►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Formal Meeting - 2/18/2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
B
I'm
Graham
I'm
in
fifth
grade,
and
my
favorite
thing
about
Scouts-
is
that
we
get
to
make
friends
I'm
snow
and
my
favorite
thing
about
Scouts
is
probably
the
Pinewood
Derby
race.
You
get
to
build
a
car
and
race
it
I'm
in
fifth
grade.
My
name
is
Gideon
I'm
in
fifth
grade
and
I,
like
that,
you
can
learn
new
things
that
you
probably
haven't
learned
before.
When
you
join
Scouts,
my
name
is
Mason
Bracken
I
am
h10.
My
favorite
thing
about
scouting
is
probably
Horning
what
to
do.
B
C
B
B
B
A
A
A
Okay,
I
want
to
welcome
each
of
you
to
our
Salt
Lake
City
Council
meeting
this
evening.
We
appreciate
that
you
have
taken
time
out
of
your
day
to
attend
and
participate
and
see
your
local
government
at
work
to
start
the
meeting.
We
have
some
guidelines
for
decorum
and
civility
to
make
sure
that
people
feel
comfortable
and
safe
participating
in
our
meeting
tonight.
A
We
ask
that
you
please
be
respectful
during
other
people's
comments,
avoid
cheering
jeering,
snapping
fingers
or
any
disruptive
noise,
because
it
could
cause
others
to
feel
intimidated.
Please
also
help
take
care
of
this
historic
meeting
room
by
not
standing
on
furniture
or
leaning
against
the
decorative
pieces.
This
is
room
is
the
only
room
in
the
city
and
county
building
that
is
still
used
for
its
original
purpose,
which
is
lawmaking.
A
A
Please
do
not
approach
the
Dyess
if
you
have
something
to
pass
out
to
the
council
members
a
staff
member
can
come
assist
you.
Our
staff
is
here
to
help
you
if
you
have
any
assistance
or
if
you
need
any
assistance
or
have
any
questions,
please
raise
your
hand
and
a
staff
person
will
come
and
help
you
also.
We
recognize
that
two
minutes
of
public
comment
may
not
be
long
enough
to
get
all
of
your
comments
outlined.
A
D
A
A
We
are
now
at
item
a5,
recognition
of
David
Sorenson,
who
won
an
award
for
his
work
on
a
personal
project
to
improve
pedestrian
safety
near
Legrand
and
900.
South
David
is
a
14
year
old
resident
who
lives
in
district
6
he's
a
freshman
at
the
academy
for
math
engineering
and
science,
a
public
charter
school.
The
school
focuses
on
stem
based
advancement,
curriculums
David,
took
on
the
project
as
part
of
his
citizenship
in
the
community
scout
to
earn
a
community
Scout
merit
badge.
He
wanted
this
project
to
focus
on
something
that
was
really
important
to
him.
A
His
friends
and
his
neighbors.
His
goal
has
been
a
goal
of
the
community
for
decades.
He
would
like
to
see
a
900
South,
a
c9
South
at
the
intersection
of
a
grand
and
military
safer
for
everyone.
David
said
he
was
almost
hit
three
times
by
speeding
cars
at
these
intersections.
He
met
with
salt
lake
city
transportation,
division,
John,
Larson
and
Scott
voted
louse,
okay
to
identify
ways
that
he
could
help
with
speeding
in
the
area
based
on
what
he
learned
from
the
meeting
with
John
and
Scott.
A
While
working
on
his
merit
badge,
David
decided
to
take
things
a
step
further
and
create
awareness
for
drivers
about
their
responsibility
to
drive
25
miles
per
hour
in
the
neighborhood
for
his
Eagle
Scout
project.
After
on
going
undergoing
a
process
of
determining
the
best
way
to
do
this,
David
decided
to
focus
his
efforts
on
the
blocks
between
Greenwood
Terrace
and
900
East
on
ninth
south.
A
He
had
signs
printed
with
the
help
of
a
friend
and
neighbor
John
Lee,
who
took
David's
phrase,
drive
25
in
the
hive
and
created
a
logo
for
him
David,
distributed
close
to
a
hundred
and
forty
flyers,
asking
drivers
on
9th
South
to
slow
down
the
signs
were
posted
on
lawns
where
they
were
visible
to
drivers.
The
response
has
been
very
positive
and
supportive.
The
purpose
of
his
Eagle
Scout
project
is
to
address
the
two
main
safety
risks
of
speeding
and
visibility
in
the
area.
A
B
B
Asked
around
on
the
street,
who
would
want
one
and
I
posted
them
in
their
lungs
so
that
they
could
raise
awareness
for
this?
We
also
made
these
cards
that
say
this:
that
speeding
is
a
major
problem
and
efforts
are
being
made
with
the
city
just
low
speeds
down
on
a
street.
Ultimately,
it
is
up
to
those
driving
on
our
street
to
drive
25
miles
per
hour.
Please
put
this
card
in
your
car
to
remind
you
to
drive
25
in
the
hive,
which
is
the
slogan
that
I
came
up
with
for
my
Eagle
Scout
project.
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much.
We
really
appreciate
that
you
take
the
leadership
and
the
time
to
think
about
something
that
matters
not
just
to
you,
but
to
your
family
and
to
your
neighbors,
and
then
that
you
put
the
time
and
dedication
to
executing
that
and
doing
something
that
really
did
make
a
difference.
So
we
want
to
thank
you
very
much
and
I
have
a
little
gift
for
you
and
we'd
love
to
come
down
and
get
a
picture
with.
You
is
that
okay
yeah,
all
right,
you
want
to
come
stand
right
up
here.
E
A
A
We
have
a
few
opportunities
for
public
comment
tonight
and
I
will
call
names
on
the
comment
cards
as
they've
been
turned
in
I'll
call
people
two
at
a
time,
so
the
first
person
please
come
forward
to
the
microphone
second
person
you're
on
deck
as
next
in
line
the
comment.
Time
is
limited
to
two
minutes
per
person
and
you
cannot
combine
time
with
another
speaker
as
a
reminder.
Please
help
create
a
civil
and
respectful
meeting.
Please
be
respectful
of
other
people's
comments,
no
loud
noises
or
disruptions.
Please
do
not
block
other
people's
views.
