►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 02/15/2022
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting please use this link https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
This
is
going
to
be
a
new
environment
for
a
lot
of
us,
because
this
is
the
first
time
we've
been
in
the
second
time.
We've
been
together
the
last
couple
months,
so
it's
nice
to
be
a
meeting
again
in
person
and
and
be
here
with
members
of
the
public
and
my
fellow
council
members
and
city
staff,
hybrid
council
meetings
allow
people
to
join
online
through
webex
or
in
person
at
the
city
and
county
building.
We
are
continuing
to
watch
coveted
rates
to
make
the
safest
choice
for
all
of
us.
A
A
A
We
will
now
begin
the
work
session
items
with
the
number
one,
the
update
from
the
administration,
and
I
probably
have
on
the
screen
up
there.
There.
She
is
hello,
rachel
rachel
otto
from
the
chief
of
staff,
lisa,
schaefer,
andrew
johnson
and
and
chief
brown
is
probably
also
on
that
screen
somewhere.
It's
all
yours,
rachel.
B
Thank
you,
council
chair.
I
just
have
a
very,
very
few
brief
slides
on
covid
and
the
community
engagement
piece
and
then
I'll
hand
it
to
andrew
and
chief
brown
will
update
the
council
later
when
we
get
closer
to
the
budget.
Amendment
six
item:
if
that's
okay,.
B
Okay,
second
slide:
please,
taylor,
alright,
so
I
feel
like
we
finally
have
a
little
bit
of
good
news
to
report.
We
are
slowly
seeing
more
counties
come
out
of
high
transmission,
the
positivity
rate
is
down,
the
vaccinations
are
still
going
ever
slowly
up
and
code-like.
B
Illness
is
down
and
hospitalizations
are
also
down,
although
they're
still
pretty
high,
so
we're
still
seeing
about
40
people
per
day
go
into
the
hospital
for
code-like
illness
in
the
county,
but
that
is
down
from
about
from
nearly
50
per
day
a
week
or
so
ago,
so
trending
in
the
right
direction.
There
next
slide.
Please
taylor.
B
B
B
Okay,
so
last
week
we
started
showing
you
this
community
engagement,
update,
slide,
and
this
hasn't
changed
significantly,
but
just
wanted
to
draw
your
attention
to
a
few
of
the
things
that
are
coming
to
a
close
in
terms
of
opportunity
for
the
public
to
engage
so
the
first
two
on
the
11th
east
reconstruction
and
the
pioneer
park.
Vision
are
closing
here
in
the
next
few
days.
B
There
is
a
live
q
and
a
session
on
february
16th
at
9
00
a.m
on
the
affordable
housing
overlay.
So
that
is
something
that
a
lot
of
people
have
been
interested
in
and
welcome
you
to
join
that.
I
can
pop
the
link
in
the
chat
here.
Actually,
after
I
get
finished
here,
then
the
thriving
in
place
is
what
we're
calling
the
gentrification
or
anti-displacement
study
that
we're
doing
so.
C
Oh,
thank
you,
council
members.
This
is
the
resource
center
and
overflow
occupancy
numbers
from
the
last
week,
but
the
total
column
on
the
right
is
slightly
up
from
the
previous
discussion.
We
had
from
96
last
time
to
just
under
98
capacity
in
the
resource.
Centers
and
st
vincent
de
paul
is
running
at
61
per
night
and
the
weekend
center
averaging
26
per
night
next
slide.
C
C
We
have
a
limited
number
of
large
camps,
but
two
of
them
will
be
addressed
this
week
and
next
and
then
as
well,
probably
some
smaller
cleanings
simultaneous
to
those
a
resource
fair
was
held
at
the
north
temple
high
needs,
motel,
formerly
the
ramada
last
friday,
and
you
can
see
some
of
the
partners
that
were
there
rough
haven,
the
courts,
etc
sacred
circle
and
the
state
court
help
desk
are
two
new
ones
that
were
there
at
this
time,
which
is
very
helpful.
C
Sacred
circle
runs
a
couple
of
clinics
in
town,
including
one
at
pamela's
place,
one
of
the
permanent
sport
of
housing
development
that
was
open
this
year
and
then
utah
transit
authority.
Excuse
me,
association
should
be
authority
continues
to
join
with
us
in
bus
passes
and
a
new
survey
of
those
who
are
unsheltered
or
in
the
ramada,
and
right
now
we're
in
the
free
free,
fair
february.
But
this
is
helpful,
going
forward
to
figure
out
more
transportation
options
for
folks
without
vehicles.
C
C
The
high
needs
temporary
housing
program,
formerly
ramada
in
motel
rooms,
is
still
operating
and
they've
gone
up
to
116
beds
filled
from
our
last
discussion
at
90,
and
then
we
said
the
second
piece
of
that
building.
