►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Formal Meeting - 3/16/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Salt
lake
city
council,
formal
meeting,
we
are
happy
to
have
you
here
while
we
continue
to
hold
our
meetings
remotely
due
to
the
declarations
of
emergency
related
to
the
pandemic
and
earthquake.
Thank
you
for
joining
us.
We'll
begin
with
a
moment
of
silence,
as
we
recite
the
pledge
of
allegiance
when
we
are
done,
we
will
turn
on.
Excuse
me
we'll
turn
our
audio
back
on.
A
All
right
thanks,
everybody
to
begin
our
meeting
tonight,
I'd
like
to
turn
a
little
time
over
to
council
member
dan
dugan
to
for
a
special
honor
for
a
previous
council
member.
B
Thank
you
chair
johnston,.
B
B
I
did
not
know
her
and
wasn't
a
resident
of
utah
during
her
tenure,
but
the
people
who
did
know
her
and
served
with
her
speak
more
than
kindly
of
rosalind
former
council
member
dave
euler
posted
about
her
dedication.
As
a
member
of
this
body
for
eight
years,
as
I
sat
in
her
seat,
bueller
wrote,
I
often
looked
at
her
picture
on
the
wall
and
wondered
what
rosen
would
do.
B
B
She
filled
two
stints
at
each
as
a
council,
chair
and
vice
chair,
and
also
serve
as
the
chair
of
the
rda
when
she
finished
her
time
on
the
council.
A
newspaper
article
noted
that
clerk's
accomplishments
included
negotiations
that
led
to
the
fire
station
at
research
park,
the
steiner
black
attic
center.
B
B
B
B
A
I
will
cover
our
public
meetings
rules
before
our
public
comment.
Sections
of
the
agenda-
and
this
brings
us
to
item
a4,
to
approve
the
work
session.
Meeting
minutes
of
tuesday
may
12
2020
tuesday
may
26
2020
and
thursday
may
28
2020,
as
well
as
the
formal
meeting
minutes
of
tuesday
january
5th,
2021
and
tuesday
january
19th.
2021
I'll
look
for
an
auction.
D
A
We
have
a
motion
by
council
member
fowler,
our
second
by
councilmember
wharton.
Is
there
any
discussion
all
right,
those
in
favor
council
member
rogers,
yes,
councilmember
wharton,
yes,
council,
member
morris.
E
F
D
A
That
is
unanimous
and
the
motion
passes.
We
are
now
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
agenda.
We
take
comments
for
each
of
the
items
scheduled
for
our
council
hearing
general
comments
will
take
place
after
the
scheduled
hearings.
Tonight
we
are
accepting
your
comments
through
webex
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line.
A
The
city
council
has
always
had
rules
of
decorum
that
are
created
to
advance
the
legitimate
government
objectives
of
having
an
orderly,
efficient
meeting
that
moves
through
the
agenda
and
gives
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
in
person.
We
had
the
added
benefit
of
being
able
to
see
each
other
which
helped
us
get
to
know
our
constituents
and
engage
more
meaningfully.
A
We
still
want
to
provide
a
space
for
people
to
feel
comfortable
and
safe
to
participate.
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
deform
extend
from
the
moment
you
arrive
into
our
virtual
meeting
to
help
facilitate
our
comment
period.
Please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
A
The
council
respects
all
points
of
view,
and
we
welcome
new
insights.
However,
using
foul
language
and
personal
attacks
make
the
public
comment,
form
uncivil
and
intimidating
for
others,
this
meeting
is
also
being
broadcast
on
television
and
the
internet,
and
so
we
will
more
strictly
enforce
the
use
of
profanity
profanity.
A
This
will
be
considered
your
advance
warning
against
the
use
of
profanity.
If
someone
uses
profanity,
we
will
mute
your
microphone
and
you
will
forfeit
your
opportunity
to
address
the
council
tonight
if
you
feel
you
need
to
use
profanity
to
express
your
point.
You're
welcome
to
email,
council
members
or
call
our
comment
line
at
801
535-7654.
A
A
If
your
registered
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
use
the
chat
feature
to
gather
that
information
from
you,
robert
nuts
newsman
excuse
me
from
our
staff,
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting.
I
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate.
Please
monitor
the
chat
screen
for
information
and
or
feel
free
to
message
our
staff
with
any
questions.
A
Again,
his
name
is
robert
knutsman.
Robert
will
also
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
and
unmuting
lines.
Once
we
open
public
comment,
robert
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
people
can
have
a
notice
and
be
prepared
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak,
the
meeting
host
will
unmute
your
line.
Please
state
your
name
and
two
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two-minute
mark.
The
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
A
Four.
If
you
do
not
wish
to
speak,
please
message
our
staff
to
let
them
know
or
when
the
host
states,
your
name,
please
let
us
know
you
are
here
to
listen
again.
I
apologize.
If
you
get
cut
off
tonight,
we'll
try
and
give
you
advanced
notice
when
time's
up,
but
please
feel
free
to
comment
outside
of
our
public
comment
section.
If
you
need
to
finish
your
comments,
we
have
four
public
hearings
tonight.
Our
first
public
hearing
combines
items
b1
through
b3
as
one
hearing
which
involves
for
grant
applications.
A
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
The
city
applies
for
and
receives
grants
which
help
to
support
and
fund
some
city
programs.
Each
grant
application
is
reviewed
and
then
receives
a
public
hearing
which
gives
the
public
an
opportunity
to
comment
on
them
tonight.
There
are
three
grants.
First,
is
the
congestion
mitigation
air
quality
2022-27
grant
for
the
east,
downtown
200
south
transit
hub
second,
is
the
assistance
to
firefighters
grant
for
fire
equipment
purchases,
and
third,
is
the
justice
court
implementation
lab
initiative
grant
for
an
online
virtual
platform
tool?
G
Okay,
you
know
me:
I'm
always
gonna
fight
this
ridiculous,
taj
mahal
in
the
middle
of
nowhere,
a
bus
garage
on
200
east
to
function
as
what
I
mean.
There's
no
seventh
east
bus
really
a
couple
of
express
buses,
but
trying
to
get
money.
Very
I
mean
we
don't
have
a
bottomless
barrel
of
money.
Please,
let's
be
realistic
and
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
will
actually
be
better
used.
G
G
E
Unneeded
all
right
max,
are
you
there
all
right,
council,
chair,
we'll
we'll
do
some
troubleshooting
with
max
and
see
if
we
can't
get
him
up
and
going.
That
is
the
final
commenter
for
this
item.
A
Okay,
thanks
robert,
if
you
can
help
your
volume
a
little
bit,
I
might
help
me
a
little
bit.
I
might
be
getting
just
old,
though
can't
tell.
A
A
No,
it
was
me
we're
gonna,
say
councilmember
dugan
then,
since
he
put
his
hand
up
any
discussion,
all
right.
Seeing
none
we'll
take
a
vote
council
member
rogers.
Yes,
councilmember
wharton.
Yes,
yes,
councilmember.
I
B
A
And
let's
see
we're
going
to
scroll
down
here,
that
brings
us
to
our
second
public
hearing
tonight.
Item
b4
is
regarding
ordinance
library,
budget
amendment
number
one
for
fiscal
year:
20
20
20
21.
A
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
This
is
the
first
budget
amendment
for
the
library
system
for
the
fiscal
year.
That's
going
to
end
on
june
30..
The
amendment
would
involve
a
general
fund
allocation
from
the
library
fund
of
six
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars.
Eight
hundred
and
ninety
five
for
the
library,
general
fund
and
two
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars
for
the
library
capital
projects
fund.
J
A
Motion
by
councilman
rogers,
the
second
by
councilmember
ward,
in
any
discussion
all
right
hearing,
none
we'll
take
a
vote:
councilman
rogers;
yes,
councilmember
wharton;
yes,
yes,
council,
member,
moros,.
D
G
A
Councilmember
fowler,
yes,
and
I'm
yes
as
well.
That
motion
passes.
B
Mr
chair,
this
public
hearing
is,
is
for
the
public
to
to
comment
on
proposed
changes
to
to
the
city's
off
street
parking
ordinances.
The
proposed
ordinance
is
intended
to
tie
off
street
parking
regulations
to
land
uses
in
four
categories:
general
neighborhood,
center,
urban
center
and
transit.
B
This
item
is
the
four
categories:
are:
are
a
new
way
of
looking
at
how
the
city
intends
to
regulate
the
the
parking
ordinance
off
street
parking.
A
B
Hi
this
is
ron
tamu.
I
don't
know
all
the
issues
with
around
this
parking,
but
obviously
you're,
looking
at
putting
in
a
behemoth,
complex
and
240
units
with
150
parking
places.
B
Obviously
we're
not
going
to
have
any
place
to
park
around
our
church
and
we
definitely
want
remedy.
I
don't
know
where
that
fits
into
your
code,
but
we
want
to
have
all
our
property
available
for
parking
and
there
isn't
going
to
be
any
parking.
B
So
I
don't
know
how
this
how
you
handle
the
parking,
but
I
don't
even
know
if
we're
gonna
have
a
chance
to
comment
on
the
zoning
thing
we're
trying
to
do
that.
We
tried
to
contact
the
mayor
and
she
shined
us
off.
Obviously,
all
all
week
long,
my
president
sent
her
a
couple
of
emails.
B
A
K
Okay,
great
jen,
colby
and
overall
there's
some
good
elements
in
this,
but
it's
not
ready
for
council
action.
In
my
opinion,
it's
true
that
mandatory
minimum
off-street
parking
drives
up
the
cost
of
housing
and
development.
It's
incompatible
fundamentally
with
compact
pedestrian,
bicycle
and
transit-friendly
neighborhoods.
K
That
said,
without
robust,
affordable
and
safe
transportation,
alternatives
for
people
cars
don't
just
disappear
on
their
own.
This
needs
to
be
tied
to
a
more
connected
protected
bicycle
infrastructure,
network,
sweet
street
design,
appropriately
priced
on
and
off
street
parking,
vehicle
storage
and
more
developers
who
get
a
break
from
the
cost.
To
reduce
parking
minimums
should
be
required
to
provide
substantial
amenities.
Dropping
ppm
requirements
is
not
appropriate.
K
Increased
bicycle
parking
is
a
good
goal.
Bike
parking
ratios
are
far
too
low,
though
ninth
and
ninth
is
an
example
of
need.
Five
to
ten
bikes
can
fit
in
one
car.
Space
parking
space
design
requirements
are
really
needed.
There
are
already
too
many
badly
designed
unusable
outdoor
bike.
Racks
from
the
city
of
commercial
locations
adjacent
to
transit
is
not
enough.
Has
the
city
actually
studied
if
residents
of
the
tfa
zones
are
using
transit
at
high
rates?
Transportation?
Choice
is
much
more
complicated
than
just
availability.
K
Unfortunately,
this
does
not
appear
to
reflect
major
changes
driven
by
the
pandemic,
such
as
rapid
adoption
of
telecommuting.
The
claim
that
corporations
demand
high
parking
stall
counts
to
locate
downtown
as
outdated
thinking
and
should
be
challenged.
Hopefully,
telecommuting
and
bicycle
ridership
will
persist
and
transit
users
will
rebound
as
we
recover.
