►
From YouTube: Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of Salt Lake City - 1/14/2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
We
are
going
to
have
an
amazing
year
this
year,
we're
putting
that
intention
out
there
into
the
world
and
the
universe
so
that
we
have
an
amazing
RDA
year
where
we
get
to
build
communities
throughout
our
city.
That's
our
goal
this
year
so
welcome,
and
we,
of
course,
because
I
never
like
to
do
things.
The
way
I'm
told
to
do
them
are
going
to
switch
up
the
agenda.
Quite
a
bit.
I
will,
however,
start
with
approval
of
the
minutes.
A
Actually,
I'll
start
with
general
comments
to
the
board,
but
I
don't
have
any
unless
somebody
wants
to
say.
Yes,
we
do
have
one.
B
New
Year,
thank
you
so
I,
don't
know
where
it's
going
to
take
place
on
the
agenda,
but
I'm
here
to
speak
about
the
North
temple
catalytic
project.
My
name
is
Nigel
sway,
B
I'm,
the
chair
of
the
River
District
Chamber,
and
a
lot
has
happened
since
that
was
first
presented
to
you,
but
as
a
board
and
an
organization,
we
continue
to
support
the
idea
of
a
public
market
at
the
fair
park,
as
the
number
one
priority.
B
Second,
of
course,
is
our
long-standing
project
of
the
Folsom
corridor
and
there
were
some
items
on
there.
That
would
support
that
and
then
third
would
be
lighting
and
safety
improvements
along
North
temple,
particularly
around
the
Gateway
in
on
eighth
west
and
north
temple.
So
that's
where
we
stand
as
an
organization
and
we're
eager
to
see
what
you
guys
decide.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
A
A
motion
by
board
member
Rogers
and
a
second
by
board
member
Wharton,
all
those
in
favor
aye,
any
opposed
Griet
minutes
are
have
been
approved,
and
so
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
andrew
is
here
for
a
vice
chair
election
and
for
the
North
temple
catalytic
project
is
that
is
a
lot
of
his
district.
We
are
going
to
move
on
to
item
number
four,
which
is
our
project
area
creation
priorities,
so
been
lucky:
Danny
waltz
and
core
cutely
I.
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
about
once
a
year
we
like
to
have
a
discussion
with
the
board
about
the
potential
for
new
project
areas
in
the
city
and
to
really
step
back
from
our
day-to-day
work
and
have
a
discussion
about
what
areas
of
the
city
we
think
could
benefit
from,
or
most
benefit
from,
the
tools
that
the
RTA
brings
through
the
creation
of
project
areas.
D
The
last
two
years,
when
we've
had
this
discussion,
the
top
priorities
have
been
the
State
Street
project
area
and
the
nine
line
project
area
and,
as
you
know,
just
by
way
of
reminder
we're
still
in
the
project
area
creation
process
with
both
of
those
the
board
has
adopted
the
project
area
plans.
It's
my
understanding
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
School
District,
is
also
generally
in
favor
of
them
and
we're
still
negotiating
with
Salt
Lake
County.
D
Regarding
those
we
do
have
five
active
project
areas,
the
central
business
district,
Depot,
North,
Temple
granary
and
the
northwest
quadrant
I.
Suppose
we
could
add
block
sixty-seven
to
that
list.
Now
it's
my
understanding
that
that's
been
formally
that
the
interlocal
agreements
have
been
executed
so
and
I
think
any
discussion
of
new
project
areas.
We
probably
ought
to
highlight
just
really
what
that
entails.
D
It's
a
often
years
long
process,
by
which
we
requires
a
number
of
steps
from
this
body,
as
well
as
the
City
Council,
to
identify
a
boundary
and
and
within
the
city
and
study
that
area
and
prepare
public
benefit
analysis,
look
at
the
amount
of
tax
increment
that
could
be
generated
over
time.
Hold
public
hearings,
notify
property
owners.
There's
a
protest
period.
D
Project
plans
have
to
be
adopted
and
interlocal
agreements
have
to
be
negotiated
and
executed
with
taxing
entity
partners
and
because
of
that
latter
point
I
think
we
should
point
out
that
some
political
capital
is
expended
when
we
do
that.
We
can't
return
to
that
well
too
many
times
and
create
project
areas
indiscriminately
we
sort
of
have
to
be
strategic
about
how
we
do
it
and
where
we
do
it
and
how
frequently.
D
So
Before
we
jump
into
those
eight
I.
Think
I
would
like
us
to,
if
possible,
consider
these
new
project
areas
in
the
context
of
the
guiding
framework
that
the
board
approved
in
November
a
new
mission
statement,
new
values,
new
metrics,
by
which
we
would
evaluate
our
projects
and
processes,
and
if
you
remember
the
three
kind
of
values
and
they're
up
on
the
screen
there,
if
you'd
scroll
down
just
a
touch.
D
Thank
you,
economic
growth,
Community,
Impact
and
neighborhood
vibrancy,
so
I
would
propose
that
any
new
project
area
we
would
consider
it
would
really
touch
all
three
of
those
things
and
kind
of
be
a
healthy
overlap
among
them.
That
we
would
want
to,
of
course,
have
an
economic
impact,
but
we
would
want
to
create
a
project
area
that
would
prioritize
the
improvement
of
quality
of
life
and
equity
for
both
residents
and
businesses
in
the
city,
and
that
we
would
want
to
cultivate,
distinct
and
livable
neighborhoods
that
are
contextual,
II,
sensitive
resilient
connected
and
sustainable.
A
D
A
And
a
lot
of
the
same
project
areas
were
discussed,
so
maybe
you
can
jump
in
court
and
kind
of
give
us
a
quick
briefing
on
that
and
then,
if
people
have
questions
about
what
we
talked
about
last
year
in
relation
to
these,
then
you
can
maybe
provide
some
of
that
historical
context.
If
need
be,
does
that
work
for
everyone?
Yeah.
D
So
you
want
me
to
sort
of
hit
just
a
high
level
of
what
these
eight
project
areas
are.
Then,
okay,
great,
so
research
park.
These
first
two
really
would
be
partnerships
with
the
university
of
utah.
The
research
park
would
be
really
a
reimagining
of
the
existing
research
park
to
think
of
it
more
as
a
mixed
use,
environment
with
greater
density.
D
There's
currently,
as
you
know,
a
lot
of
surface
parking
and
a
lot
of
lawn
at
research
Park,
and
so
this
would
be
a
complete
reimagining
of
that
and
it's
my
understanding
that
the
universities
in
the
process
of
looking
at
a
master
plan
for
the
research
park
there
should
be
done
the
spring
the
it
would
look
at
business
growth,
as
you
know,
there's
some
new
businesses
that
are
that
are
spun
off
of
that
research
park.
And
so
how
can
we
keep
those
there
and
they're
going
to
need
office
space
to
do
that?
A
I'm
gonna
look
to
my
board
members.
I,
don't
know
if
you
guys
want
to
get
that
high
level
out
and
I'll
eat
and
then
go
back
to
questions
or
if
you
want
to
jump
in
with
questions
now.
That's
up
to
you.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
Jonathan
Bates
from
the
University
of
Utah
he's
the
executive
director
of
the
Department
of
real
State
Administration
for
Research
Park.
That
is
very
long
title,
but
I
think
I
got
it
all
is
here
in
the
audience.
D
Ok,
stadium
village,
also
a
potential
partnership
with
a
university
to
look
at
the
redevelopment
potential
of
the
area
of
the
large
parking
lot
just
west
of
the
stadium,
as
well
as
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
Again,
this
could
be
looked
at
in
terms
of
a
mixed-use
development.
