►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 04/05/2022
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting please use this link https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
We
are
continuing
to
watch
coveted
rates
to
make
the
safest
choice
for
all
of
us.
Maps
are
no
longer
required
in
city
facilities,
but
attendees
who
prefer
to
continue
using
a
mass,
are
welcome
to
do
so.
We
will
continue
to
monitor
the
situation
and
take
any
reasonable
precautions
for
the
public
and
staff.
A
As
many
of
you
know,
there
is
no
public
comment
during
that
work
session.
However,
please
join
us
at
7
pm
for
the
formal
meeting
tonight
to
share
your
any
comments.
Your
feedback
is
always
welcome
and
you
may
share
with
the
city
council
anytime
by
mailing
us
at
p.o
box,
145,
476,
salt
lake
city,
utah,
84114
or
emailing
us
at
council.com
at
slcgov.com,
or
calling
our
24-hour
phone
comment
line
at
801-535-7654.
A
Taylor
will
be
monitoring
today's
meeting
and,
as
usual,
we
start
off
with
the
work
sessions
with
item
number
one,
the
informational
and
an
update
from
the
administration.
A
B
Thank
you,
council,
chair
dugan.
We
also
are
expecting
westin
clark
to
be
able
to
join
us
too.
I
think
he's
coming
down
here
physically,
but
we'll
get
to
him
in
a
minute.
So
today
we
have
our
typical
covid
update
for
you,
but
it's
going
to
look
a
little
bit
different
now
that
we
are
in
what
the
state
is
calling
the
study
state
of
the
pandemic,
so
taylor,
if
you
can
go
to
the
first
slide
there.
B
That
said,
vaccines
are
still
still
should
be
widely
available
for
free
at
community
clinics
and
pop-up
locations
and
other
things.
So
you
can
still
find
information
about
those
community
clinics
on
the
state
and
county
websites,
as
you
always
have
been
able
to
do.
The
dashboards
that
you're
used
to
seeing
are
now
going
to
be
updated,
weekly
instead
of
daily
both
on
the
state
and
on
the
county
site.
B
I
think,
as
far
as
as
far
as
they're
saying,
although
I've
heard
both
but
the
county
is
saying
weekly
on
mondays,
so
the
county
dashboard
is
now
focused
on
hospitalizations
deaths,
vaccine
coverage
and
outbreaks
rather
than
the
individual
cases
of
illness
in
our
community,
and
you
know,
I
think
we
all
know
that
a
lot
of
testing
is
happening
at
home
or
it's
not
happening
over
the
last
few
months,
and
so
looking
at
those
daily
positive
or
even
weekly
or
monthly.
Positive
rates
are
just
not
it's
just
not
really
that
effective
anymore.
B
Also,
the
state
transmission
index
that
we've
been
using
for
the
last
couple
of
years
will
no
longer
be
used,
and
instead
the
state
is
saying
that
people
should
refer
to
the
cdc
community
levels.
So
if
you
go
to
the
cdc
website,
you
can
type
in
the
state
and
the
county,
and
they
give
you
basically
what
the
cdc
transmission
is
for
your
area,
so
sally
county
is
still
in
the
low
transmission
range.
B
So
in
our
in
our
weekly
updates
to
you
for
now
we'll
be
showing
you
some
of
the
county
data
and
then
the
waste
water
tracking
results
which
I'll
get
to
in
a
second
with
a
little
bit
of
an
introduction.
So
I
wanted
to
just
show
a
couple
of
the
slides
of
the
way
that
the
county
is
presenting
data
now
just
for
familiarity's
sake.
So
if
you
move
to
the
next
slide
taylor,
this
is
this
nice
little
snapshot
you
get
from
the
county.
B
Now
that
shows
kind
of
the
leading
indicators
there
pretty
self-explanatory,
but,
as
I
said,
it
focuses
really
on
hospitalizations
and
who's
seeking
emergency
care.
What
people
are
up
to
date
on
vaccinations
which,
as
you
know,
is
both
of
the
primary
course
and
then,
if
you're
eligible
for
boosters
up
to
date
on
those
boosters
too
hospitalizations
and
the
trend
of
who's
up
to
date
this
week,
so
you
see,
as
we've
been
following,
you
know
consistently
all
along
the
people
who
are
up
to
date
on
vaccinations
continues
to
increase,
but
like
very,
very
incrementally
so
next
slide.
B
B
B
Also
kind
of
similar
to
a
view
that
you've
gotten
before
on
the
coverage
by
age
and
all
of
these
graphs
are
available
either
in
graphs
or
in
tables,
depending
on
how
you
like
to
look
at
them.
But
this
just
again
gives
you
that
age
range
snapshot
and
you'll
see
that
we
still
have
a
lower
vaccination
levels
for
the
younger
population
and
increasing.
As
you
see
the
the
population
increasing
in
age,
there.
A
Real
quick
is
that
salt
lake
city,
or
is
that
the
that's
the
county,
that's
county,
that's
county,
wise,
okay,
gotcha.
B
Yep,
so
it
is
a
little
bit
more
difficult
now
on
the
county
website.
As
far
as
in
my
now,
my
still
limited
experience
with
the
new
way
they're
tracking
data
to
really
dig
into
the
city-based
information,
so
it
it
has
shifted
that
a
little
bit.
But
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
it
does
give
you
some
more
city,
specific
info
in
terms
of
cova,
19
vaccine
coverage
and
that's
kind
of
a
similar
view
to
what
we've
looked
at
over
the
last
many
months
where
it
gives
you
the
zip
codes.
B
You'll
see
there,
which
I
think
is,
is
interesting
in
salt
lake
city.
How
we've
been
talking
about
it
for
most
of
the
course
of
the
pandemic.
You'll
see
that
some
of
our
east
side,
zip
codes,
are
in
the
highest
up-to-date
coverage
range
for
the
county
and
some
of
our
west
side.
Zip
codes
are
in
the
lowest
up-to-date
coverage
for
the
county,
so
you
know
still
really
needing
to
get
the
word
out
about
vaccinations
county-wide,
but
particularly
in
some
of
our
east
or
in
our
west
side,
zip
codes.
B
C
Mr,
I
have
a
question
thanks
rachel.
I
maybe
my
brain
is
just
not
remembering
correctly,
but
I
feel
like
we
were
closer
to
70
before
is
what's
the
difference,
I
assume
it's
a
different
metric
that
we're
looking
at
if,
with
below
50
percent
up
to
date,
can
you.
B
If
you
had
had
two
doses
on
this
view
anyway,
and
so
we
were
looking
a
lot
better
than
this
like
up
to
date.
Raising.
B
Yeah
so,
as
I
just
mentioned,
the
updated
recommendations
allow
certain
individuals
and
people
over
the
age
of
50
to
be
eligible
for
another
booster.
So
you
know
again,
you
can
still
check
in
with
the
county
or
with
your
health
care
provider,
to
see
if
you're
one
of
the
eligible
people
there
next
slide.
Please.
B
As
I
just
mentioned,
the
the
wastewater
surveillance
system
is
a
good
leading
indicator
to
to
track
the
spread
of
coba
19
in
our
communities
and
it
actually,
I
think
the
the
surveillance
system
is,
is
used
to
track
all
sorts
of
things
across
the
country.
So
this
is
a.
It
is
considered
a
very
accurate
early
leading
indicator
because
it
essentially
samples
the
intake
of
our
of
our
wastewater
treatment
plant.
B
B
B
So
it's
kind
of
interesting
to
look
at
it
over
the
long
term,
since
we
don't
normally
show
this
slide
and
then,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
just
over
the
past
month,
you
see
a
pretty
flat
graph
there.
So
it
is
a.
It
does,
make
a
lot
more
sense
to
take
a
look
at
that
view
than
the
testing
or
the
I
mean
or
the
positive.
You
know
the
specific
positive
tests
that
we're
getting
back
in
salt
lake
county.
A
Okay,
so
that's
the
start
of
the
okay,
so
we're
out
right
where
we
were
in
april
when
we
started
the
pandemic
or
when
the
pandemic
hit
the.
B
A
B
And
sorry,
I
should
have
said
if
you
can't
see
it
up
there.
The
bottom
graph
is
the
daily
new
cases
per
100
000
population.
So
it's
normalized
over
the
hundred
thousand
over
100
000
people
and
then
the
top
is
actually
the
microgram
comparison
like
the
specific
micrograms
that
they're
picking
up
in
the
wastewater
per
day.
Okay,
so.
B
D
D
Next
slide,
there
aren't
a
lot
of
updates
today,
so
this
should
be
pretty
quick,
the
affordable
housing
overlay-
and
I
can't
even
see
it
now
that
I'm
in
person
that
is
very
hard
to
see.
I
can
see
it
here,
but
I
feel
bad
for,
for
you
all
yeah
I'll,
find
a
better
way
to
present
it.
It's
a
lot
of
information
in
a
small
or
a
small
area,
so
yeah
the
affordable
housing
overlay
process
continues
with
the
mailer
this
month,
there's
going
to
be
multiple
open
houses
scheduled
both
virtual
and
in
person
throughout
april.
D
D
No
updates
provided
for
this
slide,
but
outreach
does
continue
on
numerous
projects,
including
the
capitol
hill
traffic
calming
and
the
avenues
restriping
next
slide,
also
not
any
no
changes
to
the
ones
on
this
slide.
This
is
mostly
public
utilities.
We
talked
about
all
of
them
last
council
meeting,
including
the
city
creek
water
treatment,
plant
upgrades,
which
begin
the
retaining
wall
construction.
Now,
through
memorial
day,
the
state
street
water
line
project,
which
is
going
to
be
pretty
impactful.
I
mentioned
last
time,
and
the
proposed
utility
rate
increases
next
slide,
and
this
is
a
new
addition.
D
The
city
is
applying
for
a
federal
grant
for
a
study
of
east-west
connections
across
I-15
and
railroad
tracks,
we're
looking
at
possible
ways
to
improve
crossings
for
safety,
comfort
and
time.
Reliability.
Transportation
is
asking
for
comments
that
can
be
included
with
the
grant
application
to
demonstrate
community
need
comments
will
be
accepted
through
sunday
april
10th.
So
that's
a
quick
turnaround
and
and
the
public
can
go
to
the
website,
slc.gov
feedback
and
navigate
to
this
project
to
include
those
as
well,
and
that's
it
for
me.
E
I'll
assume
I'm
up
next
next
slide.
Please
we're
gonna
go
through
the
first
couple
kind
of
quickly
if
it's
okay,
because
there's
some
things-
and
I
want
to
get
to
this-
is
the
occupancy
rate
of
the
resource
center,
as
you
can
see
we're
at
97
98,
essentially
at
this
point
next
slide.
Please.
E
The
cleaning
and
abatement
schedule
south
temple
in
the
200
south
area
is
really
next
on
the
list.
Victory
road
and
that
area
has
a
lot
of
folks,
but
because
of
the
springtime
weather
and
the
soil
conditions.
It's
almost
impossible
for
the
health
department
and
city
resources
to
get
up
there
other
than
by
foot,
and
so
that'll
probably
be
a
focus
continually
for
a
few
weeks
of
resource
outreach.
E
We
also
have
porta-potties
there
at
the
base
of
that
trail
in
preparation,
for
probably
in
the
springtime
more
of
a
work
up
there
to
clean
it
up
resource
fair
at
victory
world
this
week
you
can
probably
anticipate
that
will
happen,
probably
frequently
going
forward
by
kayak
slash
bicycle
court.
It's
still
kayak
court,
but
the
river
is
pretty
low
right
now
and
so
they're
going
to
do
bicycles
up
and
down
the
parkway
on
the
15th.
E
For
that,
and
then
the
an
overflow
report
will
be
ready,
probably
in
may,
and
that
will
be
looking
at
the
former
ramada
site,
all
the
programs
that
were
there
as
well
as
st
vincent
de
paul
and
the
efforts
and
have
that
available
to
the
council
to
review
and
see
the
progress
and
all
some
safety
pieces
to
it,
because
the
council
is
interested
in
the
impact
on
the
neighborhood,
but
also
numbers
and
some
other
pieces
for
you
all
next
slide.
E
This
is
the
same
slide.
We
talked
about
the
overflow
again,
I
want
to
reiterate
ending
times
for
these
programs
april.
15Th
is
a
big
one
for
a
lot
of
them,
scattered
motel
rooms
at
the
end
of
june.
I
know
the
providers
are
trying
to
find
ways
to
provide
funding
for
that
going
forward,
at
least
for
the
motel
rooms
we'll
see
if
they
can
or
not
overflow
beds.
Obviously,
and
then
the
the
number
again
801
990
9999
is
always
the
best
way
to
call
for
resource
beds,
whether
the
resource
centers
or
overflow,
next
slide.
E
Now
we
want
to
give
you
an
update
on
the
planning
going
forward
past
this
winter
and
you're.
Aware
of
hb
440
in
the
legislative
session
this
year
that
laid
out
a
plan
for
salt
lake
county
overflow
needs
to
be
met
for
next
winter.
Essentially
right
now,
the
goal
for
continually
is
more
housing
options,
so
providers
everyone's
trying
to
figure
that
piece
out
ongoing.
E
But
in
addition
to
that,
the
conference
of
mayors
has
met
and
has
formed
a
subcommittee
to
evaluate
criteria
for
an
overflow
for
next
year,
overflows
plural
for
next
year
and
they're,
working
with
salt
lake
valley
coalition
and
homelessness,
as
well
as
salt
lake
county
staff
to
provide
that
and
they'll
have
a
meeting
in
the
next
two
weeks.
I
assume,
through
the
summer
potential
sites
will
be
located
buildings
property,
those
kind
of
things.
E
Discussions
will
be
had
between
all
the
entities,
all
the
stakeholders
and
then,
by
september
1st,
a
plan
needs
to
be
submitted
to
the
state
office
of
homeless
services
if
it's
not
submitted
or
if
the
plan
doesn't
meet
the
need
essentially
or
people
can't
agree
on
it.
I
guess,
then
it
kicks
into
the
backup
options
which
we've
talked
about
before,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
clear
about
that.
E
State-Owned
property
can
be
used,
but
there
are
some
distancing
restrictions
in
the
language
right
now
from
current
resource,
centers
and
other
buildings
of
various
types,
and
then
also
that
salt
lake
city,
south
salt
lake,
could
not
hold
the
the
cap
on
beds
for
the
current
resource
centers,
they
could
increase
those
by
up
to
25
percent.
E
E
Some
of
them
are
homelessness,
related,
some
of
them
sort
of
overlap,
but
aren't
completely
homeless
related
the
first-
and
these
are
some
things
we
talked
about
months
ago
before
the
legislative
session,
with
some
specific
goals
we
wanted
to
align
ourselves
on
with
the
business
community
and
other
partners
short-term
shelter,
which
was
ensuring
that,
as
we
enforce
the
camping
ordinance,
that
there
were
options
this
winter
and
the
overflow
was
opened.
We've
talked
about
the
mvp
program
nightly
beds.
E
They
could
pull
these
numbers
and
say
we're
having
a
lot
of
interaction
with
these
folks,
who
may
or
may
not
be
going
to
jail
and
coming
back
out
or
just
getting
accruing
citations,
and
are
there
different
ways
to
sort
of
intervene
here,
and
so
a
working
group
has
been
set
up.
It's
been
meaning
with
all
those
entities
you
see
there
and
some
others
there's
a
top
20
list
that
they're
staffing
very,
very
in-depth
in
background
on
all
these
individuals.
E
What
have
they
previously
been
offered?
What
have
they
taken
for
services?
What
are
diagnoses?
They
may
have
housing
previous
housing,
current
housing
options,
family
whatever
it
is,
and
then
also
looking
at
the
jail
discharge
process
and
having
an
incense
excuse
me
an
enhanced
process
when
you
get
discharged
from
jail
depending
on
the
time
of
day
and
then
also
national
best
practices
and
there's
a
small
group
of
this
working
group.
E
What
we
find
right
now
is
that
one
of
the
unifying
factors
for
most
people
we're
seeing
is
mental
illness.
There
are
some
disability
issues
with
some
of
the
folks:
that's
not
mental
illness,
but
it
turns
out.
We
need
a
lot
more
support
in
that
arena
right.
We
know
that
our
criminal
justice
system
for
a
long
time
has
really
have
been
one
of
the
primary
housing
options
for
folks
with
mental
illness,
and
we
know
there's
treatment
there,
but
we
need
a
lot
more
support
all
around
this
system.
So
the
next
piece
was
increasing.
E
Behavioral
health
supports,
and
there
was
some
limited
increase
in
state
funding.
I
don't
think
they
were
fully
funded
from
their
ask
from
the
state
level
and
then
the
no
refusal
receiving
center
is
still
being
built
right
now
in
south
salt
lake
and
is
still
planning
to
open
next
year
and
we're
trying
to
figure
out.
Are
there
other
things
we
could
do
between
now
and
then,
as
intermediate
steps
to
help
folks
with
more
acute
mental
illness
issues
that
are
driving
their
interaction
with
law
enforcement?
