►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Formal Meeting & Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Meeting - 10/18/2022
Description
To access agendas please go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
If
you're
here,
to
give
public
comment
and
are
wearing
a
mask,
feel
free
to
remove
it
once
you
get
called
to
address
the
council
from
that
podium.
Thank
you
for
your
participation
today.
Next
in
our
agenda
will
be
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
Please
join
us.
A
Well,
thank
you
again
to
everyone
who's
joining
us
tonight.
If
you'd
like
to
give
public
comment
today,
we're
accepting
comments
in
person
online
on
WebEx
and
Via
telephone
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
before
we
begin
moving
through
our
agenda,
I
want
to
mention
and
review
our
rules
of
the
Quorum.
The
city
council
has
always
had
guidelines
in
place
to
ensure
meetings
are
orderly,
civil
and
efficient.
The
guidelines
help
everyone
feel
comfortable,
sharing
their
comments
without
feeling
intimidated
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
the
Quorum
take
effect.
The
moment
you
arrive.
A
We
respect
all
points
of
view
and
welcome.
New
insights,
please
be
respectful,
while
sharing
your
comments
avoid
yelling
using
profanity,
making
racial
slurs
or
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
If
you
violate
this
rule,
we
will
mute
your
line
or
we'll
ask
you
to
stop.
If
you
feel
the
need
to
use
such
language
to
express
your
opinion,
you
may
email,
council
members
or
leave
a
message
on
our
24
hour
comment
line.
Additionally,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
WebEx
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
A
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
a
rules
of
the
Quorum.
If
your
name
doesn't
comply,
our
staff
will
let
you
know
for
those
joining
on
WebEx.
Please
watch
your
chat,
your
chat
window
in
case
we
try
to
reach
you.
Isaac
Canada
from
our
staff
will
moderate
our
WebEx
and
we'll
message
you
with
any
questions
about
your
registration
staff
is
handling
many
tasks.
So
please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
information
updates.
A
Next
will
be
item
four,
oh
sorry,
A4,
which
is
for
the
council
to
approve
the
work
session
meetings,
sorry
work
session,
meeting,
minutes
of
June,
2nd
2022
and
August
9
2022,
as
well
as
a
formal
meeting
minutes
of
August,
16
2022
and
the
truth
in
taxation
meeting
minutes
of
August
16
2022
and
August
29
2022.
well,
I'll.
Look
for
a
motion.
Madam.
B
Chair
I
move
that
we
approved
the
work
session
meetings
of
the
dates
listed,
June,
2nd
2022,
August,
9,
2022,
formal
meeting
minutes,
August,
16,
2022
and
Truth
in
text.
Each
and
meeting
minutes
August
16,
2022,
August,
29,
2022.
C
A
A
D
A
And
whereas
we
strive
to
improve
Communications
with
Services
too
and
part
partnership
with
all
CD
residents.
As
we
journey
together
on
a
quest
for
justice,
a
quality
of
respect
and
prosperity
now,
therefore
be
resolved
at
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
and
mayor
of
Salt
Lake
City
declare
the
month
of
November
2022
as
a
Native
American
heritage
month.
I,
look
for
a
motion.
A
F
A
We,
oh
sorry,
Wharton,
yes,
Point,
yes,
Fowler,
yes
and
I'm.
A
yes
and
that
motion
passes
seven
to
zero
and
we
have
Representatives
from
several
tries
present.
We
would
like
to
thank
you,
the
tribal
leaders
for
the
discussions
with
the
city,
investment
in
deepening
relationships
and
attendance
for
the
reading
of
the
resolution.
So
thank
you
very
much.
We
do
have
the
resolution
here
and
we
would
like
to
present
it
to
you
and
perhaps
we
can
take
a
few
pictures.
G
A
All
right,
we
are
Item
B.
Now
we
will
begin
our
public
hearings,
Taylor
Hill
and
our
staff.
We
were
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
We
will
call
the
names
of
people
on
WebEx
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards
once
we
open
public
comment.
Taylor
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time,
so
people
have
can
have
some
notice
and
prepare
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak.
A
Taylor
will
announce
your
name
if
you're
on
WebEx,
your
line
will
unmute
and
you
may
begin
if
you
are
here
in
person,
please
step
up
to
the
podium
to
make
your
comment
once
Taylor
announces
your
name
to
begin.
Please
state
your
name
and
your
two
minute
timer
will
start
add
the
two
minute.
Mark
staff
will
announce
time.
If
you
are
unable
to
finish
your
comment,
please
send
the
rest
via
email,
mail
or
caller
office.
Our
contact
information
is
available
in
the
meeting
room
and
in
the
WebEx
chat.
A
H
A
C
A
D
A
Mano,
yes,
Wharton!
Yes,
yes,.
E
A
Yes,
Nama
yes,
and
the
motion
passes
seven
to
zero
foreign
public
hearing,
which
is
item.
B2
is
the
next
step
in
the
general
obligation,
Bond
legal
process
and
serves
as
a
public
meeting
to
accept
comments
and
allow
for
the
presentation
of
arguments
for
the
general
obligation
bond
for
Parks
trails
and
open
space
before
we
begin
taking
comments.
I
will
first
turn
the
time
over
to
Cindy
Lou,
trishman,
City,
recorder
and
Elections
office
elections
office.
She
will
read
the
argument
on
behalf
of
the
city
in
favor
of
the
bond.
Thank.
J
You,
madam
chair,
a
con
argument,
was
not
submitted
to
the
city
on
behalf
of
this
General
obligation,
Parks
trails
and
open
space
Bond.
The
pro
argument
provided
was
provided
by
the
city
council,
chair
and
mayor
and
reads
as
follows:
Parks
trails
and
urban
forests
and
natural
areas
contribute
significantly
to
our
quality
of
life
and
environment.
J
These
outdoor
spaces
and
Recreation
opportunities
provide
important
air
and
quality
water
quality
benefits
and
opportunities
for
Community
Gathering
and
mental
and
physical
health
Wellness.
The
recently
adopted
public
lands,
master
plan,
titled
reimagined
nature,
included
feedback
from
over
12
000
residents
and
will
help
address
their
priorities
for
the
next
20
years.
J
In
the
survey
conducted
as
part
of
this
plan,
over
90
percent
of
respondents
prioritized
putting
the
environment
first
and
growing
our
Urban
Forest
people
love
Parks
trails
and
natural
lands
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
In
the
same
survey,
seventy
percent
of
respondents
said
they
visit
a
Park,
Trail
or
open
space
at
least
monthly,
and
over
40
percent
of
respondents
said
their
parks
and
trails
visitation
has
increased
since
the
covid-19
pandemic
began
at
the
same
time,
according
to
the
2020
census,
more
than
13
000
new
residents
Now
call
Salt
Lake
City
home.
J
As
this
rapid
growth
continues,
improvements
to
existing
parks
and
trails
and
new
outdoor
spaces
are
needed.
The
parks
Trail
is
an
open
space
bond
is
an
investment
in
our
city.
Funding
through
this
measure
will
improve
water
quality
around
the
city
by
restoring
habitat
along
Trails
creeks
and
the
Jordan
River.
It
will
add
vegetation
and
trees
to
the
city's
tree.
Canopy,
helping
filter
air
pollution,
decrease
temperatures
and
beautify
public
spaces.
It
will
create
resilient
landscapes
in
our
parks
and
Open
Spaces
that
are
adapted
to
our
arid
climate
and
use
less
water.
J
Through
this
measure,
Salt
Lake
City
will
work
directly
with
residents
to
create
new
parks,
playgrounds
and
trails
in
areas
that
currently
have
few
of
these
spaces.
It
will
ensure
that
kids,
low-income
families,
seniors
West,
Side
communities
and
communities
of
color
have
equal
access
to
Safe,
accessible
places
for
recreation
close
to
home,
while
also
funding
improvements
to
our
most
well-loved
Regional
Parks.
J
It
will
provide
improvements
to
at
least
one
neighborhood
park
in
every
Council
District.
This
Bond
represents
an
investment
in
the
things
that
make
our
city
great
and
will
benefit
the
community
for
less
than
five
dollars.
Each
month
for
the
average
phone
average
homeowner
vote,
Yes
on
the
parks,
trails
and
open
space
ballot
measure
on
November,
8th.
K
L
C
Over
the
last
year,
I
have
witnessed
a
constant
Cloud
around
the
Great
Salt
Lake,
made
worse
every
day
by
our
growing
drought.
If
this
resolution
and
bond
passes,
which
I
do
hope
it
does,
I
must
be
the
priority
of
the
city
government
to
prioritize
water
conservation
and
water
efficiency
in
all
new
and
updated
plans
to
existing
infrastructure
and
parks
and
Open
Spaces.
Here,
if
we
are
successful
in
this
endeavor,
we
may
this
just
work
our
way
out
of
this
drought
and
save
the
namesake
of
this
city.
Thank
you
very
much.
M
Are
you
okay?
Yes,
all
right,
my
name
is
Nigel
swaby
I
am
here
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
bond
as
I've
learned
more
about
it
over
the
last
few
months,
since
it's
it's
been
released,
I
I
think
it
makes
sense
for
a
number
of
reasons.
First
off,
like
was
previously
stated
in
the
mayor's
letter.
M
The
pandemic
has
has
put
us
outside,
and
we've
learned
about
The
Great
Outdoors
that
we
have
here
in
in
Salt
Lake
and
in
Utah
and
spent
more
time
there,
and
in
doing
that,
I've
noticed
that
there
there
are
certainly
issues
so
particularly
on
the
west
side.
I'm
thankful
that
the
Folsom
Trail
is
part
of
this
project.
I
got
to
write
it
for
the
first
time
the
other
day
and
didn't
realize
how
complete
it
actually
is,
which
is
fantastic.
M
The
in
terms
of
the
cost
for
it
I
hope
that
this
distributed
as
equitably
as
possible
and
I
think
the
language
on
it
is
a
little
misleading
because
it's
going
to
cost
us
far
less
as
homeowners
than
state
it,
because
we
get
a
50
percent
exemption
for
our
primary
residences.
So
you're
valuing
it
at
585
000
for
the
for
the
five
dollars
a
month
and
it'll
be
at
least
half
that.
So
please
vote
Yes
for
the
do
bond
in
November.
G
Hi,
my
name
is
Sean
Tomlinson
I'm,
a
city
I'm,
a
Salt
Lake
City
resident
and
have
been
for
my
entire
life
I'm,
mostly
opposed
to
raising
our
taxes.
My
taxes
went
up
this
year.