There
is
a
light
rail
station
there,
so
transit
oriented
development
would
could
be
successful
there.
We
had
look
at
commercial
services
as
well
as
structured
parking
item.
D
Currently,
the
idea
here
would
be
to
amend
the
existing
project
area
or
incorporate
it
into
the
State
Street
project
area.
That's
under
development
right
now
in
order
to
utilize
a
portion
of
the
tax
increment
to
deal
with
some
deferred
maintenance
to
the
stadium
and
also
some
improvements
to
the
stadium
and
then,
of
course,
to
redevelop
the
city-owned
parking
lot
immediately.
North
of
the
stadium.
D
Item
five
as
the
grand
boulevards,
this
would
really
be
kind
of
thinking
about
the
front
door
to
the
city
and
what
kind
of
entry
experience
do
people
have
when
they're
entering
our
capital
city?
So
it
would
be
a
beautification
project
for
primarily
the
500
south
and
600
South
corridors
would
be
a
partnership
with
a
Utah
Department
of
Transportation,
and
we
would
also
look
at
fostering
development
on
parcels
that
are
adjacent
to
those
two
corridors.
D
400,
south
and
400
west
item
number
six
would
be.
This
would
be
a
transit
focused
project
area.
It
would
look
at
extending
the
downtown
rail
network.
A
part
of
the
current
cities,
light
rail
master
plan
or
transit
master
plan
is
a
spur
that
would
come
off
of
the
track
station
at
900,
South
and
Central.
Ninth
we'll
go
west
down
900
south
and
then
go
north
right
up,
400
west,
so
that
we
right
through
the
heart
of
the
grainery
district
and
eventually
terminate
into
the
intermodal
hub.
D
Of
course,
any
time
we
look
at
projects
that
involve
transit
there
is
the
potential
for
redevelopment
and
transit
does
have
a
tendency
to
catalyze
redevelopment
in
the
neighborhoods
they're
located
in
item
number
seven
also
a
transit
focused
project
area.
Now
this
would
be
an
extension
expansion
of
the
s-line,
which,
at
least
in
the
city's
transit
master
plan,
would
go
north
along
1,100
east
to
1700
south
there's.
D
As
you
know,
brick
yards
are
primarily
Auto
centric
development.
It
is
a
neighborhood
within
the
city
that
I
think
has
a
lot
of
development
potential,
and
so
this
project
area
would
look
at
adding
housing
to
that
neighborhood.
As
well
as
considering
some
pedestrian
oriented
infrastructure
improvements,.
G
Hoping
that,
finally,
the
momentum
is
has
come
in,
it's
been
said
so,
but
I
guess
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is:
how
do
you
think
you
can
handle
more
projects,
or
is
it
a
good
way
to
to
use
staff
time
or
should
we
expand
the
ones
that
were
kind
of
working
on
and
have
gained
momentum
I'm,
not
sure?
What
do
you
think
yeah.
F
That's
a
great
question,
so
thank
you
for
asking
that,
because
that's
one
of
our
most
important
concerns
as
we
look
at
our
workload
and
taking
on
projects
as
well
as
court
indicated
taking
on
project
area
creation,
which
is
extremely
task
burdensome.
So
if
you
remember
as
part
of
our
current
year
budget
last
year
during
the
budget
process,
we
did
get
approval
from
the
board
for
three
new
positions,
so
that
was
two
project
managers
and
a
data
person
through
the
course
of
just
losing
previous
staff.
F
We
have
not
even
gotten
to
the
point
where
we're
tapping
into
hiring
those
positions.
Yet
we
have
brought
on
two
new
staff
members
over
the
past
three
months,
and
so
we
have
found
that
bringing
on
staff
is
not
something
you
can
do
in
large
numbers.
You
need
to
bring
them
on
slowly
and
train
them
because
then
otherwise,
you're
spending
more
time
just
training
than
you
are
actually
doing
projects.
So
we
anticipate
a
steady
path
of
filling
those
positions
and
I.
F
Think
as
we
do
that
and
fill
that
that
that
will
increase
our
capacity
for
projects
as
well
as
looking
at
project
area
creation.
Now,
if
the
board
were
to
say
we
want
it
all
eight
project
areas
and
I'd
probably
be
back
here
saying
that
we
need
to
get
more
staff,
but
I
think
right
now
we're
nine
line
in
State.
G
F
I
mean
I
think,
ideally,
if
you
were
to
ask
me
right
now,
when
I
think
a
sweet
spot
would
be,
would
probably
looking
to
target
replacing
granary
and
Depot
coming
offline
in
the
next
three
to
four
years
and
obviously,
as
those
come
off,
we'd
be
creating
project
areas
and
ramping
them
up
to
to
replace
those.
So
I
think
if
you
were
to
ask
I'd
say
two
would
be
good.
F
Three
is
probably
possible
if
you
get
to
where
you're
looking
at
four
more
than
I
think
we'd
start
having
problems,
but
every
project
area
is
different
in
terms
of
its
workload
and
and
what
the
demands
are.
Cbd
is
much
different
than
West
temple
gateway
ever
was
as
far
as
the
scope
and
the
number
of
projects,
but.
F
That
is
a
fantastic
question
and
that
is
probably
a
priority
number
one
for
the
University
of
Utah
and,
if
we'd
like
to
get
into
further
discussion
of
that
with
Jonathan
during
that
item,
I
would
recommend
that,
but
I
will
say
just
high
level
briefly
to
give
you
an
answer
right
now.
That
is
probably
the
focus
of
their
master
plan
that
they're
working
on
right.
F
Well,
at
the
University
and
the
idea
there
is
to
create
a
community
that
truly
is
live,
work
and
play
so
that
you
are
minimizing
the
commuting
into
research
park
and
providing
more
options
for
people
to
live
right
there
on
campus
within
that
village,
and
so
that's
something
they're
very
tuned
to
they
recognize
that
that
would
be
a
challenge
to
increasing
their
density
within
the
city.
Moving
forward,
so
yeah.
F
I
Just
have
a
follow-up,
I
guess
on
University
projects
and
that's
looking
at
the
taxing
entities,
and
we
know
that
a
lot
of
the
property
up
at
the
University
of
Utah
is
property
tax
exempt.
So
how
does
this
work?
Are
we
just
picking
and
choosing
up
there
what
is
and
what
isn't
going
to
be
property
tax
exempt?
And
how
are
we
going
to
invest
that
money
right?
That's.
F
What
we
have
indicated
is
obviously
the
level
of
support
and
participation
we
can
have
in
research
park
is
clearly
dependent
on
how
much
of
their
property
is
taxable
what
it
throws
off
in
tax
increment
and
then
how
we
can
apply
that
to
the
project
area
itself.
So
we'd
be
looking
at
a
more
blanket
area,
project
area
so
that
you
could
still
spend
it
on
the
big-ticket
items
of
transit
and
trails
and
an
open
space.
But
it
would
be
driven
by
the
amount
of
actual
taxable
value
that.
C
J
C
I
just
like
to
really
support
for
the
Gateway
projects
to
the
city.
I
think
that
this
is
something
that's
that
the
city's
talked
about
doing
for
a
long
long
time.
Ever
since
we
shortened
the
runways
or
the
off
ramps
and
on
ramps
to
the
to
the
freeway
and
I.
Think
that
there's
so
much
opportunity
there
that,
if
I,
if
I'm
looking
at
these
and
that's
the
one
that
I'm
the
most
excited
about
because
I
think
it's
so
overdue
and
there's
the
opportunity
potential.
