►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
You
but
a
safe
and
welcoming
space.
We
are
looking
forward
to
seeing
the
street
improvement
project
become
a
reality
to
reduce
traffic
speeds,
create
safes,
crosswalks,
enhanced
walkability,
with
shaded
sidewalks
and
provided
needed
parking
street
parking
having
a
slower
traffic
pattern
in
a
welcoming,
tree-lined
block
will
hopefully
attract
more
visitors
to
the
neighborhood
on
behalf
of
spy.
Hop
in
the
thousands
of
young
people
will
be
serving
at
the
new
center
in
central
ninth
I
hope.
You
all
approve
amending
your
budget
to
include
the
streetscape
and
undergrounding
on
900
South.
Thank
you.
B
B
To
close
the
public
hearing
and
defer
action
to
a
future
moment
in
time,
I
think
that
Andrew
was
emotion
by
board
member
Mendenhall,
a
second
board
member
Johnston,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed.
Okay
that
will
be
closed
and
we
will
talk
about
it
later.
So
we're
moving
on
to
RTA
business
I'm.
Looking
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
minute
meeting,
minutes
of
Tuesday
March
26
2019.
B
A
motion
by
vice-chair
Wharton,
a
second
by
board
member
Mendenhall,
all
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed
hey
that
passes
as
well.
Now,
let's
get
on
to
the
meat
of
things
ie,
we
will
start
with
the
central
ninth
streetscape
improvements
and
underground
II
and
follow
up
and
if
I
can
have
Ben
and
Danny
and
court
and
Jonathan
here
with
us
today
that
JP,
but.
E
Madam
chair,
this
is
the
follow-up
briefing
on
this
topic
at
the
March
26
briefing,
the
board
just
got
discussed
the
original
vision
for
the
neighborhood,
the
intent
to
encourage
small
local
businesses
and
improved
pedestrian
environment,
calming
vehicle
traffic
and
transit
oriented
development.
The
board
also
discussed
the
potential
consolidation
of
ten
projects
across
three
departments
that
would
be
a
community
in
neighborhoods,
the
RDA
and
public
utilities,
into
one
large,
coordinated,
900,
South
Corridor
project.
E
The
board
also
discussed
creating
a
working
group
on
creating
a
city
policy
for
undergrounding
power
lines
and
the
possibility
to
salvage
traffic
signals
instead
of
completely
replacing
them
to
decrease
the
overall
project
costs
up
on
the
big
screen,
you
will
see
a
memo
which
is
also
attached
to
your
packet
from
the
administration
dated
April
10th.
It
provides
a
update
on
the
chart
of
the
ten
projects
showing
the
existing
funding
funding
gaps
and
the
current
status
of
those
designs.
E
The
plan
is
the
plan
is
discussed
as
hiring
a
consultant
team,
and
this
would
decrease
the
workload
on
the
city's
existing
staff,
while
the
city's
employees
would
act
as
project
managers
over
that
consultant
team.
The
funding
gaps
are
noted,
as
one
million
dollars
for
the
nine
line
trail
center
section.
This
already
received
four
point:
eight
million
dollars
from
the
county
and
the
transportation
choice
grants,
but
that
was
a
million
less
than
requested.
So
that's
a
funding
gap
that
would
need
to
be
looked
at.
E
E
There
are
also
a
couple
caveats
on
the
public
utilities
projects,
specifically
that
some
of
them
are
listed
as
to
be
determined
because
it's
still
too
early
in
the
design
phases
to
have
more
refined
cost
estimates,
and
there
is
also
the
note
that
some
of
these
projects
may
need
to
be
designed
in
a
closely
coordinated
rather
than
a
consolidated
manner,
which
means
you
may
have
separate
consultants
working
on
these
projects.
That
would
then
be
closely
coordinated
by
the
city
employees,
but
not
necessarily
one
shared
unified
consultant
team.
E
South
was
identified
by
engineering
as
one
of
the
potential
arterioles
to
be
rebuilt
with
the
streets
reconstruction
bond
financing
it
was
originally
listed
as
2025
and
going
down
the
consolidated
project
route
would
require
shifting
that
up
to
be
one
of
the
first
projects
that
would
be
reconstructed
with
the
bond,
and
so
the
question
is
what
other
Street
would
move
down
that
list.
There's
a
second
section
of
the
staff
report
about
parking
and
maintenance,
but
I
figured.
We
would
start
with
the
consolidated
discussion.
First.
B
A
C
E
A
F
A
E
E
So
this
is
the
amount
that
you
could
approve
today
and
it's
part
of
the
overall
funding
shortfall
for
the
project
and
it's
also
five
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
for
the
powerline
undergrounding
and
it's
split
evenly
two
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
using
the
tax
increment
from
the
inspired
project
area
and
two
hundred
eighty
thousand
from
the
program
income
fund.
Those
two
are
all
of
those
together
is
1.3
million
and
that
would
fully
fund
based
on
current
designs,
the
streetscape
improvements
and
the
undergrounding.
C
B
So
I
think
Thank,
You,
Aaron
I
think
what
are
the
things
that
we
need
to
do
and
I
appreciate
you
for
starting
this
out
is
there
sort
of
we've
talked
about
the
9th
central
streetscape
quite
a
bit
and
in
kind
of
discussing
with
our
TA
staff,
what
they
needed
from
us?
There
were
three
things
that
we
kind
of
came
up
with
the
first
being
to
discuss
exactly
whether
or
not
we
wanted
to
allocate
this
in
budget
amendment
number
4,
which
is
later
on
in
our
agenda.
So
this
would
be
allocating
this
money
to
this
project.
B
E
C
B
B
But
thank
you
to
the
city
administration
for
having
everyone
here
to
have
this
discussion
so
and
then
number
three
is
the
the
maintenance
option
and
whether
we
want
to
decide
on
a
maintenance
option
now
or
sort
of
wait
to
see
how
it
all
is
going
with
the
consolidated
plan
and
then
have
a
maintenance
discussion
at
that
time.
So
it's
kind
of
where
we
kind
of
saw
I
saw
this
plan.
B
B
Consolidating
just
the
this
1.3
million
or
whatever
it
is
it
that
is
being
asked
for
in
budget
amendment,
for
that
we
will
vote
on
again
later,
but
kind
of
getting
support
of
whether
people
are
are
getting
an
idea
of
whether
people
are
in
support
of
allocating
that
money
at
this
time
Aaron
did
you
have
something
so
is
that
a
decent
shop
hold
event?
Everybody
understand
what
I'm
talking
about
well,.
H
Madam
chair
finite,
yes,
please
I,
think
they're
tied
in
my
head,
I'm
hesitant
to
go
ahead
with
allocate
the
money
without
a
firm
idea
about
how
to
do
the
maintenance.
If
we
get
to
70
percent
and
we
anticipate
some
percentage
of
cost
increase,
because
there's
gonna
be
a
cost
increase
to
get
to
88
and
hundred
percent
I.
C
H
And
this
is
our
best
number
that
we
have
now
yeah,
so
I
mean
I'm
supportive
of
it,
but
I
mean
me
it's
tied
into.
Are
we
willing
to
do
them
before
and
just
allocate,
but
not
have
that
discussion
or
have
a
firm
plan
for
the
maintenance
gone
going
I
personally,
a
favor
of
having
that
discussion
and
making
a
plan
for
the
maintenance?
If
we're
gonna
allocate
the
money
for
the
project?
Okay,.
B
However,
for
in
my
opinion,
if
we
decide
as
a
board
that
we
want
to
move
this
forward
with
the
consolidation
of
the
rest
of
the
the
departments,
I
think
there's
a
different
maintenance
discussion
that
may
happen
once
we
kind
of
get
the
rest
of
the
city.
We're
kind
of
at
this
part
right
here,
this
50%,
the
city
kind
of
the
rest
of
the
departments,
need
to
catch
up
with
us
and
at
that
time,
that
maintenance
and
that
allocation
may
look
different
and
those
options
may
also
look
different.
G
A
question
on
that,
madam
chair,
so,
if
we
so
if
we
were
to
allocate
the
1.3
million
and
it
comes
back,
that
maintenance
is
going
to
be,
you
know
substantially
higher,
would
we
then
just?
Would
we
then
be
stuck
with
the
1.3
million
that
we've
already
allocated
and
then
have
to
figure
out
how
to
fund
that?
G
Because
that's
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
with
I
think
if
we
so
as
far
as
the
consult
I
love
the
consolidated
plan
idea,
because
I
think
that
there
are
things
especially
on
central
ninth
with
the
nine
line,
and
you
know
some
of
the
other
systems
that
that
aren't
necessarily
part
of
what
the
RTA
is
doing,
and
so
you
know
with
that,
I
have
you
know,
I
think
it's
fully
appropriate
to
have
the
city
general
fund.
You
know
be
a
part
of
of
that.
G
You
know
with
the
as
far
as
the
maintenance
piece-
and
this
is
where
you
know,
if
you
can
help
me,
you
know
what
I
I
just
don't
want
to
do
something
where
we
as
an
RDA
board,
make
an
appropriation
or
a
commitment
to
this
certain
project.
