►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Formal Meeting - 12/07/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
so
much
for
joining
us
today.
We
are
happy
to
be
returning
to
our
hybrid
pilot
meetings,
which
we
plan
to
continue
with
as
islam,
for
as
long
as
it
is
safe.
I
am
certainly
glad
to
be
back
on
site
with
my
council
colleagues,
council
staff,
madam
mayor,
and
the
public
attending
in
person.
A
If
you
are
here
joining
us
on
site,
the
council
is
following
cdc
guidelines
to
prevent
and
reduce
transmission
of
covid19
and
maintain
healthy
business
operations
and
work
environments,
also
for
the
mayor's
executive
order.
3
of
2021
masks
and
face
coverings
are
required,
while
in
city
facilities,
even
if
vaccinated
everyone,
please
keep
your
face
coverings
on
at
all
times
during
the
meeting
for
people
who
are
signed
up
for
public
comment
feel
free
to
remove
your
mask
once
your
name
has
been
called
and
you
are
at
the
microphone
to
address
the
council.
A
A
A
Thank
you.
I
did
want
to
also
make
sure
to
mention
that
we
are
still
as
for
the
hybrid
streaming,
everything
and
having
people
be
allowed
to
join
us
virtually,
and
so
our
public
hearings.
We
will
get
to
that.
A
So
you
may
have
noticed
on
our
agenda
that
we
have
our
typical
formal
meeting
agenda
and
beforehand
we
also
beforehand.
We
also
have
a
quick
local
building
authority
agenda.
As
the
city's
elected
officials
council
members
not
only
serve
on
the
city
council,
we
also
serve
as
the
local
building
authority
board.
Think
of
it
as
the
council
wearing
different
hats
for
each
role.
A
If
you
are
joining
us
for
the
public
comment
opportunities
we
have
later
on
the
agenda,
we
are
accepting
your
comments,
also
through
webex
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line.
Before
we
begin
our
lba
agenda
items,
I
want
to
mention
and
review
our
rules
of
decorum.
A
There
are
guidelines
that
the
city
council
has
always
had
in
place
to
help
keep
our
our
meeting
moving
in
an
orderly
civil
efficient
way,
and
these
rules
also
apply
as
we
wear
our
lba
hats.
These
rules
of
decorum
help
us
move
through
the
agenda
and
give
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
A
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
decorum
begin
from
the
moment
you
arrive
in
our
virtual
meeting
or
here
in
person.
We
respect
all
points
of
view
and
we
welcome
new
insights
while
giving
your
comments,
please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling
profanity,
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
I'd
also
encourage
people
to
refrain
from
attacking
others
individually,
we're
here
to
listen
to
your
comments
on
the
issues
that
we
are
facing,
and
we
would
hope
that
you
can
stick
to
those
issues
with
those
comments.
A
If
you
do
decide
to
use
profanity
during
your
comment,
if
you're
online,
your
line
will
be
muted
if
you're.
Here,
we
will
ask
that
you
forfeit
your
time
at
the
podium
and
if
any
comments
reach
a
level
of
disrespect,
I
will
ask
that
you
be
muted
and
you
will
forfeit
your
opportunity
to
address
the
council
simmer.
Similarly,
if
there
is
a
level
of
disrespect
here
in
person,
we'll
ask
you
to
forfeit
your
time
at
the
podium.
A
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
for
your
name
during
the
webex
registration
process.
Of
course,
those
in
attendance.
We
already
got
your
name
on
the
cards.
If
you
plan
on
speaking
so
this
is
only
in
regards
to
our
webex
folks,
so
we
will
ask
for
your
name
on
the
during
the
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
decorum.
If
your
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
our
staff
will
make
contact
with
you
to
gather
this
information.
A
Delaney
sillman
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions
with
your
commenting
registration,
that's
online
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks,
so
please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
changes
to
your
registration.
A
A
C
A
A
D
A
Sorry
lots
of
talking
the
council
will
now
look
to
approve
the
work
session
and
formal
meeting
minutes
of
tuesday
november
9,
2021
and
tuesday
november
16
2021..
I
will
look
for
a
motion
I
move.
We
approve
the
minutes
for
tuesday
november
9th
and
tuesday
november
16th
2021..
Second,
I
have
a
motion
by
council
member
ferris
is
second
by
council
member
wharton
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
aye.
E
A
Any
opposed
that
passes
unanimously.
We
are
now
at
our
public
hearing
section.
All
of
the
rules
that
I
just
went
over
as
far
as
the
decorum
and
giving
comments
still
apply.
Nothing
has
changed
in
the
last
35
seconds.
So
please
keep
those
in
mind
and
we
can
move
forward.
Taylor
hill
is
from
our
staff
is
going
to
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
A
We
will
call
names
of
people
joining
on
webex
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards
once
we
open
public
comment,
taylor
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
people
can
have
some
notice
and
be
prepared
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak.
Taylor
will
announce
your
name
for
people
in
webex.
She
will
unmute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
for
people
in
person.
Please
feel
free
to
step
up
to
the
podium,
remove
your
mask
and
make
your
comment
into
the
microphone
once
you
begin.
A
Please
state
your
name
and
the
two-minute
timer
will
start
at
the
two-minute
mark.
The
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted,
that
we
can't
mute
you
here.
We
will
ask
you
to
stop
talking
at
that
two
minute
time.
If
you
are
unable
to
finish
your
comment,
please
send
the
rest
of
your
comment
via
email,
mail
or
call
in
our
office
for
those
in
webex.
Our
contact
information
is
posted
in
the
chat.
A
If
you
do
not
wish
to
speak,
please
either
message
our
staff
or
let
them
know
or
when
the
host
states,
your
name
just.
Let
us
know
that
you
are
here
to
listen.
Our
first
public
hearing
combines
items
e1
through
e7
as
our
first
hearing
before
we
begin
taking
comments.
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
sylvia
richards
council
staff
policy
analyst
to
give
a
short
introduction.
F
F
The
first
is
the
granary
district,
floodplain
mitigation,
remapping
covid19,
local
assistance
matching
grant
program
which
would
fund
the
granary,
district,
floodplain
mitigation
and
remapping
project,
including
infrastructure
improvements
to
the
city's
stormwater
system
to
mitigate
flood
risk
for
at
least
1182
properties
that
are
partially
or
completely
located
within
the
federal
emergency
management
act,
designated
750
acre
flood
hazard
area,
which
is
concentrated
in
the
granary
district.
Excuse
me
along
the
along
the
adjacent
stretch
of
the
jordan
river.
F
The
second
grant
is
the
new
water
reclamation
facility
in
fluent
pump
station
force
mains
covet
19
local
assistant
matching
grant
program
which
would
fund
the
cons,
construction
of
the
new
influent
pump
station
force
mains,
which
is
a
sub-project
of
the
water
reclamation
facility,
and
replaces
the
existing
pump
station
and
force
mains
that
are
at
the
end
of
their
service.
Life.