There
is
huge.
C
I
Guess:
mine's
a
follow-up
to
that
and
that's
there's
one
big
obstacle
with
those
gateways
and
those
are
the
billboards
and
I
we're
still
waiting
to
hear
back
on.
What
is
the
plan
to
clean
that
up?
What
are
the
you
know
the
power
lines?
How
are
we
going
to
do
that?
We
need
to
have
that
follow-up
discussion
in
my
opinion,
before
we
go
diving
in
and
deciding
what
we're
going
to
do,
because
if
there's
no
way
forward
why
I
move
forward.
I
My
other
question
is
to
we've
got
a
10%,
affordable
housing
coming
our
way
with
a
tax
increment
in
the
northwest
quadrant.
We
still
need
to
have
that
discussion
and
for
me,
I
I,
don't
want
to
make
any
decisions
until
we
have
that
discussion.
So
we
can
actually
look
and
say
look.
This
is
what
it's
going
to
throw
off
in
the
next
ten
years.
Let's,
let's
figure
out
where
we're
going
to
spend
that
money,
so
I
mean
I,
I,
see
the
Brickyard
and
the
s-line
extension
would
be
amazing.
C
I
would
agree
that
and
a
sign
extension
well
I
mean
I
agree
about
both,
but
I
think
if
there's
a
way
to
use
RDA
and
creating
them
as
a
tool
to
help
maybe
facilitate
and
a
compromise
with
the
billboards
that
they're
also
invested
in
I
think
that
I
would
love
to
see
that
be
part
of
the
part
of
the
solution.
Even
though
it's
previously
been
a
barrier.
I
know
that
they've
been
talking
with
some
of
the
other
developers
in
that
area
and
those
developers
seemed
kind
of
optimistic
that
they
could
come
to
an
agreement.
C
I
H
Question
on
the
number
six
with
the
400
South
and
foreign
West.
So
we
talked
about
extending
that.
But
how
does
this
tie
into?
Or
is
there
any
tie-in
to
transportation
out
to
the
airport?
And
how
does
that
gonna
work?
Because
we
have
a
lot
of
people
going
out
to
the
airport,
but
it's
almost
impossible
to
use
the
right
way
either
go
to
the
airport
if
you
want
to
get
there
in
the
same
day
and
it's
just
time
to
the
idea
or
a
plan
to
get
the
trail
out
to
the
airport
in
a
reasonable
time.
It.
D
Does
yeah,
if
you
were
south
excuse
me
if
you
were
northbound
on
tracks,
this
would
provide
a
more
direct
route
to
get
to
the
airport.
Without
changing
you'd
have
to
change
trains,
but
yeah
you
would.
It
would
be
more
direct
than
going
through
the
current
path
through
the
downtown
that
currently
exists.
F
Think
to
that
point
before
we
leave
that
I
think
that
would
absolutely
be
something
that
we
would
study
as
part
of
the
feasibility
of
the
project
area.
Escort
said,
we
understand
it's
on
their
plan
for
a
long
term
plan.
We
can't
speak
to
what
the
capacity
is,
but
clearly
I
think
that
would
be
something
that
we
would
return
and
say.
This
is
what
that
project
area
would
look
like.
This
is
potentially
what
the
benefits
would
be
and
how
it
may
or
may
not
address
that
capacity
versus
other
priorities.
Yeah.
H
G
I
have
another
so
I
agree
with,
with
James
and
and
Chris
with
a
ramble
over
so
I'm,
sorry
and
I'm
and
I'm
in
agreement
with
you
guys,
but
moving
on
to
also
the
granary
district
I
think
sometimes
we
in
my
mind,
I,
think
about
this
project
areas
and
I'm
thinking.
Okay,
this
is
what
we
were
set
to
do.
This
is
what
we
have
accomplished,
and
this
is
a
momentum
that
we
have
or
not.
G
Can
we
extend
that
or
is
it
something
we
could
leverage
so
that
we
can
see
even
more
than
what
we
what
we're
hoping
for
or
more
than
what
we're
hoping
for?
So
this
is
a
way
that
I'm
not
sure
if
you
guys
are
looking
at
it.
That
way
saying
this
is
an
opportunity.
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
positive
things
happening
at
the
granary.
G
Would
it
be
worth
our
time
investing
in
that
one
for
a
few
more
years,
then,
instead
of
moving
on
to
another
project
area
that
it's
unknown,
if
it's
going
to
generate
anything
or
not,
so
that's
how
I
I
would
be
prioritizing
if
I
had
to
choose,
I
will
be
looking
at
the
ones
that
are
working
and
maybe
extending
those
are
focusing
on
those
more.
Thank
you.
K
A
So
this
may
come
as
a
shock
to
you,
but
I
have
a
few
things
to
add
to
the
discussion.
First
off
just
for
board
members
sake
on
some
some
context
to
the
s-line
extension.
This
was
something
that
I
asked
the
RDA
staff
to
put
on
the
list
as
a
priority
for
me,
and
this
stems
and
there's
a
couple
of
things
to
keep
in
mind
and
if
I
get
this
wrong,
like
Ben,
and/or,
Danny
or
court
or
Ben
can
fix
what
I'm
saying,
but
so
in
part
this
comes
from.
A
If
you'll
remember
last
year,
our
transportation
division
is
Jenna
in
here,
because
Jen
mcgrath
worked
really
hard
on.
These
grants
received
a
grant
from
the
county
to
study
the
tension
of
the
s-line,
where
it
would
viably
and
and
most
efficiently
go
mostly
looking
south.
It
was
a
grant
that
we
did
in
conjunction
with
Mill,
Creek
and
Holliday,
so
it
was
a
multi-jurisdictional
grant
that
provided
us
most,
a
million
dollars
to
look
at
the
extension
of
the
S
line,
the
TR
Z's
these.
This
has
never
has
not
been
used
as
to
my
knowledge
right.
A
It's
not
yet
been
used
and
the
statute
was
passed
two
years
ago
now
and
actually
would
run
sort
of
through
the
City
Council.
It's
not
really
an
RTA
think
it's
more
of
a
council
thing,
but
it
seems
best
to
be
at
the
RDA
level,
because
it's
more
like
a
creation
area
and
is
sort
of
another
tool.
That's
a
little
bit
broader
in
some
ways
and
because
of
the
idea
that
that
this
study,
hopefully
and
I,
don't
see
john
larson.
A
But
I
talked
to
him
or
late
last
year
that
hopefully,
by
the
middle
of
spring
and
a
beginning
of
summer,
we're
gonna
have
some
information
back
about
that
grant
and
what
those
results
sort
of
look
like
or
maybe
at
that-
and
I
know
we're
in
the
process
of
hiring
a
consultant
and
there's
no
one
from
transportation,
but
they
weren't
expecting
for
me
to
go
on
and
on
about
this.
So
we
will
have
some
results
from
this
study
and
the
idea
of
putting
a
TRC
on
our
radar
in
this
area
is
that
why?
A
Why
get
a
grant
for
a
million
dollars?
If
we're
not
going
to
then
figure
out
some
ways
to
have
a
funding
stream
line
or
have
some
sort
of
funding
options
to
actually
implement
the
study
that
we
just
spent
a
million
dollars
right
and
so
and
it
would
be
in
conjunction,
and
I
think
that
it's
a
conversation
we
can
start
having
with
Mill
Creek
and
Holliday
and
and
sort
of
be
able
to
create
some
connections
there,
so
that
we
are
bettering
our
public
transportation
as
a
whole
right.