A
A
F
F
In
addition,
the
plan
has
48
inch
wide
trails
cut
across
our
most
iconic
faces
in
the
Wasatch
or
at
least
in
the
city
here
in
the
foothills
across
van
cot
and
mount
wire
and
I
think
those
will
be
disruptive
visually
and
I
also
don't
think
the
city
is
gonna,
be
able
to
manage
people
cutting
across
switchbacks
etc,
which
is
already
happening
in
the
lower
regions
of
the
trail.
Those
are
my
two
biggest
problems:
width
of
the
trail,
the
where
the
trails
are
going.
F
F
Miracle,
moon
on
a
10-year
resident
of
Salt,
Lake
City
in
particular
just
wanted
to
talk
about
Mount
Wired
mountebank
caught
too
similar
to
what
was
previously
stated
to
iconic
Peaks
that
show
the
Wasatch.
The
trail
system
that's
been
proposed,
I
believe,
is
flawed
simply
in
that
it
calls
for
numerous
switchbacks
to
be
placed
in
the
front
of
the
mountain.
Increasing
the
distance
required
of
trails,
the
width
of
those
trails
being
40
inches
in
width
is
substantial.
All
of
us
have
seen
the
cuts
that
have
been
made
to
put
pipelines
in
place
along
the
Wasatch
Front.
F
These
would
be
put
in
place
across
across
the
front
of
Mount
van
cot
and
mount
wire
in
particular,
it's
important
that
we
become
aware
that
both
of
these
call
for
trails
to
the
top
of
those
peaks
for
mountain
bikes.
Now
I
myself
in
a
mountain
biker,
I
love
it.
However,
a
lot
of
people
in
mountain
biking
tend
to
have
agency
with
where
they
go.
Once
there
had
an
elevated
at
an
elevation.
This
will
introduce
trails
that
are
not
not
intended.
People
will
come
down
that
those
mountain
faces.
They
will
cut
their
own
trails.
F
G
Everyone,
this
is
a
good
night
to
be
outside.
On
a
trail,
my
name
is
Elliot
I'm
here
to
support
the
des
plan
before
you
tonight.
There
are
several
reasons
for
that.
First
of
all,
my
longtime
volunteer
organizer
of
open
call
outdoor
groups
for
nonprofit
groups
and
outdoor
clubs,
I've
organized
over
900
of
these
through
the
years,
mostly
to
to
include
many
on
the
Foothill
trails.
In
addition,
I've
led
hundreds
of
bike
rides
on
city
streets
and
dozens
of
kayak
tours
on
the
Jordan
River
Water
Trail.
G
From
this
perspective,
I
see
the
user
concerns
applicable
to
this
plan.
There
are
three
recurring
conflicts:
I
see,
one
is
off:
leash
dogs,
traumatizing
trail
users
to
errant,
bicyclists,
blasting,
down
trails,
indifferent
to
other
trail
users
and
three
homeowner
conflicts
at
trail.
Heads
a
master
plan
provides
the
foundation
to
address
these
many
issues
it
will
provide
for
signage,
defining
user
conduct
and
and
that
could
provide
for
a
ranger
program,
separate
conflicting
user
groups
where
appropriate,
closed
down
maverick
trails
and
fast-track
trailhead
development,
where
appropriate.
G
Second,
as
an
urban
planning
graduate
I
recognize
master
plans
as
guiding
documents,
we
don't
have
one
now.
This
is
the
first
one
can
address
the
aforementioned
conflicts,
maintain
and
improve
existing
trails,
construct
new
trails
and
address
infestation
of
invasive
nuisance,
weeds,
among
other
things.
G
Furthermore,
master
plans
trigger
the
funding
cycle,
which
is
critical
for
the
parks
department
to
move
forward.
Finally,
as
chair
of
the
peanut
advisory
board,
from
this
perspective,
I
can
report
that
the
dialogue
I
witness
is
that
the
general
public
highly
values
its
trails
and
wants
more
that
general
public
highly
values
its
open
space
and
wants
it
preserved
wherever
possible
time.
B
Good
evening,
members
of
the
council,
thank
you.
Providing
the
opportunity
to
comment
on
this.
I
am
here
representing
district
6
I'm,
the
representative
of
the
on
the
peanut
board
for
district
6,
and
want
to
speak
from
that
experience.
I
also
have
a
background
in
environmental
policy
and
have
had
been
involved
in
a
number
of
recreational
trail
planning
efforts
across
both
federal
and
local
lands.
So
I
have
some
experience
in
this
type
of
planning.
I
want
to
speak
in
support
of
the
plan.
B
I
think
that
the
agency
staff
that
have
worked
on
this
have
been
outstanding
in
their
ability
to
navigate
the
planning
process,
specifically
in
the
way
in
which
they
went
about
collecting
public
comment
and
seeking
public
input
into
this
plan.
It's
been
the
best
public
input
process
that
I've
ever
experienced
as
part
of
a
plan
like
this
I
also
want
to
note
that
they
have
specifically
acknowledged
that
this
is
the
first
step
right.
A
plan
is
the
first
step
in
a
long-term
management
of
this
trail
system.
B
I
think
the
plan
is
an
important
first
step,
but
I
know
that
the
parks
agency
and
staff
understand
this
is
a
long-term
investment
that
will
require
long-term
funding
and
long-term
support
from
the
staff
and
from
the
council
and
from
the
mayor
and
I
think
that
they
acknowledge
that
and
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
see
this
plan
move
forward
to
start
this
process.
I
also
just
want
to
speak
to
the
fact
that
these
plans
are
very
difficult,
because
you
have
a
number
of
stakeholders.
You
have
public
that
is
diverse
with
diverse
needs.
B
You
have
a
number
of
collecting
user
groups
and
I
think
that
the
staff
has
an
excellent
job
in
weighing
and
balancing
all
of
the
various
factors
in
all
the
comments
and
the
concerns
and
coming
up
with
a
plan
that
really
reflects
the
needs
of
the
community
at
large
and
the
best
possible
public
option
for
us
to
pursue.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
H
Evening,
thank
you.
I'm
Jeff,
Rocco
and
I
live
north
cove
estates,
the
top
of
his
capital
boulevard,
referring
to
an
email
from
our
HOA
president,
igor
best
Devereux
sent
to
Salt
Lake
City
gov
council
comments,
as
well
as
to
mr.
Wardin.
