►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
B
Welcome
to
the
members
of
the
public
who
may
be
watching
our
usual
video
feeds
online,
even
though
we're
not
in
person,
this
meeting
is
still
considered
an
open
and
public
meeting.
Your
feedback
is
always
welcome
and
you
can
share
that
with
the
city
council
anytime
by
mailing
us
at
po
box,
145476
salt
lake
city,
utah,
eight
four
one,
one,
four
for
email
or
emailing
us
at
council.comments
at
slcgf.com,
or
by
calling
our
24-hour
phone
comment
line
at
801,
535-7654.
B
Today
it's
a
special
limited
rba
meeting
and
there
won't
be
general
comments
and
there
are
no
public
hearings
and
we
will
have
an
opportunity
for
comments
next
meeting
next
week
at
our
regular
rda
meeting.
So
this
is
a
special
limited
rda
meeting
because
we
need
to
keep
talking
about
additional
budget
discussions,
but
there
will
be
public
comment
next
week.
B
So
since
we
don't
have
general
comments
or
no
public
hearings,
we
will
now
move
to
item
c1
and
that
is
rda
budget
amendment
number
one
for
fiscal
year,
20
20,
21,
it's
a
follow-up
and
at
the
table
we
have
ben
ducky
from
the
council
office
police,
he's
a
policy
analyst
danny
walsh
and
tommy
hunsaker
welcome
the
floor.
Is
yours.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
If
you
approve
this
additional
amount,
the
reserve
would
have
about
2.1
million
dollars
available.
The
reserve
is
needed
to
cover
a
projected
shortfall
in
revenues
to
cover
the
bond
payments
for
the
theater.
The
total
amount
under
an
earlier
projection
was
seven
and
a
half
million
dollars
of
a
shortfall
from
fiscal
year
21
to
fiscal
year.
29.
C
C
C
C
The
annual
budget
is
also
requesting
funding
for
this
new
program.
In
the
amount
of
four
hundred
and
forty
three
thousand
dollars,
the
administration
has
stated
that
the
funding
would
go
into
a
holding
account
and
it
would
come
back
to
the
board
to
approve
the
criteria
and
a
process
for
what
this
new
program
would
be
prioritizing
and
how
people
would
apply
for
the
funding.
C
C
C
C
750
000
of
that
is
currently
tied
up
awaiting
reimbursement
from
adjacent
developments.
Next
to
the
new
track
station
downtown
at
650
south
main
street,
the
rda
fronted
750
000
to
get
the
new
track
station
built
with
the
understanding
that
adjacent
developments
would
reimburse
the
rda
for
that
amount.
C
C
B
B
D
B
E
Go
ahead,
yeah
just
to
clarify,
I
believe,
in
the
seed
funds
for
nine
line
and
state
street.
The
board
also
conducted
a
straw
poll
to
utilize
up
to
900
000
of
those
funds
for
an
acquisition
in
the
nine
line.
Neighborhood
just
wanted
to
add
that
in.
E
B
I
know
boar
member
mano
is
here,
but
you
might
not
have
any
questions
at
the
moment
so
go
on.
F
Yeah,
I
just
I
think,
thank
you
very
much
ben
as
usual,
as
always
wonderful
presentation
and
staff
report,
and
I
would
like
to
go
through
all
the
policy
and
get
answers
to
all
those
policy
questions.
As
you
propose.
I
think
there
are
very
good
questions
and
I
think
they
would
be
nice
to
be
answered,
and
that
would
just
start
off
with
a
and
go
down
unless
other
people
have
a
another
idea
to
start
with,
the
cbd
request.
C
Have
to
so
I'll
repeat
it,
I
don't
know
if
danny
or
tammy
have
those
questions
before
them.
The
question
for
the
cbd
commercial
development
loan
program
is:
is
there
a
timeline
for
when
the
board
would
have
a
proposal
to
revise
those
guidelines,
and
how
is
this
loan
program
different
than
the
revolving
loan
fund?.
D
Thanks
ben,
thank
you,
members
of
the
board
for
allowing
us
the
opportunity
to
answer
these
questions.
I
think
to
tackle
the
first
one.
We
do
not
have
a
set
timeline
for
the
new
policy
as
much
as
we
have
started
on
it,
and
I
think
we
anticipate
probably
having
those
initial
conversations
with
the
board
within
the
next
two
or
three
meetings
to
at
least
start
getting
the
high
level
priorities
for
that,
as
well
as
taking
that
before
our
advisory
committee.
D
In
other
words,
as
we
collect
tax
increment
from
the
project
areas,
we
are
statutorily
required
to
spend
them
initially
within
the
project
areas
from
which
they
are
collected.
And
then,
as
those
loan
pun,
funds
are
repaid
those
go
into
our
evolving
loan
fund
and
then
those
are
available
through
our
program
income
fund
and
available
to
be
lent
out
across
all
project
areas.
I
think
it's
important
to
keep
in
mind.
Commercial
funds
are
only
available
to
be
spent
within
project
areas,
whereas
our
housing
funds
are
allowed
to
be
spent
city-wide.
B
I
have
a
question
danny
about
that.
So
is
this
idea?
