►
From YouTube: Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of Salt Lake City - 5/4/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
Great
all
right
welcome
everybody.
Welcome
to
today's
redevelopment
agency
board
meeting.
It's
may
4th,
so
some
of
you
know
what's
going
on
today,
we're
happy
to
have
you
here.
While
we
continue
to
hold
our
meeting
remotely
due
to
the
declarations
of
emergency
related
to
the
pandemic
and
the
earthquake
we
had
last
year,
even
though
there
isn't
a
location
to
attend
meetings
in
person,
this
is
still
considered
an
open
and
public
meeting.
Please
keep
joining
us
remotely
until
the
day
it's
safe.
B
B
Our
first
items
of
our
agenda
is
item
a
which
is
comments,
and
we
start
our
rda
meetings
with
comments
to
the
board.
As
a
reminder,
written
comments
can
be
submitted
to
the
rda
offices
at
po
box,
one
four,
five:
four:
five:
five
salt
lake
city,
utah
8414-5455,
your
comment
about
any
rda
business
or
if
you
have
any
feedback
to
give
us
regarding
to
this
meeting
setup,
please
contact
us
we're
accepting
your
comments
through
webex
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line.
B
The
board
has
always
had
rules
of
the
quorum
that
are
created
to
advance
the
legitimate
government
objectives
of
having
an
orderly,
efficient
meeting
that
moves
through
the
agenda
and
gives
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
in
person.
We
have
added
the
benefit
of
being
able
to
see
each
other
which
helps
ask
it
to
know
our
constituents
and
engage
more
meaningfully.
B
B
The
word
respects
all
points
of
view
and
we
welcome
new
insights.
However,
using
foul
language
and
personal
attacks
make
the
public
comment
forum
uncivil
and
intimidating
for
others,
this
meeting
is
also
being
broadcast
on
television
and
the
internet,
and
so
we
will
more
strictly
enforce
the
use
of
profanity.
B
B
B
B
Amanda
lao
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
and
unmuting
lines
when
amanda
unmutes
your
line
and
lets
you
know
it's
your
turn,
please
state
your
first
and
last
name,
just
as
you
would
in
our
in-person
meetings,
indicate
the
topic
you're
speaking
on
and
the
two-minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two-minute
mark.
We
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
D
Thank
you
rda
board.
Today
I
see
we
only
have
one
commenter.
We
have
george
chapman
on
the
line.
George
go
ahead,
you're
unmuted.
E
Okay,
george
chapman
salt
lake
city
rda
should
not
be
looking
for
excuses
to
expand
or
reconfigure
tracks
for
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
in
the
ballpark
400
west
area.
Uta
just
gave
a
report
on
it.
Salt
lake
city's
rda
should
publicize
it,
but
why
not
a
park?
Why
not
a
park
library?
Why
not
unrepurpose
the
5
million
in
impact
fees
that
you
decided
not
to
use
for
a
park
in
the
area
you're
willing
to
spend
20
million
on
a
soccer
complex
in
the
middle
of
nowhere?
E
That
requires
car
use,
but
you're
not
willing
to
spend
20
million
on
a
part.
People
can
walk
to.
Why
not
ask
the
residents
and
businesses
what
they
want?
You
encour
want
to
encourage
an
innovation
center.
A
big
park
is
the
best
way
and
by
the
way,
the
400
west
spur
needs
to
be
protected
from
the
new
apartment
that
salt
lake
city
is
about
to
approve.
E
The
ballpark
area
deserves
more
affordable
housing.
This
is
again
general
comments.
It
deserves
mixed
income,
not
like
the
228
west
13
south
loan
proposal,
you're
considering
for
106
out
of
140
units
affordable
more
than
25
percent
ends
up
like
palmer
court.
The
errand
needs
a
wide
sidewalk
and
that
should
be
part
of
the
project
so
that
bicycles
and
pedestrians
can
safely
and
comfortably
use
the
sidewalk.
E
D
Alrighty
board
chair
just
double
checking.
There
are
no
more
commenters
for
general
comment.
B
Great
thank
you
to
everybody
too
george,
for
a
general
comment.
We
have
no
public
hearings
today
and
so
we're
moving
on
to
item
c,
one
and
c1
hold
on.
B
G
B
Okay,
remember
mano
yes,
fowler.
B
H
B
B
We
will
receive
a
briefing
today
and
at
the
table
we
have
allison
roland
from
our
staff,
tommy
hunsaker
and
lauren
parisi
from
rda,
and
also
thank.
C
You
good
afternoon,
madam
chair,
this
is
alison,
as
you
mentioned.
The
idea
with
this
briefing,
is
to
discuss
and
consider
approving
a
1.3
or
million
dollar
loan
to
colony
bllc
for
a
mixed
income,
affordable
housing
project
you
mentioned
the
project
is,
is
located
at
about
228,
west
and
1300
south,
and
it
would
be
about
a
21
million
dollar
total
development,
it'd
be
140
residential
units,
of
which
106
would
be
deed,
restricted
as
affordable
for
50
years,
and
the
units
would
be
a
mix
of
studios
and
one
bedroom
apartments.
C
The
rents
for
the
affordable
units,
which,
as
I
mentioned,
were
those
106,
would
be
between
25,
ami
and
50.
Ami
15
of
the
units
will
accommodate
people
with
long-term
mobility
challenges
and
another
11
units
would
initially
be
available
for
people
who
are
aging
out
of
foster
care.
This
is
something
that
the
developers
intend
to
continue
to
the
extent
possible
with
future
renters.
C
The
developer
colony
be
llc
is
a
joint
venture
between
the
neighborhood
non-profit
housing
corporation,
which
is
based
in
logan,
I
believe,
and
defy
collabs,
which
is
based
in
bountiful
the
loan
itself.
This
1.3
million
loan
is
intended
to
cover
a
funding
gap
created
by
increased
construction
costs,
which
have
risen
about
1
million
by
the
estimate
of
the
developers.
They
also
reflect
a
drop
in
the
value
of
the
li-tech
credits
that
were
awarded
to
the
development
last
september.
C
With
this
loan
there's
also
a
proposed
interest
rate
reduction.
The
rda
staff
recommends
that
this
interest
rate
reduction
be
approved
by
the
board
and
it's
permitted
by
program
policy
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
The
reason
they're
asking
for
this
special
approval
is
because
the
proximity
to
the
ballpark
station
tracks
line
would
allow
for
a
reduction
of
0.25
percent
and
that
would
take
the
standard
housing
development
loan
program
rate
to
2.75.
C
C
According
to
the
senior
lenders
requirements
and
the
housing
development
loan
programs,
minimum
is
1.1,
so
it's
fits
within
the
housing
development
loan
programs
parameters.
The
city
would
be
in
second
position
for
repayment.
The
project
would
break
ground
in
july,
2021
and
occupancy,
and
lease
up
would
be
beginning
in
late,
2022
and
early
2023.
C
D
Hello
rda
board
and-
and
thank
you,
tammy
and
lauren-
for
allowing
me
to
take
just
a
moment
to
introduce
sarah
montoya,
who
she
just
turned
her
screen
on.
I
see
her
down
there.
She
joined
our
office
gosh
a
couple
weeks
ago,
maybe
a
month
ago,
and-
and
I
thought
I
would
just
give
you
a
quick
bio
and
let
you
know
how
excited
we
are
for
sarah
to
to
join
our
team.
D
Sarah
was
previously
a
vice
president
and
senior
counsel
at
select
portfolio
servicing,
which
was
a
very
large
mortgage
servicer
and
she
spent
nearly
eight
years
engaged
in
transactional
work
and
litigation
management
for
them.
She's
got
experience
with
securities,
real
estate,
consumer
finance
and
lean
enforcements
and
foreclosures,
and
she
was
born
in
rural
new
mexico,
attended,
uc
berkeley
and
earned
a
bachelor's
degree
in
cognitive
science.
D
So
we
are
absolutely
thrilled
to
have
sarah
join
our
team
she's
going
to
be
taking
over
all
of
the
loans
both
for
the
city
and
the
rda,
and
we're
really
looking
forward
to
her
expertise,
and
I
wanted
to
be
sure
that
you
could
put
a
face
to
a
name
when
you
see
her
on
meeting
invites
or
or
emails
that
how
thrilled
we
are
to
have
her
on
our
team.
So
sarah,
I'm
not
expecting
you
to
say
anything,
but
I
wanted
to
be
sure
to
welcome
you
to
the
team.
K
Hi
sarah,
it's
so
good
to
see
you
welcome
to
salt
lake
city,
I've
known
sarah
for
a
little
bit
even
back
in
law
school.
So
this
is
really
exciting.
Welcome
to
the
team
it'll
be
good
to
see
your
face.
Hey
I
mean.
The
only
thing
is
that
you
don't
live
in
salt
lake
city,
but
we'll
forgive
you.
J
J
J
Thank
you
bobby.
If
we
can
flip
to
the
next
slide.
J
So
again,
this
is
a
1.34
million
dollar
loan
request
from
colony
bllc
from
the
salt
lake
city's
housing
development
trust
fund
to
accommodate
a
new
apartment,
building
to
be
located
at
228,
west
1300.