A
So
that
was
I
had
asked
that
we
put
this
on
this
list,
because
there's
a
lot
of
other
things
at
play
with.
Why
that
that
may
become
a
priority
kind
of,
maybe
sooner
rather
than
later,
even
though
it
may
not
seem
like
it's
such
a
priority.
Now
there's
there
may
be
some
things
that
come
out
of
this
study
that
say:
oh,
we
should.
We
might
have
the
opportunity
to
really
hop
on
this
and
make
it
a
priority
and
and
as
far
as
Brickyard.
A
This
is
always,
but
this
was
on
the
list
because
of
Mill
Creek
last
year
and
was
a
very,
very
high
priority.
When
we
were
dealing
with
the
annex,
it
did
potential
annexation
of
Brickyard
I,
the
the
property
owners
I
mean
I,
don't
think,
there's
a
real
rush
from
Claud
right
now,
and
so
it's
on
the
list,
I
think
to
stay
on
our
radar
that
that
is
there
somewhere,
but
I.
Don't
it's
not
like
something
that
I
think
anybody,
including
the
property
owners,
ready
to
jump
on
right
at
this
moment?
A
But
it's
it's
there
that
it
is
a
part
of
our
city
that
I
kind
of
think.
We
have
an
opportunity
to
really
look
at
and
it
could
be
a
great
place
for
some
affordable
housing,
especially
as
we
maybe
look
at
whatever
what
our
high
Opportunity
Zones
may
look
like,
and
if
we
change
some
of
those
high
opportunity
zones,
I
think
that
actually
I
don't
know
if
it
falls
within
our
designated
high
opportunity
zone.
A
But
again,
if
we're
looking
at
what
this
study
may
look
like
as
we
extend
the
s-line
south,
there
may
be
a
real
opportunity
to
kind
of
do
some
development
in
conjunction
with
development
of
an
extension
of
the
s-line
south.
So
those
are
just
kind
of
there
for
your
radar
and
that
they
may
come
up
quicker.
I
mean
we
sort
of
had
to
jump
on
Brickyard
last
year
and
they
put
a
wonderful
plan
together
in
a
matter
of
minutes.
It
seemed
like
so
those
are
just
there.
For
that
those
reasons.
A
So
when
we
talk
about
the
grand
boulevards
I've
had
I
feel
like
I
may
have
a
different
idea
of
what
that
project
area
looks
like
than
other
people
in
the
community,
and
maybe
people
who
are
involved
in
our
legend,
nature
or
and
so
I'm
wondering
how
we
define
grand
boulevards
and
because
you
know,
I've
had
a
lot
of
property
owners
or
lobbyists
come
and
say
we
need
to
fix
the
grand
boulevards
and
do
all
these
things.
But
I
guess.
A
My
question
is:
what
really
is
the
responsibility
of
the
RTA
and
as
we're
looking
at
these
project
areas?
What
are
you
as
RDA
staff
envisioning
and
are
we?
Is
that
the
same
thing
that
other
people
are
envisioning
because
it
seems
like
I
feel
a
little
bit
of
the
conversation?
Has
it
has
a
disconnect
yeah.
D
Would
have
to
we
didn't
share
a
pretend,
a
potential
boundary
with
you
today
for
a
reason,
and
it's
because
I
we
wanted
to
have
a
discussion
more
conceptually
about
a
neighborhood
or
an
area
within
the
city
instead
of
getting
caught
up
and
should
the
line
be
on
5th
south
or
this
east
or
whatever
so
I
think
that
I
know
the
downtown
Alliance
has
done
a
bunch
of
work.
Looking
at
the
grand
boulevards
I
know,
there's
some
property
owners
along
that
corridor.
D
Some
major
property
owners
that
and
lobbyists
involved
there's
been
conversations
with
members
of
the
legislature
about
it
and
state
participation.
So
that's
a
long
way
of
saying
I
think
we
would
need
to
study
that
and
we
would
need
to
reach
out
and
we
would
need
to
identify
an
appropriate
boundary
and
then
return
to
the
board
and
have
a
discussion
about
that.
G
F
I
think
it's
a
good
question.
I
think
it
touches
back
to
councilmember
Rogers
comment
about
really.
What
would
we
be
trying
to
accomplish
there,
because
arguably,
the
first
two
things
that
come
to
mind
are
either
the
bearing
of
the
power
lines
and
or
removing
reducing
doing
something
with
the
billboards
that
make
it
more
visually.
F
Appealing
and
I
think
those
are
all
the
high-level
things
that
seek
to
approve
the
aesthetics
of
the
grand
boulevards
and
at
the
surface
we
probably
wouldn't
need
to
play
a
role
in
that
outside
of
maybe,
if
we
wanted
to
prioritize
sharing
in
some
of
those
costs.
For
for
that
impact,
I
think
beyond.
That
is
what
court
is
touching
on.
F
How
can
we
work
on
that
pedestrian
level
of
improvements
or
connectivity
of
you
know?
Arguably,
these
are
two
massive
one-way
streets
that,
for
all
intents
and
purposes
serve
as
a
boundary
within
our
city,
and
so
is
there
a
role
we
could
play
in
terms
of
that
that
street
level
activation
and
improvements
of
the
projects
and
how
to
make
it
a
little
bit
better
of
an
area
but
again
that's
entirely
dependent
on
what
we
feel
our
role
could
be
if
we
are
needed
and
to
what
extent
we
draw
those
boundaries.
A
Can
I
just
point
out
that
this
came
up
in
our
earlier
discussion?
I'm
looking
at
Ben's
notes
from
last
year's
discussion
and
I
bring
this
up
because
James
mentioned
it
last
year
and
I
think
it
needs
to
be
brought
up
again,
that
this
might
be
the
perfect
area
and
probably
the
perfect
time
as
we
look
at
the
area
to
talk
to
property
owners
about
SaaS.
As
for
maintenance
on
these
things.
So
just
throwing
that
out
there
well.
F
In
an
in
response,
so
the
legislation
was
changed
last
year
that
provided
that
the
level
of
voltage
that
is
going
through
those
power
lines
right
now
does
qualify
as
part
of
state
legislative
intent
to
be
covered
under
an
essay.
So
we
were
successful
in
hitting
the
goal
in
that
way,
and
those
were
the
conversations
we've
had
with
a
lot
of
the
property
owners
to
where
some
of
the
property
owners
are
coming
to
us
saying
we're
actually
interested
in
utilizing
that
as
a
tool
that
actively
engaged
in
that
and.
K
I'm
just
I'll
just
add
the
the
piece
that
always
seems
to
be.
The
barrier
is
when
the
numbers
are
crunched
and
it's
very
expensive
to
bury
power
lines
that
you
know
of
that
high
voltage.
And
so
even
though,
it's
great
that
the
state
now
allows
us
to
that
was
previously
not
something
that
we
could
even
offer
as
a
tool
to
bury
power
lines.
But
there
there
will
be
sticker
shock
from
whoever
gets
the
bill.
So.
A
But
now
is
the
time
to
get
them
involved
in
the
discussions
of
an
essay,
a
write
and
and
get
their
participation
in
it
as
much
as
they
want
our
participation
in
it
right
and,
and
have
that
conversation.
So
nobody
so
when
that
stickers
does
come,
everybody
at
least
knows
that
they.
This
is
what
they
wanted
as
well
right
and
we're
not
footing
the
bill
agreed.
I
E
Want
to
add
one
of
the
city's
major
planning
efforts,
the
ROO
dot
study
of
1988,
which
was
really
focused
on
the
downtown
and
where
it
should
go
over
the
next
half
century
is
the
oldest
adopted
document.