F
Fourth
is
the
foothills
natural
area
and
bonneville
shoreline
trailhead
infrastructure
improvements
grant
which
would
fund
infrastructure
improvements
at
the
foothills
natural
area
and
bonneville
shoreline
trailhead,
including
the
construction
of
five
public
access
trail
heads
fifth:
is
the
utah
railroad
safety
grant
2021
round
two
which
would
fund
safety
improvements
to
the
union,
pacific
railroad
crossing
at
4,
900,
west
and
700?
South
sixth?
Is
the
800
east
neighborhood
byway,
1300
south
to
1700
south
fiscal
year,
22
region,
2
transportation,
alternative
program
grant
which
would
fund
the
construction
of
pedestrian
and
bicycle
activated
crossings.
G
Thank
you,
council
chair,
it
looks
like
we
have
one
person
here
to
speak
to
these
items
this
evening
and
that
will
be
george
chapman
george
you're
now
unmuted.
H
Okay,
I'm
against
the
800
east
grand
applications.
It's
roundabouts
and
bull
belts
are
a
costly
and
unnecessary
addition
to
the
quiet
and
bikeable
800
east.
That
money
could
be
and
should
be
better
used
to
maintain
west
side
streets
which
are
still
getting
minimal.
Street
funding
versus
the
east
side-
and
I
know
salt
lake
city
just
got
a
grant
with
uta
and
university
of
utah.
You
should
have
had
a
grant
application
hearing,
but
you
didn't
so.
H
They're,
just
not
getting
the
funding
they
have.
A
west
side
has
to
bear
with
zigzag
milk
run
bus
routes
and
they
deserve
electric
buses
and
one
dollar
fares,
but
the
not
the
new
disrespectful,
uta
documentation
system,
perhaps
fair
salt
lake
city,
should
push
uti
to
implement
one
dollar
bus
fare
county
wide
and
implement
electric
buses
on
the
west
side
with
better
routes,
and
this
idea
that
we
need
to
spend
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
on
the
east
side.
H
What
about
the
west
side?
So
I'm
against
the
uta
grant
with
salt
lake
city
transportation
that
they
just
got
because
it
kind
of
puts
the
west
side
in
the
back
seat
and
actually
in
the
trunk.
Those
are
my
comments.
G
All
right
and
then
we
had
one
more
person
register
for
this
item
and
that
will
be
paulie
art
paulie.
You
are
now
unmuted.
I
I
I
desperately
want
to
encourage
the
grant
application
for
the
foothills
natural
area
trail
head
infrastructure,
the
the
number
of
trails
above
the
avenues
and
well
primarily,
the
avenues
in
the
last
couple
of
years
have
doubled
more
than
doubled
and
not
one
parking
space
has
been
added,
not
one
bathroom
has
been
added
and
if,
if
you
were
to
go
up
to
18th
avenue
or
the
top
of
terrace
hills
on
a
saturday
morning,
people
have
counted
over
100
cars
parked
at
at
those
trail.
Heads
and
the
neighbors
are
not
happy.
I
I
am
not
one
of
those
neighbors,
but
I
certainly
understand
that
their
streets
are
just
completely
parked
up
with
all
of
the
users
for
the
foothills.
So
we
desperately
need
the
infrastructure
to
go
along
with
those
foothills,
and
I
want
to
encourage
you
to
move
forward
with
that.
Thank
you.
So
much.
J
Thank
you,
jen
colby
district
4..
I
just
wanted
to
chime
in
on
a
couple
of
these,
I
agree
with
paulie.
I
strongly
support
the
foot,
the
trailheads
infrastructure
improvements
grant
to
someone
who
uses
the
photos
regularly
and
I'm
not
burly
enough
to
bike
up
there.
Sadly,
even
I
realize
that
there
is
a
need
for
access.
It's
also
been
just
so
important
during
the
pandemic.
J
I
think
it
really
drove
home
how
critical
our
public
lands
and
open
spaces
are,
and
unfortunately,
how
little
of
them
in
many
of
our
neighborhoods,
we
actually
have
whether
park
pocket
parks
or
other
things.
So
that
is
a
great
one.
I
hope
that
goes
through,
and
then
I
want
to
say
regarding
the
800
east
improvements
in
just
those
four
blocks,
I
have
a
slightly
different
perspective.
First,
I
really
hope
we
can
avoid
east
side,
west
side
division
divisions
and
can
see
the
improvements
to
our
entire
city.
J
The
mapping
of
the
street
conditions
showed
incredibly
deteriorated
streets
all
over
the
city
and
some
of
the
worst
ones
are
actually
in
the
near
east
side
neighborhoods,
and
I
think
we
mix
up
the
wealthier,
fully
east
side
bench
neighborhoods
with
central
city
and
some
of
the
near
east,
older
neighborhoods.
I
also
want
to
say
that
I
highly
encourage
selling
city
transportation
to
really
rethink
what
they
consider
major
improvements
and
upgrades.
I
have
been
watching
lots
of
videos.
J
I
highly
recommend
the
just,
not
bikes
channel,
it's
all
about
netherlands
planning
we
are
so
far
behind
and
the
bulb
outs
and
these
kind
of
improvements
without
such
a
complete
rethinking
of
our
streets,
including
our
street
patterns.
These
are
really
inefficient
investments
and
really
don't
improve
much
in
the
way
of
pet
safety.
We
have
to
completely
overhaul
things
and
just
sort
of
incremental
little
changes
are
not
getting
us
there.
100
south
is
a
complete
disappointment.
I
can't
believe
we
invested
this
much
in
that
project
and
it
just
shows
how
little
we
get.
Thank
you.
C
A
This
brings
us
to
our
second
public
hearing
item
e8.
This
is
regarding
an
ordinance
that
would
amend
the
zoning
ordinance
related
to
limit
the
amount
of
city
culinary
water
that
commercial
and
industrial
land
uses
can
utilize.
A
D
A
A
G
You,
council
chair,
it
looks
like
we
have
10
people
here
to
speak
to
this
item,
the
first
of
which
will
be
katie
newborn,
followed
by
john
giles,
and
then
he
joined.
G
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
ask
the
council
to
adopt
this
amendment
with
impending
growth
in
industrial
water
demand
for
projects
related
to
the
utah
inland
port,
it's
essential
to
impose
responsible
limits
on
future
commercial
and
industrial
water
use.
I
encourage
the
council
to
consider
additional
opportunities
to
regulate
these
water
users
and
all
water
users
in
salt
lake
city,
with
great
salt
lake
at
record
lows
and
no
sign
of
relief
from
our
persistent
drought.
It
has
never
been
more
urgent
for
municipal
policy
to
drive
conservation
and
strategic
water
management.
G
K
My
name
is
john
giles,
and
I
would
just
encourage
you
to
extend
this
amendment
when
I
look
up
the
wasatch
mountains
that
should
be
laden
with
snow
and
or
not.
K
K
K
E
E
J
J
I
am
also
extremely
concerned
about
the
climate
catastrophe
that
we
are
facing.
After
the
sum
I
mean
I
used
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
this.
As
a
sustainability
coordinator
for
the
university
of
utah,
many
leaders
were
talking
about
effects
on
their
grandchildren
and
I
was
always
sort
of
sitting
in
the
back
waving
my
hands
saying.
No,
no,
it's
us!