K
I
question
the
claim
that
parking
demand
is
higher
in
neighborhood
centers
than
urban
centers
or
urban
core.
By
what
metric
also
buses
should
count
as
transit
general
category
is
to
catch
all
it
needs
to
be
divided
by
use.
The
map
should
be
carefully
ground
truth.
How
does
a
parking
contact
zone
get
changed?
Who
initiates
it?
Is
there
a
public
process?
Please.
Another
question
should
be
addressed
before
any
action
is
taken.
Revised
proposal
should
be
considered.
Thank
you.
E
H
Thank
you.
So,
yes,
as
others
have
raised,
I
love
the
idea
of
increased
bike
parking,
I'm
happy
to
see
a
reduction
of
car
use
and
upping
of
bike
usage.
However,
keep
in
mind
that
there
are
those
with
accessibility
issues
that
that's
not
helpful,
for.
I
am
concerned
that
this
appears
to
focus
on
a
reduction
of
off
street
parking
to
free
up
space
for
other
development.
H
Less
off
street
parking
really
poses
an
issue
to
access
for
housing,
especially
those
looking
to
move
in
the
city.
Personally,
I
live
right
next
to
the
project
open
apartments.
I
really
love
them.
They
give
a
lot
of
affordable
housing.
However,
their
lack
of
off
street
parking
has
filled
the
rest
of
our
neighborhood
with
cars
they
even
have
to
park
a
block
or
two
away.
H
It's
so
sparse
that
people
are
nearly
blocking
our
driveways
every
night
and
parking
on
corners,
so
they're
getting
ticketed
for
just
trying
to
park
near
their
home.
I'm
concerned
this
proposal
would
push
that
same
issue
out
to
other
neighborhoods,
where
this
would
be
applied
also.
I
know
this
really
doesn't
touch
on
it
and
it's
mostly
focused
on
residential,
but
I
think
it
just
bears
mentioning
that
parking
downtown
is
expensive
and
it's
an
obstruction
to
people
wanting
to
visit
the
city,
just
something
to
keep
in
mind
down
the
line.
Thank
you.
E
L
L
The
first
thing
is
it:
it
generally
simplifies
all
the
parking
requirements
throughout
the
cities
and
makes
it
a
little
bit
fair
if
you're
developing
a
certain
kind
of
housing
in
one
area
of
the
urban
area
of
the
city,
then
you're
going
to
have
the
same
kind
of
requirement
in
another
urban
area,
despite
the
10
or
15
different
zoning
requirements
you
may
have,
and
those
also
I
admire
the
fact
that
it
works
within
the
context
of
various
areas
which
are
defined
fairly
well,
you
could
argue
about
the
boundaries
of
those,
and
I
think
jen
colby's
suggestion
ground
truthing.
L
It
is
a
very
good
one.
I
also
support
increasing
the
bike
parking,
the
amendment
that
the
planning
commission
did
not
see
the
one
for
ten
thousand
seems
like
a
pretty
minimum
when
pretty
minimal
when
bart
park
bike
parking
is
actually
not
that
expensive.
L
So
I
think
the
second
thing
to
remember
about
this
parking
ordinance
is
that
the
city
of
salt
lake
is
looking
20
30
years
ahead
with
buildings
being
built.
Now,
and
will
we
in
20
years
really
need
that
giant
parking
garage
and
if
we
don't
need
it,
what
are
we
going
to
do
with
it
at
that
point,
so
I
think
it's
really
reasonable
to
start
suggesting
that
we
sort
of
begin
to
squeeze
down
the
amount
of
parking
that's
available.
L
It
may
hurt
a
little
bit,
but
I
think
that
this
is
the
only
way
that
we
can
actually
lean
on
ourselves
on
the
idea
that
we
can
that
we
can
drive
our
car
to
any
destination,
pull
up
and
walk
in
the
door.
Thank
you.
G
The
parking
proposal
makes
it
worse
since
it
decreases
off
street
parking
requirements
in
many
areas
and
it
decreases
parking
requirements
for
old
buildings
that
are
repurposed
and,
ironically,
it
re-emphasizes
no
parking
requirements
for
areas
near
tracks
and
front
runners,
but
recent
proposals
near
the
future
650
south
main
street
track
station,
asked
for
more
parking
than
required.
There's
a
reason
for
this.
We
fought
this
battle
eight
years
ago.
Some
of
you
may
remember,
and
the
most
important
issue
is
you
have
a
parking
study
in
process
and
you
won't
let
the
public
see
it.
G
So
why
are
we
being
asked
to
comment
on
information
that
we
don't
have
it's
disrespectful
at
best?
The
consultant,
fear
and
peers
work
with
developers
and
the
downtown
alliance,
but
not
with
residents
and
businesses
that
I
know
and
remember,
councilman
andrew
johnson,
saying
that
if
it
is
being
used
to
get
people
out
of
their
cars,
it
may
not
work,
and
I
totally
agree
with
that
man.
G
F
Hi,
my
name
is
zachary
dusal.
I
live
in
district
4.
off-street
parking
minimums
in
additional
addition
to
single-family.
Zoning
are
probably
one
of
the
most
harmful
land
use
and
zoning
regulations
that
u.s
cities
currently
have
on
the
books.
While
this
ordinance
update
does
move
our
city's
regulation
in
the
right
direction,
particularly
by
removing
off-street
parking
minimums
for
new
residential
development
in
the
transit
context,
it
leaves
much
of
the
city
stuck
with
outdated
off-street
parking
requirements
by
requiring
parking
for
new
development.
F
We
are
effectively
mandating
as
a
city
that
all
the
areas
outside
the
red
zone
on
the
context
map
will
never
have
widespread
widespread
adoption
of
transportation
solutions
outside
of
the
personal
car.
Additionally,
replacing
off-street
parking
correction
requiring
off-street
parking
results
in
increased
cost
for
housing,
goods
and
services.
Often
parking
at
businesses
and
apartments
is
provided
for
free.
I'm
using
air
quotes
there.
This
free
parking
effectively
results
in
people
who
take
alternate
forms
of
transportation,
subsidizing
those
who
choose
to
drive
in
the
form
of
higher
costs
of
things
such
as
groceries
and
rents.
F
A
common
concern
for
neighborhoods
is
the
management
of
on-street
parking
in
areas
where
off-street
parking
is
already
limited.
I
agree
that
is
a
valid
concern
and
the
city
should
develop
solutions
such
as
parking
permits
for
owners
without
access
to
off-street
parking
or,
more
ideally,
widespread
metered
parking
throughout
the
city.
F
F
The
revenue
generated
from
these
parking
fees
should
then
be
reinvested
into
the
streets
that
they
were
generated
on
so
locals
can
see
a
tangible
benefit
for
the
cost
they
pay.
I
became
interested
in
urban
planning
because
I
wanted
to
know
why
american
cities
are
so
much
less
livable
compared
to
those
in
other
countries.
F
E
D
M
Great
sorry,
I
have
a
baby
in
the
background
talking,
so
I'm
completely
in
favor
of
this
reduction
in
off-street
parking
requirements,
I
used
to
work
doing
parking
management
for
another
city
nearby
and
one
of
the
best
books.
I'm
parking
is
donald,
trump's
high
cost
of
free
parking,
I'm
going
to
quote
some
things
from
him.
Really,
quick
and
I'll
have
a
brief
comment.
M
Typically,
the
more
income
people
make
the
more
cars
they
own,
and
so,
if
we're
requiring
more
parking
spaces
that
directly
hurts
our
lowest
income
residents
and
then
from
a
climate
standpoint,
just
makes
it
easier
to
drive
and
encourages
driving.
So
I
think
the
planning
department
has
put
together
a
great
plan
and
I
ask
that
you
guys
support
it.
A
All
right!
Well
then,
thanks
to
everyone
who
made
a
comment
on
this
item
and
I'll
look
for
a
motion
from
the
council.
D
A
G
G
D
A
And
imes
as
well,
that
is
unanimous
and
emotion
passes.
This
brings
us
to
our
last
public
hearing
item
b6
regarding
an
ordinance
that
would
amend
the
rmf-30
low-density
multi-family
residential
zoning
district
and
corresponding
sections
of
the
salt
lake
city.
Zoning
ordinance
before
we
take
public
comments
tonight,
I'll
first
turn
the
time
over
to
nick
tarbet
council
staff
policy
analyst
to
give
a
short
introduction
nick.
D
All
right,
the
council
is
considering
a
proposal
that
would
make
amendments
to
various
sections
of
the
city
code
relating
to
the
rmf
30.
Zoning
district
proposed
changes
include
design
standards
for
all
new
development,
reducing
the
minimum
lot
area,
requirements
per
unit,
removing
lot
width
minimums
and
adding
width
maximums,
allowing
new
building
types
such
as
sideways
row,
houses,
cottage
developments
and
tiny
houses,
and
allowing
more
than
one
primary
structure
on
the
lot.
D
Currently,
the
rmf
30
zoning
does
not
allow
multi-family
developments
three
or
more
living
units
on
an
average-sized
property.
The
proposed
changes
would
allow
for
more
multi-family
housing
that
could
be
compatible
in
size
and
scale
with
existing
buildings
in
area
zoned,
rmf
30..
This
is
the
third
public
hearing
on
this
item.
The
previous
two
were
held
last
last
october.
E
N
Okay,
great,
thank
you
acting
chair
johnston.
My
name
is
sarah
j
bland.
I
am
representing
myself
and
I
live
in
district,
one
in
rose
park
council
member
rogers
and
mayor
mendenhall.
I
am
your
constituent.
I
am
against
any
kind
of
rezoning
amendments
or
changes
to
development
ordinances
that
result,
in
the
consequence,
be
that
consequence,
unintended
or
foreseeable
of
any
west
side.
Community
members
displacement
from
their
current
housing.
N
I
urge
you
to
consider
affordability
as
the
key
component
of
the
rm
f30
low
density,
multi-family,
residential
zoning
district
and
corresponding
sect
sections
of
salt
lake
city
zoning
ordinance.
While
I
am
new
to
this
topic,
I
am
concerned
with
the
same
issues
that
I
hear
from
many
many
community-based
groups
right
now
in
regards
to
affordability
and
sustainable
growth
as
a
tax-paying
property
owner
on
the
west
side.
I
am
far
less
concerned
with
the
stylishness
of
housing
developments.
I
am
with
the
livelihoods
and
quality
of
life
of
those
residents
who
live
in
my
community.
N
I
really
hope
that
whatever
actions
the
council
takes
tonight
or
in
future
meetings
on
this
topic,
those
actions
reflect
that
you
have
paid
attention
to
those
concerns
and
the
need
for
healthy,
humane
growth
within
our
metropolitan
spaces.
I
urge
you
to
only
pass
amendment
language
that
is
community
centered
and
generated
from
robust
constituent
feedback.
Thank
you
for
your
time
for
taking
my
comment.
O
Cool
hi,
my
name
is
ian.
I'm
with
the
organization
wasatch,
tenants,
united,
I'm
a
solid
city
resident.
I
reject
these
amendments
as
reckless
short-sighted
and
negligent.
