►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Formal Meeting - 3/3/2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
You
opposed
the
motion
passes.
We
are
at
item
a5,
which
is
to
consider
adopting
a
joint
ceremonial
resolution
with
mayor
Mendenhall
recognizing
and
honoring.
The
hundredth
anniversary
of
the
League
of
Women
Voters
I
will
started.
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
councilmember
Amy
Fowler
to
read
the
resolution.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
can
I
just
say
how
awesome
this
is
to
have
the
privilege
of
reading
this
resolution
and
hopefully,
which
I
imagine
there
wouldn't
be
a
opposition
to
adopting
this
resolution,
especially
on
today's
Super
Tuesday.
So
it's
quite
monumentous
that
you
know
we
women
get
to
vote
and
not
only
that
we
get
to
vote
but
that
we
get
to
sit
up
in
these
spots
and
as
elected
officials.
C
Voters
held
in
the
South
Salt
Lake
Tabernacle
on
November
17th
1919,
and
whereas
the
conference
was
sponsored
by
the
Utah
State
suffrage.
Council
then
presided
over
by
Utah,
feminists,
mlmp,
wells,
Emily,
C,
Richards
and
others,
and
whereas
the
League
of
Women
Voters
is
a
civic
group
originally
formed
to
help.
Women
take
a
larger
role
in
public
affairs
after
they
won
the
right
to
vote
and
whereas
the
League
of
Women
Voters
is
proud
to
be
nonpartisan.
C
Neither
supporting
or
opposing
candidates
or
political
parties
at
any
level
of
government,
but
always
working
on
vital
issues
of
concern
to
members
and
the
public.
And
whereas,
since
1987
the
United
States
Congress
has
annually
authorized
the
President
of
the
United
States
to
declare
the
month
of
March
as
Women's
History
Month
and
whereas
the
League
of
Women
Voters
was
formed.
100
years
ago,
On
February,
14
1924,
be
it
resolved
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
and
the
mayor
of
Salt
Lake
City
recognized
the
League
of
Women
Voters
as
an
important
civic
organization.
C
Working
for
the
welfare
of
all
utans
be
further
resolved
that
the
Selig
City
Council
and
mayor
of
Salt
Lake
City
recognized
the
long
history,
a
civic
engagement
by
the
organization
and
its
intent
to
pursue
this
work
for
the
next
100
years
and
is
signed
by
all
of
us
and
I
have
to
say.
This
right
here
makes
me
proud
to
be
a
you
of
woman
from
Utah.
So.
B
A
A
Okay,
we
will
now
hold
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
meeting.
We
have
a
few
opportunities
for
public
comment
tonight
and
we'll
call
people
based
on
the
comment
cards
that
we
have,
that
having
turned
in
I
will
call
people
to
at
a
time
the
first
person
please
come
forward
to
the
microphone
and
the
second
person
please
be
ready
to
follow.
Comment.
Time
is
limited
to
two
minutes
per
person.
Then
you
cannot
combine
time
with
another
speaker
as
a
reminder,
please
help
create
a
civil
and
respectful
meeting
be
respectful
during
other
people's
comments.
A
D
For
meeting
with
me
today
and
thank
you,
Mia
yeah
and
I
just
moved
into
sugar
house
two
months
ago
to
be
closer
to
to
the
you
health
system,
I
like
to
mention
Jana
nice,
to
have
all
these
lists
of
things.
That's
problems
that's
going
on
every
day,
but
the
thing
is
the
best,
the
bad
news,
but
the
good
news
is
everybody.
You
drive
by
has
a
little
piece
of
the
solution
to
all
any
of
those
items.
D
So
the
thing
is:
is
people
you
drive
by
at
the
grocery
store?
They
have
a
little
solution.
Two
suicides,
two
divorces.
You
know
everything
like
that.
I
had
a
couple
of
proposals
that
the
city
would
change,
which
goes
down
to
the
connection
part.
If
you
go
to
mass
gov,
which
is
the
Massachusetts
the
website,
they
have
an
easy
menu
bar
in
which
you
go
living
working,
living,
working
learning
and
each
down.