The
ramada
are
the
conference,
rooms
and
they're
planning
on
opening
the
larger
one
tonight
at
11,
starting
at
11
pm
until
6
30
a.m.
There
will
be
a
an
additional
shuttle
added
to
the
regular
two
shuttles
they're
going
around.
So
three
shuttles
they'll
run
between
the
ramada
and
the
wigan
center
at
st
vince's
depaul
downtown.
C
So
folks,
staying
in
those
overnight
beds
in
the
conference
rooms
can
go
from
downtown
out
there
at
night
and
then
from
there
back
to
meals
and
services
the
wigan
center
during
the
day.
C
The
change
is
that
the
wigan
center
is
going
to
have
to
cease
to
operate
as
an
overflow
starting
tomorrow.
I
believe,
and
I
have
a
short
statement.
The
shelter
the
homeless
has
written.
Excuse
me
that
the
salt
lake
valley
coalition
and
homelessness
is
putting
out,
as
we
speak
detailing
this
detailing
this.
A
little
bit
if
I
could
read
this
a
portion
of
it
for
you
all
february,
15
2022,
nightly
beds
will
be
available
starting
tonight
through
april
15th
at
the
former
ramada
inn
to
those
experiencing
homelessness.
C
Additionally,
after
tonight
february
15th
overflow
services
at
the
wigan
center
operated
by
volunteers
of
america
will
close
together,
voa
and
the
road
home
will
consolidate
staff
and
resources
to
provide
45
overflow
shelter
beds
at
the
former
ramada
inn.
This
transition
is
a
continuation
of
our
collective
efforts
to
provide
consistent
and
safe
shelter
to
those
in
need.
During
the
winter
months,
we
remain
committed
to
responding
to
the
needs
of
those
who
are
unsheltered
and
being
flexible
and
responsible.
C
As
a
system
we
are
assessing
overflow
needs
in
our
community
and
our
ability
to
expand
capacity.
We
have
spaced
open,
24
additional
beds
in
the
ramada
if
needed
and
feasible.
The
wigan
center
served
a
critical
role
in
providing
safe
and
overflow
beds
to
those
experiencing
homelessness
during
the
first
months
of
winter.
C
The
wigan
center
will
be
open
tonight
with
those
35
beds,
but
then,
starting
tomorrow
it
won't
be
open
at
night.
St
vincent
de
paul
will
continue
to
be
open
every
night
and
the
ramada
will
have
another
45
beds
for
first
come
first
serve
at
night
as
well,
and
transportation
is
going
from
the
rio
grande
area
from
wigan
center
to
the
ramadan
back
every
night
and
every
morning,
so
folks
can
get
there
fairly
easily.
We
hope
other
questions
from
the
council.
C
A
C
C
Yes,
mr
chair,
and
the
funding
and
plans
are
in
place
to
have
those
open
until
april
15th,
as
in
as
it
happens
every
year,
so
another
two
months
or
so.
A
Okay,
are
there
any
other
questions
from
the
council
members
on
the
closure
of
the
wigan
center
or
other
questions.
D
I
have
a
question
andrew,
so
the
the
reason
why
they're
closing
the
wigan
center
is
because
there's
no
need
no
more
need.
I
didn't
is
the
reason
why
they're
closing
the
wigan
center
is
because
there's
no
more
need
for
that
to
be
open
or
they
run
out
of
funds.
Why
are
they
closing
it.
C
It's
primarily
a
lack
of
staffing
council
member
of
baltimore's
they've,
been
struggling
for
a
bit
and
utilizing
other
staff
at
voa
to
cover
overtime
shifts
for
that
center
to
keep
it
open,
and
it's
just
not
feasible.
So
it
made
more
sense
for
them
to
consolidate
with
the
road
home
at
ramada.
They
can
add
more
beds
more
easily
out
there
and
then
scale
up
more
quickly.
D
Thank
you
and
then
another
question
is,
as
the
legislature
session
is
going
on
right
now,
is
there
any
information
that
you
can
give
us
or
like
a
brief
something
of
what's
going
on
with
that?
I
because
you
know
we're
looking
at
housing
allocations
or
funding,
but
also
the
lingering
question
to
me
about
having
the
research
fairs
that
you're
having
the
constituency
is
saying,
still
there's
a
lot
of
people
out
there
without
housing.
D
Even
when
we
have
offered
housing
or
or
going
to
a
shelter
to
people
experiencing
hopelessness,
we
get
turned
down.
I've
been
turned
out
many
many
many
times
to
me.
The
lingering
question
is
always
mental
health
issues
right
now
and
maybe
associated
with
drug
addiction.
Is
there
anything
that
we're
doing
that?