Does
this
idea
come
from
a
group
of
businesses
in
the
cv
area,
saying
hey,
we
need
help
here
and
we
would
love
that
if
you
guys
had
some
funds
available
for
us
or
is
it
you
guys
looking
at
the
cbd
and
looking
at
a
lot
of
vacant
businesses
or
buildings
right
now
at
the
ground
level
and
and
you're
thinking,
hey,
we
need
to
help
some
of
these
businesses.
D
That's
exactly
madam
chair.
I
think
this,
along
with
the
requests
in
our
next
year's
fiscal
budget
for
storefront
reactivation
is
all
part
of
just
trying
to
either
improve
and
or
fill
up
some
of
the
vacant
first
floor
space
as
well
as
look
at
ways
that
we
can
make
that
more
attractive,
either
to
the
property
owners
and
or
find
ways
that
we
can
provide
lending
directly
to
the
tenants
as
part
of
tenant
improvements.
B
Well,
I
like
the
idea
and
I'm
going
to
pitch
this,
and
you
know
we'll
have
there's
a
lot
of
new
development
happening
in
downtown
for
housing
and
if
it's
possible,
as
soon
as
we
hear
that
there
is
a
building
coming
up
and
maybe
will
display
some
of
the
existing
businesses
and
or
we
would
like
to
bring
some
local
new
businesses.
B
D
C
D
C
B
I
have
a
question
for
staff,
so
if
we,
if
we
have
a
funding
gap
of
the
sort,
how
do
how
do
we
cover
that
debt?
What
are
our
resources.
G
B
And
we
are
being
asked
to
use
594
000
for
the
debt
correct.
B
Okay,
great,
don't
see
anybody
and
spray
stuff.
So
let's,
let's
keep
moving
on
to
the
next
item,
then
ben
the
station
center.
C
Yeah
station
center
in
the
depot
district
attachment
one
is
a
map
if
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
it.
The
policy
question
is:
when
is
construction
expected
to
begin
and
there's
the
three
million
to
five
million
dollar
funding
gap?
Are?
D
We
have
not
yet
looked
at
revising
the
plans
in
terms
of
any
funding
gap,
mostly
because
part
of
the
anticipation
for
the
project
is
always
that
a
portion
of
the
land
sales
proceeds
would
be
used
to
fund
the
gap
and
fully
fund
the
project.
So
that
is
the
direction
we've
been
proceeding
under
and
that's
what
our
designs
are
being
estimated
out
at
this
time.
F
And
danny,
what
is
that
14
to
16
is
that?
Did
we
have
a
adjustment
to
that
with
the
latest
labor
costs
and
construction
material
costs,
or
is
that
a
prior
estimate.
D
Now
we
have
not
fully
updated
that
estimate.
Part
of
that
estimate
has
been
updated
as
it
relates
to
the
current
streetscape
design,
but
we
have
not
fully
updated
that
estimate
as
it
relates
to
some
of
the
utility
upgrades,
and
so
that's
something
that
would
need
to
be
done
as
well.
Okay,
great.
B
And
so
to
that,
can
we
have
a
couple
of
like
options
when
you
come
back
with
an
update
on
first
of
all
how
much
construction
is
as
of
whenever
you
know
the
most
recent
construction
costs
then
number
two.
B
If
there's
a
funding
gap
where
that
gap
may
come
from
option
one,
if
you
know
if,
if
property
is
sold
and
option
two
if
property
is
not
sold
so
so
that
we
have
an
idea
of
where
we're
at
and
then,
if
there's
anything
else,
we
can
do
with
the
design
that
could
lower
the
cost
and
then
that
not
have
a
gap.
A
gap
in
the
funding
gap.
D
Okay,
if
I
may
mad,
I'm
sure
could
ask
for
a
little
clarification
on
that.
We
are
we're
currently
working
on
updating
the
design
that
we
brought
to
the
board
a
couple
months
ago
in
terms
of
taking
that
further
through
the
design
process,
and
I
anticipate
as
part
of
that.
We
would
obviously
work
to
update
those
estimates
and
then,
as
we
get
closer
to
actually
being
in
a
position
to
put
that
to
bid,
is
when
we
would
probably
start
getting
more
finalized
engineering
estimates.
D
So
that
is
underway
right
now,
and
so
we're
certainly
happy
to
share
that
information
as
we
gather
it.
With
regard
to
the
disposition
strategy
that
is
actually
slated
to
come
to
the
board
next
week,
where
discussion
is
part
of
what
is
being
proposed
and
with
regard
to
that
being
proposed
as
a
land
sale.
And
so
we
can
certainly
have
that
conversation,
and
so
I
don't
know
as
part
of
that
discussion
if
it
then
makes
sense
to
get
direction
from
the
board
as
how
to
fill
the
gap
with
other
alternatives.
B
Okay,
so
after
the
presentation
you
want
us
to
this
to
to
discuss,
he
wants
us
to
discuss
that
a
little
bit
of
the
design
and
the
land,
the
potential
land
disposition
right
of
that
area.
D
It'd
be
the
proposed
disposition
strategy.
Yes,.
C
C
So
there's
a
series
of
questions.
