►
From YouTube: Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Board Meeting - 04/12/22
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting please use this link https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
It
is
nice
to
be
meeting
again
in
person
and
to
be
here
with
members
of
the
public.
My
fellow
board
members
and
city
staff,
hybrid
board
meetings
allow
people
to
join
online
through
webex
or
in
person
at
the
city
and
county
building.
Masks
are
no
longer
required
in
city
facilities,
but
are
welcome
for
any
attendees
who
prefer
to
continue
using
them.
A
A
A
We
are
accepting
your
comments
in
person
and
through
webex,
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line.
I
want
to
mention
the
rules
of
the
quorum.
These
are
guidelines
to
help
our
meeting
progress
in
an
orderly
civil
efficient
way
and
want
to
give
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
A
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
the
quran
begin
from
the
moment
you
arrive
in
person
or
into
a
virtual
meeting.
The
rda
world
respects
all
points
of
view,
and
we
welcome
new
insights.
Please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling,
profanity
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
If
you
violate
this
rule,
your
line
will
be
muted
or
you
will
be
asked
to
stop
if
you
feel
you
need
to
use
profanity
or
disrespectful
remarks
to
express
your
point.
You're
welcome
to
email,
board
members
or
call
our
comment
line.
A
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
webex
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
the
quran.
If
your
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
make
contact
with
you
to
gather
that
information
from
you
for
those
joining
in
webex.
Please
monitor
your
chat
in
case.
We
try
to
reach
you.
A
Scott
corpani
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions
with
your
commenting.
Registration
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks.
Excuse
me,
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks.
Please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
changes
to
your
registration.
A
Taylor
hill
on
our
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
We
will
call
names
of
people
joining
on
webex
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards
when
it
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak,
taylor
will
announce
your
name
for
people
in
webex.
She
will
admit
your
line
and
you
may
vegan
for
people
in
person
please
step
up
to
the
podium
right
there
and
if
you
have
a
mask,
please
feel
free
to
remove
before
making
a
comment.
A
D
Whoops,
sorry,
hello,
I
think
most
of
you
guys
know
me,
I'm
michael
valentine,
I'm
one
of
the
founders
of
save
the
utah
advantageous
theater,
I'm
also
a
2023
candidate
for
mayor
of
salt
lake
city
of
utah.
So
I'm
here
to
really
talk
about
two
issues.
Today,
I'm
really
not
going
to
get
into
campaign
donations.
I
think
I
got
plenty
of
time
to
talk
about
that
in
a
mayor
oil
race.
D
The
first
issue
is,
I
really
want
to
talk
about
this
guy
director,
danny
waltz.
I
think
he
needs
to
be
held
accountable
for
his
actions
as
director
for
the
rda
for
several
years
now,
especially
in
regards
to
the
pantages
he
inflated
restoration
costs
by
40
million
dollars,
which
are
accurate.
He
canceled
public
surveys,
which
is
actually
against
an
ordinance
in
your
own
city
laws.
D
He
canceled
updated
seismic
costs
and
really
worked
at
every
level
of
this
deal
to
push
this
to
a
private
developer
for
a
zero
dollar
deal
when
this
is
a
public
building
that
was
bought
with
tax
dollars
to
assist
him
to
be
restored.
The
second
thing
I'm
here
to
talk
about
is
the
community
preservation
policy.
This
plan
it
was
passed
in
2012,
ironically
by
aaron
mendenhall's
husband,
kyle
lamoffa,
while
he
was
on
city
council.
This
is
the
number
one
document
in
the
city
about
historic
preservation.
It's
200
pages.
D
It
took
five
years
to
write
this
and
you
know
chris
warren
is
actually
the
one
who
gave
it
to
me.
So,
thank
you
chris.
I
would
ask
you
to
go
through
and
read
this.
I
would
ask
all
of
you
to
read
this
and
we
have
copies
for
you
here,
because
this
really
sets
the
foundation
of
historic
policy,
especially
for
city-owned
property.
There's
stuff
here
about
public
surveys,
where
the
director
of
the
rda
and
other
city
agencies
actually
have
to
go
out
and
find
historic
properties.
Do
public
surveys.
D
Do
public
education
put
the
buildings
on
as
landmarks
to
be
protected
when
they're
bought,
there's
so
much
stuff
in
here?