Our
first
concern
is
the
way
the
map
depicts
the
existing
trail
of
the
Bonneville
shoreline
as
it
goes
from
east
to
west.
H
We
believe
that
there's
an
error
showing
that
the
Bonneville
shoreline
exists
in
a
southern
spur
that
feeds
directly
into
private
property
and
that
there
are
no
Platts
that
we've
been
able
to
review
that
show
that
there's
an
easement
of
any
kind.
We
believe
this
could
be
misleading
for
trail
users,
and
they
may
be
tempted
to
take
the
trail
to
know
we're
ending
up
on
private
property
coming
from
a
public
trail
where
they
would
be
turned
away
and
not
allowed
to
have
access
to
exit
the
community
through
the
lower
gate.
H
This
is
potentially
something
you
might
consider
removing
that
spur
from
the
map,
because
to
the
best
of
our
knowledge,
it
is
not
actually
part
of
the
Bonneville
shoreline
trail.
Our
second
concern,
also
addressed
in
this
email,
revolves
around
the
section
of
trail
new
trail
proposed
from
the
bottom
of
City
Creek
Canyon,
up
to
the
existing
shoreline
trail
to
the
west
side
of
City
Creek,
to
replace
the
very
steep
and
dangerous
switchbacks
in
general,
where
I
am
personally
in
favor
of
that,
however,
the
community
is
concerned,
having
met
previously
with
fire
chief.
H
You
know,
after
the
fire
that
we
experienced
a
little
over
a
year
ago
about
the
difficulties
that
may
be
inherent
in
trying
to
defend
against
a
fire
coming
up.
City
Creek
up
the
western
side
of
the
City
Creek
Canyon,
and
does
the
trail
as
proposed
present
an
increased
risk
in
fire
danger,
or
perhaps
does
it
even
for
prevent
present
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
better
control
a
catastrophic
fire
event
should
occur.
Also,
it
appears
that
the
map,
the
way
it's
depicted,
shows
open
space
on
that
western
slope.
J
J
I,
don't
think
we
have
a
clear
idea
of
how
many
adaptive
users
will
use
the
trail,
because
currently
there's
just
not
enough
use
trail
as
it
is
right
now.
Programs
like
ours,
are
able
to
get
riders
out,
but
typically
that's
only
on
the
Bonneville
shoreline
trail
and
even
some
of
those
parts
of
that
trail
just
don't
fit.
Some
of
the
bikes
that
we
have
with
that
said.
I
am
excited
about
the
plan.
If
we
can
move
forward
with,
maybe
an
advisor
or
some
sort
of
Greater
advisory
look
for
adaptive
use.
J
There
is
a
lot
more
to
be
said
on
that,
but,
as
it
pertains
to
my
time,
I
just
really
asked
you
guys
to
consider
adaptive
use
and
potentially
having
a
greater
look
at
that,
not
necessarily
from
a
master-planned
point
of
view,
but
from
someone
with
experience
like
myself
or
other
adaptive,
riders
or
wheelchair
users.
It's
not
just
a
mountain
biking.
There's
a
lot
multi-use
that
goes
into
adaptive.
It
could
be
great
for
younger
people
looking
great
for
older
people,
but
adaptive
really
consider
thank.
K
That
would
be
fine
if
there
weren't
a
few
issues
that
were
particularly
concerned
about
that
mountain
bike
park
that
is
being
proposed
is
on
a
very
prominent
visible
here.
Hill.
If
you
look
at
almost
any
picture
of
the
university
that
hill
is,
is,
is
displayed
and
we're
very
concerned
about
the
kind
of
thing.
That's
happened
to
that
mountain
bike
park
up
on
18th
Avenue
happening
on
the
top
of
that
on
on
that
hillside.
We're
very
concerned
about
environmental
issues
as
it
relates
to
that
expansion
of
Putin
Park.
K
The
proposal
is
for
2
miles
of
trail
on
on
a
very
small
piece
of
real
estate.
That
would
very
quickly
make
that
look
like
a
piece
of
dirt
spaghetti.
It's
very
steep
on
all
sides
of
that
of
that
hill,
and
we
don't
really
think
it's
in
a
position
to
accommodate
that.
We
think
well-planned
trail
system
through
the
park
would
be
wonderful
and
it's
not
that
we
stand
necessarily
in
opposition
to
that,
but
it
ought
to
be
environmentally
looked
at
and
approached
correctly,
we're
also
a
little
bit
concerned
about
safety
issues
that
trail
head
already
has.
E
L
Custom
members
mayor,
my
name-
is
Kevin
Dwyer
I'm
at
the
Salt
Lake
Valley
Trail
society.
We
are
Salt
Lake
County's
mountain
bike.
Trails
group
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
address
you
all
on
this
very
important
thing:
the
Foothill
trails
master
plan.
It's
been
a
long
time
coming.
You
may
know
that
in
2012
and
in
2017
County
residents
in
a
sin
surveys
polled
stated
that
trails
were
their
number
one
recreation
amenity
that
they
desire
and
we're
excited
to
see
that
Salt
Lake
City
has
done
such
a
comprehensive
job
in
terms
of
vetting.
L
This
foot
health
trails
master
plan
to
the
community
and
to
you
all,
and
so
we
would
really
urge
your
support
for
the
foothill
trails
master
plan.
We
feel
like
it
goes
a
long
ways
towards
enhancing
the
trail
experience
for
all
users
and
also
eliminate
some
user
conflicts
by
developing
trail
systems
that
are
unique
to
different
types
of
user
groups
and
appropriate
for
the
the
trail
surfaces
and
slopes.
In
particular.
I
would
note
that
the
trails
master
plan
shuts
down
a
number
of
social
trails
that
we
found
have
been
unsustainable,
so
going
forward.
L
We're
excited
to
partner
with
you
all
to
continue
to
maintain
the
trails
here
in
Salt,
Lake
County
and
up
in
Salt
Lake
City
in
the
foothills
and
develop
a
stewardship
plan
that
really
grows
the
experience
for
all
the
trail
users
and
for
the
community
and
your
partners
in
the
profit
and
trail
user
groups.
Thank
you
thank.
M
Agree
with
everything
the
previous
speaker
said.
In
addition,
you
should
be
speeding
up
the
foothill
trails
program.
This
is
important
for
recreation
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
making
Utah
a
recreation
destination
for
the
country
and
the
world.
Please
speed
it
up.
