►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 2/2/21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Although
conducting
our
meetings
is
different,
I'm
going
to
take
this
line
out
of
the
script,
because
at
this
point
a
year
later,
it's
not
really
that
different.
I
mean
it
certainly
is
different,
but
we're
getting
used
to
it.
So,
even
though
we
are
electronic,
this
is
still
an
open
meeting
and
it's
open
to
the
public,
and
we
encourage
you
to
join
us
for
our
work
session.
We
have
a
formal
session
later
this
evening
at
seven
o'clock.
A
A
As
many
of
you
know,
there
is
no
public
comment
during
a
work
session,
but,
as
I
mentioned,
we
do
have
our
formal
session
at
7
00
pm,
and
we
will
be
taking
comments
at
that
time
during
our
general
comment
period.
However,
if
you
do
have
feedback,
it
is
always
welcome.
We
encourage
feedback
and
when
you
can
reach
us
at
the
city,
you
can
reach
the
city
council
anytime
by
mailing
us
at
p.o
box,
one
four,
five:
four:
seven:
six
salt
lake
city,
utah,
84114
or
emailing
us
at
council
dot
comments,
slc
gov,
dot
com.
A
You
can
also
call
our
24
hour
phone
comment
line
at
801,
535
five.
Four.
Now
we
will
move
on
to
our
first
agenda
item.
Our
first
agenda
item
is
updates
from
the
administration
mayor.
I
will
go
ahead
and
turn
the
time
over
to
you
again,
thank
you
for
being
here
and
for
always
joining
us
at
our
council
meetings.
We
appreciate
it
so
the
floor
is
yours.
Mayor.
B
Thanks,
madam
chair,
happy
tuesday
city
council,
I
believe
at
the
top
of
our
our
normal
update,
we're
going
to
do
the
covet,
update
and
lisa
schaefer
is
going
to
do
that
and
then
I'll
go
into
a
homeless
update
after
that.
C
C
They
are
making
outreach
to
determine
how
those
how
they
can
reach
the
remainder
of
that
initial
group
and
then
they're
also
beginning
outreach
to
determine
how
city
employees
who
may
meet
the
definition
of
k-12
staff
can
receive
a
vaccine
if
the
supply
has
not
already
been
allocated
and
for
more
information
about
the
actual
rollout
of
the
vaccinations
residents
can
visit,
coronavirus.utah.gov,
backslash
vaccine
dash
distribution,
it's
a
mouthful
and
so
far
with
city
employees.
C
C
As
of
this
time,
we
have
950
of
our
eligible
employees
that
have
utilized
the
emergency
responder
pandemic.
Leave
we've
been
calling
it
erpl
if
you're
used
to
us,
calling
it
that
and
215
of
our
employees
have
utilized
the
emergency
pandemic
leave.
This
was
the
federal
aid
offered
to
employees
nationwide.
C
So
that's
1165
of
our
total
eligible
employees
have
used
some
kind
of
pandemic
leave,
which
equates
to
about
34
just
over
34
percent
of
our
total
employees.
So
that's
it
for
covent
and
vaccinations
unless
you
have
any
questions
I'll
pass
it
back
to
the
mayor
mayor.
A
If
I
may
just
really
quickly,
I
I
think
it
would
be
good
for
us,
as
council
members
that
have
facebook
pages
or
our
email
blasts,
to
get
some
of
that
vaccine
information
lisa
and
maybe
put
it
on
our
city
council
webpage
and
facebook
and
kind
of
get
that
information
out
there.
So
I
know
we
could
probably
all
find
it,
but
it's
nice
to
make
sure
that
we're
trying
to
keep
our
constituents
educated
on
this.
A
A
B
No
apology
necessary
I'll
move
on
to
our
homelessness
update
and
I'm
gonna
start
with
a
link
in
the
chat.
I
hope
that's
the
right
link.
I
think
it
is
because
yesterday
folks
from
our
administration,
hosted
an
ama
on
homelessness
and
answered
a
lot
of
questions
and
beliefs
that
are
in
the
community,
so
I
encourage
you
to
share
it.
B
If
you
want
it,
hopefully
you
had
a
chance
to
watch
it
or
you
can
check
it
out,
because
I
think
it
goes
into
great
depth
that
it's
in
in
that
unique
format
that
we
really
need
to
get
out
some
of
the
realities
of
what
we're
doing
to
the
public.
So
our
work,
as
you
know,
is
always
to
make
homelessness
rare
brief
and
non-recurring
and
at
the
same
time,
to
keep
our
public
spaces
clean
and
safe
and
accessible
for
everyone.
B
So
one
of
the
pieces
of
work
around
transparency
and
providing
more
transparency
in
the
homelessness
services
system
is
this
dashboard
that
we've
been
working
on
and
council
members.
I
don't
know
if
you've
seen
it
yet,
but
I'm
going
to
put
that
in
the
chat
right
now-
and
I
remember
as
a
council
member
when
the
homeless
resource
centers
were
cited,
that
we
talked
about
the
desire
to
have
one
place.
One
website
online
that
would
have
continuously
updated
numbers
about
beds
available,
and
so
I'm
really
excited
that.
B
Now
we
actually
have
as
close
to
that
as
we
can,
given
that
the
city
doesn't
own
or
operate
the
homeless
resource
centers
bed
availability
is
on
that
dashboard,
it's
updated
as
it
becomes
available
from
the
utah
homeless
management,
information
system
or
hemis.
B
I'm
understanding
today
that
they
haven't
updated
it
since
the
28th,
but
as
soon
as
it
gets
updated
it
gets
onto
our
website
and
that
the
website,
the
dashboard,
includes
the
obviously
the
shelter
capacity,
transportation,
contact,
information,
storage.
You
know
where
people
this
place
for
your
stuff
information
and
also
where
a
map
of
where
the
city
has
received
calls
for
service
related
to
homelessness,
and
it
goes
back
30
days
90
days
and
it
distinguishes
those.
So
you
can
kind
of
see
where
the
community
is
asking
for
assistance.
B
We
wish
that
we
could
provide
real-time
shelter
numbers,
but
the
way
that
the
resource
centers
manage
the
walk-in
beds
and
the
case-managed
beds
makes
that
impossible
for
them
to
give
real-time
numbers.
So
the
best
we're
doing
the
best
we
can
do
is
to
get
this
percentage
of
available
beds
for
the
previous
night
and
that's
what
that
chart
shows.
B
It's
important
that
and
you'll
see
that
on
the
chart,
it
doesn't
reflect
every
bed
in
the
entire
system.
B
It
doesn't
include
the
milk
creek,
temporary
winter
housing,
location
or
the
salt
lake
city,
temporary
winter
housing
location
which
together
are
about
210
beds,
in
addition
to
the
ones
that
you
see
on
the
dashboard
there's
also
detox
and
treatment
treatment
beds
available
that
our
outreach
workers
can
offer
people
to
get
to,
and
I'm
we're
hearing
from
our
county
partners
recently
that
there's
quite
a
bit
of
availability
with
detox
at
the
time
at
this
moment,
if
there
aren't
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
daughter.
B
B
She
brings
me
things
if
there
are
questions,
I'm
happy
to
take
it.
Otherwise,
I
want
to
talk
to
you
about
the
large
encampments
and
cdc
guidelines.
Is
that?
Okay?
Madam
cherry.
A
Of
course,
let
me
council
members:
are
there
any
questions
for
the
mayor
just
on
that
first
part
with
that
she
spoke
about
excellent
yeah.
Please.
B
B
We
have
consistently
over
the
last
couple
of
months,
especially
since
the
community
commitment
program
received
comments
about
wondering
about
the
cdc
guidelines
regarding
leaving
unsheltered,
homeless
encampments
in
place
and
early
in
the
pandemic.
We
started
coordinating
with
our
meeting
with
our
outreach
partners
and
the
county
counterparts
to
talk
about
what
our
plan
was
going
to
be
for
response
to
homelessness
and
our
covet
in
the
homeless
community.
B
B
Other
important
member
measures
are
suggested,
including
an
emphasis
on
connecting
people
to
housing
and
shelter
options
and
using
quarantine
and
isolation
facilities
which,
as
you
know,
have
been
operating
in
the
city
since
the
summer.
Other
important
guidelines
that
we've
been
following
and
we're
using
to
assess
the
risk
of
large
encampments
include
these
three
things.
B
The
balance
of
these
risks
when
addressing
options
for
decreasing
covet
19
spread.
So
those
who
are
experiencing
unsheltered
homelessness
face
several
risks
to
their
health
and
safety,
and
our
partners
at
the
health
department
are
weighing
those
different
risks,
we're
also
discouraging
clients
from
spending
time
in
crowded
places
or
just
or
gathering
in
large
groups,
for
example,
at
locations
where
food,
water
or
hygiene
supplies
are
being
distributed
and
encouraging
those
staying
in
encampments
to
set
up
their
tents
and
sleeping
quarters
with
at
least
12
feet
by
12
feet
of
space
per
individual,
the
county
health
department.
B
With
our
support
and
service
provider,
support
has
been
consistent
in
determining
that
large
encampments
often
pose
a
greater
public
safety
and
health
risk
to
campers
because
of
the
biowaste
the
garbage
and
discarded
drug
paraphernalia
that
are
in
the
area.
Those
immediate
risks
and
large
encampments
are
more
critical
and
small
encampments
don't
pose
as
large
of
a
risk
often,
and
we-
those
are
often
left
alone,
other
than
service
provider
outreach
with
the
individuals
there.
B
So
we
hope
that
this
helps
to
clear
up
how
we've
been
working
with
our
partners
to
evaluate
those
cdc
guidelines
and
try
to
make
the
best
health
decision
in
terms
of
operations
whether
it's
strictly
service
engagement
or
the
health
department
goes
ahead
with
a
camp
abatement.
Are
there
any
questions
about
that.
D
B
Yes,
so
great
point
councilmember
and
when
I
mentioned
very
vaguely
that
balancing
of
other
risks
when
addressing
options
for
decreasing
the
spread,
the
there,
the
several
risk
factors
to
health
and
safety,
definitely
include
the
attraction
of
rodents
that
can
also
spread
other
health
risks
to
the
population.
B
And
you,
as
you
know,
that
the
county
with
the
animal
services
are
also
our
partners
with
that.
Their
other
hat
on
in
dealing
with
that
human
interface.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
have
one
more
item
on
homelessness
around
camp
last
hope.
If
you're
ready
for
me
to
go
there.
B
B
Our
team
has
been
working
directly
with
the
camp
organizers
to
keep
them
informed
of
the
plans
for
closure
and
make
sure
that
the
people
in
the
camp
have
plenty
of
time
to
remove
any
of
the
belongings
they
want
to
take
with
them.
So
it'll
be
closed
to
camping,
beginning
tomorrow,
but
the
abatement
has
been
briefly
postponed
until
thursday
and
that
will
allow
people
to
remove
their
belongings
before
the
area
is
cleaned
and
that
again
was
part
of
the
collaborative
work
that
we've
been
doing
with
the
organizers.
B
D
I
have
one
question
about
last
hope:
where
are
they?
What
are
do
they
I
mean:
where
do
they
go
to
to
relieve
themselves
at
that
camp?
Is
that
also
part
of
the
problem?
There's
no
bathrooms
in
that
camp.
B
E
Sorry,
I'm
faceless
for
a
second.
I
was
just
down
there
this
morning
and
the
bathrooms
are
there
and
advantage
services
is
still
on
site.
F
A
And
in
this
collaborative
effort
with
the
camp
organizers,
is
there
a
plan
for
where
people
are
going
to
go
once
camp
hope
is
closed?.
B
Yeah,
so
the
service
providers
have
been
consistently
trying
to
connect
and
working
to
connect
people
in
the
camp,
with
shelter,
options
or
housing
options
and
with
the
resource
fair.
Today
and
tomorrow,
those
options
are
still
out
there
on
the
table,
for
people
who
want
to
go
into
shelter
or
perhaps
into
detox
or
whatever
their
particular
needs
are,
so
that
those
connections
have
been
consistent.
A
Any
other
questions
or
comments
from
council
members,
okay
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
you.
Madame.
B
I
wondered
if
you
might
allow
me
to
read
what
is,
I
hope
to
be
a
joint
resolution
with
the
council
that
recognizes
salt
lake
city
police
department's
hostage
negotiation,
team
and
community
connection
center
director
and
social
worker
jessica
waters.
B
A
Please
madame
I,
I
don't
know
that
we
have
gotten
back
to
you,
but
I
do
anticipate
that
this
will
be
a
joint
resolution.
We've
heard
from
council
members-
and
so
yes,
we
just
haven't
it-
had
a
chance
to
touch
the
face
before
the
the
meeting
started.
B
Great,
do
you
mind
if
I
go
ahead?
B
B
Only
response
to
crisis
and
whereas
jessica
waters
serves
as
the
director
of
the
salt
lake
city
police
department's
community
connection
center
and
leads
a
team
of
social
workers
who
work
directly
with
the
public
and
whereas,
as
a
trained
social
worker.
Director
waters
has
vast
expertise
working
with
people
experiencing
life
challenges
and
mental
health
crises.
A
Thank
you
mayor,
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
they
I
truly
appreciate
that
the
team
and
jessica
waters
she
certainly
the
whole
team,
really
works
hard
for
our
residents
and
jessica
has
such
a
passion
for
what
she
is
doing
with
her
role
as
the
director
of
the
social
services
social
worker
there
with
that
department
and
had
a
wonderful
opportunity
to
meet
in
a
small
group
with
her,
and
then
we
had
a
briefing
a
few
weeks
ago
and
just
a
lot
of
passion
coming
out
of
that
department
to
really
keep
our
residents
safe
in
all
aspects,
I
think
as
much
as
possible.
A
So
thank
you
mary.
I
appreciate
that
all
right.
Any
further
updates
mayor
for
that
agenda.
Item
number
one.
H
Thank
you
thanks,
madam
chair
could.
Could
we
give
sergeant
givens
a
moment
to
to
recognize
his
team.
A
I
No
worries,
madam
council
person.
Excuse
me
first
and
foremost,
thank
you
this.
This
is
a
very
kind
gesture.
It's
very
timely
and
it's
been
very
well
received
by
members
of
my
team.
So
thank
you
for
taking
your
time
to
honor
us
today,
as
you
laid
out
in
that
proclamation,
it
was
very
detailed
and
very
accurate.
There
were
many
members
of
our
agency
that
were
on
that
scene
and
it's
important
to
acknowledge
their
actions
as
well
with
both
patrol
the
tactical
swat
team,
also
the
public
relations
unit.
They
were
all
there.
I
We
all
had
the
common
goal
of
working
towards
peace.
That's
the
important
thing
I
do
credit
our
success
to
patients,
persistence
and
professionalism
and,
as
stated
in
the
proclamation,
there
were
some
standouts.
So
again,
I'd
like
to
echo
what
you
said
director
waters
is
fantastic
she's
great
to
work
with.
I
She
took
this
on
head
on,
had
no
hesitation
jumping
in
that
seat
and
was
exactly
what
we
needed
in
that
situation
was
able
to
say
the
same
things
that
detective
taylor
was
saying
as
a
police
officer,
but
able
to
reach
because
didn't
have
that
law
enforcement
perspective
there.
So
it
was,
it
was
just
a
great
situation,
all
around
one
other
person
that
deserves
credit
is
lieutenant
diamond
for
thinking.
I
Long
term
he's
a
he's,
a
an
experienced
negotiator,
but
also
an
experienced
tactician,
and
you
know
he
kind
of
saw
something
like
this
coming
in
the
future
and
was
the
one
to
introduce
and
to
bring
jessica
to
the
team.