D
We're
keeping
tally
off
of
how
many
people
are
telling
us
no
to
the
resources
that
we
have
in
our
city
and
that
we're
not
being
able
to
help
them
and
is
there
anything
else
that
we
should
be
thinking
about
on
how
to
help
these
folks,
and
maybe
the
legislature
is
doing
something
about
mental
health?
I
don't
know.
Is
there
anything
any
information
about
that
because
I
feel
like
we?
We
do
this
every
week
and
and
we
kind
of
know
the
numbers
and
we
kind
of
know
what
the
issues
are.
But.
D
C
There
is
a
by
name
list:
that's
shared
by
providers,
both
outreach
and
shelter
operators
in
the
system
to
identify
individual
needs
or
there's
also
a
separate
list.
We've
talked
about
about
high
utilizers
that
tend
to
go
through
the
jail
and
the
courts
and
we're
working
with
the
county
on
that
list
as
well.
So
the
buy
name
list
is
critical
council
member
about
identifying
their
individuals
and
their
unique
needs,
because
a
lot
of
them
have
a
wide
variety
of
issues.
C
As
far
as
the
resources
there
aren't
enough
resources,
I
think
fundamentally
number
one.
So
housing
is
a
good
example
of
this,
where
there's
actually
more
vouchers
than
units
right
now
and
the
housing
authorities
are
trying
to
find
places
where
people
can
use
vouchers
to
get
into
housing,
they're,
just
not
housing
units.
C
C
And
so
we
know
some
folks
are
going
to
gravitate
towards
a
tiny
home
village
who
are
going
to
be
fairly
independent
in
that
sort
of
situation
daily
life
skills
they
can
handle
those
things.
We
also
know
that
there's
a
fair
percentage
of
folks,
both
in
the
resource
centers
and
on
the
street
right
now,
who
suffer
from
severe
mental
illness
and
they're
going
to
need
a
different
level
of
housing
than
we
currently
have
in
the
quantities
we
needed.
C
One
example
we
found
at
the
high
utilizer
list
downtown
your
your
area,
council
member
is
we
have
a
few
20
people
or
so
who
are
seeing
police
multiple
times
per
week,
sometimes
or
daily,
almost
and
sometimes
they're
being
arrested,
sometimes
cited,
sometimes
you're
actually
going
to
jail
and
leaving
very
quickly
for
misdemeanor
level
offenses,
and
so
that's
that
coordination
with
the
jail
and
the
courts
and
then
all
the
other
service
provision
to
figure
out
a
different
interaction.
C
We've
gone
through
a
by
name
list
for
that
group
we
found
so
far.
At
least
three
people
probably
have
severe
a
head
trauma
in
the
sense
that
it's
not
something
you
there.
You
have
therapy
for
necessarily
and
become
independent
again
or
have
a
medication
regimen
that
helps
you
regain
some
functioning.
They
may
be
permanently
impaired,
there's
just
not
a
way
to
get
them
into
services
right
now,
there's
a
waiting
list
of
about
2
000
people
for
that
that
need
at
the
state
level.
C
D
Thank
you
and
if
you
know
anything
I'm
happy
to
advocate,
I
I
did
put
it
in
my
request
to
the
mayor
and
priorities
list
for
this
year
that
she
would
let
us
know-
or
at
least
let
me
know-
to
advocate
from
the
city
with
mental
for
mental
health
resources,
because
I
think
that's
the
one
thing
that
we're
missing
in
this
puzzle
that
we're
trying
to
solve
and
help
people
experiencing
homelessness.
So
I'm
happy
to
to
be
out
there
and
advocating
for
the
city
thanks.
C
Thank
you,
council
member
baltimore's,
appreciate
that.
A
Thank
you
for
that
briefing
andrew
and
those
responses
I
appreciate
are
we
on
to
lisa
or
chief
brown.
B
His
update
during
the
ba
six
conversation
is
that
right,
chief.
F
A
A
And
thank
you
very
much
for
always
engaging
with
us
appreciate
it.
We'll
move
on
to
item
number
two,
which
is
the
equity
update,
and
we
have
no
update
for
this
evening.
We'll
probably
get
another
update
on
our
next
meeting
item
number
three
is
the
rezone
and
master
plan
amendment
for
1583,
east
stratford
avenue.
A
I
can't
tell,
and
today
at
the
table
we
have
brian
fomer
from
the
council
office
and
nanette
larson,
the
senior
planner
brian.
It's
all
yours.
C
C
Under
the
proposal,
the
sugar
house
master
plan,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
would
change
from
medium
density,
residential
to
neighborhood,
business
planning
staff
recommended,
and
the
planning
commission
forwarded
a
unanimous,
negative
recommendation
to
the
city
council.