It's
us!
It's
us
and
I'm
in
my
50s.
J
I
can
already
see
the
possibility
of
becoming
a
climate
refugee
from
the
city
I
had
adopted
as
my
permanent
home
and
expected
to
stay
for
the
rest
of
my
life.
This
is
incredibly
important
as
we're
looking
at
the
equivalent
of
industrial
sprawl
throughout
the
west,
the
western
part
of
the
northwest
quadrant.
Unfortunately,
thanks
to
the
inland
port,
we
already
know
that
the
sprawl
is
financially
unsustainable
and
debt,
fueled
and
putting
the
water
use
on
top
of
that
is
problematic,
but
this
water
use
extends
to
the
entire
valley.
J
I
was
a
member
of
the
most
recent
public
utilities
rate
review
advisory
group.
It
was
clear.
Current
water
rates
for
large
users
are
inadequate
to
drive
sufficient
conservation
with
egregious
property
tax
subsidies,
making
the
market
distortion
even
worse,
so
regulation
is
truly
needed.
Our
only
hope
for
is
a
is
a
general
slowing
of
the
rate
of
increase
in
water
withdrawals,
a
focus
on
water
conservation
and
ecosystem
protection.
J
G
M
My
name
is
dorothy
owen.
I
am
the
chair
of
the
west
point.
Community
council
west
point
is
the
la
the
home
of
the
last
agricultural
land
in
salt
lake
city.
It's
also
the
community,
that's
closest
to
the
great
salt
lake
and
the
people
who
live
in
this
area
are
very
sensitive
to
the
water
needs.
M
M
M
G
M
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
carolyn
erickson.
I
reside
at
368
emory
street
poplar
grove.
I
would
like
to
remind
you
that
last
march,
governor
cox
declared
a
state
of
emergency
due
to
the
drought
conditions.
He
asked
utahns
to
evaluate
emerg
their
water
uses
and
find
ways
to
save,
not
only
because
of
current
drought
conditions,
but
also
because
we
live
in
one
of
the
driest
states
in
the
nation.
M
M
The
city's
water
conservation
plan,
2020
and
the
water
shortage
response
summary
seem
vague
and
are
based
on
voluntary
aspirational
goals.
I
am
concerned,
for
example,
as
the
previous
speaker
said,
that
manufacturing
facilities,
like
the
1.2
million
square
foot
volbev
facility,
which
just
opened
in
september,
have
good
intentions.
They
say
quote
that
they
plan
to
leverage
sustainable
processes
like
water
reclamation
and
solar
power.
But
what
is
the
reality?
M
I
haven't
seen
that
when
I
drive
by
apparently
when
the
state
enacted,
sb
234
and
in
2018
grabbing
16
000
acres
in
the
northwest
quadrant,
they
may
have
given
away
your
power
to
limit
water
consumption
within
a
land
area.
That's
one
third
of
the
total
land
of
salt
lake
city
is
that
possible,
even
in
a
drought
emergency.
M
H
Okay,
I
think
this
ordinance
is
not
ready
for
prime
time
I'm
against
it.
I'm
concerned,
first
of
all
that
the
ordinance
may
discourage
the
refinery
from
upgrading
their
equipment
to
reduce
pollution
that
typically
requires
more
water.
H
That
might
make
more
sense,
and
why
is
salt
lake
city
watering
lawns
when
it's
so
cold
outside
it
seems
like
the
city
is
trying
to
water
parks
to
discourage
homeless,
camping
and
may
have
in
one
case
contribute
to
a
death
that
is
a
waste
of
water.
This
city
wastes
water
too,
and
this
city
is
still
planting,
plantings
and
medians
and
planters,
and
after
digging
up
park
strips
requiring
that
owners
replant
and
maintain
them
the
park
strip.
Ordinance
of
this
city
needs
updating
first,
since
it
wastes
more
water.
H
N
N
N
Research
has
shown
that
our
snowpacks
through
the
western
u.s,
including
the
great
basin,
will
be
reduced
by
80
percent
by
2100.
That's
80
percent
we're
spending
water.
We
don't
have,
and
it's
time
for
us
to
stop.
We
need
to
realize
that
our
water
credit
line
is
overdrawn,
and
although
the
lake
is
calling
the
loan
due
public
health,
our
environment,
our
collective
quality
of
life
is
in
the
balance.
We
urge
salt
lake
city
council
to
amend
the
text
and
so
that
we
as
a
community
can
demonstrate
our
belief
in
responsible
water
conservation
practices.
O
Hello,
this
is
keenan
wells
district.
Four,
on
this
day
in
the
year
2000
21
years
ago,
I
had
been
skiing.
For
almost
two
months
I
haven't
had
a
good
or
skier.
Yet
this
year
that's
been
a
pattern
for
a
while
we're
kind
of
running
out
of
water
here,
and
I
really
think
you
should
approve
limiting
the
use
of
water
even
below
what
this
amendment
provides,
but
at
very
least
this
level.
The
fact
that
we're
excluding
the
university
of
utah
is
a
little
bit
disappointing.
O
C
I
further
moved
the
council
initiated
legislative
action,
requesting
administration,
review
and
research
potential
amendments
to
the
city's
water
conservation
policies
and
come
back
to
the
council
with
recommendations
for
ordinance
changes.
Potential
policies
could
include,
but
would
not
be
limited
to
additional
zoning
amendments
rate,
structure,
changes
or
review
of
supply
demand
studies
to
evaluate
conservation
needs.
A
A
K
K
Each
bedroom
would
be
leased
individually
and
have
a
private
bathroom
kitchen
and
living
room
spaces
in
each
apartment
would
be
shared
among
residents
within
the
unit.
72
on-site
parking
spaces
are
included
in
the
proposal.
A
single-story
amenity
and
leasing
building
fronting
on
700
east
is
also
proposed
as
part
of
the
development.
Thank.
C
G
L
So
the
east
central
community
council
does
not
support
these
proposed
changes
and
modifications
to
our
neighborhood.
The
ecc
does
not
find
this
request
consistent
with
various
adopted
city
plans,
including
the
central
community
master
plan.
The
proposal
does
not
meet
the
criteria
for
changes
to
the
plan.
L
L
L
L
The
plan
impacts,
neighborhood
quality
of
life,
privacy,
noise,
traffic
density,
light
destruction
of
another
inner
court
development
pattern,
history,
non-sustainable
practices,
etc
of
the
existing
neighborhood
unintended
consequences.
Follow
from
these
changes,
I
respectfully
encourage
you
to
review
all
comments
written
and
spoken
opposing
this
zoning
change.
Thank
you
very
much.
J
Thank
you,
jen
colby
district.
Four,
please
vote
no
on
the
proposed
episoding.
This
is
just
no
bueno.
I
agree
with
the
final
planning
commission
negative
recommendation.
There
are
numerous
conflicts
with
the
area
master
plan
surrounding
block
context
and
many
impacts
that
cannot
be
mitigated
even
with
a
development
agreement.
The
master
plan
highlights
these
interior
courts
as
distinctive
pattern.
Languages
of
this
neighborhood
deliberately
designed
for
smaller
scale,
workforce
housing
on
small
lots.