On
you
know
what
things
are
gonna
look
like
with
the
1.3
million
dollars
and
then
have
to
you
know
back
fund
that
with
the
general
fund,
money
I
would
feel
much
better.
D
Think
that
ranges
everywhere
from
the
determination
of
are
we
doing
a
consolidated
project
to
what
information
you
may
want
to
help
guide.
The
conversation
for
the
maintenance
discussion
and
a
big
part
of
determining
that
maintenance
discussion
is
just
authorizing
us
to
go
and
follow
through
and
carry
the
design
forward
a
little
bit
more,
because
it's
only
then
that
we
really
have
a
sense
of
what
we're
going
to
be
able
to
build.
D
So
the
important
thing
to
start
with
is
just
setting
aside
the
funds
so
that
we
know
that
you
at
least
are
recognizing
that
we're
going
to
do
a
project,
and
we
have
funds
that
we
can
only
start
moving
forward
with
the
design
if
that
design
is
a
standalone
design.
If
that
design
is
part
of
the
consolidated
project,
we
can
determine
that
as
part
of
this
straw
poll
as
well.
D
But
regardless
we're
going
to
come
back
to
you
with
the
project
with
the
scope-
and
you
can
add
the
contingency
that
you're
not
going
to
release
any
of
those
funds
or
do
anything
until
we
have
also
addressed
what
that
maintenance
is
going
to
be
so
I
think
we
can
add
that
to
the
provision.
But
at
least,
if
we
set
those
funds
aside,
then
we
have
authority
to
start
getting
that
better
information
for
you
right
now.
D
D
G
So
and
I
appreciate
that
now
I
will
say
it's
a
little
bit
different
from
you
know
the
the
concept
that
you
know.
We
just
heard
that
we
would
be
here's
what
I
don't
want
to
do.
I
don't
want
to
I,
don't
want
it
as
a
board
to
paint
ourselves
into
a
corner
where
we
end
up
approving
something
without
you
know,
having
a
full
idea
of
what
the
maintenance
cost
is
going
to
be,
and
then
you
know
lock
ourselves
into
something
that
we're
going
to
have
to
pay
for
that.
You
know
that
upgraded
maintenance
regardless
now.
G
What
you
said
is
is
different
from
what
that
corner.
Painting
thing
is
what
you
didn't
you
and
I
just
want
to
know
which
it
is.
So
if
we,
if
we
strap
hole
this,
you
still
have
to
come
back
with
the
mate.
You
know
to
create
a
maintenance
plan
to
do
everything
else,
we're
not
locked
into
a
into
into
something.
If
that,
if
that
you
know
what
we're
funding
and
the
one
point
three
million
dollars,
if
it
doesn't
pan
out
or
if
the
if
the
cost
is
much
much
higher,
we
can
still
revisit.
That.
G
The
the
sugarhouse
Plaza
is
one
ix
lawyer,
not
the
nine
line,
the
the
s-line
is
another.
You
know
we
continue
to.
We
fund
these
really
cool
projects
that
become
you
know
extremely
expensive
to
maintain
that
ends
up
pulling
from
everything
else
in
the
general
fund.
That's
already
stretched,
then
so,
madam
chair,
I
would
be
ok
if
we
were
to
your
point.
G
That,
to
me,
is
not
a
plan
you
know
and
because
I
think
what
we
need
to
look
at
is
if
we
have
future
discussion
with
the
property
owners
in
central.
Might
then
they're
not
interested
in
in
participating
in
some
sort
of
an
essay,
a
I
think
that
that
should
definitely
determine
what
kind
of
a
project
we
end
up
doing
and
that
and
it's
still
gonna
be
a
better
project
than
any
other
city
street.
G
D
Is
different
because
we've
started
bringing
that
information,
you
hasn't
been
giving
us
feedback
as
to
what
you
may
or
may
not
want
to
consider
for
that
maintenance,
while
at
the
same
time
we've
been
refining
the
design,
updating
those
numbers
and
in
order
to
continue
that
process
of
designing
this.
This
is
where
we're
at
now
with
the
estimates.
G
Okay
and
one
more
thing
madam
chair
I,
do
want
to
thank
you
for
your
vision
and
leadership
on
the
consolidation
piece,
because
that
is
something
that
has
not
happened
for
decades
and
I.
Think
that
you
know,
having
you
know
all
of
the
departments
talking
to
each
other
is
how
not
only
future
RTA
projects
should
go,
but
every
project
that
we're
spending
taxpayer
money
on
the
fact
that
the
department's
have
not
traditionally
communicated
with
each
other
or
that
it
has
been
as
difficult
to
do
is
crazy.
G
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
hear
Charlie's
concerns
about
the
the
funding
that
we've
executed
in
every
department
across
the
city
over
decades
and
decades,
without
really
having
a
thorough
conversation
about
where
the
maintenance
is
going
to
come
from.
I
can
think
of
parks,
trips
on
seventh
east
to
all
sorts
of
other
capital
investments
that
we've
made
that
really
we
want
to
do
as
a
city.
They
make
the
city
a
better
place
to
live
in
a
better
place
to
work
and
play,
and
yet
we
do
need
to
have
a
reality
about
the
maintenance
costs.
A
I'm
I
think
that
which
makes
Charlie
feel
better
about
this
discussion
about
this.
Not
painting
us
into
a
corner
is
exactly
that
which
makes
me
uncomfortable
about
this
discussion.
We
created
a
unique
project
area
in
central
ninth
years
and
years
ago
so
long
ago,
it's
about
to
expire
and
we
have
sold
all
of
our
properties
all
but
one
in
that
project
area
and
when
amy
said
we
have
half
the
city
here
I
thought
you
were
talking
about
half
the
business
nonprofit
property
owners
that
are
here
because
this
thing's
baked,
we
created
a
killer
project
area.
A
A
Today
they
own
property
they've
been
participating
in
these
discussions,
and
so,
while
I
agree
that
we
need
a
policy
and
we
need
a
more
systematic
approach
to
attaching
future
maintenance,
especially
in
RDA
project
areas
that
are
going
to
expire
and
that
you
know
the
general
fund
has
looked
at
for
that
funding,
but
I'm
sad
that
it's
on
the
backs
of
these
people
in
this
incredible
neighborhood.
That
really
is
a
success.
A
This
is
an
RDA
success
story
and
if
and
if
we
burden
this
success
story
with
the
weight
of
an
undone
policy
in
this
city
to
address
maintenance
at
the
same
time,
we
do
capital,
we
can
kill
this
success.
This
neighborhood
can
fail,
and
these
amazing
business
owners
and
architects
and
nonprofits
they
may
have
to
leave.
So
if
the
policy
discussion
leads
us
to,
we
need
to
put
in
an
essay
a
that
is
similar
to
the
essay
we
have
in
the
central
business
district.
These
kind
of
businesses
that
we
intentionally
cultivated
can't
afford
to
do
that.
A
A
I,
just
don't
want
us
to
see
all
the
work
we've
put
in
over
two
decades
and
hundreds
of
thousands
millions
of
dollars
as
an
RDA
taxpayers
that
we've
intentionally
invested
in
these
people
in
this
community
slip
away.
Because
of
how
long
it's
taken
us
to
do
all
of
this
and
the
policy
discussion
that
isn't
this
neighborhoods
fault.
So
it's
it.
There's
a
balance.
A
I
get
that
this
isn't
a
mutually
exclusive
conversation,
but
I
want
you
to
know
that
when
I
vote
to
support
this
1.3
million
I'm
going
to
be
fighting
all
the
way
that
we
finish
this
project
and
we
have
this
policy
discussion.
But
we
should
not
be
sinking
this
project
area
because
we
haven't
done
that
on
our
backs.
I
wasn't
pointing
at
you.
C
H
Supportive
as
well
but
I
do
want
the
the
Ryder
contingency
on
it
to
talk
about
maintenance,
I,
don't
know
what
that
looks
like,
but
if
we're
gonna
write,
if
the
investment
means
higher
property
values
and
or
tax
revenue
for
retail
or
anything
else
in
the
general
fund,
that
should
be
our
discussion
right.
The
investment
generates
more
I
think
the
details
we
need
to
hammer
out,
but
I'll
be
supportive
of
the
funding.
Today,
with
that
contingency
on
it
maintains.
C
I,
like
what
Erin
said
already
and
I,
think
these
days
are
an
opportunity
to
to
have
you
know
more
general
maintenance
discussion
for
our
city
projects
from
now
on,
because
it's
notorious
that
we
have
these
awesome
plans
and
certain
improvements,
and
then
they
stay
there
and
I
maintained,
and
then
you
know
and
then
falling
apart.
So
I
really
appreciate
that
work.
C
I
do
like
the
idea
of
the
consolidation
gives
us
more
direction
really
and
hopefully
save
us
or
some
some
more
money,
but
I
again
share
the
concerns
with
Andrew
and
Charlie
as
well
that
maintenance
how
much
who's
in
charge?
How
are
we
gonna
do
this?
So
I
will
be
supportive
of
this,
but
also
really
supportive,
like
Erin
said
on
who's
gonna
end
up
footing
the
bill
for
the
maintenance
in
general
for
project
in
the
city.
So
there
you
go.
That's
my
two
cents.
G
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
am
in.
It
is
not
my
interest
or
intent
to
undo
what
has
been
done.