So
not
all
law
enforcement
agencies
have
this
resource,
we're
very
lucky
in
salt
lake
city,
and
that
is
due
to
the
leadership
of
lieutenant
diamond
and
just
so.
Everyone
is
aware:
my
team
loves
their
job.
They
are
fully
invested
in
effective
communication.
I
They
go
the
extra
mile,
they
love
to
de-escalate
the
impossible
and
help
bring
back
perspective
and
create
opportunities.
So
it's
important
that
you
know
this
is
what
we
train
for
and
we're
going
to
be
ready.
The
next
time
you
call
thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you
for
your
acknowledgement.
I
really
feel
privileged
to
represent
the
full
membership
of
my
team
and
to
receive
this
honor
from
you.
So
I
sincerely
hope
you
all
are
as
proud
of
my
folks
as
I
am
of.
B
Them,
madam
chair,
may
I
well
said
mason,
I'm
so
proud
of
you
and
your
team,
and
I
think
what
we
haven't
said,
which
should
be
abundantly
clear.
Is
this
a
part
of
the
evolution
of
salt
lake
city
police
department?
This
is
what
makes
our
department
the
best
department
in
the
state
of
utah,
if
not
beyond,
because
this
is
what
we
go.
This
is
what
we're
working
for.
How
do
we
get
more
peaceful
resolution?
How
do
we
get
better
at
de-escalating?
B
Let's
have
someone
who's
a
social
worker
who's,
not
a
law
enforcement
officer
officer
to
change,
train
to
negotiation
and
be
able
to
come
into
these
highly
volatile
situations,
and
I'm
just
really
proud
of
the
department
and
everybody
on
your
team
for
seeing
that
need
and
then
getting
the
training
making
it
happen
and
making
all
the
difference
in
the
world
for
the
kids
and
the
parent.
In
that
situation.
A
A
H
Actually,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
but
I
think
the
legislative
update
is
a
little
bit
further
down
on
the
agenda,
so
I
will
wait
for
my
turn.
Thanks.
A
You're
welcome
and
it
is,
but
I
didn't
know
if
you
had
something
special
planned
for
us.
So,
okay
with
that,
we
will
go
to
the
second
agenda
item
which
is
updates
on
racial
equity
and
policing,
and
we
have
kira
and
then
I
believe,
kira
luke
from
the
council
staff
and
then
I
believe
ben
lucky
will
have
some
report
after
kira
as
well.
So
karen
the
floor
is
yours.
C
All
right,
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
just
keep
the
council
in
the
loop.
The
racial
equity
and
policing
commission
will
next
be
meeting
as
subcommittees
tomorrow,
wednesday
february
3rd.
The
policies
and
practices
subcommittee
meets
at
4
pm,
as
does
the
school
safety
subcommittee.
There's
also
a
training
subcommittee
that
meets
at
5
pm.
C
C
In
the
meantime,
the
commission's
facilitators
are
working
on
responses
to
all
the
questions
they
receive
from
the
public
during
the
listening
session
when
the
compiled
questions
and
answers
are
complete,
we'll
send
that
to
the
council
and
it'll
also
be
posted
online
for
the
public
staff
is
also
coordinating
an
opportunity
this
month
for
the
police
department,
budget
audit
consultant
to
brief
the
racial
equity
and
policing
commission.
The
final
scheduling
for
that
will
be
up
to
the
commission,
but
we'll
keep
the
council
posted
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
ben
for
an
update
on
the
audit.
J
J
J
A
Let's
see
we
have.
I
item
number
three,
which
is
our
state
legislative
briefing.
I
see
kate
bradshaw
joined
us
and
I
don't
know
rachel
you're
there.
You
are
you're
here
as
well,
so
I
don't
know
you
want
me
to
turn
it
over
to
you,
kate
or
to
rachel.
So
you
guys
flip
a
coin
and
decide.
H
H
So
I
just
wanted
to
go
through
a
few
subject
matters
and
can
jump
in
particularly
on
the
law
enforcement
issues
that
she's
much
more
in
tune
with
than
I
am
so
on
the
on
the
affordable
housing
front.
The
mayor
testified
this
morning
in
support
of
a
30
million
appropriations
request
for
affordable
housing
projects.
That
was
that
is
brought
by
senator
kitten
and
representative
collard.
H
Our
community
and
neighborhoods
policy
team
is
monitoring
the
two
accessory
dwelling
unit
bills
that
have
been
introduced
that
I
know
that
council
has
been
paying
attention
to
as
well.
Those
are
hb
82
and
hb
273,
so
hp,
273.
Just
came
out
yesterday,
so
I
don't
think
that
we've
done
a
lot
of
engagement
on
that
yet,
but
hb
82
is
something
that's
being
thoroughly
worked
on
by
the
utah
league
of
cities
and
towns,
and
the
community
and
neighborhoods
team
has
also
provided
comments.
Technical
comments
on
various
components
of
that
bill,
with
with
council's
input.
H
So
the
single
family
is
in
the
land,
use
the
loan
program,
that's
contemplated
in
that
bill
and
the
impact
fee
component.
So
we
will
continue
to
monitor
and
recommend
some
reasonable
amendments
to
that
bill
to
try
to
balance
the
needs
of
our
existing
neighborhoods
with
the
need
that
we
have
for
affordable
housing.
So
it's
not
a
it's,
not
always
the
easiest
balance,
but
we
appreciate
your
engagement
on
that
topic
and
your
feedback
on
that
bill.
So
far,
we'll
keep
you
posted
on
developments
with
hp,
273
as
well.
H
The
housing
affordability
commission
bill
and
the
homelessness
of
the
state
homeless
officer
bill
are
supposed
to
be
released.
This
week
they
haven't
been
really
publicly
released.
Yet
I
know
that
councilmember
johnston
is
involved
with
a
commission
on
housing,
affordability
and
is
probably
well
aware
of
the
components
of
that
bill,
but
we
will
monitor
and
we'll
look
forward
to
seeing
precisely
the
language
and
the
the
various
provisions
in
those
bills
and,
as
always,
we'll
continue
to
advocate
for
more
state
investments
into
affordable
housing
and
homeless
services.
H
K
Sure
can
you
hear
me?
Okay
with
my
mask
yes,
okay,
I'm
so
in
keeping
with
the
requirements
will
keep
the
mask
on
unless
it
becomes
too
hard
to
hear
me,
there
are
a
lot
of
law
enforcement
bills
that
have
been
introduced.
It
is
by
far
the
largest
category
of
bills
introduced
this
year
and
on
any
particular
slice
of
law
enforcement.
K
K
There
is
some
effort
by
both
the
house
and
the
senate
to
group
bills
together
and
so
that,
if
they're
all
dealing
with
the
same
topic
say,
for
instance,
de-escalation,
training
that
they
all
are
are
in
the
same
committee
hearing
together,
so
that
they
can
advance
one
of
the
bills
that
makes
you
makes
the
most
sense
rather
than
all
of
the
bills,
so
that
that
process,
that
kind
of
sifting
of
grouping
the
bills
into
the
different
law
enforcement
subcategories
is
is
actively
taking
place.
K
There
are
a
handful
of
bills.
I
thought
I
would
quickly
highlight
for
you
that
I
think
would
be
of
interest
to
you.
Some
of
these
we've
we've
covered
in
other
meetings,
but
I
think
they
speak
to
some
of
the
priorities
for
salt
lake
city.
The
first
is
sb13
law
enforcement,
internal
investigation
requirements
by
senator
ivamoto.
K
The
city
is
in
a
support
position
and
it
deals
with
finishing
the
investigations
of
any
officer
so
that
if
they
were
to
leave
and
go
to
a
different
police
department,
those
records
and
things
like
that
would
which
would
follow
with
them
and
any
of
those
issues
would
be
complete
in
the
record.
K
The
next
hb
84
use
of
force
reporting
amendments
by
representative
romero,
so
he's
in
a
support
position.
This
one
would
allow
for
the
collection
of
better
data
on
use
of
force
so
that
everyone
is
using
the
same
fbi
standards
in
reporting
that
data
on
use
of
force.
K
Two
more
in
the
law
enforcement
category,
hb
264
law
enforcement
weapons
use
amendments
again
by
representative
romero,
with
a
support
position,
and
this
one
would
deal
with
reforms
on
transparency
and
reporting
whenever
an
officer
points
their
their
gun
or
their
taser
at
a
person.
And
then
finally,
last
one-
and
this
one
is-
is
something
I
think
the
city
is
probably
excited
about
and
has
been
very
supportive
of
sb
102
peace
officer,
training
qualifications
sponsored
by
senator
main.
K
They
have
people
that
are
in
that
legal
resident
category
haven't
been
able
to
join
the
police
department,
they
can
join
the
military,
but
not
the
police
department,
and
so
there
are
some
individuals
that
have
been
interested
in
in
doing
so,
and
this
there's
also
an
amendment
coming.
That
would
also
include
police
dispatchers
being
able
to
be
legal
residents
and
and
join
the
department.
H
I
I
don't
want
to
go
into
great
detail
about
a
bunch
of
land
use
issues,
but
I
do
want
to
flag
for
you
two
pretty
concerning
billboard
bills,
that
we
are
tracking
they're
they're,
both
in
the
senate
and
one
just
came
out
yesterday.
So
again,
there
haven't.
H
There
hasn't
been
a
lot
of
engagement
on
the
bill
that
came
out
yesterday,
specifically,
but
just
in
brief
between
the
two
bills,
they
would
essentially
remove
all
authority
that
a
government
entity
has
to
regulate
billboards
or
even
require
permits
for
any
upgrades,
including
digitizing
billboards,
so
they,
as
you
know,
billboards
already
have
more
rights
than
any
other
land
use
in
utah,
but
don't
pay
any
property
taxes,
and
this
would
give
them
even
more
super
special
property
rights.
H
Salt
lake
city
has
over
200
billboards,
mostly
located
in
central
city
in
the
northwestern
part
of
the
city,
so
we're
obviously
worried
that
if
these
legislative
efforts
are
successful,
all
of
these
billboards
would
have
the
right
to
digitize
without
any
restrictions,
and
this
could
definitely
have
some
pretty
serious
impacts
on
quality
of
life
for
a
lot
of
our
residents
residents,
particularly
residents,
who
are
finding
new
homes
in
quickly
developing
areas
of
our
city
and
central
city,
where
we're
seeing
dense
residential
development.
H
A
Those
again,
I
don't
see
any
hands,
but
I
do
appreciate
that
update
and
certainly
appreciate
us
paying
attention
to
those
billboard
potential.
Sorry,
those
billboard
bills,
and
I
would
encourage
if
council
members
have
not
seen
the
billboard
map
that
was
emailed
out
to
us.
A
It
is
public
information,
it's
something
that
if
constituents
are
interested
in
where
billboards
are,
I
think
I
was
checking
it
out
the
other
day
and
it
is
quite
interesting,
obviously
there's
a
lot
of
billboards
along
our
freeways,
but
there
are
quite
a
bit
of
billboards
in
areas
that
I
would
say,
don't
have
as
high
as
high
of
maybe
property
taxes
as
other
areas,
which
is
an
interesting
equity
question
as
rachel
brought
up,
and
so
I
would
encourage
you
to
all
look
at
that.
A
Billboard,
map
and
kind
of
pay
attention
to
these
these
bills
as
well.
Obviously,
if
there's
any
questions
from
council
members
that
come
up,
I'm
offering
rachel
and
kate
to
their
services
to
answer
those
questions
and,
of
course,
all
of
the
other
lobbyists
that
we
have
working
with
us,
but
particularly
kate,
can
point
us
in
the
right
directions.
If
you
have
questions.
E
All
right,
madam
chair,
could
I
go
back
to
the
law
enforcement
discussion
for
a
quick
sec.
E
Let
me
know
when
we're
ready.
I
know
there
is
a
bill
proposed
to
increase
the
minimum
educational
standards
for
public
employees.
I
think
in
general
does
that
come
out
or
do
we
know
details
on
it
yet.
K
Yes,
that
bill
has
come
out
and
it's
been
significantly
modified.
Actually,
the
the
league
of
cities
and
towns
led
negotiations
on
that
issue,
and
so
the
minimum
education
standards
are
now
focused
on
on
the
state,
and
then
the
state
department
of
human
resources
is
supposed
to
create
some
guides
that
local
governments
can
use
if
they
want
to.
So
that's
that's
what
involved
in
the
substitute
bill.
It
is
representative
thurston
that
is
carrying
that
bill.
A
Kate,
if
you
have
a
second,
I
don't
know
if
everyone's
aware
of
what
that
bill
originally
stated.
If,
if
you
could,
maybe
give
just
a
little
background
quickly
on
that,
if
you
have
a
moment.
K
Sure
I'm
just
pulling
it
up
real
quick,
so
it's
hb
139,
if
you,
if
you
want
to
to
find
it
on
the
tracker,
so
originally
it
would
have
required
minimum
would
have
said
you
can't
have
these
minimum
education
standards
so
for
some
of
your
departments
that
maybe
require
engineering
backgrounds
in
the
public
utilities
or
arena
things
like
that
that
that
probably
would
have
created
a
significant
burden
so
that
you
could
ensure
that
you
got
qualified
people.
K
You
know
I
think
representative
thurston's
policy
perspective
is
that
if
people
can
prove
they
can
do
the
job
via
training
or
background
or
other
things
that
he
wants
to
to
not
to
lower
barriers
to
entry
of
various
jobs.
But
there
was
general
concern.
I
think,
on
the
part
of
local
governments
that
there
are
qualifications,
standards
and
education
standards,
often.
C
A
A
A
All
right,
we
are
on
agenda
item
number
four.
This
is
a
zoning
amendment
at
lincoln
street
and
200
south.
It
looks
like
I
have
brian
fulmer
from
our
council
office
and
kelsey
landquist,
the
senior
planner
plus
other
members
of
can
and
planning
so
I'll
turn
it
over
first
to
brian
and
we'll
go
from
there
thanks
brian.
I
These
this
rezone
request
is
for
properties
at
159,
south
lincoln
street,
which
is
approximately
9,
45
east,
and
also
properties
at
949,
955,
959
and
963,
east
200,
south.
So
they're
on
the
corner
of
lincoln
street
and
200
south.
The
applicant
is
requesting
amendments
to
the
zoning
map
and
central
community
master
plan.
Future
land
use
map
from
the
current
r2,
which
is
single
and
2
family,
residential
zoning
to
rmf
35
or
moderate
density.
Multi-Family
residential
zoning.
I
The
property
owners
are
requesting
these
changes
because
they
stated
they
would
like
to
have
more
flexibility
in
developing
future
multi-family
housing
with
greater
density
and
height
than
is
currently
allowed
under
the
existing
zoning.
Under
the
proposed
plan,
the
existing
structures
on
the
parcels
would
be
removed
for
the
new
building.
F
Good
afternoon,
can
the
presentation
be
pulled.
F
F
Okay,
as
brian
mentioned,
this
is
a
proposal
which
includes
two
requests:
the
first
to
amend
the
zoning
map
designation
from
r2,
which
is
the
single
and
two
family
residential
to
rmf
35,
which
is
a
moderate
density,
residential
multi-family
zoning
district,
and
the
second
request
is
to
amend
the
central
community
master
plan.
Future
land
use
map
from
low
density
residential,
which
is
designated
as
1
to
15
dwelling
units
per
acre
to
medium
density,
residential,
which
is
designated
as
15
to
30
dollar
units
per
acre.
F
F
Thank
you.
The
existing
zoning
is
r2,
as
the
image
illustrates.
The
subject
area
consists
of
a
variety
of
residential
zoning
districts.
