
under
1,700
acres
of
natural
lands.
So
those
are
kind
of
the
three
recreation
areas
that
are
contemplated
when
you're
thinking
about
where
or
how
to
prioritize
where
the
officers
would
be
going.
I.
K
Thinks
it's
Kristin
Riker,
so
the
chief
is
exactly
right
and,
as
far
as
you
know,
coming
up
with
a
strategic
plan
to
get
the
police
officers
in
our
parks
during
different
times
of
the
day.
I
thought
it
might
be
helpful
to
clarify
the
restrooms
and
closing
the
restrooms
and
that
10
a.m.
to
2
a.m.
hour
is
an
odd
time
to
ask
our
police
officers
to
be
in
our
parks.
But
the
reason
why
we're
asking
for
that
is
because
it
really
is
the
time
when
most
of
the
activity
happens
in
our
park.
K
That
isn't
a
good
thing
and
our
part,
our
parks
staff,
that
the
chief
met
with
we're,
mostly
our
supervisors
and
our
employees,
who
work
directly
in
the
parks
and
those
folks
are
the
ones
that
get
there
at
6:00
a.m.
and
open
the
door
to
potentially
a
very
violent
situation
in
the
park
and
have
been
threatened
with
all
sorts
of
different
things
from
glass
to
all
sorts
of
tools
or
sticks
and
chased
in
our
part.
K
And
that's,
and
that
is
their
biggest
fear-
is
getting
there
in
the
morning
and
and
seeing
and
and
and
just
being
surprised
by
those
folks
in
the
restrooms
but
having
police
officers
there
during
different
times
of
the
day
and
in
the
evening.
I
think
eventually
would
be
the
goal,
because
people
will
know
that
they'll
be
showing
up
and
that
and
and
then
they'll
discontinue
doing
some
of
those
things,
putting
emptying
our
large
garbage
cans
and
putting
them
over
our
sprinkler
heads
so
that
they
don't
get
wet
at
night.
K
L
So
whatever
plan
we
decide,
I
would
recommend
we
well
I
would
ask
that
you
fund
that,
because
I
think
that's
a
very
important
component
to
what
the
parks
need
and
their
people
need,
and
then
we
can
decide
how
we
want
to
fill
that
gap
with
the
different
plans
that
we've
looked
at,
but
I
think
over
time
is
a
good
start,
but
at
some
point
over
time
is
going
to
surpass
what
it
would
really
cost
to
to
have
another
squad.
That.
L
L
A
M
A
Rather
words,
but
the
decrease
of
500,000
that
you
had
savings,
we're
still
going
up
three
hundred
to
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
annual
for
overtime
yeah,
which
kind
of
scares
me
like
you're
talking
about
with
that
saturation.
What
point
do
they
do?
We
not
fill
those
overtime
positions
right
now,
very
good.
A
D
D
Next
is
item
D
to
request
for
one
and
a
half
million
dollars,
budget
increase
for
the
home
investment
partnership.
First
time,
homebuyer
and
housing
renovation
program
attachment
9
provides
a
2
page
overview
of
this
program,
as
well
as
some
of
the
history
involved.
As
of
up
November
19th.
The
remaining
budget
for
the
current
fiscal
year
is
three
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
five
hundred
and
fifty-two
dollars.
This
is
enough
for
two
home
mortgages
or
four
to
five
rehabilitation
projects.
D
The
long-standing
practice
for
this
program
was
to
use
repaid
loans
and
requests
in
the
annual
budget,
those
receipts
from
the
repaid
loans
to
cover
the
next
fiscal
year's
expenditures
for
the
program.
So
it's
a
self-perpetuating
program
that
didn't
happen
for
some
reason
in
the
fiscal
year,
20
annual
budget,
which
is
why
this
request
is
coming
to
the
council
in
the
budget
amendment,
because
the
program
is
set
up
to
be
self-perpetuating
in
this
way.
D
H
D
D
Correct
there's
currently
a
little
over
two
million
dollars
in
repaid
loans,
and
what
would
happen
in
previous
years
is
there'd,
be
a
one
or
a
one,
and
a
half
million
dollar
request
in
the
annual
budget
to
use
the
repaid
loans
in
the
next
fiscal
year
to
continue
the
program
that
did
not
happen
in
fiscal
year
22.
No,
why
I
do
not.
H
Thank
you.
My
understanding
is
that,
in
the
loss
of
the
hand,
director
sort
of
during
the
budget
process,
that
item
just
got
missed,
it
never
got
to
the
can
admin
department
to
be
considered
it's
something
that
is
part
of
our
annual
budget
process
every
year.
E
D
D
The
other
update
is
on
item
d3,
the
general
obligation
bonds
2019,
a
these
are
the
first
issuance
of
the
streets,
reconstruction
bonds,
the
87
million
voters
approved
last
November
and
there's
a
table
in
the
staff
report
showing
the
breakdown
up
to
20
million
dollars
and
the
estimated
costs
for
each
of
the
major
streets.