I.
You
know
fully
appreciate
the
investment
that
the
the
business
owners
and
property
owners
have
been
making
here,
but
at
the
same
time,
I
think
it's
important
that
we
also
understand
that
for
two
decades
that
all
tax
increment
generated
in
this
area
has
gone
to
this
area
and
if
we
are
going
to
begin
to,
if
we're
going
to
talk
about
looking
at,
do
it
what's
being
done
on
the
backs
of
these
folks.
G
I,
don't
think
that's
a
fair
assessment,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
benefits
coming
directly
from
the
investments
that
have
already
been
made.
Now
the
you
know
the
other
improvements
and
things
that
can
be
done,
I
think
if
maintenance
is
going
to
sink
this
project,
that
is
a
product
that
is
a
problem
with
the
project.
If
you
know,
if
something
is
as
minor
as
how
to
pay
for
something
that
you're
putting
in
place
is
going
to,
you
know
create
an
unsuccessful
future.
G
Well
then,
when
maybe
we
ought
to
be
looking
at
what
the
future
is
that
we
drew
out.
So
you
know
I,
while
I,
you
know
fully
understand
and
respect.
You
know
the
property
owners
that
have
been
there
and
have
been
benefiting
from
the
tax
increment
for
two
decades
that
the
rest
of
the
city
has
not
been
seeing.
I
also
want
to
look
out
for
the
residents
throughout
the
rest
of
the
city.
Who
don't
have
we
don't
have
the
resources
to
fund
streets?
We
don't
have
the
resources
to
fund
sidewalks.
G
We
don't
have
the
resources
to
fund
other
street
improvements.
We
don't
and
you
don't
have
the
benefit
of
looking
at
what
our
DA's
have
at
keeping
the
investment
or
the
increment
in
those
areas.
So
you
know
I
I,
take
a
little
bit
of
Prince
with
the
you
know,
the
the
assertion
that
you
know
we're
doing.
You
know
that
by
talking
about
maintenance
and
how
to
pay
for
future
maintenance
instead
of
having
all
of
Salt
Lake
City
residents
pay
for
you
know,
project
specifics
in
this
area,
but
that's
going
to
sink
the
project.
G
A
A
That's
wrapping
up
to
have
these
other
city
departments
come
in
with
some
big
investments
to
accomplish,
maybe
more
than
the
RDA
thought
to
accomplish
in
the
beginning
on
these
streetscape
improvements,
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
opportunity
for
us
to
have
that
funding
discussion
with
the
with
the
city
in
a
way
that
is
probably
more
relevant
to
those
departments
than
other
RTA
project
areas.
So,
yes,
let's
talk
about
the
funding
and
yes,
let's
talk
about
approving
a
consolidated
approach
right
now,.
B
B
Do
I
appreciate
what
early
said,
but
this
was
all.
This
was
all
admin
staff.
This
was
all
you
guys
and
all
of
your
work
and
putting
your
efforts
together
and
I
appreciate
it,
because
I
think
it
can
be
a
model
for
the
way,
moving
forward
and
being
able
to
do
better
with
our
resources
and
be
more
efficient,
which
is
what
I
think
we're
all
trying
to
do.
B
I
think
we
all
know
that
our
departments
are
spread
thin
and
everybody's
working,
very,
very
diligently
and,
and
quite
amazingly
and
I,
think
this
is
the
way
that
cities
should
be
run.
Is
that
everybody
all
the
departments
are
working
together,
so
I
want
to
just
say
as
Charlie.
Thank
you
for
giving
me
any
sort
of
credit
I
appreciate
that,
but
it
was
all
it
was
all
of
them.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
thank
you
for
the
board's
support
and
moving
forward.
Hopefully
with
this
consolidated
plan.
H
I
agree
with
that:
I
think
that
the
onus
is
on
us,
though
I
think
we
need
to
bind
ourselves
to
make
that
decision.
They
can
bring
us
information
but
I
think
from
a
body
perspective.
We
can
still
take
the
information
they
bring
us
and
say:
well,
we
don't
make
a
decision,
let's
just
ignore
it
or
kick
it
down
the
line.
A
little
more
so
my
my
my
contingency
was
more
for
us
to
get
the
information
and
then
make
sure
that
we
bind
ourselves
to
make
a
decision
on
that
I.
B
A
A
G
C
D
Need
anything
else
from
the
board:
I
appreciate
that
in
the
direction
just
take
a
moment
to
thank
all
the
city
staff
and
apologize
if,
if
our
DEA
staff
has
been
relentless
in
harassing
them,
that
can
but
thank
them
very
much
for
all
the
information
that
went
into
this
memo
and
getting
us
to
this
point
and
appreciate
continuing
to
work
with
them
and
moving
this
forward.
I
am.
C
We
we
would
work
with
the
transportation
division
and
the
engineering
divisions
to
get
a
design.
They're
gonna
be
working
on
a
design
for
the
whole
corridor
and
as
a
part
of
that,
we're
gonna
finish
the
design
for
this
ninth
portion,
and
it
sounds
like
as
a
part
of
that
process.
We
need
to
have
a
more
thorough
discussion
about
the
the
maintenance
right
and.
C
I
C
Thank
you
for
asking
the
question.
Our
proposed
schedule
would
begin
the
consolidated
design
approach
as
soon
as
the
budget
amendment
is
approved
to
incorporate
the
funds
that
we're
receiving
from
Salt
Lake
County
with
the
fourth
quarter,
funds
that
will
allow
us
to
to
begin
the
consolidated
design
approach
and
that's
obviously,
the
the
next
budget
amendment,
not
the
one
that.
C
Correct
so
our
anticipated
schedule,
if
that
is
approved,
is
to
hopefully
start
with
a
design
consultant
doing
all
of
the
projects
at
once
or
as
many
as
we
possibly
can
in
that
design
approach
beginning
this
summer
and
then
having
the
the
design
finished
within
about
a
year,
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
any
bids
that
we
that
we
get
back
are
the
best
prices
that
we
can
get
rather
than
waiting
and
waiting
and
waiting.
So.
A
I
have
a
question:
I
know
that
it's
probably
a
matter
of
weeks
in
difference,
but-
and
maybe
it's
question
for
Jennifer.
Sometimes
we
can
give
a
straw
poll
motion
of
intention
to
do
an
approval
on
something
that's
part
of
a
budget
amendment
we
aren't
yet
we
do
this
some
time
we
did
it
recently
with
the
airport
and
I
wonder
if
that
kind
of
motion
could
give
your
group
the
confidence
or
the
security
that
you
need
to
be
able
to
move
forward
faster.
That's.
A
C
B
F
I
could
just
I
don't
know
the
email
traffic
is
crazy
on
Tuesdays,
so
I
don't
know
if
council
members
have
all
seen
it
but
been
emailed
out
earlier
today.
Some
updated
information
from
the
RDA
staff
about
what
the
administration
is,
anticipating,
as
sort
of
like
the
baseline
cost
for
maintenance
of
the
sort
of
baseline
City
plan
for
the
nine
line
trail,
which
I
think
helps
inform
sort
of
what
would
be
expected
typical
city
maintenance
and
then
that
can
help
inform
the
future
conversation.
C
B
E
This
is
the
second
briefing
and
the
public
hearing
was
held
earlier
in
this
meeting.
The
board
can
take
action
on
any
or
all
of
the
items
in
the
budget
amendment
today,
at
the
March
26
briefing,
the
board
held
a
healthy
discussion
about
catalytic
projects
for
the
state's
treated
nine
line,
project
areas
and
an
understanding
that
once
negotiations
and
interlocal
agreements
with
the
other
taxing
entities
are
concluded
to
hold
a
follow-up
discussion
about
what
those
catalytic
projects
and
those
two
new
project
areas
could
look
like.
E
Instead
of
having
one
detailed
maintenance
policy,
the
board
also
requested
information
on
the
2016
Tiger
grant,
and
there
are
a
couple
of
charts
I'm
going
to
show
up
on
the
screen
that
summarize
originally,
when
the
city
with
UTA
as
the
lead
applicant
applied
for
tiger
funding,
twenty-eight
million
dollars
was
requested
from
the
federal
government
and
it
was
for
three
projects:
two
million
for
Folsom
Trail
400,000
for
Lucy
Avenue.
This
would
be
a
ball
park,
tract
station
improvement
and
as
well
as
four
and
a
half
million
dollars
for
the
300
north
pedestrian
overpass
bridge.
E
Given
the
lower
funding
amount
and
the
overall
cost
increases,
the
funding
shifted
a
bit.
This
table
is
specific
to
the
fulsome
trail,
as
well
as
the
separate
but
related
City
Creek
daylighting
project.
There's
if
approved,
there
will
be
an
additional
ninety,
seven
thousand
to
the
2.2
million
currently
appropriated
for
the
fulsome
trail.
The
city
creek
daylighting
is
at
a
lower
amount
at
a
hundred
and
four
thousand,
and
it's
a
feasibility
study.
It's
not
the
funding
to
fully
daylight
the
creek,
so
there
would
likely
be
additional
funding
needs
on
that
project.
E
There
are
a
couple
policy
questions
on
the
Folsom
trail
about.
