►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
C
B
B
D
We're
gonna
try
that.
Okay.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board.
We
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
here
today.
I
do
not
want
to
steal
much
of
Court's
thunder,
because
he
has
put
a
lot
of
work
into
this
presentation
and
he's
excited
to
give
it
so
I
will
just
frame
the
conversation
with
what
you
have
in
your
packet
is
a
proposed
strategic
framework
for
the
agency
and
and
the
initial
goal
here,
as
we
took.
D
And
so
it
kind
of
took
us
down
this
path
of
rethinking
our
entire
approach
and
and
first
and
foremost,
updating
a
mission
statement
that
is
probably
older
than
20
years.
And
so
having
said
that,
court
and
the
rest
of
staff
have
put
in
a
lot
of
work
at
taking
a
look
at
this
and
really
being
thoughtful
in
our
approach
of
what
we
want
to
present
to
you
and
how
we
want
to
guide
the
agency
going
into
the
future.
So
I
hope
that's
a
good
enough
ting
up
for
your
court
and
it's
all
yours
yeah.
A
B
A
The
I
should
say
that
this
was
done
through
all
the
staff
participated,
but
this
was
a
working
group
with
Amanda
and
Corrine
and
Tammy
and
Danny.
We
sort
of
put
those
ideas
together.
So
with
that
we
didn't
recreate
the
wheel
here.
It's
a
bit
of
an
existential
discussion,
I
realize
you
know
who
we
are,
what
we're
all
about,
how
not
to
get
to
stephen
r.covey
with
you.
But
what
are
we
prioritizing
and
we
have
an
old
mission
statement
that
we
looked
at.
A
We
looked
at
the
Department
of
Economic
Development
strategic
plan,
which
actually
calls
for
the
creating
creation
of
a
strategic
framework.
We
looked
at
what
some
of
the
other
communities
are
doing
around
the
country
and,
as
we
thought
through,
that,
there
were
kind
of
three
categories
that
emerged.
A
One
of
them
would
be
money
and
return
kind
of
the
finance
stuff,
the
people
and
having
an
impact
on
the
community
and
quality
of
life
and
then,
lastly,
the
built
environment,
like
our
neighborhoods
and
so
you'll,
hear
us
refer
back
to
that
a
number
of
times
today,
as
we
kind
of
walk
through
this.
The
framework
that's
projected
up
on
the
screen.
A
So
the
money,
the
people
in
the
place
working
our
way
down.
We've
identified
what
we're
calling
threshold
requirements
so
before
we
invest
a
lot
of
time,
energy,
your
time
as
well
on
a
project
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
hitting
threshold
requirements
and
so
we're
gonna
dive
into
those
the
three
different
types
there.
A
We
see
this
as
kind
of
a
every
day,
operational
working
document
that
we
would
pin
up
in
our
cubicle
we're
hoping
that
it
creates
a
vernacular
that
allows
us
to
have
a
dialogue
with
all
of
you
about
these
certain
benchmarks
and
processes.
We
we
hope
it's
a
way
to
communicate
to
the
development
community
and
our
private
sector
partners
what
the
expectations
are
when
they're
seeking
RDA
participation
in
a
project
in
order
to
be
transparent
with
those
expectations.
A
E
I'm
sure
so
talk
to
us
a
little
bit
about
how
and
another
agenda
item
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
some
potential
project
area
conversations.
Future
considerations
talk
to
us
about
how
this
might
translate
to
that
multi
month,
if
not
over
a
year
long
discourse.
Does
this
look
like?
Does
it
look
like
a
worksheet?
How
does
the
an
applicant
engage
with
yeah.
A
A
Think
this
would
be
information
that
we
would
communicate
through
our
website
and
and
with
all
of
our
private
sector
partners
and
whether
that
is
a
loan
application.
A
tax,
increment
reimbursement
request,
whether
we're
debating
internally,
whether
or
not
to
purchase
a
property
for
redevelopment
purposes.
I
would
see
us
utilizing
this
process
is
that
am
I
answering
your
question.
E
D
And
then,
as
we
evaluate
what
level
of
participation
we
would
have
in
that
project,
and/or.
What
level
of
incentives
we
would
provide?
Those
benchmarks
would
become
kind
of
almost
boxes
that
we
would
check
and
we
would
tie
those
to
actual
metrics
within
our
incentives
and
so,
whether
that's
the
justification
for
buying
a
property
or
whether
that's
the
justification
of
reducing
the
interest
rate
on
the
loan,
our
job
as
staff
will
be
figuring
out.
How
to
convey
that
message
to
you,
as
well
as
the
the
community
and
the
developers
and.
B
Can
I
interrupt
real,
quick
and
and
if
you'll
remember,
board,
member
Mendenhall
and
you'll
have
to
remind
me
which
project
it
was
but
dilute
it
was
the
upu
loan
when
we
were
briefed
by
the
RTA
staff
on
the
U
P
alone.
They
there
was
a
section
in
that
briefing
that
sort
of
listed
which
of
these
these
that's.
B
In
order
to
kind
of
help
us
and
everyone
justify
and
the
developer
understand
why
that
loan
interest
rate
came
down
because
they
met
so
many
or
X
number
of
these
benchmarks
and
it,
as
we've
kind
of
talked
with
within
our
chair,
Vice,
Chair
sort
of
stuff.
It's
one
of
the
things,
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
that
they've
brought
up
is
to
make
sure
that
this
is
that
there
isn't
anything
else
that
board
members
would
want
to
see
as
a
benchmark.
B
So
if
there
are
things
missing,
it's
yeah
I
think
the
RTA
staff
would
want
to
know
about
that.
If
you're
looking
at
this
and
saying
wait
what
about
this
benchmark,
or
what
does
this
mean
this?
What
we've
kind
of
talked
about
and
again
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
is
that
this
is
sort
of
a
living
document
that
can
kind
of
work
and
evolve
and
change,
but
with
those
key
values
and
missions
at
the
kind
of
staying
at
the
top
of
that
I
mean
we've.