D
You
know
when
you
go
over
there,
you
have
stuff
like
for
living
on
children's
and
families
and
for
learning
you
have
job,
training,
programs
etc.
But
the
thing
that
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
have
suggest
the
city
analyze.
How
Massachusetts
has
it
and
also
I'm,
trying
to
push
for
k,
ue
d
to
produce
some
shows
with
some
actors
at
on
campus?
Maybe
they
can
get
a
house
and
they
didn't
have
anybody
from
from.
D
You
know,
families
who
have
small
kids
to
anybody
like
that
and
have
some
shows
and
then
upload
it
to
the
the
website,
but
there's
all
of
course,
I
got
one
more
minute,
but
the
thing
I'd
like
to
see
is
the
city
also
get
digital
signs
up,
have
a
partnership
with
some
of
the
grocery
stores,
fast
food
stores.
They
would
have
the
signs
up
digital
signs
and
they
would
promote
their
own
their
products
inside,
but
then
PSAs
will
come
on
and
it
will
say
if
you
want
to
have
any
problems
with
time.
E
A
A
F
Regarding
the
notification
ordinance,
the
land
use
committee
has
several
comments.
We
think
you're
doing
a
really
good
job
of
notifying
recognized
organizations
good.
We
get
too
many
too
many
projects
going
on
in
sugarhouse,
but
we
have
several
requests.
One
is
that
the
sign?
That's
on
the
property?
That's
put
30
feet
from
the
sidewalk
way
back
in
the
middle
of
a
muddy
field,
and
it's
this
big
isn't
valuable.
Nobody
can
read
it
nobody's
going
to
walk
through
the
mud,
to
see
what
it's
about
see.
F
If
you
can
figure
out
a
way
to
put
that
closer
to
the
street
I
understand
you
don't
want
people
to
walk
off
with
the
signs,
but
maybe
there's
something
you
can
do
to
make
that
more
efficient,
because
I
know
you
notify
the
people
right
around
the
parcel,
but
it
could
be
somebody
dropping
by
who
lives
a
block
away.
That
would
be
affected
by
whatever's
being
proposed
and
something
else
the
Facebook
page,
I
didn't
even
know
the
city
had
a
Facebook
page
until
we
started
getting
comments
about
a
land
use
proposal.
F
So
if
you
can
work
it
into
the
ordinance
or
maybe
make
it
an
informal
thing
tell
us
when
you're
posting
something
about
our
community
on
the
Facebook
page,
so
I
can
make
sure
I've
got
it
posted
on
our
website
where
they
want
to
see
the
plans,
because
I
often
they're,
simultaneous
and
I,
don't
get
them
up
on
the
website
for
two
or
three
days.
So
that's
just
a
civil
thing.
Thank.
A
E
I
am
still
Cindy
Cromer
things
are
not
always
what
they
appear
to
be
or
more
accurately.
In
this
case
they
are
more
than
they
appear
to
be.
This
proposal
was
the
one
that
Sheree
coffee,
the
former
deputy
planning
director,
was
working
on
at
the
time
of
her
death.
It
has
taken
longer
to
reach
you
because
of
her
premature
departure.
E
Secondly,
the
issue
of
notification
was
the
Achilles
heel
in
trolley
squares
expansion
to
the
south.
It
wasn't
the
most
important
problem,
but
it
provided
a
way
to
ask
the
state
Ombudsman
for
property
rights
for
an
opinion
we
did
and
he
agreed
with
us
number
three.
The
larger
problem
was
the
proposed
use
of
the
FB
un-to
zone
in
an
historic
district
on
a
predominantly
low
density
block,
in
an
application
that
the
city
had
never
examined
so
fast
forward
to
where
we
are
now.
E
You
have
modified
the
FB
you
into
the
Planning
Division,
now
examines
the
citywide
impact
of
zoning
changes
which
will
be
applied
citywide
and
they
do
that
consistently.
