►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 7/20/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Good
afternoon
everyone
it's
empty
in
here.
We
welcome
the
members
of
the
public
who
are
in
person.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
and
who
may
be
watching
our
usual
video
feeds
online.
I
am
happy
to
share
our
hybrid
pilot
meeting
last
week
ran
successfully
and
today
marks
the
beginning
of
our
hybrid
meetings
going
forward.
Although
we
did
have
some
technical
issues,
so
they
are
successful,
but
not
without
a
little
flaws
every
once
in
a
while,
but
that
is
technology.
A
If
you
are
joining
us
on
site,
the
council
is
following
cdc
guidelines
to
prevent
and
reduce
transmission
of
covet
19
and
maintain
healthy
business
operations
and
work
environments
per
cdc
guidelines.
Face
coverings
are
strongly
recommended
for
all
and
are
required
for.
Those
who
are
not
fully
vaccinated
social
distancing
will
be
maintained.
A
Oh,
who
am
I
I
think,
I'm
anna.
As
many
of
you
know,
there
is
no
public
comment
during
our
work
session.
However,
please
join
us
for
the
7
pm
formal
meeting
tonight
to
share
any
comments.
Your
feedback
is
always
welcome
and
you
can
share
with
the
city
council
anytime
by
mailing
us
at
p.o
box,
145,
476,
salt
lake
city,
utah,
84114
or
emailing
us
at
councilcomments.slcgov.com,
or
by
calling
our
24-hour
comment
line
at
six
five
801-535-7654.
A
C
And
then
andrew
johnston
will
give
you
an
update
and
then
I
think,
there's
a
third
piece
of
the
update,
but
rachel
will
have
to
let
us
know
who's
doing
that
one
if
we
could
pull
up
the
update
slide
deck.
That
would
be.
C
C
You
can
go
on
to
the
second
slide,
we'll
start
with
our
covid
metrics,
and
you
know
that
we
are
back
into
the
moderate
transmission
level
and,
although
for
many
weeks
we're
able
to
report
that
our
crude
case
rates,
that's
how
many
cases
positive
cases
are
there
per
100
000
people
were
down
or
declining,
they
are
all
climbing
right
now
in
every
salt
lake
city,
zip
code
and
84101,
is
at
315
positive
cases
per
100,
000
and
84116
is
the
next
highest
there.
At
179.
C
we
still
we're
seeing
the
same
trends
with
central
city.
Vaccination
rates
behind
and
west
side
areas
are
behind
our
east
side
and
east
bench,
and
the
next
slide
will
give
you
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
where
84104,
101
and
116
are
at
and
because
we
had
a
we
had.
Some
council
breaks
in
there
you'll
see
a
big
jump
between
june
8th
to
july
13th.
C
C
C
We
are
still
hearing
that
about
62
percent
of
unvaccinated
utahns
are
interested,
so
the
doors
are
not
closed,
and
I
know
that
our
partners
at
the
county
health
department
are
working
very
hard
to
try
to
make
those
trusted
connections
with
people
who
are
willing,
still,
as
the
majority
say,
they're
still
willing
to
be
vaccinated
and
our
administration
is
working
on
a
big
push
on
for
our
three
zip
codes
in
particular
that
need
it
the
most
and
will
be
coming
to
the
council
as
soon
as
we
can
with
details
on
that.
The
next
slide
please.
C
But
you
can
see
that
we
have
approximately
12
of
the
available
beds,
are
unoccupied
on
each
night
on
any
given
night
across
the
three
homeless
resource,
centers
and
happy
to
answer,
or
rather
andrew,
could
probably
answer
those
questions,
any
detailed
questions
you
have
in
his
part
in
just
a
moment,
but
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
we
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
kayak
court
did
its
third
run
this
last
friday,
oops
yeah
there
we
go
and
was
really
successful
again
with
engaging
14
individuals
and
I'm
hearing
17
cases
so
kudos
to
our
kayak
court
and
salt
lake
city
justice
court
and
then
the
last
slide
from
me
is
about
abatements
that
took
place
thursday
of
last
week
at
these
locations
quite
a
few
locations,
and
I
believe
andrew
johnston
can
go
into
a
little
bit
more
depth
for
you.
A
Thank
you
mayor
and,
if
I
could
just
really
quick
before
you
go
andrew,
an
update
also
on
kayak
court
judge
robinson
was
able
to
connect
a
family
who
is
pregnant
with
the
health
department
and
get
a
voucher
for
them
and
get
all
of
the
services
for
them
as
well.
So
that's
not
just
about
the
justice
system,
but
judge
robison
and
the
rest
of
all
of
the
volunteers
that
go
on
kayak
court.
A
I
was
there
again
really
dennis
was
there
it
would
go
above
and
beyond
to
reach
out
and
and
get
people
services,
and
so
it
was
very
cool.
She
actually
was
going
to
marry
them
on
the
river,
but
they
didn't
get
their
marriage
certificate
in
time,
so
she's
going
to
perform
that
at
another
time.
But,
mr
johnston,
it's
awfully
awesome
to
see
you
on
that
side
of
the
table
in
person.
We
miss
you
over
here,
but
why
don't
you
take
it
away
for
us
on
homeless,
outreach
updates.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
appreciate
that
introduction
to
go
back
to
the
a
couple
slides
if
you
wouldn't
mind
to
the
resource
center
census,
if
we
could
do
for
a
second,
I
want
to
take
a
second
and
talk
about
what
that
means.
There's
been
some
discussion
in
the
community
about
vacancy
rates
in
the
resource
centers,
and
I
want
to
talk
through
some
details,
so
you
have
a
bit
of
a
context
to
that.
D
If
you
look
on
this
current
utilization
statistic,
table
you'll,
see,
there's
three
resource
centers
listed
a
total
on
the
far
right
and
then
the
different
areas
of
of
data
down
the
left-hand
side,
shelter
capacity.
That's
the
total
number
of
beds
available
average
number
of
beds
occupied
each
night
during
that
week,
average
number
of
beds
unoccupied
each
night
that
should
add
up
to
300,
200,
300,
200,
etc.
The
percentage
of
beds
occupied
and
the
percentage
who
are
unoccupied.
D
Okay,
pretty
straightforward
you'll
notice
that
the
men's
resource
center,
the
1000
west
men's
resource
center,
was
running
at
about
79
occupancy.
For
that
week,
you'll
see
to
the
right,
the
geraldine
king
women's
resource
center
at
95
percent
and
the
shelter
the
homeless
miller
mixed
resource
center
at
93
percent,
essentially,
and
that
comes
to
that
total
of
88..
D
D
D
Now
you
have
other
beds
that
are
night
tonight,
but
to
turn
over
every
night
for
folks
who
are
new,
who
are
showing
up,
who
we
didn't
anticipate
all
those
kind
of
things
and
there's
a
mixture
in
each
of
these
resource
centers
between
those
two
types.
So
what
you'll
have
some
nights
is
a
fair
number
of
beds
that
were
reserved
for
somebody
who
wasn't
there
that
particular
night?
If
they're,
not
there,
multiple
nights,
then
it
they
lose
the
bed.
D
It
goes
to
somebody
else,
so
we
don't
have
these
reserved
indefinitely,
but
for
each
individual
night
there
may
be
different
people
who
are
there,
who
are
not
there
now
oftentimes.
What
happens
is
they'll
take
that
bed,
particularly
in
the
winter
time,
and
if
somebody's
not
in
there
say
at
nine
o'clock
at
night,
when
we
do
another
refresh
during
the
day,
they'll
say
well.
This
person
already
told
us
they
weren't
going
to
be
here
tonight.
Let's
open
up
an
alter
alternative
bed
for
somebody
else
just
for
that
night,
so
we
can
still
do
the
full
capacity.
D
So
typically,
what
happens
is
almost
every
bed
is,
or
virtual,
every
bed
I'll
say
is
actually
assigned
to
somebody,
but
may
not
be
there
at
that
bed
count
say
seven
in
the
morning
when
the
official
account
happens,
so
the
occupancy
rate
is
probably
somewhat
higher,
sometimes
in
these
things,
but
it's
not
reflected
all
the
time
in
that
seven
a.m.
Count!
Okay!
Now
there
are
some
nights
when
it's
lower,
it's
higher,
it
sort
of
fluctuates
a
bit,
but
sometimes
the
numbers
seem
like
there's
a
full
87
beds
that
are
just
not
being
used.
D
The
reality
is
they're
probably
being
used
in
some
capacity,
but
it
may
not
be
exactly
reflected
in
this
number.
That
makes
sense
and
we
could
break
that
down
further
for
you
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
by
the
providers
about
how
to
be
most
efficient
in
keeping
as
many
beds
occupied
as
possible
with
that
flexibility.
Folks
who
need
that
ability
to
not
be
there
for
a
night
or
two?
Okay,
all
right!
That's
a
long
explanation
of
that.
D
So
when
you
hear
people
talk
about
there's
a
lot
of
capacity
in
the
resource
centers,
there
is
some,
but
there's
not
this
percentage,
necessarily
every
night.
Okay
and
we
can
move
forward
to
the
community
commitment
program
slides
and
there
we
go.
This
is
an
update
on
the
community
commitment
program.
Three
slides
essentially
we'll
go
to
the
next
slide.
D
We've
used
the
the
visual
of
gears
interlocked,
because
there's
three
different
areas
we're
going
to
talk
about
here,
the
one
at
the
top
is
the
unsheltered
status,
and
you
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
see
this.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
pull
it
up
on
your
own
screens.
D
What
that
refers
to
is
the
unsheltered
homelessness.
We
have
about
300
plus
unsheltered
individuals
in
salt
lake
city.
Right
now,
we
believe
now
that's
technically
county-wide,
but
a
lot
of
them
are
moving
to
this
city.
We
also
know
that
we
have
probably
up
to
100
vehicle
campers
throughout
the
city.
Now
that's
a
hard
number
to
sort
of
track
because
they
move
around
a
lot.
Sometimes
some
are
unoccupied.
Some
are
partially
occupied
it's
hard,
but
we're
guessing
it's
somewhere
in
that
area.
D
Okay,
now
that
top
number
of
300
is
comes
from
our
last
two
winters
and
the
hemis
data
we
have
so
in
the
winter
time.
Generally,
we
sort
through
a
lot
more
folks
who
literally
have
no
place
to
go
versus,
have
a
place
to
go,
but
are
out
there
a
lot
for
business
reasons
on
the
street
okay,
so
we
think
there's
at
least
300
folks
that
literally
have
no
place
to
go
and
we
don't
have
capacity
in
the
resource
centers
for
them,
even
if
we
fully
fulfill
the
resource.
D
Centers,
there's
still
that
lack
okay,
we
get
to
the
second
gear
here.
