►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 4/23/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Council
for
Tuesday
April,
23rd
2019,
we
apologize
for
the
delay
are
already
a
meeting
went
a
little
bit
longer
than
than
we
had
planned.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
regarding
a
one-year
action
plan
for
Community,
Development,
Block
Grant
and
other
federal
grants
for
fiscal
year,
2019,
2020
and
councilmembers.
As
you
will
see
from
your
agenda,
we
do
have
a
packed
agenda
with
some
budget
presentations
from
different
departments,
and
so
I
would
well
well.
I
would
never
say
not
to
talk
about
issues
and
not
to
raise
questions.
A
B
Is
the
second
briefing
and
the
council
is
scheduled
to
vote
tonight
and
the
deadline
to
act
according
to
HUD
is
May
1st,
so
we
don't
have
council
meetings
between
now
and
May
1st
so
action
tonight.
The
council
at
the
April,
2nd
briefing
made
several
funding,
shifts
totaling
615,000
$115.
These
are
summarized
by
the
table
on
the
big
screen
and
you'll
note
that
the
last
one
in
home
relates
to
Habitat
for
Humanity.
It
was
a
tentative
shift
pending
additional
information
and
discussion
between
the
administration
and
the
organization.
B
Since
these
funding
shifts
were
made,
we
have
received
final
award
amounts
from
HUD.
Previously
we
were
working
off
of
estimates.
Now
we
have
actual
award
amounts,
CDBG
was
93
thousand
less
than
we
expected,
ESG
was
8,000,
more
home
was
a
hundred
and
fourteen
thousand
less
and
HOPWA
was
61
thousand
dollars
more.
So
some
up
some
down
based
on
the
estimates.
The
two
advisory
boards
who
provide
funding
recommendations,
also
provide
funding
contingencies
in
case
the
funding
amounts
are
more
or
less
than
expected.
B
Applying
those
funding
contingencies
resulted
in
these
shifts,
as
shown
in
the
graph
on
page
the
table.
On
page
two
of
the
staff
report
and
up
on
the
big
screen,
someone
up
some
went
down
and
I
want
to
point
out,
in
particular
the
very
top
CDBG
item
for
Public
Services
English
skills,
Learning
Center,
the
decrease
would
bring
it
below
the
30,000
dollar
minimum
grant
award
that
the
city
has
as
a
policy.
B
The
reason
the
policy
exists
is
we
need
a
minimum
amount
to
create
that
community
impact
and
if
you
give
less
than
that,
you're
not
getting
as
much
bang
for
your
buck.
So
since,
since
these
tables
were
put
together,
the
administration
has
provided
a
couple
of
documents.
They
are
in
your
folders.
The
first
one
is
memorandum.
B
Yeah,
so
implementing
the
funding
contingencies
would
be
a
thirteen
thousand
nine
hundred
and
eighty
two
dollar
decrease
for
the
English
skills.
Learning
Center,
and
this
is
again
the
advisory
boards
recommendation
for
how
to
deal
with
the
decrease
and
where
to
pull
the
money
from.
They
also
recommended
that
it
would
be
just
over
a
sixty
thousand
dollar
decrease
for
housing,
the
hand
Multi
Family
Development
Program,
which
would
leave
a
million
just
over
a
million
dollars
in
the
account.
C
A
B
Since
we
have
additional
money
in
ESG.
This
means
it's
an
increase
of
six
hundred
and
five
dollars
for
the
administration.
Line-Item.
The
advisory
board
recommended
increasing
the
Road
homes
rapid
rehousing
program.
If
additional
funding
was
found-
and
so
it
was
a
little
over
seven
thousand
dollars
that
would
be
added
to
this
program
for
home,
the
funding
was
less
than
expected.
As
a
result,
the
ten
percent
maximum
was
reduced.
B
There
was
more
money
than
expected,
so
the
administration
is
capped
at
three
percent
and
this
increased
it
by
one
thousand,
eight
hundred
and
thirty
eight
dollars
to
just
over
sixteen
thousand,
and
then
the
Advisory
Board
recommended
splitting
the
increase
between
two
of
the
projects
by
an
equal
amount.
This
would
be
twenty
nine
thousand
seven
hundred
and
six,
and
it
would
be
for
the
tenant
based
rental
assistance
from
the
County
Housing
Authority,
and
then
you
talk
community
actions,
salaries,
operational
support
and
rent
and
utility
assistance.
B
So
these
are
the
funding
shifts
based
on
the
actual
award
amounts.
In
response
to
this,
the
administration
took
a
look
at
what
the
impacts
would
be
to
these
individual
programs
based
on
the
council's
funding
shifts
and
the
actual
award
amounts,
and
this
is
I
draw
your
attention
to
the
handout
with
the
the
teal
strip,
which
is
a
summary
of
what
the
impacts
would
be
to
each
of
the
organizations.
B
B
It
looks
like
you
found
the
handouts,
making
sure
they're
there
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
the
administration
to
talk
about
the
conversations
with
Habitat
for
Humanity,
and
then
they
can
also
discuss
the
funding
shifts
that
the
administration
has
made.
This
is
an
email
printout
in
your
folders
and
the
the
gist
of
the
administration's
revised
funding
recommendations
are
to
spread
the
pain
of
the
decreased
awards
across
more
projects
instead
of
fewer.
D
So
if
we
could
start
with
the
shall
we
start
with
the
spreading
the
pain
so
to
speak,
I'm
as
Administration
I'm
looked
at
this,
we
if
we
could
start
with
CDBG
public
services
I'm.
This
is
again
15%
of
the
overall
grant
award
and,
as
we
looked
at
keeping
in
mind
that
minimum
funding
level
that
our
community
has
said
is
impactful
to
them.
We
would
like
to
present
an
approach
that
allows
for
a
$1400
reduction
to
all
of
the
public
services
applications,
with
the
exception
of
those
two
that
are
already
at
the
minimum
funding
level.
D
C
A
It
seems
like
if,
if
the
intent
was
to
keep
things
fair,
you
would
go
with
the
percentage
approach
rather
than
a
dollar
amount
of
approach.
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
arguing
one
way
or
another
I'm.
Just
saying
cuz
I
mean
he
said
that
you
know
based
on
fairness.
He
came
up
with
this
plan,
but
it
seems
like
the
fairness
thing
would
be
just
to
decrease
the
percentage.
The
councilmember
Mendenhall
was
raising
just
a
different
approach.
E
B
G
H
A
So
councilmember
Wharton
proposes
a
straw
poll
to
take
this
funding,
chart
but
add
a
or
assign
a
percentage.
The
three
percent
percentage
yes
point,
six
to
be
precise,
okay,
so
the
two
points,
so
the
strap
hole
would
be.
Do
we
want
to
assign
the
two
point?
Six
decrease
across
the
board
equally,
with.
F
A
D
A
So,
whatever
the
percentage
drink
thumbs
up
that,
you
would
read
that
you
would
rather
get
K.
Let's
make
it
simple
thumbs
up
that
you
would
rather
go
the
percentage
as
opposed
to
a
dollar
amount
approach,
and
then
we
will
work
with
staff.
Our
staff
will
work
with
administration
staff
to
figure
out
what
that
number
is
before.
Our
meeting
where
we
take
action
tonight
comes
up
that
we
support
that
from
them.
I
can't.
E
A
And
and
I
would
say
that
we
are
last
minute
in
it,
but
I
think
we're
working
within
you
know
the
the
timeframe,
the
parameter
that
we
have
the
administration
went
with
a
dollar
amount
approach.
You
know,
and
so
the
question
really
is:
do
we
want
to
go
with
the
dollar
amount
approach,
or
do
we
want
to
go
at
the
percentage
approach
timeframe?
Both
of
them
are,
you
know,
I,
don't
think
going.
I
F
Think
we
should,
you
know,
because
we're
dealing
with
such
we're
dealing
with
different
amounts,
I
think
it's
fair
to
that
everybody
feels
the
administration
said.
We
want
to
spread
the
her
and
I
think
everyone
should
feel
the
same
magnitude
of
hurt,
and
this
is
the
really
the
only
way
to
do
that.
So
council.
C
Wonder
if
to
help
us
be
able
to
can
have
our
eyes
on
it
in
a
work
session
before
we
get
across
the
hall
to
vote,
if
we
could
take
a
straw
poll,
ask
staff
if
they
have
the
capacity
to
go
crunch.
Some
numbers
bring
it
back
to
us
at
the
end
of
the
work
session.
So
we
could
reopen
this
and
look
at
those
numbers.
Would
that
help
councilmember
Fowler
I'm
still.
E
I
mean
I,
understand
the
purpose
behind
it,
but
I
also
understand
that
it
looks
to
me
like
I,
mean
sort
of
for
the
most
part.
They
tried
dollar
amounts
and
I
just
want
to
try
to
give
people
the
most
money
we
can
give
them,
but
I
understand
the
rationale
behind
doing
a
percentage
versus
a
dollar
amount,
so
I'm
still
just
kind
of
processing
a
little
bit
in
my
brain.
Well,.
F
I
think
this
isn't
just
to
add
I
think
it's
an
easy
way
to
explain
to
what
happened.
You
know
as
opposed
to
two
people
who
come
and
are
like
well,
I
had
fifty
eight
thousand
six
hundred
and
the
person
and
I
had
forty
four
thousand
six
hundred,
and
then
there
was
an
another
group
that
was
fifty
eight
thousand
six
hundred
and
you
took
the
same
amount
from
both
of
us,
like
obviously
I'm
feeling
that
hurt
more
than
they
are
so
I.
Think
it's
easier
to
go
to
the
group
and
say
look.
F
A
The
reason
that
I
would
be
supportive
of
the
percentage
approach
is
because
there
is
a
there
are
massive
discrepancies
here.
I
mean
you
look
under
housing
number
one
assist
emergency
home
repair,
their
request
was
thirty,
three
hundred
and
eighty
four
thousand
eight
hundred
and
fifty
one
they
are
decreased.
Fifteen
thousand
one
hundred
and
forty
nine,
the
same
amount
that
housing
number
two:
the
Community
Development
Corporation
of
Utah
program
operations
was
decreased
at
the
same
amount,
even
though
they
were
only
at
53,000
yeah.
So
you
know
I
would
I
would
say.
A
A
D
Going
down
the
list,
each
of
those
sections
have
different
limitations
that
we
have
to
think
about
and
consider
as
we
look
at
regulations,
and
so
that's
why
it's
it's
broken
up
that
way.
Public
services
is
its
own
category.
Housing
is
approached
differently
and
then
they
each
grant
is,
is
approached
differently
as
well.
So.
J
There's
if
I'm
taking
that
correctly,
then
you'd
have
to
take
each
of
these
sections
and
do
them
independently
for
a
percentage.
Is
that
right,
correct,
yes
and
then
make
sure
that
adds
up
to
exactly
the
now
we're
trying
to
replace
so
it's
a
little
more
complicated
than
I
think
just
doing
that
that
haircut
kind
of
concept.
So
that's
what
I'm
a
little
worried
about
making
a
rush.
I
understand
the
rationale
and
I:
don't
I'm
not
opposed
to
that.
J
H
Before
we
decide
on
that,
I,
don't
as
long
as
I
have
this
universal.