These
came
to
staff's
mind
since
it's
a
new
program
and
it
would
be
you
know,
a
discussion
between
the
board,
but
also
with
the
administration.
C
D
I'm
happy
to
answer
the
first
one
as
it
relates
to
the
guiding
framework
and
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
tammy,
who
can
provide
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
what
the
program
would
be
and
some
of
those
questions
with
regard
to
the
guiding
framework.
This
essentially
targets
the
values
of
community
impact
and
neighborhood
vibrancy,
as
far
as
empowering
community
groups
to
do
improvements
within
project
areas
on
kind
of
a
faster
leaner
meaner
scale,
as
well
as
find
ways
to
make
the
built
environment
and
communities
more
livable.
D
E
Yeah
thanks
danny,
we
can
definitely
return
with
more
of
a
thorough
analysis
on
how
the
program
will
hit
the
guiding
framework
benchmarks,
but
essentially
danny's
exactly
right.
We're
contemplating
this
as
a
new
program
to
reinforce
public
arts
and
cultural
programming
by
supporting
community
organizations
in
better
carrying
out
their
missions
or
their
projects.
E
So
it
following
that
lighter
quicker,
cheaper
model.
We
would
look
at
incentivizing
either
small-scale
capital
projects
such
as
place
bait,
making
or
potential
small
scale
projects
to
building
facades.
Things
like
that
or
else
projects
could
be
more
technical
assistance
in
nature,
such
as
a
feasibility
study
or
a
planning
project.
E
But
a
key
component
of
the
program
that
we're
envisioning
is
that
eligible
projects
would
need
to
demonstrate
community
involvement
and
support
from
the
neighborhood
and
the
community
council,
so
we're
we
are
really
wanting
those
grassroots
community
projects
to
be
funded.
Through
this
program
we
have
not
yet
kind
of
flushed
out
the
structure
of
how
the
funding
would
be
allocated,
but
we
do
envision
that
it
would
be
competitive
in
nature
and
that
applications
would
be
ranked
and
evaluated
on
a
set
of
criteria
and
standards.
E
B
Yeah,
that
would
be
great.
I
I
mean
I'm
excited
that
we
can
spend
some
a
little
bit
of
funds
on
at
the
granary.
I
just
when,
when
I
read,
I
don't
know
if
I
read
it,
maybe
I
just
write
it
in
my
head.
It
said
non-profit
groups
to
to
accomplish
their
mission
and
and
values
and
to
me
it's
just
right
in
my
head,
it's
something
different
like
than
than
place
making,
for
example,
right
or
or
a
feasibility
study
for
something
there,
so
that
did
I
read
that
wrong.
Did
I
understand
that
wrong.
E
No
we're
we
have
not
really
defined
the
eligible
activities,
but
we're
kind
of
wanting
to
design
it.
So
it's
pretty
broad
in
nature
to
do
various
activities
to
support
cultural
organizations
and
public
arts
within
the
neighborhoods.
E
B
B
It's
the
name
of
the
group
a
couple
of
times
I
haven't
attended
recently,
but
I
would
like
to
know
how
many
organizations
in
the
granular
district
are
there.
I
know
there's
an
arts,
music
group,
obviously,
and
then
the
granary
and
and
it
wouldn't
it
would
be
nice
to
have
a
list
of
who's
out
there
and
what
their
needs
are,
so
that
we
can
have
a
better
understanding
of
how
these
funds
can
help
them
and
help
the
ground.
This
neighborhood.
B
A
B
C
B
H
B
G
Chair
so
just
a
few
things
updated
from
the
last
conversation
the
board
had
about
the
rda
budget.
The
intention
was
just
to
gauge
board
member
interest
for
any
adjustments
to
the
proposed
budget
before
we
have
to
adopt.
The
rda
staff
did
provide
some
additional
information
about
those
new
programs,
so
those
write-ups
are
on
that
first
page
of
the
staff
report.
If
any
council
members
are
interested,
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
them
during
the
budget.
G
Amendment
discussion
recognizing
it's
a
little
confusing
to
talk
the
budget
amendment
and
the
annual
budget,
but
hopefully
we
can
connect
them.
So
if
there's
any
questions
about
those
feel
free
to
hype,
it
jump
in
we've.
We've
noted
sort
of
four
general
areas
that
the
board
has
indicated
at
least
some
level
of
interest
in
changing,
and
so
maybe
I'll
go
over.
Those
and
board
members
can
give
me
like
a
sign
or
a
smoke
signal
or
something
of
to
continue
pursuing
these
changes
or
no,
you
know
we
suggested
that.
G
But
let's
let's
change
course:
one
of
the
areas
was
shifting
the
northwest
quadrant
housing
money,
the
the
housing
money
that's
generated
in
the
inland
port
jurisdictional
boundaries.
Instead
of
funding
the
adu
program,
funding
a
west
side,
urban
land
fund-
and
I
believe
the
rda
staff
is
in
discussions
with
some
different
council
members
about
sort
of
what
that
fund
could
look
like.
I
don't
think
you'd
need
to
necessarily
have
a
fully
sketched
out
program.
Like
some
of
these
programs.