It's
the
kind
of
pattern.
Smart
growth
advocates
are
trying
to
bring
back
and
a
terrible
mistake
to
eliminate
it.
J
What
goes
where
is
in
context
is
zoning.
101
keeping
development
in
the
correct
zones
is
crucial
for
preventing
more
rampant,
real
estate
speculation
in
dysfunctional,
neighborhoods
and
infrastructure.
This
is
speculative
real
estate
investment.
It's
worth
a
gamble
for
developers
to
bid
high
on
contracts
for
lower
zone
properties,
to
file
applications
for
a
minimum
fee
and
then
take
a
chance.
The
city
might
grant
an
up
zone
and
gift
them
a
few
hundred
thousand
dollars
or
more
in
inflated
land
values.
Why
go
to
las
vegas?
If
your
odds
seem
really
good
here?
J
This
up,
zoning
would
lay
the
groundwork
for
a
massive
luxury,
rooming
house
ideal
for
short-term
stays.
Lower-Income
local
renters
can't
afford
luxury
even
200
square
feet
of
it.
I
ran
the
numbers,
and
claims
of
social
benefit
are
pr
spin
on
a
per
square
foot
basis.
The
rents
would
be
50
above
a
studio
or
one
bedroom
and
the
newer
mid-rise,
with
no
private
kitchen
or
living
space.
There
are
cheaper
units
in
the
older
buildings
for
sure.
Make
no
mistake.
J
This
is
a
high
return
to
investor
product
being
sold
to
you
as
a
solution
to
the
very
real
housing
needs
of
the
city.
Nearly
every
renter
who
spoke
at
the
planning
commission
hearing
made
it
clear.
This
is
not
the
housing
type.
They
want
good
things
happen
when
the
council
rejects
bad
upzoning
proposals
like
this
one,
for
example
the
hackston
apartments
on
ninth
east.
The
project
was
redesigned
and
built
within
zoning
for
five
200
south
houses,
the
threats
of
tear
downs
were
a
bluff.
J
E
Hi,
thank
you,
reid,
snyderman.
Here,
I'm
reaching
out
in
support
of
the
rezone.
I
think
that
this
innovative
project
is
going
to
provide
some
attainably
priced
housing
that
is
otherwise
non-existent
in
salt
lake.
It's
offering
class
a
quality
apartments
designed
to
be
rented
by
individual
private
bedrooms
as
opposed
to
units,
and
this
will
actually
open
up
attainably
priced
housing
to
the
missing
middle-income
earners.
E
I
think
one
of
the
issues
we
need
to
consider
here
is:
if,
if
the
zoning
doesn't
change,
the
incentive
for
the
developer
would
be
to
build
a
luxury
apartments,
and
that
is
just
like
the
last
speaker
said
no
bueno,
so
actually
going
with
the
rmf
45
like
the
surrounding
units
provides
more
housing
that
we
are
in
fact
in
desperate
need
of.
E
You
know,
a
critical
member
of
salt
lake
city's
workforce
will
be
able
to
rent
an
individual
room
with
shared
kitchen
and
living
room
space
with
a
few
other
individuals
at
a
rental
rate,
that's
accessible
and
attainable
far
below
what
is
what
a
typical
studio
would
be
in
the
same
area.
You
know
teachers,
health
care
workers,
first
responders,
young
professionals,
students,
people
that
are
getting
priced
out
of
the
community
would
would
have
access
and
they're
in
critical
need
of
housing
at
an
attainable
rate.
So
I
encourage
you
to
vote
for
this.
C
C
If
the
developer
really
wants
to
build
something
that
requires
rmf
45
zoning
on
the
entire
lot,
they
should
do
so
on.
One
of
the
many
underdeveloped
lots
in
salt
lake
city
already
zoned
for
that
use
if
they
are
committed
to
building
on
bueno,
they
have
an
exciting
opportunity
to
breed
new
life
into
this
street,
with
a
mix
that
could
include
townhouses
apartments
and
micro
or
traditionally
sized
houses,
the
type
of
imaginative
and
appropriately
scaled
housing
that
the
city
needs,
and
that
needs
to
carefully
and
and
intentionally
developed
goals
of
the
governing
central
community
master
plan.
C
Hi
happy
tuesday
evening
this
is
michael
augustine.
I
am
the
developer
with
alteterra
real
estate,
and
I
thank
you
for
the
time
this
evening.
C
We
are
very
excited
to
offer
a
project
that
is
driven
by
kind
of
mission,
driven
through
innovative
design,
leasing
to
allow
for
a
level
of
affordability
that
is
not
being
seen
with
new
apartment
development
in
the
city
we're
doing
this
fully
privately
funded.
We
are
not
seeking
any
subsidies
from
any
level
any
grants.
C
This
is
privately
funded.
We're
very
excited
to
sort
of
bring
this
affordability.
You
know
concept,
you
know
to
the
east
side
of
the
city
as
well,
which
has
been
really
lacking.
We
are
developing
other
projects
in
the
city
that
do
not
need
affordability,
so
this
one
is
particularly
important
to
us.
C
P
Hi
this
is
bruce
johnson,
I'm
a
member
of
the
of
the
community
and
I'm
recommending
a
yes
vote
on
this.
Just
doing
my
own
brief
survey
doesn't
show
anything
close
to
affordable
for
for
an
individual
in
the
area,
especially
a
teacher
or
a
student
or
or
anybody
in
that
specific
area.
P
The
current
conditions
of
the
units
are
are
tear
down
and
they
should
have
been
demolished
a
long
time
ago,
but
what
that
leaves
is,
with
the
current
zoning,
the
option
for
a
developer
to
simply
put
up
expensive
town
homes
there,
which
is
what
any
developer
is
going
to
put
up,
and
I
think
if
we
are
able
to
unify
the
zoning
and
allow
a
developer
to
come
in
and
put
a
well
thought
out
attention
project
there.
That's
that's
going
to
benefit
the
community,
the
most
and
yeah.
P
I
appreciate
the
time
and
and
hope
that
you
vote
yes
on
this.
O
O
I
actually
now
have
a
firm
number
for
units
beds
and
parking,
so
we've
got
72
sparking
spaces
for
65
units
sounds
great
on
paper,
but
then
we
need
to
evaluate
the
fact
that
we're
planning
to
rent
two
to
four
beds
in
each
of
these
units,
at
which
point
those
72
parking
spaces,
don't
sound
great
anymore.
In
fact,
there
would
be
well
below
the
city's
limit
for
parking
spaces
if
we
were
treating
this
as
units
for
hat
for
actual
housing,
so
interes
interesting
decision
with
parking
there.
O
Second,
I'm
a
renter
and
I'd
like
to
talk
about
affordability
and
dignity.
When
this
developer
introduced
their
apartment
to
the
community
council,
they
referred
it
to
it
as
attainable
luxury
housing.
It's
interesting.
They
have
now
changed
their
description
to
affordable.
To
me,
affordable
is
an
apartment.
Okay
is
the
apartment.
I
live
in
right
now
in
a
very
similar
cul-de-sac,
interior
block
area.