Had
some
of
these?
Do
you
think
that's
accurate?
A
I
do
yeah
I
and
the
the
benchmarks
which
we're
going
to
get
to
in
a
minute
yeah
would
be
something
what
we
would
actually
evaluate
a
project
against
and
try
to
identify
how
many
of
them
are
being
achieved
and
the
ones
that
achieve
a
lot.
We
would
want
to
move
forward
and
the
ones
that
don't.
We
would
want
to
communicate
that
information
to
our
development
partners
that
they
need
to
achieve
more
of
them.
So.
E
Yeah
I
appreciate
you
bringing
that
up,
madam
true,
because
that's
that
particular
alone
kind
of
highlighted
some
additional
opportunities
I
think
that
we
can
build
into
this
valuation
process.
So
I
would
submit
that
we
change
some
of
this
under
Community,
Impact,
I,
think,
transit
opportunities
needs
to
be
new
or
enhanced
transit
opportunities.
Simply
locating
me
or
something
we've
already
made
an
investment
in
that's
been
there
for
six
months
or
been
there
for
15
years,
doesn't
bring
anything
new
to
the
community.
E
Also
under
community
support.
I
would
like
us
to
be
more
specific
about
what
kind
of
unique
needs,
they're
filling
so
so
to
say
we're
going
to
have
a
restaurant.
So
that's
going
to
support
the
community
by
activating
the
area
is
different,
and
so
this
makes
me
think
of
when
I
think
we
talked
in
that
yupi
loan
discussion
about
maybe
having
tiered
or
graded
scoring
on
these.
E
So
if
a
restaurants
different
from
providing
a
daycare
or
from
saying
that
we're
going
to
do
community
support
through
creating
some
housing
units
that
serve
a
particular
demographic
or
something
really
different,
both
community
support,
but
really
quite
different
outcome.
So
I
guess
I
would
like
a
way
for
us
to
not
just
check
the
box
that
a
restaurant
gets
the
same
credit
as
a
daycare
or
a
clinic
or
something.
E
You
know
what
I
mean
with
that
and
then
the
sustainability
that
was
another
box
that
was
checked
even
though
they're
not
doing
a
certain,
a
LEED,
certification
or
and
and
the
definition
of
an
equivalent
is
not
something
we
can
with.
There's
no
teeth
in
that
for
us
that
when
they
say
we're
going
to
do
equivalent,
what
do
we
check
that
against
really
and
what
what
guarantees
do
we
have
I,
don't
feel
that
we
have
enough
guarantee.
E
So
if
we
could
get
more
clarity
around
what
degree
of
sustainability
or
if
there
specific
investments,
which
is
that's
a
changing
marketplace,
I
know
all
of
all
the
time
that
building
scenario
is
changing,
but
I'd
like
us
to
see
more
clarity
about
the
unique
assets
that
are
being
brought,
not
just
that
they're
co-locating
near
something,
or
simply
by
opening
the
doors
to
their
business.
They're.
Bringing
community
support
yeah.
E
That
puts
the
burden
on
this
body,
and
this
and
I
don't
from
a
policy
perspective.
We're
sort
of
ever-changing,
too
and
I
could
be
hit
by
a
bus
tomorrow
and
I'm,
not
sure
that
the
community
support
and
unique
needs
conversation
would
continue.
So,
if
it's
possible
for
us
to
build
it
into
the
process
that
takes
our
interests
or
relativity
out
of
it,
that
would
I
think
give
the
community
more
clarity
across
time
right.
E
A
Okay,
so
where
were
we
got
back
on
the
values?
I
think
the
the
values
then
building
on
the
mission
are
really
again
categorized
in
these
topics
of
the
economic
growth,
the
positive
impact
on
the
community
and
the
neighborhood
vibrancy,
and
one
of
the
things
we
were
excited
about.
There
is
the
simplicity
of
that.
You
know
I
think
it's
it's
great
to
be
able
to
say
well
what
does
the
RTA
do,
while
we
foster
economic
growth,
community
impact
and
neighborhood
vibrancy
I
think
there's
a
simplicity
to
that.
That
really
adds
some
clarity
to
our
work.
A
I
I,
the
the
language
there
I
think,
is
important,
and
if
it's
okay
with
you,
we
ought
to
read
those
two
under
economic
growth
we
act
as
a
responsible
steward
of
public
funds
taking
a
long
term
view
of
investment,
return
and
property
values.
This
is
an
acknowledgment
that
we're
utilizing
funding
from
our
taxing
entity,
partners
and
there's
a
certain
expectation
in
terms
of
an
economic
return
under
Community
Impact.
We
prioritize
projects
and
programs
that
demonstrate
commitment
to
improving
equity
and
quality
of
life
for
residents
and
businesses
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
A
We
would
get
into
this
pretty
simple
three-step
process,
which
is
really
does
a
project
meet
our
threshold
requirements.
To
what
degree
does
a
project
achieve
livability
benchmarks
and
public
benefits,
and
then
lastly,
let's
apply
our
policy
and
our
program
criteria
to
the
application?
So
we
see
the
threshold
requirements
being
those
three
things
that
are
listed
there
does
a
project
align
with
the
adopted
city's
policies
and
plans.
A
That's
simply
identified
here's
our
key
project
area
objectives
for
that,
given
project
area,
here's
a
handful
of
projects
that
implement
those
objectives-
and
there
is
a
budget
and
a
timeframe
associated
with
each
of
them
and
I
think
these
work
plans
would
have
a
kind
of
one
to
three
year
lifespan
and
would
acknowledge
kind
of
these
nuance
differences
between
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
North
temple
versus
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
the
central
business
district
versus
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
the
grainery,
for
example,
and
then.
Lastly,
a
threshold
is
the
financial
viability.
