►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
Today,
salt
lake
city,
council
meeting,
we
are
happy
to
have
you
here
while
we
continue
to
hold
our
meeting
remotely
due
to
safety
precautions
related
to
the
pandemic
and
the
earthquake.
But
thank
you
for
joining
us.
We
will
begin
with
a
moment
of
silence
as
we
recite
the
pledge
of
allegiance
when
we
are
done,
we
will
turn
our
audio
back
on.
B
As
we
begin
tonight's
formal
meeting,
I
would
like
to
highlight
that,
as
the
city's
elected
officials
council
members
not
only
serve
on
the
city
council,
we
also
serve
as
the
local
building
authority
board
and
the
redevelopment
agency
board
as
we
move
through
each
of
those
agendas.
Think
of
it,
as
the
city
council
wearing
a
different
hat
for
each
of
their
roles.
B
B
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
decorum
begin
from
the
moment
you
arrive
into
our
virtual
meeting.
The
council
respects
all
points
of
view
and
we
welcome
new
insights
while
giving
your
comments,
please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling,
profanity
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks
again
we're
trying
to
create
a
place
where
everyone
can
feel
that
their
voice
is
being
heard
and
a
place
of
respect.
B
If
you
use
profanity
during
your
comment,
your
line
will
be
muted
and
if
any
comments
reach
a
level
of
disrespect,
I
will
ask
that
you
be
muted
and
you
will
forfeit
your
opportunity
to
address
the
council
tonight
if
you
feel
you
need
to
use
profanity
to
express
your
point.
You're
welcome
to
email,
councilmembers
or
call
our
comment
line.
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
decorum.
B
If
your
registered
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
our
staff
will
use
the
chat
feature
to
work
with
you
on
that
robert
knutsman
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate.
Please
monitor
the
chat
screen
for
information
and
or
feel
free
to
message,
robert
with
any
questions.
B
535-7654
will
begin
with
our
first
hearing
item
for
the
local
building
authority.
Taylor
hill
on
our
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
and
unmuting
lines.
Once
we
open
public
comment,
taylor
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
the
people
can
have
some
notice
and
be
prepared
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak,
taylor
will
say
your
name.
I
mute
your
line
and
you
may
begin.
Please
state
your
name
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
start
at
the
two
minute
mark.
B
B
B
C
Yes,
council,
chair
for
this
item.
It
looks
like
we
have
about
nine
commenters.
The
first
one
will
be
carolyn
fleming,
followed
by
morgan,
call
and
then
pacheco,
la
taro.
D
Madam
chair,
if
it
would
be
helpful,
I
can
give
a
little
context
about
what
the
local
building
authority
is
and
it's
a
pass-through
for
debt
service
on
the
glendale
and
marmalade
library
branches.
So
it's
it's
essentially
just
debt
service
for
those
those
buildings
that
have
already
been
built.
C
Ahead:
okay,
my
apologies
for
this
item.
It
looks
like
we
have
four
commenters,
which
will
we
will
start
with
the
deborah
chaltron,
followed
by
tyre
hauser
and
then
lucy
hauser.
E
Hi,
yes,
it's
my
understanding
that
this
is
in
regards
to
sorry,
let
me
just
try
again.
I
came
to
salt
lake
city
six
years
ago
with
my
boyfriend
and
it
was
through
tennis
at
coach
mike's
that
we
developed
our
circle
of
friends.
E
I
wasn't
even
a
tennis
player
at
the
time,
but
after
watching
my
boyfriend
plant
picked
up
the
sport
and
at
the
age
of
43,
it's
given
me
a
social
network
that
didn't
exist
before
so
it's
more
than
playing
tennis
to
me
it's
my
way
of
connecting
to
the
community
and
there's
nothing.
I
look
forward
to
more
than
seeing
my
friends
at
a
tennis,
workout
or
meeting
my
beginner
tennis
league
friends
for
dinner.
Every
month.
E
All
this
is
made
possible
has
been
made
possible
through
the
city-owned
facilities,
tennis
facilities
at
liberty,
park
and
oak
hills.
Tennis.
I
would
love
for
the
city
to
help
the
the
liberty
park
and
oak
hills,
tennis
clubs
to
continue
to
provide
for
the
community.
E
Anyway,
one
of
the
things
I
loved
about
salt
lake
was
the
fact
that
the
city
has
done
an
amazing
job
at
maintaining
facilities
and
keeping
the
whole
city
so
well
run
it's
it's
one
of
the
most
profound
things
the
city
can
do
is
to
support
its
community.
This
way
and
the
tennis
facilities
at
liberty
park
and
oak
hills
would
tremendously
benefit.
It
would
so
help
the
community
further
if
the
city
would
step
up
and
and
fund,
what's
necessary
to
keep
it
successful
these
facilities.
E
F
B
And
I
think
that
it's
a
little
bit
confusing
and
especially
since
we
are
on
webex
and
it's
even
more
confusing,
cindy
or
jen,
perhaps
you
could
give
a
little
bit
longer
explanation
of
the
local
building
authority
and
what
this
topic
is
and
just
again
for
people
listening.
We
will
have
general
comment
for
the
city
council
a
little
bit
later
in
the
agenda.
F
And
I'll
add
one
thing
before:
jennifer
explains
the
local
building
authority.
There
is
a
budget
hearing
tonight
and
that
will
be
coming
up
in
a
few
minutes
this.
This
is
not
the
budget
hearing.
So
if,
if
someone
wants
to
comment
on
the
city
fees
or
the
taxes
or
improvements
that
they
want
to
have
made,
then
that's
when
they
would
speak.
D
I
could
see
how
this
is
a
little
confusing.
The
the
the
technical
term
for
the
budget
that
we're
talking
about
within
the
local
building
authority
is
the
capital
projects
account
which
could
cause
people
to
think
capital
projects
as
it
relates
to
the
general
fund,
but
just
to
clarify
this
particular
hearing
relates
to
local
building
authority,
which
at
this
point,
is
just
a
pass-through
for
debt
service
on
the
glendale
library,
branch
and
marmalade
library.
D
Branch
like
cindy
said
the
hearing
later
in
the
evening
when
it
relates
to
the
overall
annual
budget,
is
an
appropriate
time
for
the
public
to
talk
about
proposed
capital
projects
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget,
as
it
relates
to
the
general
fund.
D
B
Hopefully,
that
made
the
muddy
waters
muddier
or
clearer
a
little
bit
so
taylor,
let's
get
back
and
see
if,
where
we're
at.
C
Okay,
so
we
will
hear
from
tayer
hauser
and
then
kelly
maurer.
G
So
I
I
think
I
may
have
to
speak
later.
If
that's
all
right,
I
think
I
think
my
comment
would
be
best
suited
for
the
I
guess.
Maybe
the
general
one.
B
F
And
tyler,
if
you
are
meeting
or
if
you're
speaking
about
a
budget
item
that
you'd
like
the
city
to
fund
something,
then
you
can
speak
at
the
budget
hearing
which
it
will
be
before
the
general.
The
general
is
the
very
last
thing.
So
if
you,
if
you
have
anything
to
do
with
budget,
then
speak
during
budget.
C
Okay,
then,
we
will
hear
from
hallie
maurer.
H
B
B
We
will
then
meet
as
the
rda
as
the
redevelopment
agency
board
again
some
very
preliminary
couple
of
items
of
business
and
then
we
will
be
meeting
as
the
city
council
and
I'll
try
to
make
that
as
clear
as
possible.
I
wish
I
could
change
outfits,
so
you
or
like
have
t-shirts
or
something
for
all
of
us.
So
council
members,
I
am
looking
for
a
motion
on
the
result.
Oops
sorry.
B
J
B
Board
member
dugan
yes
board
member
valdo
morris,
yes,
and
I'm
a
yes
that
passes
and
we
will
go
to
new
business.
The
new
business
is
the
board
considering
adopting
a
resolution
which
permits
the
local
building
authority
board
of
directors
to
meet
electronically
pursuant
to
the
utah,
open
and
public
meetings
act.
I'll,
look
for
a
motion.
I
G
B
F
F
B
Board
member
mano
yes
board,
member
dugan,
yes,
and
I'm
a
yes
and
that
passes.
Finally,
this
does
conclude
our
local
building
authority
agenda.
I
would
look
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
and
reconvene
as
the
redevelopment
agency
board
no
move.
F
B
F
F
F
F
B
B
Okay,
so
I
will
turn
it
to
taylor.
F
D
F
B
Okay,
taylor:
we
will
start
with
our
first
public
comment.
Please.
C
K
Oh
good,
okay,
the
guiding
framework
and
priority
for
rda
is
economic
growth,
community
impact
and
neighborhood
vibrancy
right.
So
why
isn't
the
best
implementation
of
those
goals
recognized
as
parks?
Look
at
singapore,
hong
kong,
sugar
house
all
are
successful
and
they
have
lots
of
parks.