If
scope
reductions
are
possible
as
the
design
proceeds
and
as
the
City
Creek
daylighting
feasibility
study
is
finalized,
that
would
better
identify
what
the
cost
would
be
in
is
scope.
Reductions
would
be
needed
within
this
existing
budget.
There
are
also
questions
about
coordinating
the
Folsom
trail
with
other
projects
when
looking
at
a
map
of
RDA
project
areas
it
the
Folsom
trail
connects
the
north
temple
depot
district
in
north
temple,
viaduct
project
areas.
So
it's
a
urban
trail
that
uniquely
connects
3
Rd
a
project
areas.
E
It
also
touches
two
of
the
transit
oriented
development
station
areas,
the
Salt
Lake
Central
Station
and
the
North
Temple
station.
That
UTA
is
board
recently
selected
for
their
Tod
projects
and
a
briefing
on
those
is
tentatively
scheduled
for
next
month
and
then
there's
also
a
question
about
next
steps
for
the
daylighting
study
staff
isn't
sure
what
the
timeline
is
and
what
the
the
details
would
be
on
that
those
deliverables.
E
The
other
Tiger
grant
project
is
the
300
north
pedestrian
overpass,
and
it
is
5
point
1
million
dollars
total
some
of
these
funding
contributions
have
not
been
secured
but
are
currently
in
the
works.
This
includes
a
half
million
dollar
contribution
from
the
Union
Pacific
and
a
half
million
dollars
from
UDOT
in
safety
funds.
E
The
bridge
is
located
at
approximately
300
north
and
500
west,
and
it
would
span
five
sets
of
railroad
tracks.
There
are
not
currently
concerns
on
scope
reductions,
but,
of
course,
the
design
as
it
proceeds
could
identify
additional
funding
needs
before
I
proceed.
Are
there
any
questions
on
the
tiger?
Grant
funding
split.
A
Thank
you,
Ben
thanks
for
walking
us
through
that
I
I,
wonder,
and
perhaps
it's
rhetorical
at
this
point,
but
the
I
wonder
about
the
experience
we
have
to
date
with
how
these
different
types
of
improvements
leveraged.
Other
investments
in
areas
and
daylighting
is
sort
of
a
new
thing
for
us,
but
not
entirely
new
trails.
We've
had
more
experience
with
you
know
and
I.
A
Maybe
it
would
be
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
anything
to
reflect
on
that
at
the
moment,
but
it
might
be
interesting
going
forward
when
we
have,
especially
when
we
have
to
look
at
reductions
for
projects
and
when,
if
we're
trying
to
compare
a
trail
to
a
playground
or
I
I'm,
making
things
up
obviously,
but
if
if
we
can
have
a
better
sense
of
how
we've
seen
those
kind
of
investments
motivate
other
investments
in
the
area,
it
would,
it
would
be
really
fascinating
and
helpful.
I
think
in
these
discussions,
I.
E
Would
just
say
from
a
staff
level,
there's
a
similarity
with
the
Jordan
River
Parkway
bridge,
which
cobbled
together
I
think
seven
different
funding
sources
before
it
was
finally
constructed
the
years
it
took
to
cobble
those
funding
sources
together,
definitely
attracted
a
lot
of
attention
and
I
think
also
had
a
bearing
on
businesses
and
residents
looking
at
if
they
wanted
to
move
into
the
neighborhood
or
not.
But
I
see
some
parallels
in
that
project.
With
this
trail
in
this
bridge,.
H
The
fulsome
trail
is
interesting
because
there's
two
blocks
between
8th
and
10th
west,
where
it's
really
an
economic
development
question
is
more
than
a
park
because
the
land
there
scan
is
right
across
the
tracks
from
north
temple
and
businesses
are
looking
at
redeveloping
that
so
it's
more
of
an
RDA
kind
of
concept.
That
actual
trail
just
those
two
sections
so
I
appreciate
that
question:
to
bring
back
this
discussion
out
of
the
Folsom.
To
that
discussion,
question
been
the
500,000
from
Union
Pacific
was
intended.
Is
that
a
good
term
but
wasn't
signed?
H
E
E
B
E
Those
were
the
updates
to
follow
up
on
the
board's
requests
at
March
26th.
There
are
other
items
that
were
not
discussed
at
March
26
if
the
board
would
like
to
continue
going
through
or
if
there
are
items
you'd
like
to
jump
to.
If
not,
there
are,
if
not,
there's
the
question
of
what
what
votes
to
follow
up
on
based
on
the
two
straw
polls
for
900,
South,
the
consolidation
and
then
the
additional
funding
are.
C
B
A
C
A
D
A
D
Am
interested
in
hearing
everyone's
ideas
because
I
think
it's
a
very
important
discussion
to
have
both
in
terms
of
either
what
our
larger
priorities
and
strategy
should
be
as
we
go
into
these
project
areas
and
what
we
should
potentially
focus
on.
First
in
terms
of
timing
and
building
increment
and
leveraging
our
funds
to
the
maximum
amount.
D
But
just
for
the
purposes
of
this
conversation
we
have,
since
we've
approved
the
CRA
plan
for
both
those
project
areas
we
have
reached
out
to
both
the
county
and
their
school
district
and
have
initiated
both
of
their
processes
for
presenting
the
plan
starting
the
discussions
beginning
negotiations
for
the
interlocal
agreements
within
the
county.
They
have
started
us
down
that
path
of
just
telling
us
what
information
we
need
to
provide.
We're
finalizing
that
and
are
about
ready
to
submit
that
for
presentation
to
their
internal
committee.
D
That
reviews
it
and
then
ultimately
makes
a
recommendation
of
the
County
Council
with
regard
to
the
school
district.
They
have
indicated
that
they
are
very
supportive
of
the
nine
line
project
as
it
is
proposed
and
with
the
strategies
and
the
goals
they
did
provide
some
input
and
comments
in
terms
of
what
they
would
like
the
RTA
to
focus
on.
Those
are
just
at
a
very
high
level
in
terms
of
housing
trying
to
encourage
both
housing.
D
That
would
support
and
be
available
for
families
and
potentially
increase
the
families
coming
into
the
city
or
at
least
maintaining
those
options
for
families
to
stay
in
the
city
as
well
as
housing.
That
is
at
a
ami
level
that
is
targeted
towards
what
we
would
probably
call
workforce,
but
they
are
looking
at
in
terms
of
wanting
their
teachers
to
be
able
to
stay
and
live
in
the
city.
So
those
are
two
priorities
that
we
are
putting
and
incorporating
into
the
specific
interlocal
agreement
for
nine-line
for
State
Street.
D
They
are
very
supportive
for
State
Street,
as
it
relates
to
the
State
Street
corridor
and
the
idea
of
how
that
is
an
arterial
for
the
city,
as
well
as
the
opportunities
for
development
and
also
because
that
is
a
significant
impact
and
barrier
for
their
schools.
I'm
wanting
to
make
sure
that
what
we
do
in
that
area
both
supports
and
offsets,
whatever
development
happens
there
they
do
have
concerns
with
the
size
of
State,
Street
and
bye-bye
sighs.
D
I,
don't
necessarily
mean
the
number
of
acreage,
because
that
is
very
similar
to
nine-line,
but
specifically,
they
look
at
State
Street
in
the
area
to
the
west
that
becomes
more
industrial.
They
do
not
necessarily
know
if
that
supports
their
goals
as
a
school
district.
So
when
we
had
this
conversation,
it
was
very
preliminary.
A
I
would
really
like
us
to
have
a
conversation
about
incorporating
those
two
taxing
entities
into
more
of
our
development
process,
at
least
for
updates
along
the
way
meetings
with
our
chair
and
our
vice-chair
of
the
RTA
as
opportunities
for
their
leadership
to
hear
where
we're
at
in
our
process,
because
it's
this
was
a
long
time
coming
and
now
we're
experiencing
a
bit
of
a
road
bump
on
it
and
I
feel
like
in
the
future.
We
could
prevent
that
with
more
regular
and
frequent
communication.
A
D
Appreciate
that
in
your
right
and
we
did
involve
them
in
terms
of
updating
them
on
the
process
in
the
idea
and
I.
Think
to
your
point
is
what
we've
also
recognizes.
We
probably
need
to
have
deeper
conversations
with
them.
As
we
were
developing
that
plan.
We
treat
it
as
traditionally
of
just
informing
them
and
bringing
them
up
to
speed
on
where
we're
at
and
what
we've
realized
is.
D
We
probably
need
to
have
deeper
negotiations
with
them
before
we
finalize
the
plan
and
have
that
approved
so
that
we
don't
get
into
this
situation
and
that's
simply
an
oversight
on
our
part
of
traditionally,
as
we
have
done
project
areas.
Usually
that
has
not
been
a
problem,
but
where
project
areas
are
now
created
as
that
negotiation
with
our
taxing
entity
partners
that
negotiation
part
needs
to
happen
sooner
than
then
later.
A
A
D
Think,
basically,
this
splits
into
two
different
types
of
funding
reserves
and
an
obligation,
reserves
and
first
I'll
cover
are
our
obligations,
the
bulk
of
which
are
our
bonding
obligations
for
the
echos
theater,
which
span
both
the
block
70
project
area,
as
well
as
our
CBD
project
area,
and
that
is
a
question
that
is
also
in
the
staff
report,
and
that
is
information
that
we
hope
to
bring
back
to
the
board.