South
the
site
is
highlighted
in
red
on
the
map
here
and
it's
just
east
of
third
west
across
from
the
lows
and
directly
adjacent
to
the
1300
south
track.
Stop
there.
J
15
of
the
units
will
be
built
as
type
a
to
accommodate
individuals
with
long-term
mobility
issues,
and
the
applicants
also
have
a
relationship
with
volunteers
of
america's
youth
center
and
will
work
to
place.
15
individuals,
aging
out
of
foster
care
into
the
building
and
so
on.
The
screen
here
is
the
site
plan
and
it
will
run
the
length
of
the
property
fronting
13th
south
next
slide.
Please.
J
So
here
are
a
few
more
renderings
of
the
project.
The
top
right
is
the
front
facade
off
13th
south.
This
is
a
five-story
building
that
will
include
a
gym
bicycle
storage
and
community
lounges
for
residents
next
slide,
here's
another
view
of
the
front
facade
off
13th,
and
then
there
will
be
parking
to
the
rear
next
slide.
Please.
J
The
total
project
cost
is
approximately
21
million
dollars.
The
project
has
secured
nine
percent
low
income,
housing
tax
credits
and
have
an
equity
investor.
That's
that
will
purchase
the
credits
for
9.59
million.
The
project
will
also
apply
for
state
litec
and
have
an
equity
investor
to
purchase
the
credits
for
702
000.
J
They
have
secured
traditional
financing
from
rocky
mountain
crc
for
8.2
million
and
an
olene
walker
loan
for
one
million
they'll
also
receive
energy
rebates,
leaving
a
gap
of
approximately
1.34
million
that
they
are
requesting
from
the
housing
development
trust
fund.
At
this
time
next
slide.
J
I
also
wanted
to
note
that
the
housing
development
trust
fund
policy,
prioritizes
projects
that
can
break
ground
within
three
months
and
construction
for
colony
b
is
projected
to
start
in
july.
So
it
hits
that
priority
for
the
program
next
slide.
Please
so
I'll
go
through
the
terms
quickly.
Here
again,
it's
a
1.34
million
dollar
loan
request.
J
The
project
qualifies
for
a
point,
two
five
percent
interest
rate
reduction
from
the
standard
three
percent
rate
due
to
its
proximity
to
transit,
but
the
applicants
are
requesting
an
additional
1.55
reduction
to
get
to
1.2
percent.
Sorry,
there's
a
typo
there
that
should
be
1.55
and
they
need
this
in
order
to
maintain
a
debt
coverage
ratio
of
1.15
which
is
required
by
their
senior
lender.
J
So
the
housing
trust
fund
policy
does
state
that
exceptions
to
standard
loan
terms
may
be
recommended
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
based
on
the
requirements
of
senior
lenders.
But
the
interest
is
not
to
go
below
one
percent,
so
rda
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
this
reduced
interest
rate.
As
the
project
has
a
high
number
of
deeply
affordable
units,
it's
ready
to
break
ground
this
summer.
J
So
the
project
does
align
with
multiple
policies
within
the
city's
housing
plan.
As
you
can
see
listed
here,
the
housing
trust
fund
advisory
board,
who
gave
the
project
a
positive
recommendation
commended
the
high
number
of
deeply
affordable
units
in
a
single
project,
and
this
project
also
makes
the
most
of
its
location
right
next
to
the
1300
south
track.
Stop.
J
B
Lauren
members
is
open
to
you.
If
you
have
questions
for
lauren
or
we
can
let
the
applicant
address
us
if
you
like,
and
then
we
have,
but
then
we're
gonna
ask
questions
for
everybody,
so
questions
now.
H
H
Confirmation
or
clarification
there's
a
106,
affordable
the
11
for
the
aging
out
of
foster
care.
Is
that
included
in
the
106
or
is
that
an
addition
to
it?
And
then
the
other
ones
for
the
mobility
are
those
included
or,
in
addition,.
H
F
Curious,
I
have
a
couple
questions.
Madam
chair
thanks.
So
my
the
housing
development
loan
bond
is
that
this
is
that's
the
right
one
right
is.
Can
you
tell
me
what
the
balance
of
that
is
right
now
and
and
how
much
of
that
this
would
take
out
of
that
pot.
J
F
I
Would
be
well
to
clarify
this
is
tammy
the
the
fy
20
allocation.
It
was
provided
with
legislative
intent
that
the
rda
administered
those
funds
on
policies
that
hand
had
been
administering,
so
we
kept
those
funds
available
on
a
first-come,
first-served
basis
for
emergency
gap
financing.
I
There
have
been
allocations
in
previous
or
in
more
recent
fiscal
years
that
have
been
going
out
through
notice
of
funding,
availability
more
through
a
competitive
process
and
there's
actually
about
around
4.5
million
available
to
go
out
through
a
competitive
process,
and
we
will
actually
get
into
those
numbers
in
the
next
agenda
item.
I
F
Okay
thanks,
I
was
I
I
mean
the
the
mix.
The
number
of
affordable
units
is
obviously
really
necessary
and
needed,
so
I
I'm
really
happy
for
those
to
come
online
and
I
love
that
there's
programs
that
are
targeting
specific
underserved
communities.
I
think
that's
great.
I
worry
about
the
lack
of
ground
floor
commercial
space
on
this
part
of
the
of
13th
south
on
this
part
of
the
of
13th
south
one.
I
just.
F
I
worry
that
it's
not
a
great
the
ground
floor
right,
adjacent
to
the
sidewalk
of
13
south
right
by
the
track
station
doesn't
really
feel
like
a
great
place
to
live
with
people
walking
by
right.
Along
that
sidewalk
and
b.
I
just
think
ground
floor.
Commercial
would
do
a
ton
to
help
revitalize
this
part
of
the
the
neighborhood,
and
I
know
we're
talking
about
that
stationary
plan
and
all
of
those
those
goals.
F
So
I
worry
about
that
and
then
I
also
worry
about
the
lack
of
family-sized
housing
within
projects
and
so
understanding
that
this
is
emergency
gap
financing.
So
we
weren't
brought
to
the
table
until
very
late
in
the
project
process.
I
assume
those
things
are
impossible
to
be
fixed
at
this
point,
but
but
maybe
not
either
way.
I
guess
I
I'm
inclined
to
support
the
project,
but
also
just
raise
my
concerns
that
I
think
there
are
a
few
things
I
I
love
when
I
can
agree
with
george
chapman.
F
I
think
there
are
a
few
things
that
that
are
concerning
about
the
design
of
the
project.
So
I'm
not
sure
what
other
board
members
think,
but
those
are
some
of
my
thoughts.
B
Go
ahead:
thanks,
go
ahead,
amy.
K
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
have
not
yet
in
four
years
of
being
on
the
council,
had
anyone
bring
to
the
table
the
idea
of
reserving
space
for
those
that
population
that
is
aging
out
of
foster
care.
It
is
unbelievable
how
many
people
we
actually
have
in
that,
like
1821
to
2526
area
that
are
experiencing
homelessness
because
they
they
can't
get
resources,
and
I
commend
you
and
want
to
thank
you
for
thinking
about
that
very
vulnerable
population.
K
K
I
I
my
question
is-
and
I
heard
this
in
the
presentation
that
you
hope
to
continue-
dedicating
that
I
know
that
there's
a
rent
restriction
for
50
years
and
there's
only
so
much
legally
and
I'm
looking
at
allison
to
tell
me
legally
what
we
can
and
can't
do
here,
but
alison
parks.
But
is
there
a
way?
So
we
have
a
rent
restriction
for
50
years
with
the
50
ami?
K
Do
we
know
and
and
maybe
I
can
ask
jake
yeah-
I
believe
you're,
the
the
representative
for
the
developers
here
and
welcome?
Yes,.
L
L
Perfect
perfect,
so
the
way
it
works,
the
way
it
was
worded
in
the
presentation
it's
required
of
us
to
when
those
units
become
back
available
so
from
the
get-go
we
have
to
to
market
to
that
population.
First,
for
a
certain
amount
of
time,
I
think
it's
90
days
we
have
to
market
to
that
population
and
then,
if
we
can't
find
a
qualifying
tenant
at
that
point,
we
can
we
can
rent
it
to
someone
else,
but
our
goal
would
be
obviously
in
those
90
days.
L
We
would
like
to
continue
that
the
voa
being
because
their
youth
resource
center
is
just
one
stop
away.
We
love
the
idea
of
partnering
with
them
and
the
work
they
do
so
we'll
be
working
closely
with
them
to
hopefully
keep
a
list
of
folks
who
need
a
spot.
So
we
can
keep
those
full.
So
it's
our
hope
that
we
do
continue
that
barring
we
just
can't
find
anybody
that
that
qualifies
if
that
makes
sense.
L
So
hopefully,
hopefully
that
answers
your
question
and
as
far
as
some
of
the
other
things
that
come
up
with
the
design
I
tend
to
agree.