Just
my
property
taxes
went
up
23
percent,
which
meant
that
almost
a
thousand
dollars
more
out
of
my
family
budget
goes
to
taxes
and
property
taxes.
G
Please
take
a
look
at
our
budgets
and
a
better
look
sharpen
your
pencils,
please,
because
Salt
Lake
City
is
becoming
unaffordable
and
it's
becoming
unaffordable
to
a
lot
of
us
that
worked
very
hard
to
raise
money
to
pay,
pay
those
taxes
and
take
it
away
from
our
families.
So
please
treat
our
tax
money
with
precious
regard
and
do
everything
that
you
can
not
to
raise
them.
Thank
you.
A
C
A
C
E
I
J
A
You
closure
of
the
public
meeting,
passes
7-0
all
right.
Our
third
public
hearing
item
B3
is
regarding
a
resolution
for
Salt
Lake
City
International,
Airport
master
plan
and
before
we
begin
taking
comments,
I
will
first
turn
the
time
over
to
Sam
Owens
Council
staff
police
policy
analyst
to
give
a
short
introduction.
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
The
airport
master
plan
guides
the
development
and
staging
of
airport
facility
growth
over
the
coming
decades.
The
plan
relies
on
a
regulatory
framework
from
the
Federal
Aviation
Administration
or
the
FAA,
based
largely
on
those
requirements.
The
plan
forwards
proposed
airport
Capital
expansion
plans
over
the
horizon
of
the
document.
N
K
K
C
In
this
master
plan
here
it
again,
it
must
be
the
priority
of
everything
here
to
be
as
energy
and
resource
efficient
as
possible.
Here,
the
state
of
Utah
weighs
more
some
of
the
most
water
in
the
country
here
and
we
house
Millie.
We
go
through
millions
of
visitors
through
our
airport
every
single
year
we're
getting
a
worser
reputation
for
resource
misallotment
here
by
making
the
master
plan
as
energy
and
resource
efficient
as
possible,
we
could
try
to
rectify
that.
C
Reputation
show
the
world
that
we
are
aware
of
the
energy
resource
crisis
we're
all
facing
and
that
we're
all
on
board
in
addressing
it
together,
so
that
we
can
fix
our
reputation,
help
the
planet
and
most
of
all,
ensure
that
future
Generations
have
a
lot,
have
the
resources
that
we
are
enjoying
right
now.
Thank
you.
A
J
A
All
right
so
I
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
Dugan
seconded
about
council
member
Fowler.
Is
there
any
other
discussion
seeing
none
I'm
going
to
roll
call
this
council
member
Petro,
yes,
councilmember,
Dugan.
C
A
E
E
I
A
Yes
and
I'm
a
yes
and
that
motion
passes
seven
to
zero.
Her
fourth
public
hearing
item
B4
is
regarding
a
nelly
vacation
at
approximately
925
South
1200
West,
and
before
we
begin
taking
comments.
I
will
first
turn
the
time
over
to
Brian
Fulmer
Council
staff
policy
policy.
Analyst
to
give
a
short
introduction.
N
Chair
this
is
a
proposal
to
vacate
a
city-owned
alley
segment
adjacent
to
the
property
at
925
South
1200
West,
where
1200
West
dead
ends
at
the
nine
Line
Trail
Ali
Ali
segments
to
the
West
and
East
of
this
one
were
vacated
in
1981.
with
the
nine
Line
Trail
a
few
feet
away.
The
alley
is
essentially
unused.
Thank
you.
I
A
F
A
E
A
Yes,
Fowler,
yes
and
I'm
a
yes
and
that
motion
passes
seven
to
zero.
We.
This
brings
us
to
potential
action
item
C1
regarding
a
Northern
end
called
shared
housing.
Zoning
text,
amendments,
formerly
known
as
single
room
occupancy
or
sros
and
I,
will
look
for
a
motion.
C
A
O
B
Just
wanted
to
point
out,
and
maybe
I
should
have
done
it
after
I
vote,
but
as
I
will
be
voting
yes
on
this.
B
That
I've
heard
the
concerns
and
I
believe
that
the
changes
that
we
recently
made
to
the
ordinance
that
address
the
Mac
minimizing
the
maximum
size
so
lowering
the
maximum
amount
of
people
in
the
units,
lowering
the
the
maximum
amount
of
people
that
would
be
sharing
certain
amenities
like
bathrooms,
and
kitchens
addresses
my
concern,
while
also
adding
what
I
believe
is
a
very
valuable
and
dignified
alternative
of
affordable
housing
and
adding
to
our
housing
stock
in
a
meaningful
in
a
meaningful
way.
So
I
I
just
felt
like
I
needed
to
discuss
that.
E
I
just
want
to
Echo
what
council
member
Fowler
said
that
I
know
that
some
people
have
opposed
shared
housing,
and
we
just
fundamentally
disagree
on
that.
But
I
think
because
we
heard
from
residents
and
different
Advocates.
They
did
impact
this
ordinance
for
the
better,
and
so
there
was
a
positive
impact
and-
and
we
did
hear
those
concerns
and
I
hope
that
this
is
a
represents,
a
compromise
that
will
work
for
Salt,
Lake
City.
A
Thank
you,
council,
member,
Fowler,
I'm,
sorry
Martin.
Anybody
else
all
right.
So
there
was
a
motion
by
councilmember
Fowler
seconded
by
councilmember
work.
A
C
E
E
A
Council
member
Pui,
yes,
council,
member
father
number,
yes
and
that
motion
passes
seven
to
zero.
This
brings
us
to
potential
action
item.
C1
regarding
a
northern
excuse
me
regard
see.
Sorry
next
time
is
C2
regarding
an
ordinance
zoning
text.
Amendments
for
the
off
street
parking
and
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
F
A
E
E
E
A
Council
member,
yes,
council,
member
Fowler,
yes,
I'm,
a
yes
and
that
motion
passes
7-0.
A
I'm
moving
moving
on
to
item
C3
regarding
an
ordinance
for
text,
amendments
to
the
rmf-30,
low
density,
multi-family,
residential
zoning,
District
I
would
look
for
a
motion.
F
A
I
I
would
like
to
suggest
an
alternative
motion.
I
move
that
the
council
adopt
the
audience
amending
various
sections
of
title
21A
pertaining
to
the
RMA
30,
low
density,
multi-family,
residential
district
and
I.
Further
move
that
the
city
recorder
wait
to
publish
the
ordinance
for
180
calendar
days.
Our.
J
Person
that
made
the
motion
accepts
it
and
the
second
or
does
that's
fine.
If
not,
it
could
be
a
substitute
motion
and
then
you
would
vote
on
that
first,
providing
it
still
has
a
second.
A
H
O
I
Body
so
my
motion
is,
is
the
substitute
motion
that
will
weight
the
ordinance
for
180
calendar
days?
A
Right
so
I
have
a
motion
by
councilman
report
and
seconded
by
council
member
Petro.
Do
I
see
any
other
discussion.
Can.
I
F
I
And
this
is
this:
the
reasoning
for
this.
This
this
motion
is
because
of
the
other
ordinances.
The
city
is
working
that
I
I
think
there
is
unintended,
the
consequences
that
we
are
trying
to
minimize,
and
we
know
some
of
our
councilmember.
Some
of
us
were
talking
quite
a
bit
with
Community
organizations
on
some
of
the
unattended
consequences
and
we're
trying
to
Gap
these
two
ordinances.
I
So
there
is
not
that
many
consequences
during
those
times
when
the
other
ordinances
are
worked
out,
so
I
feel
like
this
brings
it
closer
to
that
to
that
timeline.
So
those
180
days
will
give
us
a
little
more
cushion
to
give
the
administration
a
little
more
time
to
work
through
order
changes.
F
So,
just
to
clarify
that
the
motion,
if
this
passes
it
would
be
implemented
in
180
days,
whether
or
not
those
other
ordinances
actually
come
to
fruition,
because
okay,
because
that
otherwise
we're
right
back
to
where
we
were
two.
B
Years
ago,
Madam
chair,
if
I
may,
as
well
and
I,
think
the
other
ordinances
we're
talking
about
are
mitigation.
Run-Ins
is,
if
that's
it
and
displacement
policies
and
things
along
those
lines
and
I
appreciate
a
compromise.
There,
however,
I
similar
to
the
sros,
where
I
felt
my
concerns
had
been
addressed
and
the
concerns
I
heard
from
constituents
had
been
addressed,
even
if
not
perfectly
they
still
had
been
addressed.
I
don't
see
that
here
and
while
I
do
support
a
variety
of
housing
stock
and
necessary
for
that
I
still,
don't
think
that
concert.
A
And
the
two
and
the
two
documents
for
the
public
and
I
know
you
said
it
are
you
me,
but
I
will
reiterate
this
as
a
thriving
in
place.
Documented
Administration
is
working
on
and
also
the
housing
loss
mitigation
plan
that
we
that
we
need
to
review
and-
and
these
are
AIDS
to
this
ordinance
to
prevent
you-
know,
displacement,
Etc
and
I-
think
in
in
loss
of
housing
that
that
we
have
been
experiencing
recently.
So
any
further
discussion,
all
right,
so
I'm
going
to
roll
call
this
council
member
Petro,
yes,
Dugan.
A
E
A
A
A
C
A
I
A
I
F
A
Thank
you
we're
moving
on
to
item
C7,
so
if
you're
looking
at
an
agenda
instead
of
going
to
six
we're
going
to
vote
on
c
7
first
and
then
we're
going
to
go
back
to
C
six,
and
that
is
regarding
the
resulting
to
facilitate
development
of
The
Other
Side
village
at
1850,
West,
Indiana,
Avenue
and
I
would
look
for
a
motion.
Madam.
C
A
F
I
I
I'm,
really
hopeful
about
this
project
and
the
pilot
project.
I
I
still
remain
concerned
about
rezoning
the
whole
third
28
acres
and
wish
that
we
had
reduced
that,
but
I
understand
I'm
the
I
think
I'm
the
only
council
member
that
still
feels
that
way.
So,
but
I
am
opposed
to
the
full
rezone,
because
I
want
an
additional
public
input
when
before
we
expand
it
to
the
full
site.
F
But
I
do
want
this
pilot
project
to
go
forward
and
I,
want
I,
I'm
hopeful
and
and
excited
to
see,
success
there,
but
I
I
I'm,
not
supportive
of
the
full
rezone,
because
I
want
that
additional
layer
of
council
and
public
input
before
the
pilot
project
is
expanded.
But
that's
reiterating
something.
I
said
a
few
weeks
ago.
A
A
A
F
A
F
A
Yes,
powler,
yes
and
I'm.