We
that
I
like
to
use
which
means
I,
don't
have
to
do
anything
and
everyone
else
has
to
do
everything
as
long
as
Jen
feels
comfortable
and
crunching
some
numbers
quickly,
then
I
trust
that
we
can
do
it.
But
if
we
could
finish
going
through
that,
because
these
are
different
categories
and
I
just
and
I
just
want
to
emphasize
I
appreciate
the
recognition.
That's
just
a
different
approach
right.
H
So
on
this
first
category
our
focus
was
keeping
those
30,000
those
minimum
levels
and
then
and
then
spreading
in
that
category,
the
cut
instead
of
percentage-wise,
we
just
looked
at
what
that
was
applied
across
all
and
so,
but
if
we
could,
if
Jen
could
maybe
finished
going
through
that
the
next
category,
the
next
two
categories
and
I
wanted
to
address
the
the
Habitat
for
Humanity's
piece.
Then
we
could
decide
whether
you
want
us
to
crunch
those
numbers
or
not
so.
A
D
Great
so
in
the
housing
section
of
CDBG
I'm,
the
approach
was
to
read
I'm.
To
look
at
the
sorry,
let
me
back
up
on
April
2nd
when
we
met
Council
discussed,
making
cuts
to
specific
programs
in
order
to
fund
other
ones
that
were
not
recommended.
So
we
looked
at
that
approach
and
instead
of
continuing
to
decrease
those
programs,
it
had
already
suffered
a
decrease.
We
look
to
spread
again.
D
K
K
H
No,
it's
a
great
question,
so
the
factor
as
you're
pointing
out
between
what
the
council
recommendation
the
straw
poll
is
taken
on
April
2nd
is
these
actual
amounts
that
we
received
right
so
on
this
particular
funding
on
April
2nd,
the
council
shifted
some
funding
from
two
items:
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
I,
don't
have
the
title
right
from
from
from
from
one
of
the
hand,
proposals
to
NeighborWorks
and
then
one
hundred
ninety
six
thousand
dollars
from
the
is
it
up
there,
the
the
multifamily
to
the
Housing
Authority.
H
So
when
we
went
back
and
looked
at
the
actual
amounts,
what
our
recommendation
on
it
on
this
is
to
spread
the
additional
cuts
to
those
items
that
were
not
reduced
on
April
2nd
and
not
give
additional
reduction
to
those
items
that
had
already
been
reduced.
So,
for
example,
looking
at
housing
number
one
assist
what
the
council
did
on
April
2nd
was
add,
$25,000
from
the
hand
from
the
hand,
item
to
assist,
and
so
so
we're
recommending
that
assist,
receive
a
50
receive
a
proportional
cut
because
it
was
not
reduced,
April,
2nd.
H
Actually,
what
Ben
showed
initially
was
what
the
CDC
IP
board
proposed
in
reductions
as
a
contingency,
if
in
anticipating
that
HUD
could
reduce
right.
So
we
didn't
feel
that
was
as
relevant,
because
it
did
not
account
for
what
happened
in
April.
Second.
So
if,
if
the
reductions
had
not
been
made
on
April
2nd,
we
most
likely
would
have
just
come
back
with
what
the
CDC
IP
board
had
proposed
as
their
okay.
H
If
I
could
just
maybe
clarify
a
good
example
of
what
I'm
saying
is
the
Community
Development
Corporation
of
Utah
program
operations
on
this
listed
under
housing
number
two,
the
53,000
dollars?
That
was
what
the
CDC
IP
board
recommended.
That
was
left
the
same
on
April
2nd,
but
because
they
did
not
receive
a
reduction
when
we
got
the
actual
amounts,
we
applied
a
reduction
to
their
application
as
well.
J
Chance
my
job
good
question
along
this
line
down.
So
if
I
look
at
at
NeighborWorks
number
five
was
that
the
council's
change
recommendation
to
add
a
hundred
thousand,
then
that
get
decreased
by
fifteen
breakfast
I.
Think
that's!
What's
throwing
off
a
little
bit
saying
so
that
was
the
to
make
that
change
and
then
to
pull
it
away
from
the
change
that
was
made.
That
makes
a
little
confusing
I
guess
in
some
ways
sure
okay.
B
B
H
Just
to
clarify,
because
the
CDC
IP
board's
recommendation
did
not
account
for
any
changes
April.
Second,
so
if
we
take
the
whole
sixty
thousand
dollars
from
the
multifamily,
that,
in
essence,
is
a
two
hundred.
Please
don't
quote
my
math,
it's
a
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
something
dollar
cut
to
that
one
line
item.
A
A
And-
and
so
here's
so
based
on
that,
based
on
the
discussion
that
we're
having
and
this
discussion
that
we've
heard
and
also
you
know,
David
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
you
that
we
have,
you
know,
received
the
your
memo
and
an
explanation
about.
You
know
what
what
the
justification
was
and-
and
you
know
that-
cannot
a
concern,
but
some
of
the
issues
that
were
raised
about
our
straw
polls.
A
What
I
would
what
I
would
like
to
do
right
now,
just
because
of
the
time
frame
that
we're
working
in
and
because
of
the
discussions
that
this
council
has
already
had.
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
is
important
to
remember
is
that
you
know
the
recommendations
from
the
CID
CDC
IP
board
then
go
to
the
mayor.
The
mayor
will
then
make
recommendations
based
on
the
CDC
IP
board,
oftentimes
those
don't
change.
Sometimes
they
do
those
recommendations.
A
The
mayor's
recommendations
then
come
to
the
council
and
the
council
then
deliberates
and
decides
which,
which
of
the
projects
are
going
to
be
funded
and
which
are
not.
We
went
through
that
process.
It
was
a
very
public
process.
We
had
a
number
of
straw
polls
that
that
we
went
through
where
we
weighed
these.
You
know
the
different,
you
know
issues
and,
and
we
made
those
decisions
that
was,
that
was
the
prerogative
of
the
council.
A
The
administration
has
come
back
and,
and-
and
you
know
has
has
disagreed
with
some
of
those
straw
polls
that
were
done
and
in
a
memo-
and
that
is,
you
know
completely.
You
know
the
the
administration's
prerogative
to
do
that
as
a
council
and
as
the
chair,
my
feeling
is
that
we
have
spent
you
know
quite
a
bit
of
time
talking
about
these
things.
There
are,
you
know,
fundamental
disagreements
that
we
may
have
with
the
administration.
We
appreciate,
we
duly
know
the
issues
that
you've
raised
to
us.
A
The
explanation
of
this
has
done
more
to
unsettle
me
than
to
make
me
feel
better
about
it,
because
it
you
are
using
your
using
your
judgment.
Call
the
administration
is
using
this
judgment,
call
ignoring
what
the
CDC
IP
board
is
doing,
even
though
you
told
us
that
we
needed
to
you
know
to
remember
what
the
CDC
IP
board
did.
Take
that
into
consideration
with
what
the
administration
has
done.
A
We've
done
that
when
we
have
limited
resources,
limited
federal
resources-
and
there
are
requirements
of
this-
those
federal
resources
and
spending
federal
money
as
a
city,
we
do
not
fund
project
or
we
do
not
fund
different
programs.
This
is
this
is
the
one
area
that
we
have
where
we
can
use
federal
money
to
fund
programs,
and
it
concerns
me
when
I
see
other
program,
other
community
programs
being
cut
for
whatever
reasons,
while
administration
budgets
are
being
increased,
it
doesn't
mean
the
hand
is
not
doing
a
good
job.
A
It
doesn't
mean
that
that
that's
that's
not
doing
good,
but
hand
also
receives
general
fund
money,
whereas
a
lot
of
these
other
projects
do
not.
This
is
the
one
opportunity
that
we
can
work
with
the
community
and
that
is
I
think
what
we
did
and
what
was
discussed
in
our
meeting
when
we
went
through
and
prioritized
this.
A
If
the
programs,
the
$30,000
programs
that
are
already
at
a
minimum,
those
programs
would
not
be
reduced
in
funding,
but
all
of
the
programs,
including
the
hand
programs,
would
be
funded
defunded
to
the
same
tune
that
everybody
else
in
the
community
is
going
to
be
dealing
with.
As
far
as
the
issue
with
with
NeighborWorks
and
some
of
the
issues
and
concerns
that
have
been
raised
there,
one
of
the
things
that
the
there
will
be
a
motion
in
the
formal
meeting
that
we
could
make.
A
That
would
essentially
take
the
you
know
in
light
of
in
light
of
what
the
administration
has
raised
with
NeighborWorks
and
in
light
of
NeighborWorks
response.
Instead
of
funding
the
full
NeighborWorks
amount,
you
would
have
fund
half.
You
know
upfront
when
we
fund
the
other
programs
with
the
remaining
half
to
be
funded
when
they're
able
to
provide
proof
of
the
repayment
of
their
federal
issues
that
don't
deal
in
a
they
couldn't
use
this
money
that
we'd
be
spending
anyway
to
do
that,
but
the
conditions
would
be
that
they
would.
A
They
would
have
to
come
back
and
show
that
you
know,
through
an
independently
outside
audit,
by
a
firm
recognize
that
they've
done
that,
and
then
they
would
have
access
to
the
remaining
half
yeah.
It's
a
50,
upfront
or
51.
The
rest
is
funded
and
then
50
at
a
later
date.
When
you
know
when
the
contingent,
when
they've
met
the
the
issues.
A
Then
we'd
find
the
rest
of
it,
so
that
would
be
that
would
be.
You
know
on
the
agenda
for
later
this
afternoon,
but
in
order
to
we're
now
at
five
o'clock,
we're
planning
on
voting
on
this
at
7
o'clock
in
order
to
give
staff
time
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
straw
poll,
whether
we,
whether
we
have
them,
do
that
where
everything
would
be
decreased
at
an
equal
rate
except
for
those
projects
that
are
funded
at
the
minimum
thumbs
up
that
you
support
that
some
down.
Yes,.
A
C
C
C
J
I'm
gonna
excuse
myself
from
the
ESG
discussion
in
a
moment.
Assume
I
am
so
understand.
We're
gonna
ask
for
them
to
come
back
with
the
new
figures
based
on
a
percentage
reduction
across
all
these
areas.
Right
are
we
gonna
have
enough
time
to
understand
the
impacts
on
each
of
those
programs?
For
that.
F
K
Doing
it
by
percentage,
though,
does
prevent
it
from
being
sort
of
like
sales
tax
being
regressive,
affecting
the
lowest
income
people
sure.
So
so
that's
one
thing
you
could
do
to
mitigate
no
I.
Don't
think
you
will
have
time
to
see
the
impact
and
one
thing
I'm,
not
sure
if
the
staff
is,
our
staff
is
going
to
have
time
to
participate
in
each
item,
because
Ben
is
the
staff
person
on
our
next
agenda
item.
But
what
I
think
we
could
craft
a
detailed
enough
motion
as
I?
Was
writing
it
down
here?
J
H
H
If
I
should
apologize,
that
the
memo
that
we
sent
is
being
read
as
being
argumentative
or
disagreeing
with
the
council's
action.
I
would
ask
you
to
please
take
another
look
at
the
the
memo.
It
was
not
intended
to
make
a
judgment
on
any
action
that
the
council
took
on
April
2nd.
It
was
merely
an
attempt
to
provide
an
impact
statement
so
that
you
would
have
full
information
and
making
the
final
decisions.
