►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Formal Meeting - 3/2/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Thank
you
for
joining
us,
we're
going
to
start
with
the
pledge
of
allegiance
tonight
we
hold
a
moment
of
silence
as
recited
and
then
when
we
are
done,
we'll
turn
our
audio
back
on.
Let's
go
ahead
and
do.
A
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Everyone
excuse
me.
I
will
cover
our
public
meeting
rules
before
our
public
comment.
Sections
of
the
agenda-
and
this
brings
us
to
item
a4-
to
approve
the
work
session
meeting
minutes
of
tuesday
december
1st
2020,
as
well
as
the
airport
bond
minutes
of
tuesday
january
19th
2021.
I
look
for
a
motion.
B
A
A
All
right,
hi!
Excuse
me,
sorry
I'll
go
in
order.
Councilmember,
rogers,
aye,
council,
member
of
aldomorrows.
A
Councilmember
mano
hi,
councilmember,
dugan
hi
and
I'm
and
I
as
well
that's
unanimous
with
council
members,
fowler
and
wharton
absent.
A
A
Excuse
me,
as
a
reminder:
we
are
taking
comments
in
the
order
of
each
scheduled
public
hearing.
General
comments
will
take
place
after
the
scheduled
hearing
items.
We
are
accepting
your
comments
through
webex
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line.
The
city
council
has
always
had
rules
of
decorum
that
are
created
to
advance
the
legitimate
government
objectives
of
having
an
orderly,
efficient
meeting
that
moves
through
the
agenda
and
gives
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions.
A
We
have
these
rules
of
decorum
and
we
are
meeting
in
person
and
it
is
important
to
continue
with
the
practice
in
person.
We
have
the
added
benefit
of
being
able
to
see
each
of
the
commenters
which
helped
us
to
get
to
know
our
constituents
and
engage
more
meaningfully
as
we
continue
to
meet
electronically.
We
still
want
to
provide
a
space
for
people
to
feel
comfortable
and
safe
to
participate.
A
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
decorum
extend
from
the
moment
you
arrive
into
our
virtual
meeting
to
help
facilitate
our
comment
period.
Please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
The
council
respects
all
points
of
view
and
we
welcome
new
insights.
However,
using
foul
language
and
personal
attacks
make
the
public
comment
form
uncivil
and
intimidating
for
others.
In
addition
to
being
a
public
forum,
this
meeting
is
also
being
broadcast
on
television
and
the
internet
because
of
that,
the
council
has
decided
to
more
strictly
enforce
the
use
of
profanity.
A
A
A
If
your
registered
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
use
the
chat
feature
to
gather
that
information
from
you.
If
you
are
unable
to
give
a
first
and
last
name
that
meets
this
requirement,
our
staff
is
happy
to
direct
you
to
another
form,
because
your
message
is
still
important
to
us.
Amber
pearson
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting.
She
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate.
Please
monitor
the
chat
screen
for
information
and
or
feel
free
to
message.
Our
staff
with
any
questions
again.
Her
name
is
amber
pearson.
A
A
Robert
knutsman,
another
staff
member
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
and
unmuting
lines.
Once
we
open
public
comment,
robert
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time,
so
that
people
can
have
some
notice
and
be
prepared
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak.
The
meeting
host
will
unmute
your
line.
Please
state
your
name
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two
minute
mark.
The
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
A
D
Great,
thank
you.
As
you
mentioned,
it's,
this
public
hearing
is
about
a
very
small
segment
of
a
public
alley.
The
area
you
locate
here
you
mentioned
and
the
proposal
is
to
close
the
alley,
so
the
applicant
can
square
off
the
southwestern
corner
of
his
property.
For
a
future.
I
propose
future
multi-family
residential
and
commercial
development.
D
B
E
And
so
what
I
want
to
know
is
they're
closing
out
that
little
there's
a
little
alley
back
there
over
by
our
church
and
a
lot
of
times.
Traffic
goes
through
there.
So
that's
going
to
be
open
to
for
people
to
still
travel
through.
A
Yeah,
we
don't
generally
do
public
kind
of
back
and
forth
question
and
answer
here,
but
we
keep
brian
fulmer
answer
that
question.
E
Okay,
I'm
just
concerned
that
that's
going
to
remain
open
because
people
travel
through
that
through
that
alley
and
they
still
need
access
to
that.
I'm
just
wondering
whether
or
not
that's
going
to
be
be
available
to
people
to
travel
and
we
can
travel
through
there
when
trains
are
there.
That's.
A
All
okay,
thank
you,
mr
tenu,
and,
like
I
said
we
can
have
council
staff
answer
that
question
for
you
here.
If
you'd
like.
B
C
Hi,
thank
you.
My
name
is
brenda
scheer
and
I'm
chair
of
the
salt
lake
city
planning,
commission
and
I'd
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
proposal.
It
is
a
very
short
ali
vacation
and
it
enables
a
what
is
considered
to
be
what
we
consider
to
be
a
really
nice
project
for
this
area.
Thank
you.
F
Hi,
this
is
dennis
ferris
vice
chair
of
the
poplar
grove
community
council,
former
chair,
when
this
project
started
the
wanted
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
project.
This
alley
vacation
will
allow
the
developer
to
actually
improve
the
alley
and
maintain
access
through
there
with
multiple
improvements
to
the
space
would
be
very
beneficial
to
the
community.
F
He's
been
extremely
communicative
and
collaborative
with
the
community
for
the
last
two
and
a
half
years
since
he
first
put
the
property
under
contract,
and
it's
been
very
appreciated.
He's
heard
a
lot
of
our
input
and
has
applied
the
vast
majority
of
it.
Much
to
our
joy
that'll
do
me.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
F
Okay,
hi
sorry,
I
just
joined,
so
I
missed
the
initial
context.
Are
we
am?
I
is
this?
The
alleyway
expansion
on
the
southwest
corner.
F
Oh
yeah,
so
I'm
I'm
in
support
of
that
and
just
excited
to
see
some
renovations
of
the
older
warehouses
and
conversion
into
some
commercial
space
to
revitalize
the
ninth
west.
Ninth
south
area-
that
I
know
the
city
is
really
interested
in
putting
a
lot
of
resources
into
and
I
just
live
on
the
same
block
and
it's
been
great
to
see
the
the
work
going
on
and
just
really
excited
to.
Yeah.
F
Have
you
know
some
new
energy
infused
into
this
block,
700
and
800
west
block,
which
is
you
know,
obviously
close
to
the
ninth
and
ninth
so
yeah,
I'm
in
support
of
that's
what
I
have
to
say.
Thanks.
G
I
I
actually
wasn't
expecting
that,
but
thank
you
calling
in
to
address
the
concerns
over
the
unsheltered
and
the
moves
on
the
encampments.
And
I
was
just
wondering
how
things
were
going
to
be
addressed
and
what
we're
looking
at
the
next
few
days.
But
we
want
to
put
that
at
the
end
of
the.
H
A
Right
thanks
everyone
who
made
a
comment
on
this
item
I'll
look
for
a
motion
council.
A
Second,
we
have
a
motion
from
councilmember
rogers,
a
second
from
councilman
member
dugan,
any
discussion,
if
not
all
in
favor
I'll
start
with
councilman
rogers.
J
K
A
Our
second
public
hearing
item
b2
is
regarding
an
ordinance
that
rezoned
properties
at
706
to
740,
west
900,
south
and
710
to
739
west
genesee
avenue,
including
portions
of
two
alleys,
from
m1
light
manufacturing
to
rmu
residential
mixed
use.
This
is
the
properties
that
are
adjacent
to
the
alleyways
discussed
before
before
we
begin
taking
comments.
I
will
again
first
turn
the
time
over
to
brian
fullmer
council
staff
policy
analyst
to
give
a
short
introduction.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
The
applicant
is
hoping
to
re-zone
these
properties
in
order
to
develop
the
remaining
portion
of
the
site
with
multi-family
residential
housing.
That
is
not
currently
permitted
under
the
m1
zoning
designation
and
also
intends
to
commercial
buildings
on
the
site
for
commercial
uses,
and
that
is
my
introduction.
I
A
I
can't
see
any
any
any
bad
side
to
this,
but
I
bring
to
your
attention
that
there
there
are
a
few
problems
with
the
east-west
travel
through
the
alley
from
the
middle
of
that
property
that
goes
out
to
eighth
west.
So
maybe
somebody
should
look
into
that.
A
J
Great
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
project.
I
think
it's
great
to
re-zone
this
area
and
to
see
kind
of
a
new
life
in
the
the
gateway
into
the
west
side.
On
ninth
south.
J
B
I
L
L
I'm
excited
as
well
about
what
is
coming
for
the
revitalization
for
this
area,
but
a
really
critical,
important
piece
that
I
want
to
stress
that
I'm
not
sure
if
the
neighbors
are
aware
of
an
rmu
zoning
will
allow
this
building
to
be
as
tall
virtually
as
the
builders
want
to
make
it
an
rmu-35
is
what
most
of
these
buildings
are
down
on.
Fourth
south,
which
happens
to
be
where
I
live,
they're
already
very
large
buildings.
F
F
Larry
from
e
yeah,
I
live
a
kitty
corner
on
the
block
to
where
well
where
this
rezone
will
happen,
and
I
am
in
support.
I
I'm
excited
to
see
some
additional
residential
development
in
the
area,
especially
to
contribute
to
some
of
the
new
commercial
commercial
businesses
that
might
be
coming
and
and
yeah.
It's
again,
it's
exciting
to
see.
I
appreciated
the
the
previous
person's
comment
on
the
height.
F
I'm
not
sure
what
the
plans
or
the
heights
are,
but
I
did
notice
that
yeah,
the
rmu
maybe
apparently
does
look
like
it
does
have
unlimited
height.
So
that's
just
something
I
would
want
more
information
about
as
the
rezoning
goes
on,
but
otherwise
yep
everything
sounds
great
and
I
appreciate
appreciate
you
guys.
Thank
you
for
this.
L
E
Hi,
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
make
comments.
I'm
a
member
of
selma
and
when
our
founder
corki
raw
was
looking
for
a
place
to
put
our
church.
E
He
was
looking
for
a
nice
residential
area
that
was
at
a
low
profile,
where
we'd
have
plenty
access
to
sun,
which
is
relevant
to
our
religion,
and
we
were
informed
because
when
we
make
our
sacrament
it's
made
with
grape
juice
and
fermented
and
we
were
not
allowed
to
make
wine,
even
though
we
made
it
with
our
own
hands
and
we're
going
to
use
it
for
religious
purposes,
only.
We
were
forced
to
go
into
the
m1
zone,
which
we
didn't
want
to
do,
but
we
had
to
go
here.
So
that's
where
we
landed.
E
So
now
that
we're
here
we
use
the
sun
for
a
lot
of
our
our
religious
practices
and
what
we're
looking
at
now
is
when
you
come
out
from
under
the
freeway.
They
want
to
build
a
building
that
is
not
65
feet,
which
is
there's
only
now,
but
actually
up
to
75
feet
little
tower,
even
over
the
freeway.
E
So
when
you
come
underneath
the
freeway
and
you
come
in
and
you're
going
to
have
this
gigantic
building
there
with
a
proposed
244
units
and
unfortunately,
I'm
a
funeral
director-
and
I
have
been
in
a
lot
of
homes
in
the
low-income
place
of
this
town
and
they
pack
people
in
as
much
as
they
can.
