►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session Only - 5/14/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
In
our
city
and
in
our
state,
this
Friday
is
a
start
of
the
living
traditions
festival.
They
are
celebrating
34
years.
So
it's
a
big
deal
that
we
have
happening
here
at
City,
Hall
grounds
and
I
wanted
to
thank
the
Salt
Lake
Arts
Council
for
the
you
know,
for
supporting
diversity
in
our
city
and
fostering
all
of
these
different
cultures
and
countries
are
represented
in
that
festival.
By
the
way
there
are
over
90
cultures
in
over
25
countries
that
will
be
participating
at
the
food
hall
this
year.
B
Thank
You
councilmember
Valdemar
else.
We
appreciate
the
information
on
that
and
look
forward
to
an
exciting
weekend
here
in
Washington
Square.
The
first
on
our
agenda
is
an
ordinance
regarding
how
the
housing
zoning
map
of
Man
Metis
1805,
South
Main
Street
for
the
Alliance
house,
Bryan
Fullmer
from
council
staff,
is
our
policy
analyst
we'll
introduce
this
item
and
David
gildner
is
here?
Is
the
principal
planner
so
hey
afternoon.
C
We're
also
joined
by
Molly,
Robinson
planning
manager,
so
on
the
screen
you
can
see
the
parcel
outlined
in
red.
That's
the
1805
South
Main,
Street
property.
It
is
owned
by
Alliance
house,
which
is
an
organization
that
serves
adults
with
mental
illness
issues
and
the
motel
that
is
on
the
property
is
being
used
as
multi-family
multi-family
housing
for
Alliance
House
members
Motel
is
in
poor
condition
and
the
applicant,
which
is
Alliance
house,
would
like
to
construct
a
new
multi-family
building
on
the
property.
C
C
D
Thank
you
Brian.
As
Brian
pointed
out.
This
is
it's
a
single
parcel.
It's
a
little
over
a
quarter
acre.
It
is
currently
Zone
B
P
and
it's
just
to
the
north
of
the
OC
Tanner
property,
because
it's
a
non-conforming
use.
They
have
that
Motel.
They
can
keep
using
it
as
housing,
but
it
is
according
to
them
in
poor
condition,
repair.
The
zoning
doesn't
support
multi-family
housing,
so
they're,
looking
to
change
that
zoning
to
build
a
new
apartment
on
the
site
and
the
master
plan
calls
for
community
commercial
in
that
area.
Corridor
commercial.
D
There
is
no
zoning
designation
called
community
commercial,
but
when
you
look
at
the
description
for
corridor
commercial,
which
calls
for
commercial
and
residential
along
kind
of
Main
streets
with
some
integration
into
neighborhoods,
it's
very
similar
to
the
corridor-
commercial,
the
sorry,
the
community
commercial
description
in
the
master
plan,
so
staff
looked
at
a
number
of
this.
Looking
at
the
city,
neighborhood
and
city,
wide
master
plan
considerations
also
that
zoning
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties
and
also
looked
at
alternative
zoning
districts
that
could
possibly
be
instead
of
the
CC
zoning
where
the
property
is
located.
D
D
The
zone
they're
proposing
to
change
to
CC
would
be
limited
to
30
feet
in
height
or
45
feet
through
what
was
called
the
conditional
building
and
site
design
review
process,
thankfully
shortened
to
design
review
process
now,
so
they
are
going
to
a
much
less
intense
zone
and
if
they
were
to
not
use
the
property
in
the
future,
just
for
housing,
it
wouldn't
preclude
some
commercial
uses
and
things
on
the
property,
which
is
why
we
weren't
recommending
one
of
our
multifamily
zones,
which
then
would
just
lock
it
into
housing
only
kind
of
zone.
So.
B
D
E
F
D
D
F
B
B
And
does
that
so
the
Alliance
House
representative
does
that
time
frame
work
with
with
what
your
plans
are,
the
time
frame
to
have
four
tentative
Council
action
on
July
16th.
The
public
hearing
would
be
on
July
9th
great
okay.
Thank
you
thank
you
and
Bryan
David
Molly.
Thank
you
for
your
presentation.
B
D
So
this
is
a
pretty
short
one
I'll.
Let
Doug
do
most
of
the
talking.
But,
as
you
said,
it's
in
it
is
that
X
change
allows
self
storage
facilities
in
the
d1
central
business
district,
but
they
would
have
to
be
below
ground.
They
would
not
be
allowed
above
ground,
so
Doug
can
pretty
much
covers
it.
Probably
yeah.
G
This
was
a
pretty
non-controversial
item
when
I
went
through
the
Planning
Commission's.
Basically,
it
allow
commercial
still
self
storage
in
basements
of
buildings
in
the
d1.
The
d1
is
what
you
can
see
on
the
map.
It's
downtown
people
already
store
things
in
their
basement
in
these
districts
to
matter
whether
they
can
do
it
commercially.
G
G
Businesses
are
here,
they
have
off-site
storage
and
what
we're
seeing
is
dedicated
buildings
sort
of
popping
up
on
the
referee
of
downtown
and
part
of
the
logic
is
storing
it
in
the
basement
actually
has
less
impact
on
the
activity
levels
on
the
sidewalk
than
an
exclusive
storage
building
on
the
sides
of
your
downtown,
so
it
seemed
like
a
pretty
normal
fit.
There
was
a
discussion:
do
we
do
a
commercial
conditional
or
permitted?
G
A
G
E
This
is
a
great
example
of
Salt
Lake,
City
being
dynamic,
looking
at
our
existing
building
stock
and
figuring
out
how
to
do
it
better
good
job,
guys,
I
think
this
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I
appreciate
the
looking
at,
but
building
uses
that
are
happening
outside
of
the
downtown
core
and
makes
I
think
that
there's
better
uses
for
those
spaces.
So
thanks
so.
B
J
All
right,
thank
you
for
letting
us
come.
The
budget
is
obviously
a
big
deal
and
we're
grateful
for
the
opportunity
to
come
and
present
we're
grateful
that
we
had
the
opportunity
to
be
here,
but
we
want
to
recognize
that
this
is
the
culmination
of
a
lot
of
people's
work,
not
just
simply
the
three,
the
three
of
us
that
you
see
sitting
here.
We
want
to
recognize
each
of
them
and
the
hard
work
and
dedication
that
they
put
in
and
thank
them
for
their
service
as
well.
J
So
as
we
begin,
the
budget
today
just
want
to
start
by
showing
a
slide
that
shows
the
entire
city
budget.
This
includes
all
the
different
funds
and
across
all
of
those
different
things,
and
the
total
budget
for
FY
2020
is
at
one
point
nine:
four
billion
dollars,
that's
an
increase
of
nearly
662
million
or
51%.
J
The
majority
of
the
increase
again
is
associated
with
a
terminal
redevelopment
project
at
the
airport.
That's
expected
to
increase
by
about
five
hundred
and
sixty
million
dollars.
Public
utilities
also
saw
a
significant
increase.
It's
up
sixty
three
point:
eight
million
dollars
and
that's
associated
with
CIP
projects
that
they
are
going
to
begin.
The
general
fund
specifically
increased
by
twenty
eight
point:
seven
million
dollars-
and
this
increase
was
made
up
of
additional
three
months
of
the
new
sales
tax.
J
At
about
nine
point:
five
million
the
quarter,
cent
sales
tax
at
four
point;
seven
million
and
then
reimbursements
from
the
airport
due
to
the
transfer
of
the
police
and
some
additional
positions
of
eight
point:
six
million.
We
also
recognized
about
2.6
million
new
growth
for
this
coming
fiscal
year.
K
So
this
is
a
over
an
overview
of
just
the
revenue
portion
of
the
budget
for
this
year,
as
John
mentioned,
our
general
fund
budget
increased
by
about
28
million
or
9.5
percent.
The
budget
includes
judgment
levy
and
increases
in
real
property
tax,
new
growth
by
about
2.6
2.6
billion,
and
the
mayor
is
also
recommending
a
property
tax,
stabilization
of
a
million
dollars.
K
The
sales
and
use
tax
is
increasing
by
about
eleven
million
dollars
and,
as
John
mentioned
part
of
that
is
a
recognition
of
the
full
year
of
the
funding.
Our
future
sales
tax
will
have
12
months
instead
of
the
nine
that
we
budgeted
for
last
year.
So
that's
an
increase
of
nine
nine
million
five
hundred
and
forty
two
thousand
dollars.
K
K
The
city
is
budgeting.
Some
major
increases
for
building
permits
totaling
about
2.3
million
dollars,
as
construction
is
really
on
the
rise,
and
there
is
one
negative
change
or
change
to
that,
which
is
in
our
parking
permits,
which
of
we're
seeing
a
reduction
of
five
hundred
and
sixty
five
thousand
in
that
area.
K
K
Also,
we
budgeted
for
some
pretty
major
decreases,
we're
seeing
a
decrease
in
franchise
tax
of
about
1
million
62,000
or
1
million,
yes,
1
million
62,000.
This
is
a
nationwide
trend
and
we're
hoping
that
we
can
focus
in
on
that
in
next
year's
legislative
session,
there's
also
been
a
decrease
in
parking
tickets
that
we're
reflecting
here
of
about
2.5
million
dollars,
part
of
that
is
from
lower
than
anticipated
ticket
issuing,
but
also
a
legislative
change
in
the
parking
fee,
late
structure.
K
K
The
other
change
is
an
increase
in
the
base.
Fine
of
parking
citations,
the
average
parking
citation
will
increase
about
20
dollars
and
the
late
fee
structure.
I
actually
have
a
slide
for
that.
If
you
want
to
show
that,
but
the
late
fee
structure
changes
from
$40
every
ten
days
to
just
a
25%
late
fee
at
30
days
of
the.
B
K
K
That
top
shows
our
top
four
citations.
Sorry,
it's
a
little
small.
The
the
most
issued
citation
is
for
registration
violations.
It's
currently
$30
that
fine
would
go
up
to
forty
five
and
what
typically,
what
happens
now
is
that
every
ten
days
there's
a
forty
dollar
late
fee.
So
your
citation
increases
by
120
dollars
over
that
30
days
at
41
days
we
charge
a
collection
fee,
so
it
can
max
out
at
about
$200
under
our
current
structure.
So
the
new
structure
would
raise
that
five
to
forty
five
thank.
K
A
late
fee
of
I
think
it's:
what
is
it
$11
yeah
a
late
fee
of
$11
at
30
days,
we
received
complaints
in
the
past.
Why
don't
you
treat
this
like
a
regular
bill
and
charge
me
late
penalties
after
30
days,
so
we're
kind
of
following
that
idea,
and
just
waiting
until
30
days
to
charge
that
late
fee
25%
is
the
max
we
can
charge
based
on
the
new
legislation:
okay
collection
fee
at
forty
days?
Okay,
what's
it
max
out
to
a
few
as
far.
I
B
B
E
B
B
J
All
right
a
little
bit
more
in
depth
into
revenue
into
the
expense
side.
This
slide
shows
a
breakdown
of
the
expenses
in
two
different
ways.
It
shows
a
breakdown
between
the
departments
on
the
left
and
then
on
the
right.
It
shows
a
breakdown
between
our
costs
by
cost
type.
On
the
right
you
can
see,
you
can
see
that
we
are
certainly
a
customer
service
organization.
J
Over
50%
of
our
costs
about
60%
of
our
costs
are
related
to
personnel
costs
associated
with
the
people
that
we
have.
These
costs
are
strictly
within
the
general
fund.
So
as
we
look
at
the
general
fund,
we'll
go
over
some
of
our
major
expense
changes,
salary
and
benefit
changes
for
personnel
costs
increased
by
5.6
million
dollars.
J
There
was
also
8.6
million
in
personnel
and
other
related
costs
that
are
associated
with
airport
positions.
So
that's
the
68
police
officers
and
then
there
are
three
additional
firefighters
and
one
attorney
in
the
City
Attorney's
Office.
So
each
of
those
expenses
are
now
offset
by
a
revenue
that
comes
into
the
city
from
the
airport
as
a
transfer
within
the
mayor's
budget.
There
are
43
additional
positions
without
those
four
that
are
being
paid
for
by
the
airport,
so
the
other
43
positions
are
a
change
of
3.2
million
dollars.
J
Some
other
large
increases
that
we
thought
would
be
worthy
of
note
would
be
judicial
salary
increases.
This
is
for
the
judges
to
bring
them
up
to
the
state
allowed
95
percent
citywide
research
and
development
within
the
mayor's
department,
the
mayor's
office
to
be
able
to
conduct
citywide
types
of
studies
to
be
able
to
figure
out
where
we
should
go
as
a
city.
J
H
J
B
To
your
to
your
point,
though,
we
talked
about
this
in
chair
Vice
Chair
a
little
bit
that,
with
this
contract
we
talked
last
or
two
weeks
ago
or
three
week
or
whenever
it
was
about
the
daf,
leash
dog
issue
and
expanding
service
on
that.
So
that
may
be
something
that
well,
that's
not
included,
though
in
this
and
so
we'd
have
to
come
back
and
revisit
that.
Okay.
J
I
I
E
H
J
There
is
gulf
funding,
an
increasing
gulf
funding
of
five
hundred
and
seventy
nine
thousand
I'm
sure
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
as
we
go
on
and
and
additionally,
there
are
some
additional
costs
associated
with
IMS.
Some
of
those
are
software
maintenance,
ongoing
cost
increases
as
well
as
some
new
software.
So
as
we
speak
with
the
speak
to
that
IMS
we'll
talk
about
those
specifically
as
well.
J
J
In
public
safety,
I
got
a
rumor
which
one's
next
the
budget
includes
the
hiring
of
23
additional
police
officers
to
bring
the
total
from
funding
our
future
to
50
new
police
officers.
As
we've
as
we
met
to
discuss
this,
one
of
the
key
features
that
the
proposal
would
include
is
using
those
police
officers
to
help
all
areas
within
the
city,
including
city
parks
and
other
areas,
like
that
two
other
pieces
within
Public
Safety.
E
I
E
I
B
H
Guess,
mine
just
for
clarification
and
mine's
still
tied
to
the
police
officers
for
funding
our
future
I
thought
that
we
made
a
legislative
intent
that
we
didn't
want
to
use
the
ongoing
funding
from
funding
our
futures
for
salaries,
maybe
I'm
wrong.
But
can
we
double
check
that
I
thought
we
weren't?
Looking
at
using
salary
for
I
mean
you
know
to
do
the
actual
increase
salary
not
did
to
pay
for
the
officers,
but
looking
at
the
increase
for
contract
negotiation
through
Union.
L
D
I
B
M
B
H
J
J
We
took
nine
hundred
thousand
to
make
sure
that
we
would
maintain
that
ten
percent
could
it
have
been
slightly
higher
to
match
that
five
hundred
and
forty
two
thousand
yes,
but
we
felt
that
the
funding
was
sufficient,
that
if
we
just
budgeted
nine
hundred
thousand
going
dropping
to
fund
balance
that
that
would
ensure
that
the
city
would
maintain
that
ten
percent
requirement.
Mr.
chair.
F
Member
Johnston-
this
is
gonna,
be
a
discussion
for
later
on,
but
I
would
like
the
council
to
discuss,
setting
some
measure
of
policy
or
not,
but
something
along
the
lines
of
a
threshold
which
we
would
like
to
keep
the
fund
balance
higher
than
10
I'd,
say
14.
I
say
that
because
it's
important
generally
but
the
last
two
budget
cycles.
F
As
we
point
out,
our
sales
tax
now
exceeds
our
property
tax,
which
makes
our
budget
much
more
volatile
to
the
economy
and
if
the
economy
stalls
or
slows
or
go
south,
we
would
be
a
much
greater
risk
than
we
have
in
previous
years
for
cuts.