E
The
last
piece
was
more
affordable,
housing,
money
and
we've
talked
about
the
55
million
from
the
state
allocation
from
the
legislative
session.
Less
than
you
know,
half
of
what
was
asked
for,
but
it's
a
great
start,
and
we
need
to
continue
that
discussion
going
forward.
C
E
Some
of
these
came
out
of
direct
interaction
with
businesses
downtown,
and
so
they
were
identifying
concerns
they
had.
The
city
has
met
with
them
multiple
times
and
we've
found
ways
to
sort
of
bring
our
interests
together
and
then
have
some
joint
efforts
to
during
the
legislative
session
to
speak
with
legislators
to
the
state
and
say
here's
some
needs.
We
all
have
here's
some
things.
The
state
could
do
to
help
all
of
us
with
this,
so
it's
been
a
joint
interaction
with
them
and
we
continue
to
update
them
on
progress
and
moving
forward.
C
E
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much.
I
should
have
gone
back
to
that.
I
appreciate
it.
Yes,
there's
a
process
going
forward
with
the
ramada
there's
three
different
programs
in
there,
so
the
quarantine
and
isolation
run
by
a
fourth
street
medical
clinic.
Those
are
folks
who
have
coveted
symptoms
who
are
being
isolated
and
generally
they
have
other
co-occurring
issues
as
well.
It
makes
them
more
vulnerable,
so
they've
been
in
separate
rooms
there.
They
are
stopping
taking
intakes.
E
I
think
today
or
pretty
close
to
this
week,
because
they
need
two
weeks
to
isolate
before
they
close
on
the
15th.
All
of
those
folks
are
finding
very
specific
placements
back
in
either
resource
centers
or
other
options,
the
150
or
so
rooms
that
were
used
for
people
that
were
used
in
the
medically
vulnerable
rooms.
The
interior
courtyard
there.
E
Those
folks
going
back
three
weeks
now
have
been
talked
to
every
day
and
sort
of
give
them
priority
into
the
resource
centers
on
a
daily
basis.
A
number
of
them
have
gone
back
into
the
resource.
Centers.
Some
have
said
no
and
want
to
stick
around
as
long
as
they
can
in
that
building
and
take
their
chances.
E
Those
are
folks
who
generally
are
coming
from
unstructured
unsheltered
situations
and
so
they're
likely
going
to
stick
around
till
the
14th
and
then
find
other
locations
as
well
sure,
oh,
I
I
should
mention
I
apologize
as
of
this
morning.
20
of
those
folks
have
actually
found
housing
while
they've
been
in
the
ramada.
A
G
Mr
chair,
thank
you
a
couple
of
questions
that
I
wrote
down.
The
subcommittee
that
you
mentioned
andrew.
Are
you
on
that
subcommittee.
H
G
H
G
G
Good
to
know,
and
then
so
one
of
the
things
you
know
I
attend
or
have
been
attending
the
majority
of
the
resource
fairs.
I
G
The
majority
of
the
resource
fairs
and
kayak
court
when,
when
that
was
in
session,
and
one
of
the
things
at
the
last
resource,
fair
that
came
up
both
with
some
of
the
clients
that
we
were
able
to
help
and
talk
with
and
have
come
up
through
things
that
that
our
voa
volunteers
and
our
judge
volunteers
have
heard
from
clients
that
we've
been
able
to
connect
with
is
that
our
resource
fairs
are
often
and
almost
always
connected
with
an
abatement
the
next
day.
And
that
makes
it
so
that
we
lose
a
lot
of
trust.
G
And
it
is
something
that
I
think
is
frustrating
to
me.
It's
frustrating
to
our
clients
and
it's
frustrating
to
the
programs
that
we're
trying
to
implement
or
put
in
place
and
help
people,
because
they
won't
show
up.
I
probably
at
the
last
resource,
fair
over
at
the
library
on
what
is
that
10th
west.
G
I
probably
I
helped
half
a
dozen
to
a
dozen
people
and
heard
the
same
thing
from
all
of
them
like.
Oh,
do
we
need
to
go
clean
up
now
because
you're
just
going
to
bring
everyone
in
because
you
know
where
we're
at
and
that's
frustrating,
because
we're
really
trying
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
a
good
job
and
providing
resources
to
people
and
then
and
then
it's
automatically
connected
with
this
abatement.
G
That,
like
I
said,
we
lose
trust
and
we're
not
getting
the
same
outreach
that
I
think
we
could
have-
and
I
know
that
judge
robison
has
mentioned
this
and
tries
to
assure
our
clients
that
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
us
and
what
we're
trying
to
provide
or
what
the
other
organizations
are
trying
to
provide.
G
But
I
hope
that
somehow
this
conversation
can
come
up
with
the
county
with
the
health
department.
That
I
mean
I
recognize
the
need
for
a
cleanup.
I
recognize
the
the
health
issues
that
these
that
this
can
cause
if
we
wait
too
long
but
having
it
right
in
the
same
correlation
as
these
resource
fairs
really
undermines
what
I
think
we're
trying
to
do
and
what
I
certainly
am
trying
to
do.
E
E
All
the
entities
get
together
to
talk
through
the
all
the
camps
that
are
known
within
the
city
limits
and
if
a
new
one
comes
up,
outreach
goes
out
immediately
to
to
meet
with
whoever
they
can
and
they'll
keep
trying
to
contact
with
folks
multiple
times
before
that
small
ones
big,
it
doesn't
matter
the
size
of
the
camp.
E
So
there
is
a
lot
of
outreach
that
happens
prior
to
that,
and
then
we
did
outreach
around
the
ramada
this
year
because
we
knew
a
lot
of
folks.
Are
there
victory
road
is
going
previous,
even
if
we
don't
have
a
one
planned
right
now,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
folks
there,
so
sometimes
they
do
overlap,
which
is
unfortunate.
E
A
E
Sure
I
don't
know
the
details
of
the
building
of
the
size
at
this
point,
but
it's
a
large
program,
I
know
no
refusal
receiving
center
is
a
concept
that's
been
around
for
decades
now.
Essentially,
it's
an
intermediate
step
for
law
enforcement
between
law
enforcement
and
jail
or
treatment
options,
and
so
it's
set
up
essentially
as
an
assessment
location.
E
So
law
enforcement
can
come
across
somebody
or
get
called
to
a
situation,
somebody's
acting
erratically.
But
it
may
not
be
clear
if
it's
substance
induced
if
it's
underlying
mental
illness,
if
it's
acute
trauma,
combination
of
medical
factors,
all
sorts
of
things.
Generally
speaking,
it's
not
a
medical
issue
and
they
don't
go
to
the
er.
E
They
don't
have
a
lot
of
options
other
than
jail,
and
so
this
is
a
way
to
take
them
directly
into
a
place,
a
physical
place
with
trained
staff,
medical
staff
and
law
enforcement,
and
so
they'll
do
an
assessment
there
for
23
hours,
sometimes
multiple
days
and
then
move
them
to
treatment,
options
directly
stabilization
and
move
to
treatment.
Oftentimes
in
these
centers
davis
county's
got
one
now
and
they'll
be
about
five
across
the
state.
E
Eventually,
there
is
some
legal
thing
attached
to
it
so
that
you
may
have
potential
charges
if
you
don't
follow
through
on
certain
things,
but
there's
some
leverage
there
to
help
people
who
go
into
the
system
to
avoid
a
long-term
incarceration
or
permanent
charges
and
get
the
treatment
they
need.
So
that's
the
concept
around
it.
We
can
probably
get
more
details
for
you
about
the
number
of
beds,
they're
planning
on
more
specifics
as
they
get
into
this
year,
updates.
That
might
be
helpful
for
the
council.
If
that'd
be
interesting,.
A
E
South
salt
lake,
so
by
oxbow
by
the
jail
area,
okay,.
F
E
The
actual
location
has
certain
restrictions
on
it.
You
can't
be
there
for
too
long,
so
they'll
have
23
hour
beds
and
then
usually
it's
a
couple
days
if
somebody
needs
to
be
a
little
longer,
but
it
really
should
be
a
really
a
new
triage
step,
and
then
you
can
go
to
outpatient
or
inpatient,
depending
on
the
assessment
and
the
frankly,
the
availability
of
beds
as
well
in
the
community.
B
No
not
today
with
chief
brown,
I
wanted
to
give
you
one
other
super
quick
update
that
I
don't
have
a
slide
for
the
city
is
currently
hiring
dozens
of
seasonal
positions,
and
some
of
these
are
applicable
for
people
ages,
16
and
over
so
tomorrow.
B
Most
of
these,
I
should
say,
are
in
our
public
lands
department,
so
park
maintenance
and
other
things
so
tomorrow
at
jordan
park,
there's
a
job
fair
from
four
to
six,
where
people
can
go
check
out
all
the
cool
equipment
they
might
get
to
use
the
summer
jordan
park
from
four
to
six
tomorrow
and
talk
and
apply
in
person.
So
just
wanted
to
pass
that
along
to
you.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Rachel
weston
andrew
appreciate
that
very
much
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
two
equity
update
with
our
chief
equity
officer,
coletta
lynch.
J
J
Also,
the
racial
equity
and
policing
commission
meets
every
second
thursday
of
the
month,
and
so
they
haven't
met
since
the
last
time
that
I
gave
you
all
an
update,
so
their
information
still
remains
the
same.
However,
that
meeting
is
open
to
the
public
and
they
look
forward
to
engaging
with
the
public
and
hearing
public
feedback.
J
Recently,
chief
brown
has
worked
with
our
staff,
human
resources
and
others
in
the
city
to
identify
by
by
poc
facilitators
and
curriculum
creators,
because,
as
you
are
probably
aware,
from
the
first
phase
of
racial
equity
and
policing,
the
commission
recommended
that
there
be
a
bypoc
facilitator
who
does
training
and
and
gives
a
history
of
policing
to
new
cadets
that
come
into
the
police
department.
And
so
they
are
working
now
on
that
piece.
J
That
curriculum
will
also
include
a
portion
that
outlines
the
history
of
relationship
building
with
local
communities
here
in
salt
lake
city,
and
I
do
need
to
back
up
for
just
a
moment
the
human
rights
commission.
I
wanted
to
acknowledge
council
member
wharton
and
the
conversation
that
you
brought
forth
recently
about
getting
the
hrc
more
involved
in
city
processes,
so
they
did
identify
that
some
of
the
areas
they
want
to
focus
on
for
policy
and
procedures
in
the
city
has
to
do
with
refugees
and
new
americans
homelessness
and
gentrification.
J
So
we
will
be
bringing
forth
more
information
about
how
they
will
be
more
integral
and
involved
going
forward
and
then
really
quickly.
I
don't
think
that
we've
spoke
to
you
all
about
gear,
which
is
our
government
alliance
on
race
and
equity.
We
are
members
of
this
organization
and
so
in
june
of
2020,
our
city
was
one
of
the
first
municipalities
to
join
gear.
It's
a
national
network
of
governments
with
over
400
members
in
36
states,
and
it
was
established
to
achieve
racial
equity
and
advance
opportunities
for
all.
J
So
as
we
continue
to
work
in
this
area,
darby
egbert
is
our
equity
coordinator
for
special
projects,
she's
also
our
gear
manager.
So,
should
you
have
any
questions
please
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
her.
However,
we
wanted
to
highlight
that
the
gear
membership
conference
is
coming
up
april,
19th
through
the
21st,
and
there
are
employees
throughout
the
city
that
are
have
been
identified
as
gear
ambassadors
in
each
department.
J
Some
of
them
have
been
approved
to
attend
this
conference
and
their
main
responsibilities
are
to
take
gear,
implement
implementation
back
to
their
departments.
They
also
share
and
provide
guidance
on
city
dei
best
practices,
efforts,
training
and
facilitation,
and
they
also
are
involved
in
the
equity
lens
review
process
for
departmental
policies,
programming,
staff,
recruitment
and
development.
J
D
Everyone
I
just
want
to
give
you
a
quick
update
on
the
accessibility
and
disability
commission.
First,
I
want
to
extend
a
big
thank
you
to
each
of
you
for
approving
the
ordinance
for
that
commission
and
the
next
step
is
reviewing
and
interviewing
the
candidates
for
that
commission.
The
mayor
has
forwarded
12
candidates
that
will
be
interviewed
on
april
12
and
april
19th,
and
each
of
these
candidates
are
folks
who
previously
served
on
the
accessibility
and
accessibility
advisory
commit
committee.
There
are
so
many
names.
D
And
each
of
these
candidates,
I
just
want
to
go
over
their
names
with
you.
The
first
half
are
everett
bacon
steven
persinger,
scott
browning
nate
kripas
jeff
kenyon
margot
thurman.
Those
are
the
folks
that
will
be
interviewed
on
the
12th
and
then
the
19th
is
todd,
claflin,
amy,
carmen
carolyn,
campbell,
leah,
lubato,
pamela,
maurer
and
glynis
wright,
and
each
of
these
individuals
are
community
members.
Volunteers
advocates
professionals
who
either
have
lived
experience
and
or
experience
working
with
people
with
disabilities.
D
So
we're
very
excited
for
that
to
move
forward
that
that
would
be
if
all
of
those
interviews
go
well,
that
will
be
12
people
that
hopefully,
will
be
appointed
to
that
commission,
which
will
leave
three
vacancies
that
we
will
fill
with
recruitment
to
get
additional
voices
on
that
commission
that
aren't
already
there
and
then
I
did.
D
As
kalitta
mentioned,
I
am
overseeing
an
internal
ada
liaison
group
and
that's
comprised
of
different
liaisons
from
different
departments
to
kind
of
work
on
ada
issues
as
they
come
up
in
different
kind
of
arenas
of
the
city
and
one
thing
specifically
that
we're
kind
of
working
on
right.
Now
I'm
working
with
ims
and
the
different
liaisons
in
different
departments
on
web
accessibility
and.
F
J
C
D
L
Mr
chair,
I
understand
the
focus
of
the
briefing
today
is
on
potential
funding
shifts
that
council
members
want
to
raise.
I
know
there's
a
few
that
are
in
the
works.
I
also
wanted
to
highlight
two
things
in
the
staff
report.
L
K
And
just
just
so
that
it's
clear
for
the
members
of
the
public,
we
typically
would
not
include
a
proposal
from
a
council
member's
funding
shifts
in
a
staff
report,
because
we
would
wait
until
there's
a
majority
who
support
that
proposal
in
order
to
include
it,
and
that
requires
that
public
discussion.
So
that's
why
we
tend
to
have
these,
even
though
there
have
been
discussions
in
the
background,
all
right.
L
So
I'll
I'll
go
over
council
member
petro
eschler's
shift
it's
in
cdbg
the
public
services
section
and
the
proposal
is
to
take
funding
from
number
15.
This
is
shelter
the
homeless
committee
homeless,
resource
center
meals,
which
is
recommended
for
fifty
seven
thousand
seven
hundred
and
seventy
eight
dollars
and
to
shift
that
full
amount.
A
A
Yeah,
yes,
that
was
the
intent
of
this
case,
because
this
this
this
section,
we
can
straw
pull
over
any
sections
that
we
have
on
on
the
public
services,
because
that's
a
set
amount
of
money.
G
Okay,
so
I
would
propose
a
straw
poll
that
we
accept
victoria's
proposal
to
shift
the
money.
C
Could
I
ask
a
question
before
we
struggle
councilmember
peter?
I.
I
think
this
is
a
good
suggestion
on
the
face
of
it,
and
I
understand
the
need
for
the
program
that
the
ywca
is
working
on,
and
I
also
see
this
as
funding
potentially
preventing
people
from
becoming
homeless,
which
seems
like
a
more
impactful
use
of
that
amount
of
money.
The
question
that
I
have
is
that
it
sounds
like
you're.
C
Can
you
give
me
just
a
little
more
information
about
why
funding
the
meals
or
like
what
the
other
sources
of
for
the
meals
could
be
and
and
like?
Why
you're
confident
that
they'll
be
able
to
fill
that.
F
Gap
in
another
way,
so,
according
to
my
friends
who
operate
in
homelessness,
there's
kind
of
when
you
operate
in
any
non-profit
in
general,
asking
people
to
fund
your
like
you
know,
accountant
and
bookkeeper-
is
not
a
sexy.
Ask
right.
It's
a
it's
a
thing
that's
hard
to
quantify,
however,
when
you
can
do
campaigns
like
five
dollars
pays
for
a
lunch.
There
are
grassroots
opportunities
for
fundraising.
F
There
are
entities
that
will
partner
and
do
in
kind
more
likely.
There
are
many
more
avenues
to
do:
meals,
both
from
non-profit
best
practice
and
from
what
the
people
I
was
consulting
with,
who
are
actually
in
the
field
are
saying,
is
a
reality
they're
facing
so
whereas,
like
if
we're
asking
to
fund
you
know
the
heating
bill
at
a
domestic
violence,
shelter,
that's
not
a
sexy.
Ask
no
one
wants
to
do
that.
So
it's
you
know
the
general
operating
comes
from
grants
like
this
kind
of
grant.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thanks
for
the
question
back
to
councilmember
fowler's
straw
poll
on
accepting
the
chant
these
move
of
funding
from
the
homeless
resource
meals
to
the
ywca.