G
I
think
you
could
have
an
intel,
general
intent
and
then
come
back
with
the
board
when
you've
got
kind
of
a
more
specific
proposal,
but
the
proposal
was
to
have
that
northwest
quadrant
money
go
to
that
use
instead
of
the
adu
use.
B
I
have
a
question
okay,
so
when
we
say
you
know,
you
haven't,
got
westside
urban
land
fund.
Does
that
just
mean
property
acquisition,
or
can
that
mean
that
we
would
like
to
fund
projects
that
are,
for
example,
condos
for
sale
or
housing
for
sale
like
for
as
affordable
home
ownership?.
G
I
think
that
there's
different
models
of
the
land,
trust
that
have
been
pursued,
and
so
maybe
that's
one
of
the
things
that
as
rda
works
on
it
more,
they
can
kind
of
hone
in
on
what
model
this
could
take
shape
as
because
there
are,
there
are
different
models
throughout
the
country
that
that
do
provide
for
that
kind
of
opportunity.
B
Okay,
so
that's
what
I
mean
as
well
interested
as
well
in
providing
you
know,
afford
for
the
entry-level
professionals
or
the
or
the
working
or
the
working-class
opportunities
for
them
to
own
their
own
place
house
home
condo,
whatever
that
might
be
at
an
affordable
rate
that
we
can
help
with
that.
I'm
happy
to
to
do
that.
G
I
Maybe
not
a
question
but
a
comment
in
the
sense
that
I
mean
the
rda
already
does
a
lot
of
this
in
the
we
have
the
the
housing
loan
trust
fund.
We've
got,
I
mean,
and
so
we
have
different
models
just
within
the
rda,
and
I
think
after
we
sort
of
decided
that
this
is
the
route
we
want
to
go,
which
I
would
like
to
support
this,
then
I
think
rda
staff
is
pretty
good
at
coming
back
to
the
board
and
saying
here
are
some
different
models
that
we
could.
I
It
could
be
a
nofa
type
of
thing
where
we
put
out
something
it
can
be
a
a
gap,
financing
thing,
it
could
be
property
acquisition
and
then
I
think
it's
just
up
to
the
board
to
decide
what
the
priorities
of
that
funding
would
be.
I
think
right
now,
it's
just
getting
it
funded
and
saying
this
is
going
to
be
dedicated
to
this
thing
in
the
north,
in
this
urban
land
trust
fund
that
will
facilitate
growth
and
development
in
and
benefit
the
residents
of
the
north
west
quadrant
area
right
jen.
G
And
I
think
that
this
amount-
that's
in
the
current
budget
this
year,
is,
I
think,
250
000
from
this
increment
and
I
think
in
future
years,
and
is
you
know
three
four
years
it
could
be
a
very,
very
substantial
amount
of
money
in
that
fund,
and
so
maybe
keeping
open
keeping
flexibility
is
a
good
idea,
considering
how
vastly
different
the
funding
stream
may
look
in
a
couple
years.
G
Okay,
so
then,
the
next
item
is
on
the
adu
program
that
we
referenced,
that
was
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
funded
with
the
northwest
quadrant
money.
I
think
we
heard
from
a
majority
of
board
members
that
they're
still
interested
in
funding
that
kind
of
a
program
just
not
through
the
northwest
quadrant
one
consideration
was
to
fund
it
through
program,
income
fund
and
you'd
have
to
figure
out
which
line,
item
and
program
income
fund
you'd
want
to.
G
You
know,
sort
of
shift
in
that
another
option
was
holding
off
on
funding
it
this
year,
because
the
funds
from
the
nine
line
are
not
yet
tax.
Increment
funds
are
not
yet
flowing
in
the
nine
line,
and
so
you
could
wait
until
there
actually
is
tax
increment
to
spend
in
the
nine
line.
So
those
are
just
two
two
options
for
that,
and
I
don't
know
rda
staff
may
have
other
suggestions
of
where
you
could
fund
that
program.
F
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
just
re-emphasize
the
effect
on
the
administrative
costs
and
the
burden
of
putting
up
an
adu.
We
need
to
really
see
how
we
can
improve
that,
so
it
doesn't
take
so
long
to
put
up
an
adu
and
it
costs
so
much
to
put
up
that
adu
administratively,
I
think
that's
should
be
part
of
that
discussion
or
consistency.
G
If
that's
the
goal
of
the
board,
we
might
need
to
consider
the
funding
source
in
a
different
way
than
rda,
because
the
rda,
if
it's
funded
through
some
sort
of
city-wide
or
intended
to
be
a
citywide
benefit,
you
would
have
to
track
the
and
ami
of
the
users.
G
So
if
that's
the
goal,
maybe
let
staff
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
talk
to
rda
staff
about
sort
of
what?
How
that,
how
it
might
make
sense
to
fund
that,
and
maybe
some
city
general
funding
funding
our
future
dollars
would
make
sense
for
that,
since
that
not
that's
not
as
restricted
by
state
law.
H
Madam
chair,
another
thing
that
I've
noticed
in
regards
to
adus
is
I'm
following
a
friend
of
mine
who's,
trying
to
build
a
third
structure
on
his
property,
which
is
an
adu.
He
owns
a
home
on
this
property.
