►
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting please use this link https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
Therefore,
we
have
returned
to
only
virtual
public
meetings
to
help
reduce
the
transmission
of
covet
19..
The
board
will
return
with
hybrid
or
in-person
meetings
when
appropriate.
Thank
you
and
let's
move
on
to
our
first
agenda
item
and
we're
a
section
a.
We
start
our
rda
meetings
with
comments
to
the
board.
Your
feedback
is
always
welcomed.
B
We
are
accepting
your
comments
through
webex
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line.
I
want
to
mention
our
rules
of
the
column.
These
are
guidelines
to
help
to
help
our
meeting
progress
in
an
all
utterly
civil
efficient
way.
We
will
move
through
the
agenda
and
want
to
give
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
B
B
B
Sorry,
I
will
ask
that
you
be
muted
and
you
will
forfeit
your
opportunity
to
address
the
board
today
if
you're
not
able
to
complete
your
comments
this
afternoon,
you're
welcome
to
email
the
board
or
call
our
comment
line.
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
for
your
name
during
the
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
the
quorum.
B
If
you
register,
if
your
register
name
submit
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
use
the
chat
feature
to
gather
that
information
from
you,
taylor,
hill
from
our
staff,
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions
with
your
commenting.
Registration
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks.
Please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
meaningful
changes
to
your
registration.
B
Taylor
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
and
emulating
lines.
When
taylor
and
mutes
your
line
and
lets
you
know
it's
your
turn,
please
state
your
first
and
last
name
indicate
the
topic
you're
speaking
on
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two
minute
mark.
We
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
B
D
D
B
And
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
two,
which
is
the
election
for
vice
chair
person,
as
we
all
may
remember,
there
are
the
hrs
chair
serves
for
a
two-year
term,
but
the
vice
chair
serves
for
a
one-year
term.
So
today
we
have
this
item
to
select
a
new
rda
vice
chair.
I
will
begin
by
letting
anyone
who
is
interested
in
serving
or
any
war
member
who
would
like
to
nominate
someone
to
raise
those
names.
Now
after
we
identify
anyone
interested
in
serving.
C
B
Person
will
begin
a
moment
to
share
why
you're
interested
in
serving
as
vice
chair.
After
that
we
will
take
a
straw
poll.
Please
use
a
chat
feature
in
webex
to
let
taylor
the
host
know
who
you
vote,
for.
She
will
coordinate
behind
the
scenes
to
let
our
city
recorder,
know
and
cindy
liu
will
read
the
tally
allowed
for
public
record
okay.
I
will
now
open
discussions
forum
nominations.
B
F
E
Leadership
is
because
I
want
to
work
through
re-energizing,
neighborhoods
and
business
districts
for
economic
growth.
That
makes
sense,
and
it
understands
our
communities
and
also
adds
you
know,
neighborhood
vibrancy.
There's
a
lot
of
rda
districts
that
you
know
we
can.
You
know
re-energize
and
do
much
better.
I
know
the
rda
team
is
working
very
hard
with
your
leadership.
B
B
E
Thanks
for
everyone's
patience,
we
just
want
to
make
sure
we
have
them
all
recorded,
so
I
do
have
from
board
chair
baldomoros,
yes
to
elect
board
member
poi
board
member
pedro
eschler,
also
selected.
Yes,
for
the
nomination
of
board
member
boy
board,
member
poi
agreed
and
voted
for
himself.
Remember:
wharton
voted
yes
for
board
member
boy
board.
Member
mano
voted
yes
for
board
member
boy
and
board
member
dugan
voted
yes
for
board
member
boy.
Remember
fowler
is
absent.
B
Thank
you
so
much
cindy
for
doing
that,
and
congratulations
to
board
member
puy,
I'm
very
excited
to
work
with
you.
I'm
also
very
excited
to
work
with
board
member
dugan,
but
he
has
moved
on
for
other
leadership
and
I'm
very
excited
that
we
have
a
representation
from
the
west
side,
because
there
are
important
rda
areas
in
the
west
side
that
are
coming
online
or
they
have
been
online
and
we
need
to
put
additional
energy
to
that.
So
I'm
super
excited
for
this
advocate
that
I
just
gained.
B
That
represents
our
area,
so
we're
going
to
move
on
to
item
c3,
which
is
the
utah
open
meetings,
law,
training
and
government
records
access
and
management
act.
Wow,
that's
a
mouthful
for
just
grammar
or
a
grammar
request
like
a
lot
of
people
know-
and
this
is
a
little
bit
of
training
that
will
be
done
by
the
city's
attorney's
office
about
grandma
and
how
it
works
and
it
will
be-
and
this
briefing
will
serve
as
the
annual
trainings
for
both
the
council
and
the
world
of
directors
of
the
rda.
B
E
G
Hi
there
councilman
members
sitting
as
rda
board
members,
I'm
katie
lewis,
the
salt
lake
city
attorney
nice
to
see
you
all
today
and
we
thought
we
would
start
out
with
our
grandma
presentation,
which
is
the
open
records
act
for
the
state
of
utah.
And
then
we
will
do
our
open
meetings
act,
training
which
is
an
annual
requirement
as
board
member
voldemort
said
it
has
to
be
for
this
public
body
either
in
the
council
meeting
or
in
the
rda
meeting
and
this
year
it's
in
the
rda
meeting.
G
H
I
will
go
ahead
and
get
started
on
this
portion
of
it
see
if
you
could
go
back.
One
slide,
please
that'd
be
great,
so
my
name
is
keith
reynolds.
I'm
the
deputy
city
recorder
that
oversees
records
management
and
today,
I'm
here
just
to
give
a
quick
overview
of
grandma
and
a
few
statistics
and
numbers
from
2021..
H
That
stands
for
government
records,
access
management
act
and
is
a
mouthful.
It's
quite
a
lot.
It's
a
state
law
that
was
enacted
in
1991
and
it's
a
very
complex
balancing
act
between
the
public's
right
to
access
public
records,
our
requirement
to
protect
certain
records
and
the
desire
to
prevent
abuse
of
confidentiality.
H
So,
in
short,
virtually
everything
that
we
create,
while
conducting
city
business,
is
considered
a
record
to
move
to
the
next
slide.
Please
records
have
four
different
classifications,
but
we
typically
only
provide
public
records.
We
restrict
private,
controlled
and
protected
records
next
slide.
Please.
H
H
If
it's
not
already
available,
anyone
can
submit
a
grammar
request
by
by
clicking
that
top
right
blue
box
that
says,
submit
a
records
request
from
there.
The
requester
will
fill
out
an
online
form
and
the
request
will
be
routed
to
the
appropriate
department
to
be
filled.
You
can
move
to
the
next
slide.
Please
grandma's
very
specific
about
how
we
respond
to
public
records
requests.
H
H
Slide
shows
the
total
number
of
grammar
requests
the
city
received
over
the
last
six
years.
Last
year,
the
city
received
nearly
16
000
requests.