The
zoning
project
refuses
any
obligation
to
address
affordable
housing.
These
amendments
dismiss
the
issue
of
affordable
housing.
By
saying
that
quote,
the
project
may
indirectly
promote
the
development
of
affordable
units.
O
It
is
totally
unacceptable
for
the
city
to
leave
the
livelihood
of
the
residents
of
the
city
to
chance,
especially
when
the
city
is
putting
it
some
on
the
scale
by
using
our
tax
money
to
buoy
up
these
empty
luxury
apartments
through
tax
breaks,
land
gifts
and
fee
waivers,
such
as
tax,
increment
financing
and
other
things
of
the
sort.
The
city
is
giving
millions
upon
millions
to
all
kinds
of
buildings
that
are
straight
up
luxury.
We
can't
call
1300
affordable,
which
is
the
80
ami,
which
that
kind
of
investment
is
typically
limited
at.
O
It's
shocking
to
me
that
the
city
looks
at
rising
rent
and
looks
at
the
rent
costs
of
new
units
being
built
and
thinks
of
the
answers
to
raise
a
massive
swathes
of
the
city
for
further
redevelopment.
It's
disgusting
and
it's
just
straight
up
neglectful
the
area
is
designated
in
this
measure
are
some
of
the
last
remaining
areas
you
can
find
affordable,
mainly
the
area
north
of
liberty
park
and
the
areas
around
east
central
and
the
areas
on
the
west
side
that
are
being
designated.
O
O
What
I'm
going
to
guarantee
you
and
I'm
sure
I
can
speak
on
my
beh
on
behalf
of
the
entire
organization
when
I
say
this-
is
that
if
you
vote
if
this,
if
this
is
passed
against
the
will
of
the
against
the
will
of
the
constituents,
we're
going
to
be
in
your
neighborhoods
to
come,
re-election,
we're
going
to
making
sure
everybody
knows
where
you
fell
on
this
and
who
they
can
blame
for
for
the
rising
rent.
Thank
you.
E
N
Hi,
my
name
is
paula
mendoza.
I
am
with
wasatch
tenants,
united
and
I
am
a
salt
lake
city
resident
and
I
urge
city
council
to
reject
these
amendments
and
make
any
approval
contingent
on
explicit
provisions
for
affordable
housing.
N
N
This
conjecture
is
not
only
insulting
it's
harmful,
it's
insulting
to
residents,
who've
seen
excessive
rent
hikes
every
year
and
it's
harmful
to
families
and
neighborhoods
who
face
eviction
and
displacement.
City
council
must
prioritize,
affordable
housing
in
all
zoning
project
decisions.
We
can't
afford
a
zoning
project
that
may
indirectly
promote
affordable
housing.
We
can't
afford
a
project
that
has
no
clear
plan
or
evidence
to
back
up
their
assurances.
N
E
P
All
right,
I'm
a
salt
lake
city
resident-
I
lived,
I've
lived
here,
my
whole
life
and
myself,
and
the
people
in
my
community
can
already
barely
afford
our
rent,
as
is,
and
the
idea
that
you're
going
to
re-zone
large
sections
of
salt
lake
city,
so
that
you
can
create
new
developments
without
considering
without
requiring
affordable.
Housing
is
absolutely
irresponsible
and
careless,
I'm
with
wasatch
united,
and
I
am
urging
you
to
reject
this
proposal
until
it
explicitly
states
the
required
inclusion
of
affordable
housing
and
when
we
say
affordable.
P
Let's
define
that
because
y'all
are
including
housing
that
is
like
around
1
300
a
month
that
is
not
affordable.
That
is
more
than
twice
what
I
can
afford
and
what
a
lot
of
the
people
I
know
can
afford.
Let's
keep
in
mind
what
minimum
wage
in
utah
is
at
the
moment
that
is
7.25
an
hour.
How
are
you
supposed
to
afford
1
300
a
month
for
rent
and
that's
on
and
that's
still
considered
affordable?
P
So
if
we're
gonna
can,
if
we're
gonna,
consider
this
new
development,
we
need
to
be
including
affordable
housing
as
a
requirement
we've
seen
rezones
like
this
happen.
In
other
cities
like
portland
and
when
it's
happening
here,
you
guys
are
explicitly
taking
out
the
requirements
for
affordable
housing.
That's
heartless,
I'm
sorry,
but
that's
straight
up!
Evil
like
I,
don't
have
any
other
way
to
put
it.
It's
really
frustrating
to
see
you
guys
again
and
again.
P
A
Time,
thanks
for
your
comments
and
we
can
take
the
balance
of
them
offline
if
you'd
like
to
add
them,
either
electronically
or
council
staff.
E
D
Hello,
I'm
beverly
hill
and
I
live
in
district
one,
and
I
would
like
to
offer
a
solution
for
the
property
between
eight
and
nine
hundred
south
and
three
hundred
and
four
hundred
west.
D
I
would
like
to
start
a
program
called
greener
acres,
village,
environment
and
then
acronym
gave
and
a
greener
acres
village
environment
hopes
to
set
up
a
campground
hut
and
tiny
home
complex
with
an
urban
garden
positioned
within
that
block,
and
they
are,
the
area
is
already
being
used
by
the
homeless.
So
why
not
leave
it
and
I
use
it
for
their
benefit.
D
I
don't
see
really
any
programs
addressing
how
to
leave
that
problem.
Greener,
acres,
village
environment
offers
a
way
to
give
back
to
our
community.
We
all
deserve
a
place
to
live
with
dignity
and
safety,
and
some
have
fallen
down
and
need
a
little
help.
Getting
back
up
the
greener
acres
village
will
give
those
interested
and
a
chance
to
try
again
greener
acres
village
would
become
a
bridge
to
help
them
get
back
on
their
feet.
D
A
pilot
program
to
assist
those
who
choose
to
follow
village
rules
and
contribute
two
hours
a
week
to
help
maintain
the
complex
network
of
flexible
housing.
The
village
would
be
comprised
of
covered
camping
sites,
one
and
two
person
huts
and
tiny
home
models
for
two
and
four
people.
There
would
also
be
communal
houses
with
equipped
kitchens,
restrooms
and
laundry
facilities.
E
K
Hello,
jen
colby
me
again
regarding
the
rmf
30
proposal.
The
subcost
fallacy
is
a
common,
logical
error.
Personally,
I
know
it
all
too
well,
even
as
someone
who
values,
critical
thinking
and
rationality,
I
have
implore
you
to
avoid
the
cost
fallacy,
despite
the
time
and
level
of
effort
invested
in
this
process.
So
far,
there
are
too
many
underlying
flaws
in
the
assumptions
intent
current
draft
and
likely
unintended
and
intended
consequences
to
pursue
this
further
without
a
wholesale
re-evaluation.
K
Some
of
the
goals
and
elements
may
be
admirable.
However,
as
a
package
the
changes
have
implemented
will
only
exacerbate
the
affordable
housing
situation
in
salt
lake
city,
while
also
laying
the
groundwork
to
undermine
the
central
city
master
plan,
historic
districts
and
neighborhoods,
where
most
of
these
rmf
30
zone
housing
units
now
exist.
Issues
include
the
700
single-family
unit,
legalized
and
duplex,
building,
subject
to
these
changes.
If
the
goal
is
to
help
preserve
them
as
naturally
occurring
stock.
This
is
not
the
way
to
do
so.
K
They're
overwhelmingly
overzoned
in
the
first
place
and
should
be
down
zoned
systematically
to
r2
upzoning
just
increases
land
costs.
Adus
are
already
permitted
in
both
r2
and
rmf
30..
The
level
of
change
appears
to
be
creating
an
entirely
new
zone.
As
such,
it
should
be
called
something
else
created
separately
and
then
appropriately
appropriate
parcels
rezoned
to
it.
K
K
Salt
lake
city
has
more
than
two
hundred
thousand
sorry
twenty
thousand
new
rental
units
built
or
in
the
pipeline
recently,
most
mostly
so-called
luxury.
I
did
a
study
for
this
in
my
mpa
program,
gis
class
by
failing
to
pass
an
inclusionary
zoning
policy
prior
to
the
construction
boom.
We've
missed
a
huge
opportunity.
K
E
J
Hello,
council
members,
as
always
thank
you
for
your
service.
Thank
you
for
your
time
tonight
I
am
speaking
as
the
director
of
preservation,
utah,
utah's,
historic
preservation,
non-profit
based
here,
of
course
in
salt
lake
city
as
an
organization
that
advocates
for
stewardship
of
our
historic
built
environment.
J
These
homes,
of
course
provide
character
and
reflect
the
local
heritage,
a
character
and
heritage
that
many
of
you
on
city
council
have
indicated
publicly.
You
wish
to
see
protected
economically
speaking.
Of
course,
many
of
these
older
homes
offer
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing,
affordable
housing
that
contrasts
greatly
with
the
market
rate
prices
seen
in
new
buildings.
J
We
specifically,
therefore
ask
that
everyone
on
city
council
vote
to
that
before
you
on
city
council,
vote
to
approve
arm
of
30.
You
continue
to
work
with
salt
lake
city's
planning
division,
but
also
housing,
neighborhood
development
and
economic
development.
This
multi
multi-disciplinary
approach,
as
well
as
with
community
members,
to
ensure
that
there
are
robust
measures
in
place
that
actively
discourage
demolitions
of
existing
structures
and
also
incentivize
maintaining
historic
structures.
J
Q
Perfect,
so
I
just
I'm
emma
cleave
and
I'm
a
resident
of
salt
lake
for
my
whole
life,
and
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
echo
some
of
the
comments
that
have
already
been
made,
particularly
with
the
rezoning
in
regard
to
affordability,
given
the
current
circumstances,
not
only
with
covet
19
but
kind
of
the
affordability
crisis
preceding
it.
I
think
perhaps
the
timing
of
this
rezone
would
require
more
consideration
for
affordability.
Q
I
think
affordability
is
the
more
pressing
matter
in
our
housing
situation,
so
I'm
not
necessarily
opposed
to
multi-unit
or
multi-family
unit
housing.
However,
I
think
the
rezone
and
language
really
needs
to
center
on
affordability
and
again,
particularly
considering
our
minimum
wage
in
utah
and
what
money
other
people
have
already
mentioned
about:
just
rents
being
unaffordable.
Thirteen
hundred
dollars
a
month
is
not
affordable,
or
especially
for
low-income
residents
or
other
people.
So
that's
kind
of
the
gist
of
what
I
wanted
to
say
and
thank
you
so
much
for
your
time.
E
I
Thanks
robert,
my
efforts
regarding
changes
to
the
rmf
30
zone
started
four
years
ago.
If
you
approve
the
ordinance
tonight,
you
will
significantly
increase
the
value
of
my
properties.
I'm
asking
you
not
to
do
that.
Do
not
increase
my
net
worth.
The
consequences
of
your
approval
are
not
unanticipated.
I
You
will
drive
up
the
value
of
land
in
the
zone
and
therefore
the
cost
of
housing.
You
will
displace
existing
residents
through
evictions
and
the
replacement
of
existing
housing
with
market
rate
units,
and
you
will
change
the
character
and
some
of
salt
lake's
most
diverse
neighborhoods.