A
We
need
projects
to
demonstrate
a
reasonable
need
for
public
assistance
and
I
think,
even
if
we
just
look
back
on
some
of
the
actions
that
this
board
has
taken
over
the
last,
you
know
three
to
six
months,
we
can
sort
of
see
the
spectrum
of
that
need
and
I
think
that's
something
that
in
many
ways
we're
doing
well
through
the
rigor
that's
introduced
in
our
process
through
the
Finance
Committee.
But
it's
something
we
want
to
continue
to
emphasize
from
there
once
a
project
meets
those
thresholds.
A
Is
this
project
creating
a
public
benefit
and,
as
I
was
mentioning
earlier,
these
are
really
just
kind
of
the
categories
and
we
need
to
go
in
and
sort
of
flesh
those
things
out.
If
those
seem
like
the
right
topics
and
then
lastly,
if
we've
achieved
enough
of
those
benchmarks,
we
would
look
at
applying
the
program
criteria
and,
as
you
know,
those
are
identified
in
the
policies
for
the
different
programs.
For
example,
loans
go
to
the
Finance
Committee
and
if
there
are
requests
above
$500,000,
then
we
bring
them
to
the
board
for
approval.
A
Maybe
that's
two
in
each
category,
maybe
that's
three
so
that
we
know
we're
really
focusing
on
sort
of
back
to
the
Venn
diagram
kind
of
projects
that
like
hit
all
three
of
the
values,
and
it
would
be
a
way
for
us
as
staff
to
really
prioritize
hey
if
here's
a
project
loan
application,
for
example,
that's
achieving
12,
livability
benchmarks
and
here's
another
one
competing
for
the
same
pot
of
money
and
it
achieves
two.
We
would
certainly
know
where
we
we
should
be
prioritizing
our
time
and
our
energy.
B
B
Just
really
can't
tell
you
enough
how
how
impressed
I
am
by
the
amount
of
work
that
you
guys
have
done
on
this
and
continue
to
do
on
this
I
know
that
it's
still
a
work
in
progress,
but
I
have
a
trust
that
it
will
come
out.
Looking
as
fabulous
as
this
does
and
to
the
my
fellow
board
members,
we
were
in
a
meeting
today
and
with
the
developer
and
every
time
I've
been
in
a
meeting
with
a
developer.
B
They
cannot
stop
talking
about
how
great
it
is
to
work
with
the
RDA
staff,
and
that
was
evidenced
again
today
when
we
were
meeting
with
the
developer
and
I
I.
Think
it's
important
for
us
here
to
sit
and
and
recognize
that
as
well,
that
throughout
every
project
that
I've
had
the
opportunity
to
sit
with
and
with
the
RDA
staff,
everyone
raves
about
how
great
it
is
to
work
with
you
guys
and
I
want
to.
Thank
you
for
that,
because
you're
you
make
me
look
good
and
I
like
looking
good,
so.
E
A
D
This
is
carryover
from
previous
meeting
and
it
was
one
that
a
staff.
We
appreciate
the
opportunity
really
just
to
put
in
front
of
you
to
to
have
whatever
level
of
discussion
you'd
like
to
have
on
it,
but
it's
really
also
just
to
kind
of
bring
to
the
table
a
lot
of
the
different
directions
that
we
are
being
either
asked
or
pulled
to
go
into.
D
And
so
we
wanted
to
compile
a
list
for
the
board
to
take
a
look
at
and
see
kind
of,
what's
happening
within
the
city
and
and
and
understand
how
much
is
really
happening.
And
how
hard
is
a
agency
right
now.
It
is
to
try
to
prioritize
where
to
spend
our
resources
and
our
time
and
and
more
specifically,
where
we
should
be
looking
at
where
we
want
to
spend
that
time
and
energy
and
investment
over
the
next
3-5
20
years.
D
So
I
thought
it'd
be
helpful
to
first
start
with
giving
an
update
on
where
we're
at
with
the
State
Street
and
nine
line
project
areas.
Because
when
we
had
this
conversation
last
year,
the
board
gave
us
that
direction
to
focus
on
those
and-
and
it
has
been
a
very
long
process
to
get
to
where
we
are,
but
I
want
to
assure
the
board
that
we
are
still
actively
working
on
those
and
making
progress
and
give
you
an
update
on
that
as
well
as
we
have
provided,
updates
and
briefings
on
block
67.
D
The
creation
of
that
CRA.
So
I
think
you.
You
understand,
we're
out
on
that
and
then
also
see
if
there's
any
input
or
discussion
moving
forward
of
what
other
areas
we
could
be
looking
at.
So
having
said
that,
I
will
say
with
regard
to
nine
line
in
State
Street,
both
of
those
we
have
been
in
discussions
with
the
county
as
our
taxing
entity
partner,
with
the
goal
of
obviously
entering
into
you
in
interlocal
with
them,
as
well
as
we've
had
several
discussions
with
the
school
district
on
both
of
those
project
areas.
D
D
We've
had
some
very
good
conversations
with
them
in
terms
of
what
we
could
incorporate
in
that
inner
local
everything,
ranging
from
how
we
can
align
our
housing
priorities
and
projects
that
we
look
at
doing
to
support
their
mission
in
terms
of
retaining
families
within
the
city,
as
well
as
what
we
can
do,
just
even
on
the
small
scale
of
street
improvements
and
safe
streets
for
moving
the
kids
through
the
neighborhood
and
identifying
how
that
could
work
with
infrastructure
improvements
that
the
city
would
like
to
utilize
as
well.
So
that
one
is
moving
forward.
D
We
should
have
an
agreement,
probably
negotiate
within
the
next
couple
weeks
and
then
have
that
on
an
agenda
for
for
the
board
approval
for
the
State
Street
project
area.
The
school
district
is
very
supportive
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
in
the
stage
three
project
area.
They
absolutely
understand
the
importance
of
recognize
revitalizing,
the
State
Street
corridor.
D
They
do,
however,
have
some
concerns
with
the
size
of
State
Street
and
when
I
say
size,
I,
don't
necessarily
mean
the
total
acreage,
because
it's
very
similar
to
where
we're
at
with
the
nine
line
as
much
as
the
the
expansion
of
the
state's
free
project
area
west
towards
300,
west
and
the
freeway
in
the
industrial
area.