I
take
people
out
from
closets
and
everywhere
else.
E
I
know
that
right
now
it's
going
to
be
nice
and
pretty,
but
in
about
30
40
years
when
it
gets
a
little
run
down
and
you
have
all
these
families
living
in
there
and
I
watch
the
kids
rolling
around
looking
for
something
to
do
at
night.
When
I
go
into
these
communities
you're
going
to
have
to
be
dealing
with
this
chris,
you
won't
be
dealing
with,
it
will
be,
your
grandchildren
will
have
to
deal
with
the
crime
and
the
rape
and
the
drugs
and
everything
else
to
go
with
high
density.
E
E
E
We've
been
part
of
the
popular
growth
community
for
over
40
years
we
teach
and
practice
meditations
that
are
conducted
inside
our
buildings
outside
on
our
sanctuary
grounds.
We
heard
the
salt
lake
planning
commission
thank
the
developers
for
working
with
the
community,
which
was
disappointing
because
we
were
never
involved
in
any
such
meetings.
We
were
disappointed
that
the
popular
growth
community
council
approved
the
development
without
counting
contacting
us
for
any
feedback
or
concerns.
E
Without
a
building
that
high
there
will
be
added
noise
from
the
freeway
that
will
be
reflected
onto
our
sanctuary,
diminishing
what
peacefulness
we
have,
and
this
will
affect
our
practices
of
meditation.
In
addition,
our
meditations
have
components
to
them,
one
of
which
is
sunlight.
We
consider
sunlight
to
be
have
spiritual
benefits
and
a
building
this
tall
will
significantly
affect
the
sunlight
that
shines
on
our
sanctuary.
There
will
be
times
of
the
years
where
we
won't
have
any
sun
at
all.
E
We've
encountered
governmental
burdens
before
and
by
doing
this
rezoning
you
are
facility,
you
will
be
facilitating
the
construction
of
a
building
that
will
place
another
burden
on
us
and
infringe
our
right.
We
understand
there
are
housing
needs
and
things
change,
but
there
are
also
religious
needs
which
are
guaranteed
by
our
constitution.
E
B
H
H
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
have
the
area
beautified,
however,
that
tall
of
a
building
is
going
to
totally
encapsulate
us
in
darkness.
During
the
winter
and
our
greenhouse,
we
will
have
to
have
lights,
and
we
will
have
to
have
locks
on
all
of
our
buildings
to
protect
it
from
people
wanting
to
come
over
and
investigate
and
try
and
open
up
our
pyramid,
which
has
already
happened,
and
I
just
think
that
you
need
to
reconsider
what
kind
of
a
building
you
are
going
to
put
there.
B
H
Good
evening,
city
council,
thank
you
for
letting
me
speak
tonight.
My
name
is
ian
percy.
My
wife
and
I
have
been
residents
of
the
liberty
wells
neighborhood
near
900
south
for
over
10
years,
and
my
wife
has
been
a
small
business
owner
on
900
south
for
the
past
five.
I
also
work
for
the
developer
of
this
project.
H
Tonight
I
am
speaking
in
support
of
this
rezone
as
a
resident
of
salt
lake
city.
I
believe
the
requested
rezone
for
manufacturing
to
residential
rmu
is
appropriate
for
the
redevelopment
of
these
vacant
parcels
which,
up
until
two
years
ago,
were
still
being
used
in
salvage
yards,
and
I
think
it's
important
for
those
listening
tonight
to
know
that
under
the
m1
zoning
we
would
be
allowed
on
these
properties
to
build
up
to
65
feet
and
under
the
rmu
zone.
It
would
only
increase
that
pipe
up
to
75
feet.
H
I
believe
this
project
will
be
a
positive
catalyst
for
change
in
the
neighborhood
and
will
serve
as
a
significant
gateway
to
the
west
side
along
the
900
south
corridor
in
the
near
future.
I
look
forward
to
riding
bikes
with
my
wife
and
kids
down
the
new
nine
line
trail
from
liberty
park
to
the
jordan
river
and
stopping
for
a
snack
at
this
development
along
the
way.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
H
B
I
B
I
So
much
good
evening,
I'm
max
caress,
I'm
actually
the
applicant.
I
just
wanted
to
take
my
two
minutes
to
sort
of
give
a
little
bit
of
perspective
on
what
we're
trying
to
do.
You
know
one
of
the
things
we
did
over
two
years
ago,
as
dennis
mentioned
before
we
actually
bought
the
properties.
I
We
engaged
a
community
asking
a
lot
of
questions.
I
One
of
the
things
that
kept
coming
back
was,
you
know,
we'd
love
to
see
more
businesses
on
the
side
of
the
tracks
in
poplar
grove,
and
so
one
of
the
ideas
that
we
had
was
to
sort
of
renovate
those
two
beautiful
barrel,
roof
buildings
that
are
sort
of
along
the
alley
that
we've
spoken
about
and
to
sort
of
attract
businesses
to
have
you
know,
potentially
restaurants,
coffee
shop,
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
One
of
the
things
we
we
found
out
over
the
last
two
years
is
one
of
the
reasons
those
businesses
aren't
really
migrating.
I
There
is
just
the
density
of
this
community
is
just
not
that
big
and
there's
just
not
enough
residents
to
support
the
businesses
that
the
community
would
like
to
see.
So
it's
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
decided
to
keep
those
buildings
as
they
are
to,
like
I
said
we
we
did
we're
very
thankful.
We
did.
We
went
to
the
rda
to
support
you
know
doing
an
adaptive
reuse
of
those
two
buildings,
so
we
can
eventually
bring
like.
I
We
do
need
some
density
and
I
think,
given
the
proximity
to
the
freeway,
the
existing
m1
zoning,
which
already
allows
for
65
feet,
we
certainly
feel
it's
an
appropriate
place,
given
the
master
plan
of
salt
lake
city
to
create
nodes
of
of
of
density
along
certain
corridors.
This
is,
in
our
view,
according
to
the
master
plan,
a
perfect
place
to
do
that.
That's
what
the
community
really,
I
think,
would
need
to
support
the
businesses
that
it
wants
to
see
there.
Thank
you
so
much.
B
Following
max,
we
have
brenda
shear,
followed
by
melanie
pearson
and
dennis
dennis
ferris
one
moment,
while
I
unmute
brenda
brenda
you're
unmuted.
C
Thank
you.
The
planning
commission
did
support
this
particular
project
and
partly
because
of
the
issues
that
were
just
talked
about
by
the
applicant,
but
and
about
especially
concerning
the
sort
of
burgeoning
activities
along
ninth
south,
particularly
central
ninth,
but
also
the
nine
line
as
places
where
we
could
identify
some
activities.
C
I
think
in
relationship
to
the
sumim
pyramid
that
the
sanctuary
that
is
there,
I
think
this
is
a
difficult
decision.
We
did
have
some
issues
with
the
height,
but
I'm
just
leaving
that
there
as
a
comment
for
council
to
consider
in
the
end,
because
the
zoning
is
already
approving
of
some
certain
amount
of
height
this.
C
This
was
not
an
easy
decision,
but
we
did
admit
in
to
to
go
ahead
and
allow
this
to
excuse
me
to
recommend
this
free
zoning.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
M
G
The
initiatives
that
mr
koreth
and
the
high
boy
advent
ventures
to
transform
the
stretch
we
as
a
council-
and
we
personally
support
mixed-use
development,
especially
along
this
stretch.
We
recognize
the
housing
needs
in
our
salt
lake
city
communities
and
that
they
are
great
and
that
we
are
sensitive,
that
we
encourage
community
sensitive,
sensitive
development
to
help
meet
the
ever
increasing
need
of
this.
G
We
also
support
affordability
for
residents,
both
individual
and
commercial,
looking
forward
to
a
time
when
small,
local,
culturally
applicable
businesses
inhabit
the
commercial
spaces
on
the
block,
we
appreciate
the
developer's
willingness
to
have
active
outreach
with
us
and
hope
that
it
will
continue
and
if
there's
anything
that
we
or
I
can
do,
we,
the
popular
grove
community
council,
can
do
to
help
and
be
invested
in
this
process.
We
are
all
ears.
F
Hello,
this
developer
came
to
the
poplar
grove
community
council
about
two
and
a
half
years
ago,
when
I
was
chair
and
brought
his
designer
asked
to
meet
with
us
simply
to
ask
hey,
I'm
considering
purchasing
this
property.
F
Listen
to
all
of
our
inputs
applied
that
input
salvaging
refurbishing
the
barrel,
roof
buildings,
creating
them
as
viable
spaces
for
small
local
businesses
that
we
so
desperately
need
in
this
neighborhood
coffee
shops,
bike,
shops,
bakeries,
delis,.
F
Since
then,
he
has
offered
volunteered
our
his
space
for
us
to
use
as
a
meeting
place,
to
discuss
the
project
offered
additional
manpower
to
assist
in
getting
the
word
out
about
that
meeting
that
we
did
take
him
up
on.
So
I
personally
knocked
on
every
door
around
that
block
and
anyone
that
didn't
answer.
We
dropped
off
flyers
too,
as
well
about
that
meeting.
F
So
we
certainly
did
our
best
to
outreach
to
everyone
and
engage
them,
bring
them
in
on
the
project
and
get
some
feedback
early
on
and
again
all
that
feedback
was
applied
and
taken
very
well.
So
I
still
continue
to
support
the
entire
project,
and
I
think
that
this
bringing
the
zoning
of
this
space
into
more
in
line
with
what
the
usage
of
that
block
already
is
to,
because
it
is
predominantly
residential
right
now,
rather
than
the
m1,
would
be
a
great
benefit
for
the
neighborhood.
B
You
council,
chair
following
dennis:
we
have
justin
heckler,
followed
by
devin
o'donald.
Then
nina
continue
one
moment,
while
I
unmute
justin.
I
Thank
you,
members
of
the
council,
I'm
justin
hepler
with
ajc
architects
working
with
highboy
ventures
on
the
future
project
that
will
go
on
this
site,
excited
about
the
opportunity
to
help
continue
to
reinvigorate
and
build
neighborhoods
of
salt
lake
city,
especially
with
the
momentum
that
will
be
coming
with
the
night.
I
South
redevelopment
just
want
to
address
some
items
quickly
related
to
why
the
rmu
zone
is
appropriate
to
this
site
for
one
it
is
consistent
with
the
popular
grove
area,
master
plan
that
encourages
density
in
these
nodes
along
the
freeway
in
particular
in
night
south.
It
allows
for
a
unit
density
and
some
flexibility
in
unit
density
that
will
provide
the
critical
mass
to
reinvigorate
the
site
and
neighborhood
and
be
supportive
to
the
new
businesses
that
will
come
and
also
the
existing
businesses
in
the
neighborhood.
I
It
is
basically
it
de-incentivizes
development
that
does
not
have
residential
component
to
it
by
limiting
the
height
to
that.
So
it
encourages
the
developer
to
move
forward
with
the
residential
development
in
this
neighborhood.
I
I
One
thing
that
had
come
up
in
the
work
session
a
couple
weeks
ago
is
a
question
of
why
forum
based
zones,
you
know,
looked
at
okay.
Thank
you.
A
Answer
your
comments
and
we
can
take
more
feedback
like
I
said
online.