I
have
certainly
made
mistakes
in
the
last
four
years,
as
I
attempted
to
convince
decision
makers
that
this
approach
was
the
wrong
way
to
increase
density
number
one
for
the
first
two
years.
I
Number.
Two
about
the
time
I
figured
out
about
my
properties
being
rezoned.
I
also
figured
out
that
the
city
does
not
have
a
policy
on
displacement.
How
can
salt
lake
city
fail
to
have
a
policy
on
displacement
of
its
residents
number
three
as
a
landlord
providing
housing
at
reasonable
prices?
I
know
that
housing
does
not
trickle
down.
I
kept
saying
it's
apples
and
oranges.
The
city's
mindset
has
been
that
any
additional
housing
is
a
benefit.
No
market
rate
housing
displaces
far
more
people
than
I
can
possibly
accommodate
for
the
past
year
and
a
half.
I
I
have
insisted
that
housing
is
interdisciplinary
and
the
city
plowed
ahead
with
this
rezoning.
That
is
exclusively
about
planning
I'm
going
to
try
one
more
time.
There
are
skill
sets
and
sequencing
involved
in
creating
housing.
The
framers
and
the
roofers
have
to
show
up
then
the
electricians
and
plumbers.
Of
course,
someone
had
to
figure
out
how
to
pay
for
their
efforts
in
the
first
place
and
when
the
project
starts
to
resemble
housing.
The
dry
wallers
come
in.
The
drywall
is
one
of
the
final
steps
and
in
this
story
the
dry
wallers
are
like
the
planners.
I
E
R
Yes,
hello,
my
name
is
tina
balderrama,
I'm
fighting
the
koso
apartments
that
are
planning
to
displace
me
and
my
family
from
my
home.
I
want
to
give
you
the
recipe
that
can
make
any
person
a
low
income
family.
It
begins
with
the
murder
of
your
spouse.
Then
your
18
year
old
daughter
has
a
stroke
that
impairs
her
entire
right
side.
She
can
no
longer
speak
or
walk
because
the
trauma
her
eyes
and
her
heart
have
absorbed
it
is.
Then
you
become
the
family
nurse.
R
After
a
year
of
rehab
she's
released
back
to
the
world,
then
you
try
to
hide
under
your
parents
swing
you
move
into
their
rented
home
with
your
children.
Then
your
mother
gets
diagnosed
with
terminal
liver
disease.
You
are
now
a
hospice
nurse.
You
take
your
mother
to
her
last
breath.
While
you
sleep
on
the
same
bed
with
her
to
make
sure
she
does
not
fall
out
at
night.
You
then
move
your
father
out
and
a
year
later,
his
heart
disease
reaches
its
point.
You
then
take
him
to
your
rented
home.
R
You
hold
this
trembling
hand,
but
he
won't
stop
breathing.
Until
he
knows
his
little
girl
is
out
of
the
room,
you
walk
back
in
and
he's
just
gone.
Then,
a
few
years
later,
your
first
born
son,
who
is
only
26,
has
a
widowmaker
heart
attack
in
the
same
exact
room,
your
father
passed
him.
He
falls
to
the
floor
holding
his
chest.
While
you
try
to
convince
yourself
that
this
is
not
happening
somewhere
in
between
all
that.
R
You
take
custody
of
your
two
small
grandchildren,
because
your
impaired
daughter
can
only
give
birth
but
cannot
take
care
of
the
children.
She
has
no
idea.
Now.
You
are
a
mother
again,
a
nurse
a
sister,
a
mom
to
all
of
them,
because
your
brothers
cannot
handle.
What's
happened
to
your
parents
either.
Now
you
truly
are
the
head
of
a
low
income
family.
If
you
survive
this
virus,
there
is
a
reason
for
it.
It's
because
you
are
here
to
help
others.
You
have
a
job
to
do,
whether
you're
being
paid
for
it
or
not.
R
Do
not
fail
your
family.
Do
not
fail
yourself
and
truly
make
a
difference
in
others
lives.
If
you
are
not
doing
that,
then
you
should
not
have
any
right
making
decisions
that
affect
others
lives.
Anybody
can
become
a
low-income
family
if
you
are
not
helping
solve
this
pandemic,
you
should
not
be
in
that
chair.
Thank
you
for
listening
to
me,
tina
holt,
balderama,.
E
A
A
R
E
L
I'm
brenda
scheer,
I'm
chair
of
the
salt
lake
city
planning,
commission
and
the
planning
commission
did
approve
this
or
did
recommend
it
be
approved
by
city
council,
but
I
think
that
actually,
in
listening
to
many
of
the
concisions
come
forward
today,
I
think
that
there
actually
is
some
merits
thinking
about
what
kind
of
effect
this
may
have
on
on
housing
that
is
currently
serving
as
low
and
moderate
income
housing
that
is
fairly
dilapidated,
which
is
one
of
the
ways
in
which
low
income
housing
is
actually
provided
in
a
city.
L
The
design
standards,
the
the
new
building
types
all
encourage,
to
a
certain
extent
that
things
which
are
fairly
dilapidated,
be
demolished,
and
while
these
are
reasonable
ideas
in
terms
of
trying
to
add
additional
housing
stock
to
the
community,
I
think
that
it's
also
true
that
the
housing
stock
that's
going
to
be
added
is
not
going
to
be
necessarily
affordable
to
a
range
of
people
who
might
need
the
affordability
the
most.
L
However,
I
believe
that
the
state
legislature
has
re
has
recently
nixed
this
one,
and
I
think
that
this
is
a
an
area
for
people
who
are
interested
in
housing,
affordability
to
really
work
on,
so
that
the
city
can
in
fact
go
forward
with
inclusionary
ideas
that
might
actually
mitigate
not
only
the
failure
to
provide
affordable
housing,
but
also
some
of
the
potential
of
this
zone.
Change
to
moderate.
E
E
F
Hi,
my
name
is
zachary
dusal.
I
live
in
district
4..
I
I
am
generally
supportive
of
these.
The
zoning
amendments
to
make
the
rmf
30
district
more
utilitarian
in
its
its
use
and
with
the
prevent
potential
to
provide
more
units
than
it
currently
can.
I
do
think
we're
ignoring
the
elephant
in
the
room,
and
that
is
single-family.
F
But
I
feel
like
this
is
a
this
is
a
baby
step
and
we're
not.
We
need
to
take
bold
action
to
address
things
like
housing,
affordability,
address
things
like
climate
change
and
our
air
quality,
and
I
think
this
is
kind
of
just
a
piecemeal
solution.
That's
not
really
going
to
have
much
of
an
effect.
Much
like
the
adu
ordinance.
F
I
feel
like
that
had
had
great
goals,
but
it's
it's
not
enough.
There's
only
been
like
30
of
those
built
since
the
ordinance
has
passed
so
legalize
housing
thanks.
Q
Hi,
my
name
is
madeline
glenn.
I
live
in
district
3
and
I
am
a
social
worker
and
I
work
in
the
rose
park
area,
and
I
know
that
this
would
really
impact
the
people
that
I
work
with
and
when
I
moved
to
salt
lake
it
was
really
hard
to
find
far
affordable
housing.
Q
We
eventually
did
find
something
that
was
affordable
for
a
dual
income,
but
I
know
that
and
it's
a
studio
apartment,
but
I
know
that
there's
lots
of
families
that
that
can't
afford
housing
and
it
wouldn't
have
been
affordable
for
us
to
to
live
in
something
that
was
900
to
1300,
which
was
kind
of
the
affordable
housing
option
that
we
had.
Q
I,
I
don't
oppose
multi-family
housing
necessarily,
but
I
do
think
that
the
city
council
members
must
reject
these
amendments
as
they
stand,
and
approval
must
be
contingent
on
explicit
provisions
for
affordable
housing.
Thank
you
for
your
service
and
for
your
time.
G
Oh
boy,
well,
obviously,
the
rmf
30
proposal
should
be
sent
back
to
staff.
Cindy
cromer
gave
one
of
the
best
arguments
against
this.
You
want
affordable
housing.
What
happened
to
the
inclusionary
zoning
with
impact
fee
decreases
that
got
lost
in
the
ozone
two
years
ago,
and
it
was
recommended
by
your
affordable
housing
expert
recently.
G
So
what
about
the
80
of
land?
That
is
not
allowed
to
have
housing
in
salt
lake
city,
and
I
need
to
emphasize
this
because
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
sinking
in.
Only
10
percent
of
the
property
in
salt
lake
city
is
single
family
home
zoned.
What
happened
to
the
state
suit
north
temple
plans?
They
need
faster
implementation.
G
Despite
the
vigorous
efforts
of
the
chair,
thousands
of
housing
units
should
have
been
built,
but
weren't
six
years
ago
and
again
you're
asking
for
the
public
to
comment
without
the
without
all
of
the
information
and,
of
course,
I'm
talking
about
the
secret
draft
gentrification
plan.
Obviously,
salt
lake
city,
housing
plans
need
a
reset,
and
the
rmf
30,
unfortunately,
will
encourage
destruction
of
affordable
housing
to
build
more
market
rate
housing.
Again,
as
noted
by
your
housing
expert
dan
nackerman.
G
This
proposal
will
result
in
affordable
rental
owners
getting
an
offer
they
can't
refuse
to
sell
and
allow
redevelopment
of
their
properties.
I
need
to
emphasize
this.
This
proposal
will
result
in
an
eviction
tsunami.
You
want
more
housing,
put
a
park
on
fleet
block,
watch
developers
jump
at
building
housing
there.
Please
return
this
proposal
back
to
the
staff
for
a
better
analysis
until
you
release
a
super
duper
secret
gentrification
study,
thanks
for
listening.
F
H
Thank
you
council,
so
this
freezone
proposal
shows
both
good
intention
and
a
further
lack
of
attention
to
affordability.
Many
lower
income
millennials,
I
know,
would
love
the
opportunity
to
develop
a
community
of
homes
on
a
small
lot
by
cost
sharing.
However,
having
this
opportunity
without
any
guarantee
for
affordable
housing
is
beyond
dangerous,
the
city
is
already
unaffordable
and
this
would
only
expand
that
problem.
The
most
upsetting
part
throughout
this
proposal
is
the
lack
of
enforcement
around
affordable,
affordable
housing.
H
The
majority
of
the
item
focuses
on
appearance
requirements
with
more
with
mere
sentences
regarding
displacement
or
affordability.
Even
those
the
language
is
of
hope
and
not
of
guarantee.
These
are
quotes
from
the
documents.
The
goal
of
this
project
was
never
to
facilitate
development
of
affordable
housing
units.
Instead,
the
goal
was
removing
zoning
barriers
for
development.
H
These
amendments
do
not
directly
facilitate
affordable
housing
units
as
per
the
u.s
hud
standards.
However,
by
reducing
required
lot,
size
per
units
units
themselves
might
also
be
smaller
and,
in
turn,
more
affordable,
greater
supply
of
market
rate
housing
may
free
up
the
number
of
affordable
or
mid-priced
units
for
those
who
truly
qualify
for
them.