The
next
item
you
have
on
your
agenda
has
20
million
dollars
for
in
street
transportation
projects
that
twenty
million
dollars
should
be
used
for
Foothill
trails
expansion.
Now
you
also
kicked
the
can
down
the
road
on
restrooms
and
dogs
and
I.
Don't
think
you
should
do
that.
M
You
should
address
it
right
now
and
you
should
also
have
more
park
rangers
again.
The
foothills
I've
written
up
there
on
bikes,
it's
beautiful!
It's
it's
an
amazing
experience.
Everybody
should
be
pushing
that
and
that
should
be
a
high
priority
higher
than
anything
else.
I
can
think
this
city
should
be
involved
in
right
right
now.
So
please
push
the
Foothill
trails
program
and
look
for
a
lot
more
funding
from
the
county
transportation
funding.
They
have
the
money
and
you
should
be
pushing
it
right
now.
C
Evening,
members
of
the
council,
my
name
is
Samantha
Finch
I'm,
a
resident
of
Salt
Lake
City,
and
a
current
member
of
the
parks,
natural
lands,
urban
forestry
trails,
Advisory
Board
of
Salt
Lake
I'm.
Here
tonight.
My
two
roles,
one
as
a
member
of
the
citizen
advisory
board
and
the
other
as
an
outdoor
recreation
list.
From
both
of
these
perspectives,
I
urge
you
to
adopt
the
foothill
trials
master
plan
offered
by
the
Salt
Lake
City
departments
lands
department.
C
My
enthusiasm
for
the
plan
stems
from
my
regular
usage
of
the
foothills
Natural
Area
for
the
sport
of
mountain
biking.
Over
the
past
10
years,
I
routinely
written
the
current
foothills
aerial
trails
throughout
the
warmer
seasons,
as
a
mountain,
biker,
I
value
being
a
little
bike
so
close
to
home.
The
proximity
of
the
foothill
area
helps
me
avoid
some
costly
and
time-consuming
trips
to
other
places
like
Park
City
for
Salt
Lake
I
see
the
benefits
of
a
well
designed
recreational
plan
that
will
enhance
the
public's
experience,
providing
outdoor
recreational
opportunities
in
the
city.
C
Furthermore,
I'm
particularly
thrilled
with
the
development
of
more
beginner
and
intermediate
biking
trails
with
loops,
it
is
a
design
that
will
clearly
enhance
my
experience
as
a
biker,
while
minimizing
conflicts
with
hikers
runners
and
other
bikers
I
believe
this
plan
will
provide
a
sense
of
design
and
order
promoting
a
safe
recreational
environment
for
all
users,
as
an
advocate
for
outdoor
space,
I
particularly
appreciate
the
goal
of
increasing
public
access,
but
but
directing
growth
away
from
environmentally
sensitive
areas
to
protect
the
beauty
of
the
foothills
areas
years
to
come.
Thank
you.
A
N
You
Council,
my
name
is
Andy
mcaro
I'm,
a
resident
in
marmalade
district
I
use
the
Foothill
trails
by
bike,
mostly,
and
sometimes
by
and
occasionally
by
skis,
I
moved
here
nine
years
ago.
The
foothills
trail
systems
were
in
a
central
part
of
that
decision.
I,
don't
know
if
we
would
have
come
here
if
it
wasn't
for
the
trails
and
I've
used
them
most
days
of
the
week
ever
since
we
bought
a
house
close
to
the
victory
Boulevard
trailhead.
That
was
a
really
important
decision.
N
There
loved
it
so
glad
they
built
a
trail
so
close,
but
more
trails
are
well
I'm.
Speaking
out
in
favor
of
this
plan,
I
love
this
plan
I
got
to
take
part
in
the
planning
process.
That
was
really
a
joy
and
incredibly
easy
and
I
felt,
like
I,
had
ample
opportunity
to
make
my
opinion
known.
I
made
a
few
minor
comments.
But
honestly
the
plan
was
pretty
much
awesome
from
the
start.
More
trails
are
better
for
all
users.
The
extra
use
of
directional
trails
is
fantastic.
N
N
I'd
like
to
oh,
and
also
the
new
trails
that
have
been
built
or
the
are
of
the
highest
quality
I'm
talking
about
the
ones
from
the
victory
Bowl
of
our
trailhead,
the
switchback
trail,
the
hell
Canyon
Trail
and
the
new
Ensign
Peak
Trail
they're
gonna
last
they're
not
going
to
be
hard
to
maintain
they're,
really
great
for
all
users.
So
more
of
that
is
going
to
be
fantastic
and
that's
what
the
plan
is
going
to
give
us
I,
fully
support
it
and
I'd
like
to
thank
everybody
for
all
their
hard
work
on
it.
Thank.
O
Hi,
my
name
is
Dave
eltis
I'm
with
cycling,
Utah
I'm,
here
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
plan.
I
think
it's
it's
a
long
needed
plan.
Salt
Lake
has
had
essentially
no
plan
for
the
foothills
and
that
I
think
is
what
has
led
to
a
lot
of
the
rogue
trails
that
previous
speakers
have
not
endorsed
and
I
agree
with
that.
We
don't
need
any
rogue
trails
as
a
long-term,
hiker
and
biker
in
the
foothills.
O
O
The
inland
port
is
a
disaster
for
that,
and
this
brings
Salt
Lake
City
residents
closer
to
nature,
which
means
that
they
will
value
nature
that
much
more
and
that,
if,
if
anything,
is
reason
enough
to
pass
it,
please
do
add
in
funds
for
maintenance
and
especially
weed
control.
Very
little
is
being
done
to
control,
tires
road
and
other
noxious
weeds
in
the
foothills
and
as
well
as
building
the
trails
and
also,
please
make
sure
to
I.
O
Don't
know
if
this
is
in
the
plan
or
not
I
suspect
it's
not,
but
light
pollution
on
the
trails
is
a
real
problem
where
you
have
things
like
oil
pipelines
or
natural
gas
pipelines
up
in
research
park,
where
there's
horrible
lights
that
pollute
the
night
sky
and
that
needs
to
be
nipped
in
the
bud
and
then
the
last
thing
in
terms
of
the
plan,
there
aren't
really
enough
trail
heads
in
this
plan.
The
the
plan
needs
more
trail
heads
in
areas
like
top
of
terrace
hills,
drive
by
the
JCC
and
other
places.