The
primary
land
uses
that
surround
the
subject.
Properties
include
single-family,
residential
low-scale
multi-family
and
some
moderate
scale.
Multi-Family,
the
multi-family
structures
are
located
along
200
south
as
well
as
1000
east.
The
intensity
of
land
uses
fluctuates
along
200
south
generally.
The
more
intense
uses
are
located
closer
to
7th
east
corridor,
with
smaller
scaled
and
less
intense
residential
uses,
moving
east
towards
1000
east
next
slide.
Please.
F
F
F
F
A
Real
quick,
you
might
have
said
this
and
I
missed
it.
What
is
the
height?
Is
the
height
35
feet
on
the
rmf
35?
Hence
the
35.
A
I
A
No,
please
thank
you.
I'm
happy
to
have
the
applicant
join
us
with
her
presentation
this
time.
I
think
generally,
we
give
about
five
minutes
for
applicants,
so
if
we
can
get
that
time
frame,
that'd
be
great,
but.
G
Hello,
everybody,
my
name
is
chowi
hoy
and
thank
you
for
your
time
today.
Next
slide,
please.
G
So,
as
kelsey
mentioned,
our
proposal
is
to
change
the
current
r2
zone
to
rmf
35.
This
will
allow
us
to
go
from
five
existing
single-family
homes
to
16
multi-family
units
kelsey
mentioned
15.
We
are
300
square
feet
short
about
and
the
the
property
adjacent
to
us.
They
actually
are
willing
to
work
with
us
on
giving
us
the
300
square
feet
for
the
16
units.
G
This
is
a
rendering
of
what
we
would
like
to
build
next
slide.
So
why
be
a
proponent
of
this
request?
There
are
currently
nine
units
within
those
five
single-family
homes,
and
this
proposal
will
move
that
to
16
energy-efficient
town
homes.
It's
an
increase
of
the
housing
stock
of
either
seven
units.
If
nothing
is
done
currently
from
those
nine
units
today
to
11
units,
because
there's
also
consideration
for
us
to
just
rebuild
anyway.
G
If
this
proposal
does
not
go
through,
and
so,
if
it's
left
as
an
r2,
we
would
demo
and
then
just
rebuild
the
five
units.
So
the
minimum
gain
is
seven
units
and
the
likely
gain
is
11
units
of
housing
stock.
Currently
we
can
get
market
rate
rent
for
what
is
there,
which
is
2200
to
2600
a
house.
Our
original
proposal
was
to
set
aside
one
designated
affordable
housing
unit.
G
We're
actually
we're
very
excited
about
that
and
we're
actually
working
with
several
different
institutions
to
to
try
and
figure
that
out
and
nail
that
down
current
affordable
housing
units
in
the
area
are
all
lofts
or
small
apartments,
and
we're
we're
really
excited
that
we
could
be
able
to
offer
some
of
the
first
and
possibly
only
family-centric,
affordable
housing
in
the
area.
G
Right
now,
there
is
very
little
green
space
that
joins,
that
is
around
the
property.
The
area
that
joins
all
five
houses,
as
shown
in
the
pictures
that
kelsey
had,
is
basically
a
parking
lot
for
our
current
tenants
with
our
new
proposal,
because
every
unit
has
their
own
private
garage.
It
will
then
allow
us
to
include
green
space
that
will
surround
the
the
units
proposed
and
lastly,
according
to
neighborhood
scout,
with
over
90
of
the
homes
in
the
area
built
either
1970
or
before.
G
As
a
result,
many
homes
in
the
air
are
fairly
inefficient.
Our
new
build
will
specifically
focus
on
energy
efficiency
and
we
are
working
to
a
carbon
neutral
living
space,
so,
ultimately,
that's
long-term,
better
long-term,
that's
better
for
our
environment
as
well
as
our
our
community
and
then
last
slide.
G
A
D
G
Yes,
so
financing
has
changed
drastically
in
the
last
two
years
and
as
a
result,
we
think
we
are
able
to
afford
to
give
more
than
just
one
affordable
housing
unit.
We
don't
have
the
final
numbers,
yet
I
was
hoping
to
have
them
by
today.
I'm
hoping
maybe
we
can
get
them
by
next
week
or
even
the
week
after
before.
You
guys
need
to
make
a
decision,
but
we
are
financing.
Options
are
just
really
different
and,
as
a
result,
we
think
we
can
peel
away
more
affordable
housing
for
for
the
city.
D
And
would
it
be
possible
that
you
know
if,
if
that
happens,
would
it
be
possible
that
you
can
house
some
of
your
current
tenants.
G
It
might
be
possible,
we
actually
have
a
lot
of
tenants
that
have
moved
away.
They've,
they've,
they've
moved
away
basically,
and
so
we
we
currently
have
tenants
in
there
that
might
at
this
point.
Yes,
the
the
units
are
at
market
rates,
and
so
they
would
either
be
able
to
afford
the
non-affordable
housing
units
and
if
they
qualify,
then
they
certainly
if
it's
the
same
people
now,
then
they
and
if
they
qualify
for
affordable
housing,
then
yeah
they
could
certainly
live
there
as
well.
G
G
So
we
yeah
that's
a
very
good
question.
We
specifically
looked
at
the
city's,
affordable
housing
rates
and
I
believe
for
a
two
bedroom.
G
G
I
don't
have
that
off
the
top
of
my
head,
I'm
I'm
really
sorry.
I
can
certainly
come
back
to
you
with
that.
It's
I,
I
would
just
need
to
look.
We
specifically
used
the
guidelines
from
from
the
city
website
and
and
city
guidelines
that
that
hand
helped
us
with.
L
G
Right
now
so
of
those
nine
units,
it's
a
variety
of
two
bedrooms
up
to
the
largest
house.
Has
six
bedrooms
actually
and
they
are
I'm
not
sure
what
their
exact
income
levels
are.
To
be
honest
with
you,
we
have
transitioned
all
of
the
units
over
to
a
property
management
company
and
prior
to
anyone
moving
in.
G
They
do
a
background
check,
as
well
as
a
financial
credit
check,
and
so
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
situ
the
financial
situation
of
our
tenants,
except
that
they
have
passed
both
credit
and
background
checks
to
to
be
able
to
live
there.
G
C
E
I
I
got
a.
I
got
a
master
plan
question
for
nick
after
this,
but
the
first
ques
first
statement.
It
sounds
like
the
mitigation
is
already
done
right.
The
housing
loss
is
gone
if
people
were
low
income
in
there
before
they're,
not
there
now
because
of
the
requirements
from
the
management
company.
E
G
Currently?
Yes,
yes,
because
we
have
transitioned
over
to
a
property
management
company
with
we
had
a
lot
of
tenants,
move
away
just
for
other
opportunities
and
then
and
then
one
of
the
ten
as
they've
moved
away.
Then
we've
moved
the
houses
to
the
property
management
company,
this
last
house,
the
person
who
was
under
contract.
He
moved
away
to
another
state,
and
so
that's
why
that
the
last
house
was
also
transitioned
to
a
property
management
company.
E
All
right,
I
had
major
concerns
about
housing
loss
overall
for
these
folks,
but
it
sounds
like
that's
already
occurred.
To
be
blunt,
if
I
might,
which
is
frustrating
for
me
personally.
E
The
question
I
guess
for
nick
perhaps
is
the
the
master
plan
for
this
area
is
2005
and
it's
low
density,
residential,
but
second
south
is
probably
the
busiest
bus
route
in
the
city
as
far
as
passenger
volumes
on
a
daily
basis
is
their
thought
about
what
the
future
of
second
south
corridor
looks
like
for
density.
M
Yeah,
I
think,
I
think
the
corridor
as
a
whole.
I
don't
know
what
it
looks
like
as
we
transition
east
of
900
east
and
we
start
entering
areas
where
we
already
have
actually
pretty
decent
density,
and
we
also
run
into
both
the
national
and
the
local
historic
district,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
what
kind
of
opportunities
there
are
east
of
900
east
for
additional
density.
Right
now,.
E
But
as
a
whole,
are
we
thinking
of
second
south,
as
it's
probably
not
a
monolithic
corridor,
it's
different
sections
of
that
corridor
is
there
thought
that
that
entirety
of
second
south
might
become
more
dense
over
time.
M
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
it
will
even
based
off
current
zoning.
It's
I
mean
it's
an
interesting
corridor
because
it
does
cross
through
two
different
historic
districts,
the
central
city
and
the
university
district
and
the
extended
university
national
district.
So
so
it's
it's
kind
of
a
complex,
sorry
area,
but
it
particularly
up
to
500
east.
I
think
that's
something
that
right
now
most
of
that
is.
It
goes
from
d1
to
rmu
75
almost
instantly,
and
there
are
some
opportunities
for
for
redevelopment
and
more
density
for
sure.
E
G
If
this
proposal
doesn't
go
through,
we
are
considering
of
rebuilding
just
because
of
the
inefficiencies
of
the
home,
and
we
would
build
five
homes
instead
of
the.
What
that
rmf
35
will
allow
us
to
do.
G
E
G
E
Yeah,
I'm
done
with
my
questions.
I
I
a
couple
of
concerns.
One
is
losing
those
old
homes,
I
understand
the
inefficiencies
and
the
problems
and
their
density.
E
We
need
density,
obviously
in
different
ways,
I'm
on
the
fence
about
if
it's
an
improvement
to
get
one
out
of
16
units
affordable
since
we've
lost
the
affordability
in
those
buildings.
At
this
point
already,
which
is
lamentable
so.
G
And
certainly-
and
that's
one
thing
that
I
was
addressing
with
councilmember
valdemaros,
there's
actually
more
than
one
that
we
can,
we
can
peel
off
at
this
point.
We
just
don't
have
the
exact
numbers,
I'm
hoping
to
have
that
to
you
soon,
just
because
financing
has
changed
since
when
we
first
looked
at
this
two
years
ago,
and
our
financing
options
have
changed
drastically,
and
so,
with
this
recent
we
revisited
with
several
institutions
starting
gosh
a
few
months
ago.
H
Thank
you,
councilmember
morton,.
N
Thank
you,
my
questions
for
nick
norris
nick.
Do
you
think
that
the
changes
that
have
happened
regarding
financing
since
this
went
through
the
department
and
the
and
the
commission
would
potentially
impact
the
recommendation.
M
I
think
the
bigger
the
bigger
thing
is
whether
or
not
they're
occupied
and
if
we've
already
lost
the
affordable
units.
I
don't
know
if
financing
really
is
something
that
we
necessarily
weigh
when
we're
figuring
it
out.
But
I
think
what
we're
really
concerned
about
is
the
displacement
and
whether
or
not
especially
sorry
go
ahead.
N
That's
kind
of
what
I'm
asking
you
to
speak
to
is
the
the
displacement.
M
Yeah,
so
it
what
we're
concerned
with
displacement,
obviously
is
using
those
losing
those
units
by
an
action
of
the
city,
and
so
when
we're,
if
we're
considering
a
master
plan,
amendment
or
a
zoning
amendment
and
seeing
those
things
come
in,
then
it
becomes
a
little
bit
more
of
a
red
flag
for
us
and
a
concern.
M
Obviously
right
now
we
don't
have
any
sort
of
tools
to
deal
with
the
private
side,
and
you
know
the
the
what
happens
when
people,
when
property
owners
are
increasing
the
the
rent
and
the
costs.
So
we
just
don't
know
that
we
don't
have
those
tools,
so
we
would.
We
would
look
at
it
from
the
unit
itself
and
losing
it,
and
so
these
are
even
though
they
may
be
more
expensive
than
they
were.
M
A
N
Well,
I
guess-
and
maybe
I
heard
some
of
the
changes
that
that
the
applicant
mentioned,
but
I'm
wondering
if,
if
maybe
you
could
speak
a
little
bit
to
what
specifically
what
changes
you
made
in
response
to
the
public
process.
G
Yeah,
I'm
happy
to
I'm
happy
to
go
over
that,
so
we
had
a
lot
of
responses
for
how
the
new
units
would
look,
and
so
we
specifically
we
we
commissioned
our
architect
to
do
a
study
and
he
went
out
a
mile
from
from
the
the
location
and
he
took
very
specific
architectural
details.
G
The
I
believe
it
was
the
utah
historic
commission
he
specifically
because
we
we
originally
wanted
stone
and
he
came
back
and
said:
hey.
Do
you
mind
making
it
brick?
So
then
we
changed
that
and
made
it
back.
We
also
heard
to
a
lot
of
it
was
more
architectural
detail
that
the
community
wanted
to
see,
and
we
had
our
architect
make
all
of
those
changes.
Basically,
we
have
gone
through
a
design
review
with
the
city.
There
were
some
changes
that
were
requested
from
the
fire
department
and
we've
also
made
those
changes.
G
There
was
also
changes.
G
They
requested
something
I
can't
remember
off
the
top
of
my
head.
It
was
was
quite
a
bit
of
time
ago,
but
we
did
make
those
changes
as
well,
and
now
garbage
collection
will
be
on
individual
property.
You
know
outside
of
each
garage,
you
know
rather
than
out
on
the
street,
for
instance,
so
so
things
like
that,
we
everything
that
we
did
receive,
we
that
we
were
able
to
make
like
architectural
changes.
G
You
know
using
brick
instead
of
stone
using
specific
materials
having
that
man-starred
pitched
roof,
for
instance,
was
also
requested,
because
there's
a
lot
of
structures
with
that
nearby.
Those
are
all
things
that
we've
we've
actually
incurred,
cost
and
asked
our
architect
to
make
those
changes
for.
N
Okay
and
then
just
a
follow-up
question,
if
I
can
sure
so,
why
is
it
exactly
that
other
than
that
the
older
houses
are
inefficient,
that
you
have
to
like
completely
demolish
them
like?
Was
it
that
there
needed
to
be
maintenance
over
time
that
wasn't
happening
or.
G
That's
a
very
good
question.
We
actually
also
had
we
actually
had
a
structural
engineer,
go
and
take
a
look
at
everything,
and
the
types
of
changes
we
would
like
to
make
in
terms
of
remodeling
would
be
to
make
it
easier
living.
As
you
may
know,
a
lot
of
those
older
houses,
each
of
the
rooms
are
very
closed
off
one
of
the
things
we
were
looking
at,
especially
if
they
make
it
more
family-centric
right.
You
want
to
always
have
a
line
of
sight
of
little
kids
was
to
open
up
a
lot
of
the
floor
plan.
G
G
There
there
was
one
that
was
structurally
fine,
but
it
is
really
small
anyway,
and
so
it's
it's
just
so
small
and
it's
it's
the
one
on
lincoln
street.
G
N
L
Yes,
good
thanks.
Could
you
the
15
units?
Are
the
number
of
units
that
you
have?
There
are
16?
If
you
get
to
300
square
feet,
are
they
you
said
talked
about
family
and
kids
in
line
of
sight?
How
many
would
those
units
be
three
bedrooms
or
family
size
units
and
what
would
be
the
makeup
of
that
development.
G
Yeah
so
of
the
16
units
we
have
one
that
is
a
one
bedroom.
If,
if
for
whatever
reason,
you
know
the
the
owners
of
the
property
adjacent
to
us,
if
they
decide
they
don't
want
to
do
the
300
square
feet,
we
would
what
we
would
actually
do
with
that.
One
unit
is
add
that
to
the
adjacent
two
bedroom
two
bathroom
unit
next
to
it
and
then
turn
that
into
a
three
unit.
Does
that
make
sense?
G
So
of
that
we
have
three
that
are
definitely
three
bedroom,
two
bathrooms
two
and
a
half
bath.
Excuse
me
and
then
the
remainder
are.