H
H
Adding
insult
to
injury,
the
five-year
plan
for
growing
slc
is
included
in
the
petition
entire
sections
of
that
state,
a
commitment
to
increasing
affordability
and
access
to
all
while
preventing
displacement.
These
lofty
goals
do
not
appear
in
the
hard
text
of
this
item,
including
that
does
nothing
but
taunt
us
with
promises
that
are
not
fulfilled
in
policy.
H
S
S
I
just
wanted
to
again
echo
a
lot
of
what's
already
been
said
for
this
council
to
reject
the
amendments
to
b6.
The
zoning
project
refuses
any
obligation
to
address
affordable
housing.
These
amendments
as
echoed
from
devin's
statement
they
address
or
discuss
the
issue
of
affordable
housing,
saying
that
the
project
may
indirectly
promote
development
of
affordable
housing.
S
The
year
of
2020
brought
on
a
storm
of
social
reckoning,
and
all
members
of
this
council
have
given
the
salt
lake
city
residents,
promises
of
advancing
equity
and
instilling
actual
change.
Affordable
housing
is
vital
to
this
work.
This
zoning
will
displace
families
and
neighborhoods
neighborhoods
that,
I
might
add,
are
historically
poor
working
class
and
non-white.
S
S
I
would
really
suggest
and
recommend
that
the
salt
lake
city
residents
continue
to
speak
out
towards
this
and
that
we
get
something
in
writing.
That
does
really
address
the
affordable
housing
issues,
especially
here
out
on
the
west
side,
where
a
lot
of
these
developments
are
planned.
We
are
already
overrun
by
our
homeless
neighbors
and
it's
like
there
and
then
now
we
want
to
evict
families
and
build
housing
that
families
can't
live
in
or
afford.
S
E
E
Q
Been
unmuted
hello,
city,
council
members.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
today.
My
name
is
tressa
murray
and
so
much
been
said
today.
That
I
think
is
wonderful
on
the
subject
talking
about
just
how
important
it
is
that
we
prioritize
affordability,
especially
what
martha
castillo
said.
Q
Given
that
so
much
has
been
said
on
this
particular
ordinance.
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
the
affordability
crisis
in
the
housing
problem
has
obviously
been
going
on
for
a
long
time
and
has
been
getting
worse,
but
I
think
2020
has
particularly
been
the
worst
year
for
it
and
we
have
a
national
looming
eviction
crisis
that
I
think
it
has
to
be
addressed
directly.
I
think,
particularly
in
the
temporal
context
of
our
current
environment,
this
ordinance.
Really
it
is
it's
it's
appalling
that
it
wouldn't
address.
Affordability.
Q
N
Great,
thank
you
so
much
so.
First
of
all
I
like
to
just
begin
with
so
yeah.
My
name
is
annie
lim
I
am
with
wasatch
tim's
united
and
I
yet
again
we
know.
N
We've
had
several
people
discuss
this
and
I
would
like
to
echo
a
lot
of
their
points
that
really
great
things
to
mention,
especially,
let's
see
we
had
martha
and
some
people
earlier,
but
I
agree
in
the
sense
that,
like
while
I
mean
the
path
of
hell
is
paved
with
good
intentions
and
while
I
you
know,
I
understand,
like
logically
like
why
I
want
to
increase
housing.
There
are
so
many
things
that
go
wrong
with
how
it
is
currently
written.
I
went
to
the
faq
page
for
the
specific
movement.
N
Let's
see
if
I
had
it
pulled
up,
yes
and
it
says
that
it
offers
a
range.
Let's
see
quote
these
types
of
provide.
Sorry,
these
types
provide
diverse
housing
options
along
a
spectrum
of
affordability.
But
what
does
that
mean?
Unfortunately,
you
know
it's
like
somebody
mentioned.
You
know
like
we
like
we
like
to
blame
developers,
but
you
know,
like
money,
does
drive
this
and
a
sudden
that
we
need
to
if
we,
if
we
don't
like,
dig
out
of
space
for
affordability,
it's
going
to
get
ran
over
and
for
as
far
as
like
city
go.
N
N
You
know,
I
understand
how
like,
oh,
like
I'm
doing
a
good
like
we're
doing
a
good
thing,
we're
expanding
different
kinds
of
housing,
but
that
can
be
very
easily
twisted
and
manipulated
as
something
much
more
sinister
so
without
having
like
this
needs
to
be
taken
back
and
have
something
written
in
specifically
like
with
numbers
that
can't
be
twisted
or
changed
or
manipulated,
because
this
is
really
important
to
people.
We
I
mean
I
was
at.
I
can't
remember
latina.
N
That
was
a
really
moving
story,
and
it
is
true
like
it
is
anything
that
happened
to
anybody
and
affordable
housing
is
crucial
landmark
for
people
so
to
to
push
out
this
to
push
out.
The
people
is,
I
think,
you
know
cruel
evil
and
at
best
ignorant.
So
yet
again,
it's
I
think
it's
important
to
make
sure
we
dish
out
a
specific
wording
for
that
and
we
are
very
thoughtful
in
how
we
use
that
so
yeah.
Thank
you
so
much
again,
wasatch
attends
united
and
have
a
great
night.
I
My
name
is
monica
hilding
and
I'm
a
long
time
resident
of
district
four.
The
city
council
must
prioritize
affordable
housing
in
all
zoning
project
decisions.
I
I
am
concerned
that
these
amendments
will
be
highly
detrimental
to
historic,
neighborhoods
throughout
the
city,
including
mine,
and
will
diminish
the
unique
character
of
these
neighborhoods.
Much
of
the
best
low-income
housing
in
salt
lake
is
found
in
the
very
sort
of
older
residential
buildings
targeted
by
these
amendments.
I
Most
developers
will
prioritize
economic
return
over
historic
preservation
or
other
public
benefits.
So
I
urge
you
to
reconsider
this
amendment
and
think
about
keeping
people
in
their
homes,
whether
they
be
owners
or
wrenches.
Thank
you.
E
N
N
Please
stop
sending
that
as
a
an
automatic
response
or
a
default
response
to
the
poor
families
that
are
asking
for
a
service
stop
doing
that.
Mayor,
mendenhall
and
the
vague
definition
of
affordable
housing
is
a
joke.
Anything
that's
over
50
ami
is
not
affordable,
especially
to
folks
that
live
in
rose
park.
Mayor
mendenhall
city
council,
you
are
allowing
for
realtors
and
housing
developers
to
kill
us.
We
are
dying,
we
are
being
sent
to
the
streets
and
we
are
dying,
stop
the
kozo
apartments
and
stop
the
ellie
develop
and
stop
the
lusso.
Q
Thank
you
just
make
sure
everyone
can
hear
me.
Q
Okay,
so
more
small
units
such
as
cottages
and
tiny
homes
can
help
keep
prince
in
check
as
rents
may
not
raise
as
quickly
as
if
other
or,
if
housing
units
would
not
have
been
added.
Q
So
I
do
see
a
potential
there
that
rents
can
be
kept
in
check
with
these
kinds
of
small
units,
and
I
see
that
changes
in
zoning
is
a
way
to
give
some
power
to
local
property
owners
in
order
to
provide
the
affordable
housing
that
they
want
to
see
in
their
communities,
and
many
people
would
like
to
share
some
of
their
unused
land
and
provide
places
that
people
can
live
in
an
affordable
manner.
Q
A
property
owners
have
the
power
to
create
modest
and
affordable
houses.
If
they're,
given
that
power
throughout
through
zoning
as
property
values
increase,
they
can
use
that
kind
of
equity
to
then
build
affordable
housing
and
be
part
of
the
solution
themselves.
So
I
do
appreciate
the
the
empowerment
for
property
owners
to
create
affordable
housing
units
and
share
some
of
their
own
land.
Allowing
tiny
houses
and
cottages,
I
think,
is
a
form
of
gentle
density
that
I
think
many
residents
are
more
comfortable
with.
Q
With
than
some
of
the
other
forms
of
development
that
they
are
seeing
within
the
city
and
what
I'm
seeing
now
is
that
there
are
a
lot
of
property
owners
or
investors
who
are
renovating
single-family
properties
or
duplex
properties
in
these
areas
anyway,
and
then
still
renting
them
for
a
higher
rate.
And
I
don't
think
that
that
is
assisting
affordable
housing
either
and
as
housing
prices
increase
and
purchasers
buy
those
houses,
then
they
would
need
to
charge
increasing
amounts
of
rent
in
order
to
pay
mortgages.
So
it's
a.
Q
I
think
the
problem
continues
unless
there
are
more
housing
units
in
the
system,
and
I
do
appreciate
the
preservation
incentives
with.
A
Sorry,
I
have
to
cut
you
off
there,
but
please
offline
continue
to
comment
with
us
through
our
staff,
thanks
for
your
time
tonight,.
E
Q
Hi
city
council,
my
name
is
coley
and
I'm
a
resident
of
district
one
like
many
others.
In
this
meeting,
I'm
asking
you
not
to
pass
the
rmf
30
amendment
as
our
city
grows.
It's
obviously
important
to
add
housing
to
our
city,
but
it
can't
be
at
the
cost
of
our
low-income
residents
to
move
forward
with
the
amendment,
as
is
without
explicit
language,
protecting,
affordable
housing.
It
will
push
low-income
residents
out
of
their
homes
and
out
of
the
community,
we
need
higher.
Q
T
T
I
appreciate
it
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
you
know
chime
in
and
like
the
rest
of
the
kind
people
that
are
here
in
this.
You
know
meeting
today
speak
against
this
rezoning
that
y'all
have
planned.
I
think
that
a
lot
of
people
have
been
relatively
kind
to
y'all.
T
With
regards
to
the
vagueness
that
you
have
defined
the
bigness
regarding
affordability
within
this
rezoning
specifically-
and
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
understand
right-
that
such
a
vague
definition
is
not
really
a
mistake,
you
know,
but
it
it's
a
tactic.
You
know
it's
very
much
a
weapon.
You
know
because
they
can
can
y'all
can
continue.
T
Building
these
types
of
properties
in
these
areas
that
you've
left,
dilapidated,
you
know
or
otherwise
allowed
like
property
value
to
you
know,
go
down
right
because
you're
not
taking
care
of
any
of
the
infrastructure,
making
sure
that
these
communities
need
what
they
have
to
actually
sustain
themselves
and
thrive
right
and
then
you
jack
up
those
properties
and
you
sell
them
to
developers
for
a
profit
right
and
the
worse
off.
The
community
is
in
terms
of
the
infrastructure
that
you
all
have
there.
T
The
more
profits
made
by
the
developers,
which
is
good
news
for
the
city
council
right
and
with
that
in
mind,
you
know
we
can't
look
at
this
type
of
development
project
right
and
understand.
It
is
anything
more
than
an
attempt
to
push
working
class
and
poor
communities
and
oppress
nationalities
out
of
the
communities
that
they've
been
in.
T
You
know
this
is
you
know
something
that
if
you
vote
for
you
know,
y'all
will
be
complicit
in
knowing
that
you're
going
to
be
displacing
families
that
have
been
here
for
generations,
and
I
hope
when,
if
this
does
pass
or
it
would
happen
to
pass
at
any
point,
you
know
that
you
go
to
sleep,
knowing
that
that's
on
your
conscience,
I
yield
my
time.