He
owns
a
garage
on
this
property
and
wants
to
build
a
separate
adu
has
enough
land
to
have
the
30
area
for
the
open
space,
but
our
policy
building
code
is
mandating
that
his
third
one
of
his
three
structures
be
fire
suppressed,
and
this
is
a
residential
area.
That's
an
added
cost
to
it.
B
Sorry
then,
I
and
to
talk
that
like
to
talk
along
what
james
said.
I
also
have
friends
trying
to
build
an
adu.
I
think
it's
in
district
and
at
the
meeting
they
were
hopeful.
There
was
a
company
that
was
walking
through
it
and
they
have
the
space.
But
it
came
to
a
point
because
of
all
the
requirements
and
all.
F
So
I
guess
jen
you're
right,
it's
probably
not
rda
funding,
but
maybe
other
cities.
But
it's
that
rda
planning
funding.
We
need
to
look
at
all
costs
to
the
resident
or
owner
to
put
one
up
is
prohibitive
and
timely
and
that
we
gotta
break
that
barrier
down
a
bit.
G
Staff
can
get
together
kind
of
offline
and
figure
out
where
it
makes
sense
to
which
home
it
makes
sense
to
put
that
put
that
program
in
maybe
it's
even
in
housing
and
neighborhood
development,
or
maybe
maybe
under
tan
under
some
of
those
development
services
type
functions.
So,
let's
I'll
we'll
plan
on
checking
in
with
the
administration
and
getting
back
forward,
slash
counsel
on
where
that
makes.
E
B
B
G
Okay,
the
next
item
is,
we
think,
we've
heard
from
a
majority
of
board
members
that
they're
interested
in
changing
the
strategic
property
acquisition
line
item
to
being
more
of
a
north
temple,
strategic
intervention
and
being
a
little
broader
in
that
language,
so
that
as
different
opportunities
arise,
the
staff
can
act
quickly.
G
One
item
we
were
just
or
councilmember
rogers
was
kind
of
referencing
is
the
north
temple
viaduct
cda
that
has
been
paying
the
general
fund
for
the
debt
service
on
the
north
temple
viaduct
for
a
couple
of
years
it
was
essentially
overpaying
the
general
fund
and
the
general
fund
was
collecting
the
money,
because
the
debt
service
wasn't
wasn't
quite
as
high,
and
so
the
council
put
that
money
into
a
holding
account.
G
Last
year
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
includes
spending
about
a
million
dollars
of
that
fund
for
the
fair
park
public
market,
but
there's
about
six
hundred
thousand
dollars.
That's
left
in
that
fund.
There's
nothing
prohibiting
the
general
fund
from
allocating
funds
to
the
rda
for
the
rda
to
administer.
So
that's
one
source
of
funding.
Another
source
of
funding
is
the
last
two
years
of
that
increment
that
the
general
fund
has
collected
there's
about
a
million
dollars
in
excess
funds
for
the
council
wanting
to.
G
Temple
strategic
intervention:
I
know
we
made
that
name.
G
Discussions
is
the
north
london
catalytic
account
that
we
actually
talked
about
in
the
earlier
the
budget.
Amendment
discussion,
because
it
feels
like
a
very
similar
use
right
and
so
then,
that
increases
that
size
of
the
plot
in
order
to
make
sort
of
impact.
E
Math,
I
think
we
have
a
slightly
different
accounting
on
that
than
council
staff.
We're
showing
we
have
898
000
left
to
spend
on
the
north
temple
catalytic
project
account
because
a
portion
of
those
funds
were
allocated
to
folsom
corridor
design.
I
believe.
A
G
So
that
would
take
that
total
amount
to
just
under
4
million.
If
you
did
the,
if
you
started
with
a
million
that
was
proposed
in
the
mayor's
budget,
and
then
you
added
the
catalytic
project
account.
Thank
you
cami
for
clarifying
those
amounts
and
the
debt
service.
Viaduct.Service
overage,
calling
it
over.
I
G
I
G
A
million
proposed
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
for
strategic
site
acquisition-
oh
that's
great,
and
so
I'm
sorry,
but
renaming
the
purpose
right
using
that
same
amount
of
money
renaming
the
purpose
to
this
strategic
intervention.
Since
that's
consistent
with,
I
think
what
the
mayor's
recommendation
was
all
about.
G
A
I,
like
your
number
better.
I
I'm
definitely
not
opposed
to
combining
the
pool
so
that
we-
and
so
we
can
be
more
flexible
with
it
and
have
a
larger
pot
to
draw
from.
G
Okay,
okay,
great
then
as
board
member
or
as
board
chair
of
elder
morris
mentioned
some
council
members
have
expressed
an
interest
in
prioritizing
homeownership
or
family
sized
units,
and
rda
staff
mentioned
this
in
the
sort
of
first
discussion
of
the
budget
and
that
when
the
rda
staff
does
a
nofa,
that's
an
opportunity
for
the
board.
If
you
want
to
say
rather
than
having
all
this
criteria
and
sort
of
putting
it
out
there,
that
any
of
those
criteria
are
eligible.
G
If
you
really
want
to
focus
sort
of,
you
know
one
million
of
the
dollars
on
family
size
and
home
ownership,
and
I'm
totally
plugging
that
number
out
of
the
air.