Unless
we
have
something
in
there.
That's
sufficient
to
cover
us
so
I
need
the
sacrifice
of
other
things,
but
I'd
like
us
in
this
cycle
to
talk
through.
Maybe
the
expectation
we
would
have
is
accounts
about
where
we
want
to
floor
on
that,
maybe
even
a
goal.
Okay,.
F
F
J
Last
slide
well,
two
more
slides,
but
one
last
slide
on
some
of
the
new
things.
One
of
the
other
new
things
is
the
quarter.
Cent
sales
tax,
the
new
county
quarter,
cent
sales
tax
for
for
transit,
related
items
within
there,
we've
budgeted
for
some
people
to
make
sure
that
the
projects
can
move
forward,
but
mostly
we've
set
that
funding
aside
2.1
million
for
urban
trails,
that's
the
nine
line
and
the
Folsom
trail,
and
then
some
funding
for
intersection
safety
and
multimodal
operations
and
neighborhood
street
safety
and
livability.
So
those
funding
have
been
set
aside.
I
Also
note
that
this
has
been
put
into
a
new
fun
class,
so
this
one
class
is
fun
class
69,
it's
under
transportation,
because
these
funds
can
only
be
spent
for
transit
and
transportation.
We
have
separated
them
out
from
the
general
fund.
They
will
be
tracked
separately,
so
anything
that
drops
so.
The
1.5
will
technically
drop
to
fund
balance
and
will
be
able
to
be
reallocated
in
the
next
fiscal
year
and
if
we
receive
more
than
four
point
seven
that
will
also
drop
to
fund
balance
and
be
able
to
be
reallocated.
I
You
know
keep
in
mind
like
we
always
discuss
right,
that
this
is
going
to
have
to
be
a
self-sustaining
fund
now.
So,
if
you
need
to
cover
these
three
positions
or
something
some
of
these
other
areas,
you're
gonna
have
to
do
that
with
inside
this
fund
class
or
you're
gonna
have
to
do
a
transfer
from
the
general
fund.
So.
B
My
question
would
be
on
the
line
nine
line
and
Folsom
urban
trail,
so
you
have
21
meant
1
million
set
aside
for
those
projects.
Do
we
are
there?
Are
those
projects
do
have
2.1
million
dollars
where
the
shovel-ready
projects
there,
or
are
we
just
trying
to
build
the
fund
to
take
care
of
this
and
John
I
know,
is
jumping
up
rose
and
is
able
is
willing
to
answer
that
question
I.
Think.
B
John
Larson's
are
a
transportation
director
that
guys
yeah.
That's
how
much
our
staff
said
is
the
shortfall
to
finish
those
two
projects
just
to
finish.
Ok,
the
central
portion
are
about
a
million
short
for
the
central
portion
of
the
nine
line
are
about
a
million
short
to
do
to
do
Folsom
trail
right,
ok,
so
remove
any
any
change
to
that
would
impact
the
construction
of
where
we
need
to
be
great.
Thank
you.
J
Lastly,
just
wanted
to
put
a
slide
up
of
where
we
sit
with
general
fund
fund
balance
as
of
current
projections.
So
these
are
the
projections
that
we
sent
along
with
budget
amendment
number
six
and
they
are
currently
showing
us
at
fourteen
point,
four
six
percent
in
general
fund
fund
balance.
Fourteen
point
four,
almost
fourteen
point:
five.
N
B
I
K
Okay
right,
so
these
are
actually
the
projections
for
the
current
fiscal
year,
so
it'll
just
give
you
an
update
of
where
we
are
right.
Now,
as
you
can.
If
you
can
read
this
slide,
hopefully
it's
a
little
bit
better
than
the
others,
but
general
fund
revenue
right
now
is
trending
above
budget
by
about
2.7
million
dollars.
It's
mostly
due
to
property
taxes
and
sales
and
use
taxes
offset
by
the
declining
revenues
from
franchise
taxes,
as
we
mentioned
before.
We
do
continue
to
monitor
and
research
the
reasons
for
that
decline
and
as
I
mentioned.
K
Hopefully,
we
can
focus
in
the
next
legislative
session,
maybe
making
some
changes
to
that.
Our
building
permit
revenues
and
our
plan
check
fees
are
higher
than
budgeted
offset
again
by
a
loss
in
the
business
parking
permits
not
being
realized.
We
are
looking
at
ways
to
maybe
reinvigorate
that
program
and
maybe
make
it
work
and
be
more
successful
in
the
future.
In
the
intergovernmental
revenue
section,
we
received
402
thousand
dollars
of
unbudgeted
reimbursement
from
Salt,
Lake
County,
so
we're
showing
a
little
bit
of
a
positive
variance
in
that
area.
K
Again,
parking
tickets
is
down
about
25
percent
issuance
from
last
year,
so
we
are
reflecting
in
our
projections
here.
A
revenue
loss
of
about
2.2
million
dollars
also
parking
meter
collections
are
down
and
we
really
feel
there's
a
strong
correlation
between
number
of
tickets
issued
in
people's.
You
know
willingness
to
pay
for
at
the
meter.
They
know
they're,
not
gonna
get
a
ticket,
so
they
don't
pay.
So
we
really
see
a
strong
correlation
there
in
the
charges
and
services
area.
The
library
parking
garage.
B
So
we're
under
were
under
budget
right
now.
I
know
what
was
projected
for
tickets
and
fines,
yes,
but
with
the
recommendation
to
increase
the
price
and
increase
the
fine,
how
I
mean
I
get
how
that
balances
budget
wise,
but
that's,
what's
always
been
a
frustration
to
me.
You
know
any
time
we
do
these
budgets.
We
we
seem
to
balance
our
bud
balance
a
part
of
the
budget
on
parking,
knowing
that
it's
not
real.
K
Well,
our
projections
are
really
based
on
the
number
of
tickets
we've
seen
being
issued
this
year,
we've
been
basing
it
on
payments
received,
not
just
tickets,
we
hope
will
be
issued,
so
we
feel
like
they're,
fairly
accurate
and
and
conservative
the
the
amount
between
the
parking
fine
increase,
as
well
as
the
parking
meter
rate
increase,
is
about
1.4
it.
It
covers
about
half
of
the
loss
that
we're
going
to
see
next
year
between
the
lower
ticket
issuance
and
the
legislative
it
impact.
So
it's
really
it's
not
covering
the
whole
thing.
Okay,.
A
Did
you
say
we
the
defines
like
are
lower?
Do
you
have
a
specific
reason
for
that,
or
what's
that
they're
having
fines
or
have
decreased?
It's
just
I,
don't
like
I'm,
not
understanding.
Things
are
lower.
Like
the
you
know,
the
tickets
and
then
the
fines,
I'm,
sorry,
the
the
parking
meters
and
then
the
fines
and
then
we're
trying
to
come
up
with
an
increase
so
that
we
can
be
back.
K
So
you
know
that's
definitely
contributing
to
that
that
issue
and
then,
whenever
you
see
that
kind
of
drop
in
the
number
of
tickets
issued,
you
see
that
a
correlating
drop
in
the
number
of
in
the
amount
of
parking
meter
revenue
we
receive
now
kind
of
word
gets
out
there
that
they're
not
really
issuing
tickets,
and
so
people
don't
pay
at
the
meter
either
right.
So
we
definitely
see
that
correlation.
So
our
hope
is
that
we,
you
know,
increase
the
meter
revenue
a
little
bit.
We
get
you
know
more
enforcement
going.
K
K
I
66
that
limited
us
to
only
a
25%
late
fee
that
will
drop
our
fines
and
late
fees
significantly,
which
has
a
decreased
score
going
forward.
So
that's
where
the
fine
discussion
comes
in
is
the
fines
will
end
up
dropping
because
the
late
fees
we
used
to
have
to
late
fees
on
expired
meters
and
three
on
everything
else.
Now
we've
got
to
drop
up
to
25%
in
total.
Thank.
K
So
just
some
of
the
major
revenue
categories.
This
is
going
to
be
where
we
are
now
in
line
with
the
projections
I.
Just
showed
you
and
then
I've
also
added
the
2020
budget.
Just
so
you
can
see
where
we're
going,
but
this
is
property.
Tax
revenues
broken
down
by
the
major
or
the
categories
that
are
inside
of
the
total
property
tax
revenues.
K
And
then
every
year
we
try
to
show
you
the
GIS
values
by
council
districts,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
where
each
just
district
is
going
at
that
every
district
seems
to
be
seeing
a
little
uptick
in
value,
which
I
think
was
expected.
So
this
is
the
residential
property.
Also
there's
one
for
the
commercial
property
by
district.
K
K
I
So
the
other
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
as
far
as
sales
tax
is,
we
have
seen
a
slowdown
over
the
last
two
years
and
actuals
collected
year
over
year.
So
when
we
budgeted
sales
tax
this
year
we
did
a
conservative
four
percent
increase,
whereas
in
previous
years
it
was
five
point
five
and
six
percent.
So
we've
seen
a
slowdown
in
the
collection.
So
we
did
a
conservative
estimate
for
sales
tax,
which
you
know
it's
point
to
council
member
Johnson
and
how
volatile
sales
tax
is.
So
we
took
a
conservative
approach
this
year.
K
So
this
next
slide
is
to
kind
of
show
you
the
areas,
the
different
sectors
where
the
sales
tax
comes
in
our
largest
sector
is
obviously
retail
trade,
that's
about
41%
of
all
of
the
sales
tax
receipts,
accommodations
and
food
service,
our
next
at
about
14%
and
wholesale
trade.
These
three
make
up
69%
of
the
sales
tax
we
receive.
K
Just
to
hone
in
on
the
top
three,
the
retail
trade
I,
like
this
yellow
line
to
show
you
the
percentage
change,
and
this
is
one
of
the
areas
that
we
are
concerned
about.
Whenever
you
see
a
drop
in
the
in
retail
trade,
it's
sort
of
an
economic
indicator
that
maybe
sells
you
know
things
are
starting
to
slow
down.
So
we've
noticed
that
retail
trade
has
dropped
by
about
two
percent
over
last
year.
So
that's
what's
caused
us
to
be
so
conservative
about
our
budgeting.
E
I
Know
that
we
have
dug
that
deep
into
it.
We
just
completed
these
slides
like
a
week
ago,
but
I
think
that
is
something
that
one
of
our
financial
analysts,
the
one
that
tracks
sales
tax,
I,
think
that
he
is
tracking
this
very
closely
and
that
he
is
digging
into
both
the
retail
sales
and
the
eating
and
drinking
right.
Both
of
those
you
see
a
decline
when
we
start
down
the
recession,
path,
retail
sales
and
eating
and
drinking
both
people
stop
eating
out
and
drinking
now
they
they
do
everything
inside
their
homes,
but.
I
But
the
increase
is
slowed
down
and
the
increase
is
in
total
right.
So
its
total
sales,
so
you'll
see
two
slides
where
it's
decreased.
Percentage
of
change,
but
you'll
see
one
slide
where
there's
a
significant
increase
in
wholesale
goods.
Percentage
of
change
as
we
go
forward
into
the
last
slide
of
categories
and.
E
F
Keeping
on
the
tax
question
going
forward,
if,
if
as
a
city,
we
are
focusing
on
a
cultural
core
concept,
we
may
be
moving
ourselves
more
to
be
depending
on
sales
tax,
I'm
guessing
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
land
depending
what
happens
to
the
inland
port
in
the
northwest
quadrant,
our
property
tax
may
not
may
not
exceed
our
sales
tax
in
the
near
future
or
the
long
future.
I'm,
not
sure
how
that
looks.
F
I
F
I
Think
you
can
the
only
the
only
difference
would
be
how
this
state
is
going
to
allocate
out
the
sales
tax
once
they
put
services
into
play
right,
that's
significant
that
can
be
significant
win
or
a
significant
loss
and
I,
don't
see
it
being
anywhere
in
between
I,
see
it
being
I.
Don't
see
that
it's
going
to
keep
us
flat,
but
I
think
that
there
that's,
where
we
need
to
focus
right
is
to
at
least
keep
us
flat
once
the
services
become
taxable,
but
it
could
potentially
hurt
us
significantly
as
well
and.
B
I
would
say
that's
one
of
the
things
that
is
most
frustrating
and
concerning
about
the
way
that
the
tax
discussion
has
taken
place
during
the
session,
and
then
you
know
hopefully
during
the
interim,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
it's,
not
just
industry-
that
that's
being
impacted
by
this,
but
I
mean
our
budget.
It's
hard
to
predict
what
things
are
going
to
look
like
once
the
legislature
is
done
with
the
changes
that
they're
gonna
make,
but
you
know
Mary
Beth's,
absolutely
right.
They
can
do
any
number
of
changes
and
it
is
gonna
have
zero.
I
We've
done
during
legislation,
we
did
several
different
scenarios
and
we've
created
a
what
I
call
lever.
So
if
you
tweak
this
lever,
what
will
happen
if
you
change
this
lever?
What
will
happen?
The
financial
analyst
who,
who
does
sales
tax
andrew,
has
done
some
great
work
where,
if
you
just
changed
this,
what
will
happen
with
our
sales
tax
or
if
you
tweak
this,
what
will
happen
with
our
sales
tax
because
we
had
to
be
prepared
during
the
legislative
session
yeah.
K
K
And
then
just
a
little
visual
on
the
parking
ticket
revenue,
you
know
we
are
budgeting,
quite
a
decrease
over
last
year
to
try
and
be
conservative
and
account
for
the
number
of
tickets
that
are
being
issued
last
year.
They
were
in
the
neighborhood
of
I.
Think
96
thousand
is
where
they
were
at
and
now
we're
just
a
little
over
70,000
budgeting
this
year.
So.
B
O
Sorry
about
that.
Thank
you.
The
intention
of
this
briefing
is
not
necessarily
to
go
over
what
the
administration
did,
which
is
give
sort
of
a
high-level
overview
of
the
technical
changes
in
the
budget,
but
to
maybe
call
out
some
of
the
policy
changes
that
might
be
of
interest
to
the
council
or
changes
in
the
budget
that
relates
specifically
more
specifically
two
areas
of
council
interest.
So
if
it's
okay,
mr.
O
We
won't
necessarily
have
the
option
to
significantly
expand
the
city
budget
and
so
then,
we'll
be
sort
of
where
we
used
to
be
which
is
sort
of
rearranging
the
PI
pieces
instead
of
adding
pie
pieces.
So
that's
a
really
really
broad
overview,
but
it
gets
to
sort
of
what
councilmember
Johnston
was
saying,
which
is
that
we're
seeing
this
trend
of
sales
tax
being
an
increasingly
large
portion
of
the
city
budget
and
just
to
touch
briefly
on
the
previous
conversation.
O
I
actually
see
an
opportunity
in
the
sales
tax
discussion
at
the
state
if
they
do
restructure
the
sales
tax
more
towards
services
and
less
towards
goods.
That
could
actually
help
offset
some
of
that
sort
of
decrease
in
retail
goods.
Because
if,
if
the
distribution
formula
is
in
our
favor,
we
happen
to
have
a
lot
of
a
service
based
economy
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
So
to
marry
best
point.
It
all
depends
on
the
details,
but
it
actually
could
help
be
a
buffer
towards
any
kind
of
future
drop
in
in
obvious
retail
sales.
O
F
O
But
well
maybe
we'll
dig
a
little
bit
deeper
into
that
with
finance
to
see
if
there's
any
micro
trends
that
they've
recognized
and
in
the
meantime,
they
are
also
involved
with
the
Chamber's
discussions
getting
input
from
businesses
on
what
they
believe.
So
going
on.
