►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 10/18/2022
Description
To access agendas please go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
D
B
E
Council
members
you'll
see
on
the
screen
in
a
moment
the
current
census
numbers
for
the
Resource
Centers
they're
the
same
as
last
week,
essentially
just
a
slight
difference
in
the
numbers
at
each
num
one
of
those
locations.
What
you
don't
see
on
here
yet
which
we
will
have
starting
next
meeting,
is
the
Overflow
census
numbers
per
night.
I
have
an
update
as
of
a
couple
hours
ago.
That
last
night
was
the
first
night
for
Saint
Vincent,
De
Paul,
to
be
open
for
the
winter
season.
E
E
There
we
go.
Thank
you
you'll,
see
on
the
left
is
the
upcoming
schedule
with
kayak
Court
this
week
and
then
the
multiple
case
docket
on
the
28th
of
this
month.
We
would
anticipate
the
heart
team
is
planning
on
this
being
the
last
month
of
these
resources
being
out
in
the
community
that
could
change
based
on
need
and
weather
and
those
kind
of
things,
but
probably
not
until
the
springtime
again
you'll
see
the
resource
fair.
That
happened
this
past
Friday
here
at
Library
Square
a
lot
of
folks
were
there.
E
It's
probably
the
biggest
one
of
the
season,
I
I
I'd
say
a
lot
of
resources
given
haircuts
for
the
first
time
this
year
and
you'll
see
some
of
the
numbers
up
there
from
the
health
department.
As
far
as
vaccinations,
rough
Haven
for
pet
vaccinations,
Salt
Lake,
City,
Justice,
Court
52
cases
heard,
and
you
can
see
the
rest
there.
The
rapid
intervention
team
continues
to
work
with
a
number
of
camps
for
a
small,
two
or
larger
for
the
Outreach
component
and
then
a
14
15
sites.
E
G
This
in
no
way
is
an
exhaustive
list.
As
you
know,
we
have
focused
around
Transportation
food
Equity
housing
access,
economic
support,
but
one
of
those
that's
coming
out
right
now
is
the
phase
one
of
the
rescue
plan.
Community
grants
those
four
million
dollars
to
between
two
at
Economic
Development,
two
with
community
and
neighborhoods.
We've
got
231
eligible
applications
that
have
come
in
so
far
with
phase
one
and
45
44
of
those,
as
you
see,
are
from
the
west
side.
Businesses,
transportation
and
land
use.
G
This
TLC
Grant,
the
West
Side
North
Temple
Corridor,
is
ready
for
new
strategy
on
economic
development
strategy
and
focus,
and
so
we've
applied
for
a
Wasatch,
Front
Community
Council
Wasatch
Front
Regional,
Council
Grant.
Thank
you.
You
get
my
struggle.
There
community
councils
on
the
brain
and
that'll
be
awarded.
Hopefully
in
early
2023.
We
think
we
have
a
great
application
and
that
would
fund
this
visioning
process
for
the
North
Temple
Corridor
through
an
economic
development
lens
there's
also
the
Port
Authority
contract.
G
G
Also
the
1.9
million
that
you
invested
with
us
on
the
transit
on
demand
service
on
the
West
Side
pilot
project
is
so
popular
that
at
a
recent
meeting
with
UTA
and
our
transportation
team,
they
it
is
it's
being
utilized
to
the
extent
that
they
would
like
us
to
invest
up
to
from
1.9
to
3
million
dollars
to
keep
up
with
the
demand.
That's
happening
with
the
transit
on
demand
service
and
from
participating
in
the
the
River
District
Alliance
to
neighborworks
swazo
Business
Center,
our
Arts
Council
with
the
public.
G
Our
public
art
project
on
700
100
West
with
it's
called
colorful
connection,
is
coming
Utah,
State,
Fair,
Park
Partnerships,
we're
doing
our
marketing
and
social
media
campaign
starts
in
November
to
highlight
restaurants
and
other
businesses
on
the
North
Temple
and
a
community
activation
plan
to
be
held
in
2023
is
a
celebration
and
activation
awareness
campaign
that
we're
working
on.
So
a
lot
of
things
focused
on
the
west
side
in
particular,
but
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
quick
minute
to
kind
of
look
holistically.
G
I
Just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
mayor
for
that.
I
know
that
there
were
a
lot
of
phone
calls
and
emails
and
text
messages,
and
you
stepping
away
from
things
that
you
had
to
do
and
as
a
West,
Side
representative
I
didn't
once
feel
like
me
asking
for
you
to
go
above
and
beyond,
to
show
concrete
evidence
of
our
commitment
not
to
ask
the
west
side
to
take
it
on
faith.
I
H
D
D
It
is
separate
from
the
large
85
million
dollars
that
the
council
has
been
discussing
and
appropriating
as
part
of
the
general
fund.
The
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
we're
talking
about
today
is
specifically
through
the
U.S
Housing
and
Urban
Development
Department
or
HUD
their
home
grant
program.
D
The
city
receives
funding
through
this
same
program
each
year,
but
this
one-time
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
is
subject
to
separate
regulations.
It
is
important
to
point
out
that
the
three
and
a
half
million
it's
more
than
three
times
the
city
receives
as
part
of
its
annual
funding
from
the
same
program.
So
it's
a
significant
opportunity
to
meet
the
community's
needs
for
housing
and
Supportive
Services.
D
Next,
what
the
administration
recommends.
The
recommendation
is
to
use
two
and
a
quarter
million
dollars
for
permanent
Supportive
Housing
or
transitional
housing
with
rents
targeted
at
40
percent
of
area,
median
income
or
Ami.
This
is
very
similar
to
The
Six
Million
Dollars.
The
council
approved
from
the
general
fund
last
month
to
create
deeply
affordable
housing.
D
The
administration
is
also
recommending
753
thousand
dollars
for
Supportive
Services.
This
is
a
broad
category.
Some
examples
would
be
food
assistance,
legal
assistance,
mental
health
treatment,
substance,
abuse
treatment
and
there's
several
other
examples
in
that
category.
Child
Care
would
be
another
one.
D
D
There
are
several
other
allowable
uses.
In
addition
to
what
I
just
listed
the
administration
is
recommending,
you
can
find
those
in
the
staff
report
in
the
additional
info
section
the
administration's
not
recommending
all
of
the
allowable
uses,
but
if
you
wanted
to
see
it,
the
list
is
on
the
page
three
of
the
staff
report.
D
The
last
thing
is
the
council's
role.
The
council
approved
five
percent
of
the
total
funding
in
budget
amendment
number
six
last
fiscal
year,
and
this
was
for
planning
costs
which
we
have
to
do.
Hud
is
requiring
a
community
assessment
and
an
allocation
plan
before
the
other
95
percent
of
the
funding
can
be
accessed
so
housing
stability
staff
have
been
working
on
this
for
several
months.
D
The
council
has
several
steps
to
access
the
other
95
percent
before
you
today
is
a
draft
plan.
There's
additional
work
to
be
done
on
that
draft
plan.
The
council
in
the
future
will
be
will
need
to
adopt
the
plan,
hold
a
public
hearing
and
then
HUD
needs
to
review
and
accept
the
plan
once
those
steps
are
completed.
They'll
release
the
95
percent
of
the
other
funds
for
City
uses.
D
After
that
point,
it'll
be
pretty
similar
to
the
annual
process
for
the
other
HUD
grants,
where
the
administration
will
publicly
announce
a
application
period
where
anyone
can
submit
their
proposal.
An
Advisory
Board
will
review
and
make
funding
recommendations.
The
mayor
can
make
another
set
of
funding
recommendations
and
then
all
of
that
information
comes
back
to
the
council
to
review
and
make
the
final
funding
Awards.
J
J
Also
in
your
staff
report,
we
did
include
just
a
two-pager
process,
summary
of
just
where
we're
at
with
these
funds,
for
your
review
later
on
a
few
slides
to
go
through
and
really
the
goal
of.
What
we're
trying
to
do
right
now
is
just
really
what
Ben
said
is
just
to
inform
you
about
where
we're
at
with
the
process,
but
then
also
have
a
policy
discussion
for
some
specific
questions
that
we
have
and
then
make
sure
we
know
your
roles
for
the
next
steps.
J
Can
we
advance
this
slide
again
made
available
through
the
American
Rescue
act
plan,
3.5
million
dollars
again
like
what
Ben
said.
Basically
is
not
just
our
normal
HUD
home
funds,
but
these
are
very
much
earmarked
towards
a
very
unique
purpose:
non-congregate
shelter,
affordable,
housing,
related
to
services
to
benefit
homeless,
individuals
and
other
specific
qualifying
populations
next
slide.
J
So
those
four
qualifying
populations
are
homeless
or
at
risk
of
becoming
homeless
individuals
or
households,
the
others
households
fleeing
domestic
violence.
Third,
one
is
populations
with
a
high
risk
of
housing,
instability
and
then
fourth
are
veterans
are
who
are
homeless
or
at
risk
of
becoming
homeless.
The
qualifying
population
is
a
very
I
can't
Circle
that
enough.
Maybe
you
can
Circle
it
in
your
mind,
because
it's
good,
because
everything
that
comes
out
of
the
community
assessment
and
our
ultimate
allocation
plan
ties
directly
back
to
these
four
qualifying
populations.
Mr.
J
K
Hi
through
him,
a
little
late
is:
are
these
definitions
listed
I
assume
because
having
dealt
a
little
bit
with
some
of
the
definitions
with
HUD?
Are
these
defined
by
federal
government
and
HUD
and
I
asked
that
because
I'm
wondering
what
the
difference
between
somebody
at
risk
of
becoming
homeless
and
somebody
at
risk
of
housing
instability?
How
are
those
two
things
different?
They
seem
somewhat
similar
to
me.
They.
J
Gave
us
very
specific
guidelines
and,
to
be
honest,
it
was
a
little
bit
of
a
Frankenstein
is
because
home
funds
usually
don't
Target,
specifically
homeless
individuals.
So
they
took
a
little
bit
of
the
HUD
definitions
as
well
as
ESG,
and
a
little
bit
of
even
mckinney-vento
definitions
for
homeless
students
to
kind
of
combine
and
come
up
with
new
definitions
specifically
for
these
funds.
Okay,.
K
J
Next
slide,
there
are
five
eligible
uses
for
these
funds.
They
are
the
development
of
affordable
housing.
They
are
non-congregate
shelter
that
will
be
converted
into
permanent
housing,
there's
tenant-based,
rent
Support
Services,
I.E
housing,
counseling,
homeless
prevention
and
the
last
one
is
non-profit
operating
and
capacity
building.
That
last
one,
though
at
the
bottom,
though,
we
do
want
to
give
a
caveat,
though,
there's
a
lot
more
detail
behind
this,
but
basically
that
has
to
be
used
in
conjunction.
If
you
want
to
support
a
non-profit,
it
has
to
be
used
in
conjunction
with
another
funded
home
ARP
project.
J
Again,
this
comes
down
to
this,
so
really,
what's
before
you,
the
main
purpose
of
why
we're
here
is
to
really
kind
of
have
your
eyes
on
the
draft
of
the
allocation
plan.
The
allocation
plan
is
a
result
of
a
very
large
and
intensive
Community
assessment
that
has
been
we've
been
doing
basically
all
the
way
from
November
of
last
year,
all
the
way
to
June
of
this
year.
J
We
actually
we
again,
we
coordinated
with
the
county,
who
also
has
similar
funds.
We
were
going
to
be
asking
and
surveying
the
same
people
and
collecting
the
same
data,
so
it
was
great
to
be
able
to
partner
with
our
County
Partners.
The
surveying
itself
went
took
place
from
January
through
February,
where
he
reached
out
to
a
wide
net
of
providers
that
were
actually
specified
by
Hud.
We
are,
we
got
a
42
percent
response
rate.
We've
got
33
of
them
to
respond
with
their
survey
information.
J
J
All
of
that
basically
kind
of
was
boiled
down
into
again.
Every
single
all
these
data
points
lining
up
with
those
specific
qualifying
populations.
J
We
then
had
to
like
basically
take
everything
and
distill
that
down
to
all
right,
so
we'll
distilled
what
are
the
going
to
be
the
priorities,
though,
from
the
survey
results
from
the
Gap
analysis,
overlap
that
with
eligible
home,
ARP
activities
as
and
then
and
yeah,
and
then
basically
just
double,
checking
Crossing,
all
the
t's
and
all
the
I's
for
this
document
that
ultimately
has
to
be
approved
by
Hud.
J
So
again,
we
have
them
for
you
of
his
draft.
It
is
a
result
with
we've
already
done,
one
round
of
Hud
required
public
comment
period
after
you,
we
receive
your
feedback.
We
will
go
back
to
the
public
for
a
larger
30-day
public
comment
period
for
their
public
for
their
comments
next
slide,
just
a
really
quick
timeline
of
just
where
we're
at
two
big
things
or
three
big
things.
J
I
want
to
really
point
you
towards
is
HUD,
actually
didn't
really
release
any
initial
guidance
up
until
September
of
last
year
for
these
funds,
even
though
they
were
announced
in
April.
They
didn't
provide
any
initial
guidance
until
September
and
then,
basically,
their
final
guidance
came
through
this
year
in
March,
but
then,
even
just
recently
in
June,
they
reached
out
and
basically
said,
here's
some
technical
assistance
to
clarify
how
to
interpret
the
guidance.
So
it's
been
an
ongoing
evolution
of
receiving
guidance
and
interpreting
that
guidance
from
HUD.
J
J
last
slide,
so
last
slide
is
just
to
give
you
a
little
snapshot
of
just
kind
of
where
we're
at
nationally
with
all
these
funds.
These
are.
These
is
data
as
of
September
of
2022,
basically
out
of
the
651
recipients,
of
which
Salt
Lake
City
has
won,
so
I
have
651
recipients
only
175
have
actually
submitted
their
allocation
plans
to
HUD
from
those
HUD
has
only
accepted
93
of
those
plans
and
then
fully
contracted
88
of
those
plans.
J
J
So
those
are
the
end
of
these
slides
I
do
want
to
turn
it
over
to
Heather
Royal
deputy
director
of
housing
stability,
to
kind
of
bring
your
attention
to
where
we've
kind
of
we
try
to
make
it
as
simple
as
possible
to
identify
council's
roles
for
next
steps
with
these
funds.
L
L
On
page
three
of
the
transmittal,
which
is
page
23
of
the
meeting
materials
I,
don't
know
how
that
translates
for
your
information,
you'll
see
kind
of
a
little
snapshot
of
the
different
activities.
The
steps
that
need
to
occur,
the
details
for
those
in
City
council's
role
in
those
Steps
step,
one
as
Ben
and
Tony
have
already
mentioned-
is
the
initial
community
outreach
and
assessment
which
is
completed.
L
L
One
quick
item
of
note:
you
will
see
it
come
back
to
you
after
HUD
approves
that
in
the
form
of
a
budget
amendment
in
order
for
us
to
recognize
the
funds
here
at
the
city
to
be
able
to
actually
disperse
those.
So
before
we
Circle
back
to
step
two
where
we
would
really
like
to
have
the
policy
discussion
and
receive
your
input,
we
just
want
to
pause
and
see
if
there
are
any
initial
questions
from
Council
or
possible
clarifications
that
we
can
provide.
H
H
J
So
from
the
from
the
community
assessment-
and
it
made
its
way
into
the
allocation
plan
to
identify
homeless
individuals
but
then
also
homeless,
families
as
well
also
another
qualifying
population
is
victims
of
domestic
violence.
Right,
so
it'd
be
kind
of
some
overlap
as
well.
So,
yes,
that
is
definitely
a
possibility
for
prioritization.
Okay,.
H
And
that
would
be
one
of
I
think
one
of
our
at
least
one
of
my
definitely
priorities
on
that
side
of
the
house
on
and
on
the
you
know,
it
says:
development,
affordable,
housing
and
we're
talking
about
a
specific
population
of
you
know
at
risk
or
of
homelessness
or
instability,
domestic
violence.
If
you're
looking
at
an
apartment
building,
is
it
and
is
it
mixed
income?
Would
it
be
just
the
Amis
at
that
level
that
gets
the
funding
how's
it
how's
it
work.