They
don't
necessarily
see
how
that
benefits
their
mission
in
terms
of
the
school
district
and
families
and
housing.
And
so
we
appreciated
that
that
feedback
we
received
from
them.
D
We
asked
that
we
could
return
to
them
with
some
options
of
how
we
may
either
refine
the
State
Street
project
area
and/or,
the
terms
by
which
we
can
enter
into
an
agreement
with
with
them.
Excuse
me,
and
so
that
is
what
we're
working
on
right
now
is
kind
of
putting
those
options
down
on
paper
so
that
we
can
sit
back
down
with
them
and
see
if
we
can
have
a
extended
conversation
on
how
we
can
address
their
goals,
while
also
trying
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
necessarily
changing
our
direction.
D
What
our
focus
is
of
what
we
want
to
see
is
a
city
and
I.
Think
that
may
just
be
one
of
those
where
our
priorities-
our
city,
are
a
little
bit
different
than
a
school
district,
and
we
just
got
to
try
to
find
a
way
to
make
those
work
together
and
still
maximize
our
options
for
that
project
Darrius.
So
we
were
working
on
that
so
that
one
has
kind
of
slowed
down
a
little
bit.
D
We
initially
were
trying
to
run
these
both
together
and
that
one's
kind
of
got
a
little
bit
of
a
delay
that
Sue's
is
working
on
right
now.
As
far
as
block
67
I
think
we
had
an
update
with
the
board
a
couple
months
ago,
we're
in
the
final
negotiations
with
the
county
in
terms
of
that
inner
local
and
how
that
would
be
structured
with
the
developer.
D
D
School
district
we
have
met
with
them
on
that
they
have
indicated
that
they
do
not
necessarily
know
if
that
meets
their
goals
and
priorities
for
a
new
project
area,
and
they
are
having
their
internal
meetings
to
discuss
that.
We
have
a
meeting
scheduled
with
them
to
follow
up
on
that
I
think
in
June.
D
They
have
asked
to
do
that
after
the
end
of
the
school
year,
and
so
we
will
have
that
follow
up
and
we
will
be
sitting
down
with
them
in
the
county
to
see
where
everyone
is
out
on
that
page,
so
that
that
ball
is
in
their
Court
right
now,
so
we
will
follow
up
with
them
and
try
to
get
them
some
more
information
to
help
explain
our
priorities
for
that
project
area.
So
so
that's
where
we're
at
with
the
ones
we're
working
on
now.
Are
there
any
questions
on
on
that
or
concerns.
B
F
D
We're
gonna
propose
a
few
different
options
to
them.
Obviously,
first
and
foremost,
we
could
change
the
boundaries
of
State
Street
to
reflect
kind
of
where
they
would
be
willing
to
to
invest
or
contribute.
Tax
increment
from
that
option
is
not
our
preferred
choice,
because
if
you
change
the
boundaries
at
this
point,
you're
pretty
much
just
restarting
the
whole
process
again
and
we've
put
a
lot
of
work
into
this
project
area,
and
so
we'd
prefer
not
to
do
that.
D
So
the
other
options
are
really
to
sit
down
and
hopefully,
in
a
better
format,
try
to
convey
what
the
city's
priorities
are,
what
our
goals
are
with
that
project
area
and
show
them
how
those
really
do
align
with
what
they
would
probably
want
to
contribute
and
get
out
of
that
project
area
as
well.
That's
our
preference
is
that
we
can
kind
of
show
that
we're
all
trying
to
accomplish
the
same
things,
and
even
though
we
may
be
doing
it
differently
that
there
is
some
benefits
for
them
to
to
participate
in
that
larger
area.
D
And
then,
if
that
doesn't
work,
then
we
could
look
at
ways
of
reducing
or
changing
their
participation
rate
within
the
project
area
such
that
it
reflects
more
of
what
they
feel
is
in
alignment
with
the
their
target
area
that
they
would
like
to
do
so,
instead
of
them
participating
at
a
seventy-five
or
eighty
percent
rate.
Maybe
it's
lower
and
it
reflects
kind
of
more
of
what
would
be
the
the
smaller
area
that
they
would
be.
Okay,
focusing
on
so
okay.
C
Been
trying
to
compile
some
data
to
bring
back
to
them
in
terms
of
especially
like
new
housing
projects
that
might
be
built
over
in
that
western
section.
So
we've
been
working
on
that
data
compilation,
but
I
think
it's
possible
that
if
it
works
for
them,
we
might
be
able
to
piggyback
on
the
block
67
and
June
yeah.
If
that.
F
B
C
E
That
the
thinking
back
to
our
conversations
about
that
West
part
in
including
300
West
and
what's
evolved,
it's
been
a
couple
years
to
say
the
least
in
this
conversation
about
State
Street.
There's
a
lot.
That's
come
to
happen,
including
the
I,
almost
Resource
Center,
that's
coming
online,
including
the
incredible
rebuild
of
300
West,
that's
coming
in
time
that
doesn't
have
to
do
with
the
RTA.
At
this
point,
and
so
there's
been,
there
have
been
some
big
shifts
and
the
kind
of
investment
that's
happening.
E
The
area
that
I
think
is
going
to
attract
this
similar
investments
as
an
RDA
would
different
strategy.
Different
funding,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
for
us
to
consider
for
the
school
district
to
consider
about
what
was
our
goal.
I
think
I
keep
remembering
that
I,
don't
know
if
it's
still
accurate,
but
that
300
West
is
the
second-highest
area
of
tax
generation
in
the
city.
D
That's
a
good
point
because
that's
that's
a
message
that
can
be
sent
to
that,
although
that
area
may
not
seem
to
the
school
district
to
align
with
their
goals.
That
area
is
an
economic
generator
and
that
economic
generator
can
help
feed
development
throughout
the
rest
of
the
project
area,
and
that's
that's
an
important
point
to
make.
So
thank
you
so.