O
I
pick
I
pay
significantly
less
rent
for
this
single
bedroom
apartment
than
I
would
in
a
50
year
old
home
than
I
would
for
for
a
apartment
in
the
new
development.
O
This
doesn't
have
luxury
features,
it
doesn't
have
its
own
shared
theater
or
hot
tub
or
meeting
room,
but
it
does
have
a
kitchen
which
means
I
can
cook
for
myself
and
that
cuts
down
on
cost,
which
is
important
for
people
who
aren't
making
a
whole
lot
of
money.
It
also
has
my
own
bathroom,
which
lets
a
certain
amount
of
big
dignity.
O
G
I
So
I
am
for
this
proposition.
I
think
that
anything
bringing
more
affordable
housing
into
salt
lake
is
a
really
big
opportunity
for
the
city
and
needs
to
be
taken
advantage
of.
So
I'm
in
full
favor.
Q
Hi,
you
already
have
a
great
deal
of
commentary
for
me
about
this
proposal
tonight.
I
want
to
respond
to
the
question
that
some
of
you
have
articulated.
Why
were
there
two
hearings
at
the
planning
commission,
and
why
did
the
recommendation
change?
You
received
a
response
from
the
planning
staff
at
the
work
session.
It
did
not
do
justice
to
what
happened.
It
was
far
more
complicated
than
different
members
of
the
commission
showed
up.
In
september.
I
sent
you
the
details
from
the
record
this
afternoon.
Q
On
june
23,
the
commission
held
a
hearing
on
four
proposals
associated
with
the
site
regarding
the
two
before
you.
Now
there
were
two
people
in
favor,
one
of
them.
The
seller
and
nine
people
opposed.
The
commission
voted
four
to
two
in
favor
of
the
zoning
change
and
master
plan
amendment.
Then,
in
july
the
commission
had
to
meet
again
and
recall
the
motion.
Then
they
had
to
recall
the
recall.
Both
of
those
votes
were
unanimous
and,
of
course
there
was
no
public
comment.
Q
Q
I
might
add
that
it
appears
that
the
supporters
of
this
proposal
have
figured
out
that
you
got
to
show
up,
because
there
are
more
of
them
here
already
than
have
ever
shown
up
before
the
first
motion
to
support
the
request
resulted
in
a
2-2
vote
and
the
chair
broke.
The
tie,
and
the
second
motion
was
also
a
two
to
two
vote
and
again
the
chair
broke
the
tie.
But
the
interesting
thing
about
all
of
this
is
that
one
of
the
commissioners
changed
position
between
the
first
vote
in
june
and
the
second
vote
in
september.
Q
C
Hi
there
thanks
for
having
me,
I
am
a
young
professional
living
in
salt
lake
and
I
used
to
go
to
school
right
around
the
proposed
site
and
I
am
in
favor
of
rmf
45,
because
I
understand
the
kind
of
people
that
are
living
in
this
area
and
the
struggle
for
affordable
housing
in
this
area.
So
once
again,
I
am
in
favor
of
rmf45.
R
Good,
thank
you.
My
name
is
jeff
taylor,
I'm
one
of
the
current
owners
of
the
properties
and
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
something
that
was
really
important
to
us,
and
it
was
really
important
to
alta
tara
and
councilwoman
valdemoros,
and
that
was
making
sure
that
this
development
did
not
displace
the
current
tenants
or
put
them
at
risk.
R
You've
actually
got
letters
from
those
tenants.
Dorian
is
one
of
them,
and
david
is
the
other
that
assistance
is
still
in
place.
We
are
going
to
be
supporting
any
tenant
that
needs
assistance.
What's
the
current
situation
right
now,
three
of
the
six
homes
that
are
at
the
core
of
this
proposal
are
currently
vacant.
R
The
first
one
was
david
beam,
he's
currently
living
in
a
clean,
safe
apartment
and
he's
paying
half
in
rent
to
what
he
paid
us.
The
other
is
pardon
him
needing
to
remember
this
stacy.
He
moved
to
tennessee.
He
bought
a
house
on
five
acres
that
just
happened
in
november
and
then
gillian.
She
just
bought
a
home
up
in
layton,
so
those
guys
are
all
great.
Our
other
three
tenants
that
are
currently
in
the
homes
are
all
new
tenants,
they're,
paying
near-market
rates
they're
all
fully
aware
of
the
development
and
they're
fine
with
it.
R
So
there's
that
a
few
facts
about
the
property
as
it
stands,
five
of
the
seven
homes
have
no
structural
foundations,
they're
literally
sitting
on
earth.
We've
got
about
a
thousand
feet
of
private
sewer
lines
and
sewer
laterals
that
are
in
various
states
of
disrepair
and
failure.
There's
no
curb
gutter,
sidewalk
or
street.
It's
time.
I
I
I
love
riding
the
bus
walking
to
the
store
living
downtown,
so
I
think
that
the
property
at
bueno
is
a
promising
opportunity
and
maybe
mr
taylor
could
find
another
way.
Maybe
these
guys
are
the
cat's
pajamas,
but
it
seems
like
people
ought
to
stay
with
the
existing
zoning
under
the
central
community
master
plan.
H
H
This
is
not
affordable,
since
it
increases
the
cost
per
square
foot
of
renting
in
this
city,
and
this
city
should
not
be
encouraging
more
market
rate
and
increasing
rental
rates.
This
is
not
affordable
housing.
This
is
market
rate
housing,
100
percent
market
rate
housing.
Approving
this
rezone
will
encourage
hyper
development.
H
Please
don't
approve
the
rezone
and
send
a
message
to
the
developers
that
this
city
does
not
want
to
throw
out
moderate
income
residents
with
super
gentrification
you're,
going
to
get
a
lot
of
developers
throwing
a
lot
of
proposals
at
you.
If
you
don't
send
the
message
now,
stop
it.
Please
do
not
approve
this
reason.
G
B
I
get
to
be
the
property
manager,
and
so
I'm
actually
taking
care
of
all
these
houses
and
trying
to
keep
the
tenants
in
in
a
safe,
livable
kind
of
place,
and
I
manage
probably
50
units
in
the
city
and
they're
all
one
bedroom,
two
bedroom,
the
pressure.
That's
on
these
rentals
is
absurd.
I
understand,
and
there's
got
to
be
a
creative
way
that
we
can
address
the
need.
I
probably
have
15
to
30
applicants.
B
On
the
first
day.
That's
the
last
day
we
have
some
tenants
who
are
moving
out
of
the
city
because
they
just
can't
find
anything,
and
this
is
a
creative
idea
that
allows
for
a
safe
nice,
creative
solution
to
what
we're,
what
we're
looking
at
in
the
city
of
just
not
having
enough
housing,
and
so
I
really
hope
you
can
support
this,
and
it
just
is
a
it's.
A
great
idea
that
might
work
might
alleviate
some
of
the
pressure.
P
Great,
thank
you
not
sure
what
happened
earlier.
Hey.
I
have
lived
up
next
to
the
university
for
about
15
years
and
regardless
of
whatever
the
zoning
rules
are,
it
is
overrun
by
students
living
in
unauthorized
mother-in-law,
apartments,
parking
anywhere
and
everywhere.