H
It
was
again
just
you
can
accept
our
admission
or
not,
and
it
was
not
the
intent
of
the
administration
to
try
and
protect
the
administration's
projects
in
in
in
harm
of
community
organizations
and
community
partnerships.
We
were
recognizing,
as
councilmember
Mendenhall
said
in
this
particular
area,
that
you
already
had
significant
reductions
made
to
two
areas
and
that's
why
we
felt
that
not
making
additional
reductions
there.
J
A
Councilmember
Johnston
asked
the
question
about
you
know,
knowing
that
we
were
raised
the
point
that
we
wouldn't
have
time
to
go
back
and
and
ask
how
each
of
those
impacts
would
be
felt
by
by
the
recipients
did
I
get
that
right.
Yeah,
so
is
the
them
on
what
the
impact
would
be
on
this.
These
reductions.
Have
you
worked
with
them
or
did
they
do?
A
We
know
the
answer
to
that:
okay,
so
either
way
we're
in
the
same
position
where
you
know
where
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
time
to
you
know
we
got
the
numbers
last
week
we're
moving
forward.
We
don't
have
time
to
vet.
You
know
what
the
what
the
percentage
would
be,
but
we
also
know
that
this
hasn't
been
vetted
either.
So
we're
gonna
have
to
we're
passing
something
that
hasn't
been
vetted.
That's
not
the
greatest
kind
of
public
policy,
but
in
the
timeframe
that
we're
working
with
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
councilman,
ebberd
mendenhall.
A
C
A
I
would
say
that
most
applicants
I
think
understand
that
that's
kind
of
the
nature
of
dealing
with
grant
money.
Okay,
so
do
we
do
I
need
to
restate
this
motion
again
or
for
the
strap
hole
or
we
do
we
are
we
subdue?
We
want
to
look
at
the
percentage
thumbs
up.
You
want
to
look
at
the
person
area
to
have
the
staff
develop
those
numbers
thumbs
down
at
you
oppose
them
all
right:
okay,
council,
member
Johnson
votes,
no
and
everyone
else
votes.
Yes,
council.
H
Chair
I'm,
sorry,
if
I
could
have
just
habitat,
be
a
journey
so
as
asked
by
Council
to
work
with
Habitat
for
Humanity,
and
if
you
recall,
initially,
this
contingent
recommendation
of
moving
$250,000
from
the
home
development
fund
to
habitat,
based
on
conversations,
you
received
a
memo
from
from
the
administration.
There
are
two
reasons
why
this
does
not
work
and
that's
coming
directly
from
habitat
when
they
have
used
home
funds
before
with
Salt
Lake
County.
Those
have
been
grants.
H
Salt,
Lake,
City,
home
dollars
are
low
interest
loans,
which
requires
payback
via
the
provider.
That
is
not
their
model,
so
that
does
not
fit
with
their
model.
The
other
issue
that
it
was
not
that
we
were
not
able
to
resolve
with
habitat
was
part
of
their
request
is
also
city
land,
and
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
last
time
and
in
terms
of
the
need
to
go
through
some
kind
of
poke.
You
know
not
some
kind
of
to
go
through
a
public
benefit
analysis.
If
we
were
to
donate
city
land
to
habitat.
A
H
A
So,
council,
so
that
so
based
on
that-
and
you
know
the
information
that
we
received
from
Habitat
for
Humanity,
so
that
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
isn't
going
to
work,
there's
a
couple
of
different
things
we
can
do.
One
would
be
to
take
that
money
and
reappropriation
the
time.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
actually
do
that.
A
A
B
Just
to
be
clear,
the
council's
strawpoll
for
a
percentage
decrease
only
applies
to
CDBG,
not
the
other
three
grants
right.
It
will
not
affect
any
projects
going
below
thirty
thousand
dollars
and
it
will
affect
every
single
CDBG
application,
but
it
will
still
maximize
the
administration
and
maximize
the
public
services
categories.
A
Thank
you
and
thanks
for
that
clarification,
I
apologize
for
the
I
have
so
many
different
numbers
and
things
floating
around
in
my
head
right
now,
I,
don't
know
what
the
heck
is
up.
So
with
that
being
said,
we
will
then,
let's
move
forward
with
getting
those
getting
that
information
staff
we'll
get
back
to
each
of
you
before
or
by
the
formal
meeting
when
we
have
this
discussion
and
I
just
want
to
thank
hand
want
to
thank
David
for
the
administration's
work.
A
A
Does
anybody
here
from
the
library
for
their
budget?
Oh
they're,
outside,
oh
well,
since
the
library
was
outside,
then
this
isn't
going
to
matter
because
of
the
time
frame
that
we're
working
with
we're
going
to
have
to
delay
your
presentation.
I
am
so
sorry
because
I
know
that
your
board
members
here
we're
gonna,
have
we're
gonna,
have
to
delay
the
library
discussion
to
a
future
meeting.
So
my
apologies
to
to
you,
your
staff
and
your
board.
We
have
a
packed
agenda
that
is
not
speeding
up
so.
F
Please,
okay.
Mr.
chair
regarding
neighborhood
works,
I
move
that
we
allocate
50,000
well
subject
to
what
we
just
discussed
and
the
amount
in
or
around
a
50,000
to
be
immediately
available
for
home
ownership
and
real
estate
development
services
and
50,000
to
be
in
a
contingency
reserve
to
be
released.
Neighborhood
works
as
of
January
1st
2020.
F
Subject
have
an
independent
outside
audit
by
recognize
auditing
firm
to
confirm
me
issues
identified
in
the
recent
audit
but
have
been
addressed,
and
that
no
new
issues
exist
and
should
the
requirements
not
be
met,
the
funds
will
lapse
for
reappropriation
by
the
City
Council,
based
upon
a
recommendation
from
the
city
administration
based
upon
qualified
applications,
as
required
by
the
federal
government.
Okay,.
A
A
J
I
think
my
question
mr.
chair
is
the
nature
of
the
issue.
Is
that
their
business
model
doesn't
mean
they
spend
the
money
down
immediately
within
the
calendar
year?
Is
that
part
of
it
and
that,
as
far
as
I
understand
it
because,
previous
years,
it's
a
rotating
system?
And
so
that's
one
question
does
does
giving
50
thousand
with
fifty
thousand
contingency
actually
addressed
that
the
second
question
is
an
audit
happening,
quick
enough
to
actually
reallocate
these
funds
within
the
calendar
year
in
any
meaningful
way?
Is
a
question
in
my
head?
J
D
So
their
program
income
does
not
have
a
time
sensitivity
I'm,
except
for
that
they
can't
access
new
funding
in
a
application
cycle
until
their
old
program
income
is
spent.
So
there's
that
the
current
year
application
we
do
one-year
applications
and
then
we
look
to
extenuating
circumstances
that
may
allow
us
to
extend
an
application
I'm,
but
typically
we
we
don't
do
that
as
matter
practice.
D
H
Two
hundred
eighty
thousand
dollars
that
neighborhood
currently
halves
in
program
income
fund
that
they
would
have
to
spend
down
before
they
can
access
the
fifty
or
the
hundred.
In
addition,
there
is
eighty
thousand
dollars
from
the
previous
award
that
contractually
they
have
to
spend
down
by
the
end
of
June
or
that
those
dollars
are
recaptured
for
reallocation
in
a
future
application.
I.
J
B
Executive
director
of
NeighborWorks
sent
an
email
with
information
to
the
council.
I
think
it
was
two
weeks
ago
and
it
was
forwarded
to
you
and
she
clarified
that
as
Jen
said.
Yes,
they
do
need
to
spend
their
program
income
fund,
which
is
the
money
that's
repaid
from
the
loans,
and
they
need
to
spend
that
first
before
they
can
spend
the
new
CDBG
Award
dollars.
But
she
also
referenced
a
pipeline
of
projects
coming
up
where
they
were
expecting
to
spend
said
funds.
B
F
Just
like
to
point
out
that,
as
part
of
the
straw
poll,
it's
that
they
they
only
have
to
demonstrate
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
administration
and
the
council,
that
they've
met
the
requirements
that
or
they
perform
an
audit.
So
if
we're
happy
with
with
what
they've
done
we
can
they
don't
need
to
provide
a
full
audit.
Second
of
all,
like
I,
don't
think
it
prevents
us
from
releasing
the
from
releasing
the
funds
early
if
the
requirements
have
been
met
or
the
demonstrations
have
been
met
that
are
satisfied
satisfactory.
Yes,
that's.
D
I'm,
what
it
does
is
it.
It
shows
that
there
is
a
lack
of
need
within
our
community,
because
funds
are
not
being
spent
immediately.
So
when
any
organization
that
holds
on
to
their
funding
for
too
long,
it
triggers
another
timeliness
requirement
that
HUD
watches
very
closely.
So
it
just
adds
to
that.
C
C
So
I,
don't
I
hope
that
there's
no
doubt
in
the
public
eye
that
we
want
to
support
NeighborWorks
and
we
believe
in
the
in
the
work
that
they
do
in
the
west
side
of
our
city,
but
I
I
think
I
share
some
of
the
concerns
of
councilmember
Johnston
and
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
compromise
this
really
tenuous
funding
stream
anyway,
by
trying
to
do
something
out
of
the
goodness
of
our
hearts
and
I
think
they
take
it
that
way.
But
if
it
can't
actually
be
utilized,
then
we
don't
want
to
compromise.
D
J
So
I
I
think
the
homeownership
thing
is
is
so
fundamental
to
the
city.
I
think
this
is
important,
but
is
this
the
right
mechanism
for
that
particular
funding
stream,
because
there's
certain
federal
requirements
that
were
held
accountable
for
I
don't
have
a
clear
understanding
of
how
we
would
go
a
different
direction
to
help
this
bit.
I
think
there's
so
many
questions,
and
how
did
this
does
this
money
actually
do
working
in
the
right
way?
We
want
it
to
work
there,
so
that
was
my
concern
about
the
50
councilmember
Mendenhall
I
I.
C
Want
to
support
the
motion,
I
want
to
believe
in
the
pipeline
of
funding
that
they
have
coming
up,
that
they
tell
us
they
do
and
I
would
like
to
ask
for
a
meeting
with
NeighborWorks
representatives
in
the
coming
month
or
so
to
really
understand
their
plan
and
bring
my
concern
that
I
don't
want
to
compromise
the
integrity
of
our
city,
CDBG
dollars
for
some
potential,
miss
or
unspent
dollars
in
their
regard.
So
that's
where
I'll
be
voting.
A
Turn
my
mic
on
so
the
motion,
the
the
strap
hole
on
the
table.
I.
We
don't
need
to
go
through
that
again.
Would
the
way
that
this
would
work
is
if
this
passes,
then
it
doesn't
automatically
be
become
part
of
the
ordinance.
We'd
still
have
to
make
the
motion
across
the
hall
and
vote
on
it,
but
this
at
least
gives
some
intent
on
the
direction
of
the
council's
going
so
thumbs
up
that
we
support
it.
Councilmember
Wharton's
straw
poll
thumbs
down
that
we
posed
them
great.
Okay,
that
passes
unanimously
without
erred.
A
The
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
an
item
that
Ben
is
still
going
to
have
to
stay
up
at
the
table.