I
know
of
that
talks
about
the
Grand
Boulevard.
So
it
does
go
back
at
least
thirty
plus
years
as
an
idea
to
councilmember
Wharton's
point
earlier,
and
it
wasn't
focused
so
much
on
the
the
power
lines.
It
was
focused
on
making
it
welcoming
showing
civic
pride
and
doing
through
doing
so
through
art,
doing
so
through
pedestrians,
amenities
and
landscaping.
H
A
H
F
Don't
have
any
target
timeline,
I
think
this
court
said
we've
just
kind
of
gotten
in
the
habit
of
bringing
this
once
a
year,
so
that
we
can
have
the
conversation
and,
if
there's
something
we
want
to
start
pulling
the
trigger
on.
We
do
have
on
the
agenda
today
setting
the
survey
boundaries
potentially
for
the
research
park
in
University
Village,
no,
no
timeline
tied
to
any
of
those
other
than
just.
Is
there
interest
for
us
to
start
looking
at
other
possibilities
or
future
project
areas?
A
Maybe
we
can
talk
about
this
offline
I'm
curious
of
what's
the
best
route
with
the
baseball
stadium,
mostly
I,
think
so
that
if
somebody's
already
working
on
a
project
area
there
and
we
just
sort
of
incorporate
it-
is
that
gonna
help
or
hinder
or
staff
time
and
and
priorities
and
stuff
like
that.
So
maybe
we
can
get
some
information
on
for
a
future
date
and
I.
E
F
The
county,
as
of
last
tuesday,
adopted
an
updated
version
of
their
policy
by
which
they
would
consider
partnering
as
part
of
project
Ares
and
interlocal
agreements,
and
so
we
had
submitted
our
request
for
those
two
project
areas
right
at
the
time
that
they
were
transmitting
that
to
the
council,
and
they
asked
us
to
hold
off
on
that
until
the
final
approval.
And
now
we
will
resubmit
those
requests
based
on
the
updated
version
of
that
policy
and
start
to
move
forward.
F
E
L
A
Okay,
so
we
are
going
to
move
on
to
item
number
five,
which
is
the
survey
survey
area,
boundaries
and
initiation
of
Community
Reinvestment
for
University
of
Utah
Research
Park
in
Utah,
Stadium,
village,
and
as
I
mentioned,
we
do
have
Josh
Bates
in
the
audience
and
we
may
call
you
up
and
ask
some
questions.
We
are
going
to
try.
We
have
about
twenty
five
ish
minutes
for
this,
so
fYI
board
members
Jonathan
did
I,
say:
Joshua.
Sorry,
sorry,
Jonathan,.
L
Good
Happy,
New
Year
everybody
as
I
was
mentioned,
I'm
here,
to
discuss
the
University
of
Utah
survey,
boundaries
for
University
of
Utah,
Research
Park
and
the
U
of
U
stadium
village.
So
just
to
give
you
a
kind
of
a
high
level
overview
there
approval
the
boundary
of
resolution
is
it's
just
the
very
first
step
that
would
establish
survey
areas
which
would
authorize
the
RDA
to
kind
of
further
explore
the
feasibility
of
establishing
a
potential
project
area.
The
next
steps
in
this
process
would
be
engaging
with
the
well
would
be.
L
The
University
of
Utah
would
be
adopt
their
master
plan
and
the
RTA
would
coordinate
with
the
stakeholders.
So
we
would
talk
with
property
owners,
taxing
entities
and
the
city
departments
from
there.
We
would
then
create
a
draft
plan
that
includes
the
public,
benefit
analysis,
project,
our
goals
and
objectives,
and
we
would
create
a
budget
and
just
to
quickly
go
over
the
project
areas.
I
think
court
kind
of
mentioned
a
lot
of
this
information,
but
the
first
proposed
survey
area
would
be
for
Research,
Park
and
I.
L
Think
many
people
know
Research
Park
houses,
many
of
the
universities
or
many
businesses
and
companies
that
have
come
from
the
result
of
you
view
research.
The
area
has
very
low
rate
vacancy
rates,
and
many
businesses
start
out
here
and
many
expand
from
this
location.
The
layout
and
footprint
of
research
park
is
more
suburban
in
nature,
with
its
sprawling
office
buildings
and
between
the
sea
of
surface
parking
lots.
L
In
addition,
the
area
is
not
really
conducive
to
walking
and
transit,
and
the
park
lacks
connection
to
the
main
campus,
so
the
purpose
of
exploring
the
research
park
as
a
project.
Your
project
area
includes
kind
of
creating
a
mixed-use
development
that
incorporates
housing,
retail
and
services
to
the
existing
office,
development
and
surface
parking.
It
would
consider
the
efficient
use
of
existing
surface
parking
and
the
potential
for
structured
parking.
It
would
accommodate
various
transportation
options
so
right
now
a
lot
of
manure
car-centric.
L
So
we
would
explore
other
options
of
and
for
people
to
get
around
walking
bike
and
use
in
using
transit.
We'd
also
look
at
connecting
to
the
main
campus
and
plan
for
future
transit
opportunities
and,
in
addition,
provide
housing
opportunities
for
people
who
work
for
the
University
and
within
research
park.
L
The
second
proposed
survey
area
would
be
the
stadium
village.
This
would
create
so
the
U
has
explored
redevelopment
of
the
parking
lot
for
many
many
years,
and
this
project
would
kind
of
create
an
active
node
with
amenities
for
the
West
Campus
area
and
it
benefits
from
the
proximity
to
the
University,
the
stadium,
light
rail
and
neighborhood
neighbor
may
nearby
neighborhoods
and
commercial
I'm.
It
would
also
consider
the
redevelopment
opportunities
on
the
stadium
parking
lot
and
it
would
establish
a
destination
between
downtown
and
the
university
from
there.
K
Just
the
process
cuz,
especially
for
a
new
board
member,
the
this
is
the
first
kind
of
detailed
briefing
that
the
board
will
have
had
on
this
topic
and
so
creating
a
boundary
area
doesn't
commit
the
city
to
doing
the
project
area.
It
doesn't
commit
staff
time
necessarily,
but
it
does
take
a
little
staff
time
to
do
kind
of
an
initial
survey.
So
just
keeping
that
in
mind
that
it's,
you
know
pretty
casual
in.
F
You
can
change
the
boundary
area.
Arguably,
at
this
point
in
the
process,
you
would
typically
want
to
make
the
boundary
area
larger
than
what
you
may
or
may
not
actually
settle
in
on
and
I'd
say,
that's
probably
more
of
a
factor
for
the
University
Village
area
than
research
park.
I
mean
that
has
some
pretty
natural
boundaries.
That
I
think
we
would
respect,
but
that
can't
change
as
we
start
to
look
at
the
feasibility
and
hone
in
on
to
what
our
actual
role
and
feel
that
we
would
want
to
participate
in
and
provide
other.
H
F
H
Just
the
same
thing
about
where
cap
ecchi
goes
into
across
this
foothill
with
a
VA
hospital
and
then
there's
that
the
just
a
little
update
just
for
the
just
south
of
the
X
and
then
map
it
kind
of
goes
right
through
it
looks
like
a
building,
yeah
office
area
and
the
restaurant
right
right
there.
Sorry,
the
line,
dance
exactly
it
just
seems
like
it
goes
right
to
where
there's
a
bakery
shop
and
the
intersection
I'm
Michael.
F
M
L
A
So
I
do
have
a
question,
a
couple
questions
how
you
mentioned
earlier
court
mentioned
earlier,
when
we
were
kind
of
going
through
our
last
agenda
item
that
this
would
be
a
partnership
with
the
university.