A
yes
and
that
motion
passes
six
to
one
okay,
we're
going
back
to
C
item
C
six,
which
is
a
resolution.
The
Other,
Side,
village
pilot
project
at
1850,
West,
Indiana,
Avenue,
public
benefits,
analysis
and
a
resolution
to
authorize
the
lease
rate
and
terms.
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
E
Madam,
chair
I,
move
that
the
council
approved
the
public,
benefit
analysis
and
ground
lease
terms,
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
one
the
city
and
the
other
side
Village
enter
into
the
ground
lease
on
the
terms
and
conditions
set
forth
on
the
proposed
term
sheet
and
two,
the
city
and
the
other
side.
Village
enter
into
a
development
agreement
on
the
terms
and
conditions
set
forth
on
the
proposed
term
sheet.
Second,.
A
I
Chair
I
would
like
to
go
ahead
I.
You
know
this.
This
Village
is
proposed
to
be
built
in
District,
Two
and
I.
You
know,
I
wrote
a
few
things
today,
I'm
gonna
just
paraphrase,
but
this
wasn't
an
easy
project
you
know,
and
no
because
we
don't
need
more
resources
for
for
those
that
live
in
the
streets.
Those
are
on
shelter
and
homeless.
I
In
our
city
we
do
and
we
need
quite
a
bit
more,
but
I
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
work
that
the
administration
and
the
city
council
staff
has
put
to
address
some
of
the
issues
that
the
community
has
brought
up.
I
So
many
of
those
issues
are
partnered
of
an
agreement
in
writing
with
with
the
provider,
in
this
case,
The,
Other,
Side,
Academy
and
I
believe
that
this
creates
a
rubric
in
some
way
on
how
we
work
with
other
providers
in
the
future
that
we
are
okay,
asking
some
hard
questions
about
how
we
use
the
resources
of
this
city
for
the
benefits
of
of
everybody.
I
So
I
I
also
would
like
to
acknowledge
the
trauma
of
my
community,
the
trauma
of
my
community
about
you
know
the
feeling
that
everything
comes
to
the
west
side
and
not
that
many
good
things
come
to
the
west
side
and
acknowledging.
That
is
very
important,
but
we
cannot
just
stop
acknowledging
it.
We
need
to
do
everything
in
our
power
to
mitigate
not
only
the
consequences,
but
also
bring
good
things
to
the
to
the
west
side
and
I
pledge
personally
to
be
working
as
much
as
I
can
to
to
do
that
with
this
project.
I
With
this
area
and
with
my
whole
district
and
in
general
to
the
West
Side
I
I
also
would
like
to
mention
that
sometimes
we
disagree
and
and
disagreements
sometimes
become
personal
and
disagreements
shouldn't
become
personal
and,
unfortunately,
you
know
this
project
has
brought
up
some
of
those
issues.
I
So
I
I
want
to
thank
everybody
that
worked
so
hard
from
the
from
the
mayor's
side
and
the
administration
I'm
from
Arkansas
and
our
co-counselors
for
the
Dawsons
and
doses
of
meetings
and
phone
calls
and
and
conversations
about
this
again.
This
feeling
that
many
neighbors
have
is
real
and
it's
based
on
facts
and
this
feeling
that
the
west
side
has
left
out,
but
there's
a
lot
of
great
things
coming
and
there's
a
lot
of
great
things
that
we
should
be
fighting
for
more
and
that's
my
pledge
to
this
community.
H
H
Before
we
could
get
to
the
issue
at
hand
on
the
agenda,
we
had
to
deal
with
other
housekeeping
as
all
Community
councils
do.
Among
the
issues
we
dealt
with,
we're
checking
in
with
our
detective
on
the
status
of
Investigations
into
repeated
property
theft
and
the
recent
shooting
death
of
a
Young
Man.
H
That
discussion
was
followed
directly
by
strategies
for
supporting
the
devastated
family,
as
well
as
how
to
destigmatize
and
clear
the
young
man's
name
as
reporting
on
the
incident
gave
the
impression
that
he
was
gang
involved
and
he
was
not
I
wrestled
with
the
idea
of
sharing
that
story.
I'm
loathed,
to
allow
false
narratives
about
our
home
to
persist,
and
invariably
someone
listening
to
me
recite.
The
story
will
think
goodness.
The
west
side
is
so
violent.
H
We
need
to
save
them,
but
it's
important
for
you
to
know
I
guarantee
you
the
magnitude
of
the
issues
addressed
by
this
volunteer
group
of
concerned.
Citizens
is
not
congruent
to
the
conversations
across
the
city.
While
we
certainly
do
not
need
anyone
to
save
us.
The
truth
is
we
deal
with
literal
life
and
death
on
a
much
more
regular
basis.
H
The
margins
that
exist
in
other
communities
are
quite
simply
not
a
luxury.
The
West
Side
enjoys
we've
never
enjoyed
those
sort
of
margins.
If
done
well.
Zoning
considerations
like
this
one
consist
of
two
components:
the
project
with
its
merits
and
the
context
into
which
the
project
will
be
inserted.
H
We've
heard
exhaustive
choruses
of
praise
for
the
organization,
petitioning
the
Fantastic
work
of
Tammy
hunziker,
and
the
mayor's
Administration
has
ensured
the
Integrity
of
this
particular
project.
However,
there
is
very
rightly
earned
concerns
about
the
context
into
which
we're
putting
this
project.
H
When
tosa
took
on
piloting
their
Academy
at
the
intersection
of
100
South
and
700
East,
they
rehabbed
a
historic
mansion,
an
indication
that,
even
if
they
found
it
in
disrepair,
it
has
not
always
been
so.
Their
proximity
to
the
grand
beauty
of
South
Temple
to
the
North
and
the
economic
centers
to
the
South
ensures
that
that
intersection
may
fall
out
of
fashion,
but
it
will
never
be
terminally,
so
the
west
side
does
not
share
that
privilege.
As
Maria
Garcia
has
rightly
pointed
out,
we
carry
every
possible
Scar
from
developmental
traumas.
H
A
community
can
bear
we're
boarded
on
three
sides
by
major
highways.
We
are
re-rooted
and
thwarted
by
Rail
lines
that
quarantine
us.
We
have
been
redlined,
we
have
been
displaced,
we
have
been
unheard
and
then
we've
been
chastised
for
not
wanting
to
return
to
the
table.
Our
low
voter
turnout
has
become
a
vicious
cycle
of
not
getting
attention
from
Power
structures
which
lead
to
feelings
of
disillusionment
and
unimportance,
which
leads
us
to
not
show
up
for
elections
and
then
gets
us
back
to
the
lack
of
attention
from
Power
structures.
H
I'm
thankful
to
be
with
this
city
on
the
front
lines
of
a
municipal
effort
to
change
some
of
those
historical
pains,
but
we're
nowhere
near
making
progress
enough
for
any
of
the
wounds
to
have
healed
over.
They
are
felt
they're
felt,
multi-generationally,
they're
felt
multi-ethnically
and
they're
felt
on
a
daily
basis
when
this
project
was
first
conceived,
a
city-owned
parcel
at
the
mouth
of
emigration.
Canyon
was
a
consideration.
H
There
are
two
stories
as
to
why
this
parcel
fell
out
of
favor
the
first.
The
two
major
institutions
with
budding
properties
did
not
want
the
risk
of
the
project
so
close
to
them.
The
second
that
there
was
a
master
plan
for
the
land
that
precluded
this
sort
of
usage
there
either
of
these
stories
is
salt
in
the
west
side
wound.
If
those
two
Utah
shaping
entities
considered
a
risk,
why
should
we
consider
it
an
asset
if
the
master
plan
helped
avoid
it?
H
Why
was
the
West
Side
master
plan
and
the
nine
Line
Trail
master
plan
not
enough
to
help
keep
it
from
being
proposed
on
the
west
side
shouldn't
a
project
like
this
always
be
outside
of
expected
usages
the
homeless,
goodness
crisis
is
unprecedented.
A
land
use
like
this
should
be
equally
unforeseeable
for
any
area
in
equal
measure,
but
here
we
are
West.
Cider
saw
this
coming
a
mile
away.
H
Most
of
my
neighbors
are
conditioned
to
be
content
to
hope
that
bad
things
don't
happen
to
us.
It
is
the
rare
Visionary
to
dare
to
Hope
good
things
come
to
us,
but
I'm
going
to
take
this
moment
to
put
into
the
public
record
that
we
deserve
good
things
that
we
should
be
protected
by
City
investment
and
neighborly
good
regard.
H
H
They
have
been
incredibly
responsive
to
many
many
demands
for
information,
redirections
and
questions
I,
believe
their
commitment
to
personal
Excellence
will
be
the
central
asset
to
this
project.
They
will
not
fail
because
it
is
anathema
anathema
to
them
and
the
way
they
view
their
reputation
to
fail
at
anything
they
set
their
minds
to.
They
are
the
bright
spot
for
me
in
an
otherwise
torturous
decision.
H
Beauty
resilience,
recognized
and
responded
to
and
kind
of,
using
your
mission
and
expertise
to
offer
our
unsheltered
neighbors,
who
have
had
nowhere,
but
a
Riverside
or
sidewalk
to
call
home
a
good
faith
and
grace-oriented
opportunity
to
change
their
fortunes.
You
are
capable
of
this
sort
of
work,
but
you
should
not
rely
on
any
organizational
muscle
memory.
This
work
will
be
new
to
your
org
and
will
help
you
learn
but
you're
asking
to
bark
on
a
new
sort
of
Community,
Partnership
and
investment.
We
are
unique.
H
Your
interaction
with
us,
and
particularly
your
interaction
with
the
most
vulnerable
Among
Us,
must
also
be
unique
to
my
West
Side
Neighbors,
especially
those
who
cannot
find
a
way
to
reconcile
this
project
into
our
neighborhood
context.
You're,
not
unheard.
Your
input
has
shaped
so
many
protections
for
this
neighborhood
that
are
enshrined
in
contract
and
enforceable.
H
Your
advocacy
has
been
Relentless
and
brilliant.
I
have
heard
you
when
you
tell
me
that
as
a
black
professional,
you
get
side-eyed
everywhere
else.
You
go
in
the
city
and
when
you
come
home
to
the
one
place
in
the
entire
state,
where
your
skin
color
doesn't
stick
out,
you're
forced
to
deal
with
disproportionate
stressors
from
the
homelessness
crisis
and
property
theft
and
homelessness.
H
This
project
will
be
leveraged
in
concrete
and
in
tangential
ways
to
bring
actual
positive
things
to
our
community.
The
mayor
has
already
committed
to
at
least
two
concrete
projects
in
direct
response
to
this
project.