The
emergency
shelters
resource
centers
on
the
left.
Current
capacity
is
just
under
1100
beds.
Those
are
mostly
congruent,
meaning
they're,
large,
open
spaces,
not
ideal
for
covet
transmission
or
fluid
transmission
or
any
transmission
of
viruses.
Okay,
it's
worked
well
in
the
past,
just
for
bang
for
the
buck.
A
lot
more
people
in
a
smaller
space,
but
kobe
taught
us
very
well
that
it's
safer
to
have
folks
a
little
more
spread
out.
D
The
third
gear
is
housing
stability
and
that's
the
current
unmet
housing
needs
for
this
population
in
the
county.
We
estimate
that
we
need
about
low
income
units
about
3
000
and
that's
for
just
those
who
are
homeless
and
below
40
ami.
We
need
of
that
3
000
about
450
permanent,
supportive
housing
units
like
the
magnolia,
which
some
of
you
have
seen
case,
management
and
site
services
on
site
folks
probably
have
higher
needs
who
live
there
and
additionally,
we
need
about
85
additional
case
managers
through
the
whole
housing
system
for
this
population
in
the
county.
D
Now
to
the
next
slide,
taking
that
as
your
as
your
context
will
go
to
the
the
system,
if
you
have
the
next
slide
up,
is
it
there?
You
go
system,
structure
and
partners.
This
is
how
we
fit
into
the
system
and
how
it's
working
or
should
work
right
now,
at
the
top
you'll
see
the
state
of
utah
homeless
council,
which
is
new
this
year
and
a
new
state
coordinator
wayne
niederhauser,
the
salt
lake
valley
coalition
to
end
homelessness
is
one
of
13
local
homeless
councils.
D
That
is
tasked
with
feeding
information
up
to
that
state
council
for
a
statewide
plan.
Salt
lake
county
is
a
piece
of
this
salt
lake
city
is
a
piece
of
this.
We
have
our
partners
shelter
the
homeless,
which
owns
the
current
resource,
centers,
the
adult
ones,
volunteers
of
america,
the
road
home,
utah,
community
action
etc,
including
switch
point
there,
which
is
planning
to
open
the
airport
in
this
fall
in
september.
B
D
So
the
coalition
came
up
with
those
numbers
based
on
our
data
from
several
years
back.
The
coalition
includes
all
these
folks,
I'm
a
representative
of
salt
lake
city
on
the
steering
committee
of
that
so
yeah.
We
vetted
those
numbers
through
the
housing
authorities
through
the
providers
and
through
the
assist
the
state
system,
so
we're
pretty
confident
in
those
numbers.
B
A
D
Goals
what
I'll
say
is
the
homeless
council
is
brand
new.
D
It's
just
barely
getting
its
membership
sorted
out
and
the
steering
committee
of
that
group,
the
executive
committee
wayne
ederhauser,
is
doing
a
lot
of
fact-finding
right
now
and
I'm
impressed
by
the
level
of
detail
he's
getting
into
so
we're
meeting
frequently
at
least
once
a
week,
if
not
more
here,
statewide
partners,
local
partners,
there's
a
lot
of
discussion,
particularly
right
now
about
the
federal
stimulus
money
and
how
to
use
that
effectively
between
city
county
state,
so
we're
on
the
same
page,
and
we
have
some
some
unified
goals
there,
how
to
use
that
the
county
and
the
city
and
the
state
are
talking
as
well
about
short-term
and
longer-term
funding
priorities
together,
so
that
we're
not
isolating
each
of
these
pots
of
money
separately
and
we
have
a
coherent
plan.
D
So
all
this
is
fairly
new
I'd,
say
I'm
heartened
by
the
direction
it's
going,
there's
more
collaboration
and
more
sharing
of
data
and
information
we've
had
before,
and
I
think
that
the
coalition
itself
in
a
local
way
it's
bringing
forward
both
that
housing
study.
You
probably
have
seen
where
that
3000
number
comes
from
the
cost
associated
with
doing
that.
The
different
sub
breakdowns,
the
types
of
housing,
as
well
as
the
need
for
emergency
shelter.
Now
that
300
beds,
that's
some
stuff
that
we've
had
in
pieces
before,
but
not
this
coherent,
and
not
this
detailed.
D
This
is
go
back
one
slide.
I
apologize
the
plans
slide
there
we
go
so
we
laid
on
the
left
for
the
needs
on
the
right.
Are
our
current
ideas
here
and
plans
so
1a
and
1b
go
together?
1A
is
that
300
new
beds
by
winter
of
this
year?
We
would
ideally
like
to
target
non-congregate
settings,
motels
hotels,
individual
rooms
as
much
as
possible
and
we'd
like
to
own
those
as
a
system,
so
that
we
don't
have
to
rent
something
for
six
months.
It
goes
away.
D
D
Second
piece
is
the
camping
ordinance.
We
have
one
on
the
books
right
now.
The
mayor
and
the
chief
of
police
have
stated
that
we
have
not
rescinded
that
in
any
way.
It's
still
in
force,
it's
a
question
of
how
you
enforce
it
and
how
much
resource
we
have
to
enforce
it,
and
what's
the
alternative
for
folks
to
enforce
on
no
camping,
if
they
literally
have
no
place
to
go
so
you
can
see
how
it
gets
tricky
in
there.
D
Fourth
piece,
I
believe,
is
the
social
worker
program
which
you've
increased,
which
is
very
helpful
for
intervening
in
certain
situations.
Fifth,
is
the
car,
the
car
and
rv
camping
intervention-
that's
something
we
haven't
talked
a
lot
about
here,
it's
hard
to
get
a
specific
number
on
that.
It's
also
a
different
population
that
doesn't
identify
as
homeless.
Sometimes
there
are
some
there
who
see
themselves
as
living
in
their
car
and
that's
a
temporary
housing
for
them
and
by
federal
definition.
Sometimes
it
is
it's
literally
housing.
D
We
know
that
it
doesn't
last
for
some
folks
very
long,
because
the
car
eventually
breaks
down
problems
happen.
They
end
up
without
that
housing.
So
they
end
up
in
our
larger
housing
need
group,
but
it's
hard
to
intervene
in
some
ways
because
it
is
somewhat
housing.
Our
parking
ordinance
is
48
hours
on
a
block
face
and
nobody
wants
to
tow
anybody
in
their
vehicle.
It
doesn't
make
any
sense
because
it's
a
safety
issue
and
then
you're
in
the
tow
yard,
with
your
vehicle
and
you're
locked
up,
it
doesn't
make
any
sense
for
anybody.
D
The
other
piece
is
for
vehicles
that
aren't
operable.
It
costs
a
lot
of
money
to
tow
and
to
store,
and
eventually
you
got
to
dispose
of
that,
and
so
a
tow
company
won't
do
it.
They
lose
money
on
those
and
so
we've
coming
up
with
a
plan.
How
do
we
help
with
those
folks
who
are
living
in
vehicles?
Follow
our
parking
ordinance
as
much
as
possible?
D
So
we
don't
have
long
congregations
in
the
same
place
for
long
periods
of
time
and
bring
them
into
the
greater
homeless
system
to
get
resources
to
them
when
they
really
don't
respond
to
outreach.
The
same
way
that
some
of
the
other
camps
do.
The
last
piece
is
the
enforcement
of
the
camping
and
parking
ordinance.
D
That's
that's
going
to
have
to
come
along
with
this,
so
it's
got
to
work
together
with
enough
capacity
in
the
system
for
beds
for
folks
who
need
beds
and
also
enforcing
community
standards
through
those
ordinances,
and
we
can
talk
more
about
that
in
a
future
day.
If
you'd
like
number
two
number
three
at
the
end,
are
the
housing
piece
that
big
cog
at
the
bottom.
If
the
housing
is
not
being
created
and
maintained
and
stabilized
nothing
else
in
the
system
works
the
cogs
weren't
together.
D
What
we've
run
into
is
when
that
housing
cog
stops
and
we
don't
produce
more,
we
don't
retain
what
we've
got
everything
else
stops
it
can't
turn
so
we've
got
to
have
our
city
deeply,
affording
housing
plan
that
meshes
with
the
county
and
the
state.
Hopefully,
they'll
have
housing
plans
as
well,
and
then
we
can
lay
out
what
we
can
do
as
a
city
in
coordination
with
all
of
them
to
keep
that
moving
said
before
we
need
about
3
000
units
now
and
about
1400
every
year
after
this
for
the
next
four
years.
D
D
We're
still
going
to
need
two
and
three
to
get
me
sustainable
after
this
year,
and
the
next
slide
is
contact
information
for
me
and
again
I
want
to
reiterate
for
the
public
and
for
you
all
that
the
best
way
to
you
can
contact
me
anytime,
but
I'm
not
the
best
way
to
report
camps
or
issues
that
way.
The
best
way
is
through
the
city
app.
If
you
have
a
mobile
phone
and
access
to
that,
you
can
email.
Michelle
hoon
who's
been
great
about
managing
this
for
the
entire
city.
D
I
give
her
all
the
credit
in
the
world
for
this,
and
you
can
also
call
if
you
really
have
no
access
other
than
a
telephone.
That's
not
as
effective
it'll.
Take
you
probably
to
the
main
city
line.
You
can
leave
a
message
and
it'll
get
through,
but
the
first
two
are
the
better
way
to
contact
folks
on
these
issues.
If
it's
a
crime
issue,
though,
if
there's
a
crime
happening,
that's
a
police
call.
I
always
want
to
clarify
that
that
homelessness
and
crime
sometimes
overlap
in
the
camps,
but
not
always
exactly.
D
A
We're
very
far
behind
so
you
can
ask
andrew
questions
at
another
time,
andrew
that
was
an
absolutely
excellent
presentation
and
congrats
to
the
mayor
for
picking
you,
because
that
was
a
great
decision
and
I'm
very
very
happy
that
you're
in
the
position
that
you
are
to
do
be
doing
the
work
that
you
are
doing.
So.
Thank
you
so
much
for
that.
Thanks.
A
And
then
so,
my
understanding
mayor,
if
I
may
just
continue,
is
that
we
have
jesse
from
public
utilities
here
to
talk
about
our
drought
and
again
I
I
don't
want
to
rush
you
too
much
jesse,
but
we
are
very
far
behind.
So,
if
you
guys
can
be
quick,
I
would
appreciate
that.
F
We
can,
hopefully
everybody
can
hear
me.
I've
been
having
a
little
bit
of
my
trouble
with
it,
but
yeah
we
can
be
quick.
So
one
thing
I
had
talked
with
sam
owens
about
doing
a
more
in-depth
briefing
at
some
point
to
counsel
or
to
individual
council
members
or
even
to
anybody
from
the
administration.