I
I
thank
you
actually,
if
it's
okay,
I'd
prefer
to
hold
my
comment
for
the
the
next
hearing.
N
Hi,
yes,
I
I'd
like
to
save
my
comment
for
the
public
comment
portion,
but
just
say
one
quick
thing
before
I
leave
my
comment
for
the
rest,
I
see
now
that
there
are
four
to
five
rezoning
requests
that
are
commercial
rezoning
requests
on
this
agenda
item
today,
and
we
have
been
lobbying
the
the
mayor
as
well
as
the
city
council
several
months
to
please
rezone
some
land
for
the
end,
shelter
and
it
it
really
hurts
my
heart
that
there
are
all
these
commercial
interests
that
take
precedence
over
real
lives
that
are
being
wasted
and
dying
on
the
streets,
and
I
would
please
urge
you,
please,
please
listen
to
the
voices
that
are
voiceless,
listen
to
those
that
have
no
place
to
go,
rather
than
just
putting
all
your
emphasis
on
bolstering
business
interests
because
they
need
our
help.
N
This
is
what
the
city
council
is
for
is
to
speak
up
for
those
that
have
no
voice.
So
thank
you
so
much
and
I
would
still
like
to
reserve
my
comment
for
the
latter
portion.
Thank
you.
A
D
Thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
ryan
mcmullen.
D
I
am
an
architect
here
in
salt
lake
city
and
a
full-time
resident
of
the
liberty
wells
neighborhood,
my
wife
and
I
actually
just
purchased
a
sort
of
blighted
property
just
on
outside
of
the
international
peace
gardens
on
the
west
side
to
hopefully
someday
be
able
to
afford
to
build
a
little
single-family
residence
for
ourselves
and
start
to
invest
in
the
west
side,
and
I
think
salt
lake
city's
got
a
lot
of
big
plans
for
this
sort
of
westward
movement
using
ninth
south
as
the
corridor
really
excited
to
see
the
development
and
growth
with
the
nine
line
trail
in
particular
to
echo
some
of
the
things
we've
talked
about
earlier
with
the
pods
of
ninth
and
ninth
and
the
success
of
just
that
retail
core
between
central
ninth
and
ninth
and
ninth.
D
I
think
this
is
a
great
stepping
stone
to
continue
that
development,
west
and
hopefully
sort
of
kick
start.
The
city's
investment
in
that
nine
line
and
these
street
improvements
that
will
one
day
connect
the
international
peace
gardens
to
liberty
park
and
ninth
and
ninth
and
just
create
a
great
walkable
local
community
corps.
This
redevelopment
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
to
put
multi-family
residential
along
it,
so
I'm
definitely
in
support
of
it.
D
I
don't
think
going
from
65
to
75
feet
is,
should
be
a
major
consideration
since
right
next
to
it
is
you
know
our
main
freeway
that
cuts
through
the
valley
and
then
just
on
the
other
side
of
the
freeway
is
the
sort
of
horror
house,
whether
we
like
it
or
not,
sort
of
billboard
right
right
next
to
this
same
location.
So
in
my
mind,
if
that
height
seems
to
be
the
challenge
and
75
feet
doesn't
seem
that
much
higher
than
65,
especially
considering
location
against
the
freeway.
G
Thanks,
I
wasn't
going
to
originally
speak
on
this
piece,
but
after
hearing
all
the
comments,
I
just
wanted
to
note
a
couple
of
things.
I
was
really
encouraged
by
hearing
how
much
outreach
was
done
to
the
community
directly
to
make
sure
that
they
did
approve
of
what
was
happening
with
the
space
and
the
amount
of
like
refurbishing.
That's
going
to
be
done.
A
couple
concerning
things
were
a
lot
of
stigmatizing
language
against
low-income
housing.
G
I
think,
if
you
actually
look
at
research
that
the
salt
lake
tribune
just
did
it
actually
increases
property
values
for
people
and
really
helps
communities
to
be
able
to
provide
that
housing
for
people
and
if
we're
really
trying
to
to
create
spiritual
communities
within
our
our
living
spaces,
we
should
be
willing
to
reach
out
to
people
and
and
cooperate
in
these
ways,
and
it
seemed
somewhat
exclusionary
the
way
people
were
talking.
G
I
went
to
a
religious
institution
for
college
and
it
did
a
lot
of
outreach
to
the
community
that
it
was
a
part
of,
and
I
really
loved
that
about
it.
It
was
trying
to
better
the
community
and
trying
to
to
really
involve
the
community
as
much
as
possible,
and
just
the
language
was
concerning
to
me
that
I
was
hearing.
So
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
that.
K
Okay,
council,
I
wasn't
going
to
comment
on
this,
but
a
couple
of
comments
from
the
group.
The
religious
group
indicated
that
I
better
comment,
because
over
the
last
10
years,
this
council
has
had
several
significant
problems
with
adjacent
properties
ending
up
in
shadows.
K
If
any
of
you
remember
life
the
universe
and
sugar
house,
that
was
one
of
the
starting
issues.
We've
seen
a
lot
of
plans
come
through
that
actually
check
shadows
to
make
sure
that
adjacent
properties
aren't
impacted
and
creating
shadows
is
an
objective,
a
problem
that
can
result,
in
my
opinion,
in
a
lawsuit
against
salt
lake
city
negative
impacts.
K
If
objective
can
be
result
in
a
lawsuit
and
that's
a
problem,
so
we've
had
arguments
back
and
forth,
but
shadows
seem
to
be
a
really
really
important
issue.
The
noise
is
also
if
it's
reflecting
noise.
K
G
Thanks,
I
changed
my
mind.
You
guys
are
doing
great.
E
A
J
O
A
Councilman,
romano,
yes,
councilmember
dugan,
yes,
and
I'm
a
yes
as
well.
That
motion
passes
with
councilmember
fowler
absent.
A
That
brings
us
to
item
b3,
our
third
public
hearing
regarding
an
ordinance
that
would
amend
the
sugar
house
master
plan
and
zoning
out
for
property
at
2903.
South
winds
drive
again
before
we
begin
taking
public
comments.
I
will
first
turn
the
time
over
to
brian
fulmer
council
staff
policy
analyst
to
give
a
short
introduction.
D
D
The
portion
fronting
pilot
drive
is
zoned
cb
or
community
business,
and
the
eastern,
approximately
one
third
of
the
property,
is
zoned
r,
one,
seven
thousand
or
residential
the
that
portion
fronts
on
zenith
avenue
and,
if
approved,
the
two
parcels
would
take
on
the
single
cb
or
community
business.
Zoning
designation-
and
that
is
my
introduction.
A
Thanks
brian
robert,
please
start
the
first
public.
B
C
Thank
you.
I
just
would
like
to
support
this
application
it
it
is
in
we've
been
in
favor
of
this,
so
thank
you.
Thank
you.
N
First
of
all,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
for
your
very
adept
attempt
at
my
name,
I'd
like
to
reserve
my
public
comment
for
later,
but
thank
you
so
much.
I
appreciate
all
the
feeling.
B
A
I
A
We
have
a
motion
from
councilmember
wharton,
a
second
from
I'll,
say:
council,
rogers,
who's,
a
guest
here
and
any
public.
Any
comment
on
this
item
all
right.
If
none
we'll
take
it.
P
A
I
need
any
discussion
on
this
item.
All
right,
councilmember
rogers,
who
vote.
J
I
K
A
As
well
that
motion
passes,
we
are
now
at
item
b4,
a
public
hearing
regarding
an
ordinance
that
would
rezone
the
properties
at
1301
and
1321
south
state
street
and
again
before
we
take
public
comments.
I'll
turn,
some
time
over
to
brian
fomer,
our
account
council
staff
policy
analyst
to
give
an
introduction
to
the
sign.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
This
is
a
proposal
to
change
the
properties
you
mentioned
from
corridor
commercial
or
cc
to
form
base
urban
neighborhood,
2
or
fbun2
zoning
and
amend
the
table
of
the
zoning
ordinance
to
allow
for
some
additional
height
and
that
would
be
used
to
potentially
develop
a
new
mixed-use
building
which
would
replace
the
current
buildings
on
the
parcels.
B
Q
Great
thanks,
yeah
jen
colby,
as
I
was
preparing
my
comments
for
the
200
south
and
lincoln
street
hearing.
I
spotted
this
hearing
on
tonight's
agenda.
After
reviewing
it,
I
support
the
zoning
amendment
for
this
location
on
state
street
with
suggestions.
I
first
want
to
contrast
this
application
to
the
200
south
and
lincoln
street
situation.
They
are
in
many
ways
the
mirror
images
of
each
other.
In
both
cases,
the
unanimous
planning
commission
votes
should
be
ratified
by
the
council
for
these
state
street
properties.
Q
That
means
a
yes
vote
for
the
amendments,
because
the
planning
staff
recommended
and
commission
voted
unanimously
to
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
council.
Community
council
and
public
comments
were
also
largely
positive.
This
is
the
exact
opposite
of
the
200
south
and
lincoln
street
properties
case.
I
visited
the
state
street
properties
this
week
and
feel
the
current
buildings
are
beyond
their
design
life
and
add
nothing
to
the
neighborhood
fabric.
A
mixed-use
project
would
be
beneficial
with
form-based
guidelines
already
in
place.
Q
This
is
especially
true
because
the
project
will
add
substantial
housing
where,
under
current
zoning,
residential
units
are
not
allowed.
This
is
exactly
how
and
where
the
city
should
be
adding
housing
to
address
the
gap.
The
zoning
amendment's
approval
should
be
straightforward.
However,
the
applicant
is
also
asking
for
additional
height
allowance.
This
is
where
the
city
should
negotiate
for
tangible
community
benefits
back
from
the
developer.
Frankly,
development
agreements
seem
largely
unenforceable,
so
this
needs
to
be
structured
to
be
readily
verifiable.
Q
Q
For
the
extra
height
the
city
council,
the
city
could
require
a
certain
number
of
smaller
condo
units
at
a
lower
price
point
or
a
leed
certified
building
that
would
lower
tenant
and
owner
costs
over
time
and
help
advance
city
sustainability
goals
or
lease
a
certain
number
of
commercial
spaces
that
reduce
rents
to
local
businesses,
nonprofits
or
something
similar.
I
recommend
more
time
to
explore
these
before
a
final
vote.
Thank
you.
B
Following
jen
colby,
we
have
brenda
scheer,
followed
by
devin
o'donnell
and
then
catherine
jazeek
brenda.
You
are
unneeded.
C
Thank
you.
This
particular
proposal
at
state
street
and
13th
south
is
a
very
important
corner
in
the
city.
It's
got
a
lot
of
visibility.
C
I
think
that
we
are
looking
at
changing
from
a
quarter
commercial
zoning
to
an
fbu
in2
for
base
code
and
then
allowing
a
higher
a
taller
building
at
this
area.
This
is
a
particular
location
where
I
believe
that
a
higher
that
a
taller
building
is
important
and
to
help
hold
that
corner
and
to
give
it
some
character-
and
it
goes
along
with
the
city's
request-
need
for
higher
density
housing
and
allows
us
to
have
a
design
review
on
this
and
a
particular
property.
C
So
in
general
this
is
a
very
good
change,
especially
from
court
quarter,
commercial.