We
will
not
let
this
end.
Ically
I
commit
this
to
you
when
it
comes
to
city-owned
property.
H
I'm
done
approving
things
like
this
on
the
west
side,
until
we
have
material
geographical
equity
for
similar
projects
and
economic
development
for
us,
I
cannot
control
private
property
or
what
comes
from
other
levels
of
government,
but
I
will
work
my
hardest
to
prevent
any
city
property
from
being
used
for
purposes
such
as
this.
As
this,
while
I
hold
this
seat,
I
believe
in
the
long
run
that
this
project
will
not
inhibit
our
West
Side
Rising
that
is
coming
and
that
we
deserve
so
heartily.
H
I
believe
these
are
the
right
providers
for
us
to
work
alongside
to
make
something
beautiful
here,
but
the
tears
we've
shed
to
get
to
this
point
are
well
shed.
Our
wounds
are
still
fresh
and
our
trepidation
is
well
earned,
but
we're
leveraging
this
project
to
propel
us
to
Greater
growth
that
comprehends
all
of
us,
even
the
most
vulnerable,
improves
our
strength.
Once
again,
thank
you.
E
E
You
know,
law
making
is
not
a
zero-sum
game,
or
at
least
it
shouldn't
be,
and
I
hope
that
the
people
that
disagree
with
us
on
this
project,
like
the
sros,
don't
look
at
this
and
say:
oh,
this
was
a
we
lost
day,
one
because
there
so
much
of
what
we
received
in
comments
and
emails
and
and
concerns
that
and
people
reaching
out
with
genuine
concerns
about
all
facets
of
this
project
really
helped
us
create
a
much
better
outcome.
E
But
what
I
really
wanted
to
thank
are
the
the
two
West
Side.
My
two
colleagues
from
the
west
side
and
and
I
am
very
proud
to
represent
a
small
portion
of
the
West
side.
But
to
have
you
consider
me,
as
as
one
of
your
one
of
the
the
three
representatives
of
the
West
side
and
I,
feel
really
fortunate
and
proud
to
represent
those
West
Side
residents
to
trust
me
to
be
able
to
do
that.
E
Even
though
the
vast
majority
of
my
district
is
on
the
east
side
and
I
I
heard
some
comments
or
some
insinuations
that
my
colleagues
from
the
West
Side
were
not
working
for
the
west
side
on
this
or
that
they
weren't
representing
West
Side
concerns
in
this
and,
as
somebody
who's
been
in
all
of
our
public
discussions
and
been
in
all
of
our
small
group
meetings.
Seen
all
of
the
work
that's
gone
into
this
behind
the
scenes
that
absolutely
could
not
be
further
from
the
truth.
E
There
was
never
a
moment
when
councilmember
Peter,
ashler
and
council
member
POI
were
not
putting
the
the
needs
and
the
concerns
of
the
West
side
first,
when
they
were
not
advocating
and
pushing
all
of
us
and
when
they
were
not
circling
back
and
double,
checking
and
and
pushing
back
on
areas
where
this
project
could
be
better
and
I'm.
E
So
grateful
for
that,
because
I
think
that
this
is
going
to
be
such
a
much
better
project
for
all
of
that
work,
and
so
everybody
that
that
did
come
in
and
everybody
that
that
did
raise
those
concerns.
I
want
you
to
know
that
those
were
heard
and
they
were
heard,
particularly
by
these
two.
They
were
and
and
I
looked
to
them.
E
First
in
helping
me
understand
even
better
what
more
of
the
West
Side
concerns
were
beyond
my
own
small
portion
of
the
West
side,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
you
very
much
for
that,
and
thank
you
for
your
hard
work
and
assure
that
all
residents
of
the
West
side
that
you
did
them
a
great
service
by
the
work
that
you
put
into
this.
So
thank
you.
A
All
right
so
I
will
take
a
moment
of
personal
privilege,
but
I'll
be
shorter,
because
I
can't
say
yes,
everybody
else
has
I
struggled
with
this
project.
A
I
think
a
lot
of
people
know
because
of
the
things
that
Victoria
talked
about
because
of
the
things
that
Alejandro
talked
about,
but
and
the
things
that
I
wanted
for
the
west
side
was
a
little
bit
more
attention
to
Economic
Development
and
that
thanks
to
Victoria
thanks
to
Alejandro
and
thanks
to
the
mayor,
we've
and
thanks
to
the
academy
as
well,
we
were
able
to
to
come
to
to
certain
agreements
on
doing
that
and
that's
something
that
it
was
really
important
to
me
and
it
actually
happened
and
that
really
made
made.
A
You
know
my
heart
to
change
towards
this
project.
It's
not
about
the
project.
I
think
Dosa
have
been
amazing
Neighbors
in
District
Four
I
would
like
to
have
more
of
you.
I've
said
this
before
in
my
district
to
help
the
folks
that
you
help
you
know,
turn
their
lives
around.
It's
been
amazing
and
also
you've
been
amazing
neighbors.
So
it's
not
about
that.
It
was
more
about
the
other
issues
that
Victoria
talked
about
in
Alejandra,
so
I
Echo.
A
What
what
Chris
has
said,
the
document
if
the
public
has
seen
or
will
see,
which
is
the
contract
and
their
rezone,
and
the
development
agreement
and
lengthy,
lengthy
requirements
and
negotiations
with
tosa
is
thanks
to
them
and
to
listen
to
All
what
they
listen
to
all
of
us
or
they
listen
all
of
our
concerns,
our
our
personal
histories,
our
history,
all
the
the
values
and
the
things
that
at
least
that
I
presented
to
them
they've
been
hurt.
So
I
truly
appreciate
the
West
Side
council
members
and
also
the
mayor.
A
She
publicly
informed
us
today
in
her
earlier
the
work
session
of
fostering
west
side
economic
growth,
and
you
have
four
points
and
certain
properties
that
you
will
be
calling
for
RFI,
that's
extremely
important
that
we
haven't
done
so
Direct
in
the
past
and
now
it's
there
in
writing
and
we
can
move
forwards
towards
that
and
I.
Do
super
duper
appreciate
that
that's
that
so
I'm
going
to
roll
call
this
and
I'm
going
to
start
with
council
member
Petro.
Yes,
councilmember
Dugan.
C
C
I
A
Council,
member,
yes,
council,
member
Fowler,
yes
and
I'm
a
yes
and
that
passes
seven
to
zero,
we're
moving
on
to
comments.
This
is
questions
to
the
mayor
from
the
city
council
and
are
there
any
questions
for
the
mayor
mayor?
Thank
you
for
being
here
any
questions
of
the
mayor.
A
All
right,
apparently
not
we
are
now
at
the
common
portion
of
our
agenda
and
I
will
hear
and
we'll
hear
comments
on
General
topics
and
items
not
scheduled
for
a
hearing
tonight.
I
went
over
to
City
council's
Rules
of
the
Quorum
earlier,
and
those
rules
apply
here
as
well.
We're
accepting
comments
in
person
online
via
WebEx
and
Via
telephone
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
Isaac
Canada
and
our
staff
is
moderating
the
meeting
and
will
message
attendees
as
needed.
A
Taylor
Hill
and
our
staff
will
call
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
based
on
the
order
of
registration,
I've
received
or
received
comment
cards
once
we
we
open
public
comment.
Taylor
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
people
can
have
some
notice
and
prepare
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak
for
people
in
WebEx,
she
will
unmute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
if
you're
in
here
in
person,
please
step
up
to
the
podium
to
make
your
comment
once
Taylor
announces
your
name
to
begin.
A
Please
state
your
name
and
your
two
minute.
Timer
will
start
and
the
two
minute
Mark
the
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
If
you're
unable
to
finish
your
comment,
please
send
the
rest
via
email,
mail
or
call
our
office.
Our
contact
information
is
available
in
the
meeting
room
and
in
the
WebEx
chat.
If
you
no
longer
wish
to
speak,
please
either
message
our
staff
or
when
staff
States
your
name.
Let
us
know
you're
here
to
listen
Taylor.
You
can
begin
with
our
first
general
comment.
K
D
My
name
is
Katie
Pappas
and
I'm
a
long
time
resident
of
Salt
Lake
City,
the
interlocal
agreement
between
the
Utah
Inland,
Port,
Authority
and
Salt
Lake
City
needs
to
be
put
on
hold
more
carefully
reviewed
and
widely
shared.
With
residents
of
this
city,
you
have
a
small
Board
of
individuals
appointed
by
the
Utah
legislature,
negotiating
with
the
city
Administration
that
represents
a
Salt
Lake
Metro
population
of
180
000
people.
D
D
It
doesn't
make
sense
to
enter
into
a
25-year
contract
when
we
are
living
in
a
world
of
frequent
catastrophic
events,
two
of
which
a
mega
drought
and
an
environmental
disaster
at
the
Great
Salt
Lake
are
literally
next
door
to
this
project.
25
years
is
too
long.
Salt
Lake
City
must
be
able
to
adapt
and
address
environmental
and
human
impacts
as
they
arise
in
the
next
few
years.
It
may
become
apparent
that
this
project
is
a
disaster
in
itself
and
we
must
have
the
ability
to
make
Corrections.
D
Just
today,
I
read
in
the
Salt
Lake
Tribune
that
the
EPA
is
launching
its
environmental
justice
study
of
Salt
Lake
City's
west
side.
This
is
thanks
to
concerned
and
dedicated
community
members
and
groups
who
have
been
pushing
for
it.
Mayor
mendenhaus
letter
to
the
EPA
supports
this
and
asks
that
specific
attention
be
paid
to
the
Utah
Inland
Port
area.
Why
would
the
city
sign
this
contract
now
without
awaiting
the
results
of
this
assessment?
In
fact,
why
wouldn't
the
city
wait
for
the
results
of
the
other
assessments
that
will
be
done?
D
G
Thank
you,
I'm
Brian
Vince,
president
of
Utah,
Physicians,
for
a
healthy
environment.
At
today's
Port
Authority
meeting
every
public
speaker
spoke
against
the
port
and
called
for
a
better
contract,
one
that
treats
the
city
as
an
equal
partner,
not
as
a
handmaiden
to
the
Port
Authority,
one
that
truly
protects
our
air
and
water,
not
just
studies
them.
G
Given
the
water
consumption
at
other
Inland
ports,
any
version
of
our
Inland
Port
will
only
light
the
fuse
to
that
nuclear
bomb.
Nonetheless,
so
far
from
no
one
seems
to
be
willing
to
say,
like
the
boy
who
finally
pointed
out,
the
emperor
has
no
clothes.