There
is
a
category
for
local
streets.
It
does
not
specifically
list
each
of
the
local
streets
segments
that
information
would
come
back
to
the
council
once
the
projects
are
completed.
D
So
we
have
the
cost
estimates
and
the
locations
for
the
major
streets,
the
local
streets,
because
there
are
many
more
of
them
and
they're
much
smaller
dollar
amounts
once
those
are
built.
Those
costs
would
come
back
to
the
council
just
for
the
worth.
The
report
about
what
happened
with
the
money,
especially
since
the
expectation
last
year
to
the
public,
was
that
there'd
be
a
report
on
how
the
funding
was
used
other
than
that
there's
a
council
added
item,
I
1,
which
is
the
additional
funding
for
patrols
in
city
parks
or
hotspots.
D
J
D
A
A
So
let's
talk
about
required
fee
waiver
for
youth
participating
in
youth
city
programs.
We
have
Sylvia
Richards
from
our
council
office
who's
here,
as
well
as
I
believe
Kim
Thomas
from
Public
Services,
Youth
and
Family
Division
Director,
no,
yes,
and
no
walking
Shaw.
What
is
your
current
title?
Knoll
I'm,
the
deputy
administrator.
H
Right
so
the
city
applied
for
and
received
the
after-school
match,
partnership
grant
from
the
Utah
Department
of
Workforce
Services,
and
this
grant
provides
$250,000
for
the
next
three
years
for
school
break
and
after
school.
You
city,
programming,
with
this
grant.
The
city
is
required
to
waive
programming,
related
fees
for
youth,
qualify
for
the
free
school
lunch
and
offer
a
sliding
fee
scale
to
those
who
qualify
for
reduced
lunch
in
order
to
use
the
grant
funding
and
the
fee
waiver
prompted
the
public
benefit
analysis
and
the
public
hearing
is
tonight
in
your
form.
H
During
your
formal
meeting
and
Kim,
did
you
have
anything
you
wanted
to
add
we're?
What
we
would
be
doing
is
just
adding
one
more
category
to
our
existing
sliding
fee
scale,
so
we're
looking
at
a
potential
revenue
loss
of
20
to
30
thousand
dollars.
Those
families
only
pay
$11
a
month
anyway,
as
it
is
we'll
be
gaining
two
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars.
However,
if
we
accept
the
grant
with
the
grant.
H
Mr.
chair
I
move
that
we
go
into
a
closed
session
for
the
purposes
of
discussion
strategies
to
just
excuse
me,
strategy
regarding
the
purchase,
sale,
change,
a
release
of
real
property,
including
any
form
of
water,
right
or
water
shares,
and
then
also
for
the
purposes
of
discussing
deployment
of
security
personnel.
Second,.
J
J
A
A
K
N
Would
be
filled
would
all
be
defined
there
and
now
it's
time
for
a
history
minute,
decorating,
storefront
windows
for
the
holidays
is
nothing
new
and
in
Salt
Lake
the
tradition
goes
back
as
far
as
we've
had
storefronts
through
the
early
1900's
shops
all
over
downtown
got
in
on
the
holiday
spirit
and
drew
people
to
the
area
by
elaborately
decorating.
Their
windows
in
the
1970s
zcm
I
kicked
off
a
new
tradition
that
combined
the
window
displays
of
the
past
with
candy
decorations.
These
candy
windows
became
a
mainstay
of
shopping
downtown.
N
This
continued
all
the
way
up
until
2012,
when
zcm
I,
then
Meyer
and
Frank
closed
to
make
way
for
the
city
creek
development.
When
Macy's
took
the
space
over,
they
decided
to
continue
the
tradition
of
the
candy
windows,
selecting
six
artists
and
every
year
to
create
elaborate
candy
displays
drawing
in
visitors
from
all
over
the
state.
N
Thanks
for
watching
SLC
TV
Salt
Lake
City's
government
access
channel
on
this
week's
episode
of
capital
city
news,
we
hear
from
Sabri
Gil
Salt
Lake,
City's,
new
sustainability
program
manager
about
food
equity
and
inclusion
in
the
city,
and
our
history
minute
is
about
part-time
Salt,
Lake,
er,
Adam
Yauch
of
the
Beastie
Boys.
Let's
get
started
with
our
legislative
update
and
look
back
at
its
November
12th
meeting.
N
They
heard
proposals
for
the
Utah,
theater
and
adjacent
retail
property,
and
they
also
approved
the
RDAs
budget
amendment
which
provided
funding
for
a
new
track
station
at
6:50,
South,
Main
Street,
as
well
as
other
projects
to
learn
more
visit,
SLC
gov,
slash,
council,
cold
car
interiors
are
uncomfortable
and
frosted
windshields
are
a
safety
hazard
but
leaving
your
car
running
unattended
to
warm
up
and
defrost
as
an
open
invitation
to
auto
theft.