C
As
a
matter
of
policy,
I
believe
that
the
city
council
should
empower
the
planning
department
to
look
at
changing
code
or
commercial
wherever
it
appears
throughout
the
city,
as
it
is
an
old-fashioned
zone
that
allows
the
kind
of
building
that's
actually
on
here,
which
are
sort
of
low-rise
commercial
strip,
commercial
buildings,
drive-throughs
and
so
forth,
and
as
our
city
matures,
these
kinds
of
uses
should
be
phased
out
in
favor
of
urban
density
and
pedestrian
oriented
activities.
Thank
you.
I
Sorry,
my
apologies.
I
should
have
clarified
that
I
wanted
to
hold
my
comment
for
the
public
comment.
At
the
end.
G
I
apologize
I'm
a
newbie,
so
I
do
apologize.
I
actually
would
like
to
be
at
the
very
end
with
the
public.
I
guess,
but
I
do
say
that
I
do
support
state
street
being
modernized.
I
find
that
seeing
all
those
old
buildings
that
used
to
be
great
and
no
longer
are
you
know
I
find
that
all
these
developers
are
trying
to
push
in
on
areas
that
you
know
that
we're
just
getting
really
overpopulated
in
such
a
small
area.
G
If
that
makes
sense,
I
don't
know
but
I'll
move
on.
Sorry,
if
I
can
go
to
the
end,
that'd
be
great.
That's
no
problem.
G
M
A
H
O
K
A
As
well,
that's
unanimous
and
that
motion
passes
with
council
of
the
power
of
absenteeism.
A
That
brings
us
to
our
last
public
hearing
item
of
b5
regarding
an
ordinance
that
would
amend
the
zoning
map
and
central
community
master
plan.
The
property
is
located
at
159,
south
newton
street
949,
east
955,
east
959,
east
and
963
east
200
south.
A
D
The
proposal
would
change
the
zoning
on
the
properties
you
mentioned
from
r2
single
and
two
family
residential
to
rmf
35,
which
is
moderate
density,
multi-family
residential
and
the
applicant
indicated
a
desire
to
develop
a
multi-family
residential
housing
on
the
property,
and
that
would
create
more
density
than
what
is
currently
allowed
under
the
existing
zoning.
B
Hey
council
chair
first,
we
have
catherine
bieli,
followed
by
jew,
rabadou
and
then
gwen
chris
catherine.
You
are
unmuted.
R
Thank
you,
I'm
catherine
beeley,
I
own
a
small
duplex
in
the
neighborhood
and
I'm
also
a
member
of
saint
paul's
episcopal
church,
both
of
which
are
just
around
the
corner
from
lincoln
street.
While
I
understand
the
anxiety
over
housing
and,
of
course,
affordable
housing,
I'm
curious
about
the
willingness
to
so
radically
change
the
character
of
historic
neighborhoods.
R
R
These
are
five
structures
that
will
be
lost
along
with
the
heritage
they
represent.
This
plan
is
just
the
beginning:
st
paul's
is
looking
to
tear
down
two
more
historic
structures
in
the
neighborhood
and
I'm
saddened
by
that
direction.
They'll
tell
you
they're
planning
a
community
garden
and
another
short-term
park
private
parking
lot.
Neither
option
would
add
to
the
housing
mix
but
again
destroy
character,
I'm
also
a
resident
of
the
yale
crest
area,
so
I'm
a
witness
to
the
massive
tear-downs
of
historic
homes
in
our
city.
R
B
Next,
we
have
jude
ravadu,
followed
by
gwen
chris
and
then
tamara
pittman
jude.
You
are
unmuted.
J
J
I
just
happened
to
live
a
block
up
the
street
on
200
south
from
these
guys.
I've
lived
here
since
1992
I
I
know
those
houses
are
run
down,
but
I
know
a
lot
of
people
who
lived
there
didn't
have
funds
to
live
somewhere
fancy.
J
J
J
A
J
Hi,
my
name
is
gwen
chris.
Thank
you
for
taking
my
comments
tonight.
I
am
opposed
to
this
rezoning
request
as
a
resident
of
the
university
neighborhood,
I
am
very
concerned
about
the
trend
toward
higher
density
and
rezoning.
That
is
not
consistent
with
current
ordinances
and
the
city's
master
plan.
This
trend
is
rapidly
changing
the
character,
historic
nature
and
affordability
of
our
area,
removing
older
homes
and
replacing
them
with
high
market
value,
multiple
units
that
do
not
fit
the
neighborhood.
J
J
These
historic
homes
should
be
refurbished
to
provide
housing
that
continues
to
fit
in
the
neighborhood
and
continues
to
create
a
neighborhood
that
is
friendly
and
respectful
of
its
residents.
I
ask
that
the
council
uphold
its
own
ordinances,
the
professional
work
of
city
planners
and
the
unanimous
planning
commission
no
vote
on
this
project
and
the
overwhelming
opposition
from
neighbors
and
the
community.
L
Hi
thanks
for
your
time,
I'm
speaking
as
a
representative
of
the
non-profit
preservation
utah.
So
we
first
want
to
recognize
the
timeless
work
of
the
local
community,
who
has
made
their
homes
in
the
bryant
neighborhood
and
clearly
deeply
care
about
the
long-term
sustainability
of
its
makeup
and
the
zoning
decisions
that
will
affect
them
for
years
to
come.
All
five
historic
homes
are
contributing
to
the
salt
lake
city,
east
side,
historic
district
on
the
national
register
of
historic
places
being
on
the
national
register
recognizes
their
significant
but
doesn't
offer
any
protections.
L
L
Rehabilitation
would
not
only
result
in
more
environmentally
sustainable
practices
by
preventing
five
demoed
homes
from
going
to
the
landfill,
but
in
maintaining
the
integrity
of
the
historic
district
and
continuing
the
legacies
of
five
homes
that
are
from
124
to
131
years
old
and
have
long
contributed
to
the
neighborhood
and
salt
lake.
So
please
do
not
reward
the
developer
with
a
zoning
density.
Increase
they've
done
nothing
to
merit
this
benefit
on
a
personal
level,
I'm
a
resident
of
district
4
and
I'm
extremely
concerned
at
the
precedent.
This
is
going
to
set.
L
I
reside
in
the
central
city,
and
I
see
more
and
more
large-scale
apartment
structures
developed
that
are
completely
out
of
scale
with
the
historic
fabric
of
the
neighborhood
as
a
millennial,
I
hope
to
one
day
to
be
able
to
afford
to
buy
a
home
and
since
moving
to
salt
lake,
all
I
hear
about
is
the
housing
crisis.
Yet
I'm
alarmed
by
the
amount
of
decisions
that
incentivize
the
demolition
of
naturally
occurring,
affordable
housing,
which
is
typically
also
historic
for
fast
developments.
L
Q
Okay,
yeah
judd
colby,
so
it
is
clear
from
the
voluminous
public
record
that
the
rezoning
application
fails
to
meet
the
standards
in
the
city
code
is
inconsistent
with
the
central
city
master
plan
and
has
no
justification
whatsoever.
Q
Additionally,
the
original
application
and
comments
may
be
the
owner
representatives
during
this
process
have
contained
numerous
apparent,
factual
errors,
misstatements
and
misrepresentations.
This
includes
taking
elements
of
city
plans
out
of
context
that
do
not
actually
support
their
argument
upon
scrutiny.
Of
course,
parties
seeking
an
amendment
will
present
their
case
in
the
best
light.
However,
they
have
appeared
to
go
well
beyond
that
in
their
attempts
to
persuade
the
claim
that
this
amendment
is
quote
necessary
to
allow
applicants
proposed.
Use
of
the
parcels.
Q
Unquote
is
not
relevant
to
the
given
the
master
plan,
nor
a
rational
basis
for
approval.
Extensive
case
law
supports
the
authority
of
cities
to
control
zoning
and
land
use,
regardless
of
an
owner's
desires.
They
should
just
buy
appropriate
land
for
their
proposed
use
elsewhere.
The
owners
still
have
many
options
in
the
r2
zoning
for
these
parcels
they
can
sell
somewhere
all
of
them.
They
can
redesign
the
projects
to
fit
in
the
current
zoning
or
rehab
the
buildings.
Q
Q
Other
applicants,
who've
lost
their
case
at
the
planning
commission
in
recent
past,
have
accepted
the
vote
and
gone
back
to
the
drawing
board
within
their
zoning
to
good
effects
such
as
the
hackston
apartments
on
ninth
east.
Please
uphold
existing
council
approved
district
master
plans,
the
goals
and
land
use
policies
in
our
master
plan
are
more
relevant
today
than
ever
on.
A
personal
note
I,
along
with
many
neighbors,
have
been
forced
to
spend
hundreds
of
hours
of
personal
volunteer
time
and
emotional
labor
in
order
to
challenge
this
application.
Q
This
has
fallen
largely
on
women
unsurprisingly,
and
has
been
costly.
I'm
sad
to
say
I
felt
compelled
to
make
the
effort,
because
I
did
not
fully
trust
the
process.
Luckily,
so
far
the
trust
has
been
restored
thanks
to
the
professional
work
of
city
planners
and
the
commission.
This
should
not
be
a
hard
decision.
Please
vote.
No.
Thank
you.
B
J
O
O
O
It's
I
I
agree
with
with
everything
that
has
been
said.
Many
of
the
people
who
have
lived
in
these
homes
over
the
years.
I've
I've
known
them
it.
It
is
affordable,
housing,
it
was
affordable
housing
and
it
continues
to
be
affordable
housing.
O
O
I
would
hate
to
see
them
torn
down,
but
I
would
especially
hate
to
see
the
landlords
who
have
owned
these
buildings
for
30
years
that
I
have
had
as
my
neighbors,
who
have
done.
Nothing
to
maintain
these
properties
be
rewarded
with
a
reason
that
would
actually
increase
the
values
of
their
properties.
I
urge
you
to
please
vote
no
on
this
rezone.
Thank
you.
J
Hi,
can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
you
can
great,
I'm
esther
hunter,
I'm
the
chair
of
east
central
community
council
and
I've
been
a
long-term
resident
of
this
neighborhood.
I
would
like
to
emphasize
two
points
in
addition
to
the
many
thoughtful
comments
and
emails
the
community
has
sent
to
you.
First,
this
application,
if
it
were
approved,
does
not
add
housing
to
salt
lake
city.
J
J
The
ecc
already
provides
a
large
portion
of
existing,
affordable
priced
workforce,
housing
stock
on
transit
and
bus
routes
close
to
our
largest
employers.
A
vast
majority
of
our
single-family
homes,
as
monica
mentioned,
are
actually
already
multi-family
adus,
with
anywhere
from
two
to
six
units
per
house.
The
rents
range
from
750
to
hundred
and
fifty
per
unit
compared
to
market
rate
apartments
in
our
fixed
transit
zone
on
four
hundred
south.
That
range
from
sixteen.
J
A
Thanks
for
your
comments
again,
we
can
finish
your
comments,
offline
with
our
staff
or.
B
R
R
It
is
my
hope
that
you
would
see
the
same
thing
happening
in
this
area
here
and
stop
that
I
want
to
make
three
points.