So
where
is
the
funding
for
more
parks
in
rda
this
city?
On
another
subject
on
rda,
the
city's
rda,
affordable
housing
funding
strategy
should
be
focused
on
inclusionary
zoning
with
salt
lake
city's
council.
K
All
rda
in
salt
lake
city
development
should
include
inclusionary
zoning
through
impact
feed
mitigation
or
rda
funding.
Creating
a
building
with
all
low-income
residents
is
disrespectful
and
treats
low
income
as
less
than
people
who
can
afford
market
rate.
People
who
make
25
percent
of
ami
should
be
able
to
live
even
in
a
micro
unit.
K
E
B
G
F
F
B
K
B
I
F
B
G
F
F
B
B
I
went
over
the
rules
of
decorum
that
are
the
guidelines
for
our
city
council
meetings
and
what
we've
had
in
place
for
everyone
to
stay
safe
and
feel
comfortable
in
commenting
just
a
friendly
reminder
that
those
rules
apply
for
our
next
public
hearings
and
for
our
general
comment
section
when
we
get
there
as
well.
B
B
Our
first
public
hearing
item
is
h1
and
it
is
regarding
the
learned
alley
vacation.
The
council
will
accept
public
comment
and
consider
adopting
an
ordinance
that
would
vacate
a
city-owned
alley
adjacent
to
properties
at
1025,
west,
north
temple
and
1022
1028,
1030
and
1032
west
learned
avenue
t
before
we
begin.
I
would
like
to
turn
the
time
over
to
brian
fulmer,
with
the
council
staff
for
a
brief
introduction.
F
F
It
is
currently
being
used
as
a
parking
lot
for
the
restaurant.
All
properties
adjacent
to
the
alley
are
owned
by
the
applicant,
and
it
should
be
noted.
This
proposal
is
only
for
vacating
the
alley.
There
is
no
other
council
action
on
this
at
this
point,
that
is
my
intro.
C
F
Thank
you
for
this
time.
I
think
that
this
should
go
through,
because
I
I
feel
in
looking
at
it
that
having
a
multi-family
housing
in
that
area
would
be
really
nice
to
make
it
so
that
it's
you
know
using
that
alleyway
to
make
it
so
that
it
it
fits
together
as
a
instead
of
two
completely
separate
units.
F
F
F
C
Oh
thank
you.
Can
you
hear
me
I
I
would
like
to
oppose
the
learn
at
all
vacation,
mostly
honestly,
just
because
I
don't
think
that
the
gentrification
that
will
occur
with
most
likely
high
income
housing,
there's
no
there's
little
to
no
evidence
that
what
jared
hall
will
be
building
will
be
beneficial
to
the
residents
already
living
in
the
neighborhood.
L
G
Thank
you.
My
name
is
with
the
rose
park
brown
berets.
I
mean
I
am
here
to
speak
and
demand
that
y'all
oppose
the
ordinance
learn
ali
vacation,
the
applicant
jarrod
hall,
who
is
the
developer
for
the
luso
apartments,
has
not
answered
any
of
our
concerns
and
rejections
for
the
apartments.
This
is
another
gentrification
project
that
we
and
the
poor
and
working
class
will
not
be
able
to
afford
families
already
been
displaced
without
any
relocation
options.
G
Real,
affordable,
single
family
homes
have
been
demolished
already,
as
well
as
dependable
fed,
which
was
a
local
restaurant
in
the
community.
If
you
allow
this,
it
will
give
jared
hall.
The
construction
permit
to
start
building
do
not
allow
this
to
happen
long
time,
residents
are
being
pushed
out,
as
we
can
see,
we
the
could.
We,
the
community,
are
rising.
We
will
not
allow
this
to
continue
opposing
ordinance,
please.
This
is
not
right.
We
need
direct
answers
from
the
applicant
jared
hall
and
why
he
is
destroying
our
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
A
M
L
L
L
As
we've
talked
about
before
market
rate
units
are
wildly
unaffordable
for
the
average
person
or
low-income
earners.
All
these
projects
continue
to
do
is
move
residents
further
west
and
the
current
community
is
continually
being
pushed
out
in
order
for
these
gentrifying
apartments
to
go
up
in
our
neighborhoods.
L
I
feel
like
we're
in
a
constant
loop
of
repeating
ourselves
on
this
topic,
and
I
cannot.
We
cannot
stress
enough
the
necessity
for
the
council
to
stand
firm
against
these
luxury
developers.
They
want
to
take
advantage
of
our
city's
desire
to
get
the
extra
money
coming
in
from
out
of
state
high
earners.
L
G
Good
evening,
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
before
I
begin
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
that
we
are
on
goshu,
mute
and
eastern
shoshone
lands,
and
this
area
of
salt
lake,
where
this
learned
out
learned
alley
is
being
proposed,
would
push
out
the
low-income
residents
and
allow
further
gentrification
projects
for
high-income
folks.
G
This
isn't
what
our
community
needs
at
this
time.
We
need
more
housing
for
the
lower
income
people,
otherwise
we
won't
be
able
to
stay
in
salt
lake
anymore.
The
lusso
apartments
is
another
gentrification
project
in
our
community
that
we
will
not
be
able
to
afford,
and
if
the
city
council
approves
the
ordinance,
it
gives
the
developer
jared
hall.
The
construction
permit
for
the
luso
apartment,
families
that
have
lived
in
the
homes
have
been
displaced
and
not
given
relocation
options.
So
I
urge
the
council
to
vote
no
on
this
ordinance.
C
N
Are
unmuted
thanks?
I
also
just
wanted
to
say
emily
allworth
will
want
to
speak
on
this
as
well
she's
using
the
same
computer
as
me,
I
wanted
to
reiterate
a
lot
of
what
people
have
already
been
saying.
I
think
this
is
going
to
further
gentrification.
It
is
not
wanted
by
many
members
of
the
community,
and
people
have
already
been
displaced
and
don't
have
a
place
to
go.
The
mayor
herself
is
starting
this
gentrification
committee.
N
I
don't
even
think
we
need
a
committee
right
now,
you're
getting
feedback
from
the
community
telling
you
what's
going
on
telling
you
this
will
further.
That
I
think
right
here
is
the
start
of
that.
I
think
reach
out
to
a
lot
of
these
people,
because
they're
dropping
facts
that
are
really
helpful,
and
I
wish
I
had
you
know
more
information
to
give,
but
I
think
you
guys
are
really
getting
the
point
and
people
are
are
giving
really
good
information
about
how
this
is
just
going
to
further
hurt
a
community.
That's
that's
already
being
actively
displaced.
N
I
don't
think
we
need
a
gentrification
committee
if
it's
not
going
to
appropriate
appropriately
address
these
issues,
and
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
faith
that
it
necessarily
will
based
off
of
the
work
of
the
racial
equity
and
policing
committee
right
now,
based
off
of
matrix's
review
of
the
policies
of
the
police
like
right.
Now,
it
just
isn't
really
looking
good,
and
I
want
you
to
know
that.
That's
all.
I
Thank
you
appreciate
it.
I
I
probably
don't
have
much
to
say
I
said
everything
in
the
last
meeting,
but
I
just
to
address
the
concerns
the
individuals
are
bringing
up.
I
completely
understand
where
people
are
coming
from,
and
I
mean
I
I
get
it
the
with
what
we're
doing
and
the
direction
we're
going.
The
individuals
that
we've
worked
with
the
residents.
All
of
them
have
been
paid
handsomely
for
for
their
troubles
and
for
moving.
We
worked
out
situations
that
that
worked
for
each
of
them.
I
There
was
a
confrontation
on
one
of
the
properties,
that's
a
longer
story
than
here
with
the
sewer
main
in
an
issue
that
probably
wasn't
handled
in
the
best
way
with
the
individual
that
was
working
with
them,
but
even
with
that,
after
I
spoke
with
each
of
those
residents
this
week
and
you
know
further
the
conversation
and
to
make
amends
with
them
and
make
sure
everything
was
okay.
I
mean
we've
literally
paid
out
over
220
000
individuals
to
help
them
move.
We've
done
as
much
as
we
could
do.
I
We
offered
to
help
find
housing.
I'm
not
aware
of
anybody
that
isn't
able
that
wasn't
able
to
find
another
place
or
that
we
didn't
help
find
another
place.
So
you
know
we
did
what
we
could
on
that
front
yeah,
and
I
guess
that's
all
I
got
thank
you.
O
I
would
like
to
actively
and
vietnamese
oppose
the
projected
alleyway.
I
think
that
it
I
know
that
it
will
only
allow
for
construction
of
a
gentrification
property.
I
understand
what
the
person
before
me
was
saying
about
trying
to
pay
out
residents
of
an
area
in
order
to
move
from
places
in
which
they
are
comfortable
and
happy,
and
I
understand
that
they
may
have
spent
what
seems
like
a
large
amount
of
money
split
amongst
many
many
people
in
a
housing
market
that
is
extremely
expensive.