It's
for
budget
amendment
number
five
for
fiscal
year,
2018
2019
follow-up
Ben.
Let
ki
will
lead
this
discussion
from
the
dais.
Our
council
policy
analyst
and
Mary
Beth
Thompson
are
the
city's
CFO
and
and
John
Vike
from
the
city
budget.
Director
well
also
join
us
at
the
table.
B
This
is
the
third
briefing
for
a
budget
moment
number
five
general
fund
Cityside
and
the
council
is
scheduled
to
take
action
tonight.
There
are
two
quick
updates.
The
first
is.
The
staff
report
includes
a
summary
of
the
key
findings
from
the
2006
study
of
Warm
Springs
historic,
plunge
site.
The
administration
is
requesting
$37,000
to
fund
a
study
looking
at
the
water
side
of
the
site,
we've
never
as
a
city
done
a
water
analysis
of
Warm
Springs
before
they're,
also
asking
for
funding
to
do
a
structural
and
engineering
study.
B
The
studies
would
not
be
done
concurrently,
as
the
results
of
the
water
study
would
certainly
have
an
impact
on
the
potential
and
allowable
uses
of
the
site
and
whatever
the
use
is
for
the
site
will
determine
part
of
the
structural
and
engineering
study
and
I.
Don't
know
if
Jennifer
McGrath
is
in
the
room
and
wants
to
add
a
little
more
on.
That
I
would
also
call
the
council's
attention
to
there's
a
recommendations
for
future
research.
B
L
Our
intention
at
this
point
is
to
do
an
update
to
the
work
that
was
done
back
in
2006,
with
an
emphasis
on
the
roof,
because
that
seems
to
be
the
most
immediate
issue
that
we're
concerned
about
so
again
as
soon
as
we're
able
to
nail
down
that
scope
with
the
engineering
firm.
Our
intention
is
to
move
that
forward.
B
Thank
you.
The
one
other
update
for
the
council
is
the
council
added
item
of
$70,000
for
the
tuition
reimbursement
program.
The
council
requested,
at
the
previous
briefing
information
on
employee
retention
and
utilization.
If
you
refer
to
the
big
screens,
it
shows
three
years
of
utilization
and
I
want
to
note
that
the
terminated
amount
includes
voluntary
and
involuntary.
So
it's
not
just
people
who
were
involuntarily.
B
A
C
A
Right
so,
overall,
do
any
of
you
have
any
other
questions
about
the
budget
amendment
it
at
all.
Okay,
thank
you.
The
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
a
the
proposed
Department
of
Public
Utilities
budget
for
fiscal
year.
2019,
2020
and
I'm,
not
sure
who
from
the
department
is
going
to
be
here,
is
David
here.
A
N
N
N
So
our
budget
proposal
presentation
today
is
made
up
of
a
couple
of
different
parts,
just
an
introduction,
and
we
wanted
to
talk
about
the
budget
for
each
separate
utility,
water,
stormwater,
streetlights
and
sewer,
and
then
there
are
two
companion
pieces
to
this
year's
budget
that
are
also
on
the
agenda.
When
is
the
resolution
for
the
new
water
reclamation
facility?
N
This
resolution
is
something
that's
required
by
the
Utah
Department
of
Environmental
Quality,
as
part
of
our
variance
to
complete
compliance
by
January,
21st
2025
and
then
the
second
piece
is
the
adoption
of
new
water
and
sewer
rate
structures.
These
are
part
of
the
recommendations
for
a
comprehensive
water
sewer
in
stormwater
rate
study
that
was
completed
last
year.
N
So
I
don't
know
if
you'll
have
time
to
get
to
all
of
those
pieces,
but
we
do.
We
are
prepared
to
talk
about
all
of
them,
so
the
major
focus
of
public
utilities
budget
this
year
is
really
based
on
the
premise
of
serving
our
community
protecting
public
health
and
protecting
the
environment
and
that's
in
a
few
different
ways.
First
of
all,
a
very
major
focus
in
all
for
utilities
is
the
rehabilitation
and
replacement
of
aging
infrastructure,
particularly
aging
water
infrastructure,
infrastructure.
N
Failure
and
degradation
can
have
a
very
significant
impact
to
public
health,
water
supplies,
environment
and
the
local
economy.
Our
capital
asset
process
uses
a
very
systematic
approach
that
identifies
and
prioritizes
infrastructure
needs
to
proactively
avoid
these
negative
impacts.
A
second
major
focus
is
planning
for
both
today
on
tomorrow's
challenges.
This
includes
includes
water
supply.
We've
just
completed
a
40-year
plan,
which
will
then
move
into
a
major
water
infrastructure
plan
for
the
next
40
years.
N
We
also
have
a
water
conservation
master
plan
update
a
source
water
protection
update,
particularly
with
our
Wasatch
watersheds,
and
we
are
also
looking
at
climate
vulnerability
and
adaptation
studies.
A
third
piece
is
supporting
the
economic
growth
in
our
communities
that
we
serve.
We
are
requesting
budget
to
hire
additional
personnel
to
help
with
development
review
and
inspections,
there's
lots
of
new
development
occurring
within
our
service
area,
both
in
Salt
Lake
City
and
in
our
water
service
area
outside
of
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
then.
N
So
our
total
proposed
budget
across
all
four
utilities
is
just
just
shy
of
300
million
dollars
across
our
utilities
are,
but
our
revenues
are
projected
to
be
a
little
about
two
hundred
and
forty
nine
million
dollars
we're
proposing
to
use
reserves
at
about
forty
eight
million.
Forty
eight
point:
nine
million.
Some
of
that
is
a
balance
of
a
twenty
seventeen
bond
issue,
we're
also
proposing
water
rate,
increases
and
increases
in
both
sewer
and
storm
water.
N
To
give
a
sense
of
what
those
rate
increases
would
do
for
sort
of
Middle
average
residential
water
bills.
The
total
for
all
three
utilities,
with
rate
increases,
would
be
about
five
dollars
and
thirty-five
cents
a
month
for
folks
that
have
lower
water
water
consumption
across
all
of
those
utilities,
about
B
about
two
hundred
two
dollars
and
fifty
two
dollars
two
dollars
and
fifty
two
cents
per
month.
N
We
are
proposing
capital
investments
at
184
million
out
of
our
entire
budget.
Operations
comprises
a
little
over
ninety
seven
million
and
then
we're
also
proposing
to
bring
on
17
new
full-time
equivalent
positions
to
bring
our
staffing
from
four
hundred
and
twenty
two
point.
Five
to
four
hundred
and
thirty.
What
nine
point
five.
N
The
revenues
for
this
budget
include
water
service
fees,
reserve
funds
and
revenue
bonds,
again
we're
proposing
that
5%
rate
increase
and
out
of
the
entire
budget
capital
investments
are
at
60
1.7
million
in
operations
at
sixty
six
point,
two
million
a
capital
improvement
program
as
part
of
this
budget
has
have
has
quite
a
few
different
projects,
some
of
them
long-term
projects
in
our
master
plan.
This
would
include
the
east-west
conveyance
project.
That
is
a
project
that
brings
water
sources
from
the
south.
N
That's
our
Cottonwood
Canyons
in
Deer,
Creek
Reservoir
and
constructs
a
pipeline
to
bring
those
water
sources
in
to
Salt
Lake
City,
downtown,
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
potentially,
eventually
to
the
northwest
quadrant.
But
this
first
phase
is
is
to
accommodate
growth
and
have
some
redundancy
and
water
supplies
to
Salt
Lake.
N
We
also
are
proposing
some
rehabilitation
of
our
three
water
treatment
plants
for
a
total
of
8
million.
We
are
supporting
the
roadway
bond.
We
have
to
get
in
ahead
of
the
resurfacing
of
city,
roads
and
replace
utilities
and
in
the
water
utility
that
amounts
to
about
nine
million
nine
point,
eight
million
and
then
we're
replacing
water
water
mains
at
it
for
a
total
of
23
million.
N
We're
continuing
our
smart
meter
program
this
year.
So
far,
we've
replaced
about
seventeen
thousand
over
ninety
thousand
meters
with
smart
meters.
That's
going
to
have
a
significant
impact.
We
think
in
terms
of
opportunities
for
water
conservation
opportunities,
for
people
to
be
able
to
look
at
their
water
use
in
real-time
and
identify
properties,
IED
leaks
earlier
I'm,
so
excited
about
that
and-
and
then
I
should
also
mention,
with
this
five
percent
rate
increase.
With
the
changes
to
the
proposed
rate
structure
that
we
talked
about
a
little
bit
earlier.
N
Most
residents
will
not
experience
a
change
in
their
water
bills.
In
fact,
most
most
residents
will
see
their
water
bills
decrease
and-
and
that's
due
to
a
structural
change
that
goes
from
a
class
cost-of-service
ista
muy
cost
of
service
to
a
class
cost
of
service
and
in
the
water
utility
we're
also
out
of
those
17
full-time
equivalent
employees.
We're
proposing
7.8
equivalent
employees
in
this
and
this
utility.
F
Okay,
so
I
know
that
council
members
have
gotten
some
or
may
have
gotten
some
inquiries
from
some
district
3
residents
about
the
4th,
Avenue
well
project
and
I
just
want
to
ask
some
questions
about
that
and
I
know
that
there's
quite
a
number
of
my
residents
here
that
are
concerned
about
that.
So
so
we
have
the
original
meeting
with
the
community
back
in
November
and
there
we
were
able
to
subsequently
meet
and
get
an
update,
and
you
communicated
to
me
some
changes
that
were
made
as
a
result
of
feedback
to
the
pump
house.
N
So
the
fourth
Avenue
well
is
located
it
on
Canyon
Road,
and
that
is
one
of
the
more
important
drinking
water
wells
in
our
system.
It
supplies
downtown
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
some
areas
of
northern
Salt
Lake
City
and
ranges
from
about
three
to
seven
million
gallons
per
day.
So
it's
very
important
for
for
the
summertime
water
supply.
N
N
We
actually
started
this
process
in
2017
and
started
working
with
the
community
early
on
and
and
so
we
delayed,
we
were,
we
were
budgeted
for
this
project
last
fall.
We
can
only
do
the
construction
in
the
fall
time
period
because
that
will
has
to
operate
during
the
summer,
so
we
delayed
construction
for
a
year
after
we
had
pretty
significant
community
feedback.
N
The
well
house
has
an
impact
to
a
local
community,
and
we
understand
that
so
since
then,
we
have
been
working
with
some
architects
from
CRS
a
and
with
two
two
engineering
firms,
so
that
we
can
ensure
that
we
have
proper
engineering
and
that
we're
able
to
take
community
feedback
on
the
architecture
of
the
well
house
and
also
the
community,
asked
us
to
look
at
other
alternatives
such
as.
Can
we
move
the
wells
to
a
different
location?
What
would
be
the
cost
of
that?
N
F
M
Oh
sorry,
is
that
get
this
little
closer.
Sorry.
So
again,
once
we
once
we
decided
to
address
the
electrical
we
realize
we
need
to
address
all
the
different
codes
electrical
codes,
drinking
water
codes
and
make
it
into
a
larger
project
than
just
an
electrical
project
that
requires
bringing
above
ground
that's
required,
building
a
pump
house.
Initially
we
wanted
to
have
because
again,
as
Laura
mentioned,
this
is
such
a
critical.