But
as
far
as
the
way
this
land
worked
out,
we
wanted
to
get
as
many
units
as
we
could
could
fit,
because
we're
right
on
the
track
stop
there.
But
we
did.
L
There
is
some
in
the
site
plan,
there's
some
landscaping
and
things
to
hopefully
buffer
those
ground
floor
units,
but
also
to
put
some
eyes
on
the
street
to
a
certain
extent,
to
hopefully
keep
that
both
with
landscaping
and
lighting,
to
keep
it
a
place
that
becomes
inviting
to
walk
by.
But
we
we
tried
to
take
those
things
into
account.
They
we
were
in
our
mind,
even
though
we
made
it
a
perfect,
perfect
solution.
L
But
it
was
something
that
that
enabled
us
by
putting
that
many
units,
it
enables
us
to
get
actually
more
affordable
units,
so
normally
a
nine
percent
tax
credit
project
caps
out
at
about
100
units
and
we're
at
140
and
only
106
of
those
are
restricted,
but
the
other
because
of
the
design
of
the
project
and
and
the
population
we're
targeting.
L
We
were
able
to
get
more
units
that
still
fall
below
70
every
single
one
of
our
units,
even
the
market
rate
ones,
are
below
70
ami
and
even
the
majority
of
those
fall
close
to
like
60
percent
ami.
So
we
feel
like
it's
a
really
good
complement
to
some
of
the
stuff
that
even
cw
urban
built.
This
is
phase
three.
We
purchased
it
from
cw
urban.
They
built
some
market
rate
for
cell
town
homes
that
sold
for
like
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
just
behind
us,
so
we
feel
like
it
it.
L
B
Thank
you
jake,
and
I
think
thank
you
that
I
oh
board
member
rogers,
see
your
hand
go
ahead.
G
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
echo
what
amy
said
you
know
when
we
were
exciting
the
homeless
resource
centers.
We
know
that
there
were
nine
subsets
that
we
were
trying
to
to
actually
identify
and
we've
built
for
three
we're
missing
six,
and
this
helps
you
know,
facilitate
one
of
those
missing
links,
so
you
know
to
have
a
public
private
partnership
that
we're
doing
with
this
it
to
me
is
a
win-win
scenario
for
that
population
that
we
are
missing
so,
and
I
I'd
like
to
hear
that
jake
that
you
guys
want
to
partner
with
the
voa.
G
D
This
is
kimberly
tytras.
Do
you
mind
if
I
chain
men
from
the
legal
perspective
on
amy's
question?
You
know
right
now.
Our
restrictions
under
our
loan
agreements
run
for
50
years.
That
is
consistent
and
maybe
even
longer
with
what
the
state
requires
and
that's
probably
what
you're
going
to
find
as
market
value
or
it's
sort
of
the
market
terms
for
restricted
units
when
we're
restricting
a
housing
type.
D
I
will
say:
there's
probably
some
opportunities
as
this
project
matures
where
they
might
need
additional
funding
or
there
might
be
additional
incentives.
The
city
can
offer
through
programs,
you
know
as
the
program
matures
as
it
gets
closer
to
mentoring
and
and
maybe
is
looking
at
changing
its
purpose,
where
we
can
incentivize
keeping
that
use
and-
and
you
know
really
trying
to
target
those
vulnerable
populations.
I
think
right
now,
50
years
is
a
pretty
long
time
and
we
could
consider
someone
policies
going
forward,
though
that
might
help
us,
as
these
projects
continue.
K
K
K
I
If
I
can
jump
in,
I
and
jake,
I
believe,
can
clarify
this,
but
I'm
assuming
the
approval
for
the
nine
percent
tax
credits
through
the
utah
housing
corporation.
I
That
includes
what
we
call
a
lura,
a
land
use
restriction
agreement
and
all
of
these
details
will
be
laid
out
in
the
lira,
including
restricting
units
for
special
populations,
and
it
sounds
like
the
negotiation
that
the
developer
has
done
with
utah
housing
corporation
includes
that
90-day
provision
that,
if,
when
they,
if
they
can't
find
the
applicable
population
within
90
days,
they
can
open
it
up
to
other
populations.
I
I
So
I
believe
we
could
kimberly
can
clarify,
but
I
believe
we
could
add
the
same
language
that
the
laura
has
about
the
special
populations.
Am
I
on
the
right
track?
Jake.
L
Yeah,
so
it
is
required
and,
and
it's
a
part
of
the
tax
credit
requirements
from
uhc
in
the
lower,
so
that
will
still
be
on
there
and
and
so
as
a
part
of
us
staying
in
compliance.
We
have
to
show
that
we
made
sufficient
marketing
efforts
to
do
that.
I
don't
know
I
I
know,
there's
a
fair
housing
issue
and
saying
you
can
only
rent
to
a
certain
population,
so
I
don't
know
how
that
works
with
the
laura.
L
I
K
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
everybody
and
and
jake.
I
I
do
like
this
project
too,
echoed
amy
and
james.
I
think
this
is
one
of
those
that
were
probably
used
as
an
example
for
our
next
discussion
and
the
next
your
next
item
about
what
our
priorities
should
be
for
funding
projects
like
yours
or
when
people
come
to
ask
us
for
money.
I
do
you
know
having
that
said.
I
do
agree
with
board
member
manu
about
the
street
activation
right.
B
We
we're
also
looking
into
street
activation
through
commercial
uses,
but
you
explain
that
you
know
you're
trying
to
get
more
units
into
the
project,
so
it's
that
balance
it's
hard,
sometimes
for
us
to
to
pinpoint
exactly
what
what
we
need
or
what
the
priorities
are.
So
thank
you.
I
don't
have
any
questions
or
other
comments.
We
will
talk
about
this
later.
Go
ahead.
G
Just
that,
but
amy
and
james
were
saying
I
would
love
to
see
if
we
can
do
more
projects
like
this,
where
we're
reaching
out
to
groups
like
youth
that
are
in
danger
of
homelessness
as
they're
coming
out
of
the
foster
care
system,
and
I
also
like
that
this
is
like
mix
that
it
it's
mixing
that,
with
with
other
groups
that
are
potentially
or
that
are
traditionally
underserved.
So
I
just
wanted
to
I'd
love.
To
see
more
of
that,
thank
you.
K
You
chairman
it.
Would
it
be
okay
if
we
heard
a
little
bit
from
the
developer.
I
know
we
sort
of
bombarded
him
with
some
questions
and
I
apologize,
but
I
gotta
I
got
a
little
aggressive,
mostly
just
because
I'm
so
excited
about
this.
Like
I
love,
I
love
yeah
that
you're
thinking
about
a
population
that
isn't
a
couple
of
populations
that
aren't
generally
thought
about.
K
So
would
it
be
okay
if
we
gave
the
developer
his
five
minutes
to
me,
if,
if
he
wants,
don't
mean
to
put
you
on
the
spot
jake,
but
just
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
project
and
that
impetus
behind
it?
For
you.
L
Yeah
and
there's
actually
two
of
us-
we
should-
I
don't
know
if
josh
is
still
on
here.
Josh
represents
neighborhood
nonprofit,
which
has
been
doing
this
a
lot
longer
than
me
and
is
our
our
partner
on
this
on
the
nonprofit
side.
So
maybe
I'd
let
josh
go
first
and
then
I'm
happy
to
to
fill
in
a
couple
minutes
kind
of
about
about
our
side
of
of
the
partnership.
Josh.
Are
you
still
there
yeah
I'm
here.
Can
you
hear
me.
M
M
We've
got
projects
out
in
vernal
and
tree
mountain,
but
this
is
our
first
floor
area
really
into
the
wasatch
front,
with
ogden
and
salt
lake
yeah
I
mean
jake
actually
should
deserve
all
the
credit
for
for
going
out
and
seeking
the
partnership
with
voa,
and
when
we
heard
about
it,
we
thought
it
was
a
great
idea.
M
We
have
on
top
of
our
live
tech.
We
have
multiple
hud
properties,
that
service
low-income,
disabled
and
elderly
persons
and
we're
always
trying
to
find
ways
to
reach
out
to
serve
other
populations.
We
just
realized.
We
have
to
do
that
within
a
mix
because
we
still
have
to
make
the
projects
pencil
to
some
degree,
which
is
why,
even
in
this
project,
we
we
have
some
market
rate
units,
even
though
they're
they're
still
affordable
for
being
market
rate.
But
now
we're
we're
excited
with
this
project.
M
It's
been
a
great
partnership
for
us
too,
to
to
partner
up
with
jake
and
his
group,
and
it's
just
a
matter
now
of
making
sure
lumber
doesn't
go
any
more
expensive.
L
Yeah,
so
we'll
take
any
prayers
finger
crossings,
whatever
you
can
do
to
get
lumber
to
go
down
would
be
would
be
helpful
as
far
as
me.
Personally,
I
have
two
partners
in
defico
labs,
we're
kind
of
a
new
group
together
I
have
worked
in
a
few
different
places,
but
my
my
passion
for
some
of
this
work
actually
came.