O
I'm
wondering
why
they
are
not
instead
offering
to
give
them
housing
within
these
apartments
free
for
the
rest
of
their
life.
If
it
is-
and
I
don't
appreciate
any
sort
of
eye-opening
or
shocked,
looks,
I
think,
ask
removing
someone
from
their
home
that
their
family
has
been
in
in
order
to
form
new
properties
that
are
only
going
to
increase
the
amount
of
money
that
people
who
are
able
to
afford
building
right
now
in
this
economy.
O
I
don't
think
that's
okay
and
I
understand
that
that's
a
part
of
city
living.
However,
people
are
clearly
speaking
out
in
the
community
against
this,
and
I
think
that,
in
order
for
salt
lake
to
eliminate
housing,
un
unhoused
people
and
support
a
cleaner
city,
if
you
will,
instead
of
paying
tons
of
money
in
order
to
sweep
up
after
unsheltered
people,
instead
preemptively
not
letting
people
become
unsheltered
because
they
are
pushed
from
their
property.
O
Ask
yourself:
this
is
the
payout
money
enough
for
each
individual,
family
and
family
member
to
actually
buy
a
piece
of
property
similar
to
the
property
that
they're
being
asked
to
vacate.
Are
they
going
to
have
enough
funds
to
pay
rent?
Are
they
going
to
have
enough
funds
to
continue
to
live
where
the
in
similar
conditions
to
what
they
had
before
and
if
they
are
not
able
to
do
that,
then
I
don't
understand
why
you
would
even
offer
time
a
pity
payout.
B
B
F
K
A
J
B
B
F
Thank
you
again,
madam
chair.
As
you
mentioned,
this
alley
is
a
city-owned
alley
between
the
coordinates
you
mentioned.
The
north-south
coordinates
are
approximately
1600
south.
Just
to
get
your
bearings
the
east-west
alley.
Segment
is
approximately
336
feet,
long
and
seven
feet
wide
and
the
north
south
segments
are
approximately
126
feet
long
and
10
feet
wide.
C
Council
chair,
it
looks
like
we
have
about
seven
people
here
to
speak
on
this
item.
The
first
will
be
devin
o'donnell,
followed
by
kathleen
a
and
then
rachel
bicknow.
L
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
intro,
but
I'm
still
left
a
little
unable
to
understand
the
purpose
of
this
vacation
and
what
the
alley
would
be
used
for.
L
The
agenda
had
no
information
further
than
a
petition
number,
and
when
you
look
up
that
petition
number
there's
nothing
more
than
the
practitioner's
personal
info
before
action
is
taken
here.
I
would
expect
further
information
regarding
that
neighborhood
impact
and
purpose
of
the
land
afterward
at
a
future
hearing,
so
that
residents
will
understand
what's
happening
there.
Thank.
P
P
P
The
fence
is
falling
down,
so
we're
going
to
replace,
replace
that
fence.
We've
already
talked
to
all
of
our
neighbors
about
splitting
the
alleyway
they're,
like
the
first
person
speaking,
the
east-west
portion
of
the
alley
is
already
closed.
It's
been
closed
for
over
60
years
and
all
of
the
fences
from
the
adjoining
neighbors
have
gone
up
and
we've
been
working
on
the
since
may
of
2018
when
we
needed
to
replace
the
fence
at
that
time,
and
now
we've
got
boards
that
are
propping
it
up
because
of
the
wind
blowing
it
down.
P
So
that's
why
we're
asking
to
vacate
and
I'm
willing
to
take.
B
F
Oh,
thank
you.
I
live
across
from
kathleen
bratcher
and
several
years
back
quite
a
while.
We
had
an
alley
closed
behind
my
property
and
we
had
had
people
coming
through
and
doing
drugs.
I'm
not
saying
that's
happening
here,
but
I
can
say
once
it
was
vacated
and
we
had
to
actually
deed
over
a
little
bit
of
our
property,
but
it
was
well
worth
it
because
it
became
a
much
quieter
and
more
secure
place
with
not
having
different
people
coming
in
and
out
with
it.
F
And
you
know,
I
just
think
it's
a
good
decision
to
vacate
and
you
know
kathleen
richard.
I
can't
think
of
any
better
people
to
do
whatever
is
required,
so
I'm
a
full
support
of
vacating.
Thank
you.
A
I
Thank
you
so
much.
I
also
support
kathleen's
statement.
This
alleyway
has
not
been
used
as
an
alleyway
for
a
very
long
time.
It
doesn't
resemble
an
alleyway
and
so
to
vacate,
I
think,
is
the
right
move,
the
the
one
concern
I
have,
and
it's
not
so
much
a
concern,
but
devon
voiced.
It
is
that
it
hasn't
acted
as
an
alley
for
a
long
time.
I
have
a.
I
I
have
a
garden
box
with
tomatoes
in
what
is
currently
the
the
alleyway,
and
so
there
it's
a
very
fine
property
line,
and
I
would
just
ask
that
once
the
alley
is
vacated.
Hopefully
the
council
votes
in
that
in
that
direction,
because
it's
only
a
matter
of
three
or
four
homes
that
they
that
the
council
would
recognize
the
existing
sort
of
agreed
upon
property
line.
I
I
mean
there's
garages
sort
of
abutting
each
other
it
it
needs
to
happen,
but
but
it
also
needs
to
happen
in
the
existing
current
way,
so
that
you
know
people
aren't
having
to
remove
their
garages
from
a
formerly
vacated
alley
or
tomato
boxes,
and
things
like
that.
So
I
fully
support
the
vacation
of
the
alley
and
and
also
recognize
the
current
existing
agreed
upon
property
lines.
Thank
you
so
much
for
taking
the
time
to
hear
this
council.
M
M
1700,
south
and
specifically
logan
avenue,
are
already
high
traffic
areas
with
street
parking
and
they're
one
car
accessible
even
now,
either
way
you
have
to
wait
for
oncoming
traffic
to
be
on
one
side
or
the
other
before
you
can
even
pass,
and
eliminating
portions
of
that
alley
would
further
complicate
this
problem
as
far
as
traffic.
That's
there.
M
There
is
no
parking
in
the
street
currently,
so
anything
is
better
than
nothing.
In
my
opinion,
and
I
would
have
to
there
are
some
homes
I
guess
that
are
using
the
alleyway
for
other
things.
There
are
other
homes
who
are
not
who
actually
utilize,
that
space
to
be
able
to
have
accessible
parking,
not
only
to
the
back
entry
to
their
home,
but
there's
so
much
traffic
and
already
parked
cars
on
the
front
entry
time
they.
J
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
opportunity
yeah.
So
I
wanna
mention
I
am
the
favorite
of
the
week
in
the
place,
because
I'm
going
that
area
almost
more
than
three
years
to
drop
my
daughter
in
the
daycare-
and
I
saw
that
area-
I'm
not
pointing
anyone,
but
there's
a
lot
of
people.
You
know
using
drugs
there
and
all
that.
J
So
if
the
new
construction
coming
there,
that
would
be
the
plus
point
for
the
community
and
looks
more
beautiful
for
the
city
and
have
more
people
to
live
the
more
working
opportunities
because
I
heard
like
there
is
a
lot
of
opportunities
in
the
downtown
the
companies,
but
the
people
don't
have
a
place
to
live
in
downtown
and
they're
just
coming
all
the
way,
the
far
for
40
or
50
minute
drive.
J
So
if
you
have
a
more
place
to
live
in
downtown,
so
it's
more
benefit
for
the
other
four
job
wise
for
their
work,
wise
and
also
if
they
have
a
good
construction
there.
They
have
like
more
people
live
there.
So
it
reduced
the
the
drug
system
there,
the
people
using
there
and
they
have
like
you
know
they
has
like
security
system.
There's
the
cameras
there
if
the
new
construction
come
there,
so
I
think
it's
control
the
crime
too.
If
it's
a
new
construction,
that's
all.
B
G
B
F
G
G
K
B
And
I
am
a
yes
council
member
of
elder
morrow
stepped
away
for
a
moment
so
that
passes.
We
are
on
the
next
agenda
item
h3,
which
is
a
budget
amendment
number
nine
for
fiscal
year,
2020
2021..
B
Before
we
begin
taking
comments,
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
ben
ludke
with
council
staff
to
give
a
short
introduction.
Thank
you
ben.
L
L
L
C
For
this
item
it
looks
like
we
have
about
four
people
here
to
speak.
The
first
will
be
devin
o'donnell,
followed
by
ann
charles
and
then
ainsley
monik.
L
N
Thanks
the
first
part
of
this,
the
raise
up
slc
I
saw
that
there
were
over
half
a
million
funds
that
have
not
been
allocated
yet
because
people
didn't
qualify
for
the
second
round
of
stimulus
checks
because
of
the
changes
that
were
made.
I
really
encourage
you
to
just
give
that
directly
to
people
who
need
it.