Well
for
us,
we
were
going
to
have
on
on-site
emergency
generator.
M
For
such
a
large
portion
of
the
time
downtown
Salt
Lake
gets
about
80
to
100
percent
of
its
water
from
that.
Well,
in
the
summertime
and
chlorination
again,
the
water
from
the
well
is
actually
very
good
water.
You
can
drink
it
straight
up,
but
if
you're,
the
twelfth
thousandth
connection
or
you're
in
a
high-rise
building,
I
would
like
to
have
chlorine.
We
want
to
have
chlorine
residual
within
our
system
to
keep
the
system
as
pure
as
possible.
Okay,.
C
M
A
lot
of
our
are
blended
again:
we've
got
sources
from
Little,
Cottonwood,
Creek,
big
carton,
woods,
parlays
and
City.
Creek
are
big
water
treatment
plants
plus
we
get
water
from
the
Jordan
Valley
system
that
comes
in
to
the
west
side
and
kind
of
wraps
around.
We've
also
got
26
wells
that
we
use
periodically
depending
on
supply
and
demand.
All
of
those
aren't
chlorinated
right
now,
but
we're
have
plans
to
do
that
in
the
future
as
we
move
forward
again.
This
is
such
a
big
producer
and
it
does
it.
M
C
M
N
I
think
that
the
answer
to
that
question
is,
we
did
look
at
it
and
there
are.
There
are
risks
to
doing
that
and
significant
cost
if
we
were
to
have
to
if
we
were
to
build
put
chlorine
in
one
place,
we'd
have
to
build
a
new
distribution
line
to
bring
it
to
an
appropriate
area
of
the
city,
and
there
are
risks
in
transporting
that
chemical,
undiluted
chemical
through
that
line
and
I
mean.
M
M
F
If
it's
dangerous,
too
I
think
one
well,
okay,
let
me
back
up
a
little
bit
before
I
get
into
the
chloride.
How
have
the
changes
to
the
well
house
that
have
happened
in
the
in
the
last
couple
months
and
as
a
result
of
the
Hansen
report?
How
that
how
those
been
communicated
to
the
public?
Aside
from
the
presentation
today,
we've.
N
F
N
N
L
Thank
You
members
of
the
council
we'll
be
doing
what
we
would
what
we
would
often
will.
We
typically
do,
but
in
this
case
with
social
media
with
flyers
with
our
website,
which
has
been
updated
regularly,
I
hope
you've
all
had
an
opportunity
to
check
that
out.
The
fourth
Avenue
website
is
regularly
updated
and
a
lot
of
questions
answered
frequently
and
we
plan
on
we
myself
and
the
project
engineer
plan
on
actually
taking
the
Flyers
house-by-house
in
the
area,
especially
in
the
neighborhood,
where
people
have
been
most
affected.
Okay,.
F
L
F
F
Think
a
concern,
too,
is
that
from
the
time
that
we
have
the
November
meeting
until
now
that
there
that
we
talked
about
sort
of
resetting
and
trying
to
restart
the
project
and
get
more
input,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
plan
is
still
to
do
that
because
they
think
a
lot
of
residents
are
are
concerned
about
the
lack
of
about
the
time.
That's
a
passed
and
then
that
we
haven't
done
anything
yet
so
I
did.
L
N
And
then
from
February
through
March
was
when
we
had
to
do
all
of
the
engineering
work
so
the
well
inspection.
We
did
have
some
interaction
with
the
community
during
that
time
as
well.
Just
people
were
concerned
about
what
was
going
on,
so
we
we
answered
individual
questions,
we
and
then,
of
course,
we've.
We
met
with
you
in
April
to
give
you
an
update
as
well
and
then
on.
F
So
what
let's
see
it
with
the
chemicals
I
want
to
go
back
to
that
really
quickly,
the
chlorine,
a
chlorine,
it
sounds
like
it
would
be.
There
risks
about
chlorinating
and
later
down
the
pipe.
So
why
would
people?
Why
should
people
not
be
concerned
that
the
chlorination
is
happening
at
the
well
if
chlorinating
further
down
the
pipe,
could
present
risks
right?
Well,.
N
M
At
the
site,
again,
as
Laura
mentioned,
it's
in
the
secure
facility
it'll
be
double
wall
containment,
so
it'll
have
its
own
in
built-in
safeguards,
but
also
it's
right
there
for
our
operators.
When
they're
adjusting
flows,
the
the
dosing
is
right
there,
it's
not
distal
or
distant
from
it.
Someplace.
Instead
of
only
two
sites
which
we'd
have
to
do
a
chlorination
site,
someplace
else,
it
would
cause
a
footprint.
Someplace
we'd
still
have
a
well
house.
It
would
just.
It
would
be
two
different
places
that
our
operators
are
going
to
try
to
regulate
flow
and
regulate
chlorination.
F
M
So
part
of
that
is
in
in
dr.
Hanson's
report,
also
with
some
of
the
pros
and
cons.
So
right
now,
we've
got
a
known
entity.
We've
got
a
known
quantity
of
three
like
Laura
said:
three
is
about
as
low
as
we
pump
it
up
to
seven
million
gallons
a
day,
there's
no
guarantee
if
we
move
that
well,
someplace
else,
we'll
get
that
same
production.
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
cons
of
moving
the
well
someplace
else
is
giving
up
a
water
resource
that
is
known,
that's
plumbed
into
our
system.
Now.
M
If
we
move
that
someplace
else,
we've
got
to
plumb
it
into
our
system.
Hopefully
that's
where
we
need
it
right.
Now,
it's
it's
where
our
system
is
designed
for
so
again,
it's
got
its
it's
both
operational.
It's
would
we
be
able
to
find
the
same
water.
Would
we
be
able
to
get
a
water
right
if
we
moved
it
more
than
three
or
four
feet
away?
If
we
moved
it
within
three
or
two
feet
away,
we
probably
have
to
take
two
homes
and
and
demolish
them,
based
on
dr.
F
The
loss
of
potentially
two
historic,
Commons,
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
okay,
well,
I
appreciate
all
that
information.
I
think
that
the
residents
that
are
here
appreciate
any
information
and
I'll
be
really
excited
to
see.
When
you
start
advertising
this,
this
open
house
I
want
to
be
there
and
I
think
people
would
want
to
have
as
much
notice
as
possible,
because
they're
eager
to
be
heard
again.
So
thanks
her.
Thank
you.
Inform
me
about
that.
A
Before
before,
I
go
to
other
questions,
I
do
want
to
first
off
I
need
to
step
out.
I
have
a
prior
commitment,
so
I'm
turning
the
chair
over
to
councilmember
Fowler,
who
will
chair
the
remainder
of
the
meeting,
but
I
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
Laura
and
your
team
with
Public
Utilities
I've
said
this
before
you
know,
while
people
can
go
back
throughout
history
and-
and
you
know
pick
apart,
what
Salt
Lake
City
has
done
in
decisions
that
we've
made.
A
You
know
the
one
thing
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
has
been
consistent
with
is
the
managing
of
our
watershed
and
the
delivery
of
our
water
to
the
city,
and
you
have
you
know
taken
over
a
you
know,
a
very
historic
program.
You've
operated
it
well,
your
predecessors
have
operated
it
well,
so
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
for
that
work
and
for
making
all
of
us
in
the
city
look
good,
because
you
do
have
a
very,
very
tough
job.
A
It's
not
just
residents
of
Salt
Lake
City
that
the
public
utilities
is
providing
water
to
they're,
providing
water
to
most
of
the
east
bench
of
Salt
Lake
County.
As
well
as
Salt,
Lake
City
and
you
manage
the
you
know
our
Wasatch
canyons,
and
do
it
well
so
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all
for
that
as
I
as
I
step
out.
I
I
N
With
rate
structure
changes
in
the
water
rates,
we
were
we,
so
we
went
through
a
very
long
process
to
do
a
rate
study
to
identify
the
cost
of
service
to
provide
water
service,
and
we
convened
a
30-something
person
rate
advisory
committee
made
up
of
representatives
around
the
city
and
in
the
county
and
what
our
rate
Advisory
Committee
settled
on
were
a
few
main
goals,
but
one
of
them
was
a
fairness.
School
and
one
was
an
equity
goal
and
to
meet
those
goals
we
they
recommended.
N
N
The
rate
Advisory
Committee
realized,
after
some
evaluation
that
the
cost
of
service
burden
was
higher
on
commercial,
industrial
and
institutional
customers
than
it
was
on
residential
customers,
and
so
they
recommended
going
with
a
class
cost
of
service,
which
means
that
that
these
different
classes
of
ratepayers
will
pay
a
different
amount
commensurate
with
the
cost
of
service,
and
so
what
that
means
for
our
residential
ratepayers
is
that
their
costs
actually
go
down.
Even
though
we're
projecting
an
overall
five
percent
rate
increase
for
revenue
purposes,
the
residents
will
pay
a
lower
amount.
N
I
E
C
You
I
want
to
jump
back
to
the
pumphouse
conversation
and
I'm,
looked
through
the
report
on
the
website
and
I'm
curious
about
whether
or
not
you
can
answer
this
now,
I'm,
not
sure
other
pumphouse
construction
projects
that
have
taken
place
in
the
last
ten
years
or
so
or
any
that
you
have
in
the
pipeline.
So
many
puns
so
that
we
can
have
an
idea
of
I'm
looking
at
the
percentage
differences
and
also
that
there's
some.
My
understanding
that
there's
some
architectural
investments
that
aren't
weren't
standard
that
have
been
included
now
in
this
project.
C
So
I
would
just
like,
as
a
you
know,
a
different
council
district
and
for
the
other
council
members
to
understand.
If,
when
there's
a
pump
house
project
in
one
of
our
districts,
are
we
going
to
be
able
to
expect
that
increase
cost
of
a
more
beautiful
building
and
the
architectural
investments
that
public
utilities
has
made?
Because
this?
If
this
is
a
an
increase
from
what
you
would
do
in
a
standard
format,
then
my
residents
want
that
increase.
C
E
So
maybe
we
can
do
that
and
then,
if
there's
nothing
further
on
the
pump
house,
if
there's
other
questions
on
the
particular
budget,
I
have
a
question
unless
somebody
else
wants
to
go
and
it
has
to
do
with
the
policy
questions
and
I
know
again.
I
know
we're
running
sort
of
out
of
time,
so
I'm
gonna
ask
also
before
I.
Ask
this
question
my
council
members.
E
If
it's
okay,
if
we
kind
of
push
through
to
6:30
ish
at
least
and
try
to
get
through
as
much
of
our
agenda
as
we
can,
we
did
pull
library
but
kind
of
keep
pushing
so
I
hope,
that's,
okay
with
everyone.
My
question
is
and
I
don't
know
if
you've
received
our
stuff
briefing
and
the
policy
questions,
but
it
does
have
to
do
with
our
impact
fees
and
how
those
are
being
collected
and
applied.
I
still
am
learning
I've
been
on
the
council
for
a
year
now,
and
impact
fees
are
still
confusing
to
everyone.
E
I
think
we
finally
have
been
as
somewhat
of
our
resident
impact
fee
expert,
but
maybe
you
could
I'm
interested
in
how
we're
doing
this,
how
we're
implementing
it
if
there
is-
and
this
might
be
for
mayor
staff.