The
Great
Salt
Lake
has
no
water
to
give
to
an
inland
port.
G
We
can
pass
laws
that
don't
incentivize
further
development
of
the
Northwest
Quadrant
and
given
our
dire
situation,
if
no
level
of
government
can
protect
us
from
profiteering
and
environmental
destruction
at
the
hands
of
the
area's
biggest
landowners,
real
tendo
and
colemana,
then
we
have
simply
surrendered
the
public
good
by
subsidizing.
These
International
corporations.
G
From
an
economic
perspective,
we
desperately
need
a
living,
Great,
Salt,
Lake
and
breathable
air.
What
we
don't
need
is
more
water
intensive
industrialization,
instead
of
being
intimidated
into
signing
this
contract
as
the
lesser
of
two
evils,
the
city
needs
to
lead
by
calling
on
our
legislature
to
pass
all
the
necessary
laws
to
reverse
what
is
obviously
an
enormous
mistake
in
creating
a
publicly
subsidized
Port
Authority,
the
Great
Salt
Lake
simply
has
no
water
to
give
to
any
version
of
an
inland
Port.
Thank
you.
O
Thank
you,
I'm
Tina,
Rohr
greetings,
mayor
Mendenhall
and
council
members.
I
urge
you
to
avoid
signing
this
contract
with
the
legislature
and
the
Inland
Port.
Our
property
taxes
belong
to
Salt
Lake
City,
not
the
Inland
Port
you,
as
representatives
of
the
people
of
Salt
Lake
City,
need
to
be
looking
out
for
our
best
interests.
O
The
city
needs
to
take
the
lead
in
selecting
monitoring
and
managing
the
contractors
and
Consultants
who
would
be
in
charge
of
conducting
the
human
health
risk,
the
human
health
risk
assessment
and
environmental
report
on
the
effects
report
on
pollution
of
air
water
land
noise
light,
as
well
as
increased
traffic
and
spraying
of
toxic
chemicals.
Yupa,
has
a
poor
record
of
managing
money
and
being
secretive
in
their
spending
of
our
tax
money,
as
was
revealed
in
the
recent
audit,
which
showed
81
percent
of
uepa's
contracts
were
no
bid.
O
The
report
from
the
respected
Authority
Dr
Leachman
should
also
be
considered
as
the
results
of
these
studies.
Roll
in
the
clause
in
the
contract,
stating
the
time
frame
of
the
contract
to
be
25
years
is
ludicrous.
Considering
the
harm
uepa
is
creating
for
our
city
and
its
people,
we
need
to
shut
down
this
monstrosity
before
any
more
harm
is
done
to
the
environment,
its
habitats,
people
and
Wildlife.
O
You
see
me
often
and
probably
know
a
lot
about
me,
but
you
probably
do
not
know
that
toward
the
end
of
my
career
in
mental
health,
I
had
to
teach
CPR
and
first
aid
I
had
no
skills
related
to
this
assignment
at
all
the
big
takeaway
for
me
was
you
have
to
stop
the
bleeding
it
doesn't
matter
what
else
you
know
how
to
do
as
a
first
responder.
If
you
fail
to
stop
significant
bleeding,
that
is
where
Salt
Lake
City
is
with
respect
to
housing.
O
It
has
failed
to
stop
the
bleeding
the
loss
of
lower
income
residents,
the
loss
of
existing
housing,
the
loss
of
architectural
variety
and
the
loss
of
ethnic
diversity.
The
losses
are
all
around
me
in
the
Bryant
and
Central
City,
neighborhoods
ones,
which
contain
the
majority
of
the
rmf-30
zoning
in
the
city.
I
have
some
benchmarks
to
share
with
you
in
2014
I
stopped
advertising
vacancies
and
began
renting
by
referral.
Only
in
2018,
the
last
tenants
left
to
purchase
a
house.
O
My
tenants
have
not
been
able
to
purchase
houses
on
the
market
since
then,
four
years
ago,
in
2020,
the
only
tenants
who
Moved
were
leaving
the
city,
no
one
left
to
get
a
better
deal
on
housing.
No
one
left
to
purchase
a
house
when
the
rmf-30
modifications
were
initiated
five
and
a
half
years
ago.
I
knew
that
they
would
result
in
the
loss
of
existing
housing
displacement
of
current
residents,
the
demolition
of
character-defining
buildings
in
our
older
neighborhoods.
O
If
the
city
was
making
mistake,
then
the
impacts
were
concentrated
in
District
4
and
would
fall
on
the
residents
who
could
least
afford
them.
I
want
to
thank
the
council
for
the
180
delay
day.
The
day
delay
delay,
protects
people
and
existing
housing
when
you're
living
paycheck
to
paycheck
180
days
is
a
long
time,
but
it
is
to
council
member
Fowler
who
I
want
to
offer
my
most
sincere
thanks.
O
Q
It's
taken
a
long
time
to
get
to
this
point
and
I
can
tell,
by
your
faces
that
you're
glad
you
approved
some
of
these,
but
I
think
you
have
the
horse
before
the
car
or
the
cart
before
the
horse
and
I
appreciate
the
180
days
of
I.
Guess
we
call
it
relief,
but
I
urge
you,
as
the
people
in
charge
of
the
city,
put
some
deadlines
on
the
staff.
Don't
make
it
take
five
years
to
write
the
ordinance
for
housing
mitigation
because
you
think
there's
a
lot
of
affordable
housing.
Q
That's
going
to
be
generated,
but
there's
not
a
word
in
any
of
those
ordinances
about
things
have
to
be
affordable
or
else
so
people
can
just
go
scrape
the
land,
because
the
new
demolition
permit
says
go
ahead
and
scrape
it.
If
it
looks
a
little
bit
sad
and
then
it
sits
there
and
the
property
value
goes
up
and
up
and
up
and
then
they
sell
it
to
a
developer
and
they
build
expensive
houses.
Q
So
I
think
unless
you
get
these
ordinances
cleaned
up
and
those
rules
written
you're
not
going
to
have
any
result
that
you
can
count
on,
and
the
second
thing
you
need
to
do
is
ask
monthly
what
kind
of
permits
were
issued
and
what
kind
of
certificate
of
occupancies
were
issued
and
what?
What
are
the
rents
that
they're
charging
or
the
sale
price
of
a
house?
You
don't
have
any
data
and
you
need
a
like
monthly
progress
report
to
make
sure
that
these
things
are
working
on
delay.
O
I'm
Lynne
Schwartz,
the
shared
housing
ordinance,
the
rmf-30
ordinance
and
the
proposed
affordable
housing
initiative
are
likely
to
have
a
displacement
impact
on
existing,
affordable
housing.
The
mitigation
regulations,
in
effect
now
are
clearly
having
no
effect
the
passage
of
these
ordinances
without
an
effective
companion
mitigation
ordinance
is
asking
for
a
worse
disaster
than
we
have
now.
According
to
the
city's
own
thriving
in
place
study,
there
is
no
thriving
and
certainly
no
stay
in
place
for
cost
burdened
renters.
Under
the
existing
mitigation
ordinance.
O
The
amount
required
by
developers
to
provide
the
city
for
each
unit
of
eliminated
housing
is
laughable.
The
amount
should
be
raised
by
the
actual
unit
replacement
costs
so
that
there
is
some
reasonable
expectation
that
there
will
actually
be
some
mitigation.
The
amount
should
be
adjusted
on
a
regular
basis
to
ensure
it
keeps
up
with
actual
costs
you
get.
You
can
do
something
to
ensure
effective
mitigation
now,
before
the
totally
foreseeable
effects
of
any
of
the
density.
Increasing
ordinances
fully
take
hold.
R
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Bob
Danielson
and
I
appreciate
the
time.
First
and
foremost,
I'd
like
to
commend
the
Council
on
improving
The,
Other,
Side,
village.
I
think
this
is
a
very
positive
move
for
our
entire
community.
R
R
In
fact,
our
district
five
councilman
won't
reply
to
a
large
group
of
his
constituents,
whose
Public,
Safety
and
and
property
have
been
compromised
as
a
result
of
the
lack
of
accountability,
so
because
our
councilman
won't
reply
to
us.
I
urge
the
rest
of
the
city
council
and
the
city
to
please
review
those
conditional
use
permits
and
without
compromise,
hold
accountable,
The
Operators
of
the
Gale
Miller
resource
center
and
other
Resource
Centers
to
these
permits,
I'm
speaking
for
a
large
group
of
residents
and
businesses
in
District
5..
R
Lastly,
dark
councilman.
We
are
still
waiting
for
your
acknowledgment
and
explanation
as
to
why
you
are
exempt
from
securing
building
permits
on
your
personal
property.
When
we
are
not.
You
also
answer,
and
until
then
the
message
is
clear:
building
permits
are
not
necessary
in
District
Five.
Thank
you.
F
Madam
chair
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment
of
personal
privilege.
This
is
the
second
week
that
Mr
Danielson
has
come
and
taken
time
out
of
our
Council
agenda.
To
attack
me
personally
and
the
truth
is
I'm,
proud
that
Mr
Danielson
does
not
approve
of
my
leadership.
Mr
Danielson
has
made
it
clear
that
he
does
not
support
our
City's
work
towards
diversity,
equity
and
inclusion.
F
He
speaks
about
individuals
facing
poverty,
addiction
and
homelessness
as
though
they
are
less
than
human,
and
he
represents
a
Viewpoint
which
does
not
match
the
constituents
who
elected
me
to
this
office.
It
is
my
belief
that
Mr
Danielson
sees
me
a
queer
person
of
color
in
office
as
a
threat
to
his
systemic
privilege.
F
As
such,
he
spends
an
incredible
amount
of
time
and
energy
and
efforts
to
attack
me
personally,
including
stalking,
me
and
members
of
my
family
and
making
my
private
residential
address
public.
This
is
an
attempt
to
bully
me
out
of
office
it's
shameful
and
it
will
not
work
as
to
the
specific
accusation
relating
to
building
permits
I'm
looking
into
it
and
I'll
commit
today
to
rectifying
anything
that
may
have
been
in
violation
on
my
property.
F
The
building
permit
process
in
our
city
is
onerous,
complicated
and
difficult
to
navigate
it's
very
hard
for
homeowners
and
residents
to
determine
what
types
of
work
require
a
permit
and
to
know
how
such
permits
are
obtained.
This
process
needs
to
be
fixed
and
I'll
use.
My
personal
experience
to
inform
those
improvements.
Thank
you.
K
M
M
I
believe
that
there
should
be
a
master
plan
developed
for
that
area,
and
the
reason
is,
those
properties
have
been
rezoned
were
done
without
any
plans.