P
You
know
parties
late
at
night
they
started
calling
my
street
the
beer
pong
district
and
regardless
of
whatever
city
ordinances,
weren't
being
involved,
forced
and
and
the
way
it
was
zoned.
There
was
nobody
to
hold
responsible
for
this
stuff,
and
what
I
really
love
about
the
proposed
development
is
that
somebody
stands
up
and
says:
it's
me,
I'm
the
one
who's
who's
responsible
for
this
area.
P
I
drove
through
it
the
the
bueno
area
and
the
parking
is,
is
hell
mel
on
dirt
and
and
the
the
houses
have
been
recently
painted,
many
of
them,
but
foundationless
and-
and
I
I
look
forward
to
any
sort
of
solution
that
actually
brings
a
responsible
party
to
the
table.
That's
exciting
to
me,
and
I
think
ultra
pair
can
do
that.
I
stayed.
I
went
to
the
climate
summit
in
glasgow
a
few
weeks
ago
and
I
stayed
in
housing
like
this,
and
there
was
nothing
undignified
about
it.
P
The
people
there
were
thoughtful,
the
people
there
were
were
informed
and
educated,
and-
and
it
was
a
great
way
for
us
to
to
you-
know
for
a
meeting
of
like
minds.
I
I
yeah,
I
look
forward
to
having
this
type
of
housing
here
in
salt
lake.
There's
a
similar
project
up
near
the
university
that
is
nothing
short
of
predatory
and
and
that
results
from
a
greater
supply
which
drives
down
the
price
and
that's
exactly
how
this
works.
P
A
Great,
thank
you.
Thank
you
to
everyone
who
commented.
I
know
that
a
few
of
you
did
get
cut
off
at
that
two
minute
mark.
So
please,
if
you
have
other
comments,
feel
free
to
send
them
our
way
by
any
of
the
other
means
that
we
have
to
communicate
with
us
as
council
members.
So
with
that,
I
will
look
for
emotion.
A
A
That
passes
unanimously,
I
want
to
say
we
have
a
lot
of
public
hearings.
I
know
there
are
people
in
the
audience
waiting
and
we
have
people
online
waiting,
but
we
are
going
to
take
just
a
short
five
minute
break.
So
thanks.
Everyone.
D
A
We
are
back
and
we
are
on
agenda
item
number
10..
This
is
a
public
hearing
on
the
rezone
at
redwood,
road
and
indiana
avenue.
Before
we
begin
taking
comments,
I
am
going
to
turn
the
time
over
to
council
staff
policy.
Analyst
nick
tarbet
nick
take
it
away.
D
Yep.
Thank
you
very
much.
As
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
rezone
for
the
proper
ids
at
835,
south
redwood
world
and
1668
west
indiana
avenue
from
r1
5000
to
rmu
45..
The
property
at
1668
west
indiana
currently
contains
an
individual
single
family
dwelling
and
the
other
property
is
vacant.
B
A
I
have
a
motion
by
council
member
ferris,
a
second
by
council
of
ever
dugan
any
discussion
on
this
nope.
Okay,
all
those
in
favor.
M
A
A
So
we
are
on
to
agenda
item
number
11..
This
is
in
regards
to
an
ordinance
allowing
commercial
uses
on
rooftops
which
exceed
two
stories
again.
I
am
going
to
turn
to
nick
tarbet
for
a
brief
introduction
before
we
get
to
our
first
public
comments.
Nick.
D
Thank
you.
This
proposal
would
amend
the
form
based
special
purpose
corridor
edge,
sub
district,
the
fbsc
to
allow
for
rooftop
commercial
uses
above
the
second
street,
subject
to
beating
a
height
of
30
feet.
The
proposed
amendment
affects
a
couple
different
sections
of
the
zoning
ordinance
and
all
properties
citywide
in
the
fbse
would
be
impacted
by
this.
G
K
You
may
already
know
this,
but
to
make
sure
you're,
clear,
rooftop
dining
is
already
allowed
in
this
zone
on
single
story
properties,
so
this
would
simply
allow
for
rooftop
dining
to
occur
on
second-story
two-story
buildings
as
well.
It's
definitely
a
progressive
use.
We're
excited
to
introduce
it
into
this
market.
K
My
client
has
already
had
this
property
engineered
and
built
and
designed
to
allow
for
the
rooftop
use.
They
will
clearly
comply
with
building
code
requirements
and
all
other
requirements
from
a
safety
perspective,
but
in
this
environment,
where
some
restaurants
anyway,
have
really
been
hit
hard
by
the
kovad
pandemic.
K
This
allows
for
more
flexibility.
It
allows
for
wider
appeal
and
it
will
certainly
allow
for
this
restaurant
use
to
succeed
in
this
location.
This
property
is
it's
buffered
from
the
residence
there's,
a
six
foot
cement
buffer
wall
at
the
back
to
help
contain
the
noise
and
the
activity
they'll
still
have
to
comply
with
other
noise
regulations.
It's
sort
of
a
seasonal
use,
weather
permitting,
but
we're
very
excited
about
this,
and
we
appreciate
all
the
support
from
staff
to
get
this
text
amendment
to
this
point
in
the
process.
Thank
you
very
much.
G
Okay,
we
will
move
on
and
circle
back
to
judy
and
go
to
bill.
Grognik.
D
I'm
a
no,
I
gotta
unmute
here
again.
Well,
I'm
fine
yeah,
so
I
own
the
one
of
the
buildings
in
the
zoning
district
and
outdoor
dining
is
really
critical
for
success
of
restaurants.
These
days
they
people
want
to
eat
outdoors
and
restaurants
want
to
offer
that
amenity
and
our
building
is
really
set
up
for
it
already
that
to
have
a
rooftop,
dining
experience,
and
so
we
hope
that
the
council
will
approve
the
text
amendment
and
we're
looking
forward
to
that.
Thank
you.
H
This
is
a
potential
very
popular
use
as
a
rooftop,
restaurant
or
a
bar,
but
I
remind
the
council
that
an
adjacent
rooftop
bar
restaurant
has
had
a
lot
of
noise
complaints
and
it
never
went
away
it's
right
next
to
this
potential
property,
so
her
proposal,
so
it
actually
is
a
fantastic
idea.
The
idea
of
a
rooftop
bar
restaurant,
it's
a
great
idea,
but
it
requires
more
noise
and
parking
requirements.
S
This
is
judy.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you
perfect.
This
afternoon
I
sent
you
a
letter
with
the
comments
I
received
from
members
of
the
sugarhouse
community
and
it's
clear
from
the
various
comments
that
people
are
confused
by
what
they're
reading.
So
I
think
the
ordinance
needs
some
editing
for
clarity
before
you
approve
it.
We
have
two
concerns.
S
One
is
sound
and
we'd
like
salt
lake
county,
does
a
terrible
job
of
noise
enforcement,
so
we'd
like
you
to
put
in
the
ordinance
materials
that
can
be
used
to
block
the
noise
and
more
specifics
about
noise.
The
second
thing
is
that
we
don't
like
the
idea
of
putting
this
right
next
to
a
parcel
that
has
a
single
family
house
on
it.