L
I
used
to
share
a
cubicle
wall
with
with
tammy
and
worked
in
the
housing
neighborhood
development
department
for
salt
lake
and
kind
of
fell
in
love
with
I've,
always
loved
development
and
design,
but
just
fell
in
love
with
mission
driven
development
and
trying
to
to
find
ways
to
use
it
to
serve
the
good
of
the
community.
L
So
the
I
think
the
inspiration
for
the
the
youth
aging
out
of
foster
care
came
from
one
just
proximity
that
I
knew
that
that
facility
was
there
and
it's
I
don't,
for
whatever
reason
it's
been
a
population.
I've
always
felt
a
connection
to
maybe
it's
because
I
wish
I
was
still
18
to
25.
L
But
who
knows
where
the
connection
came
from,
but
I
think
it
just
that
proximity
made
sense
where,
without
a
car,
they
could
still
be
able
to
participate
in
the
services
that
the
voa
offers
and
and
still
get
around
town,
and
then
I
think
to
the
premise
of
where
we
did
they're
smaller
units
and
there's
a
lot
of
them,
and
so
the
premise
of
hey
who,
who
does
that
market
look
like
and
it
that
fits
the
model
to
be
able
to
give
a
young
person
aging
out
of
foster
care,
a
place
where
they
can
afford
that's
their
own,
but
they
can
still
be
mobile
and
connected
to
all
the
other
services
and
amenities
that
are
offered
just
by
being
right
there
on
the
track.
L
Stop.
So
maybe
that's
that's
a
little
bit
of
it,
but
yeah
defy
co-labs
is
a
group
where
we're
a
younger
group,
but
we
have
a
passion
for
kind
of
mission,
mission-driven,
real
estate
development,
and
that's
this
is
our
our
first,
hopefully
not
the
for.
Hopefully,
the
first
of
many
projects
to
come
and
and
love
this
neighborhood,
even
we've
been
looking
at
a
couple
other
parcels
in
the
neighborhood
and
would
love
to
participate
on
the
ballpark
or
this
piece
of
ballpark
neighborhood
kind
of
making
that
transition
here
on
the
track.
Stop
so
anyhow,
yeah.
K
B
K
L
There
there
are
some
on
the
first
floor.
They
kind
of
efficiency
wise
if
you
stack
them,
there's
basically
three
on
each
floor,
so
there's
some
on
each
floor.
Yes
and
those
follow
the
same
rules
as
the
they're
marketed
first
to
people
with
mobility
issues,
and
then
they
can
be
marketed
elsewhere,
but
as
they
fall
under
the
same
the
same
governance
of
the
laura
requiring
it
be
marketed
to
them.
First.
K
L
B
Very
nice
so
jake,
I
know,
and
we
don't
have
time,
but
just
real
quick.
Your
other
partner
mentioned
that.
Then
you
have
done
three
bedroom
units.
You
know
and
that's
one
of
the
discussions
as
well
that
we're
about
to
have
about
multi.
You
know
housing
for
for
family
size
units,
so
why
this
project
doesn't
have
it
it's
just
a
matter
of
finance.
What
what
happened.
L
Yeah,
it's
a
combination
of
both
the
site
is
really
small,
and
so
because
of
the
constraints
of
the
land.
That
was
one
of
the
reasons
we
had
to
be
really
efficient
with
the
way
the
units
stacked
and
then
really
the
amount
of
units,
because
we
were
able
to
get
a
larger
chunk
of
market
rate
units.
It's
it's
kept
us
in
line
on
construction
costs.
L
I
mean
a
normal
project,
runs
about
10
million
dollars
in
cost,
and
this
one
because
of
the
design
and
the
smaller
units
we
get
140
units
and
it's
21
million
dollars
in
cost.
So
that's
part
of
the
reason,
but
we
are
looking.
We
actually
are
looking
at
another
one
on
north
temple,
because
we
we
agree,
we'd
love
to
figure
out
a
way
to
get
some
two
and
maybe
three
bedroom
units
in
the
next
project.
This
one
I
mean
we're.
L
We're
really
only
have
like
0.75
acres,
so
it's
a
pretty
tight
site
to
fit
bigger
units,
but
we
share
the
concern
right
now,
I'll
just
say
from
the
standpoint
of
a
developer:
it's
really
really
hard
to
justify
a
three
bedroom,
because
construction
costs
are
so
high
there
when
you
could
fit
two
or
three
studios
for
the
price
of
one
three
bedroom,
that's
kind
of
the
the
crux,
but
ultimately
we
share.
We
share
the
concern.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
information,
and
that
gives
us
information
for
our
next
conversation,
so
board
members.
Traditionally
what
we
do
with
this
type
of
pro
or
not
these
type
of
projects,
but
these
items
this
would
be
our
briefing
and
and
then
we
would
schedule
it
for
voting
at
a
later
time,
unless
nobody
else
has
any
concerns
that
need
to
be
addressed
before
before
we
can
vote
for
it.
H
B
All
right,
a
motion
by
remember,
dugan
and
seconded
by
I'm
gonna,
say
fowler
and
I'm
gonna
roll
call.
This.
B
G
B
H
H
B
And
I'm
a
yes,
so
thank
you
very
much
that
passes.
Thank
you
to
the
applicants.
Congratulations!
It's
going
to
be
awesome
and
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
three
we're
a
little
bit
behind
in
our
schedules.
So
it's
a
result.
It's
not
a
resolution!
So
it's
on
a
resolution
today,
this
next
item.
We
will
have
a
discussion
about
this.
So
it's
for
fiscal
year,
2021,
22,
affordable
housing,
development
funding
priorities.
B
We
will
receive
a
briefing
about
these
priorities
and
at
the
table
we
have
alison
roland
and
danny
walls
and
tommy
hunsaker
go
ahead.
Alison.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Hello.
Again,
I
just
want
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
context
for
this
fiscal
year.
2022,
affordable
housing
priorities
item.
Essentially,
the
board
already
took
two
steps
toward
this
new
way
of
doing
housing
by
adopting
two
different
policies.
C
One
was
the
housing
fund's
allocation
policy,
which
you'll
probably
remember
you
started
talking
about
back
last
year
about
last
fall,
and
the
second
was
the
housing
development
loan
program
policy,
which
is
distinguishable
from
the
old
housing
trust
fund
policy,
because,
as
this
has
shifted
into
the
rda,
the
policies
have
have
also
changed
somewhat
according
to
to
your
preferences.
C
The
goal
today
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
madam
chair,
but
the
goal
today
is
this
to
discuss
the
priorities
that
you
can
find
on
a
list
on
page
5
of
the
12
pages
in
that
in
that
packet
in
that
pdf,
and
provide
policy
direction
for
the
rda
staff,
so
that
they'll
be
able
to
consider
the
applications
that
come
in
for
affordable
housing
projects
according
to
your
priorities
in
future
years.
C
The
idea
is
that
this
priorities
discussion
will
happen
in
march,
say
more
much
more
early
than
it
did
this
year,
so
that
the
board
can
consider
it
before
the
budget.
Discussions
begin
so
again
in
this
transmittal
there's
both
the
proposed
total
funding
for
all
affordable
housing
projects
through
the
rda
and
there's
also
the
proposed
allocation
of
each
amount
or
sorry
each
share
of
that
total
funding
among
different
program
categories.
C
So
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
discuss
these
funding
amounts
in
more
detail
on
may
18th,
and
today
the
goal
really
is
to
discuss
the
priorities
and
decide
whether
you
can
come
to
agreement
on
which
priorities
you
want
to
change
slightly
downplay
up
play
emphasize
whatever
you'd
like
to
do
on
those
and
then
that
date
for
potential
action
on
these
priorities
would
be
may
18.
thanks.
B
Remember
we're
clear
right
on
what
we're
doing
today.
Yes,
okay,
all
right,
danny
and
tammy
floor
is
yours.
N
Thanks
man,
I'm
sharon
thanks
alison
for
that
introduction.
I
will
turn
it
over
to
tammy,
but
first
as
alison
alluded
to.
Our
intention
is
in
the
future
that
this
will
come
to
you
sooner
and
the
reason
that
we're
saying
that
is
because,
between
the
time
that
the
board
approved
this
policy
in
march,
I
just
want
to
give
credit
to
tammy
for
turning
around
this
entire
strategy
and
funding
proposal
and
just
a
little
over
two
weeks
in
order
to
transmit
it
in
time
for
today's
meeting.
N
So
that
is
not
ideally
what
we
would
like
to
do,
but
that
was
a
function
of
just
when
the
policies
were
approved
and
I'm
sure
tammy
would
love
to
have
more
time
to
dive
into
it
in
the
future,
but
wanted
to
give
her
credit
for
that
as
she's
about
to
present
it.
So
tammy
you're
up.
I
I
All
right,
can
everyone
see
this
as
alison
mentioned?
There's
the
larger
strategy
within
your
packet,
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
some
key
elements
to
the
strategy
and,
as
allison
also
pointed
out,
this
is
the
result
of
two
housing
policies
that
were
recently
adopted.