Soon.
The
Finance
has
prepared
an
update
on
what
we
feel
is
the
potential
shortfall
for
the
debt
service
obligations.
D
We
are
still
in
the
process
of
reviewing
that
and
once
we
we
feel
we
have
that
we
want
to
come
and
present
that
to
council
staff
and
and
determine
if
that's
something
the
board
wants
to
see
is
an
update
as
well.
But
that
is
the
bulk
of
our
financial
obligations.
I
mean
that
really
is
what
drives
a
lot
of
what
we
are
at
risk
for
at
any
time
in
terms
of
what
our
increment
would
have
to
be
obligated
for.
D
So
we
are
going
to
understand
that
so
that
we
can
set
aside
the
money
for
a
reserve
fund.
You
see
that
within
BA,
for
you
will
see
that
within
our
next
year's
proposed
budget,
that
we
recognize
that
we
need
to
start
saving
those
funds
up,
so
that
we
are
not
impacted
by
that.
As
far
as
it
relates
to
other
obligations
of
the
agency,
those
are
primarily
in
the
form
of
reimbursement
agreements,
which
we
have
contractual
obligations
to
make
payments
to
the
developers
as
they
are
paid
for
performance.
D
Those
are
generally
tied
to
the
increment
that
is
generated
from
their
specific
properties.
So,
while
it's
an
obligation
to
make
a
payment
to
them,
the
amount
that
we
pay
them
is
tied
directly
to
what
they
ultimately
generates.
So
it's
not
necessarily
something
that
we're
going
to
experience
a
shortfall
on,
but
it
is
something
that
we
have
to
pay
them
first,
before
we
pay
ourselves
as
far
as
our
okay.
D
Should
we
tie
that
into
a
stated
policy
of
what
we
target
similar
to
what
you
have
on
the
general
fund?
Ideally,
the
agency
is
a
little
bit
different
in
how
we
structure
those
budgets
and
because
we
generally
have
pretty
good
surplus
of
funds.
It's
not
always
a
concern,
but
I
think
from
a
policy
and
best
practice.
Standpoint
I
think
it's
something
that
we
should
probably
target
and
and
have
a
number
that
we
at
least
try
to
make
sure
that
we
always
can
adjust
for.
A
F
Kind
of
reiterate
something
Danny
mentioned,
which
is
that
it's
out
of
best
practices
and
good
financial
management
that
the
RTA
is
consulting
with
finance
on
this
approach
and
not
state
law
requirements.
So,
unlike
the
general
fund
which
have
there
is
a
state
law
requirement
that
we
have
to
have
a
minimum
level
of
fund
balance
and
actually
maximum
level
of
fund
balance,
the
RTA
is
not
governed
in
the
same
way,
but
I
think
Danny's
point.
F
B
B
G
H
Yes,
well
you're,
not
talking
about
the
catalytic
projects
and
I.
Think
that's
gonna,
be
a
discussion
to
be
had
later
on,
I
think
on
the
nine
line
project,
particularly
this
might
come
up
because
what
might
be
the
the
best
tax
increment
generating
concept
may
not
actually
have
a
lot
of
direct
impact
on
the
residents
in
the
area
that
makes
sense
discuss
way.
It's
configured,
there's
a
large
amount
of
land
than
west
of
most
of
that.
H
So,
in
my
view,
the
light
pole,
banners
concept
makes
some
more
sense
as
far
as
cost-effectively,
showing
improvement,
building
morale
for
the
the
project
area
and
everything
else
so
I
would
like
to
see
us
pursue.
Maybe
some
cost
estimates
there.
Okay
I
know
the
cost
is
really
in
putting
up
and
taking
them
down.
Frankly,
which
seems
strange
to
me,
but
there's
only
one
business
that
does
it
is
that
what
I
understand
as
well
I,
don't.
H
I'd
put
a
plug
in
I,
think
the
the
groups
could
buy
ban
or
something
that's
been.
The
issue
I
think
the
issue
has
been
access
to
and
putting
them
taking
down
so
not
to
bump
this
ahead
of
too
many
large
pieces
of
this
needs
to
be
looked
at,
but
I
think
this
could
pay
off
in
public
goodwill,
pretty
quickly
for
a
pretty
small
financial
incentive.
D
I
think
we
can
certainly
do
that
and
and
I
think
before
Charlie
times
and
I
think
that's
something.
We
can
definitely
look
at
from
a
maintenance
standpoint
of
providing
options
on
how
if
the
RTA
were
to
do
a
similar
model
of
installing
the
hardware
yeah
responsible
for
the
ongoing
printing
of
the
banners
insulation
and
coming
up
with
options.
For
that.
Because.
H
D
D
Can
give
you
a
quick
update
and
a
preview?
The
quick
update
is,
we
have
not
had
anyone
actually
submit
something
that
is
viable
to
review
and
consider
and
present
to
the
board,
and
then
the
preview
is.
We
are
planning
on
presenting
this
next
month
as
kind
of
an
overall
update,
as
well
as
some
information
as
to
why
we
think
that
may
not
have
gotten
the
success
that
we
would
have
liked
have
seen
and
then
discuss
options
moving
for
it
of
what
to
do
with
that
money.
It's.
D
Yeah
we
did.
We
did
a
small
group
when
we
announced
that
both
nofas
at
one
time,
we
did
a
workshop
in
a
presentation
to
all
the
developers
and
partners.
We've
done
it
on
our
website
and
in
facebook.
We
put
it
on.
You
know
out
in
the
media.
We
did
it
on
the
the
channel
2
news
in
the
morning
channel
4
news
segment
so.
A
B
D
So
this
is
something
that
we
we
are
proposing
additional
funding
as
part
of
our
fiscal
year
20
budget
within
the
Granary
district
project
area.
We
have
had
conversations
as
we've
tried
to
identify
opportunities
for
the
north
temple
project
area
of
whether
that
would
be
a
model
or
if
it
would
be
a
slightly
different
model.
It
has
been
very
successful.
It's
been
successful
in
terms
of
accomplishing
its
purpose
of
really
targeting
adaptive
reuse
of
buildings
that
have
significant
cost
to
it.
D
C
B
B
James
voted
YES
for
you
as
well:
yeah,
okay
movie
9.
We
have
the
Union
Station
Hotel
loan
for
seven
million
dollars
and
we
will
have
Danny
at
the
table.
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
we
do
have
the
developers
from
the
Athens
group
mark
Sanford
and
Rob
MacGyver,
as
well
as
Scott
Howell
here
to
answer
any
questions
by
board
members
that
may
be
Carter
straightening.
The
stairs.
B
D
I'll
just
tee
it
up
and
turn
it
over
to
Kara
here
real
fast
and
take
a
personal
side
of
we.
We
are
excited
to
be
here
today
to
talk
about
this
project
for
as
long
as
I
think
I've
been
with
the
RTA.
We've
talked
about
options
of
how
to
activate
and
and
restore
and
adaptively
reuse,
the
the
U
P
Depot,
and
that
was
a
cornerstone
of
the
original
gateway
plan
and
and
I
think
everyone
thought
that
it
probably
could
have
been
activated
a
little
bit
further,
especially
with
regards
to
a
public
use.
D
So
we
are
excited
at
this
opportunity
and
to
have
a
group
that
that
is
interested
in
doing
it
and
we
feel
has
the
the
financial
capability
and
experience
to
do
it,
and
so,
having
said
that,
I
think
Kara's
prepared
to
kind
of
go
through
some
of
the
information
in
the
packet
and
provide
some
information
and
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
and
as
we
get
in
any
more
details.
As
chairperson
fowler
said,
the
developers
are
here
to
just
speak
to
that
and
and
answer
questions
specifically
to
them
in
the
project.
So.
J
J
The
site
map
here
shows
the
project
location
with
the
blue
shading
and
just
move
on
to
the
project
overview.
The
concept
is
a
boutique
hotel
that
I
mentioned
includes
the
adaptive
reuse
of
the
Union
Pacific
building
and
the
guestroom
structure.
It
will
include
between
210
and
225
guest
rooms
and
the
ground
floor
of
the
Union
Pacific
Union
Pacific
station
building
will
be
renovated
and
be
a
historic
preservation
project
that
will
include
a
restaurant
in
public
spaces
on
the
ground
floor
and
then
signature
hotel,
suites
on
the
upper
levels
of
the
historic
building.
J
And
then
the
loan
terms
that
are
proposed
are
for
a
loan
amount
of
seven
million
dollars,
an
interest
rate
that
starts
with
the
US
Treasury
10-year
yield,
curve
rate
and
then
adds
300
basis
points
which
is
our
standard,
RDA
loan
policy
and
then
that
interest
rate
is
reduced
by
three
and
a
half
percent
to
acknowledge
seven
public
benefits
that
are
provided
by
the
project.
So
the
final
interest
rate
is
one
point:
eight,
nine
percent,
the
term
of
the
loan
that's
proposed
is
twelve
years,
and
that
includes
two
years
during
construction
of
interest
being
waived.