K
A
C
A
G
G
G
So
I'd
be
proposing
to
move
that
171
219
from
the
home
development
fund
in
the
housing
stability
division,
which
that's
what
we're
calling
hand
now
right.
G
Okay,
two
neighbor
works
and
the
neighbor
works
program
is
the
affordable
home
buy
down
program.
We
in
the
past
have
funded
this,
although
I
feel
like
it
came
out
of
cdbg
and
not
home,
but
we
have
funded
it
in
the
past
and
we
have
had
testimony
a
lot
of
testimony
regarding
how
how
this
program
works
and
actually
really
does
work
for
the
community
members.
G
I
mean,
I
think,
we've
had
people
come
in
and
during
general
comment
and
talk
about
the
fact
that
they
couldn't
have
bought
a
house
without
this
program
and
so
I'd
hate
to
we've.
We've
funded
it
in
the
past
and
I
would
hate
to
not
fund
it
this
time.
Now.
If
you
look
in
the
application,
it
doesn't
show
that
we
funded
it.
But
again
I
think
that
was
because
it
came
out
of
cdbg
and
not
out
of
this
particular
program.
M
N
G
G
C
C
Ben,
can
you
explain
to
me
why
what
the
15
limit
is
because,
if
we're
moving
it
from
one
home
project
to
another
home
eligible
project,
I
thought
that
that
wasn't
a
swap
we
could
just
make.
But
what's
the
15
floor.
L
L
G
And
mr
chair
probably
have,
after
this
particular
straw
poll
of
follow-up
straw
poll
with
the
leftover
money.
D
D
Okay
got
it
thank
you
and,
and
then,
while
I
was
looking
for
that,
I
was
only
half
listening
to
your
explanation,
then
about
that
this
is
a
certified
provider,
but
this
isn't
a
certified
program
yeah.
L
L
So
taking
the
15
of
the
funds,
putting
it
in
the
home
development
fund
and
knowing
that
the
division
will
come
back
to
the
council
in
the
future.
To
say
here
are
some
options
and
recommended
policies,
because
every
year
we're
going
to
have
this
15
requirement.
So
it's
basically
putting
those
funds
aside.
Knowing
that
they'll
come
back
to
the
council
to
say,
here's
how
we
want
to
meet
hud's
requirement
and
encourage
these
organizations,
which
are
certified
to
also
take
that
additional
step
of
submitting
applications
that
qualify
as
well.
L
L
N
G
Eventually,
I
will
get
used
to
your
new
name,
but
until
I
am
for
hand
to
come
and
have
discussions
with
the
council
on
policy
ideas
and
and
things
that
we
might
be
looking
at
and
ways
that
the
certified
organizations
can
then
well
really
what
I
envision-
and
I
hope
is
that
you
we'd
cut
you
you
all.
The
experts
would
come
to
us
with
ideas
on
how
we
can
market
or
or
help
or
certified
organizations
meet
their
requirements
so
that
their
applications
get
that
15
percent.
F
With
this
clarification,
I
like
it,
because
what
you're
explaining
is
that
we're
actually
just
getting
the
money
into
the
community
quicker
and
then
you
all
are
not
being
deprived
of
the
opportunity
to
do
something
that
you
know
was
was
integral
to
your
function.
My
one
concern
with
this
is
is:
is
there
is
there?
Why
is
their
score
so
low
on
their
grant
application
compared
to
all
others?
That's
a
20
point
differential
there.
That's.
L
One
of
them
is,
there
was
greater
competition
this
year
with
larger
dollar
amounts
being
requested
by
the
other
applicants,
and
there
was
also
a
discussion
by
the
board
about
the
need
for
neighborworks
to
develop
further
program
guidelines
and
policies,
and
the
board
had
a
preference
this
year
to
prioritize
rental
assistance
and
low
income
assistance
programs
instead
of
the
down
payment
assistance.
That
neighborworks
is
doing.
F
K
Right
and
if
I
could
flag
just
a
general
topic
for
council
members,
especially
new
council
members,
the
the
scoring
is
subjective,
it's
not
objective,
and
so
it
you
know
it's
scoring
to
assist
the
board
and
the
mayor
with
adjusting
how
different
priorities
every
year
cause
things
to
sort
out.
It's
not
the
same,
as
you
know,
using
objective
criteria
to
score
things,
and
so
it's
just
it's
the
challenge
we
have
every
year
and
it
is
the
way
it
is.
O
I
want
mr
chair,
I
wanted
to
just
like
a
little.
I
mean
everybody
in
this
table.
O
I
believe,
knows
never
works
on
their
incredible
track
record
in
my
community
and
the
west
side,
especially
and
in
my
own
block
three
out
of
the
six
houses
in
my
blog
are
neighbor
works
houses
and
those
families
cannot
tell
you
enough
how
the
power
of
being
able
to
own
a
house
and
own
a
home
and
and
create
a
community
and
this
organization
just
works
tirelessly
to
allow
people
the
possibility
owner
at
home
in
this
market.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that,
and
I
I
will
support
this,
this
shifting
of
funds.
G
P
G
A
G
G
G
P
D
D
A
And
then
goes
back
to
your
question
about
the
rental,
the
owner,
homeownership
policy
discussions.
That's
just
to
further
discussions
along
those
same
lines,
and
this
goes
back
to
the
idea
that
when
we
had
the
priorities
for
rda
funding
is
that
okay,
we
gave
them
these
priorities
and
we
slimmed
them
down
from
13
to
five
to
these
three
and
this,
as
usual,.
B
A
A
I
thought
we
just
did
that.
No,
we
didn't
do
that,
one
yet!
Okay,
sorry!
So
the
second
straw
poll
thumbs
up
for
second
thought,
straw
poll.
A
L
L
L
The
recommendation,
if
there
is
more
funding,
is
to
keep
the
administration
category
maximized
at
20
and
then
add
funding
to
shelter
the
homeless
resource
center
meals.
Based
on
the
funding
shift
that
just
occurred.
I
am
guessing.
Instead
of
putting
the
funding
toward
the
meals,
the
council
would
be
interested
in
any
additional
funding
going
to
the
ywca
domestic
violence,
shelter.
F
Honestly,
I
don't
really
want
to
give
a
whole
lot
more
to
ywca,
because
what
we've
given
them
now
is
within
the
historic
limits
of
what
we've
typically
given
them
and
from
a
non-profit
administration
point
of
view
that
helps
them
predict
cash
flow
in
a
more
reasonable
way.
Do
we
have
to
abide
by
the
30
thousand
dollar
minimum
because
I
yeah.
D
So
are
we
allowed
to
because,
if,
because
in
in
1718,
we
gave
them
34
000.,
are
we
allowed
to
like
give
to
split
it
and
then
to
give
30
000
to
one
area
and
then
supplement
the
other
to
get
it
to
30
000?
D
Well,
yeah!
Not
yes!
So
what?
If
we
took
instead
of
giving
57
to
57
778
to
ywca,
if
we
gave
them
what
we
gave
them
last
time,
which
was
37
900
and
then
whatever
the
difference?
Is
we
keep
in.
D
L
D
Or
no,
it's
not
I'm
saying
if
we
take
so
we
take
37
from
57,
so
we're
gonna
give
that
down
here,
so
they
still
have
20
000
in
for
meals
for
shelter
the
homeless,
and
then
we
take
10
000
from
somewhere
else.
F
So
south
valley
sanctuary
was
the
other
place
that
is
getting
a
significant
amount
in
another
category
and
had
an
overlap
so
taking
10
000
from
south
valley
and
shifting
it
over.
They
south
valley
would
still
get
40
000
in
this
category
and
then
30
would
go
towards
meals
and
then
37
would
go
towards
ywca.
C
B
A
Going
to
the
the
ywaca
and
then
10
from
the
south
valley
sanctuary
to
meals,
to
get
them
over
30
000
and
then
anything
if
we
have
a
the
contingency.
N
C
Q
A
C
A
G
Oh
hi,
may
I
address
this:
can
we
talk
about
the
neighborhood
improvement
section,
those
three
that
are
there,
and
this
is
the
economic
development
facade
program,
the
target
area,
bus,
stop
improvements
and
the
ballpark
tracks
accessible
pedestrian
crossing.
So
in
this
contingency,
if
there's
less
funding,
then
we
would
reduce
some
of
those
correct.
G
L
The
the
administration
has
forwarded
five
different
requests
for
funding
improvements
to
the
ballpark
area.
Some
of
them
are
currently
before
you.
You
may
remember
in
rda
budget
amendment
number
two
there's
1.6
million
dollars
for
that
purpose.
As
an
example,
one
of
those
five
is
also
three
million
dollars
from
the
capital
improvement
bond,
which
has
been
pulled
back
to
be
reevaluated
by
the
administration,
so
that
may
come
back
to
you
in
a
different
form
but
you're
correct.
There
have
been
five
different
requests,
this
also
being
one
of
them
for
improvements
to
the
ballpark
area.
G
G
A
So,
let's,
since
we're
on
the
same
vein
for
the
ballpark,
let's
continue
there
we'll
come
back
to
the
straw
poll
on
the
other
funding.
So.
C
This
is
the
13th
south
track
station
on
13
south
has
no
pedestrian
crossing
for
a
block
in
either
direction,
so
you'd
have
to
go
all
the
way
out
to
third
west
or
all
the
way
to
west
temple
to
have
a
safe
way
to
walk
across
from
the
track.
Stop
to
anything
on
the
south,
which
we
have
a
lot
of
actual
multi-family
apartments
that
have
been
built.
The
enclave
is
right
there
to
the
south
of
lowe's,
so
you
see
a
lot
of
people
walking
across
the
street.
C
That's
also
a
common
direction
that
people
go
to
get
from
the
track
station
to
the
hrc,
the
gail
miller
resource
center.
So
I
I
do
want
to
put
a
plug
in
for
the
necessity
for
the
pedestrian
crossings
at
that
track
station,
because
there's
a
lot
of
potential,
auto
pedestrian
accidents.
That
could
happen
right
there
and
the
so
it
it
is
an
urgent
need
in
that
area.
N
F
L
The
other
funding
sources,
particularly
the
1.6
million
in
the
rda
budget,
amendment
they're
intentionally
flexible
and
they're,
going
into
a
holding
account
and
part
of
that,
is
to
wait
for
the
ballpark
station
area
plan
to
finish
going
through
the
public
process
ultimately
coming
before
you
all
for
adoption,
and
it
will
have
implementation
recommendations
and
those
would
inform
the
uses
of
the
funds.
So
do.
F
We
have
any
projections
or
schematics
for
what
kind
of
protected
crossing
like
if
we're
putting
in
a
whole
pedestrian
footbridge.
I
can
see
this
becoming
very
costly
if
we're
doing
the
blinking
lights
that
we
get
on
the
river
trail,
you
know
with
a
stoplight,
that's
starting
to
feel
like
1.6
million
might
suffice
like
do
we
have
any
ideas
drawn
up
for
this
or
or
any
input
on
the
scope
of
the
project
are.
F
F
Respect
asking
from
multiple
sources
like
look
in
nonprofit,
you
ask
for
four
times
the
amount
that
you're
looking
to
get,
because
you
expect
three
rejections
for
everyone
acceptance.
I
got
that,
but
that
does
you
know,
lend
gravity
to
what
councilmember
fowler
is
talking
about
here
and
and
if
this
actually
does
have
flexibility
to
it
in.
N
My
mind,
may
I
add
to
that
as
well,
is
that,
okay,
when
we,
when
they
presented
the
transportation
division
to
the
board,
they
indicated
that
this
is
the
only
source
of
funding
they
are
requesting
for
this
particular
project,
and
this
is
what
they
anticipate
the
cost
to
be
so
they
said
that
if
they
had
a
choice,
the
it
sounds
like
the
target
area.
Bus
stop.
Improvements
is
more
scalable.
Okay,.
R
N
O
I
know
mr
chair
very
quick.
I
I
know
that
this
is
somewhat.
You
know
no
relevant
to
this
specific
pedestrian
crossing,
but
this
weekend
someone
in
and
council
member
manos
district
died.
You
know
crossing
the
street
or
you
know-
and
I
think
it
will
also
signify
a
lot
to
this
community,
that
you
know
this
is
an
important
project
and
we
obviously
have
an
issue
with
crossings
in
the
city.
It's
a
very
dangerous
time
these
days
to
be
in
the
streets
and
walk.
O
So
you
know
you
know
if
we
cannot
find
the
money
in
other
places.
I
I
believe
that
we
probably
should
support
this
assist.
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
discussion.
So
back
to
the
motion
or
excuse
me,
the
straw
poll,
the
straw
poll,
is
you.
F
L
The
esg
contingency.
If
there
is
more
money,
is
to
maximize
administration
at
seven
and
a
half
percent
and
then
to
equally
distribute
remaining
funding
between
number
two
family
promise:
salt
lake
community,
family
shelter,
number
three
first
step:
house,
homeless,
resource
center
program,
number
10,
volunteers
of
america,
women's
resource
center
and
number
11
voa's
youth
resource
center.
L
A
And
you're
getting
another
thumbs
up
and
a
knot
up:
okay,.
L
So
then
we
can
go
to
home
if
there
is
more
money
for
home.
The
recommendation
is
to
maximize
administration
at
ten
percent
and
add
the
remaining
amount
to
the
home
development
fund
and,
if
there's
less
money,
it's
to
take
it
away
from
the
home
development
fund.
So
the
recommendation
is
to
balance
either
way
on
the
home
development
fund.
G
That
may
require,
but
then,
if
that
would
require,
if
there's
more
money
than
it
would
just
be,
I
would
propose
either
I'm
open
for
discussion
either
give
whatever
that
remaining
money
is
to
neighbor
works
or
split
it
between
the
other
one,
two,
three,
four,
five,
six
organizations
that
are
being
funded.
I.
F
A
G
F
L
N
B
L
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Ben
tony
heather
appreciate
the
discussion
and
the
energy
that
you
put
into
this.
So
thank
you.
L
I
will
update
the
funding
log
and
email
out
an
updated
copy,
so
if
you
see
anything
that
you
thought
you
said
something
else,
let
me
know
it's
not
scheduled
for
a
vote
tonight.
So
there
is
time
to
do
a
little
more
review.
A
N
A
L
This
is
the
first
briefing
for
the
ordinance
amendment
that
is
before
you
I
want
to
point
out.
There
are
actually
two
things
before
you
and
they're
both
related.
So
you
may
remember
back
in
october,
in
budget
amendment
number
four
one
of
the
items
in
the
budget
amendment
was
four
million
dollars
for
creating
this
new
program.
L
What
is
also
before
you
is
an
ordinance
amendment
to
create
a
committee
that
would
review,
recommend
and
in
some
instances
approve
some
of
that
four
million
dollars.
So
if
the
council
supports
what
is
proposed,
you
would
need
to
act
in
the
budget
amendment
to
release
the
four
million
dollars,
as
well
as
adopt
the
ordinance
amendment
to
create
the
committee
overseeing
the
four
million
dollar
distribution.
L
The
four
million
dollars
is
proposed
to
be
split
into
two
separate
offerings:
two
million
dollars
for
business
assistance
grants.
This
would
be
administered
by
the
economic
development
department
and
another
two
million
dollars
for
non-profit
assistance
grants
and
that
would
be
overseen
by
the
community
and
neighborhoods
department,
the
community
recovery
committee.
L
L
If
it's
more
than
fifty
thousand
dollars,
then
it
would
still
come
back
to
the
council
to
make
the
final
decision
and
that's
one
of
the
policy
questions
is.
Does
the
council
support
that
fifty
thousand
dollar
amount
as
where
you
wanna
draw
the
line
hypothetically?
The
committee
could
make
80
awards
of
50
000
and
that
would
spend
all
the
money,
and
none
of
it
would
come
back
to
the
council
for
final
decision.
L
So
if
you
wanted
to
delegate
the
authority
but
make
sure
some
of
the
funding
comes
back
to
you
for
a
final
decision,
you
could
put
a
cap.
For
example,
you
could
say
up
to
a
million
dollars
of
the
total
could
be
approved
for
grants
of
fifty
thousand
dollars
or
less,
and
that
means
the
remaining
three
million
would
come
back
to
the
council
for
final
decision.
L
The
council
has
approved
33
million
dollars
in
budget
openings,
so
39
of
all
the
arpa
funds
have
been
budgeted
and
the
next
annual
budget
will
likely
need
significant
arpa
funding,
because
the
funding
that
has
been
approved
using
arpa
is
mostly
for
ongoing
costs.
These
are
existing
and
new
programs
and
employees.
So
we
just
want
to
keep
our
eye
on
the
total
amount
of
arpa.
We
have
left.
L
And
I'll
run
through
those
quickly,
the
categories
are
offering
services
to
retrain,
displaced
workers,
providing
legal
or
other
assistance
for
evictions,
or
rent
relief,
expanding
educational
opportunities,
deploying
resources
to
mitigate
the
digital
divide,
supporting
parents
or
children
affected
by
the
pandemic.