The
remainder
are
two
bedrooms,
two
two
bathrooms,
so
that
would
be
12
units
that
are
two
bedroom
and
the
two
and
a
half
baths
and
all
of
them
have
their
own
garage
underneath
them,
so
they
all
have
their
own
parking
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
there
are
spaces
for
visitor
parking
as
well.
G
Yet
we
are
looking
at
so
we're
looking
at
more
than
one
and
that's
what
we're
waiting
for
the
financial
institutions
you
know,
depending
on
which
one
we
can
go
with
well,
depending
on
which
ones
we
would
go
with
the
one
that
would
give
us
the
most
affordable
housing.
Let
me
put
it
that
way
and
that's
what
we're
waiting
on
so
we're
definitely
doing
more
than
one.
G
At
this
point
it
looks
like
all
three
institutions
would
afford
us
to
be
able
to
do
20
of
the
units
to
be
affordable
housing,
and
we
would
certainly
we
would
work
with
city
council
to
decide
if
it's
going
to
be
a
three
bedroom
or
a
two
bedroom,
whether
you
know
which
ones
would
be
affordable.
At
this
point,
we
don't
know
what
the
city
needs,
but
we're
happy
to
work
with
what
the
city
needs
and
what
would
be
best
for
everybody.
L
And
sorry
sorry,
you've
probably
asked
this
one
already,
but
so
all
the
all
the
the
five
units-
five
houses
right
now
are
empty.
L
G
No
no
right
now
there
are
two
units
that
are
being
remodeled,
but
the
others
are
all
full.
G
No
they're
not
they're
all
at
market
rates.
At
this
point,
one
of
the
other
things
that
it's
interesting
that
we're
we're
having
this
conversation,
one
of
the
things
that
came
out
of
the
community
council
was
that
we
needed
to
transition
everything
to
a
property
management
company
because
it
had
been
managed
by
by
my
dad
and
my
uncles.
G
Some
of
the
some
of
the
comments
back
from
the
community
council
meeting
was
that
we
need
to
transition
to
property
management
like
a
real
property
management
company,
and
so
so
that's
what
we
have
done
and
part
of
that
was
the
agreement
was,
as
a
house
became
empty.
Then
we
would
transition
over
to
a
property
management
company.
We
would
again
that's
just
where
we
are
and
that's
what
we've
done,
and
so
so
all
five
units
are
under
property
management
care.
At
this
point,.
A
Thank
you,
miss
wait.
I
do
have
a
couple
of
quick
follow-up
questions.
If
that's
okay,
sure
you
did
mention
that
if
you
did
not,
if
the
rezone
was
not
successful
and
it
stayed
r2
that
the
plan
would
be
to
demolish
and
make
five
houses.
A
Would
any
of
would
all
of
those
still
be
just
for
rent,
or
would
you
consider
selling
any
of
them
and
and
having
providing
homeownership
opportunities?.
A
Okay
and
then
another
question
talking
about
the
affordable
housing
units,
how
do
you
know
how
long
you'd
be
willing
to
commit
to
keeping
those
units
affordable.
G
That
would
that
would
again
be
part
of
this
financial
decision
that
I'm
waiting
on
and
so
and
again
I
apologize
for
not
having
that
ready,
but
certainly
I
will
have
that
soon
and
I'd
love
to
discuss
that
with
everybody.
G
E
Thanks
man
of
chair,
I
think
first
thing
I
need
to
apologize.
I
didn't
address
my
zoning
question
to
kelsey
and
nick
sorry,
kelsey,
that's
my
fault,
there's
also
no
binding
agreement
if
we
re-zone
to
anything
that
the
developer
is
planning
on.
Is
that
correct?
E
So
I'm
I'm!
I
don't
want
to
get
too
in
the
weeds
about
that
piece.
I
mean
I'm
concerned
about
losing
historical,
older
homes
in
the
neighborhood,
balancing
that,
with
the
need
for
affordability
and
a
unanimous
negative
recommendation
from
the
planning
commission.
Frankly,
so
I'm
not
right
now,
I'm
not
moving
towards
approving
it,
but
I'm
hoping.
D
Anna
yeah
I
was
going
to.
I
was
going
to
say
that,
because
we
got
a
similar
situation
in
the
neighborhood
about
this
development
agreement
and
I
feel
like
we
have
so
many
things
to
address
that
our
community
needs
with
affordable
units,
also
keeping
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
as
is
and
displacement
and
and
reasons
things
that
the
community
has
worked
for
so
long
to
keep.
D
You
know
the
character
of
the
neighborhood,
and
you
know
it's
it's
a
tough
for
us,
but
we
were
able
to
accomplish
it
with
another
similar
project
and
I
would
be
interested
in
seeing
the
opportunities
and
what
the
applicant
brings
about,
but
so
far
I
don't
see
a
lot
of
many
different
things
than
from
the
last
time
we
talked
to.
So
I
look
forward
to
meeting
with
the
applicant
and
see
what
else
can
be
done
so
that
our
issues
of
the
city
can
be
addressed
through
this
project.
D
If
not,
I'm
you
know
I
I
will.
I
will
rethink
this.
I
don't
right
now,
I'm
probably
announced
I
know,
but
looking
forward
to
meeting
with
the
applicant
again.
A
Okay,
great,
I
do
have
just
one
quick
question.
This
recommendation
came
to
us
literally
almost
a
year
ago.
Has
there
been
any
other
public
outreach
either
from
planning
or
the
applicant
since
that
planning
commission
back
in
february
of
2020.
G
Not
formally
with,
as
I
mentioned
as
as
we've
been
turning
them
over
to
the
property
management
company,
there's
been
a
lot
of
remodeling
going
on
and
so
neighbors
have
popped
in
informally
and
they
they
seem
to
be
very
excited
about
about
speaking
next
month
and
and
hopefully
hopefully
they
do
voice.
You
know
their
their.
I
guess
them
for
it
and
why
they
would
be
for
it.
A
lot
of
them
have
said
yeah
we're
really
excited
to
see
new
things
and
new
development.
Here,
great.
A
G
A
With
that,
we
will
go
to
our
next
agenda.
Item
agenda
item
number
five:
a
zoning
amendment
amendment
at
approximately
29
degrees,
south
highland
drive.
I
think
we've
already
heard
one
briefing
on
this,
which
I'm
not
mistaken,
but
we
do
have
ryan
here
with
us,
along
with
blake
thomas
nick
norris,
minnett,
larson
and
john
anderson,
so
I
will
first
turn
it
over
to
brian
filmer.
Thank
you,
brian.
I
Thanks,
madam
chair,
this
was
on
a
previous
agenda
but
was
pulled
from
the
agenda
just
because
of
time
constraints,
so
you
saw
it,
but
you
didn't
hear
it
yet.
The
property
is
currently
split.
Zoned
with
the
western
portion
of
the
parcel
zoned
community,
business
or
cb,
and
the
eastern
portion,
which
is
approximately
thirty
percent,
is
zoned
r,
one,
seven
thousand
or
single-family
residential.
I
The
request
is
to
amend
the
master
plan
and
zoning
maps,
so
the
entire
parcel
is
zoned,
cb
or
commercial
business
to
accommodate
a
future
potential
development.
On
the
entire
parcel,
the
planning
commission
forwarded
a
unanimous,
positive
recommendation
for
these
amendments
to
the
council,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
nanette.
F
F
F
This
is
amend
the
master
plan
and
rezone
the
eastern
approximate
55
foot
portion
of
the
property,
the
site
fronts,
highland
drive,
which
is
an
arterial
street
and
zenith
avenue.
A
local
street
arterial
streets
generally
allow
for
high
traffic
movement
with
higher
speeds,
while
local
streets
are
less
trafficked
with
lower
speeds,
the
site
is
located
in
the
claremont
subdivision
flat,
which
was
created
in
approximately
1910.
F
F
F
Thank
you.
The
property
is
part
of
the
sugar
house
master
plan
and
is
split
designated
as
low
intensity,
mixed
use
on
the
western
portion
and
low
density
residential
on
the
eastern
portion
of
the
property.
The
request
would
amend
the
eastern
portion
of
the
property
from
low
density
residential
to
low
intensity
mixed
use.
F
The
property
is
also
zoned
split
zone
on
the
zoning
map.
The
western
portion
is
currently
zoned
commercial
business
and
the
eastern
portion
is
zoned,
r1,
7000
or
single
family
residential
7000
square
foot
lots.
The
request
would
raise
on
the
eastern
portion
of
the
property
from
r1
7000
to
commercial
business.
Next
slide.
F
During
the
public
comment
period
of
the
review,
a
few
comments
were
received
by
staff
that
voiced
concerns
about
building
height
and
parking
requirements
for
the
proposed
rezoned
and
future
development
of
the
site.
As
reviewed
in
the
staff
report,
the
building
height
and
parking
requirements
in
the
cp
zone
are
generally
similar
to
the
single-family
residential
uses
to
the
north
and
east
of
the
site:
a
landscape
buffer
of
seven
feet
from
adjoining
residential
property
for
any
development
in
the
acv
zone.
F
Further
the
cv
zone
requires
that
a
design
review
is
reviewed
by
the
planning
commission
if
the
new
development
is
over
7
500
square
feet.
Building
footprint
this
review
would
include
whether
the
design
of
the
building
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
in
regard
to
height,
massing
vehicle
access,
landscape,
buffers
and
building
setbacks.
Next
slide.
F
F
Provide
a
concept,
land
use
drying
the
concept
land
use
the
applicant
provided
is
a
townhome
development
with
three
separate
structures,
while
a
concept
land
use
and
drawing
are
helpful
in
understanding
the
development
potential
of
the
site.
The
developer
is
not
obligated
to
carry
out
the
land
use
or
concept
drawings.
F
If
the
amendments
are
approved,
staff
has
found
that
the
petition
for
the
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendment
meets
the
standards
and
criteria
in
title
21a
and
recommends
that
the
city
council
follow
the
recommendations
of
the
planning
commission
when
they
heard
the
application
on
may
13th
last
year
to
approve
the
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendment,
and
I
saw
jim
nelson
here
as
a
panelist,
and
I
will
be
available
for
any
questions
and
the
applicant
jim
nelson
with
access.
Architects
appears
to
also
be
available.
A
E
Yes,
please
just
just
a
couple
of
comments
if
that
helps
the
planning
commission
heard
from
my
business
partner,
pierre
long,
he
could
not
be
here.
I
am
glad
to
make
just
a
few
comments
now.
Let
me
just
read
a
couple
things
for
you
that
we
gave
to
the
that
we
presented
to
the
planning
commission
we're
looking.
The
goal
is
to
have
a
single
zone
for
a
single
parcel
so
that
we
have
the
ability
to
use
it
in
a
rational
way.
E
E
A
A
Okay,
council
members,
I'm
gonna,
give
jim,
hopefully
a
chance
to
maybe
reconnect
with
our
link,
sounds
like
there
might
be
and
if
he
pops
back
in
we'll
we'll
make
sure
to
to
get
the
rest
of
his
comments.
But
does
anyone
have
questions
for.
E
Going
back
to
that
slide
with
the
proposed
three-story
complex,
I
know
they're
not
tied
to
doing
that
on
that
property,
but
it's
done
that
way.
Would
the
scale
of
that
prompt
the
design
review
process?
Can
you
tell
from
their
their
drawings
and
their
sketch
kind
of
thing.
F
You
know,
based
on
the
size
of
the
lot,
I
think
in
any
development
that
meets
the
density
allowed
in
the
cv.
District
would
be
required
to
go
back
to
planning
commission
for
a
design
review,
but
I'm
not
100
sure
they
did
not
give
me
the
square
footage
that
they
were
looking
at
for
the
town
homes
on
the
concept
plan,
but
based
on
the
size
of
the
lot.
It
appears
that
it
probably
back
to
planning
commission
for
a
design
review.
E
I
know
I'm
not
going
to
hold
you
to
that.
Sorry,
just
give
me
a
sense.
That's
all.
I
guess
my
concern
that
council
council
members
is,
I
want
to
support
projects
like
this.
I
think
they
make
sense
in
these
locations.
E
What
doesn't
make
sense
is
how
we
can
we
find
a
way
to
give
any
sort
of
buffer
to
a
single
story
home.
That's
going
to
be
14
feet
away
from
a
three-story
building
a
wall
essentially
to
the
west.
There's
got
to
be
a
way
we
can
have
the
density
and
give
a
little
bit
of
sort
of
cushion
to
a
house
like
that
in
some
way
is
there
a
way
we
can
sort
of
do
that
in
the
existing
zoning,
or
is
that
a
whole
big
can
of
worms.
F
So
it
would
depend
on
one
it.
There
is
the
possibility
that
it
would
be
going
back
to
planning
commission
for
a
design
review
and
that
something
that
planning
commission
is
able
to
review
is
the
allowed
building
or
wall
height
of
the
proposed
building.
That's
adjoining
to
the
neighbors.
F
They
would
also
be
able
to
review
the
landscaping.
There
is
a
seven
foot
landscape
buffer,
but
it
would
require
that
it
in
order
to
regulate
that.
It
would
need
to
go
to
a
design
review
back
to
planning.
Commission
planning
commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
without
any
conditions
applied
to
the
proposed
rezone.
M
So
I'll
I'll
jump
in
with
that,
and
I
I
think
that
the
form-based
code
has
better
buffering
requirements
than
our
other
zoning
districts
and
frank.
Frankly,
our
buffering
requirements
are
not
adequate,
as
you
pointed
out,
most
zones
have
that
minimum
of
seven
feet
and
there's
not
really
options
to
increase
that
in
our
code.
So
I
think
it's
a
bigger
project
that
needs
to
be
looked
at
so
that
we
don't
have
to
put
everything
through
this
kind
of
process
and
discuss
development
agreements
on
site-specific
types
of
things
like
this.
M
But
if
I
mean
this
is
the
cb
zone
is
one
of
the
few
zones
that
specifically
grants
the
planning
commission
the
authority
to
increase
that
buffer
through
the
design
review
process.
Most
zones
do
not
have
that,
and
so
it's
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
unique
situation,
and
that
was
that
was
added
in
response
to
a
development
in
the
ninth
and
ninth
neighborhood.
But
it's
proving
to
be
more
effective.
P
E
So
I'm
not
opposed
to
unifying
the
zoning
on
those
two
parcel
that
makes
sense
and
it
could
be
a
not
a
problem
at
all,
based
on
the
way
they
orient
their
buildings
eventually,
but
it
just
seems
like
we
could
maybe
figure
out
a
way
to
have
this
be
more
consistent
across
we're
going
to
have
the
same
issue
across
the
city.
I'm
guessing.
A
E
If
I
am
thoroughly
forgettable,
that's
okay,
if
you'd
rather
just
leave
it
wherever
I
left
it.
I
probably
got
enough
in
okay.
A
A
Questions
well,
jim,
it
looks
like
you
might
be
off
the
hook.
I
don't
see
any
hands
going
up,
so
this
is
also
set
for
a
public
hearing
again
next
next
month
on
tuesday
march,
2nd
at
our
formal
meeting
at
7
pm.
So
thank
you
for
joining
us,
jim
and
thanks
for
the
presentation,
annette.
A
Great,
we
now
have
are
on
to
agenda
item
number
six.
It's
a
resolution
regarding
hud
and
cares
funding.
This
is
a
follow-up
from
a
briefing
that
we
had
on
january
19th
and
that's
it.
I
thought
I
was
going
to
say
more,
but
that
there's
a
period
at
the
end
of
that.
Okay,
at
this
table
I
mean
at
this
time
we
have
been
lucky
from
the
council
office
blake
thomas
lonnie,
eggertson,
jennifer,
schuman
and
tony
milner,
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
ben.