That's
just
been
completely
ignored.
This
isn't
even
10
years
old.
Yet
this
should
be
setting
the
foundation
for
decades
to
come
for
historic
preservation,
and
it's
really,
you
know
unbelievable-
that
the
city
is
not
even
following
its
own
plans:
you're
ignoring
the
entire
public.
Who
wants
this
save?
We
have
people
from
around
the
world
watching
this
right
now
that
want
this
theater
saved
time.
E
E
It's
been
a
long
road
that
we've
traveled
to
to
find
out
why
the
deal
happened,
the
circumstances
around
it.
We
were
at
lots
of
meetings
where
questions
were
asked,
and
recently
we
filed
a
legal
action
to
stop
the
demolition,
because
we
believe
that
there
was
a
purposeful
effort
to
create
a
narrative
that
the
theater
wasn't
historic
so
that
certain
policies
and
utah
laws
didn't
have
to
be
followed.
The
plan
that
michael
mentioned,
the
community
preservation
plan,
I
think
it's
called,
was
adopted
into
by
the
city
council
as
an
ordinance.
E
So
it's
not
simply
a
downtown
master
plan
that
has
no
teeth,
we
believe
more,
so
the
state
code
has
teeth
because
there
are
certain
requirements
the
city
has
to
follow.
Interestingly,
all
of
that
may
not
have
saved
the
theater,
but
we
have
ordinances.
We
have
laws,
we
have
rules
and
regulations,
because
thousands
of
public
common
hours,
elected
officials
of
the
past
adopted
them
for
real
reasons,
because
we
didn't
want
certain
things
to
happen,
or
at
least
we
wanted
certain
processes
to
happen.
E
So
it's
it's
for
me
as
a
citizen
of
the
city,
it's
most
alarming,
because
there
were
such
clear
indications
that
it
was
eligible.
They
were
told
numerous
times,
but
they
chose
to
cherry-pick
the
information.
That
said
it
wasn't
when
the
majority
of
the
information
said
it
was,
and
I
think
that
was
so,
they
could
avoid
whether
it
was
political
fallout
or
having
to
follow
the
ordinances
and
the
laws.
E
So
I
guess
for
you
guys
today.
What
I'm
asking
is
that
you
look
at
these
ordinances
and
these
these
regulations
and
laws
and
make
sure
that
the
staff
is
giving
you
all
the
details
and
that
they're
following
all
the
regulations
and
laws,
because
when
you
don't
follow
those
it
makes
us
feel
as
citizens
that
there's
people
that
have
more
benefit
than
we
do
so.
A
Thank
you
to
everybody
who
provided
general
comment
and
I
don't
see
any
other
comments.
Commenters
right,
we're
now
at
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
agenda.
We
only
have
one
public
hearing
item
b1
resolution,
rda
budget
amendment
number
two
for
fiscal
year,
2021-22
the
same
rules
of
the
quorum
that
I
earlier
explained
also
applies
to
our
public
hearing
portion
of
the
board's
agenda.
Now
before
we
begin
taking
comments,
I
will
first
we.
I
will
first
turn
the
time
over
to
ben
lutky
council
staff
policy
analyst
to
give
a
short
introduction.
G
Thanks,
madam
chair,
the
second
budget
amendment
for
the
rda
includes
53
individual
items.
The
vast
majority
of
them
are
legally
required
whether
these
are
pass-throughs
to
taxing
entities
based
on
interlocal
agreement
contracts
or
are
reimbursements
to
property
owners
that
have
individual
post-performance
agreements
with
the
rda.
The
discretionary
items
are
outlined
in
the
staff
report.
G
C
I
A
C
I
A
A
G
G
G
B
G
G
The
first
is
in
west
temple
gateway,
it's
forty
thousand
dollars
for
construction
mitigation,
assistance
to
businesses
in
the
central
ninth
area,
and
this
would
be
the
second
round
of
assistance
related
to
the
construction
and
it's
proposed
because
the
construction
is
being
delayed.
It's
taking
longer
than
the
original
schedule,
and
those
delays
are
related
to
timelines,
with
rocky
mountain
power
and
other
utilities
for
undergrounding,
their
various
cables
and
conduit.