First,
there
is
a
tremendous
embodied
energy
in
the
homes
that
are
proposed
to
be
torn
down,
and
this
embodied
energy
I
speak
of
is
the
labor
that
it
took
to
build
them
the
designers
and
the
once
in
a
lifetime
materials
of
old
growth,
forest
mined,
clay
sand,
iron
and
other
minerals
that
exist
in
these
old
homes.
R
R
R
B
I
I
years
ago
was
on
the
historic
landmarks
commission
and
I
have
a
master's
degree
in
historic
preservation
from
the.
U,
so
I
am
quite
familiar
with
the
historic
neighborhoods
of
salt
lake
city.
I
urge.
R
B
P
Hi,
thank
you
for
letting
me
speak
tonight.
I
have
a
little
different
angle
on
this
tonight.
We
are
newbies
to
the
neighborhood.
We
purchased
our
house
in
september
of
last
year,
we're
raising
our
children,
we're
walking
our
dogs
in
this
neighborhood.
We
love
the
character
of
this
neighborhood.
We
moved
from
the
country
club
area
downtown
for
the
charm
and
the
character
of
this
neighborhood,
we're
about
a
block
and
a
half
down
200
south
from
this
proposed
project.
P
What
one
thing
I
want
to
bring
up
is
one
of
the
reasons
to
change.
Zoning
is
for
when
there's
a
need
for
it,
and
I
can
say
that
I
I
walk
my
dogs
and
I
walk
this
drive
this
neighborhood
daily
and
there
are
there's
an
abundance
of
rental
and
other
properties
available
in
this
neighborhood.
P
So
I
don't
see
a
need
for
a
large
commercial
project.
I'm
concerned
about
traffic,
I'm
concerned
about
parking.
It
may
be
trivial
but
living
on
second
south
many
times.
We
can't
even
get
our
trash
cans
out
on
the
street
because
of
all
of
the
parking
due
to
some
of
the
apartment
complex
that
complexes
that
have
received
apparently
zoning.
Whatever
it's
called
modifications,
so
you
know
this
is
a
neighborhood.
It's
it's
not
downtown,
and
I
appreciate
an
earlier
speaker
who
was
comparing
this
to
the
state
steep
state
street
project.
P
We
are
not
state
street,
we
are
not
downtown,
we
are
a
neighborhood,
it's
a
charming
neighborhood.
We
love
this
neighborhood
and
I
would
ask
that
you
know
if
and
I
I
believe
you
guys
are
going
to
do
the
right
thing.
I
know
that
zoning
and
planning
have
rejected
this
application,
but
in
the
off
chance
that
you
don't,
I
think
that
either
the
either
the
applicant
or
the
city
need
to
commission
studies
on
the
effect
on
traffic,
public
services
and
parking
to
the
existing
neighbors
to
add
such
a
high
density
project.
B
O
Good
evening,
council
members,
I'm
shannon
wells,
please
do
not
rezone
these
five
properties.
The
people
who
actively
live
here
are
invested
in
the
future
of
this
neighborhood
invested
in
preserving
and
reviving
beautiful
historical
homes,
some
of
which
have
stood
for
nearly
a
century.
I
grew
up
here.
I've
seen
beloved
homes
beautifully
cared
for
and
restored
their
apartment
buildings
mere
blocks
away
built
in
the
last
decade.
That
cannot
claim
the
same
longevity
structures
built
fast
and
as
cheaply
as
possible
for
the
maximum
profit
of
a
select.
O
Few
individuals
do
not
last
a
commitment
to
preserve
the
neighborhood.
We
have
is
a
better
investment
in
the
future
of
our
city.
It
is
more
environmentally
friendly,
less
wasteful.
Above
all
else,
it's
what
the
residents
the
citizens
who
live
here
want.
We've
tried
to
make
our
voices
clear.
We've
fought
to
preserve
this
neighborhood,
the
people
trying
to
change
that
don't
even
live
here.
They
are
not
invested
in
the
future
of
our
community.
Do
not
re-zone!
B
M
Hi,
can
you
hear
me?
Okay,
yep?
Yes,
we
can
okay,
wonderful
hi.
My
name
is
angela
jensen
and
I
am
one
of
the
tenants
that
was
actually
evicted
from
the
property
at
9,
59,
east
and
200
south,
formerly
known
as
china,
blue,
so
originally
shane
cahoon
was
the
lease
holder
and
after
five
years,
shane
decided
to
move
out
and
break
the
lease.
M
We
received
word
on
october
20th
that
shane
would
no
longer
or
we
would
no
longer
have
that
or
sorry
august
20th.
We
were
told
by
shane
who
would
no
longer
live.
No
longer
lived
there
that
he
received
a
text
message
from
michael
that
we
had
eight
days
to
vacate
none
of
the
tenants
that
lived
there
received
notice.
Until
the
day
we
were
supposed
to
be
evicted.
M
We
only
heard
through
word
of
mouth.
We
were
then
given
until
september
12th,
we
were
displaced
in
a
pandemic
shutdown,
even
though
pc's
daughter's
daughter,
miss
hoy,
told
the
community
community
council
that
when
it
came
time
to
evict
people,
they
would
be
given
help
relocating.
This
was
not
the
case.
This
will
not
be
the
case.
M
We
didn't
want
to
leave
we
loved
living
there
because
of
how
wonderful
shane
had
made
the
house
two
of
the
three
of
us
were
insurance
contractors
and
we
all
had
good
paying
jobs.
I
am
college
educated
I
was
displaced.
There
was
no
reason
to
evict,
except
that
we
were
the
ones
that
spoke
out
against
the
rezoning.
A
Thanks
for
your
comments
bobby,
I
know
you
call
that
two
more
names
looking
at
the
time
at
8
27,
I
want
to
ensure
the
council
members
have
about
a
five-minute
break
after
the
next
two
names,
so
they'll
be
able
to
take
care
of
their
business
and
come
back
ready
to
pay
attention
to
the
remainder
of
the
public
comment.
So
we'll
take
two
more
names,
take
a
five
minute
break
and
then
we'll
zoom
after.
B
S
Hi
I
sent
you
these
comments
and
an
attachment
this
this
earlier
today
in
the
winter
of
1973,
I
moved
two
blocks
east
of
these
houses.
I've
moved
two
more
times
since
then.
My
current
home
is
a
half
block
away,
starting
in
the
early
80s.
I
began
working
on
land
use
planning
for
the
bryant
area,
as
it
is
known.
S
The
draft
of
the
first
plan
called
for
urban
renewal
of
the
houses
that
my
neighbors
and
I
were
enjoying
living
in
the
planning
director
at
the
time
had
a
vision
of
an
office
park
between
downtown
and
the
university.
We
and
our
houses
were
in
the
way
we
pushed
back
by
1984.
The
city
recognized
that
the
office
buildings
built
at
the
expense
of
housing
had
not
been
a
good
idea.
S
S
One
of
the
plans
was
funded
by
hud,
a
planner
elizabeth
gero
donated
her
time
to
complete
the
nomination
for
the
national
register
in
2012.
The
planning
division
committed
to
keep
the
increased
density
on
the
transit
quarter
and
has
done
so
since
with
the
recommendation
in
this
case
and
for
the
redevelopment
on
900
east
now
known
as
the
haxton,
the
embodied
energy
in
these
plans
is
staggering.
S
My
own
investment
represents
most
of
my
life
as
an
adult.
The
investment
the
city
has
made
to
get
us
to
this
recommendation
is
also
staggering.
You
cannot
waste
the
time
that
so
many
citizens
and
city
employees
have
spent
or
the
funds
that
previous
city
council
members
and
the
federal
government
have
authorized
the
potential
for
a
dis.
Additional
housing
exists
in
the
bryant
neighborhood
and
it
is
where
the
housing
was
removed,
not
where
it
still
exists.
R
Okay,
great,
I
would
like
to
speak
against
this
rezone
and
add
my
support
to
all
the
other
comments
that
have
been
made
tonight
regarding.
R
A
lack
of
commitment
to
rezoning-
I
I
I
am
the
bryant
neighborhood
chair,
I
work
with
the
east
central
community
council.
R
R
I
I'm
in
support
of
people
having
land
rights,
but
I'm
not
in
support
of
them
being
able
to
land
bank
and
then
get
an
up
zone
on
properties,
and
I
am
aware
also
because
I'm
privy
to
this
kind
of
information
of
other
investors
that
are
in
the
area-
land
banking,
in
hopes
that,
in
the
future,
the
city
and
the
master
plans
will
change
for
them
and
their
benefit.
R
And
I
would
just
like
to
leave
one
quote
here
by
a
prominent
author
to
solve
the
future.
We
must
save
the
past
and
I
thank
you
for
your
time.
A
Comment,
as
I
mentioned
a
second
ago,
I
want
to
ensure
council
members
will
take
a
five
minute
break
starting
now,
so
they'll
be
ready
to
come
back
and
listen
attentively.
We
will
resume
the
public
comment
on
this
item
at
8.
36.
be
right.
A
I
I
A
Perfect,
let's
we're
gonna
end
our
break
and
restart
into
public
comment
bobby
whenever
you're
ready.
B
C
Thank
you.
I
s.
I
speak
as
the
current
salt
lake
city
planning
commission,
but
also
as
a
fellow
of
the
american
institute
of
architects
and
a
fellow
of
the
american
institute
of
certified
planners
community
plans
have
impact
they
have
consequences
and
they
are
intentions
that
we
together
plan
for
our
growth
in
parts
of
the
city.
C
C
C
However,
in
this
instance,
it
is
my
observation
that
the
planning
commission
and
the
staff
did
not
find
that
the
current
zoning
was
inappropriate
or
outdated.
It
seemed
to
be
in
line
with
the
scale
of
the
neighborhood
and
the
intention
and
objectives
of
the
master
plan.
In
particular,
the
master
plan
calls
for
stability
for
the
lower
density
designations
in
this
area.
The
subject
properties,
particularly
on
200
south,
are
adjacent
to
low
density,
residential
to
the
east,
west
and
north,
and
the
proposed
zoning
district
result.
C
Higher
density,
rmf,
35
zoning
would
result
in
development
that
is
not
compatible
in
terms
of
height,
massing
and
scale
of
the
adjacent
proxies,
not
to
mention
the
loss
of
the
historic
buildings
itself.
As
such,
I
do
not
recommend
changing
the
zoning
or
the
master
plan
associated
with
the
future
land
use
map.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
B
K
Thank
you.
Thanks
for
staying
up
late,
it's
I've
been
on
for
12
hours
of
zooming
today
already
so
I
appreciate
you
guys
sticking
around
for
this.
K
My
wife
and
I
have
lived
right
across
the
street
from
these
this
property
for
the
last
near
25
years.
Restoring
an
old
house
and
many
people
in
this
neighborhood
are
restoring
these
old
houses.
It
is
a
historic
district
and
I
kind
of
look
at
zoning
as
kind
of
the
rebuttable
presumption
that
the
presumption
is
you
don't
do
it
unless
you
have
a
good
rebuttal
for
that,
and
I
have
not
seen
a
good
rebuttal
to
change
the
zoning
of
this
area.
K
When
I
work
up
the
university,
I
have
many
my
students
who
live
around
here,
they're
not
going
to
be
living
in
the
proposed
building.
They
have
there
you're
basically
displacing
affordable
housing,
albeit
not
in
the
best
of
shape,
but
that's
not
their
problem.
It
was
the
land
property
owners
who
have
not
maintained
this
property
for
decades.