J
Then
the
following
two
years
after
hotel
opening
and
before
the
stabilization
of
the
project,
interest
will
accrue,
and
then
the
loan
will
begin
the
repayment
period
at
four
years
after
the
loan
is
closed.
So
that's
two
years
after
the
hotel
opening
and
it
will
go
on
for
eight
years
and
then
any
remaining
balance
at
the
end
of
the
eight
years
will
be
repaid
at
that
time.
J
The
collateral
and
the
project
is
a
subordinated
interest
in
the
developers
least,
whole
leasehold
interest
in
the
historic
building
and
the
future
improvements
and
the
corporate
guarantee
is
provided
by
the
hotel
venture.
Already
a
I
have
some
site
plans
and
renderings
and
I'd
like
the
Athens
group,
to
present
those
because
I
think
they
can
speak
to
the
project
better
than
I.
Can
this
case
so
sorry.
B
Want
to
open
up
to
questions
to
the
board,
just
sort
of
about
the
loan
terms,
and
things
like
that.
If
there
are
questions
before
we
actually
kind
of
get
the
site
plans,
so
I'll
open
it
up
to
the
board
for
questions,
take
care
and
Danny.
Regarding
the
information
that
was
presented
just
now,
Andrew
thank.
H
D
Yeah
I
mean
traditionally
we
we
prefer
to
be
under
10%.
We
were
very
comfortable
within
the
10
to
20
percent
range
and
usually
how
we
make
that
determination
is
just
a
function
of
what
the
the
scope
of
the
project
is.
What
the
related
gap
is
as
well
as
what
we're
getting
in
return
for
the
public
benefit,
and
so
where
this
is
right
at
or
below
10%.
That's
we're
pretty
comfortable
with
just
being
an
equity
partner
at
that
level.
Okay,.
H
D
Our
collateral
really
will
just
be
on
the
structures
themselves,
which
I
think
there
will
still
be
significant
value
to
to
cover
that.
The
fact
that
they
have
over
30
percent
of
equity
in
that
and
they're
only
going
to
be
leveraged
to
60
percent
provides
us
a
lot
of
coverage
with
that
percentage
and
and
even
with
regard
to
what
the
coverage
is
for
our
dollar
amount.
Specifically.
And
then
we
will
have
a
corporate
guarantee,
which
is
fairly
significant.
D
D
That's
not
correct.
The
developer
could
speak
to,
but
that's
that's
how
we've
suggested
so
I
mean
that's
as
far
as
our
loan
program
and
underwriting
criteria
go.
That's
pretty
much
exactly
what
what
we
would
be
looking
for
in
this,
and
then
there
is
Kara
can
speak
to
as
part
of
the
the
primary
lender.
We
will
also
piggy
back
on
the
completion
/
guaranty
of
the
project
as
well
and
whatever
form
that
takes
within
that
financing.
So
we
will
have
that
added
security.
Okay,
Chris.
C
C
C
A
hefty
loan
and
the
risks
that
there
was
one
of
the
concerns
when
we
were
thinking
looking
at
this
there
is
this
project
not
going
through,
because
we've
seen
you
know
in
the
past
things
that
we've
learned
and
they've
been
installed
for
too
many
years,
and
so
I
wanted
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
How
you're
feeling
about
this
project.
Overall,
it
looks
great.
J
C
D
We
will
all
of
the
standard
protections
we
put
in
our
documents
for
for
protecting
us
from
that
risk
and
security
will
be
there
and
I.
Think
your
point
is
valid
in
terms
of
this
is
a
much
larger
dollar
amount.
Then
we
look
out
for
some
of
our
other
loans
and
we
will
protect
ourselves
insofar
as
obviously
we
will
not
be
doing
any
closing
or
dispersing
any
funds
until
they
have
their
entire
financial
package
ready
to
go.
D
We
will
work,
you
know
closely
with
the
developer,
as
well
as
the
the
primary
lender,
to
make
sure
that
it
is
on
track
that
we
have
not
put
ourselves
at
you,
know
and
overexposed
our
risk
in
terms
of
dispersing
funds
as
it
relates
to
the
project,
and
then
we
will
have
all
the
standard
protections
we
have
within
our
loan
documents
and
working
with
the
City
Attorney's
Office.
So
dollar
amount
is
a
little
bit
higher,
but
all
of
the
same
rules
and
conditions
apply
and-
and
we
will
make
sure
that
we're
securing
that
obligation.
A
Aaron
thanks,
madam
chair
Danny.
My
questions
are
around
the
public
benefits.
I
wanted
to
ask
about
the
transit
alternative
section.
I,
see
that
it's
adjacent
city
to
the
tracks
is
sort
of
a
natural
piece
of
anything
in
a
TSA.
So
it's
not
necessarily
about
what
the
development
is
doing.
I
expected
to
see
something
about
a
green
bike,
station
or
bikes,
available
to
to
clients
or
hotel
guests
rather
and
I'm,
not
seeing
those
kind
of
things
as
we
look
at
a
multi,
multimodal
transit
approach
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
just
being
near
tracks,
doesn't
necessarily
do
that.
A
So
not
necessarily
for
this
loan
today,
but
I
would
like
us
to
get
more
detailed
and
maybe
more
stringent,
actually
about
what
transit
alternatives
qualify
as
public
benefits
in
you
know
when
we're
doing
a
9%
loan
on
an
80
million
dollar
project
and
it's
transit
is
that
it's
next
to
the
track
station?
That's
not
quite
a
public
benefit,
necessarily
we've
already
built
the
track
station.
It's
there
so
I
think
this
isn't
stringent
enough
and
I
wondered
what
guarantee
we
have
about
the
hotels
maintenance
of
a
transit
pass
program
for
employees.
Do
we
know?
A
A
D
A
If,
if
they're,
if
we
don't
have
a
guarantee
about
that,
and
it's
just
that
it's
across
the
street
from
tracks
there,
that's
not
bringing
a
new
public
benefit
to
us
and
I
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
be
supportive
of
this
loan,
but
these
are,
they
feel
weak
to
me.
I
had
one
more
on
the
public
benefit
question,
which
is
under
sustainability
and
the
energy
efficient
design.
D
You're
right
and
that's
hard
for
us
also
to
measure,
because
there
are
many
different
ways
and
lead
seems
to
be
one
of
the
easiest
to
to
latch
on
to
identify
and
I.
Think.
That's,
probably
an
appropriate
question
for
the
developer
to
see
if,
as
part
of
their
operations
or
their
hotel
flag
or
just
their
policy
in
general,
how
they
approach
that
from
an
operating
standpoint.
B
I
certainly
understand
board
member
Mendenhall
kind
of
looking
at
these
public
benefits
and
saying:
can
we
define
these
more,
but
I
really
want
to
a
huge
shout-out
to
you
guys
for
putting
those
in
there
and
giving
us
sort
of
a
written
way
to
to
sort
of
May
to
manage
expectations
for
future
developers
and
future
people
of
people
that
come
to
us
with
projects
of
saying
this
is
why
one
person
got
a
lower
interest
rate,
and
this
is
why
we're
not
doing
it
here
and
Erin.
This
is
sort
of
to
your
point.
B
Those
are
our
incentives,
but
I
really
want
to
think
the
RDA
staff
for
putting
that
together
and
for
making
this
process
incredibly
transparent
for
really
having
a
way
for
us
as
a
board
to
look
at
something
and
say:
oh,
this
makes
sense.
I
mean
historic
preservation
of
one
of
the
most
unique
and
amazing
buildings
that
we
have
downtown
is
huge
really
like
for
me
personally,
that's
like
at
point
zero.
Five
percent
decrease
is
great,
I
mean
it's.
B
B
You
I
know
that
you're
working
on
policies
there
as
well
so
I
I,
just
truly
want
to.
Thank
you
for
Purdue
this
hard
work.
I
know
that's
taken
all
of
last
year
and
probably
then
some
but
a
lot
of
overtime,
and-
and
this
is
the
product
that
we
get
out
of
it,
and
this
is
exactly
what
we're
looking
for
I.
Think
as
we
move
forward
in
project
areas
and
in
these
things.
So
thank
you
for
that
and,
if
there's
nothing
else
on
this
part
of
it,
I
would
like
to
have
the
Athens
group.
B
I
I
We
are
very
excited
about
the
opportunity
to
to
redevelop
and
re-energize
the
historic
train
station.
We
think
it's
an
amazing
asset.
We
fell
in
love
with
it
minute.
We
saw
it
and
you
know
a
number
of
number
of
great
things
have
happened
to
over
the
two
years.
We've
been
involved
so
far
to
get
us
to
where
we
are
today.
So
these
are.
These
are
complicated
projects,
they're,
expensive
projects
and
the
RTA
gap.
Financing
is
a
critical
part,
and
just
want
to
thank
you
for
your
consideration
in
your
program.
I
K
I'm
Mark
Sanford
I'm,
our
director
of
development
with
the
Athens
group
and
I
guess
right
now,
we'll
do
a
quick
kind
of
overview
through
the
site
plan
and
some
of
the
renderings
that
we
have
just
to
give
you
some
context
about
the
project
I'm.
So
here
on
the
screen.
Now
you
see
a
site
overview
and
you'll
see
the
historic
station
running
north
to
south
there
directly
across
the
street
from
the
event
smart
home
arena.