So
I'll
keep
this
pretty
short
and
kind
of
high
level,
and
then
we
can
follow
up
in
the
next
month
or
so
with
a
more
in-depth
briefing.
F
One
thing
so
you
know:
we've
been
heavily
monitoring
our
droughts
and
our
water
supplies
and
water
forecasts.
That's
always
never
far
from
our
minds
as
we
go
forward.
One
thing
I
do
want
to
address
real,
quick
and
again
I'll
be
brief
on
this.
Is
there
was
a
recent
article
about
one
of
our
nearby
municipalities,
oakley
city,
that
put
in
a
implemented
a
moratorium
on
construction?
F
A
F
A
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
I'm
having,
I
think,
we're
all
having
a
little
bit
of
a
hard
time
understanding
you.
If
maybe
you
can
make
sure
that
the.
A
F
I've
been
going
from
headphones
to
not
headphones
all
day
long,
because
one
works
one
time
and
one
doesn't
work
the
other
time
so
anyway,
I
was
just
trying
to
give
a
brief
overview
of
there's
a
recent
article
about
oakley
city,
doing
a
implementing
a
moratorium
on
construction,
and
I
wanted
to
point
out
before
I
get
too
far
in
that
we're
in
a
much
different
place
than
a
small
municipality
such
as
oakley,
where
they're
reliant
on
one
or
two
small
springs,
whereas
we
have
a
very
diverse
water
portfolio,
we're
able
to
get
water
from
multiple
surface
water
locations,
including
city,
creek,
harley's,
big
little
cottonwood
canyons,
and
then
also
the
deer
creek
system
through
the
metropolitan
water
district
of
salt
lake
city.
F
So
we
have
a
very
robust
surface
water
system
plus
we
have
26
to
30
wells.
We
can
and
springs.
We
turn
on
across
our
system
and
those
range
from
cottonwood
heights
all
the
way
to
the
fourth
avenue
well
at
the
mountain
city,
creek.
So
again
we
have
a
very,
very
diverse
water
portfolio
as
far
as
drought
and
water
management,
we're
currently
in
stage
two
of
our
water
shortage.
F
Contingency
plan
that
relies
on
voluntary
efforts
by
consumers
and
then
some
a
little
bit
more
mandatory
efforts
for
some
of
our
municipals
municipality
municipal
organizations,
state
and
federal
organizations,
and
with
that
we've
seen
very
good
response.
So
the
good
news
in
this
is
our
customers
have
really
cut
back
their
use,
typically
in
a
dry
hot
dry
conditions
like
we're,
seeing
we
would
be
expecting
to
see
I'd,
say
165
to
170
million
gallons
of
water
consumed
today
and.
F
We're
seeing
about
135
to
140
so
about
a
30
million
gallon
a
day
reduction
in
what
we
would
expect.
That's
huge!
That's
a
15
to
18
reduction,
we're
getting
across
and
that's
you've
seen
you've
all
seen
the
communication
that's
been
out
either
through
social
media
or
on
the
news,
newspapers
or
television.
F
You
know
really
urging
people
to
watch
their
watch
their
use.
You
know
where
we're
using
water
to
survive
and
not
thrive.
That's
one
of
the
new
posters!
That's
out
there
so
kudos
to
all
of
our
city
agencies,
whether
it's
parks
or
golf
or
whoever
might
be
facilities
really
cutting
back
and
a
lot
of
that's
gone
as
we
work
with
them
to
find
ways
they
can
cut
back
on
immediate
use
or
long-term
plans
as
we
go
forward.
So
that's
been
a
big
push.
F
We've
had
with
stephanie
and
her
conservation
program
to
do
messaging
and
to
work
with
our
own
city
to
work
with
other
municipalities.
We
serve
water
too,
whether
it's
cottonwood
heights
or
milkweed
or
holiday,
or
working
with
other
water
agencies
to
make
sure
we
have
a
very
good
message
going
forward.
So
that's
that's
been
great
again
water
to
survive
and
not
thrive,
our
supplies.
So
we
went
into
the
stage
two
because
we
were
watching
our
supplies
go
down,
so
our
cottonwood
or
our
wasatch
canyons
are
definitely
low.
F
I
don't
think
anybody's
been
up
there,
but
we
look.
I
put
it
as
we
look
like
we're
in
the
late
august
or
early
september
now
and
we're
just
in
mid-july,
so
our
supplies
are
definitely
down,
but
the
good
news
is
that
we
do
have
a
water
reserve
and
water
stored
in
the
deer
creek
system,
which
is
allowing
us
to
remain
in
the
states
too.
That
supply
along
with
our
reduction
is
keeping
us
in
the
stage
two,
rather
than
moving
into
a
stage
three
or
higher.
So
that's
that's.
The
good
news
is.
F
F
So
really,
what
we're
doing
is
we're
monitoring
our
supplies
and
we're
optimizing
them
we're
trying
to
optimize
our
creek
flows
is
our
treatment
in
big
cottonwood
and
city
creeks.
Those
are
direct,
creek
clothes,
we're
using
our
and
little
cottonwood
creek
through
metropolitan
water
district
of
sullivan
sandy
and
then
reminded
we're
optimizing,
the
water
we
have
in
the
deer
creek
system,
parley
street's
a
little
different.
F
We
have
our
own
storage
there,
so
we're
kind
of
holding
that
for
a
right
non-rainy
day,
instead
of
waiting
for
a
rainy
day,
use
some
of
our
stored
water
supplies
and
then
we're
kicking
wells
on
earlier
and
we're
using
them,
maybe
a
little
bit
more
than
we
typically
would
and
we're
prepping
some
wells
that
we
don't
typically
use
every
year
in
anticipation
that
we
will
be
using
and
as
an
example,
the
sixth
or
the
fourth
avenue
well
we're
currently
using
that
at
about
six
million
gallons
a
day.
F
So
I'm
really
happy
that
we
got
that
up
and
running
for
this
season.
So
again
we're
really
looking
at
looking
at
our
systems.
Looking
what
we
can
do
to
optimize.
You
won't
see
us
out
doing
hydrant
flushing
we're
going
to
be
doing
that
on
an
as
needed
basis
for
water
quality
or
testing.
Typically,
that's
something
we
do
on
an
annual
basis,
but
we're
going
to
postpone
some
of
that
because
of
the
shortage
and
so
in
summary,
I'll
go
ahead
and
wrap
it
up,
so
hopefully
get
back
on
track
here.
F
We
need
to
just
continue
to
push
the
message
and
I'd
encourage
you
to
push
that
with
your
constituents,
push
the
message
to
conserve
to
thrive
and
not
to
survive
and
not
thrive.
I
guess
I
might
have
said
that
earlier
and
then
we're
going
to
just
continue
to
monitor
our
source
waters,
continue
to
monitor
the
droughts
and
keep
the
council
and
administration
informed
as
you're
all
aware.
We're
in
the
whole
western
united
states
is
in
anything
from
extreme
to
exceptional
drought
and
utah
is
an
extreme
to
exceptional,
with
a
small
sliver
to
the
north
of
sevier.
F
A
No,
I
don't
think
so.
I
know
you
have
other
members
of
your
team
here
today,
but
I
think
we're
going
to.
I
appreciate
everyone
for
being
here
and
thank
you
for
that
update
jesse.
We
will
continue
trying
to
watch
how
much
water
we
all
use
so
that
we
we
can
get
through
this.
So
with
that,
I
thank
you
all
for
being
here
and
we're
going
to
move
on
to
we're
skipping
agenda
item
number
two,
which
is
the
racial
equity
and
policing.
A
We
will
have
more
update
a
more
a
sort
of
a
more
robust
update
in
the
future
regarding
what
the
rep
commission
will
be
doing
in
its
second
year.
Item
number
three
is
a
text
amendment
eliminating
the
special
exception
process
from
the
zoning
ordinance
nick
tarbet
with
the
city
office
council
office
poly.
I
can't
talk
today.
Policy
analyst
is
with
us
nick
norris,
from
the
planning
who
is
our
planning
director
and
blake
thomas
who
is
our?
A
Can
director
and
nick
norris
promised
that
he
would
put
a
30-page
brief
into
a
15-minute
discussion
and
I'm
holding
him
to
that
today
so
but
first
I'll
turn
it
over
to
nick
tarbit.
E
Thanks,
madam
cherkin,
if
it's
all
right
with
everybody,
since
we
are
short
on
time,
I
can
just
turn
this
over
right
to
netkill
I'll,
probably
just
repeat
much
of
what
he's
going
to
say
so,
nick
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you
we'll
go
from
there.
If
that's
all
right.
G
Sorry
when
we
started
this
project,
we
were
thinking
of
all
different
kinds
of
names,
to
name
it,
and
so
the
end
result
is
that
this
removing
the
special
exception
process
makes
our
zoning
code
easier.
It
streams
streamlines
our
processes,
removes
inequities
in
how
we
allocate
our
planning
resources
and
it
removes
barriers
next
slide.
G
So
this
is
in
your
staff
report
from
from
your
council
staff.
So
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
this
too
much
just
a
couple
of
key
things
to
know
about
special
exceptions,
they're
generally
very
minor,
they
usually
deal
with
a
dimensional
requirement
in
the
code
or
an
accessory
use,
and
sometimes
they
legalize
past
things
that
have
happened
in
the
past
that
were
never
recognized
by
the
city.
Next
slide.
G
This
we
can
stay
here,
so
the
city
code
has
42
different
authorized
special
exceptions,
including
one
big
massive
one,
which
grants
the
landmarks
commission
the
power
to
modify
any
lot
or
bulk
standard.
We
average
about
156
applications
per
year
over
the
last
10
years.
2021
we
are
on
projected
to
hit
240
so
we're
more
we're
about
50
higher
than
average.
Just
this
so
far
in
the
first
six
months
of
this
year,
next
slide.
G
I
wanted
to
go
over
a
key
some
of
the
key
issues
with
some
of
the
special
exceptions,
most
special
exceptions.
We
are
very
minor
in
nature.
We
don't
get
a
lot
of
applications.
These
are
some
of
the
bigger
ones,
so
the
first
one
is
fencite.
This
is
the
one
that
is
is
most
frequently
denied
we're
actually
handling
this
through
a
separate
transmittal
that
should
be
on
this
way
to
you
guys,
but
basically
it
eliminates
the
ability
to
request
extra
height
and
instead
establishes
parameters
for
when
extra
height
is
warranted.
G
Probably
the
one
that's
risen
created,
the
most
controversy
lately
is
outdoor
dining
and
removing
that
that
process.
This
particularly
when
it
when
the
outdoor
dining
itself
is
located
directly
adjacent
to
a
residential
use.
It's
not
as
big
of
an
issue
when
it's
in
a
front
yard
and
the
backyard
of
a
restaurant
is
next
to
residential
use.