My
understanding
is
that
we're
looking
at
a
new
facilities,
impact
fee
facilities
report
and
what
the
impact
of
that
may
be
and
kind
of.
Are
we
sort
of
streamlining
the
process
to
make
sure
that
we're
using
those
impact
fees?
Where
do
they
need
to
go
and
how
they
need
to
get
there?
N
N
As
part
of
our
rate
study
last
year
we
did
prepare
a
new
impact
fee
facilities
plan,
but
the
rate
of
growth
in
our
service
area
has
been
so
fast
that
we
are
gonna
update
that
a
little
bit
because
I
don't
think
it
includes
all
of
the
facilities
that
we
need
to
include,
and
so
we'll
be
doing
that
this
this
summer
and
bringing
that
back
to
you
with
a
new
impact
fee
and
analysis.
But
it
does.
It
does
show
that
impact
fees
would
go
up
even
with
the
one
that
we
prepared
last
year.
Okay,.
E
N
Does
with
the
northwest,
quadrant
and
inland
port
Area
Development
does
pay
for
development,
so
we
are
not
paying
for
betterments
for
the
development
community
on
that
there
are
some
master
planned
projects
that
provide
downstream
capacity,
for
instance
in
the
sewer
system,
and
those
were
part
of
our
impact
fee
analysis.
So
one
thing
that
we
are
going
to
look
at
a
little
bit
more
closely
is
the
new
water
reclamation
facility.
N
E
L
Councillors,
I
would
just
like
to
add
that,
as
Laura
has
indicated,
I
believe
that
it
would
be
interesting
for
us
to
look
at
the
wastewater
facility
because
when
we
think
about
this
capacity,
it's
it's
not
only
development
new
development
new
capacity,
but
if
we
have
available
capacity
within
our
existing
systems,
that
would
push
us
to
say
our
90
or
100
percent
limit.
We
need
to
assess
fees
to
address
that
capacity,
so
we're
kind
of
like
selling
that
excess
capacity
through
this
process,
I'm.
N
Think
we
assumed
that
the
water
reclamation
facility
wouldn't
be
wouldn't,
would
it
be
eligible
for
that
because
it's
not
it'd,
be
it's
not
increasing
capacity?
It's
still
going
to
be
a
fifty
six
million
gallon
per
day
planet
and
the
need
to
to
build
a
new
planet
really
was
driven
by
nutrient
requirements,
new
Clean
Water,
Act
requirements,
and
so
but
but
I
think
it's
worth
it
for
us
to
take
another.
Look
at
that.
L
F
L
L
There
was
a
small
recap
of
where
we
were
at
as
of
our
audited
fees
at
June,
30th
of
2018.
Of
course,
that
will
be
updated.
As
you
can
see,
we
do
a
great
job
of
reinvesting
those
sewer
impact
fees
every
year,
but
I'm
very
confident
that,
with
our
large
water
projects
that
we
are
spending
those
down
appropriately
as
they
have
been
assessed.
So,
there's
no
worry
that
we're
collecting
something
and
not
utilizing
it.
E
E
I
think
unless
Lorie
you
want
to,
if
there's
other
things
I
know,
we
didn't
quite
get
through
your
whole
budget,
but
I
think
the
sort
of
bullet
points
will
help
and
I
do
know,
you're
always
available
for
our
questions.
But
if
there's
something
else,
you
want
to
wrap
up
with
we'll
give
you
that
that
moment,
no.
N
I
think
we
can
address
the
rest
at
another
time
and
yes,
we
are
open
to
any
additional
questions.
When
we
see
you
next,
we
would
like
to
go
a
little
bit
more
in
depth
into
our
sewer
utility,
stormwater
utility
and
street
lighting
budgets,
and
then
we
have
prepared
a
lot
of
information
related
to
the
rate.
What
the
rates
would
be
under
this
new
rate
structure,
with
these
proposed
overall
rate
increases,
because
it's
it's
not
necessarily
well,
it's
just
a
little
complex
to
be
doing
both
at
the
same
time.
So,
okay.
C
For
one
thing,
thank
you,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
always,
including
the
comparable
rates
to
other
cities
in
the
state
and
other
states
in
the
region.
I
think
that,
for
my
in
my
experience
as
a
council
member
going
to
community
council
meetings
and
answering
questions
about
rate
increases
that
you
have
done
a
good
job
of
articulating
the
really
the
federal
requirements
that
were
we're
working
to
update
our
system
to
the
historic
nature
of
the
rest
of
the
system
that
needs
updating
and
then
helping
us
to
contextualize.
It
is
really
critical.
C
E
E
P
Efficient
as
we
can
possibly
be,
I'll
just
make
a
couple
of
introductory
comments
and
then
turn
this
over
to
Brian
for
a
more
detailed
presentation,
but
I
think
what
you're
going
to
see
is
a
budget
that
reflects
two
basic
dynamics
that
are
occurring.
One
is
next
year
the
first
phase
of
the
airport
redevelopment
concludes
and
we
open,
and
so
the
budget
increases
that
you'll
see
are
in
many
cases
driven
by
that
we're
buying
equipment
and
we're
hiring
people
that
will
be
needed
to
operate
phase
one
of
the
new
airport.
P
Even
though
phase
one
doesn't
actually
open
until
September
15th.
We
can't
wait
until
that
date
to
begin
hiring
and
to
acquire
the
equipment.
So
it's
kind
of
an
exciting
moment.
You
will
notice
that
in
the
budget
that
we've
presented,
there's
not
a
penny
allocated
for
capital
improvements
to
our
existing
facilities.
P
That's
the
first
time
in
the
history
of
the
airport,
when
that's
been
the
case
and
just
kind
of
a
moment,
take
a
deep
breath
and
realize
the
scale
of
what
you
all
have
supported
and
endorsed
the
the
second
item
that
I
think
you'll
begin
to
see,
and
our
budget
is
just
a
reflection
of
part
of
what
you
were
just
talking
about
here,
and
that
is
the
economy
is
booming.
That's
good.
It's
created
tremendous
competition
for
labor,
and
so
that's
reflected
in
a
number
of
ways.
P
P
They
at
one
point
we're
experiencing
a
hundred
percent
monthly
turnover
that
really
doesn't
provide
the
kind
of
service
that
we
want
at
the
airport,
and
so
we
are
proposing
a
fairly
substantial
increase
to
accommodate
that,
because
Salt
Lake,
even
though
it's
an
old
facility,
it
has
a
reputation
for
being
very
well
cared
for,
and
we
want
to
continue
that.
Okay,
great.
So
let
me
introduce
Brian
who
will
go
through
the
budget
and
obviously
any
point
along
the
way.
O
Thanks
Bill
Bill's
been
really
hands-on
in
this
budget,
and
he's
probably
heard
this
presentation
four
or
five
times,
so
he
could
probably
give
this
presentation
if
I
were
not
here,
but
we're
just
gonna
go
over
the
highlights,
so
you
guys
are
aware
of
what
we're
doing
the
first
slide.
It's
really
just
the
goals
we
have
it's
the
same
as
that
we've
come
with
in
the
previous
years.
You
know
we're
getting
ready
to
open
the
new
facility
we're
trying
to
manage
that
project.
You
know
control
cost.
O
At
the
same
time,
we're
trying
to
you
know,
develop
IT
the
latest
and
greatest
technologies
that
are
going
to
go
into
that,
but
at
the
same
time
as
we
open
the
new
airport,
we're
gonna
be
still
operating
out
of
the
old
facilities
to
maintain
the
gates.
So
there
are
a
lot
of
complexities
when
you
open
a
new
facility,
and
then
you
start
demo
demolition
on
the
garage
and
the
other
facilities,
it
does
come
with
challenges
and
then
the
last
bullet
point
is
is
just
increased
airline
activity.
O
This
next
slide
is
really
just
to
kind
of
show
you
the
breakdown
of
with
the
increase
in
passengers.
Where
is
the
revenue
coming
from
the
way
the
airport's
set
up?
Is
it's
almost
like
a
cost
recovery
for
the
airport
when
it
comes
to
the
airlines
as
our
operating
expense
goes
up,
it
costs
more
for
the
airlines
to
land
their
planes.
O
But
what
you
do
see
in
this
slide
is
all
those
passengers
going
into
the
terminals
they're
buying
more
concessions,
they're
renting,
more
cars,
their
parking
more,
and
so
you
see
a
much
steeper
slope
to
our
non
airline
revenues
as
we
continue
to
see
this
passenger
growth
through
SLC
when
it
comes
to
the
airport,
our
benchmark
is
called
cost
per
and
plane
passenger.
This
is
what
the
airline's
kind
of
hold
us
accountable
to
this
kind
of
gives
you
an
idea
of
where
we
have
been
historically
for
fiscal
year.
P
Just
make
a
point
here
too:
so
in
2024
you
see
that
it
goes
up
to
$12
and
66
cents.
That's
based
on
the
same
employment
forecast
that
we've
been
using,
which
have
been
really
conservative.
That's
point
one.
Secondly,
by
2024.
That
will
continue
to
be
one
of
the
lowest
cost
per
employments
of
any
major
airport
in
the
United
States,
many
of
whom
are
already
in
the
high
teens
or
low
20s.
P
So
we'll
have
a
brand
new
four
billion-dollar
airport
and
one
of
the
lowest
costs
for
operation
in
the
country,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
Delta
keeps
banging
us
on
schedule.
You
know
schedule
schedule
schedule
they
want
to
get
in
there
and
start
operating
because
they
think
it's
gonna
be
so
competitive.
Yeah.
O
O
But
a
lot
of
that
is
your
debt
service
that
you're
gonna,
see
and
as
bill
mentioned
kind
of
here's
where
Salt
Lake
compares
you
know
in
fiscal
year,
18
our
audited
results
were
three
dollars
and
83
cents
we're
projecting
for
this
budget
to
be
at
four
dollars
and
53
cents
in
comparison
for
2017
numbers.
There's
a
delay
in
getting
these
benchmark
numbers
from
other
airports,
but
you'll
see
like
Minneapolis
they're,
fairly
similar
to
Salt
Lake
and
that
their
major
delta
hub
they're,
almost
twice
as
much.
O
You
got
Phoenix
Seattle
Las
Vegas,
so
we
continue
to
be
one
of
the
lowest
cost
per
in
plane
passengers
across
the
country.
This
slide
is
really
busy.
All
this
really
is
kind
of
giving.
You
is
a
high-level
overview
of
you
know
what
were
actual
fiscal
year.
18
results
as
far
as
revenues
and
expenses,
as
well
as
where
we're
forecasting
the
current
year
to
be,
and
then
what
we're
budgeting.
The
only
thing
I
will
point
out
here
is:
you
will
notice
we
have
bond
issuance
cost
of
three
and
a
half
million.
O
As
we
get
ready
to
open
this
new
facility,
we
will
anticipate
going
out
to
the
bond
market
in
the
first
quarter
of
2020,
so
we
do
have
that
programmed
in
and
you'll
notice
the
interest
expense
it
continues
to
grow
just
as
the
more
debt
we
we
su.
So
we've
got
several
slides
on
different
revenue
categories.
This
first
one
it's
just
kind
of
its
to
show
you
that,
even
though
we're
an
airport,
only
38
percent
of
our
revenues
come
through
Airlines,
the
vast
majority
land
side
concessions
is
parking.