K
Basically,
I'm
very
much
opposed
it.
I
see
that
the
the
planning
people
have
unanimously
opposed
this
rezone
and
I
have
not
seen
or
heard
any
reason
to
rezone
it.
It
was
brought
up
earlier
this
study
from
the
university
saying
how
larger
density
improves
value.
It's
kind
of
looked
at
that
it's,
if
not
flawed.
It
has
some
limitations
to
their
conclusions
that
I
don't
think
match
this
neighborhood
at
all.
So
larger
density
does
not
improve
the
livability
and
property
of
this
neighborhood.
So
please
turn
this
proposal
down.
Thank
you.
B
I
Awesome
yeah,
my
name
is
vincent
and
I'm
a
recent
graduate
from
the
university
of
utah
with
degrees
in
urban
planning
and
environmental
science
and
now
work
as
a
landscape
architect.
I
am
a
resident
in
salt
lake
city
and
have
lived
near
the
proposed
rezoning
and
therefore
the
dismal
demolishment
of
these
beautiful
historic
homes
having
walked
past
these
homes
and
their
stately
trees
every
day
for
over
two
years.
On
my
way
to
and
from
the
university,
I
vehemently
oppose
the
rezoning
of
these
properties.
I
I
can
only
imagine
the
way
the
homeowners
around
these
properties
feel
in
opposition
to
the
rezoning.
The
rezoning
of
these
properties
would
negatively
impact
the
character
of
their
surrounding
community,
specifically
rezoning.
This
property
would
reinforce
a
slippery
slope
towards
the
gentrification
and
demolishment
of
similar
properties,
ultimately
displacing
people
and
raising
the
cost
of
living,
while
at
the
same
time
ruining
the
sense
of
place
that
makes
salt
lake
city
an
attractive
place
to
live.
I
Given
the
aesthetic
and
quality
of
the
recent
apartment
developments
in
the
area,
it
would
be
short-sighted
and
a
disservice
to
the
community
long
term.
I
much
prefer
they
refurbish
and
maintain
the
homes
using
the
tax
credits
mentioned
earlier.
Rather
than
tearing
them
down,
demolition
is
a
choice,
not
a
solution.
Vote.
No.
Thank
you.
B
K
Yeah
my
name's
arthur
sandeck.
I
submitted
a
good
deal
of
correspondence
regarding
this
matter
which,
in
which
I
addressed
it
quite
seriously
as
I
could.
I
decided
with
this
short
time.
I've
got
here
to
make
my
comments
in
blank
verse.
I'm
sorry,
I'm
no
good
at
rap
that
probably
wouldn't
be
permitted
anyway.
So,
if
you
please
bear
with
me,
I
am
against
this
petition,
like
no
other.
This
entire
process
has
been
hard
to
uncover.
It
will
be
even
harder
once
the
buildings
come
down.
What
will
I
do?
K
Should
I
leave
town
they'll
shake
up
the
blocks
and
maybe
my
place.
I
hope
when
they're
done
I'll
still
have
some
space,
if
you
believe
their
promises
to
help
the
needy
then
believe
that
of
those
who
are
only
greedy,
if
you
want
to
do
something
right
for
the
city
stand
by
the
master
plan
and
the
planning
committee,
if
not
you'll,
encourage
many
bad
actors.
What
counts
now
on
what
counts.
Now
are
our
standards
and
those
noble
factors
it
takes
more
than
words
to
get
to
the
future.
It
takes
something
bigger
than
just
a
suture.
K
I'm
sorry
these
buildings
at
issue,
don't
glisten,
but
their
history
is
proud.
If
you
would
just
listen
from
the
house
and
days
of
greek
immigrants,
immigrants
with
the
newfound
freedoms,
making
such
a
difference
if
the
buildings
were
proud
and
gentrified
rather
than
blighted
and
brushed
aside,
if
the
owners
had
something
at
least
to
give,
but
no,
I
don't
even
know
where
these
people
live.
Well,
I
guess
I
can't
hope
for
an
entrepreneur
rich
not
to
arrive
who's
good
and
pure
to
raise
the
stately
victorian
palace
of
lore.
K
Well
I'll
have
to
settle
for
howards,
which
is
right
next
door
have
any
of
you
gone
and
looked,
or
have
you
been
too
heavily
booked?
This
is
all
I
can
say
of
what's
left
of
my
minute.
What's
left
of
my
hope,
what
wisdom
is
in
it
we'll
win
it,
but
with
my
last
breath
I'll
again
try
and
plead
my
good
lords.
I
beg
please
deny
thank
you.
H
Thank
you.
I've
lived
about
a
block
and
a
half
from
the
homes
that
we're
talking
about
for
close
to
40
years.
I
bought
my
run
down
funky
falling
down
little
house
at
that
time,
and
I've
spent
the
past
40
years,
fixing
it
up
improving
my
yard,
improving
my
home,
because
I
like
it
here.
I
like
this
neighborhood,
it's
eclectic
it's
interesting
and
it's
full
of
different
wonderful
houses
during
that
40
years,
the
people,
the
landlords
of
those
five
units,
have
done
absolutely
nothing
for
those
units.
H
They've
been
a
variety
of
tenants
there,
and
some
of
them
have
fixed
the
place
up.
Some
of
them
haven't
been
so
great
that
the
owners
have
done
nothing.
They
have
done
nothing,
but
let
those
homes
deteriorate
and
it's
a
heartbreaking
tragedy,
because
they're
beautiful
houses-
and
they
could
be
a
great
addition
to
this
neighborhood
if
only
they
were
cared
for.
H
F
One
day
I
saw
a
sign
at
the
east
side,
community
council-
and
I
thought
you
know
I'm
getting
older
and
I
always
told
myself
I
was
going
to
get
involved
and
I
never
did,
and
so
that
day
I
drove
and
parked
and
went
to
east
hot
sorry,
the
the
catholic
high
school
and
attended
a
meeting,
and
it
happened
to
that
day
that
there
was
a
proposal
for
a
a
re-zone
of
a
series
of
properties
near
where
I
live,
that
had
a
large
parcel
of
open
land
in
the
back.
F
She
was
sitting
next
to
me,
along
with
one
of
the
the
husband
of
the
couple
who
is
a
in-law
of
this
family,
and
this
has
bothered
me
greatly.
This
whole
process
of
watching
this
slander,
I'm
an
economist
by
training
at
the
university
of
utah,
and
I
hear
a
lot
of
arguments
about
high
density
impact
on
neighborhoods
transportation,
resource
utilization.
A
B
J
Hello
good
evening,
council
members,
I
represent
the
project
and
if
past
our
project
has
actually
been
amended
and
will
add
10
units
of
housing
stock
with
30
designated
to
affordable
housing
stock,
it'll,
diversify
the
area
of
housing
stock,
it
actually
addresses
parking.
I
know
there
have
been
concerns
about
that
expressed
tonight.
It
is
that
it
will
add
green
space
to
the
community,
and,
specifically,
this
project
adds
family-centric,
affordable
housing
units
to
an
area
that
doesn't
actually
have
any
specifically
set
aside.
J
Additionally,
this
project
will
also
contribute
to
cleaner
air
in
salt
lake
city.
Ultimately,
the
houses
on
our
parcels
are
old
and
inefficient,
and
if
we
don't
receive
the
result
of
pro
approval
because
of
the
inefficiencies
and
higher
maintenance
costs,
we
do
have
plans
to
demolish
and
rebuild
five
units
for
the
luxury
rental
market.
This
will
be
a
loss
of
four
units,
as
there
are
currently
a
total
of
nine
units
between
the
nine
buildings.
J
There
have
been
numerously
numerous
policy
papers
from
the
kensington
policy
institute,
as
well
as
other
think
tanks
with
evidence
that
shows
that
zoning
laws
that
allow
for
diverse
housing,
stock
and
higher
density
combats
the
scarcity
of
affordable
housing
and
burdensome
housing
prices,
while
still
maintaining
and
even
raising
housing
values
in
the
areas
they
are
in.
It
will
take
your
leadership
and
sometimes
making
difficult
and
unpopular
decisions
to
guide
our
community
through
this
housing
crisis
that
we
are
facing.
B
G
You're
unneeded,
it's
me
again.
I
just
wanted
to
I'm
going
against
this.
It's
just
allowing
for
changes
to
zoning
in
older,
developed
communities
is
not
a
good
idea.
G
It
opens
the
door
for
more
developers
to
come
in
and
destroy
and
over
populate
lovely
neighborhoods,
I'm
over
on
the
liberty
park
area,
even
though
I'm
not
around
there,
but
I
love
this
neighborhood.
It's
one
of
the
one
reasons
why
I
moved
here
is
because
of
the
houses
with
bringing
in
these
developers.
G
You
know
and
them
changing
to
multi-units
multi-multi-units,
it's
causing
more
pollution,
more
parking
problems,
and
I
hate
to
say
it
crime,
not
because
of
the
people
that
get
into
the
properties,
but
the
people
that
actually
visit
the
properties
and
over
time
it
does
become
an
issue.
People
talk
about.
You
know.
G
G
G
I
really
do
wish
that
they
would
push
these
developers
out
to
areas
that
really
can
you
know
have
them
in
that
area.
You
know
via
state
street
via
any
of
those
areas.
That'd
be
great,
I
mean
who's
to
say
they
couldn't
put
a
beautiful
little
park
in
the
middle
of
these
developments.
G
B
G
Our
it's
a
really
you
know
small
street
there's
not
a
lot
of
places
a
park.
So
that's
a
big
concern
for
us,
the
traffic,
but
mostly
it's
just
heartbreaking
to
think
about
the
neighborhood
and
the
character
being
changed
so
much.
I
remember
going
to
san
francisco
and
seeing
those
like
famous
houses
that
you
see
the
beginning
of
full
house
and
they're.
G
Just
these,
you
know
iconic
houses
in
san
francisco
that
I'm
sure
you
guys
can
all
picture
in
your
head
right
now
and
these
houses
are
like
that
once
they're
gone,
they're
they're
never
coming
back,
and
we
don't
want
to
see
that
happen
and
we
plan
on
living
in
this
neighborhood
for
decades
to
come,
and
so
we
really
really
hope
that
this
zoning
is
is
not
changed.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
B
L
L
I
think,
if
anything,
the
last
30
minutes
of
listening
to
comments
has
made
me
feel
very
hopeful
that
there
are
many
salt
lake
city
residents
who
have
the
same
values
and
reflect
how
I'm
feeling
about
the
growth
that's
happening
in
our
city,
and
I
think
that
that
we
have
seen
numerous
other
buildings
be
replaced
by
frankly
low
quality,
quickly
constructed
housing
with
absolutely
no
character.
L
That
does
not
contribute
to
our
community,
and
I
think
that,
as
a
city
council,
I
really
urge
you
to
consider
putting
other
policies
in
place
to
preserve
historic
buildings.
It's
very
disheartening
to
have
the
developers
representative
come
on
and
say
you
know,
even
if
this
zoning
isn't
approved
they're
going
to
tear
down
the
buildings
anyway,
so
that's
very
frustrating
and,
as
a
member
of
this
community
very
disheartening
to
hear,
but
I
really
encourage
you
to
oppose
this
reason.
Thank
you.
So
much.