That
is
my
intro,
and
I
will
now
turn
it
over
to
nan
larson.
I
Thank
you
brian.
I
have
a
presentation
if
I'm
able
to
share
or
tailor,
if
you're
able
to
share
okay,
great.
I
The
amendments
proposed
are
for
a
potential
redevelopment
of
the
site
that
would
allow
for
a
mixed-use
development
that
includes
office
space
and
would
retain
the
six
residential
units
on
the
site.
The
site
is
currently
occupied
by
a
multi-family
condominium
structure,
with
six
residential
units
that
front
on
stratford
avenue
parking
is
located
towards
the
rear
of
the
site.
Next
slide.
I
I
The
site
is
also
located
in
the
sugarhouse
master
plan,
where
it's
designated
as
medium
density
residential.
The
proposed
amendments
would
change
this
future
land
use
designation
to
neighborhood
business.
There
are
other
neighborhood
business
designations
at
the
stratfor
glenmare
intersection,
as
well
as
other
medium
density,
residential
designations
and
next
slide.
I
Because
the
requested
rezone
would
change
the
district
from
a
residential
to
a
commercial
district.
There
are
a
number
of
different
standards
between
the
two
districts.
Different
setbacks
between
the
rmf,
35
and
cn
districts
are
required.
The
existing
building
needs
all
of
these
required
setbacks,
except
the
maximum
front
yard
setback
where
the
structure
is
set
back,
27
feet
and
required
is
up
to
25
feet.
If
the
rezone
were
approved,
it
would
create
a
legal
non-compliant
structure
at
as
to
the
standards
of
the
cn
district.
I
The
permitted
building
height
in
the
sanded
strip
is
limited
to
25
feet.
The
existing
multi-family
structure
meets
this
standard.
There
will
be
different
landscaping
buffers
between
the
two
zoning
districts
under
consideration
and,
finally,
because
the
current
district
is
residential
and
the
proposed
district
is
commercial,
there
are
many
other
uses
that
are
permitted
in
the
cn
district.
I
That
would
not
be
permitted
in
the
rmf
district,
however,
because
neighborhood
commercial
is
intended
to
be
located
near
residential
housing
and
therefore
allows
low
intensity
commercial
uses
that
serve
residential
neighborhoods
mixed
use
is
a
permitted
use
in
the
proposed
cn
zone.
This
includes
residential
commercial
or
office.
All
on
the
same
property
in
next
slide.
I
The
sugar
house
master
plan
includes
language
that
discourages
the
expansion
of
non-residential
land
uses
into
areas
of
medium
density,
residential.
It
encourages
increasing
opportunities
for
affordable
housing.
The
intersection
of
stratford
and
glenmare
avenues
are
also
identified
in
this
plan
as
a
commercial
node
growing
slc
in
clan
salt
lake
also
includes
statements
of
the
importance
of
insurance
of
ensuring
affordable
housing
is
available.
City-Wide.
I
Initially,
when
the
amendments
went
to
planning
commission
on
march
24th
of
last
year,
staff
had
recommended
the
planning
commission
forward
a
recommendation
of
denial
to
the
city
council,
as
the
proposal
didn't
include
retaining
the
six
residential
units
on
the
site
and
it
would
redevelopment
redevelop
the
site
to
only
office
use.
The
planning
commission
did
forward
a
recommendation
of
denial
of
the
master
plan
and
zoning
amendments
without
much
discussion
on
their
decision
after
the
public
hearing
staff
continue
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
change
their
request.
I
With
these
project
updates,
where
the
six
residential
units
will
remain
on
the
site
and
be
part
of
a
mixed-use
redevelopment,
it
appears
the
proposal
does
meet
the
intent
of
the
applicable
master
plans
and
the
purpose
statement
of
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
last
slide.
Please
taylor,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
The
council
may
have
for
me
and
brian
scott,
who
is
a
representative
of
the
applicant,
I
believe,
is
also
prepared
to
speak.
A
Nanette,
could
you
make
that
last
time
the
current
development
has
has
changed
some
plans
on
that
and
they
would
be
matching
the
vision
of
the
master
plans.
Could
you
kind
of
restate
that.
I
Yeah,
absolutely
so
initially,
when
this
project
first
went
to
planning
commission
and
when
staff
wrote
the
planning
commission
staff
report,
the
project
was
proposing
to
eliminate
all
six
residential
units
and
convert
the
site
or
redevelop
the
site
to
an
office
use
only
which
is
permitted
in
the
cn
district.
I
I
So,
as
part
of
the
amendment,
the
there
would
need
to
be
a
development
agreement
is
generally
what
the
city's
done
in
the
past,
so
it
would
be.