At
page
three
of
the
staff
report,
we've
sort
of
segmented
out
the
revenue
changes
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
that
relate
to
a
sort
of
base
or
growing
economy,
and
then
revenue
changes
that
relate
to
sort
of
an
affirmative
policy
choice
a
lot
of
times.
O
That
has
been
a
path
that
the
council
has
chosen,
though
the
next
is
2.6
million
a
new
growth
property
tax
revenue
I
consider
this
to
sort
of
base
revenue
increase,
because
it
reflects
the
sort
of
growing
economy
of
the
city,
new
property
development.
Things
like
that.
It's
something
that
we
weren't.
We
didn't
use
to
be
able
to
estimate,
and
we
can
now
thanks
to
finance
staffs
digging
in
on
understanding
of
the
new
property
tax
formula.
At
the
state
level,
they
did
build
in
a
sort
of
$500,000
buffer.
O
The
next
is
just
general
fund
fees,
fees
for
services,
due
largely
to
a
CPI
inflator
index
that
the
council
built-in
to
general
fund
fees
a
number
of
years
ago
that
helps
the
city
sort
of
keep
pace
with
inflation.
Previously,
the
council
would
have
to
sort
of
decide
each
year
to
increase
fees
and
there's
obviously
pros
and
cons
to
that.
But
this
helps
the
city
you
sort
of
keep
up
that
generates
about
two
hundred
ninety
thousand
dollars
and
then
the
expiration
of
the
west
temple
gateway.
Rd.
O
A
project
area
is
bringing
in
an
additional
three
hundred
forty
five
thousand
dollars
to
the
general
fund.
So
that's
the
sort
of
end
of
the
city's
investment
in
that
project
area
in
terms
of
revenue,
increases
from
policy
choices
or
new
proposals.
We've
discussed
the
sales
tax
options
and,
while
the
County
sales
tax
option
was
the
county's
policy
choice,
they,
if
you
remember,
relied
on
cities
to
adopt
resolutions
of
support
before
they
would
enact
that
sales
tax
revenue,
property
tax
stabilization
is
proposed
to
bring
in
a
million,
and
this
is
an
interesting
concept.
O
It
does
trigger
the
requirement
for
a
truth
and
taxation
hearing.
So,
from
the
perspective
of
the
state,
this
is
effectively
a
property
tax
increase
because
we
are
proposing
to
collect
more
property
tax
revenues
next
year
than
we
did
the
previous
year
or
they
were
budgeted
the
previous
year.
But
what
finance
has
pointed
out
is
that
when
we
collect
more
money
in
the
current
year,
we'll
lose
that
money
unless
we
budget
it
in
the
next
year,
and
so
this
is
a
way
to
sort
of
recognize.
O
When
we've
collected
more
money
in
the
current
year
than
we
than
we
budgeted
it
does,
there
is
sort
of
a
calculated
risk.
If
you
will
that
if
the
economy
sort
of
tanks
in
the
middle
of
the
year,
this
is
effectively
a
property
tax
increase
on
all
property
owners.
But
the
hope
is
that
the
economy
continues
to
grow
and
that
new
growth
will
pay.
That
million
dollars.
Mr.
chair.
E
E
Thank
You
Jennifer,
Bruno
I
love
how
every
year
you
explain
this
so
well
to
us.
It's
almost
like
it's
new
every
year
because-
and
let
me
I
want
you
to
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
basically,
if
we
are
to
recognize
the
growth
that
we
have
been
experiencing,
we
are
currently
experiencing
in
this
coming
budget.
We
have
to
go
through
the
through
the
state
requirements.
O
And
maybe,
to
put
a
little
finer
point
on
it,
I
think
due
to
the
state's
requirements
about
when
and
by
what
date
we
have
to
have
that
truth
in
taxation
hearing
and
by
what
date
we
have
to
adopt
a
balanced
budget
in
many
ways
the
council's
put
in
the
position
of
deciding
right
now
before
we
know,
and
so
there
is
a
little
bit
of
a
we
it's
just.
It
is
what
it
is
that
that
we
have
to
put
the
cart
before
the
horse
a
little
bit
to.
O
E
O
Right
is
in
mid-august,
yeah
and
then
you
have
to
adopt
a
balanced
budget
by
the
end
of
June
technically,
and
so
there
is
right
now
the
mayor's
budget
is
balanced
with
assuming
that
million
dollars
is
part
of
the
budget.
So
if
the
council
wants
to
pull
that
out,
obviously
that
would
mean
either
reshuffling
or
reducing
expenses.
Well,.
E
I
I
would
appreciate
your
keen
eye
and
feedback
and
and
Ben
and
the
rest
of
the
budget
team.
June
8th,
is
sort
of
that
notorious
date.
We
get
it's
also
my
birthday,
which
is
a
fun
thing
to
get
our
final
revenue
totals
on
my
birthday,
but
I
would
appreciate
your
advice
and
thinking
and
helping
us
think
through
what
that
might
mean
in
terms
of
next
year's
revenue
and
and
what
we
should
be
responsibly
doing
at
that
taxation
process.
Thank
you,
I'll.
Do
the.
O
Next
item
is
a
sort
of
similar
placeholder
until
we
get
final
information
from
the
state.
It's
a
judgment
levy
doing
this
also
triggers
the
truth
in
taxation
process,
but
this
one
is
a
little
different
and
that
it's
a
one
year,
one-time
property
tax
increase
essentially
to
pay
the
city
pay
ourselves
back
for
property
taxes
that
were
opposed
by
private
property
owners
or
centrally
assessed
property
owners.
O
The
next
is
a
decision
to
increase
parking
meter
rates
by
50
cents
from
two
to
250
an
hour.
We
discussed
it
a
little
bit
more
just
to
give
the
council
a
sense
of
what
that
generates
a
year.
It's
786,000
and
revenue
for
the
fiscal
year,
20
budget
and
the
next
item
about
parking
meter.
Fine
increases
generates
about
$700,000
in
revenue.
O
H
O
There
are
a
number
of
revenue
decreases,
the
one
that
Mary
Beth
and
her
team
mentioned
is
the
franchise
tax
decrease,
which
is
a
national
trend.
This
is
one
of
those
items
that
if
the
council
wants
the
legislative
subcommittee
to
look
at
sort
of
on
a
basis
for
next
year's
legislative
session,
we
could
certainly
put
that
on
the
list.
O
I'm
not
sure
how
simple
of
a
problem
it
is
to
solve,
but
it
seems
like
there's
a
structural
issue
there
that
every
municipality
or
that
relies
on
franchise
fees
is
facing,
and
so
that
frequently
is
the
route
that
we
go,
maybe
even
working
in
conjunction
with
the
league
and
the
next
is
fines
and
forfeitures.
This
gets
to
what
Mary
Beth
mentioned,
that
HB
366,
when
it
passed,
reduces
the
city's
flexibility
in
charging
late
fees,
because
those
had
already
been
built
into
the
budget.
O
O
This
was
to
attempt
to
get
a
better
handle
on
who
legitimately
needed,
Freight
loading
passes
and
who
really
just
needed
some
sort
of
parking
pass,
and
so
that
participation
in
that
program
has
not
been
as
robust
as
we
would
hope,
and
so
they're
they're
reducing
the
revenue
to
reflect
the
actual
participation.
But
staff
has
asked
what
kinds
of
things
we
could
do
to
get
participation
in
that
program.
O
There
are
a
number
of
positions
that
were
added
or
shifted
in
the
budget
amendment,
and
so
we've
tried
to
delineate
which
items
are
proposed
to
be
added
in
the
current
budget:
the
fiscal
year
20
budget,
that's
in
front
of
you
and
which
positions
are
essentially
already
kind
of
a
ship
that
sailed
because
you've
funded
it
in
the
budget
amendment.
So
let
staff
know
if
you
have
any
specific
questions
on
any
of
those.
There
are
a
couple
that
are
funded
by
funding
our
future
sales
tax
dollars.
O
The
three
that
you
won't
see
on
this
chart
are
the
ones
that
are
related
to
the
county
option,
option
transportation
tax,
and
that
has
to
do
with
the
way
that
Mary
Beth
mentioned
they're
handling
the
accounting
of
those
funds
and
the
FTEs
are
actually
in
that
separate
fund
class.
So
it's
almost
treated
as
a
separate
fund,
even
though
those
employees
will
essentially
be
reporting
to
the
general
fund
Department,
and
that's
not
all
that
uncommon.
O
E
O
E
O
H
O
O
Our
future
overview
we'll
get
into
more
detail
on
that
item
homelessness.
The
mayor's
proposed
budget
continues
the
process
of
consolidating
the
budget
for
homeless
services
expenses
into
the
can
budget.
This
is
all
except
for,
of
course,
Public
Safety
in
any
RDA,
affordable
housing,
development,
they're,
proposing
to
add
a
program
manager
FTE
in
this
budget
year.
O
The
next
item
is
Public
Safety
in
general,
and
staff
has
prepared
a
chart
kind
of
showing
the
three-year
history
of
a
9-1-1
fire
and
police
I'm,
realizing
that
this
chart
left
off
spending
in
fleet,
which
also
relates
to
public
safety.
Clearly,
fire
fleet
is
huge
and
police
fleet
is
huge,
so
this
sort
of
shows
in
total
there's
a
one
hundred
and
thirty
three
million
dollars
in
fiscal
year.
Twenty
proposed
to
Public
Safety,
which
is
probably
the
largest
share
of
the
city's
budget.
The
next
is
affordable
housing,
okay,
councilmember.
M
O
So
the
next
item
is
affordable,
housing,
there's
a
significant
influx
of
funding
for
affordable
housing
relating
to
the
funding,
our
future
initiative
and
I'll
leave
that
detail
to
them,
but
the
base
budget
for
hand
is
5.2
million
and
then
funding
our
future
adds
an
additional
5.2
million.
On
top
of
that,
so
essentially
doubling
the
budget
for
that.
That's
aside
from
the
RDAs
investment
in
affordable
housing,
which
is
its
own
budget,
which
we'll
go
over
next
week,
the
next
is
sustainable
funding
for
infrastructure.
O
The
proposed
budget
includes
7%
of
funding
for
CIP,
which
is
what
has
historically
been
identified
as
a
minimum.
Although
I
think
at
this
point
maybe
Cindy
would
agree
with
me
that
that
number
is
just
something
we
hang
on
to
because
we
love
it
and
it
reminds
us
of
home
or
something
I.
Don't
know
it
isn't
really.
The
study
hasn't
been
updated
in
years.
O
I
think
we
can
all
agree
that
less
funding
would
not
be
good,
and
so
I
know
that
the
current
administration
is
looking
to
update
the
capital
facilities
plan
and
the
impact
fee
facilities
plan,
which
will
be
key
to
figuring
out
exactly
how
much
of
our
general
fund
we
need
to
be
allocating.
Every
year
it
could
be
nine
percent,
so
we
I
just
want
to
put
a
flag
in
it
there
that,
just
because
we've
achieved
seven
percent,
which
is
good,
doesn't
mean
we're
sort
of
done.
Charlie.
M
M
Q
M
Capital
facilities
plan
is
that,
though,
yeah
and
all
the
meetings
and
the
deferred
maintenance
and
trying
to
come
up
with
a
ten-year
plan
and
all
this
other
stuff
that
we
have
so
it
would
be
helpful
to
kind
of
understand
and
maybe
with
public
services,
because
I
think
they're
doing
that
as
well
understand
where
those
are
in
the
process
and
if
we
can
see
some
of
that.
So
we
can
make
some
some
good
decisions
here
with
increasing.
If
need
be,
is
funding
and.
O
We'll
pass
that
along
I'll
say
that
the
last
information
that
the
last
update
I
heard
about
it
was
that
they
were
beginning
to
pull
together
some
of
that
data.
So
I'm
not
sure
that
you'll
have
it
in
time
for
the
decision-making
process
now,
but
we'll
certainly
ask
that
and
ask
them
for
a
timeline.
The
other
sort
of
new
piece
of
information
about
CIP
that
I
forgot
to
put
in
this
report
is
state
law
changed
recently.
Well,
no!
O
Actually
this
this
was
actually
related
to
an
interpretation
of
ding
state
law
that
clarified
for
us
and
I'm
smiling,
because
it
means
more
work
over
the
summer
for
Bourbon
that
the
council
needs
to
adopt
the
CIP
final
funding
log
by
September,
1st
Oh.
So
in
previous
years,
where
we've
kind
of
took
in
some
years
taken
and
we
usually
adopt
by
the
end
of
September,
sometimes
leads
and
talked
over
a
little
bit
in
this
year,
we'll
have
to
prioritize
that
on
the
agenda
to
accomplish
it
by
September
1st.
Okay,
let's
see.
B
Jennifer
yeah
I
just
want
to
say
one
thing
about
the
neighborhood
street
safety
and
livability
piece.
This
is
something
that
used
to
be
in
our
budget
years
ago.
The
way
before
me
and
I'm
very
happy
to
see
this
back
in
the
budget
this
year.
It's
something
that
I
think
all
of
us
get
complaint.
We
hear
complaints
regularly
from
constituents
about
crosswalks
safety.
You
know
other
street
safety
when
we
talk
about
Complete
Streets
as
a
council.
Typically,
we
are
only
talking
about
lane
reduction.
O
So,
just
to
make
it
clear
that
that
is
being
funded
through
the
county
option,
sales
tax,
and
so
it's
funded
directly
through
that
own.
That
separate
fund
class
been
provided
some
information
about
what
it
would
take
to
if
the
council
wanted
to
increase
the
IP
to
8%,
which
has
been
something
that
the
council
has
done
in
the
past,
it's
about
3
million
dollars
and
then
what
percentage
of
CIP
is
sort
of
already
pledged
to
debt
service?
That's
about
60%!
So
about
eight
point.
O
Five
million
is
available
to
spend
on
new
project
and
that's
actually
better
than
it's
been
in
previous
year.
So
there's
also
kind
of
a
brief
overview
of
all
the
different
ways
we
fund
infrastructure
and
then
the
overall
fiscal
health
of
the
city.
This
has
obviously
been
a
council
priority
and
that's
where
we
review
the
fund
balance
amounts
it's
about
14%
above
the
10
percent
level.
Obviously,
if
the
council
has
different
fund
balance
targets,
we
can
update
that
information.
N
O
Were
last
year,
the
legislative,
intense
and
administrative
responses
are
all
in
the
budget
book,
so
starting
on
page
C,
20
I
have
not
listed
them
all
here,
but
if
you're
interested
that's
where
they
are
one-time
revenue
versus
one-time
expenses,
the
administration
did
balance
this
budget
without
using
one-time
revenue
to
pay
for
ongoing
expenses,
which
is
a
first
that
I
can
recall.
So
we
like
that,
that's
a
great
idea.
O
There
are
a
few
sort
of
operational
reductions
in
various
departments
that,
as
council
staff,
we
always
flag
because,
while
a
department
might
be
able
to
go
one
year
without
operations
and
maintenance
or
equipment,
it's
usually
difficult
for
departments
to
go
multiple
years
without
those
line
items.
And
so,
while
there
are
one-time
reduction
this
year,
they
tend
to
come
back
in
previous
years
as
a
budget
need,
and
so
we've
flagged
that
it's
about
$319,000
in
various
departments
that
relate
to
one-time
reductions.
So
I.
O
O
See
other
expense
related
items
of
no
compensation.
There's
a
2%
proposed
increase
across
the
board
for
city
employees.
There
is
a
proposed
agreement
with
the
police
department,
that's
more
complicated
than
I
understand,
and
so
Ben
can
speak
questions
about
it,
but
it
is
funded
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget.
So
no
money
would
need
to
be
added
if
the
council
didn't
change
anything
to
that.