B
I
B
K
B
I
He
has
one
of
the
last
few
people
last
three
that
lived
at
the
house,
and
then
you
heard
the
story
before
they
evicted
us
all
and
all
that
fun
stuff
saying
that
they
were
going
to
remodel
the
houses,
but
it
doesn't
sound.
Like
that's
the
case.
It
sounds
like
they're
just
trying
to
rezone
it
and
you
know,
put
apartments
up,
but
I
don't
feel
like
they're.
F
Qualified
to
do
that,
they
did
paint
over
the
house,
but
I
would
be.
I
A
All
right
well,
that
is
correct.
Then
I
will
thank
everyone
who
made
a
comment
tonight
on
this
issue,
and
I
want
to
look
for
a
motion
from
the
council.
I
O
A
We
have
a
motion
from
councilman
rogers
in
a
second
councilman
revolving
with
any
council
members
feel
like
we
need
to
say
something
comment
on
this
discussion.
B
O
The
council
decided
about
three
months
ago
that
once
the
double
hearings
had
concluded
for
that
batch
that
they
would
go
with
the
standard
practice,
we
were
having
a
lot
of
complaints
from
people
that
things
were
taking
too
long,
and
I
think
one
of
the
reasons
the
council
agreed
to
go
back
to
the
main
usual
process
was
that
people
were
now
getting
the
hang
of
the
socially
distant
remote
meetings
and
we
weren't.
Having
that
the
complaints,
we
were
getting
worried
about
not
getting
into
the
meeting
or
not
having
a
chance
to
comment.
A
H
A
E
A
And
I'm
a
yes
as
well
and
that
that
motion
passes
unanimously
with
counseling
with
fowler
absence
tonight,
with
that
we
have.
A
We
have
no
potential
action
items
on
today's
agenda,
which
brings
us
to
section
d
of
our
agenda
regarding
comments.
First
portion
of
the
comments
section
is:
are
there
any
questions
for
the
mayor
from
the
council?
Well
mayor?
Thank
you
for
being
here.
First
of
all,
and
I
see
you
rachel
otto's,
also
on
any
questions
to
the
mayor.
A
O
No,
I
I
just
have
a
comment
and
and
tell
the
mayor
that
we,
I
appreciated
the
invite
for
yesterday's
memorial.
I
Of
the
salt
lake
city
residents
that
died
of
coved
during
this
past
year,
it
was
about
146.
O
And
there
were
about
146
candles,
put
around
the
plaza
where
the
flags.
I
A
I'm
a
poor
man's
james
rogers
so
do
my
best.
A
All
right
with
that,
we
are
now
at
the
general
common
portion
of
our
agenda
for
comments
about
general
topics
and
items
that
we're
not
scheduled
for
hearing
tonight.
A
I
know
we
have
a
number
of
folks
who
have
called
them
for
this,
so
we
are
accepting
your
comments
through
webex
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
phone
line
for
those
who
have
just
joined
us.
As
I
shared
earlier
city
council
has
always
had
rules
of
decorum
that
are
created
to
help
us
conduct
an
orderly,
efficient
meeting
and
moves
through
the
agenda
and
gives
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions.
A
These
rules
are
no
different
when
we
are
meeting
in
person
and
are
important
to
create
a
space
where
people
can
feel
safe
to
provide
their
comments
and
differences
of
opinion,
even
when
we
are
meeting
virtually
in
order
to
achieve
this.
Our
rules
of
decorum
extend
from
the
moment
you
arrive
into
our
virtual
meeting
to
help
facilitate
our
comment
period.
Please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
A
The
council
respects
all
points
of
view
when
we
welcome
new
insights.
However,
using
foul
language
and
personal
attacks
make
the
public
comment
form
on
civil
and
intimidating
for
others.
In
addition
to
this
being
a
public
forum,
this
meeting
is
also
being
broadcast
on
television
and
the
internet
because
of
that,
the
council
has
decided
to
more
strictly
enforce
the
use
of
profanity.
A
Five
801-535-7654,
based
on
that
this
will
be
considered
your
advance
warning
against
the
use
of
profanity.
If
someone
uses
profanity
will
mute
your
microphone
and
you
will
forfeit
your
opportunity
to
address
the
counsel
tonight.
In
addition,
just
as
we
would
ask
for
your
name
in
our
in-person
meetings,
we
provide
our
first
and
last
name,
part
of
speaking
the
public
comment
period
and
to
limit
disruption.
Your
first
and
last
name
given
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules.
A
If
your
registered
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
use
the
chat
feature
to
gather
that
information
from
you.
If
you
are
unable
to
give
a
first
and
last
name
that
meets
this
requirement,
our
staff
is
happy
to
direct
you
to
another
forum,
because
your
message
is
important
again.
Amber
pearson
from
our
staff
is
helping
moderate
the
meeting
she
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate.
Please
monitor
the
chat
screen
for
information
and
or
feel
free
to
message
our
staff
with
any
questions
again,
her
name
is
amber
pearson.
A
Robert
another
staff
member
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
and
unmuting
lines
once
we
are
open
once
we
open
public
comments.
Excuse
me,
robert
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
people
can
have
some
notice
and
be
prepared
to
speak.
If
you
do
not
wish
to
speak,
please
message
our
staff
to
let
them
know
or
when
the
host
states-
your
name,
please
just
let
us
know
you're
here
to
listen
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak.
A
The
meeting
will
host
will
unmute
your
line,
then
state
your
name
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two
minute
mark.
The
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted
and
I
apologize
in
advance
for
that
we're
trying
to
be
fair
for
everyone.
Of
course,
if
you
are
unable
to
complete
your
full
comment
within
the
available
time,
please
feel
free
to
email,
us
email,
us
or
you
can
also
call
us
on
the
phone.
We
can
get
that
information
to
you,
robert.
A
Please
go
ahead
and
announce
actually
before
I
do
that.
Just
one
quick
clarification:
we've
had
a
lot
of
land
use
items
tonight
and
I
know
oftentimes
the
public.
There
is
some
confusion
about
how
that
works.
Private
property
owners
can
petition
the
city
for
a
reason
of
their
property.
A
As
a
council,
we
don't
go
actively
trying
to
read
some
people's
property
for
them
or
to
change
what
they
want
to
zone
it
to.
We
can
make
a
determination,
yes
or
no
on
their
application,
and
so
it's
fairly
narrow
for
us
here
so
just
be
aware
of
that.
As
we're
talking
about
land
use
items
in
the
context
of
this
council
meeting
all
right
robert,
please
go
ahead
and
announce
the
first
three
individuals
who
are
in
the
queue
to
speak.
B
Thank
you,
council,
chair
first,
we
have
cindy
cromer,
followed
by
arthur
sandack
and
then
scott
andrews,
indeed
you're
unmuted
now.
S
S
S
S
One
is
that
the
planning
division
is
so
far
out
in
front
of
everybody
else
in
terms
of
doing
the
homework
that
there
is
no
comparison.
Where
is
economic
development?
Who
is
going
to
deal
with
the
cost
basis?
Depreciation
capital
gains
the
value
of
non-conforming
density
financing,
affordable
units,
those
factors
which
drive
the
decisions
that
developers
make
housing
is
interdisciplinary
now
finally
hand
is
at
the
table.
Could
somebody
send
an
invitation
to
the
people
who
understand
the
financing?
S
S
I
have
a
pot
shot
at
the
cordini
administration
and
the
third
thing
is,
as
as
I
was
listening
to
you,
the
thought
just
kept
recurring
to
me
as
how
many
people
will
be
displaced
in
the
rmf
30
modifications
if
they
occur
before
the
city
gets
the
safety
net
constructed
demolitions
and
displacements
will
accelerate.
We
know
that
we
do
not
know
by
how
much.
B
B
F
Hello,
thank
you.
I
I've
been
a
resident
of
salt
lake
city
utah,
starting
when
I
was
about
17.
I
I
actually
had
to
leave
home
in
high
school.
F
My
dad
dropped
me
off
at
my
uncle's
house,
and
my
uncle
was
supposed
to
let
me
finish
my
senior
year
of
high
school
a
week
after
my
uncle
left.
My
sorry,
my
dad
left
my
uncle
dropped
me
off
at
a
boarding
house
and
said
goodbye
and
that's
how
I
started
my
life
here
in
salt
lake
city.
As
a
17
year
old,
I
worked
nights
at
sizzler
and
lived
in
a
one-room
boarding
room,
and
I
think
my
rent
at
that
time
was
something
like
a
hundred
and
ten
dollars.
F
I've
watched
over
the
years,
the
salt
downtown
salt
lake
city
was
extremely
scary.
It
was
full
of
high
density,
packed
in
people
and
all
types
of
shabby
houses.
Many
owners
that
I
know
that
invested
in
properties
here
that
own,
like
10
or
20,
houses,
paid
five
and
ten
thousand
dollars
per
house
downtown
and
the
university
continued
to
grow
and
the
salt
lake
city
became
a
mecca
for
diversity,
and
we've
now
reached
the
inflection
point
with
changes
in
super
trends
of
technology
and
everything
that
we're
now
very
successful.
F
And
I
subsequently
own
buildings,
downtown
and
eastside
central
rents
and
demand
are
going
through.
The
rough
and
costs
continue
to
go
up,
and
I'm
reminded
of
my
experience
of
living
in
san
francisco
more
than
15
years
ago,
where,
as
the
other
lady
who
commented
about
those
charming
houses
of
which
each
house
cost
at
least
two
million
dollars-
and
I
was
there
during
the
recession
and
the
building
codes
and
other
things
were
so
onerous
on
the
owners
of
property.
There.
A
Sorry
for
the
the
cut
off
again
we'd
love
to
hear
what
you
have
to
say.
Please
talk
to
staff
offline
here
and
get
your
comments
to
us
as
soon
as
possible.
I
As
a
long-term
resident,
I
have
steadily
seen
rental
prices
rise,
both
in
large
buildings
and
private
rentals.
This
seems
to
be
driven
mostly
by
new
apartment
buildings
and
their
prices.
I
did
a
survey
of
60
of
the
newer
apartment
buildings
in
the
downtownish
area,
according
to
their
marketing,
the
rent
rates
start
at
about
twelve
hundred
for
a
studio,
with
a
small
hundred
at
nine
fifty
thirteen
hundred
to
two
thousand
for
a
one
bedroom
and
twenty
three
hundred
for
a
two
bedroom.
There
are
some
older
buildings
that
also
offer
lower
income
housing
in
these
areas.
I
These
are
entirely
unaffordable
for
many
in
the
city.
If
we
were
to
follow
the
generally
accepted
budget
rule
of
spending,
50
percent
of
your
income
on
needs
includes
housing,
food
and
transport
that
50
percent
would
equal
about
500
at
minimum
wage
620
at
the
40,
medium
income
and
10
20,
if
you're,
50
or
15
an
hour.
I
Now,
if
you
spent
that
entirety
on
housing,
which
should
actually
go
to
food
as
well,
that
would
put
occupancy
at
between
two
to
three
people
in
a
studio
three
to
five
people
in
a
one
bedroom
and
four
to
six
people
in
a
two
bedroom
at
minimum
wage
that
averages
around
two
to
three
for
the
rest
of
them
at
fifty
dollars
an
hour.
So
again
that
was
a
survey
of
sixty
total
buildings,
10
of
which
included,
affordable
housing
under
550
for
a
one
bedroom.