This
is
about
the
same
number
that
we
received
in
2019
and
about
800
more
than
we
received
in
2020.,
so
we've
had
sort
of
an
upward
slope
and
we
may
have
leveled
off
just
a
little
bit
next
slide.
Please,
the
slide
has
a
breakdown
of
how
those
requests
were
distributed
throughout
the
city
police
department
received
over
14
000
requests,
most
of
which
were
for
police
reports.
H
H
H
H
Go
to
the
next
slide.
Please
correspondence
is
almost
always
a
public
record
if
it
is
created
by
a
city
employee,
while
conducting
city
business,
the
format
is
less
important
than
the
content.
It's
important
to
note
that
the
city
just
recently
adopted
an
email
retention
policy
of
seven
years,
with
some
exceptions,
including
elected
officials.
H
J
Thanks
thanks
keith,
I
could
you
give
me
a
little
bit
of
clarification
on
the
policy
regarding
text
messages,
because
I
had
heard
some
different
information
in
the
past
that
those
are
transitory
documents
and
do
not
need
to
be
retained.
But
could
you
let
me
know
what
the
current
position
of
the
attorney's
office
is,
or
the
reporter's
office.
E
G
So
if
I'm
texting,
allison
and
saying
hey,
do
you
want
to
grab
some
late
lunch
after
this?
That's
that's
a
personal
communication
between
allison
and
me
and
it
can
be
deleted.
But
if
it's
a
text
that
says
hey
allison
in
your
open
meetings
that
presentation
today,
can
you
please
remember
to
touch
on
the
closed
meeting
exceptions?
G
Then
that's
the
public's
business
that
I
am
doing
with
her
and
that
should
be
retained.
So
it's
it
really
has
really
think
about
how
you're,
using
these
messaging
systems
and
remember
that
it
still
could
be
requested
and
it
could
still
be
considered
public.
I
I
hope,
that's
helpful
board
member
mono.
B
B
E
G
This
is
a
confusing
area
of
the
law,
and
the
the
the
baseline
rule
is
that
certain
types
of
messages
fall
within
a
longer
retention
schedule,
so
so,
for
instance,
policy
making
decision
making
fall
within
the
a
retention
schedule
that
need
to
be
retained
beyond
your
transitory,
probably
30-day
deletion
of
your
text
messages.
Now
I
am,
I
am
assuming
that
most
of
the
business
that
you're
doing
on
text
is
not
that
high
level
policy
making
decision.
It
really
is
more
transitory
messaging.
G
Like
hey,
you
know
what
are
you
doing
after
this
or
you
know
something
that,
even
if
it
is
the
public
having
to
do
with
your
meeting
or
your
business?
Currently
it
doesn't
have
that
that
retention
requirement
of
a
high-level
policy
making
message.
So
my
my
overarching
advice
to
all
of
you
today
in
this
meeting
is
think
about
how
you
use
text
messaging
and
if
you
are
doing
public
business,
that
is,
that
high
level
policy
making
decision
making
work
consider
doing
it
in
a
forum
that
is
either
more
easily
retained
or
in
this
public.
H
E
E
Thank
you,
katie
could,
I
add
something
about
our
internal
practice,
and
that
is
that
there's
there
are
times
when
we
as
staff,
send
out
information
to
the
council
and
we
alert
them
to
it
via
text,
but
often
times.
If
it
is
a
policy
issue
where
we're
explaining
some
information,
it
means
it's,
you
know
longer
and
it
isn't
like.
E
E
May
I
chime
in
I
just
want
to
add
one
level
to
the
definition
that
we're
using
with
correspondence,
there's
transitory
and
then
administrative,
which
is
what
I
think
you're
referring
to
cindy
the
administrative
level
is
business
related
correspondence
has
to
do
with
the
administration
of
city
functions
or
programs
or
like
referencing
the
email
to
review,
that
is,
that
is
city
business,
and
so
there
is
a
retention
on
it.
It's
less
than
tran,
it's
less
than
your
executive
correspondence,
which
is
the
one
that
is
retained
for
a
longer
period
of
time.
E
So
I
wanted
to
add
that
caveat.
I
understand
I'm
not
answering
your
questions
specifically
about
the
email
versus
the
text.
I
see
both
of
them
as
records
and
we
are
working
to
develop
a
method
to
assist
in
the
retention
of
them
because
everybody
has
a
cell
phone
and
everyone
is
managing
text
messages.
E
J
This
may
be
something
that
we
can.
I
can
receive
an
answer
on
later,
but
another
question
that
has
that
came
up
last
year,
going
through
an
election
cycle
was
inevitably
as
you're
campaigning
you're
talking
about
city
business,
because
the
people
you're
engaging
with
throughout
the
campaign
are
asking
you
about
city
business,
but
doing
so
through
the
sort
of
mechanism
of
a
campaign
communication.
J
How
do
we
determine-
and
I
understand
that
we
like-
cannot
use
city
tools
and
information
that
would
have
that
retention
kind
of
built
into
it
potentially
like
we
can't
use
city
computers
to
use,
can
do
campaign
emails?
How
do
we
manage
that
and
like
if
the
communication
was
started
as
a
campaign
with
the
with
the
intent
to
campaign
not
to
you
know,
decide
on
specific
policies,
but
that
constituent
asks
about
specific
policies?
Do
we
then
have
to
retain
it
in
both
places?
J
B
C
Thank
you
everyone,
so
I
my
name
is
alison
parks
and
I'm
a
senior
city
attorney
in
the
city
attorney's
office,
and
for
the
past
two
years
I've
been
serving
as
the
primary
counsel
for
the
rda,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
I'm
giving
you
this
presentation
since
we're
in
the
rda
board
meeting.
Let
me
make
sure
I'm
sharing
my
screen
with
you.
C
C
C
C
Some
other
examples
of
meetings
include
retreats
workshops
and
field
trips,
as
well
as
other
types
of
electronic
meetings.
So
you
know
think
about
if
you
are
convening
a
quorum
of
the
counselor
board
members
through
email
or
text
message
or
even
social
media.
If
you're
talking
about
things
that
you
have
jurisdiction
or
advisory
power.
Over
of
that
would
be
considered
a
meeting
under
open,
and
that
means
that
the
requirements
of
opmah
would
apply,
and
there
are
a
few
exceptions
under
opmah,
so
oma
doesn't
apply
to
chance
meetings
or
social
gatherings.
C
So,
for
example,
if
you
just
happen
to
run
into
a
quorum
of
council
members
at
the
dog
park-
and
you
start
talking
about-
and
if
you
just
happen
to
run
into
them,
the
requirements
of
opma
don't
apply.
But
if
you
start
talking
about
things
that
you
have
jurisdiction
or
advisory
power
over,
then
the
requirements
of
oatmeal
would
apply.
So
there
are.
These
know
that
there
are
these
exceptions,
but
they're
not
intended
to
circumvent
the
requirements
of
the
law.
So
transparency
is
key
here.
C
C
The
first
question
again
was
what
does
oatmeal
apply
to
and
it
applies
to
public
bodies,
and
the
second
question
was:
when
does
opa
apply?