J
J
J
This
is
almost
nine
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars
in
total.
So
there
are
two
items
before
the
council
for
discussion
today.
One
is
the
council
comfortable,
adopting
some
or
all
of
the
funding
recommendations
for
the
applications
that
were
received
and
two.
How
does
the
council
want
to
proceed
with
those
remaining
funds?
J
The
council
asked
a
number
of
questions
last
time
about
the
remaining
funds
and
potential
uses
and
hand
staff
has
updates
on
some
of
those.
So
as
a
reminder,
the
council
was
interested
in
if
the
health
department
could
use
funding
for
vaccine
distribution,
and
this
was
one
of
the
recommendations
from
the
resident
advisory
board
was
to
use
the
remaining
funds
to
facilitate
vaccination
efforts
in
underserved
and
low-income
communities.
J
The
council
also
asked
about
the
salt
lake
valley
coalition
end
homelessness
if
they
could
use
the
funds
as
well
as
nourish,
to
flourish,
their
ability
to
scale
up
operations
providing
food
through
participating
restaurants
to
low-income
communities,
as
well
as
if
the
grant
funds
could
be
used
to
purchase
property
to
provide
emergency
pandemic,
housing
and
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
lonnie
and
tony,
with
updates
on
those
four
council
questions
from
the
last
briefing,
and
we
do
have
the
funding
log
available
to
screen
share.
If
there
are
specific
questions
on
any
applications.
Q
But
you're
right
on
target-
and
it
has
been
kind
enough
to
provide
in
your
staff
report
or
in
the
staff
report
more
detail
about
all
of
the
topics,
the
questions
that
the
council
had
last
week
and
I
would
like
to
just
outline
the
things
that
we
have
learned
in
the
past
week
that
would
fill
in
some
of
those
gaps
related
to
the
various
questions
that
came
from
council.
Q
First
is
kind
of
a
point
of
personal
privilege.
I
really
appreciate
being
able
to
hire.
We
have
three
new
staff
that
are
going
to
be
implementing
the
hud
cv
dollars.
Two
of
them
started
yesterday
and
another
will
be
starting
out
two
weeks
from
yesterday,
so
we
will
be
fully
staffed
to
be
able
to
take
forward
the
council
recommendations.
Council
appropriations
as
those
happen.
Q
So
thank
you
for
the
cdbg
cv.
Funding
the
dollar
amount
of
four
hundred
and
sixty
eight
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
has
not
been
requested
by
the
applicants
during
the
typical
process.
Q
The
council
requested
information
related
specifically
to
food
insecurity
programs
and,
since
the
last
briefing
we
have
confirmed
that
the
salt
lake
city
corporation
or
sustainability
application
that
was
in
conjunction
with
united
way,
the
international
rescue
committee
and
communities
unionists,
can
expand
the
initial
application
to
provide
more
emergency
food
delivery.
Q
The
shelter
the
homeless
application
was
not
scalable
according
to
the
applicants
and
our
follow-up
conversations
with
them
and
then.
Thirdly,
the
nourish
to
flourish
folks
were
contacted
and
they
could
use
any
of
the
468
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
that
council
deems
appropriate
to
provide
to
them
as
they've
utilized.
All
of
their
cares
act,
funding
from
sally
county
about
450,
000
and
city
about
a
hundred
thousand,
and
they
would
be
able
to
target
providing
services
to
our
residents
in
the
zip
codes
that
have
been
most
impacted
by
the
pandemic.
Q
Q
Q
They
at
the
time
I
spoke
with
them
last
week,
had
about
seven
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
in
request
for
a
pot
of
only
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
available
after
the
closure
of
that
application.
On
sunday
evening
they
have
over
900
000
in
requests,
and
they
they
have
an
anticipation
of
being
able
to
provide
possibilities
for
some
of
the
hud
cv
funding
to
bolster
applications
that
they
will
not
be
able
to
fund.
We
will
be
meeting
with
the
health
department
team
tomorrow
afternoon.
Q
We
were
hoping
to
have
it
happen
before
this
meeting,
but
it
just
wasn't
feasible
and
we'll
determine
if
any
of
the
applications
that
they
received
from
community
partners
that
could
serve
again.
The
salt
lake
city,
zip
codes,
glendale
and
rose
park
that
those
would
align
with
the
hud
cv
eligible
activities,
and
then
hopefully
we
would
be
able
to
anticipate
having
council
staff
have
more
detail
that
could
be
shared
with
you
prior
to
your
making
final
decisions
on
where
to
put
this
excess
money.
Q
I
hope
that
those
funding
numbers
would
be
able
to
be
with
you
very
shortly.
That's
all
of
the
cdbg
information.
If
there
are
questions
on
that,
I'd,
be
happy
to
try
and
answer
them.
A
Yeah,
let's,
let's
do
that
those
questions
for
now,
if
there's
more
information
on
other
funding
we'll
get
to
that
after
these
questions,
I
think
that's
the
best
way
to
handle
it.
Questions,
council,
members,
dan.
L
Solana,
you're
you're
telling
us
that
we
have
places
to
spend
that
dollars.
Do
you
have
a
recommendation
on
how
you
would
or
what's
your
recommendation
on
how
you
would
split
that
money
up
amongst
those
three
possible
recipients.
Q
O
Sure,
with
sustainability,
they
just
said
that
they
could
go
for
an
increase.
We
didn't
go
into
exact
details
for
a
budget
they'd
be
happy
to
to
entertain
that
kind
of
conversation
with
staff
talking
to
brian
jones
over
at
nourish
to
flourish.
They
could
take
all
of
it.
So
what
we
could
do
basically
do
based
on
council's
guidance.
We
would
go
back
and
just
work
with
the
individual
applicants
on
what
would
be
scalable
doable
for
their
organizations
down
to
the
available
penny
that
we
have.
L
O
J
O
I'd
I'll
speak
to
their,
I
don't
have
a
preference,
they
are
both
capable
committed
and
proven
organizations.
J
It
may
be
helpful
to
have
details
on
the
number
of
people
served
for
each
of
these
different
uses.
That
information
has
been
provided
for
other
applications,
such
as
the
number
of
individual
meals
that
could
be
provided
or
the
number
of
sites
that
a
vaccine
distribution
application
might
be
able
to
provide
on
the
west
side.
I
think
those
details
would
be
helpful
for
the
council
to
compare
the
applications.
A
One
of
the
things
I
would
be
interested
in
lonnie
is,
I
mean
for
me
my
probably
my
number
one
price
I
mean
all
of
them
are
high
priorities,
but
the
vaccine
obviously
is
is
a
high
priority
for
us,
and
you
mentioned
so.
A
The
health
department
put
out
a
call
for
applications
for
partners
to
help
the
equitable
distribution
of
the
vaccine
right
and
they
received
over
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
worth
of
of
applications
and
they
for
a
two
hundred
thousand
dollar
pot.
Have
they
decided
which
applicants
will
receive
money
and
funding.
Q
She
said
that
there
were
a
couple
of
the
applicants
that
asked
for
a
lot
that
there
is
no
way
that
they
could
fund
those,
but
all
of
the
non-profit
entities
have
said
that
they
would
be
able
to
use
a
portion
of
what
they
asked
for.
It's
very
typical
with
the
funding
grants
that
we
see
come
through
for
pass
through
for
city
right
and
she
did
say
that
they
would
not
be
able
to
obviously
have
as
much
impact
if
they
spread
the
dollars
more
thinly.
A
And
you're
having
a
meeting
with
them
this
morning,
okay,
okay,
I
will
come
back
to
that
at
the
end
of
our
discussion.
Did
you
have
other
information
on
the
other
435
000?
Did
you
want
to
skip
to
that
now?
Lonnie.
Q
Q
This
dollar
amount
the
additional
funding
we've
spoken
with
the
for
the
three
applicants
that
specifically
could
assist
in
vaccination,
rollout
and
assistance.
Esg
as
a
reminder
is
for
homelessness
response,
and
so
this
would
be
additional
funding
for
vaccine
education
and
outreach
force.
That
would
be
specific
to
our
homeless
population,
including
follow-up
for
a
second
vaccine,
shot
transportation.
Q
Those
kinds
of
things
specifically
were
what
were
mentioned
when
we
had
those
conversations.
The
three
applicants
are
fourth
street
clinic
volunteers
of
america
and
soap.
To
hope
and
we've
had
conversations
and
when
I
say
we,
our
team
have
had
conversations
with
each
of
those
community
partners
and
they
are
able
to
accept
more,
and
I
guess
in
maybe
a
preemptive
attempt
dan
councilmember
dugan.
We
would
just
say:
let's
split
that
460
between
the
three
and
tony
can
slap
me
virtually
to
say:
no,
that's
not
right
lonnie.
If
that's
not
right,.
A
Funding,
okay,
I
see
no
hands,
so
we
are
set
to
take
action
on
february,
16th
ben
I'm.
Turning
to
you
real
quick
on
something.
So
we
could.
You
know
for
the
applications
that
we
already
have
allocated
some
money
and
I
guess
maybe
ben
and
lonnie.
We
could
vote
yes
on
everything,
that's
been
allocated
and
then
come
back
to
the
935
000
and
then
do
another
vote
for
that
before
any
deadlines
are
up.
A
J
A
Okay,
I
think
what
I'd
like
to
do
is,
if
I
could
ask
lonnie
and
tony
if
they
would
be
able
to
be
available,
put
put
you
on
the
agenda
again
next
week,
because
you
just
can't
get
enough
of
us,
but
with
the
esg
funds.
A
If
we
sort
of
know
that
those
three
applicants
could
and-
and
this
is
my
opinion,
if
somebody
just
on
the
council
disagrees
with
me-
raise
your
hand
and
say
no,
that's
not
what
you
want
to
do,
but
if
we
already
sort
of
know
that
they
could
handle
an
increase
in
their
budgets
and
you
could
work
with
them.
Perhaps
you
could
come
back
next
week
with
a
new
number
for
each
of
them.
That
includes
that
460
000
unallocated
from
the
esg
funds.
A
E
Thanks,
madam
chair
cause,
that's
a
clarifying
question
for
tony
arlani
about
the
expenditure
deadlines
for
those
funds.
I
know
the
allocation
deadlines
are
coming
up
in
may
and
june.
What
are
the
expenditure
deadlines
on.
O
E
I
I
asked
that
madam
chair,
because
the
vaccines
aren't
available
yet
for
a
majority
of
the
unsheltered
or
homeless
populations,
but
when
they
are
available,
it's
going
to
be
a
mad
rush
to
get
enough
staff
in
time
to
make
these
happen,
so
I
can
see
the
need
being
less
immediately,
but
in
a
month
to
two
months
or
three
depending
ultimate
has
vaccines
it'll
be
a
major
need,
so
I
would
say
I
would
support
the
the
move
you're
suggesting.
A
And
tony
and
lonnie
can
those
esg?
I
remember
us
having
this
discussion
last
week,
but
I
can't
remember
the
answer.
The
the
hud
and
the
esg
funds
or
all
the
hud
funds
cannot
be
spent
on
personnel
correct
or
it
can
be.
O
So
esg
can
cover
personnel.
A
Perfect
so,
for
example,
you
could
start
if
we
allocated
this
now
they
could.
These
different
organizations
could
start
hiring
and
training
so
that
when
we
get
vaccines,
as
andrew
mentioned,
they're
already
ready
to
hit
the
ground
running
and
then
we
would
hopefully
meet
that
this
september
deadline
of
that
20.
A
E
Yes,
that's
correct,
okay,
I'm
not
sure
madam
sheriff
will
be
hiring
going
on,
since
these
are
one-time
funds
and
no
agency
wants
to
hire
people
to
lay
them
off
in
a
few
months.
It
might
end
up
being
more
of
direct
client
care
costs
or
overtime
costs
or
those
kind
of
things
for
existing
staff.
I'm
guessing,
but
that's
just
a
guess,.
A
Sure
I
might
I'll
leave
it
to
the
people
in
charge.
Okay,
so
perhaps
we
can
come
back.
Put
you
guys
on
an
agenda
for
next
week,
have
a
little
bit
more
information
and
then,
hopefully,
at
least
with
the
parts
that
are
already
allocated,
be
able
to
take
action.
A
A
J
Madam
chair,
one
more
update
at
the
last
meeting,
you'd
requested
a
graphic
or
a
simple
way,
to
show
all
the
different
federal
funding
that
the
city
has
been
receiving
during
the
pandemic,
and
I
just
wanted
an
update
that
we've
put
together
a
table
showing
that
and
we're
working
with
our
our
pec
team
and
our
amazing
amanda
lao
and
her
graphic
talents
to
put
that
in
a
friendlier
format.
And
so
we
hope
to
have
that.
For
you
later
this
month.
A
Awesome,
thank
you.
So
much
appreciate
it.
Well.
If
there
are
no
other
questions
for
lonnie
and
tony,
we
are
at
item
number
seven,
which
is
a
break
and
we
are
10
minutes
early
for
that
break.
I'm
still
only
going
to
give
you
a
20-minute
break
so
that
we
maybe
can
finish
up
before
they
can
have
a
longer
break
before
our
formal
meeting
and
actually
allow
everyone
to
get
some
dinner
with
their
families.
So
20
minutes
be
back
here
in
20
minutes
be
on
time
or
that's
it.
You
get
a.
R
R
R
A
A
A
It
is
the
rezone
at
1301
and
1321
south
state
street.
We
have
brian
fulmer
from
the
brian.
Today
is
your
date,
you
it's
all
you
from
the
council's
office,
blake
thomas
nick
norris
and
katya
pace
as
the
principal
planner,
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
brian
and
we'll
go
from
there
thanks
brian.
I
A
A
I
Okay,
this
is
a
zoning
map,
amendment
for
properties
at
1301
and
1321
south
state
street.
They
are
currently
zoned
cc,
which
is
corridor.
Commercial
and
request
is
to
change
the
zoning
to
fb
un
ii
or
form
based
urban
neighborhood
2.
An
amendment
to
the
zoning
table
is
also
requested
to
add
this
corner
to
other
named
locations
eligible
for
increased
building
height
under
the
fbi.
I
Fbun2
zoning
designation-
you
may
be
familiar
with
the
area.
This
is
where
the
coachman's
restaurant
is
located
and
a
two-story
office
building
is
also
on
the
site.
The
applicant
indicated
intent
to
replace
the
existing
buildings
with
a
new
mixed-use
building,
which
would
include
ground
floor
commercial
space
and
owner
occupied
condominiums
above
the
commercial
space
at
a
price
point
which
would
be
attainable
to
a
wider
range
of
potential
buyers.
S
Good
afternoon
city
council,
I
would
like
to
start
my
presentation
with
the
slide
and
if
that
can
be
arranged,
so
try
not
to
repeat
too
much
what
brian
just
explained
to
you.
S
S
As
you
can
see
this
corner
here,
the
properties,
the
subject
properties
are
cc
commercial
corridor
and,
as
you
can
see,
state
street
is
mostly
zone
commercial
corridor
from
ninth
south
down
to
21st.
South.
S
This
corner
is
a
very
crucial
corner
for
the
city.
It's
a
very
important
corner.
It's
state
street
is
a
gateway
to
salt
lake
city
and
13.
South
is
a
major
ulterior
arterial
street
that
connects
the
east
and
west
sides
of
the
city
and,
as
you
can
see
it,
it
also
kind
of
transitions
from
a
more
commercial
area
to
a
more
residential
area.
S
So,
in
order
to
make
findings
for
this
rezoning,
we
looked
at
the
master
plans
applicable
to
this
area
and.