Last
year,
135
vehicles
were
stolen
because
owners
left
their
vehicles
running
an
idling,
keep
your
car
and
property
safe.
N
While
clearing
the
air
by
staying
idle
free
for
more
safety
tips,
visit,
SL,
CPD
comm,
the
utah
census
area
office
is
currently
hiring
over
4,000.
Temporary
positions
in
Salt,
Lake
County
baby
ends
at
$17
per
hour
with
a
flexible
schedule.
Census
takers
provide
the
perfect
opportunity
for
students,
retirees
and
part-time
or
seasonal
workers
to
earn
some
extra
income
while
helping
count.
Our
community
apply
today
at
2020
census,
gov,
slash
jobs.
N
M
Essentially,
food
is
the
foundation
that
connects
us
all.
It
is
in
a
community's
food
system
is
such
a
complex,
complex
system,
it's
a
complex
web
of
relationships
and
networks
and
from
producers
to
consumers,
but
there's
so
much
more
in
between
there's
distribution
systems.
There
is
food
access
in
terms
of
accessibility
and
availability
of
healthy
food
and
affordability
of
healthy
food.
M
There's
food
safety
challenges,
there's
so
much
on
the
consumption
and
and
then,
of
course,
the
environmental
impacts
around
that.
So
food
community
can
be
a
very
complex
topic
and
a
very
complex
system
Utah
produces
two
percent
of
its
vegetables
and
three
percent
of
its
produce.
So
we
are
not
very
food
secure
at
all,
and
our
production
systems
are
not
fully
functioning.
There's
a
very
few
for
there's
a
handful
of
farmers
that
produce
most
of
that
produce
land
is
there's
land
scarcity,
there's
water
scarcity,
there's
a
human
labor
scarcity.
M
So
there's
all
these
challenges
and
then
that's
just
on
the
production
end
on
the
distribution
and
there's
even
more
and
then
on
the
consumption
and
there's
even
a
more
elaborate
challenge
in
terms
of
food
access.
So
we
at
the
city
really
hope
to
alleviate
some
of
these
challenges
and
these
gaps
and
in
need
and
services
by
creating
programs
that
have
a
more
targeted
approach.
So
we
have
17
community
gardens
in
on
city
land
in
partnership
with
lots
of
community
gardens,
one
is
going
to
come
online.
Hopefully
next
year
we
have
our
microwave
food.
M
The
microloan
fund
for
farmers
and
the
microloan
fund
for
farmers
is
a
way
for
the
city
to
support
our
small
to
medium
size,
sometimes
even
legacy
farmers
in
their
operations
in
terms
of
helping
purchase,
equipments
he's
an
extension
staff
seeds
and
that
increases
the
amount
of
fruits
and
vegetables
that
come
into
the
city.
So
we've
seen
a
really
great
uptick
in
the
amount
of
produce
that's
available
at
the
winter
market
through
that
program.
M
So
one
of
the
goals
of
the
city's
food
programs
is
to
have
food
equity
and
to
have
that
be
a
key
component
in
our
community's
food
system,
and
equality
and
equity
are
different
in
in
sort
of
the
foundational
ways
and
the
way
that
I
could
best
describe.
It
is
imagine
an
apple
tree,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
have
everyone
be
able
to
pick
an
apple
from
the
napple
tree,
the
tall
person
has
an
advantage
and
they
can
just
go
pick
an
apple
right
away.
A
O
I'll
tell
you
more
about
myself:
I
am
from
Europe
from
the
Czech
Republic.
Originally
came
here
25
from
20
years
ago.
Little
over
20
years
ago,
work
at
the
University
of
Utah
I
also
primarily
move
myself
around
by
bike
these
days,
I
have
a
one-year-old
and
a
six-year-old
and
I'm
moving
the
one-year-old
to
or
daycare
edu
from,
sugarhouse
everyday,
so
I
can
kind
of
attest
from
firsthand
how
it
is
to
kind
of
move
around
with
vulnerable
people
behind
you
and
that's
the
main
reason.
O
We
are
on
near
17th,
East
and
21st
south,
so
I
take
15
East.
Today
you
it's
it's
pretty
nice.
It's
the
only
Greg
grip
I
have
these
days
is
that
the
snow
doesn't
get
clean
very
well
from
the
bike
lane
when
the
cars
are
parked
right
next
to
it.
So
we
have
to
take
the
the
mainline
you
know,
which
makes
me
a
little
bit
nervous
with
a
keep
behind
that
it
will
melt
in
a
few
days
so
well
anyway.
A
Thank
you,
you'll,
be
on
the
consent,
agenda
and
I
you're
more
than
willing
to
go
across
the
hall
and
listened
to
your
name,
be
your
name
won't
be
called
it'll
just
be
say,
will
prove
the
consent
agenda
or
hero
feel
free
to
go
home.
It
looks
like
everything
everyone's
in
favor
of
you
being
on
these
boards
and
we're
appreciative
of
you
willing
to
serve
okay.