They
asked
for
Community
input
on
the
the
first
one,
which
is
a
15,
acre
parcel
that
was
rezoned
a
few
years
ago.
It
was
the
seller
that
did
the
rezone
to
improve
the
value
of
their
property.
Nothing,
not
that
there's
anything
wrong
with
that,
but
they're
without
creating
a
master
plan.
We
don't
know.
M
What's
going
to
go
in
there
and
as
a
community
council,
we
had
a
difficult
time
supporting
Rocky
Mountain
Power's
recent
rezone
request,
because
we
don't
know
what's
going
there.
Yet
a
master
plan
will
help
determine
that
and
give
more
power
to
the
community.
I'd
also
like
to
reiterate
the
concerns
that
I
have
about
businesses
leaving
the
area
a
master.
We've
lost
two
since
the
last
I
spoke
to
you
again,
not
businesses
that
I'm
worried
about
leaving.
M
But
what
precedent
is
that
going
to
set
by
creating
a
master
plan
and
knowing
what
kind
of
Housing
and
what
kind
of
businesses
will
be
allowed?
It
will
give
greater
confidence
for
investment
in
the
area.
So
we're
going
to
be
having
this
discussion
at
our
next
community
council
meeting.
Since
three
of
you
represent
that
area,
I
hope
you
can
take
place.
Q
We
can
hear
you
I
would
like
to
support
I'm
Nancy
Alice
McHugh.
Many
people
know
me
as
Alice,
with
Salt
Lake
indivisible
in
the
Coalition
I
warmly
endorse
Katie
Pappas
and
Brian
minch's
comments
and
I
was
gonna
pass,
but
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
I
really
hope
the
council
will
slow
down
not
approve
that
contract
on
the
Inland
port.
Q
It
I
know
that
people
have
worked
very
hard
on
it
and
are
delighted
to
finally
have
something
that
two
sides
have
agreed
to,
but
it
has
lots
of
holes,
there's
nothing
about
the
wetlands
or
the
Great
Salt
Lake,
or
enforcing
current
code
violations.
For
example,
AB
433
said
there
would
be
a
process
in
the
contract
for
dealing
with
the
tax,
increment
money
and
all
the
contract
says.
Is
there
will
be
a
process
leaving
the
decision
up
to
the
UEFA
board?
Q
K
Hi,
my
name
is
Maureen
bottoman
I
live
a
couple
blocks
from
the
proposed
rezone
site
at
675,
North
F
Street.
This
rezone
contributes
positively
to
the
character
of
our
community,
while
acknowledging
the
growth
of
Salt
Lake
and
the
value
and
privilege
of
being
able
to
live
in
a
new
construction
home
in
a
neighborhood
as
amazing
as
the
Avenues
zoned
or
not
two
family,
two
families
living
on
a
lot
is
court.
At
The,
Avenues
I
live
on
a
pretty
average
middle
Avenues
block
two
of
my
neighbors
rent,
their
basements
one
house
is
a
converted.
Fourplex.
K
K
It's
the
diversity
of
these
types
of
housing
that
make
the
neighborhood
diversity,
and
this
project
supports
that
I
have
heard
a
lot
of
talk
from
a
vocal
minority
of
my
neighbors
of
preserving
The
Avenues
master
plan.
The
Avenues
master
plan
was
written
before
I.
A
homeowner
in
the
neighborhood
was
born
using
this,
as
the
immutable
standard
feels
deliberately
exclusionary
to
a
non-trivial
percentage
of
the
community.
K
Ultimately,
this
is
a
debate
over
a
handful
of
homes
in
a
privileged
community,
and
it
pains
me
it's
taking
up
time
in
your
worlds
and
continuing
to
take
up
your
time
in
your
worlds.
When
there
are
real
challenges
to
be
solved,
we
have
a
housing
shortage.
We
can
continue
to
invest
in
this
brawl
out
to
Harriman
or
late
in,
in
the
contributing
contributing
to
the
Myriad
of
Social
and
environmental
problems
that
we
have,
or
we
can
provide
people
with
reasonable,
viable
options
within
our
community
and
I
urge
you
to
support
this
rezone.
Thank
you.
L
D
You
for
your
time
tonight
my
name
is
Levy
Woodruff
and
I
wanted,
principally
to
speak
in
support
of
a
letter
that
was
recently
submitted
by
leaders
of
seven
Faith
groups
in
downtown.
D
I
am
a
member
of
the
congregation
at
First,
United
Methodist,
and
our
pastor
was
one
of
those
signatories,
and
this
letter
asks
the
mayor
and
the
city
council
to
ensure
that
there
are
adequate
overflow,
shelter
options
available
for
all
homeless
individuals,
but
especially
for
families
before
snow
and
cold
weather
come
on
just
in
September
alone,
there
were
70
families
that
were
turned
away
from
the
Midvale
family
shelter
because
there
was
no
room.
There
are
families
with
infants
and
young
children
who
are
trying
to
survive
in
tents
as
a
city.
D
We
cannot
allow
the
situation
to
continue,
because
this
is
inhumane.
It
is
dangerous
to
the
people
who
are
are
trying
to
survive
these
conditions
and
it
causes
long-term
trauma
to
children.
So
I
would
Echo
the
request
that
was
made
in
that
letter,
asking
that
the
mayor
and
the
council
ensure
that
there
is
increased
funding
for
the
motel
Voucher
Program,
which
enabled
families
to
stay
in
motel
rooms
and
be
warm
and
dry
and
off
the
streets
in
Winter.
The
need
for
this
program
has
increased.
D
The
funding
levels
that
were
adequate
in
previous
years
are
no
longer
adequate,
so
I
would
urge
you
to
increase
funding
for
this
simple
but
effective
program
and
make
sure
that
there
are
no
families
with
children
or
any
individuals
who
are
trying
to
survive
on
the
streets
in
Winter
and
finally,
I
would
just
like
to
Echo
what
has
been
raised
by
other
commenters
about
as
new
housing
is
built.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
kids
are
truly
affordable.
D
There
are
many
many
apartment
buildings
going
up
all
around
my
church
in
downtown,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
I,
don't
think
I
or
most
people
could
afford
to
live
in
any
of
them.
I
would
urge
you
to
make
sure
that
new
construction,
especially
in
multi-family
units,
designates
a
certain
amount
of
those
units
for
deeply
affordable
housing.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
L
Thank
you.
I
am
calling
about
the
interlocal
agreement
with
uepa
that
previous
people
have
spoken
about
Katie,
Pappas
and
Dr
Brian
Munch,
and
this
interlocal
agreement
that
was
signed
by
ueepa
this
morning
at
7
30.
L
is
not
advantageous
to
Salt
Lake,
City
and
I'm.
Asking
that
the
city
council
take
time
and
not
sign
the
agreement.
L
L
What
one
of
the
things
that's
in
there
is
that
uepa
has
a
dedicated
employee
to
expedite
developers.
Projects
I
believe
that
Salt
Lake
City
should
have
a
specific
employee
to
monitor
mitigation
and
compute
Community
Improvement.
L
So
that's
my
comment
and
thank
you
very
much.
K
P
Hi,
thank
you.
I'm
Dr,
Courtney,
Henley
I'm,
a
resident
of
Salt
Lake
City
I
am
a
delegate
of
the
Utah
Medical
Association
I
represent
the
board
of
Utah
Physicians
throughout
the
environment
and
I
actually
I
serve
on
the
environmental
health
committee
at
the
Uma.
My
crowning
philanthropic
achievement
this
year
was
to
have
a
resolution
passed
at
the
Utah
Medical
Association
House
of
delegates
last
month,
instructing
our
lobbyists
that
the
legislature
is
not
to
spend
another
dollar
on
the
Inland
Port
Authority.
P
P
You
know
the
the
port
has
spent
40
million
dollars
so
far,
really
sadly,
handouts
to
friends
of
Greg
Hughes,
who
created
the
authority,
and
you
know,
and
leases
for
people
that
have
it
inside
with
the
legislature,
and
it's
been
a
big
waste
of
money
and
even
during
that
time,
with
the
the
transportation
that
goes
out
right
now,
right
now
in
the
air
pollution.
That's
caused
I
mean
there's
EPA
studies
they've
probably
caused
the
people
of
this
city.
P
You
know
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
in
the
health
care
costs
that
they
pay
every
year
and
premature
death.
Heads
of
households
die
early
and
leave
their
spouses
and
kids
without
income
because
of
the
air
pollution
in
this
area.
So
I
am
speaking
specifically
to
the
interlocal
agreement.
I
also
would
like
to
see
it
not
approved
until
there
is
real
teeth
in
the
contract
that
specifies
who's
who's
performing
the
human
health
risk
assessment
who's
paying
for
it.
P
Today,
I
was
at
the
meeting
with
councilwoman
petro
and
Ben
Hart
told
me
afterwards
he's
like
yeah
we're
going
to
have
that
done
in
a
month
we're
going
to
have
a
request
for
proposals,
we're
going
to
see
proposals
and
I,
don't
think
we
should
sign
anything.
We
see
see
these
proposals,
that's
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city.
Thank
you.
S
My
name
is
Dave
eltus
I
had
three
quick
comments.
One
is
that
on
the
Avenues
rezoning
I'm
in
favor
of
higher
density
in
the
upper
Avenues,
however
I
would
love
to
see
the
council
require
a
small
neighborhood
park
as
well
as
a
insurer
there's
a
wildlife
Corridor,
since
the
rezoning
will
shut
out
a
wildlife
habitat
second
on
the
Inland
Port
I
Echo.
S
What
Brian
Munch
has
to
say
had
to
say
and
also
have
concerns
that
the
active
Transportation
component
of
the
Northwest
Quadrant
master
plan
has
not
been
followed
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that's
actually
in
the
interlocal
agreement.
S
The
third
and
major
comment,
however,
is
I,
filed
a
complaint
with
the
city
on
the
100
South,
and
the
violation
of
the
complete
streets
ordinance
I,
sent
that
to
the
city.
They
responded
with
essentially
illogical
nonsense.
S
I
then
sent
that
to
the
council
and
received
a
equally
offensive
letter
from
Council
chair,
Dan
Dugan,
stating
to
look
at
the
city's
response
to
my
complaint,
and
it
was
very
clear
that
the
council
did
not
take
their
role
seriously
as
a
check
and
balance
with
the
administration.
The
administration
broke
several
laws
in
the
Reconstruction
of
100
South,
and
that
would
be
mayor,
Mendenhall
and
the
transportation
division.
They
broke.
The
complete
streets,
ordinance,
the
open
meetings,
Act
and
the
funding
our
future
Bond
ordinance.