So
things
like
child
care
after
school
programs
and
providing
access
to
health,
healthcare
services,
including
mental
health
support
and
any
non-profit
they're,
not
limited
to
those
categories.
If
they
have
an
idea
that
is
arpa
eligible,
they
can
still
apply,
but
those
are
specifically
identified
categories
signifying
the
policy
priorities
for
the
city.
L
L
A
Is
that
date
spent
or
date
just
appropriated.
L
So
it's
if
I
remember
december
31st
of
2024
and
that's
when
they
have
to
be
spent,
so
not
just
like
obligated,
but
it's
been
fully
spent
out
of
the
account
yeah
as
an
official
city
board.
There
are
several
requirements
that
they
would
need
to
meet,
including
the
state,
open
and
public
meetings
act.
So
these
will
be
public
meetings
where
people
can
come
and
observe
and
comment.
L
The
membership
of
the
committee
is
is
an
exception
to
other
city
boards,
in
that
this
committee
would
be
formed
of
members
from
four
other
boards.
That's
an
exception
to
the
normal
city.
Practice.
Typically,
you're
only
allowed
to
serve
on
one
city
board,
so
you
can
maximize
the
opportunity
for
residents
to
participate
in
the
local
government.
L
L
There
would
be
a
one
month
window
for
applications
to
be
submitted,
and
then
the
committee
would
meet
to
review
rank,
recommend
funding,
approve
funding
for
grants
that
are
fifty
thousand
dollars
or
less
grants
that
are
more
than
fifty
thousand
dollars
would
then
go
to
the
mayor.
The
mayor
may
have
a
separate
set
of
recommendations
and
then
those
would
go
to
the
council
for
final
review
and
approval.
L
L
L
Is
there
a
place
they
could
come
in
to
get
help
in
person
to
fill
out
the
application
or
to
ask
questions
if
that's
something
the
council's
interested
in
making
sure
that
to
have
a
level
application
field,
that
everyone
gets,
the
assistance
that
they
may
need,
whether
it's
translation
or
language
services
or
technical
support.
C
I
I
think
the
question
I'm
still
trying
to
get
to
where
I'm
understanding
why
four
million
dollars
to
businesses
or
non-profits
is
the
best
use
of
the
arpa
money
over
something
like
permanent,
supportive
housing
or
deeply
affordable
housing,
which
I
think
we
know
is
a
serious
need
in
our
community,
and
so
I
think
the
questions
I
have
are
like
what
kind
of
organization
like,
for
instance,
when
we
did
the
that,
like
our
first
out
of
the
gate,
one
million
dollars
of
small
business
funds
when
the
pandemic
hit.
C
Is
it?
Is
that
not
going
to
be
enough
to
support
that
business
and
how
many
businesses
are
we
going
to
be
able
to
support?
I
think
the
economy
has
moved
in
a
direction.
That
is,
I
mean,
I
think
overall,
our
economy
is
doing
a
lot
better
than
any
of
us
would
have
expected
two
years
ago.
So
I'm
wondering
if,
in
terms
of
pandemic
recovery,
this
is
the
highest
and
best
use
of
that
four
million
dollars.
C
And
so
I
think
I
just
need
a
little
more
understanding
about
which
specific
businesses
are
struggling
right
now
and
I
think
the
nonprofit's
an
easier
sell
for
me,
because
nonprofits
are
always
struggling
with
funding
and
are
always
doing
things
that
are
maybe
less
tied
to
the
economy,
but
helping
individuals
and
residents,
but
like
small
businesses,
I'm
a
small
business
owner
myself
and
I
just
feel
like
a
lot
of
that
ppp
money
and
the
eid,
l,
money
and
all
the
stuff
that
came
from
the
sba.
C
A
lot
of
it
really
did
help
businesses,
but
a
lot
of
it
didn't
necessarily
go
to
businesses
that
actually
needed
it.
And
I'm
wondering
how
are
we
going
to
make
sure
that
this
is
helping
local
businesses
in
utah?
That
really
need
the
money
and
for
whom
that
money
is
significant
enough
to
make
a
difference,
whereas,
if
we're
two
years
into
the
pandemic,
and
these
again,
these
businesses
haven't
been
able
to
stabilize.
C
Is
this
just
going
to
delay
the
inevitable
or
how
can
like?
I
think
I
need
a
little
bit
of
an
illustration
as
to
why
this
is
actually
going
to
help
people
as
opposed
to
something
that
I
think
I
can
quantify,
which
is
like
okay
put
out
this
money
into
affordable
housing,
and
we
know
that
that's
a
need
in
our
community.
So
I
don't
know
who
maybe
rachel
looks
like
you're
ready
to
answer.
But
thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
mano.
You
asked
a
lot
of
really
good
questions
in
that
question
and.
B
I
think
one
of
your
bigger
questions
was:
is
this
the
highest
and
best
use
for
pandemic
recovery
money?
And
I
think
you
know
there's
so
many
pressing
needs,
there's
lots
of
places.
We
could
put
four
million
dollars
that
you
know
could
be
useful
or
needed,
and
it's
hard
to
it's
it's
harder.
Now.
I
think
as
we've.
B
This
has
been
such
an
attenuated
process
since
we
first
came
to
the
council
with
kind
of
our
overarching
package
for
how
to
how
to
appropriate
or
our
thoughts
on
how
to
appropriate
the
rescue
plan
money
and
in
context
you
know,
just
as
by
way
of
background
we
had
proposed.
You
know
several
different
buckets
right.
We
had
proposed
money
to
go
to
our
immediate
needs.
B
The
community's
biggest
needs,
as
we
saw
them
at
the
time,
which
was
really
housing
and
the
spike
in
crime
or
homelessness
and
the
spike
in
crime,
not
housing,
homelessness,
and
we
had
proposed.
You
know
a
longer
term
strategy
around
the
social
impact
investment,
and
then
we
had
proposed
this
way
of
trying
to.
We
had
proposed
also
the
west
side
community
initiative.
That
would
you
know
hopefully
help
with
that
longer
term.
B
You
know
wealth,
building
and
housing
strategy,
and
then
we
had
proposed
this
four
million
dollars
to
really
try
to
get
out
into
the
community
and
be
responsive
to
a
lot
of
the
non-profits
and
small
businesses
that
both
the
mayor's
office
and
I
think
council
members
were
hearing
from
at
the
time.
B
You
know
to
your
point:
maybe
that
has
shifted
in
the
last
nine
months,
but
I
think
you
know
I'd
like
to
give
ben
and
lorena
a
chance
to
comment
more
specifically
on
the
kinds
of
businesses
that
they
are
still
hearing
from
to
to
cast
a
little
bit
more
light
on
that.
I
think
you
know
to
your
to
your
point
about
the
nonprofits
and
the
arts
and
artisans
applications.
B
This
year,
the
mayor's
office
had
over
600
000
worth
of
requests
just
for
our
small
ace
grant
funding,
and
we
only
have
200
000
to
fund
so
not
to
like
use
that
as
as
great
evidence,
but
you
know
extrapolating
from
there.
I
think
there's
still
a
lot
of
need
out
there
for
small
organizations
and
part
of
our
goal
with
this,
with
putting
it
out.
This
way
was
to
hear
from
the
community
themselves
on
what
the
needs
were,
as
opposed
to
like
pre,
assuming
what
the
needs
were
and
trying
to
like
give
them.
B
You
know
just
to
certain
organizations
really
prescriptively,
so
that's
why
we
had
proposed
doing
it
this
way,
and
then
you
know
having
the
the
amalgamation
of
those
different
boards
and
commissions
to
review
the
the
applications.
Was.
You
know
another
layer
of
community
involvement
here
that
could
help
us
make
sure
that
we
were
really
trying
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
community.
So
with
that,
if
ben
or
lorena
want
to
chime
in
on
the
specific
businesses,
they
should.
R
R
We
even
had
some
professional
services
like
advertising
agencies,
and
what
has
happened
to
them
is
that
many
of
them,
you
mentioned
the
elp,
the
one
million
dollar,
which
I
think
it
was
incredible,
and
the
community
really
received
that
at
a
time
when
they
really
needed
it.
52
businesses
actually
benefited
from
that.
R
My
understanding
is,
the
applications
were
about
300
to
400,
so
we
can
see
that
the
demand
is
huge,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
what's
critical.
Here
is
the
fact
that
many
of
those
businesses,
many
businesses,
did
not
receive
some
of
the
federal
funding.
The
ppp
they
didn't
receive
other
sources,
so
there
is
right
now
is
still
a
demand.
R
We
are
now
dealing
you're,
absolutely
right.
The
economy
is
doing
so
much
better
utah,
we're
lucky
salt
lake
city,
and
yet
many
businesses
are
dealing
with
inflation,
so
it's
costing
them
a
lot
more
to
produce
what
they
need
to
in
order
they're
charging
their
clients
a
lot
more.
Their
customers
they're
having
a
hard
time
getting
people
to
come
and
work
for
them
in
terms
of
their
wages.
R
Minimum
right
now
we're
looking
at
fifteen
dollars.
Most
most
entities
are
paying
that
so
in
as
much
as
there
is
good
momentum.
I
think
this
is
the
time
where
we
need
to
provide
that
support
to
ensure
that
these
businesses
actually
do
recover
and
many
businesses
actually
have
gone
under.
I
was
walking
in
my
neighborhood,
and
there
was
this
really
great
restaurant
108
went
under
right
there
on
you
know
in
my
own
neighborhood,
so
it's
still
happening.
R
F
I'd
like
to
amplify
what
you
said
too,
even
those
of
us
who
received
the
federal
assistance
when
you
are
a
small
organization
or
a
small
business.
Your
margins
are
equally
small
and
so
now
that
the
federal
assistance
is
gone
now
that
we're
in
this
landscape,
like
in
my
case,
our
earned
income
contracts
are
not
coming
back
at
the
rate
that
my
employees,
hourly
salaries,
need
to
increase.
So
even
having
been
stabilized
for
two
years.
F
Fifty
thousand
dollars
would
would
mean
everything
to
my
organization.
Right
now
and-
and
I
know
several
small
businesses-
I'm
non-profit-
but
I
know
several
small
businesses
where
it
would
be
the
difference
between
six
months
of
viability
to
re-establish
those
contracts
and
those
other
things,
and
you
know,
affordable
housing
is
good,
but
people
have
to
have
incomes
too.
So
investing
on
this
side
in
some
measure
is
is
necessary
as
well.
C
I
mean,
I
guess,
if
it
based
on
this
conversation,
if
it
really
is
for
small
businesses
and
small
organizations,
then
I
actually
think
that
policy
question
number
four
needs
to
be
flipped
and
rather
than
a
minimum
award.
We
should
be
doing
a
maximum
award
so
that
it
could
spread
out
as
much
as
possible
and
so
that
we're
not
just
awarding
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
one
important,
but
like
larger
organization,
which
feels
not
very
equitable
to
me.
C
So
I
would
actually
say
we
flip
that
and
make
a
maximum
award
so
that
it
and
make
sure
that
we
are
awarding
it
to
organizations
for
whom
that
maximum
reward
is
still
significant,
and
not
just
the
organizations
who
have
the
staffing
or
have
the
ability
or
have
the
connections
with
government
to
be
able
to
know
how
to
apply
for
those
awards.
Make
sure
that
it's
going
to
those
businesses
that
actually
they
actually
need
it.
C
Ideally,
the
ones
that
didn't
receive
federal
funding
and
the
ones
that
typically
don't
even
know
about
it,
which
is
like
super
hard
for
your
team
lorena
to
find
those
those
businesses
that
don't
even
connect
with
us.
But
those
are
the
ones
that
I
I
see
my
I
guess
my
concern
is
that
it's
going
to
go
to
a
business
that
we
all
know
and
love
or
like
businesses
that
we
all
know.
C
F
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
that
is
part
of
the
reason
we
want
this
community
review
committee
as
well,
just
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
are
looking
at
this
with
a
lens.
That's
not
just
you
know
not
just
who's
in
the
mayor's
office
or
or
you
know,
whoever
they
happen
to
contact
in
economic
development,
not
that
I
think
our
staff
would
make
those
decisions,
but
you
know
if
you
know,
people
it's
easier
to
access
processes
right.
So
I
agree
with.
I
agree
with
you
and.
A
Thank
you
and
thank
you
councilmember
model,
because
I
was
looking
at
this
program
here
and
going
back
to
the
earlier
comments
we
made
when
we
gave
out
those
grant
money
and
we
had
specific
dollar
amount
date
required
programs.
We're
going
to
give
money
is,
and
I
see
this
is
almost
in
the
same
vein,
but
with
a
lot
more
dollars
out
there
to
give
out
so
a
minimum
level,
and
I'm
asking
this
because
I
apply
for
it.
Is
it
one
time
or
do
you
have
a
date?
Everyone's
gotta
have
all
their
applications.
A
Are
there
grants
requests
in
and
then
we
we
outline
them
and
we
provide
grant
money
at
that
time
and
how
do
we
divide
it
out
and
making
sure
that
we're
providing
everyone
the
opportunity,
not
just
the
ones
who
have
the
writing
capabilities
or
the
know-how
to
get
an
application
in
and
get
the
funding
in.
R
We,
we
were
looking
at
situations
like
what,
if
we
had
we
partnered
with
the
city
library
and
used
computers
and
had
technical
assistance
and
training
at
those
locations,
and
we
provide
that
type
of
training.
R
I
would
say
in
you
know
several
languages
depending
upon
what's
needed
within
our
community.
So
I
think
I
think
absolutely
that
we
need
to
be
very
cautious,
we're
sure
of
this.
You
know
pot
of
money
that
needs
to
go
into
the
community
and
really
help
the
ones
that
need
it.
The
most
and
the
community
engagement
community
outreach
is
going
to
be
critical
and,
I
believe,
is
going
to
be
something
that
we
all
need
to
do,
because
we
all
know
someone
or
an
entity
that
may
need
this
funds.
R
So
the
other
thing
that
I
want
to
be
cautious
in
just
talking
to
my
team,
because
I
learned
I
learned
so
much
from
them
because
they're
out
there
with
the
community,
they
said,
if
you
put
you
know,
let's
say
you're,
going
to
only
allow
50
000.
Some
businesses
don't
have
that.
They
cannot
show
you
receivables
for
50
000,
but
they
can
show
your
receivables
for
10
000,
11
000
and
I
know
that's
probably
more
work,
but
I
just
wanna
also
caution.
R
Sometimes
when
we
put
limits,
we
leave
a
lot
of
people
out
that
could
be
positively.
You
know
receive
a
lot
from
just
applying
for
fifteen
twenty
thousand
dollars
instead
of
let's
say
fifty.
A
A
I
want
to
go
back
to
this
split.
It's
2
million
for
economic
development,
2
million
to
can
is
there
if
economic
development,
I
can't
imagine
them
not
being
able
to
spend
the
2
million,
but
is
there
a
need?
Is
it
50
50?
Is
it
60
40?
Is
it
70
30?
How
did
I
know
it's
probably
of
okay,
we're
going
to
go
50
50
here?
Was
there
more
thought
than
that
in
the
the
split,
and
can
we
move
it
from
one
to
the
other?
If
we
think
there's
more
need
in
one
area
than
the
other
area.
B
Mr
chair,
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
the
community
and
neighborhoods
team,
but
I
think
that
our
approach
here
was
that
there
was
more
than
enough
need
for
both
and
originally
we
had.
We
had
planned
on
proposing
more
money
for
this
bucket,
so
I
don't
think
either
department
will
have
trouble
dispersing
that
money
into
the
community.
I
mean
you
know
you
you're
you're,
going
through
the
cdbg
process
right
now
too.
So
you
see
a
lot
of
that.
A
lot
of
the
need
out
in
the
community
and
it's
there's
plenty
yeah.
A
And
one
more
time
I'll
give
it
back
up.
Sorry,
one
more
question
on
the
the
delegation,
I'm
I'm
kind
of
hesitant
on
delegating
our
financial
obligations
to
the
the
staff.
I'd
rather
see
the
delegation
staying
with
the
council
members
and
that
that's
just
my
my
thoughts
on
that
right
now
and.
K
To
clarify
that's
responding
to
the
that
what's
in
the
proposal
is
that
anything
under
50
000
would
be
approved
by
this
board
by
this
staff
level
board
and
not
yeah.
A
B
Mr
chair,
just
that
it
becomes
just
really
time
consuming
for
the
council
as
well
to
process
those
applications
and
it
I
completely
understand
and
respect
the
the
desire
not
to
delegate,
but
the
idea
is
to
get
the
money
out
into
the
community
faster.
So
we
tried
to
propose
you
know
something
that
wasn't
you
know
that
would
that
would
be
acceptable
but
appreciate
that
okay.
G
So
a
couple
of
questions
first
off
and
I
I
don't
think
that
I
think
it
was
asked,
but
maybe
not
touched
upon-
is
this
going
to
be
in
in
the
the
four
million
dollar
proposal
and
either
through
the
housing
part
of
it
or
the
the
business
part
of
it?
Is
this
a
rolling
application
where
anybody
could
come
in
and
try
to
access
this
money
at
any
time?
Or
is
this?