O
It's
our
understanding
that
fire
compensation
is
not
yet
ratified,
and
we're
not
sure
about
ask
me
so
we'll
check
on
that
I
believe
compensation
is
next
week,
so
Golf
believe
that
the
administration
covered
the
key
overall
budget
impact
of
the
proposal
for
golf.
The
overview
staff
report
goes
a
little
bit
more
into
how
the
administration
arrived
at
that
conclusion.
I
can
go
over
that
or
I'm
happy
to
just
skip
it
depending
on
what
people
feel
like.
Maybe
I'll
just
skip
I'll
just
skip
it.
O
We
have
golf
scheduled
on
the
agenda
I
believe
two
weeks
from
tonight
fleet
the
administration
is
recommending
an
additional
four
million
dollars
from
funding
our
future
and
then
an
additional
1
million
from
just
general
fund
to
increase
the
contribution
to
fleet.
This
has
been
one
of
those
funds
that,
for
years,
staff
has
flagged
as
a
structural
deficit
problem.
The
administration
has
convened
a
working
group
which
been
helped
was
able
to
help
out
with
and
they've
been
looking
at
it,
and
so
this
gets
the
fleet
fund
a
long
ways
towards
funding
sustainability.
This.
O
Million
of
the
increases
for
police
vehicles,
but
my
understanding
is
that
the
additional
1
million
would
just
be
in
general
fleet
replacement,
so
that
would
help
out
in
general
and
the
way
the
fleet
fund
works
in
order
to
the
things
are
all
kind
of
linked
and
that
if
police
vehicles
are
replaced
on
a
more
regular
basis,
that
affects
the
maintenance
budget,
which
helps
out
the
rest
of
the
fleet
fund.
Does
that
make
sense?
And
so
we
can
get
more
information
on
exactly
how
and
in
what
way.
But
it's
our
understanding
that
it
helps.
H
Q
The
council
had
asked
it
for
a
10-year
fiscally
sustainable
plan
from
fleet
and
fiscal
year.
18.
It
proposed
10
million
dollars
so
doubling
the
flat
5
million
that
they
had
received
since
2005
before
then,
and
then
it
escalated
to
13
million,
and
then
it
fluctuated
between
16
and
18
million
for
the
rest
of
the
7
year
period.
So
17
million
at
the
time
and
one
of
the
requests
were
making
to
fleet
is
if
they
have
an
updated
version
of
the
ten-year
plan
and
how
this
4
million
would
factor
into
the
ideal
funding
level.
E
When
we
get
to
that
conversation,
I've
I
hear
rumors
of
things
like
that,
we
put
it.
We
put
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
worth
of
transmission
replacement
work
into
a
vehicle
that
would
sell
at
auction
for
a
thousand
dollars
and
so
I'm
wondering
about
what
are
our
maintenance
costs
versus
and
I
know
that
we've
had
those
presentations
in
past
years.
But
it
would
be
helpful
when
we
get
to
the
fleet
discussion
with
as
many
new
council
members
as
we
have
to
revisit
what
those
trade-offs
are
for
decreased
investment.
Q
One
thing
I'll
add
is
the
four
million
dollar
increase
for
police
fleet
would
allow
the
police
fleet
to
be
turned
over
every
five
to
six
years
so
that
you
are
selling
the
vehicle
for
the
resale
value
and
minimizing
the
maintenance
costs.
This
is
the
best
practice
in
the
industry
is
to
sell
the
vehicle
within
five
to
six
years,
especially
police
vehicles
which
are
in
office,
and
the
usage
of
the
vehicle
is
usually
two
and
a
half
times.
What's
on
the
odometer,
because
they're
left
running
and
sitting
so
frequently
Cindy
just.
M
Q
Last
thing
on
fleet
I
don't
want
to
belabor
the
discussion
in
response
that
comes
of
members
questions
earlier.
The
choice
to
get
hybrid
sedans
versus
other
SUV
vehicles
was
discussed
in
the
fleet
committee
and
the
fleet
committee
had
recommended
the
sedans
because
you
would
get
more
of
them,
whereas
the
SUVs
were
more
expensive.
So
for
the
same
four
million
dollars,
you
would
get
about
three
fewer
vehicles
total,
so
that
was
that
was
the
trade-off
and
there's
additional
information
about
the
sustainability
goals
for
the
city
to
output
from
using
the
hybrid
versus
the
non-hybrid.
B
That
and
I
would
also
be
interested.
You
know,
based
on
my
earlier
question,
to
Jennifer
about
you
know
how
many
normal
or
regular
police
cars.
You
know
what
what
that
for
million
dollars
would
be
for
regular
police
cars
for
the
hybrid
sedans
and
then
hybrid
SUVs
as
well,
because
I
think
that
they're
I
mean
we
have
a
number
of
competing
requirements
in
the
city.
Sustainability
is
one
of
them,
but
it's
not
the
only
and
so
I
think
we're
gonna
have
to
look
at.
O
The
next
item
is
health
insurance.
The
city
a
number
of
years
ago
switched
to
an
HSA
model.
A
high
deductible
health
savings
account
model.
Each
high
deductible
health
plan
is
still
proposing
to
donate
750
for
a
single
employee
and
1500
for
a
double
and
a
family
into
the
health
savings
accounts
to
help
offset
with
the
high
deductible.
It's
resulted
in
significant
claims
savings
and
which
has
helped
the
city's
premium
increases
manage
the
city's
premium
increases.
The
city's
premium
increases
proposed
to
be
about
seven
and
a
half
percent.
O
This
year
the
administration
is
proposing
a
premium
holiday
which
will
help
offset
this
cost
for
the
average
employee.
So
that's
been
a
unique
sort
of
tool
that
the
city
has
used
to
manage.
Health
insurance,
expectant
expenses,
which
a
lot
of
other
companies
are
struggling
with
retirement,
is
a
cost
that
we
can't
control.
O
The
costs
are
not
projected
to
go
up
significantly
this
year,
but
I
always
like
it
every
year,
as
one
of
those
things
that
subject
to
whatever
urs
tells
us,
it
could
change.
So
this
year
is
good
news
on
that,
and
then
every
year
the
council
is
interested
in
objectives
and
measurements
for
each
department.
We've
noticed
that
each
department
write-up
has
included
objectives
and
measurements
that
the
departments
are
tracking
and
so
we'll
include
those
as
relevant
in
the
various
sort
of
department,
specific
reports.
O
B
Could
try,
though
it's
the
fiscal
year
2019
2020
budget,
the
overview
from
the
Department
of
Economic
Development
Alison
Rowan
from
our
staff,
is
going
to
introduce
this
as
well
as
Sylvia,
Richards
and
then
Lara
Fritz
will
join
them
at
the
table
as
well.
After
their
presentation,
we
will
have
a
break.
H
The
total
overall
budget
would
be
about
forty
nine
thousand
dollars
higher
than
last
year's,
and
that
is
that
religious
reflects
the
standard
changes
to
personnel
services
that
are,
but
that
we
see
across
the
board
and
the
city
or
virtually
across
the
board
in
the
city.
There's
also
a
reduction
in
this
department's
budget
for
MNO
maintenance,
sorry
management
and
operations,
and
that
would
reduce
the
department's
travel
and
training
budget
and
I
suspect
that
the
division
director,
I
sorry,
the
department
director
and
the
division
director
can
talk
a
little
more
about
that
I'll.
H
H
Two,
let's
see,
let
me
get
to
the
right
page
here-
my
apologies,
2.6
percent
over
last
year's
budget
and
there's
a
ninety
one
thousand
dollar
decrease,
and
that
relates
to
the
transition
from
last
year.
That
funding
is
no
longer
being
included
in
the
budget
and
I
wanted
to
mention
specifically
that
on
page
two
of
the
Arts
Council
and
economic
development
staff
report
item
one
under
non
departmental
transfer,
the
Arts
Council
administration
brought
to
my
attention
that
the
thirty
thirty-five
thousand
dollar
split
for
Twilight
and
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
for
living
traditions
is
incorrect.
H
That
is
not
the
split.
The
correct
split
the
Arts
Council
will
continue
its
core
programs
and
focus
as
well
on
their
pilot
programs.
Those
include
Monday's
in
the
park
living
traditions,
peace,
gardens,
garden
party,
the
busker
festival
and
expansion
of
living
traditions,
workshops
at
various
city,
city
library,
locations.
H
The
Arts
Council
has
not
yet
received
their
SAP
funding,
the
zoo
arts
and
parts
parks,
and
they
have
not
received
their
arts
funding
from
the
state
of
Utah.
So
the
true
costs
of
the
pilot
programs
and
versus
the
Twilight
funding
have
yet
to
be
identified.
So
the
Arts
Council
might
want
to
talk
more
about
that.
I.
L
Thank
you
and
I
want
to
say.
Thank
you.
It's
hard
to
believe
that
it
was
less
than
three
years
ago
that
I
sat
in
front
of
you
talking
about
becoming
the
director
of
this
new
department
and
think
in
three
years
we've
built
had
a
business
development
division.
We've
turned
around
some
challenges
at
the
Arts
Council
and
we
also
have
worked
diligently
on
the
budget
for
the
RDA
and
now
to
see
all
three
of
those
divisions
working
together.
R
Members,
so
we'll
start
with
just
a
quick
overview
in
you
know
what
we're
looking
to
do
here.
Some
of
the
key
budget
changes
council
staff
has
outlined.
We
want
to
go
over
these
at
a
high
level
now
just
there
on
the
screen
and
we'll
go
through
it
in
more
detail
as
we
go
through
our
presentation
on
what
some
of
these
funds
will
be
used
for
what
the
impact
are
on
some
of
these
reductions.
But
we
also
want
to
go
through
and
highlight
some
of
our
accomplishments
from
the
year.
R
What
what
did
you
get
for
the
funding
that
we
were
allocated
last
year?
And
then
what
are
we
thinking
at
a
high
level
for
next
year?
And
just
you
know
some
of
the
high-level
considerations
that
were
thinking
about
we've
seen
a
lot
of
movement
in
life
sciences,
IT
in
aerospace
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
capture
there.
So
we're
going
to
be
placing
a
strategic
focus
on
those
industries
over
the
next
year.
We
also
are
looking
at
looking
at
some
synergies
with
partners
and
decreasing
some
of
our
travel.
R
R
So
it's
coming
up
on
our
third
year
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
deliver
on
what
we
said
we
were
going
to
deliver
on
on
our
strategic
plan
so
that
at
a
high
level,
that's
what
we'll
be
thinking
about
for
FY
21
to
start.
You
know
talking
about
some
of
our
progress
over
the
last
couple
of
years
with
this
number
and,
if
I
can,
if
I
can
entertain
the
council
for
a
moment
on
this
number,
does
anybody
know
what
this
number
is.
R
This
is
the
number
that
says
what
our
business
is
thought
of:
Salt
Lake
City
three
years
ago,
so
on
a
scale
from
negative
100
to
positive
100.
When
we
did
our
initial
survey,
when
we
were
a
department,
we
got
negative
twenty
four
point:
nine
one.
What
that
means
is
businesses
are
actively
telling
other
businesses
to
go,
invest
somewhere
else,
they're,
not
satisfied
with
the
city
and
in
the
major
barriers
to
growth
involved.
Workforce
involves
finding
the
right
the
right
space
for
the
right
and
really
figuring
out
how
to
navigate
some
of
the
city
framework.
R
So
that's
what
we've
based
a
lot
of
our
work
on
over
the
last
couple
of
years,
and
you
know
and
that'll
take
me
to
the
next
slide.
So
this
slide
is
a
visual
representation
of
you
know
our
progress.
Last
year
we
did
the
same
survey.
We
got
negative
seven,
it
said
businesses
we're
still
saying
you
know.
R
If
you
have
to
I
guess
you
can
invest
in
Salt
Lake
City,
but
there
are
also
other
places
to
invest,
and
you
can
start
to
see
that
needle
moving
to
positive
six
and
just
to
sort
of
paint
the
picture
on
what
this
means.
This
shift
in
our
Net
Promoter
Score
is
quite
substantial.
This
isn't
something
to
skim
over.
This
is
our
customer
service
for
businesses,
and
this
is
a
survey
that
we
put
out
is
professionally
done
by
EDC
Utah,
an
independent
economic
development
organization.
R
So
what
you
could
see
on
some
of
these
scores
just
to
put
this
in
relation
we're
catching
up
to
what
some
of
these
other
scores
are
for
like
coca-cola?
Is
it
20?
Everybody
knows
that
brand
right,
EDC
Utah?
Our
partners
have
raised
their
scores
substantially
as
well
over
the
past
few
years
and
they're
at
seventeen
point.
R
Eight
nine
right
now
for
decided,
28
and
harley-davidson
has
out
of
50
and
Lara
was
at
a
great
event
with
EDC
Utah
recently,
and
they
were
talking
about
what
a
50
means
and
it
means
people
are
getting
a
tattoo
of
your
brand
on
their
body.
And
so
you
know,
we've
got
a
little
ways
to
go
at
six
percent
to
get
to
that
50
mark
and
have
that
happening
for
Salt
Lake
City
economic
development.
But
this
is
some
of
the
progress
that
we've
made
so
far.
Councilmember.
M
E
Happen
can
I
ask
a
question
not
for
right
now,
but
I
would
love
to
learn
more
about
and
I
know.
In
past
years
you
talk
to
us
about
what
businesses
are
surveyed
and,
of
course,
they
respond
of
their
own
accord,
but
I'd
love
to
learn
more
about
the
downtown
businesses
versus
locally
owned
businesses,
and
obviously
we
have
some
big
national
brands.
Here
too,.
L
We
didn't
just
transmit
to
the
mayor's
office.
That'll
come
to
you
a
quick
overview
of
this
short
survey
that
we
did,
that
does
sort
of
show
who
responded
to
it.
This
time,
I'm
not
sure
it
included
where.
But
we
can
ask
you
to
see
huge
how
to
pull
that
data
for
us,
but
you
will
get
that
transmittal
imminently.
It.
E
R
Any
questions
about
this
slide
and
one
more
thing
to
note
we're
working
with
EDC
Utah
to
say
you
know
based
off
of
the
surveys.
What
are
the
most
strategic
things
that
we
could
be
doing
to
help
raise
that
score
moving
forward
as
well,
so
that
we're
not
doing
it
blindly.
Of
course
we-
and
this
takes
me
into
the
next
slide.
R
You
know
we
are
very
intentional
about
what
we
do
and
you
know
we've
done
almost
800
site
visits
to
local
companies
that
have
that
has
really
contributed
to
businesses
having
a
better
perception
of
doing
business
in
Salt,
Lake,
City,
we've
informed
them
of
resources
and
where
they're
at
we've
helped
them
navigate
the
city
process.
We've
really
broken
down
those
barriers,
I,
don't
know
if
councilmembers
have
seen
or
taken
the
business
resource
survey.
Quiz,
that's
on
our
website
right
now,
but
it
helps
you
understand.
R
What
are
the
resources
not
only
financially,
because
that
can
be
such
a
complex
landscape
to
navigate
as
a
small
business
in
particular,
but
informational
ones?
We
have
open
counter.
We
have
so
many
great
resources
in
the
city
and
it
spits
out.
You
take
some,
it's
eight
simple
questions
and
it
puts
out
for
you
hey
what
what
resources
should
I
be
considering
as
a
small
business,
and
so
that's
something
that's
on
our
website
now
and
as
council
members.
R
We
would
ask
you
guys
if
you're
you're,
having
questions
from
businesses
about
this
in
your
district,
too
feel
free
to
share
that
and
it's
a
great
resource
for
businesses.
We'd
also
like
to
encourage
we
set
site
visits
as
a
metric-
and
this
is
very
intentional
for
us
and
our
engagement
with
the
business
community
because
we
feel
like
this
is
a
great
way
for
us
to
have
a
pulse,
but
also
it
pushes
us
to
go
out
into
the
community.