A
C
No
you're
of
your
honor-
I
don't
I
do
this
whenever
I'm
not
cheering.
No.
Mr
chair,
I
do
have
a
motion.
If
I
mean
please
go
ahead,
I
move
that
the
council
continue
the
public
hearing
to
a
future
date
until
related
amendments
such
as
the
affordable
housing
overlay
or
residential
housing
loss
mitigation
plan
are
brought
to
the
council
for
consideration
and
potential
adoption.
B
A
A
I
will
take
a
point
of
personal
approach,
then
I
agree
with
the
motion
fully
and
I
don't
want
to
overlook
the
rest
of
the
things
that
are
still
happening.
Concurrent
to
this
we've
mentioned
in
here.
The
delaying
consideration
of
this
particular
ordinance
change
for
zoning,
but
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance
which
is
being
worked
on.
A
I
believe
we
have
to
keep
looking
at
the
affordable
housing
overlay,
which
is
in
process,
I
believe
any
displacement
efforts
which
are
going
to
be
tied
to
the
nine
line
cda,
as
well
as
adu
incentives
which
should
be
tied
to
that
as
well.
I
think
there's
a
variety
of
things
the
city
is
working
on
currently
or
has
worked
on.
That
probably
need
to
be
a
part
of
this
and
a
personal
point.
A
I
would
also
include
inclusionary
zoning
on
my
end,
even
though
that's
a
tricky
subject
statewide,
I
think
they
all
have
to
be
a
part
of
the
discussion,
because
one
thing
is
not
going
to
solve
this
for
us.
So
I
appreciate
the
council
and
taking
this
motion
I'm
making
this
motion
at
this
point.
Anyone
else.
A
Go
ahead,
councilman.
T
Thanks
I'd
also,
like
the
point
of
personal
privilege,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
I
think
tying
this
to
affordable
housing
and
waiting
for
that
may
be
a
good
idea.
I
am
concerned
because
I
agree
with
one
of
the
commenters
that
a
lot
of
these
parcels
right
now
are
being
demolished
and
under
the
current
zoning.
The
only
thing
that
can
be
rebuilt
is
a
single
family
house.
T
Rmf
30
is
effectively
a
single
family
zone
right
now,
unless
multiple
parcels
are
combined
and
that
single
family
home
will
be
multi-million
dollars
to
purchase,
and
so
the
current
zoning
does
not
allow
affordable
development,
and
this
proposal
would
move
us
in
that
direction.
However,
I
understand
waiting
to
tie
it
to
the
affordable
housing
overlay
or
the
helping
loss
mitigation,
and
I
understand
that
the
motion
and
I'll
support
it
to
do
so,
but
I
really
encourage
the
administration
to
do
that
as
quickly
as
possible.
I
know
these
things
take
time,
but
we
are
losing.
T
We
are
already
losing
this
naturally
affordable
housing.
As
soon
as
a
house
sells,
then
the
new
owner
either
demolishes
it
and
rebuilds
or
remodels
it,
and
it's
no
longer
an
affordable
housing
unit
and
that's
already
happening,
and
so
the
sooner
that
we
can
get
those
other
two
pieces
in
place
so
that
we
can
move
land
use
ordinances
like
this
forward.
The
better
thank
you.
C
I
would
like
to
make
an
amendment
to
my
motion.
I
would
actually
like
to
close
the
public
hearing.
This
is
our
third
public
hearing
on
rmf
30.,
I'd
like
to
close
the
public
hearing.
Everything
else
remains
the
same,
so
I'll
read
it
so
everyone
knows.
I
moved
that
the
council
closed
the
public
hearing,
but
we
put
this
on
a
future.
A
Would
you
second
that
as
well
the
change
I'll?
Second,
that,
okay,
we
have
discussion
on
this
change.
A
D
A
A
T
A
We
have
a
motion
by
councilman.
Mano
is
second
by
councilmember
morris
any
discussion
on
this
item.
Seeing
none
take
a
vote.
Councilman
rogers.
B
D
A
Yes-
and
I
am
a
yes
as
well-
the
voting
is
unanimous.
The
motion
passes.
Our
next
potential
action
item
is
c2
regarding
an
ordinance
that
would
re-zone
properties
at
706
to
740,
west
900,
south
and
710
to
739
west
genesee
avenue,
including
portions
of
two
alleys,
from
m1
light
manufacturing
to
rmu
residential
mixed
use.
A
T
A
I
will
take
a
a
moment
to
make
a
comment,
then
I
believe
we
probably
need
another
discussion
between
the
developer
and
the
neighbors
to
ensure
we're
on
the
same
page
about
this
before
we
take
this
this
vote.
So
we
will
come
back
to
this
at
some
point
in
the
future.
D
S
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
B
A
T
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
mention
I'm
very
excited
for
a
new
development
on
this
corner.
Within
my
district
I
was
actually
I
had.
I
expected
that
there
would
be
more
concerns
about
this
proposal
and
I
checked
in
with
my
community
council
chairs
and
I
followed
very
closely,
and
there
was
not,
and
even
called
community
council
chairs
and
both
were
supportive
and
so
I'm
very
excited
to
have
something
move
forward.
T
I
will
reiterate
a
previous
concern
that
this
whole
part
of
the
city
is
right
for
development
and
right
for
reinvestment,
and
especially
with
the
rda
project
area
and
the
new
station
area
plan,
and
I'm
hopeful
that
those
that
our
planning
efforts
can
move
forward
as
quickly
as
possible
so
that
it's
not
just
whatever
developer
whatever
zone
the
developer
asks
for.
We
give
them,
but
that
there's
a
more
comprehensive
plan
for
the
area,
but
I'm
excited
very
excited
for
a
catalytic
project
on
that
corner.
Thank
you.
A
Excellent,
thank
you
councilmember.
Anyone
else
all
right,
so
you
know
more
further
comments.
We'll
take
a
vote
council
member
rogers.
B
D
D
D
A
And
I'm
yes
as
well
motion
passage
unanimously.
A
D
D
F
G
A
Thank
you
for
calling
me
out,
council
members.
That
is
correct.
The
motion
passes
to
reject
the
petition.
Thank
you
very
much
love.
The
record
request
reflect
that.
Please
questions
to
the
mayor
any
questions
to
the
mayor
tonight.
Well,
first
of
all,
thank
you
mayor
for
being
here
on
your
staff.
Today,
council
members.
C
Mr
chair,
I
don't
have
any
questions,
but
if
I
may
have
just
a
and
it's
not
directed
to
you,
madam
mary,
I'm
sorry
just
a
point
of
clarification.
If
I
may
have
a
point
a
moment
of
privilege
sure
for
anybody,
that's
tuning
in
I
want
and
maybe
had
not
been
to
council
meetings
before
covid
and
before
we
went
virtual.
C
I
did
want
to
just
sort
of
explain
why
I'm
here
as
chair
but
andrew,
miss
councilmember
johnston
is
cheering,
and
this
was
a
tradition
that
came
in
that
was
in
place
before
I
got
on
the
council,
where
council
members,
if
they
wanted,
would
take,
turns
cheering
our
formal
meetings
just
to
make
sure
everybody
gets
a
chance
to
do
that.
So
I
didn't
want
people
to
be
confused
at
why
I
was
sitting
here
and
and
council
member
johnston
was
cheering.
C
A
Well,
thank
you
man
of
chair,
but
I
will
defer
to
you
to
to
lead
us
anytime,
I'm
glad
to
participate
and
help
out,
though
people
will
take
turns
on
this.
I
do
want
to
give
some
time
to
the
mayor
if
she
would
like
some
time.
N
Well,
I
I
wanted
to
thank
you
city
council,
for
working
with
our
administration
over
the
last
many
months
on
the
proposal
that
you
just
received
a
bunch
of
public
comment
on
and,
as
you
know,
we
we
wish
that
our
planning
division
had
had
the
capacity
to
do
the
housing
loss
mitigation
work.
Parallel
with
that
zoning
amendment-
and
you
know
that
they're
working
on
it
now,
we
will
get
it
to
you
and
the
affordable
housing
overlay
as
soon
as
we
can
and
we
understand
the
action
taken
tonight.
N
N
There's
been
a
lot
of
work
happening
between
the
city,
council
and
the
administration,
and
it
was
unfortunate
to
hear,
however,
perhaps
misinformed
a
vacuum.
N
Perception
of
this
ordinance
is
perceived
by
some
of
the
public
and
just
wanted
to
reiterate
what
happened
in
the
work
session
today
around
the
tremendous
investment
that
this
salt
lake
city
in
total
has
made
an
affordable
housing
and
continues
to
make,
above
and
beyond
any
other
government
in
the
state
of
utah,
including
the
state
of
utah,
with
65
million
dollars
to
affordable
housing
in
the
last
five
years,
and
the
only
city
with
a
funding
stream
that
is
dedicated
to
affordable
housing.
N
In
addition
to
accessory
dwelling
units
throughout
the
city
and
all
of
that
work
that
we're
talking
about
coming
through.
So
I
just
want
to
re-contextualize
that
piece
of
zoning
proposal
and
thank
the
council
for
working
with
us
over
the
last
many
months
of
holding
public
hearings
to
make
sure
that
when
we
update
that
zoning,
it's
done
in
the
best
way.
We
can.
A
I
thank
you
mayor
very
much.
Did
I
see
councilmember
wharton
recent
hand
a
moment
ago
I
apologize
if
I
missed
it.
D
D
A
We're
gonna
go
into
our
general
comment
section
of
our
meeting
at
this
point,
but
since
I
know
there
was
a
number,
there
are
a
number
of
items
that
people
are
very
interested
in
tonight
and
they
have
comments
on
during
the
general
portion.
I
wanted
to
quickly
try
and
recap
quickly
what
we
voted
on
tonight.
We
looked
at
the
budget
amendment,
but
moving
on
to
that
the
austrian
parking.
A
We
took
a
vote
on
that
and
I
believe
we
approved
that
I'm
going
to
look
at
the
counselors
to
make
sure
that
I
don't
screw
this
up.
The
rmf
30
low
density,
multi-family
residential
zoning
district.
We
deferred
action
on
that
to
a
future
date.
The
west
end
alley
vacation
we
approved,
however,
the
west
end.
Re-Zone
we
deferred
to
a
future
day
the
rezone
on
highland
drive
2903.
We
approved
the
rezone
on
1301
1321
state
street
we
approved
and
the
zoning
amendment
for
lincoln
street
and
200
south
we
did
not
approve.
C
Yeah
the
just
to
make
clear
the
zoning
text
amendment
for
off
street
parking.
We
voted
on
that.
We
voted
to
set
a
public
hearing
date
for
february
16th.
A
Excuse
me,
thank
you
very
much.
Yes,
we
didn't
approve
it.
We
set
up
public
hearing
correct.
This
is
why
councilmember
fowler
can
share
any
time
anything
else
from
the
council
before
we
move
on
public
comment.
Okay,.
A
We
are
accepting
see
we
are
now
the
general
comment
portion
of
our
agenda
for
comments
about
general
topics
and
items
that
were
not
scheduled
for
hearing
tonight.