It's
when
the
outdoor
dining
is
in
the
side
or
rear
yard.
G
So
what
this
proposal
does
is
that
it
requires
a
setback.
It
limits,
music
between
certain
hours,
there's
a
small
little
typo.
The
idea
was
in
the
parking
chapter
is
that
outdoor
dining
would
not
require
any
additional
parking
of
what
is
already
there
and
for
some
reason,
this
code.
The
word
not
was
left
out,
so
we
wanted
to
clarify
that
and
then
one
one
thing
we
have
heard
from
people
who
live
next
to
restaurants
and
cafes
and
coffee
shops
is
that
they
actually
want
some
sort
of
an
approval
process.
G
So
hlc
authority
this
remains.
This
is
one
of
the
streamlining
things
about
this
proposal
right
now.
If
you
want
to
get
additional
high
to
match
your
historic
building
like
what's
shown
in
this
picture,
you
actually
have
to
spend
two
different
applications:
removing
the
special
exception
remo
eliminates
that
need
to
to
submit
that
second
application
and
just
relies
on
the
existing
processes
in
the
historic
overlay.
Next
slide.
G
Grade
changes.
This
was
also
another
item
that
was
initiated
by
a
city
council,
opacity
council.
Because
of
that
picture
on
the
left,
it's
about
a
23
foot
tall
retaining
wall
right
now,
you
could
get
a
special
exception
to
do
that.
What
this
proposal
it
changes
that,
so
that
it's
more
like
the
picture
on
the
right.
It
could
be
different
materials,
but
the
idea
is
that
there
there'd
be
a
max
wall
height,
plus
the
required
step.
G
So
right
now
we
have
multiple
processes
in
our
code
to
get
extra
building
height.
This
proposal
would
actually
remove
those,
so
we
would
be
relying
on
the
base
zoning
district
in
most
of
our
residential
zones,
our
single-family
residential
zones,
where
this
is
authorized
mostly
there's,
there's
already
two
other
provisions
that
help
address
building
height.
One
is
that
there's
a
max
of
in
most
districts
28
feet,
it's
it's
less
than
the
sr1a
zones
or
the
average
of
the
building
heights
on
the
block
face.
G
So,
if
you're
on
a
block
that
has
taller
buildings,
then
that
you,
you
could
potentially
get
tall,
get
it
taller
on
your
own
property.
This
removes,
or
you
could
ask
for
a
special
exception.
This
removes
the
special
exception
piece
and
relies
on
the
previous
two.
The
landmarks
commission
retains
their
authority
through
new
construction
or
major
modifications
to
contributing
our
landmark
site
next
slide.
G
Inline
editions-
this
is
probably
one
of
the
more
controversial
special
exceptions
that
we
do.
This
basically
are
additions
to
properties
that
don't
make
current
setbacks.
It's
usually
on
properties
that
were
built
prior
to
about
1950
and
where
they
don't
meet,
particularly
an
interior
side
yard.
The
old
standards
used
to
be
set
base.
G
The
setback
was
based
on
the
actual
building
height,
so
the
taller,
you
went,
the
bigger
setback
you
needed,
but
many,
but
these
setbacks
now
are
different
than
that,
and
so
we
end
up
with
probably
50
of
our
homes,
not
meeting
current
standards,
and
so
this
frees
that
up
a
little
bit
and
addresses
some
of
our
experience
that
people
have
had
going
through
this
process
in
the
past.
G
It
allows
it
in
the
side.
It
doesn't
allow
them
to
go
vertical
like
in
this
picture,
but
they
they
can
go
along
the
property
along
a
side,
property
or
a
rear
property
line.
To
a
certain
extent,
and
one
of
the
problems
with
the
current
special
exception
process
is
that
it
actually
violates
state
law
because
it
it
doesn't
have
any
parameters
on
how
much
of
a
change
could
be
approved
through
the
special
exception
process,
and
so
essentially,
what
that
means
is
that
staff
or
the
planning
commission
takes
on
that
authority.
G
That's
reserved
for
the
city
council
and
making
essentially
zoning
decisions
and
zoning
rules,
and
so
this
helps
establish
how
to
deal
with
non-complying
buildings
and
is
in
that
chapter
as
a
buy
right
type
of
thing.
Next
slide.
G
This
is
one
that's
kind
of
a
little
bit
out
there.
This
is
accessory
building
height
changes,
so
if
you
have
a
taller
building,
then
you
could
potentially
get
a
slightly
taller
accessory
building,
so
it
allows
if
you're,
if
you,
if
your
building's
over
right
now
in
the
r1
zone,
you
can
only
go
up
to
17
feet
if
you
have
a
pitched
roof
and
12
feet,
if
you
have
a
flat
roof
accessory
building,
this
allows
some
increases.
G
If
the
setback
is
increased
on
a
foot
for
foot
basis
and
your
home
is
the
principal
building
is
taller
again
there.
This
was
another
section
that
we
just
recently
discovered
a
typo
with
a
number.
It's
outlined
there
in
the
presentation
that
we'll
plan
to
correct,
but
basically
it's
intended
for
a
multi-family
zone
for
a
pitch
through
structure
to
be
also
up
to
21
feet,
instead
of
actually
decrease
next
slide.
G
G
You
can
do
it
outside
in
your
yard,
without
any
kind
of
special
approval
and
as
we've
learned
over
the
last,
you
know,
15
months,
there's
more
and
more
growing
interest
in
the
use
of
accessory
buildings
to
expand
people's
living,
spa
living
spaces,
home
offices-
things
like
that,
and
so
this
provision
will
remove
the
requirement
for
a
special
exception
and
authorize
these
by
right.
Next
slide.
G
Probably
the
biggest
changes
in
terms
of
number
of
things
that
are
sections
of
code
that
are
changing
is
in
the
non-complying
building
sections,
basically
we're
trying
to
make
it
easier
for
existing
buildings
to
be
rebuilt
and
and
expand,
retain
the
property
rights
and
deal
with
some
of
the
non-complying
issues
that
have
happened
over
time
as
zoning
changes
without
having
to
go
through
a
process
like,
for
example,
even
though
the
it's
listed
as
a
conditional
use
we're,
I
believe,
we're
addressing
it
in
this.
G
If
you
have
a
single
family
dwelling
in
a
zoning
district
that
doesn't
allow
it,
and
you
want
to
add
more
than
25
to
that
technically,
you
need
to
get
a
conditional
use
for
that.
This
proposal
fixes
all
of
those
types
of
things
and
makes
it
clear
what
that
outcome
is,
so
that
we
can
help
one
help
preserve
existing
historic
buildings,
since
most
of
these
were
built
prior
to
1950,
without
the
need
to
designate
them
in
a
historic
district
and
give
more
options
next
slide.
G
This
happens
in
a
lot
of
our
historic
districts,
because
properties
were
built
without
wide
enough
side
yards
to
get
into
the
rear
yard.
Planning
staff
was
of
the
opinion
that
this
shouldn't
be
allowed.
The
planning
commission
wanted
it
allowed
and
they
made
recommendation
to
you
to
allow
it
with
cert,
in
certain
instances,
very
limited
with
certain
parameters
as
far
as
dimension,
basically
enough
room
for
for
one
off
street
parking
stall,
and
if,
if
there's
no
other
option
on
the
property
next
slide,.
G
Ground
mounted
utility
boxes.
This
one
has
certainly
risen
up
in
the
recently
as
an
issue.
Basically,
what
this
proposal
does
is
that
it
would
remove
the
ability
for
private
development
to
locate
their
necessary
transformers
and
electrical,
particularly
electrical
equipment
in
the
right-of-way.
They
have
to
put
that
on
their
property.
With
this
change,
we've
had
all
kinds
of
issues
with
those
things
going
in
the
right-of-way,
including
granting
essentially
a
property
right
to
portions
of
public
property
which
which
we
have
a
big
issue
with
in
planning,
engineering,
transportation,
public
utilities,
etc.
G
It
establishes
some
requirements
on
the
property
so
that
the
utility
providers
have
access
to
those
require
some
screening
in
a
front
or
corner
side
yard.
The
only
exception
of
when
it
wouldn't
when
we
may
allow
it
in
the
in
the
right
of
way
is
if
it's
an
adaptive,
reuse
of
a
historic
building,
and
there
is
no
other
alternative
on
the
property.
So
if
that
building
occupies
a
hundred
percent
of
that
property
or
there's
no
way
for
the
utility
company
to
get
into
the
rear
yard,
or
something
like
that,
then
this
is.
G
That
would
be
the
the
limited
situation
where
it
would
be
allowed
next
slide
when
serving
the
neighborhood.
This
becomes
something
that's
regulated
through
chapter
14,
which
deals
with
structures
in
the
right-of-way.
It's
not
a
zoning
issue
because
again
we're
trying
to
remove
the
ability
or
the
scenario
where
granting
some
sort
of
zoning
approval
grants
a
property
right
to
to
property
in
the
right-of-way,
and
so
the
the
better
way
to
do
it
is
to
follow
that
process.
That's
in
14
and
chapter
2,
about
encroachments
lease
agreements
etc
in
public
spaces.
G
This
is
a
big
thing
for
the
top
right
pitcher.
That's
the
equipment
necessary
to
underground
very
high
voltage,
high
capacity
power
lines.
So
you
can
see
it
is
a
pretty
significant
amount
of
infrastructure
that
has
to
go
in
there
with
that
various
switch
gear.
And
then
the
picture
in
the
on
the
left
is
one
of
the
things
that
happens
with
small
cell
towers
when
there's
a
light
attached
to
it,
and
we
need
to
use,
what's
called
an
h
frame,
to
hold
the
power
meter
right
now.
G
So
again,
this
just
reiterates
what
I've
already
already
said
removes
the
stuff
from
the
zoning
code
and
moves
it
to
fort
to
title
14..
One
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
do
is
make
sure
that
we're
maintaining
our
ability
to
utilize
our
rights
of
way
in
multiple
different
ways,
whether
that's
planting
street
trees,
making
protecting
street
trees,
protecting
underground
utilities,
the
ability
to
add
cycling
infrastructure
or
widened
sidewalks.
G
G
F
A
You
actually
did
great,
you
know
you
can
call
me
amy,
I
think
you're
at
like
14
minutes,
so
good
work.
Council
members,
any
questions.
H
Thank
you
nick.
I
know
that
this
is
gonna
free
up.
A
lot
of
well,
hopefully,
is
gonna
free
up
a
lot
of
staff
time
for
for
planning,
and
that's
certainly
very
important
to
to
me
and
to
the
city,
and
so
in
that
sense
it
makes
it
it
better
for
us,
how
does
this
make
it
better
for
the
public.
G
But
it
also
reduces
because
of
some
of
the
qualifying
provisions
that
we've
added.