It
applies
to
meetings
of
the
public
bodies
and
now
for
the
rest
of
the
presentation.
We'll
talk
about
the
requirements
of
oprah
so
again
requires
transparency
to
the
public,
and
how
do
we
achieve
that?
We
achieve
that
by
providing
notice
to
the
public.
C
C
C
And
the
agenda
has
to
open
details
that
the
agenda
has
to
give
enough
specificity
to
ensure
that
members
of
the
public
have
enough
information
to
know
what
will
be
discussed.
So,
for
example,
if
your
agenda
just
says
that
you're,
just
gonna
rezone
you're
gonna
talk
about
rezoning
property,
but
you
don't
provide
any
other
information
about
that.
If
I'm
seeing
that
agenda,
I
might
not
think
that
I'm
interested
in
going,
but
I
might
be
more
interested
if
the
agenda
said
that
they
were
talking
about.
C
C
C
So
opa
talks
about
two
different
kinds
of
electronic
meetings.
There
is
an
electronic
meeting
with
an
anchor
location
and
so
that
that
anchor
location
just
means
that
you're
providing
a
place
for
the
public
to
come
and
participate
in
the
electronic
meeting
and
then
there's
an
electronic
meeting
without
an
anchor
location,
which
is
the
meeting
that
we're
having
today
and
there
are
specific
requirements
under
opa
in
order
to
have
an
electronic
meeting
without
an
anchor
location
and
the
the
chair
of
the
body
has
to
make
a
determination
and
the
determinant.
C
So,
in
addition
to
those,
the
chair's
determination
also
has
to
give
a
summary
of
facts
upon
which
the
chair's
determination
is
made
and
how
a
member
of
the
public
can
attend
the
electronic
meeting.
So
that's
what
was
read
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
There
was
a
statement
saying
it
was
unsafe
to
have
an
electronic
meeting
and
noted
the
rising
number
of
coveted
cases
and
then
another
thing
to
note
too
about
this
determination.
C
But
what
you
should
know
is
that
there
are
written
meeting
minutes
of
open
meetings
and
a
recording
of
open
meetings,
and
then
there
are
recordings
of
closed
meetings
and
sometimes
written
minutes
of
closed
meetings,
and
there
are
some
exceptions
to
that.
But
just
know
generally,
there
are
meeting
records
of
each
meeting.
C
Okay,
so
let's
go
back
to
that
guiding
statement.
We've
talked
about
the
first
half
of
this
sentence,
and
so,
let's
move
on
to
the
second,
where
we're
talking
about
exceptions
that
allow
the
meaning
to
be
closed,
so
closed
meetings
can
be
held
only
to
discuss
specified
topics
and
so
here's
a
list
of
some
specified
topics.
I'm
not
going
to
read
through
these-
and
I
think
you
guys
are
generally
familiar
with
them.
C
So,
for
example,
if
you
close
the
meeting
to
talk
about
pending
litigation
regard
like
regarding
a
dog
park,
you
can't
also
discuss
in
that
same
closed
meeting
a
proposed
budget
amendment
to
set
more
money
aside
to
build
more
dog
parks.
That
discussion
would
have
to
happen
in
an
open
meeting,
and
I
think
that
example
is
like
pretty
simple,
and
I
know
it
can
get
a
little
bit
more
complicated
when
you
put
this
into
practice.
C
But
I
think,
what's
helpful,
is
to
remember
that
you
are
doing
the
public's
business
and
you
can
only
close
the
meeting
for
very
specific
topics,
and
you
can
only
talk
about
those
topics
in
the
closed
meeting
and
then
once
once,
it's
discussed
in
a
closed
meeting.
The
intention
is
for
that
discussion
to
be
confidential,
so
it's
important
to
continue
to
keep
that
confidential.
C
So
just
know
that
those
are
different
requirements
under
the
law
and,
as
I
mentioned
before,
people
in
the
public
can
comment
on
things
that
aren't
on
the
agenda
and
that
can
be
discussed
by
the
public
body
at
the
chair's
discretion.
But
again
you
can't
take
final
action
on
something
unless
it's
on
the
agenda.
C
I
I
really
like
this
gift,
because
I
think
this
really
highlights
the
principle
that
this
dog
is
purposefully
disrupting
this
guy's
push-ups,
and
he
can't
continue
to
do
these
push-ups
because
the
dog
is
in
the
way
so
that,
if
you
don't
remember
anything
else
about
willful
disruption,
remember
this
dog
in
the
push-ups
all
right.
So
the
last
thing
we're
going
to
touch
on
are
consequences
of
violating
the
act.
C
C
C
That's
my
presentation
and
I
I'll
open
it
up
to
questions
but
I'll
just
say
first
too.
In
addition
to
any
other
questions
you
guys
have
today,
the
city
attorney's
office
is
here
to
serve
you
and
help
you
navigate
these
laws.
So
please
reach
out
if
you
have
any
questions
or
concerns-
and
I
also
wanted
to
thank
you.
Thank
you
all
for
your
service
and
your
ongoing
commitment
to
serve
the
public.
B
B
No,
but
in
all
seriousness,
thank
you
for
training
us
it's
a
great
reminder
and
refresher
for
the
council
members
or
board
members.
I
have
been
in
this
position
for
a
couple
years
and
you
know
I
extend
the
invitation
to
victoria
and
nale.
If
you
this,
could
it's
a
lot
of
information?
It
could
be
very
confusing
and
it
also
the
confusion,
may
come
from
a
previous
notion
that
that
you
may
have
had
about
closed
sessions
about
open
act.
B
E
E
G
That's
all
that
needs
to
be
in
the
emotion
and-
and
the
purpose
of
that
is
often
the
the
specific
subject
matter
goes
to
the
confidential
confidentiality
of
what
the
board
or
the
council
is
going
to
talk
about.
So,
if
you
were
to
say,
I
moved
that
we
discussed
the
sale
of
451
south
state
street.
Oh
then
everyone
knows
where
what
that
piece
of
property
is
that
the
the
city
is
considering
selling.
That
is
a
fictional
motion,
because
that
would
be
the
city
county.
G
B
Right,
well,
I
don't
check
again,
I
don't
see
anybody
else.
Let
me
see
there,
you
know
you
didn't
okay,
so
I
think
this
is
great.
I
think
that
we're
about
nine
minutes
behind
me,
so
I
think
we
are
going
to
move
on.
I
appreciate
the
training
that
we've
had
today.
Thank
you
for
the
preparation
and
we
are
moving
on
to
item
number
c4,
which
is
a
resolution,
but
we'll
receive
a
briefing
and
consider
adopting
resolution
repealing
and
replacing
the
housing
allocation
funds
policy.
B
Our
the
staff
presented
the
basic
terms
for
a
west
side.
Community
initiative
program
to
award
back
in
september
of
2021
and
staff
has
incorporated
the
priorities
for
the
wci
into
the
housing
allocation
funds
policy,
along
with
other
amendments
that
address
broader
housing
goals
and
activities.