G
The
next
three
items
are
all
in
block
70.
one
is
revenue
and
two
are
expenditures
for
that
new
revenue
there
was
a
cash
bond
posted.
Maybe
it
was
a
decade
ago.
It
was
several
years
ago
and
engineering
has
released
that
bond
and
it
was
related
to
the
eccles
theater
construction
of
the
street,
the
public
right-of-way
in
front
of
the
theater,
it's
720
000
of
revenue
that
is
now
available
for
use
and
the
proposed
uses
are
twofold.
G
First
is
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
relocation
of
the
bennion
jewelers.
There
is
an
agreement
between
them
and
the
rda
from
when
the
eccles
theater
was
originally
negotiated
with
adjacent
property
owners.
The
second
item
is
six
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
for
potential
future
improvements
and
maintenance
at
the
eccles
theater,
the
mccarthy,
plaza
and
or
regent
street.
Now
that
funding
would
go
into
a
holding
account
pending
determination
of
what
specific
improvements
or
maintenance
would
be
done.
G
So
this
will
come
back
to
you
for
specific
approval
and
a
future
budget
opening
one
other
change
of
note:
the
housing
trust
fund.
It
was
originally
listed
as
two
million
dollars,
and
this
is
transferring
that
funding
from
the
hand
division
to
the
rda.
This
is
part
of
the
board
and
council's
policy
direction
for
a
one-stop
shop
for
all,
affordable
housing
development.
It's
been
increased.
It
went
from
2
million
to
2.8
million
next
week
in
budget
amendment
number
7.
A
C
And
ben
I'm
not
finding
the
staff
report
and
the
online
packets,
it
was
probably
just
a
mistake,
so
I
don't
know
if
taylor
has
access
to
it
and
can
pull
it
up
on
the
screen.
I'm
just
thinking.
If
board
members
can't
access
the
motions,
then
maybe
I
don't
know
if
you
can
walk
through
them
on
the
fly.
Sorry.
G
H
I'm
sure
just
been
some
clarification
on
the
bond.
This
is
a
bond.
The
agency
put
up
cash
for
potential
non-performance
on
that,
but
that's
now
being
released
by
the
city.
So
it's
from
the
agency,
the
city
was
holding
it
now.
The
city
is
giving
it
back
to
the
agency
and
we
can
now
use
it
for
other
things
as
an
agency
is
that
right?
Am
I
understanding
that
correctly
correct
and
then
the
two
things
are
benign
jewelers,
helping
them
move
and
then
updates
to
mccarthy,
plaza
and
regent
street
and
a
few
other
things.
J
H
A
All
right,
any
other
comments
or
preferences
about
making
a
decision
on
this
amendment
concerns.
No,
so
shall
we
okay.
So
then
I
need
a
motion
correct
by
someone,
whichever
whichever
option
you'd
like,
but
I
think
it
would
be
my
preference
that
we
approve
it
all
together,
but
that's
up
to
the
board.
H
A
C
A
So
and
I'm
a
yes
so
that
moves
forward
without
board
member
follower
being
present,
yet
all
right,
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
three:
it's
informational
about
north
temple,
strategic
interference,
intervention
fund
and
at
the
table
we
still
have
ben
danny
and
carrot
linsley
hi
welcome.
Thank
you.
K
Okay,
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
I
just
wanted
to
provide
a
little
background
on
this
topic
last
year,
when
the
board
was
approving
the
rda
budget
for
fiscal
year
22,
the
board
consolidated
four
million
dollars
of
funds
from
three
different
sources
to
provide
funding
for
north
temple
strategic
intervention
fund
so
that
front.
That
budget
item
is
in
place,
and
so
what
I
wanted
to
talk
to
you
about
today
was
proposing
the
expansion
of
the
use
of
that
fund.
So
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,.
K
So
we
used
those
two
plans
to
guide
the
development
of
the
goals
we
would
like
to
propose
for
the
north
temple
strategic
intervention
fund
and
those
goals
are
on
the
next
slide.
If
we
could
go
to
that
together
to
preserve
small-scale
building
fabric
in
which
small
local
businesses
can
thrive
and
ensure
that
new
developments
are
an
asset
to
the
neighborhoods
that
surround
them.