It
reduces
the
impacts
of
some
of
these
things,
similar
to
what
I
showed
with
the
grade
changes
and
retaining
walls,
and
so
those
things
become
less
impactful
to
neighbors
and
more
predictable
to
the
neighbors,
and
they
understand
what
can
be
expected
next
door
to
them
or
in
their
or
around
the
corner
or
nearby,
and
so
that's
a
big
push
for
it.
G
It
also,
like
I
said,
helps
us
create
more
reasonable
standards
to
promote
the
reuse
and
and
the
appropriate
expansion
of
historic
properties
by
retaining
that
ability
with
the
landmarks
kid
mission,
but
also
granting
some
more
flexibility
outside
of
historic
districts
for
preserving
those
homes,
and
so
in
those
areas
where
we
have.
You
know,
particularly
where
we
have
historic
districts
and
slopes,
which
is
a
good
number
of
capitol
hill
avenues.
University
district.
G
It
really
does
actually
provide
some
flexibility
in
how
our
zoning
code
applies
in
those
areas
with
generally
those
standards
that
we
put
into
the
code
or
based
off
of
conditions
of
approval
that
were
pretty
typical
on
those
things
and
because
more
than
you
know,
the
I'm
trying
to
think
of
the
percentages.
But
it's
it's
north
of
95,
of
all
special
exceptions
are
approved
at
the
staff
level
and
only
a
very
small
number
are
denied
anyway,
and
so
this
this
helps.
G
You
know,
if
that's
the
trend
that
we're
seeing
and
most
are
denied
with,
or
I
mean
sorry
most
are
approved
without
any
sort
of
contact,
even
though
they're
noticed
the
immediate
neighbors
are
noticed.
G
H
A
Great
well,
we
will
set
the
date
for
a
public
hearing
tonight
at
our
formal
meeting.
Public
hearing
will
be
on
august
17th
and
we'll
look
at
taking
potential
action
on
this
on
august
24th.
I
know
your
team
has
put
a
lot
of
work
into
this
and
it's
been
through
a
lot
of
discussions
so
looking
forward
to
this-
and
I
really
liked
the
name-
removing
barriers-
let's
just
call
it-
that
ordered
the
whole
list.
Let's
make
the
ordinance
have
all
the
list
in
there
thanks
nick.
E
E
Those
are
made
by
the
planning
commission,
the
historic
landmark
commission
or
the
zoning
administrator
in
the
administration
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
These
amendments
would
clarify
which
matters
can
be
decided
by
the
city's
appeal
hearing
officer
who
can
appeal
decisions
and
when
an
appeal
can
be
stayed,
these
will
be
done.
These
proposals
are
being
done
to
bring
city
ordinance
in
compliance
with
state
law
and
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
daniel.
J
So
the
city
code
section
that
deals
with
these
appeals
hasn't
really
been
changed
or
updated,
since
it
was
adopted
a
number
of
years
ago.
So
these
changes
will
get
it
up
to
date.
The
changes
are
generally
technical
changes
to
comply
with
recent
state
code,
changes
and
other
case
law
decisions
by
courts
in
the
state.
J
Oh,
thank
you.
So
there
there
are
a
few
key
changes.
The
first
is
to
clarify
the
authority
of
the
appeals
hearing
officer
in
the
city
code
itself,
so
city
appeals,
hearing
officers
only
have
legal
authority
over
city
code
and
processes,
not
state
code,
but
that
limit
is
not
called
out
specifically
in
the
city's
own
code.
So
the
proposal
updates
the
city
code
to
make
the
limits
of
the
city's
appeal
authority
clear
and
for
background
appeals.
J
J
So
that's
intended
to
align
with
state
code
and
case
law
that
provides
a
presumption
of
correctness
to
commission
decisions
and,
additionally,
it
does
help
avoid
meritless
appeals
from
delaying
implementation
of
commission
decisions.
So
those
are
the
main
changes.
The
remainder
are
minor
wording
and
other
technical
clarifications
to
the
code
language
itself.
J
A
Any
questions
here
so
it
looks
like
katie
and
her
team
and
and
daniel
you
all
lucked
out,
so
this
is
set
again
to
for
we're
setting
the
date
for
a
public
hearing
tonight.
Our
public
hearing
will
be
on
august
17th
and
then
potential
action
on
august
24th.
Thank
you.
E
G
So
the
the
portion
of
this
that
deals
with
the
city
appeals
hearing
officer,
not
hearing
appeals
related
to
state
code.
It
doesn't
prevent
someone
from
submitting
that
it
just
prevents
the
hearing
officer
from
making
a
decision
on
that.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
was
clarified.
A
Right,
so
would
the
hearing
officer
only
make
a
decision
on
the
city
code
claims
and
then
they
would
have
to
take
the
state
code
claims
to
state
court
and
could
they,
I
presume
they
could
take
both
of
those
claims
to
the
state
court
as
well,
but
if
they
submitted
it
with
the
city,
the
city
would
look
at
the
city
code.
Is
that
right?
I
see
katie
shaking
her
nodding
her
head.
Yes,
did
you
want
to
clarify
anything
there
katie.
K
A
Okay,
the
one
thing
I
am
I
just
realized
I
was
a
little
concerned
about-
is
that
it
doesn't.
It
gets
rid
of
that
automatic
stay
recognizing
that
as
daniel
you
mentioned
that
this
is
in
line
with
state
code
and
and
case
law,
presuming
sort
of
a
deference
to
the
hearing
officer.
A
J
At
least
as
far
as
how
that
would
go
is
when
they
submit
their
application.
They
would
just
need
to
include
that
request
and
we
would
get
to
that
as
as
quickly
as
possible
that
we
wouldn't
be
waiting
until
the
scheduling
and
a
full
appeal
to
have
the
appeals
hearing
officer
make
it
make
a
decision
on
that
request.
A
Is
the
is
there
something
in
the
ordinance
that
says
that,
as
far
as
you
know,
the
decision
about
the
stay
needs
to
happen
within
x
amount
of
days
after
the
application
or
something
along
those
lines
or
or
would
that
be
something
that
would
be
helpful
to
add
simply
so
that
there
is
at
least
some
amount
of
transparency
for
the
applicant
or,
and
we
aren't
just
waiting
and-
and
you
know
like
we're,
continuing
or
not
continuing
or
things
happening,
and
then
and
then
it's
like.
G
A
A
Awesome
thanks
everyone
for
joining
us
today,
all
right!
Look
at
us
catching
up.
We
are
on
a
rezone
agenda
item
number
five
rezoned
at
329,
331,
south
600
east.
We
have
nick
tarbet
from
our
council
staff,
caitlin
tubbs,
a
principal
planner
wade,
budge
who's,
the
representative
for
the
applicant
and
blake
thomas,
the
director
of
can
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
nick
tarbet.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
As
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
rezone
for
the
property
at
329
331,
south
600
east,
from
rmf
35
to
rmu-35.
The
purpose
is
to
allow
for
a
cafe,
eatery
type
use
in
the
existing
building.
That's
the
short
summary
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
caitlyn.
She
may
have
a
map
that
would
be
helpful
to
see
it,
but
there's
not
much.
To
that
background.
There.
E
E
All
right,
the
vicinity
map
is
a
little
bit
on
the
small
side,
but
this
property
is
mid
block
along
600
east
between
the
third
south
and
fourth
south.
It
is
directly
to
the
north
of
the
commercial
development
that
runs
along
fourth
south
there
and
is
opening
the
zoo
buzz
it's
less
than
a
quarter
acre
in
size,
and
the
proposed
zoning
would
allow,
of
course,
for
the
establishment
of
that
cafe,
as
well
as
some
other
uses
for
the
historic
building
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
we
have.
A
I
know
that
council
members,
I
know
that
wade
budge
is
here
for
the
applicant
and
I
don't
know
if
we'd
like
to
give
him
five
minutes
just
to
talk
about
the
project
before
questions.
A
M
M
Our
client
in
circle
is,
as
many
of
you
know,
providing
very
important
services
in
this
community
and
when
they
approached
me
about
wanting
to
open
a
cafe,
we
engaged
in
discussions
with
the
planning
staff
and
we
looked
at
opportunities
to
find
a
reason.
That
would
be
consistent
with
consistent
with
the
existing
general
plan
for
the
area,
and
that
would
also
be
consistent
with
the
historic
districts
in
the
area.
M
In
circles,
I
have
some
slides
that
explain
a
little
bit
about
a
circle's
operations
and
circle.
Encircle
is
an
important
lgbtq
community
partner,
one
of
their
first
properties.
Is
this
one
right
here
in
the
middle,
which
is
the
john
williams,
the
circle
home,
the
one
that
we're
talking
about
today
and
it
was
purchased
by
encircle
and
has
been
restored
to
its
current
condition,
which
is
a
fabulous
asset
and
part
of
the
community.
They
also
have
other
buildings
that
they
are
doing
in
other
cities,
but
this
is
the
one
we're
talking
about
today.
M
We
offer
some
important
programming
and
this
this
rezone
is
going
to
allow
us
to
expand
our
operations
at
this
site.
These
are
some
of
the
important
services
that
we
provide
today
and,
as
we
go
through
the
general
plan
and
take
through
the
various
values
that
are
identified
in
the
general
plan,
we
know
that
a
number
of
the
things
that
we're
doing
and
that
we're
looking
to
do
with
this
free
zone
marry
real
well
together
with
what's
in
the
general
plan-
and
this
is
just
a
summary
of
some
of
those-
I
won't.
M
I
won't
read
them,
but
if
anyone
wants
to
stop
and
talk
to
me
about
any
of
those,
I'm
happy
to
show
those.
But
we
we
obviously
touch
on
all
these
important
values,
and
we
believe
that
by
being
allowed
to
pursue
this
rezone
we're
going
to
be
able
to
better
fulfill
our
mission,
as
was
already
indicated
by
caitlyn.
M
This
is
in
the
neighborhood
that
it
joins
the
the
commercial
center
that
is
located
to
our
our
south,
and
if
this
rezone
were
to
be
pursued
when
the
council
is
presented
to
the
council,
hopefully
next
month,
then
what
we
would
have
is
this
area
right
here
would
be
consistent
with
all
the
mixed-use
development
that
is
adjacent
to
the
property
and
we'll
be
allowing
a
cafe
use,
which
is
consistent
with
the
types
of
uses
that
are
occurring
in
this
blue
zoning
district.
M
Our
thought
would
be
that,
when
preparing
our
drawings
is,
we
would
do
a
cafe
on
the
main
level-
and
I
know
this
is
more
than
you
get
in
a
typical
rezone,
but
we
wanted
you
to
understand
how
we
would
implement
it
and
it
wouldn't
involve
any
exterior
changes
to
the
historic
structure.