We
are
putting
a
deadline
on
it
and
all
applications
must
be
in
and
then
the
committee
will
review
the
applications
and
go
from
there.
L
G
Okay,
so
recognizing
that
that's
what
I
I
thought
recognizing
that
and
knowing
that
sure
you
know,
we
have
to
process
all
of
the
applications
if
we're
processing
all
of
the
applications
at
one
time,
then,
even
if
we
get
you
know,
a
million
applications
and
several
of
them
are
under
50
000..
K
B
N
Q
G
A
balancing
question
sure
I
guess
my
concern
is,
and
I
recognize
again
going
back
that
there's
a
lot
of
work
involved,
but
if
you're
sitting
down
and
processing
all
of
the
applications
and
looking
at
all
of
them,
then
the
recommendation
it
doesn't
you're
having
that
discussion,
whether
you're
then
at
that
point
making
the
decision
or
then
giving
a
recommendation
right,
you're
still
making
that
having
that
discussion
within
that
committee
level
such
that,
I
would
hope
that
whether
the
amount
of
the
application
doesn't
necessarily
I
mean,
of
course
it
plays
a
role
right,
but
you're
probably
I
would
hope
evaluating
all
of
that
as
you're
looking
at
how
these
the
funds
are
spent.
G
So
going
to
this
idea
of
whether
there
be
a
threshold
where
somebody
can,
the
committee
would
just
make
the
decision,
I
don't
necessa,
I
don't
neces.
I
don't
see
anything
wrong
with
just
bringing
all
of
those
applications
to
the
committee
the
same
way
we
do
with
cip
and
what
we've
just
done
with
hud,
because
you're
already
having
that
discussion-
and
I
know
exactly
what
you
may
be
thinking
over
there.
No.
F
Member
mono's
amendment,
if
we
actually
want
to
incentivize
maximum
instead
of
minimum,
it
makes
more
sense
for
us
to
stick
to
just
make
formal
either.
The
committee
has
all
the
say-
or
we
retain
all
of
our
say
over
the
process,
because
I
I
do
think
that
his
amendment
is
probably
more
necessary
to
make
sure
that
we
target
that
demographic
that
keeps
falling
through
other
holes.
G
I
think
we
can
still
deploy
it
as
relatively
quickly
as
it
can
get
on
an
agenda
and
and
we're
following
through
with
all
of
the
same
transparency
and
processes
that
we've
done
in
deploying
any
other
funds
that
we
we
have.
So
that's
my
pitch
for
having
an
advisory
committee.
I
appreciate
the
people
that
have
been
listed
or
the
organizations
rather
the
other
boards
that
have
been
listed
as
members
of
that
advisory
committee.
I
think
we
could
add
to
it,
or
maybe
get
some
community
members
involved
in
in
that
board
would
be
interesting
and
helpful.
G
A
Thank
you
very
much
council
member.
Please.
O
Like
we've
been
doing
for
the
last
couple
months,
I
prefer
to
obviously
have
this
committee
have
have
a
recommendation
like
we
have
done,
and
I
think
this
this
console
can
be
efficient.
We
just
made
a
bunch
of
amen
amendments
to
the
cb,
cdbg
and
hud
very
quick,
and
I
think
it
was
very
efficient.
I
think
we
can
handle
it.
I
really
really
believe
so.
C
C
I
would
say
it's
probably
better,
to
have
an
eve,
an
odd
number,
and
I
would
request
that
the
odd
number
comes
from
either
the
racial
equity
and
policing,
commission
or
the
human
rights
commission
just
because
I
think
it's
important
for
me.
This
is
really
important
that
we
deploy
these
funds
with
an
eye
towards
equity.
That's
a,
I
think,
a
citywide
goal,
but
something
espec
specifically
when
we're
handing
out
cash
to
organizations.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
as
equitable
as
possible
and
how
we
do
that.
C
So
I
would
request
that
it's
a
five
member
board
and
the
additional
person
comes
from
one
of
those
two
or
maybe
it
becomes
a
nine
member
and
we
get
two
from
each
and
that
way
we
could
fulfill
council
member
pui's
request
of
having
well.
We
may
be
able
to
fulfill
the
request
of
having
at
least
one
person
from
each
council
district,
making
sure
that
the
east
and
the
west
side
is
represented,
but
that
would
be
my
suggestion
for
the
board
makeup.
A
F
F
K
O
Mr
chair,
I
I
just
to
add
to
this
conversation.
The
part
that
are
trying
to
this
suggest
this.
This
proposal
is
trying
to
cut,
is
us
who,
I
think,
we've
been
efficient,
so
you
know
cutting
us.
O
And
I
believe
so
we
are
committed-
I
you
know
just
to
bring
up
ppp.
I
mean
I
was
working
last
year
at
the
end
of
the
year
trying
to
get
information
into
magna
about
ppp,
and
you
will
be
surprised
how
many
small
businesses
didn't
get
the
information
it
wasn't
as
ideal
as
it
was
many
of
these
organizations.
Many
businesses
of
color
didn't
believe
that
this
was
true
right.
O
They
did
not
believe
that
this
money
was
for
reals,
they
thought,
and
I
was
calling
with
with
a
friend
of
ours,
rudy
calling
these
businesses
and
they
thought
we
were
a
scam
which.
A
H
H
A
D
Okay,
while
we,
while
taylor's
pulling
up
the
presentation
for
the
canned
stuff
I'll,
give
a
quick
introduction.
D
D
P
D
Additionally,
in
the
coming
weeks,
the
city
council
will
receive
separate
updates
from
can
staff
on
thriving
in
place,
which
is
the
previously
named
the
gentrification
study
and
the
fleet
block.
So
that's
what
we're
doing
here
today.
I
will
now
turn
the
time
over
to
canned
staff
and
I
will
go
back
to
the
audience.
D
D
In
brief,
we
want
to
portray
that
the
housing
team
manages
millions
of
federal
dollars
that
we
pass
through
to
help
stabilize
rent,
provide
mortgage
assistance,
support
individuals
experiencing
homelessness
and
provide
housing
rehabilitation
work.
In
short,
they
do
the
work
of
preserving
affordable
housing
and
protecting
tenants
keeping
residents
in
their
homes.
Essentially,
next
week
april,
12th
we're
scheduled
to
provide
a
brief,
a
briefing
on
the
thriving
in
place,
study
and
housing
loss
mitigation.
So
please
note
that
we're
not
intending
to
go
in
depth
on
those
items
today,
but
are
excited
and
ready
to
next
week.
D
So
the
remainder
of
our
presentation
will
be
as
follows:
angela
price,
the
canned
policy
director
is
going
to
give
the
overview
of
the
2022
legislative
requirements
and
an
overview
of
growing
slc
an
update
and
then
nick
norris
will
give
an
overview
of
our
ordinances
that
are
in
the
works
as
well
as
existing
and
developing
plans.
So
thanks
for
your
time
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
angela.
I
Thank
you,
blake
cindy
lou.
Are
you
guiding
slides
or
sorry?
It's
taylor
hill
online,
okay,
taylor.
Do
you
mind
advancing
us
one
more
slide,
please
thank
you
so
much
taylor.
I
I
I
think
we
made
tremendous
progress
this
session,
having
worked
on
housing
for
several
years-
almost
I
guess,
12
years
now,
if
I'm
counting
back,
I
I
think
this
is
the
first
year
that
we've
seen
some
substantial
progress
in
housing,
and
so
I
just
want
to
illuminate
some
of
that.
First
right
before
the
session
the
week
before
the
session,
the
city
hosted
a
legislative
policy
summit,
and
this
was
a
really
great
event
where
we
had
many
legislators
come
and
we
were
really
setting
the
table
for
the
session
and
and
asked
of
funding
for
deeply
affordable
housing.
I
I
I
want
to
tee
this
up
a
little
bit
because
I
don't
know
how
many
of
you
are
aware
of
sb
34,
which
passed,
I
believe
in
2018,
and
this
is
the
new
requirements
for
moderate
income
housing
plans.
That
was
the
first
time
that
we
saw
at
a
state
level
this
nexus
between
land
use,
transportation,
housing
and
economic
development.
I
This
bill
was
passed
before
I'm
sorry,
growing
slc
was
adopted
before
this
bill
was
passed
and
that's
a
very
important
distinction
that
I'll
get
to
in
a
minute.
I
The
purpose
of
this
bill
was
to
start
having
cities
tailor
their
moderate
income
housing
plans
to
meet
the
identified
needs
within
our
communities,
and
while
there
wasn't
a
requirement
to
update
the
land,
use
and
and
transportation
element
in
our
general
plan,
the
idea
is
that
those
three
elements
come
together
and
create
this
nexus.
So
we're
looking
at
our
our
community
in
a
holistic
way.
I
I
When
sb
34
was
initially
drafted,
we
as
a
city
were
in
a
really
great
position,
because
we
are
thought
leaders
in
the
space
of
developing
affordable
housing
and
having
affordable
housing
programs
and
so
having
to
pick
three
menu
items.
We
do
18
of
them,
so
I
just
want
to.
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
work
that
we're
doing
in
the
city,
because
I
know
we
hear
a
lot
that
we
aren't
doing
enough
and
we
always
can
be
doing
more.
I
I
wholeheartedly
believe
that,
but
we
have
made
substantial
strides
against
unprecedented
circumstances
of
land
values,
increasing
labor
costs,
increasing,
there's
a
whole
host
of
things
right
that
are
happening
that
are
beyond
our
control,
so
I
wanted
to
just
sort
of
set
the
table
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
about
where
we're
at
within
growing
slc.
You
can
see
on
the
slide
here
that
all
of
the
ordinances
that
nick
is
going
to
be
discussing
here
in
a
few
minutes
are
all
tied
to
goals
and
objectives
outlined
within
the
adopted
growing
slc
modern
income
housing
plan.
I
Can
you
switch
to
the
next
slide?
Please
so
this
year,
I'm
proud
to
say
that
salt
lake
city
worked
very
closely
with
the
utah
league
of
cities
and
towns
and
the
land
use
task
force
on
amending
the
requirements
for
moderate
income
housing
plans
and
the
bill.
Hb
462,
utah
housing,
affordability,
amendments-
I
don't
know
if
it
ended
up
at
like
130
pages.
There
was
a
lot
of
policy
in
there
and
it
was
a
lot
of
work
over.
I
You
know
not
just
last
year's
interim,
but
we've
been
teeing
up
these
changes
for
a
couple
of
years.
The
impetus
of
the
changes
really
are
for
cities
to
be
accountable
and
and
adopting
affordable
housing
policies
for
us
to
have
substantive
and
quantitative
data.
When
we
analyze
what
strategies
have
been
selected.
I
Knowing
that
we
have
to
update
our
entire
plan
this
year,
we
are
required
to
select
four
strategies
and
if
we
select
six
strategies
we
bump
into
a
category
category
of
priority
consideration
for
funding.
What
this
means
is
that
we
can
get
additional
points.
They
haven't
quite
developed
what
this
framework
will
look
like,
but
we
can
get
additional
points
for
state
funding
through
the
transportation
commission
through
the
office
through
the
governor's
office
and
through
arpa
grants,
and
so
it's
very
imperative
for
us.
I
So
our
current
our
current
framework
is,
we
can
say
you
know
we
want
to
do
these
27
things,
but
we
didn't
have
to
have
a
plan
or
a
timeline
on
when
we
were
going
to
do
them
now.
For
example,
if
we
say
we
want
to
adopt
an
adu
ordinance,
we
have
to
say
we're
going
to
adopt
an
adu
ordinance
and
we're
going
to
do
it
by
this
time
frame
and
we
have
to
report
on
that
every
year.
I
If
we
are
not
making
substantial
progress
or
accomplishing
the
adoption
of
that
adu
ordinance,
we
lose
points
and
we
do
not
get
bumped
for
that
priority
consideration
of
funding.
So
this
is
a
really
substantial
change
for
us
and
for
other
cities
right.
So
just
flagging
that,
for
you
guys
that
that
we
again
as
we're
selecting
those
strategies
we're
going
to
want
to
be
very
strategic
about
what
we
pick
and
thinking
through
how
we're
going
to
get
you
know,
have
the
most
impact
on
housing
within
our
city.
I
We
are
working
within,
can
right
now
to
identify
a
are
working
on
the
draft
of
an
rfp
to
hire
a
consultant
to
do
the
data
analysis
portion
and
the
public
engagement
portion
of
the
new
moderate
income
housing
plan.
We
see
thriving
in
place
which
we'll
be
talking
about
next
week,
which
is
the
city's
gentrification
study
as
a
foundational
piece
of
the
modern
income
housing
plan,
and
I
envision
the
policies
that
will
come
out
of
thriving
in
place
or
tip
as
as
a
foundational
framework
for
our
new
moderate
income
housing
plan.
I
I
I
I
We
have
there's
certain
time
frames
of
when
these
plans
need
to
be
completed,
and
we
thankfully
had
something
baked
into
the
policy,
because
we
have
34
stations
within
salt
lake
city
that
we
don't
have
to.
If
you
have,
I
believe
it
ended
up
at
four
or
five
stations
within
your
city.
You
get
more
of
a
grace
period
on
adopting
and
going
through
that
process.
I
We
for
the
existing
23
stations.
Nick's
team
will
start
analyzing
those
once
the
criteria
is
established
in
the
next
few
months
and
those
stations
will
be
analyzed
for
compliance
with
state
statute
and
then
nick's
team,
or
can
will
be
coming
before
the
council
to
have
you
adopt
a
resolution
certifying
that
we
meet
state
requirements.
I
Thank
you
before
I
go
into
the
details
on
the
slide.
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
this
this
is
simply
a
visual
graphic.
It's
not
showing
that
a
causation
between
housing
loss
mitigation
having
to
happen
before
arm
f30,
for
example.
So
I
just
want
to
show
that
this
is
more
of
just
a
road
map
identifying
the
different
areas
within
growing
slc.
We
see
this
as
our
policy
roadmap,
so
with
any
good
policy.
I
I
want
to
just
highlight
a
couple
things
so
right
now.
Recent
data
is
showing
that
we
have
less
than
a
two
percent
vacancy
rate
here
in
salt
lake
county.
We
have
a
gap
of
over
eighteen
thousand,
affordable
units
within
salt
lake
city
and
we've
seen
at
least
a
ten
percent
year-over-year
increase
in
rent.
I
just
read
in
the
deseret
news
that
that's
actually
more
close
to
40
percent,
so
we
know
we
have
a
housing
crisis
and
I'll
be
the
first
to
tell
you
that
I
often
am
looking
at
what
other
solutions
do
we
have?
I
What
should
we
be
doing?
What
else
can
we
be
doing,
and
I'm
constantly
brought
back
to
the
the
guiding
principle
of
growing
slc,
which
is
in
its
last
year
and
us
being
able
to
close
that
chapter
looking
at
the
policies
that
we
have
before
us
to
adopt
or
implement
and
how
we
can
chip
away
at
those
close
that
chapter
and
look
at
thriving
in
place
and
our
new
modern
income
housing
plan
is,
is
the
pathway
forward?
I
I
Basically
how
that
policy
shook
out
and
we'll
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
in
this
next
week
is
we
can
only
require
affordable
units
if
it's
incentive,
based
or
if
it's
through
a
development
agreement.
So
we
have
these
limitations
at
the
state.
Obviously,
funding
is
always
a
limitation
for
us
and
then
land
we
have
we're
built
out
city
and
our
land
values
in
salt
lake
are
really
high
as
a
council.
What
are
the
policy
levers
that
you
have?
What
are
the
levers
that
you
have
their
budget
and
their
policies
and
you'll
see
here?
I
We
have
several
ordinances
that
are
at
various
phases
throughout
the
adoption
process
and
nick
will
go
into
those
in
a
minute
that
are
those
policy
levers
that
you
guys
have
the
opportunity
to
pull.
If
you
choose
they're
all
aligned
with
growing
slc
and
they're
all
they
all
meet
objectives
and
action
items
as
identified
in
our
adopted
housing
plan.
I
We
also
have
our
programs-
and
I
was
just
listening
in
on
your
discussion
on
cdbg
funding
our
housing.
Our
housing
team
has
been
doing
exceptional
work
in
our
community,
mobilizing
funding
resources
to
assist
in
rent
assistance,
mortgage
assistance,
homeless
services,
and
they
they
are
kind
of
the
lifeblood
of
housing
stability
within
our
community.
I
Lastly,
I
just
want
to
say
that
these
all
work
towards
addressing
the
goals
identified
within
growing
slc,
our
land
use
ordinances
are
a
long
term
strategy.
They
unlock
the
ability
to
create
more
affordable
housing,
but
they
don't
necessarily
lead
to
an
immediate
increase
in
the
amount
of
affordable
housing.
So
with
that,
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
nick.
P
So
on
this
slide,
what
we've
tried
to
do
is
highlight
some
of
the
in
progress
activities
and
proposals
that
this
council
has
seen.
Maybe
some
of
the
the
newly
elected
council
members
have
not,
but
but
they've
been
in
the
council
office
prior,
some
of
which
you've
had
some
briefings
on,
so
I'm
going
to
try
to
go
over
why
we
have
selected
and
worked
on
the
things
that
we
have
and
I
think
it's
to
hit
on
what
angela
was
just
speaking
about.