What
how
would
that
partnership
be
structured,
I,
guess,
besides
just
the
land
bright
like
what
does
that
look
like
well.
F
And
that's
giving
a
little
background
on
that
I'd
like
to
say:
we've
been
working
with
Jonathan
now,
for
probably
almost
two
years,
at
least
since
since
I've
come
on
and
the
University
of
Utah
recognized
the
need
to
do
a
master
plan
for
this
area,
and
so,
as
we
got
involved
in
those
conversations
early
on,
we
started
identifying
exactly
what
that
partnership
could
be
and
for
us
initially
it
would
be
as
we
create
our
CRA
plan.
That
essentially
would
create
the
project
area.
Their
their
university
research
park
plan
would
be
kind
of.
F
What
we
would
use
is
the
the
starting
point
for
that,
and
so
we
would
want
to
make
sure,
first
and
foremost
that,
as
they
look
at
doing
things
within
their
plan,
we
can
start
finding
ways
that
that
would
align
with
us
setting
up
a
project
area
and
utilizing
tax
increment
to
help
realize.
What
we
would
want
to
see
is
the
benefits
coming
out
of
that
plan,
and
so
our
office
tracy
has
been
sitting
in
on
that
process
for
the
master
plan
and
in
tracking
that
and
then
ultimately,
our
next
step
would
be.
A
M
A
F
G
F
One
bumped
up
higher
on
our
priority
list
because
of
the
involvement
we've
had
with
the
University
on
their
master
plan
number
one
and
number
two
because
for
us
is
the
department
a
lot
of
the
things
that
and
I
can
let
Jonathan
speak
to
this
because
he's
much
smarter
than
I
am
on
him.
A
lot
of
the
things
that
the
university
is
looking
at
doing
in
terms
of
targeting
the
uses
and
the
projects
and
the
developments
and
and
the
tenants
they
they
want
to
see
up.
F
A
research
park
ties
in
directly
with
what
our
economic
development
department
and
business
to
business
development
are
doing
in
terms
of
recruiting
and
building
kind
of
that
pipeline
of
incubator
companies.
That
then
expand
within
both
the
city
and
and
the
region
as
a
whole.
So
it
really
really
ties
in
to
aligning
both
what
the
RTA
can
do
with
economic
development
along
with
housing
and
transit
and
doing
it
in
a
way
that
is
a
partnership
with
the
the
majority
landowner
up
there.
A
F
E
C
A
K
A
I
A
H
A
J
A
I'm
gonna
get
started
again
because
we
only
have
a
few
minutes.
We're
gonna
save
the
elections
till
the
very
last,
so
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
start
with
the
North
temple
catalytic
projects,
which
is
item
number
two,
because
we
don't
have
a
ton
of
time.
We
want
to
be
able
to
talk
about
these
things.
I'm
just
gonna
give
a
quick
overview.
We
had
a
discussion
in
October
about
what
catalytic
means
and
what
sort
of
projects
North
temple
could
look
at
to
be.
A
Catalytic
I
think
a
lot
of
this
stemmed
and
from
Andrew
and
James
of
how
do
we?
Actually
you
know
we
we
need
something
there
to
activate
the
area,
and
so
we
asked
staff
to
kind
of
come
out
with
some
strategies
for
us
and
that's
where
we're
at
right
now
then
I
did
a
great
job
on
the
staff
report
and,
if
there's
more,
if
you
have
more
questions
or
want
more
information,
just
talk
to
anybody
sitting
at
the
table
there.
A
N
N
The
third
idea
is
the
Folsom
Trail
enhancement
and
City
Creek
daylighting,
so
this
is
taking
the
current
design
that
UTA
is
working
on
through
the
tiger
grant
and
enhancing
some
of
that
for
landscape
lighting,
above
and
beyond
what
the
current
budget
can
do
for
the
fulsome
trail
and
then
also
considering
City
Creek
daylighting.
The
next
idea
was
implementing
interim
and
temporary
uses
of
city-owned
property
in
Folsom
corridor,
and
I
can
go
into
more
detail
about
any
of
these.
If
you
guys
want
to
come
back
to
them.
N
The
next
idea
was
an
adaptive
reuse
loan
program,
similar
to
what
we
did
in
The
Granary
District,
and
that
would
be
establishing
a
separate
loan
program,
probably
funded
by
tax
increment,
where
buildings
could
be
brought
up
to
code
in
the
project
area.
I'm
using
that
program,
a
facade
improvement
grant
program
and
I
think
there's
been
further
discussion
about
the
2020
2020
for
consolidated
plan
and
how
that
might
overlap
with
RDA
project
area.
So
this
might
not
need
to
use
RDA
funds
after
all
and
then
finally
implementing
a
public
art
program.
N
N
G
A
I
I'm
sure
I
was
just
wondering:
maybe
we
can
call
it
out
a
little
bit
more
in
regards
to
Anna's
a
board
member
of
Baltimore's.
This
question
is
just
maybe
calling
it
out
just
saying
in
conjunction
with
the
investment
that
we've
already
made
with
the
fair
park
feasibility
study
looking
at
ways
to
you
know
implement
that
with
partners
in
the
Fair
Park
or
the
state
or
the
county
at
that
level.
O
Madam
chair,
thank
you
again
for
all
this.
The
the
policy
questions
were
of
a
question
about
policy.
Question
number
two:
the
focus
area.
If
we
were
to
look
at
a
focus
area,
what
would
what
would
change
I
guess
what
would
be
helpful
in
that
potential
idea
to
focus
on,
say
the
two
blocks
there,
between
8th
and
10th
or
7th
and
9th.
O
N
Know
I
think
that
came
out
of
the
map
where
we
identified
where
current
projects
were
in
the
project
area
and
looking
at
where
private
investment
is
already
happening
and
maybe
really
focusing
there
I
don't
know,
fill
the
gaps
where
it's
not
happening.
But
I
can
you
know
with
the
list
of
strategies
that
we've
offered
in
this
memo
they're,
not
all
located
in
that
focus
area,
so
I'm,
not
sure,
okay,.
O
I
think
I
would
be
interested
in
something
akin
to
that
I
think
we
could
have
a
lot
of
development.
I
agree
with
the
ball
part,
though
the
white
ball
field
redevelopment
question
and
where
that
is
right.
Now
the
market
etc.
Those
are
great,
but
the
heart
of
the
issue
is
rad.
Around
Jackson
track,
stop
right,
baby,
thouest,
essentially,
and
so
I'd
love
to
see
us
focus
on
that
small
geographic
area
as
a
focal
point
for
efforts.
If
we're
gonna,
we
have
a
limited
amount
of
money
or
time
and
staff
and
all
those
things
right.
O
If
we
could
I
think
focus
a
catalytic
concept
there,
probably
through
strategic
property
redevelopment
or
acquisition
or
some
combination
with
the
City
Housing
Authority
or
some
other
entities,
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
jumpstart
for
everything
else.
You've
talked
about
which
could
all
be
helpful,
whether
it's
on
fulsome
the
Fair
Park
anywhere
else
along
last
rate,
I,
think
that
would
be
the
starting
point
for
me
and
then
you
emanate
out
from
there
and.
O
Good
initial
meeting
with
the
new
owner
of
the
gateway
in
motel,
so
we
started
a
good
relationship,
I
hope
but
I
think
that
is
sort
of
the
epicenter
of
a
lot
of
what
we're
talking
about
there
and
so
I'd
love
to
see
as
much
focus
as
possible
there
as
it
ripples
north
and
south
along
North
temple,
because
these
are
all
great
things.