I
know
in
your
last
work
session
you
guys
had
talked
about
changing
the
requirements.
N
I
really
support
that
I
personally
donated
it
donated
to
it,
hoping
it
would
go
directly
to
those
who
needed
it,
and
it's
really
disappointing
to
see
how
much
is
left
over
that
we
just
have
like
a
lump
sum
of
money
that
could
easily
be
going
to
people
who
need
it
and
it's
not
getting
there.
So
I
really
hope
that
you
guys
re
look
at
you
know
the
qualifications
and
you
get
it
to
those
who
do
need
it.
N
I
also
saw
that
the
convention
hotel,
if
I'm
understanding
this
correctly,
has
like
a
tax
incentive
where
they're
not
having
to
pay
sales,
tax
or
property
tax
over
the
next
25
years.
From
my
understanding
that
was
a
county
decision,
but
I
think
it's
terrible-
and
I
just
want
to
express
that
I
I
have
to
pay
taxes
and
I
don't
think
a
multi-million.
Potentially
billion
corporations
should
get
out
of
paying
taxes
because
we
want
to
bring
another
hotel
into
the
city.
N
C
Ainslie,
you
are
unmuted
hi.
I
intended
to
speak
on
the
20
21
2022
budget
as
a
whole.
So
sorry
about
the
confusion,
I'm
gonna
wait
and
comment
on
that
later.
F
K
Okay,
on
budget
amendment,
nine
there's
an
item
that
says:
you're
refunding
510
000
that
was
provided
by
developers
for
police
impact
fees.
Whatever
happened
to
the
promised
and
desperately
needed
east
side
precinct,
I
mean
this.
This
doesn't
make
sense
to
not
be
able
to
manage
the
funds
that
developers
are
giving
us
for
these
items
to
provide
police
impact.
K
I
mean
all
this
development.
We
don't
have
places
for
the
police
to
actually
work
out
of
and
we're
wasting
a
significant
amount
of
time,
40
minutes
to
go
from
higher
near
precinct
to
a
sugar
house
area
and
we're
desperately
needing
cops.
So
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
obviously
this
city
mismanaged
the
police
impact
fees
and
the
east
side
precinct
should
be
higher
priority.
K
O
I
would
like
to
chime
in
following
up
on
george's
comment
before
me.
I
agree
with
him
in
that
the
impact
fees
were
severely
mishandled.
I
think
it's
frankly,
embarrassing,
really
really
embarrassing
for
the
city
to
constantly
be
funding
the
police
and
seeing
things
mismanaged
so
holy.
We
are
giving
so
much
money
to
an
organization
that
is
unable
to
purchase
a
property
intended
because
it
quote
did
not
work
for
a
lower
case,
east
side,
police
precinct,
they
didn't
even
capitalize
it
correctly.
I
don't
understand
this.
O
This
whole
section
on
their
housekeeping
on
the
funds
need
to
be
refunded
from
unclaimed
refunds,
because
the
administration
is
trying
to
find
an
east
side
precinct
and
has
evolving
conversations
and
yet
is
unable
to
find
something
that
works.
This
has
been
going
on
for
far
too
long.
I
think
that
the
city
needs
to
consider
how
it
is
managing
its
money
and
time
when
it
comes
to
policing.
O
I
don't
know
why
we
have
an
unlimited
budget
and
time
for
dealing
with
these
issues,
and
yet
we
are
unable
to
correctly
manage
many
simple
issues
within
our
city.
There
is
money
that
could
be
spent
being
given
to
direct
payments,
credit
cards
or
even
housing
vouchers
to
unhoused
people,
and
instead
we
are
spending
money
and
time
trying
to
figure
out
properties
that
will
work
for
a
precinct
put
them
in
an
old
dump.
I
don't
know
just
find
something
that
is
empty:
they
can
go
in
the
old
road
home
if
they
really
hated
it.
O
B
Thank
you
and
thank
you
to
everyone
who
commented
with
that
counsel.
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
B
Second
councilmember
duke,
and
was
that
a
second
okay
I
have
a
jen?
Did
you
need
to
clarify
something?
Okay,
I
have
a
motion
from
council
member
rogers,
the
second
from
council
member
dugan.
Here
goes
the
roll
call
councilman
bermano,
yes,
council,
member
ferris.
J
I
F
B
And
I
am
a
yes
on
a
stepped
away,
so
that
passes
and
we
are
moving
on
jen.
Are
you
going
to
talk
about
where
to
we?
Can
people
can
find
information,
such
as
our
staff
reports
that
really
lay
out
all
of
the
issues
that
we're
talking
about
when
we're
looking
at
an
agenda?
That's
come
up
a
couple
of
times,
and
I
know
we,
our
staff
works,
really
hard
to
make
sure
that
all
of
that
is
public.
So
maybe
you
can
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
for
us.
D
Yes
and
I
popped
on
actually
to
give
it
a
little
intro
to
the
next
hearing
item.
I
was
just
a
little
early,
but
I
will
talk
about
the
staff
reports.
Some
of
them
are
actually
on
the
council's
web
page
home
page,
including
the
budget
amendment
and
links
to
the
annual
budget.
So
sometimes
it
helps
if
there's
a
timely
issue
to
just
go
to
the
council's
home
page.
Otherwise,
you
can
navigate
to
the
council's
meeting
materials
and
any
of
the
agenda
items,
especially
if
you
click
on
the
html
version.
B
B
These
are
all
of
the
ordinance
revisions
that
are
associated
with
the
implementation
of
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
for
salt
lake
city,
including
the
library
fund
for
the
fiscal
year.
2021-2022
all
ordinances
will
be
heard
as
one
public
hearing
item
today
and
before
we
begin.
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
jennifer
bruno
with
our
council
staff
to
give
us
an
introduction
thanks,
jen
thanks.
D
Madam
chair,
so
just
to
give
a
little
context.
This
is
the
first
of
two
public
hearings
to
accept
public
comment
on
the
proposed
fiscal
year.
22
budget.
This
hearing
covers
all
ordinances
associated
with
the
budget
which,
in
this
agenda
are
items
h4
to
age
15..
It
also
includes
the
library
budget
and
the
overall
capital
improvement
program
investment.
D
We
did
want
to
note
for
the
public
that
specific
allocations
to
specific
projects
are
usually
not
decided
until
after
the
council's
budget
adoption
in
the
council's
july
and
august
meetings
so
follow
those
meetings.
If
you're
interested
in
those
specific
projects,
there
is
a
second
public
hearing
on
this
budget,
scheduled
for
june
1st.
D
The
council
will
continue
discussing
specific
departments
in
more
detail
at
each
of
their
work
sessions,
which
are
scheduled
for
every
tuesday
in
may
and
june,
and
some
thursdays
as
needed,
and
the
mayor's
proposed
budget
staff
reports
and
analysis
for
all
the
departments
and
funds
and
links
to
the
various
briefing
videos
of
those
tuesday
work
sessions
are
available
on
our
website.
We've
created
a
central
place
for
all
budget
materials
and
the
public
can
view
that
at
tinyurl.com
forward
slash
slc
fy22
budget,
so
hopefully
that
was
clear.
People
can
visit
it.
D
Otherwise
you
can
navigate
through
our
webpage
and
there's
pretty
helpful
links.
There.
D
Chat
for
everybody,
and
because
the
topic
of
policing
and
racial
equity
in
policing
is
an
important
topic
for
the
city
at
this
time.
I
also
wanted
to
share
again
kira
shared
earlier
today,
the
central
webpage
for
information
on
that,
both
as
it
relates
to
the
budget
and
the
council's
other
efforts
in
that
area
and
that's
tinyurl.com
forward,
slash,
slc,
racial
equity
and
bobby
will
can
hopefully
put
that
in
the
chat
too.
D
Just
in
terms
of
timeline,
the
council
may
decide
to
make
adjustments
to
the
mayor's
proposed
budget,
and
those
adjustments
would
also
be
discussed
in
the
council's
public
work
sessions
likely
not
until
june,
and
the
council
is
scheduled
to
adopt
the
fiscal
year
22
budget
on
june
15th,
although
technically
by
law.
The
council
has
until
june
30th
to
figure
that
out.
So
that's
all
that
I'm
sure
turn
over
to
you.
B
We
are
scheduled
to
have
another
work
session
on
may
25th
june,
1st
june
3rd
and
then
the
week
after
that,
as
well
before
we
adopt
the
budget
and
in
each
of
those
work
sessions
we
will
be
going
over
the
different
department's
budgets
and
having
conversations
so
I'd
encourage
people
to
listen
into
those
work
sessions,
if
there's
a
particular
department
or
issue
that
you're
interested
in
regarding
the
budget.
With
that,
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
taylor
to
get
us
started
on
commenters.
Thank
you,
taylor.
C
For
the
these
items
it
looks
like
we
have
about
four
people
here
to
speak.
The
first
will
be
george
chapman,
followed
by
tyre
hauser
and
then
kelly
maurer.