Time.
P
A
Q
I've
spoken
to
you
before
in
favor
of
this
trail
system,
I
support
all
of
the
comments
that
have
been
previously
made
in
favor
of
the
trail
system
and
I'm
pleased
that
it
seems
to
be
moving
forward.
I
did
pick
up
on
the
first
speakers,
comment
about
regulation
and
I
think
that's
an
important
consideration
that
has
not
been
talked
about
elsewhere.
Q
I'm,
presently
pretty
upset
with
the
fact
that
nobody
seems
to
take
account
of
the
dog
regulations
and
I
feel
like
either
we
have
a
regulated
system
or
we
do
away
with
the
ordinance,
because
if
you
don't
enforce
an
ordinance,
it's
not
going
to
happen.
There
also
needs
to
be
some
future
planning
because
we
have
ebikes.
We
have
Imani
scooters,
we're
going
to
let
these
scooters
on
the
on
the
trail
system,
etc,
etc.
So
there
doesn't
seem
to
there
does
need
to
be
some
planning.
Q
That
said,
I
would
encourage
you
to
move
ahead
and
build
five
miles
of
trail.
Get
a
Citizens
Committee.
That
starts
to
look
at
what
the
conflicts
are
on
the
trail
and
work
from
there
I'm
a
big
proponent
of
doing
rather
than
continually
studying,
because
as
you
build,
you
can
see
what's
right
what's
wrong
and
then
then
the
next
phase
continues.
I
may
have
said
this
once
before
in
my
previous
comments
to
you,
but
the
best
way
to
think
that
you're,
helping
out
and
delay
is
to
study
some
more.
Q
R
A
D
D
It's
not
fair
for
the
people
in
Salt,
Lake
City
to
be
traveling
down
to
Draper
and
talk
to
Park
City,
all
the
time
with
respect
to
traffic
and
congestion
pollution,
but
to
those
cities
that
have
invested
in
trail
systems
and
us
not
to
pick
it
up
and
have
Salt
Lake
City
provide
for
their
own
residences,
I
think
not
fair
to
the
other
folks.
So
what
overall
I
think
Lewis
Cogan
and
the
parks,
the
trails,
an
open
space
group
have
done
a
great
job
with
public
outreach,
they've
gotten
tons
of
public
input
on
this.
D
S
Hi
Matt
Peterson
I'm
a
20-year
resident
of
our
user
of
the
Foothill
trail
system
as
a
dog,
walker,
jogger,
mountain
biker,
flower,
picker
and
I
live
in
the
avenues,
probably
precisely
because
the
trails
are
so
close
to
us.
I
couldn't
be
more
in
favor
of
this
plan.
I
think
it
was
it's
come
about
by
a
admirable
and
masterful
process.
The
options
for
input
have
been
numerous
and
I
have
tried
to
avail
myself
of
them.
I
just
feel
like
it's
so
long
overdue,
a
trail
system
for
the
people
of
Salt
Lake.
It's
such
a
valuable
resource.
S
It's
exactly
what
Salt
Lake
should
be
all
about.
It's
healthy,
it's
active.
It
doesn't
contribute
to
air
pollution,
I'm
guilty
myself
of
driving
numerous
times
a
week
to
Draper
or
to
Park
City,
because
that's
where
the
trails
are
I've
been
involved
in
youth,
mountain
bike
volunteer
work
and
it's
a
shame
because
it's
really
hard
to
get
young
kids
onto
the
Salt
Lake
City
trails.
They
are
just
too
steep
they're,
not
well-managed.
The
city
deserves
a
world-class
trail
system.
The
foothills
is
an
invaluable
resource.
S
P
P
However,
I
think
that
the
user
groups
need
to
be
addressed
right
at
the
beginning,
I
bike,
I
hike,
but
every
day,
I
hike
my
dogs
in
the
foothill,
it's
important
for
them.
It's
important
for
hundreds
of
dog
owners
to
have
that
access,
I'm,
a
physician,
I,
don't
have
time
to
drive
to
Mill,
Creek
Canyon
or
to
Park
City
after
work
to
exercise
my
my
extended
family.
P
P
Pet
owners
are
very
conscientious
and
I
would
like
you
all
to
consider
incorporating
that
area
as
an
off-leash
area
in
the
first
iteration
of
the
master
plan,
it's
very
important
to
all
of
us.
I've
talked
to
many
many
people
that
agree.
Hopefully
you
guys
are
hearing
from
them
as
well
I'm
trying
to
get
that
going.
Thank
you
thank.
T
After
about
ten
months
of
stakeholder
development
that
was
with
this
is
the
place
State
Park,
the
University
Utah
open
lands,
Salt
Lake
City
the
city
stepped
forward
and
agreed
to
pay
for
this
master
plan,
as,
as
others
have
said,
it
was
really
a
fantastic
process.
It's
one
of
the
best
I've
ever
seen.
I
think
they
got
a
great
deal
for
what
they
spent
on
it,
and
there
was
plenty
of
opportunity
for
public
input
and
we
want
to
keep
that
input
coming
trails.
T
Utah
is
officially
the
nonprofit
partner
for
Salt
Lake
City
on
the
Foothill
trails,
master
plan
and
ongoing
project
for
years
to
come.
So
we
really
hope
to
help
feed
comments
and
concerns
I.
Just
like
everybody
to
know
that
the
very
top
people
in
the
world
of
trail,
design
and
trail
construction
were
consulted
in
this
plan.
T
We've,
given
lots
and
lots
of
thought
to
single
direction,
different
areas
for
use
dogs
on
leash
dogs
off
leash,
hiking
only
and
getting
a
mix
of
trail
users
that
can
really
all
enjoy
the
system
at
the
same
time
was
one
of
our
main
goals,
so
I,
just
like
I'm
speaking,
obviously
in
favor,
would
love
to
see
the
funding
come
consistently
over
the
next
few
years.
I
think
there's
a
very
strong
interest,
tieing
it
just
one
last
thing:
is
it's
been
a
free-for-all
in
the
past,
but
we're
gonna
change
that.
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
Hi,
my
name
is
Clint
Campbell
I
wanted
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
master
plan.
I
also
wanted
to
welcome
Darrin
district
5.
Congratulations
also
so,
with
this
master
plan
growing
up
in
Salt,
Lake
I
couldn't
wait
to
get
out
of
it
until
I
realized
that
we
have
this
amazing
trail
system
right
at
our
front
door.