H
If
you
have
a
mixing,
because
I'd
like
to
have
a
mixed
income
apartment
building,
not
just
a
full
100
apartment
building,
that's
25
am
I
and
lower.
So
does
that?
Can
that
be
blended
into
a
developments?
Funding
yeah.
J
H
H
H
Okay,
so
the
family
side
of
the
house
and
the
mixed
use
is
a
big
proponent
of
mine,
I.
Think
I,
like
the
where
this
funding
is
going.
Thank
you
any
other
questions.
H
Well,
I.
Guess,
the
third
question,
with
the
other
fun
the
home
funding
how's
this
bounce
out.
When
we,
when
we
every
year,
we
have
a
home
funding.
Will
this
take
precedence
of
the
other
funding?
Will
it
the
other
funding?
Is
every
on
an
annual
basis?
L
H
Two
different
kind
of
or
application
process,
yep.
H
And
probably
two
different
groups
of
people
requesting
the
funding.
L
Okay,
we
can
Circle
back
to
step
two,
then
the
draft
allocation
plan
that
we
submitted
with
the
transmittal
again
Pages
25
through
32,
it's
a
bunch
of
red,
that's
where
we
are
really
looking
for
Council
input
and
feedback.
Those
are
the
planned
activities,
not
projects
they're,
not
Project
Specific
at
this
point
in
time,
just
planned
activities
and
uses
for
those
funds
and
the
targeted
populations.
L
So
the
proposed
uses
are
really
focusing
on
affordable
housing
and
Supportive
Services,
and
then
the
targeted
populations,
homelessness
and
those
at
risk
of
homelessness.
Are
they
that's?
What
came
out
of
the
community
assessment
as
far
as
the
most
critical
need
and
then
the
method
of
awarding
funding?
As
Ben
mentioned,
we
can
follow
our
annual
HUD
entitlement
process.
There
is
also
the
ability
for
funds
to
be
directed
by
recommendation
from
the
mayor
and
then
approval
by
city
council,
and
so
if
we
could
receive
some
feedback
from
you
folks,
on
those
proposals.
L
K
And
to
Dan's
question
this
could
be
a
part
of
Gap
financing
for
under
head
regulations
and
rules.
You
could
use
this
in
accordance
with
other
projects.
Yes,
absolutely
now
we
also
just
provided
six
million
dollars
for
a
different
housing,
Loan
Fund
as
well
right,
so
we're
now
at
that
point,
we're
at
about
eight
point
something
in
housing.
Loan
funds
coming
out
of
the
and
I
can't
remember
your
new
name:
I
will
one
day
I
promise
housing
stability.
K
There
we
go
right,
so
we
we
have
about
eight
point.
Something
proposed
well,
six
definitely
allocated,
but
this
other
2.2
of
creating
affordable
housing
right,
but
this
particular
program
and
I
think
actually
we
could
have
done
this
with
the
Six.
Million
could
also
support
rental
assistance.
K
Right
and
I
recognize
that
we
have
some,
and
this
was
I
believe
in
the
staff
report.
We
have
some
funding
our
future
monies
that
are
going
towards
rental
assistance
or
have
gone
towards
rental
assistance
and
I.
Believe
that's
an
ongoing
program
right,
but
I
think
one
of
my
concerns
and
I'm
asking
these
questions
leading
up
to
my
concern
right.
Is
that
I
think
what
we've
heard
on
the
news
and
what
we're
anticipating
is
probably
a
recession
coming
and
it
we.
K
We
know
that
there
is
it's
easier
to
keep
people
housed
than
to
have
them
become
unhoused
and
then
try
to
house
them
again,
and
so,
while
I
recognize
that
we
need
to
create
the
affordable
housing,
it's
not
very
affordable
to
anyone
ever
any
anymore,
and
so
I
really
would
like
to
look
at
increasing
our
rental
and
Mortgage
Assistance
programs,
so
that
we
are
keeping
people
housed.
I
recognize
the
importance
again
of
creating
the
housing,
but
we
have
actually
quite
a
few
programs.
K
I
mean
if
you
look
at
RDA,
we
dedicate
10
towards
affordable
housing.
We
have
loan
funds
through
there.
We
have
Grant
programs
I'm,
not
taking
away
from
any
of
the
importance
of
any
of
those
things
I'm
trying
to
look
at
what
does
the
future
hold
and
how
can
we
keep
people
housed
and
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
saw
in
here,
I'm.
K
Sorry,
there's
like
eight
well
304
pages,
so
I
can't
find
it
right
now,
but
about
how
many
renters
we
actually
have
and
how
that
is
increasing
in
Salt
Lake
City
we've
also
seen
from
the
Gardner
Institute
that
we've
we
do
have
a
disparity
among
renters
and
how
renters
can't
afford
to
rent
here
anymore.
K
And
then,
if
you
look
at
what
I
assume
from
what
I
hear,
people
that
know
money
stuff
say
that
you
know
hard
times
could
be
coming.
I
really
would
hope
that
we
can
look
at
how
do
we
keep
people
housed
and
those
two
categories
that
are
interesting:
that
of
the
four
categories
of
eligible
people,
two
of
them
address
on
the
verge
of
homelessness
and
housing.
Instability,
and
that
tells
me
that
this
is
a
trend
around
the
country
and
and
we're
not
not
subject
to
that.
K
We've
seen
it
and
we've
seen
it
for
in
in
reports
for
several
years
prior
to
now,
so
knowing
and
and
one
of
the
things
maybe
I
could
ask,
staff
and-
and
the
administration
to
do
is
knowing
that
we
have
these
other
programs
in
place
that
are
helping
create
that
affordable
housing
and
yes,
we
do
have
a
program
for
rental
and
Mortgage
Assistance
really.
Should
we
be
beefing
that
up
a
little
bit?
That
would
be
my
priority.
J
If
I
may
Council
chair,
if
we
were,
if
the
council
were
to
increase
or
dedicate
because
right
now
from
the
community
assessment,
the
surveying
and
then
also
the
data
Gap
analysis,
basically,
the
61
percent
of
the
respondents
basically
said
create
affordable
housing
and
then
Supportive
Services.
So
those
are
the
two
that
kind
of
talk
came
to
the
rise
as
well
as
then.
We
have
to
make
sure
that
we're
identifying
and
working
with
the
qualifying
populations
for
those
two.
J
K
And
and
if
I
may
just
a
little
bit
to
that,
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
we've
talked
about
a
lot
in
this
particular
iteration
of
council
is
who
actually
responds
to
surveys,
and
so
I
recognize
that
we
have
to.
We
have
to
have
that
there
for
HUD
and
say
we
did
these
surveys.
It
would
be
interesting
like
who,
who
actually
responds
to
surveys
and
and
something
we've
talked
about
and
I
know
that
you
have
the
data
and
I
trust
you
and
all
of
that.
K
I
also
think
that
we
could
Define
creating
affordable
housing
in
a
way
that
is
creating
affordable
housing
by
helping
helping
people
stay
housed
and,
and
there
I'm
sure
there
are
federal
definitions.
If
I've
already
questioned
you
about
that
that
we
know
that
that
is
there
I
get
it.
I
also
think
that
we
have
a
lot
of
creative
minds
in
this
in
this
building.
That
could
probably
come
up
with
a
way
to
make
that
fit.
J
And
just
to
quickly
clarify
the
respondents
who
responded.
The
33
respondents
were
all
agencies
non-profits
or
governing
or
planning
organizations
who
serve
homeless
individuals
or
domestic
violence
Etc
the
ones
who
were
there.
So
they
were
agency
Representatives,
who
responded
to
the
survey
so.
J
H
Think
I
kind
of
I
just
want
to
touch
on
that
so
part
of
the
instability
side
of
the
house
they
already
in
are
in
a
place
and
they
may
not
be
responding.
So
that's
let's
see
if
we
can
tie
that,
because
I
think
that
instability
goes
right
into
the
back
into
now,
they're
homeless
and
now
we're
in
we're
in
more
trouble.
So
I
I
like
where
we're
going
there
and
so
I'll,
stick
with
the
idea
of
the
the
mixed
families
mixed
use.
H
C
Will
you
clarify
I
may
be
misunderstanding.
You
count
the
city
council
input
as
input
into
your
process.
Don't
you
yes,
okay,
good,
because
they're
they're
bringing
you
input
from
their
constituents
and
their
observations
as
elected
officials,
and
so
that
that's
why
we
have
these
briefings,
so
they
can
get
their
thoughts
into
you.
C
C
Yeah,
that's
kind
of
so
this
input,
so
the
the
public
process
is
designed
to
inform
the
mayor's
recommendations
and
the
councils
recommend
or
decisions
and
all
of
that.
But
but
were
you
saying
that
some,
depending
on
what
that
input
is
the
city
council
couldn't
is
limited
if
if
they
had
something
that
they
wanted
to
raise,
for
example,
what
council
member
Fowler
raised?
Are
you
saying
that
they're
Limited
in
their
ability
to
choose
that.
M
L
Is
that
okay,
not
exactly?
It
is
one
time
special
purpose,
HUD
funds,
so
they
came
with
a
very
specific
set
of
guidance
that
we
had
to
follow.
L
Hud
has
the
option
not
to
approve
our
allocation
plan,
as
you
might
remember,
from
that
slide
on
the
national
stats
they
have
out
of
the
170
they've
received
they've
only
approved
93
of
those
they
are
kicking,
many
of
them
back
because
their
guidance.
This
is
much
different
than
our
annual
entitlement
funding,
which
we
are
awarded
every
year
and
we
have
access
to
those
funds
as
soon
as
we
go
through
our
public
process
and
Council
Awards
those
funds.
L
This
is
different
in
the
fact
that
HUD
determines
whether
or
not
they
approve
that
allocation
fund
that
allocation
plan
and
therefore
release
those
funds
to
us.
So
they
do
have
the
option.
Hud
has
the
option
not
to
approve
our
allocation
plan
if
they
feel
like
it
was
not
driven
by
the
community
assessment,
and
so
it's
not.
N
To
say
here,
Mr
chair,
if
I
may
and
I
know,
you
have
a
full
agenda,
but
really
brief.
It's
my
understanding
that
this
check-in
is
early
in
the
process.
So
it's
after
a
community
assessment
was
done
by
Zion's
Public
Finance,
an
initial
Community
engagement,
so
the
point
of
this
briefing
is
actually
giving
you
the
information
that
has
been
collected,
thus
far
getting
your
input,
so
your
input
can
help
guide
the
formation
of
the
plan,
so
the
actual
activities
that
the
funding
will
be
allocated
to
have
not
been
selected.
N
This
is
your
opportunity
to
provide
input
and
it's
also
your
opportunity
to
provide
input
on
the
Outreach
and
the
process
that
we've
done
thus
far.
So
if,
if
you
feel
that
some
of
the
data
isn't
matching
your
experience
with
your
constituents
in
the
community,
we
can
definitely
take
that
into
consideration
and
I
know.
There's
a
lot
of
information
in
the
packet.
The
original
adopted
Consolidated
plan
is
attached
as
one
of
the
attachments.
N
So
if
you
want
to
look
through
the
information
and
provide
us
feedback
at
a
later
date
or
via
email,
where
we
are
welcome
to
that
I
know,
you
do
have
a
full
agenda
and
the
finding.
So
the
findings
thus
far
aren't
binding
the
council
in
any
way.
It's
it's
an
opportunity
for
you
to
provide
feedback
right
now,
but
ultimately
we
do
need
to
end
up
with
a
product
that
the
data
and
the
eligible
activities
the
allocations
Align,
is
that
helpful?
Yes,.
H
Think
councilman
Fowlers
has
a
great
point
and
I'm
going
to
stress
on
the
instability
side
of
that
of
that
housing
side
and
how
that
works
with
some
of
the
providers
and
the
service
providers,
because
they
may
be
I,
don't
want
to
say,
use
the
word
blind,
but
not
fully
aware
of
that
instability
side
because
they're
not
seeing
it
they're
already
seeing
it
when
it's
on
the
they
need
a
place,
they
don't
have
a
place
in
their
instability.
H
So,
however,
we
can
maybe
dig
in
mind
for
that
information
would
be,
would
be
I,
think
helpful.
Mr.
K
Chair
I
have
one
final,
quick
question
and
I
know
this
was
on
the
timeline,
but
when
is
I
know
the
money
has
to
be
spent
by
2030..
Is
that
right?
When
is?
Is
there
an
application
deadline?
When
and
when?
Is
that
no.
L
K
H
O
H
Tammy
Ben
moving
on
to
item
number
three
ordinance:
rezone
and
master
plan
Amendment
at
675,
North,
F,
Street,
Capitol,
Park
Cottages
and
a
petitioner's
Ivory
home.
We
have
Nick
and
Daniel
and
I
knew
we
couldn't
have
not
have
this
briefing
without
the
other
Nick.
So
thank
you.
Nick.
A
So
again,
this
is
a
request
by
the
applicant
Ivory
development.
They
are
requesting
to
two
changes,
one
to
the
zoning
map.
They
are
requesting
a
change
from
the
fr3
12
000,
Foothills,
residential
district
to
the
sr1
special
development
pattern,
residential
district
and
with
that
they
are
also
requesting
a
master
plan
amendment
to
The
Avenues
master
plan.
The
designation
in
the
master
plan
is
very
low
density
and
they
are
requesting
a
low
density
designation.
A
A
So
as
far
as
context,
this
is
an
aerial
view
of
the
subject:
property.
It's
about
3.2
acres
to
the
north
of
the
property
is
the
North
Point
Estates
condos
they
are
Town
Homes
to
the
West.
Is
the
capital
Park
Subdivision?
This
is
a
single-family
detached
development
to
the
South.
Is
the
meridian
condos?
A
Oh
sorry,
can
we
change
the
slide?
Please.
Thank
you
so
to
the
south
of
the
subject.
Property
is
the
meridian
condos.
It's
that
five-story
multi-family.
Building
that
you
can
see
in
the
image
and
then
to
the
east
is
a
single
family
detached
into
family
mix
on
that
block
to
the
east
next
slide.
Please.
A
So
this
is
zoning
context,
so
the
subject
properties
in
the
middle.
It
is
zoned
fr3
to
the
North
and
the
West.
The
properties
are
also
Zone
fr3
to
the
South
is
the
property
Zone
rmf-35,
but
it
was
regulated
with
a
development
agreement
to
a
density
level
similar
to
The,
sr1,
Zone
and
then
to
the
east
of
the
property
is
the
sr1a
zone,
and
this
is
very
similar
to
the
applicant's
request
of
sr1.
There
is
a
height
difference
of
five
feet
between
the
two
zones
so
to
provide
some
context
on
the
zoning
report
request.
A
A
The
fr3
requires
a
flat
35
foot,
rear
setback
for
any
lot,
whereas
the
sr1
has
a
variable,
25
percent,
rear
setback
that
can
go
as
low
as
30
feet
and
as
high
as
low
as
15
feet
as
high
as
30
feet,
and
one
other
key
difference
between
the
two
is
that
the
fr3
does
not
allow
buildings
in
the
rear
yard.
Beyond
that,
the
zones
are
fairly
similar.
The
heights
are
the
same.
The
building
coverage
for
the
fr3
is
35
percent,
whereas
the
sr1
is
40.
Front,
setbacks
are
the
same
side.
A
Setbacks
are
similar,
there's
a
six
foot
difference
between
the
two
and
then
adus
are
permitted
in
both
zones
and
parking
is
the
same
in
both
zones
as
well,
so
to
provide
some
density
context.
The
key
question
is
how
many
single
Lots
single
family
lots
could
be
built
with
the
zoning
on
the
3.2
acre
lot.
I'm.
K
You
go
back
to
the
last
slide.
Yes,
so
the
similarities
between
fr3
and
sr1,
it
says
adus
are
permitted
in
both
zones
attached.
That
is.
A
A
Thank
you
so
how
many
Lots
could
be
built
with
the
zoning
on
the
Avenues
property?
So,
theoretically,
under
the
current
zoning,
you
could
have
11
Lots
on
the
property.
That's
based
strictly
on
the
minimum
lot
size
required
for
that
zone,
whereas
sr1,
theoretically,
you
could
have
27
Lots,
but
those
numbers
don't
take
into
consideration.