I
I
You
approved
it
essentially
last
december
and
it
was
formally
adopted
in
february
and
that
policy
creates
four
housing
funds
under
the
rda
umbrella.
The
primary
housing
fund,
which
is
required
tax
increment.
A
lot
of
our
project
area,
have
tax
increment
set-asides
that
are
required
to
be
used
for
housing
that
that
monies
goes
in
there.
The
secondary
housing
fund,
which
is
our
our
state
statute,
allows
us
to
allocate
additional
funds
for
housing,
that's
dictated
by
a
different
section
of
the
code,
so
the
discretionary
housing
funds
go
there.
I
I
I
I
So
as
part
of
this
strategy,
it's
more
of
an
administrative
document,
but
the
board
has
two
distinct
roles
with
the
strategy.
It's
the
adoption
of
the
budget
with
the
revenues
and
expenses
for
all
of
these
housing
funds
and
then
the
adoption
of
a
resolution
that
identifies
the
funding
strategies
for
the
next
upcoming
fiscal
year.
I
So
this
flowchart
kind
of
explains
that
process
within
the
strategy.
The
proposed
fund
fiscal
year,
22
activities
include
three
main
components:
the
housing
development
loan
program,
a
strategic
site
acquisition
fund
and
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
program.
So,
let's
get
into
the
numbers
a
little
bit
more.
I
You
within
the
mayor's
recommended
budget,
which
I
know
is
still
forthcoming.
So
this
is
kind
of
a
draft
sneak
preview,
but
the
rda's
for
housing
funds
collectively
will
have
about
4.7
million
in
revenue
in
the
funds.
We're
proposing
that
about
3.5
million
of
that
go
to
the
housing
development
loan
program.
I
One
million
dollars
be
set
aside
for
a
strategic
site
acquisition
and
250
000
for
an
adu
program,
since
we
don't
want
to
just
look
at
the
fiscal
year,
22
resources
in
a
silo.
I
This
second
chart,
the
lower
chart,
has
the
prior
year
budget
available,
which
is
about
5.6
million.
This
is
higher
than
in
typical
years,
because
our
nofa
that
was
issued
last
july
had
a
lower
response
rate,
we're
fairly
certain
that
was
due
to
uncertainty
with
what
was
happening
with
the
development
market
and
covet
at
the
time.
I
We
so
collectively
between
what
we
have
available
that
will
revolve
in
nature
and
the
new
fy
22
year
revenues.
We
have
about
10.4
million
to
deploy
for
housing
development
in
fiscal
year,
22.
I
Oh
and
I
should
mention
going
back
to
the
different
housing
funds-
there
are
fund
priorities
based
on
the
source
of
funds,
for
example
the
inland
port,
the
northwest
quadrant
housing
funds
in
the
policy
adopted.
Those
are
prioritized
for
neighborhoods
west
of
I-15
and
the
secondary
housing
fund,
which
is
discretionary
tax,
increment
housing
funds.
Those
are
prioritized
for
rda
project
areas,
so
there
are
restrictions
on
how
and
where
some
of
the
funds
can
be
used
and
that's
been
taken
into
account
in
this
strategy,
so
diving
into
the
funding
priorities.
I
We
left
them
pretty
broad
for
this
upcoming
fiscal
year.
Of
course,
it's
up
to
your
discretion
to
give
us
feedback
and
and
modify
these,
and
we
have
taken
into
account
the
ongoing
conversations
that
you
have
been
having.
I
So
hopefully,
we've
we're
somewhere
in
the
ballpark
of
what
you
would
like
to
see
the
first
funding
priority,
and
I
guess
I
should
explain
these
funding
priorities
will
be
utilized
to
not
only
rank
and
compare
applications
that
we
get
through
nofas
through
the
housing
development
trust
fund,
so
to
prioritize
which
applications
we
give
funding,
but
the
funding
priority
priorities
will
be
used
to
provide
those
interest
rate
reductions
to
projects
so
they'll
be
used
in
two
different
ways.
I
So
the
priorities
are
family
housing
and
we're
kind
of
qualifying
that
as
three
to
four
bedroom
plus
units
target
populations.
I
I
Other
populations
like
that
so
projects
that
have
20
or
more
of
the
units
set
aside
for
these
special
populations,
neighborhood
safety.
We
are
qualifying
that
as
properties
or
sites
that
have
significant
blight
or
are
distressed
significantly
and
kind
of
a
magnet
for
crime
and
detracting
from
the
livability
of
the
neighborhood
number
four
missing
middle
and
unique
housing
types.
I
I
Expand
opportunity
so
provide
housing
within
areas
designated
as
high
opportunity,
neighborhood
impact
that
would
be
going
through
the
rda's
design
review
process
to
ensure
that
the
projects
are
high
quality
enduring
and
that
fit
into
the
neighborhood
context
and
livability
through
architectural
and
urban
design,
best
practices,
transportation
opportunities
so
near
a
transit
stop
and
providing
transportation
options
such
as
bike
share
car
share,
passes
bike
facilities
on
site
number.
10
is
historic,
preservation
and
or
adaptive.
Reuse.
I
Number
11
is
commercial
vitality,
which
kind
of
speaks
to
the
point
that
director
mono
brought
up
incentivizing
the
build
the
developments
that
do
offer
affordable
housing,
but
that
also
offer
that
ground
floor
commercial
space.
I
So
those
are
the
funding
priorities
based
on
what
we've
been
putting
into
recent
projects
in
terms
of
funding
percentage
and
whatnot,
we
came
up
with
some
impact
targets
that
we
hope
to
hit
with
the
10
million
in
rda
funding
available.
I
We
think
total,
including
the
market
rate
units
we'd,
be
at
about
350
new
units
and
10
development
projects
really
quick,
I
I
know
probably
short
on
time,
but
I
would
like
to
point
out,
through
the
housing
development
loan
program,
we're
wanting
to
deploy
5.4
million
of
that
through
a
competitive,
citywide
nofa.
I
I
We
would
still
keep
that
earmarked
for
the
high
opportunity
areas
and
the
strategic
site
acquisition.
We
don't
have
a
property
in
mind,
but
based
on
recent
conversations
and
interest
by
the
administration
on
the
board,
we
would
where
I
were
envisioning
that
these
funds
could
be
used
to
purchase
potentially
a
distressed
motel
that
came
up
for
sale
or
properties
that
are
located
in
a
strategic
location
or
that
align
with
rda
priorities
and
objectives
and
then
finally,
the
accessory
dwelling
unit
program.
I
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
details
on
this
program,
yet
it
would
be
a
policy
and
a
program
that
comes
back
to
the
board
for
a
discussion.
We
are
required,
through
our
interlocal
agreement,
with
the
county
on
the
nine
line
area
to
implement
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
program
in
the
nine
lines.
So
we
would,
for
this
year,
target
the
nine
line
area
with
this
program,
so
we
anticipate
potentially
two
projects
could
be
done,
but
that
is
just
an
estimate
at
this
point.
I
In
time
we
would
use
the
other
funding
in
the
balance
just
to
get
the
program
up
and
running.
We
envisioned
that
it
could
provide
not
only
financing
but
potentially
technical
assistance.
It
could
potentially
include
a
design
competition
to
come
up
with
some
standardized
adu
plans
for
the
community,
but
these
are
all
ideas
that
are
yet
to
be
kind
of
fleshed
out
in
detail,
and
we've
already
talked
about
this.
The
board's
role
is
the
first.
You
adopted
the
housing
policies.
I
B
Thanks
tammy
before
we
we
move
on
on
on
those
numbers
that
you
have
because
we
haven't
seen
the
budget
yet,
should
we
like
in
my
mind
the
you
know,
the
amounts
that
you
kind
of
allocated
to
each
of
the
funding
sources:
they're
not
like
not
yet
real,
because
we
don't
know
yet
the
exact
numbers.
So
I
would
like
people
not
to
think
so
much
about
that,
but
to
talk
about
the
priorities
in
the
next
time.
When
we
talk
about
the
budget,
then
we
have
real
numbers
and
then
we
can.
B
You
know,
compare
to
to
our
priorities
that
we
will
discuss
today
and
see
if
those
match
right.
Am
I
understanding
this
correctly?
I
think
this
is
tammy.
Okay,
going
like
this
all
right,
so
discussion
about
those
12,
total
13
items
priorities,
so
who's
had
rogers
and
then
wharton
and
then
mano.
I
think
you
had.
I
don't
know
if
you
so
you're,
okay,
okay,
wharton
and
sr
rogers
and
morton.
L
G
For
me,
the
blighted
properties
need
to
be
bumped
to
one
of
the
top
priorities,
specifically
because
we
have
so
many
blighted
properties
in
the
areas
that
we're
looking
at.
So
that
was
the
top
priority
for
me
to
say
that
we
identify
that
as
a
much
higher
priority
in
that
list
also
board
members.
I
would
appreciate
it
if
we
would
remove
the
northwest
quadrant
money
from
this.
G
I've
been
working
with
staff
and
with
rda
board
members,
not
board
members,
but
rda
staff
to
discuss
community
land
trust
specifically
tied
to
the
west
side
and
for
home
ownership,
as
well
as
for
affordable
units.