If
the
council
chooses
to
approve
those
amendments,
it
would
be
an
approval
with
a
condition
that
those
six
residential
units
are
retained
on
the
site
and
with
that
condition,
a
development
agreement
would
be
created
and
that
development
agreement
is
tied
to
the
property.
J
J
Given
the
the
amount
of
change,
you
know
it
really,
it
changes
the
project
from
being,
you
know,
contemplated
by
the
master
plan
to
to
or
from
not
being
contemplated
by,
the
mastermind
to
being
contemplated.
Wouldn't
we
normally
send
that
back
to
the
planning
commission
to
give
feedback
on.
K
The
attorney's
office,
sorry,
the
attorney's
office-
can
can
give
us
more
insight
about
that.
My
experience
is
that
in
the
cases
where
it's
becoming
more
compliant,
you
wouldn't
necessarily
need
to
send
it
back
if
it
became
much
less
compliant
or
less
compliant
at
all,
then
you,
you
might
send
it
back.
So
that's
a
judgment
you
have
to
make
and
with
the
attorney's
advice.
L
Cindy
I'm
here
this
is
paul
nielsen.
If
you
want
me
to
weigh
in
yeah
sorry,
can
you
hear
me.
L
All
right,
thank
you,
yeah,
to
the
extent
that
you
do
want
me
to
weigh
in.
I
think
it's
it's
perfectly
fine
for
the
council
to
commit
to
consider
this
petition,
even
though
it
has
changed.
The
state
code
really
only
discusses
the
city
council,
taking
action
on
a
planning
commission
recommendation
in
the
form
of
a
an
approval,
a
denial
or
an
approval
with
changes
and
there's
nothing
in
state
code
that
dictates
that
an
applicant
can't
change
that
petition
along
the
way,
so
that
they're
somewhere
in
between.
So
that's
that's
perfectly
fine.
L
Certainly
it's
your
prerogative
to
send
it
back
to
the
planning
commission.
If
you
want,
but
under
under
state
law,
it's
not
necessary.
J
Follow-Up
question
then:
so,
oh
thanks,
so
I'm
having
a
hard
time
finding
the
the
summary
of
the
discussion
at
the
planning
commission,
but
I
think
in
the
presentation
it
was
said
that
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
discussion
that
the
planning
commission
just
voted
it
down.
Is
there.
J
I
guess
in
that
discussion
was
there
any
indication
that
if
the
units
were
saved
that
this
would
change
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
or
anything
like
that,
I
guess
I'm
just
worried
about
that.
There's
this
this
change
that
was
made,
but
we
haven't
had
the
benefit
of
the
planning
commission
input.
Since
this
this
change
was
made.
I
So
you're
right
there
there's
not
a
lot
of
minutes
on
the
item
because
there
was
actually
no
discussion
from
the
planning
commission.
The
my
recollection
of
the
meeting
was
staff
presented.
I
M
I
just
wanted
to
to
note
some
of
the
the
council
staff
considerations
on
this
issue.
I
you
know
master
plan
and
some
of
the
issues
that
you
know
we
are
seeing
with
this
project
and
some
of
the
conflict
with
it,
and
you
know
it
is
hard
for
me
to
not
listen
to.
You
know
not
hear
the
planning
commission.
After
all
these
changes,
and
and
and
just
the
the
fact
that
this
is
no
matching
with
the
overall
plan
that
we
already
designed
for
this
area.
M
A
I
have
one
more
comment,
but
I'll
first
I'll,
let
the
oh
sorry,
that's.
F
Okay,
mr
chair,
if
I
may,
the
current
condos
that
are
there
are
what
we
would
probably
consider
naturally
occurring
right,
like
they're,
actually
affordable
in
sugar
house.
I
Yeah,
they
would
be
considered
naturally
occurring,
affordable
or,
at
the
very
least,
attainable
housing
right.
I
But
the
the
condition
that
would
be
needed
on
the
on
the
approval
of
the
amendments
would
be
to
retain
those
six
housing
units,
but
it
doesn't
necessarily
speak
to
retaining
the
structure
and
the
configuration
of
those
six
housing
units
so
to
demolish
that
building
and
rebuild
with
six
residential
units
that
are
a
lot
more
expensive
is
possible.
I
But
it's
up
to
the
discretion
of
the
property
owner.
Technically,
that's
what
they
would
be
able
to
do
under
the
existing
zoning
district
that
they
have
right
now,
the
rmf
35
they
could
demolish
and
rebuild
with
those
same
units
just
as
they
could.
If
the
reason
was
approved,
with
a
condition
of
approval.
I
I'm
not
certain
right
now.
I
know
that
it
is
owned
by
the
the
the
applicant,
the
entity
that
the
applicant's
representing,
I
think
the
applicant
would
be
able
to
speak
towards
that,
though,.