We
don't
just
do
it
as
a
reactive
but
as
a
proactive
measure.
R
60%
of
our
site
visits
west
of
I-15.
We
noticed
that
business
is
on
the
west.
Side
had
different
needs
and
businesses
on
the
east
side,
but
most
of
our
natural
course
of
business
took
us
to
site
visits
on
the
east
side.
So
to
remedy
that
we
really
did
open
up
our
networks
and
and
really
did
door
knocking
on
the
west
side.
R
We
had
got
referrals
to
get
up
to
the
number
where
were
13
site
visits
away
now
from
meeting
our
mark
of
a
hundred
and
eighty
site
visits
on
the
west
side,
and
we've
learned
so
much
about
you
know
some
of
the
translation
barriers
to
just
micro
loan
funds
are
a
critical
thing
on
the
west
side,
as
opposed
to
some
of
the
other
standard
offerings
that
we
have
in
the
city.
So
it's
informing
us
on
how
to
partner
with
other
organizations
to
find
resources
for
local
businesses
as
well
as
how
to
communicate
with
those
businesses.
R
So
some
of
our
FY
19
wins
so
far.
This
is
just
a
standard
like
logo
sheet
of
some
of
our
wins,
but
one
of
the
things
too,
that
we
take
seriously
is
in
our
metrics.
Wins
doesn't
just
mean
a
celebration
of
a
company
investing
here.
It
stands
for
written
impact,
narrative
statements,
so
it
means
when
a
business
publishes
its
the
city's
involvement
in
their
investment
in
the
city
in
documents.
What
we
did
to
help
that
business
invest
here.
R
So
it's
beyond
a
success
right
where
a
company
is
just,
we
really
did
help
the
company,
but
for
one
reason
or
another
it
wasn't
publicly
published.
So
this
is
the
most
quality
metric
in
terms
of
making
a
company
making
an
investment
and
documenting
our
involvement
in
helping
that
investment
happen.
So.
L
Local
businesses
that
are
expanding
so
polarity
te
was
a
company
that
has
expanded
here.
Health
is
new
to
the
market.
Dis
genex
is
an
expansion.
Olive
in
cocoa
is
a
utah-based
company,
expanding
their
distribution
industry,
of
course,
they're
a
Denver
based
developer
who's
coming
in
and
making
investments
all
over
the
Granary
district
and
so
dry
spell
new
startup
entrepreneur.
So
really
it
just
kind
of
a
broad
perspective
from
expansions
to
new
companies
moving
into
market
great.
B
Because
I
think
that's
good
I,
think
that
you
know
recruiting
local
business
and
and
retaining
local
business
is
important,
but
you
know
it's
we're
much.
We
can't
just
rely
on
that.
You
know.
One
of
the
things
that
I
was
always
very
supportive
about
was
was
having
economic
development
split
out
into
its
own
Department
I.
Think
that
you
know
that
has
needed
to
happen
for
a
long
time.
What
I'm
really
worried
about
with
this
budget,
though,
is
that
it
looks
like
now
that
you've
been.
B
You
know
that
we
have
an
organization
where
you're
actually
able
to
go
and
recruit
business.
We
eliminate
the
travel
budget.
So
how
can
you
do
your
job?
I
mean
your
job
is
to
go
out
and
find
more
business
and
recruit
businesses
to
come
here,
and
that
means
you're
gonna
have
to
travel,
you're
gonna
have
to
go,
and
you
know
visit
companies
where
they
are
how
how
does
that
work?
If
you
can't
travel
and-
and
just
you
know,
focusing
on
local
business,
isn't
enough
and
my
I
just
don't
see
that
being
enough?
R
So
in
our
metrics
one
of
the
impacts
that
we've
seen
we
do
a
lot
about
out
of
market
travel
from
everything
everything
from
select
USA,
which
is
recruiting
in
foreign
companies
to
which
Stadler
was
actually
originally
a
select
USA
project
which
ended
up
here
in
Salt,
Lake
City
to
you
know.
If
we
have
a
project
like
project
Eagle,
the
individual
Amazon
deals
that
we
go
out
and
travel
out
of
market
to
you
know
some
of
those
are
we.
R
We
received
a
lead,
that
is
a
strong
lead
and
some
of
it
we're
prospecting
a
lot
out
of
market,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we've
cut
back
on
in
FY
20s
a
lot
of
the
prospecting
out
of
market,
and
so
you
can
see
that
reflected
in
our
metrics.
We've
cut
our
leads
down
by
50
leads
and
our
opportunities
down
by
10
in
the
future.
As
we
develop
our
sales
force
more,
we
can
be
even
more
accurate
and
what
that
means.
R
But
this
is
a
rough
estimate
that
we've
received
from
some
of
the
people
working
the
numbers
behind
the
scenes
on
what
that
impact
will
be
and
how
we
should
how
we
should
set
our
metrics
to
correspond
with
the
travel
reduction.
The
travel
reduction
is
about
25
percent
of
our
overall
travel
budget,
and
so
it's
not
a
complete
cut,
but
it
is
a
decrease
in
what
we've
had
previously.
R
E
You
for
explaining
that
a
little
bit
I'm
wondering,
though,
if
the
back
to
that
slide.
If
you
wouldn't
mind,
if
the
if
these
decreases
are
a
response
to
the
administration
asking
you
to
trim
your
budget
and
not
necessarily
what
you'd
hope
to
accomplish
in
the
coming
year
without
travel
decreases
well,.
R
Budget
constraints
do
play
into
some
of
the
metrics,
of
course,
because
we
it's
very
difficult
to
keep
up
with
the
same
amount
of
leads
if
you
are
not
allowed
to
prospect
out
of
market,
and
so
that
does
impact
the
metrics
to
some
extent.
But
this
is
this
also,
you
know
the
the
simple
answer
is
yes,
it
gives
us
more
time
here
locally
as
well,
to
focus
on
local
businesses.
So
it's
just
a
trade
off
in
terms
of
how
we
spend
our
time
as
well
and.
E
I
think
to
look
at
the
numbers
and
say
well,
like
I
guess
I'm
wondering
about
if
we
could
wait
those
metrics.
If
you
could
say
you
know
what
site
visits
are
really
they're
local
they're
affordable.
We
can
do
a
few
in
a
day,
but
the
the
impact
may
be
in
our
Net,
Promoter,
Score
or
I.
Guess
I'm
wondering
when
it
comes
to
the
bottom
line.
E
How
do
we
wait
these
metrics
so
that
we
can
say
so
that
the
council
can
appropriately
evaluate
where
we
should
concentrate
investment
if
it
if
we
want
it
to
be
different
than
what
the
recommended
budget
looks
like
and
where
are
those
greatest
opportunities
for
your
department
to
help
our
economy
flourish?
You
know
what
I
mean
that
site
visits
aren't
necessarily
the
same
as
wins
or
out-of-state
visits.
So
can
you
help
us
understand
if
there's
some
waiting
to
the
opportunity
from
a
budget
aspect,
the.
R
Way
that
we
think
about
our
metric
is
really
twofold:
one
is
sort
of
customer
service
right.
How
are
we
providing
for
businesses
here
versus
you
know,
sailes
right?
How
do
we
sell
a
new
company
on
coming
in
and
it's
hard
to
draw
an
exact
line
in
the
sand
on
where
that
is
because
oftentimes,
if
business
is,
if
you're
providing
good
customer
service
locally
businesses
here
will
also
say
good
things
about
your
city
and
investing
here,
and
that
alone
may
recruit
new
businesses
in
right.
So
drawing
that
line
is
a
little
bit
difficult.
R
So
it's
all
about
strategy
and
what
you
know,
what
we're
doing
with
the
funds
and
spending
more
time
locally
here
we're
trying
to
focus
on
the
network
promoter
score
a
little
bit
more
to
increase
the
recruitment
in
that
way.
But
we
can
look
at
some
more
the
data
in
depth
that
we
can
get
you
on.
What
exactly
that
means
and
provide
that
to
the
council,
but
just
very,
roughly
speaking,
that's
some
of
the
thought
process
in
this
budget.
I.
L
Think
the
most
important
metric
for
us
to
take
a
look
at
and
we
can
get
you
this
data-
is
what
it
costs
us
to
bring
in
an
out
of
market
company
and
we've
have
a
couple
of
those
examples,
and
then
we
can
then
compare
that
against
an
expansion
and
what
it
costs
us
to
do,
an
expansion
that
won't
be
scientific,
but
at
least
we'll
give
you
an
idea
of
what
it
takes
to
bring
in
a
new
company.
Thank
you
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
R
R
Don't
know
if
you
councilmembers
have
heard
of
that,
but
as
we've
briefed
the
council
a
few
times
before,
this
is
a
historic
event
for
the
city
and
it's
the
first
time
that
the
United
Nations
has
ever
moved
out
of
their
extraterritorial
property
in
New,
York
City
to
go
onto
US
soil,
and
so
this
is
a
really
big
deal
for
our
community
and
something
that
we
would
invite.
Council
members
to
attend.
Registration
is
now
open.
So
the
UN's
even
told
me
Ben.
R
We
won't
allow
you
on
site
if
you
don't
register
so
I,
don't
like
to
encourage
council
members
to
register
as
well.
Another
date
to
save
on
your
calendar
is
June
9
through
11,
so
this
is
e
future
forum.
So
this
is
where
all
economic
development
professionals
nationwide
come
and
talk
about
what
sort
of
emerging
technologies?
What
sort
of
future
leaning
policies
economic
developers
across
the
country
are
thinking
about
and
we're
fortunate
enough
to
be
hosting
them
here
in
less
than
a
month?
R
L
The
sort
of
impetus
behind
the
site,
selectors
was
EDC,
Utah
had
done
a
survey
and
it
said
that
if
site
selectors
have
been
to
Utah,
they
were
more
likely
to
recommend
Utah
and
so
what
better
way
than
to
bring
in
all
50
of
them
for
their
conference
and
showcase
Utah.
And
so
it
was
an
outstanding
event.
And
thank
you
I
know.
R
S
Hi,
thanks
for
having
me
I
hope
that
we'll
see
you
all
at
living
traditions
this
weekend
with
your
families,
rain
or
shine.
Looking
like
rain,
we
wanted
to
kind
of
highlight
some
of
our
successes
this
year
and
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
direction
we're
going.
Living
traditions
is
seeing
growth
as
a
program.
This
program
is
a
high
priority
for
me
this
year
we're
trying
out
a
new
model
and
expansion
of
our
programming,
which
includes
workshops,
we've
strategically
partnered
with
the
Salt
Lake
City
Library.
S
In
order
to
implement
these
not
only
for
the
festival
but
citywide
at
library
branches
in
the
future,
so
we
have
15
new
workshops
with
various
cultural
groups
that
are
happening
at
the
festival.
We
had
a
record
number
of
applicants
of
food
vendors
at
the
festival,
which
means
our.
We
know
that
the
demographics
in
our
community
are
changing
and
diversifying,
and
that
was
really
exciting
to
see
that
a
lot
of
first-time
participants
to
this
festival
this
year
in
in
kind
of
all
of
our
categories-
craft
performance,
art
food.
S
S
We
have
88
performing
groups
this
year,
six
other
first-time
participants
that
are
in
those
performing
arts
groups,
and
this
program
is
one
that
we
were
tasked
with
last
year
of
expanding
programs
and
included
the
mondays
in
the
park
series
at
Liberty
Park
and
the
fall
garden
party
at
the
peace
garden.
So
we're
looking
at
increasing
our
geographic
reach
and
reached
more
cultural
communities
in
the
city.
So
that's
part
of
that
programming
and
we
plan
to
continue
those
programs
in
the
future
and
hope
to
because
we've
deemed
them
successful.
S
Twilight
concert
series
Ben,
asked
me
to
make
images
fit
into
the
template
and
that's
hard
for
arts
people.
We
are
really
excited
about
the
community
response
that
we're
seeing
so
far
for
the
Twilight
concert
series.
This
year
we
found
a
successful
model
that
worked
last
year
and
felt
like
from
community
feedback.
S
Some
of
the
goals
that
we
set
for
this
year
so
far
for
the
program
is
just
real
diversity
in
lineup,
so
that
we
see
inclusion
of
for
all
city
residents
and
representation.
So
we
prioritized
historically
underrepresented
groups
and
we
were
able
to
kind
of
achieve
that
with
including
groups
like
women
in
music,
LGBTQ
communities,
people
of
color
and
a
really
kind
of
broad
range
of
performers,
so
that
residents
feel
like
they're
represented
so
far.
We
have
more
VIP
sales
than
we
did
last
year
and
we're
really
excited
about
the
continuation
of
the
program
and
council.
L
Members
I
just
want
to
remind
you
that,
just
in
here
two
years
ago
we
were
having
some
really
difficult
conversations
about
Twilight
and
by
entering
into
the
public-private
partnership.
Last
year,
as
Felicia
said,
we
did
find
a
model
that
has
worked
and
we're
excited
about
continuing
a
public-private
partnership
that
allows
for
the
city
to
limit
its
exposure
on
the
cost
of
Twilight.
S
The
public
art
program,
just
for
example,
this
year
I'm,
received
a
record
number
of
applications
for
our.
We
compared
it
to
another,
nationally
open
project
last
year,
which
received
136
applications.
Last
year
this
year
we
saw
318
applications
and
we
saw
a
higher
proportion
of
Utah
artists
apply
for
those
projects
and
we
ever
had,
which
is
a
real
success,
because
it
can
be
challenging
to
get
you
two
artists
to
compete
for
these
larger
commissions.
S
So
that
was
something
we
really
strived
for
and
two
of
those
recommendations
out
of
three
were
local
that
have
gone
on
to
mayor's
office.
So
we're
really
excited
about
seeing
an
increase
in
that
in
the
last
year
we
completed,
of
course,
the
granary
mural
projects
with
link
cooperation
with
local
businesses
in
Utah
artists
and
we're
we're
prioritizing
again
geographic
distribution
in
projects
around
the
city.
So
we
have
the
Salt
Lake
City
Airport,
coming
up
Glendale
Park
nine
line
bike
park,
north
temple,
underpass,
was
just
completed
and
fire
station
number
three.
S
E
Thanks
Felice
yeah,
this
is
sort
of
a
curveball,
but
today,
council,
member
of
Aldo,
Moros
and
I
had
the
chance
to
tour
the
two
new
yet
to
open
homeless
resource
centers,
and
we
were
kind
of
struck
with
the
group
that
we
were
with
how
stark
the
dorms
are
at
the
five
rooms
where
people
will
be
where
the
bunks
will
be
essentially
in
both
of
the
buildings.
E
So
there's
ten
dormitories
and
the
big
white
tall,
two-story
kind
of
height
ceiling
in
those
spaces
made
us
think
about
the
opportunity,
perhaps
to
get
some
mural
art
in
there
to
sort
of
warm
the
space
and
soften
it.
And
so
that
is
something
that,
in
the
past
were
like
when
Derrick
brought
the
idea
to
I
think
it
was
to
the
counselor,
where
we
being
the
RDA.
When
we
did,
it
was
to
the
RDA
for
the
granary
mural
project.
We
kind
of
like
made
that
up
in
a
way,
and
it
worked
really
well
I.
E
Think
I
don't
want
to
just
shove
some
money
in
and
say:
let's
make
it
happen,
so
I
wonder
if
we
could
talk
more
and
in
this
budget
process
about
how
perhaps
the
city
could
help
to
infuse
some
art
that
works
with
the
needs
of
the
space
which
there's
a
lot
of
you
know,
cleaning,
needs
and
sort
of
the
room.
You
can
almost
spray
it
down.
E
It's
built
that
way
on
purpose,
and
so
it's
I'm
not
talking
about
oil
paintings,
but
maybe
more
like
a
digital
medium,
a
printed
medium
in
that
way,
but
I
wanted
to
insert
that.