So
there's
much
more
to
be
discussed.
I
do
not
want
to
allocate
this
money.
I've
been
involved
with
this
from
the
start.
We
need
to
finish
this
through
and
getting
the
community
land
trust
going
so
that
we
can
use
it
specifically
for
the
west
side
impacts
that
the
inland
port
is
going
to
give
the
residents.
G
So
those
are
my
two
starting
statements
and
I'd
open
that
for
discussion,
but
we
are
I've
been
meeting
with
several
different
non-profits
also
with
the
city
staff
and
in
order
to
discuss
the
community
land
trust
and
making
that
a
viable
option,
because
I
don't
want
to
reinvent
the
will
every
single
year
talking
about
this,
I
want
to
establish
the
community
land
trust,
so
it
is
running
on
its
own
and
it's
feeding
itself
and
growing
at
larger
and
larger
on
its
own
without
having
to
fund
it.
G
So
I
know
that
money
is
going
to
be
directly
tied
every
single
year,
but
this
is
something
that
could
absolutely
be
a
game
changer
for
affordable
housing
on
the
west
side,
as
well
as
economic
development.
There's
so
many
things
that
we
can
do
with
it.
But
we
are
just
barely
touching
the
bottom
of
the
iceberg
in
order
to
get
to
that
point,.
B
Thanks
james
chris,
do
you
have
an
answer
for
that?
Or
should
we
address
some
of
okay?
So
james
help
me
understand
it,
because
I
was
going
to
bring
that
up
because
it
doesn't
say
home
ownership
and
I
was
thinking
no,
the
northwest
quantum
funds
should
be
used
for
affordable
homeownership
in
the
in
the
west
side.
So
for
this
purpose
and
for
your
purpose
of
community
land
trust
the
community
land
trust
is
not
housed
with
within
the
rda
or
is
it
because
I
no
okay?
So
how
does
this
work
well?.
B
D
G
And
and
that's
something
that
we
can
discuss,
but
there
are
community
land
trusts
in
other
areas
that
have
been
doing
successful
development,
whether
it's
tied
to
rda
or
not,
is
something
that
I
think
that
staff
can
actually
identify
a
lot
better
than
I
can
specifically
our
our
city
council
staff.
Just
because
they've
been
involved
with
me
in
these
discussions
from
day.
One.
D
They're
they're
just
models:
there
are
models
in
different
areas
that
haven't
necessarily
been
explored
just
with
bandwidth
and
everything.
So
there
is
a
community
land
trust
line
item
that
is
located
in
hand
that
does
not
preclude
the
rda
from
participating
in
something
like
a
community
land
trust
with
city-wide
housing
or
northwest
quadrant
housing
funds,
because
as
long
as
they
operate
within
the
requirements,
the
legal
requirements
of
those
that
would
be
that
would
satisfy
that
requirement.
We've
never
done
it
before.
B
All
right
so
james,
what
you're
saying
is
stop
for
direction
for
our
staff
is
to
say,
let's
and
for
our
discussion.
Let's
not
talk
about
this
affordable
home
ownership.
At
this
point,
let's
talk
about
the
other
priorities.
G
Hey
the
rda
staff
has
done
a
magnificent
job
in
regards
to
identifying
our
silos
right
and
I
don't
feel
comfortable
at
this
point
saying
this
is
where
this
money
is
going
to
go
until
I
explore
every
single
option
in
regards
to
the
community
land
trust,
because
we've
never
done
it
and
having
this
much
money
coming
in
10
percent
of
that
coming
into
this
and
throwing
it
at
the
community
land
trust.
I
just
don't
want
to
throw
it
at
projects.
G
I
want
to
create
an
environment
where
we
are
funding
this
and
creating
affordable
and
we're
doing
affordable
rentals
as
well
as
market,
to
help
supplement
the
affordability
component
of
it.
There's
just
there's
just
so
many
options
that
we
can
do,
and
I
want
to
sit
down
with
rd
staff
and
with
city
staff
and
make
sure
that
we
are
100
on
board
with
the
community
land
trust
and
looking
how
projecting
forward
how
this
can
fund
itself.
B
G
G
1
million
is
not
sufficient
for
that.
So
I'm
just
a
little
bit
concerned
about
about
why
that
separated
out
this
year
and
and
what
is
being
contemplated
for
that
one
million
which
properties
and
it's
not.
I
don't
think
it's
the
ones.
I'm
thinking
of.
I
There
are
no
specific
properties
that
have
been
identified.
I
I
think
there
have
been
discussions
happening
on
on
various
properties,
but
nothing
has
been
solidified
by
any
means.
So
we
just
put
that
one
item
within
the
budget,
because
throughout
the
year
it
seems
like
we
do
when
they're
done
when
there
is
an
opportunity
to
purchase
a
property.
There's
a
discussion
like
where
are
we
going
to
get
the
resources?
B
I
O
Madam
chair
yeah
go
ahead
cindy,
I'm
just
I'm
wondering
you
might
just
keep
going
in
circles
on
this
because
having
this
discussion
absent
having
the
budget
in
your
hands
yet
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense
as
long
as
numbers
are
attached
to
it.
I
could
see
having
a
discussion
about
the
the
priorities
and
things,
but
I
I
think
you're
getting
wound
up
into
the
into
the
budget
piece
of
it
when
you
don't
don't
have
access
to
that
information.
O
Yet
so
that's
one
thing
and
then
the
other
thing
is,
as
the
staff
was
defining
the
role
of
the
board.
O
That
is
absolutely
the
role
of
the
board,
that's
great
and
it,
and
that
is
the
path
that
you're
on.
If
you
wanted
to
be
on
a
different
path,
that's
okay,
too,
so
so
they're,
following
up
on
the
things
that
you've
told
them
so
far,
so
the
interest
that
the
board
has
expressed
the
the
approaches.
That's
that
sort
of
thing
there
they're
bringing
that
to
you
in
a
package.
O
But
now
once
you
see
that
if
you
say
oh,
we
want
it
to
be
a
little
bit
different
or
we
want
it
to
be.
A
lot
different,
that's
still,
okay,
you
know
you
can
still
give
more
feedback
to
to
the
rda
staff
or
to
us
or
whomever
to
to
to
tweak
this
or
or
change
it
significantly.
They're,
just
trying
to
react
to
what
you've
you've
said
so
far,
so,
for
example,
councilmember
rogers
on
the
on
the
motel
piece
or
the
blighted
property
piece.
O
O
If
it's
that
you're
not
ready
to
commit
in
any
way
shape
or
form
on
the
inland
port
10,
then
you
can
do
a
straw
poll
on
that.
So
I
think
is
there
some
funding.
B
K
K
I
Correct,
yes,
we
were.
We
were
unaware
of
the
community
land
trust
discussions,
so
we
were
thinking
the
inland.
We
have
heard
that
there's
a
priority
for
inland
port
money's
to
be
used
to
help
home
ownership
and
an
adu
program
does
help
with
homeownership,
maybe
not
direct
home
ownership
to
encourage
new
homeowners
but
homeownership
and
diversifying
incomes
for
homeowners.
Providing
you
know,
another
type
of
housing
within
neighborhoods
multi-generational
housing
opportunities
that
sort
of
thing.
K
And
to
be
clear,
I
think
that
you
very
much
took
exactly
what
we
have
talked
about
in
the
past
and
tried
to
implement
that,
and
I
want
to
appreciate
you
for
that
and
the
rda
staff
for
that,
because
we
have
emphasized
that
that
10
needs
to
be
spent
on
the
west
side,
and
there
has
been.
K
There
has
been
talk
about
how
important
home
ownership
is
on
the
west
side.
So
I
appreciate
you
creatively,
thinking
about
that
and
implementing
what
we
have
talked
about.
I
also
very
much
appreciate
james
coming
up
with
this
this.
K
This
other
idea
that
I
think
is
worth
exploring
at
for
me
at
this
time
of
we've
we've
seen
that
the
community
land
trust
has
has
been
funded,
it
hasn't
utilized
the
money
that
has
been
in
those
funds,
for,
I
would
say
at
least
a
couple
of
years
at
this
point,
and
then
we
sort
of
lose
focus
on
it,
and
so
I
think
it's
an
interesting
way
to
look
at.
How
do
we?
K
Continue
ensuring
that
there
is
some
I
I
want
to
say
legacy
it's
the
only
thing
I
can
think
of
with
this
community
land
trust
right
that
there
is
a
legacy
to
it
and
there's
a
reason
that
the
inland
port,
I
mean,
there's
a
lot
of
reasons.
People
think
it
exists,
but
the
things
that
we
were
able
to
negotiate
out
of
it
have
a
purpose
and
and
a
place
to
go
without
ever
without
necessarily
needing
to
come
back
and
renegotiate
that
so
first
off.
K
K
For
trying
of
come
up
with
other
ideas
and
say,
wait,
there's
this
other
thing,
and
I
I
appreciate
this
other
avenue
to
explore
a
little
bit,
so
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
throw
that
out.