It's
the
car
rentals.
O
The
terminal
concessions
are
your
your
retail
and
your
food
and
beverage,
and
then
we
have
several
leases.
We
have
hangars
out
in
the
general
aviation
community,
but
this
next
slide
is
to
kind
of
just
break
down
the
airline
revenues.
You'll
see
that
airline
revenues
are
increasing.
That's
a
direct
impact
of
the
increased
cost
that
we'll
be
budgeting
for
fiscal
year,
twenty
billion.
O
You
know
just
this
amazing
growth,
but
when
it
comes
to
the
budget
season,
we
do
rely
on
the
airlines
to
tell
us
what
they
anticipate
coming
in.
It's
very,
very
conservative,
as
you'll
notice
for
fiscal
year,
20
they're
telling
us
they're
gonna,
do
12
point:
6
million
in
plane,
passengers
we're
already
forecasting
for
fiscal
year.
Nineteen
thirteen
point
one
and
every
conversation
we
have
with
them.
They
all
airlines,
not
just
Delta,
tell
us
to
expect
you
know
anywhere
from
five
to
six
percent
growth,
even
though
they
don't
get
reflected
in
the
numbers
here.
O
Thirty-Two
dollars
would
go
to
thirty-five
and
then
the
premium
the
front
lobe
front
row
parking
would
go
from
fifty
to
fifty-five.
A
lot
of
this
is
you
know,
just
like
our
janitorial,
our
shuttle
drivers,
one
of
the
biggest
complaints
we
get
at
the
airport
is
you
know
it
takes
too
long
to
get
a
shuttle.
You
know
from
long
term
parking
to
the
terminals,
and
so
we've
made
some
investments
in
the
salaries
for
hours
for
our
shuttle
drivers,
as
well
as
we've
also
invested
in
technology,
to
put
real-time
GPS
tracking
on
the
shuttles.
O
So
they
can,
you
know,
dispatch
those
shuttles
in
a
much
more
timely
and
efficient
manner,
and
then
that
gets
us
to
our
operating
expenses.
This
pie
chart
just
kind
of
gives
you
the
different
categories.
This
is
historically
very
similar.
The
only
difference
you'll
see
here
is
historically
salaries
and
benefits
are
around
50%
of
our
budget
with
the
airport
police,
joining
Salt,
Lake
City,
Police
Department
we're
just
simply
transferring
it's
about
eight
million
dollars,
which
represents
about
8%
from
salaries
and
benefits
over
to
the
intergovernmental
charges.
F
P
This
year's
budget
in
this
proposed
budget
we've
actually
included
a
fairly
significant
number
of
new
employees,
most
of
whom
we're
proposing
in
the
budget
to
be
hired
somewhere
in
the
last
month
or
two
of
the
fiscal
year.
So
the
positions
are
reflected
there
and
I
would
not
expect
to
see
a
significant
increase
in
new
positions
in
the
following
year's
budget
2020.
But
the
dollar
amount
will
change
because
then
we'll
be
budgeting
for
a
full
fiscal
year,
and
we
did
this
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
One.
P
We
can't
wait
until
the
beginning
of
the
next
fiscal
year
to
start
hiring.
It's
you
know
for
equipment,
operators
electricians,
it's
a
six-month
slog
to
find
labor.
Today,
that's
one
issue
and
the
other
is
we
want
the
airlines
to
be
able
to
see
the
the
ramp
where
expenses
are
headed
as
early
as
possible
and
I
think
this
allows
that
to
occur,
so
the
dollar
amount
will
increase,
but
the
number
of
people
shouldn't
increase
significantly.
F
O
P
Yeah
so
the
other
thing
that
will
happen,
though,
and
I
think
this
is
positive
development,
because
the
facility
is
so
much
larger
food
and
beverage
concessions.
I
think
we're
gonna
see
significant
jumps,
they're
going
from
a
1,700
car
parking
garage
which
fills
twice
a
week
to
a
3600
car
parking
garage,
and
so
the
the
non
aeronautical
revenues
are
going
to
increase
pretty
substantially
and
we're
gonna
continue
to
see
increased
passenger
volume,
and
so
all
of
that
helps
generate
the
resources
necessary
to
pay
for
this.
I
have.
C
P
F
C
O
C
P
I
mean
I
think
everybody
is
facing
this
to
some
extent.
We
did
actually
worked
very
closely
with
HR
on
our
electricians.
So
this
is
a
unique
challenge
because
we're
in
a
way
we're
killing
ourselves,
they
can
walk
across
the
street
and
go
to
work
for
one
of
the
contractors
at
the
airport
and
make
$10
an
hour
more
now,
on
the
other
side
of
that
at
the
end
of
their
new
employers
contract.
P
You
know
they
got
a
hope
that
there's
another
job
out
there
somewhere
if
they
stay
working
for
us,
it's
a
permanent
job
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
we
were
able
to
to
work
with
some
incentives
and
hiring
bonuses
and
so
forth,
and
it's
it's
better.
It's
just
very
for
the
trades
in
particular
it's
difficult
for
everybody.
I
would
say
it's
the
when
I'm
out
about
in
the
community.
It's
the
number
one
complaint
I
get
we're
ruining
the
market
for
trade
contractors
in
the
valley,
because
the
project
is
just
so
mammoth
Thanks.
O
Okay-
and
so
this
one-
the
only
thing
I'd
point
here
is-
we
did
not
take
police's
salaries
out
of
here,
so
we
could
have
an
apples
to
apples
comparison.
So
you
could
see
the
true
budget
impact.
We
are
in
proposing
60
new
full-time
equivalents
that
will
be
staggered
into
this
coming
year.
It
started
out
at
104,
but
we
did
reduce
it
down
considerably,
but
we
do
have
increased
expenses
with
our
contracted
janitorial
shuttle
drivers
as
well.
As
you
know,
we
had
a
really
bad
snow
season.
We
try
to
take
an
average.
O
We
try
not
to
overreact
with
anyone
snow
year,
but
we
do
have
increases
there
and
then
just
to
wrap
it
up.
We
have
some
capital
equipment
requests
some
of
the
the
bigger
items
is
we
always
order
new
shuttle
buses?
We
always
have
three
on
order.
Every
year
we
are
gonna,
be
buying
a
new
fire
truck
for
the
fire
department
and
then,
as
bill
mentioned,
there's
a
lot
of
equipment.
That's
going
to
be
required
for
this
new
facility.
O
It's
just
in
the
current
facility,
Bill's
famous
for
saying
you
can't
you
can
get
to
anything
with
a
stepladder
in
the
new
facility.
We're
gonna
need
a
hundred
and
forty
one
hundred
and
eighty
foot
aerial,
lift
truck
to
kind
of
replace
lights
and
everything
so
a
lot
of
the
equipment.
You
know
three
point:
six
million
is
new.
The
other
three
point:
eight
million
is
just
replacement
of
our
existing
fleet
and
then
the
capital
improvement.
O
As
bill
mentioned,
we
don't
have
anything
budgeted
in
our
terminals,
but
we
do
have
different
projects
going
on
in
the
airfield
auxilary
airports.
Real
quick
on
the
airfield
we're
gonna
do
some
taxiway
pavement
rehabilitation,
some
lighting
projects,
we're
gonna,
relocate
some
security
gates.
As
far
as
the
auxilary
airports,
we
do
have
some
budget
in
the
in
the
for
the
willow
valley,
water
and
sewer
improvements,
as
well
as
some
hangars
out
at
the
West
Jordan
Airport.
O
As
far
as
the
land
side
projects
we
have,
we
have
several
different
parking
lots
that
we
are
going
to
be
doing
and,
lastly,
the
TRP
and
the
NCP.
What
we're
requesting
the
council
to
approve
is
just
the
remaining
amount
that
has
not
been
approved
through
City
Council
for
the
the
projects.
What
this
allows
us
to
do
is
it
allows
us
to
enter
into
contracts
in
the
coming
year
for
Phase
two
of
the
project,
as
we
try
to
kind
of
tie
down
those
contractually
guaranteed
maximum
prices
for
Phase
two.
E
Are
there
any
questions
from
Council
members,
okay,
I
just
want
to
Andrew.
Did
you
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
say
again
build?
This
is
an
amazing
project.
I
was
recently
in
Seattle
with
a
few
council
members
from
you
know
when
a
year
old,
stomping
grounds
from
some
council
members
from
throughout
the
country,
and
they
were
bragging
about
how
they
were
the
best
run.
Airport
and
I
was
like.
Oh
please,
we
actually
are
building
our
own
Airport,
so
I
brag
about
it
as
often
as
I
can,
which
is
often
and
I.
Really
it's
an
awesome
project.
E
E
G
I'm
kanika
I
am
a
native
of
Mississippi,
recently
relocated
to
Salt
Lake
in
November
and
I
was
very
excited
when
I
saw
the
board
openings
because
I
was
thinking
how
can
I
get
connected
to
the
community
and
saw
like
in
the
most
meaningful
way,
I'm.
Also
a
published
author
and
a
former
thespian,
so
Arts
Council
is
kind
of
right
up.
My
alley,
I
really
enjoy
well
I
know
for
me.
Personally,
the
arts
have
been
an
intriguer
part
of
my
life
and
any
opportunity
that
I
have
to
share
arts
with
other
people.
E
I
F
E
Thank
you
for
for
allowing
us
to
feel
good
and
we'll
do
the
informal
board
appointment
in
our
consent
agenda
tonight
at
our
formal
meeting.
Okay,
you
don't
have
to
stay
for
that.
We
just
kind
of
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
we
consent
to
put
you
on
the
board.
So
thank
you
for
meeting
with
us
today
and
thank
you
for
taking
this
opportunity.
Thank
you.
E
J
Sure,
like
kaamika
I'm,
relatively
new,
but
I've,
been
here
about
four
five
years:
I
live
over
in
Rose
Park,
so
I'm
district
1
and
you
know,
I
went
to
school
for
art.
I
have
been
an
artist
all
my
life
I'm
also
involved
in
the
downtown
artists,
collective
I'm,
a
member
of
that
gallery
and
I'm
the
design
director
for
YESCO.
J
So
I
want
to
bring
a
little
bit
of
my
knowledge
I'm,
a
very
aware
of
permits,
easements
and
all
those
kind
of
things,
so
maybe
I
can
bring
some
of
that
knowledge
in
for
public
art
or
for
festivals
want
to
get
more
involved
again
like
we
moved,
we
chose
Rose
Park
to
kind
of
move
to
a
nice,
integrated
neighborhood
that
you
know
in
involved
with
that,
rather
than
you
know,
some
of
the
other
neighborhoods.
Also
it's
it's
it's
fairly
affordable
these
days,
I
just
wanted
to
be
involved,
and
so
you
know
that's
it.
J
I
have
a
history
of
it.
I
am
originally
from
New
York
I
know
you
can't
tell,
and
I
worked
for
a
non-profit
in
Coney
Island
for
ten
years
volunteering
there
it's
a
the
last
ten
and
one
circus,
sideshow
and
I
helped
with
the
Mermaid
Parade.
If
anybody
has
ever
learned
heard
of
that
for
I
did
marshaling
and
setting
that
up
for
about
ten
years,
so
I
like
to
be
involved,
Thanks
council.