That's
something
I'm
interested
in
talking
about
in
this
budget
process
and
I
think
that
the
RDA
and
Arts
Council
have
done
a
really
wonderful
job
recently
around
working
with
local
artists
to
make
some
of
those
projects
happen.
This
is
a
different
need,
but
it
would
be
a
it
would
be
a
really
wonderful
asset
to
those
buildings.
Then
I
think
shelter.
S
I'm
I'm
still
sort
of
learning
about
some
of
the
structure
and
funding
mechanisms
of
public
art
in
the
city,
which
is
vastly
more
complicated
than
at
the
state
and
I
would
never
say
no
to
more
funding
for
public
art
and
and
how
that
happens
for
capital
facility.
Construction
again
is
a
little
bit
different
because
there's
not
a
1%
policy
across
all
construction
and
in
all
programs
and
I
think
what
we're
looking
at
right
now.
M
But
but
have
them
understand
that
maybe
there
is
a
1%
policy.
Maybe
there
is
something
that,
with
each
of
if
we're
giving
you
money,
part
of
that
is
giving
back
or
we're
taking
out
1%
for
public
art
or
I
think
that's
a
policy
discussion.
We
can
certainly
have
and
start
to
kind
of
incorporate
some
of
these
ideas
and
actually
that
I
hope
that
we
can
have
soon
so
I.
E
S
This
is
an
example
of
a
new
pilot
program
that
we
tried
last
year
and
are
continuing
this
year.
It's
documentation
from
the
busker
fest
on
Regent
Street
70
over
70
artists
were
presented
in
2000
attendees
in
its
first
year,
and
we
identified
sort
of
a
gap
in
the
community
in
serving
the
street
performer
and
bus
community,
and-
and
this
is
sort
of
a
goal
towards
working
towards
ordinance,
revisions
and
education,
about
how
these
kind
of
artists
can
function
in
our
community.
S
Future
goals.
I
just
want
to
talk
about
sort
of
broad
goals.
You
know
I'm
looking
at
Inc,
like
we
sort
of
had
talked
about
before
including
city
residents,
in
the
way
that
we
think
about
trees
and
streets
and
waste,
and
the
arts
as
a
city
service
for
also
more
inclusive
demographic
and
geographic
reach
in
the
community
and
equity
and
access
and
and
broad
a
broad
look
at
different
artistic
disciplines
and
needs
that
aren't
being
served
in
the
community.
S
Because
what
you've
seen
is
just
sort
of
a
sampling
and
some
of
our
programs
in
the
community.
You'll
kind
of
recall
that
the
council
had
allocated
funding
to
kind
of
explore
ways
for
the
Arts
Council
to
improve
and
help
clarify
some
of
the
challenges
with
the
foundation
and
the
city
relationship.
And
at
the
time
the
department
had
recommended
a
split
with
the
two
entities.
S
But
no
decisions
were
made
and
then
the
the
board
convened
with
the
department
in
the
city
and
sort
of
assessed,
pros
and
cons
and
different
options
for
how
we
would
operate
going
forward
and
and
a
few
options
sort
of
came
up.
One
being
to
maintain
the
current
model.
Another
split
and
be
an
independent
foundation
and
the
other.
To
only
be
a
city
division
and
really
all
the
entities
kind
of
came
together
and
said,
we
don't
really
have
enough
information
to
formalize
this
decision
and
we
need
to
you,
know,
kind
of
take
a
step
back.
S
This
was
a
very
internal
decision.
We
need
to
do
some
community
listening
and
so
we
kind
of
slowed
down
asked
how
we
could
best
serve
the
community
completed
the
gap.
Analysis
with
that
funding
and-
and
you
know,
with
my
leadership
transition
here
and
really
clarified-
that
we
want
to
maintain
the
same
structure
and
that
it's
really
this
unprecedented
model
for
moving
forward
where
we
can
leverage
the
assets
of
both.
S
You
know
maintaining
this
sort
of
hybrid
structure
that
we
have
and
that
we
really
need
to
work
to
kind
of
clarify
the
roles
of
those
two
and
continue
the
work
of
additional
stakeholder
engagement,
board,
training
organization
and
human
resources,
analysis
and
consulting,
and
so
we
are
continuing
that
work
to
clarify
some
of
those
challenges
and-
and
we
plan
to
finish
doing
that
process
in
this
calendar
year
fiscal
year.
Really
with
that.
E
S
E
S
So
so
we
really
have
kind
of
decided
that
we're
not
looking
at
a
separation
and-
and
originally
it
was
a
reorganization,
and
so
what
we
are
doing
is
continuing
with
Union
creative
stakeholder
engagement
with
the
community,
we're
under
contract
with
them
right
now
to
do
more
listening
out
in
the
community,
and
one
of
the
needs
that
we
identified
was
really
that
we
had
some
big
visibility,
kind
of
issues
in
the
community
and
needed
to
be
more
present
in
the
community.
So
so
we're
not
we're
not
planning
for
a
separation
process
did
that.
R
This
may
be
helpful
context
in
some
of
the
public
engagement
that
took
place,
one
of
the
things
that
the
community
came
back
and
said,
of
course,
was
you
know,
we
understand
the
city's
perspective
and
why
it
would
be
important
to
separate,
but
a
lot
of
that
risk
was
carried
based
off
of
Twilight,
which
that
risk
under
the
current
model
was
removed.
So
what
the
the
question
was
posed
back?
What
is
this
really?
R
S
Other
parts
of
that
process,
with
the
consultation
is
looking
at.
You
know:
board
development
training
our
board
to
clarify
the
role
between
the
city
and
the
foundation,
looking
at
redrafting
our
bylaws
in
with
consultation
and
then
coming
back
to
the
city
and
making
sure
their
alignment
in
alignment
with
city
ordinance,
because
we're
not
planning
for
a
separation.
We're
looking
at
new
fundraising
strategies
that
that
we
haven't
employed
before,
where
we're
happy
to
report
that
we've
seen
a
couple.
Funders
come
back
to
Twilight,
because
they're
really
excited
about
it.
S
We've
exceeded
our
fundraising
goals
for
the
living
traditions
festival
this
year
and
we
have
other
sources
of
funding
outside
of
the
city
which
are
from
the
state
and
the
county
and
private
foundations.
So
we
see
a
lot
of
other
community
support
and-
and
we
you
know,
the
city
is
our
largest
support
of
our
source
of
funding,
but
we're
hoping
for
that
holistic
support
of
all
of
our
programs
as
well.
So.
E
L
L
S
A
priority
and
we're
looking
at
by
the
end
of
June
having
some
assessment
from
a
consultant
done
about
the
best
direction
to
go
with
that.
We
have
drafts
in
progress
with
our
board
and
when
we
understand
what
that
process
might
look
like
we're
absolutely
going
to
involve
stakeholders
and
in
clarifying
that,
and
we
feel
on
a
really
good
path.
To
now
that
we
have
leadership
in
our
organization.
S
M
M
I
noticed
in
the
budget
that
there
wasn't
any
proposal
for
additional,
FTEs
and
I
know
you
guys
are
doing
a
ton
of
work.
I
know
that
by
doing
all
of
this
work,
we've
increased
that
score
from
a
negative
25
up
by
a
lot
of
points
in
two
years
to
almost
three
years.
They
know
that
we
are
looking
at
this
accreditation
with
the
International
Department,
whatever
of
economic
development,
something
which
is
awesome
and
I
learned
yesterday,
we'd
be
one
of
65
economic
development
departments
in
the
country
that
would
have
this
accredit
datian.
M
Out
of
what
five
thousand
eight
five
thousand
I
mean
is
huge,
and
that
is
because
of
the
amount
of
work
that
all
of
you
are
doing,
and
probably
the
overtime
and
the
sleepless
night,
and
then
the
UN
and
all
of
these
events
that
are
happening
so
I'm,
curious,
I,
say
all
of
this.
To
not
just
praise
you
but
to
say
what
are
you
fully
staffed
right
now?
Do
you
have
the
funding
to
be
fully
staffed
if
you're
not
and
how
many
more
reasonable
people
would
you
not
reasonable
people
reasonably
people?
L
L
There
is
definitely
challenges
when
somebody
goes
out
on
leave
either
you
know
parental
leave
or
due
to
a
medical
issue,
and
you
know
we
just
don't
have
a
deep
bench
to
pick
up
that
work.
The
other
challenge
that
we're
seeing
is,
as
we
are,
continuing
to
grow.
Our
international
brand
Ben
is
wearing
multiple
hats,
and
so
we
really
don't
have
a
dedicated
international
person,
and
so
there
I
think
there
are
opportunities.
M
L
Know
I
think
the
answer
to
that
is
in
part.
Yes,
there
are
companies
that
we
would
love
to
see
locate
here
in
Utah.
That
being
said,
we
also
have
a
large
contingent
of
these
businesses
in
our
community
and
retention
is
always
more,
is
less
expensive
than
new.
It's
like
any
good
marketing
plan
right,
and
so
we
want
to
build
off
of
the
assets.
We
have
continued
to
grow
our
existing
business
base,
while
being
mindful
that
the
only
way
we
can
continue
to
grow
is
also
to
bring
in
new
companies.
A
M
L
Know
I
think
right
now,
we've
been
pretty
successful,
using
the
tools
that
we
have
in
the
city.
We
are
hearing
some
concerns
from
some
of
our
local
businesses
that
need
to
do
things
like
tenant
improvement
that
are
not
in
an
RDA
project
area
that
would
like
to
see
that
lending
limit
of
350
bump
up
because
they
are
having
a
challenge
with
local
banks,
providing
them
the
capital
to
do
that.
Tenant,
improvement
and
not
all
landlords
are
as
wonderful
as
councilmember
Rogers,
providing
a
good
tenant
improvement.
L
A
B
Other
questions
seeing
none.
Thank
you
all
for
your
presentation.
Thank
you.
We
really
appreciate
it
now:
council,
member
Mendenhall
we're
ready
for
a
break,
but
as
much
as
I
love
all
of
you
and
love
spending
time
with
with
each
of
you,
we
are
scheduled
here
for
a
40
minute
break.
Let's,
let's
come
back
at
now.
Let's
do
6:15,
we
do
have
dinner,
but
it's
portable.
So
let's
plan
on
coming
back
at
6:15,
so
that
we
can
get
home
to
families
tonight.
N
N
N
N
N
B
Sort
of
short,
break
and
sort
of
not
so
short.
The
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
also
part
of
our
budget
discussion.
The
Metropolitan
Water
District
will
be
presenting
their
issue.
Sam
Owen
from
the
council
office
will
introduce
this
topic
and
then
Mike
DeVry
general
manager,
as
well
as
Tom
Godfrey
from
the
board,
will
be
there
and
I
think
we
have
another
board
member
well.
P
Q
Hey
Sam
mr.
chair:
oh
thanks,
the
Metropolitan
Water
District
of
Salt
Lake
and
Sandy
conveys
water
to
the
customers
of
Salt
Lake
City
public
utilities
into
Sandy
City
as
well
from
the
central
utah
project
and
the
Provo
River
system.
This
year
there
is
a
small
two
percent
rate
decrease
from
the
district
to
Salt
Lake
City
customers.
Aside
from
that,
the
budgets
pretty
similar
to
last
year.
So
with
that,
mr.
chair,
okay,.
P
My
name
is
Mike
DeVries
I'm,
the
general
manager
of
the
Metropolitan
Water
District
of
Salt
Lake
and
Sandy
Thank
You,
chair
and
council
members
for
allowing
us
to
present
today.
We
appreciate
that
so
in
the
way
of
introduction.
So
tom
godfrey
is
not
only
the
Metro
chair,
but
he
is
also
the
president
of
the
Provo
River
water
users,
Association
as
well,
and
so
appreciate
him
being
here.
We
have
Don
Milne,
who
is
also
a
trustee
for
the
Metro
water
district,
and
he
serves
also
as
our
Vice
Chair
for
the
for
the
water
district.
P
Also,
we
have
Cindy
Cromer,
one
of
our
trustees
and
attendants
appreciate
her
being
here
and
Anna.
Lee
Muncie
is
my
assistant,
general
manager,
so
appreciate
everything.
She
does
appreciate
her
being
here
as
well,
and
then
also
Jesse
Stewart
with
Salt
Lake
City
Public
Utilities
appreciate
our
working
relationship
with
Public
Utilities,
so
he
and
Laura
just
do
an
outstanding
job
serving
the
public.
So
with
that,
so
as
I
go
through
the
presentation,
don't
hesitate
to
interrupt
or
interject
with
question.
P
I
I
want
to
be
sensitive
to
your
time.
So,
just
let
me
know
if
I'm
going
too
long
or
if
we
need
to
to
change
up
what
we're
doing
so.
Can
you
hear
me
okay,
so
alright
so
get
right
into
it.
Just
a
quick
background
for
most
of
you
may
be
aware
of
this,
but
in
the
way
of
introduction
the
district
was
established
in
1935
and
our
member
cities
are
Salt.
Lake,
City
and
Sandy
City
is,
as
was
mentioned
by
Sam
earlier
five
board.
P
P
City
are
the
primary
again
the
member
cities,
the
the
primary
customers
of
our
drinking
water
supply
were
a
wholesaler,
but
also
we
have
surplus
customers
that
we
sell
water
to
so
Jordan,
Valley,
Water,
Conservancy,
District
and
some
irrigate,
errs
and
and
sometimes
others
will
go
into
surplus
contracts
when
it
makes
sense
and
in
a
way
that
will
not
create
any
concerns
for
Salt,
Lake,
City
or
sandy
city.
Water
supply
they're,
always
paramount.
O
B
That
is
a
question
that
I
hear
somewhat
regularly
about
if
Salt
Lake
City,
just
because
the
watershed
that
that
we
have
and
then
the
partnership
that
we
have
with
Sandy
on
Metro
water,
I,
get
questions
about
people,
people
asking
about
the
surplus
water
contracts
and
whether
or
not
you
know
we
may
end
up
getting
ourselves
into
a
position
where
we've
signed
surplus
contracts
with
other
municipalities,
other
groups,
what
happens
in
the
case
of
drought
or
in
the
case
of
something
where
we're
having
to
roll.
Some
of
that
back
right.
You
mentioned
that.
B
P
Are
we
yeah
we
a
catalyst
to
that
problem
and-
and
the
answer
is
no
we're
careful
with
how
we
said-
oppose
contracts
great.
Thank
you,
yep,
okay.
So
this
is
just
a
summary
or
a
map.
Rather
that
shows
the
service
area,
so
sandy
city,
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
service
areas,
of
course
extend
beyond
if
they're
incorporated
boundaries,
as
you
can
see,
they're
primarily
across
the
northern
end
of
the
valley
and
eastern
side
of
the
valley
as
well.
The
the
green
area
to
the
south
west
of
the
highlighted
yellowish
color.
P
It
would
be
primarily
supplied
by
Jordan
Valley,
Water,
Conservancy
District.
As
a
side
note,
our
water
sources,
so
the
Provo
River
Project,
is,
is
our
primary
water
source
at
sixty
one
thousand
nine
hundred
acre
feet
in
a
given
year
for
a
full
allocation,
Little
Cottonwood
Creek.
Typically,
the
yield
is
about
twenty
thousand
acre
feet
and
that
usually-
and
so
that's
a
combination
of
water
rights
that
are
actually
owned
by
Salt
Lake
City
and
Sandy
City
we're
treating
on
their
behalf
central
Utah
project.
P
This
is
a
M&I
or
the
municipal
and
industrial
portion
and
that's
20,000
acre
feet
and
that
that's
a
pretty
steady
number
it's
a
taker
pace.