I,
just
don't
think
any
of
them
are
gonna
hit
the
core
of
the
issue.
Until
we
can
hit
that
geographic
area.
I
G
G
G
Then
the
next
thing
so
so
far
we've
tried
with
North
temple.
We
did
try
at
some
point
facade
improvements
and
in
the
past,
which
were
I
wish,
it
was
had
been
more
successful
and
and
I
think
it
was
because
of
it
was
somewhat
of
a
difficulty
on
how
to
get
further
improvement
was
a
matching
grant.
So
if
I
don't
think
that
the
owners
couldn't
really
grasp
what
we
were
asking
and
so,
but
we
did
a
few
of
them,
so
that's
good!
G
We
could
try
it
again
if
it's
something
that
if
we
could
loosen
up
all
those
rules
and
those
strings,
then
in
tandem,
we're
doing
in
tandem
world
I
think
it's
important
that
we've
focused
this
linear
this
linear,
like
Street,
then
what
are
the
things
are
working
and
we
have
not
worked
and
the
things
that
we
could
try
gain
some
momentum
in
it
to
us.
So.
J
G
Me
it's
important
that
we
do
look
at
the
part,
sorry
at
the
market,
when
we
do
look
at
the
hundred,
West
and
I'm
gonna
show
if
they
have,
which
one
happens.
First
of
they
happen
at
the
same
time
that,
but
we
keep
looking
at
it
like
that,
like
that,
by
step
by
step
and
I
were
fulfilling
the
things
that
we
were
hoping
to
fulfill
and
gain
some
extra
activity
in
the
north
temple
I'm,
not
sure
if
that
make
sense,
but
I
hope
it
does.
O
O
Well,
so
yeah
I
think
my
my
interest
was
incrementally.
It
could
take
a
long
time
because
we
don't
see
as
many
issues
going
west
from
the
fairgrounds.
For
instance
right.
We
have
development
going
way
further
west,
obviously
already
and
then
our
current
developments
are
focused
around
the
West
End
of
the
white
ball
field
and
the
overnighters
down
there.
O
That
sort
of
thing
we
don't
have
is
something
to
deal
with
further
east,
which
is
where
the
epicenter
of
what
we're
talking
about
the
problems
that
are
causing
the
perception
issues,
the
real
issues
of
crime,
those
kind
of
things.
So
that's
where
I
was
saying.
We
prioritized
that
small
section
as
really
our
focus
as
much
as
possible
and
collaborate
with
other
entities
who
are
also
interested
in
putting
some
money
towards
it,
perhaps
and
see.
If
we
can
get
a
group
concept
together
and
make
an
impact
right
there,
on
8th
West.
I
I
N
N
I'd
say
definitely
not,
but
we
did
have
a
brownfields
grant
ended
assessments
on
eight
different
sites.
Those
were
the
property
owners
that
were
interested
in
I'm,
taking
advantage
of
that
money,
and
so
we
have
results
on
those
eight
I
think
what
it
tells
us
is
that,
along
the
rail
line,
there's
probably
contamination
that
we
can
expect,
but
we
haven't
assessed
other
science.
C
Okay
and
then
my
second
question
is:
what
about
do?
We
have
any
update
on
what's
going
on
with
white
ballpark,
and
it's
talking
here
about
how
the
policy
question
talks
about
how
it's
owned
by
the
state
and
D
FCM.
So
what
role
would
that
would
we
have
in
that,
if
it,
if
they
were
to
develop
that
since
it
it
wouldn't
be
tax
generating
I.
F
Would
assume
would
be
if
the
state
were
to
put
that
out
for
development,
that
that
would
be
some
kind
of
public/private
partnership
and
by
a
fact
of
the
state,
either
selling
or
more
likely
leasing
the
property
to
a
developer,
then,
once
they
do
that
it
becomes
taxable,
and
so
our
role
at
that
point
could
be
to
assist
whoever
the
ultimate
developer
is
in
redeveloping
that
property
and
building
it
out.
Okay,.
N
G
F
And
then
the
purpose
of
those
work
plans
is
to
inform
us
as
staff
of
what
we
ultimately
will
put
before
the
board
as
part
of
our
annual
budget.
And
so
you
will
see
this
come
back
around
to
you
as
part
of
the
next
year's
budget
cycle,
where
you
want
to
put
funding
in
priorities,
but
as
part
of
allocating
those
funds
and
last
year's
budget
to
come
back
and
give
you
ideas
of
what
we
we
may
utilize
those
funds
for.
And
so,
if
there's
something
specific
you
would
like
us
to
do.
F
We
can
take
that
as
direction.
We
can
obviously
come
back
and
and
run
run
some
feasibility
on
a
few
of
these
options
and
see
what
what
we
think
we
could
do
in
the
short
term
and
then
what's
our
long
term
approach
in
terms
of,
should
we
be
looking
at
property
acquisition
or
just
setting
assigned
loan
funds
and
doing
it
that
way
so.
A
Agree
with
Anna
in
this
end
that
it's
important
to
look
at
like
sort
of
what
at
what
has
worked
well
and
what
hasn't,
but
I,
also
think
an
incremental
change
is
what
we
thought
we
liked
it
sort
of
as
what
we've
been
waiting
for,
and
it
hasn't
happened,
and
that's
why
you
know
policy
question
number
one
is:
is
the
biggest
one
for
me
and
it's
something
that
I
keep
wanting
us
to
answer
and
I.
Don't
know
that
we
can
I,
don't
know
that
we
have
that
answer.
But
what
is
catalytic?
What
does
it
mean?
A
And
this
isn't
just
going
to
be
the
question
that
we
have
for
this
project?
It's
the
question
that
we
will
have
for
State
Street.
It's
the
question.
We
will
have
four
nine
line.
What
is
catalytic
such
that
we
are
creating
a
project
that
creates
more
projects
and
not
just
projects
that
the
RDA
has
to
fund,
but
projects
that
make
it
so
people
want
to
come
into
that
area
and
fund.
It
I
think
I
would
encourage
us
to
and
I'm
sure
you
already
have
care.
A
I
know
that
you
have
been
working
very
hard
out
in
this
area,
but
to
a
little
bit
to
to
Andrews
point,
the
our
local
small
business
is
over
there
that
actually
have
survived
and
thrived
in
in
an
area
that
I
think
sort
of
you
would
have
expected.
Maybe
they're
not
to
be
as
many
what
is
working
for
them
and
what
do
they
need?
A
A
I,
don't
want
it
to
be
a
guinea
pig
right,
I
want
it
to
be
successful,
but
how
can
we
use
it
as
a
learning
experience
for
State
Street,
and
we
also
can't
just
focus
on
North
temple,
but
the
neighborhoods
that
feed
and
and
use
North
temple,
and
that's
really
who
we
need
and
want
to
support.
Those
are
the
communities
that
that
we,
the
reason
that
we
have
these
areas
and
the
reason
that
the
RTA
exists
right
is
to
support
those
surrounding
communities
and
ensure
that
that
they're
not
forgotten
about
and.
E
A
I
think
for
me,
as
you're
developing
the
your
sort
of
work
plan,
I,
hope
that
and
as
board
members,
we
keep
in
mind
what
is
catalytic?
What
does
that
mean?
What
does
that
look
like?
What
does
it
look
like
for
the
neighborhoods?
What
does
it
look
like
for
those
small
businesses
and
how
do
we
use
the
tools
that
we
have
to
create
that
catalyst
for
that
community,
right
and
I?