I
watch
and
finally,
the
repairs
are
almost
finished
with
this
ordinance.
It's
an
example
of
how
much
effort
is
behind
each
item.
On
your
agendas,
Thanks
thank.
B
B
A
G
Hi
folks,
good
evening,
my
name
is
Kol
Nielsen
I'm,
a
lifelong
resident
of
this
great
city,
I
work
for
a
real
estate
development
firm
in
sugarhouse,
where
we
own
operate
and
have
built
three
projects.
We
love
sugar
house,
we
think
it's
a
great
urban
walkable
community.
We
appreciate
the
efforts
of
the
City
Council
and
the
planning
staff
and
Planning
Commission
in
furthering
that
cultivating
a
good
place
to
live.
G
There's
just
one
item
on
this
proposal
that
I
would
object
to,
and
that
is
the
mandating
of
retail
on
the
first
floor
along
21st,
south
and
1100
East,
and
a
couple
reasons
for
that
parking
is
an
issue.
What
it
does
is
it
drives
up
costs
in
the
projects
when
costs
go
up,
rents
go
up
for
for
tenants,
whether
they
be
retail,
tenants
or
residential
tenants
up
above
and
that's
not
something.
We
would
like
to
see
the
the
other
issue.
We've
we've
actually
built
a
live-work
unit
and,
unfortunately,
for
us
it
didn't
work.
G
I
took
us
three
years.
It
was
a
condo.
It
took
us
three
years
to
try
and
sell
it,
and
we
ended
up
splitting
it
in
half
and
selling
them
separately.
So
this
well
I
think
this
ordinance
is
good
in
general.
This
piece
really
doesn't
allow
the
flexibility
in
the
future.
If
we
have
a
difficult
time
economically,
we
may
see
a
lot
of
empty
storefronts
because
of
more
and
more
retail
getting
built
by
mandate
rather
than
by
the
demands
of
the
market.
So
thank
you.
F
So
this
is
for
smaller
scale
sugar
house,
so
one
thing
we
do
not
like
is
the
maximum
facade
length
should
be
200
feet,
not
300
feet.
When
you
look
at
the
longest
building,
we
could
find
of
the
new
ones
that
are
built.
The
sugar
house
legacy
is
207
feet.
That's
a
big
long
building
to
add
another
hundred
feet
is
ridiculous.
It's
the
size
of
a
football
field,
so
the
smaller
scale
development
should
be
smaller,
not
larger.
F
There
should
be
one
active
entrance
every
30
feet,
not
40.
The
area
needs
to
remain
walkable,
not
on
the
scale
of
a
car,
and
we
don't
like
live
work
units
on
the
ground
floor
as
a
substitute
for
ground-floor
retail.
Usually
it
results
in
a
curtain
window,
not
an
active
window
with
something
interesting
to
look
at
sidewalk
width
should
be
10
feet
wide
most
of
our
sidewalks
and
we've
measured.
Many
of
them
are
4
or
5
feet
and
too
narrow
for
pedestrians
going
both
ways
down
the
street.
F
A
walkable
community
means
welcoming
easy
to
travel
sidewalks
if
families
feel
jostled
or
pushed
while
walking,
they
won't
come
back.
We
need
to
remember.
We
also
want
to
encourage
street
furniture
and
trees
all
of
that
on
the
sidewalk.
So
wherever
we
can,
we
need
to
be
able
to
widen
them
to
10
feet.
Thank
you.
H
Well,
we
appreciate
the
codification
of
design
standards
for
the
sugarhouse
business
district
zones
taken
from
the
master
plan.
We
feel
that
there
are
several
proposed
standards
that
do
not
meet
the
spirit
of
the
master
plan.
The
recommendation
that
frontage
be
allowed
to
extend
unbroken
to
300
feet
is
too
long
a
distance.
H
This
would
lead
to
a
dehumanizing
looming
mass
of
a
structure,
especially
with
the
recommended
eight
or
six
foot
sidewalks
and
forty
foot
distance
between
active
doorways,
the
sugarhouse
master
plan
business
district
guidelines
handbook
states
that
the
mass
and
height
of
new
buildings
should
relate
to
the
historical
scale
of
sugarhouse
development
to
avoid
an
overwhelming
or
dominating
appearance
in
new
construction.