S
This
area
also
is
part
of
a
study
that
was
done
between
south
south
salt
lake
and
salt
lake
city.
It's
still
as
a
draft.
It
hasn't
been
adopted
yet,
but
some
of
the
goals
for
that
plan
talks
about
more
density
along
state
street,
more
height
development,
that
better
engage
the
sidewalk
and
street
next
slide.
S
So
if
you
keep
in
mind
the
goals
of
the
the
master
plans,
we'll
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
the
the
zoning
in
comparison.
If
you
can,
you
know,
look
with
more
detail
here.
You'll
see
that
the
cc
zoning
requires
more
setbacks,
more
parking
and
less
height
and
density,
even
though
it
is
part
of
the
south
salt
lake
street
corridor,
which
exempts
a
front
yard
setback.
It's
still,
the
the
maximum
setback
is
still
more
than
the
fb
un2,
so
it
shows
you
know
a
comparison.
S
How
how
much
more
in
also
the
design,
which
is
the
next
slide
next
slide?
Please
you
see
that
the
f
fbun2
has
a
lot
more
design
guidelines
than
the
cc
zone,
even
though
you
know
this
south
state
street
corridor
overlay.
S
Has
you
know
an
additional
three
guidelines
design
guidelines.
S
And
you'll
see
that
you
know
this
is
the
development
that
the
cc
zoning
has
it's
the
result
of
what
the
cc
zoning
has
allowed
on
on
that
corridor
with
properties
that
are
a
lot
you
know
shorter
because
of
the
the
height
is
goes
up
to
30
feet.
S
With
drive-throughs
and
next
line.
S
And
a
lot
more
parking
in
front
of
the
property,
so
the
cc
is
also
a
lot
more
permissible,
and
so
the
the
land
use
that
is
surrounding
this
property.
You
know
reflects
what
what
what
the
ccs
allows
in
that
prop
in
in,
as
as
a
zoning
district
next
slide.
S
And
finally,
in
order
you
know
some
of
the
the
properties
on
the
fbun
to
allow
for
a
higher
height
on
on
some
specific
corners
and
what
is
allowed
is
50
feet,
but
in
some
corners
and
the
the
height
is,
is
can
be
up
to
65
feet.
This.
We
we're
proposing
that
this
corner
be
one
of
those
sites
where
the
corner
can
go
up
to
65
feet.
S
But
in
order
to
allow
that
to
be
zoned
in
in
indicate
that
in
the
zoning
ordinance
that
it
can
go
up
to
65
feet,
the
two
parcels
should
be
consolidated.
S
So
it's
one
parcel
in
the
corner,
and
with
that
I,
you
know,
I
finalized
my
presentation
and
I
am
open
for
any
questions.
A
Thank
you,
katia.
Do
we
have
questions.
D
This
looks
great
as
far
as
I
know,
I'm
looking
at
what
the
applicant
is
proposing,
and
it
says
he
has
an
intent
to
replace
existing
buildings
with
a
new
mixed-use
building,
including
rough
ground,
commercial
space
and
owner
occupied
condos,
above
at
a
price
point
attainable
to
a
wide
range
of
potential
buyers,
and
I
I
love
that,
and
I
and
I
think
it's
something
that
we
need
in
salt
lake
city.
D
We
we
we
need
housing
in
general,
but
I
I
like
that
these
are
condos,
and
I
know
that
applicants,
usually
you
know
you
will
come
over
and
tell
us.
This
is
what
we
would
like
to
do,
and
sometimes
it
happens,
and
sometimes
it
doesn't
and
I'm
leaning
towards
how
can
we
assure
or
make
sure
that
that
these
actual
you
know
these
condominiums
actually
happen?
D
You
know,
is
there,
do
you
know
if
you
know,
if
they're
for
sure
it's
gonna
happen
or
we
can
do
a
development
agreement
which
I
know
we
talked
in
the
past,
we're
not
sure
about
them,
but
but
I
I
would
really
like
to
see
this,
and
I
would
I
don't
know
I
I
really
want
this
to
happen.
So
how
can
we
make
this
happen?.
S
I'll
let
the
applicant
answer
more
of
this
question,
but
at
the
same
time
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
the
the
applicant
is
trying
to
have
a
zoning
where
no
additional
process
is
is
gonna
be
required.
So
we
can't
just
say
you
know
it's
going
to
go
through.
You
know
a
plant
development
for
example,
or
you
know
there
will
be
a
condominium
plot
that
that
will
need
to
be
approved,
as
you
know,
an
additional
process,
but
nothing
else
so
I'll.
S
P
Times
have
changed
a
lot
since
then,
and
a
lot
of
things
have
happened
in
that
area.
I'm
aware
of
that
that
building
to
the
south
of
me
the
office
building
is
in
dire
dire
native
of
I
have
to
either
refurbish
it
or
I
have
to
do
something
different
there,
it
just
it's
not
conducive
with
with
the
times
right
now
it's
got
breezeways.
It's
got
just
a
bunch
of
mistakes
that
were
made
back
then,
unfortunately,
and
I'm
living
with
it
right
now
so
either.
P
I
have
to
do
something
to
a
larger
degree
which
to
me
would
be
wonderful
to
just
rejuvenate
that
whole
area.
It
needs
it
so
desperately
bad,
and
I
want
to
hope
that
it'll
clean
things
up
and
keep
things
a
lot
safer
and
better
and
I'm
not
trying
to
complain
or
brag
or
anything,
but
I
kick
at
least
five
people
off
of
the
property
every
single
day
that
are
doing
drugs
right
in
front
of
children
right
in
front
of
other
things.
P
It's
it's
not
a
good
scene,
so
I
mean
I
really
want
to
change
that
whole
atmosphere
there.
It's
not
good
for
the
area
and
yeah.
That's
absolutely!
My
intention,
just
like
the
coachman's,
my
father's
mantra
has
always
been
to
you-
know,
give
the
most
for
the
best
and
at
the
best
price
you
possibly
can
and
that's
exactly
what
we
want
to
do
with
those
condominiums
there.
I'm
looking
at
you
know
a
wonderfully
affordable
and
great
spaces
and
you're
right
close
by
to
the
city
center
and
you've
got
office.
I
mean.
P
Excuse
me,
you've
got
the
ballpark,
you've
got
liberty
park,
you've
got
13th
south
entrance
for
freeway.
You've
got
state
street
entrance
for
freeway
just
further
down,
I
mean
really
it's
a
wonderful
location
and
it's
almost
kind
of
the
gateway
to
the
city
center
and
I'd
like
it
to
be
that
way,
and-
and
I'm
hoping
to
do
that,
you
you
ask
me,
for
you
know,
like
some
type
of
a
solid
verification.
P
I
would
love
to
give
that
I
mean
I
I've
been
trying
to
la
I've,
been
working
on
this
for
a
long
time,
and
I
I
just
want
you
to
know
that
I've
taken
a
lot
of
things
into
consideration
at
first.
I
started
with
the
city
and
looked
into
a
hotel
there,
because
I'm
obviously
in
the
hospitality
industry-
and
I
thought
that
might
you
know,
be
conducive
for
me,
but
when
I
seen
how
many
hotels
were
going
up
and
permits
requested
and
everything
for
hotels,
I
decided
that
wasn't
the
right.
P
You
know
thing,
then
I
started
thinking
apartments,
but
then
I
I
didn't
like
the
apartment
idea,
because
I
want
ownership
so
that
people
are
are
going
to
care
about
what
they're
doing
and
what
they're
seeing
on
the
streets
there.
Just
like
I
do
with
my
own
businesses.
I
don't
want
anything
to
happen
there
that
shouldn't
be
okay
and
I
want
it
as
safe
as
possible,
and
my
design
is
definitely
going
to
keep
all
that
in
mind.
Of
course,
that
will
have
to
go
through
the
the
city
planners
and
everything.
P
But
you
know
my
ideas
are
always
trying
to
keep.
You
know
safety
and
and
beauty,
and
just
a
whole
bunch
of
things
in
mind
when
we're
doing
this
and
of
course
cost
cost
is
a
big
one.
I
want
it
affordable,
I'm
not
trying
to
make.
You
know
super
expensive
units
there.
That's
not
my
goal,
I'm
trying
to
make
the
best
for
a
super
reasonable
price.
That's
exactly
what
I
want
to
achieve.
D
I
think
thank
you
so
much
mr
nichols.
I
it
sounds
wonderful
and
I'm
excited
to
see
something
awesome
happening
there
and
with
the
new
zoning.
So
thank
you
for
for
having
that
spirit
and.
S
L
Thanks,
madam
chair
yeah,
I'm
also
really
excited
to
see
something
happen
on
this
corner.
I,
the
the
corner,
is
kind
of
a
frequent
there's,
a
free,
frequent
problems
around
that
corner,
so
a
catalytic
development
that
would
help
revitalize
that
area
would
is
much
welcome
and
I'm
really
excited
that
that
something's
happening.
L
I
have
a
couple
questions
specific
to
the
zoning
that
I
don't
know
if
katya
maybe
could
help
me
sort
of
just
sort
through
in
my
brain
it
the
parcel
so
for
form-based
urban
2,
and
I
think
I
know
why
that
was
chosen
because
I
don't
think
there's
really
a
good
sort
of
middle
ground
between
what
they're
currently
is
now
and
what
the
the
developers
trying
to
do.
L
I
think
we
saw
that
last
year
with
cleveland
court,
where
they
used
form-based
urban
too,
and
it
doesn't
feel
like
the
perfect
fit
because
it's
not
really
close
to
tracks
or
things
like
that.
So
my
question
is,
as
we
start
to
use
form-based
urban
two
and
places
outside
of
central
ninth,
where
it
was
started.
L
And
specifically,
I'm
thinking
forward
to
the
off-street
parking
ordinance
that
we
have
coming
forward
and
again
I
don't
want
to
be
a
person,
that's
advocating
for
more
parking
in
the
city,
but
the
whole
ballpark
commercial
corridor
area
is
in
the
general
context,
which
is
the
most
required
parking
and
forum
based
urban,
I
believe,
will
be
in
the
least
required
parking.
L
So
to
me,
there's
like
a
big
disconnect
that
we
have
one
parcel,
that
is,
that
is
going
to
be
zoned
in
a
way
that
requires
no
parking,
and
I
may
have
some
of
those
details
wrong,
but
maybe
just
help
me
sort
through
that
katy.
If
you
why
this
was
considered
the
correct
zone.
Choice
for
that
parcel.
S
Well,
you're,
right
that
you
know
the
fb
until
does
not
require
parking
and
so
parking.
The
the
cc
requires
a
lot
more
parking,
but
also
13th
south.
S
If
you
go
down
a
couple
blocks
you
you're
gonna,
have
you
know
a
track
station.
S
Fairly
close
to
it-
and
there
are
a
lot
of
buses
going
through
state
street
they're
they're,
not
the
ideal
buses,
because
they're
not
they're,
more
regional
buses
than
then
it
should
be.
I
I
think
that,
with
the
state
street
life
on
state
street,
it
calls
for
more
local
buses
to
be
in
that
area,
which
is
an
ideal
area
to
have.
You
know
a
transportation
center
hub.
Well,
not
centered,
but
you
know
a
lot
of
transportation.
N
L
I
think
that
actually,
what
you're
saying
is
is
true
that
it
makes
sense
to
have
more
frequent
transportation
along
state
street
and
then,
if
that
can
connect
to
13th
south
to
the
track
station.
That
could
become
a
really
great
sort
of
redeveloped
part
of
the
city,
and
this
might
be
a
great
first
project
for
that,
and
I
think
I
just
want
to
think
through
what
the
current
zoning
is
and
the
things
that
we're
we're
going
to
be
considering.
L
So
maybe
that's
just
my
flag
in
the
ground,
for
I
think
that
the
current
the
proposed
changes
to
that
neighborhood.
I
think
we
need
to
think
that
through
a
little
bit
more
so
I'll
I'll
address
that
again
when
we
actually
talk
about
that
ordinance.
But
it
feels
like
a
just
a
kind
of
a
weird
fit.
But
I
I
like
the
idea
of
that
parcel
moving
forward.
E
Thanks,
madam
chair,
I
mean
I
agree
with
the
comments
earlier.
I
I
want
I
like
the
project
point
of
just
personal
requests.
If
we
could
write
in
some
way
to
reuse
the
coachman's
sign
or
logo
for
a
place
making
kind
of
piece,
that
would
be
very
important
to
me
personally,
just
a
small
piece
about
the
neighborhood,
but
I'm
sure
we
can
talk
that
offline
katya.
E
If
you
go
back
to
one
of
your
slides,
you
showed
the
the
west
side
of
state
street
across
the
street
from
it,
and
you
showed
examples
of
three
buildings
in
there
that
are
next
to
wayne's
corner
going
south.
I
believe,
there's
the
christian
school
andy,
tran's,
mural
and
then
another
one
right
next
to
it.
E
This
is
sort
of
in
the
context
of
the
neighborhood.
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
fbun2,
which
darren
just
talked
about
what's
being
considered
or
thought
about
in
general
for
that
whole
neighborhood
on
state,
because
one
of
the
things
that
attracts
me
to
that
place
is
the
the
potential
for
that
west
side
of
the
street
to
have
really
interesting
facades,
single
story
facing
the
street
for
small
business,
and
if
you
go
higher,
you
got
to
go
behind
it.
Up
kind
of
like
a
floor
based
kind
of
setback.
E
S
This,
the
the
whole
area
is
supposed
to
be
looked
a
little
bit
more
carefully
once
the
life
and
on
state
master
plan
is
adopted,
and
I
believe
that
that's
when
my
indication,
you
know
that
I
got
from
management-
is
that
that
area
the
whole
area
is
going
to
be
looked
for
a
more
consistent
zoning
that
might,
you
know
fit
for
for
that
whole
entire
corridor,
but.
M
Thanks
so
koch
is
right,
we
are
trying
to
work
into
our
work
program
for
the
year.
A
look
at
the
zoning
on
on
the
states
recorder
as
a
whole.
One
of
the
unique
things
about
it
is
that
we
have
the
state
street
overlay
zone,
which
right
now
is
a
lack
of
a
better
term
kind
of
a
design
standard
overlay
than
applied
to
state
street
and
as
we
rezone,
that
a
lot
of
those
design
standards
are
going
to
be
duplicative
based
on
future
zoning.
M
And
so
we
have
the
opportunity
to
use
that
overlay
and
make
changes
to
it
at
the
exact
same
time
to
address
those
types
of
things.
If
there's
a
way
that
we
can,
we
can
find
a
way
to
keep
some
of
the
more
unique
building
placements
and
facades
and
have
development
behind
them.
That's
something
that
we
could
consider
as
part
of
part
of
that
project
as
we
look
at
both
the
overlay
and
whatever
the
future's
owning
for
the
quarter.
Maybe-
and
it
may
be
different
based
on
where
on
the
corridor,
we
are.
E
Yeah,
I
I'm
looking
at
this
and
the
coachman's
and
the
closet
next
to
it
really
the
old
sort
of
parking
out
front,
big
setbacks.
E
You
know
exactly
what
we
don't
kind
of
want
there,
but
if
the
only
alternative
is
the
close
set
glass
and
steel
facade
that
goes
straight
up
60
feet,
I'm
not
sure,
that's
it's
better
in
some
ways,
but
it's
not
necessarily
a
great
community
still
and
so
figuring
out.
How
did
we
get
the
old
buildings
because,
like
I
said
right
across
the
state
street
from
there,
excluding
maybe
the
wayne's
corner
service
station,
there's
some
great
structures
if
they're
incorporated
and
kept
could
add
the
character
to
that
community
to
be
important.