S
We
need
an
ombudsman
in
Salt,
Lake
City
and
we
you
as
a
council,
need
need
to
examine.
What
is
your
role?
Are
you
Paper
Tigers?
Do
you
have
any
standing
or
backbone
to
stand
up
to
the
administration
when
they
break
the
law?
And,
lastly,
it
sets
poor
precedent
for
2100,
South
and
other
streets
like
in
the
Inland
Port.
Thank
you.
N
The
federal
the
Federal
Reserve
monetizes
heavy
spending
bills
by
the
politicians,
which
creates
hot
inflation,
inflation's
running
at
least
four
times
more
at
a
greater
rate
than
it
than
it
has
been
prior,
and
it's
unlikely
that
this
is
going
to
stop.
This
drives
up
the
prices
of
housing,
which
also
then
leads
to
increases
in
property
taxes
for
people
who
are
staying
in
houses,
and
some
of
them
have
fixed
income.
Some
of
them
have
jobs
that
they
do
not
keep
up
with
the
inflation
and
so
having
these
spending
bills.
N
Where
there's
where
property
taxes
go
up
and
people
want
something.
So,
let's
just
put
that
on
the
property.
Taxes
creates
a
lot
of
trouble
for
people
who
are
not
going
to
have
a
very
easy
time
in
the
coming
years,
as
this
problem
gets
worse.
Please
consider
this
solution
make
these
bills
voluntary.
Somebody
wants
a
project
for
something
have
people
who
believe
in
it
and
want
to
write
a
check
and
spend
it
also
consider
the
Federal
Reserve
wants
a
inflation
rate
of
2
percent.
Consider
putting
a
cap
on
your
spending
increases
at
two
percent.
N
The
issue
I'd
like
to
address
is
about
tiny
house
Village
on
the
west
side.
Any
serious
attempt
to
deal
with
home
with
the
homeless
population
successfully
must
first
address
the
mental
health
of
the
homeless
population.
Unless
the
mentally
ill
homeless
can
be
screened
from
the
other
homeless.
The
project
will
be
little
better
than
the
present
efforts.
The
mayor
and
city
council
should
be
aggressively
lobbying
the
legislature
for
mental
health
facilities
in
Salt
Lake
City.
N
Some
people
pushing
the
tiny
house
Village
project
their
view
that
the
American
dream
is
home.
Ownership
I've
talked
to
homeless,
who
only
want
a
roof
and
Shelter
From
The
Elements.
The
point
by
the
airport
is
a
better
program
model
for
many
homeless.
I
gave
a
recommendation
earlier
that
the
best
place
for
the
homeless.
If
you're,
going
to
build
a
tiny
village,
build
it
out
at
the
Wing
Point
Golf
Course,
they
had
a
clubhouse
there.
They
had
restrooms,
he
had
a
police
station
across
the
you
know
it
was
all
fence
too.
N
You
could
make
a
track
station
there,
but
that
wasn't
given
serious
consideration
and
I
don't
know
much.
Okay,
one
other
issue
that
I'd
like
to
say
is
about
air
quality.
People
are
talking
about
the
Great
Salt
Lake,
you
know,
is
drying
up
in
the
air
quality
there
right
now.
The
air
quality
is
deteriorating
to
a
great
extent
because
of
the
tailings
from
the
Kennecott
Rio
Tinto
Mesa
out
there
anytime,
the
wind
blows
they
haven't
addressed.
You
know
the
problems
either
the
wind
blows
that
you
look
out
in
the
west
side.
N
L
Hi,
my
name
is
Marina
Grossman
I
live
in
District,
Seven
and
I
actually
originally
came
here
to
talk
about
the
interlocal
agreement
in
regard
to
the
Utah
Island
Port,
Authority,
I,
guess
really
I'm
just
going
to
Echo
what
most
people
are
asking
for,
and
that
is
to
wait
and
make
sure
that
we
have
preventive
measures
in
there
Beyond
mitigation
right
now.
L
We
need
to
take
care
of
our
city
or
people
or
community
sitting
here.
Hearing
about
the
unsheltered,
the
inequities.
L
We
need
to
take
care
of
our
communities
and
right
now
our
Great
Salt
Lake
we're
losing
her
and
she
is
the
city's
namesake.
The
Inland
Port
has
created
a
lot
of
issues.
It
is
not
needed,
but
we
all
know
that
so
I'm,
just
speaking
here
on
behalf
of
the
Great
Salt
Lake
and
our
community
and
for
the
future
Generations,
we
need
to
take
care
of
our
people.
We
need
to
take
care
of
the
unsheltered.
L
I
don't
have
much
else
to
say.
I
hope
that
the
projects
that
are
moving
forward
in
regard
to
the
unsheltered
will
be
beneficial.
I
need
to
do
more.
Thank
you.
K
Next
we
will
hear
from
rosalba
Dominguez
and
then
we
will
Circle
back
to
Carolyn.
Erickson
rosalba
is
here
in
person
hi.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
tonight.
Council
I
just
wanted
to
come
and
personally
support,
Lorena
rifle
Jensen,
who
I
know
you
guys
are
going
to
be
approving
here
and
the
next
agenda
item.
I
thought
she
would
be
here
so
I
just
came
to
support
her
after
my
own
council
meeting,
so
I
got
bored
at
mine
and
thought
I
would
skip
on
over.
So
thank
you
all
for
your
time
and
that's.
G
A
Q
Good
evening
I'm
Carolyn,
Erickson,
368,
Emory
Street,
usually
I,
try
to
make
comments
based
on
the
record
of
ueepa,
falling
short
on
transparency
and
planning
enforcement
and
disregard
for
the
welfare
of
the
residents
of
the
Northwest
Quadrant
and
I,
usually
like
to
try
to
provide
data-driven
litanies
of
the
harms
caused
by
the
port
development,
but
tonight
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
the
prodigious
work
and
optimism
of
the
new
UE
Lipa
board
members,
especially
Victoria
Petro.
Q
Leonard
Cohen's
lyrics
are
stuck
in
my
head.
Everyone
knows
the
ship
is
sinking.
Everyone
knows
the
captain
lied,
I
could
trust
the
process
and
the
contract.
If
the
citizens
of
Salt
Lake
were
equal
members
with
the
pro
development
UEFA
board
members,
please
hold
out
of
this
power
and
delay
the
city's
consent
to
the
contract.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
comments,
we're
at
item
e,
which
is
new
businesses.
That's
our
new
business
E1
advice
and
consent
for
director
of
Economic
Development,
Lorena,
rifo,
Jensen.
B
Go
ahead,
a
move
that
we
approve
the
appointment
of
Lorena
refo
Jensen
for
our
director
of
Economic
Development.
C
I
Madam
chair
and
to
acknowledge
council
member
here,
Dominguez
the
discussion
and
the
presentation
was
in
the
work
session
earlier
today.
A
All
right,
if
there's
any
other
discussion
about
this
I,
will
roll
call
this
council
member
Petro
absolutely.
A
H
C
A
We
are
now
at
a
finished
business
item
F1.
Regarding
a
resolution
for
the
Utah
Performing
Arts
Center
interlocal
agreement,
I,
look
for
a
motion:
Madam.
B
C
A
C
A
A
motion
by
councilmember,
POI
and
secondary
by
council
member
Mano
I,
don't
think
I
have
a
I,
don't
think.
I
have.
H
I
have
sat
now
through
two
comment
sessions:
Dr
Henley,
it's
nice
to
have
you
at
the
beginning
and
at
the
end
of
my
day,
I
want
to
start
out
by
thanking
Katie
Lewis,
for
the
amazing
work
that
she
did
in
advocating
for
our
city
for
our
constituents
and
for
as
many
protections
as
possible.
I
want
to
thank
the
mayor
and
Rachel
Otto
for
leading
robust
feedback
processes
and
informing
this
with
a
lens
towards
historical
wrongs
and
future
possibilities.
H
This
contract
is
highly
reactive
to
statute
that
we
got
terms
like
25
years
are
enshrined
in
that
statute
and
they
needed
to
be
there
in
the
contract
that
we're
doing.
I
am
thankful
that
we
have
something
that
stabilizes
us
and
does
not
make
us
subject
to
every
legislative
session
with
changing
wins.
This
gives
us
something
to
Anchor
to
it,
gives
us
something
to
enforce
around.
It
gives
us
something
that
allows
us
to
say
in
black
and
white.
This
is
what
our
protections
are.
H
The
new
executive
director,
Ben
Hart,
is
taking
seriously
the
mandate
to
make
to
move
on
this.
He
is
not
okay
with
the
amount
of
money
that
has
rightly
been
called
into
question,
and
so
he
is
very
eager
to
start
moving
things
along.
H
However,
one
of
his
first
acts
of
business
after
getting
his
own
board
to
approve
this
was
to
sit
for
an
hour
and
a
half
with
the
mayor
Rachel
several
heads
of
our
department
me
and
to
strategize
around
what
next
steps
look
like
this
in
meaningful
and
significant
ways
he
took
to
heart,
Rachel
Otto's
suggestion
that
movement,
that
is
too
quick
will
be
as
suspect
and
as
ill-conceived
as
movement.
That
is
not
executed.
Well,
we
have
a
highly
responsive
relationship
at
this
point.
H
We
are
being
good
stewards
over
it
and
will
continue
to
ferment
that,
with
this
contract
at
in
our
back
pocket
to
guide
those
interactions.
Additionally,
he
offered
Conformity
to
our
Master
plans.
While
I
know,
we
want
certain
things
to
be
enshrined
in
the
contract.
There
are
just
some
things
that
are
our
responsibility,
which
is
why
I've
repeatedly
called
for
things
like
the
Northwest
vegetation
overlay
to
be
reevaluated
as
quickly
as
possible,
so
that
we
can
use
our
land
use
Authority,
which
exists
in
statute
already
to
maximize
our
input
and
Direction
building.
H
One
of
the
people
who
was
a
department
head
who
was
in
the
meeting
today
was
Laura.
Briefer
water
will
be
the
limiting
factor
on
any
Utah
growth,
whether
it's
population
or
industry,
and
we
are
cognizant
of
that.
We
are
fortunate
to
have
possibly
the
most
brilliant
mind
when
it
comes
to
water
in
our
city,
guiding
our
policies
and
the
port
staff
and
board
are
prepared
to
defer
to
it.
A
I
I
would
like
to
point
out
the
work
again.
You
know
from
council
member
Petro
Escher
has
been
in
and
non-stop
meetings
on
this
and
trying
to
voice
the
concerns
of
of
the
of
the
city
and
also
the
administration,
the
mayor,
Katie
Lewis
and
her
staff
incredible
work,
I
mean
I.