K
So
the
rda
is
proposing
to
use
funds
for
property
acquisition
in
effort
to
preserve
the
existing
small-scale
building
fabric
of
the
community
and
prevent
the
displacement
of
the
city's
local
independent
businesses.
Small
businesses
often
need
small-scale
commercial
space.
It's
often
left
out
of
new
developments
in
favor
of
larger
space,
that's
suitable
for
larger
tenants,
often
national
chains
and
also
in
newly
developed
spaces.
K
K
Is
to
provide
funding
for
site
development
costs,
we're
aware
of
environmental
contamination
along
the
folsom
corridor
and
north
temple
project
area
in
general,
resulting
from
historical
and
rail
road
uses
in
the
past
and
in
cases
where
the
rda
is
a
project
owner.
We
are
eligible
for
epa
brownfields
cleanup
grants
that
are
up
to
650
000
to
address
site
contamination.
K
K
It
opens
up
this
tool
for
the
rda
to
clean
up
environmental
contamination
on
these
sites
and
then,
in
addition
to
funding
environmental
assessments
and
cleanup,
these
funds
could
be
used
to
address
other
site
and
utility
issues
that
are
barriers
to
redevelopment
and
then
last
slide.
If
we
could
advance
the
third
activity,
we're
proposing
to
use
these
funds
for
is
to
provide
development
support
for
community
benefits.
So
I
think
we
probably
all
understand
the
north
temple
corridor
is
rapidly
developing.
A
C
K
C
A
So
my
question
is
like
this:
these
are
great
ideas
and
I
think
this
is
what
we
want
to
do.
It
just
looks
like
to
me
it.
You
know
we
tried
something
like
this
in
the
past
and
it
does
take
a
lot
of
work
to
get
to
convince
people
that
there
is
some
money
available.
So
one
question
is:
is
this
going
to
be
grant
or
loans?
So
do
people
have
to
go
through
our
process?
A
A
Maybe
I
heard
from
some
constituents
that
that
was
acquired
is
going
to
change.
So
is
somebody
going
to
go
talk
to
those
developers
to
say
hey?
This
is
what
we're
planning
take
us
up
on
it.
We
need
x,
y
and
z.
I
mean
it
seems
like
it's
a
it's
a
little
work.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we,
actually
it
gets
done
it.
A
I
worked
on
north
temple
way
back,
you
have
it
listed
here
and
I
was
able
to
do
a
few
of
the
facade
improvements
under
temple,
but
it
wasn't
as
successful
as
I
thought
it
would
be
it.
There
was
a
lot
of
maybe
some
government
resistance
or
or
some
you
know,
skepticism
to
get
through
the
process
and
unfortunately
we
I
think
I
was
only
able
to
do
five
or
six
facade
improvements
up
again
and
it
was
you
know,
one
person,
one
staff
dedicated
to
this,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
can
make
it
happen.
K
I
I
Multiple
times,
so
how
are
you
how
you?
How
do
you
envision
yourself
using
that
funding?
I
know
you're,
not
gonna,
peanut
butter
spread
it,
but
I
mean
you
gotta
balance
it
around.
So
how
do
you
propose
that
you're
gonna
use
the
funding
and
not
leave
out
one
for
another
one
and
prioritize
themselves.
J
So
to
that
extent,
I
think
we'd
first
look
at
how
we
can
work
and
leverage
our
funds
with
existing
property
owners
and
other
programs
and
then
to
the
extent
that,
as
part
of
that
analysis,
we
discover
properties
that
maybe
need
a
little
bit
more
help.
We
could
then
step
it
up
to
whether
that
becomes
more
of
a
site,
development,
cost
participation.
J
And
then,
if
that
doesn't
succeed
or
other
properties
come
up,
then
those
would
be
ones
we'd,
look
at
maybe
just
buying
outright,
but
I
think
we'd
focus
first
on
trying
to
get
the
biggest
bang
out
of
our
buck
and
how
to
stretch
that
dollar
by
utilizing
other
programs
first
and
then
the
last
resort
is
then
falling
back
on
whether
we
just
need
to
to
identify
a
few
few
properties
and
pick
them
up
ourselves.
So
I
don't
think
we
have
that
list
right
now.
J
I
certainly
don't
think
we
have
that
plan
because
part
of
this
we
need
to
do
a
few
other
things
to
put
in
place
like
the
commercial
loan
program.