E
So
that's
on
my
mind,
the
the
other
question
is
sort
of
a
little
outside
the
scope
of
this,
but
I
want
to
bring
it
in
if
I
could
give
a
second
this.
The
fpun2
zone
allows
up
to
60
to
65
feet.
S
S
50
50
is
the
the
zoning
and
then
there's
a
requirement
for
a
setback
after
the
the
ground
level
of
15
feet.
N
E
I'm
I'm
in
favor
of
that.
My
concern
is
that
in
the
same
neighborhood
there's
a
cg
zone,
it's
mostly
was
it
west
of
what
main
street.
Maybe
I
can't
recall
them
out
there
I
mean
you
know
better
than
I
do:
there's
a
big
swath
of
cg
up
sort
of
the
west
side
of
the
city
up
to
I-15
and
there's
a
proposal
recently
on
brooklyn
avenue
not
too
far
from
here
that
was
sort
of
their
petition
for
conditional
use,
but
up
to
like
77
feet
on
a
very
narrow
street.
E
It's
not
a
state
street
with
it's
a
it's
a
side
street
and
it
seems
like
that's
going
to
go
through
which
be
77
straight
up
without
any
setbacks
or
step
backs
really,
and
it
seems
like
there's,
there's
some
problems
in
how
we're
thinking
about
the
side
streets
in
the
cg
neighborhood
part
of
this
neighborhood
and
maybe
a
major
thoroughfare
on
state
street
as
far
as
height
and
setbacks
and
step
back
so.
M
M
E
Yeah,
I
understand
I'm
sorry
to
sort
of
kind
of
convolute
this
request,
because
I
think
it's
a
good
step
forward
for
this
corner.
I
agree
with
that.
I
I'm
just
looking
east
to
west
and
saying
on
13th
if
we
went
from
state
street,
which
is
a
major
thoroughfare,
obviously,
and
the
max
height
in
the
corner
of
65
dropping
to
50..
If
you
go
further
west
to
third
west
and
we
could
have
some
max
heights
exceed
70.,
it
seems
like
it's
a
little
off
kilter.
E
L
Yeah
thanks,
madam
chair,
I
I
think
that
thank
you
councilmember
johnson,
that
helped
me
kind
of
formulate
what
I
think
is
sort
of
not
sitting
super
well
with
me
on
this.
I
I
think
the
project
we
need
a
catalytic
project
in
that
neighborhood,
and
so
I
think
it
should
go
forward,
but
I
think
the
my
fear
is
that
this
neighborhood
is
just
going
to
be
the
result
of
a
sort
of
a
patchwork
of
different
zones
based
on
which
which
developers
want
to
do
what-
and
I
I
like
what
this
would
do
to
the
neighborhood.
L
But
I
hope
we
can
invest
some
energy
into
sort
of
a
more
comprehensive
look
at
that
whole
ballpark
neighborhood
and
the
state
street,
and
I
know
that
that
becomes
the
thing
we
always
get
is
staff
time,
and
so
I
I
some
of
these
things
are
going
to
really
have
long-term
effects
that
might
not
be
as
they
might
be
good,
but
they
might
not
be
as
good
as
we
could
get,
and
so
this
goes
back
to
that
same
conversation.
We
had
at
last
year's
budget
season.
L
P
L
Long-Range
studies,
because,
because
I
think
to
me,
foreign-based
urban
2
is
a
zone
that
was
really
well
thought
through
for
a
different
part
of
the
city
and
I'm
not
sure
that
it's
the
exact
right
thing
here
and
I
don't
think
it's
the
right
thing
in
just
one
parcel.
I
think
we
need
to
think
of
the
neighborhood
kind
of
broker,
given
that
I
know
we
don't
have
time
to
do
that,
and
this
project
wants
to
move
forward.
I
don't
want
to
stop
it
from
going
forward,
but
I
I
think
we
really
need
to
invest
that.
A
Okay,
I
just
want
to
say,
mr
nicholas,
that
I
really
appreciate
the
thought
of
having
home
ownership
on
state
street
right
there.
I
mean
that
is
huge,
you're,
absolutely
right
that
when
we
have
one
our
city,
I
believe
we
don't
have
enough
home
ownership
opportunities
within
the
city
and
within
new
developments
that
are
coming
online,
so
being
thoughtful
of
that
particularly
being
thoughtful
of
a
price
range
that
people
can
actually
afford
and
live
in
and
want
to
live
in
long
term
really
is
what
we
need
on
state
street
in
this
area.
A
I
know
it
pretty
well
and-
and
I
think
that
that
buy-in,
that
you
talk
about
caring
about
the
space
that
you're
living
in,
because
it's
yours
and
you
own
it,
and
you
want
it
to
be
that
home-
that
that
you
bought
that
you
paid
your
hard-earned
money
for
it
and
I
think
renters
are
the
same.
A
But
there
is
a
difference,
sometimes
when
we
have
that
consistency
of
people
wanting
to
to
stay
in
their
place,
and
so
I
really
appreciate
that
we're
not
seeing
enough
of
it
from
developers
of
the
the
bringing
to
the
table,
the
idea
of
homeownership,
and
I
think
it
really
is
exactly
what
this
area
needs.
So
thank
you.
A
A
A
O
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Just
a
brief
intro
on
this
item.
Salt
lake
city
has
a
program
that
allows
relatively
more
energy
efficient
vehicles,
green
vehicles,
electric
vehicles,
higher
mileage
vehicles.
It
allows
those
vehicles
to
obtain
a
parking
exemption
where
those
of
the
sticker
on
the
car
those
vehicles
can
park
at
metered
stalls
downtown
for
up
to
two
hours
without
paying
for
parking.
That
program
started
to
go
into
effect
in
2006
in
2018.
O
So
pretty
recently,
the
administration
proposed
and
the
council
adopted
new
standards
for
determining
eligibility
in
that
pre-metered
parking
program
tied
to
a
set
of
epa
criteria
called
smart
way
elite.
The
new
criteria
adopted
in
2018
significantly
limited
the
number
of
qualifying
vehicles
on
the
basis
that
the
smart
weight
elite
thresholds.
O
Were
tied
to
new
technologies,
cleaner
technologies,
and
so
the
idea
was
to
reward
the
you
know
the
even
more
efficient,
the
even
cleaner
vehicles.
Now
the
administration
is
proposing
returning
to
the
2006
criteria
referred
to
in
the
staff
report,
and
I
think
also
in
the
administration's
trans
medal-
is
the
original
ordinance,
so
that
would
again
expand
the
inclusion
criteria
to
2006
levels.
So
all
of
those
vehicles
that
had
been
excluded
as
a
result
of
the
ordinance
change
in
2018
the
adoption
of
the
smart
way
elite
criteria.
O
Those
vehicles
would
now
be
eligible
for
the
program
again
and
with
that,
madam
chair
asked
to
turn
it
over
to
the
administration.
To
summarize
the
issue
further
and
answer
questions,
thank
you.
M
C
Yes,
thank
you.
We
have
dan
bergenthal
who
has
been
involved
with
this
program
for
a
long
time
and
he's
ready
to
to
present
and
answer
questions.
I
O
Thanks
yeah,
so,
as
was
mentioned,
this
program
has
been
around
since
2006
and
it's
been
a
very
successful
program.
People
really
like
it.
In
2018,
we
updated
the
program
because
we
felt
there
was
a
lot
of
vehicles
that
were
qualifying
for
the
program.
We
thought
it
might
be
a
little
bit
in
the
future.
O
However,
as
was
also
mentioned,
we're
now
feeling
like,
in
order
to
help
honor
the
early
adopters
of
the
green
vehicles
and
to
honor
those
who
have
purchased
the
vehicles
that
were
thinking
about
this
incentive,
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
they
purchased
their
vehicles
were
thinking
that
it
would
be
good
to
allow
them
to
keep
participating
in
the
program.
So.
O
Madam
chair,
could
I
jump
in
I
neglected
to
mention
one
important
thing
if
I
might
for
a
moment
here,
thank
you
and
also
their
first
policy
question
in
the
staff
report
has
to
do
with
whether
or
not
the
council
would
like
to
consider
this
amendment
in
the
context
of
the
annual
budget,
because
it
does
have
a
fiscal
note,
so,
under
the
2006
ordinance
standards
which
are
again
being
proposed
for
adoption
by
the
council
and
a
year
like
this,
had
it
not
been
governed
19,
so
on
a
normal
parking
year
under
those
more
inclusive
criteria.
O
The
city
estimates
about
90
thousand
dollars
in
reduced
parking
revenue
overall
under
the
more
restrictive
criteria.
The
city
estimates
approximately
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
in
lost
working
revenue,
so
the
estimated
difference
between
the
more
inclusive
criteria
and
the
more
restrictive
criteria
is
about
estimated
to
be
again
sixty
five
thousand
dollars
a
year.
So
I
just
wanted
to
call
your
attention
to
that.
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you.
So
I
had
some
constituents
contact
me
that
we're
saying
yes,
it's
great,
that
we
we
offer
these
incentives
and
we
should
do
what
we
can
to
incentivize
green
vehicles.
But
you
know
it's
still
car
traffic
and
downtown,
and
it's
still
you
know
we
should.
What
can
we
do
to
is
now?
The
time
I
think,
is
what
the
questions
we're
getting
at
is:
is
now
the
time
to
look
at
raising
parking
for
non-green
vehicles
to
try
to
encourage
people
to
be
engaged
in
active
transportation
or
is
my
concern?
N
Is
that
now
is
not
a
good
time
because
of
covet
and
because
of
the
downtown
businesses
that
are
suffering,
but
if
we
weren't
in
the
midst
of
a
pandemic,
maybe
you
know
I
would.
I
would
probably
be
pushing
more
on
that,
but
I
just
am
interested
to
hear
those
are
my
thoughts
as
a
person
that
that
doesn't
know
a
lot
of
specifics
about
this.
But
what
are
your
thoughts.
N
That's
like
one
idea,
but
I
mean
more
specifically
like
how:
how
can
we
encourage,
like
other
forms
of
active
transportation,
is
sort
of
a
broader.
O
So
those
are
the
kinds
of
things
that
we
are
really
supportive
of
and
are
trying
to
do
our
best
to
implement
in
this
city.
Right
now,.
B
Thanks,
I
I'll
just
chime
in
that
councilmember
wharton.
I
also
heard
from
some
of
your
residents
in
your
district,
who
very
much
match
the
description
that
dan
gave
at
the
beginning,
where
you
know
we
created
this
incentive
to
try
to
bring
people
into
these
transition
fuel
vehicles
and
though
we
cut
them
off.
B
Even
though
they're
still
transition
fuel
vehicles,
they
and
there's
a
lot
of
environmental
arguments
to
be
made
for
not
requiring
someone
to
dispose
of
their
vehicle
to
get
a
new
one
to
continue
with
benefits
and
there's
a
lot
of
benefits,
or
there
are
several
benefits
across
the
state
for
those
kind
of
cars.
So
I
think
it
is
a
mixed
bag
and
it's
hard
to
look
at
a
budget
increase.
B
However
slight,
this
might
be
in
the
perspective
of
the
entire
budget,
but
we
are
very
much,
as
you
know,
still
transitioning,
so
much
more
transitioning
to
go,
and
I
I
think,
in
a
very
a
nutshell
way.
We're
gonna
have
to
pay
to
get
people
on
the
transition
path,
whether
that's
a
you
know:
free
bus
pass
for
salt
lake
city
residents
or
free
fare
days
on
certain
red
air
quality
days,
or
it's
incentivizing
people
to
get
out
of
traditional
fuel
vehicles
and
into
hybrids
or
electric
cars
while
we're
on
that
transition
path.
B
N
Thank
you,
chair
fowler.
I
echo
the
mayor's
comments
and
appreciate
council
member
warted's
comments
as
well,
and
one
thing
that
I've
asked
john
and
his
team
to
think
about
as
a
2021
deliverable
is
a
real,
thorough
analysis
of
our
parking
fees
and
structures,
and
so
I
think,
if
we
find
ourselves
lucky
enough
to
potentially
bring
on
a
transportation
demand
management
planner
on
john's
team,
potentially
through
kind
of
an
expanded
scope
from
scooter
fees.
N
Who's
really
taking
a
proactive
look
at
our
parking,
and
one
of
the
things
that
is
top
of
my
mind
is
how
we
might
be
able
to
council
member
warden's
point
kind
of
tune
up
or
true
up
our
parking
fees
to
better
reflect
the
value
of
those
spots,
to
increase
turnover
at
our
businesses
and
then
also
potentially,
to
work
with
uta
on
what
an
expansion
of
the
free
fare
zone
might
look
like
as
a
consideration
so
just
want
to.
Let
you
know
that
that
is
something
that
we're
thinking
about,
and
I
have
on.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
kind
of
want
to
piggyback
on
tier
morton's
that
comes
about
to
the
fair
I
I
would
actually
would
propose
going
the
opposite
direction
and
just
eliminate
the
whole
free
parking.
I
mean.
I
drive
a
car
that
gets
free
parking,
but
and
all
I'm
trying
to
do
is
push
it
harder
to
make
people
use
the
public
transportation,
because
I'm
thinking
in
the
future
of
hey
we're
going
to
be
out
of
this
pandemic
and
we're
going
to
be
riding
buses
and
we're
going
to
be
taking
the
front
runner.
L
So
I
would
look
at
it
as
saying:
let's
not
step
back,
let's
either
stay
where
we
are
or
just
eliminate
the
free
parking.
Now
I
know
that's
hard
for
a
lot
of
people,
but
I
also
think
that
maybe
that
will
push
us
all
as
a
city
uta
and
every
in
the
residence
to
walk
more
take
public
transportation
ride
your
bike
instead
of
saying.
Oh,
I'm
gonna
get
two
hours
of
free
parking,
so
I
might
as
well
drive
because
I
I've
thought
about
that
too.
L
E
I'm
leaning
towards
dan
dugan's
perspective,
but
until
last
year
I
had
a
2004
and
a
2008
car
and
then
I
have
credit
to
a
2006.
E
there's
a
lot
of
families
in
my
neighborhood
who
can't
afford
these
cars
and
so
as
an
equity
issue.
If
we're
using
this
to
incentivize
people
to
buy
those
cars,
I'm
not
sure
that's
the
main
reason
people
are
going
to
buy
those
cars.
I
think
it
adds
a
little
cherry
on
top
to
their
already
decision
to
be
able
to
do
that,
but
for
a
lot
of
families
who
are
relying
on
cars
pre-2010
for
the
cost
and
the
size.
E
S
B
Chair,
yes
I'll
mention
also
that
part
of
what
the
part
of
the
many
requests
that
that
I've
received
to
go
to
bring
back
in
people
who
were
early
adopters
and
can't
afford
to
upgrade
their
fuel-efficient
vehicles.
Necessarily
I've
heard
the
equity
claims
there,
but
I
think
that
the
airshed
equity
and
inequity
from
areas
that
are
in
the
first
and
second
district
in
the
city
are
impacted
by
what
kind
of
cars
are
on
our
roads,
and
that
was
a
piece
of
our
consideration
in
bringing
this
to
you
today.
A
You
know
I.
I
just
want
to
leave
a
brief
comment.
I
I
really
resonate
with
the
mayor's
comments,
in
that
this
is
a
transition
and
that
in
some
way
and
a
difficult
one
I
think
you
know
utahns
are
very
used
to
driving
vehicles.
We
have,
I
grew
up
in
the
ogden
area,
and
everything
is
that
that
suburban
sprawl,
where
you
with
no
public
transportation,
really
right
and
not
not
an
investment
at
the
time
that
I
was
a
kid
right,
I'm
not
saying
anything
about.