We
very
much
value
that
structure
in
its
form,
but
what
we
would
be
doing
is
some
remodeling
inside
to
allow
a
cafe
the
reason
why
the
cafe
is
important.
It's
going
to
help
us
activate
the
area.
M
It's
going
to
help
us
be
able
to
invite
more
people
into
our
first
level,
and
then
it's
also
going
to
provide
employment
opportunities
for
some
of
the
folks
who
are
involved
in
our
programs
and
also
some
important
training
and
and
experience.
This
will
be
some
of
the
branding
of
what
you'll
be
able
to
get.
Hopefully,
this
fall
when
we're
able
to
open.
M
If,
if
we
were
able
to
obtain
the
rezone,
and
then
this
is
part
of
what
we
would,
we
would
envision
as
some
signage,
something
along
the
lines
of
what
you
see
here
to
our
public
hearing
we'll
have
some
of
our
important
staff
members
come
in
attendance
and
you
can
get
to
meet
and
know
them.
That
includes
the
chief
operating
officer
with
whom
I've
been
working
jacob
and
then
also
the
director
of
the
cafe
shaylee
and
with
that
I'll
just
end,
and
just
want
to.
N
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much.
I
I'm
all
in
favor
of
the
the
change,
but
I'm
just
wondering
whether
rezoned
from
rmf
to
rmu.
How
is
that
affected?
If
this
we
were
to
change
owners,
because
these
setbacks
and
everything
else
change
and
how
would
that
affect
the
other
rmf
zoning
in
the
area
and
how
that
would
how
the
neighbors
be
affected
by
the
change
in
the
setbacks
and
the
building
size.
M
G
G
It
doesn't
impact
the
adjacent
properties,
because
the
zoning
standards
are
very
similar
and
any
sort
of
change
to
the
site
or
the
building
would
have
to
go
through
the
landmarks
commission.
It
doesn't
there's
really
not
much
impact
here
other
than
it
helps
preserve
the
long-term
use
of
the
historic
building
by
being
more
flexible
with
how
it
might
be
used
in
the
future.
A
Great
well,
thank
you
all
for
being
here
again.
This
is
we'll
be
setting
the
public
hearing
date
tonight
at
our
formal
meeting.
Public
hearing
would
be
on
august
17th
and
tentative
action
on
august
24th
thanks
everyone
for
being
here,
we're
moving
on
to
agenda
item
number
six,
which
is
the
rosewood
park
street
and
alley
vacation
at
1400,
north
1200
west.
A
We
have
brian
fulmer
from
our
council
office
policy,
analyst
nick
norris,
it's
a
nick
norris
night
tonight,
eh
nick
our
planning
director,
kristen
reiker,
the
director
of
public
lands
and
some
other
of
her
staff.
I
believe
so.
I
will
turn
it
over
to
brian
foamer
brian.
Thank
you
for
being
here.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
city,
real
estate
services.
D
E
E
K
Hi
everyone.
I
think
there
was
a
question
regarding
park,
improvements
at
rosewood
park
and
there
is
actually
a
public
utilities
project
that's
going
to
be
happening
in
rosewood
park.
We
don't
have
a
time
frame
yet
on
this,
but
it
should
it'll
happen
at
the
same
time
as
rosewood
golf
course
is
going
to
be
under
construction.
It's
part
of
the
same
construction
for
public
utilities.
K
K
Two
concrete
pads
for
picnic
tables,
additional
trees
and
planting
along
the
walkway
there'll,
be
new
ada
compliant
sidewalk
entrance
from
1200
north
there'll
be
a
removal
of
non-functional
park,
amenities
which
is
actually
two
softball
fields:
the
up
the
outfields.
There
are
dangerous
because
they
intersect
with
a
walking
path
and
so
they're
not
they're,
not
used
as
baseball
fields
or
softball
fields.
Excuse
me,
so
those
will
be
removed
and
it'll
be
a
multi-use
ball
field
grass
only
and
public
utilities
will
pay
for
the
readjustment
of
the
irrigation
system.
There.
K
Let's
see
there'll
be
new
pavement,
curb
gutter
and
sidewalks
in
the
park.
The
parking
lot
will
get
received,
paving
there'll
be
a
new
fence
and
whether
the
bask
there
is
one
baseball
field
that
we'll
be
staying.
K
That's
in
the
southwest
corner
of
the
park
and
they're
putting
in
a
new
backstop
at
the
baseball
field
there
and
then
there'll
be
additional
turf
and
irrigation
systems
that
they'll
put
in,
and
it's
a
public
utilities
funded
project,
and
so
they've
been
working
with
us
and
really
great
to
make
some
improvements
that
we've
been
wanting
to
see
in
that
park.
B
Madam
chamber
rogers,
this
is
more
of
a
comment.
You
know
this
redwood
meadows
park
is
really
awesome.
There's
been
a
lot
of
investment
made
in
the
city.
It's
got
escape,
roosevelt,
I'm
sorry!
It's
I've
got
redwood
metals
on
the
brain,
but
rosewood
park
has
a
skate
park.
It's
got
tennis
courts.
It's
got
an
awesome
dog
park,
a
lot
of
people,
don't
like
the
dog
park
because
there
isn't
any
grass
or
water
for
them,
but
it's
an
old.
I
don't
know
what
would
you
call
it
at
least
is
on
here
it's
like
an
old
container.
B
It's
an
old
oil
container.
That's
been
remediated
and
it's
it's
a
large
dog
park
that
you
know
a
lot
of
dogs
go
out
and
use,
but
on
the
weekend
this
park
is
heavily
used
specifically
for
soccer
on
the
east
end
of
the
park.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
the
parks
department
for
coming
and
explaining
what's
going
to
be
happening,
do
we
know
timing
on
that
kristin
so
that
we
can
pass
that
and
are
we
going
to
go
out
to
the
rose
rose
park
community
council
and
discuss
this
with
them
as
well?.
K
We
don't
know
timing
actually,
a
couple
years
ago
we
were
approached
with
this
project
and
we
went
to
the
west
point
community
council
and
talked
to
them
about
the
removal
of
those
softball
fields,
and
they
were
agreeable
to
that
removal
of
the
softball
fields.
I
I
don't
know
that
public
utilities
knows
the
timing.
Honestly,
maybe
jesse
I
see
jesse
popped
up.
Maybe
jesse
can
tell
us
thanks.
L
His
headphones,
this
is
checking
your
yeah
checking
your
audio
connection.
L
A
Okay,
looks
great
again
this
we
will
be
setting
the
public
hearing
today
at
our
formal
meeting
public
hearing
set
for
august
17th
and
potential
action
on
august
24th.
Thank
you
all
for
being
here.
This
takes
us
to.
A
Item
number
seven,
which
is
offending
our
future
resolution.
This
is
an
addendum
to
the
transit
master
plan,
implementation,
interlocal
agreement
with
utah
with
the
uta,
and
we
have
kira
from
our
council
staff.
I
see
her.
I
believe
john
larson
will
be
joining
us
as
as
well
as
julian
julianne
cebula.
So
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
kyra.
L
F
I'm
going
to
make
this
quick
without
cutting
too
much
into
the
discussion
time,
but
I'd
like
to
just
give
a
quick
refresher
on
the
background
of
this
agreement.
The
resolution
you'll
be
asked
to
consider
on
august
17th
contains
two
addenda
to
the
city's
interlocal
agreement
with
uta.
F
The
interlocal
agreement
was
adopted
following
the
city's
funding.
Our
future
campaign
that
involved
extensive
public
engagement
on
two
funding
sources
for
underfunded,
critical
needs,
one
funding
source
was
the
voter
approved
streets,
reconstruction
bond
and
the
other
was
a
0.5
sales
tax
increase
the
revenue
for
that
sales,
tax
increase
funds,
the
needs
of
some
of
the
needs
of
public
safety,
housing,
streets,
maintenance
and
improved
transit.
F
So,
as
far
as
improved
transit
goes,
that's
where
we
are.
The
agreement
has
two
parts:
a
20-year
master
agreement
which
goes
until
june
2039
and
then
specific
agenda
which
are
negotiated
each
year.
The
master
agreement
forms
the
framework
of
how
transit
improvements
in
the
city's
master
plan
will
be
implemented
and
the
addenda
covers
specific
routes
and
improvements
that
are
receiving
the
city
sponsorship.
Each
year.
F
In
this
year's
budget,
5.6
million
dollars
was
allocated
for
the
improved
transit.
Critical
need
and
that's
in
anticipation
of
these
two
agenda
so
from
the
agenda.
Four
million
four
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
is
for
continued
service
on
routes,
two
nine
and
twenty
one,
which
is
in
addendum
four
and
nine
hundred
and
forty
nine
thousand
three
hundred
and
twenty
is
for
mobilization
on
10th,
north
and,
while
mobilization
doesn't
mean
that
service
will
start
up
once
this
addendum
is
approved.
F
It
does
kick
off
the
process
to
get
the
infrastructure
and
staffing
in
place
for
the
new
level
of
service.
That
leaves
a
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
to
a
hundred
and
yeah
175
000
remaining
from
the
budget
allocation
for
the
transit,
critical
need
and
with
that
I'll,
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
the
admin.
O
Okay,
great,
thank
you.
I
always
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
all
of
you,
especially
about
transit.
O
I
appreciate
kira
did
a
great
job
summarizing
the
the
background
and
and
and
the
issues
I
think
you
know.
An
important
thing
here
is
that
the
funding
for
this
was
approved
in
the
budget,
and
so
really
all
that
we're
asking
at
this
point
is
just
approval
to
then
enter
into
the
agreement
with
uta
in
order
to
to
spend
these
funds.
O
Another
important
thing
to
note
is
that
600
north
was
not
on
that
list,
because,
and
the
only
reason
why
is
because
uta
is
actually
planning
to
cover
the
cost
for
for
that
route,
so
the
city
does
not
have
to
cover
that
at
one
point
a
couple
years
ago.
We
did
think
that
the
city
would
have
to
do
that.
O
So
this
is
really
the
mobilization.
Costs
would
just
be
for
what's
known
as
the
route
one
which
goes
on
tenth
north
up,
ninth
west
and
then
to
south
temple
to
the?
U
so.
B
B
B
The
current
phase
one
map
does
not
yet
include
a
projected
route
for
600
north,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
from
uta
or
if
that's
from
you
director
larson.
If
we
need
to
have
a
I
mean,
I
think
we
should
have
a
formal
update
on
that
to
discuss
specifically
timing
and
looking
at
that.
I
know
that
we're
not
going
to
be
funding
that,
because
uti
uta
looked
at
that
as
a
significant
route
for
them.