K
So
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
mayor,
you
fought
to
add
15
new
cops
years
ago
and
you
won,
but
now
we're
in
the
hole
even
worse.
We
want
police
response
to
be
within
an
hour,
not
24
hours.
It's
incredibly
poor
management
to
spend
10
months
and
run
police
through
the
best
de-escalation
training
system
and
requirements
in
utah
and
yet
end
up
losing
them
to
other
departments
due
to
poor
pay.
K
K
This
city
should
stop
using
consultants.
The
seven
canyon
fountain
should
sculpture
is
art,
and
we
shouldn't
be
trying
to
look
for
an
excuse
to
destroy
one
of
the
city's
great
pieces
of
art
trips
to
transit.
Is
a
waste
of
money,
35
dollars
right,
subsidy
come
on
and
libraries
need
pocket
libraries
and
this
city
should
separate
the
budget
items
to
allow
a
more
respectful
public
engagement.
G
Hello
there,
my
name
is
tiger
hauser
and
I'm
here
to
ask
you
to
consider
a
budget
amendment
to
support
our
request
to
improve
the
tennis
centers
for
decades
to
come.
I'm
19
years
old
and
I
live
near
liberty
park
a
little
background
on
me.
I
was
adopted
from
kazakhstan
at
15
months
old
by
my
amazing
mother.
When
I
was
15
years
old,
my
mother
was
looking
for
a
way
to
keep
me
busy
in
the
summers
and
after
school,
so
she
signed
me
up
for
liberty,
hills
tennis.
G
G
G
Some
of
my
fondest
memories
come
from
playing
tennis
listening
to
music
and
hanging
out
with
my
friends
at
liberty,
hills,
I'm
attending
college
in
the
fall
and
I'm
planning
to
try
out
for
the
tennis
team.
When
I
was
16,
I
realized
I
needed
to
get
a
job
to
help.
My
mom
and
spencer
was
kind
enough
to
offer
me
a
position.
G
Spencer
and
liberty.
Hills
taught
me
leadership,
people,
skills
and
accountability.
These
job
skills
will
help
me
my
entire
life,
I've
grown
very
close
with
all
the
amazing
staff
at
liberty,
hills
tennis
to
me,
they've
become
like
a
family.
I
can't
even
begin
to
imagine
life
without
liberty,
hills
and
the
people,
spencer,
merchant
and
liberty,
hills,
tennis
completely
changed
my
life,
and
for
that
I
am
forever
grateful.
Please
do
support
a
budget
amendment.
Thank
you
for
your.
G
C
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
mayor
and
council
members.
I
am
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
cip
budget
recommendation
for
odyssey
house
at
a
property
owned
by
the
city
which
we
rent
mayor.
I
really
wanted
to
thank
you
for
the
recommendation
to
fund
for
300
000
for
the
property,
to
give
you
a
little
background
on
the
property.
This
is
our
fathers
with
children
program
and
also
an
auxiliary
housing
for
our
adult
residential
programs.
H
The
big
but
on
this
presentation
is
we
were
underfunded
by
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
we're
pretty
nervous
about
the
facility.
The
structural
integrity
of
the
building
has
decayed
to
where
we're
concerned
about
general
safety.
H
We
are
odyssey
houses,
paying
the
cost
to
replace
the
exterior
doors
and
there's
one
exterior
exit
door
on
our
fathers
with
children
program
that
we're
nervous
to
even
take
out
because
it
might
crumble,
a
corner
of
the
building
and
we're
not
able
to
make
those
renovations
and
so
as
a
tenant
who
has
been
renting
from
the
city
for
20
plus
years.
We
really
want
to
collaborate
with
you
guys
to
continue
renting
this
facility
for
a
very
long
time
to
come.
H
However,
with
the
recommendation
we're
just
it's
not
going
to
be
enough
to
make
the
renovations
needed,
and
we
would
desperately
like
to
encourage
the
council
to
reconsider
funding
to
add
the
additional
200
000
on
to
complete
the
renovations
of
this
project
so
that
we
can
stay
there
and
always
be
good
tenants
to
salt
lake
city
and
continue
providing
the
incredible
services
to
fathers
with
dads.
That
program
doesn't
exist
anywhere
on
the
west
coast.
It's
a
really
unique
program
and
very
beautiful.
H
C
Ainslie,
you
are
unmuted,
thank
you,
I'm
speaking
about
the
police
department
budget,
which
is
set
at
83
million
dollars.
If
this
isn't
the
right
time
on
the
I
was
a
little
bit
confused
feel
free
to
cut
me
off.
C
So
the
residents
of
salt
lake
city
have
engaged
in
every
facet
of
democracy
available
to
demand
the
defunding
of
the
police.
We
have
petitioned,
we
have
protested,
we
have
participated
in
every
city
council
meeting.
We
have
said
countless
times
where
we
would
rather
have
that
money
go
to
approve
a
department
budget
that
is
four
million
dollars
above
last
year
and
to
give
the
police
department
any
money.
Quite
frankly,
is
disrespectful
and
insulting
your
to
your
constituents
and
out
of
touch
with
their
needs.
C
I
don't
understand
how
we're
supposed
to
have
any
trust
in
our
public
officials
when
they
ignore
the
demands
of
the
people
they're
supposed
to
present
or
represent,
who
have
used
every
avenue
of
democracy
that
has
been
given
to
them.
We
demand
that
you
defund
the
police
and
stop
the
cops
from
terrorizing
the
residents
of
salt
lake
city.
Thank
you.
So
much.
N
Unmuted
thanks
first,
I
just
want
to
reiterate
the
comments
of
cali
maurer.
I
also
work
for
odyssey
house
and
we
can
definitely
use
more
funding.
I
know
we're
we're
constantly
trying
to
make
things
work
with
what
we
have
and
we
are
actively
helping
those
that,
alternatively,
could
be
within
the
criminal
justice
system,
and
so
with
that,
I
would
also
like
to
urge
you
to
reduce
the
funding
for
the
police
just
last
year.
You
all
were
saying
that
this
is
just
the
first
step.
Anna
voldemora
said
this
journey
is
far
from
over
amy.
N
You
said
I
don't
make
promises,
I
can't
keep.
I
can
promise
you
sorry.
Let
me
see
this
better,
but
also
reiterated
that
chris
wharton
you
did
as
well.
You
said
that
this
represents
a
unique
moment
in
our
history
to
deconstruct
these
problems
within
our
systems
and
fix
them
by
increasing
their
budget.
How
are
you
deconstructing
that
system
you're
simply
reinforcing
and
building
up
that
system?
That's
just
really
discouraging.
I've
come
to
almost
every
city
council.
This
meeting
expressing
the
same
points-
and
I
have
heard
others
do
the
same.
N
Minimal
steps
have
been
taken
this
past
year.
When
you
committed
to
taking
more
steps
and
then
you're
increasing
the
budget
not
only
from
last
year,
but
even
from
the
year
before
that,
and
so
I
don't
think
you
should
continue
funding
a
mismanaged
organization.
If
you
just
look
at
the
small
bit
of
the
matrix.
N
Review
that
they
did,
they
continually
have
issues
with
how
they're
budgeting
their
money,
and
it's
super
untransparent.
The
way
that
they're
moving
money
around
I
just
today
had
to
de-escalate
a
client
who
we
had
to
put
in
her
room
due
to
potential
covet
exposure,
and
she
was
in
an
active
trauma
trigger
from
being
in
jail.
O
Hi,
I
would
also
like
to
oppose
the
increased
funding
to
the
police
department.
O
I
understand
that
some
of
the
increases
to
the
budget
are
under
things
that
might
seem
potentially
with
to
people
who
have
a
lot
on
their
plate
and
maybe
do
not
go
in
depth
to
investigate
what
they're
actually
voting
on.
It
might
seem
like
it's
a
good
idea
to
fund
people
who
can
have
therapeutic
services
on
call
for
police
officers.
However,
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
deserve
therapy.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
who
deserve
social
workers.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
who
deserve
care
and
love.
O
There
is
budgeting
in
the
police
that,
where
the
police
for
food
and
drink,
while
working
to
have
a
safe
and
productive
environment,
there
is
money
towards
a
monthly
amount
of
money
that
goes
towards
upkeep
on
their
uniforms.
There's,
if
you
have
a
canine
dog
in
a
canine
unit,
you
get
paid
for
time.
You
get
an
hourly
rate
for
time
to
take
care
of
that
dog
outside
of
your
regular
work
hours.
O
I'm
sorry,
but
everyone
deserves
that,
not
just
the
police,
and
I
think
that
if
it's
really
such
a
a
thing
that
you
support,
if
you
really
think
that
people
need
health
care
and
people
need
mental.
G
O
E
Hi,
my
name
is
deborah
chaltron.
I
live
in
sugar
house
and
first
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
your
patience
with
my
earlier
miss
speaking
this
time.