There
don't
want
you
to
think
we're,
not
appreciative
of
everything
that
that
you
really
have
taken
our
goals
and
put
them
on
paper.
B
All
right,
thanks,
amy
dan.
H
I
was
just
I
want
to
go
back
to
the
priorities
because
I
think
the
community
land
trust
I
want
to
get
into.
I
got
to
get
educated
on
that
because
I
think
what
james
is
talking
about
is
something
important,
but
it's
probably
further
than
this
quick
discussion
here
or
this
discussion
here
and
on
the
priorities
and
the
incentives
to
the
using
the
the
funding
and
getting
the
reduction
in
interest
rates.
H
H
I
first
said:
hey
the
top
six
are,
I
think,
clearly,
should
have
a
higher
incentive,
but
then
I
look
at
number
six
and
saying
everything
should
be
sustainable.
Already
our
building
coaches
say
they're
sustainable,
and
that
should
be
a
bottom
line,
no
matter
what
you're
doing
in
building
these
days,
it
has
to
be
sustainable,
so
there
shouldn't
be
an
incentive
to
that.
It
should
be
just
a
fight
out
given
for
any
loan.
H
You
have
to
have
it
sustainable,
but
I
look
at
the
top
five
and
I
go
those
those
are
key
elements
that
we've
been
talking
about:
family
housing
target
population.
We
just
talked
about
the
of
the
foster
asian
animal
foster
care,
the
missing
middle.
The
safety
like
we
talked
about
with
with
james,
was
talking
about
the
blind
side
of
the
house,
those
in
home
ownership.
H
Those
are
the
big
issues
and
we
really
need
to
incentivize
those
the
others
are
nice
to
have,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
the
incentive
needs
to
be
the
same
as
the
top,
the
top
five
and
and
that-
and
I
just
saw
that
as
the
my
first
run
at
the
at
the
incentive
side,
there's
a
requirement
side
and
then
there's
the
hey:
it's
a
nice
to
have.
If
it's
a
tiebreaker
and
number
six,
the
sustainability
got
to
have
it
right
away.
No,
no
questions
asked
that's
just
that's
just
a
ticket
to
the
to
the
party.
I
Madam
chair,
if
I,
if
I
may
clarify
the
rda,
is
currently
working
on
a
sustainability
policy
and
the
mayor's
direction
to
rda
staff
has
been
to
implement
stricter
sustainability
requirements
by
2023.
B
Chris
did
you
you're
you're
unmuted,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
you're
ready,
you
wanted
to
say
something
else,
okay,
so
I
do
like
what
dan
dugan
just
said.
I
think
the
I'm
inclined
to
you
know
to
put
prayers
on
this
first,
five
that
you
have
on
the
list,
but
maybe
bring
the
commercial
vitality
to.
B
I
don't
know
how
to
move
it
to
this
side
instead,
but
but
not
being
its
own
item.
I
think
because
of
the
project
that
we
just
saw
that
doesn't
have
that
portion
on
the
bottom
floor
in
an
area
that
needs
it.
It's
something
that
I
think
it's
important.
B
We
should
have
because,
for
example,
in
in
the
north
temple
area
that
we
have
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity,
opportunities
missed
for
businesses
where
they
don't
have
spaces
right
now
and
we're
building
there's
a
lot
of
housing
being
built,
but
not
enough
commercial
spots
to
serve
the
community.
That
will
be
that
lives
there
already
and
that
will
be
living
there.
So
I
would
like
to
move
that
over
on
that
side,
but
moving
forward.
Let's
say
we
hypothetically.
We
had
agreed
on
that
when,
how
do
you
guys
propose
when
a
project
comes
over?
B
Are
you
going
to
say
your
project
needs
to
meet
this
five
priorities
in
order
for
us
to
even
look
at
you
at
your
product
or
your
proposal,
or
are
you
going
to
divide
it
up
into
we'll?
Do
10
projects
two
family
housing,
two
target
populations
like
I'm,
not
understand
because
we
have
a
lot
of
priorities.
So
how
are
you
guys
going
to
manage
that
and
in.
I
In
the
last
couple
of
nofas
that
were
issued,
we
had
about
the
same
number
of
funding
priorities
and
we
would
rank
the
projects
against
one
another
rank
each
each
of
the
priorities
and
actually
put
together
a
matrix.
I
B
G
I
mean
this
is
just
a
hard
discussion
to
have
without
the
without
the
budget
numbers
and
and
for
me
the
priorities
might
change
depending
on
you
know
where
the
location
of
the
project
is
and-
and
you
know
where
other
things
are
panning
out
so
like
what
might
what
I
might
rank
as
number
one
today
might
not
be
number
one
in
six
months.
I
We
haven't
this
is
the
new
kind
of
strategy
that
was
set
up
through
the
newly
adopted
housing
policies,
the
housing
fund
allocation
policy
and
the
housing
development
loan
program
policy,
and
it
was
intended
to
provide
a
discussion
on
an
annual
basis,
so
you're
not
setting
priorities
in
the
policy,
because
the
policy
could
live
for
10
years
and
your
funding
priorities
can
change
over
time
based
on
the
resources
available
and
the
community
need.
I
So
it
was
meant
to
be
an
opportunity
for
you
to
fine-tune
those
policies
on
an
annual
basis
and
we
we
can
definitely
change
it
in
years.
Moving
forward.
Our
thought
process
was
that
you
are
very
busy
after
the
budget
is
announced,
so
give
you
an
opportunity
prior
to
you,
getting
the
budget
to
start
talking
about
these
funding
priorities,
recognizing
that
you
probably
would
not
adopt
them
until
after
you've
seen
and
kind
of
adopted
the
budget.
I
K
If
I
may,
madam
chair,
to
clarify,
we
just
passed
these
policies
in
february
january
and
february,
and
so
I
think
this
was
a
as
mentioned
earlier,
a
preemptive
way
to
say
we're
trying
to
follow
the
policy
before
the
budget,
and
I
think
the
idea
and
why
we
talked
about
this
last
year
with
the
policy
is
that
we,
our
priorities,
may
change
year
to
year,
and
we
didn't
we
wanted
to
create
that
space
for
flexibility
and
that,
ideally,
this
would
come
to
us
in
maybe
january
february
march,
so
that
we
could
have
these
discussions
without
the
numbers,
just
the
policy
part
of
it.
K
So
then
we
could
then
the
rda
can
staff
their
or
not
staff.
They
can
create
their
budget
based
on
what
the
council's
main
priorities
have
been.
I
think
that
was
the
intent
and
the
idea
behind
that
policy,
but
because
we
just
passed
the
policy
three
months
ago
and
it
takes,
they
have
to
transmit
things
to
us
almost
three
weeks
beforehand.
I
think
it
just
it
we're
kind
of
snowballing
all
of
the
discussions
really
quickly
right
now,
but
I
can
I
agree
chris,
I
think
there's.
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
I
would
just
like
to
agree
and
add
on
to
what
both
director,
wharton
and
fowler
just
said.
As
far
as
the
timing,
I
know
we're
kind
of
hung
up
on
the
numbers
and
where
we
want
that
to
go,
but
one
of
the
pieces
that
we
would
include
in
this
moving
forward
in
the
future
is
a
report
on
where
the
money
has
gone.
N
What
we're
seeing
in
the
market
and
then
also
as
director
fowler
said,
have
that
flexibility
to
say:
okay,
well
this
or
that
maybe
didn't
hit
the
mark
as
much
or
this
is
now
what
we
really
want
to
focus
on
this
year
and
then
you
can
adjust
and
have
those
high
level
policy
discussions
earlier
in
the
year,
so
that
we
then
can
use
that
to
inform
as
we
go
into
the
budget
working
on
that
and
then
as
part
of
the
budget.
N
O
Thank
you
and
could
I
could
I
follow
up
with
danny
on
one
part
of
that?
Just
yes
to
clarify
danny,
do
you
see,
does
it
work
for
you
that
say
something
comes
up
and
it
hasn't
been
contemplated
by
the
board
or
the
staff.
It's
new
to
the
city,
a
problem
say
some
problem
property
or
some
problem
situation
that
really
couldn't
be
foreseen.
O
N
N
No,
I
I
think
cindy
you're,
absolutely
right
and
I
think
that's
where,
as
part
of
the
policy
one
that's
why
we
we've
tried
to
set
aside
funds
for
acquisition,
because
we
know,
as
opportunities
come
up,
that
we
know
that
board
members
have
been
interested
in
potentially
pursuing.
It
would
be
nice
to
have
funds
available.
For
that.
I
think
that's
also
the
purpose
behind
that
set
aside
of
emergency
requests.
N
So
if
something
comes
in
that
either
didn't
fit
within
the
nofa
as
it
was
issued
or
a
project
came
in
like
what
we
just
saw
with
colony
b,
where
construction
costs
came
in
or
their
tax
credit
levels
changed
that
we
then
have
that
ability
to
adjust
for
that
and
then
specifically
to
your
question,
you're,
absolutely
right.