O
Correct
yeah
and
and
we'd
be
happy
to
set
up
a
briefing
and
loop
in
uta
staff
as
necessary
or
appropriate.
O
Their
current
plan
is
to
take
what's
currently
the
route
205
which
goes
on
fifth
east
and
ends
at
the
intermodal
hub
and
instead
of
ending
at
the
intermodal
hub
at
second
south
and
sixth
west.
O
It
will
continue
west
down
600,
north
and
ultimately,
we'll
end
at
a
new
hub
that
we're
planting
near
north
temple
and
redwood
road
temporarily.
It
will
end
somewhere
near
redwood
road
and
about
fourth
south
until
we
can
get
the
north
temple
hub
going,
but
the
six
north
and
tenth
north
routes
are
part
of
a
package.
O
It's
it's
a
package
deal.
We
need
both
of
those
going
in
order
to
be
able
to
remove
the
current
service.
That's
in
rose
park,
so
the
only
reason
it
wasn't
on
the
map
is
because
it's
not
city
funded,
it
would
be
uta
funded.
O
No,
the
inter-local
agreement
focuses
on
the
service
that
is
paid
for
by
salt
lake
city,
so
600
north
is
not
since
we're
not
paying
for
it.
It
wasn't
included
in
the
agreement.
B
O
Sure-
and
we
do
have
nicole
bordeaux-
I
don't
know
if
as
appropriate,
if
could
jump
in.
O
E
E
So
it
is
in
our
five-year
service
plan,
which
was
adopted
by
our
board,
and
that
is
the
205
route
extension
that
does
cover
that
corridor.
Council,
member
rogers
and
then
also
we're
looking
at
if
it'll
be
15-minute
service
and
then,
if
we
are
a
30-minute
service
and
then,
if
we
add
more,
it
would
be
15-minute
service
as
of
august
2022..
E
A
O
O
We
appreciate
the
the
funding
allocations
that
have
been
made
and
that
are
in
the
works
to
be
able
to
really
transform
that
corridor,
and
then
we
also
are
working
on
the
less
visible
but
still
important,
end-of-line
facilities.
O
O
We
believe
that's
where
the
route
4
will
end,
and
so
we
just
need
these
facilities
where
the
bus
drivers
can
turn
around,
take
a
break,
use
the
bathroom
and
then
move
on
to
the
you
know
the
the
next
route
so
we're
hard
at
work.
Already
laying
the
groundwork
for
all
the
capital
improvements
to
to
support
this
program,
and
so
we're
really
excited
about
that.
A
Come
great
council
members
any
other
questions,
no
further
questions.
Thank
you
both
for
being
here
this.
If
we
don't
have
a
public
hearing
on
this,
so
we
will
be
set
to
take
action
net
on
tuesday
august
17th
at
our
next
council
meeting.
So
thanks
everyone
all
right,
you're,
never
going
to
believe
this,
but
we're
only
one
minute
behind
at
this
point,
so
we
are
going
to
have
the
opportunity
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
cip.
A
A
Welcome
back
council
members,
so
we
have
a
little
bit
of
time
to
actually
talk
about
cip,
which
we
didn't
think
we
were
going
to
have,
and
but
I
I
know
that
there
are
some
unfunded
projects
that
council
members
are
interested
in
finding
a
way
to
fund.
So
I
think,
without
having
crazy,
long
discussions,
I
I
might
just
mute
you.
A
We,
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
just
kind
of
go
down
the
line
and
everyone
kind
of
gets
a
pitch
for
their
unfunded
thing
that
they
want
and
ben
and
our
staff
and
people,
I'm
not
saying
you're
gonna
get
it.
I'm
just
saying
you're
gonna
make
a
pitch
for
it,
but
ben
is
like
does
magic,
and
I
know
that
can
and
cali
do
magic
and
find
things
and
pennies
and
couch
cushions
that
sometimes
we
are
able
to
fund,
or
at
least
partially
fund
some
of
the
unfunded
projects.
A
And
so
you
know
it's
like
shark
tank
right
now
you
get
to
make
your
pitch
for
for
your
unfunded
project.
I'm
gonna
go
this.
I'm
gonna
start
with
dan
and
we're
gonna
go
down
the
dice
this
way.
Okay,
and
if
you
don't
have
anything,
you
can
just
show
your
support
for
something
else.
I
don't
know,
but
dan
you
get
to
go
first,.
N
Why
thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
I
appreciate
that
so
my
pitch,
my
one
pitch
for
district
six
would
be
item
number
54,
which
is
the
coach
mike's
tennis
courts,
and
I
I'm
pitching
that
you
know
because
the
coach
mike
tennis
courts
is
supports
and
uses
across
the
whole
city.
It's
not
just
a
d6
tennis
courts.
Its
use
comes
across
the
whole
district
residents
of
all
ages
and
socioeconomic
levels.
N
There's
about
a
thousand
players
a
week
that
uses
facilities
and
just
a
third
of
them
come
from
d6,
but
a
third
come
from
other
districts
and
another
third
from
outside
and
the
court
reconstruction
is
necessary
to
continue
playing
tennis
on
these
courts
and
they've.
The
the
local
community
has
done
a
great
job
of
fundraising
for
the
bubble,
but
the
courts
are
also
necessary
and
it
and
it
works
together
as
the
construction
goes
together.
N
So
it's
a
year-round
use.
It's
the
only
public
tennis
courts
in
the
city
for
year
round,
with
the
bubble
and
the
one
other
bonus
about
this
project
is
it's
going
to
limit.
It
has
limited
need
of
any
engineering
support
from
its
staff.
It's
pretty
much.
They
can
get
a
contractor,
it's
easy
to
just
point:
tennis
courts.
They
gotta
remove
asphalt,
courts,
poor
tennis
courts
and
they
got
the
system
going
and
it's
across
the
whole
city.
N
I
want
to
really
emphasize
that,
because
we've
had
some
people
talk
about
it
and
we've
had
players
from
the
the
west
side,
who've
actually
played
on
the
courts
and
then
got
scholarships
at
the
university
and
they
would
never
have
had
that
opportunity
if
it
wasn't
for
coach,
mike's,
tennis
courts.
So
I'm
really
pressing
hard
for
the
liberty
heights
tennis
sports
in
the
district
six.
So
thank
you.
B
L
Yeah,
it
was
the
most
recent
allocation
from
the
county,
zap
tax
funds.
B
A
Any
other
discussion
on
this
one,
this
item-
I
guess
my
question-
is,
is
this?
Is
there
any
way
like
we're
only
looking
at
number
54
right.
N
A
N
I
asked
the
question
because
currently
there's
there
are
asphalt
courts
and
they
have
a
bubble
that
they
always
remove.
They're
going
to
have
a
permanent
bubble,
which
really
reduces
the
cost
of
removing
and
replacing
the
bubble
and
to
have
the
bubble.
You
need
reinforced,
concrete
and
so
they've
they
fund
raises
for
the
bubble
and
they
got
a
lot
of
donations
from
across
the
city
and
some
big
foundations
to
fund
the
bubble.
The
courts
are
necessary
funding
and
you've
got
to
do
them
together
to
make
the
project
worthwhile.
N
Now
the
500
000
came
from
the
the
city
engineers,
I
think
if
they
work
it
with
the
contractor,
it
maybe
come
come
down
it
all
again.
The
cost
of
concrete
the
cost
of
labor
the
500
000
may
come
could
possibly
come
down,
because
if
you
do
the
bubble
and
the
the
concrete
at
the
same
time,
it
could
come
down
and
without
any
necessary
needs
for
the
city
engineers.
The
price
would
also
come
down.
So
that's
that's
all
I
think
the
possibility
of
the
price
coming
down
is.
Is
there.
N
That
was
that
was
they
had
the
fundraising
for
the
for
the
bubble
side
of
the
house
looking
at
the
city
to
do
putting
up
their
pitch
for
some
of
the
construction
work.
N
That
will
all
depend
possibly
not
because,
if
they're
going
to
put
on
asphalt,
it
may
not
be
really
economically
suitable,
because
if
you
got
to
take
it
back
down
and
put
it
back
up,
that's
going
to
add
a
lot
of
cost
to
you.
G
P
And
I'm
not
sure
when
the
next
round
of
zap
tax
in
reference
to
your
earlier
question,
it
looks
like
one
and
a
half
million
dollars
was
the
amount
in
fiscal
year.
19
and
I've
got
it
listed
for
an
oak
tennis
pro
shop,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
was
two
different
rounds
of
funding
or
if
that
was
the
total
amount
for
the
one
year.
L
I
think
that
it
would
have
to
be
approved
by
the
voters
again
before
there
would
be
another
round
for
recreation.
They
do
approve
annual
subsidy
amounts
for
arts
in
our
arts
and.
B
E
K
Chair,
if
I
can
just
share
the
zoo's
arts
and
parks
tax,
the
applications
will
be
accepted
again
in
2025
that
tax
has
a
10
year
sunset.
It's
the
one
tenth
of
one
percent
of
a
sales
tax
bond
and
it
goes
every
10
years
and
so
applications
will
go
in
2015
or
I'm
sorry,
2025
and
then
in
2026.
K
Q
So
last
time
I
advocated
for
the
odyssey
house
and
ex-facility
renovation,
they
need
500
000.
It
was
suggested
that
it's
funded
at
300
000,
but
there
was
some
information
that
we
were
going
to
get
back
from
staff
at
some
point
about
funding
the
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
with
arpa
funding.
Do
we
have
that
information
back?
Is
it
confirmed?
Are
we
waiting.
P
Yep,
so
the
latest
is
it's
fully
eligible
for
arpa.
So
if
the
council
wanted,
you
could
either
do
the
300
000
that
the
mayor
recommends
with
arpa
or
the
full
funding
500
000
with
arpa,
and
if
you
were
to
bring
in
the
arpa
funding,
we
would
need
to
do
that
in
a
budget
amendment,
but
it
would
free
up
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
general
fund
for
another
project.
Q
So
I
think
that's
what
I
would
like
to
do-
use
those
arpa
funds,
because
it
is
eligible,
it's
a
great
program
and
it
helps
with
you
know:
fathers
that
are
single,
raising
children
are
trying
to
get
out
of
drug
substance
abuse.
So
that's
my
pitch
for
that
and
then
the
300
000
for,
for
you
know,
for
ten
days
or
four
years.
B
Yeah,
I
was
gonna
suggest
number
59,
but
I'm
working
with
lisa,
shaffer
and
she's
going
to
be
working
with
the
administration
and
kristen
reicher
in
the
parks
department
to
fix
the
redwood
rosewood
redwood
meadows
park.
So
I
am
excited
about
that.
So
I'm
actually
going
to
go
to
item
number
68
and
that
is
the
capitol
hill
traffic
calming
area.