E
I
G
I
E
I
mentioned
to
Kimiko:
we
will
do
our
formal
consent
agenda
in
the
formal
meeting.
You
certainly
don't
have
to
stay
for
it
you're
more
than
welcome
to
it
is
a
public
meeting,
but
you
don't
have
to,
and
thank
you
again
for
your
service.
We
really
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right
last,
but
certainly
not
least,
I
would
like
to
invite
Ben,
bolte
and
Jon
Larson
up
to
discuss
the
green
bike.
Q
Hello,
no
I
was
a
Poli
Sci
major.
This
is
fun,
so
I
just
wanted
to
give
everybody
an
update
on.
What's
going
on
with
green
bike
and
we'll
cover
a
few
things.
Real,
quick
I
know
it's
been
a
long
day,
but
we're
gonna
do
our
recent
stats
partnerships,
affordable
housing,
equity
connections,
our
upcoming
green
bike
products
and
new
expansions.
We
recently
had
a
very
big
milestone.
Q
This
is
start
of
our
seventh
year
with
bikes
on
the
ground
and
all
the
original
bikes
are
still
here
and
then
we
went
to
the
community
and
our
board
members,
and
we
said
what
are
the
words
and
the
themes
that
green
bike
means
to
you
and
a
few
key
things
kept
popping
up:
active
transportation,
transit
connections,
quality,
affordable
safety
and
community,
and
so
we're
gonna
make
sure
that
these
things
are
the
key
points
that
really
stand
by
the
organization
as
we
grow
and
try
some
new
things.
We
are
averaging
about
two
rides
on
every
bicycle.
Q
Every
day,
for
the
last
six
plus
years,
we
sold
more
passes
in
2018
than
we
did
in
2017
and
to
put
that
in
perspective,
when
the
doclist
products
launched
in
summer
of
last
year,
our
trajectory
was
about
10%
higher
than
it
was
the
previous
year
and
we
expected
that
to
kind
of
stay
through
for
both
sales
and
ridership.
We
ended
the
year
with.
We
were
about
two
or
three
percent
higher
in
sales
than
we
were
the
previous
year
and
we
were
about
the
exact
same
with
ridership.
Q
So
we
estimate
that
it's
essentially
a
10%
bite
out
of
the
green
bag
pie.
65%
of
our
rides
come
from
annual
users
and
less
than
1%
have
ever
rated.
Our
maintenance
is
poor
out
of
about
3,000
people
that
we've
surveyed
over
the
last
five
six
years
and
all
those
are
available
on
our
website.
We
think
that
partnerships
really
are
the
cornerstone
of
a
non-profit,
particularly
a
local
one,
so
we
try
and
get
creative
we've
done.
The
ditch
your
car
challenge
with
lyft
we'll
be
doing
that
again
this
year.
Anybody
that
gets
a
hive
Pass.
Q
Now
you
get
free
green
bike
with
that.
So
the
high
pass
RFID
card
now
comes
with
a
green
bike.
Our
few
RFID
sticker
on
the
back
that
allows
you
to
check
out
a
bike,
get
on
a
bus
or
rail
without
having
to
pay
anymore
for
it.
We
have
a
community
bike.
So
it's
one
bike
in
the
system
that
is
branded
uniquely
by
a
local
nonprofit
and
then
every
time
that
bike
is
written.
We
give
a
dollar
to
that
organization,
the
first
two
years.
It
was
the
make-a-wish
bike.
Q
Then
it's
been
the
you
mocha
bike,
the
Utah
Museum
of
Contemporary
Art
bike
and
then
upcoming.
It's
going
to
be
the
Kraft
Lake
City
bike,
we're
gonna
have
an
event
in
May
called
the
basket
bolt.
It's
gonna,
be
a
station-to-station
scavenger
hunt,
we're
doing
it
with
Salt
Lake
City,
so
participants
bill
green
bike,
baskets
with
hygiene,
products
and
clothing
for
the
vos
youth,
Resource
Center
and
the
whole
idea
is
really
just
to
promote
the
Resource
Center
and
Salt
Lake
City's
infrastructure.
Q
I
I
approve,
but
my
vote
doesn't
matter.
Other
partnerships
we've
signed
a
five-year
agreement
with
the
LDS
Church,
we're
gonna,
have
stations
on
North,
Temple
and
Main
Street,
as
well
as
North
temple
and
second
West
we're
gonna
be
providing
transportation
for
the
roughly
4,000
people
that
work
in
those
office
hours
that
already
have
a
higher
than
usual
transit
utilization.
Q
And
then,
in
the
past
18
months,
we've
seen
a
much
larger
level
of
interest
from
private
developers
than
we
previously
have
I
think
there's
a
need,
or
at
least
a
demand
for
a
permanent
piece
of
infrastructure,
and
then
a
lot
of
them
seem
to
have
an
interest
in
controlling
kind
of
the
aesthetic
of
their
new
development.
So
we
have
multiple
five-year
agreements
with
CW
urban
coming
up
over
the
next
few
years.
Multiple
agreements
with
Clearwater
homes,
PG
development.
Q
Essentially,
the
data
for
Utah
shows
that
20
to
30%
of
the
Utah's
household
budget
is
going
towards
transportation
and
for
low-income
families
that's
actually
closer
to
40
percent.
Now
we
can't
really
control
the
cost
of
housing,
but
we
think
is
a
non-profit.
We
can
step
in
and
help
lower
the
transportation
costs.
So
between
that
and
the
fact
that
every
I
feel
like
three
four
months
you're
seeing
an
article
in
the
paper
that
says
you
tones
are
really
one
month
away
from
not
being
able
to
afford
their
rent
or
their
mortgage.
Q
We
see
this
as
a
fairly
important
priority.
We
have
bridges,
project
and
rubber
company.
Those
are
art,
space
developments
that
already
have
stations,
solar,
Gardens,
we'll
get
one
later
this
year
and
everybody
in
there
will
have
free
transportation,
give
communities
an
eco
box,
those
are
100%,
affordable,
housing,
art
space
is
35
to
55
percent
of
area
median
income
and
then
we're
also
putting
a
location
near
Palmer
Court
later
this
year,
which
is
transitional
housing
for
people
that
don't
live
in.
Q
Those
developments
that
still
use
services
for
disadvantaged
individuals,
they'll
be
able
to
get
a
five
dollar
equity
pass,
will
be
able
to
pay
in
cash
so
that
allows
the
unbanked
community
to
participate.
You
don't
need
a
cellphone,
you
don't
need
a
credit
card,
five
bucks
and
quarters,
or
whatever
is
fine.
We
also
have
new
products
coming
out
for
everybody,
starting
in
July.
Anybody
that
has
an
annual
pass
or
anybody
that
gets
a
new
annual
pass
will
be
able
to
take
out
the
bike
for
12
hours
at
a
time.
Q
You
can
currently
take
it
out
for
one
hour
at
a
time,
but
this
gives
people
more
flexibility.
They
can
go
somewhere.
There
isn't
a
station,
they
can
take
it
overnight
if
they
need
to
just
make
it
easier
for
work,
and
the
nice
part
is
that
it
provides
a
little
more
security,
because
every
basket
already
has
a
cable
lock
inside.
So
if
you
take
this
somewhere
and
you
need
to
make
sure
that
you
have
transportation
on
the
way
back-
and
somebody
else
doesn't
pick
it
up,
you
have
that
security.
Q
If
you
use
even
our
stations
in
some
areas
or
like
one
of
the
doclist
products,
you
could
end
up
having
to
take
a
ten
or
fifteen
dollar
uber
a
lift
and
we're
trying
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
happen.
Ie
bikes
coming
out
this
fall.
This
is
treks
first
shareable
ebike,
so
it's
really
high
quality.
Ie
bikes
are
complicated.
Just
a
few
weeks
ago,
the
city
bike
program
in
New
York
that
purchased
by
lyft
had
to
recall
all
of
their
ebikes.
Q
It's
really
expensive,
uce
bikes,
getting
pulled
from
different
cities
all
over
the
country,
but
Trek
is
a
billion
dollar
bike.
Company
and
I'm
really
really
excited
I've
had
a
chance
to
try.
This
high-end
products
will
be
out
later
this
year
and
just
to
wrap
it
up
we're
doing
an
81%
system
expansion
this
year,
it's
mostly
housing,
affordable
market
rate,
workforce
track,
stops
Liberty,
Park,
ninth
and
ninth
office
towers,
and
then
next
year
we
have
locations
going
in
at
the
marmalade
library,
more
apartments,
more
light
rail
and
then
just
to
give
you
some
perspective.
Q
E
Just
want
to
say
thank
you,
I
think
this
is
a
great
program.
I,
really
appreciate
all
of
the
work
that
you're
doing
for
all
of
our
different
communities.
I
really
appreciate
being
thoughtful
about
our
unbanked
communities,
which
often
times
are
are
unsheltered
communities
as
well,
and
this
is
some
the
way
that
they
can
participate
in,
nor
in
sort
of
everyday
activities
and
and
it's
important
that
we
are
thinking
of
all
of
those
different
communities
and
I-
appreciate
the
creativity
and
thoughtfulness
there.
C
C
Is
really
different
system
really
different
purpose
and
and
what
stood
out
to
me
was
of
the
themes,
the
brand
themes
that
the
community
generated.
Three,
those
quality
and
reliability
safety
and
a
community
focus-
are
our
exemplary,
are
examples
of
what
set
green
bike
apart
from
the
other
system.
So,
oh.
I
One
of
our
conversations
about
market
about
things
that
we
do
just
in
general
d,
so
this
is
everything,
looks
great.
I
was
wondering
if
there's,
if
you
you
know,
if
you've
been
thinking
about
how
to
continue
Market
Market
the
green
bikes
first
from
an
air
quality
perspective
kind
of
like
what
sustainability.
That's
like,
hey.
If
you
know,
if
today
you
eat
something
came
up.
If
you
don't
need
a
steak
or
meat
for
a
day
or
if
you
know
vegetables
produce.
F
I
Q
Sure,
absolutely
our
current
marketing
campaign
is
called
why
I
ride
so
all
of
our
stuff
in
City,
Weekly
or
slug
magazine.
Basically,
there
are
only
a
few
real
reasons
that
people
ride
right.
There's
your
health.
So
that's
the
calorie
piece,
that's
what
select
health
cares
the
most
about
and
then
there's
the
air
quality,
which
is
why
a
lot
of
people
ride
and
we
really
try
and
explain.
You
know:
we've
removed
something
in
the
range
of
five
six
million
local
vehicle
miles.
Q
It's
about
four
and
a
half
million
pounds
of
co2
so
far
and
it
factors
in
for
not
just
people
riding
the
bikes
but
about
14%
of
our
users
have
reduced
the
number
of
cars
in
their
household.
So
we
try
and
put
that
stuff
out
there,
but
we
could
always
be
doing
more.
E
E
R
Q
E
K
In
writing.
There
you
have
on
your
May
7th
meeting.
You
will
have
the
youth
city
government
students
here
to
schedule
a
youth
state
of
the
city
report
to
present
a
you
state
of
the
city
report.
They
always
really
enjoy
having
dinner
with
the
councilmembers,
and
so
we
have
scheduled
it
for
downstairs
at
City
Board,
so
that
that's
more
conducive
to
visiting.
Ok,
the
end.