K
The
white
curvilinear
background
is
the
8
story.
Guestroom
structure
that's
been
referenced
where
the
building
will
attach
to
that.
On
the
first
level,
there
are
a
couple
of
vacant
retail
spaces
on
the
backside
of
the
historic
structure
today,
and
we
will
attach
the
new
guestroom
structure
in
those
locations.
This
is
a
225
room,
hotel,
it's
210
to
225
rooms.
This
take
a
room
count.
That's
contemplated
here
on
the
first
level
of
that
new
guest
room
structure.
On
the
back
side,
you'll
you'll
actually
have
public
space
public
meeting
space.
K
A
little
coffee
shop
is
planned
in
there,
I
mean
we'll
get
into
more
detail
and
further
into
the
slides
on
that.
But
just
to
give
you
kind
of
context-
and
this
shows
you
where
the
new
guest
room
structure
is
behind
the
historic
structure
and
where
it
attaches
on
the
first
level.
There
I
think
we
can
go
to
the
next
one.
K
K
We
want
that
to
be
a
gathering
place
for
hotel
and
hotel
guests
in
the
community
alike,
where
there's
a
mesh
meshing
there
of
the
two
groups.
We,
as
mentioned
in
the
memo
that
the
staff
prepared.
We
will
also
utilize
the
north
and
south
wings
of
the
historic
structure
on
the
south
wing.
Here.
You'll
see
that
there's
a
specialty
restaurant
planned
and
to
activate
that
former
retail
space
on
the
north
end,
the
depot
the
Live
Nation
concert
venue
will
continue
to
operate.
They
will
remain
in
place
and
the
vacant
restaurant
space.
K
On
the
first
floor
of
that
wing
of
the
building
will
also
be
reintroduced
as
a
restaurant
and
will
reopen
and
create
further
energy
in
that
historic
portion
of
the
building
on
the
back
side
of
the
of
this
or
I
guess
the
top
portion
of
this.
That's
the
new
guest
room
structure.
You
see
on
the
back
side,
there's
meeting
space
there
on
the
right
side
and
on
the
left
side
you
see
a
fitness
area
a
little
bit
more
meeting
space
and
some
back-of-house
space
I
mean
here.
You
see
it.
K
H
K
So,
on
the
second,
so
at
the
south
wing
of
the
building,
which
is
what's
right
there
in
the
foreground
on
the
second
and
third
level
of
that
portion
of
the
building
above,
the
restaurant
you'll
have
specialty
guest
rooms
that
are
built
in
there.
That's
a
really
magnificent
space
on
the
second
and
third
level.
K
There
you
have
big
ceilings:
the
beautiful
exposed
hundred
and
ten
year
old,
brick
there
so
we'll
have
specialty
guest
rooms
and
those
portions
of
the
building
and
then,
in
the
mid
point
of
the
building
under
the
Union
Pacific
sign
there
that
you
see
at
the
second
level
there
there's
actually
planned
to
be
a
specialty
bar
area
in
that
location
that
will
look
back
up
temple
and
towards
the
arena
so
to
be
a
way
to
re-indict
in
that
space.
So
at
night,
when
you're
coming
out
of
a
game,
you'll
see
a
lit
up.
K
K
This
is
a
close-up
where
you
would
walk
up
the
steps
from
olympic
plaza
to
enter
into
a
courtyard
area
and
that's
actually
going
to
be
on
the
next
slide.
So
this
is
the
courtyard
area.
Once
you
walk
back
through
that,
if
you
were
standing
in
this
courtyard
and
looked
up,
you
see
a
blue
sky.
So
this
is
an
open
area.
K
It's
an
area
where
the
public
will
be
able
to
come
in
and
interact
with
not
only
the
existing
gateway
center,
but
also
to
draw
you
into
the
historic
structure
as
well
and
there's
plan
to
be
a
coffee
shop
there
on
the
left
in
this
photo
and
then
on.
The
right
side
is
where
the
meeting
space
will
be,
and
so
it'll
be
a
great
area
that
we
are
excited
to
reenlarge.
B
C
Chair
please,
so,
can
you
tell
me
a
little
bit
more
about
how
this
will
engage?
The
Gateway
I
mean
I,
don't
want
people
to
be
like?
Oh,
they
found
this
really
cute
hotel
and
it's
only
several
blocks
from
City
Creek
and
we
can
walk
there
for
our
shopping
or
we
can
take
the
train
like
how
is
this
going
to
contribute
to
Gateway
as
opposed
to
people
just
staying
in
the
hotel
or
taking
the
train
down
to
a
city
Creek?
Yes,.
I
So
so,
first
and
foremost,
we
anticipate
and
and
need
to
be
a
center
of
activity
for
the
community,
the
current
trains,
you
know,
Grand
Hall,
is
open
today
from
10
a.m.
to
5
p.m.
and
and
and
you
can
pass
through
it,
although
it
looks
closed,
even
if
you
you
know
so
so
as
an
active
hotel,
those
hours
will
be
vastly
expanded.
I
We
anticipate
having
you
know,
food
and
beverage
offerings
and
gathering
places,
and
you
know
fun
activities
within
the
ground
hall.
It's
meant
to
be
flexible,
flexible
space
that
that
you
know
can
be
used
for
different
purposes
along.
You
know,
throughout
the
the
days
and
months
and
years
and
and
ultimately
our
goal
is
to
create
an
upscale
boutique
hotel
that
provides
a
level
of
sophistication
and
fun
and
interactive,
miss
that
you
know
quite
honestly,
we
believe
as
a
whole
in
the
in
the
lodging
market
in
Salt
Lake
City.
I
Today,
we
think
the
the
historic
nature
of
the
Union
Station
building
gives
us
a
great
competitive
advantage
for
a
long-term
viability,
and
you
know
something
that
can't
be
replicated
and
while
we,
you
know,
respect
and
believe,
there's
great
competition
here
in
in
Salt
Lake
City.
We
we
anticipate
that
we'll
be
you,
know,
kind
of
raising
the
bar
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
terms
so.
I
I
Because
we
are,
we
have
a
national,
you
know
scope
of
what
we
pursue
and
develop,
and
so
we
are
constantly
looking
in
different
communities
and
for
different
opportunities.
We
got
to
know
Salt
Lake
fairly
well,
as
we
spent
time
developing
the
montage
Deer
Valley
up
in
Park
City
and
spend
a
lot
of
time
coming
through
Salt,
Lake
and
and
interacting
with
some
of
you
know
the
you
know:
Salt
Lake,
you
know
consultants
and
teams
that
we
we
utilize.
So
we
have
followed
the
the
energy
that's
been
created
from
the
tech
sector.
I
Here,
the
you
know
the
improvements
that's
going
on
in
the
in
the
Rio
Grande
district.
That
specifically
I
mean
we
got
involved
a
couple
years
ago.
That
was
a
big
challenge
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
bringing
a
hospitality
use
there,
and
we
were
big
believers
in
what
the
star
is
doing
to
revitalize
the
Gateway
Center,
making
it
a
fun.
You
know,
atmosphere,
REE,
tending
some
of
the
retail
into
creative
office.
I
Space
kiln,
if
you
haven't
been
in,
is
a
very,
very
unique
co-working
space
and
recursion
pharmaceutical
and
some
of
the
great
things
that
they've
been
doing.
You
know
within
the
center
have
reinforced
our
thesis
as
we've
spent.
You
know,
time
working
through
the
concept
designs
and
and
getting
through
Planning
Commission
and
historic
landmarks.
We've
it's
been
a
journey
and
we
are
at
a
place
now
where
it
feels
like
all
the
things
are
lining
up
and
allows
us
to,
and
it's
basically
reinforced
our
original
thesis
in
that
you
know.
I
B
I
know
councilmember
Mendenhall
wants
to
say
something,
but
before
that
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
a
little
bit
to
activating
gateway,
I
would
had
the
opportunity
to
meet
with
Robin
mark
this
morning
or
afternoon.
Sometime
today
and
rob
has
been
working,
has
no
investor
been
working
with
vest
R
since
the
beginning,
and
so
I
think
what
I
understood
is
they
kind
of
were
in
collaboration
of
what
that
area
needed
and
and
to
reactivate
both
gateway
and
in.
I
True
and
we've
known,
vest
R
for
a
long
time
ever
since
I
started
with
the
Athens
group
twenty
more
than
twenty
years
ago,
and
and
my
first
office
with
the
Athens
group
was
invest
hours
office.
So
we
were
very
close
and
know
each
other
very
well
and
I
think
that's
allowed
us
to
overcome
some
hurdles
and
structure,
something
that
makes
sense
and
and
get
us
to
a
place
where
we
are
today.
So
the
I
forgot
your
question.
There.
A
I
I
think
it's
it's
wonderful.
That
Athens
group
is
at
the
table
with
us
that
that
brings
in
your
portfolio
bring
with
it
a
great
deal
of
thorough
experience
that
I
don't
feel
I.
Don't
have
a
question
about
whether
or
not
you
know
what
you're
getting
into
I
think
you
know
what
you're
getting
into,
and
let
me
tell
you
lots
of
people
believe
in
Salt
Lake
City's
future.