I
know
that
that
is
another
resident
looked
at
promoted,
researched
project
that
I
think,
would
be
extremely
helpful
for
the
marmalade
area,
specifically
with
all
the
trucks
that
go
through
there.
B
H
E
H
H
So
I
have
a
couple
points
here,
so
this
is
a
really
important
issue
to
me.
I
you
know
I've
been
talking
about
this
for
several
months,
and
this
is
really
a
project
about
saving
lives.
That's
critical
to
not
only
the
lives
of
of
individuals
but
pets
in
the
area.
H
There
have
been
fatal,
auto
pedestrian
accidents,
literally
on
every
border
of
this
to
the
north,
to
the
south
and
to
the
west,
and
this
project
would
go
from
roughly
3rd
and
4th
west
all
the
way
up
into
capitol
hill
and
including
east
capital
boulevard,
and
so
this
is
a.
This
is
multiple
different
projects
that
have
been
worked
out
over
a
long
period
of
time
between
engaged
and
concerned
residents
and
the
transportation
division.
H
This
is
a
citizen
application
that
has
been
submitted
in
one
form
or
another
multiple
times
and
was
one
of
the
ones
that
we
weren't
able
to
act
on
in
2019
because
of
the
abbreviated
process.
That
year,
there's
been
a
long
period
of
public
engagement
over
about
16
months
with
residents
doing
surveys
community
meetings,
all
that
this
is
a
for
the
most
part,
a
shovel
ready
project.
So
it
will
because
of
the
collaboration
with
the
transportation
division.
H
H
This
is
regionally
significant,
because
this
is
the
northwest
gateway
to
the
city,
and
it
is
a
lot
of
people
coming
and
traveling
from
davis
county
to
try
to
get
to
our
downtown
and
to
the
university.
H
This
is
a
neighborhood
scale
approach
to
traffic
calming.
So
it's
not
just.
We
want
this
on
our
street
and
you
know
putting
streets
and
neighbors
against
each
other.
This
is
looked
at
as
a
holistic,
neighborhood
approach,
and
the
final
thing
is
that
we
know
that
we're
going
to
be
getting
in
the
next
month
or
so,
a
proposal
from
transportation
to
address
traffic
calming
in
all
in
neighborhoods
across
the
city,
because
I
know
this
is
not
just
a
problem
in
my
district.
H
I
know
that
every
district
has
an
area-
that's
like
this,
but
because
this
is
so
much
further
along
in
the
process
and
because
this
is
a
neighborhood-wide
approach.
I
think
funding
this
now
at
the
600
000
level
will
be
a
good
model
for
us
in
how
we
can
things
we
can
actually
see
and
fund
going
forward
when
the
traffic
proposal
from
transportation
comes
to
us.
H
B
I'm
torn
there's,
of
course,
lots
of
good
projects
in
here,
and
I
feel
as
though.
B
H
A
Great
sorry,
everyone.
A
I
so
one
of
the
things
I
was
looking
at
was.
A
Number
66
the
study
at
library
square.
I
had
asked
about
that
the
last
time,
but
we
remembered-
and
I
think
chris
actually
kind
of
found
out
that
we
actually
funded
that
a
couple
of
cips
ago
on
james's
it's
number
66
request
and
that
study's
just
never
been
done.
So
my
understanding
is
that
there
may
still
be
money
there
funded
for
that
study,
and
I
would
look
to
the
administration
to
maybe
look
at
that
when
you
have
time
it.
L
May
also,
madam
chair,
my
apologies
for
not
raising
this
earlier.
There
may
also
be
a
role,
clarity
question,
because
I
believe
the
downtown
alliance
was
also
leading
a
study
and
I
think
that
there
may
have
been
some
collaboration
there,
and
so
we
could
also
reach
out
to
the
downtown
alliance
to
see
if
they're,
the
ones
holding
that
ball
so.
A
Oh
that'd
be
great
and
obviously
there's
no
rush
on
it,
since
we
kind
of
know,
there's
already
money
there
and
we
don't
need
to
make
a
decision
on
that.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
to
everyone's
attention,
so
the
other
one
is
speaking
of
traffic
calming
and
all
of
the
traffic
things
that
I'm
looking
at
is
number
72.
A
I
don't
know
if
y'all
have
been
to
sugar
house
recently,
but
there's
a
ton
of
traffic
and
a
ton
of
cars
and
people
treat
20
100
south,
like
it's
a
like
it's
a
freeway
and
ninth
east
and
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
side
streets
in
those
areas
with
a
lot
of
neighborhoods.
And
so
the
proposal
here.
A
One
of
the
constituents
who
put
this
together
and
she
worked
with
tom
mylar
to
kind
of
say.
Maybe
was
there
a
different
way
that
we
could
go
about
this
just
so
that
we
could
fund
it,
and
so
they
modified
the
request
to
300
000
and
they
would
look
at
the
study
being
35,
000,
construction
being
225
000
and
engineering
fees
being
40
000.,
and
so
I
I
know
we
don't
have
a
ton
of
extra
money,
but
I
would
I
would
like
to
fund
the
whole
300
000..
If
we
couldn't,
I
think
we
could.
A
I
would
like
to
do
the
35
000
for
at
least
this
study.
We
know
how
long
studies
takes.
We
know
how
what
our
resources
are
within
our
engineering
department
or
transportation
department.
So
it
may
be
even
beneficial
to
just
fund
the
study
this
year
with
some
sort
of
intent,
language
that,
once
the
study
is
finished,
we
kind
of
put
this
as
a
priority
in
future
cip
years.
A
Any
other
questions
on
cfp
great?
We
have
a
couple
we
have
one
more
discussion
on
cip
is
that
right.
P
We've
got
two
more
scheduled
august
17th
and
then
august
24th,
if
needed,
with
the
vote
needed
august
24th
to
meet
the
deadline
under
state
law.
P
A
So
for
all
of
those
people
that
are
advocating
for
their
projects,
we
will
have
a
public
hearing
date
on
the
august
17th,
and
that's
that
so
with
that
we
will
thanks
everyone
for
sorry,
dan.
N
If
ben
gives
a
update
on
the
arp
rescue
plan
funding
and
how
that
fits
into
the
cip
project
projects.
P
So
two
parts
we
we
heard
at
the
last
meeting
interest
from
council
members
to
have
a
broader
discussion
about
the
remainder
of
the
arpa
funding
with
the
administration
which
could
happen
in
august
before
you
vote
on
cip,
we're
also
tracking,
I
think
it's
eight
different
items
to
follow
up
with
the
administration
on
arpa
funding
and
there
was
new
treasury
guidance
which
expanded
allowable
uses
again
for
arpa
funding
to
include
things
such
as
open
spaces.
P
P
N
A
Great
anything
else:
council
members,
okay,
thanks
everyone
for
being
here,
we
are
on
number
nine,
which
is
our
campaign,
finance
reporting
and
personal
campaign
committees.
We
have
jennifer
bruno
here
with
us.
We
also
have
cindy
lou
trishman,
our
city
recorder
and
lauren
schaefer,
our
deputy
city
recorder.
Thank
you
all
for
being
here.
I
know
this
will
probably
be
helpful
information
for
everyone.
I
All
right
so
under
traditional
voting,
salt
lake
city
would
have
had
six
campaign
finance
report
periods.
By
date,
you
can
speak
closer
closer.
Is
that
better
great,
so
under
traditional
voting,
salt
lake
city
has
six
campaign
finance
report
periods
by
date,
I'm
going
to
go
through
them,
so
bear
with
me,
but
it's
february
15th,
which
is
due
every
year,
the
july
1st
report,
which
is
due
only
on
election
years
for
candidates
up
for
election
that
year.
I
The
pre-primary
report,
which
is
due
seven
days
before
the
primary,
which
is
roughly
a
month
and
a
half
after
the
declaration
of
candidacy
due
on
august
3rd
unsuccessful
in
a
primary
due
30
days
after
candidates,
were
eliminated
in
a
primary
which
would
have
been
september
9th.
The
general
report,
due
a
week
before
the
general
election
on
october
26
and
the
post
general
election
report,
due
in
december
30
days
after
the
election
since
there's
no
primary
this
year,
due
to
opting
into
ranked
choice
voting
without
a
primary
two
of
the
campaign.
I
Finance
report
periods
are
no
longer
enforceable
and
to
re,
and
because
of
that
it
reduces
the
transparency
of
campaign
finance
prior
to
the
general
election,
our
office,
the
recorder's
office,
has
raised
the
option
for
consideration
to
add
a
report
period
between
june
29th
through
september
6..
This
report
would
be
due
on
september
9th.
The
idea
behind
these
dates
was
just
that
this
report
combines
the
two
unenforceable
reports
and
creates
a
new
reporting
period
only
when
opting
in
to
rank
choice,
voting
without
a
primary.
I
The
report
would
become
available
about
a
month
and
a
half
before
the
general
election
report,
slash
the
general
election
and
would
also
end
about
a
month
after
the
declaration
of
candidacy
period.
Adjustments
from
this
discussion
can
be
added
to
the
motion
sheet
in
order
for
the
ordinance
to
be
updated
to
reflect
this
conversation.
If
you
decide
to
move
forward
with
the
date
of
the
report,
we
can
adjust
it,
but
it
will
impact
the
final
report
completed
prior
to
the
general
election.
H
Councilmember
morton,
thank
you
just
quickly
in
the
event
that
we
let's
say
that
we
write
this
ordinance
and
then
the
state
I
know,
there's
been
some
encouragement
to
modify
the
state
law
that
this
is
based
on
and
let's
say
that
that
becomes
permanent.
Because
right
now
it's
a
pilot
program.
Will
it
be
easy
to
like
if
the
candidate
declaration
period
moves
earlier
into
the
year,
will
it
be
easy
for
us
to
just
change
the
dates
on
this
ordinance
so
that
we
can
meet
that
if
that
deadline
moves.
I
Yeah
under
103
208
we're
allowed
to
enforce
basically
our
own
strict
ordinances
on
our
state
statute,
so
we
can
move
report
periods
around
as
long
as
they're,
not
the
state
enforceable
ones.
So,
like
the
october
26th
one
is
a
state
report.
The
primary
reports
would
have
been
state
reports,
but
any
ones
we
create.
We
can
move
around
as
we
see
fit.
H
A
Anything
okay!
Well,
thank
you
for
being
here
and
giving
us
that
update.
Oh,
we
now
have
the
resolution.
Oh
no
jen.
L
A
Okay
report
from
the
chair
and
vice
chair
james.
B
A
I
don't
have
anything
report
and
announcements
from
the
executive
director
jim
bruno,
nothing
there.
We
have
no
tentative
closed
session
friends
of
family.
We
are
done
until
our
formal
meeting
at
7
pm.
Thank
you.
You're.