F
So,
looking
forward
to
seeing
this
progress,
so
I
drive
out
the
draper
anymore,
Park
City,
as
well
as
just
being
able
to
see
all
the
high
school
mountain
bike
teams
how
quickly
they've
grown
and
how
excited
kids
are
to
get
out
and
ride
these
trails
to
have
them
in
their
back
yard,
where
they're,
accessible
and
not
having
to
get
parents
to
drive
them
somewhere.
Whatnot
can
really
help
expand
the
sport
as
well
as
trail
stewardship,
so
I
really
look
forward
to
seeing
it
grow
and
Salt
Lake
grow.
A
R
R
I'm
I'm
from
so
I'm
Bob,
first
and
and
I'm
from
Draper,
grew
up
there
as
I
spent
a
lot
of
year
20
years
there
and
one
cautionary
tale.
I
would
tell
you
all
to
consider
is
about
the
watershed.
I
currently
live
in
emigration,
Canyon
and
my
concerns
are
about
the
trails
that
are
in
the
immigration
watershed
mount
wire
and
some
others,
and
also
Salt
Lake
County
land
that's
owned
and
is
there
for
watershed
protection
in
the
canyon
as
the
county
does
more
development
I
mean
the
water
systems.
R
There
aren't
like
big
or
little
Cottonwood
Canyon,
where
you
have
municipal
systems,
treating
it
I'm
the
water
manager
from
my
well.
If
there's
dog,
fecal
matter
in
my
well,
it's
my
problem
to
deal
with
and
I.
Don't
have
anyone
looking
at
at
that
quality
every
day
other
than
myself,
so
my
kids
and
my
family
rely
on
it
as
do
everyone
in
emigration
Canyon.
R
That's
why
we
don't
allow
them
in
Big
and
Little,
Cottonwood
and
and
up
above
some
of
the
reservoirs
nearby
East
Canyon,
so
I
would
I
would
just
say
make
sure
as
you
do,
that
that
you
study
that
with
a
mindset
that
there
there
needs
to
be
a
study
there,
because
people
rely
on
that
water,
it's
our
only
water,
there's,
no
city
water,
there's
no
alternative,
so
we're
we're
committed
to
that
system.
So,
as
you
think
about
trails,
I
mean
I,
know,
there's
a
lot
that
you're
doing
is
very
good.
R
A
K
Time,
I'm
Tom,
McFarland
I'm,
a
property
owner
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
but
a
current
resident
of
immigration
Canyon.
My
concern
is
specifically
about
Phase
two
in
the
trail
of
Mount
wire
and
the
density
of
trails
that
are
proposed
for
the
kind
of
the
mouth
of
immigration.
Canyon.
If
you
know
the
topography
of
the
of
the
land
there
once
you
get
on
Mount
wire,
it's
it's
sort
of
opens
the
floodgates.
People
going
further
east
along
the
ridge.
K
Creating
you
know:
rogue
trails
along
that
Ridge,
the
the
northern
Ridge
of
immigration
Canyon.
What
I
see
when
I'm
using
trails,
I'm
a
huge
proponent
of
trails,
particularly,
are
people
who
don't
care,
take
care
of
their
dogs.
If
you
go
up
Mill
Creek
Canyon,
you
ski
ski,
over
dog
feces.
If
you
go
up
all
the
trails
in
emigration,
Canyon
you're
dodged,
dodging
dog
feces,
there
are
commercial
dog,
walkers
they're.
You
know
irresponsible
dog
owners.
M
K
My
brother
said
you
know
this
is
our
watershed:
it's
not
protected
watershed
for
the
city,
but
it
should
be
in
my
opinion,
because
I
have
a
well
in
immigration,
Canyon
from
which
I
draw
water,
that's
contaminated
with
fecal
coliforms
in
part
because
of
human
activity
and
dog
activity.
These
trails,
especially,
why
are
gonna,
increase
that
problem
for
us.
So
you
know
I
think
that
the
plan
looks
great,
except
that
I
think
it
inadequately
addresses
the
problem
of
water
quality
for
for
private,
well,
owners
in
immigration,
Canyon
Thanks
thank.
A
N
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Sean
Rossiter
I
live
in
district
7
at
the
risk
of
getting
some
harsh
words
outside
I'll,
say
I'm.
The
coach
of
these
tide,
mountain-bike
team
I
also
serve
on
the
board
of
the
Utah
mountain
bike
league,
which
grows
by
19%
every
year,
so
we're
already
behind
this
should
have
got
like
by
the
time
we
get.
This
done.
We're
gonna
have
to
have
another
plan
to
do
more
trails,
because
it's
just
building
but
I
want
a
second
a
lot
of
what
said.
N
A
F
Hi
there,
my
name
is
Alec
I'm,
a
student
at
the
you
re,
oh
yeah,
sorry
student
at
the
U
I've
lived
here
for
two
years
really
enjoy
it.
I'm
from
Boise.
We're
like
one
of
the
biggest
resources
is
the
trail
system
brings
people
together,
everybody
loves
it.
We
all
convene
around
the
trail
system
and
we
really
do
enjoy
everything
about
it.
So
I
think
adding
new
trails
will
be
really
beneficial
for
us
as
a
community.
As
a
former
Nike
fleeted.
F
A
B
Name
is
Magnus
Peterson
I'm
in
seventh
grade
out
west
hi
I'm
on
the
West
Side
bike
team
and
I
live
in
the
avenues
and
I
use
the
trails
up
there
quite
a
bit,
and
they
would
be
really
nice
to
have
more
up
there
because
I
didn't
almost
all
the
trails,
then
they
get
a
little
more
boring
after
writing
and
to
be
honest,
I,
don't
know
that
much
about
the
topic,
but
it
would
be
really
nice
to
have
more
trails.
Okay,.
A
B
F
If
I
might
mr.
chair,
yes,
aye
aye
I
support
the
the
master
trail
system,
master
plan,
three
hills,
trail
system
master
plan,
but
there
were
a
couple.
Things
were
brought
up
tonight
that
I'd,
like
maybe
some
discussion
or
some
answers.
Louis
Cogan
seemed
tonight.