P
P
That
number
now
is
less
than
30
percent,
and
the
reason
being
is
because
we
did,
we
saw
very
little
housing
being
built
in
that
1980s
1990s
period,
and
so
we
don't
have
that
supply.
There's
not
much
that
we
can
do
about
that
as
a
city
right
now,
right,
that's
in
the
past.
That's
done
what
we
are
doing
with
zoning
changes
now
is
trying
to
avoid
repetition
of
that
for
future
generations,
so
that
future
generations
have
better
access
to
housing
than
what
the
current
generations
of
people
who
are
looking
for.
P
P
This
the
goal
of
this
project
is
to
do
a
couple
of
things.
One
is
to
expand
the
land
area
that's
available
for
building
housing,
particularly
the
missing
middle
housing.
Missing
middle
housing
is
the
housing
that
tends
to
be
more
accessible
to
ownership
opportunities.
P
We
also
want
to
stretch
those
particularly
taxpayer
dollars
that
are
invested
in
affordable
housing
further
by
promoting
more
units
that
can
help
offset
the
cost
per
unit,
and
we
want
to
expand
who
may
be
able
to
create
that
affordable
housing
right
now.
I
think,
when
you
look
around
our
city,
you
can
see
that
it's
typically
big
developers,
and
so
we
want
to
expand
that
so
that
it's
open
to
more
people
to
and
entrepreneurs
to
help
provide
that
this
is
in
the
engagement
process.
We
actually
are
just
kicking
off.
P
In
fact,
we
have
a
community
meeting,
that's
going
on
right
now,
and
the
goal
is
to
transmit
this
by
the
end
of
this
calendar
year.
So
we're
going
to
be
pretty
aggressive.
We
know
we're
not
going
to
appease
everybody,
but
I
think
the
approach
that
we're
taking
on
this
is
that
this
is.
P
We
have
reached
the
point
in
salt
lake
city,
where
this
is
a
critical
issue
and
we
we
need
to
get
something
in
front
of
decision
makers
so
that
they
can
move
forward
along
those
same
lines,
a
project
that
that
some
of
you
have
seen
the
changes
to
the
rmf-30
zoning
district.
The
goal
of
this
project
was
to
increase
density
while
preserving
scale.
P
The
intent
was
to
start
with
one
there's:
four
rmf
zones,
the
30,
35,
45
and
75..
The
goal
was
to
start
with
the
30
and
then
quickly
translate
that
to
the
other
three
zones,
because
that's
taken
longer
than
what
we
anticipated.
That
has
not
happened
yet,
and
so
we
are.
We
are
waiting
to
see
what
happens
with
that.
We
also
have
to
coordinate
that
with
the
affordable
housing
incentives.
P
It's
been
challenging
for
us
to
do
that,
because
we
don't
know
what
the
outcome
of
that
arm
of
30
is
going
to
be
the
next
project.
I
wanted
to
talk
about
what
is
the
shared
housing,
which
is
formerly
single
room
occupancy
and
the
status
of
that,
or
why
we're
doing
that.
So
the
goal
of
that
project
was
to
introduce
additional
housing
types.
P
So
we're
hoping
to
to
have
that
move
forward
as
well
along
those
same
lines
is
that
we
have
a
proposal
to
reduce
our
parking
requirements.
The
reason
why
parking
is
important
is
because
it
contributes
to
two
things:
one,
the
cost
of
developing
housing
and
it
reduces
the
amount
of
land.
That's
available
for
housing,
and
so
we
know
that
those
are
two
things
that
that
is
our
premium
in
salt
lake
city.
P
I
think
many
of
you
have
heard
me
talk
in
the
past
about
how
much
land
in
the
city
allows
zoning
and
how
limited
that
or
allows
housing,
I'm
sorry
and
how
limited
that
is
in
the
city,
especially
for
non-single-family
homes
and
those
that
land
is
competing
with
every
other
commercial
use
and
office
use
in
the
city.
P
And
so
it's
it's
a
very
tight
option.
A
couple
of
things
that
are
in
process
we
just
on
last
friday,
we
received
our
draft
pro
a
draft
proposal
from
a
consultant
who's,
updating
the
downtown
building
heights,
and
that
includes
updating
street
engagement
standards.
P
And
when
we
talk
about
downtown
building
heights,
that's
the
geography
of
the
downtown
plan.
It
is
not
just
the
downtown
zones,
it
touches.
Actually
we're
probably
gonna
have
to
scale
this
back,
because
there's
about
18
different
zoning
districts
that
it
touches,
and
we
know
that
there
might
be
some
ramifications
of
making
changes
to
those
zoning
districts
that
are
outside
of
the
downtown
area.
P
But
we
plan
on
having
responding
back
to
that
consultant
with
some
edits
in
the
next
two
weeks
and
then
once
we
get
the
final
draft,
we'll
start
that
publi
that
public
engagement
process,
for
that.
The
goal
of
that
obviously
is
to
increase
to
update
building
heights
some
places
to
increase
them,
but
also
to
have
them
match
and
align
with
the
different
building
types,
how
they're
regulated
in
the
building
code
so
that
we
are
not
creating
barriers
and
obstacles,
particularly
for
housing.
P
Other
things
that
could
be
addressed
in
that
or
that
will
be
addressed
in
that
are
ground.
Floor
uses
some
of
our
setbacks
for
residential,
hopefully
also
some
tree
regulations
and
and
other
things
like
that
and
then
finally,
something
that
we
briefed
the
planning
commission
or
the
city
council
on
in
march,
updates
to
the
adu
code.
Those
are
in
staff
level,
development
and
hopefully
in
may
we'll
start
that
public
engagement.
P
P
The
other
things
that
we
have
going
on
in
in
the
planning
division
that
are
related
to
housing
but
also
bigger
picture
types
of
things-
is
that
we're
working
on
a
number
of
updates
to
plans.
Obviously,
the
ball
pick
ballpark
stationary
plan,
which
many
of
you
have
heard
about.
P
You
were
discussing
it
a
little
bit
earlier
we've.
I
think
we
just
recently
sent
a
transmittal
about
updating
about
the
update
to
that
plan
to
to
address
the
resolution
14
of
2020
that
the
council
adopted
about
updating
the
council
on
plans
and
then
we
hope
to
start
the
public
engagement
on
zoning
and
get
the
plan
to
the
planning
commission
in
the
next
two
months,
so
we'll
that
will
be
something
that
everybody
can
look
forward
to
we're
also
going
to
restart
the
life
on
state
project.
P
For
those
that
don't
know,
this
was
a
grant
project
that
the
city
received
back
in.
I
think
it
was
a
2018
grant
that
went
through
a
planning
process
to
revision,
state
street
and
the
land
use
and
the
connections
on
how
to
improve
particularly
the
function
of
state
street
for
people
not
just
cars,
obviously
with
udot
ownership.
Of
that
street,
that
that's
a
challenge,
but
this
was
done
in
conjunction
with
south
salt
lake
city.
P
They
adopted
theirs
because
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
salt
lake
city
did
not,
and
so
we
want
to
bring
that
back.
Take
that
through
the
process
to
get
that
updated,
it
would
be
an
update
to
the
central
community
plan
as
well
as
the
ballpark
would
be,
and
so
hopefully
that
includes
some
zoning
changes
along
the
state
street
corridor.
P
P
That
will
be
our
last
station
that
we
have
a
have
to
do
a
plan
for
outside
of
the
s
line,
which
we
don't
know
to
the
extent
of
how
many
planning
we'll
have
to
do
along
that
corridor.
But
that's
a
significant,
I
think,
milestone
for
the
city.
Considering
10
years
ago
we
did
not
have
a
single
station
area
plan
in
this
city,
even
though
we
had
dozens
of
stations
and
then
I
think
that
that
was
the
only
other
plan
that
I
had,
and
I
don't
know
if
we
program.
I
That
was
brought
to
us
was
by
a
company
called
rhino.
They
were
an
ivory
innovations
prize
winner
in
2020,
I
believe,
and
essentially
I'll
just
use
them
as
an
example.
Although
there's
many
companies
that
that
do
this
type
of
program,
but
essentially
they
offer
a
security
deposit
insurance
program
and
you
don't
have
to
income
qualify
for
this.
This
isn't
for
low.
It
can
be
used
by
low-income
individuals,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be,
and
basically
it
allows
me
as
a
renter.
I
I
would
pay
say
five
dollars
a
month
into
this
insurance
program
and
rhino
would
cover
my
security
deposit.
So
if
my
landlord
said
you
know
your
dog
ate
through
the
the
door
you
have
to
pay
for
this
rhino
would
cover
that
or
the
security
deposit
insurance
program
would
cover
what
would
normally
be
taken
out
of
my
security
deposit
as
we
started
drafting
an
ordinance
with
this.
I
In
this
with
the
city
attorney's
office,
we
came
across
some
challenges
with
some
state
preemption
and
we
were
directed
to
bring
that
before
the
council,
and
we
can
do
that
at
another
time
or
we
can
have
a
detailed
discussion
about
it
today,
but
to
see
if
there's
a
legislative
interest
in
working
in
the
interim
on
fixing
that
state
preemption
on
on
renters
choice.
So,
additionally,
we
have
been
working
on
rolling
out
a
landlord
tenant
resource
website.
I
You
tenants
can
currently
opt
into
a
renter's
choice
program
if
they
want,
but
this
was
this
would
have
been
an
ordinance
that
would
have
really
kind
of
encouraged
landlords
to
participate
as
well.
So
I
know
that
ivory
and
all
of
their
rental
properties
are
accepting
programs
like
rhino
for
security,
deposit
insurance,
and
I
know,
there's
other
landlords
across
the
city
that
are
doing
that
as
well.
I
Well,
that's
also
one
of
the
questions
as
well.
It's
a
good
one,
that's
a
good
one!
It
would
have
been
a
voluntary,
a
voluntary
opt-in
by
landlords,
but
an
encouragement
through
ordinance.
A
A
P
Give
us
direction
on
what
future
changes
to
make
in
those
areas
that
they
cover.
A
A
P
Those
are
in
the
proposed
code
to
address
that,
so
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
follow-up
questions,
I
know
that
through
the
development
of
some
projects
and
some
proposals,
there's
been
some
potential
things
that
community
has
raised
that.
Maybe
we
want
to
think
about
as
a
city
as
that
goes
forward,
because.
A
A
K
Previous
council,
the
previous
council
felt
that
it
was
important
to
have
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance
figured
out
in
place.
Before
adopting
that.
I
think.
Since
there
are
new
council
members,
there
may
be
a
different
feeling
on
the
council,
but
we're
not
sure
previously.
The
council
was
not
interested
in
acting
until
the
housing
loss
mitigation
was
adopted
because
of
some
comments
that
were
raised
during
the
public
hearing
related
to
that
about
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
and
what
what
that
ordinance
may
do
to
that.
A
P
And-
and
the
issue
with
that
is
that
we
were
asked
to
do
some
research
on
a
couple
things-
and
you
know
just
to
give
you-
I
guess
a
sneak
peek
of
that
transmittal.
P
The
the
main
thing
we
were
looking
we
were
asked
to
look
for
was
increasing
the
exemption
from
parking
for
lots
between
five
thousand
and
ten
thousand
square
feet,
and
we
we
were
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
what
that
ramifications
of
that
would
be,
and
because
there
are
so
many
variables
with
that
building
sizes
type
use,
it
was
impossible
to
figure
out
what
those
ramifications
may
be,
and
so
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
trying
to
research
that,
but
we
just
couldn't
figure
out.
There's
too
many
unknowns
and
every
unknown
changes
the
outcome
so.
A
So
I
I
ask
those
questions,
because
I
look
at
this
and
I,
after
other
discussions
and
and
you
know,
we
always
want
to
strive
for
perfection,
but
you
know
in
anything
policy-wise
you're
never
going
to
get
there
and
you've
got
to
negotiate
and
you've
got
to
compromise
on
different
things,
and
I'm
just
looking
at
the
council
going.
I
know
we
stopped
moving
forward,
rmf
30
for
a
very
viable
reason,
but
we're
you
know
in
hindsight.
A
Was
it
because
we
were
looking
for
perfection
and
we
could
have
just
got
to
the
80
position
and
then
it
you
know,
made
adjustments
afterwards,
when
we
get
to
the
housing
loss
mitigation,
I'm
not
really
kind
of
asking
a
question,
I'm
kind
of
like
pointing
it
at
ourselves.
A
Do
we
need
to
kind
of
reset
and
say:
okay:
80
is
better
than
zero.
Let's
keep
the
ball
moving
and
then,
when
we
get
to
the
the
next
ordinance,
we
start
adjusting
at
that
point.
F
As
someone
who's
never
had
a
bite
at
this
apple,
we
need
to
go
back
and
revisit
it.
I
know
council,
member
poi
and
I
have
never
had
the
opportunity,
but
the
concerns
about
it
to
me
are
very
grave
and
if
we
can
get
creative
about
addressing
them,.
A
Yeah
and
that's
I'd
like
to
absolutely
that's
the
the
other
thing
is
that
we
have
two
new
members
on
the
council
and
it
would
probably
be
talking
to
ourselves
here
be
wise
to
readdress
it,
so
we
all
get
better
educated
on
it,
and
then
we
can
also
look
at
it
at
this
time
where
we
were
on
the
house
loss
mitigation
scheduled
for
the
april
12th.
So
that's,
I
think,
about
seven
days
from
now,
something
like
that.
Something
like
that.
A
C
C
It's
a
rooming
boarding,
house
or
whatever,
but
it's
really
kind
of
the
same
thing,
and
I
I
would
like
for
us
to
bring
back
both
of
those
and
discuss
them
and
be
expeditious
about
get
going
through
the
parking
ordinance
now
that
it's
been
transmitted
back
to
us,
and
thank
you
for
looking
into
that,
even
though
there
wasn't
a
clear
solution
to
the
the
question,
but
I
think
those
three
are
things
that
we
need
to
do,
and
I
think
to
your
question
earlier
as
to
whether
the
plans
are
dependent
on
us
making
action
on
those,
though
not
technically.
C
True,
like
the
plan
is
like
the
idea
for
the
ordinances,
not
the
other
way
around.
I
think
if
we
don't
act
on
the
things
that
have
had
hours
and
hours
and
at
this
point
years
of
time
invested
into
them,
then
what's
the.
Why
would
can
keep
working
on
other
things
in
those
master
plans
that
we
want
them
to
work
on?
So
I
think
it's.
I
think,
those
three
things
now
that
all
three
of
them
are
in
our
court.
F
I
think,
in
addition
to
us
just
operating
in
good
faith,
it's
really
important
for
us
to
acknowledge
that
the
development
around
us
happens
whether
or
not
we
act
and
we
actually
are
putting
our
constituents
at
risk.
Sros
are
happening.
You
know
we
are
we're
facing
neighbor
versus
neighbor
on
parking
issues.
We
are
creating
conflict
and
risk
in
places.
If
we
don't
take
this
up
quickly,.
C
And
I'll
add
to
that,
I
think
the
the
concern
about
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
loss
as
connected
with
rmf
30
is
valid.
However,
that's
already
happening.
There
are
multiple
houses
on
the
market
right
now
in
liberty,
wells
that
I
represent
for
over
a
million
dollars.
That
is
terrifying
and
the
fact
is
because
and
that's
a
our
one
5000
zone.
So
it's
not
our
mf
30,
but
like
the
fact
that
those
single-family
houses
are
now
selling
in
our
city
for
over
a
million
dollars
means
that
it
doesn't
matter
how
old
the
house
is.
C
It's
going,
it's
not
of
an
affordable
house
as
soon
as
it
changes
hands
once
in
this
market.
So
it
would
be
better
for
us
to
allow
those
things
to
the
house.
The
the
rmf
30
ordinance
has
in
it
a
preservation
bonus,
so
they
could
keep
that
existing
house,
but
still
build
some
smaller
units
behind
it
and
and
then
we
get
instead
of
one
one
million
dollar
1.5
million
dollar
house
in
our
city,
we
maybe
get
four
at
four
or
five
hundred
thousand
dollars,
which
is
still
not
affordable,
but
at
least
it's
not
sorry.
C
At
least
it's
not
a
million
dollars,
and
so
I
don't
see
that
as
getting
at
our
deeply
affordable
housing
crisis
or
need,
but
it
at
least
keeps
it
more
somewhat
more
moderately
affordable,
rather
than
just
right
now
it's
it's
insane
how
much
houses
are
selling
for
it,
and
at
least
we
could
get
something
that
is
within
the
realm
of
attainability,
rather
than
1.5
million
for
a
single
family
house.
That
is
a
bungalow
that
is
less
than
2
000
square
feet.
It's.
A
Any
other
question
just
I'm:
I
appreciate
the
conversation
and
and
the
first
installment
in
our
can
education
and
discussion
yeah.
This
is
a
a
multi-family
netflix
tv
show
here
can
part
one.
H
A
Shouldn't
I
shouldn't
be
facetious
about
this.