A
Other
minimum
lot,
Dimensions
like
lot
width,
any
public
Street
requirements,
any
private
Street
limitations
for
access
to
the
property
realistically,
under
the
current
Zone
you're
likely
looking
at
nine
Lots
and
with
the
sr1
you're
likely
looking
at
18
lots
and
so
just
for
some
additional
context.
This
image
on
the
right
is
a
typical
Avenues
Block.
It's
about
2.5
acres,
maxing,
that
out
with
single
family
lots
results
in
16
single
family
lots
with
a
density
of
about
6.4
dwelling
units
an
acre.
Q
A
bit
a
question
sure
so
the
difference,
though,
in.
Q
In
this
typical
Avenues
block
and
what
is
being
proposed,
a
lot
of
that
has
changed
by
the
develop
or
the
the
plan
development
part.
Q
Oh
sorry,
a
lot
of
that's
changed
by
the
plan
development
component
of
the
project
so
like
for
in
terms
of
like
city-owned
land,
all
of
the
area.
On
that
slide,
that's
within
the
white
lines
is
privately
owned,
but
it
doesn't
include
the
setbacks
that
we
have
all
around
a
typical
Avenues
block.
This
one
would
only
have
two
roads,
one
that
comes
off
of
a
private
road
and
another
private
road
and
then
F
Street.
So.
K
Q
A
The
city-owned
land
isn't
changing,
the
the
right
of
right-of-lay
lines
would
remain
the
same.
They
would
need
to
improve
that
roadway
on
F
Street.
Q
A
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
So,
and
and
what
I'm
saying
is
that,
by
comparison
like
to
this
typical
Avenues
block,
where
you
have
four
sides
with
four
public
streets
and
all
of
that
space,
that
is
between
the
streets
and
the
white
space,
you
were
only
in
in
this
Ivory's
development
under
their
proposal.
That
would
only
be
on
one
Road
in
this.
Q
A
A
A
So
with
any
rezone
we're
directed
to
look
at
five
main
considerations,
that's
consistency
with
adopted,
City
plans,
consistency
with
zoning
ordinance
purposes,
the
effects
on
adjacent
properties
from
the
rezone,
essentially
compatibility
consistency
with
any
special
overlays
and
the
adequacy
of
any
public
facilities
and
services
to
serve
the
property
next
slide.
Please.
A
So,
based
on
that,
we
identified
some
key
issues.
One
of
those
is
the
West
yard
setbacks,
so
the
fr3
properties
to
the
west
of
the
site
have
a
35
foot,
rear
setback
and
again
no
buildings
are
allowed
in
that
rear
setback,
whereas
with
the
sr1
you
could
have
buildings,
possibly
up
to
just
15
feet
away
from
that
rear
property
line
on
the
west.
So
there's
the
potential
of
a
second
story
being
just
15
feet
away
from
those
rear
yards
that
can
start
to
impact
the
privacy
of
your
rear
yard.
A
A
A
H
A
key
question:
Daniel
sorry
back
to
that
slide
on
the
North
side,
it's
still
the
same
problem
on
the
north
side
of
that.
A
So,
on
the
North
side
for
context,
that's
a
private
drive
for
the
town,
home
development
and
North
Point,
Drive,
yeah,
and-
and
it
doesn't
have
that
same,
oh
because
it's
a
privacy
potential,
because
it's
a
private
drive
right.
H
Right
yeah
and
they
already
have
the
yeah
right,
gotcha.
H
C
C
Q
A
The
current
plans
that
we
have
on
file
for
the
plan
development
there
is
that
that
grade
change
at
the
back
that
they're,
even
in
proposing
to
increase,
so
that
does
put
second
levels,
maybe
at
the
same
level
as
the
fence,
essentially
the
fence
or
the
street,
that
North
Point
Drive.
So
the
houses
are
down
here
and
then
the
drive
could
be
about
at
this
pretty
much.
The
second
level
of
the
homes.
Q
Q
A
A
You
so
again,
traffic
impacts.
What
is
what
is
the
traffic
potential
of
this
development?
The
applicant
did
provide
a
traffic
study
that
showed
a
low
impact
to
the
neighborhood.
It
showed
that
there'd
be
less
than
a
second
added
to
wait
times
at
intersections
down
F
Street
at
Peak
traffic
hour,
which
is
about
five
to
six
pm.
Ultimately,
it
would
account
for
about
five
percent
of
traffic
at
the
main
intersection
down
the
street
at
F,
Street
and
11th
accidents
were
also
brought
up
as
a
concern.
A
So
we
did
look
at
the
accident
rate
for
that
street.
There's
been
a
low
number
of
serious
injury
accidents
on
F
Street
over
the
past
decade,
there's
been
two
between
2008
and
2019..
Given
the
the
low
increase
in
traffic
identified
in
that
traffic
report,
we
wouldn't
expect
a
substantive
impact
to
that
serious
accident
rate.
Q
A
A
So
as
far
as
Zone
context
and
compatibility,
the
sr1
Zone
they're
requesting
again
is
nearly
identical
to
the
sr1a
Zone.
That's
mapped
across
the
street
and
across
most
of
the
Avenues,
the
difference
is
a
lower
maximum
height.
The
sr1a
has
a
23
foot
height
limit
and
the
sr1
has
a
28
foot
height
limit.
Beyond
that
the
requirements
are
the
same.
They
have
the
same
density
requirement
of
5
000
square
feet
for
any
single
family
development,
but.
A
I,
don't
believe,
there's
any
planned
developments
up
in
this
right
like
right,
adjacent
to
the
to
the
property
right.
Okay,
the
properties
to
the
just
to
clarify
the
properties
to
the
west
and
the
fr3
did
go
through
a
plan
development
process
in
the
90s
when
they
were
established.
A
A
Thank
you.
So
the
concept
plan
proposed
by
the
developer
has
a
density
of
about
10
dwelling
units
an
acre
without
their
adus.
It
would
be
about
5.9
dwelling
units,
an
acre,
that's
the
10
Unit
10
dwelling
units.
An
acre
is
pretty
similar
to
a
number
of
other
Lots
in
the
Avenues.
So
this
map
is
color
coded,
so
lots
around
10
dwelling
units,
an
acre,
are
in
yellow
Lots
below
about
7.5
or
in
red.
A
A
So
this
is
just
a
map
showing
the
maximum
theoretical
potential
just
based
purely
on
the
zones
that
are
mapped
in
the
Avenues.
Most
The
Avenues
can
go
up
to
8.7
dwelling
units,
an
acre
the
property
zoned
fr3
could
only
go
up
to
3.6
and
again
that
doubles
with
adus.
You
go
up
to
17.4
dwellings
in
most
of
the
Avenues
and
7.3
in
the
fr3
zoned
areas.
A
So
another
key
consideration,
of
course,
is
Master
plans.
The
Avenues
master
plan
is
specific
for
this
property.
It
calls
this
property
out
as
a
very
low
density
in
the
text.
It
does
support
larger
Lots
in
the
foothill
areas
and
it
does
call
out
the
property
in
the
text
as
a
low
density
property.
A
However,
we
do
have
a
number
of
City
plans
have
been
adopted
since
that
time,
including
the
housing
plan,
with
growing
SLC
adopted
in
2018.
That
has
a
number
of
policies
intended
to
ensure
low
and
moderate
income.
Housing
is
in
the
city.
It
also
supports
Aging
in
place
with
diverse
housing
choices
and
identifies
specifically
large
lot
sizes
as
a
barrier
to
meeting
its
goals.
A
We
also
have
the
city
General
plan
plan,
Salt
Lake,
which
has
a
number
of
housing
policies,
but
they
do
support
finding
ways
to
accommodate
new
housing
growth,
new
housing
types
where
it
could
be
compatible
throughout
the
city,
and
we
know
the
housing
market
has
changed
significantly
in
30
years.
Based
on
that,
the
commission
found
that
the
amendments
were
warranted,
given
that
level
of
zone
change
requested
those
changed
housing
conditions
and
change,
Citywide
policies
next
slide,
so
another
thing
to
bring
up
is
that
this
is
a
vacant
lot
in
full
development
with
many
other
rezones.
A
We
get
concerns
about
displacement,
gentrification
loss
of
neighborhood
character,
defining
buildings,
in
this
case
we're
dealing
with
a
large
vacant
lot
that
doesn't
have
these
potentials.
It
additionally,
is
in
a
high
opportunity
area
with
good
access
to
jobs,
schools
parks
and
services,
which
overall
makes
it
a
good
location
for
additional
families.
A
So,
just
to
show
you
the
the
oh
next
slide,
please
so
just
to
show
you
the
applicant's
concept
plan.
This
is
their
19
lot
development.
They
have
formally
submitted
plans
to
the
planning
division
for
plan
development
and
subdivision.
Those
again
may
go
before
the
commission
at
a
later
date,
pending
the
outcome
of
the
zoning
Amendment
right
now,
they
do
need
to
make
some
changes
to
the
plans
due
to
building
Heights
and
meeting
the
slope
slope
requirements
so
because
of
that
they
are
currently
on
hold.
A
As
far
as
public
input
goes,
we
did
receive
a
significant
amount
of
public
input.
The
proposal
has
changed
over
time
with
multiple
iterations.
Originally
they
were
requesting
the
fbu
in
one
zone.
They
did
change
their
concept
plans
and
changed
the
request
to
the
sr1,
that's
before
you
now,
and
they
did
ultimately
submit
their
plan
development
submittal.
A
A
They
did
also
circulate
a
opposition
petition
that
received
about
2
000
signatures
and
then
two
Community
organizations
did
provide
multiple
letters
opposed
to
the
development
they
provided.
A
variety
of
concerns
related
to
The
increased
density
of
the
Zone,
but
they
did
support
development
of
the
property
under
the
current
zoning.
A
A
On
the
west
side,
we
received
a
comment
from
one
property
owner
asking
for
a
35-foot
rear
setback
from
the
new
development
on
the
east
side
of
the
property.
We
received
concerns
about
density
traffic,
vehicle
access,
and
we
also
received
one
comment
with
concerns
about
the
original
Zone
request.
The
multiple
HOAs
around
the
development
provided
comments.
Generally,
the
concerns
were
related
about
density,
Vehicles,
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
use
of
the
private
road.
Capital
Park
Avenue
Capitol
Park
HOA
on
the
west
had
the
same
concerns
as
Meridian
condo
generally.
A
The
North
Point
Condos
also
shared
those
concerns.
They
did
also
have
concerns
with
that
North
setback
that
reduced
setback
with
the
sr1
traffic.
They
also
had
concerns
about
fire
vehicle
access
and
safety
egress
onto
F
Street
from
their
neighborhood,
because
they
only
have
one
access
point
on
F
Street
in
in
and
out
of
their
neighborhood.
A
For
the
most
part,
I
don't
think
that
we
received
a
lot
of
opposition
to
the
to
the
current
Zone
and
developing
under
the
current
Zone.
We
may
be
maybe
received
a
handful
that
just
wanted
to
remain
completely
open.
Oh
okay,.
A
They
did
also
provide
concerns
about
the
plan
development
concerns
related
to
setbacks.
The
grade
changes
they're,
proposing
the
retaining
walls,
the
level
of
open
space
service
Logistics,
as
far
as
like
deliveries
go
and
the
loss
of
the
mature
trees
on
the
site.
A
I
Thank
you
for
all
of
that
amazing
data
that
actually
helped
me
really
contextualize
a
lot
of
policy
points,
which
is
what
I
want
to
make
decisions
on
historically
in
other
districts,
when
we've
done
an
app
zone
of
this
magnitude,
we've
kind
of
there's
kind
of
Four,
Points
I'm,
not
loud
enough.
That's
the.
I
Ever
historically,
when
we've
done
an
episode
of
this
magnitude,
there's
kind
of
Four
Points
around
which
the
council
policy
points
around
which
the
council
and
and
the
city
has
kind
of
distilled
our
decision.
Making
one
of
them
has
been
historic
preservation.
I
know
it's
an
empty
lot,
but
I
do
no
historic.
Botany
counts
because
I
was
on
Historic
Landmark
commission,
so
I
wouldn't
be
opposed
to
asking
the
applicant
or
talking
about
the
possibility
of
preserving
some
of
this
gorgeous
historical
trees.
I
We've
historically
prioritized,
walkability
and
I
know,
there's
not
much.
We
can
do
but
I'd
love
to
entertain
a
conversation
around
that
talked
about
affordability
and
while
I
love
the
concept
of
adus
I
hate
the
concept
of
additional
airbnbs
and
not
actually
adding
to
the
stock.
So
I
love
conversations
around.
How
do
we
guarantee
those
adus
actually
enter
into
the
affordable
housing
stock
and
improve
our
housing
landscape?
And
then
the
final
one
would
be
around
sustainability,
and
so
I'd
really
love
to
entertain
conversations
this.
I
While
you
have
proven
that
we
are
within
the
parameters
of
some
really
important
things,
I
think
we,
as
a
city,
are
in
the
middle
of
a
growth
trajectory
and
asking
for
bare
minimum
out
of
good
partners
is
not
in
our
best
interest
and
making
sure
that
there
are
tangible
benefits
for
the
adjacent
community,
and
those
of
us
in
Salt
Lake
in
general,
is
really
in
our
best
interest.
So
I
love
any
conversation.
Feedback
engagement
around
those
four
that
would
help
justify
an
up
zone
of
this
magnitude.
A
P
Mr,
chair
Daniel,
in
addition
to
that-
and
maybe
this
was
kind
of
folded
in
the
last
thing
that
councilmember
Peter
wrestler
was
asking
for
I'm
wondering
if
that
open
space,
that's
shown
on
their
site
plan
can
be
designated
as
accessible
to
the
public
and
what
sort
of
agreements
that
would
be
required.
It
seemed
like
it
would
be
easy
to
allow
that
to
be
sort
of
a
community
pocket
park
that
doesn't
have
like
no
trespassing.
Nobody
can
come
here,
except
for
people
that
live
here
signs.
P
P
I'll
just
say:
I
I
think
the
comparing
this
rezone
request
to
a
lot
of
the
ones
that
we're
seeing
in
my
district.
It
just
feels
almost
and
I
know
I'm
going
to
get
in
trouble
for
sayings,
but
almost
surprising
to
see
how
much
pushback
there
is
on
a
request
for
low
density,
where
we're
asking
for
very,
very
high
density
in
most
other
parts
of
the
city.
P
Q
Is
there
another
project
in
the
city
where
they've
asked
for
a
rezone
and
for
a
plan
development
that
would
increase
the
density
this
much
because
when
I
look
at
this
project
and
I
see
it
on
the
slide,
I
mean
that's
one
thing,
but
when
I
compare
it
to
it's
more
dense
than
the
neighborhood
to
the
north,
the
townhouses
it's
more
dense
than
the
apartment
building
to
the
South.
It's
certainly
more
dense
than
the
neighborhoods
to
either
side
it's
more
dense
than
rmf-30,
which
we're
supposed
to
vote
on
tonight.
Q
So
where
well,
density,
wise
I'm,
just
saying
I
can't
think
of
another
area
in
the
city,
where
we've
granted
a
rezone
I
mean
I
I
concede.
When
you
compare
an
f,
you
could
compare
fr3
and
sr1
on
their
face.
That's
one
thing,
but
comparing
them
with
the
addition
of
the
Adu
ordinance
and
the
addition
of
the
proposed
I
just
forgot.
The
word
plan
plan
development.
Q
Where
does
that
compare
to
something
that
else
that
we've
put
up
in
the
city
and
and
if
you
could
think
of
one
that
is
comparable
in
terms
of
the
public,
transit
and
walkability.
A
Trying
to
think
of
passbook
generally
the
plan
developments
we
get
are
requesting
modifications
a
lot
size
oftentimes.
They
are
zoned
sr3,
which
has
a
much
lower
zoning
lot
requirement
than
the
surrounding
properties.
We
have
a
lot
of
like
interior
Court
sort
of
developments
that
are
in
like
the
middle
of
a
block
that
are
zone
sr3,
for
whereas
the
rest
of
the
block
is
zoned,
something
like
R15
or
R17
and
I.
Think
we've
had
a
lot
of
plan
developments
for
situations
like
that.