Look
at
some
of
the
properties
and
then
specifically
reach
out
to
property
owners
to
see
even
what
the
interest
and
the
needs
are.
So
I
think,
as
we
look
at
all
those
things
and
come
back,
hopefully
the
priorities
will
start
identifying
themselves
as
part
of
that
process.
C
And
just
to
add
just
for
board
members
context,
to
the
extent
that
you
know
I
in
in
proceeding
on
this
program,
you
identify
that
you
know
the
need
is
five
or
six
million
dollars
in
the
annual
budget
or
budget
amendments.
The
board
can
always
adjust
the
amount
dedicated
to
this
program
right
there.
It
might
mean
shifting
funds
away
from
other
programs,
but
that
is
within
the
board's
purview
to
add
or
redirect
funding
into
this
program.
So
that's
an
option
too.
Just.
J
To
keep
in
mind
and
to
build
on
that
because
I
think
jen
that's
a
great
point,
we
could
also
combine
our
funding
too,
not
just
reallocate,
but
whether
we
identify
a
site
that
we
think
could
become
a
housing
site.
Then
obviously
we
can
stack
that
with
some
of
our
housing
funds.
So
just
I
think,
that's
a
very
great
point.
H
Thanks,
madam
chair,
so
I
I
mean
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
the
comments.
I
think
they're
all
good
ideas,
I'm
not
sure
if
I
have
one
that
I
feel
like
is
more
important
than
the
others,
but
the
one
I
do
have
questions
on
and
it
sounds
like
we'll
have
a
a
discussion
in
the
future
board
meeting,
but
the
commercial
loan
program
I
wouldn't
want
to.
H
I
want
to
be
really
clear
about
what
the
rda's
commercial
loan
program
is,
as
opposed
to
like
economic
developments,
business
loan
programs
and
how
are
they
similar
or
different,
and
is
it
do
we
inadvertently
create
the
same
situation?
We
had
with
hand
and
rda
with
there
were
substantially
similar
loan
programs
happening
at
different
parts
of
the
the
bigger
you
know
city.
So
I
guess
that'll
be
my
question
when
we
get
to
that
discussion
is
like.
Is
it
just
development
of
buildings
for
commercial
purposes?
H
A
And
I'm
going
to
add
to
that,
I
think
in
the
past.
In
my
experience,
what
was
difficult
for
some
of
them
is
because
we
had-
and
I
think
we've
evolved
and
I
think
we
have
better
like
what
you
got
like
applications
and
they're
easier
to
understand
now,
but
maybe
also
looking
into
that
when
we're
trying
to
loan
some
funds
to
people
that
might
not
be
accustomed
to
it
or
have
not
done
that
before
so
some
people,
you
know,
get
scared.
A
I
got
scared
when
I
had
to
do
my
first
loan
like
I,
it
was
too
complicated
in
my
hand.
I
had
a
husband
that
helped
me.
Thank
you
reagan.
If
he's
listening
like
held
my
hand,
you
know
to
do
this,
but
it
could
be
really
overwhelming
to
small
business
owner
to
go
through
a
process.
You
know
with
the
city.
So
that's
something
that
I
wish.
A
So
that's
when
we
intervene
with
rda
commercial
loans
or
facilitation
of
certain
things,
so
that
those
folks,
instead
of
when
they're,
growing
and
they're
doing
really
well,
instead
of
moving
on
to
other
cities,
they
could
stay
in
the
area
and
they
could
live,
and
you
know
live
work
and
play
where
they
live
close
by.
So
that's
another
way
to
to
distribute
these
funds
in
my,
in
my
opinion,
go
ahead.
Victoria.
C
I
do
love
us
establishing
a
presence
and
kind
of
a
standard
for
what
we
expect
with
that
folsom
corridor,
eventually
terminating
in
that
area,
and
I
really
do
love
that
we
would
take
that
opportunity
and
maybe
focus
there
where
the
the
stakes
are
marginally
lower.
But
we
have
a
chance
to
make
more
of
an
impact
with
them.
L
Madam
chair
yeah
go
ahead.