B
D
That's
a
good
question,
because
we
we've
kind
of
delayed
that
conversation
on
personnel
until
the
the
newer
project
areas
came
online
because
we
figured
that
those
would
increase
caseload
but
I.
Think
given
where
we're
getting
interest
with
developers
right
now.
I
think
it'd
be
short-sighted
for
us
not
to
be
looking
at
a
few
additional
project
areas
and
starting
that
process
of
seeing
to
what
extent
we'd
want
at
least
begin.
B
D
So
that'd
be
one
that
we
have
a
lot
of
interest
from
the
University
of
participating
in
granary,
as
we've
talked
about
as
a
city
and
as
other
departments
with
regard
to
the
Phillippe
block,
taking
a
look
at
what
we
may
or
may
not
want
to
do
in
the
granary
area,
do
we
want
to
read
up
that
project
area?
Do
we
want
to
create
a
new
one?
Does
that
project
area
revolve
around
transit
opportunities
coming
through
that
area?
D
Is
that
our
role
so
I
would
probably
blend
both
granary
in
the
400
west
and
400
south
conversations
into
one
just
to
start
that
looking
at
of
what
we
want
that
priority
to
be,
and
then
probably
also
grand
boulevards,
there's
been
a
lot
of
property
being
acquired
along
the
500
and
600
South
Corridor
we've
had
a
lot
of
developers
and
current
property
owners
reach
out
to
us
of.
Why
hasn't
the
city
done
anything
with
this?
C
B
D
We're
asking
for
two
additional
project
managers
or
project
one
project
manager,
one
coordinator
and
then
one
position
that
we're
calling
kind
of
a
special
project
assistant
which
could
be
everything
from
research
and
data
collection
to
support
of
the
project
management
team.
So
more
of
like
an
entry
level
and.
C
Have
one
manager
Danny
my
question
for
you
is
when
you
look
at
the
map
with
all
of
these
potential
project
areas
when
we're
basically
blanketing
the
entire
city
right,
so
is
that
something
that
we
can
discuss
and
looking
at?
Do
we
really
need
boundaries,
or
do
we
create
project
areas
over
the
entire
city
that.
D
I
always
like
to
tell
the
joke
that
I
love
playing
the
game
risk
and
if
this
was
a
risk
board,
I'm
winning
but
yeah.
That
is
actually
a
conversation
that
that
has
happened
for
several
years
as
agencies
have
kind
of
looked
to
struggle
and
and
how
they
can
exist
and
I.
Think
when
you
look
at
how
long
it's
taken
us
to
create
the
State,
Street
and
nine
line
project
areas,
I
think
it's
definitely
worth
looking
at.
D
That's
almost
more
citywide,
because
it
is
really
hard,
sometimes
to
tell
a
property
owner
that
we
can't
help
them
because
they're
on
the
wrong
side
of
the
street,
or
it's
really
hard
to
sit
here
and
take
a
look
at
our
personnel
and
think
about
how
much
time
we
dedicate
just
to
creating
project
areas
and
not
actually
being
able
to
spend
as
much
time
going
out
and
doing
the
work.
So
I
will
tell
you
that
is
under
consideration.
I
will
tell
you.
That
is
something
that
we're
kind
of
looking
at.
D
D
Is
there
a
way
that
we
could
do
that
both
for
redevelopment
and
economic
development
and
provide
the
tool
citywide
that
just
really
hones
in
on
kind
of
what
we've
done
with
the
central
ninth
area
of
creating
this
model,
by
which
we
could
really
align
all
of
the
city's
priorities
and
projects,
and
do
that
in
a
way
through
redevelopment
through
the
other
city
departments,
but
has
that
greater
return
on
investment?
Creates
these
really
cool,
neighborhoods
and
leverages
all
of
the
city's
resources
within
target
areas?
D
B
D
G
G
Originally,
the
CEM
C
Gardener
policy,
the
Institute
published
this
map
or
a
similar
map
in
2014
as
part
of
the
fair
housing
equity
assessment
that
was
done
at
the
regional
level
and
after
that
it
was
updated
with
new
data
indicators
which,
on
the
next
slide,
we
have
an
overview
of
what
those
indicators
are.
So
right
now
we're
looking
to.
B
G
So
originally
it
was
in
2014.
It
was
the
bureau
of
economic
and
business
research.
They
have
since
changed
their
name
to
Kim
C
Gardner
Policy
Institute,
so
but
they
did.
It
was
the
same
staff
doing
both
of
the
assessments
and
the
assessment
was
housed
kind
of
under
housing
and
Neighborhood
Development.
They
passed
off
the
data
to
the
RDA
to
use
in
the
NOFA.
B
G
Think
it
was
heavily
defined
by
the
Kim
C
Gardner
Policy
Institute,
the
2014
data
that
was
actually
used.
It
was
provided
by
HUD,
okay
and
a
lot
of
those
data
indicators
are
no
longer
available,
so
they
updated
the
index
based
on
these
indicators
with
newer
data
that
was
available,
but
our
DEA
staff
did
look
at
other
opportunity.
Opportunity
indices
in
other
communities
and
a
lot
of
them
do
include
other
factors
that
measure
neighborhood
quality,
such
as
elementary
school
performance,
access
to
transit
crime,
even
access
to
open
space.
E
B
E
G
C
You
so
much
if
I
could
just
chime
in
just
from
the
staff
observation
perspective.
I
think
what
staff
was
looking
for
was
an
easy
sort
of
plug-and-play
model
that
could
be
used
to
get
that
money
on
the
street.
We
were
lucky
that
we
had
a
sort
of
outside
group
that
had
already
looked
at
this
from
sort
of
a
holistic
perspective
of
pulling
in
a
variety
of
indicators.
Otherwise
we
could
probably
spend
a
year
debating
which
indicators
belong
in
opportunity
index,
and
we
probably
will
do
that.
C
G
B
G
H
In
trying
to
understand
why
developers
have
not
been
accessing
the
higher
opportunity
funding,
we
analyze
potential
limitations
on
developing,
affordable
housing
within
these
high
opportunity
areas.