Once
again,
the
wci
is
a
website
community
initiative
and
at
the
table
we
have
alison
roland
from
our
office,
danny
walls.
They
are
the
aco
tracy
tran,
a
project
manager
at
the
rda
and
lauren
parisi
as
well.
A
project
manager
so
welcome.
I
I
This
is
a
policy
that
was
adopted
by
the
board
in
early
2021.
It
was
part
of
the
process
that
was
begun
way
back
in
2017
to
work
out
guidelines
for
the
different
housing
revenue
sources
that
are
funneled
into
the
rda.
There
are
four
basically
for
the
for
the
information
of
the
new
board
members.
There
are
four
housing
funds
right
now
in
the
rda
and
they're
defined
by
the
revenue
sources
of
each
one,
the
board's
policy
priorities
for
their
use,
annual
budgeting
processes
and
the
annual
reporting
requirements.
I
The
proposed
revisions
are,
as
the
chair
said
in
court,
are
designed
to
incorporate
the
west
side,
community
initiative
or
wci
into
the
housing
allocation
funds
policy,
and
there
are
some
other
revisions
sprinkled
in
there
that
relate
to
broader
aspects
of
the
policy.
Like
providing
additional
definitions,
references
clarifications,
the
redevelopment
advisory
committee,
iraq
was
briefed
on
these
proposed
revisions
on
january
5th,
and
rda
staff
will
present
any
feedback
from
the
rack
during
their
briefing
on
this
topic.
I
I
do
want
to
note
that
the
board
doesn't
need
to
adopt
this
policy
today.
It
doesn't
need
to
act
on
it
at
all.
The
goal
here
is
to
identify
any
potential
adjustments
prior
to
adoption.
At
the
february
meeting,
the
policy
questions
I'll
go
over
very
quickly
include
one
that
goes
to
the
to
some
options,
to
the
specific
wording
of
the
proposed
first
wci
polity
policy
priorities
and
whether
the
board
might
want
to
include
some
explicit
references
to
equity
and
historical
practices
that
have
disadvantaged
west
side
residents.
I
The
second
is
whether
the
board
wants
to
know
more
from
the
administration
about
the
progress
in
broader
efforts
to
establish
and
measure
city
opportunity
indicators.
This
is
something
just
parenthetically
I'll
add.
We've
seen
come
up
in
a
number
of
different
policy
proposals
that
the
measure
or
the
metric
will
be
progress
in
the
opportunity
indicators.
I
But
it's
important
to
to
keep
in
mind
that
right
now,
these
opportunity
indicators
as
they
exist
at
a
county
level,
estate
level
actually
from
a
an
organization
called
opportunity
index
or
something
like
that,
but
we
don't
have
them
available
at
the
city
scale
or
on
an
annual
basis.
So
this
is
obviously
a
work
in
progress.
I
The
third
policy
question
is
whether
the
board
wants
to
ask
about
the
new
rda
data
manager
position,
who
presumably
will
have
some
some
role
in
updating
these
opportunity
indicators
and
finally,
the
fourth
question
is
about
reporting
requirements
and
whether
the
board
would
like
to
explicitly
incorporate
a
cumulative
accounting
of
programs
and
projects,
as
well
as
the
annual
account.
This
may
be
something
that
the
rda
was
already
planning
to
do,
but
it
isn't
listed
in
the
policy,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
flag
that.
So
I
will
leave
the
rest
to
danny
and
tracy.
F
Thank
you,
allison.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
and
congratulations
to
newly
elected
vice
chairperson.
We
look
forward
to
working
with
you
and
so
on
behalf
of
the
mayor
and
the
rest
of
the
agency
staff.
We
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
present
this
policy
to
you
and
the
discussion
for
the
west
side
community
initiative,
as
both
chairperson,
baltimore's
and
allison
stated.
This
is
essentially
the
the
next
step
in
the
evolution
of
what
began
as
the
discussion
on
the
west
side
community
initiative.
F
I
have
a
brief
presentation,
if
that's
all
right,
if
we,
if
it's
possible
to
get
that
teed
up
that
was
sent
earlier
perfect.
Thank
you.
Taylor
appreciate
that,
and
this
will
hopefully
explain
how
we
went
from
that
initial
conversation
on
the
westside
initiative
to
what
is
before
you
today
for
your
consideration,
which
is
titled
as
the
repeal
and
replacement
of
our
housing
allocation
funds
policy.
Next
slide,
please.
F
F
F
The
main
platform
to
carry
this
out
would
be
mixed-use
developments
that
could
incorporate
both
market
rate
units
and
subsidized
units
of
both
residential
and
commercial
uses
and
as
the
project
and
the
activities
were
undertaken.
Any
revenue
that
was
received
by
utilization
of
the
funds
would
then
be
held
within
the
fund
and
continue
to
grow
it,
and
then
the
last
piece
was
board
directed
staff
to
include
metrics.
That
would
demonstrate
that
the
funds
are
being
used
to
accomplish
both
the
state
and
city
goals.
F
So
this
is
a
chart
that
was
part
of
that
initial
briefing
back
in
september,
and
this
was
as
part
of
that
discussion
laying
out
what
the
direction
from
the
board
was.
What
we
we
indicated
would
be
the
purpose
what
we
incorporated
as
those
goals
that
I
just
went
through
and
then
within
the
funding
sources
that
identified
what
those
incoming
sources
would
be,
starting
with
the
inland
port
housing
differential,
any
other
sources
that
the
board
may
allocate
from
the
agency
and
then
obviously
any
potential
for
revenue.
F
It's
important
to
note
here
that
it
was
within
those
activities
and
the
the
description
of
the
goals
as
we
started
crafting
the
program
that
we
realized
a
lot
of
what
we
were
setting
up
as
part
of
a
separate
program.
Either
was
already
pointing
to
components
of
the
allocation
funds,
policy
or
other
programs
and
policies
that
the
agency
has
and
then,
additionally,
that
some
of
those
goals
probably
should
apply
and
be
mentioned
as
part
of
those
funds.
F
So
it
was
essentially
the
work
of
of
staff,
and
I
also
want
to
commend
allison
parks
within
the
attorney's
office
and
her
involvement,
as
we
were,
structuring
that
it
seemed
to
make
more
sense
to
incorporate
those
goals
within
the
housing
allocation
funds
policy,
broaden.
What
some
of
that
scope
is
within
that
policy,
and
it
also
allowed
us
to
specify
what
those
priorities
would
be
for
the
west
side.
Community
initiative
next
slide.
Please.
F
So,
there's
a
little
bit
more
explanation
on
what
allison
indicated
and
how
this
evolved
from
its
own
policy
to
being
incorporated
as
part
of
this
larger
policy
and
program
and
helps
to
describe
a
little
bit
of
what
the
housing
allocation
funds
policy
is.
This
was
adopted
by
the
board
back
in
february
of
2021,
and
it
establishes
the
high
level
guidelines
for
the
allocating
and
directing
of
resources,
I.e
the
housing
funds
within
the
agency
for
the
development
and
preservation
of
housing.