We
use
that
entire
amount
on
an
annual
basis
Ontario
drain
tunnel.
This
is
a
sandy
preferential
right,
as
it's
noted
there
and
that
typically
yields
about
3,200
acre
feet.
So
the
total
currently
is
about
a
hundred
five
thousand
acre
feet
per
year
and
then
you'll
note
at
the
bottom
there.
P
The
central
Utah
Project
Utah
Lake
system
has
yet
to
be
provided
to
Metro
through
the
block
noticing
process
and
that
that
will
take
place
likely
in
2021
there's
a
deferral
option
by
both
member
cities
and
and
they're
likely
going
to
exercise
that
deferral
option
based
on
feedback
we've
received
at
this
point
when
the
deferral
can
be
anywhere
from
one
to
ten
years
and
each
member
city
can
defer
any
amount
of
that
time
period.
So
any
questions
on
the
supply
before
I
move
on
so
just
really
quickly
tying
to
the
supply.
P
It's
important
I
think
to
understand
the
relationships
with
these
entities.
The
Provo
River
project
is
managed
by
the
Provo
River
water
users
Association
the
Deer
Creek
division,
part
of
the
Provo
River
Project.
It
was
developed
back
in
the
early
30s
and
then
Metropolitan
Water
District
MW
dsls
is
the
aqueduct
division
side
of
that
Salt,
Lake,
aqueduct
being
the
component
or
the
delivery
facility.
That
brings
the
water
from
Deer
Creek
to
the
Salt
Lake
Valley,
the
shareholders
of
the
Provo
River
water
users.
Association
Metro,
is
the
primary
shareholder
of
sixty
one
point.
P
Nine
percent
are
their
other
shareholders
as
well.
The
companies
have
noted
there
is
sixteen
percent
who
primarily
is
held
by
Jordan
Valley
Water
Conservancy
District.
As
far
a
shareholder
ship,
central
Utah
project
is
managed
by
the
central
Utah
Water
Conservancy,
District
and
Metro
has
the
two
petitions
one
for
the
M&I,
which
is
20,000
acre
feet
as
I
mentioned
a
minute
ago,
and
then
5600
acre
feet
forthcoming
with
us
water,
some
of
our
key
facilities.
P
This
is
located
in
Cottonwood,
Heights
pointed
Mount.
Water
treatment
plant
located
in
the
Draper
area,
has
a
capacity
of
70
million
gallons
per
day,
and
that
was
completed,
constructed
in
2007
so
and-
and
these
were
both
part
of
a
capacity
improvement
project
known
as
Metro
water
project
and
I've
shared
this
with
some
of
the
council
members
in
the
past.
So
let
me
ring
true
to
some
of
you.
Salt
Lake
aqueduct
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
is
a
key
conveyance
facility
of
water
supply
from
the
from
Deer
Creek
42
miles
long.
P
P
We
it's
in
good
condition
right
now,
but
we're
looking
at
a
potential
replacement
in
the
maybe
2035
to
2040
timeframe,
and
so
we're
we're
planning
for
and
looking
toward
that
with
our
capital
improvement
planning,
design
capacity,
113
million
gallons.
As
I've
noted
there
per
day.
Point
of
the
mountain
aqueduct
also
part
of
the
Metro
water
project,
connects
the
Little
Cottonwood
water
treatment
plant.
With
the
point
of
the
mountain
water
treatment
plant
allows
us
to
convey
drinking
water
between
the
two
plants
either
direction,
so
we
can
send
it
north.
P
We
can
pump
it
north
from
the
point
of
the
mountain
water
treatment
plant
to
supplement
deliveries
during
the
high
flow
seasons
of
the
summer,
or
we
can
provide
the
water
to
the
south,
and
we
also
have
a
connection
to
the
Jordan
Valley
Water
Conservancy
District
Jordan
aqueduct
systems
that
we
share
with
them.
That
is
at
the
point
of
mountain
water
treatment
plan
as
well.
So
we've
got
an
interconnect
to
the
west
side
of
the
valley
as
well,
which
is
a
very
beneficial
redundant
connection
of
water
systems.
P
Thermal
reservoir.
You
may
be
aware
that
so
this
is
i2
15
and
about
33
3300
South,
recently
completed
construction
on
refurbishing
or
replacing
those
reservoirs.
The
capacity
of
that
design
capacity
is
48
million,
gallons,
and,
and
so
this
is
a
very
helpful
and
a
very
important
supply
system
for
Salt
Lake
City,
both
fire
some
fire
safety
supply,
as
well
as
peaking
demand
supply,
Jordan
aqueduct
system.
P
I
just
alluded
to
this-
just
a
second
but
so
Metro
owns
2/7
of
the
Jordan
aqueduct
and
related
facilities,
which
includes
a
terminal
reservoir
on
the
Jordan
aqueduct
system
as
well,
and
also
the
Jordan
Valley
water
treatment
plant.
We
have
a
two
sevenths
ownership
interest
in
that
as
well.
Now
it
may
be.
The
importance
of
this
to
Salt
Lake
City
in
particular,
is
this.
This
provides.
This
is
a
key
supply
artery
into
the
northwest
quadrant
the
northwest
area
of
Salt
Lake
City's
distribution
system,
so
budget
revenues
so
getting
into
the
budget
now.
P
So
just
to
kind
of
help
me
understand
how
revenue
is
is
projected
and
planned
in
our
budget.
Ninety-Eight
percent
of
our
revenue
is
really
from
three
primary
sources,
so
we
have
water
sales
at
about
49%
property
taxes
is
20
at
23
percent
in
capital
assessments
at
about
26
percent
capital
assessments,
primarily
tying
back
to
the
Metro
water
project
that
I
alluded
to
a
minute
ago.
That's
not
likely
going
to
be
increasing
much
if
at
all
anytime
soon,
so
that's
gonna
be
a
pretty
static.
P
Number
property
taxes
and
I'll
talk
about
this
more
in
a
minute,
but
we're
just
letting
that
the
the
certified
rate,
the
road
we're
not
doing
anything
to
increase
that,
and,
as
you
can
see,
it's
not
it's
not
the
primary
source
of
our
revenue.
So
anyway,
it
gives
us
some
flexibility.
If
we
ever
do
need
exercise
at
triple
zero
five,
which
is
the
highest
amount
we
can
exercise
as
far
as
the
assessment
to
be
able
to
have
another
resource.
If
you
will,
if.
K
P
But
what
we
found
is
is
we
had
a
revenue
shortfall
when
we
actually
looked
at
what
was
happening
with
the
revenues?
So
we
we
went
back
to
volumetric,
beginning
in
in
2014
and
then
at
2017,
working
with
the
member
cities
sandy
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
with
some
extensive
deliberation
and
discussion
and
and
analysis
decided
that
a
fixed
rate
would
actually
be
beneficial
and
worked
to
the
to
the
best
interest
of
both
member
cities.
P
So
and
as
I've
noted
here,
it
supports
conjunctive
use
because
member
cities
are
using
water,
the
surface
water
when
it's
available
and
they're
not
worried
about
the
volumetric
rate.
So
it's
basically,
they
pay
their
fixed
amount
and
they
can
use
as
much
as
they
need
to
use
and
then
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
there's
a
predictability
from
a
budgetary
standpoint
for
both
Metro
as
well
as
the
member
cities.
P
They
can
look
at
their
budgets
and
say:
okay,
we
we
know
we
can
budget
this
amount
and
we
can
stick
to
that
still
so
just
really
quickly,
just
a
few
graphs
to
kind
of
show
what
how
that
has
played
out
over
the
years
as
far
as
how
member
cities
have
utilized
their
proportionate
amount
of
water.
This
is
an
acre
feet.
P
So
we
look
at
all
the
way
back
to
1996
is
a
period
of
record
that
we
have
as
far
as
water
sales
that
we
feel
solid
about
and
and
the
reason
being
is
that
way
as
one
member
city
decides
to
use
more
water
given
year,
it
doesn't
adversely
impact
him
financial
the
next
year,
so
there's
a
buffer.
If
you
will,
since
we're
looking
at
it
from
a
period
of
record
so
the
current
fiscal
year,
the
proportion
of
allocation
is
twenty-seven
percent.
P
Seventy
three
percent
is
noted
in
this
pie
chart
and
based
on
sandy
city's
trends
since
2017,
with
their
increased
usage,
but
again
looking
at
that
whole
period
of
record
that
has
nudged
them
up
to
twenty
eight
percent
and
sandy
in
Salt,
Lake
City
has
dropped
down
to
seventy
two
percent,
and
so
with
with
that
adjustment.
That's
that's
where
this
two
percent
decrease
for
Salt
Lake
City
comes
into
play
and
a
three
percent
increase
for
Sandy
City.
So.
E
P
E
P
You
let
it
get,
and
that's
that's
a
really
good
question
and
I
think
the
answer
right
now
is
we're
gonna
continue
to.
We
meet
monthly
with
in
our
member
cities
with
Sandy
City
Salt,
Lake
City,
public
utilities,
staff
and
the
intent
would
be
to
continue
to
discuss
this
and
dialogue
this
with
them
and
and
see
what
makes
sense
as
far
as
in
their
minds,
because
you're
right
I
mean
if,
if
it's
too
extended,
then
to
some
degree
I
mean
it
needs
to
be
reactive
right.
P
It
can't
be
too
dampened
if
it's
too
long
or
too
lengthy,
then
it
becomes
problematic,
potentially
if
it's
too
short,
there's
kind
of
the
other
end
of
that
spectrum
as
well.
You
know
if
Salt
Lake
City,
for
example,
suddenly
bumps
up
their
use.
When
you're
you
know
I,
you
know
we
don't
want
to
have
Salt
Lake
City
suddenly
have
an
impact
of
that
proportion.
Adjustment
impacting
negatively
them
as
well.
So
what
is
reasonable
is
kind
of
the
question.
E
23
years
is
too
long:
okay,
that's
my
opinion
and
that's
my
opinion
from
from
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
standpoint
and
and
working
on
some
board
there
and
looking
at
what
even
the
EPA,
which
is
a
different
subject:
I'm
not
on
the
water
board,
but
the
times
that
we
are
asked
to
calculate
into
and
then
pull
an
average
from
or
no
more
than
ten
years
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
from
a
best-practice
standpoint.
What
other
water
districts
around
the
country
do
for
pulling
that
average
where,
where
they
have
a
shared
system
like
this
and
then
I'm.
P
P
P
E
E
P
Whenever,
whenever
you'd
like
to
dialogue,
that
we
can
talk
about
that
as
well,
so
okay,
thank
you
appreciate
that
okay,
so
so,
we've
already
noted
some
of
this,
but
overall
that
adjustment
that
we
just
talked
about
and
then
looking
at
other
other
charges.
Other
other
rates
we're
also
planning
a
three
percent
rate
increase
for
all
non-member
entity,
water
sales.
So
that
would
be
two
you
know.
Jordan
Valley
is
a
good
example
or
any
of
the
irrigation
sales
that
we
do.
P
Raw
water
sales
we're
not
proposing
a
certified
tax
rate
increase
is,
as
we
mentioned,
and
in
our
capital
assessments
will
remain
static
as
well
just
quick
summary
on
operations
and
maintenance.
So
we
have
because
of
increased
volumes.
We've
had
a
little
bit
of
an
increase
in
capital
or
not
capital
chemical
expenses
rather
and
with
the
chemical
expenses.
P
One
of
the
things
that
we've
been
doing
I
mean
we've
always
gone
through
a
competitive
process,
but
we've
been
trying
to
work
through
different
approaches,
with
competitive
process,
to
help
minimize
increased
costs
on
the
chemicals
and,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we're
continuing
to
look
at
we're.
Also,
looking
at
opportunities
with
other
entities
teaming
up
with
other
entities,
water
districts
and
others
to
see
if
there
might
be
an
opportunity
for
economy
of
scale
benefit
to
find
some
additional
savings.
So
that's
another
thing:
we're
looking
at
power
costs
we're.
P
Actually
we
have
a
really
good
story
on
this
one
we're
actually
saving.
Quite
a
bit,
we've
been
a
part
of
what
is
known
as
a
strategic
energy
management
cohort
and
and
with
our
involvement,
we've
been
looking
at
and
part
of
that
analysis.
There
there's
a
third-party
consultant
that
was
hired
by
Rocky
Mountain
Power
to
help
out
with
this
process,
and
there
are
multiple
entities
involved.
I
think
sandy
City
is
one
of
the
members
and
Kern's
Improvement
District
and
a
few
others.
P
As
I've
noted
here
for
the
proposed
budget,
FY
2020,
it's
a
33
percent
increase
next
year,
twenty
five
percent
two
hundred
thousand
per
year
and
then
over
the
course
of
basically
four
years.
It's
been
about
a
two
hundred
thirty
three
percent
increase
or
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars.
So
we've
gone
from
three
hundred
thousand
and
17
to
over
a
million
dollars
for
the
projected
FY
2021
costs
and
they're
likely
to
continue
beyond
that
and
I.
Don't
know
the
projections
yet
beyond
that,
so
I
didn't
dare
estimate.
P
I've
got
projections
in
our
cash
flow,
but
central
Utah
will
likely
be
sharing
more
information
on
this.
But
the
challenge
that
Metro
has
here
is:
we
do
not
have
any
governance
control
on
that
board.
So
that's
that's.
One
of
the
challenges
is
that
we've
had
to
deal
with.
We
have
met
with
their
staff
shared
some
concerns.
With
with
these
costs
and
with
you
know,
we've
encouraged
them
to
try
to
stretch
out
the
costs.
You
know.
If
there
really
is
that
need,
can
we
have
it
over
the
course
of
more
more
years?
P
Can
it
be
more
like
a
decade
or
beyond,
and
and
the
answer
that
they
gave
us
was
known
so
anyway,
this
is
3.8
million
total
when
you
add
in
the
capital
for
our
budget.
So
it's
a
big
chunk
of
our
budget
and
not
necessarily
the
largest
supply
of
our
water,
so
Provo
River
water
users
Association.
So
we
kind
of
touched
on
this
a
little
bit
earlier,
but
just
to
kind
of
share
a
couple
of
additional
components
relating
to
the
budget.
P
If
that
is
plugged
up
or
if
there's
a
problem
with
also
some
guard
gates
that
allow
water
to
come
through
the
intake,
we
could
basically
not
be
able
to
get
the
water
that
we
need
not
only
for
the
Provo
River
project,
but
also
Century
central
Utah
project,
because
that
flows
through
Deer
Creek
as
well.
So
there's
a
big
concern
about
the
need
to
give
that
some
attention
did
you
have
a
question
your.
P
There
was
a
Bella
jure,
like
an
infant
quagga
mussel
that
was
identified
a
few
years
back
and
so
Deer
Creek
was
a
suspect
body
for
a
while,
but
all
the
recent
tests
and
there's
a
certain
period
of
time
when
they
have.
If
they
have
negative
testing
for
a
certain
period
of
time,
then
it
becomes
a
clear
body
again
and
that's
that's
where
it
is
right
now,
so
so
yeah
we.
We
don't
have
that.
P
We're
looking
at
some
additional
cost
to
the
Metro,
Water
District
we'd
be
looking
at
a
capital,
and
this
would
be
something
that
we've
already
programmed
into
our
cash
flow,
but
some
additional
capital
costs.
As
I've
noted
there.
This
would
not
be
an
additional
capital
assessment
to
the
member
cities.
It's
something
we've
already
been
planning
and
programming
in,
but
something
that
we're
looking
at
and
carefully
wanting
to
support
with
the
probe
association
and-
and
there
should
be
other
participants
in
this
from
a
cost
standpoint.
P
So
just
what
I've
noted
second
bullet
item
from
the
bottom,
so
historical
averages,
you
know
we
have
the
primary
because
it
were
the
primary
shareholder
of
this
association.