F
F
A
Thank
you
brian.
We
usually
give
applicants
five
minutes
to
speak,
and
the
time
is
yours.
N
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
for
you
guys
time.
So,
I'm
an
architect
with
raw
design,
we're
representing
the
client
who's
aaron
hoffman
is
the
owner
of
the
of
the
lot
and
just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
context
and
kind
of
a
timeline.
N
So
aaron
owns
the
building
across
the
street
from
this
location.
It's
their
current
office,
it's
currently
zoned
for
cn
and
that's
where
they
work
out
of
it's
a
engineer.
It's
kind
of
an
engineering,
slash
medical
firm,
they
produce
prosthetic
limbs
and
things
like
that
and
his
business
is
growing
and
so
he's
trying
to
look
for
more
space.
He
went
through
this
process
and
what
originally
wanted
to
just
put
in
different
units
there
and
that
got
voted
down,
and
that
was
back
in.
N
I
believe
I
believe,
march
of
last
year,
almost
a
full
year
ago
and
after
that,
after
you
kind
of
received
the
feedback
from
the
planning
staff
and
got
voted
down,
he
came
and
retained
us
to
kind
of
come
up
with
a
solution
to
look
at
all
that
and
come
up
with
a
solution
that
would
satisfy
that
and
work.
N
And
so
we
came
on
in
july,
a
few
months
after
the
previous,
after
the
the
previous
application
went,
went
through
and
failed
and
basically
we
looked
at
it
and
tried
to
figure
out
how
we
could
how
we
could
satisfy.
You
know
all
of
those
concerns
that
came
up
from
planning
and
and
still
help
him
grow
his
business
in
place
and
get
him
the
office
space.
That
he's
hoping
for
a
couple
things.
N
Just
in
response
to
some
of
the
questions,
our
our
plan
is
to
keep
the
six
units
as
they
are
and
to
build
a
separate
building
back
behind
it.
That
would
be
the
office
space
and
basically
right
now,
there's
the
apartment
buildings
and
then
a
large
parking
lot
behind
it,
and
what
we're
looking
at
doing
is
having
the
parking
underground
and
putting
an
office
building
behind.
So
we
are.
N
Well,
if
it
comes
to
me
I'll,
bring
it
back
up,
but
I
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
guys
have
or
anything.
A
Thank
you
brian.
I
think
we
have
a
councilmember
fowler.
F
N
I
I
can't
say
for
certain
I
believe
when
I,
when
I
went
and
toured
they
were
occupied
a
few
back
then
so
I
think
that
the
upper
ones
are.
I,
I
know
that
at
least
some
of
them
are,
and
I
I
believe
the
intent
is
to
to
keep
them
as
they
are,
and
yeah
just
kind
of
keep
them
in
place
and
keep
them
occupied.
F
N
The
the
one
change
that
we
are
looking
at
doing
to
that
would
affect
that
building
is
currently
they're
accessed
from
a
kind
of
old
staircase.
That's
behind
the
building
that
just
switch
backs
up
and
we'd
be
replacing
that
with
an
elevator
and
then
a
new
new
staircase,
so
that
now
there
would
be
elevator
access
to
to
the
upper
apartments.
F
Okay
and
then
how
what's
anticipated
for
sort
of
parking
mitigation
with
the
office
building
sounds
like
the
intent
behind
the
property
owner
is
to
expand
because
their
business
was
expanding,
which
means
more
traffic
in
that
area,
which
believe
me.
I
already
get
enough
emails
about
so
traffic
and
parking.
So
is
there
a
mitigation
plan
or
idea
on
what
parking
admit
and
traffic
would
look
like
if,
if
this
were
to
go
through,
and
if
you,
the
businesses,
were
to
expand.
N
Yeah,
so
we've
we've
kind
of
looked
at
what
our
layout
would
be
and
planned
it
out
and
it
what
we're
looking
at
does
work
in
terms
of
the
parking
requirements
for
cn.
I
think
I
mean
at
the
legislative
level
when
you
switch
from
cn
to
rmf.
The
units
only
require
one
unit
or
one
parking
spell
instead
of
two,
but
that's
obviously
not
you
know
applicable
to
the
outside
world.
It's
just
it's
just
a
change
in
in
name,
so
we
are
adding
with
moving
the
parking
down
underground.
N
We
would
be
adding
some
units
and
then
probably
the
biggest
thing
is
that
we're
the
the
parking
will
be
shared
parking
between
the
two
spaces
and
so
there's
kind
of
synergy
between
the
the
times
that
different
people
are
are
using
those
spaces
so
and
there's
provisions
in
the
code
for
that
and
for
for
kind
of
reducing
parking
based
on
it
being
shared.