So
we
identified
four
factors
so
the
first
one
is
land
use.
So
everything
in
the
hatched
green
is
everything
within
that
high
opportunity
area
and
everything
pink
is
actually
the
zones
that
would
allow
multifamily
to
be
developed.
It's
only
about
10%
the
land
and
then,
when
you
look
into
that
a
little
further,
the
average
parcel
size
for
this.
H
So
when
you
couple
that
with
a
small
parcel
size
and
it
limits
the
ability
to
offset
any
of
these
costs
so
that
that
increases
the
overall
gap
to
build,
affordable
housing,
I
mean
one
other
factor
so
within
about
almost
about
23
percent
of
the
land
is
within
a
historical,
historic
district.
So
these
neighborhoods
are
already
pretty
well
established
and
they're
built
out
and,
and
they
also
have
additional
protections,
so
it
does
limit
the
ability
to
to
demo
and
to
assemble
land
and
whatnot.
H
G
So
RTA
staff
came
up
with
four
options
for
moving
forward.
The
first
one
is
kind
of
business
as
usual
and
just
keep
the
NOFA
out,
as
is
for
a
longer
period
of
time.
The
second
option
is
to
look
at
the
opportunity
area
and
potentially
add
in
some
other
variables
to
broaden
the
high
opportunity
land
area
within
our
city,
and
we
would
do
that
by
working
with
the
division
of
housing
and
Neighborhood
Development,
potentially
planning
and
engaging
MC
gardener
Policy
Institute
to
update
that
data
set
to
broad
in
the
area
we
can
deploy
these
funds.
G
The
third
option
is
to
acquire
property,
the
RTA
go
out
and
look
for
property
to
purchase,
purchase
property
and
then
issue
an
RFQ
or
RFP
process
to
engage
a
developer
in
developing
the
property.
The
fourth
option
we
came
up
with
is
to
use
part
or
all
of
the
funding
to
further
incentivize
a
higher
level
of
affordability
in
the
Sugar
Mont
Plaza
redevelopment
project
which
actually
sugar,
Mont
Plaza,
isn't
in
a
high
opportunity
area
as
they're
currently
defined,
but
it's
within
a
close
proximity.
G
B
Have
a
couple
of
questions:
is
there
an
advantage
for
developers
to
go
through
an
RFQ
RFP
process,
rather
than
just
apply
for
the
NOFA
I
mean
if
one
of
the
options
is
for
us
to
buy
the
land,
but
then
go
through
an
RFP
RFQ?
How
does
that?
How
is
that
going
to
increase
our
chances
of
getting
that
money
out
there?
Is
it
better
easier
for
developers?
I,
don't
I,
don't
understand.
B
G
Went
out
and
purchased
a
site
and
issue
it,
an
an
RFQ
RFP,
the
due
diligence
of
securing
of
acquiring
the
property,
ensuring
that
the
zoning
is
in
place.
All
of
the
other
due
diligence
that
has
to
happen
would
be
a
burden
on
our
DEA
staff,
and
under
that
scenario
there
could
potentially
be
room
for
further
financial
participation
from
the
RTA,
so
we'd
purchased
the
land.
There
could
be
a
land
right
down.
There
could
potentially
be
a
loan
that
would
come
into
play.
Yeah.
D
H
C
G
Yeah,
that
was
the
redevelopment
advisory
committees
recommendation.
They
recommended
keeping
the
NOFA
the
high
Opportunity
NOFA
out
on
the
street
as
it
is
now,
while
we're
engaging
in
a
conversation
to
broaden
the
area
based
on
additional
indicators
and
then
but
put
a
time
limit
on
that.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
six
months
or
a
year,
if
the
funds
still
aren't
used,
then
deploy
the
funds
in
sugar,
Mont,
Plaza
or
another
already
a
project
that
meets
the
criteria.
E
You
thank
you
for
doing
this,
and
evaluating
and
I
want
to
talk
through
one
of
the
parts
in
the
the
challenges
section
under
land
use.
Actually,
no
I'm.
Sorry,
it
wasn't
under
the
land
used
when
it
set
there
I
think
it
was
under
the
one
applicant
that
didn't
end
up
coming
to
fruition,
that
it
was
its
I
think
that
was
not
cost-effective
to
develop.
E
Basically-
and
that's
that's
exactly
the
problem
that
we
were
trying
to
address
here
and
so
I
wondered
if
there
are
if
there
was
maybe
in
the
advisory
committee
discussion
or
if
among
staff,
you've
thought
about.
If
maybe
we
need
to
approach
our
criteria
for
what
is
what's
what
constitutes
our
participation?
If
we
need
to
look
at
that
differently,
when
the
fact
is
this
is
exactly
the
problem,
we're
trying
to
solve
is
for
super
expensive
properties
compared
to
other
lower
income
areas
of
the
city,
but
we're
using
that
same
criteria
to
to
say
shoot.
E
This
project
doesn't
pencil.
Well,
yeah
and
that's
like
you
know,
you
see
what
I'm
saying
right:
it's
like
a
revolving
door,
the
project
doesn't
pencil
and
that's
why
we're
doing
this?
So
is
there,
did
you
guys
talk
about
maybe
adjusting
our
criteria
for
the
use
of
these
funds
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
our
participation
like.
G
The
terms
of
the
funding
to
further
incentivize
the
the
NOFA
funds
already
have
pretty
favorable
terms
attached
to
them.
It's
we've
defined
them
as
soft
loans
that
only
are
repaid
through
cash
flow,
a
relatively
low
interest
rate,
I
think
we'll
go
up
to
a
35-year
term,
so
that
particular
project
the
site
was
point
one:
nine
acres.
So
there
were
a
limited
number
of
units
on
the
site.
G
C
D
E
I
guess
I'll
mention
that
if
we
get
to
a
point
where
we're
talking
about
changing
the
criteria
or
the
opportunities
associated
with
this
fund,
I
am
I
appreciate
that
these
are
small
properties
and
I'm
wondering
about
the
conversations
we've
had
around.