They've
done
a
great
job
on
this
there's
just
a
couple
things
regarding
particularly
mountebank
cot
and
wire,
the
north
cove
residents,
the
adaptive
use
question
and
then
immigration,
watershed
questions
so.
B
C
C
F
A
A
We
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
Fowler
in
a
second
by
councilmember
Johnston,
all
in
favor,
say
aye,
aye,
all
opposed,
say,
nay,
and
no
abstentions.
Okay,
so
and
James
Oh
James
is
absent.
So
all
right,
thank
you,
so
that'll
be
well
we'll
postpone
that
to
be
scheduled
for
later
for
adoption
later
and
in
the
meantime,
those
of
you
did
express
concerns.
We
have
your
contact
information,
we'll
be
able
to
reach
out
to
you
that
way.
Okay,
our
next
public
hearing
includes
items
b2
through
b7.
A
M
Lots
of
items,
and
so
I'm
gonna
have
to
use
this
a
little
bit.
So
what
happened
to
the
ninth
South
trail?
What
happened
to
the
railroad
bridge
over
nine
South?
What
happened
to
the
seventh
East
byway
and
what
happened
to
the
McClelland
trail,
the
mayor's
pet
project,
where's,
that
we
need
a
priority
list
and
engagement
with
the
communities
community
councils
to
get
a
realistic,
respectful
list
and
I
want
to
remind
all
the
councilmembers,
the
staff
and
the
mayor
and
the
Transportation
Department
that
separated
bike
lanes.
M
M
The
proposed
grant
applications
would
seem
to
be
lower
priority
than
safe
wide
bike
lanes,
which
we
need
now
citywide
and
I'm
against,
using
any
transportation
funds
for
projects
like
the
BRT
on
second
south.
We
should
be
using
for
service
and
before
putting
in
a
Transit
Center,
we
should
be
telling
UTA
to
move
the
bus
stops
to
the
corners.
We
shouldn't
have
to
work
to
use
mass
transit.
The
Main
Street
project
should
have
raised
bike
and
pedestrian
pass
in
accordance
with
completed
streets.
M
Hopefully,
transportation
will
give
you
the
report
in
the
next
few
weeks,
and
the
back
street
daily
maintenance
will
be
very,
very,
very
expensive.
The
600
700
North
Pole
BOTS
endanger
cyclists
and
the
300
West
I,
don't
think,
should
have
a
cycle
track
because
there
are
a
lot
of
small
businesses.
They
use
parking
right
in
front
of
their
stores.
Little
stores,
small
businesses,
locally
owned
and
they'll
go
bankrupt.
If
you
put
a
cycle
track
in
front
of
them.
M
A
O
Hi,
my
name
is
Dave
Ellis
with
cycling.
Utah
first
thing
I'm
a
bit
dismayed
that
you're
wrapping
these
all
into
one
comment
period
because
there's
a
lot
to
say
on
all
of
this,
so
try
and
go
quickly.
First
thing
is
that
cycle
tracks
are
great.
Despite
what
George
Chapman
has
recently
said,
they
are
the
way
bike.
Bike
lanes
should
be
built
so
quickly
on
item
7,
the
surplus
canal.
Please
open
this
as
soon
as
possible
as
a
dirt
trail
and
worry
about
paving
it
later.
O
When
you
have
funds,
this
could
be
open
within
months
by
adding
signage
and
opening
the
gates.
The
300
west
grant
is
wonderful,
please
do
add
protected
bike
lanes
there
on
600
north.
One
of
the
primary
things
you
could
do
is
reduce
the
speed
limit
tomorrow
from
35
to
25
it's
dangerous
because
of
increased
speed
limits.
O
The
Main
Street
high
comfort
bike
lane.
You
need
to
add
legislative
intent
that
this
should
not
preclude
a
protected
bike
lane
on
State
Street.
This
is
being
put
forward
as
the
life
part
of
the
life
on
state
network,
but
at
the
public
hearings
and
public
charettes
for
for
for
life.
On
State
people
wanted
good
facilities
on
State
Street,
and
it
is
only
because
of
inaction
by
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
udot's
obstinance
that
we're
not
getting
a
vibrant,
State
Street
and
that's
really
a
shame.
O
The
main
reason
I'm
here
to
speak,
though,
is
about
the
200
South
transit
corridor.
This
Grant
mentions
nothing
about
preserving
the
bike
lanes.
Those
bike
lanes
were
things
that
we
fought
for
years
and
years
to
get
the
one
solid,
crosstown
bike
lane
in
Salt
Lake.
That
goes
all
the
way
from
the
University
to
basically
to
the
Jordan
River
Parkway
and
there's
not
a
single
mention
of
that
in
there
I'm
in
favor
of
all
the
grant
applications,
but
in
November
of
2018
I
guess
I'll.
O
B
A
A
Q
A
I
Am
still
Cindy
Cromer
and
my
comments
tonight
are
about
the
myths
which
have
been
circulating
in
this
building
regarding
housing.
My
rebuttals
are
based
on
45
years
of
experience
as
a
landlord
and
property
manager
and
on
the
work
of
some
well-known
economy.
They
are
myth,
defying
you
have
a
handout
on
your
desk
in
front
of
you.
Myth
number
one
landlords
are
motivated
primarily
by
rental
income
rebuttal.
I
Some
of
them
clearly
are,
but
it
is
false
that
the
city
only
needs
to
look
at
rental
income
in
determining
whether
a
property
owner
will
demolish
an
existing
building
and
displaced
tenants
into
a
challenging
housing
market.
I
have
two
primary
motivations
to
be
a
landlord.
One
is
fairly
unique
and
the
other
is
very
common.
Neither
of
them
are
driven
by
rental
income.
Myth
number
two
that
creating
more
market
rate
housing
makes
other
housing
more
affordable.
This
one
took
me
a
while
to
figure
out
the
issue
is
really
complicated.
I
More
market
rating
housing
only
reduces
rent
at
market
rate
housing
in
close
proximity,
in
other
words,
we're
dealing
with
apples
and
oranges.
If
you
increase
the
number
of
apples,
apples
in
that
particular
location
become
slightly
less
expensive.
However,
oranges
are
the
same
price
or
higher
as
they
were
before.
You
increase
the
number
of
apples.
The
current
price
of
market
rate
housing
just
makes
my
units
my
affordable
units,
more
valuable,
because
I
have
oranges
and
my
tenants
don't
aspire
to
pay
for
apples.