Well,
where
essentially,
they
are
maybe
double
the
density
of
the
surrounding
properties.
A
Q
But
what
about
I
would
imagine
that
those
are
in
areas
that
are
more
walkable
and
more,
where
there's
easier
access
to
trans,
oh
I,
mean
I,
mean
it's
hard
to
there's
nowhere
in
town,
that's
less
walkable
than
this
in
terms
of
the
grade
right,
maybe
in
District
six,
but
none
of
the
other
ones
in
the
in
the
in
the
valley
that
aren't
on
the
hills.
Are
this
much
density,
this
high
up
with
no
Transit
access?
Wouldn't
you
agree.
E
Q
Okay,
one
more
sorry,
so
the
UTA
route
changed
in
the
time
that
this
was
being
proposed
as
well
and
moved
further
away
from
the
property
and
UTA
cited.
Those
reasons
for
that
included
that
the
current
route
was
less
Ada,
accessible
and
less
Equitable
to
the
rest
of
the
Avenues.
Is
that
considered
in
your
presentation?
The
change
in
the
UTA
route.
Q
A
Q
Well,
when
I
look
at
at
fr3,
it
says
that
the
purpose
of
that
you
know
which
is
put
over
the
area
in
the
90s
1995,
which
is,
after
obviously
after
the
hospital
after
North
Point,
the
townhouses
that
were
built
higher
on
the
hill.
Q
When
we
put
these
Foothills
zones
into
place,
it
was
to
promote
environmentally
sensitive
and
Visually,
compatible
development
and
then
sustainable
sustainability
and
suitable
suitability
for
the
Foothills
locations,
minimizing
flooding,
erosion
and
other
environmental
hazards,
protecting
the
scenic
character
of
the
Foothills
by
limiting
development,
protecting
wildlife
habitats,
and
that
this
is
intended
for
most
Foothills
areas
of
development.
So
is
it
does
growing?
Slc
say
that
we
don't
is
that
in
conflict
with
fr3
or
to
put
it
another
way,
does
growing
SLC
require
us
to
basically
repeal
fr3
zones.
E
Given
that
analysis,
our
recommendation
was
that
our
current
issues
that
we're
facing
and
our
plan
and
our
policies
in
growing
SLC
and
other
Citywide
documents
we
felt
required
or
didn't,
require
but
led
us
to
support
this
proposal
and
I
think
the
Planning
Commission
agreed
with
that
analysis.
Q
Sure,
but
again
comparing
it
to
from
1987
is,
is
kind
of
a
false
comparison
right,
because
we
subsequently
rezone
that
area
to
to
Foothill
zoning,
saying
we
want
to
protect
the
Foothills
right,
and
so
this
would
be
adding
density
to
an
area
that
was
already
legacied
in
from
density,
because
it
pre-existed
fr3
well.
E
K
I
apologize.
This
question
was
already
answered,
but
is
the
applicant
supportive
to
doing
a
development
agreement
of
some
sort?
Do
we
know.
H
C
H
C
A
Think
the
the
the
former
BYU
campus
up
there
I
think
it
got
all
rezoned
to
the
same
thing.
At
the
same
time,
okay,
including
the
subdivision
to
the
West,
it
was
just
because
of
those
1987
master
plan
policies
that
called
out
this
as
a
unique
property.
Okay
that
led
to
us
rezoning
it
to
the
just
the
entire
thing
to
fr3.
Okay,.
C
H
B
Thank
you,
council
members.
My
name
is
Peter
gamfrulis
I'm,
a
project
manager
with
Ivory
development
here
with
me
today
is
Nick
Mingo
project
engineer
with
EDM
partners
and
Nigel
swaby
project
consultant.
Thank
you
for
having
us
and
giving
us
an
opportunity
to
present
briefly.
So
much
was
covered
by
Daniel.
That
I
won't
try
and
be
too
repetitive
on.
But
if
you
don't
mind
clicking
to
the
next
slide,
I
do
want
to
reference
again
the
diversity
of
zoning
that
already
exists
in
this
area.
B
So
right
now
we
are
next
to
three
different
zones
and
four
different
land
uses
to
our
West
is
the
shared
fr3
Zone.
This
is
one
of
the
least
intense
zones
in
the
entire
Avenues
third
acre
quarter.
Acre
lots
to
our
South
is
the
rmf-35.
This
is
the
converted
Hospital,
which
are
now
a
Luxury
Condominiums
to
our
East
is
the
sr1a
Zone.
B
This
is
the
typical
Zone
known
through
the
Avenues
block
pattern
and
to
our
North
also
the
fr3
Zone,
however
non-conforming
in
that
it
also
had
a
development
agreement
which
allowed
it
to
build
attached
town
homes.
So
out
of
these
three
different
zones,
four
different
land
uses
right
now
our
property
is
zoned
for
the
least
intent
in
the
largest
Lots,
and
so
a
lot
of
the
talk
was:
how
did
we
get
there?
So
if
you
will
go
to
the
next
slide?
B
Well,
in
the
1987
master
plan,
this
area
was
actually
overlaid
for
the
foothill
zone
or
at
least
reference
to
be
overlaid
as
the
foothill
Zone,
as
as
council
member
Wharton
had
suggested
the
foothill
residentials
or
excuse
me.
B
Foothill
over
lazon
is
often
meant
for
erosion
control
for
the
extensions
of
the
or
excuse
me
for
the
outer
limits
of
development
and
for
the
extensions
of
the
Foothills,
and
this
made
sense
if
you'll
go
to
the
next
slide,
I
was
able
to
get
the
closest
aerial
to
the
time
of
the
adoption
of
the
Avenues
master
plan,
which
was
in
1977..
B
Obviously,
in
10
years
some
things
would
have
changed,
but
this
was
most
likely
what
it
looked
like
back,
then
you'll
notice
that
the
only
area
of
development
in
this
fr3
Zone
was
the
existing
hospital
to
the
South
and
to
the
east
is
the
wooded
area
that
is
now
the
Capital
Park
fr3
large
lots
and
to
the
north,
which
was
the
extension
of
the
hillside,
is
now
the
49
unit,
townhome
Community
North
Point
fast
forward
to
today
it's
a
very
different
site.
This
is
no
longer
an
extension
of
the
hillside.
B
B
If
you'll
go
to
the
next
slide,
but
beyond
the
foothill
residential
Zone,
there
was
other
considerations
that
were
taken
into
account
when
people
were
looking
at
zoning
and
land
use
in
1987..
B
Each
plan
is
responding
to
the
challenges
of
its
time
and
at
the
time
there
was
reference
of
depopulation,
there's
different
value
sets
and,
frankly,
there's
different
prejudices
that
exist.
A
cursory
look
at
the
1987
plan
shows
what
they
were
celebrating
or
not
things
that
we
currently
value
any
longer.
They
were
valuing
the
fact
that
they
were
down
zoning,
getting
rid
of
what
we
today
call
missing
middle
housing.
They
say
it
specifically
three
unit
two
of
the
apartments
are
gone.
B
They
were
celebrating
the
fact
that
the
Avenues
were
becoming
less
of
a
tenant
and
renter
community
and
we're
becoming
a
prestigious
area.
In
fact,
they
referenced
the
top
of
the
Avenues
as
the
most
prestigious
area
of
Salt
Lake
City,
with
its
larger
lots
and
with
its
larger
homes.
So
if
you
take
these
together,
if
you'll
go
to
the
next
slide,
thank
you.
B
B
While
this
is
a
standard
plan
that
we
do
in
a
lot
of
areas,
we
don't
think
that
this
is
the
best
and
highest
use
for
this
property.
We've
identified
this
as
a
very
unique
property.
3.2
acres
in
the
Avenues,
the
last
of
which
are
not
developed
and
that
are
completely
infill,
require
no
demolition
of
buildings,
no
displacements
of
displacement
of
tenants.
B
We
think
that
we
can
do
something
a
little
more
interesting
that
wouldn't
be
a
radical
reason
if
you'll
go
to
the
next,
and
we
believe
that
Salt
Lake
agrees
with
us,
as
was
mentioned
by
planning
staff.
There
have
been
several
plans
and
City
policies
that
have
been
adopted
since
1987
that
are
more
more
specific
to
the
city-wide
rather
than
the
Avenues.
In
fact,
the
Avenues
are
one
of
the
longest
non-adjusted
plans
that
we
have
today
in
the
city,
but
growing
us.
B
B
They
made
that
commitment
in
SB,
34
and
2019
using
that
as
a
strategy
to
get
there
if
you'll
go
to
the
next
slide,
and
so
we've
been
spending
the
last
two
years
trying
to
come
up
with
a
plan
that
is
moderately
denser
than
what
would
currently
be
allowed
and
would
bring
a
new
type
of
housing
that
would
meet
some
moderate
affordability
strategies
that
exist
in
the
city.
If
you'll
go
to
the
next
slide.
Q
Q
It
still
has
the
Adu
as
part
of
the
plan.
It's
still
achieves
that.
That
goal
that
you
have
said,
and
that
Ivory
said
many
times-
is
to
try
something
in
the
Avenues
that
comprehends
the
Adu
being
built
along
with
it
and
and
you're,
saying
that
it's
consistent
with
growing
Salt
Lake,
because
this
would
add
the
adus
could
be
used
as
affordable
housing.
B
Thank
you,
council
member,
so
we
did
invite
several
of
the
council
members
to
go
to
that
development
to
show
the
type
of
product
that
we
were
trying
to
do.
It
was
never
going
to
look
exactly
like
the
site,
this
very
different
site,
very
different
city,
but
we
that
was
our
trial
run
of
this
product
that
we
think
has
been
very
successful
and
is
being
used
today
by
all
three
of
those
owners
now
as
adus
helping
them
supplement
their
income
and
pay
against
their
mortgage.
B
A
good
question
right
right
now,
we're
evaluating
all
of
our
pricing
throughout
Utah.
The
market
is
changing.
There's
there's
no
way
to
put
a
number
to
it,
but
I
think
that
it
would
be
likely
the
same
as
what
you
see
in
the
sr1a
in
on
the
same
level,
they're.
B
You
know
I
appreciate
that
question
because
I
think
it's
all
of
the
above,
so
it
does
help
the
owner
to
offset
mortgage
if
they're
going
to
rent
it
at
Market.
It
also
helps
some
owners
to
house
their
elderly
parent
to
help
offset
the
price
of
assisted
living.
It
also
helps
some
people
keep.
Maybe
children
who
are
boomerangs
coming
back
from
college,
or
maybe
children
with
children
with
certain
needs
that
they
would
need
to
stay
home
and
they
want
a
slice
of
Independence.
B
Adus
are
an
interesting
concept
because
they
work
very
much
differently
than
the
average
one-bedroom
apartment
first
of
all,
they're
owned
by
individual
owner
occupiers,
and
so,
unlike
large
real
estate
holding
firms
and
often
they
rent
for
much
less
than
what
would
be
comparable
for
a
one-bedroom
apartment
in
the
area
because
they
typically
go
to
family
friends
or
similar
people
who
are
close
to
the
owner
sure.
But
as
council
member
or.
Q
B
Correct
we
we
can't
guarantee
it,
but
we
believe
that
when
we
build
them
without
you,
I
won't
say
what
you
want
me
to
say:
yeah
I'll
say
it:
if
we
build
them,
they
will
come
now.
So
we
do
believe
that
by
targeting
them
by
building
them
up
front
and
by
the
certain
design
elements
that
we
have,
that
we
will
encourage
people
who
think
that
this
will
be
a
value
for
their
family
to
buy
these
homes.
Okay,
that's
what.
O
So
I
there
is
a
few
things
that
did
resonated
with
me
about
the
conversation
here
and
I.
I
want
to
stay
begin.
The
conversation
by
all
my
comments
by
by
saying
stating
that
this
city
needs
to
warm
up
and
very
fast
about
the
concept
of
density
and
density
is
not
a
bad
word.
No
matter
what
part
of
town
you
live.
O
If
you
live
in
District,
Six
and
or
if
you
live
in
District,
Four
or
three,
but
you
know,
no
old
density
should
happen
on
the
west
side
and
we
need
density
in
all
parts
of
the
city
and
I
believe
density
on
even
higher
density
in
these
parts
of
town
is
appropriate
and
you
know
I
am
going
to
maybe
die
on
dinosaur
and
I'm.
O
Okay
with
that,
because
the
kids
and
your
grandkids,
if
you're
opposing
to
density,
need
a
place
to
live
and
the
reality
is
that
you
live
when
you
were
buying
a
house
when
houses
were
twenty.
Thirty
thousand.
O
Fifty
thousand
dollars
is
not
a
reality
that
we
live
in
today,
and
that
is
very
important
to
note
and
and-
and
that
is
is
something
that
we
really
need
to
be
cognizant-
that
we
we
are
not
as
lucky
these
days,
but
that
said,
I
do
want
to
mention
the
the
point
of
housing,
affordability
and
I
understand
that
this
lot
is
not
cheap,
I'm
sure
it
wasn't
cheap
I,
don't
know
how
much
it
was,
but
I
have
to
guess
wild
guess
there
and
I
do
want
to
push
and
maybe
shape
this
project,
because
we
have
the
authority
here
about
affordability,
as
at
least
on
some
of
the
ad
units.
O
You
are
proposing.
I
I,
understand
that
you
know
you
as
a
developer
need
to
pencil
this
out.
But
if
you
can
now
pencil
that
out
by
making
some
of
the
units
affordable,
I
think
that
I,
you
know
I
I
challenge
you
I
challenge
the
developer,
you
guys
to
to
come
up
with
a
plan
that
will
be
something
that
I
feel
very
strongly
about.
O
I
think
you
know
there
is
ways
of
restricting
some
of
this
I
think
there
is
ways
of
of
pushing
the
the
conversation
forward
to
to
bring
some
some
public
benefit
to
the
city
as
a
whole.
Again,
I
am
not
against
density
I'm,
even
I
actually
think
that
may
be
a
little
too
low
in
density
and
but
I
I.
O
If
we
are
going
to
rezone
this
to
to
give
more
density
to
to
you
guys,
there
has
to
be
something
back
to
the
community
and
I
know
that
your
argument
is,
we
need
more
housing
stock,
and
that
is
point
well
taken.
O
I
I'm
actually
saying
that
we
need
more
density
in
the
city
and
we
need
it
not
only
in
my
district
on
on
Victoria's
District,
but
we
need
it
in
in
Christmas,
District,
I
I
believe
very
strongly,
but
there
has
to
be
something
back
and
so
that
that
is
something
that
I
feel
strongly
and
I
think
we
can
work
on
and
I
believe
that
I
believe
that
this
is
not
too
far.
In
my
opinion,
I
mean
not
too
far
for
me
to
feel
comfortable
and
completely
supporting
I
I
understand.
O
There
is
other
issues
that
I
still
need
to
learn
more
about,
and
but
that
to
me
is
the
first
first
step
to
feel
comfortable
on
this
issue,
so
yeah
thank.
K
Thanks
just
a
quick
question,
so
my
understanding
is
that
from
the
prior
presentations
there
are
19
Lots
with
1480
use,
so
you
guys
are
already
planning
on
building
these
adus
yeah.
Yes,
I!
Think
that's,
philosophically,
where
things
are
a
little
like
modeled.
For
me
right
is
that
with
our
adu's
ordinance
and
throughout
the
city,
it's
generally
the
homeowner.
That's
making
that
decision
to
build
the
edu.
K
For
generally,
probably
all
of
the
reasons
or
a
majority
of
the
reasons
that
you
stated
right,
I've
got
aging
parents,
I've
got
you
know,
kids
out
of
college
I
just
need
to
supplement
a
little
bit
of
my
mortgage.
My
friend
just
moved
back
whatever
right
those
things.
So
I
think
that
philosophically
it's
sort
of
becomes
a
little
bit
different.
When
really
what
you're
doing
is
building
two
houses
on
one
lot
right,
I
think
that's
how
people
can
look
at
it
in
some
ways.
K
That,
under
our
ordinance,
the
Adu
has
to
be
there's
an
owner
occupied
and
things
like
that.
But
I
think.
Can
you
see
how
that
changes
a
little
bit
of
that
conversation,
at
least
for
me
right
that
that
the
philosophy
of
the
Adu
sort
of
it
it
kind
of
changes
when
the
developer's,
the
one
building
the
Ado
and.