Amy
well,
hi
everyone,
I'm
not
on
the
camera,
but
thank
you
for
letting
I
mean,
plus
the
silver
lining
to
covet
is
this
that
I
get
to
be
here,
but
one
of
the
things
I
have
been
thinking
about
and
listening
to
this
and
when
I
reviewed
the
material
and
it's
just
the
policy
discussion
on
the
that
we've
had
with
our
housing,
which
is
the
the
sort
of
one-stop
shop
idea
right,
and
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to
make
that
happen
here
as
a
one-stop
shop
right.
L
Not
reinventing
the
will,
but
that
we're
not
overlapping
to
your
point,
chair,
chairpointman
baldomoros
is
like
that:
we're
not
overlapping
and
we're
not
creating
this
same
problems,
but
more
that
we're
making
sure
the
money
is
getting
spent
further,
and
so
that,
like
somebody,
could
go
to
the
edlf
and
get
a
loan
and
then
go
to
the
rda
and
get
a
loan
which
is
fine
and
great.
If
that's,
what
is
need
be
but
like?
How
are
we
tracking
that
and
how
are
we
making
sure
that
there's
not
like
double
dipping?
Does
that
make
sense?
A
Thanks,
I
thought
you
were
going
to
say:
rda
needs
to
do
all
of
the
numbing,
so
I
was
like
oh
no
they're
doing
the
housing,
they
have
a
lot
of
stuff,
but
no,
it
makes
sense.
I
mean
no,
I
can't
know
no,
no,
no,
it
makes
sense,
and
that
makes
sense.
That
was
more
mano's
comment
and
my
comment
was
more
about
making
it
easier
and
more
approachable.
H
Whereas
if
it
was
a
one-stop
shop,
then
at
least
it's
only
one
application
that
a
business
owner
has
to
deal
with
as
opposed
to
two
separate
ones.
So
I
think
those
actually
are
inherently
linked,
making
sure
that
our
processes
are
as
clear
and
as
simple
as
possible,
both
just
so
that
we're
not
duplicating
things
and
we're
being
efficient
with
staff
time,
but
so
that
the
public
has,
as
many
people
of
the
public
have
access
to
that
as
possible.
J
Yeah,
madam
chair,
I
think
if
it
it's
meaningful
to
the
board,
we'd
really
appreciate
a
strong
vote
again.
Just
the
purpose
of
this
is
to
get
direction
and
permission
from
you
that
we
can
utilize
and
look
at
these
opportunities
to
start
looking
at
the
funds.
Obviously
those
would
come
back
to
the
board
and
we
really
appreciate
the
comments
and
conversation
with
regard
to
the
commercial
loan
program
gives
us
a
good
little
preview
of
what
we're
working
on
and
we
can
start
incorporating
that
right
away
and
cara.
K
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
we
are
working
closely
with
economic
development
and
want
to
make
sure
that
what
we
establish
really
complements
their
programs
and
provide
materials
that
will
really
facilitate
the
process
for
people
who
come
to
the
city
and
are
looking
for
commercial
assistance.
So
that's
great,
so
we'll
continue
to
work
together
and
those
are
great.
Those
are
great
comments.
Thank
you.
F
K
K
F
Site
for
a
site,
okay
and,
and
so
so
the
goal
there
is
that
some
properties
that
will
not
otherwise
be
sold,
because
it's
a
lot
of
work
to
clean
them
up.
We
have
an
extra
tool
to
say:
well,
you
know.
Now
we
have
all
this
money,
we
can
buy
it
or
we
can
help
you
with
these
funds,
so
you
can
put
it
on
the
market.
Is
that
the
objective
there.
K
A
A
K
F
I
was
just
wondering
about
this
if
there
is
a
way
of
using
that
as
a
carrot,
I
guess
for-
and
I
guess
this
is
all
the
purpose
of
this
right,
but
maybe
reach
out
and
you
know,
go
knock
some
doors
and
find
through
the
titles
who
owns
them
and
said:
hey.
You
know,
you
know
you
have
an
opportunity
here
and
I
that
area
you
know
with
the
trains
and
all
this
industrial
work
that
was
done
there
for
probably
a
hundred
years.
I'm
sure
that
you
know
these
funds
could
be
very
beneficial.
A
H
J
H
C
And
just
practically
speaking,
every
annual
budget
discussion
is
kind
of
a
check-in
at
you
know
on
each
of
these
things,
because
that's
when
you
guys
ask
your
policy
questions
about
you
know,
how
are
we
using
these
funds?