Just
also
would
like
to
point
out
that
this
port
is
not
stopping.
If
we
don't
sign
this
contract,
this
port
is
going
it's
moving
and
it's
not
going
to
stop.
I
If
we
don't
sign
this
contract,
it's
going
to
continue
without
any
control.
This
contract
gives
this
city
some
protections.
Yes,
those
protections
might
not
be
all
we
want.
We
might
want
all
the
protections
and
all
the
land
Authority
and
all
the
things
that
we,
but
that
is
not
part
of
the
conversation
right
now,
so
this
contract
protects
us
it.
I
Yes,
it's
not
ideal
and
I
think
that
this
moves
our
City
to
a
to
a
closer
place,
to
a
place
where
we
can
actually
start
working
together
to
protect
my
neighbors
protect
the
people
that
are
closer
to
this
and
those
neighbors
are
the
most
vulnerable
ones.
The
people
that
sometimes
don't
have
they
don't
know
how
this
government
works.
They
don't
know
how
to
contact
us.
They
don't
know
that
this
port
sometimes
don't
know
that
these
ports
exist.
I
The
city
cannot
stop,
and
we
already
tried
that
we
have
tried
that
and
I
I
really
would
like
to
to
mention
that,
because
yes,
I
understand
the
concern
of
many
of
you
and
I
believe
it
and
I
I
believe
it.
We
live
the
closest
to
this
and
we're
working
very
hard
to
make
sure
there
is
a
environmental
mitigation
that
we
are
thinking
about.
This
we're
thinking
about
trains
that
we're
thinking
about
all
these.
I
B
B
Thank
you,
madam
mayor,
for
that,
but
never
it
never
once
gave
up
on
making
sure
we
had
a
seat
at
the
table,
and
you
know,
like
council
member
Pui,
said
sure
we
wish
this
would
have
gone
a
lot
of
different
ways,
but
we're
here
and
I
truly
do
think.
I
appreciate,
councilmember,
Petro,
eschler,
saying
there's
this
moment
of
hope.
B
I
still
have
PTSD,
but
I
will
count
on
you
for
Hope
and
I
think
that
again
incredibly
lucky
to
have
the
staff
that
we
have
to
have
the
amazing
City
attorneys
that
we
have
can
for
the
last.
How
long
have
we
been
doing
this
five-ish
years
working
on
this,
to
make
it
as
best
as
we
can
for
the
residents
of
Salt
Lake
City?
B
B
E
You
I
I
also
wish
that
the
circumstances
were
were
different
in
a
lot
of
ways,
especially
in
how
we
got
here,
but
I
want
to
remind
people
that
are
are
talking
about.
You
know
the
concept
of
equal
footing
that
Salt
Lake
City
filed
a
lawsuit
over
this
based
on
the
Utah
Constitution.
We
argued
it
all
the
way
up
to
the
Utah
Supreme
Court
we
lost,
and
that
is
the
final
decision-making
Authority
on
Utah
law
and
the
Utah
Constitution.
E
Ultimately,
this
gives
us
those
things,
and
so
I
just
want
to
read
the
language
from
the
contract
about
that
that,
in
the
first
year
of
the
agreement,
the
city
and
uepa
will
mutually
engage
an
outside
firm
with
national
expertise
and
health
impact
assessments
to
create
a
comprehensive
health
impact
assessment
or
H
or
hia
analyzing.
The
planned
Inland
Port
development
in
the
authority,
jurisdictional
land
within
the
city,
the
hia,
will
use
database
analysis
to
evaluate
the
existing
and
potential
health
effects
of
the
port
development
in
Salt
Lake
City.
E
The
parties
will
use
the
hia
as
a
master
plan
to
guide
all
future
development
plans
on
the
Authority
jurisdictional
land.
The
hiaa
will
be
completed
by
December
31st
2023
will
be
reviewed
by
the
Northwest
Quadrant
review
group
and
approved
by
the
UEFA
board
and
will
be
funded
with
the
environmental
differential,
which
is
the
some
of
the
money
that's
generated
from
the
Inland
port.
E
E
The
terms
of
that
contract
as
we
move
forward
so
I
I,
do
believe
that
that
you
know
I,
don't
want
to
to
count
anything
too
early,
because,
of
course,
you
know,
I
think
the
proof
will
be
in
how
this
Bears
out,
but
I
can
honestly
say
that,
from
all
of
the
meetings,
all
of
the
conversations
all
of
the
lobbying
that
the
city
has
done
and
all
of
the
litigating
that
the
city
has
done
on
this
issue.
E
This
feels
like
an
opportunity
for
a
new
day
for
us
on
the
port
and
to
recognizing
the
limitations
of
what
we
have
under
the
law
and
what
the
Utah
Supreme
Court
has
given
us
this
these
contracts
and
these
studies
are
going
to
go
a
long
way
in
helping
us
shape
this
in
a
much
more
positive
direction
than
the
way
that
it
started
out.
Four
years
ago,
five
years
ago,
four
five
five
years
in
January,
it's
had
only
been
five.
E
Okay,
so
I
hope
that
that
addresses
some
of
what
the
commenters
brought
up
I
understand
it
doesn't
address
all
of
it,
but
I
hope
it
addresses
some.
Thank
you.
A
I
A
C
A
movie
at
the
council
adopted
resolution
released
to
holding
account
funds
with
the
following
legislative
intent
if
the
department
included
an
evaluation
of
implementing
a
fee
for
public
electric
vehicles
charging
in
the
upcoming
study
on
the
topic
and
B.
The
study
of
the
potential
fees,
including
both,
includes
both
fees
to
recoup
the
cost
of
electricity
and
fees
to
recoup
the
costs
related
to
the
public
charging
stations,
such
as
maintenance
installation
and
planning.
I
A
F
A
A
Have
a
motion
by
council
member
Petro
seconded
by
councilman
Wharton
do
I
have?
Is
there
any
discussion?
Yeah
go
ahead,
council
member
Dugan.
C
C
It's
it's
been
incredible
and
it
is
a
beautiful
airport
across
the
world,
but
I'm
still
concerned
about
parking
and
I'm
still
concerned
about
that
carc
Centric
mentality
we
have
in
in
some
of
our
buildings
and
some
of
our
infrastructure
here,
I'm
approving
the
idea
that
we
need
some
parking
study,
but
I
also
want
to
reiterate
the
point
that
if
we
build
it
they're
going
to
park
it
and
they're
not
going
to
take
public
transportation
because
it
will
be
easier
just
to
park
your
car
and
walk
and
I
really
think
that
mindset
has
to
change,
and
that
just
doesn't
mean
the
airport
has
to
change
it,
but
the
airport,
UTA,
u-dot,
Salt,
Lake,
City
Utah,
needs
to
change
the
mentality
here.
C
Also
so
I
look
at
this
funding
to
plan
on
how
we
transport
our
people
across
the
city
and
to
the
airport.
That's
the
people
that
work
there
and
that's
the
people
that
fly
out
of
that
airport.
So
this
isn't
a
blank
check
to
Blacktop,
eight
acres
of
land
or
whatever
acreages
of
land.
This
is
a
plan
to
see
how
we
can
move
people
to
the
airport
efficiently
and
that
may
actually
take
some
brain
cells
to
do.
But
I
think
we
have
some
smart
people
out
there
to
do
that.
C
So
I'm
looking
forward
to
discussing
this
with
the
airport,
U
dot,
UTA
everybody
else
and
that
who's
Smart
in
the
transportation
world
to
find
a
better
way
than
just
a
blacktop.
But
I
do
I
do
understand
that
we
do
have
a
parking
problem
out
there
at
the
airport
at
the
same
time.
So
thank
you.
Madam
chair
item.
I
I
would
like
to
reiterate
my
commitment
to
look
for
other
and
more
effective
ways
of
transportation
to
this
airport
and
I
also
would
like
to
recall
the
conversations
that
we
had
with
the
director
and
with
with
the
staff
about
this
important
issue
and
about
their
commitment
to
they
committed
right
here
in
this
table,
to
look
for
other
Alternatives
in
the
future.
I
They
committed
to
keep
on
pushing
on
this
issue
and
they
committed
to
re-advocate
on
this
issue
and
I'm,
hoping
that
we
can
hold
them
accountable
to
this
and
I
I
really
think
that
we
have
an
amazing
airport,
something
that
is
just
incredible,
but
it
won't
be
perfect
until
we
have
a
public
transportation.
That
goes
there
all
the
time
at
all
times
of
the
day
at
night,
and
we
need
we
need
to
really
really
push
all
the
all
the
people,
all
the
all
the
different
actors
and
government
agencies
that
are
part
of
this.
I
We
understand
that
this
is
not
on
the
airport
alone,
there's
UTA
the
state
and
other
Trail
rail
rail
companies
that
are
involved
on
this
too,
that
they
happen
to
own
some
of
the
the
rights
to
the
to
to
the
to
the
train
to
the
rail,
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
put
it
on
the
record
that
we
had
their
commitment
on
this
and
I
I'm,
hoping
that
we
can
see
future
expansions
on
that
on
that
matter.
So
thank
you.
B
Just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
to
councilmember
Dugan
and
council
member
pooey
for
bringing
that
up
and
it
it's.
This
has
been
a
really
difficult
conversation
for
me
and
decision
for
me
because,
with
as
councilmember
Dugan
said
blacktoppy
now,
however,
many
acres
is
not
necessarily
the
answer
and
the
build
that
they
will
park.
Dan
I,
don't
always
love
all
the
your
your
funny
sayings,
but
that
one
I'm
definitely
taking
with
me
so
no
I,
appreciate
it
and
you've
helped
me
come
to
some
Zen
moment
here.
A
C
A
C
E
F
A
I'm
sorry,
I'm,
okay,
I
see
any
I'm
going
to
roll
call.
Councilmanuel
Petro,
yes,
Dugan.
E
A
E
A
A
C
A
Very
cool:
okay,
move
by
council
member
Mano
seconded
by
council
member
Pui.
Any
discussion
on
this
councilman.
No
any.
A
A
A
It's
been
moved
by
cons,
my
board
member
Fowler
seconded
by
board
member
Petro.
Any
other
discussion
on
this
item
saying
none
I'm
going
to
roll
call
this
council
member
Petro.
Yes,
yes,.
A
Yes
and
Fowler-
yes,
yes,
and
that
passes
unanimously-
and
this
concludes
our
Redevelopment
agency
board
meeting
the
meeting
now
stands
adjourned.
Thank
you.
We're
done.
We
made
it.