How
do
we
increase
single
family
affordability
across
the
city
and
maybe
there's
a
conversation
that
we
could
have
as
the
RDA
with
hand
about
creating
some
of
those
smaller
property
opportunities
out
of
these
dollars,
not
necessarily
a
big
apartment
complex
that
is,
has
more
affordability
to
it.
E
I
wondered
also
about
our
building.
In
our
property.
Inventory
is
a
city,
and-
and
this
is
just
rhetorical
at
this
point-
but
how
does
our
property
ownership
as
a
city
even
tiny
bits
of
property,
but
developable?
Is
there
any
of
it
that
falls
within
this
area,
where
we
could
provide
that
kind
of
information
to
the
the
development
community
to
say?
E
E
D
G
C
F
C
F
F
F
If
we
were
to
read
the
Kim
gardener,
Institute
were
to
rerun
it
we're
thinking
about
just
the
existing
criteria
and
maybe
opening
abroad,
and,
like
you
just
said,
are
we
looking
at
them
real
value
in
the
city
based
on
differences
between
now
and
when
this
was
done
a
couple
years
ago
and
seeing
if
there's
significant
changes
that
would
alter
it?
Is
that
give
me
sense
of
what
we're
thinking
they're
the.
G
F
Madame
chair,
for
my
my
view,
looking
at
the
map,
if
we
think
about
we're
in
the
city,
this
is
feasible
to
get
bang
for
the
buck
sugar
house
in
downtown
or
we're
talking
about
it.
We're
not
gonna
find
parcels
anywhere
else.
Sugar
house
we're
talking
about
is
surrounded
by
the
areas
of
high
to
a
very
high
opportunity.
I
mean
essentially
surrounded
fulfills.
In
my
view,
the
intention
of
this
in
a
lot
of
ways
I,
would
personally
support.
F
Looking
at
sugar,
mine
I
say
that
because
I'm
okay
opening
up
to
another
round
of
op
of
options,
I'm
not
excluding
anything
but
four
point:
five
million
could
do
a
serious
dent
in
volume
and
the
depth
of
affordability,
which
two
things
you
can
get
there
based
on
the
zoning
and
the
size
of
the
parcel.
We
could
look
at
other
single-family
residences
and
I
get
that
niche.
F
We
still
are
looking
on
the
city,
but
I
would
be
in
favor
today,
frankly
of
a
pursuing
sugar
Mont
and
seeing
what
we
could
accomplish
there,
because
it's
pretty
rare
to
have
the
zoning
set
for
a
pretty
high
and
dense
building.
We
have
the
land
already.
We
have
money
that
can
contribute,
I
mean
we
could.
It
could
be
some
interesting
development
there
if
we
wanted
to
do
that,
so
I'd
be
in
favor
of
that,
madam
chair
personally,
okay.
B
If
I
can
interrupt
in
that,
just
real
quick
I
agree
with
with
moving
forward
eventually
with
sugar
Mont,
but
right
now
there's
a
business
there
and
it's
doing
well
and
then
I
don't
have
more
development
in
my
district
having
another
cream
for
just
right
now,
right,
but
but
I
agree
with.
You
I
think
that
we
need
to
the
goal
I.
B
Think
of
this
NOFA
and
of
having
it
as
a
high
opportunity
area
was
to
say:
let's
get
affordability
out
of
just
the
west
side
and
where
we're
generally
just
keeping
it
and
put
it
over
in
other
areas
right,
but
I
think
you're
right,
we're
looking
at
is
that
essentially
means
downtown
in
sugarhouse.
It
really
does
right,
but
yet
we've
created
these
restrictions
such
that
something
like
the
D
I,
wouldn't
even
match
that
area.
B
Technically.
If
it
was
a
privately
owned
piece
of
parcel,
they
wouldn't
be
allowed
to
apply
for
this
NOFA
because
they
wouldn't
be
in
the
area,
even
though
it's
right,
it
still
reaches
that
goal
for
which
we're
trying
to
do
this
right.
So
I
think
that
oh
no
I'm,
not
I,
think
question
and
we
can
I
would
be
looking
for
a
straw
poll
so
that
we
can
give
some
direction
to
the
staff
of
how
to
go
forward.
B
But
before
I
ask
for
a
straw
poll,
let's
say
that
it
sounds
like
there's
a
couple
of
people
on
the
board
that
would
be
interested
in
following
racks
recommendation
with
some
caveats
right.
What
do
you
want
or
need
to
know
those
caveats
before
we
just
kept
it
out
there?
Does
that
make
sense?
It
sounds
like
Aaron
wants
to
know
a
little
bit
more
and
we're
kind
of
like.
Would
we
need
to
change
anything?
Do
you
feel
or
just
kind
of
keep
it
the
same
and
I'm
saying
that
to
both
you
and
members
here?
G
D
D
So
if
we
get
something
that
does
come
in
that
we
think
we'd
like
to
consider,
we
obviously
can
bring
that
to
you
if
we
feel
that
the
terms
or
the
criteria
we
have
may
need
to
be
tweaked
a
little
bit,
so
we're
not
precluded
from
bringing
anything
back
to
you
if
something
looks
like
it's
just
on
the
fringe.
So
to
that
point,
I
don't
think
we
would
need
to
change
anything
right
now.
G
G
E
E
Yeah
I'm
not
ready
to
do
that
today.
Until
we
can
look
at
that
map
and
see
what
that
means.
I
get
that
sugar
Mont
is
a
you
know.
It
seems
like
it
makes
sense,
but
then
to
say
then,
whatever
whatever
area,
that's
in:
let's
do
it
citywide,
because
I'm
not
sure
that
it
makes
sense
across
the
map
across
the
whole
board.
So
do
you
need
a
straw
poll
I
do.
C
E
A
straw
poll
that
we
approved
the
advisory
boards
recommendation
to
preserve
the
NOFA.