F
So
the
primary
and
how
the
primary
housing
fund
and
the
secondary
housing
fund
deal
entirely
with
the
tax
increment
that
the
agency
receives
from
our
project
areas.
The
difference
between
those
two
is
that
the
primary
housing
fund
is
what
is
what
we
are
statutorily
required
to
allocate
from
our
project
areas
as
that
minimum
amount
of
tax
increment
we
receive
and
what
has
to
go
towards
the
development
of
housing.
F
The
secondary
housing
fund
deals
with
project
areas
that
either
do
not
have
that
statutory
requirement
or
includes
amounts.
Over
and
above
what
those
minimum
requirements
are,
and
so
within
state
statute,
it
states
that
we
are
required
to
set
up
and
establish
those
two
separate
housing
funds,
and
this
provides
for
better
transparency
and
accountability
of
making
sure
that
we're
meeting
those
requirements
where
those
funds
go
and
then
obviously
any
recycling
of
those
funds
continues
to
be
held
in
those
accounts.
F
The
northwest
quadrant
housing
fund
is
what
was
always
originally
proposed
as
part
of
this
program
to
be
renamed
the
west
side,
community
initiative
and
we'll
get
into
the
changes
to
that
in
the
next
few
slides,
and
then
the
housing
development
fund
is
the
fourth
fund
that
would
essentially
receive
and
collect
any
other
additional
housing
revenue
that
the
agency
receives.
The
primary
source
of
this
right
now
is
the
city
sales
tax
dollars
under
the
funding.
F
Our
future
program,
which
is
allocated
from
the
city
to
the
agency
for
the
development
of
affordable
housing,
the
other
component
of
the
housing
allocation
funds
policy,
that's
important
to
note
is
that
it
requires
an
annual
housing
development
funding
strategy.
That
staff
presents
to
the
board
and
within
this
strategy,
is
where
we
project
the
upcoming
revenues,
as
well
as
propose
the
funding
priorities
by
the
mayor
as
part
of
the
agency
budget.
That
is
for
consideration
by
you
as
the
board
for
the
upcoming
year.
F
F
So
the
next
few
slides
go
into
the
details
that
we
provided
both
within
the
redline
version
of
the
policy
in
our
memo,
as
well
as
within
our
memo.
So
I
won't
go
too
much
into
this,
but
I'll
go
over
them
briefly.
So
you
understand
the
first
four
are
what
we're
proposing
as
revisions
to
the
policy
at
that
broader
level,
that
we
felt
that,
as
we
kind
of
expand,
that
definition
and
incorporate
the
west
side
community
initiative,
some
of
those
goals
and
objectives
and
changes
applied
to
the
policy
as
a
whole.
F
First
and
foremost,
is
simply
changing
the
scope
section
to
the
purpose
to
contain
an
additional
statement
on
leveraging
resources
and
incorporating
a
higher
level
of
public
benefits.
We
felt
this
was
a
good
change
to
make
as
it
further
aligned
with
our
own
mission
and
guiding
framework.
Second
change
was
within
the
housing
fund's
descriptions.
Again.
This
is
really
just
expanding
and
changing
the
description
within
those
housing
funds
of
what
was
previously
in
the
recitals
of
the
policy
and
putting
a
lot
of
those
references
to
the
state
statute.
F
The
city's
housing
plan,
our
goals
for
project
area
development
and
putting
that,
within
those
specific
descriptions
of
the
funds
themselves,
next
slide.
Please
the
next
change
deals
with
the
housing
activities
and
within
the
housing
funds
descriptions,
as
well
as
that
funding
strategy
section,
making
the
reference
to
the
housing
activities
a
little
bit
more
general
in
nature,
rather
than
within
each
of
those
sections
providing
detailed
lists
of
activities.
F
The
point
being
here
is
that
the
agency
overall
is
already
authorized
to
do
that
whole
wide
list
of
housing
activities,
and
so
it
did
not
make
sense
to
try
to
specifically
call
those
out
within
the
housing
funds
as
much
as
just
refer
to
the
state
statute
that
provides
that
opportunity
to
do
all
of
those
activities
and
have
it
be
governed
by
the
specific
sections
of
state
statute,
so
number
four,
the
reporting
requirements
again.
This
is
that
annual
funding
strategy,
rather
than
being
a
separate
report.
F
F
So
the
first
is
really
just
that
high
level
goal
of
the
board,
which
is
to
make
sure
that
the
funds
are
being
used
to
address
the
development
activities
and
its
impact
on
the
west
side,
as
well
as
increase
the
opportunity
on
the
west
side.
A
primary
function
of
this
is
directed
by
the
board
is
for
home
ownership,
but
also
looking
at
other
ways
that
we
can
have
a
larger
impact
on
the
west
side
and
promote
development
in
a
way
that
is
a
benefit
to
the
community
and
the
residents.
F
F
Then
obviously,
one
of
the
biggest
components
of
it
is
to
utilize
these
funds,
in
an
alignment
with
the
city
study,
going
on
right
now
to
mitigate
gentrification
and
displacement
on
the
west
side
and
use
that
as
a
way
that
we
can
hopefully
offset
what
we're
already
seeing
on
the
west
side
and
a
lot
of
the
real
estate
trends
as
a
way
to
benefit
low
and
moderate
income
households
as
part
of
the
priority
for
the
program
next
slide.
Please.
F
And
then
the
final
two
priorities
and
direction
from
the
board
is
to
provide
opportunities
to
build
wealth
through
homeownership
and
then
what
will
be
coming
to
you
as
a
board.
Also,
as
we
look
to
expand
the
agency
activities
to
incorporate
a
shared
equity
model
of
development,
so
obviously
through
home
ownership,
we
can
help
residents
build
wealth
through
the
value
of
owning
the
home,
but
also
look
at
ways
that
we
can
do
projects
to
where.
F
If
there
isn't
home
ownership,
we
can
still
look
at
incorporating
a
model
of
shared
equity
so
that
the
residents
of
those
projects
can
also
build
wealth
as
part
of
even
a
rental
project.
So
this
will
come
to
you
as
a
board
in
the
future,
as
we
look
at
this
and
how
we
as
an
agency,
want
to
incorporate
that.
F
F
Inversion
of
this
policy
we
would
receive,
and
then,
if
the
board
does
not
want
to
approve
it
today,
then
we
would
return
with
those
changes
incorporated
in
the
policy
at
our
march
meeting
and
ask
for
approval
at
that
time,
and
then
we
will
start
working
even
deeper
on
what
those
shared
models
of
of
equity
development
would
be
and
bring
those
back
to
the
board
for
discussion
and
approval.
At
a
future
date
next
slide,
and
I
believe
that's
where
we're
at.
As
far
as
any
questions
we're
happy
to
answer.
B
J
So
how?
How
can
we
do
that
rather
than
just
say?
This
is
great:
we're
going
to
build
this
affordable
home
ownership
model
on
the
west
side,
but
really
all
the
people
that
end
up
going
there
end
up
being
from
outside
of
the
west
side
or
outside
of
the
city
or
or
even
outside
of
the
state,
and
then
it
it
becomes
a
tool.