O
O
So
we
tracked
successes
at
the
point
of
opening
the
project
areas,
but
I
think
this
is
a
piece
of
it.
I
think
the
piece
that
that
that
chair,
Fowler
brought
up
was
important
as
well,
and
that
I'm
taking
it
for
granted
right
now
and
I
shouldn't
that
there
is
a
maintenance
of
existing
businesses
and
small
businesses.
Particular
there
there's
also
metric
of
crime,
different
types
of
crime
and
things
which
isn't
really
Rd
a
specific.
O
But
if
the
issue
the
feedback
we're
getting
from
developers
and
businesses
is
there's
a
perception
of
unsafety
there,
we
need
to
take
something.
That's
gonna
address
that
it's
perception
at
its
reality.
So
metric
is
some
of
the
crime
statistics
we're
looking
at
and
out
of
those
move.
I
think
there
may
be
a
third
one
or
fourth
one
as
well
that
I'm
not
sure
we
have
to
I
want
your
feedback
on
this.
But
one
of
the
major
issues
in
the
city
is
to
support
businesses
and
growth.
O
You
need
residents,
people,
so
housing
is
a
piece
of
this
as
well
I,
don't
know
how
much
that's
where
I'd
look
to
you
to
sort
of
help
understand.
Is
there
a
metric
or
percentage
we're
looking
for
and
mixed-use
in
this
particular
area
on
an
hour
on
a
TSA
zone,
for
instance
that
could
yield
the
sort
of
growth
here
in
the
ink
the
tax
increment
growth
that
we're
looking
for
or
percentage.
O
Those
are
the
things
that
are
in
my
head
right
now
and
it
could
be
some
mixture
of
those
that's
and
building
up
what
you
said
earlier.
I
think,
maybe
more
specifically
I
should
have
said
this
earlier.
So
thank
you
chair.
Those
are
the
things
I'd
be
looking
for
and
then
also
this
is
obvious.
You
know
this
already,
but
I
think
those
are
the
metrics
that
I
would
be
looking
for
to
say
or
we
are
making
a,
and
in
this
there
at
least
a
start,
they
can
grow
off
of
long
term.
A
Thanks
Andrew,
so
we
have
to
wrap
up,
but
I
would
ask
I
care.
I
know
you
do
and,
and
the
team
does
some
community
outreach
and
stuff
like
that.
If
it's
okay
with
you
guys
I
would
love
if
you've
met
with
community
members
or
small
business
owners
to
maybe
be
invited
to
that
meeting.
So
I
can
just
be
a
fly
on
the
wall
and
listen
again.
I
think
this
will
help
us
inform
sort
of
what
we
need
to
be
looking
for,
as
we
do
other
projects
where
we
know
we
need
that
catalytic
start.
N
G
G
Think
the
cut
I
think
we
thought
the
catalytic
project
was
gonna,
be
the
overnighter
in
a
way
so
I
guess
we
have
a
long-term
kind
of
leader
once
there
are
big
deals
like
we
acquired
our
property
and
because
we
want
people
because
I
think
that's
what
the
businesses
need
to
have
people
around
them,
so
they
can
buy
in
their
in
their
stores.
But
and
also
we
can
look
at
the
was
this.
What
was
a
planning
thing,
the
faster,
easier,
cheaper
or
lighter.
G
That
one,
though
those
kind
of
there
are
not
as
expensive
projects
that
could
option,
that
could
actually
be
catalytic
as
well.
So
maybe
that's
how
we
think
about
north
temple
that
always
how
I
can
kind
of
wrap
my
head
around
it,
especially
with
limited
resources
that
we
have
big
ones,
small
ones,
that
we
can
do
faster.
A
Thank
you
awesome.
Thanks
for
all
your
work
on
this
and
I'm
sure
we
will
be
talking
more
about
it
and
we've
saved
the
best
for
last
I
think
we
are
at
a
new
year,
and
that
means
unfortunately-
and
unfortunately
we
have
to
miss
you,
so
we
have
he's
our
chairperson.
Now
we
have
to.
It
is
time
to
have
elections
for
a
new
vice
chair
of
the
RTA.
A
Unfortunately,
for
all
of
you,
you
are
stuck
with
me
for
another
year,
so
welcome
aboard
I
just
want
to
say
to
Chris
that
you
have
been
an
amazing
vice
chair
and
I
have
been
very
lucky
to
have
you
as
my
sounding
board
and
to
have
you
there
making
your
amazingly
witty
jokes
when
I
want
to
kill
people,
so
it
thank
you
for
that,
and
calming
me
down
in
those
times
and
I
am
glad
you're.
Our
new
chairperson.
J
C
A
M
J
K
Just
gonna
read
it
here:
if
that's
okay,
so
you
can
be
my
witness
board,
member
of
Wharton
votes
for
on
eval,
tomorrow's
board
member
Dugan
votes
for
honorable
tomorrow's
board,
member
fowler
about
votes
for
onif,
Aldo,
Moros
board
member
Johnston
votes
for
Ana
board.
Member
Rogers,
though
it's
for
Anna
and
Porter
member
about
the
Morris,
that's
piranha.
K
K
A
K
F
A
F
It
doesn't
help
that
my
next
update
is
that,
thanks
to
the
City
Council
appointing
Katie
as
the
city
attorney,
we
lost
our
our
DA
attorney.
However,
we
have
the
pleasure
of
having
Alison
parks
and
Kimberly
staying
with
us
for
our
DA
attorneys,
but
Alison
also
helped
with
the
planning
department.
So.
F
We
will
be
sending
a
nice
fruit
basket
to
make
other
updates.
Our
West
montrezl
property
on
765,
south
and
300
west
is
out
vn
RFP.
This
is
our
last
property
offering
in
the
West
Temple
Gateway
project
area.
That
is
online.
If
anyone
has
any
interest
in
reading
that,
but
those
submissions
are
due
on
March
31st
and
we'll
keep
you
posted
on
what
we
receive
on
that.
We
also
selected
GSB
s,
architects,
for
our
Japantown
design
strategy
project.
We
have
had
our
first
stakeholder
meeting
with
them
as
staff.
F
They
were
selected
because
of
their
approach
to
community
engagement
process,
their
design
strategy,
as
well
as
their
thoughts
on
including
a
maintenance
and
installation
menu
for
improvements
to
the
japantown
area.
So
they
are
getting
started.
They
hope
to
be
done
by
September
of
this
year
and
they
will
be
having
their
first
working
group
meeting
later
this
month.
If
you're
interested
in
going
Thursday
January
23rd,
we
can
get
you
the
details
on
that.
If
you
want
to
participate
in
that
and
then
finally,
each
of
you
should
have
received
our
RDA
101
binder.
F
We
have
staff
working
very
hard
on
this,
compiling
all
the
information
to
get
you
everything
together
in
one
book
that
you
may
or
may
not
ever
want
or
need
or
care
to
know
about
the
RDA.
So
this
is
something
we
hope
to
continue
to
update
as
obviously
staff
and
and
positions
change,
but
also
as
policies
and
plans
get
added
to
it.
So
can.
A
A
C
A
C
A
Was
it
wasn't
you,
oh
I'm,
sorry
stop
it!
All
of
you.
Gosh
I
have
a
motion
by
board
member
Johnson,
a
second
board
member
of
wards
and
all
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed
great.
That
is,
for
the
budget
amendment.
So
it's
on
name
its
calendered
with
that
we
are
in
we're
done
with
RDA
for
today
and
mr.
chair.
When
would
you
like
to
return
back.