But
that's
what
the
board
did
a
couple
years
ago,
when
you
decided
you
know,
we
want
some
of
the
nofa
dollars
to
be
focused
on
areas
of
opportunity,
and
so
then
that's
that
direction
to
rda
staff
that
yes
accept
applications
from
everywhere.
But
this
pot
of
money
should
be
reserved
for
this
specific
purpose,
and
so
that
was
one
idea
staff
had
about.
G
You
know
how
to
further
that
goal,
but
you
would
have
to
give
staff
some
direction
about
how
you
you
know
how
much
money
you
want
kind
of
earmarked
for
that
concept
or,
if
you
just
want
rda
staff,
to
consider
that
highly
in
terms
like
in
terms
of
ranking
criteria.
If
that
is
one
of
the
most
important
criteria,.
F
F
B
Well
to
a
specific
number
or
just
to
say,
if.
G
Which,
if
which
approach
you
want,
if
you
want
the
approach
where
you
just
say
to
the
rda
staff,
these
are
the
two
most
important
criteria.
So
when
you
get
all
the
applications
score,
those
most
highly,
I
think
the
challenge
with
that
is
that
you
might
not
get
applications
that
fit
those
criteria.
And
then
the
money
is
spent.
You
know
on
other
things,
because
obviously
you're
at
the
mercy
of
whatever
the
private
sector
is
doing
that.
G
That
was
kind
of
the
experience
with
the
areas
of
opportunity
nofa,
which
is
that
it
took
a
couple
of
years
for
enough
applications
to
come
in
to
actually
spend
those
dollars.
But
what
it
did
is
it
furthered
the
board's
policy
goal
of
investing
in
those
areas?
So,
even
though
it
took
a
little
bit
longer
to
do
and
it
and
it
meant
that
that
money
didn't
get
sort
of
spent
on
something
else.
So
those
are
two
different
approaches
and
you
can
you
can
choose
which.
F
Very
much
in
favor
of
the
homeownership
and
the
family
size
units,
I
think
that's
important,
especially
on
the
homeowner
side.
It'd
be
nice
for
people
to
actually
own
their
home
instead
of
being
the
those
with
the
house
and
those
renting
the
house
and
so
it'd
be
nice
to
be
able
to
increase
that
availability
and
the
option
for
the
people
to
buy
a
house
in
a
house.
That's
you
know
that
can
fit
a
family,
so
I
would
be
in
favor
of
that.
E
F
E
E
Just
to
clarify,
currently,
the
rda
doesn't
have
any
programs
really
available
to
provide
mortgages
to
homeowners.
I
think
that
will
be
part
of
the
discussion
with
the
urban
wealth
fund
for
the
west
side
and
maybe
that's
something
we
apply
city-wide,
but
right
now
the
housing
development
loan
program
is
focused
more
on
construction
loans
for
the
development
of
housing,
and
so
we
do
have
a
product
through
that
program
that
provides
construction
loans
for
home
ownership.
But
it's
a
shorter
term
construction
loan
with
like
a
two-year
term
that
is
paid
off
with
the
sell
of
the
unit.
E
G
I
think
it
might
be
better
from
a
city
like
operational
perspective,
to
keep
that
home
that
mortgage
stuff
underhand,
so
they
they
do
have
mortgage
assistance.
Programs
already
hand
does,
and
so,
if
the
council
wanted
to
enhance
those,
you
would
have
to
look
at
that
from
a
general
fund
perspective,
not
rda.
B
In
my
head,
what
what
I'm
thinking
about
with
our
funds
as
we
get
asked
for
the
construction
loans
or
the
gap
funding,
is
to
prioritize
projects
that
will
actually
be
sold
to
people
for
them
to
own
and
or
projects
that
people
are
some.
Some
developers
are
saying
it's
too
expensive
to
build
more
than
two
units,
and
we
can
do
it.
You
know
for
in
everyone
in
the
building
that
it's
for
for
rent,
and
so
I
would
like
the
rda
to
intervene
there
and
say:
okay.
B
Well,
we
understand
that,
but
we
would
like
to
incentivize
you
to
still
go
ahead
with
it
and
provide
housing
that
a
family
will
fit
and
it's
not
just
a
two
bedroom
doesn't
make
sense
like
so
it's
not
necessarily
that
I'm
saying
there
to
there.
Yeah
hey,
go
ahead
and
create
a
program
to
do
down
payment
assistance.
B
You
know,
grant
people
ten
thousand
dollars
for
the
down
payment
like
candace
and
other
non-profit
organizations,
it's
more
about
incentivizing,
all
of
the
development
and
developers
that
come
to
us
and
say
hey.
We
need
funds
for
this
or
for
that
and
for
us
to
say:
okay,
that's
cool!
We'll
get
priorities
to
the
ones
that
are
doing
this
right
now,
they're
doing
the
homeownership
or
or
willing
to
do
bigger
apartments.
G
I
think
that
that
the
challenge
is
that,
depending
on
your
approach,
you
may
not
have
anyone
apply
to
do
home
ownership?