B
And
you're
right,
it
does
change
it
and
we
believe
that's
a
value
proposition.
Adus
have
kind
of
suffered
from
poor
absorption
based
on
the
Adu
plans
in
Salt
Lake
City.
The
most
recent
published
is
2021
for
the
Adu
policy
and
the
largest
said
reason
why
adus
are
not
being
adopted
like
they
are?
Is
the
cost
to
build
them
very
well?.
B
Decision
we
are
hoping
that
that
weeks
ago,
we're
hoping
that
this
is
the
value
proposition
is
that
they
are
already
coming
planned
for
a
lot
that
they
are
planned
for
it,
we're
by
doing
it
up
front.
That
was
our.
This
is
our
demonstration.
We
want
to
encourage
other
home
builders
to
do
this
up
front
and
rather
than
being
two
homes,
we've
been
very
thoughtful
to
make
sure
that
all
of
our
adus
are
one
bedroom
500
to
600
square
foot,
Apartments.
K
Along
those
lines,
but
I
recognize
it,
it's
just
simply
I
think
I'm
sort
of
pointing
out
how,
philosophically
this
is
a
little
different
than
what
we
came
up
with
after
I'm,
going
to
look
at
Nick.
What
a
decade
of
talking
about
adus
before
an
ordinance
was
passed
so
just
I'm
just
throwing
that
out.
There.
H
Q
Appreciate
councilmember
Fowler
raising
that,
because
again
with
the
comparisons
that
we've
talked
about
and
the
fact
that
priorities
have
changed
like
making
the
Adu
ordinance,
city-wide
was
part
of
that
to
add
density
density
to
this
area.
And
so,
when
I
hear
you
talk
about
your
stated
goals
for
this
project
and
what
you'd
like
to
see?
I,
guess:
I,
don't
understand
why
we
you
don't
build
nine
or
11
units
with
9
or
11,
affordable,
adus
and
then
avoid
the
problem
of
having
you
know,
potentially
crumbling
walls
that
have
happened
in
that
area.
Q
Retaining
walls
that
have
happened
in
that
very
area
avoid
the
problem
of
staring
into
people's
bedrooms,
potentially
save
the
historic
trees
and
make
the
project
more
sustainable
and
not
have
to
have
a
massive
drainage
Pond
to
accommodate
all
of
The
Hardscape,
that's
being
added
for
that
area.
Wouldn't
that
achieve
better
achieve
all
of
those
policy
points
that
the
city,
because
to
me,
that
would
be
more
in
concert
with
grow
SLC
than
what
the
change
you're
asking
us
to
make,
and
the
exemptions
from
the
change
that
you're
asking
for.
B
So
I
believe
unlikely
in
either
development
scenario,
which
several
of
those
in
the
organized
opposition
have
said.
Therefore,
development
in
the
fr3
zone
will
require
walls
will
require.
The
elimination
of
some
trees
will
require
hard
pavement
with
lid
standards.
All
development
is
required
to
retain
land
or
excuse
me
retain
drainage,
so
there
will
be
drainage
basins.
B
What
there
will
be
is
nine
homes
on
nine
and
larger
lots
that
will
sell
for
at
least
double
the
land
price
of
the
home
that
are
less
likely
to
adopt
they'd
use
in
that
the
fr3
can't
have
outbuildings
in
the
backyard,
and
if
we
look
at
the
community
to
the
West,
the
little
island
of
fr3,
you
don't
see
adus
there,
because
these
are
not
typically
the
price
points
that
people
are
looking
for.
B
Having
I'm,
not
saying
that
doesn't
happen
and
I'm
not
saying
that
it
wouldn't
be
adopted,
we
think
it's
more
likely
to
be
adopted
than
the
sr1
type
zones.
It
already
is
there,
but
unfortunately,
since
we've
been
tracking
adu's
absorption
in
Salt,
Lake,
City,
The
Avenues
again
from
2021,
this
may
have
changed,
has
only
adopted,
like
nine
I
mean
we're
going
to
double
the.
Q
Can't
you
achieve
all
of
those
policy
goals
and
all
of
the
goals
that
we're
asking
you
to
do
on
this
Council
and
all
the
policy
goals
that
are
in
the
ordinances
that
we've
adopted
by
within
the
existing
zoning
and
having
the
adus
as
part
of
that
and
I.
Think
even
you
know
what
what
I've?
What
I've
heard
you
say
in
previous
presentations
is
that
doing
building
those
lots
with
the
existing
zoning
would
be
easier
for
you
and
more
profitable
for
you.
So
maybe
that
would
be
easier
to
make
those
adus
deed,
restricted,
affordable.
B
H
Have
I'm
gonna
have
to
cut
off
the
conversation
here
we
can.
We
have
some.
You
have
some
requests
and
questions
from
customer
councilman
Wharton
we're
well
beyond
our
time
right
now.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
presentation.
Thank
you
very
much.
Nick
Peter
really.
H
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
H
H
C
You,
the
digital
Equity
policy,
was
adopted
in
2020
with
the
intent
to
address
imbalances
of
digital
digital
Equity
within
the
community.
The
city's
Innovation
team
developed
a
pilot
digital
equipment
donation
program
and
one
of
the
program
action
items
focuses
on
the
need
for
an
increase
in
digital
access
with
reliable
and
affordable
computers.
C
The
city
accumulates
about
300
to
500
Surplus
computers
each
year
and
in
Prior
years
the
city
has
sold
those
computers
to
TNT
Auction
for
a
net
loss
when
you
account
for
staff
time
in
2021
during
phase
one
of
the
digital
equipment
donation
program,
IMS
donated
18
computers
to
individuals
and
families
who
were
using
Youth
and
Family
Services
and
now
for
phase
two,
which
is
before
you
now.
C
Ims
proposes
to
donate
146
refurbished
Surplus
computers
to
community
organizations
who
will
then
dispers
disperse
the
computers
to
individuals
and
families
being
served
through
their
programs
using
their
existing
computer
donation
and
digital
literacy
programs
and
25
of
those
146
will
be
donated
to
Youth
and
Family
Services.
The
goal
of
the
briefing
is
for
the
council
members
to
review
the
public
benefits
analysis
and
the
draft
resolution
authorizing
the
computer
donations
as
well
as
address
your
questions
and
any
requests
for
additional
information
and
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
Haley.
G
Thank
you,
hello,
Council.
That
was
a
great
overview
and
I
just
kind
of
want
to
elaborate
on
next
steps.
As
mentioned,
IMS
has
146
or
Plus
Computers
ready
to
donate.
25
of
those
computers
would
be
allocated
to
Youth
and
Family
Services
to
continue
supporting
individuals
in
their
programming
phase.
Two
really
focuses
on
getting
those
computers
to
community
organizations
to
distribute
those
organizations
are
able
to
to
distribute
those
computers
at
a
higher
volume
and
make
sure
they
get
to
those
most
in
need.
G
But
we
are
also
looking
at
working
with
organizations
that
already
have
established
digital
literacy
programs
and
could
potentially
help
connect
those
community
members
to
internet
access
broadband
to
qualify
organ
Community
organizations
must
submit
an
application
to
IMS
to
do
application
IMS
to
provide
an
overview
of
their
distribution
plan
and
their
digital
literacy
program.
The
computers
must
go
directly
to
clients
that
live
in
Salt,
Lake
City
and
we
will,
after
the
computers,
are
distributed.
G
We'll
ask
those
organizations
to
submit
report
that
provides
an
overview
of
their
distribution
process
and
digital
literacy
program
and
how
it
was
accomplished,
ZIP
codes
of
where
the
computers
were
donated
and
where
the
recipients
live
and
the
age
of
recipients
to
shed
a
little
bit
more
light.
In
fiscal
year,
2022
IMS
sold
a
total
of
632
computers
at
the
TNT
Auction
and
it
was
84.64
cents
per
machine.
G
The
total
cost
to
prepare
those
computers
for
auction,
including
staff
time
to
wipe
the
computer
storage
transportation
to
the
auction
was
a
hundred
and
twenty
two
dollars,
so
the
city
lost
about
49.75
per
computer
and
that
is
in
2022.
So
yeah
this
program
doesn't
lose
the
city
any
money.
It
benefits
the
compute,
the
community
greatly,
and
it's
really
working
to
address
our
the
digital
vibe.
That
was
only
made
Greater
by
the
pandemic.
P
P
First
of
all,
just
this
is
great.
We
should
definitely
be
using
the
computer
for
this
rather
than
getting
84
from
them,
but
just
to
clarify
we
still
have
staff
time
required
to
wipe
the
computers
and
transport
them
to
wherever
they're
being
donated
right.
So
it's
not
like
we
we're
still
losing
money
on
this,
but
the
benefit
is
that
a
Community
member
that
needs
a
computer
now
has
one
it
might
understand
that
correctly.
You're.
R
Correct
in
a
lot
of
that
staff
time
is
through
this
Apprentice
program
right,
so
we're
giving
some
we're
trying
to
also
build
some
work.
Experience
with
that
activity,
I.
P
M
P
O
Thank
you
I.
You
know,
I
love
this.
This
is
I,
think
it's.
It
will
help
bridge
some
of
the
the
the
separations
we
have
with
technology
and
our
community
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
using
providing
the
application
in
Spanish
and
I.
O
Think
that
would
be
very
important
and
I
would
love
to
help
if,
if
needed
on
this-
and
you
know
more
than
happy
to
help
and
another
thing
that
I
really
would
like
to
explore
without
trying
to
bomb
this
project
and
try
to
you
know,
push
it
away
from
where
you
guys
are
headed,
because
I
will
hardly
agree
about.
The
benefits
of
this
is
access
to
computers
for
board
members
that
serve
our
city.
O
I
also
believe
that
as
a
barrier
for
serving
our
city
as
a
board,
member
and
I
would
like
to
to
make
sure
that
there
are.
O
There
are
some
computers
available
for
people
that
may
not
have
one
I
know
about
a
story
that
someone
can
tell
me
about
a
board
member
that
was
going
to
the
library
every
every
board
meeting,
because
this
person
didn't
have
a
a
laptop
with
a
camera
that
you
know
through
covet,
but
I
wanted
to
attend
us
their
meetings,
as
requested
so
and
and
in
my
community
and
then
West
Side
communities.
O
Sometimes
we
struggle
filling
those
spots
and
Borah
point
is
the
appointees
and
I
want
to
make
sure
if
there
is
a
way
to
when
you
talk
about
Community
organizations?
Maybe
we
also
consider
boards,
you
know
they
might
request
some
computers
to
have
us,
backups
or
or
so
loners
or
maybe
I
I,
don't
know,
maybe
I'll
leave
that
up
to
you,
but
that
would
be
very
important
to
me.
So
thank
you.
Pizza.
I
So
during
covid
I
was
the
not
Community
non-profit
that
got
to
be
the
partner
to
make
sure
that
the
computers
that
were
donated
during
that
period
got
to
the
families
who
needed
the
most
and
I
have
to
say.
I
really
hope
that
we
continue
to
follow
that
model.
I
was
actually
the
second
in
the
chain
the
computer
went
from.
The
city
was
offered
to
a
larger
non-profit
who
knew
what
I
was
doing.
I
Who
then
got
it
to
hands
of
families
from
Title
One
schools
who
were
on
the
front
lines
of
food
and
security
runs
all
of
the
things
and
you
all
literally
made
the
difference
between
kids
being
able
to
keep
up
academically
or
falling
behind,
and
so
please
keep
that
model
of
making
sure
we're
activating
those
chains
deep
into
the
community
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
those
deep
impacts,
because
it's
been
wonderful
to
witness
it
firsthand
as
a
participant.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
the
presentation.
It
is
a
wonderful
program
on
the
e-waste.
You
know
make
sure
that
we
donate
them,
but
then
they
don't
throw
them
in
the
trash
after
they
right
they
come.
They
can
bring
them
back
to
us,
so
we
can
dispose
of
them
properly
at
the
end,
because
again
we
don't
want
to
just
throw
it
in
the
trash
at
that
point,
but
I.
This
is
a
wonderful
program
and
I
think
the
opportunities
for
those
people
who
get
them
are
invaluable.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Haley.
B
You
Mr
chair
since
the
council
was
briefed
on
this
back
in
the
spring,
the
planning
division
or
the
I'm,
sorry,
the
attorney's
office
and
the
planning
division
have
been
working
with
the
petitioner
and
have
come
up
with
some
new
conditions
that
might
address
the
concerns
the
council
brought
up
at
the
briefing
so.
E
I'll
just
turn
that
over
to
Nick
now,
thank
you
so
just
to
recap
really
really
quickly
on
what
this
proposal
started.
E
As
was
a
proposal
to
allow
stealth
cellular
wireless
antenna,
Associated
facilities
in
the
pl
Zone
I
mean
it
actually
started
as
something
else,
but
that
that's
where
we
were
and
landed
and
that
had
a
negative
recommendation
recommendation,
primarily
because
most
of
the
issues
we've
had
and
concerns
that
we've
heard
from
the
community
about
cell
towers
are
actually
generated
by
those
cell
towers
that
are
on
schools,
which
are
typically
in
the
pl
Zone.
E
This
particular
proposal
was
initiated
to
locate
a
stealth
facility
at
the
Pioneer
precinct,
which
is
also
zoned
PL
fast
forwarding
we're
not
going
to
get
into
all
of
those
fun
details,
but
fast
forwarding.
After
the
last
briefing
public
hearing
with
the
council,
there
were
some
direct
some
direction
to
come
up
with
a
mod,
a
modified
proposal
to
allow
a
stealth
Tower
up
to
70
feet,
tall
or
75
feet.
E
We
rely
on
either
the
underlying
height
in
that
zone
or
if
there
is
a
height
allowance
for
that
type
of
object,
that
the
stealth
Tower
is
being
disguised
as
we
allow
it
to
go
up
to
that
height.
For
example,
if
you're
on
top
of
a
building
that
might
have
an
elevator
in
it,
you
can
do
a
elevator,
bulkhead,
I
believe
up
to
20
feet
or
25
feet
in
additional
height
a
flag
ball
in
any
Zone
can
go
anywhere
from
60
to
90
feet.
So
that's
what
we
would
ultimately
base
the
height
on.
E
We
do
not
have
any
sort
of
height
exception
for
things
that
look
like
trees
that
aren't
trees.
Obviously,
we
don't
regulate
the
height
of
trees,
but
that
is
basically
why
we
run
into
some
issues
with
that
type
of
stealth
facility
is
that
they
often
or
times
are
proposed
in
zoning
districts
that
have
very
low
building
Heights,
in
which
case
they
don't
work
as
well,
because
they
run
into
much
more
interference
with
buildings.
E
So
this
proposal
would
essentially
authorize
that
there's
options
to
do
it,
either
as
a
conditional
use
or
a
permitted
use,
and
if
that's
something
that
the
council
supports,
then
because
this
had
a
negative
recommendation,
there's
no
ordinance
drafted
prior
to
or
during
the
transmittal
process.
So
we
would
work
with
the
attorney's
office
to
draft
that
proposed
ordinance
and
that's
all
I
have.
H
E
To
I
believe
on
City
owned
properties
is
what
we
discussed.
S
P
Thanks
Nick
for
the
the
introduction,
I
I
just
really
cannot
support
cell
towers
I
would
rather
a
75-foot
cell
tower
that
looks
like
a
cell
tower
than
a
75-foot
cell
tower.
That
looks
like
a
fake
tree,
so
I'm,
just
letting
you
know
right
now
and
I've
I
feel
so
strongly
about
this.
That
I've
talked
about
it
in
my
Urban
Design
classes,
with
my
students
about
how
ugly
those
fake
trees
are.
So
I
really
cannot
vote
for
any
proposal
that
allows
fake
trees
in
our
city.
O
Oh
well,
yes,
I
do
have
many
many
opinions.
I
found
some
very
interesting
examples
in
the
internet
and
I
and
I
I.
You
know
Mike
Mike,
regardless
of
the
the
joke
about
how
ugly
those
fake
trees
look
like
I.
Something
that
is
interesting
to
me
is
about
height,
related
to
growth.
O
You
know
we're
growing
the
city
and
we're
going
higher
and
higher.