I
I
It
would
appear
the
city
only
wants
to
invite
higher
incomes
and
corporate
interests
to
the
city
while
pushing
lower
income
peoples
to
lower
quality
homes
and
to
the
west
side,
which
honestly
is
neglected,
and
I
could
speak
to
on
a
later
date.
You
could
also
consider
at
giving
these
lands
to
developments
to
create
property
for
the
unsheltered
time
is
my
time.
Thank
you.
N
Hi,
yes,
this
is
casino
knzeva.
I
am
the
executive
director
of
the
nomad
alliance.
Again,
thank
you
for
your
value
for
pronouncing
my
name.
I
just
want
to
say
a
huge
thank
you
to
the
chair
who's,
not
here
today,
amy
and
chris
wharton,
for
coming
out
with
us
on
our
nomad
supply,
drive
several
sundays
in
a
row
and
seeing
the
true
tragedy
that
we
see
on
the
streets.
N
I
commented
before
about
the
rezoning
and
mentioning
how
there
are
so
many
commercial
interests
that
are
being
heard,
while
those
who
are
not
landowners
who
are
not
property
owners
aren't
being
heard,
and
I
just
want
us
to
investigate
whether
we
are
still
under
the
guise
of
feudalism
where
landowners
were
elevated
and
those
who
had
no
access
to
land
were
silenced,
and
you
know
we
can
do
better.
N
We
we've
got
to
answer
the
call
for
the
end,
shelter
to
have
a
place
to
rest
their
head
and
that's
why
we
are
working
with
a
village,
cooperative
and
man
on
rezoning
and
with
you
guys
to
rezone
some
land
so
that
we
can
build
a
tiny
house
settlement
so
that
we
can
finally
give
them
a
place
where
they
have
just
as
much
say
as
all
of
these
commercial
interests
that
are
always
on
the
agenda
again.
There's
an
abatement
also
a
lot
several
abatements
happening
today.
N
I
want
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
youth
camp.
There
are
several
people
there
that
everyone
there
we
truly
truly
love.
We
met
an
11
year
old
there,
kids
that
are
lgbtq
and
kicked
out
by
their
parents,
former
foster
kids-
and
you
know
these
are
children
that
can
barely
barely
take
care
of
themselves.
It's
the
community
that
needs
to
help
them
and
forcing
them
to
move
from
the
one
and
only
home
across
from
the
boa
resource
center,
where
they
can
get
a
meal,
is
just
unwarranted
and
truly
truly
cruel.
N
T
Hello,
I'm
darren
mann
and
I
just
wanted
to
speak
about
the
abatements
that
are
currently
happening
in
the
salt
lake
city
area.
So
there's
specifically
one
on
north
temple.
T
It's
very
interesting
that
we're
continuing
with
the
abatements.
Now
I
know
that
the
salt
lake
city
doesn't
have
utmost,
say
you
know
the
county.
The
health
department
is
talking
about.
T
I
would
really
urge
us
to
really
think
because
us
at
the
village,
cooperative
partnered
with
the
the
nomad
alliance,
we've
been
moving
forward
with
fundraising
for
a
tiny
home
community
and
if
we
can
start
to
actually
move
in
a
way
that
is
ecologically
and
economically
sound
for
to
address
the
homeless
crisis.
T
Instead
of
just
move
forward
on
developments
that
are
only
for
the
economic
development
of
those
those
that
have
the
privilege
to
have
housing
over
their
heads,
then
I
think
we
can
create
and
be
a
flagship
for
solutions
that
are
that
are
positive
and
not
only
to
address
homelessness
but
also
to
address
you
know
our
air
quality.
We
can
really
start
to
tackle
more
more
birds
with
just
one
stone.
T
So,
let's,
let's
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
move
forward
on
this
on
all
of
these
rezonings
that
we
keep
talking
about
in
these
councils
and,
as
you
keep
pushing
on
to
the
next
council
meeting
and
the
next
council
meeting,
let's
start
moving
forward
with
a
spirit
of
action
and
a
spirit
of
contemplative,
you
know
camaraderie.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time,
thanks
dear
thank
you.
G
G
We
need
to
plan,
we
need
to
make
a
plan
for
those
that
have
nowhere
to
go.
Our
shelters
are
near
full
or
reaching
over
capacity
as
of
today,
and
they
have
been
so
now
for
months.
Please
consider
zoning
an
area
for
them
to
live
sustainably
and
help
facilitate
current
resources.
Please
let
them
stay
put
where
they
are
at
currently
until
there
is
a
plan
considering
over
housing
in
the
shelters
and
our
current
covered
concerns,
stop
the
pushes
and
allow
camping
within
the
city
limits
until
this
is
resolved.
G
I'm
in
support
of
the
nomad
allow
alliance
and
the
unsheltered
utah
cooperative,
their
their
suggestions,
should
be
heard
and
addressed
because
they
are
providing
real
solutions
and
that's
all
thanks
guys.
L
Hi,
thank
you,
and
I
appreciate
you
all
spending
so
much
time.
Listening
to
our
comments,
I
apologize
if
you're,
not
the
right
board
to
be
addressing,
I
have
actually
found
it
particularly
confusing
and
difficult
to
get
involved.
So
this
is
one
of
my
first
steps.
L
What
I
wanted
to
briefly
speak
on
tonight
is
something
that
might
be
somewhat
unpopular,
but
particularly
during
the
pandemic,
I've
seen
an
increase
in
dogs
being
off
leash
in
public
parks,
and
this
is
something
that,
particularly
as
we
speak,
to
continued
urban
density
growing
areas
for
larger
communities.
I
think
the
preservation
of
public
spaces,
particularly
outdoor
space,
for
people
who
don't
have
their
own,
is
incredibly
important.
L
For
instance,
the
northwest
corner
of
liberty
park
there's
a
large
sunny
field
there.
I
know
lots
of
families
in
the
summer
and
in
the
nicer
months
who
use
that
area
as
a
place
to
recreate
outdoors
and
I'm
concerned
that
we
are
turning
over
the
limited
outdoor
space
that
we
have
to
off
leash
dogs.
And
again
I
don't
know
if
this
is
your
your
area
of
something
to
regulate,
but
I
just
want
to
call
that
attention.
L
We
love
our
dogs,
we
love
them
to
be
awfully
in
the
appropriate
areas,
but
I
hope
that
particularly
move
forward
into
the
warmer
months.
We
can
regulate
that
space
a
little
bit
better.
So
thanks
so
much.
A
Thanks
carolyn,
if
you
want
to
talk
to
staff
offline,
I
thought
we
could
be
pointing
in
the
right
direction.
Q
Yeah
thanks,
it's
been
a
long
night.
Thank
you
for
hearing
from
me
again.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
a
couple
of
things.
After
working
closely
with
our
neighborhood,
we
recognize
very
clearly
that
a
national
historic
district
is
different
than
a
local,
historic
district
or
an
individual
building
registry,
and
that
specifically
for
the
200
south
properties
that,
yes,
the
owners
potentially
could
still
tear
them
down.
Q
We
find
the
threats
of
tear
downs
regardless
rather
blackmail-ish,
frankly,
and
if
that
were
the
case,
well
build
back
in
r2,
we're
okay
with
that
we're
not
okay
with
it,
but
we'll
deal
with
it,
but
I
just
wanted
to
speak
up
and
say
that
we
all
value
preservation
and
the
structure
of
our
neighborhoods
we've
had
wonderful
infield
developments
that
have
fit
the
zoning
already,
and
we
can
do
that
again,
but
again,
if
the
property
owners
so
disregard
the
value
of
their
own
structures
after
30
years
of
neglect
and
now
threaten
us
with
tear
down,
as
though
somehow
that
will
get
them
the
rezone.
Q
I
ask
you
to
please
see
through
this.
It
may
be
a
bluff.
It
may
not
be
a
bluff
we'll
deal
with
it
either
way,
but
putting
back
five
structures
as
either
single
family
or
duplex.
If
they
were
sold,
they
could
have
an
adu
and
we
could
get
to
15
units-
it's
not
ideal,
but
we
all
recognize
that,
but
we
also
value
our
historic
neighborhood.
Apparently,
unlike
these
neighbors
and
a
historic
district
is
a
fabric
of
structures,
we
were
at
74
contributing
structures.
Q
Everyone
we
lose
threatens
the
historic
district
and
the
tax
credits,
the
rest
of
us
get
for
actually
maintaining
and
investing
in
our
properties,
whether
rentals
or
owners.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
totally
clear,
because
there
may
have
been
some
misunderstanding
that
people
think
they
will
be
protecting
the
structures.
We
are
very
clear.
We
understand
this,
but
we
also
value
the
structures
and
we're
very
disappointed.
Q
The
owners
are
willing
to
cut
their
noses
off,
despite
their
face,
apparently
or
be
the
kids
who
take
their
toys
home
because
they
won't
share
with
their
siblings,
but
that's
how
it
rolls
and
we'll
deal
with
it.
So
I
wanted
to
say
that,
as
I
finally
get
around
to
my
dinner-
and
I
appreciate
your
long
night
and
please
do
not
fall
for
this.
Frankly,
it
doesn't
meet
the
master
plan.
Thank
you.
E
It's
ron
tamu,
it's
been.
This
was
shocking
to
hear
how
many
of
these
community
people
from
our
local
community,
the
glendale
community,
say
how
how
they
involved
everybody.
We
have
a
a
person
that
lives
on
the
property
24
hours
a
day.
E
Nobody
came
to
our
door,
we
have
our
president
that
actually
has
the
phones
going
directly
to
her.
Nobody
called
nobody
left
the
message.
So
all
of
this
community
outreach
is
obvious
for
communities
that
are
not
members
of
our
church,
and
I
know
that
this
is
definitely
just
plain
religious
prejudice.
E
E
We
got
one
little
notice
on
our
great
gate
for
a
public
meeting.
We
showed
up
early
and
even
waited
after
we
got
there
and
they
opened
the
place
up
for
a
half
an
hour
and
nobody
showed
up.
We
were
told
by
the
person
that
was
there
from
the
city
that
don't
worry
about
it.
You
will
be
involved
in
everything
that
goes
on.
E
A
Okay,
I
would
say:
let's
double
check
it,
but
I'll
just
take
a
moment.
While
I
look
to
the
next
motion
being
on
our
agenda
here,.
A
All
right,
well,
I
want
to
thank
everyone
who
made
a
comment
in
the
general
comment
portion,
and
we
are
now
at
the
new
business
portion
of
our
agenda
item.
E1
is
regarding
a
motion
to
ratify
the
determination
that
the
council
will
continue
to
meet
remotely
and
without
an
acre
location
under
hb
5002.
A
A
motion
from
the
councilmember
dugan
doing
a
second
second,
second
from
councilman
romano,
any
discussion
of
this
item
seeing
none
councilmember
rogers;
yes,
yes,
council,
member,
wharton,.
M
I
A
We
have
no
unfinished
business
scheduled
tonight
and,
lastly,
we
are
section
g,
the
consent
portion
of
our
agenda.
I'll
look
for
motion.
A
J
E
K
A
I'm
a
yes
as
well
with
passage
unanimously
with
catholic
power
absence.
This
concludes
our
former
city
council
meeting
tonight.
The
council's
phone
meeting
now
stands
again.
A
See
you
all
soon
on
the
schedule.