N
A
This
time
I
feel
like
we've
have
a
number
of
questions
and
concerns
is,
I
was
thinking
about
taking
a
straw
poll
on
sending
this
back
to
the
planning
commission
for
their
review
again,
so
that
we
can
iron
out
the
concerns
we
have
at
that
level.
So,
mr
chair.
P
It
it
feels
a
little
difficult
to
ask
anyone
to
undertake
this
when
it
really
what
this
is
pointing
to
is
trying
to
operate
in
a
nebulous
zone
when
we
don't
have
things
like
a
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance.
That
really
would
make
guiding
these
decisions
more
concrete,
and
I
don't
I
mean
I
know
no
developer
wants
to
hear.
You
know
wait
on
another
ordinance,
but
I
mean
it
still
feels
like.
A
J
Yes,
mr
chair,
so
I
would
make
that
straw
poll
and
a
reason
for
doing.
That
is
just
that.
I
think
it's
really
beneficial
for
us
to
have
that
feedback
from
people
on
the
on
the
planning,
commission
and
I
like
to
know
not
only
what
their
thoughts
are
but
how
they
respond
or
what
their
their
response
is
to
public
feedback,
and
I
think
it
just
that's
normally
part
of
our
process.
I
think
it's
beneficial
for
us
to
have
that
information
when
we
make
these
decisions.
A
Okay,
everyone
give
me
a
thumbs
up
if
you're
in
favor
of
the
star
poll
senator
send
it
back
to
friendly
commissions,
and
that
is
unanimous
straw
poll
on
that,
so
we'll
send
it
back
to
the
planning
commission
with
council
member
mono
recused.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
And
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
four
and
we'll
get
councilmember
mono
back
here
on
the
pioneer
park,
improvement,
project,
update
and
conceptual
design
at
the
table
or
on
the
screen.
We
have
allison
roland
from
the
council
office
kristen
reicher,
director
of
public
lands,
catherine
moss,
planner
anna
lay
born
from
the
principal
plain
design
workshop
and
sean
pfeiffer
from
city,
architect,
allison.
It's
all
yours.
B
B
I'm
going
to
give
very
brief
introduction
so
that
you
can
spend
maximum
time
speaking
to
the
people
who
know
these
things
in
detail,
but
I
do
want
to
mention
that
this
is
work,
that's
being
led
by
public
lands
department
under
kristen,
recker's,
directorship-ness
and
with
help
from
the
engineering
division,
which
is
why
scott
is
here
and
the
consultants
from
design
workshop,
which
is
why
anna
is
here.
B
Of
course,
it's
very
early
at
this
point
to
to
do
that
kind
of
estimation,
but
as
the
budget
authority,
we
always
like
to
give
you
that
information
to
the
extent
it's
available
funding
possibilities
for
these
improvements
would
include
impact
fees,
sales,
tax
or
general
obligation
bond
which,
as
you
know,
the
administration
is
considering
these
mechanisms
and
then,
as
you
also
no
doubt
know,
there
was
a
request
for
appropriation
from
the
state
legislature
by
a
community
group.
So
those
three
options
are
on
the
table
at
this
point,
and
that
is
basically
I'll.
E
You
alison,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
anna
labor
and
our
consultant
has
access
oh
yep
she's
in
excellent,
so
we
will
go
ahead
and
pull
up
our
presentation.
We
have
about
a
20-minute
presentation
and
we
want
to
leave
plenty
of
time
for
you
guys,
the
council
members
to
ask
questions.
E
So
let
me
just
start
by
saying
thank
you
for
giving
us
this
time
to
present
to
the
council
to
discuss
pioneer
park.
Your
downtown
park,
vision
plan.
Hopefully,
you've
had
a
chance
to
review
some
of
the
materials,
including
the
two
minute,
video
that
was
part
of
those
materials
that
we
forwarded
and
the
proposed
improvements
that
it
includes
so
next
slide
today.
I'm
I'm
so
pleased
to
have
the
project
team
provide
insight
into
why
improvements
are
needed
to
pioneer
park.
E
E
First,
I
want
to
provide
some
background
about
why
pioneer
park
is
a
city
priority
and
what
current
park
challenges
the
vision
plan,
improvements
address
and
we'll
start
with
a
little
history
here.
Pioneer
park
is
the
city's
oldest
park
and
has
served
as
a
gathering
place
a
place
of
rest,
a
fort
and
provided
various
recreation
opportunities
that
responded
to
interests
of
the
era.
Over
the
last
150
years,
the
neighborhood
has
gone
through
a
number
of
transitions
and
now
is
seeing
a
resurgence
of
new
urban
residents.
E
This
slide
is
from
the
2019.