What
will
happen
when
it
were
some
of
these
locations
need
to
go
higher.
Will
then
we're
going
to
need
more
of
these
towers
because
we're
going
to
have
some
blockage
and
some
interference,
and
so
what?
What
is
the
answer
to
from
experts
about
these
Towers?
When
is
that
going
to
our
you
know,
decisions
when
we
are
deciding
to
up
sound
an
area
because
there
is
still
a
tower
there
or
how?
How
do
we
handle
this?
O
E
Generally,
the
types
of
towers
that
we
see
installed
in
places
with
taller
buildings
are
far
different
than
the
types
that
we
see
in
places
that
are
out
in
the
middle
of
neighborhoods,
it's
generally
and
I'm,
very
generally
speaking,
but
it's
it's
typically
easier
to
locate
the
cell
towers
that
are
intended
to
reach
wider
areas
on
tops
of
taller
buildings
right
they
can
get
up
there.
You
know
we
have
some
downtown
that
are
on
top
of
really
tall
buildings.
E
We
have
some
on
100
foot
monopoles
right,
but
has
development
occurs
those
Industries
just
like
every
other
utility,
whether
public
or
private,
adapts,
and
so
that
is
something
that
I
think
as
a
city.
We
should
expect
to
happen
out
in
the
neighborhoods.
It's
going
to
happen
much
differently
than
it
will
in
our
Urban
core
in
places
like
that.
H
E
S
Council,
member
or
Council
chair,
Dugan,
I'm,
sorry,
can
I
add
a
little
bit
more
context
to
this.
Please
and
I'm
sorry
to
do
it
from
the
back.
Would
you
like
me
to
go
to
the
table?
Okay,
okay
from
here?
Okay,
one
thing
to
remember
is
that
the
city
cannot
prohibit
cell
towers
outright
and
if
the
cell
providers
can
identify
that
there's
an
area
where
there's
a
significant
need
and
the
zoning
ordinance
prohibits
it,
then
that's
that's
an
issue
with
federal
law
because
we
have
to
require
it
and
in
this
Zone.
S
Currently
there
has
been
in
this
area.
There
has
been
identified,
a
significant
need
and
the
the
impetus
for
this
is
that
this
cell
tower
could
be
located,
as
director
Norris
said,
on
the
Pioneer
Precinct
linked
and
is
supported
not
only
by
Verizon
the
provider,
but
also
the
police
department
and
the
police
chief,
because
it
would
improve
cell
service
for
police
calls
in
that
area.
So
it's
it's.
It's
a
a
compromise
for
a
specific
need
and
a
limiting
of
the
zoning
ordinance
for
this
specific
need
in
this
area.
So
I
hope
that
context
is
helpful.
P
S
S
E
Will
add
that
if
it,
if
what
the
council
wants,
is
just
a
cell
tower
to
be
a
cell
tower,
then
that
is
a
different
type
of
cell
tower
than
a
stealth,
Tower
and
I
think
that's
an
important
distinction
to
make
it
would
it
would
become
a
monopole
if
it's
just
a
poll
and
those
are
the
same
kind
of
thing
right
now-
they're
not
allowed
in
that
zone,
but
that
would
be
as
an
option
that
the
council
could
take.
If
that
is
the
preference
and
we'll
let
obviously
public.
P
E
I
think
that
we
run
and
maybe
I'll
let
Katie
Lewis
address
this,
but
I
think
that
if,
if
our
regulations
are
so
onerous,
then
it
is
essentially
a
Prohibition
and
we'd
run
into
those
same
kinds
of
issues.
K
Thank
you
so,
having
just
like
driven
up
north
recently
and
looked
over
and
saw
this
gigantic
cell
tower,
that's
not
disguised
as
anything
I
I
would
love
a
tree.
I,
don't
I!
Don't
care,
don't
care
if
it
looks
like
Charlie
Brown's
Christmas
tree
like
it
was
so
horrible
and
I
can't
imagine
living
anywhere
near
that
thing,
and
so
for
me,
I'm
all
about
this
like
stealth,
it
up
and
so
I
would
actually
propose
a
straw
poll
that
we
ask
Administration.
K
Some
of
the
things
of
that
have
been
brought
up
of
concerns,
but
that
would
be
my
straw
poll
is
to
come
back
with
an
ordinance
and
come
back
with
some
sort
of
design
standards.
We've
done
it
with
our
5G
I
mean
we
I
recognize
we're
in
a
box
that
we
have
to
play
with
in
that
box,
but
I
think
if
we're
going
to
do
stealth
and
I'm
a
proponent
of
it,
so
that
would
be
my
Shuffle
may.
O
I
suggest
a
friendly
amendment
to
this
trouble.
I
I
think
that
is
maybe
space
for
Bridging
the
Arts
on
the
Fig
Tree
Charlie
Brown
Factory.
So
maybe
there
is
a
there
is
a
maybe
there
is
a
way
to
standardize
that
maybe
we
can
direct
the
administration
to
give
us
some
ideas,
what
some
easier
artistic
ways
of
highlighting
this
Tower
and
maybe
having
them
come
back.
O
P
H
And
that's
a
thumbs
up
on
that
that
my
six
to
zero,
with
councilmember
Wharton
absent
and
on
top
of
that
I,
do
want
the
No
No
tell
tower
on
the
school
property.
That's
already
I
think
it
is
that
already
an
obvious
one.
E
Include
that
yeah,
okay,
but
can
I
just
I,
guess
maybe
ask
some
direction
on
that
as
far
as
where
this
fits
in
priorities
to
do
that
kind
of
research
into
design
standards
for
cell
towers,
so
that
we
have
an
understanding
of
what's
expected
of
us.
S
Particular
issue
has
the
the
existing
questions
and
dispute
with
the
provider,
and
so
we
we
our
office
would
recommend
that
we
come
back
with
an
ordinance
pretty
quickly,
but
it
may
it
may
be
a
creative
solution
on
this
particular
one
that
talks
about
art
wraps
or
various
design
solutions
that
might
not
be
as
detailed
as
a
future
design,
standard
or
conversation
on
that,
just
because
the
timing
is
a
little
more
urgent
on
this
one.
Okay,.
H
H
I
hope
Lorena's
ready
for
grilling.
This
is
advisor
consent.
The
director
of
economic
developments,
Lorena
rifo,
Jensen
advice
and
consent.
M
Am
doing
great
and
I
think
I
I'm
I'm
honored
to
be
here
today
to
be
able
to
speak
with
you
and
come
before
you
and
I'm
looking
at
the
mayor
for
her
trust,
also
I'm,
looking
at
Rachel
and
Lisa,
but
I'm.
Also
looking
at
this
gentleman
who's
behind
me,
Ben
colinder,
who
gave
me
the
opportunity
to
be
his
deputy
director
and
treated
me
with
kindness
and
respect
and
before
working
for
him.
M
H
O
I
wanted
to
say
no.
O
You're,
the
right
person
for
the
job
and
regardless
they're
your
Chilean
and
and.
O
I,
you
know
I,
and
you
know
how
close
I
am
with
Chile
in
general
and
I.
Think
there's
a
connection
between
us
and
I'm
I'm,
very
proud
to
know
you
and
now
the
the
time
to
throw
her
calendar
hard
harder.
Even
I
know
that
you
has
never
stopped
it's
important.
It's
important.
O
So,
let's
just
throw
in
some
Chilean
slangs
here
for
fun,
but
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
you
have
inspired
me
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
to
learn
from
you
and
to
your
leadership
and
to
take
this
department
to
a
higher
level
even
than
what
it
was.
So
thank
you.
M
M
C
Lorena,
congratulations
on
the
nomination.
Obviously
I
appreciate
you
a
lot
I
want
to
also
say
thank
you
to
the
mayor
for
giving
Latinas
and
women,
and
you
know
in
the
care
administration
to
have
leadership
roles.
It's
very
important
to
us.
It's
very
speak.
Slightly
of
you
and
Lorena
speaks
super
highly
of
you.
C
I've
seen
your
work,
I've
seen
the
class
and
the
the
professionalism
you've
had,
even
when
we've
been
mean
to
you
or
oh,
and
we've
been
kind
of
tough
on
you
and
you're
in
your
group,
but
that
you
coming
back
and
saying:
hey,
I,
understand
where
you're
coming
from
and-
and
you
were
tough
man
but
hey.
You
know
that
that
is
a
lot
because
we
can
do
work
together.
We
can
do
better
and
I
know
we're
going
to
do
better.
C
I
mean
I
can
always
bring
this
back
a
long
time
ago,
three,
four
administrations
before
Economic
Development
wasn't
a
thing
and
I'm.
There's
a
lot
of
witnesses
here
that
economy
wasn't
a
thing
that
much
there
was
a
three
two
staff
plus
an
intern
group,
and
so
with
the
years
I
think
Salt
Lake
City
has
stepped
up.
C
Ben
has
been
an
amazing
director,
thank
you,
Ben
for
being
here
and
supporting
Lorena
and
I've,
seen
how
he's
built
this
group
with
Roberta
and
will
and
the
rest
that
are
here
and
other
Mayors.
You
know
that
she
has
this
opportunity
to
put
the
cherry
on
top
as
well,
so
I'm
super
proud
of
super
excited
for
for
Salt,
Lake
City
and
the
economic
development
path
that
we'll
be
taking
with.
P
You
I
also
wanted
to
say,
congratulations,
I
I.
L
P
Maybe
the
first
time
we
talked
one-on-one
was
recently
in
Cincinnati
and
I
was
really
impressed
with
just
the
way
you
approach
your
job
and
and
and
the
way
that
you're,
qualified
and
smart,
but
humble
and
willing
to
sort
of
sit
at
the
table
and
have
conversations
and
I
think
that's
something
I'm
really
excited
to
see
you
bring
to
this
position.
P
I
will
ask
a
question,
because
we're
supposed
to
right,
I
I,
think
that
it's
really
important
and
really
great,
that
the
mayor
has
appointed
a
woman
of
color
to
this
position,
and
so,
as
a
person.
With
your
background,
what
do
you
think
you
can
bring
to
this
this
role?
And
and
how
do
you
think
that
will
help
our
our
minority-owned
businesses.
M
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
question.
I.
Think
one
of
the
things
that
is
an
immigrant
population
I'm,
an
immigrant
to
this
country
and
everything
that
we
do
deals
with.
How
well
can
we
do
our
jobs,
I?
Think
what
I
have
learned
in
my
trajectory
as
a
as
a
woman
of
color
in
Utah,
moving
here
at
the
age
of
almost
14,
is
that
resiliency
is
the
greatest
gift.
You
would
find
in
an
immigrant
community
that
resiliency
lives
within
us
there's
somehow
somewhere
we're
going
to
figure
out
how
to
make
it
at
the
same
time.
M
Having
said
that,
what
I
bring
to
the
job
is
an
openness
to
listen,
an
openness
to
say
this
is
not
about
the
east
side
or
the
west
side.
If
there
is
something
happening
in
one,
Community
is
happening
to
all
of
us,
because
we
are
one
city.
So
what
we
develop
a
lot
of
times.
We
do
need
to
adjust
our
approach
when
we're
working
on
the
west
side,
but
we
have
to
pay
attention
to
all
the
parts
of
our
city.
M
One
of
the
things
that
I
have
to
say
that
when
we
talk
about
diversity,
equity
and
inclusion,
our
team
is
not
something
I
have
to
remind
them
something
that
they
do
every
day
is
something
we
bring
to
the
table
translation
of
documents.
If
we
are
not
reaching
the
populations
I,
sometimes
you
let
us
know
that
we
need
to,
and
that's
your
job
and
I
appreciate
that
job.
We
will
go
out
there
and
canvas
everyone
in
our
team.
Will
you
know,
walk
the
streets,
so
you
have
a
commitment
by
way
of
background.
I
am
an
attorney.
M
I
also
do
have
a
master's
in
public
health
and
I
would
say
around
not
too
hme,
but
about
30
years
of
experience
and
in
different
aspects
of
state
government,
private
sector
and
I'm
honored
to
be
sitting
here
in
front
of
you
and
if
you
allow
me
I
do
also
in
akosha.
We
do
this.
With
your
permission,
I
have
a
few
words
that
I
like
to
share
is
that
okay.
M
M
M
Couture
is
the
reason
why
we're
here
all
of
us,
it's
all
about
the
people
we
serve.
People
are
the
fabric
of
our
communities
and
they're.
The
reason
why
we
do
what
we
do
every
day
and
I'm
an
amazing
woman
once
said
to
me-
and
yes
is
my
mother,
who
is
in
the
audience
Anna
Maria
rifo,
who
I
admire
the
most
because
she's
beautiful
and
resilient
an
immigrant
from
Chile.
M
She
has
taught
me
to
never
give
up
and
to
always
remember
my
gifts
and
why
I
possess
them
to
serve
others
I
thank
her
for
teaching
and
from
being
the
force
to
remind
our
family.
What
we're
here
to
do
to
serve
others,
because
people
are
the
most
sacred
and
beautiful
creation
we
will
encounter
in
our
lives.
M
I
want
to
thank
my
family,
including
my
sisters,
brother,
nieces
and
nephew
and,
of
course,
my
daughter
Sophia,
for
their
unconditional
love
and
support
through
my
life.
My
dear
friends,
who
have
cheered
me
on
and
many
of
them,
are
in
the
audience
and
supported
me.
I
love
you
to
many
members
of
our
Latino
leaders.
Who've
extended
their
support,
kindness
and
guidance.
M
I
honor
you
I
am
honored
to
have
the
trust
of
Mayor
Aaron
Mendenhall
Rachel
Otto,
our
chief
of
staff
and
Lisa
Schaefer,
our
chief
administrative
officer,
to
lead
us
to
to
allow
me
to
lead
an
incredible
team
of
professionals
who
are
passionate
about
their
work,
whether
it's
business
development,
the
Arts,
protect,
Lake,
City,
Workforce,
Development
jobs
or
arpa
grants.
This
incredible
team
works
hard
and
always
reminds
me
that
we
exist
to
make
a
difference
in
our
communities.
M
Thank
you
for
your
commitment
toward
residents
and
businesses
to
the
previous
director,
Ben
colander,
who
treated
me
with
utmost
kindness
and
respect.
Thank
you
for
treating
me
as
your
equal
and
encouraging
me
to
other
department
heads
within
the
city.
You
have
my
commitment
that
I
will
work
with
you
side
by
side
to
address
issues,
because
together
we're
a
powerful
force.
M
The
vision
of
Economic
Development
is
in
Salt
Lake
City
is
what
inspired
me
to
join
Ben
and
his
team
is
human
centered.
Economic
development
is
all
about
the
people.
In
other
words,
everything
we
do
is
to
support
Health
a
healthy
tax
base,
which
in
turn
creates
a
great
quality
of
life
for
our
residents
for
the
people
for
our
families.
M
What
is
a
healthy
tax
base?
Thriving
businesses,
diverse
industry
with
a
diverse
economy,
which
in
turn
basically
brings
about
beautiful
Parks
streets,
Arts,
affordable
housing,
schools
and
trails.
What
is
quality
of
life
a
living
way,
so
our
families
don't
have
to
work
two
to
three
jobs.
This
is
what
tech,
Lake
City
and
the
healthcare
Innovation
initiative
is
so
important.
Public
education
and
training
opportunities
for
our
families
and
Youth
digital
Equity,
thriving
business
that
create
jobs
healthy
living.
M
When
we
learned
at
a
district
or
a
neighborhood,
is
experiencing
suffering
and
problems.
We
all
need
to
come
together
as
one
team
to
support
the
district
or
the
district
or
the
neighborhood.
Excuse
me,
it
is
not
about
the
east
side
or
the
west
side.
It's
about
our
community.
One
community
I
have
watched
each
one
of
you,
members
of
our
Council
and
your
staff
work
hard
in
the
same
work
hard
for
the
same
residents
that
we're
working
for
I,
honor
and
respect
your
commitment
to
the
people
who
elected
you.
M
M
Thank
you
for
considering
my
appointment
today.
It
is
always
an
honor
and
pleasure
to
come
before
you
because
I
understand
that
you're
all
here
to
serve
the
same
people,
the
same
residence,
the
same
businesses,
we
as
a
department
are
trying
to
serve
to
cordu
who
I
met
today,
just
stop
by
our
office
today,
and
you
reminded
us
what
this
is
all
about.