Is
that
the
best
way
to
use
these
funds
do
we
want
to
move
funds
around?
So
I
think
that's
another
opportunity
to
kind
of
fine-tune
your
expectations
on
these
dollars
a
little
bit
more
too.
A
A
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
just
as
a
brief
introduction.
This
is
a
follow-up
to
the
proposed
fiscal
year,
2023
housing
development,
funding
strategy
that
you
began
to
hear
about
in
march,
and
it's
part
of
a
relatively
new
process
that
the
rda
board
is
following
through
the
budget
through
the
annual
adoption
process
to
clarify
the
board,
approve
that
board
approval
is
needed
for
both
the
amount
of
the
annual
rda
revenue,
that's
allocated
to
the
housing
funds,
and
it's
also
needed
for
the
specific
funding
allocations
among
housing
activities,
for
example,
emergency
gap,
financing
loans,
property
acquisition,
etc.
C
It
can
review
and
consider
each
specific
loan
project
actually
will
review
and
consider
each
specific
loan
project
proposal
before
any
any
specific
funding
is
approved
and
it
can
suspend
any
adopted
policies
under
special
circumstances
for
a
specific
project
proposal.
So
those
are
just
some
things
to
keep
in
mind.
As
these
two
explain
all
the
rest
to
you.
B
I
The
this
is,
I
like
the
policies,
of
course,
because
we're
the
ones
who
adopted
and
liked
it.
So
I'm
patting
ourselves
on
the
back
here,
but
I
appreciate
the
briefing
here
and
especially
on
you
know,
as
we
continue
to
talk,
family
housing
and
deeply
affordable
are
so
so
virally
important
to
the
city,
and
if
we
get
that
right
and
we
get
that
moving,
a
lot
of
things
will
fall
into
place,
and
so
I
appreciate
the
focus
on
those
two
and
making
sure
that
we
do
it
right.
I
B
So
the
primary
housing
collects
the
funds
that
are
required
to
be
allocated
to
housing
by
state
statute
17c.
So
within
each
project
area,
there's
a
certain
amount
of
funds
that
need
to
be
allocated
to
housing
and
that's
what
the
primary
housing
fund
collects
and
then
the
secondary
housing
is
kind
of
what
we
allocate.
In
addition
to
those
ma,
the
mandated
funds
is
that
right.
Do
they
get
that.
C
Right
goes
above
and
beyond:
what's
statutorily
required,
the
secondary
secondary
yeah,
so
essentially
there
there
are
four
buckets
that
the
rda
uses
to
collect
the
funds
from
different
sources
and
then
separately,
there's
the
allocation
or
the
decision,
the
board's
decision
on
priorities
on
how
to
spend
them.
So
that's
so
there's
sort
of
two
levels
to
this.
If
that's
helpful.
A
This
is
the
beauty
of
the
tools
that
the
city
has
to
try
to
help
with
a
problem,
a
social
problem
that
we
have
right
now,
I'm
grateful
for
the
administration
as
well
for
being
on
board
and
and
doing
this
and
putting
it
you
know
in
in
paper
and
hopefully
in
action
soon,
with
all
the
issues
that
we
have
with
housing
right
now.
So
I'm
proud
of
you
guys
for
putting
this
together
and
for
listening
to
us.
Thank
you.
I
don't
have
any
other
comments
on
this
jen.
C
I
A
A
J
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
We
just
have
one
quick
report
that
I
think
was
a
last
minute
edition.
We
want
to
embarrass,
I
mean
announce
the
hiring
of
austin
taylor,
who
is
our
most
recent
project
manager.
Austin
came
to
us
from
park
city
where
he
was
a
transportation
planner.
The
irony
there
is,
he
lives
within
a
five-minute
bike,
ride
from
work
now,
so
he
no
longer
has
to
commute
as
a
transportation
planner.
J
So
that's
great
prior
to
that.
He
was
with
planning
department
of
provost
city
and
the
director
of
development
for
bicycle
collective
in
provo
as
well.
So
he
is
currently
finishing
up
his
master's
degree
in
real
estate.
Development
at
the
university
of
utah
go
utes
and
we're
happy
to
have
them
on
board.
So.