I'd
like
to
bring
awareness
to
the
council
about
the
mayor's
budget,
not
making
room
for
capital
improvement
at
the
salt
lake
city's
most
used,
tennis,
centers
liberty
park
and
wasatch
hills.
I
was
introduced
to
the
wonderful
sport
of
tennis
at
the
city's
two
managed
tennis,
centers
mustang
shows
and
liberty
park.
E
E
E
I
invite
you
to
look
at
the
constituents
requests
at
these
two
sites
and
please
consider
amending
the
budget.
On
a
personal
note,
I
work
as
a
flight
attendant
it's
a
very
lonely
position
and
the
way
that
I
was
able
to
develop
community
and
create
a
tribe
of
my
own
was
through
tennis
and
it
has
been
the
tribe
and
it's
been
the
sport
that
has
actually
gotten
me
through
a
very
difficult
time.
E
I
G
B
F
F
K
F
B
Agenda
so
we
will
have
another
public
hearing
on
june
1st,
as
was
mentioned
regarding
the
budget.
This
does
conclude
the
public
hearing
hearings
for
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
for
salt
lake
city,
including
the
library
fund
for
fiscal
year,
2021
2022,
and
we
are
now
potential
action
items
of
our
agenda
item.
I1
is
a
budget
amendment
number
eight
ordinance
and
I
have
a
look
for
a
motion.
I
B
F
K
F
B
G
B
K
F
F
N
B
Could
we,
I
am
a
yes
so
that
passes
with
one
council
member
abstaining.
We
are
now
on
to
section
j,
which
is
our
comment
section
first
off
questions
to
the
mayor
city,
council
members:
do
you
have
any
questions
for
madam
mayor?
Madame,
thank
you
as
always,
for
being
with
us.
We
do
appreciate
your
presence.
B
I
don't
see
any
questions
for
you
yet
so
maybe
next
time,
okay
and
we
are
at
the
general
comment
portion
of
our
agenda
four
comments
about
general
topics
and
items
that
were
not
scheduled
for
a
hearing
tonight.
B
Well,
the
city
council's
rules
of
decorum
earlier
and
those
rules
apply
here
as
well.
So
please
continue
to
be
respectful,
no
profanity,
no
obscene
or
racial
remarks
or
any
anything
disrespectful.
B
We
will
have
you
muted
if
it
gets
that
way,
and
I
do
appreciate
everyone's
respect
at
that
has
been
commenting
already
if
we
really
do
care
and
listen
to
your
comments
and
want
to
hear
them.
So
with
that,
I
will
turn
it
over
to
taylor.
C
It
looks
like
we
have
about
13
people
here
to
speak
for
general
comment
tonight,
the
first
of
which
will
be
beverly
cooper,
followed
by
hillary
jacobs
and
then
daniel.
M
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
tonight
about
the
foothills
trails
project.
I'm
an
avenues
resident
have
been
hiking
foot
jail
trails
for
30
plus
years.
I've
lived
here.
What
has
happened
to
the
potential
of
the
hiking
trails
is
shocking
to
everyone,
I've
hiked
with
in
the
last
few
months.
This
plan
is
way
too
important,
not
to
be
done
right.
Our
foothills
are
fragile
and
exist
in
a
dry
climate.
This
needs
to
be
done.
Right.
M
Trails
are
built
across
rock
slides,
soft
soils
and
steep
slopes
and
now
into
a
habitat
study
area
by
twin
peaks.
First,
the
trails
are
made
for
bicycles.
Then
it's
decided
after
it's
built
to
make
it
for
hikers.
The
master
plan
says
the
trail
will
go
one
way.
Then
it
goes
another
and
there's
already
been
trail
closures
for
maintenance.
Where
is
the
accountability
for
the
state
of
these
trails?
Who
gets
to
decide
to
change
the
direction
or
purpose
of
the
trail?
I've
never
seen
any
markers
indicating
which
way
the
bulldozer
is
to
build
a
trail.
M
There
should
be
an
engineer
and
surveyor
on
the
ground,
marking
the
paths.
The
foothill
paths
are
changed
daily.
This
is
not
right.
The
next
plan
is
to
go
into
dry
creek,
a
riparian
area.
Have
the
proper
studies
been
done?
There's
potentially
culturally
sensitive
land
in
the
area
of
twin
peaks
tribes
were
asked
to
weigh
in
and
when
they
weren't
heard
from
the
work
continued.
M
As
far
as
I
can
see,
there's
no
oversight
or
accountability
in
this
project,
and
that
needs
to
change.
I'm
asking
you
tonight
to
halt
permanently
any
construction
in
the
twin
peaks
and
dry
creek
areas.
I'm
asking
you
to
not
release
funding
for
any
further
trail
building
phases,
two
and
three
until
there's
assessment
of
the
ecological
erosional
and
watershed
damage
that
has
already
occurred.
Do
this
right?
Thank.
C
P
My
name
is
hilary
jacobs
and
for
almost
three
decades
I
have
walked
in
the
beautiful
foothills
and
mountains
and
embrace
our
city
on
the
north
and
east
sides
of
our
valley
on
salt
lake
city's
trails.
My
fellow
outdoor
recreationists
and
I
have
enjoyed
meadows
of
wildflowers
where
raptors
dive
refreshing
streams
in
hot
summer
months
and
undisturbed,
bridges
from
which
we
have
viewed
enjoyed
views
of
our
great
salt
lake
valley,
the
wasatch
mountains,
city,
creek
and
other
canyons
beyond.
We've
been
honored
to
enjoy
and
steward
our
wild
lands.
P
Under
the
guise
of
a
trail's
master
plan,
salt
lake
city
parks
and
trails
promised
to
create
an
equitable
sustainable
trail
system,
one
that
would
accommodate
a
full
spectrum
of
trail
users,
hikers
dog,
walkers,
skiers,
snowshoers
and
mountain
bikers.
We
expected
a
new
series
of
beautiful
trails,
reminiscent
of
those
that
we
have
walked
for
decades.
But
what
happened?
Tractors
with
backhoes
arrived?
P
Let
us
be
clear:
the
master
plan
has
resulted
in
neither
a
sustainable
nor
inequitable
trail
system
to
explain
what
has
achieved.
I
want
to
read
you
a
definition:
an
active
plunder,
violent
seizure
or
abuse,
disfoliation
violation
or,
more
informally,
to
totally
defeat
wreck,
dominate
or
decimate
these
definitions,
described
with
chilling
accuracy,
accuracy
what
the
salt,
lake
city
parks
and
trails
division
has
done
to
our
foothills
rape.
Violence
has
been
perpetrated
against
the
very
spaces
that
this
plan
claims
to
protect,
destroying
under
the
guise
of
protection.
P
That's
what
abusers
do
now
that
the
foothills
have
been
raped.
What
will
salt
lake
parks
and
trails
do
to
heal
these
terrible
wounds?
These
gashes
run
deep,
they
run
red
and
they
are
a
legacy
of
shame.
It's
time
for
parks
and
trails
to
stop
this
assault
take
stock
of
what
they
have
done
and
fulfill
the
promises
they
have
buried.
Thank
you.
Q
While
I
recognize
that
the
city
has
identified
problems
with
the
master
plan
and
has,
in
some
cases,
changed
trails
to
accommodate
these
problems,
the
floss
at
the
master
plan
is
so
numerous
that
it
should
be
incumbent
upon
the
city,
council
and
the
mayor
to
stop
any
further
construction
of
foothill
trails
until
the
public
and
the
city
have
had
time
to
review
the
master
plan
as
it
presently
exists,
and
to
allow
a
broad
spectrum
of
the
public
to
assist
in
making
any
necessary
and
all
changes
to
the
plan.
Thank
you.
F
We
have
seen
many
of
the
new
trails
and
used
many
of
the
new
trails
that
have
been
constructed
over
the
last
year
and
request
that
the
city
council
pause
the
trail
development
work
and
allow
for
additional
feedback
and
comments
by
the
community,
with
one
million
dollars
of
a
six
million
dollar
project
spent.
Already
the
magnitude
of
that
portion
alone
of
the
project
is
now
evident
to
residents
and
users
of
the
trail
system.
F
I
request
that
we
have
a
pause
in
constructing
more
trails
to
get
more
input
from
residents
and
users.
I
have
communicated
my
concerns
more
extensively
to
the
trails
and
natural
lands
division
and
request
that
the
community
council,
the
city
council
and
the
mayor
cause
additional
construction
until
there's
time
to
reassess
this
aggressive
plan.
Thank
you.
C
C
M
M
The
premise
is
flawed:
was
the
plan
really
inspired
by
a
need
to
improve
all
users
experience
while
preserving
the
foothills
for
posterity,
or
was
it
designed
to
please
and
attract
more
of
a
subset
of
users,
downhill
mountain
bikers?