You're,
accepting
your
comments
through
webex
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line,
as
we
mentioned
earlier
for
those
just
joining
us.
A
As
I
shared
earlier,
the
city
council
has
always
had
rules
in
decorum
that
are
created
to
advance
the
legitimate
government
objectives
of
having
an
orderly,
efficient
meeting
that
moves
through
the
agenda
and
gives
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
in
person.
We
had
the
added
benefit
of
being
able
to
see
each
other
which
helped
us
get
to
know
our
constituents
and
engage
more
meaningfully.
A
We
still
want
to
provide
a
space
for
people
to
feel
comfortable
and
safe
to
participate.
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
decorum
extend
from
the
moment
you
arrive
into
our
virtual
meeting
to
help
facilitate
our
comment
period.
Please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
The
council
respects
all
points
of
view,
and
we
welcome
new
insights.
A
However,
using
foul
language
and
personal
attacks
make
the
public
comment,
form
uncivil
and
intimidating
for
others,
this
meeting
is
also
being
broadcast
on
television
and
the
internet,
and
so
we
will
more
strictly
enforce
the
use
of
profanity.
This
will
be
considered
your
advance
warning
against
the
use
of
profanity.
If
someone
uses
profanity
will
we
will
mute
your
microphone
and
you
will
forfeit
your
opportunity
to
address
the
council
tonight
if
you
feel
you
need
to
use
profanity
to
express
your
point,
you're
welcome
to
email,
councilmembers
or
call
our
comment
line
at
801-535-7654.
A
In
addition,
just
as
we
would
ask
for
your
name
and
our
in-person
meetings,
we've
also
requested
your
name
during
the
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
decline.
If
your
registered
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
use
the
chat
feature
to
gather
that
information
from
you,
robert
knutsman,
from
our
staff,
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
we'll
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate.
Please
monitor
the
chat
screen
for
information
and
or
feel
free
to
message
our
staff
with
any
questions
again.
A
His
name
is
robert
nixon.
Robert
will
also
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
and
unmuting
lines.
Once
we
open
public
comment,
robert
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
people
can
have
some
notice
and
be
prepared
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak.
The
meeting
host
will
unmute
your
line.
Please
state
your
name
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two
minute
mark.
The
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
I
apologize
in
advance
for
those
who
get
muted
before
they're
done.
A
But
again,
please
continue
your
comments
online
or
call
us
getting
to
us
another
way.
Of
course
you
will
be
if
you
are
unable
to
complete
your
full
comment
within
the
available
time.
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
you
can
mail
us
po
box,
145,
476,
salt
lake
city,
utah,
84114,
six
email,
us
at
council.comments,
slcgov.com
or
phone.
A
E
P
Hi,
this
is
eli
again
with
wasatch
tenants,
united.
I
would
like
to
speak
on
this
point
directly
to
mayor
mendenhall
for
justifying
her
disappointment
in
us
by
mentioning
the
65
million
spent
on
affordable
housing
as
affordable
housing
is
currently
defined.
That
is
more
per
month
for
rent
than
I
make
in
a
month.
P
We
do
not
accept
this
as
a
justification
for
your
actions
until
affordable
housing
is
defined
as
something
that
someone
making
minimum
wage
in
salt
lake
can
afford
until
someone
making
what
is
defined
as
a
livable
wage,
which
is
around
eleven
dollars
an
hour
can't
afford.
We
want
affordable
apartments
to
mean
six
six
hundred
dollars
and
six
hundred
dollars
after
utilities
for
a
one
bedroom
or
studio
which
is
set
at
40
of
the
area,
medium
income
for
the
city
to
be
considered
affordable.
P
Additionally,
the
city
must
stop
using
our
tax
dollars
to
tear
down
affordable
housing,
to
build
more
luxury
apartments
in
general
and
must
encourage
the
construction
of
more
affordable
housing
by
holding
developers
accountable.
We
cannot
expect
developers
to
do
the
right
thing
on
their
own.
Take
it
from
tina
who
is
being
kicked
out
of
her
home,
along
with
her
entire
family,
to
make
way
for
dow
and
jolly's
development
of
the
kozo
apartments
on
the
west
side,
developers
need
to
be
held
accountable.
Additionally,
the
city
must
come
up
with
a
real
solution
for
the
housing
crisis.
P
Homelessness
is
not
a
crime,
and
instead
of
actually
fixing
this
and
providing
people
with
shelter,
you
are
giving
money
to
salt
lake
city
police
and
to
the
health
department
to
destroy
homeless
people's
encampments,
which
you
call
city
cleanups.
This
is
not
a
cleanup,
this
is
destroying
people's
shelter
and
it
is
destroying
people's
belongings,
while
also
harassing
those
who
try
to
provide
mutual
aid
to
people
being
affected
by
the
camp
sweeps.
P
A
B
B
What
I
found
sort
of
interesting
in
the
whole
ordeal
so
far
is
that
I
heard
the
salt
lake
planning,
commission
and
the
salt
lake
city
council
members
thank
the
developer
for
working
with
the
community
and
when
I
heard
that
I
thought
wow,
what
exactly
did
that
entail,
because
we
are
so
impacted
by
what's
going
to
go
on
and
no
one
contacted
us
and
included
us
in
any
type
of
discussion
about
the
project
had
had
they
done
so
they
would
have
known
that.
B
You
know
we
were
looking
at
at
some
point
implementing
solar
on
our
sanctuary
and
with
a
huge
building
that
is
going
to
possibly
go
up.
That
could
have
a
great
impact.
I
found
it
odd
that
the
poplar
grove
community
council
also
worked
with
the
community,
but
did
not
include
us
in
any
discussion.
B
So
I
it's
curious
that
there
seemed
to
be
some
sort
of
selectivity
on
who
was
being
included
in
this
community
outreach,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
that
it
seems
to
me
that
there
needs
to
be
more
inclusiveness
with
the
community
when
projects
happen
anyway.
That's
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you.
A
Thanks
for
your
comments,
I
do
want
to
clarify
I
misspoke
earlier.
I
apologize
for
those
of
you
who
can't
finish
your
full
comments
within
the
two
minutes
in
the
chat
function
on
the
right.
We
have
posted
the
city
council,
web
email
address.
Excuse
me
and
the
phone
number
you
can
leave
a
voice
message
on
the
phone
number
or
email
us.
If
you
don't
want
to
talk
in
person,
you
probably
have
to
talk
tomorrow
once
council
staff
are
back
answering
the
phones
full
time.
I
Thanks
again,
robert
back
on
february
16th,
a
month
ago,
I
talked
to
you
about
chains
of
behavior
and
how
it's
possible
to
reinforce
behaviors,
which
occur
earlier
in
a
chain.
Without
intending
to
do
so.
I
gave
you
an
example
from
my
own
experience
as
a
preschool
teacher,
an
example
that
we're
dealing
with
now
in
the
city
would
be
evictions
which
occur
prior
to
the
redevelopment
of
properties.
You
don't
intend
to
reinforce
evictions
by
landlords.
I
When
you
grant
requests
for
zoning
changes,
then,
on
february
the
24th
I
followed
that
message
with
a
video
of
a
golden
retriever
going
in
and
out
of
the
doggy
door
to
get
treats
without
doing
her
business
outside
the
critical
behavior
didn't
happen,
but
the
human
delivered
the
treat
anyway,
if
you
missed
out
on
that
video
I'll
I'll,
send
it
to
your
staff.
It's
pretty
funny
wise
old
dog.
So
we
are
here
after
two
tortuous
years
on
second
south
and
lincoln
street.
You
did
your
part
as
decision
makers,
and
I
am
deeply
appreciative.
I
R
Can
you
hear
me,
you
know
you?
Yes,
thank
you.
Just
to
clarify
my
name
is
tina
valderrama.
I
will
be
displaced
by
the
kosovo
apartments.
I
already
know
this,
but
if
I
can
help
somebody
else
by
speaking
up
against
it,
then
maybe
I
have
done
my
job.
I
would
like
to
let
the
mayor
know
that
there
are
no
affordable
housing
units.
There
is
no
place
to
go
and
tents
are
new.
Are
the
new,
affordable
housing?
R
You
can
get
one
for
each
child
in
your
home
and
in
any
color,
then
you
have
to
find
a
place
where
it
won't
be
busted
up
and
they
all
know
it.
I
have
been
ignored,
but
I'm
tired
of
being
ignored.
I've
been
a
victim,
I'm
tired
of
being
a
victim,
and
now
I
will
be
thrown
to
the
streets
and
displaced
by
the
kosovo
apartments
that
have
already
achieved
their
zoning
goal
and
are
still
moving
forward
each
day
against
my
family.
R
E
D
J
J
As
we
hosted
a
community
council
meeting
immediately
next
door
to
their
space,
we
have
always
had
an
open
door
and
we'll
continue
to
do
so.
We
would
definitely
love
to
hear
from
some.
J
O
F
Things
are
happening,
would
love
to
hear
more
from
them
and
more
things.
J
So
please
do
join
in
and
again
the
developer
on
the
west
end
property
has
been
very
communicative
and
collaborative
and
we've
been
very
appreciative
of
these
actions.
N
N
We
have
nurtured
the
property
and
because
we've
had
sunlight,
we've
been
able
to
grow
our
gardens
and
we
consider
the
ground
around
our
temple
sacred
grounds.
Just
like
the
temple
down
downtown
is
considered
temple
ground
that
is
sacred
and
building
a
75
foot
tall
surrounding
our
property
will
kill
off
much
of
our
land.
The
shade
will
cover
some
of
them
almost
totally
during
the
winter,
not
to
mention
the
noise.
That's
going
to
come
from
the
freeway
and
bounce
off
that
giant
building.
N
You
know,
part
of
our
meditation
involves
the
sun.
It
is
in
our
scriptures
and
the
fact
that
we
need
to
have
a
peaceful
surrounding
that
is
also
a
component
of
our
meditation
and
it
is
in
our
scripture.
N
So
I
would
just
ask
maybe
some
of
you:
if
you
want
to
engage
with
someone
to
drop
by,
send
us
an
email
we
we
would
love
to.
Have
the
mayor
come
visit
and
see
what
this
is
going
to
do
to
us.
We've
invited
people.
I've
tried
to
set
up
a
time
with
the
mayor,
but
have
not
been
able
to
get
a
hold
of
her.
So
all
we're
asking
we're
not
saying
not
to
develop
the
land.
I
think
it's
great,
just
not
so
high
that
it
will
impede
everything
we've
done.
J
Let's
see
I
wanted
to
comment
on
a
couple
of
things
here.
One
is
that
I
really
I'm
asking
for.
I
don't
know,
probably
the
dozen
time
at
this
point
to
the
council.
Please
fix
your
weekly
emails
so
that
they're
more
accessible,
they're
terrible.
They
do
not
have
the
agenda
in
them.
You
have
to
click
like
four
links
to
get
to
the
agenda.
The
agendas
don't
download
easily
on
mobile
phones
they're
just
a
mess.
J
It's
not
that
hard,
but
somehow
you're
not
able
to
do
this,
so
please
fix
them
to
make
them
be
more
accessible.