I
know
that
the
financing
for
apartments
is
a
lot
more
attractive
than
for
condos
right
now,
which
is
why
a
lot
of
developers
are
are
pursuing
that
and
so
it
it
might
be
a
challenge
for
rda
staff
to
say
no
to
you
know
if
there's
15
developments
that
have
come
and
applied
if
the
rda
staff
doesn't
have
that
much
like
it
doesn't
have
that
direction.
G
B
That
make
sense
so
for
you
you're
saying:
let's,
let's
set
aside
a
little
bit
or
however
much
for
that
purpose
and
then
the
rest
for
regular
projects.
G
I
I
don't
know
to
me
to
me
that
kind
of
preserves
the
policy
intent
a
little
bit
more
clearly
as
opposed
to
and
then
of
course,
the
rda
staff
can
always
come
back
and
say
you
know,
we've
got,
we've
got
way
more
applications
for
home.
G
We
were
expecting,
and
so
can
the
board
shift
that
allocation
to
allow.
For
that.
I
think
that
that
those
conversations
have
come
up
in
the
past,
even
with
the
areas
of
opportunity,
money
and
and
the
rest
of
the
pool
so,
but
we
just
wanted
to
get
a
sense
from
the
board.
How
strongly
that
policy
interest
was
strong
enough
to
set
that
money
aside,
or
is
it
just
that
you
want
them
to
put
that
criteria
at
the
top
of
the
pile.
B
F
I
guess
I'd
be
like
to
keep
it
at
the
top
of
the
priority,
but
not
necessarily
you
know
I
like,
like
keeping
the
top
of
pirating.
B
Let's
set
aside,
I
don't
know
two
million
or
a
million
dollars
or
so
just
to
start
just
to
get.
You
know
that
the
that
idea
out
in
the
world,
you
know
that
some
people
know
that
va
has
allocated
some
funding
for
that
those
types
of
projects,
so
that
we
can.
What?
What
about
you
amy
james,
dennis
he's
available.
I
I
To
just
have
it
at
the
top
of
the
priority
list,
I
think
unfortunately,
market
dix
dictates
oftentimes
when
we're
dealing
with
development
and
the
thing
that
we
saw
with
the
high
opportunity
pot
of
money
is
that
it
did
sit
there
for
a
few
years
and
it
was
like
four
million
dollars.
I
I
think,
is
what
we
had
in
there,
and
I
mean
I
just
I
guess
my
philosophy
is
that
I
have
a
little
bit
of
a
problem
when,
when
we
have
money
sitting
there-
and
we
know
that
we
can
incentivize
affordable
housing
for
with
it.
I
But
we
have
this
like
earmark
on
it
that
then
we
can't
get
it
out
onto
the
streets
and
out
into
the
development
world,
and
we
can
still
keep
incentives
on
it,
and
we
can
still
say
this
is
you
know
you
have
to
check
these
boxes
to
get
the
money,
but
just
holding
it,
and
it's
a
it's.
I
I
kind
of
walk
a
line
on
that.
I
feel
a
little
conflicted,
but
for
me
right
now,
I
think
just
keeping
it
at
like
this
is
a
real
priority
for
the
council.
A
B
A
I
agree
with
amy,
I
think
it'd
be
great
to
keep
a
preference
there,
but
not
limit
the
usage
so
that
we
can
still
make
best
use
of
the
funds
at
any
given
time
based
on
what
projects
are
before
us.
But
we
can
certainly
prefer,
if
there's
a
choice,
to
go
with
a
homeownership
model.
F
More
just
one
more
point,
just
just
for
the
discussion
purposes.
You
know
I
agree.
We
want
to
make
it
a
priority.
The
one
question
I
have
is,
if
it's
so
much
easier,
just
for
a
developer
to
get
the
funding
for
a
rental
property
he'll,
never
try
to
get
that
home
ownership
property,
because
those
are
so
much
more
difficult
for
them
to
build
and
to
pencil
out
so
it'll
always
be
easier
to
fall
back
into
the
the
rental
side.
F
And
then
we
end
up
with
a
lot
of
we
don't
end
up
with
a
very
we
end
up
with
very
few
homeown
ownership
of
opportunities.
So
I
want
to
keep
it
the
priority,
but
I
also
want
to
have
that
discussion.
Maybe
in
the
future,
is
if
we're
not
getting
them,
then
maybe
we're
making
it
too
easy
for
the
rental
side
of
the
house
and
we're
never
gonna
get
the
the
the
home
ownership
side,
because
it's
too
easy
for
them
just
to
go
to
the
rental
and
back
off.
A
D
Thanks
man,
I'm
sure
I
just
wanted
to
throw
out
there
as
a
reminder
for
the
board.
I
think
that's
entirely
the
priority
and
direction
that
we've
heard
from
the
board
members
as
it
relates
to
the
urban
development
fund
idea
and
and
proposing
that,
and
so
I
think
we
can
certainly
add
that
as
a
priority
for
this
nofa
funds.
But
I
think
long
term.