We
have
the
majority
vote
as
far
as
the
board
members
and
so
I
feel
we.
The
governance
is
really
good
there
and,
and
you
can
see,
the
annual
increases
are
pretty
pretty
reasonable.
The
total
cost
for
the
parole
association
is
about
3.3
million.
It's
on
our
budget
on
our
capital,
we're
looking
at
about
a
1.5
percent
increase.
P
So
a
couple
things
so
total
budget
for
capital,
6.4
million,
as
I've
noted,
decrease
of
about
300
10,000
and
that's
primarily
related
to
the
thermal
reservoir
recently
being
completed.
The
construction
also
an
increase
of
about
four
hundred
five
thousand
relating
to
Jordan
aqueduct
system,
capital
expenditures,
primarily
with
the
Jordan
Valley
water
treatment
plant,
some
updates
to
their
water
treatment
facilities,
the
filtration
systems
and
things
of
that
nature.
P
Condition
and
and
criticality
and
in
prioritize
capital
needs
and
and
our
capital
improvement
plan
is
actually
programmed
all
the
way
out
through
FY
2072
now.
Is
it
super
accurate
that
far
out?
No,
not
necessarily
but
but
the
point
is,
is
we're
really
careful
to
look
at
all
of
our
facilities
and
and
prioritize
the
needs
for
many
decades
out
so
debt
service,
so
switching
gears
just
a
little
bit
metro
recently
refunded
a
portion
of
our
2012,
a
bonds.
P
As
I've
noted
here,
we
were
able
to
accomplish
a
net
present
value
savings
about
of
about
2.3
million,
so
something
that
is
beneficial
for
the
the
public
that
we
serve
through
Sandy
and
Salt
Lake
City
and
then
also
a
cash
flow
savings
of
about
a
hundred
sixty
eight
thousand
annually.
We
will
continue
to
look
for
additional
refunding
opportunities,
given
the
the
way
the
economy
looks
right
now,
not
sure
if
any
will
will
pop
up,
but
we'll
continue
to
watch
carefully.
P
For
those
we
are
not
planning
to
incur
any
additional
debt
trying
to
pay
down
the
debt.
We
have
right
now,
which
is
about
two
hundred
twenty
two
million
in
principle
right
now,
and
then
our
budget
schedule.
So
so
our
tentative
budget
was
adopted,
as
noted
here
on
the
fifteenth
of
April
and
then
we'll
have
our
budget
hearing
for
our
rate
increases
that
are
proposed
on
the
20th
of
May,
so
next
Monday
at
6
p.m.
and
then
we'll
also
have
the
final
budget
considered
for
adoption
on
June
17th
so
and
I
love
this
picture.
P
B
B
E
I
want
to
ask
about
the
sort
of
broader
water
conversation
in
the
valley
about
the
Bear
River
diversion
project
and
I
wanted
to
know
how
Metro
sees
itself
as
a
steward
of
this
a
great
deal
of
this
resource
in
the
yeah
in
the
valley
and
how
you
see
yourself
in
terms
of
that.
The
potential
impacts
of
that
kind
of
a
project
on
not
necessarily
Metro
district,
but
on
Salt
Lake,
City
yeah.
D
P
You
know
we,
so
the
Bear
River
project
is
obviously
very
controversial
for
a
lot
of
folks
and
from
metros
perspective.
Looking
at
Salt
Lake
City's
interest.
Specifically
one
of
the
concerns
I
think
that
we
see
on
behalf
of
Salt
Lake
City
is
governance.
Concern
with
that
water
coming
in
it's
something
that
yes,
we
do
have
some
element
of
governance
with
the
Jordan
aqueduct
system.
P
P
C
F
E
N
N
P
Role
in
water
supply
and
the
Wasatch
Front
here
and
so
yeah
that
yeah
yeah,
it's
definitely
a
concern
for
Metro.
We
don't
really
have
a
say
in
the
Bear
River
project
per
se,
but
we
do
from
our
perspective,
want
to
do
anything.
We
can
to
help
mitigate
those
types
of
concerns
that
come
along
with
that
and
in
any
way
that
we
reasonably
can
and-
and
one
of
those
is
hopefully
helping
defer
those
types
of
projects
by
offering
supply
to
Jordan
Valley
a
win
and
if
it
makes
sense
so.
E
I'll
tell
you
from
this
council
member
I
would
be
wholly
supportive
of
any
exploration.
You
have
that
relationship
with
the
with
Jordan
Valley,
obviously
in
many
regards
from
a
governance
relationship,
ownership
relationship,
but
as
water
districts,
and
so
whatever
kind
of
enhanced
collaboration
and
communication
that
these
water
districts
can
have
about
the
realities
of
their
supply,
the
realities
of
all
of
our
conserving
conservation
efforts
and
their
projected
needs
all
of
those
aspects,
I
think
as
there's
so
few
water
districts
in
this
valley.
E
B
B
B
T
Right
I'll
go
ahead
and
jump
in
and
orient
us
so
funding
our
future.
Just
for
anyone
who
hasn't
been
following
along
before
in
2018
Salt
Lake
City
identified
some
one-time
and
on
NEADS
in
critical
areas
of
street
maintenance,
affordable
housing,
transit
and
public
safety.
So
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
last
year
of
funding
options
for
those
critical
needs,
one
of
which
was
a
0.5%
sales
tax
increase.
T
T
We're
going
to
review
the
outcomes
of
last
year's
budget
discussions,
take
a
brief
glance
at
this
year's
allocations
and
then
open
it
up
for
discussion
of
policy
questions.
This
briefing
is
kind
of
focused
more
on
the
broader
framework
policies
and
intense
governing
funding.
Our
future.
If
any
questions
come
up
relating
to
any
specific
critical
needs,
staff
will
be
taking
notes
to
make
sure
that
those
are
discussed
in
each
departments
respective
budget
briefing.
T
All
right:
here's
our
pretty
pie
chart
of
last
year's
overview
housing
was
allocated,
4.2
million
dollars,
public
safety,
five
point:
nine
million
dollars
streets
and
infrastructure
got
three
point:
one
transit
five
point
three
and
then
CIP
had
an
allocation
of
three
point:
seven:
five
with
two
point:
five
million
dollar
allocation
for
fund
balance.
That
was
a
total
of
twenty
five
million
for
a
partial
year
of
sales
tax
collection.
T
During
the
council's
budget
discussions,
they
came
up
with
several
types
of
contingencies
that
were
included
in
adoptions.
First,
the
council
has
conditional
appropriations
which
provide
clarification
on
under
which
conditions
the
funds
could
be
spent.
Those
were
using
funds
specifically
for
those
four
critical
needs,
and
only
for
those
four
critical
needs.
The
council
asked
that
any
proposed
adjustments
be
brought
back
to
the
council
for
review.
T
One
stipulation
was
that
a
publicly
available
dashboard
be
maintained
so
that
the
public
can
see
and
track
expenses
and
projects
that
are
funded
for
any
new
positions
funded
with
the
sales
tax
money
establish.
An
annual
review
period
include
interlocal
agreements
for
any
funds
in
contracts
with
outside
agencies
and
providing
quarterly
updates
on
the
sales
tax
revenue.
The
council
also
included
some
contingent
appropriations
and
their
adoption,
which
are
conditions
that
must
be
met
before
funds
can
be
released.
T
One
of
those
for
the
was
$80,000
for
the
census
coordinator,
which
relies
on
working
with
the
Gardner
Policy
Institute
to
make
sure
that
the
earliest
tasks
for
the
census
can
be
identified
to
get
the
most
accurate
count
possible.
Another
was
the
interlocal
agreement
for
with
UTA
for
transit
funding,
which
was
accomplished
earlier
this
year.
T
M
Know
we're
not
doing
policy
questions,
but
I
did
want
to
ask
if
I
may
to
the
administrative
staff,
some
of,
as
mr.
chair
pointed
out
of
like
there's,
these
policy
questions
we're
hoping
that
administrate
just
to
make
this
process
go
quicker,
which
I
appreciate.
Thank
you
having
the
administrative
staff
answer
some
of
these
questions,
but
as
it
relates
to
the
legislative,
intense
I
saw
that
they
were
put
in
the
budget
book
and
sort
of
the
responses
in
the
budget
book.
M
T
One
of
those
intents
was
the
completion
of
a
housing
program
outcomes
report
which
was
supposed
to
inform
this
year's
allocations.
Another
one
was
that
the
definition
of
public
safety
be
broadened
to
include
multiple
departments
and,
in
addition
to
police,
the
other
was
that
biennial
survey
of
citizen,
her
resident
satisfaction,
informed
the
administration's
considerations
of
the
allocations
for
this
year.
T
Four
point:
seven:
eight
million
for
CIP
$900,000
for
fun
balance,
which
brings
us
to
a
total
of
thirty
four
million
five
hundred
and
forty
two
thousand.
The
numbers
in
the
staff
report
are
slightly
different
because
the
tables
included
in
the
budget
book
included
planners
that
were
originally
included
in
the
infrastructure
category.
But
in
the
council's
discussions
last
year
they
moved
one
of
those
planners
to
housing
and
one
of
those
planners
transportation.
T
B
T
B
B
Know
I
think
at
this
point
I
would
say
no
I.
You
know,
let's,
let's
get
the
written
response,
we'll
be
talking
about
this
over
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
so
I
think
if
we
could
get
something
if
we
get
those
answers
by
next
week,
just
the
reason
that
I
that
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
important
for
this
item
more
than
any
other
one
is
because
we're
talking
about
a
funding
stream
that
is
new,
we
haven't
gone
through
a
full
budget.
B
I
mean
this
is
our
first
full
budget
cycle
that
will
you
know
where
we've
seen
how
it
works
and
so
having
that
information
I
think
is
going
to
be
critical
to
whatever
decisions
we
make
for
this
coming
budget
cycle
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
reading
the
tea
leaves
correctly
so
I'd
say:
let's
not
even
go
through
it.
Let's,
let's
you
know
we
can
see
if
we
have
questions,
but
as
far
as
the
policy
stuff,
let's
wait
and
get
that
from
the
administration
by
next
week.
B
Is
that
okay?
Okay,
all
right
so
questions
about
funding
our
future
I
know
that
there
we
there
were
some
items
that
were
discussed
today.
That
I
want
to
come
back
to.
The
first
was
a
question
about
the
definition
of
public
safety
and
and
whether
or
not
we're
expanding
that
definition.
I
think
what
we
did
in
intent.
Language
last
year
was
expand
the
definition,
but
we're
not
seeing
the
source
expanding,
and
so
that's
something
that
we'll
want
to
take
into
consideration.
What
are
some
other
things
that
jumped
out
to
any
of
you.
M
Since
we
have
some
of
the
department
people
here,
one
of
the
things
that
when
we
were
kind
of
doing
an
overview,
I
noticed
is
that
and
and
mr.
chair,
you
brought
this
up
a
little
bit
earlier-
that
there
are
three
new
positions.
Three
FTEs
proposed
for
engineering,
I,
believe
and
streets
and
I
understand
that
it
takes
people
to
do
jobs
that
we
need
done
so
I.
Just
I
I
am
putting
you
on
notice
out
there
that
I'm
going
to
be
asking
this
question.
M
So
if
you
can
connect
the
dots
for
me
of
the
work
that
they're
going
to
do
because
I
do
know,
as
mr.
chair
brought
up
earlier,
that
one
of
our
intent
that
I
believe
I
remember
is
that
with
this
money
we
didn't
want
to
fund
necessarily
fund
employees.
We
wanted
it
to
go
to
the
projects
themselves,
that
that
was
one
of
the
legislative
attempts
again
I
understand
it
takes
people
to
do
work
so
I,
just
if
you'll
make
sure
to
be
able
to
connect
those
dots
for
me,
then
that
will
be
helpful
information
for
me.
M
H
Mr.
chair
I'm
really
interested
in
hearing
more
about
the
the
Park
Safety
and
using
police
officers
as
Rangers
and
sort
of
how
that
program
is
being
planned
out,
because
I
was
sort
of
surprised
to
hear
in
one
of
our
budget
meetings
that
it's
just
that
it's
going
to
be
part
of
the
police
department
instead
of
part
of
the
parks,
department
and
I,
would
like
to
know.
You
know
what
why
that's
the
decision
and
how
that's
gonna
influence
the
park
rangers?
H
Are
they
going
to
be
armed,
for
example,
so
I'll
be
interested
to
hear
a
lot
about
that
lots
of
detail.
Please
also
just
I
would
also
like
to
know
more.
This
is
a
I
think,
a
question
for
all
of
us,
but
the
housing
working
group,
the
policy
question
about
that
and
could
could
that
be
used
to
to
help
us
move
forward,
because
we've
only
had
one
meeting.
H
There
was
a
delay
in
setting
those
meetings.
The
administration
was
able
to
get
the
contract
with
the
facilitator
signed,
not
last
fright
about
the
Friday
before
and
today.
We
just
heard
from
that
facilitator
to
begin
to
set
up
meetings
with
the
working
group.
Individual
interviews
first
is
a
technique
that
sometimes
is
used
and
that
we
had
suggested
so
you
should
be
hearing
the
next
day
or
so
about
those
interviews
and
then,
after
that,
the
meeting
will
be
scheduled
by
our
office.
Thank.
E
Have
some
opinions
and
I
know
that
the
community,
through
a
big
survey
that
they
did
last
year,
has
opinions
about
the
sort
of
look
and
feel
of
those
Rangers
and
whether
or
not
they're
in
police,
fatigues
or,
if
they're,
dressed
more
park-like,
and
that
that
that
was
a
big
conversation
from
the
Central
City
Liberty
Park
and
East
Liberty
Park
community
councils,
as
they
they
they
had
a
almost
a
500-person
survey
that
they
conducted
about
a
year
ago
in
the
mayor's
administration,
I
think
had
DITA
seed
actually
on
contract
to
work
with
that
community
yeah.
Sorry.
E
Anyway,
there
was
a
lot
of
community
work
done
around
the
park,
ranger
concept
and
a
lot
of
the
outcome
from
those
three
community
councils
that
participated
in
that
had
to
do
with
the
look
and
feel
of
those
Rangers.
How
they're
dressed
mattered
to
the
community
and
communicated
something
about
what
their
intent
was
in
the
parks?
E
A
A
E
E
B
So
a
question
about
fleet,
with
some
of
the
changes
that
and
the
the
recommendation,
that's
in
there
for
police
vehicles
and
having
that
previous
discussion
about
ongoing
cost
and
that
there
you
know
that
that
is
something
that
we're
going
to
see.
Are
we
gonna
see
that
expanded
to
other
areas
of
funding
our
future
is
or
is
that
going
to
be
held
solely
under
public
safety?
B
Other
questions
or
comments,
okay,
so
once
we
have
the
polit
the
answers
to
the
policy
questions,
you
know
we'll
be
able
to
get
through
a
lot
of
this.
You
know
I
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
this.
Is
you
know
a
pretty
intense
process,
it's
intense
for
us,
you
know
having
to
sit
through
it.
It's
and
it's
intense
for
the
administrative
staff
who
are
presenting
and
putting
all
the
information
together.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
being
here.
B
You
know
this
is
you
know,
arguably
the
most
important
thing
that
we
do
as
a
council,
so
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone's
involvement.
There's
a
lot
of
reading
this
time
of
year.
Keep
it
up
and
with
that,
if
we
don't
have
any
other
questions
or
comments
about
this
piece,
I
will
look
to
our
executive
director
for
report
and
announcements.
Oh
and
she
doesn't
even
have
any
so.
It
looks
like
someone
wants
to
get
out
of
here
early
as
well
and
I
do
not
have
a
report
from
the
chair.
Mr.