It's
about
the
people
we
serve.
We
thank
you
for
being
a
beautiful
reminder
and
promise,
and
we
promise
we
will
always
remember
you,
mayor
I.
Thank
you
for
your
trust,
I'm,
sorry.
H
I
Not
going
to
top
anything,
you
said,
except
that
I
think
I'm,
putting
the
bleeding
heart
in
bleeding
heart
liberal,
by
crying
over
Economic
Development
right
now.
But
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
understanding
that
people
are
the
unit
and
out
of
analysis,
that
an
economy
is
individuals,
thriving
and
working
together,
and
that's
what
we're
building
here.
Thank
you
for
remembering
my
ancestors,
who
came
and
wanted
those
economically
didn't
want
just
free
housing.
I
They
wanted
the
chance
to
build
and
for
making
sure
that
those
people
who
are
coming
here
today
have
that
same
chance
to
build
what
their
vision
is.
Thanks
for.
Listening
to
us
when
we're
absolutely
moving
in
seven
different
directions,
which
means
you're
moving
in
eight,
because
you
have
a
mayor
to
work
with
and
thank
you
for
keeping
the
vision
of
a
healthy,
Salt,
Lake
City
ahead
of
you
mayor,
you
know,
as
a
woman,
it's
not
always
taken
for
granted
that
your
hard
work
gets
respected
and
when
you're
Latina.
I
H
H
Moving
on
to
item
number,
eight
board,
appointment,
accessibility,
disability
commissions,
Casey,
leinen
and
I
think
Casey
is
Casey
is
joining
virtually.
H
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
Rich
Foster
for
the
same
board,
the
accessibility
and
disability,
Commission
and
I.
Think
rich
is
here
in
person.
H
Oh
you're,
on
you're
on
virtual
Rich
good
afternoon
and
welcome
to
the
work
session
hi
there.
We
got
your
visual
now
and
thanks
for
volunteering
for
the
accessibility
and
disability
commission,
please
give
us
a
little
background
and
why
you
want
to
be
on
the
board.
T
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
for
inviting
me
and
I
appreciate
it
and
I
Mr
Speaker
and
members
of
the
council.
Yep
I
have
been
an
emergency
manager
now
for
both
the
city
of
Salt
Lake
and
for
the
state
of
Utah.
For
about
12
years,
I
was
a
member
of
the
Salt
Lake
City
team,
as
a
Vista
volunteer
after
I
retired,
from
my
previous
position.
T
As
a
teacher
and
I
spent
three
years
in
the
office
of
the
emergency
manager
in
Salt,
Lake
City
after
my
emerged
after
my
Vista,
the
time
was,
which
was
up,
which
was
three
years
I
moved
over
to
the
Department
of
State
Department
of
Health,
where
I
have
been
ever
since
my
specialty
when
I
was
at
the
unit
at
Salt,
Lake
City
and
also
when
I
moved
over
to
the
state,
was
working
with
people
with
disabilities
and
in
the
area
of
emergency
preparedness,
assisting
people
with
disabilities
to
be
sure
that
they
were
prepared
in
the
event
of
a
disaster.
T
T
Of
course,
I,
like
everyone
else
at
the
Department
of
Health,
was
totally
occupied
with
the
with
the
pandemic
and
my
specialty
at
the
Department
of
Health,
as
a
an
expert
in
the
area
of
preparedness
for
people
with
disabilities
meant
that
I
spent
all
of
my
time,
working
with
hungry
at
a
living
facilities
and
people
with
people
with
disabilities.
T
As
you
know,
it
was
those
those
facilities
that
were
the
hardest
hit
by
the
by
the
pandemic
and
who
needed
the
who
needed
the
most
assistance,
and
it
was
an
honor
for
me
to
work
in
that
area.
T
I've
also
I'm
also
a
a
teacher
for
FEMA,
an
instructor
or
FEMA
in
the
area
of
access
and
functional
needs
and
I.
Guess
that
the
what
is
important
is
that
I
did
serve
on
this
committee
for
three
years
when
I
was
on.
That
is
the
committee
that
we're
talking
about,
which
was
at
that
time
was
called
mayor's
committee
on
accessibility
and
has
now
been
elevated
to
the
position
of
a
commission.
T
I
served
on
that
committee
for
three
years
at
that
time
and
I
resigned
only
when
it
became
clear
to
me
that
the
that
the
the
committee
was
was
not
accomplishing
any
or
any
of
its
goals,
and
it
was
essentially
a
waste
of
time
for
me
and
for
other
members
on
the
committee
that
has
changed
and
I
have
been
an
observer
of
the
of
the
new
commission
for
the
last
year
and
have
found
the
commission
to
be
interesting,
effective
and
all
all
working
in
the
same
direction,
and
that
direction
is
the
accessibility
issues
for
people
in
Salt.
T
Lake
City,
who
with
disabilities
I
also
during
the
pandemic,
worked
with
the
refugee
population
and
I,
was
a
member
of
the
translation
and
interpretation
committee
and
we
were
responsible
for
translating
all
of
the
significant
brochures
and
informations
and
publications
of
all
kinds
into
28
different
languages,
and
that
was
a
that
was
a
very
rewarding
part
of
my
job
during
the
pandemic
and
I
still
serve
on
that
committee.
Or
on
that.
Yes,
on
that
committee
for
the
state
and.
T
Your
consideration,
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I'd,
be
happy
to
answer
those
thank.
H
It
seems
like
we
have
no
questions
at
this
time
rich.
Thank
you
very
much
for
volunteering.
I
appreciate
your
time
and
your
experience,
because
that's
so
valuable
to
these
commissions
and
Boards
and
and
it's
lovely
that
we
have
people
that
want
to
volunteer
and
make
the
city
better
you'll
be
on
tonight's
consent
agenda
at
our
formal
meeting
that
starts
at
seven.
You
need
not
be
present
to
to
win,
but
so
have
a
wonderful
evening,
but
you
can
always
tune
in
if
you
so
desire.
H
I
C
H
H
Hello
good
good
evening
Janice,
thank
you
for
joining
us
this
evening
and
thank
you
for
volunteering,
for
the
accessibility
and
disability
commission
appreciate
you,
volunteering,
and
could
you
tell
the
council
a
little
bit
about
why
you
want
to
join
the
commission.
C
Well,
considering
what
rich
said
I'll
give
you
some
background.
My
husband
and
I
had
trouble
having
children
and
our
first
son
was
born
five
weeks
prematurely,
but
I
was
in
a
hospital,
so
he
was
all
right.
My
second
son
was
born
nine
and
a
half
weeks
prematurely
in
the
car.
He
was
sick,
developmentally
delayed
and
we
were
able
to
get
some
early
intervention
programs
for
him
that
are
different
now
than
they
were
and
he
entered
our
neighborhood
school
when
he
was
six.
C
I
was
observed
advocating
for
my
son,
so
in
1986
I
was
recruited
to
serve
on
a
Salt
Lake
City
School
District
special
education
committee,
and
they
asked
me
if
I
would
go
to
the
Capitol
and
so
I
have
been
interacting
with
the
legislature.
For
that
long
and
with
many
other
many
state
agencies
and
I'll
go
back
to
my
son.
So
oh
so
is
Steph.
His
long-term
disability
is,
he
is
deaf
and
when
and
he
was
extremely
difficult,
he
broke
Windows.
He
lit
fires
in
the
house.
C
You
know,
I
I
was
very
tired
and
the
scope
of
the
deaf
preschool
wouldn't
accept
him
into
their
program,
which
was
legal
at
the
time
and
he
graduated
from
East
High
School,
with
citizenship,
honors,
academic,
honors
and
four
scholarships,
including
one
to
the
University
of
Utah
Department
of
psychology.
He
took
sign
language
as
his
foreign
language
as
master's
degree
from
Utah
State,
and
they
live
in
Pennsylvania,
which
is
the
bad
news.
C
So
I
have
worked
on
education
issues,
mental
health,
all
kinds
of
different
things
legislatively
and
attending
legislative
sessions
online
has
has
not
been
Pleasant
and
I.
Think
I
am
serving
on
a
committee
with
Rich
right
at
the
moment.
H
H
This
is
wonderful
and
I
think
the
commission
is
going
to
be
impacted
greatly
by
your
membership
and
and
your
position
on
the
board
so
or
the
position
of
the
council.
Excuse
me
position
on
the
commission,
so
thank
you
very
much
for
volunteering
and
your
will
be
on
tonight's
consent
agenda
at
seven
o'clock.
You
need
not
be
present
to
accept
the
nomination
at
that
time,
but
you
can
always
join
us
virtually,
but
thank
you
very
much
for
volunteering.
C
H
C
Yeah
I'm
I'm
here
I
just
got
on
virtually
oh.
H
Great
Casey
yeah
we're
bringing
you
up
here
in
a
second
wonderful
great
to
have
you
and
thank
you
for
volunteering
for
to
be
on
the
accessibility
and
disability
commission.
Tell
us
why
you
want
to
be
on
the
commission.
C
Join
me
virtually
as
well
so
I
was
diagnosed
with
autism
when
I
was
about
three
or
four,
and
during
that
time
I
was
non-verbal
until
I
got
to
that
age
of
five
or
six
and
I
had
one
of
my
special
education
teachers
taught
me
like
how
to
read
and
stuff
and
so
she's
been.
You
know
teach
me
on
how
to
say
the
words
like
through
the
book
or
something,
and
that
was
right
when
I
started
talking
and
then
Flash
Forward.
C
Now
I
am
a
para
educator
at
Mountain,
Ridge,
High,
School
and
I've
been
involved
in
I
think
like
four
or
five
committees,
which
is
the
Utah
developmental
disabilities.
Council
excuse
me
Advocates
of
Slater
speakers,
Network
committee
advisory,
our
community
advisory
committee
and
and
Special.
H
Wonderful,
thank
you.
Casey
any
questions
for
Casey,
Casey
I,
don't
see
any
questions
from
our
end.
Appreciate
you,
volunteering
for
the
commission.
I
think
you
can
be
an
invaluable
asset
to
the
commission.
Just
from
your
experience
and
your
your
strong
beliefs,
there
appreciate
it
all
and
you'll
be
on
tonight's
formal
agenda
at
7
pm.
You
need
not
be
present
there
to
accept
the
nomination,
but
you
always
more
than
you're,
always
more
than
welcome
to
join
us.
But
thank
you
very
much
for
volunteering
and
thank
you
very
much
for
your
work.
Going
forward.
H
H
C
H
C
H
S
Yeah
hi
council
members,
Katie
Lewis,
Salt,
Lake,
City
attorney
I'm
here
with
Tammy
hunsaker,
the
deputy
director
of
community
neighborhoods,
and
just
to
frame
the
discussion
today
you
have
on
your
formal
meeting
agenda
tonight.
Potential
action
on
a
resolution
approving
the
public
benefits
analysis
for
a
less
than
fair
market
ground
lease
for
The,
Other,
Side,
village,
tiny
home
project
and
also
a
rezone
that
would
permit
that
type
of
use
in
that
zone.
S
And
when
we
met
at
your
last
work
session,
we
went
through
the
term
sheets
of
the
ground,
lease
that
would
be
attached
to
the
public
benefits
analysis
and
the
development
agreement
which
governs
what
would
be
constructed
on
the
property
and
the
council.
Chair
asked
us
to
go
through
that
those
term
sheets
and
very
quickly
tell
you
what
has
been
added
to
those
two
so
that
you
have
the
most
up-to-date
information
on
what
the
potential
votes
would
be
today.
So
are
there
any
questions
on
that,
or
should
we
just
Dive
In?
Okay?
I
N
S
First
for
every
10
residential
units
that
are
constructed
at
least
seven
will
be
affordable
units
until
the
maximum
number
of
Staff
units
have
been
constructed
before
that
number
was
nine.
So
now
it's
seven
and
an
additional
requirement
for
the
in
the
construction
section
is
that
at
any
one
time
there
will
be
more
residential
units
completed
than
the
community
in
units.
Remember,
there
are
25
units
that
will
be
used
for
overnight
rental,
and
this
requirement
says
that
there
will
be
more
residential
units
constructed
at
any
one
time
than
the
community
overnight
in
units.
S
Other
additions
to
the
development
agreement
include
requirements
that
all
the
construction
will
be
in
compliance
with
an
agreed
upon
construction
schedule
and
that
they
will
all
be
reviewed
and
approved
with
site
plan
and
design
review
by
the
city.
So
that's
pretty
standard,
but
those
are
two
things
that
are
in
the
red
line,
just
to
be
sure
that
you're
clear
on
those
changes.
S
So
those
are
the
requirements
that
are
in
the
development
agreement.
I'll
move
on
to
the
ground
lease,
which
is
the
document
that
addresses
the
operations
of
the
tiny
home
Village
once
it
is
constructed.
One
other
thing
that
on
on
the
rezone,
because
that's
also
tied
to
the
development
agreement
is
your
motion
sheet
for
the
rezone
will
say.
S
If,
if
you
would
like
to
add
this,
that
there
are
conditions
for
setbacks
on
the
property
that
would
be
developed
by
The,
Other,
Side
village
and
those
that
setback
would
be
a
15-foot
setback
on
the
Eastern
property,
with
trees
planted
every
30
feet,
and
the
purpose
for
that
is
to
address
that
this
zone
change
would
allow
residential
use
in
an
area
where
there
might
be
uses
that
are
industrial
or
manufacturing,
and
so
we
want
to
set
back
from
that
to
so
that
both
properties
can
be
compatible
in
that
area.
S
S
So
two
additional
conditions
in
the
ground
lease
are
that
there
will
be
firm
commitment,
letters
or
contracts
from
service
providers,
including
Medical
Dental,
mental
health
behavioral,
health
and
case
management
prior
to
occupancy
by
the
residents.
So
that's
that
tie
to
the
service
providers
in
the
village.
S
Another
additional
condition
is
that
within
12
months
of
entering
into
the
ground,
lease
The
Other,
Side
village
will
begin
Landscaping
the
property
and
contribute
to
the
beautification
of
the
neighborhood,
so
that's
to
to
ensure
that
it
becomes
compatible
with
the
neighborhood.
It
enhances
the
neighborhood
another
Edition
states
that
the
ground
lease
will
restrict
the
affordability
of
the
units
and
that's
again
to
ensure
that
the
population
that's
required
to
be
served
is
being
served
because
there
will
be
a
tie
to
affordability
for
lease
rates.
S
Another
condition
has
to
do
with
the
selection
of
individuals
who
will
be
housed
at
The,
Other,
Side,
village,
tiny
home
Village,
and
remember
that
the
the
objective
is
to
house
the
chronically
homeless
and
homeless
individuals,
and
so
we
have
added
language
that
if
chronically
homeless
individuals
have
not
been
identified,
then
vulnerable
homeless
individuals
can
be
identified
and
those
individuals
must
demonstrate
the
highest
vulnerability
using
the
vulnerability
index
service,
prioritization
decision
assistance,
tool
and
Tammy
I'm.
Guessing
that
you
understand
that
more
than
I
do.
But
that's
that's
an
assessment
on
vulnerability.
N
S
Another
addition
in
the
ground
lease
is
has
to
do
with
the
eligibility
requirements
when
those
individuals
and
begin
engagement
in
the
Welcome
Center.
S
Mm-Hmm
the
the
next
change
in
the
ground.
Lease
changes
the
lease
requirement
from
a
month
to
month
basis
to
a
12-month
lease
term,
so
any
tenant
that
is
housed
in
the
tiny
home
Village
Community
will
have
a
a
one-year
12-month
lease
rather
than
a
month-to-month
lease.
So
that's
additional
security
and
housing
for
those
individuals.
S
The
the
first
revision
is
that
the
other
side,
Village,
must
provide
the
city
with
a
report
showing
the
total
number
of
applicants,
the
number
of
applicants
who
were
approved
for
a
lease,
the
number
of
residents
who
leave
the
Welcome
Center
and
the
number
who
move
into
the
village,
as
well
as
the
number
of
residents
who
leave
the
village
and
the
reason
for
leaving
the
village.