A
I
did
now,
but
the
people
are
addicted
to
their
vehicles
and
like
them
and
and
rely
on
them
and-
and
I
think
we're
just
now-
really
working
with
uta
in
a
meaningful
way
that
we've
seen
over
the
last
couple
of
years
to
increase
bus
routes,
increase
our
rapid
bus
routes,
and
that
takes
some
time
and
we
recognize
that.
A
But
I
think
once
we
get
there,
it's
gonna
all
of
our
dreams
and
wishes
will
come
true
in
using
public
transportation
and
having
the
ability
to
use
public
transportation
in
an
efficient
and
meaningful
way
in
salt
lake
city,
but
that
we
do
kind
of
have
to
get
through
a
transition
period.
In
probably
a
couple
of
ways-
and
I
think
to
the
mayor's
point
and
to
andrew's
point
is
you
know
we're
gonna
have
to
pay
for
it.
A
A
That
has
an
incentive
in
some
ways
for
our
air
quality,
isn't
necessarily
just
going
to
force
people
to
get
on
the
bus,
not
yet
right,
and
so
I
think
we're
moving
in
that
direction,
and
hopefully
we'll
get
there.
A
Those
are
just
my
two
cents,
but
I
this
is
not
scheduled
for
anything
more
yet
we
will
keep
it
on
our
radar,
however,
and
my
one
last
comment
is
john
larson
watching
you
run
through
your
green
screen.
Your
background
really
just
made
me
happy
inside.
O
M
My
14
year
old
has
an
uncanny
knack
of
playing
jazz
music
on
the
piano
right.
As
I'm
trying
to
jump
in
to.
C
A
Yes,
hopefully
well,
thank
you,
john
and
dan
and
sam
for
this
presentation,
like
I
said
it's
not
scheduled
for
anything
but
we'll
keep
it
on
our
radar
and
next
up
item
number
10.
We
have
excuse
me
our
water
and
snowpack
report,
hello,
director
briefer.
It's
good
to
see
you!
I
don't
have
anyone
from
council
staff
listed
on
my
agenda.
So
if
it's
okay
laura,
I
will
just
turn
it
over
to
you.
T
T
We
talked
to
the
community
council
chairs
earlier
today
with
a
similar
presentation,
and
we
had
some
great
discussion
with
them
as
well,
and
some
invitations
to
go
visit,
our
community
councils
to
talk
more
about
conservation
and
about
water
supply
updates
with
me
today
I
have
our
water
conservation
manager,
stephanie
dewer
and
we've
got
our
water
resources,
manager,
tamara
prue
and
then
our
two
deputy
directors,
jessie
stewart
and
marion
rice
and
they're.
Here
with
me,
depending
on
whatever
questions
come
up
around
this,
they
have
amazing
expertise.
T
I
also
just
want
to
say
that
you
know
the
work
we
do
on
an
annual
basis
for
our
water
supplies
and
for
a
50-year
outlook.
You
know
our
our
staff.
Our
team
is
really
focused
on
the
sustainability
of
our
water
resources
for
now
and
for
future
generations.
So
we
have
a
very
passionate
and
a
very
smart
team
here.
Working
on
this,
I
do
have
a
presentation
to
share,
but
I
don't
know
that
I
can
share
it.
Oh
thank.
T
You,
okay,
so
in
a
nutshell,
we
we
are
a
little
bit
concerned
about
drought
this
summer,
just
based
on
some
of
the
some
of
the
data
that
we're
seeing.
But
I
do
want
to
say
that
it's
not
all
doom
and
gloom,
and
I
I
want
to
say
that
you
know
number
one.
T
We
have
benefited
by
the
long-term
thinking
of
our
predecessors,
where
we
have
not
only
some
direct
supply
sources
and
intakes,
but
also
a
good
amount
of
water
storage
that
we're
a
part
of
that
can
carry
us
through
multiple
drought
years
in
a
row,
and
so
that
is
that
is
the
high
point
and
then
another
high
point
is
we
have
a
community
that
has
proven
time
and
time
again
through
previous
drought
years,
that
they
know
how
to
conserve
water,
particularly
during
the
summer
peak
season
next
side.
Please.
T
So
we
we
do
have
a
broad
reach
with
our
water
supplies,
and
our
planning
includes
this
entire
area.
We
do
post
our
service
area
map
online.
So,
if
anyone's
interested
you
know
and
wants
to
go,
see
the
extent
of
our
service
area.
It
is
right
there
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
also
a
reminder
I
think
you're
all
aware
of
of
where
your
water
drinking
water
is
coming
from
in
our
service
area.
T
You
know,
depending
on
climate
conditions
and
demand,
50
to
60
percent
of
that
supply
comes
from
our
local
canyon
streams,
so
that
includes
city,
creek,
parleys,
canyon,
big
cottonwood
and
little
cottonwood
canyon,
and
then
about
30
to
40
percent
of
that
surface.
Water
comes
from
water
storage
in
the
provo
river
project
in
deer,
creek
reservoir.
T
That
project
was
constructed
post
dust
bowl
droughts
in
1934
to
to
act
as
a
an
insurance
policy
for
us
so
that
we
can
manage
years
of
drought
if
we
need
to.
T
T
I
just
put
this
in
here
because
you
know
water
resource
management
takes
on
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
different
responsibilities
and
they
all
have
to
work
together
and
so
source.
T
We
also
have
water
treatment
systems.
We've
got
free
water
treatment
plants
that
are
directly
owned
by
the
city,
that's
city,
creek,
parlies
and
big
cottonwood
treatment
plant,
and
then
we
are
through
metropolitan
water,
district
of
salt
lake
and
sandy
also
reliant
on
two
treatment
plants
there
as
well.
T
We've
also
got
a
water
distribution
system,
that's
got
thousands
of
miles
of
transmission
lines
and
mains
pump
stations,
we've
got
well,
we've
got
wells
and
reservoirs
and
dams,
and
so
quite
a
quite
a
bit
in
the
distribution
side
of
things,
and
then
we
take
steps
at
every
step
of
the
way
to
monitor
water
quality
and
our
resources
from
the
source
to
the
tap
and
with
all
of
that
work
you
can
see
we
exceed
all
of
our
safe
drinking
water
act
requirements
and
we
post
that
information
annually,
as
required
by
the
regulations
on
our
website
in
our
annual
water
quality
report.
T
Please
so
in
determining
our
annual
water
supply
outlook.
The
first
thing
we
try
to
look
at
is
what
will
we
start
with
during
this
water
year
and
we
rely
on
a
lot
of
different
data
sources
that
we
monitor
just
about
every
single
day.
T
T
T
T
Now
again,
we
still
have
more
time,
so
we'll
still
be
monitoring
this,
but
but
that's
that's
pretty
low,
that's
a
pretty
low
projection
for
this
time
of
year
and
it
seems
to
be
tracking
with
some
other
drought
years
in
recent
memory.
2015.,
it's
tracking
with
that.
T
We've
got
some
folks
that
are
tracking
both
the
stream
flow
and
snowpack
and
seeing
it
line
up
with
some
very
historic
low
low
water
years.
So
it's
important
for
us
to
be
noticing
and
talking
about
it
right
now,
so
that
we
can
plan
in
advance
next
slide.
Please.
T
This
is
lower
than
this
time
last
year,
so
we're
watching
that
closely
and
provo
river
water
users
association
is
watching
that
closely.
They
they
are
managing
that
and
we
sit
on
their
boards
through
metropolitan
water
districts.
So
we're
well
aware
of.
What's
going
on
there
and
and
reservoirs,
I
mean
this.
This
reservoir
system
is
really
important
to
us
and
it
does
provide
insurance
to
help
us
through
consecutive
drought
years,
but
it
is
also
really
important
for
us
to
be
wise
in
how
we
use
that
insurance
policy
next
slide.
Please.
T
So
water
conservation
and
demand
management-
you
know
reducing
overall
water
use
and
demand
during
the
summer
peak
is
critical
during
drought
years,
reducing
overall
water
use
and
demand.
Any
time
is
important,
but
you
know
during
the
summer
summer
peak
time
it
is
really
critical
and
based
on
our
current
data,
we
anticipate
that
we
may
need
to
initiate
our
water
shortage
contingency
plan
this
year.
T
and
that's
just
when
you
know
when
we
see
stream
flows
looking
low,
especially
and
snowpack.
Looking
looking
low
like
we
see
that
now
we
want
to
start
getting
the
word
out
to
our
community
that
voluntary
action
is
really
important
and
everyone
can
play
a
role
and
so
stage
one
of
our
water
shortage.
Contingency
plan
is
just
that
voluntary
action
we've
been
very
fortunate
and
I
think
it
speaks
a
lot
to
the
ethic
in
our
community
that
we've
never
had
to
go
beyond
stage
one
into
progressive
progressively
more
regulation.
T
We
have.
We
have
stages
two
through
five,
where
there
are
more
requirements
in
place.
Should
we
need
it,
but
we've
not
had
to
do
that
ever
in
our
history,
that
I'm
aware
of
it's
also
important
to
note
that
we
have
a
lot
of
resources
for
you
and
for
our
community
if
you
want
to
identify
ways
to
help
reduce
water,
just
real
practical
ways
to
do
so.
T
We
just
recently
updated
our
water
conservation
plan,
which
you
adopted
in
december,
and
that
has
some
some
great
new
programming
to
meet
new
goals,
but
we
also
have
some
really
great
resources
on
our
website
and
through
partner
agencies
and
and
of
course,
stephanie
is
a
wonderful
resource
to
answer
any
questions
and
provide
any
guidance
on
water
conservation
to
you
and
our
community
next
slide.
Please.
T
I
just
put
this
slide
in
because
I
think
it's
really
important
for
people
to
know
where
they
can
get
data
and
see
it
on
their
own
as
well.
So
we
have,
as
I
mentioned,
a
lot
of
information
on
our
public
utilities
website
on
our
drought
and
water
conservation
pages.
T
T
There
will
be
one
this
week
actually
with
the
colorado
basin
river
forecast
center
to
see
what's
happening
locally
and
regionally
as
well,
so
just
to
make
sure
we've
got
all
of
the
knowledge
we
need
in
order
to
make
good
decisions
moving
forward,
and
that's
the
end
of
my
presentation.
I'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Thank
you.
T
D
I
have
one,
but
maybe
if
that's
okay,
madam
chair,
of
course,
laura
maybe
this
is
a.
This
is
a
a
question
to
you,
but
when
would
be
appropriate
for
us
to
start
communicating
to
our
city
residents
to
start
thinking
about
converse
conservation
like
is
it?
Is
there
a
too
soon
time
to
start
talking
about
it,
or
should
we
just?
Do
it
like
right
now
and
start
alerting
people
a
little
bit
and
and
promo
encouraging
encouraging
them
to
to
conserve.
T
Water,
I
know
stephanie
has
a
great
response
to
that.
T
C
A
wide
palette
of
strategies
and
messaging
that
we'll
be
putting
out
on
social
platform
and
we're
meeting
next
week
to
finalize
that
and
we'll
be
starting
right
away.
So
yes,
council
person,
you're,
absolutely
right.
We
need
to
start
now
so
people
have
a
heads
up
that
this
is
coming
and
the
message
may
change
as
our
water
supply
situation
changes.
But
the
nice
thing
about
social
media
is,
you
can
be
very
adaptive
and
responsive
to
that.
So
yes,
we
will
be
starting
very
soon.
D
A
Anyone
else-
okay,
laura.
I
just
want
to
thank
you
and
your
team
for
this
presentation
and
for
all
of
the
hard
work
that
you
do.
Hey
I'm
sure
I've
said
it
a
thousand
times,
but
when
I
first
became
a
council
member
laura
made
me
want
to
be
a
water
nerd,
and
I
still
want
to
be
that.
So
I
always
love
the
data
that
you
provide
and
all
of
the
work
that
that
your
team
does.
C
A
A
Rachel,
you
are
you've,
been
suggested
to
the
bicycle
advisory
committee.
Why
don't
you
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
yourself
and
your
interest
in
that
particular
committee.
Sure.
F
So
I
have
actually
picked
up
biking
as
a
new
hobby
over
the
past
few
years,
and
it's
just
something:
I've
become
really
passionate
about,
and
it's
stemmed
for
me
wanting
to
kind
of
switch
up.
My
commute
options
from
taking
the
bus
in
the
train.
F
Bike
commute
to
work
and
I've
had
friends
who
have
expressed
that
they
also
would
love
to
get
out
and
bike
around
the
city,
but
they're,
just
too
timid
too,
because
they're
nervous.
Of
course,
cars
are
scary,
and
that's
that's
kind
of
why
I
applied
for
this,
just
because
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
share
my
input
and
help
out
where
I
can
to
get
more
people
on
bikes.
A
Well,
how'd,
you
get
in
that
nutshell,
just
kidding
it's
are
there
any
comments
or
questions
from
council
members.
L
Oh,
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
appreciated
reading
your
resume.
It
was
very
well
designed
and
beautiful,
and
I
like
beautiful
things
and
we
went
to
the
same
college
for
undergrads,
so
sweet.
Well,
you
actually
have
the
same
as
anna,
but
we
were
in
the
same
school
so
glad
to
have
you
helping
the
city.
A
Well,
rachel,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
desire
to
work
with
and
serve
the
city.
I
think
it's
always
awesome.
When
people
take
up
these
volunteer
opportunities
and
it
certainly
helps
all
of
us-
you
will
be
on
our
consent
agenda
tonight
at
our
formal
meeting.
You
do
not
have
to
log
in
if
you
don't
want
to,
but
that's
where
we
will
finalize
your
appointment
so.
A
Bye,
bye,
okie
dokie.
We
are
almost
there
kids.
Now
a
item
number
12
report
of
the
chair
and
vice
chair.
I
don't
think
I
have
anything.
Cindy's
gonna
handle
the
announcement
I
for
me
or
jen,
I'm
not
oh
there's
cindy
hi
cindy
hi.
So
james
do
you
have
anything
to
report?
C
Hi,
so
just
two
quick
things:
one
is
that
with
kobets
still
making
the
rounds
in
a
serious
way.
The
chair
and
vice
chair
have
asked
us
to
keep
our
distance
in
meetings
and
things
of
that
nature.
So
they've
authorized
us
to
continue
to
participate
via
web
x
and
and
zoom
and
things
of
that
nature,
and
we
don't.
C
We
want
to
do
our
best
to
avoid
sending
staff
people
to
in-person
meetings,
because
we
have
had
some
some
illness
in
the
office
and
we're
trying
very
hard
to
avoid
that.
C
So
we're
going
to
be
limited
to
to
the
electronic
for
until
things
calm
down
and
then
there's
a
little
piece
of
information
on
the
grant
holding
account
and
budget
amendment
number
seven,
there's
a
grant
that
the
fire
department
received
and
they
actually
two
received
dollars
more
than
was
originally
anticipated,
and
so
that
will
be
appropriated
in
budget
amendment
number
seven
if
the
council
so
desires,
so
that
stuff
wasn't
exactly
sure
where
to
list
it
or
how
to
list
it,
because
it
actually
ties
to
a
previously
approved
grant.
But
it's
good
news.
A
Thank
you.
We
don't
have
a
closed
session
today,
right
correct.
In
that
case,
everyone
we
are
done
with
our
work
session.
Thank
you
to
all
of
the
council
members
and
everyone
that
presented
and
participated
today,
and
you
have
an
hour
and
15
minutes
for
your
dinner
break
so
sylvia.
I
see
oh
sylvia
popped
in
and
I
was
like.
Did
I
miss
something?
Okay
with
that
get
out
of
here
see
you
at.