It
also
states
that
buildings
should
minimize
shadows
and
the
mass
of
tall
densely
packed
buildings
should
permit
sunlight
to
reach
open
spaces
and
should
maximize
mountain
views
view
corridors
are
needed
in
larger
parcels.
H
H
I
I
agree
with
the
last
two
presenters
commenters,
the
sugarhouse
design
standards.
You're
looking
at
right
now
do
not
follow
Complete
Streets
Complete
Streets
in
the
original
sugarhouse
circulation
and
amenities
plan
from
about
eight
years
ago,
suggested
twelve
foot
wide
sidewalks
in
accordance
with
Complete
Streets.
So
I'm
asking
you
actually
not
to
approve
this
and
to
keep
the
public
hearing
open
and
to
kick
it
back
to
staff
and
say
what
happened
to
Complete
Streets,
it's
an
insult
to
pedestrians
to
not
put
in
regular,
respectful
sidewalks.
I
In
addition,
you
only
have
ground
for
mixed-use
kind
of
on
Highland
and
21st.
That
doesn't
make
sense.
Mcclellan
is
the
best
example
of
why
you
need
to
have
ground
floor
retail.
If
you
don't
have
ground
floor
retail
and
restaurants
you're
effectively
pushing
zombi
buildings
ground
floor
would
be
dead.
If
you
just
have
apartments,
we
have
a
lot
of
those
like
that.
So
what
happens
is
when
you're
grilling
meat
you're
having
a
party
the
parties
on
the
sidewalk?
I
That's
not
what
we're
supposed
to
be
encouraging
we're
supposed
to
be
encouraging
walkability,
and
if
you
want
to
encourage
walkability,
you
need
wide
sidewalks
and
you
need
ground-floor
retail.
This
document
does
not
encourage
that
it
does
not
meet
Complete
Streets.
It
does
not
encourage
walkability
and
I'm,
urging
you
to
keep
it
open,
send
it
back
to
the
staff
and
say
you
want
walkability
and
you
want
complete
streets
and
you
want
ground-floor
retail
to
encourage
public
engagement.
That's
what
makes
sugarhouse
sugarhouse
walkability!
C
A
B
A
I
I'm
against
it,
you
do
you
realize
you
actually
put
a
marijuana.
Dispensary,
half
a
block
away
from
the
woman's
homeless.
Shelter
I
mean
come
on.
I
can
see
some
standards
on
marijuana
dispensaries,
but
it
shouldn't
be
near
schools.
I
mean
you've
done
most
of
the
work,
but
all
of
a
sudden,
you
put
it
right
next
to
allowed
it
right
next
to
a
homeless
shelter,
you
don't
want
to
put
liquor
stores
or
marijuana
dispensaries
next
to
something
like
that,
you
shouldn't
be
encouraging
and
enabling
the
the
obvious
issue
here,
because
that
area
actually
has
a
problem.
I
The
parking
lot
of
the
work
force
services
next
to
it
is
a
shooting
gallery.
So
why
would
you
want
to
have
a
marijuana
dispensary
right
next
to
it,
because
you're
incurred
you're,
letting
people
know
that?
Okay,
you
can
go
in
for
marijuana,
but
if
you
wanted
something
a
little
stronger,
just
go
down
the
street
see
you
understand:
I
have
no
problem
with
the
marijuana
dispensary
in
the
right
place.
That's
not
the
right
place!
Please
consider
changing
this.
Just
stop
this
Thank
You.
A
A
B
B
A
Motion
passes
next
items
b5
through
v8
involved,
grant
applications
that
will
be
heard
as
one
public
hearing
grant
items
include
fix
the
brakes,
pre-disaster
mitigation,
rocky
mountain
high
intensity,
drug
trafficking
area,
Salt,
Lake,
Metro,
Narcotics,
Task,
Force
force
south
viaduct
trail
and
repaving.