A
H
H
H
And
I
know:
there's
some
limitations
and,
like
I,
said
I'm
Emilie
qualified
to
talk
about
that,
but
it
from
looking
at
the
picture.
If
you
scroll
down
I
mean
I
love
this,
the
the
courtyard
etcetera,
etc.
But
if
you
scroll
down
to
the
West
elevation,
it's
gone,
I
mean
the
the
story.
The
tie-in
of
the
old
clock
tower.
Another
video
wall
tower
ties
in
to
the
front
of
the
old
Depot
right.
It's
not
there
anymore
and
that's
I
guess
what
am
I
my
hope?
H
I
I
A
look
at
that
only
ended
up
within
140
range
type
of
rooms,
and
it
it
also
was
almost
mirroring
the
historic
building
in
terms
of
red,
brick
and
and
those
sort
of
things,
and
as
we
collaborated
with
historic
landmarks
and
talking
through
design,
the
the
issue
was
hey.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
that
the
historic
building
you
know
people
can
tell
what's
historic
and
what's
not
historic
and
and
that
the
historic
building
can
ultimately
compliment
their.
I
The
the
new
building
can
ultimately
complement
the
historic
building,
so
the
the
reality
of
the
building
on
the
west
side,
the
guestroom
structure
on
the
west
side
is
just
the
reality
of
getting
guest
rooms
that
ultimately
to
a
place
where
it's
economically
viable,
the
inn
and
I
think
and
I
think
we've
done
and
getting
through
landmarks
I
think
we
spent
a
good
amount
of
time
with
them.
Making
sure
and-
and
you
know
there
were
some
sacrifices
made
it.
I
I
So
when
you're
in
the
courtyard-
and
you
have
the
blue
sky
above
you,
you
do
have
a
perspective
on
the
historic
nature
of
it
and
you'll
catch
glimpses
of
it
when
you're
down
in
olympic
plaza,
but
you're
right,
I
mean
for
the
most
part.
You
know
the
the
main
view
of
the
historic
structure
is
still
on
400
west
and.
H
I
guess:
there's
trade-offs
to
these
things.
I
understand
that
part
I.
Just
we
just
talked
about
the
fulsome
trail
corridor
that
links
this
to
the
rest
of
the
valley,
essentially
of
going
west
I,
don't
know
if
there
are
high
restrictions,
I,
don't
know
they're
the
restrictions
that
were
on
will.
You
have
because
I
know
there's
some
high
tea
left
over
from
the
building
next
door,
but
it
it's
hard
I,
guess
somewhat
to
decieve
very.
C
G
C
B
B
So
we
are
it's
four
o'clock
and
that's
when
we're
supposed
to
start
our
council
meeting
I
do
very
quickly
want
to
touch
on
item
number
five,
which
is
the
project
area
creation
priorities,
and
the
reason
for
this
is
because
this
is
important.
There
are
a
lot
of
project
area
ideas
and
some
that
are
already
pending.
B
J
D
Is
the
the
author
of
the
memo
and
I
think
thinks
you
should
at
least
be
prepared
to
answer
any
questions
if
we
get
into
that,
but
in
the
interest
of
time
I'll
go
over
it
real
fast
and
just
set
up?
Why
we're
here
talking
about
this?
Obviously
the
creation
of
project
areas
and
the
RDA
involvement
throughout
the
city
is
is
an
ongoing
conversation
that
we
have
throughout
the
year
and
we
get
pulled
in
a
lot
of
different
directions.
D
We
last
came
to
the
board
I
think
just
a
little
over
a
year
ago,
with
this
conversation
and
proposed
some
ideas
for
where
we
may
or
may
not
want
to
target
our
efforts
in
the
future.
At
that
time,
the
board
gave
us
direction
to
focus
primarily
on
finalizing
and
creating
the
nine
line
and
State
Street
project
areas.
D
D
So,
within
the
memo
we've
laid
out,
a
total
of
thirteen,
three
of
which
are
already
ongoing
and
in
process
the
other
ten
are
potential
ideas
and,
for
the
sake
of
discussion,
I'm
happy
to
provide
any
more
background
information
on
what
we
as
staff
may
or
may
not
prioritize
as
we
move
forward.
If
that
is
the
board's
liking
or
if
the
board
has
any
that
they
are
supportive
of
or
adamantly
opposed
to,
we
would
appreciate
that
direction
as
well
in
our
goal
was
simply
to
be
to
try
to
get
some
kind
of
direction
on.
G
B
B
D
D
B
If,
if
you
were
to
receive
everything,
you
asked
for
how
many
project
areas
of
the
ten
would
but
I
think
it's
really
good
members
to
understand
what
what
high
hopes
we
have.
You
know
we
talked
about
maintaining
expectations
of
our
constituents
and
maintaining
expectations
of
project
developers.
I
think
at
this
point
we
have
to
maintain
the
expectations
of
the
these
people.
These
seven
people
sitting
up
here
I
think.
D
We
may
not
be
as
heavy
in
terms
of
the
operations
of
that
project
area
as
those
may
or
may
not
be
more
heavily
tied
to
transit
and
transportation
in
those
departments,
doing
larger
share
of
the
work.
But
if
we're
looking
at
project
areas
of
the
scope
of
you
know,
research
park
or
Brickyard
and
those
are
pretty
heavy
heavy
loads
for
staff
and
an
ideally,
the
goal
is
with
our
current
staff
and
our
current
project
areas.
One
thing
that
we,
as
an
agency
have
not
been
able
to
do
as
much
because
of
the
workload
is.
D
We
have
not
been
able
to
be
more
of
a
ambassadors
towards
our
project
areas
and
be
going
out
and
being
more
proactive
and
engaging
with
the
community
property
owners,
the
businesses
and
really
starting
to
try
to
have
more
of
that
community
input
coming
through
us,
rather
than
us,
just
kind
of
reacting
to
whatever
developers
are
walking
in
the
door
that
particular
week.
So.
D
B
I'm
board
members,
I
I
know
we're
already
very
far
behind
schedule,
I
think
and
we
have
a
very
packed
council
schedule.
So
what
I
was
thinking-
and
please
let
me
know
if
anybody's
opposed
to
this,
but
what
I
was
thinking
is
skiing
and
encouraging
board
members
to
look
at
this
list.
That
was
provided
given
some
of
the
the
answers
that
Dany
just
provided
as
far
as
what
the
staffs
capacity
was,
and
hopefully
in
getting
more
staff
with
it.
Maybe
to
kind
of
look
at
this
list.
Ask
any
questions
of
this
staff
offline.
B
J
B
And
then
so
we
can
wrap
up
I'm
gonna
quickly,
move
to
the
final,
the
number
six,
which
is
the
guiding
framework
and
project
evaluation
process.
I,
don't
think
Sue's
I
don't
want
to
get
into
this
I
simply
want
to
say
yet
again
we
have
to
pull
this
from
the
agenda,
which
is
the
third
agenda
in
a
row.
We've
had
to
pull
this
from
because
we
keep
running
out
of
time,
but
I
would
like
to
do
the
same
thing
with
this
agenda.
Item
has
just
encouraged
board
members
to
read
through
that.
B
If
you
haven't
had
a
small
group
meeting
with
the
RDA
staff,
it's
incredibly
helpful
maybe
come
up
with
some
questions
and
we'll
put
it
on
next
month's
agenda
and
hopefully
put
it
higher
up
on
the
list
this
time
so
that
we
can
actually
get
there
because,
as
we
saw
with
the
U
P
long,
the
idea
behind
that
guiding
framework
is
really
what's
pushing.
Some
of
these
other
projects
and
I
think
it's
such
a
great
thing,
but
I
want
to
be
able
to
address
some
of
the
concerns
that
were
brought
up.
B
You
know
like
board
member
Mendenhall
brought
up
about.
How
are
we
defining
some
of
these
different
areas?
So
perhaps,
like
I
said,
if
you
haven't
met
with
the
staff,
I
would
really
encourage
you
to
meet
with
them.
Look
over
that
and
we'll
put
it
on
next
week's
agenda
for
a
good
discussion
there.
If
that's,
okay
with
everybody
all
right,
let's
quickly
move
on
report,
an
announcements
from
the
executive
director,
nothing
over.
There
report
an
announcements
from
you
just.
D
Two
items
real
fast,
because
they're
time-sensitive
number
one:
the
public
outreach
component
of
the
public
market
feasibility
study
at
the
Fair
Park
is
underway.
There's
a
through
the
RDA
website
results
will
be
posted,
May
31st,
there's
an
open
house
on
May
16th
at
the
Fair
Park.
So
if
you
want
any
more
information
on
that
feel
free
to
reach
out,
but
that
is
under
way.
Please
encourage
people
to
to
reach
out
on
that
and
then
number
two
just
mark
your
calendars:
that
Monday
June
10th
will
mark
the
50-year
anniversary
of
the
RDA.
B
D
D
Next,
50
years
of
maintenance
funding,
we
have
a
publication.
We
will
be
doing
an
event
to
kind
of
highlight
some
of
our
history
and
in
larger
projects.
We
will
get
you
more
information
on
that,
but
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
on
everyone's
radar,
because
it's
a
big
deal
so
that
is
all
I
have
unless
there
additional
questions
for
for
myself
or
staff.