Let
me
see
what
it
says
continue
to
offer
the
high
opportunity
NOFA,
while
pursuing
conversations
with
the
Kim
gardener,
Policy
Institute
about
indicators
and
exploring
affordability,
opportunities
with
all
or
partial
investment
in
the
sugar
mount
property.
C
B
I
think
that's
so
the
straw
poll
I
think
is
just
to
approve
the
rack,
I.
Think
there's!
No.
If
I
may
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
Aaron,
but
it
almost
has
like
two
parts
of
it.
One
is
to
approve
racks
recommendation
to
continue.
The
NOFA
and
kind
of
the
other
is
to
look
at
updating
the
indicators
for
what
is
a
high
opportunity
area
and
also
look
at
of
in
sugar
Mont
that
accurate
attack.
G
B
B
Everybody
understand
this
trouble,
all
those
in
favor
thumbs
up
or
down.
They
have
two
three
four
five
six
thumbs
up.
Okay
and
James
is
absent.
Does
that
give
some
direction
there,
and
then
we
can
put
this
on
a
future
agenda
item
like
later
later
in
the
year,
when
we're
not
doing
budgets.
Does
that
sound
good
for
the
board?
Everyone
excellent
we
are
flying
through?
This
is
like
the
easiest
RT.
B
D
D
So
to
date,
staff
has
taken
34
of
these
courses
and
we
now
have
five
staff
members
that
have
earned
this
certification,
so
I
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
them,
because
that's
not
an
easy
task
and
it's
something
that
we
are
very
committed
to
providing
that
opportunity
for
staff,
and
we
appreciate
staff
taking
us
up
on
that
and
completing
that
class.
So
thank
you.
Staff.
Members
second,
is
to
mark
all
of
your
calendars
and
we
will
be
sending
something
to
you
officially,
but
just
heads
up.
D
We
mentioned
this
I
think
last
month,
but
we
have
finalized
the
date
for
the
RDA
50th
year
anniversary,
so
that'll
be
Friday
June
21st
from
3:00
to
5:00
at
the
galavan
Center.
So,
as
I
said,
we
will
get
something
out
to
you.
Officially
I
wanted
to
make
sure
you're
aware
that
we
have
set
that
date
and
then
finally
Thursday
from
for
Danny.
D
So
and
then,
finally,
on
Thursday
from
4
to
7,
is
the
Fair
Park
public
market
open
house
for
anyone
who's
interested
that
is
happening
at
the
Science
Building
out
at
the
Fair
Park
more
information
we
have
fliers,
there's
also
information
on
the
website.
We
have
been
reaching
out
to
the
community
and
trying
to
make
sure
we're
doing
a
better
job
of
advertising
that
and
incorporating
everyone.
We've
been
responding
to
some
community
responses
to
the
survey
and
questions
and
so
wanted
to
make
everyone
aware
of
that
as
well.
Danny.
C
B
There's
a
couple
of
things
chair,
Vice,
Chair,
stuff:
one
is
Katie
for
Katie,
sorry
hi,
it's
so
good
to
see
you
over.
There
makes
me
happy.
We
have
a
board
appointment.
This
is
just
a
technical
question.
Randomly
we
have
a
board
appointment.
We
were
wondering
how
we
could
close
the
RDA
meeting
open,
City
Council,
with
the
intent
to
reopen
when
our
board
appointee
gets
here.
Is
she
here?
Oh
he's
here,
never
mind
she.
She
thank
you.
Thanks.
B
David
I
have
a
question.
I
was
wondering
about
the
Rocky
Mountain
Power
working
groups
and
I
I
know
that
you
were
going
to
be
the
person.
That
is
the
lead
on
that
and
just
wondering
if
we
had
a
date
or
anything,
it
keeps
popping
up
in
my
head
and
if
I
don't
get
it
out
loud,
then
I'll
forget
about
it
again
and
then
it'll
pop
up
it
like
2:00
in
the
morning
and
then
it's
a
whole
thing,
and
so,
if
I
just
ask
now
it's
better.
B
B
That
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
that's
perfect
yeah.
No,
that's
that's
perfect.
I
appreciate
that
I,
just
like
I
said
it
keeps
popping
up
in
my
head
at
2:00
in
the
morning
and
I
wanted
to
get
it
out
so
yeah,
and
just
because
you
were
none
of
my
understanding
is
that
you've
reached
out
to
RDA
UTA
and
council
staff
and
we'll
kind
of
regroup
and
get
a
meeting
going
with
the
working
group,
which
is
me
Andrew
and
Aaron.
B
C
B
B
I
Name
is
Marissa
cocky
and
much.
That
means
good
news
by
the
way
I
have
been
living
in
Utah
for
the
past
24
years,
coming
from
the
East
Coast
I
work
downtown
actually
cross
the
street
from
4th
south
and
I
have
seen
the
change
and
the
growth
challenges
and
everything
else
that
comes
with
it.
The
past
24
years
and
I
believe
in
public
service
I'd
like
to
be
involved
I
get
a
lot
of
our
students
involved.
I
So
we
help
a
lot
of
the
businesses
and
the
community
with
their
space
planning,
designs
and
sustainability
and
which
is
a
huge
passion
of
mine
and
so
I
would
like
I
mean
I,
often
have
a
voice,
and
it's
nice
to
know
what
I'm
talking
as
well
and
tried
to
bring
in
a
solution
sometimes,
and
in
the
past
few
days,
I
have
been
copying
pages
and
pages
and
gosh
there's
so
much
to
learn.
I
was
I
started
to
read
the
division
for
downtown,
which
is
a
packet.
I
B
B
Much
and
if
you
just
want
to
take
a
seat
right
there
then
we'll
have
we
have
a
consent
agenda
next,
and
so
it
will
be
done
and
done.
Wonderful,
excellent.
Cute.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Our
next
item
is
our
consent
agenda.
I'm.
Looking
for
a
motion,
I
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
luke,
a
second
by
board
member
Johnston.