I
would
like
to
know
who
promoted
this
plan
and
what
their
interests
were
planners
assert
a
need
to
separate
downhill
bikers
from
hikers
for
everyone's
safety
and
to
accommodate
more
users.
This
presupposes
that
all
users
should
be
accommodated.
The
downhill
cyclists
are
as
desired
as
walkers
hikers
and
bicycle
tourists
who
tread
more
lightly.
M
This
premise
should
be
questioned.
Planners
assert,
hikers
want
longer
gentler
trails.
Have
they
pulled
the
hikers
who
have
enjoyed
the
steepest
of
these
trails
for
decades?
It
is
rather
that
these
low-grade
longer
trails
are
convenient
for
uphill
cyclists.
Perhaps
planners
contend
users
cause
erosion
with
illegal
social
trails,
so
these
trails
must
be
abandoned,
but
if
they
studied
historical
usage,
they
would
know
that
many
of
the
old
trails
were
far
superior
to
the
new
ones:
sensible,
stable,
enjoyable
and
usable
in
all
seasons,
at
least
until
aggressive
downhill,
cyclists,
gouged
carved
and
reconfigured
them.
M
And
then
the
steep
trails
most
enjoyed
by
hikers
were
turned
over
to
the
cyclists
is
the
problem,
perhaps
presence
of
so
many
wheels
where
they
have
no
business?
Is
it
possible?
The
planners
were
led
astray
that
enforcing
real
rules
of
trail
etiquette
and
prohibiting
cyclists
altogether
on
steeper
and
more
sensitive
terrain
could
solve
the
problems
they
identify.
Is
it
possible
special
interest
groups
were
allowed
to
shape
the
process?
I
want
to
know
the
answers.
The
council
must
conduct
public
hearings
and
an
in-depth,
independent
re-examination
of
the
plan
before
further
public
funds
are
spent.
Thank
you.
F
Hi
so
I'm
I
messed
up
and
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the
general
budget,
but
I
am
for
funneling
money
out
of
the
police
and
but
just
basically,
finally,
it
out
of
a
system
that
has
been
proven,
ineffective
and
funneling.
It
into
very
clear
demands
that
we've
been
making
that
not
only
save
taxpayer
dollars
but
also
help
fund
into.
F
Faster
response
times
actually
equals
lower
crime
rates,
but
there
is
proof
that
if
we
do
subsidized
housing
and
rental
assistance
that
we
do
save
money
and
then
we
do
lift
more
people
out
of
the
poverty
line,
and
I
don't
know
why
they're
such
a
disconnect
for
something.
That's
so
painfully
simple
and
that's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
G
C
G
F
G
Thank
you.
My
name
is
scott
williams.
I've
been
on
the
call
since
the
meeting
started,
and
I
just
wanted
to
begin
by
thanking
you
for
your
service
and
realizing
how
many
issues
you
have
to
research
and
consider
I've
lived
on
the
avenues
for
60
of
my
68
years.
I
grew
up
playing
in
those
foothills
above
the
avenues
catching
wizards
and
squirrels,
and
I
even
went
camping
up
there
when
I
was
a
kid
to
get.
G
My
boy
scout
camping
merit
badge
for
the
past
few
decades,
though,
I've
been
hiking
up
there,
just
getting
away
from
the
rush
of
the
city
and
having
the
really
amazing
experience
that
I
think
is
very
unique
to
salt
lake
to
feel
lost
in
nature
when
in
reality,
I
was
only
about
a
mile
or
two
from
the
city.
G
When
the
trail
plan
was
developed.
I
think
many
of
us
envisioned
the
trails
that
looked
like
the
ones
that
were
already
there
very
sort
of
subtle,
not
that
obvious.
Unless
you
were
right
on
them,
not
the
deep
switchbacking
cuts
up
the
hills
that
now
make
what
previously
felt
pastoral
now
look
kind
of
like
a
racecourse.
G
I
work
in
environmental
advocacy
myself
and
we
have
a
saying
that
preservation
is
always
temporary,
but
degradation
is
permanent,
so
I'm
just
also
going
to
join
the
others
in
asking
you
to.
Please
stop
any
further
permanent
trail
development
until
the
plan
can
be
reconsidered
and
modified
to
incorporate
the
values
of
solitude
and
the
unscarred
views
that
are
important
to
hikers.
G
Consider
the
process
for
stabilizing
and
re-vegetating
the
scars
that
have
already
been
made
and
consider
the
input
of
users
now
that
about
what
were
once
lines
on
a
map,
but
now
are
scars
on
the
hillside.
Thank
you.
N
Thanks,
I
was
confused.
I
saw
h4
through
15
that
was
going
to
be
seen
as
one
item
and
there
wasn't.
I
signed
up
for
a
specific
time
to
comment
on
that,
and
then
there
wasn't
a
time
for
that.
So
I
just
want
to
express
that
again.
The
accessibility
is
an
issue,
but
specifically
on
those
pieces,
I
had
some
issues
with
how
pay
is
given
specifically
to
the
police.
There
were
several
items,
so
one
is
that
overtime
pay
is
given
if
you're
given
late
notice
for
them,
they
also
get
money
each
week
for
food.
N
They
get
seventy
five
dollars
a
month
for
their
uniform
as
well
as
39
a
month
for
plain
clothes.
People
within
the
justice
court
get
columbus
day
off,
but
no
other
employees.
Do.
I
see
a
lot
of
privileges
for
these
groups
that
other
employees
and
other
people
just
don't
get,
and
I
I
don't
support
that.
Also
the
police
union
contract
hasn't
been
updated
since
2011.
N
I
don't
think
that
makes
sense,
given
changes
that
you
guys
have
been
saying
you
want
to
make
within
policing
should
be
done.
Stat
like
this
year
last
year,
the
year
before
any
time
in
the
last
10
years,
we
could
have
been
making
updates
to
this
contract
to
make
sure
that
things
were
looked
at.
So
I
tried
to
look
at
the
contract
and
I'm
gonna
have
to
go
back
to
2011.
I
guess
to
see.
What's
in
that,
we
should
have
more
accessible
information
to
people.
N
I
shouldn't
have
to
dig
through
records
to
find
what
the
current
police
union
contract
looks
like.
So
those
are
my
comments
on
h4
through
h15.
L
Hello,
this
is
my
first
time
commenting
and
so
I
realized
I
should
have
also
been
commenting
in
the
previous,
because
I
wanted
to
speak
about
the
police
budget.
L
I
really
think
that,
after
everything,
salt
lake
and
just
the
whole
nation
have
been
through
recently
with
police
violence.
It
really
feels
kind
of
like
a
slap
in
the
face
to
everyone.
Who's
been
affected
by
the
police,
violence,
harassment
and
their
poor
decision,
making
that
we're
increasing
or
proposing
to
increase
the
police
budget.
L
If
we
look
at
policing,
you
know
less
than
half
of
crimes
ever
get
reported
to
police
and
less
than
half
of
those
ever
get
solved.
You
know
if
my
job
or
really
any
job
was
operating
at
that
kind
of
efficiency.
So,
like
20
or
less
you
know,
we'd
be
looking
to.
You
know,
replace
those
things
and
really.
L
I
think
we
should
be
moving
to
defund
and
even
abolish
the
police,
because
they're
not
doing
a
good
job
in
the
roles
they
are
put
in
and
we
should
be
replacing
them
with
things
like
more
social
workers
and
more
money
going
to
housing
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
because
that's
gonna
really
solve
the
problem
and
police,
I
feel,
are
causing
more
of
a
problem
and
that's
it.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
so
to
reiterate
a
lot
of
the
other
points
I
wanted
to
comment
about.
The
police
budget
didn't
know
about
the
right
place
to
public
comment.
Anyways
at
this
point.
It's
just
really
frustrating
that
so
many
people
have
done
the
work
for
the
city
council
as
to
how
and
why
the
police
budget
can
and
should
be
defunded,
and
it
just
kind
of
feels
like
we're
being
gaslit,
because
you're
telling
us
over
and
over
that
you're
going
to
make
changes,
and
it
just
feels
like
it's
kind
of
this
like
yeah.
E
It's
just
it
feels
so
manipulative
and
we're
just
being
lied
to
to
our
faces
over
and
over
and
like
ann
mentioned
earlier,
about
how
different
members
of
the
city
council
made
promises,
and
you
think
that
we're
going
to
forget
these
things
and
we
won't-
and
we
don't
so
just
look
at
the
work
that
we've
done
for
you.
We've
made
it
easy
and
cut
the
police
budget
in
half
at
least
I
yield
my
time.
L
L
L
In
the
last
four
months
about
two
months
when
I
grabbed
my
dog
and
I
pulled
my
dog
inside
inside
my
front
door
and
I
closed
the
door,
then
the
salt
lake
city
police
showed
up
said
you
assaulted
the
select
salt
lake
county
animal
services
officer.
L
L
L
K
Okay,
I
I
was
very
disturbed
to
hear
about
the
previous
speaker,
I
hope
the
city
council
and
the
mayor.