The
board
at
any
time
has
the
opportunity
to
you
know:
change
direction
with
their
policy,
amend
the
budget
allocations
or
determine
that
there's
a
different
priority
or
opportunity
or
problem
to
solve
that
they
then
want
to
say:
hey.
O
O
Yeah-
and
they
could
also
do
it-
sort
of,
in
the
reverse,
to
say
we're
going
to
allocate
zero
of
the
money
for
northwest
quadrant
right
now.
A
O
We're
going
to
allocate
80
or
50
of
the
other
monies
right
now
they
still
have
all
of
that
flexibility
you're
just
trying
to
give
them
a
structure
that
that
advances.
What
they've
been
requesting
is
is
that
right,
so
they
still
have
their
flexibility,
you're
you're,
trying
to
find
a
path,
but
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
technically
remove
their
flexibility.
Is
that
correct.
N
That
is
correct.
We're
trying
to
be
exactly
responsible
to
what
you're
saying
is
the
interest
in
maybe
taking
a
look
at
those
priorities
more
frequently
having
the
reporting
mechanisms
of
what
we
have
been
doing
and
what
the
projects
have
been
accomplishing
and
then
doing
all
that
in
a
way
that
informs
not
just
us
as
we
prepare
the
budget.
But
then,
ultimately,
the
board
approves
where
those
specific
allocations
go.
So
to
your
point,
it's
absolutely
within
you
know
the
board's
power
and
what
they've
you
know
done
at
times.
O
Yeah,
so,
ultimately,
council,
if
you,
if
you
felt
like
oh
you're,
not
ready
or
or
you
wanted
to
do
it
in
a
slightly
tweaked
way
or
something
you
just-
could
go
ahead
and
adopt
only
a
portion
of
those
funds
appropriate
only
a
portion
of
those
funds.
So
so
you
have
entire
flexibility
on
your
direction.
B
All
right,
good
to
know,
go
ahead
a
board
member
mano.
We
are
one
second,
but
before
that
we
are
at
3
41..
I
think
we
probably
want
to
have
there
and
say
what
he
needs
to
say.
We
have
a
little
discussion,
apparently
move
on
to
the
next
items.
Thanks.
F
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
a
couple
of
things
to
make
sure
I'm
understanding
the
discussion
right
so
one
we
talked
a
lot
about
the
priorities.
To
my
on
my
knowledge.
The
priorities
were
never
like
in
order
of
importance.
They
were
just
all
individually
important
priorities,
so
it
sounds
like
the
discussion
is.
Maybe
we
would
consider
ordering
them
as
cert.
Some
are
more
important
than
others
and
some
may
be
actually
absolutely
necessary
for
every
project,
but
that
would
be
new
right.
That's
not
something!
F
We've
ever
done
to
my
to
my
understanding
and
then
the
second
thing
was
with
what
board
member
rogers
was
saying
or
yeah
board
member
rogers
about
the
northwest
crowd
quadrant
that
money's
anticipat
is
contemplated
to
be
used
for
adus
and
board
members.
You're
saying
that
you
do
not
want
that
used
for
80s.
You
want
to
be
used
for
the
community
land
trust.
Is
that
understand
my
understanding
that
right?
Okay,
thanks,
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I'm
understanding.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
B
Yeah
you're
correct,
so
if
we're
not
ready
to
con
to
give
staff
direction
on
these
priorities,
we
can
think
about
this
and
talk
about
them
and
bring
you
know
come
prepared
with.
I
don't
know
for
your
top
five
or
whatever
to
discuss
next
time,
and
that
way
we
can
see
the
budget
and
see
how
that
changes,
our
thought
process
and
what
priorities
are
or
what
is
that
and.
D
B
Right
so
today
you
know
today,
obviously
you
know
we
got
a
little
bit
of
a
discussion.
I
I
know
where
dan
is.
I
know
where
james
is
on
two
two
other
priorities
here.
I
know
where
I'm
at
as
well
with
this
13
items
and
next
time,
unless
darren
chris
and
amy
would
like
to
express
where
their
heart
is
with
the
13
pairs.
Today
we
can,
if
you're,
not
ready,
we
can
skip
it
the
next
time
and
we'll
talk
again
and
go
ahead
there,
and
I
don't
see,
I
see.
F
I
I
think,
I'm
generally
still
agreeing
in
agreement
with
all
of
the
priorities,
and
I
think
some
kind
of
prioritization
or
saying
that
we
have
to
have
like
these
certain
ones
have
to
be
met
by
at
least
50
percent
of
our
projects
or
some
way
of
ensuring
that
a
few
of
them
are
met,
because
my
concern
is
similar
to
account
to
board
member
dugan's
concern.
Is
that
they're
broad
enough
to
the
point
that
any
project
could
say?
F
Well,
I
hit
five
and
twelve
because
mostly
every
project
we
that
would
come
to
us
would
hit
at
least
a
few
of
them
so
making
sure
that
there's
not
just
one
or
two
that
are
super
easy
to
hit
and
the
rest
of
them
are
really
hard.
The
developers
just
say.
Well,
I
choose
not
to
do
that
one,
and
then
we
actually
never
meet
that
priority.
That's
my
concern
so,
whether
that's
through
a
like
here's,
our
rank
or
here's,
the
three
that
every
project
has
to
have.
F
I
think
just
making
sure
that
we
are
that
the
priorities
can
all
be
met.
So
I
I
don't
necessarily
have
any
that
I
want
to
remove
or
or
anything
like
that,
but
I
just
think
there's
some
that
are
harder
to
get
than
others
that
we
might
not
get
unless
we
have
a
way
of
prioritizing.
B
B
B
Okay,
then,
we'll
skip
that
portion.
We're
going
to
go
to
item
number
five
report:
announcements
from
rda
staff.
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
just
two
quick
announcements,
because
I
know
we're
running
over
time.
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
announce
the
promotion
of
cara
linsley,
a
project
manager
with
the
agency
she's,
been
promoted
to
the
senior
project
manager,
role,
kara's
been
with
the
agency,
I
think,
just
over
six
and
a
half
years,
and
she
is
currently
in
the
program
at
the
u
for
the
masters
of
public
policy.
N
So
we
are
pleased
to
announce
that
promotion
and
then
second,
I'd
like
to
thank
you,
madam
chair
and
director
fowler,
as
well
as
the
mayor
for
attending
the
opening
of
spyhop,
and
thank
you
to
the
the
board
for
all
the
support
of
the
project
over
the
years.
For
those
who
may
not
have
read
about
it
or
understand,
spy
op
is
the
youth
media
arts
center
within
the
central
ninth
neighborhood.
N
N
It
has
worked
through
the
rda
all
the
way
from
the
beginning
of
acquisition
of
the
site
to
environmental,
cleanup
disposition,
fundraising
and
financing
throughout
that
entire
process.
There
have
been
a
few
rda
staff
members
who
have
been
involved
in
this
from
the
beginning,
as
far
as
laying
out
the
plan
for
central,
ninth
and
then
acquiring
the
sites,
but
our
deputy
tammy
hunsaker
was
the
project
manager
for
the
project
as
it
got
over
the
final
big
steps
in
terms
of
the
cleanup
and
then
disposition
of
the
property
and
everything.
N
So
thank
you
all
for
attending
that
and
the
support.
That's
that's
a
really
cool
project
that
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
gave
a
little
bit
more
time
to
and
thanked
everyone
on
our
end
who
was
involved
in
it.
So,
unfortunately,
tammy
wasn't
able
to
attend
the
ceremony.
So
part
of
this
was
to
make
sure
that
she
got
some
some
props
here
in
the
public
meeting.
B
Absolutely
it's
amazing.
Thank
you!
So
much
it's
been
a
long
time
coming,
but
really
you
guys
have
worked
so
hard
on
it
so
and
and
previous
board
members
for
working
through
the
financing
and
approving
such
an
awesome
project.
So
thank
you
guys,
thank
you,
tammy!
Thank
you
danny
and
the
rest
of
the
staff.
It's
that
we
know
one
of
the
the
puzzle
pieces
that,
finally
it's
there
in
that
neighborhood,
so
I'm
I'm
super
excited
to
see
that
alive.
N
Thank
you.
That
is
all
we
have,
so
thank
you,
man,
I'm
sharing
the
board.
B
All
right,
so
you
know
we
have
a
written
briefing.
Hopefully
you
guys
saw
it
and
then
we
are
the
number
e
and
then
we
don't
have
any
any
items
or
numbers.
Oh,
do
we
have
a
closed
session?
I'm
not
aware
of,
but
do
we
nope?
Okay?
B
Then
it's
3
48
we're
going
to
adjourn
this
meeting,
and
so
I
forgot
do
we
need
to
roll
call
this.
So
we
need
to
have
a
motion
fracture
no
right,
okay!
So,
madam
chair
of
the
council,
what
time
would
you
like
us
back.
K
I
know
we
are
running
late,
but
luckily
the
first
three
items
on
our
agenda
shouldn't
take
too
too
long,
so
I
would
like
a
quick
five
to
seven
minute
break.
So
all
right
is
that.