An
addition
of
bike
lanes
on
Main
Street
from
south
tempo
to
three
hundred
north
bicycle
lanes
up
Capitol
Hill
project
I
would
like
to
call
mr.
Chapman.
I
You
know
how
much
I
hate
separated
bike
lanes
I
hate
him,
but
there
are
very
few
places
in
Salt
Lake
City
that
actually
would
provide
a
safe
area
for
protected
bike
lanes.
One
of
them
happens
to
be
Main
Street,
going
up
to
the
State
Capitol,
so
the
grant
application
you're
pushing
right
now
actually
makes
sense.
Thank
you.
Finally,
a
bike
lane
protected
bike
lane
that
makes
sense.
Benson
peak,
is
a
big
deal
worldwide.
People
come
here
from
around
the
world
to
hike
ins
and
some
peak
I.
I
The
problem
right
now
is
this
grant
only
goes
to
Capitol
Hill
and
if
you
go
from
there,
where
it's
very
unsafe,
so
it
needs
to
you
need
to
work
with
the
Capitol,
the
Capitol
Preservation
Board,
and
try
to
get
a
bike
path
on
Capitol
grounds
going
up
past
the
Capitol,
because
if
you
use
these
Capitol
Boulevard,
it's
one
of
the
most
unsafe
places
around
bicyclists
actually
drive
and
park
there,
because
they
don't
want
to
go
there
with
a
bike.
So
they
park
there
and
then
go
up
the
hill
from
there.
I
A
A
I
A
G
A
B
Chair,
if
I
might
we
heard
some
concerns
last
week
last
week
last
week
about
this
and
I
know
that
Louis
Cogan
addressed
some
of
those
today
in
our
work
session
and
they're
written
out,
so
those
should
be
sent
out
to
the
public
as
well.
I'm
personally
satisfied
enough
that
we'll
keep
working
on
these
things,
I
think
there's
some
things
that
can
be
improved.
They'll
want
to
get
this
going
and
keep
working
on
as
we
go
great.
B
Want
to
remind
madam
chair,
reminding
the
public
that-
and
this
is
just
planning
the
or
passing
the
plan
that
will
be
there'll-
be
more
details
and
more
discussions
to
come
as
we
fund
and
plan
each
phase
of
the
plan
and
that
I
hope
that
people
who
came
forward
and
expressed
both
support
and
opposition,
recognizing
that
there
was
a
significantly
more
support
but
hope
that
all
of
those
people
will
stay
engaged
with
the
city.
While
we
move
into
the
next
part
of
this
project,.
B
A
C
Madam
chairman,
I,
yes,
I,
don't
have
a
question.
Madam
mayor
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
your
speech
at
the
State
of
the
City
last
night
and
I
truly
look
forward
to
working
with
you
on
all
of
your
great
plans
and
having
a
very
collaborative
relationship
between
us
and
you
and
it's
nice
to
all,
be
on
the
same
page,
with
a
lot
of
the
things
that
you
mentioned
in
the
state
of
the
city.
Yesterday,
I
know
our
priorities
of
the
council
and
you
did
a
great
job.
So
thank
you.
A
Where
I,
where
our
item
d2
will
take,
will
be
taken
general
comments,
I
will
call
people
based
on
the
comment
cards
out
have
been
turned
in
just
like
with
the
public
hearings.
I
will
call
people
two
at
a
time.
The
first
person
please
come
forward
to
the
microphone
and
the
second
please
be
ready
to
follow.
A
Comment.
Time
is
two
minutes
per
person
and
you
cannot
combine
time
with
another
speaker
as
a
reminder.
Please
help
create
a
civil
and
respectful
meeting
with
respect
folder
and
other
people's
comments.
No
loud
noises
or
other
disruptions
do
not
block
other
people's
views
with
signs
or
other
items
like
council
staff
help.
I
How
do
I
put
this?
What
the
Leonardo
did
last
week
I
would
consider
to
be
evil.