It
starts
to
gentrify
the
neighborhood
rather
than
stopping
gentrification,
which
is
one
of
the
goals
like.
Is
that
even
legal,
I'm
sure
there's
hud
guidelines?
J
That
would
say
you
can't
like
choose
who
you're
going
to
rent
and
rent
an
apartment
to,
but
can
you
prioritize
people
that
are
embedded
in
a
community
in
some
way?
I
know
there
are
some
models
where
it's
like
prioritizing
veterans
or
prioritizing
elderly
or
whatever,
with
with
certain
affordable
housing
projects.
How?
J
F
That
would
be
where
we
could
place
those
priorities
on
the
funding,
the
types
of
activities
and
have
more
information
for
you
of
how
we
would
really
carry
that
through
into
the
level
of
of
what
that
end,
user
and
buyer
would
be.
There
are
some
models
out
there
of
people
who
have
done
it
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
how
they've
structured
it
and
to
what
extent
either.
We
would
need
to
do
that
to
to
be
legal
both
within
you
know,
federal
or
state
or
even
our
own
city
city
guidelines.
So.
J
If
the
rda
the
agency
is
holding
on
to
owning
the
property
and
holding
on
to
the
land,
then
we
would,
if
we
were
to
empower
a
non-profit
that
is
already
embedded
in
a
group
in
a
community
to
be
the
developer
of
the
project.
If
assuming
they
have
the
goals
that
that
align
with
our
values
as
a
community
and
as
a
city
like.
Are
there
different
laws
that
an
rda
or
a
city
would
have
if
we
have
an
actual
equity
ownership
piece
than
if
we
empower
a
non-profit
to
be
that
that
long-term
equity
holder?
F
Yeah,
it's
it's
a
combination
of
what
our
specific
requirements
would
be,
either
as
a
city
or
an
agency.
What
we
have
to
follow.
It's
a
function
of
also,
sometimes
what
the
requirements
are
for,
whatever
funding
sources
there
would
be,
regardless
of
who
the
developer
owner
is,
and
then
it's
also
balancing
act
with.
How
do
you
continue
to
enforce
that
restriction
beyond
what
may
or
may
not
be
our
initial
role
in
the
project,
either
through
the
land,
use,
restrictions,
etc?
So
definitely
something
we
want
to
provide.
F
It's
definitely
something
that
we
want
to
prioritize
as
far
as
how
to
make
sure
that,
if
we're
doing
that
and
and
the
home
ownership
and
those
opportunities,
it
is
first
and
foremost
a
benefit
to
those
either
already
living
in
the
area
or
those
who
may
have
already
been
displaced
from
the
area
and
want
to
come
back.
So
we
will
we'll
try
to
figure
out
how
to
do
that
and
bring
that
back
to
you
as
either
a
priority
or
a
function
of
the
activities
that
we
do.
B
So
I
have
a
few
questions
and
comments.
I
think
parts
of
the
puzzle
at
least
I
know
other
other
models
out
there
and
other
non-profits
that
work
darren
is
looking
at
the
looking
at
the
income
levels
right,
so
he
doesn't
have
to
be
extremely
low.
I
mean
it
could
be,
there's
a
lot
of
folks
that
might
be.
You
know
in
that
section
that
it's
too
high
for
certain
things
or
too
low
for
a
traditional
loan
right
to
own
to
own
a
home.
B
So
I
think
that's
part
of
the
puzzle
that
it's
possible
that
then
it
happens
where
we
folk
some
non-profits
focus
on
that
where
a
traditional
bank
wouldn't
loan
to
them,
but
they
would
and-
and
so
that's
one
piece.
The
second
piece
that
I
know
of
is
before
they
can
sell
that
proprio
they
have
to
be
owner
occupied,
for
I
don't
know
five
ten
years,
fifteen
twenty
five
years-
I
don't
remember,
I
think,
that's
how
some
models
work
where
it
has
to
be.
B
You
know
owner
occupied,
so
the
person
that
was
given
that
loan
to
own
that
home
has
to
stay
for
a
while,
meaning
they
have
to
be
vested
in
that
community
and
has
to
be
vested
for
that.
For
that
wealth,
I
guess
building
if
you
will.
So
those
are
the
two
things
that
I
that
I'm
familiar
with,
but
I'm
not
sure
about
the
specifics,
like
specific
from
the
west
side
neighbors
that
have
been
displaced
or
that
live
there
if
we
can
put
that
into
our
requirements.
B
B
It
is
and
then
be
able
to
to
own.
For
you
know
for
a
few
years
and
build
wealth
that
way
they
don't
have
to
move
out
of
salt
lake
city.
They
can
actually
live
in
salt
lake,
then
the
second.
I
have
three
things
so
in
terms
of
their
their
requirements.
I
also
was
hoping
that
we
could
add
a
percentage
of
this
home
ownership
or
affordable
rentals
to
our
first
responders,
basically
fire
and
and
and
police
department,
and
also
teachers
that
live
in
salt
lake
city
that
work
in
salt
lake
city.
E
We've
had
the
sorry
board
chair
really
quickly.
We
have
had
the
attorney's
office
look
at
that
idea
previously
and
there
were
some
limitations
just
from
a
fair
housing
standpoint.
There
are
other
programs
that
can
provide
financial
assistance
to
those
employees,
but
obviously
it's
hard
to
make
the
dollars
go
very
far.
Right.
B
Okay
well
good
to
know
and
then
danny.
I
would
like
to
understand.
Well
maybe
we'll
have
that
meeting
later,
but
can
you
just
explain
just
to
clarify
exactly
what
shared
equity
is?
I'm
not
understanding
that
concept?
I
know
the
affordable
home
ownership
and
then
keeping
some
of
the
equity
or
sorry
yeah,
and
then
the
the
proper
owner
is
taking
some
of
the
equity
about
the
shirt
equity.
Is
that
what
we're
talking
about
exactly
or.
E
So
as
we
do
this,
particularly
on
the
west
side,
which
has
historically
been
such
a
family
heavy
community,
I
would
really
like
us
to
have
an
eye
towards
how
do
we
quickly
efficiently
and
strategically
gather
data
about
the
actual
housing
stock
need
and
return
that
into
this
community
land
trust
model
so
that
it
can
help
build
equity.
But
you
know
not,
supposing
that
we
would
do
this,
but
we
have
a
preponderance
of
studio
and
one
bedrooms
a
few
two
bedrooms
scattered
here
and
there
and
you
know,
I'm
an
import
who's
already.
E
Try
me
on
that
great
point
board
member
peter
wreschler,
and
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
have
nick
norris,
who
isn't
a
part
of
rda
meetings,
typically
speak
to
all
the
research
that
was
done
on
housing
stock
needs
and
what
our
intentions
are
on
the
diversity
of
that
through
our
housing
plan,
because
that
happened
now
several
years
ago.
But
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
kind
of
reorient
our
the
conversation
with
the
rda
work
with
all
that
planning
data.