This
is
very
important
and
I
appreciate
all
the
discussions
and
the
incredible
work
that
you
guys
done
on
this,
and
I
look
forward
to
our
discussion
and
education
on
these
top
three
ordinances
like
I
would
call
them
top.
C
I
I
So
when
we
wrote
the
rfp
for
the
gentrification
study
we
built
in
how
amendments
to
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance.
Now
I
want
to
just
point
out
and
again
we'll
go
into
more
detail
on
this
next
week,
but
the
gentrification
study
or
thriving
in
place,
which
was
named
by
our
community
group,
is
a
will,
help
us
housing.
Loss
mitigation
is
a
displacement
strategy
right.
I
We
would
have
to
do
a
fee
justification
with
that
as
well,
and
so
we
can
get
into
some
of
those
details
with
you,
but
that
would
be
a
separate,
a
separate
scope
of
work,
because
our
this
thriving
in
place
is
really
kind
of
policy
focused.
So,
yes,
it
is
baked
into
that,
and
the
intention
is
for
us
to
to
go
through
the
process
of
you
know,
seeking
public
input
on
what
those
policies
could
look
like.
A
O
I
just
thought
of
something.
I
think
this
is
a
probably
a
better
thing
for
a
small
group
meeting,
but
I
think
I
adus
is
something:
I've
been
like
stalking
non-stop
for
several
years
now
and
not
only
last
year,
but
and
I
I
hope
that
maybe
we
have
a
chance
to
explore
some
like
creative
ideas
that
were
implemented
in
other
cities
near
us.
O
Actually-
and
you
know
so,
you
know
pre-approved
blueprints
from
thing
from
adus
are
things
that
other
cities
are
doing
down
payment
assistant
assistance
from
those
rent
to
own
your
own
adu
are,
and
that's
a
list
of,
like
you
know,
four
different,
I
mean
40
different
things
that
other
cities
are
doing
and
they're
booming.
So
I
would
love
to
see
if
we
can.
I
would
love
to
be
helpful,
but
I
would
like
like
us
to
look
into
this
a
little
more
and
I
know
you
guys
are
doing
an
amazing
job.
R
A
The
city
recorder
is
also
joining
the
table
and
on
the
looks
like
we
have
jason,
is
on
the
screen
wave
to
us.
Jason
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
it
gotcha.
Thank
you,
jason.
A
D
P
K
K
Part
of
the
reason
why
it
came
back
in
addition
to
what
nick
tarbet
mentioned
is
that
the
county
council
also
reviewed
the
annexation
proposal
and
had
some
comments
about
the
area
and
the
annexed
property.
The
proposed
annex
property,
the
petition
did
change
from
17
acres
to
28
acres,
to
include
the
city
parcel
and
the
parcel
owned
by
the
state
to
assist
with
the
rounding
out
of
the
cleaning
up
of
that
west
area.
A
A
We
have
five
minutes.
O
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity.
I
really
don't
have
to
speak.
E
S
P
L
We
can
work
with
one
jurisdiction
moving
forward.
We
can
work
with
the
city
moving.
A
Thank
you,
jason.
Any
questions
for
jason
or
cindy
lou
nick.
C
K
C
K
K
P
Okay,
thanks
and
just
maybe
I
can
add,
the
the
zoning
process
for
an
annexation
is
different
than
the
zoning
process.
If
someone
were
to
chain
propose
a
change
to
the
zoning
map,
so
it
doesn't
go
through
it,
it's
determined
all
at
the
same
time,
under
the
same
application,
and-
and
so
I
know
when
this
was
in
front
of
the
council
before
there
was
some
discussion-
and
you
can
determine
this
later
as
whether
or
not
you
want
to
seek
a
recommendation
from
the
planning
commission
or
not.
P
That's
your
prerogative
on
on
this
on
annexations,
so
we'll
we
can
cross
that
bridge
as
we
get
closer
to
that.
A
H
A
Moving
on
to
item
number,
eight,
the
public
lands
20-year
master
plan,
reimagine
nature
allison,
oh
allison,
is
on
this.
I
thought.
M
H
T
Gonna
try
to
fix
that
echo
there
we
go.
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
I
apologize
for
that.
T
Yeah,
so
my
apologies
for
making
you
wait.
This
is,
as
you
know,
the
public
lands
20-year
master
plan
review.
T
The
goal
here
is
to
review
and
discuss
the
reimagine
nature
master
plan,
which
is
a
city-wide
long-range
vision
for
transforming
public
lands
of
salt
lake
city,
and
it's
also
a
general
work
plan
for
the
public
lands
department
itself,
which
is
a
relatively
new
department
tonight.
The
council
will
set
the
date
for
potential
adoption.
Public
hearing
would
be
on
april,
19th
and
potential
vote
would
be
on
may
3rd.
T
I
well
let
me
mention
two
before
I
turn
it
over
to
the
department
and
their
consultants
that
the
peanut
advisory
board-
that's
parks,
trails,
natural
lands
and
urban
forestry
gave
I'll
quote
this
a
ringing
endorsement
of
the
proposed
master
plan
when
they
reviewed
it
and,
as
some
of
you
will
remember-
and
others
of
you
won't
because
you
weren't
here
there
were
previous
council
briefings
on
this.
One
was
october
2020,
which
was
a
mid-process
update
on
the
community
engagement
strategy
and
which
is,
what's
essentially
part
of
the
effort
to
comply.
T
T
So
the
october
2020
briefing
was
the
mid-process
update
on
the
committee
on
the
community
engagement
strategy
for
the
public
lands
master
plan,
and
then
in
march
2020
there
was
a
review
of
public
lands
of
the
public
lands
needs
assessment
which
the
department
had
commissioned
and
said
that,
and
that
was
what
set
the
baseline
for
the
master
plan
and
finally
and
sort
of
none
of
you.
Well,
some
of
you
probably
weren't
born
then
the
most
recent
city,
comprehensive
master
plan
of
this
type,
was
in
1992.
T
So
it's
been
a
while,
since
there's
been
a
public
lands
or
anything
of
the
type
master
just.
T
I
want
to
mention
one
correction
that
will
be
made
in
the
current
version
of
the
master
plan
and
that
has
to
do
with
golf
division
finances.
So
this
is
on
page
171
of
the
plan
itself,
where
it
says
that
golf
receives
no
funding
from
the
city's
general
fund.
In
fact,
it
does
the
last
three
years
it
has
received
a
little
over
five
million
dollars,
combined
so
about
1.2
million
or
something
per
year
from
the
general
fund.
T
So
so
that
will
be
fixed.
They
already
have
the
wording
in
place
and
everything,
but
that
is
different
than
than
what
was
sent
to
you
and
then.
Finally,
I
just
draw
your
attention
to
the
policy
questions
about
how
the
department
will
balance
among
the
competing
priorities
in
terms
of
allocating
funds
and
staff
time
to
all
different
sorts
of
all
of
the
things
that
are
included
in
this
plan,
as
well
as
unexpected
funding
opportunities
scheduled
work
by
other
programs
etc.
T
The
third
is
whether
the
council
wants
to
ask
the
department
to
include
specific
budget
estimates,
at
least
very
broad
estimates
in
their
five-year
plans,
which
they
will
develop
each
every
five
years
to
to
begin
to
prioritize
specific
projects.
T
There
are
also
a
couple
items
mentioned
in
the
master
plan
that
could
have
implications
beyond
the
public
lands
department.
That
would
be
including
the
festival
street.
The
rio
grande
festival
street,
which
is
which
may
have
some
kind
of
interaction
with
the
rda's
station
center
project
area,
planning
efforts,
there's
also
questions
about
the
fleet
block
and
how
that
might
be
used
for
green
space
or
for
other
uses
or
obviously,
among
other
uses.
T
And
finally,
the
council
might
be
interested.
There
is
a
planned
golf
master
plan
coming
up,
but
given
the
importance
of
the
golf
fund
in
the
last
decade,
the
council
might
want
to
ask
for
additional
information
on
short
term
about
how
the
how
the
administration
plans
to
improve
the
financial
sustainability
of
that
fund.
So
I
will
turn
it
over
to
kristin
and
her
team.
Thank.
Q
Q
Q
Q
There's
now
a
heightened
awareness
that
these
public
spaces
are
essential
for
health,
socializing
expression
and
environmental
resilience.
They
are
restorative
outlet
for
all
of
us
in
2020.
Our
public
engagement
for
this
master
plan
needed
to
pivot
to
embrace
that
moment
with
innovative
methods
for
involving
the
community.
Q
As
alison
said,
you
hopefully
saw
the
packet
of
the
parks,
natural
lands,
urban
forestry
trails,
advisory
board,
letter
of
enthusiastic
support.
The
peanut
board
was
briefed
multiple
times
at
the
start,
after
each
engagement
phase
and
twice
more
prior
to
the
final
draft,
where
the
peanut
board
had
opportunities
to
weigh
in
and
to
direct
the
effort.
Q
The
availability
of
parks
and
natural
green
spaces
is
one
of
the
most
important
factors
in
creating
healthy
communities
and
providing
a
high
quality
of
life
for
salt
lake
city
residents.
Our
public
green
spaces
offer
opportunities
for
an
active
lifestyle
to
exercise
access,
open
space
and
connection
with
others
in
the
natural
environment.
Q
In
this
presentation,
our
team
will
be
sharing
that
public
engagement
process,
key
concepts
organized
into
five
main
goals,
sustain,
connect,
welcome,
protect
and
grow
with
10
transformative
projects
that
outline
the
plan's
ambitions.
We
will
conclude
with
plan
implementation
outlined
in
action
strategies
in
chapter
8..
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
That
study
found
that
by
2040
we
would
need
94
acres
of
additional
park
space
to
match
the
current
level
of
service,
that's
equivalent
to
the
acreage
of
liberty
park
and
we're
growing
faster
than
those
2017
estimates,
as
we
turn
now
to
engage
the
engagement
process.
I'd
like
to
thank
the
residents
of
salt
lake
city,
our
city
staff,
peanut,
board
members,
university
of
utah
staff
and
students
and
committee
members
who
participated
in
the
process
and
provided
valuable
input.
Their
collaboration
was
critical
to
the
process
of
developing
the
master
plan
we
are
presenting
today.
N
Thanks
kristin,
it
was
this-
was
this
project
was
definitely
a
career
highlight
and
being
able
to
work
with
so
many
different
people
and
bring
those
voices
into
the
planning.
The
public
engagement
was
done
with
an
intention
to
create
this.
As
the
community's
plan,
the
cobit
pandemic
pushed
us
to
engage
people
differently
and
create
an
opportunity
for
innovation.
In
the
ways
we
got
out
to
connect
with
people
in
our
spaces,
while
they
were
using
them,
and
then
we
brought
them
into
the
planning
process
to
ensure
the
voices
were
heard.
N
N
The
methods
for
engagement
were
designed
to
educate
people
about
the
issues
and
draw
them
into
the
idea,
generation
or
refinement
of
concepts.
There
were
two
main
windows,
the
first
being
awareness
and
idea
generation
from
august
to
december
of
2020,
where
we
engaged
over
seven
thousand
participants.
N
N
Approaches
for
inclusivity,
we're
following
with
the
famous
quote
by
vernon
meyers
diversity
is
being
invited
to
the
party.
Inclusion
is
being
asked
to
dance
better,
yet
bring
being
a
member
of
the
party
planning
committee
and
choosing
the
music
the
efforts
of
the
students,
organizational
partners,
staff
and
volunteer
plan
ambassadors
made
this
possible.
N
N
In
the
second
engagement
window,
we
formulated
ideas
that
had
come
from
the
community
into
tangible
potential
projects
to
test
out
support.
You
can
see
these
values
reflected
in
the
survey
responses
when
asked
to
rate
their
satisfaction
with
each
potential
project
that
feedback
fed
into
the
final
plan.
Overall,
there
was
strong
support
for
the
draft
plan,
vision,
statement,
goals
and
plan
ideals,
with
very
helpful
suggestions
for
refinements
that
are
reflected
in
the
final
draft
plan.
N
K
K
K
The
goal
sustain
focuses
on
improving
environmental
health
and
climate
resiliency,
employing
sustainable
operations.
Practices
such
as
conserving
water
resources
for
greater
resilience
to
climate
change
and
making
contributions
to
healthier
natural
environments
such
as
increasing
tree
cover
that
improves
regional
air
quality
and
provides
bird
habitat
analysis
within
the
plan,
informs
identification
of
efforts
for
addressing
environmental
considerations
and
climate
change
threats.
K
The
goal
connect
focuses
on
linking
all
types
of
public
spaces
and
enhancing
accessibility
to
public
lands,
both
through
physical
connectivity
and
improved
information,
sharing,
well-maintained,
welcoming
trails,
streets,
public
transportation
and
sidewalks
need
to
be
interconnected.
As
a
city's
circulatory
system,
a
city
is
more
livable
and
equal
when
they
connect
the
city's
green
spaces
and
outstanding
natural
landscapes.
K
K
K
The
plan
recognizes
that
public
lands
plays
a
role
in
how
our
city
collectively
addresses
homelessness.
The
parks
are
a
public
space
for
everyone
and
will
work
to
manage
conflicts
and
use.
Strategies
identified
within
the
plan
include
public
awareness
campaigns,
a
public
ranger,
a
park,
ranger
program
that
will
start
up
this
summer.
K
K
Stewardship
demands
are
profound,
diminishing
environmental
health,
increasing
need
for
visitor
management,
maintenance
and
replacement
demands,
impacts
from
unhoused
persons
using
open
spaces
refuge
and
increasing
costs
to
provide
infrastructure
and
services
to
a
growing
city
to
enhance
care
for
our
shared
outdoor
spaces.
The
department
will
seek
out
opportunities
to
partner
with
advocacy
groups
and
schools,
to
educate
on
how
the
public
can
be
stewards
of
the
land
and
learn
its
history.
K
Public
lands
has
many
dedicated
volunteers
and
partners
that
contribute
to
our
stewardship,
contributing
public
education
opportunities
and
human
capital
towards
advancing
care
for
our
lands.
This
plan
identifies
strategies
for
improving
volunteerism
opportunities,
fundraising
and
enhancing
partnerships.
K
The
plan
reflects
a
community
value
for
value
for
equitable
investment
in
public
lands
to
understand
which
areas
of
city
may
be
most
in
need
of
equitable
investment.
This
plan
provides
maps,
analyzing,
social,
economic,
public,
health
and
environmental
factors,
as
well
as
access
and
mobility,
population
density
and
growth.
K
The
plan
vision
is
further
expressed
through
10
transformative
projects
that
require
great
effort
to
achieve
with
a
shift
in
how
we
operate.
Community
input
and
feedback
shaped
the
10
transformative
projects.
The
projects
range
from
local
scale,
neighborhood
park,
initiatives
to
large
regional
skilled
efforts
to
connect
our
mountains,
city
and
lake.
M
Thanks
anna
I'll
be
sharing
an
overview
of
the
transformative
projects.
These
projects
are
comprehensive
in
nature
and
are
comprised
of
a
collection
of
many
smaller
projects,
as
well
as
ongoing
efforts.
M
Transformative
project
number
one
is
put
environment
first,
this
project
cultivates
more
biological
diversity
and
conservation
in
city
parks,
urban
forests,
city,
golf
lands
and
natural
areas.
Project
elements
include
increasing
landscape,
resiliency
to
climate
change,
by
reclaiming
landscapes
with
beneficial
plants,
building
healthy
soils,
practicing
water
conservation
and
increasing
habitat
for
birds
and
wildlife.
M
M
Transformative
project
number
three
is
connect
mountains
to
the
lake.
This
project
completes
missing
lakes
and
regional
trails
and
invests
in
greenways
to
enhance
nature
and
creeks
within
the
city.
This
would
include
connecting
the
trail
system
from
the
wasatch
mountains
and
foothills
to
the
valley
floor
at
jordan,
river,
parkway
and
west
to
the
salt,
lake,
marina
and
mountains
beyond.
M
The
next
project
is
transformative
project
number
four,
just
five
minutes
from
here.
This
project
includes
a
wayfinding
and
signage
campaign
that
makes
it
easier
to
explore
nearby
parks,
trails
and
public
spaces
to
expand
the
public's
experiences
in
nature
and
build
stewardship
principles
and
practices.
M
Transformative
project
number
five
is
reimagine
neighborhood
parks,
which
transports
parks
into
vibrant
community
spaces
that
empower
residents
to
contribute
to
their
neighborhood
identity.
Project
elements
include
identifying
priorities
for
equitable
park
redevelopment
and
promoting
volunteerism
donation
and
adopt
a
park.
Friends
groups.
M
M
M
M
M
D
Thanks
mary,
so
the
next
two
section,
the
next
two
slides,
we'll
talk
primarily
about
the
implementation
of
the
master
plan,
section,
eight
or
chapter
eight
of
the
master
plan.
The
action
strategies
are
outlined,
the
playbook
to
achieve
the
goals
and
undertake
the
visionary
projects
within
the
master
plan,
the
table
to
the
right
which
you
can
see.