The
second
it
was
kind
of
unclear
as
to
what
happened
with
the
parking
ordinance
amendments,
but
I
I
don't
know
if
they
passed
or
if
they
were
deferred
to
another
public
hearing.
J
I
didn't
quite
get
that
from
councilman
johnston
or
councilwoman
fowler,
but
in
any
case
I'm
wondering
if
you
considered
in
all
of
this,
the
downtown
and
sugar
house
parking
study
from
2015-16
that
the
administration
paid
a
lot
of
money
for
and
then
never
released
to
the
public.
This
is
a
parking
study
that
I
believe
the
council
had
seen
at
one
point,
but
it
was
never
approved.
J
It
was
squelched
for
unknown
reasons,
and
I
don't
know.
I
think
it
showed
that
there
was
lots
of
parking
available,
but
you
should
be
considering
this
as
part
of
any
any
ordinance
that
you're
presenting
to
the
city
and
then
lastly,
gladiola
street.
The
reconstruction
of
gladiola
on
the
west
side
is
on
hold
and
it
would
be
really
nice
to
see
bike
lanes
strike
from
ninth
south
to
18
south,
because
this
would
complete
a
6.3
mile,
continuous
bike
lane.
J
But
transportation
seems
to
have
dropped
the
ball
on
this
and
has
no
plan
and,
despite
the
fact
that
I've
brought
this
up
with
them
since
2018,
nothing
is
happening,
and
so
I
hope
mayor
mendenhall
can
talk
with
them
and
look
at
adding.
A
Sorry
to
cut
you
off
and
at
the
risk
of
butchering
my
recap
again,
I
think
we
close
the
public
comment
and
defer
an
action
to
next.
Another
time
is
that
right,
councilman
fowler
yep,
that
is
correct,
so
we'll
set
a
future
date
for
action
on
that
item.
E
G
I'm
sorry
to
keep
repeating
myself,
but
you
know
the
system.
Okay,
public
engagement
when
this
administration
came
in
was
actually
impressively
great.
I
was
really
impressed,
but
it
recently
has
been
failing
significantly
and
two
recent
examples
are
an
ada
tip
for
miller.
Park
was
approved
a
few
years
ago,
but
recently
the
city
told
residents
that
the
city
spent
so
much
on
the
consultant
that
there's
no
money
for
ada
access,
which
was
the
point
of
the
cip.
G
G
We
were
able
to
stop
the
city
from
allowing
sharrows
on
ninth
east
and
21st
south,
but
they
won't
allow
us
to
talk
about
restriping
for
one
nine
foot
wide
bike
lane
going
south
and
it
should
be
allowed
because
we're
taking
away
an
11
foot
center
turn
lane.
So
why
not
one
nine
foot
bike
lane,
which
should
be
standardized
actually
throughout
the
city?
G
Please
complain
to
the
county
about
releasing
criminals
from
jail
within
hours,
including
the
master
catalytic
converter
thief,
the
continuous
trade,
I
guess
the
sorensen
center
vehicles
are
in
for
a
repeat:
staff
should
discuss
hp
98,
which
will
have
a
big
impact
on
salt
lake
city
and
rental.
Assistance
with
covert
funds
should
ensure
that
apartment
owners
don't
try
to
destroy
the
credit
of
renters
if
taxpayers
pay
the
rent
and
yes
I'll,
keep
fighting
12
million
dollars.
O
Cool
check
go
check
ahead
hi,
so
I
think
that
I
just
want
to
take
a
second
here
to
kind
of
outline.
You
know,
because
there's
a
lot
of
anger
wtu
actually
does
have
written
demands
which
we've
sent
to
the
mayor,
but
I
think
that
the
city
councils
are
also
important.
I
first
off
want
to
thank
you
guys
for
deferring
action
to
this
we're
probably
pending
some
actual
consideration
but
anyway.
O
Firstly,
we're
asking
that
the
city
limit
the
rent
on
any
anything
that
they
define
as
affordable
to
616
after
utilities,
for
example,
for
one
bedroom
apartment
set
at
40
of
the
area
median
income.
That's
actually
based
off
a
number
you
can
find
in
the
state
report
on
affordable
housing.
Talking
about
what
the
living
wage
is.
The
second
thing
we're
asking
is
that
the
city
stopped
using
our
tax
money,
tear
down
affordable
housing,
to
build
luxury
apartments
and
encourage
the
construction
of
more
affordable
housing.
O
So
what
we
mean
is,
I
think,
we
kind
of
talked
about
earlier
inclusive
housing
and
maybe
there's
some
restrictions
on
that.
All
these
things
are
things
that
we're
willing
to
sit
down
and
talk
with
you
guys
about.
You
can
reach
me
at
801,
wtu,
801,
gmail.com
anytime.
O
You
want,
but
the
usage
of
tiff
to
incentivize
the
construction
of
any
form
of
housing
that
does
not
explicitly
cater
to
people
who
are
making
the
living
wage,
as
as
like
a
cap,
is
pretty
irresponsible
in
our
opinion,
and
that's
a
big
thing,
we
have
a
problem
with
is
the
rda's
usage
of
tiff
and
it's
in
its
current
incarnation.
O
We
think
that
it
needs
to
be
putting
at
least
50
of
all
units
that
it
is
working
towards
towards
affordable
housing,
affordable,
meaning,
affordable
this
one,
making
the
living
wage
or
lower,
and
then
the
last
one
is
that
the
city
needs
to
come
up
with
a
real
solution
of
the
houseless
crisis,
meaning
that
the
salt
lake
city
cops
should
not
be
helping
help.
The
health
officials
conduct
sweeps.
They
should
not
be
confiscating
anybody's
things.
O
I
know
that
it's
been
said
that
they're
no
longer
handing
out
citations,
but
once
a
week
I
see
videos
of
these
cops.
In
fact,
I
live
in
neighborhoods,
where
I
regularly
see
cops
taking
away
people's
stuff.
So
maybe
it's
a
regulation
issue.
Maybe
you
guys
aren't
being
quite
thorough
enough.
Maybe
there
needs
to
be
an
investigation,
but
that's
what
we
believe
needs
to
change.
I
mean
again
wtu
801
gmail.com.
You
can
reach
me
literally
anytime
and
I'll
be
happy
to
sit
down
with
any
of
you.
F
Hi,
my
name
is
zachary
dusal.
I
live
in
district
4..
I
just
kind
of
want
to
have
some
general
general
comments
about
housing,
affordability
and
zoning.
I
know
that
they
kind
of
get
conflated
a
lot,
but
I
think
councilman
mano
brought
up
a
great
point
that
if,
if
we
don't
focus
seriously
on
zoning
reform,
we're
just
gonna
end
up
like
san
francisco,
where
we
have
multi-million
dollar
single-family
homes.
So
I
I
think
it's
very
important
when
talking
about
this
discussion.
It's
not
it's
not
an
either
or
it's
not
like.
F
If,
if
this
amendment
doesn't
pass,
then
all
of
these
homes
are
saved
and
they're
going
to
be
affordable,
forever,
they're
going
to
be
bought
by
someone
who's
crazy,
rich
coming
here
from
california
and
then
they're
going
to
tear
it
down
and
then
they're
going
to
make
a
bruce
banner
batman,
looking
kind
of
house
and
that
they'll
live
there
and
kick
kick
whoever
is
living
there
out.
So
I
do
think
that
land
use
and
zoning
reform
is
important.
I
think
it
should
be
paired
with
housing
affordability,
but
I
don't
think
housing.
F
Affordability
should
trump
good
land
use
reform.
So
I
that's
just
a
general
comment
on
that
and
then
kind
of
to
to
the
mayor.
I
know
it's
been
a
rough
year.
I
know
we've
had
a
lot
going
on,
but
I
really
do
look
forward
to
more
proposals
about
just
kind
of
transportation
options
in
the
city.
F
I
really
liked
your
interview
a
year
ago
with
nick
norris
about
ideas
to
make
the
city
more
accessible,
transit,
wise
more
of
like
a
15-minute
city,
and
I
would
love
to
see
sweet
streets
brought
back
this
year.
I
don't
know
if
that's
in
the
works
but
closing
down
main
street
for
the
summer.
That
was
awesome
and
I
really
hope
that
comes
back
thanks.
H
I
just
want
to
remind
everyone
that
former
city
council
member
kyle
is
married
to
aaron
mendenhall.
The
mayor.
M
M
D
H
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
So
yes,
I,
I
love
what
the
last
person
mentioned
regarding
the
funding
of
the
police
department.
We,
according
to
the
city
council's
website
regarding
affordable
housing,
we've
set
around-
I
think
4
million
for
housing
this
year
going
towards
that.
H
Excuse
me
towards
that
project,
but
I
believe
the
mayor
earlier
said
something
about
60
plus
million
according
to
the
council's
website.
That's
about
48.3,
among
that
that's,
mostly
projects
being
funded
through
pilot
programs,
only
one
of
which
is
actually
a
high-density
housing
unit.
As
I
mentioned
on
my
last
comment,
60
of
the
newest
buildings.
Only
10
of
those
have
affordable
housing.
So,
yes,
you
are
creating
a
single
family
home
and
maybe
duplexes
that
are
affordable,
but
these
high-density
apartments
aren't
they're
not
affordable.
H
So
the
one
project
listed
is
the
give
foundation's
diamond
rail
which
will
cap
out
between
20
and
50
of
the
ami.
As
we've
mentioned,
the
50
ami
is
still
not
affordable
for
people.
So
again,
it's
astounding
to
me
that
the
only
affordable
housing
is
west
of
300
west
and
the
west
side
continues
to
be
neglected.
H
The
only
major
development
here
and
re-beautification
has
been
the
tracks
line
and
we
can't
provide
or
pretend
that
was
for
anything
more
than
to
bring
business
into
the
city
from
the
airport.
I've
seen
so
many
redevelopments
on
the
east
side.
You
know
medians
improved
all
of
the
great
projects
there,
but
our
sidewalks
are
barren.
There's
a
high
voltage
power
line
running
through
neighborhoods
with
children
it
I
just.
H
A
Okay,
well,
I
want
to
thank
everyone
who
made
a
comment
tonight,
both
in
the
previous
and
this
current
public
comment
section
of
the
evening.
We
have
no
new
business
or
unfinished
business
items
scheduled
tonight,
so
that
brings
us
to
the
consent
portion
of
our
agenda.
I'll
look
for
a
motion.
A
D
S
D
B
D
A
Therefore,
this
concludes
our
formal
city
council
meeting
tonight
and
before
we
conclude
officially,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
give
thanks
to
our
council
staff.
Who've
helped
us.
I
should
have
done
this
last
time
and
I
didn't
so.
Both
robert
newton
and
isaac
caneto
I've
actually
never
met
isaac
dude
pandemic.
A
We
haven't
seen
each
other,
so
I
want
to
thank
both
of
them
for
their
diligent
work
behind
the
scenes
to
make
this
one
smoothly
number
one
and
make
sure
we
have
the
public
comment:
that's
open
to
everybody
as
much
as
we
possibly
can.
So.
Thank
you
to
both
of
you
and
the
entire
council
staff
tonight
and
with
that.
The
council's
former
media
formal
meeting
now
stands
adjourned.