S
So
again,
the
the
overarching
objective
here
is
to
understand
and
ensure
that
the
most
vulnerable
individuals
are
having
the
opportunity
to
be
housed
in
the
village
that
the
city
understands
what
that
process
is,
and
the
city
understands
when
people
then
leave
the
village
and
the
reasons
for
doing
that.
So
it's
the
it's
the
big
picture
from
start
to
finish.
S
An
additional
reporting
or
information
requirement
is
that
the
other
side
Village
will
ensure
that
information
will
be
made
readily
available
to
tenants
requiring
tenant
rights
and
housing
laws
and
we'll
have
that
information
displayed
in
a
visible
location
and
another
revision
to
this.
This
section
talking
about
Supportive
Services,
is
that
transportation
to
off-site
Supportive
Services
must
be
provided
when
not
available
on
site.
So
again,
there
will
be
many
Supportive
Services
on
site,
and
then
this
is
a
requirement
for
those
Supportive
Services
that
are
not
available.
Transportation
will
be
provided.
S
Any
questions
so
far,
I'm
just
running
through
the
list.
Okay,
the
the
city
and
the
other
side
Village
also
made
some
changes
to
the
social
Enterprise
section.
S
So
the
first
revision
is
that
indicating
that
the
other
side
Village
intends
to
generate
Revenue
to
support
the
village
through
the
operation
of
social
Enterprise
businesses
that
will
be
located
on
site
and
an
indication
that
those
businesses
are
anticipated
to
be
a
motel,
which
is
that
community
in
a
thrift
store
in
cookie
manufacturing,
but
that
those
businesses
may
change
over
time.
This
is
just
a
general
indication
that
the
revenue
will
be
generated
on
site
that
will
ultimately
support
the
The
Village
itself
and,
in
addition
to
generating
Revenue
to
cover
operating
costs.
S
These
businesses
will
provide
critical
job
training
to
residents
and
the
this
provision
also
indicates
that
the
community
and
will
include
25
Standalone
tiny
homes
offered
as
nightly
rentals
to
the
General
Public,
which
will
provide
lodging
opportunities
for
visitors
and
volunteers,
which
was
a
concept
that
was
attractive
to
The,
Other
Side,
village,
and
that
is
utilized.
Another
tiny
home
Village
communities.
S
We
have
some
other
lease
terms
that
have
changed
and
since
the
the
work
session,
the
the
first
and
the
the
General
East
terms
that
don't
have
as
much
to
do
with
operations
are
that
the
city
will
not
allow
a
third
party
to
use
or
develop
the
remaining
adjacent
property.
So
remember
it's
a
bigger
property
in
the
pilot
property
will
be
on
a
smaller
section
of
it.
S
So
the
city
will
not
allow
a
third
party
to
use
or
develop
the
remaining
adjacent
property
during
construction
of
the
pilot
project
or
for
three
years
of
operation
of
the
village
following
completion
of
the
pilot
project.
During
that
time,
tosa
will
have
a
right
of
first
offer
and
may
offer
to
at
least
the
adjacent
property.
S
One
again
goes
back
to
reporting,
and
that
is
that
there's
a
requirement
that
no
more
than
annually
and
in
connection
with
an
annual
report,
the
city
May
request
additional
information
from
The
Other
Side
village
to
evaluate
if
the
village
is
compliant
with
the
ground.
Lease
and
meeting
the
purposes
of
the
public
benefit
analysis.
So
again,
this
is
another
reporting
or
compliance
requirement,
that's
built
into
the
lease
so
that
the
city
can
ensure
it's
being
operated
as
expected.
S
There
are
some
changes
to
the
operating
viability
and
financial
feasibility,
including
that
the
development
of
the
revenue
revenue
generating
Endeavors
will
provide
self-sufficiency
for
The,
Other
Side
village,
including
adequate
location,
space
and
funding
of,
and
support
of
the
Supportive
Services
by
third-party
providers.
So
again,
these
are
technical
changes,
but
they're
really
ensuring
the
objectives
of
the
city
the
another.
S
H
I
I,
don't
have
a
question,
I
want
to
say
thank
you.
I
know,
Friday
I
was
in
a
rough
place
and
to
Joseph
and
to
Tim
I
want
to
say
thank
you.
I
know
executing
your
plan
becomes
more
difficult,
but
this
to
see
enshrined
written
here
that
you're
going
to
recruit
from
the
Jordan
River
and
from
our
West
Side
neighborhoods,
to
see
that
you
are
going
to
offer
the
permanent
supportive
model.
I
That
is
the
evidence-based
response
to
the
crisis
that
we
live
with
every
day
are
the
assurances
we
need
to
I
am
sorry
for
the
complications
to
your
model,
but
if
there's
one
thing
I
know
about
you
all
is
that
you
are
resourceful
and
resilient
and
will
figure
out
how
to
adapt
that
model
to
work.
Thank
you,
I
know.
I
know.
I
in
particular
have
asked
a
lot
of
you
and
thank
you
for
rising
to
the
occasion
and
Katie
and
Tammy.
I
S
And
I
need
to
give
gratitude
to
Kimberly
chitrus
from
my
office,
who
has
really
been
in
the
Weeds
on
this
and
has
done
an
exceptional
job
and
Tammy.
You
have
too
absolutely.
H
O
Want
to
add
call
councilmember
about
tomorrow
about
tomorrow's
Pete
thrashler,
oh
my
goodness
I
so
Peter
wrestler
for
for
Echo
those
words,
because
the
amount
of
work
that
you
know
you
guys
have
done
and
translating
someone
of
the
community
concerns
I.
Think
pretty
much.
All
of
the
community
concerns
into
some
sort
of
agreement
on
contract
and
shaping
this
project,
and
and
even
to
the
auditions
done
probably
today
into
this
document
to
address
some
of
the
concerns
from
older
council
members.
O
And
it
is,
it
is
impressive
and
I,
and
that
is
that
is
our
role
is
to
to
not
just
oppose
things
just
cause
but
to
to
actually
shape
this
project.
O
If
it
were
to
happen
to
the
best
it
could
be,
and
that's
how
I
saw
my
role
to
be
because
I'm
getting
emails
and
and
I'm
working
with
the
neighbors
about
the
crisis
that
we're
seeing
in
the
streets
and
in
the
Jordan
River
on
and
around
our
neighborhoods
and-
and
we
can
not
not
do
anything
about
this
about
this
crisis
and
I-
believe
that
it
is
my
duty
to
to
shape
something
and
to
try
to
offer
a
solution
and
I'm.
O
Not
sure
if
this
is
going
to
this
is
not
going
to
solve
the
homeless
crisis
by
any
chance
fully,
but
I
believe
that
it's
our
duty
to
try
something
and
I
thank
all
of
you
for
the
work
and
the
the
many
hours
of
meetings
that
you
guys
have
done
and,
and
it's
just
impressive
I,
never
experience
this
level
of
commitment
to
this
community
and
to
our
feedback.
So
thank
you.
S
S
You
very
much
and
and
one
con
one
item
just
for
you
to
think
about
for
the
formal
meeting
is
I
think
on
the
agenda.
It
shows
the
public
benefits
analysis
before
the
rezone
and
if
I
could
request
that
you
switch
those
and
vote
on
the
rezone
first
and
then
the
public
benefits
analysis.
We
think
that
that
order
makes
more
sense.
C
C
S
Right
a
right
of
first
offer
for
three
years
and
the
intent
of
that
is
to
allow
them
to
operate
the
village
and
see
if
the
pilot
project
can
operate
in
the
way
that
the
city
expects
and
then,
if
it
does
give
them
the
opportunity,
with
any
conditions
that
the
city
wants
to
put
on
in
terms
of
remediation
or
other
operational
objectives,
to
grow.
To
that
larger
piece
of
property.
Okay,.
S
K
K
Think
there
was
some
pushback
on
those
concerns
and
I
think
that
there
was
an
amazing
dialogue
that
I
didn't
have
to
be
involved
in
because
it
was
happening
through
the
teams
that
have
been
working
together
for
so
long
to
address
those
concerns,
one
being
the
month
to
month
lease
that
was
really
hard
for
me
and
to
see
that
we're
taking
this
commitment
seriously
to
Alejandra's
point
I
want
to
thank
you.
K
I
really
want
to
thank
Tammy
and
and
Katie
and
and
Kimberly
she
I
mean
we
sat
together
for
quite
some
time
about
all
of
this,
so
I
wasn't
going
to
repeat
everything
but
I
just
couldn't
without
saying.
Thank
you.
H
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
and
Council.
We're
moving
on
to
item
number
12..
Well.
Excuse
me,
councilman
of
Vice
chair
any
any
report.
No.
P
H
H
Q
You
Mr
chair,
I,
move
that
we
go
into
closed
session
for
the
purpose
of
discussing
strategy
negotiations
or
I'm
sorry,
strategy
for
the
purchase,
exchange
and
Lease
of
real
property
for
discussions
regarding
deployment
of
security,
Personnel
devices
or
systems,
and
to
receive
Counsel
on
attorney-client
matters.
Second,.
H
C
H
And
I'm
a
yes
that
passes
seven
to
zero.
We
are
now
exiting
our
work
session
meeting.
We
will,
after
this
closed
session,
we'll
be
joining
back
up
at
7,
00
PM
for
our
formal
meeting
and
so
right
now
we'll
take
a
break
as
we
transition
to
the
works
of
the
closed
session.
F
T
Welcome
to
Capital
City
News
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
Salt
Lake
City
Government
I'm,
your
host
Brian
Young,
with
Salt
Lake
City
TV.
In
our
episode
this
week
we
spoke
with
Patrick
Nelson,
the
city's
watershed
management
supervisor
for
the
public
utilities
department
about
the
Wildfire
fuel
reduction.
That's
going
on
in
parley's
Canyon.
Our
history
minute
this
week
is
about
the
concrete
Factory.
That's
turned
into
Fear
Factory.
Before
we
get
to
those.
T
Mayor
Aaron
Mendenhall
and
Salt
Lake
City
police
chief
Mike
Brown,
released
the
latest
update
of
the
Department's
Crime
Control
plan.
The
strategies
outlined
in
the
revised
Crime
Control
plan
include
expanding
Recruitment
and
hiring
efforts
developing
a
violent
criminal
apprehension
team
implementing
the
police,
civilian
Response
Team,
expanding
the
Department's
call
diversion
program
and
its
online
reporting
capabilities
to
learn
more
visit.
Slcpd.Com.
T
Salt
Lake
city,
mayor
Aaron,
Mendenhall
and
other
local
leaders
celebrated
the
completion
of
a
new
pedestrian
bridge
over
the
Jordan
River
to
backman
elementary
school
making
for
a
safer,
quicker
passage
for
West
Side
children.
Students
who
live
in
the
neighborhood
to
the
west
of
the
river
have
previously
reached
the
school
by
using
500,
North
or
700
North,
which
made
for
a
longer
Walk
That
was
closer
to
traffic.
C
C
300
North
pedestrian,
concrete
bridge
deck
pour
happened
earlier
in
October.
Steel
work
continues
on
the
supporting
steel
beams,
stairs
and
landings.
Although
the
bridge
has
been
raised,
it
remains
closed
to
the
public
for
your
safety.
Please
do
not
use
the
sidewalk
on
the
south
side
of
300
North
in
the
construction
zone,
use
caution
as
you
approach
and
cross
the.
C
L
L
T
It
for
our
road
construction
updates
for
this
season,
but
stay
tuned
through
the
winter,
as
we
give
you
a
preview
of
the
road
construction
projects
coming
up
in
2023
to
keep
up
with
these
projects
and
any
others
in
the
city
be
sure
to
visit
slc.gov
Construction
for
our
interview.
This
week
we
spoke
with
Patrick
Nelson
from
the
city's
Public
Utilities
Department,
about,
what's
going
on
to
mitigate
Wildfire
risk
in
our
City's
vital
Watershed
areas,.
R
My
name
is
Patrick
Nelson
I
work
for
Salt
Lake,
City
Department
of
Public
Utilities
as
the
Watershed
program
manager.
The
Watershed
program
is
a
team
of
folks
that
help
protect
the
water
supply
for
over
360
000
people
before
it
hits
the
treatment
plants
after
it
goes
into
treatment
plants
and
gets
minimal
treatment.
R
This
water
goes
to
many
parts
of
the
valley,
including
Cottonwood
Heights,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
Mill,
Creek
parts
of
holiday
and,
if
you
count
Little
Cottonwood
also
parts
of
Sandy
City
we're
here
today
talking
about
a
new
fuels
reduction
project
and
that's
a
new
thing.
The
history
of
the
Watershed
has
always
been
one
of
protecting
the
trees
and
100
years
ago.
When
the
settlers
were
here,
they
were
using
the
Canyons
to
help
build
up
the
valley,
wood
for
Timber
to
build
shingles
and
structures.
R
They
did
mining
to
help
booster,
the
economy
and
it
left
the
the
Canyons
a
little
bit
hard
up
and
the
last
hundred
years.
The
city
has
worked
very
closely
with
the
state
of
Utah
and
especially
the
U.S
forest
Service,
to
help
protect
its
water
supply
through
Environmental
Protection.
But
after
a
hundred
years
the
fuels
have
built
up
to
a
point
where,
with
climate
change,
the
fires
can
be
in
the
100
Years
of
fire
suppression.
The
wildfires
can
get
really
a
little
out
of
hand.
R
So
now
they're
looking
at
fuels
reduction
projects
like
this
one
here,
the
city,
especially
Salt,
Lake
City
Public
Utilities,
collaborates
heavily
in
the
watersheds
with
everything
that
we
do
like
I
said.
The
the
forest
service
is
a
huge
partner.
Salt
Lake
County
is
a
another
huge
partner,
the
state
of
Utah
and
both
their
division
of
Forestry
fire,
State
lands
and
Division
of
Wildlife
Resources.
We
have
expertise
in
knowing
that
fire
hurts
our
watersheds
and
makes
it
difficult
for
our
treatment
plants
to
to
treat,
but
we
don't
have
the
expertise
in
fuels
management.
R
R
So
if
you
remember
in
2021,
when
we
had
that
fire
that
ripped
up
off
the
freeway
off
of
a
car
whose
catalytic
converter
was
just
throwing
Sparks,
that
fire
moved
very
very
fast
and
if
we
didn't
have
that
level
of
air
support
just
sitting,
because
some
other
fires
weren't
letting
them
fly
up
in
Oregon
or
something
like
that,
it
would
have
spread
over
into
Summit
County,
and
so
we
were
lucky
to
have
it.
This
project
will
help
slow
down
any
fires
coming
off.
The
freeway
and
it'll
also
reduce
the
fire
severity.
R
It
won't
stop
them,
but
it'll
make
the
impacts
to
our
ecosystems
and
our
watersheds
a
lot
less,
therefore,
protecting
water
supply.
Ultimately,
the
way
the
forest
service
in
the
state
describe
is
they're,
going
to
have
masticators
up
in
the
oak,
so
big
tracked
equipment,
basically
taking
these
Oak
stands
and
not
removing
a
hundred
percent.
So
if
you
look
at
our
treatment
area,
it's
just
making
little
pockets
of
Oaks
so
creating
little
pathways
through
them.
It's
not
going
to
be
mowing.
It's
not
a
clear
cut.
It's
not
anything!
R
It's
going
to
be
little
pockets
of
Oaks
remaining
and
so
there'll
still
be
quite
a
bit
of
Oak
left,
because
Oaks
are
so
essential
to
the
wildlife
and
they
provide
so
much
food.
So
for
so
many
different
species,
mule
deer
elk
black
bears
wild
turkeys
and
all
the
species
that
depend
on
those
to
survive.
We
as
a
city
are
going
to
have
to
really
formulate
fire
management
into
our
Watershed
protections.
R
Looking
towards
the
future,
we've
seen
fires
blow
out
with
water
supplies
for
cities
in
Colorado,
for
the
Central
Utah
project
and
the
infrastructure
is
really
hard
to
upgrade
and
change.
So
fire
management
and
fuels
reduction
is
going
to
be
part
of
watershed
protections
moving
forward,
but
in
the
greater
context,
this.
What
I
understand
is
just
the
start
of
the
fuels
reduction
programs
in
Salt,
Lake
County.