There
is
an
example
of
these
strategies,
the
supporting
policies
and
the
high
level
actions
identified
for
each
master
plan
goal.
D
D
D
We
have
been
asked
several
times
during
this
process
for
more
specificity
in
the
master
plan,
as
it
relates
to
cost
estimates
and
other
specific
project
implementation
strategies,
given
the
need
to
be
a
living
document
responsive
to
the
changing
situations
and
resources
within
the
city.
This
five-year
strategic
plan
is
a
more
appropriate
place
for
that
level
of
detail
to
live.
F
I
will
say
on
the
public
record
how
amazing
your
public
outreach
is
and
how
it
should
be:
a
template
for
getting
below
those
surface
level,
respondents
and
really
reaching
down
into
our
communities.
I
love
also
how
you
just
provided
us
a
data
set
that
proves
that
in
person
for
so
many
people
literally
doubles
the
likelihood
that
they
respond
over
virtual.
So,
thank
you
so
much.
C
I
just
don't
want
my
lack
of
saying
anything
to
be
construed
as
that
I
do
not
care.
I
don't
have
any
questions,
because
you've
done
a
great
job
of
keeping
me
informed,
as
the
plan
has
developed
and
I
feel
like
this
is
the
seventh
time
I've
heard
about
the
plan
and
I've
been
excited
about
it
every
time.
So
thank
you
for
the
work.
C
You're
doing,
parks,
public
spaces
trails
are
urban,
for
forest
to
me,
are
critical
pieces
of
quality
of
life
for
our
residents,
especially
as
our
city
grows
and
becomes
more
developed
and
more
dense.
We
need
to
cherish
these
these
green
spaces
and
these
the
lungs
of
our
city,
to
help
us
not
only
emotionally
but
physically
stay
healthy,
and
so
I
it's
important
to
me
that
we
have
this
plan,
but
it's
even
more
important
to
me
that
we
actually
implement
some
of
these
ideas
too
again
improve
the
quality
of
life
for
our
residents.
O
Thanks
yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much.
I
appreciate
the
seeking
comment
from
from
from
communities
of
color
people
that
live
in
the
west
side.
I
really
really
appreciate
that.
Thank
you
so
much
and
again
to
to
team
up
with
councilman
romano.
O
D
Yes,
thank
you.
I
I
think
I
gave
you
plenty
of
comments
offline
and
so
thank
you
for
taking
all
of
those,
and
but
yes,
I
am
very
excited
to
have
to
add
this,
to
some
of
the
great
master
plans
that
we
have
for
public
lands
and
I
will
reserve
the
rest
of
my
questions
and
statements
for
our
next
briefing
on
the
19.
D
G
A
They
said
it
all,
I
appreciate
the
effort
and
and
the
engagement
and
I've
had
a
few
conversations
with
the
public
and
the
and
also
the
parks
department,
and
we
had
some
great
conversations
and
great
discussions
and
your
your
passion
for
the
outdoors
and
your
passion
for
the
health,
the
mental
and
the
physical
health
of
our
residents
is
so
evident
in
this
plan
and
in
the
engagement-
and
I
appreciate
the
the
way
you're
going
about
it,
and
I
appreciate
your
engagement
with
them
and
your
openness
to
their
ideas
and
the
vision
here.
Q
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
all
also
for
for
your
involvement
and
listening
to
this
multiple
times,
some
of
you
and
just
to
let
you
know
we're
committed
to
this
plan.
It's
not
going
to
sit
on
the
shelf
you're
going
to
hear
about
it,
a
lot
you're
going
to
hear
about
it.
Every
time
we
are
coming
to
you
asking
for
cip
or
budget
money,
it
will
all
be
tied
to
this
plan,
and
so
it
is
the
lens
with
which
we
will
look
through
every
time.
Q
We
make
decisions,
policy
decisions,
budget
decisions,
it's
going
to
be
our
guide
in
our
bible,
and
I
don't
know
if
any
of
you
have
received
our
annual
report.
We
do
one
every
year
and
that
annual
report
will
change
so
that
it's
reflective
of
these
strategies
and
actions
and
show
our
progress
each
year
on
how
we're
doing
with
our
master
plan.
So
we
want
to
keep
you
updated
and
keep
it
in
front
of
all
of
us
so
that
we
can
ensure
that
we
are
achieving
these
goals
for
the
master
plan.
A
A
All
right
council,
we
have
a
couple
of
board
appointments
to
interview
and
right
now
for
the
historic
landmark
commission
we
have,
I
think
delcia
is
on
line
there.
She
is
amanda
good
evening,
amanda
or
good
afternoon.
I
guess
to
say,
welcome
to
the
city
council
and
the
work
session
and
appreciate
your
your
desires
to
serve
on
the
historic
landmark
commission.
Tell
us
a
little
bit
about
your
reasons.
N
N
However,
I
have
spent
the
last
many
years
in
the
museum
nonprofit
world,
which
has
brought
me
into
contact
with
historic,
specifically
historic
ranch
in
goleta
california,
where
I
was
the
executive
director
and
helped
to
spearhead
a
arboretum
restoration
project
and
do
some
maintenance
and
improvement
on
the
the
historic
stowe
house,
which
is
on
the
national
register
of
historic
places.
So
I
have
a
a
lot
of
familiarity
with
that
process,
as
well
as
the
importance
of
that
the
of
of
preserving
our
historic
structures.
N
My
non-profit,
was
also
in
the
middle
of
a
public
park
owned
by
the
city
of
goleta.
So
I
have
a
good
bit
of
experience
interacting
with
both
city
and
county
governments,
know
the
challenges
there,
but
the
importance
of
that
communication
process
to
preserve
our
historic
structures
and
landscapes.
N
So
recently,
I've
moved
back
to
salt
lake
city
after
a
20-year
hiatus
and
am
looking
forward
to
re-engaging
with
the
community.
I
currently
live
in
rose
park
and
am
enjoying
getting
to
know
the
folks
in
the
neighborhood,
and
I
hope
that
I
can
be
able
to
engage
with
my
community
moving
forward
in
this
capacity.
H
F
A
So,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
engagement
and
your
willingness
to
participate
tonight.
You'll
be
on
our
consent
agenda.
You
need
not
need
be
present
to
win,
but
you're
always
more
well
than
welcome
to
join
our
formal
session
starting
at
seven
o'clock.
Thank
you
very
much,
and
you
have
a
wonderful
evening.
S
S
When
I
was
told
you
wanted
to
interview
me,
it
only
occurred
to
me
an
hour
and
a
half
ago
that
maybe
I
should
have
prepared
remarks.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
want
me
to
speak
a
bit
or
you
just
want
to
ask
me
questions,
but
I'm
reasonably
new
to
salt
lake
moved
here
just
before
covid
to
join
our
household
with
my
wife's
aging
parents,
and
I
lived
in
dc
for
30
years
and
was
involved
in
urban
revitalization.
S
But
in
the
summer
of
2020
there
was
an
article
in
the
salt
lake
tribune
about
a
proposal
to
make
the
garden
center
a
cafe,
and
that
intrigued
me
and
I
wrote
an
extensive
memo
to
the
park
saying
I
was
into
cafe,
but
not
necessarily
there
and
that
sort
of
brought
me
to
their
attention.
S
Because
of
dc's
unusual
government
structure.
A
lot
of
the
park
assets
in
the
city
are
actually
run
by
the
federal
government,
and
so
I
joke
that.
I
might
not
be
a
good
planner,
but
I'm
great
at
gap.
Analysis
and
dc
gave
me
lots
of
opportunities
to
figure
out.
Gaps
in
planning
and
parks
was
one
of
my
key
interests,
cultural
resources
and
so
of
course,
sure
house
park
is
an
incredible
asset
for
both
the
city
and
county.
S
Listening
to
our
great
colleagues
in
the
parks
and
public
lands
department,
I
was
thinking
you
know.
Parks
and
libraries
are
our
most
civic
facing
public
assets.
There
are
and
the
incredible
thing
about
sugar
house
park
is
it's
so
visible
and
accessible,
and
I
think
we
could
do
a
little
more
activation
in
a
programmed
way.
Maybe
some
signature
events,
but
that
won't
be
my
decision
to
make
if
you
I'll
decide
that
I'm
worthy
of
being
put
on
the
the
board.
G
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
volunteering
to
do
this
great
work
and
and
to
your
point
about
parks
and
libraries
from
the
sugar
house
park.
If
you
take
the
hidden
hollow
trail,
you
end
up
at
this
break
library,
so
they
I'm
just
like.
I
look
forward
to
your
service
on
the
board
and
appreciate
it.
Since
sugar
house
is
in
my
district
and
we
get
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
calls
about
it
and
because
it's
such
a
unique
entity,
it's
nice
to
know
the
board
members
that
are
there.
So
thank
you.
S
Thank
you.
Actually,
I
contacted
you
a
while
back
about
the
whole
scissor
thing
and
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
how
that
transpires.
S
S
It's
the
only
commercial
parcel
on
the
block
and
1300
east
to
my
way
of
thinking
from
a
planning
perspective,
is
very
much
a
demarcation
line
between
the
more
intense
mixed-use
district
of
sugar
house
in
the
residential
neighborhoods
to
the
the
north
and
east.
So
I'm
hoping
myself
and
others.
Probably
you
have
made
compelling
arguments
that
the
planning
commission
will
consider
on
that.
H
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much
richard.
I
appreciate
that
and
I
appreciate
your
engagement
and
your
you
know
your
willingness
to
come
to
salt
lake
city
and
get
involved
and
taking
your
talents
and
bringing
your
talents
to
the
city.
So
thank
you
very
much.
You're
gonna
be
on
our
consent
agenda
this
evening
at
the
seven
o'clock
formal
you
need
not
be
present
to
win,
but
you're
more
than
welcome
to
watch
online
or
thank
you.
S
May
I
say
one
more
thing
sure
I
know
that
the
park
is
in
district
seven,
but
it's
really
for
all
the
city,
and
I
didn't
prepare
a
fancy
presentation.
Like
my
predecessors,
but
a
few
weeks
ago
I
was
in
the
park
on
sunday
walking
and
you
know
with
snowy,
and
there
were
people
grilling,
and
I
was
thinking
wow.
Is
that
awesome
and
I
think
they
were
probably
pacific
islanders
and
they
were
little
caught
off
guard
by
my
wanting
to
take
a
photo.
S
It
smelled
awesome
and
those
are
the
kinds
of
things
I
mean.
The
amazing
thing
about
the
park
to
me
is
how
it's
kind
of
self-programmed
by
how
people
use
the
park
either
formally
organizationally
and
running
pavilions
or
holding
events
or
walking
biking,
running
skateboarding
in
all
the
kinds
of
activities
people
do
and
and
I'm
hoping
that
we'll
even
be
able
to
do
more.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
richard
all
right,
hey
have
a
good
evening.
Thank
you
all
right.
We
have
next
board
appointment
for
the
utah
performing
arts
center
agency,
katie
hanson.
N
Good
evening,
I
also
did
not
prepare
anything
for
them.
N
So
I
guess
I'll
start
by
telling
you
a
little
bit
about
me.
I
am
a
utah
native.
I
grew
up
in
the
theater.
My
mother
was
one
of
the
first
directors
at
the
sundance
outdoor
theater,
so
I
spent
my
every
hour
on
the
mountain
there
and
worked
housekeeping
during
the
winter
and
box
office
and
in
the
theater
during
the
summer,
and
I
left
utah
to
pursue
my
dreams
of
being
a
big
stage
manager
in
new
york
city.
N
I
wasn't
good
at
holding
still
and
ran
off
again
and
toured
asia
with
a
couple
of
shows,
and
then
I
decided
that
I
needed
to
come
back
to
salt
lake
not
only
to
be
with
my
family,
but
because
I
loved
so
deeply
the
lifestyle
and
the
opportunities
that
were
offered
here.
N
So
I
moved
back
to
salt
lake
and
there
was
not
a
lot
of
opportunity
directly
in
what
I
was
trying
to
pursue
here,
and
so
I
went
into
business,
doing
industrial
design
and
corporate
interiors
things
like
that,
and
only
in
the
in
the
fairly
recent
past
last
five
years
or
so
have
I
gotten
back
into
active
active
arts
in
the
city,
and
I
ended
up
sharing
an
office
with
gts
development
who
was
working
on
the
eccles
theater
when
and
they
were
just
in
the
final.
N
The
final
throws
of
getting
everything
closed
up
and
I
moved
into
one
of
the
one
of
the
rooms
in
their
office
to
work
on
a
project
there,
and
I-
and
I
just
became
so
enthralled
with
the
process
of
how
that
was
going,
how
the
different
people
that
were
involved
the
complications
and
the
the
really
nuanced
pieces
of
public-private
partnerships
and
how
that
would
work
long
term.
N
And
so,
as
the
theater
opened
up,
I
had
the
opportunity
to
do
a
couple
of
private
events
there,
which
is
fantastic
and
then
over
since
the
pandemic
has
started.
Ironically,
I've
had
a
lot
more
opportunities
to
work
in
the
theater
more
often,
and
with
more
of
the
people
who
work
there
every
day
I
work
quite
a
bit
with
a
promoter
who
live
at
the
eccles.
N
So
I've
worked
in
all
the
different
in
all
the
different
areas,
and
I
have
a
really
great
affection
and
understanding
for
how
difficult
everybody's
roles
are
and
how
incredibly
important
they
are,
and
what
I
see
is
a
there's,
a
connection
that
is
missing
between
those
parties
that
could
that
could
be
solved
with
somebody
who
has
who
has
the
right
nomenclature,
who
has
an
understanding
of
the
people
of
the
roles
and
of
honestly
the
ultimate
goals
of
the
theater,
which
is
that,
ideally,
all
arts
organizations
become
somewhat
self-sustaining
so
anyway,
when
justin
approached
me
to
ask
me
if
I'd
be
interested
in
this
board
position,
I
was
so
excited
about
it.
N
N
The
facilities
that
we
have
access
to
are
incredible
and
I
would
love
to
see
them
filled
every
night
with
you
know,
broadway
shows
down
to
kids
doing
their
spring
concerts,
which
is
you
know
my
kids
are
going
to
be
at
the
capitol
which
is
going
to
be
amazing.
I
mean
seven-year-olds
perform
at
the
capitol.
It's
incredible
so
anyway,
being
able
to
be
supportive
of
that
in
a
way
that
can
be
productive
for
all.
The
parties
sounds
fantastic
to
me.
C
I'll
just
say
thank
you
for
being
willing
to
serve
the
city.
I
I
your
speech
touched
me,
I
think,
just
like
I
talked
about
with
parks
we're
so
lucky
to
be
in
a
city,
our
size
that
has
access
to
arts
and
culture
that
we
do
and
so,
and
I'm
great
grateful
that
there
are
residents
like
you
that
are
willing
to
help
support
that
access
to
arts
and
culture.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
for
your
passion
and
your
engagement.
I
welcome
you
to
the
yupaka
and
you'll
be
on
the
consent
agenda
this
evening
and
again
it's
a
formal
session
and
you
need
not
be
present
to
win,
like
I
say
to
all
the
other
appointee,
so
welcome.
Thank.
A
K
I'll
do
the
announcement
of
the
executive
director,
while
the
chair
is
looking
for
one
we
were
notified,
got
some
notification
that
there
is
an
opportunity
to
visit
the
ute
or
ray,
and
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
pronouncing
that
right.
So
my
apologies
reservation
this
saturday
on
the
ninth
for
the
day,
with
the
option
to
stay
overnight
in
a
shared
accommodation
or
drive
home
that
evening.
Some
some
members
are
going
to
stay
overnight
in
vernal
and
others
will
return
to
salt
lake
city.
K
A
Thank
you
jennifer,
so
here's
my
announcement,
I
think
you've
come
to
my
mom,
so
there's
been
a
lot
of
confusion
about
the
status
of
the
zoning
request
for
the
other
side
academy
for
the
tiny
home
village
in
the
area
of
500,
south
redwood
road
and
the
city
council
office
does
not
yet
have
the
complete
information,
and
that
is
why
that
is
not
scheduled
at
this
time.
We
are
waiting
for
the
the
required
public
benefits
analysis,
which
must
be
fully
vetted
by
the
city
attorney's
office
and
the
city's
financial
finance
division.
A
Once
that
document
is
provided
to
the
city
council,
the
zoning
request
is
eligible
for
scheduling
and
then
the
chair
and
vice
chair
will
add
it
to
our
to
our
agendas
and
in
the
multiple
issues
we
have
going
on,
because
the
city
budget
starts
shortly
and
we
need
to
prioritize
all
the
agendas.
So
in
summary,
right
now
we
don't
have
all
the
information
for,
on
the
other
side
of
calories,
information
that
we
need
to
to
move
forward.
So
we're
waiting
for
that
information
to
come
to
us
and
then
we'll
move
forward
at
that
time.
A
A
G
A
G
D
T
A
A
yes
that
passes
six
to
zero
with
council
member
morris,
absent.
K
And
to
clarify
for
the
public,
you
will
not
be
returning
to
work
session
after
your
closed
session
you'll
be
convening
in
your
formal
meeting
at
seven.