That's
there,
so
I
won't
put
nick
on
the
spot.
E
B
Thanks
mayor
and
yeah,
we
will
take
you
up
on
that,
we'll
we'll
talk
to
nick,
at
least
I
will
victoria.
Maybe
we
can
schedule
a
meeting
with
him
and
and
see
where
we're
at
and
what
he's
gathered
and
what
is
needed.
Obviously,
I
think
no
anecdotally,
but
also
with
the
numbers
that
you've
mentioned
what
has
been
approved.
It
is
that
that
we
are
moving
way.
The
pendulum
is
moving
way
to
the
side
with
its
studio,
one
bedroom,
maybe
two
bedrooms,
and
we
need
more
diversity
than
that.
B
I
think
previous
vice
chair
and
I
last
year
and
this
year
we
talked
about
that.
We
that
we
wanted
to
be
a
priority
when
we
do
give
loans
out
for
new
development,
that
it
is
that
we
start
prioritizing.
Those
are
we
call
it
family
sized
apartments-
hopefully
condos.
Hopefully
you
know,
but
if
anything
family-sized
apartments
you
know
and
start
talking
to
develop
the
developers
how
their
development
work.
E
Thank
you.
It
would
be
really
interesting
too,
to
find
strategic
ways
to
keep.
We
have
good
data.
We
have
amazing
people
at
the
city.
Doing
good
work
it'd,
be
amazing
to
find
ways
to
keep
that
data
at
the
forefront
as
we're
making
decisions
going
through
this
at
every
step,
so
that
we
don't
it
the
last.
B
B
Dumb,
so
we're
going
to
move
on
to
item
c5
for
those
that
are
watching,
which
is
an
informational
item
and
we'll
receive
a
verbal
update
from
rda
staff
on
the
process
to
create
the
state
street
and
research
park,
project
areas
and
at
the
table
we
have
danny
walls
and
danny
walls.
That's
it
danny.
Welcome
back.
F
Welcome
back
is
great.
Thank
you
again,
madam
chair.
At
the
request
of
the
board,
we
wanted
to
provide
a
quick
update
on
two
of
our
project
area
creation
processes
going
on
right
now.
First
is
the
state
street
project
area
which
has
been
going
on
for
quite
a
while.
A
quick
update
on
that
agency
staff
is
continuing
to
work
with
the
staff
with
salt
lake
county
within
their
economic
development
department.
F
F
Second
item
is
with
regard
to
research
park.
We
are
continuing
to
work
with
the
staff
at
the
university
and
the
research
park
group
on
several
aspects.
We
as
an
agency.
Our
next
step
is
to
select
and
engage
a
consultant
to
do
what
our
role
would
be.
Is
the
community
reinvestment
project
area
plan,
as
the
university
has
been
wrapping
up
their
community
engagement
for
their
initial
strategic
vision?
They
will
continue
to
work
through
their
process
and
will
continue
to
coordinate
with
the
community
councils
as
they
look
at
finalizing.
F
We
will
take
what
they
initially
did
as
their
strategic
vision,
and
we
will
incorporate
parts
of
that
as
the
basis
for
our
community
reinvestment
plan,
while
at
the
same
time
we
will
also
put
in
that
plan
what
our
priorities
are
for
either
justification
to
determine
if
agency
involvement
is
needed,
as
well
as
what
the
components
and
requirements
will
be
tied
to
that
participation
from
the
agency.
So
that
will
be
everything
from
coordinating
that
with
the
city's
goals
and
master
plan
objectives
with
what
the
university's
plans
are
for
development
for
research
park.
F
So
we
don't
know
exactly
what
the
timeline
is
for
that
we
don't
know
how,
where
that
is
specifically
in
the
process
with
the
federal
government.
But
we
know
that
the!
U
is
is
optimistic
that
that
can
hopefully
be
done
by
june,
so
our
next
steps
will
be
to
get
into
the
details
of
that
plan
and
then,
as
we
do,
that
that's
when
we
will
start
bringing
that
to
you
as
a
board
for
input
and
discussion
and
updates.
So
that
is
what
we
have
for
that.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
J
Ahead,
I
guess
I'm
I've
had
a
lot
of
constituents.
Ask
me
about
the
state
street
project
area
and
it
sounds
like
the
updates
are
that
we're
still
trying
to
work
on
it
and
that
we've
been
doing
that
for
a
couple
years
and
I'm
not
sure
what
to
tell
my
constituents
that
we're
actually
doing
or
how
they
can
help
or
how
I
can
help
in
terms
of
actually
getting
state
street
project
off
the
ground.
J
That's
my
first
question:
what
can
I
do?
What
can
constituents
do?
The
second
question
is:
if
the
county
never
approves
it,
what
does
that
look
like
in
terms
of
how
we,
what
activities
we
will
be
doing?
Obviously,
it's
just
quite
a
bit
less
tax
increment,
but
it's
my
understanding
is
that
it's
still
a
project
area
and
we
can
still
do
the
same
types
of
activities
that
we
would
have
done
just
with
less
money.
J
So
can
you
answer
those
two
questions
a?
How
can
we
help
get
that
moving
and
be
if
it
never
gets
approved?
What
does
that
look
like
and
what
can
what
can
our
constituent?
What
can
my
constituents
expect
to
see
happening
on
the
ground
in
the
state
street
project
area
in
either
situation?
Even
if
it
is
approved
like
what,
then,
what
do
we
do.
F
Great
questions,
thank
you,
director,
mono,
and,
if
it's
all
right,
I'm
going
to
take
those
in
reverse
order,
first
and
foremost,
to
clarify
that.
Yes,
you
as
an
agency
board
and
a
city
council,
have
adopted
the
state
street
project
area.
Furthermore,
both
as
an
agency
board
and
a
city
council,
you
have
approved
the
interlocal
agreements
authorizing
the
collection
of
tax
increment
from
salt
lake
city
and
the
school
district.
F
So
our
discussions
right
now
with
the
county
is
to
do
exactly
what
you
said
is
to
then
request
and
have
the
county
authorized
participation
through
their
portion
of
tax
increment,
so
to
the
extent
that
the
county
does
not
participate.
As
you
indicated,
what
that
essentially
does
is
it
reduces
the
amount
of
available
tax
increment
for
the
activities
that
we
have
proposed
within
that
plan,
so
of
a
project
area
budget
that
right
now
is
anticipated
to
hopefully
be
over
100
million.
F
The
county's
portion
of
that
is
a
little
bit
over
18
million
over
20
years,
so
that
would
if
they
do
not
participate
or
limit
their
level
of
participation
that
simply
reduces
that
overall
project
area
budget
and
the
amount
that's
available
for
those
activities
to
your
question
a
as
far
as
what
you
or
residents
can
do.
I
would
encourage
at
this
point,
as
it
is
now
moving
towards
their
internal
review
and
recommendation
by
their
ad
hoc
committee
to
both
the
county
mayor
and
the
county
council.