S
So
we
think
that
particular
issue
needs
to
be
a
conditional
use,
it's
different
if
it's
rmf,
35
or
45.
Those
are
taller
buildings,
but
when
you've
got
a
one-story
house,
this
look
could
look
potentially
right
into
the
backyard
and
take
away
the
privacy
and
add
noise
in
that
backyard,
so
that
piece
needs
to
have
a
conditional
use
other
than
that.
We
approve
this
ordinance.
We
think
it'll
be
a
lot
of
fun.
A
Thank
you
to
everyone
who
commented
on
this.
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
C
A
R
A
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
is
a
proposal
to
vacate
an
east-west
city-owned
alley
at
approximately
1550
south
between
the
mcclellan
trail
at
1200,
east
and
1300
east.
The
alley
is
impassable
due
to
a
garage
obstructing
access
at
the
east
and
east
end
and
other
encroachments
from
abutting
properties
that
have
been
in
place
for
decades.
K
C
K
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
address
the
council
on
this
proposal.
I
am
the
applicant
for
this.
It
is
in
the
back
of
my
property,
which
faces
onto
kensington
avenue.
We
obtained
signatures
from
more
than
80
percent
of
the
properties
that
had
joined
the
alleyway
and
the
unanimous
active
agreement
that
this
is
the
right
way
forward
and
to
honor
the
youth
that
has
been
in
place
for
more
than
60
years,
that
we
can
identify
that
the
alley
has
never
existed
and
that's
it.
I
appreciate
your
consideration.
A
I
have
a
motion
by
council
member
dugan,
a
second
by
council
member
ferris,
any
discussion
on
this,
all
those
in
favor
aye
aye
any
opposed
that
passes
unanimously.
I
keep
wanting
to
try
to
roll
call,
because
I'm
used
to
that.
So
I'm
just
gonna
move
that
over
there
agenda
item
number
13
is
a
ordinance
regarding
the
columbus
street
alley,
vacation
north
of
victory
road
and
sorry,
I'm
going
to
do
turn
the
time
over
to
brian
fulmer,
our
policy
analyst
to
give
a
short
introduction.
Thank
you,
brian.
K
K
A
A
P
This
item
would
authorize
the
mayor's
administration
to
approve
sub-lease
requests
at
the
leonardo.
Any
sub-lease
request
would
need
to
satisfy
three
requirements:
one
it
must
serve
a
public
purpose
two.
It
must
comply
with
the
voter,
approved
bond
purpose
that
paid
for
improvements
to
the
old
library
building
and
three
have
a
direct
connection
to
the
leonardo's
mission
and
programming
plan.
A
Oh
sorry,
thank
you,
council
members.
I
will
look
for
a
motion
on
this.
B
And
I'm
sure
I'm
moved
that
we
close
the
public
hearing
for
action
to
a
future
council
meeting.
I
A
B
A
We
are
on
item
e15,
which
is
an
ordinance
regarding
the
sugar
house,
business
district
design
standards,
zoning
text
amendment
before
taking
any
comments.
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
russell
weeks
for
one
of
our
council
policy
analysts
for
a
brief
introduction,
russell.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
item
has
been
in
the
works
since
2019.
council
consideration
really
has
been
delayed
because
of
because
the
issue
was
sort
of
put
on
hold
due
to
covet,
19.
D
and
and
how
the
office
you
know
dealt
with
with
issues
going
in,
but
now
the
council
is
up
for
for
for
that.
The
council
may
formally
consider
adopting
the
proposed
ordinance
tonight.
If,
if
it
so
chooses,
the
point
of
the
proposed
ordinance
is
to
amend
the
sugar
house
is
to
amend
zoning
design
standards
in
sugar
house
in
the
sugar
house.
Business
district,
which
contains
two
sub-districts.
S
Thank
you
very
much.
Actually,
I
have
to
correct
russell
because
the
sugar
house
council
started
in
2018
working
on
this
one.
It's
taken
a
long
time
and
we're
glad
that
it's
here
I
was
pleased
to
see
that
looking
at
it,
instead
of
just
the
text
but
the
ordinance
itself,
it's
much
more
clear.
The
ambiguity
is
gone
and
I
I
think
it's
he's
done
a
great
job
with
that.
S
We
still
disagree
that
the
maximum
street
facing
facade
can
be
up
to
200
feet.
It
should
be
150
feet,
we're
not
downtown
we're
a
village
150
feet
should
be
the
maximum.
Now
there's
two
things:
the
staff
report
that
he
wrote
says
300
feet.
The
ordinance
says
200
feet,
so
I
hope
he
means
200
feet
or
150.
Feet
would
be
my
preference
and
we
certainly
appreciate
having
the
minimum
sidewalk
width
be
10
feet.
Anything
we
can
do
to
improve.
Walkability
is
always
appreciated.
A
S
D
Yes,
madam
chair,
to
clarify
that
it
is
the
200
feet
that
everyone
reached
agreement
on
the
300
feet
was
the
older
was
the
original
proposal.
A
H
H
Instead
of
trying
to
create
more
of
a
walkable
area,
I
mean,
if
you
have
a
great
big
store,
that
does
nothing,
but
one
thing
it
actually
discourages
walkability.
You
want
to
have
more
businesses
different
businesses.
Also,
the
park
strip
should
be
converted
to
walkable
bikeable
paths
in
general.
For
this
a
new
and
improved
ordinance,
but
2100
south
is
going
to
need
a
better
plan
and
it
will
change
this
design
standard.
So
essentially,
I
urge
you
to
pass
this
now
tonight,
but
it
needs
to
be
updated
in
the
near
future.
Those
are
my
comments.
A
B
A
B
Yes,
madam
chair,
I
having
voted
on
the
prevailing
side.
I
would
like
to
go
back
to
item
e14,
which
was
the
sublease
on
the
leonardo.
I
had
voted
to
in
favor
of
closing
the
public
hearing
yeah.
I
know
I'm
just
saying
I
had
voted
to
close
the
public
hearing
and
defer
action,
and
I
would
like
to
change
my
vote
and
vote
to
just
take
action
tonight.
A
Okay,
council
members,
it
looks
like
we
have
a
motion
from
council
member
wharton
to
reconsider
the
vote
on
the
subleases
for
the
leonardo.
Do
I
have
a
second
on
the
motion
to
reconsider?
Second,
okay,
I
have
a
a
motion
by
council.
Member
wharton
is
second
by
council
member
valdo
morris.
Is
there
any
discussion
just
on
the
reconsideration,
all
those
in
favor
all.
D
A
Any
opposed
okay
that
passes
unanimously,
so
we
are
back
to
item
e14,
which
is
a
resolution
that
would
authorize
sublease
arrangements
at
the
leonardo.
I
would
look
for
a
motion
or
any
discussion.
B
Managerial
move
that
we
close
the
public
hearing
and
adopt
the
adopt
the
resolution
for
the
sublease
second.
A
B
A
We're
at
potential
action
item
f1,
which
is
an
ordinance
rezoned
at
9,
15,
south
1300,
east.
B
Madam
chair,
I
move
that
the
council
reject
the
ordinance.