Cold-Hearted
I
could
not
believe
it,
but
I
got
to
give
credit
to
the
mayor.
You
did
what
I
think
99%
of
the
citizens
of
Salt
Lake
City
wanted
to
be
done
and
you
took
care
of
it.
Thank
you
personally.
I
closed
the
leonardo,
based
on
that
alone,
but
that's
me
I'd
like
to
talk
about
two
things:
one
Alan
Park,
hundreds
of
people
in
my
area
in
sugarhouse
area
are
interested
in
trying
to
save
the
seven-acre
Alan
Park.
I
You
have
the
ability
you
have
the
tools
to
provide
that
it
stay
a
park.
The
heirs
of
that
property
want
it
to
stay
a
park,
but
unfortunately
it's
in
the
court
and
the
court
is
trying
for
the
most
money
out
of
there
and
they're
trying
to
put
63
residences
there.
It's
one
of
the
last
remaining
old
old
forests
that
we
have
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
so
I'm
asking
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
the
council
provides
some
kind
of
eminent
domain
or
something
to
save
that
property.
I
Please
and
finally,
SB
214
is
an
anti
gambling
statute
that
we
need
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
because
the
sugar
excuse
me
the
ball
park.
Labrie
Wells
neighborhood
has
a
crime
magnet
at
13th,
South
Wayne's
corner
we've
heard
about
it
for
five
ten
years.
Part
of
it
is
because
of
the
gambling
machines
there
and
I
urge
you
to
support
senator
Maine's
bill.
It
just
passed
Senate,
business
and
labor,
but
it
needs
support
at
the
in
the
legislature
only
one
more
week
to
go.
We
need
it
here,
thanks
for
listening.
E
Hi
I'm
Cindy,
Cromer
and
I'm
talking
about
housing.
Again,
you
have
a
copy
of
my
comments
in
front
of
you.
Two
weeks
ago,
I
had
an
appointment
with
councilmember
Fowler
on
the
subject
of
housing.
You'll,
remember
my
efforts
with
housing
started
in
the
mid
1970s.
In
addition
to
45
years
of
experience,
I
am
the
queen
of
detours
shaggy
dog
stories
and
trips
into
the
weeds.
E
Councilmember
Fowler
was
far
more
focused
during
our
meeting
and
asked
me
to
name
the
three
most
important
aspects
of
our
situation
regarding
housing,
brilliant
strategy
on
her
part,
first
I
had
to
shut
up
and
then
I
had
to
think
about
the
answer,
and
then
I
had
to
abandon
all
of
my
usual
detours.
Three
things
here.
They
are,
with
apologies
to
councilmember
Fowler
for
being
redundant
tonight,
which
I
try
to
avoid
number
one
housing
is
interdisciplinary
I
cannot
think
of
any
aspect
of
city
government
which
is
not
related
to
housing,
everything
from
accounting
to
zoning.
E
Yes,
a
twosie
everything
that
the
city
does
is
related
in
some
way
to
the
quantity
and
quality
of
our
supply
of
housing,
and
we
understand
that
homelessness
is
interdisciplinary
and
we
approach
it
with
team
members
from
disciplines
from
different
disciplines.
We
don't
do
that
with
regard
to
other
types
of
housing.
We
don't
consider
them
from
an
interdisciplinary
perspective.
Number
two
housing
could
benefit
from
incentives,
so
could
I
as
a
landlord
they're,
currently
virtually
non-existent,
and
that's
a
topic
for
another
comment
that
I'll
work
on
number
three
housing
in
Salt
Lake
must
be
data-driven.
E
This
issue
is
related
to
the
myths
that
I
talked
about
it.
My
last
comment
and
two
important
aspects
of
the
housing
puzzle.
If
you
buy
into
the
myths-
and
you
avoid
other
disciplines,
then
you
can
ignore
the
data
and
I
put
some
suggested
data
that
we
could
obtain
on
the
back
of
your
handout.
I
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
tolerating
my
ongoing
comments
about
housing
and
especially
to
councilmember
Fowler
thanks.