F
For
that
and
then
utilizing
funds
for
the
impact
of
the
homeless
resource
centers
and
providing
funding
to
mitigate
the
impact
of
that,
as
well
as
other
distressed
properties
throughout
the
the
project
area.
So
anything
people
can
do
to
reach
out
and
garner
support
from
the
county.
Elected
officials
for
their
involvement
in
the
plan
would
be
great.
J
J
Yes,
so,
okay,
great,
and
maybe
that
maybe
I
can
request
this
in
a
small
group.
But
I'd
love
to
look
at
the
projections
like
over
the
20
years,
when
we
expect
to
get
all
those
how,
since
we've
created
it,
how
much
have
we
actually
received
and
then
what's
the
appropriate
time
for
us
as
a
board,
to
weigh
in
on
of
all
the
priorities
that
we
have
in
that
project
area
which
ones?
J
How
do
we
want
to
divvy
up
that
100
million
dollars
of
worth
of
activities
like?
Is
that
something
we
should
request
of
the
chair
to
have
as
a
standalone
item
on
the
agenda
or
what's
the
best
way,
to
engage
in
that
discussion,
so
that
it's
not
just
sort
of
the
first
project
that
shows
up,
takes
all
the
money
and
then
we're
waiting
for
increment
to
grow?
And
then
the
next
project
that
comes
takes
the
rest
of
the
money
like.
J
How
can
we
have
more
of
a
strategic
discussion
of
what
would
actually
be
the
most
impactful
and
what
things
only
the
rda
would
do
and
the
private
development
developers
wouldn't
do
like
you
know.
There
may
be
some
things
that
we
want
to
encourage,
but
they
may
happen
anyway,
but
there's
other
things
that
would
be
really
beneficial
in
that
in
the
state
street
corridor
that
we're
probably
the
only
group
that
would
do
so.
Love
to
be
able
to
have
that
engage
in
that
discussion.
B
J
B
Sorry
danny,
I
do
like
that
idea.
Director
mano,
I
think,
and-
and
I
was
going
to
ask
danny
to
to
kind
of
give
us
an
overview
of.
What's
happened
to
you
know
the
areas
more
recent
areas,
but
the
ones
that
we
did
not
create,
how
you
know
how
us
meaning
the
current
elected
officials
to
tell
us
how
they
they're
the
one
about
you
know
deciding
what
projects
go
first
and
if
we
haven't
done
that,
maybe
it
is
an
opportunity
to
start.
F
Oh
thank
thank
you
man,
I'm
sure
sorry
for
interrupting.
If
you
recall
a
couple
months
ago,
rda
staff
presented
what
we
administratively
and
and
within
our
office,
utilizes
the
project
area
implementation
plan,
and
that
is
just
simply
where
we
take
that
community
reinvestment
plan
that's
originally
created
for
the
project
area.
F
So
you
will.
This
will
be
the
first
year
sorry
to
go
on.
This
will
be
the
first
year
you
do
that
for
both
the
nine
line
and
the
state
street
project
areas,
as
this
will
be
the
first
year
that
we
come
to
you
with
budgets,
specifically
for
those
two
new
project
areas.
So
that
explains
why
you
haven't
had
those
conversations
yet
sorry.
B
I
think
that
originally
was
we're
going
to
give
you
this
land
so
that
you
can
do
research
sciences
etc,
but
we're
going
to
limit
that.
To
that
we
don't
we
not
necessarily
want
more
housing
or
more
commercial
or
anything
like
that
and
that's
kind
of
like
in
their
when
when
that
contract
or
when
that
land
was
granted.
That
was
a
rule.
I
guess,
if
you
will
so
this
is
something
new
that
we
weren't
aware
of.
I
don't
think
they,
maybe
that
you
was
aware
of
or
the
audacious
foundation,
I'm
not
sure.
B
B
B
They
asked
us
the
city,
the
rda,
to
start
looking
at
participating
as
well
separately,
to
see
if
we
could
do
a
cra
with
them
and
then
today,
which
we
haven't
done
anything
yet
necessarily.
Today
we
are
kind
of
in
limbo
to
me,
because
we
don't
know
if
that
federal
rule
will
pass
or
not.
If
it's
a
for
sure
thing,
I
don't
even
know
what
the
timeline
is
or
the
process,
and
so
the
you
doesn't
know.
B
B
We
select
a
consultant
to
go
and
see
the
possibilities
of
a
cra,
or
do
we
go
with
it
and
you
know,
and
and
and
hopefully
you
know
whatever
the
results
of
that
we'll
have
it
in
if
you
know
in
a
few
months
or
whatever,
and
hopefully
it
matches
with
with
what
the
eu
wants
to
do
and
it's
something
that
we
want
to
do
overall.
But
I
think
to
me
those
are
the
uncertainties
that
I
don't
know,
and
I
don't
know
how
the
word
feels
about
all
of
this.
B
So
if
that's
confusing
or
if
you
guys
haven't
thought
about
it
or
or
if
you
guys
don't
feel
like
talking
about
it,
we
can
we
can
discuss
as
in
small
group
meetings
and
regardless.
I
think
we
wanted
to.
I
wanted
to
invite
danny
to
come
back
in
in
a
month
or
in
or
in
two
months,
to
give
us
a
little
bit
of
another
update
on
what's
happening
with
that
or
deal
with
the
federal
government
and
research
part.
B
F
Yeah,
madam
terrified
could
jump
in
we.
We
can
certainly
reach
out
to
the
university
and
ask
for
more
detail
on
the
process.
We
haven't
gotten
the
indication
from
the
conversations
to
date
that
they
anticipate
any
problems
with
that,
but
obviously
understanding
the
potential
concern
with
moving
too
far
forward.
D
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
and
we'll
remember
our
board,
chair
baltimore.
Thank
you
for
those
comments
on
the
land
grant
and
danny
thanks
for
the
update
here.
A
couple
concerns
additional
concerns.
We
have
in
the
neighborhood
up
near
research
park
is
along
with
the
land.
Grant,
is
the
environmental
impact
of
the
development
of
the
research
park
and
and
how
does
a
city
envision
working
with
the
university
to
do
you
know
an
environmental
impact
study
of
the
development
up
there?
I
know
the
research
part
right
now
is
majority
of
it.
D
D
F
Yes,
director
dugan,
I
appreciate
that
that
question
and
I'm
going
to
defer
to
tracy
who's,
been
actively
involved
in
a
lot
of
the
planning
process
and
discussions,
and
she
can
speak
to
how
the?
U
has
incorporated
that
environmental
impacts,
as
well
as
the
status
of
where
they're
at
with
some
of
their
initiatives
for
the
transit
priorities.
So
that's
all
right.
E
C
C
F
And
director
dugan,
I
would
add
to
that-
that
is
part
of
what
is
part
of
the
work
that
we
would
do
for
the
cra
plan.
Specifically
a
lot
of
those
details
and
priorities
that
you
mentioned
with
regard
to
both
transit
and
transportation.
Improvements
to
help
mitigate
that
impact
can
be
incorporated
is
what
the
priorities
would
be
for
agency
participation.