I
They
can't
number
three
that
the
good
Lord
Lyon
landlord
program
is
accomplishing
what
was
intended.
There
are
committed
city
employees
working
in
housing,
inspection
and
business
licensing,
but
the
truth
is
that
the
program
was
based
on
a
Nocturn
model
and
landlords
know
that
Ogden
is
a
completely
different
market
than
Salt
Lake
City.
Myth
number
four,
that
the
zoning
ordinance
is.
The
problem
citing
the
ordinance
is
really
clever
because
nobody
wants
to
talk
about
the
language
in
ordinances.
Nobody
people
would
rather
assume
that
you're
right
in
saying
that
the
ordinance
is
the
problem
and
move
on.
I
M
Need
to
explain
to
you
what
bicyclists
go
through
when
they're
riding
through
the
city-
it's
not
easy!
It's
dangerous
and
a
cycle
track
gives
very
little
room
for
maneuvering
in
an
emergency,
whether
it's
debris
on
the
road
or
a
car
jumping
out
or
we've
even
seen,
ramps
on
300
South
crossing
the
cycle
track
to
the
sidewalk.
It's
that
bad!
It's
that
dangerous.
So
if
you
really
want
to
do
a
safe
cycle
track,
you
have
to
commit
to
daily
maintenance
of
those
cycle
tracks.
We
don't
have
the
money
for
that.
M
You
need
to
remember
that
you
need
to
have
daily
maintenance
on
cycle
tracks.
If
you
are
going
to
build
a
cycle
track
anywhere
in
the
city,
that
money
should
be
used
better,
be
used
now
for
wide
bicycle
lanes
and
I
need
to
also
point
out.
Kids
shouldn't
be
riding
bicycles
in
a
cycle
track,
I,
think
they're
dangerous
for
kids.
They
should
be
on
a
raised
shared
path.
M
Also,
I
need
to
point
out
that
you
need
to
read
the
Insurance
Institute
of
Highway
Safety
report
on
cycle
tracks.
It's
really
it's
important,
because
this
city
keeps
pushing
cycle
tracks
in
the
wrong
place.
Best
cycle
track
possible
would
be
from
9
South
to
the
S
line
on
7th
east.
You
could
have
it
raised,
it'd
be
perfect,
but
where
is
it?
People
have
been
killed
on
that
road
bicyclists
have
been
killed
on
7th
East
because
of
that.
So
that's
what
we
really
really
need.
I
just
want
to
point
out.
M
P
A
E
Hello
council
good
to
see
you
I've
lived
here
I'm
one
year
short
of
of
Cindy
Cromer
I'm,
been
here
44
years,
I
have
watched
over
the
last
44
years.
Several
natural
spots
of
environmental
beauty
be
destroyed
by
developers
in
this
city
over
44
years,
the
artesian
well
at
Brickyard
Plaza
was
enriched
upon
it
had
tons
of
wildlife.
It
was
enroll
japon
by
the
Brickyard
condominiums.
Then
the
homes
of
the
elderly
destroyed
it
I
lived
there.
E
E
Anyway,
there
was
another
Westminster
College
when
the
parking
lot
was
built.
That
artesian
well
flowed
for
three
full
months
down
that
Creek
it
was
destroyed
for
a
parking
garage
for
Westminster
College.
We
have
several
spots
of
natural
beauty
in
this
city
that
were
destroyed
by
developers.
Now
one
more
is
being
threatened.
Let
me
tell
you
these
spots
support
wildlife.
They
support
environmental
and
ecological
diversity
and
for
a
short
term
dollar.
We
destroy
centuries
of
natural
beauty
in
our
city.
The
next
one
coming
is
Alan,
Park
I
think
it's
also
called
Hobbiton.
E
E
O
Again,
my
name
is
Dave,
Altis
was
cycling,
Utah
I'm
continuing
my
comment
on
the
200
South
transit
corridor.
Grant
in
November
of
2018
I
was
riding
with
my
partner
Lisa
on
this
roadway
and
she
had
a
very
large
pickup
truck
come
within
one
foot
of
her,
and
it
was
terrifying
for
both
of
us
and
right
after
that
we
contacted
the
transportation
division
to
ask
that
they
please
restriped
the
green
lanes
on
200
South.
O
The
green
lines
have
not
been
restriped
on
200
South
or
Main
Street
or
South
temple
or
north
temple
in
at
least
10
plus
11
12
years
from
now
they've
deteriorated.
They
were
trend-setting
lanes
when
they
first
came
in,
they
were
national
news
and
Salt
Lake
City
has
done
nothing,
absolutely
nothing
to
provide
for
the
safety
of
cyclists
and
that
in
on
those
roads,
streets
and
transportation
cannot
agree
on
who
should
repaint
the
road,
and
so
it's
languished.
O
They
point
fingers
at
each
other
and
nothing
gets
done
and
in
the
meantime,
cyclists
are
not
riding
on
safe
roads,
and
it
is
here
I'm
here
out
of
I,
don't
not
out
of
passion
for
this
I'm
here.
Out
of
fear,
I'm
here
out
of
fear,
because
my
partner
was
almost
hit,
I've
been
hit
on
Salt,
Lake,
City
streets
and
I'm,
so
tired
of
it-
and
you
guys
need
to
step
up
the
mayor
need
to
step
up
and
get
this
done,
because
this
is
something
where
I
don't
want
to
see.
O
Someone
die
on
that
roadway
and
this
grant
application
doesn't
address
that
it's
it's
mediocre
at
best
and
yeah.
You
should
vote
for
it,
but
you
absolutely
ought
to
ad
legislative
intent
to
get
this
done
and
get
it
done
now
and
not
wait
til.
This
is
being
rebuilt,
and
you
know
do
this
tomorrow.
They
they
put
in
some
inadequate
white
chero
markings
there
that
are
a
band-aid
on
a
band-aid
on
a
band-aid.
So
time.
T
A
Thank
you.
Mr.
Ellis,
don't
have
any
more
cards,
so
we
will
move
on
to
the
next
item,
which
is
new
business.
We
have
no
new
business,
so
unfinished.
Business
is
our
resolution
regarding
an
interlocal
agreement
between
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
Salt
Lake
County
that
would
partially
fund
the
replacement
of
the
baseball
playing
surface
at
Smith's
ball
park,
which
is
owned
by
the
city.
Mr.