C
A
A
We
are
now
on
section
g,
which
is
our
comment
section.
First,
our
madam
mayor,
thank
you
for
being
here.
It's
so
nice
to
see
you
in
person.
Did
I
miss
something
just.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
mayor.
Thank
you
for
being
here
good
to
see
you
in
person
and
council
members.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
madam
mayor.
A
I
went
over
the
city's
council
city
council's
rules
of
decorum
earlier
and,
of
course,
those
still
apply
here
as
well.
We
are
accepting
comments
through
webex
and
telephone
delaney.
Silman
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
and
will
be
messaging
with
people
in
the
chat.
Taylor
hill
is
calling
out
the
names
of
those
people
who
wish
to
comment
when
she
calls
your
name.
Your
mic
will
be
unmuted.
A
If
you
don't
wish
to
speak,
or
if
you
don't,
if
you
don't
finish
your
comments,
please
reach
out
to
us
the
rest
of
your
comments
through
any
number
of
ways
to
get
a
hold
of
us
and
if
you
don't
wish
to
speak,
please
just
tell
our
staffer
when
you're
unmuted
say
that
you
are
just
here
to
listen
with
that.
I
will
turn
to
taylor
for
general
comments.
G
Thank
you,
council
chair,
it
looks
like
we
have
five
people
here
for
general
comment,
the
first
of
which
will
be
eric
edelman,
followed
by
daniel
shelling,
and
then
chris
bell,
eric
you're
now
unmuted.
P
I've
exchanged
emails
with
several
members
of
city
council
and
mayor
herself
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
two
years
we've
seen
this
plan
for
the
salt
lake
city,
foothills
moved
forward
and
it's
been
executed
rather
poorly
we've
seen
the
morris
the
morris
meadows
be
destroyed.
Currently,
the
fencing
on
top
of
the
ridgeline
is
in
decay
and
personally
needs
to
be
fixed,
there's
also
a
massive
trenching
that
also
needs
to
be
replaced.
They're
filled
back
in
there
was
no
master
plan
to
begin
with,
and
additionally,
at
the
start
of
startup
or
end
of
october.
P
We
also
saw
massive
erosion
issues
due
directly
to
the
trails
themselves
in
lower
city
creek
canyon.
My
concern
moving
forward
is
we've
seen
that
there
was
no
master
plan.
It
doesn't
appear
that
the
parks
department
truly
has
a
plan
to
maintain
and
manage
the
more
than
100
miles
of
existing
trail.
I'm
seeking
the
city
or
asking
the
city
pleading
with
you.
Let's
build
this
correctly.
You
know
I'm
excited
to
hear
that.
There's
money
set
aside
to
build
actual
trail
heads,
but
we
need
to
utilize
what
we
have
and
improve
the
existing
trail
network.
P
D
Thank
you
during
the
heavy
rainstorm
of
last
october
25th,
a
large
gully
developed
on
the
western
side
of
city
creek,
cutting
across
a
recently
built
city,
creek
loop
trail
and
undercutting
bonneville
boulevard,
estimated
to
be
12
feet
wide
12
feet
deep
and
extending
40
feet
down
slope.
This
washout
rendered
bonneville
boulevard
unsafe
for
cars,
bicycles
and
pedestrians.
D
Half
of
the
road
had
to
be
closed
to
all
traffic.
On
november
19th,
the
public
lands
department
released
an
e-newsletter
and
instagram
message
stating,
and
I
quote,
the
trail
was
impacted,
but
was
not
a
contributing
factor
to
the
cause
of
the
washout.
Unquote.
This
is
a
verifiably,
false
statement.
In
fact,
the
poorly
planned
and
shoddily
built
city
creek
loop
trail
constructed
just
below
bonneville
boulevard
was
directly
responsible
for
the
washout
and
gully
that
undercut
the
road.
While
this
trail
was
still
under
construction.
H
You
need
a
new
salary
study,
like
the
county
just
asked
for
I'm
also
concerned
about
shifting
social
workers
to
firefighters,
since
that
could
result
in
a
bigger
response
to
the
mental
health
situations
which
are
exacerbated
by
a
large
vehicle
sirens
and
lights.
That's
the
last
thing
you
want
to
send
to
somebody
having
a
mental
health
situation
and
again
19
an
hour
is
an
insult
salt.
Lake
city
police
department
has
not
justified
the
use
of
license
plate
readers.
They
shouldn't
even
be
considered
until
there
are
some
better
policies
in
place.
H
They've
been
misused
in
the
past
and
I
know
senator
weiler
years
ago,
passed
a
bill
banning
him
in
utah,
although
uta
has
authority
to
use
them
for
traffic
studies,
but
I
encourage
the
city
to
confirm
that
utah
law
allows
their
use,
I
don't
think
it's
allowed
and
if
you
want
to
know
what
will
attract
health
tech
businesses,
it's
a
park
like
the
fleet
plug.
It
also
requires
housing,
preferably
detached
homes
that
are
desired
by
health,
tech,
business
employees.
H
If
you
want
them
to
stay
and
live
here,
you're
going
to
have
to
build
more
or
allow
more
detached
homes.
And
again
I'm
going
to
keep
saying
this.
You
have
tens
of
thousands
of
acres
available
the
west
side
of
salt
lake
city,
please
open
them
up
for
housing,
otherwise,
they'll
drive
to
ogden,
which
has
housing.
That's
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars.
H
S
I
welcome
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
you
again
and
again,
I'm
here
to
talk
about
the
trails.
I
agree
with
polly
hart,
who
spoke
earlier
about
the
request
for
funding
for
trailheads
way
overdue.
What
kind
of
planning
builds
trails
and
then
almost
two
years
later
comes
back
and
asks
if
they
can
apply
for
funding
for
trail
heads?
Will
they
next
come
and
ask
for
a
grant
for
enforcement,
which
is
not
happening
or
maybe
wheel,
weed
control
or
maybe
you'll
have
to
increase
the
maintenance
budget.
S
It
is
time
there
is
some
planning
in
the
public
lands
department
relative
to
the
trails.
I
ask
that
the
council
not
release
any
funding
for
trails
until
there
is
more
planning
and
what
has
happened
to
the
funding
benchmarks
that
were
put
in
their
budget
they're
on
a
hiatus
until
june.
22Nd
are
any
of
the
studies
or
other
requirements
in
the
budget
being
met.
Have
you
heard
anything
I
haven't?
A
Thank
you
to
everyone
who
commented
this
evening.
We
are
on
to
item
h1,
which
we
are
actually
skipping
because
we're
not.
We
don't
need
to
have
a
motion
right
now,
meeting
remotely
because
we're
here
so
skip
that
we're
on
to
unfinished
business
item
i1,
which
is
an
ordinance
regarding
epa
revisions
to
sewer
regulations.
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
B
A
A
A
I
have
a
motion
by
council
member
wharton
in
a
second
by
council
member
ferris,
any
discussion
on
this,
all
those
in
favor
aye,
aye
aye
any
opposed
that
passes
unanimously
with
that
council
members
and
public.
We
are
adjourned.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
this
evening.
Bye-Bye.