D
I
think
it's
important
for
the
board
to
realize
that
if
we
prioritize
that
money
for
that
sole
purpose,
you've
kind
of
already
done
that
with
the
long
term
of
having
a
pot
of
money
available
for
home
ownership,
and
we
can
create
that
program
to
tackle
all
of
these
issues,
we're
seeing
as
far
as
trying
to
get
developers
either
to
incentivize
it
or
to
find
ways
to
go
out
and
do
it
more
of
ourselves.
And
so
I
think
we're
going
to
get
where
the
board
wants
to
do
with
those
two
programs
in
and
of
itself.
D
B
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that
point
yeah,
I
think
it's
great.
I
think
the
point
I
was
trying
to
make
was
like.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
people
understand
that
we're
serious
about
it
right
with
just
setting
aside
just
a
portion
of
the
funds.
I
was
serious
about
it
not
just
this
is
a
wish
and
desire
and
our
priorities
this,
but
if
it
doesn't
happen
whatever
you
know,
so
we
don't
want.
We
don't
want
that.
Certainly
not
we
want
people
to
we.
B
We
won't
be
two
people
to
know
when
developers
know
that
we're
serious
and
we're
trying
to
help
solve
an
issue
that
we
are
having
in
this
hot
market
right
now
and
we
might
be
behind
a
little
bit
but
at
the
same
time
we're
trying
to
be
a
little
bit
proactive
or
whatever
happens
next,
so
I
guess
the
direct.
So
the
direction
then,
from
what
I
hear
from
the
board,
is
to
tell
the
rda
staff
our
priority
is
that
to
to
prioritize
projects
homeownership
and
family
size
units
correct.
B
A
B
D
D
E
That's
exactly
right:
that's
why
we
developed
the
housing
funds
allocation
policy.
The
way
we
did
so
the
board
does
have
more
control
and
there's
more
transparency
on
an
annual
basis
on
targeting
funds
to
current
community
need.
Rather
than
having
these
static
funding
priorities
that
live,
you
know
a
decade
or
more
hidden
within
the
policy.
E
You
can
review
those
on
an
annual
basis
so
for
this
year,
if
the
board
selects
just
to
put
that
family
housing
as
the
top
priority,
we
can
look
at
that
and
then,
when
we
return
next
year
before
the
budget
process
will
actually
come
with
a
review
of
the
outcomes
from
how
this
funding
was
spent
and
then
re-engage
the
board
and
that
funding
discussion
for
the
next
funding
year.
So
maybe
next
year
you
could
actually
allocate
a
specific
pot
of
money,
a
million
dollars
or
something
to
family
housing.
A
B
All
right
jen
do
we
have
the.
G
Only
other
item
I
have
listed
well
two
other
items.
One
was
evaluating
funds
that
you
reprogrammed
or
didn't
program
as
part
of
the
budget.
Amendment
discussion,
I
didn't
hear
that
you
guys
were
holding
back
on
any
of
those
allocations,
so
maybe
we
can
just
skip
over
that
unless,
unless
I'm
mistaken,
the
other
item
is
areas
of
interest
for
potential
legislative
intents,
and
those
are
just
you
know
some
ideas
that
staff
has
thrown
out.
G
If
you
have
other
ideas
for
legislative
intents
for
like
and
for
new
council
members,
legislative
intensive
sort
of
a
way
for
the
board
or
council
to
put
in
a
policy
an
official
policy
language,
sort
of
way,
your
hopes
and
wishes
for
the
coming
year
and
they're
not
binding
as
we
like
to
say,
but
it
is
a
way
to
help
kind
of
put
in
the
record
what
your
hopes
are
for
this
for
that
money,
that's
it.
B
Yeah,
I
I
agree.
Thank
you.
I
I'm
still
on
supportable
items
a
and
b,
it's
important
that
we
do
have
you
know
understanding
the
full
structure
of
accounts
within
the
rda,
including
the
fund
balances
and
capital
projects
and,
of
course,
the
energies
efficient
projects.
So
I'm
for
it,
I'm
still
good
with
it.
B
All
right,
I
don't
see
anybody's
mic
unmuted,
so
we
are
then
moving
on
to
item
three
and
report
an
announcement
from
the
executive
director.
I'm
not
sure
if
the
mayor
is
here
and
she
has
something
to
to
say.
B
And
then
she
doesn't
have
comments
today,
then
we're
moving
on
was.
B
A
I
just
yeah,
I
don't
want
to
join,
I'm
sorry,
I
joined
it
just
the
right
moment.
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
shout
out
to
danny
and
the
rda
staff
to
thank
them
for
their
work
on
the
budget
this
year
and
on
top
of
everything
else
that
they
are
doing
and
managing
and
evolving
for
the
rda.
So
thank
you
danny
and
all
the
rda
team.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
and
same
thing
guys,
thank
you
for
putting
all
this
stuff
together,
it's
a
lot
and
we
appreciate
it
a
lot
number
four
then
report
and
announces
from
the
rda
staff.
D
B
B
I
We
are
close
enough
and
I
think
what
we'll
do
everyone,
because
I
need
to
plug
in
my
computer
for
a
minute.
Everyone
take
like
a
we're,
not
technically
scheduled
for
our
first
agenda
item
until
3
30,
but
I
don't
want
to
take
that
long
because
we
have
a
long
night.
So
maybe
everyone
take
about
an
eight
minute
break
right
and.