I
know
you
care
about
dogs,
mayor
and
animals,
and
I
hope
you
investigate
the
issue,
because
people
need
pets,
especially
in
trying
times
like
now.
Please
investigate
further
previous
callers
issues.
Okay,
general
comments.
Social
workers
should
not
be
considered
an
appropriate
or
safe
response
to
homeless
when
drugs
are
endemic
in
most
of
our
homeless
population.
K
I
believe
that
drug
use
in
our
homeless
population
in
the
last
few
years
have
doubled
or
maybe
even
tripled.
Several
of
you
on
the
council
would
know
better,
but
there
is
a
drug
issue,
obviously,
and
partly
due
to
the
homeless,
being
thrown
out
of
homeless,
shelters
for
using
drugs
and
that's
a
problem.
K
Even
people
on
drugs
kill
even
their
loved
ones,
and
that's
the
issue
there's
so
many
drugs.
You
can't
really
depend
on
social
workers
to
do
this.
What
I'm
trying
to
say
is
that
poorly
trained
police
officer
response
it's
a
sad
commentary
on
our
situation,
but
it
is
reality
and
although
hundreds
demand
or
funding
defunding,
these
tens
of
thousands
want
more
police.
Almost
ten
thousand
a
month
are
demanding
police
response.
O
Hi,
I
would
like
to
have
a
quick
response
to
george
just
saying
I
have
know
many
social
workers,
and
I
don't
know
of
a
single
social
worker
who
has
ever
dealt
with
someone
in
an
inflamed,
violent
or
triggered
situation
that
has
ever
had
to
call
the
police
for
help.
I
think
five
men
with
guns
is
far
too
many
to
handle
a
single
person
that
seems
just
frankly
asinine
to
me.
O
I
think
that
our
overuse
of
firearms
to
handle
situations
leads
to
situations
in
which
people
with
mental
health
illnesses,
underage
people,
people
who
are
unable
to
speak
for
themselves
are
often
shot
onsite
rather
than
handled
properly.
I
believe
more
social
workers
are
needed.
I
would
like
to
also
speak
out
against
approving
the
member
end
of
understanding
between
salt
lake
city
and
the
salt
lake
city
police
association,
as
I
hope
all
of
you
are
aware,
since
you
will
be
the
ones
voting
on
this
issue.
O
The
memorandum
between
the
salt
lake
city
and
salt
lake
city
police
association
has
been
continually
renewed
year
after
year,
with
our
review
since
2011
the
fact
that
in
about
in
10
years
now,
not
a
single
reassessment
of
this
agreement
has
happened.
The
city
has
not
once
gone
against
the
salt
lake
city,
police
association's,
wants
and
needs,
and
bartered
with
this
union.
I
am
a
pro-union
person.
O
O
Clearly,
all
of
us,
as
exemplified
by
the
many
words
of
the
city
council
in
the
george
floyd,
killing.
B
L
Chair,
I'm
so
sorry
to
interrupt.
We
have
one
more
commenter
who
just
signed
up
josh
kevin
one
moment.
Please.
A
Great
sorry,
to
keep
you
all
waiting,
I
thought
I
had
checked
the
general
comment
box.
I
don't
know
I
was
on
the
list:
anyways
hi,
my
name
is
josh
klovitz,
again:
small
business
owner
social
worker.
First
and
foremost,
I'd
like
to
correct
the
record
about
what
george
chapman
said.
Social
workers
deal
with
people
who
are
under
the
influence
of
substances
all
the
time.
In
fact
that's
an
entire
specialty
within
the
field
of
social
work,
so
that
was
pretty
silly,
but
I'm
here
to
make
a
comment
about
the
budget.
A
Sorry,
if
I
was
supposed
to
be
earlier
about
this,
but
I'd
like
to
say
an
urge-
the
city,
council
and
mayor
mendenhall
to
make
changes
to
the
proposed
budget
for
the
next
fiscal
year
after
a
community
came
together
last
summer
to
protest
police
brutality
and
call
for
defending
the
police.
All
of
you
sat
here
and
rejected
our
demands,
saying
something
like
this
takes
time
and
thought
and
slow
progress.
A
Yet
again
this
year
you
ask
for
another
increase
to
the
slcpd
budget
by
five
percent,
when
their
budget
has
already
grown
58
in
less
than
a
decade,
and
it's
already
beyond
the
average
budget
for
cities
of
similar
sizes.
Like
do
you
all
actually
care,
or
were
you
just
saying
that
to
silence
us?
We
want
meaningful
change.
A
The
police
do
not
keep
us
safe
and
do
not
solve
the
problems
of
our
community.
Mike
brown
himself
said
that
the
police
are
the
least
effective
and
most
expensive
option
for
most
issues
that
police
deal
with.
We
call
on
the
city
to
defund
the
police
budget
by
60
and
redirect
those
funds
to
programs
that
actually
lift
up
our
community,
like
investing
in
rental
assistance
and
housing
programs.
Mental
health
and
substance
use
services
safer
and
more
supportive
public
spaces.
A
Perhaps
tennis
courts,
like
some
of
the
callers
have
mentioned
decar
state
utah
has
published
our
demands
about
where
we
want
cuts
and
where
that
money
should
go,
and
I
urge
the
council
on
mayor
mendenhall
to
read
through
our
demands
and
see
what
real
meaningful
change
can
look
like.
Thank
you.
So
much.
B
Great
thank
you,
and
I
just
wanted.
Excuse
me.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
there
are
updated
mousse
with
the
police
union
and
there
is
a
bobby
put
a
link
in
the
chat
where
you
can
see
the
labor
agreements.
I
believe
they're
also
on
the
salt
lake
city's
hr
page,
and
they
may
be
on
our
audit
page,
but
jen
just
popped
up
to
give
us
more
information
on
where
people
can
find
those
yeah
just
in
case.
D
Just
in
case,
people
are
tuning
in
that
can't
see
the
chat
if
you
go
to
the
council's
web
page
and
look
for
the
select
rep
hub,
specifically
the
work
on
the
police
audit
there's
a
whole
document
library
there
and
that's
where
all
those
documents
are
kept
so
and
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
our
staff.
If
you're
having
trouble,
locating
it
so
happy
to
help
find
it.
B
Perfect,
thank
you
so
much.
I
also
wanted.
We
had
a
lot
of
calls
about
the
trails
master
plan
and
did
get
a
little
information
that
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
share,
and
that
is
that
the
administration
and
the
the
team
is
definite,
is
evaluating
sensitive
areas
and
will
pause
to
do
more
assessment
between
phase
one
and
two.
There
is
also
an
faq
page
on
the
website,
so
just
a
little
more
information
for
some
of
the
people
that
had
some
comments
about
that.
B
With
that
council
members,
we
will
go
to
new
business,
which
is
our
advice
and
consent
agenda.
I
will
look
for
emotion.
Some
moved.
I
B
A
G
F
F
B
This
brings
us
to
unfinished
business
item.
L1
is
regarding
an
ordinance
that
would
grant
a
master
license
agreement
for
wireless
facilities
in
the
public
way
to
sqflc
a
delaware,
limited
liability
company.
The
agreement
would
allow
this
small
cell
provider
to
install
and
maintain
small
cell
infrastructure
within
the
city
rights
of
ways
subject
to
conditions
in
the
agreement
and
after
securing
specific
site
approvals,
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
B
B
B
B
F
F
And
we'll
save
it,
we're
continuing
to
look
at
the
design
standards
and
see
how
the
city
can
better
represent
residents
in
this
process.
Moving
forward.
J
B
F
F
B
B
I
F
F
I
F
G
B
Councilmember
dugan,
yes,
I
am
a
yes
that
passes
with
council
member
fair,
substantial
l3
is
an
ordinance
that
would
approve
an
amended
and
restated
broadband
service.
Broadband
services,
franchise
agreement
to
google
fiber
utah
llc
google,
google
fiber
intends
to
discontinue
video
services
to
its
customer
base.
B
G
B
K
A
F
F
B
G
B
F
F
K
K
B
M
Yes,
I'm
so
sorry
to
interrupt,
but
I'm
wondering
before
you
adopt
your
consent
agenda.
I
think
on
the
advice
and
consent
matter
for
debbie
lyons
council
member
wharton's
motion
was
actually
to
approve
the
consent
agenda
and
I
wonder
if
you
could
just
clarify
council
member
wharton
if
your
motion
was
to
approve
the
advice
and
consent
for
debbie
lyons.
Just
for
the
record,
please.
I
B
E
F
F
G
G
B
Oh
sorry,
councilmember
rogers,
my
titles
jumped
around
and
then
I
lost
track
of
where
I
was
going
to
keep
us
all
on
our
toes
yep.
So
if
I'm
a
yes
that
passes,
and
that
means
that
we
are
at
the
end
and
we
are
adjourned
at
this
point.
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
attending
and
thank
you,
council
members
and
madam
mayor.