Public
lands
needs
assessment,
and
from
that
assessment
we
know
that
the
downtown
and
central
community
neighborhoods
are
the
high
needs
areas
and
have
the
fastest
population
growth
rates
highest
park
needs
and
based
on
highest
park,
needs
based
on
population
characteristics
and
the
lowest
level
of
park
service
per
resident.
E
The
acres
of
parks
we
do
have
in
this
area
have
a
larger
weight
to
carry
and
should
be
designed
to
encourage
use
and
accommodate.
Many
different
needs.
Pioneer
park
is
the
only
community-sized
park
in
downtown
salt
lake
city,
serving
immediate
downtown
residents,
seeking
recreation
and
green
space,
regional
events
and
visitors.
E
E
E
Although
pioneer
park
everyday
use
is
increasing
in
the
survey
that
we
did,
residents
stated
that
they
are
not
satisfied
with
the
current
conditions.
The
10
acre
park
is
predominantly
open.
Lawn
with
large,
mature
trees,
scattered
throughout
park,
has
a
multi-use
field.
Tennis,
courts,
playground,
basketball
court
and
an
off-leash
dog
park,
some
of
which
were
built
in
the
mid
1980s
and
others
in
in
2005..
E
The
pioneer
park,
your
downtown
park
vision
plan,
provides
the
opportunity
to
begin
addressing
these
immediate
needs
for
more
recreation
options
and
a
desirable
outdoor
space
in
downtown
right
now.
Now
I'll
turn
it
over
to
public
lands,
planner
cat
moss.
Who
will
give
you
an
overview
of
the
vision
plan
process.
B
Great
thank
you
kristen,
and
thank
you
all
for
your
time.
I
am
really
excited
to
share
this
with
you
all
today.
So
right
now
we
are
in
the
final
step
in
a
series
of
engagement
opportunities
for
the
vision
plan
which
began
in
april
of
2021
when
we
met
with
area
businesses,
key
stakeholders
and
participants
from
past
planning
efforts
to
kick
off
the
process.
B
Then
this
summer,
with
engagement,
coordinated
by
david
evans
and
associates,
we
participated
in
a
series
of
in-person
events
at
the
park
to
survey
park
patrons
and
gather
their
input
on
the
park,
and
then
that
same
survey
was
distributed
online
and
we
heard
from
nearly
3
000
participants
in
person
and
online
about
how
the
park
should
be
used,
and
this
amount
of
input
and
the
representation
we
got
from
a
diversity
of
park.
Users
greatly
exceeded
the
project
goals
and
typical
engagement.
B
We
also
kind
of
heard
that
the
public
really
appreciated
exploring
ideas
that
would
help
this
park
live
up
to
its
potential
and
then
the
online
and
in-person
engagements
both
explored
a
long
list
of
potential
elements
to
add
to
the
park
to
understand
what
would
be
the
most
popular
and
overwhelmingly
conserving
trees
and
adding
to
them
with
more
diverse
and
water.
Conscious,
plant
material
was
one
of
the
public's
highest
priorities.
B
B
So
then
this
fall
and
continuing
throughout
the
planning
process.
We
met
with
area
stakeholders
such
as
the
downtown
alliance,
farmers
market,
local
businesses,
salt
lake
city,
police,
department
and
homeless
services
providers
to
ensure
that
this
vision
plan
meets
the
needs
of
all
types
of
park,
users
and
then
refinements
to
the
plan
have
been
made.
B
And
now
we
are
sharing
this
vision
plan
with
you
and
with
the
broader
public,
and
we
held
a
virtual
public
open
house
on
february
2nd
to
share
this
vision
plan,
which
the
video
recording
of
that
now
has
around
a
thousand
views
so
from
the
a
park
audit
which
was
conducted
with
community
members
and
key
stakeholders
such
as
maintenance
staff,
police
and
surrounding
property
owners.
In
addition
to
the
survey,
we
learned
that
the
park
is
frequented
by
people
exercising
taking
a
break
in
the
shade
of
the
trees
and
also
taking
their
dogs
out
for
a
walk.
B
Although
many
of
the
current
park
features
don't
fully
meet
the
needs
of
these
users
and
just
to
note,
smaller
investments
have
been
made
over
time.
These
efforts
have
taken
a
phased
approach,
but
have
kind
of
lacked
a
full
vision
to
strategically
solve
some
of
the
very
challenges
that
we've
been
facing
in
this
park
and
much
of
the
time
this
park
is
underutilized
and
does
not
attract
many
nearby
residents
and
workers
to
spend
time
in
the
space.
B
And
then
the
farmers
market
hosted
in
the
park
on
saturdays
definitely
continues
to
be
a
very
popular
attraction.
However,
shade
seating
and
other
comforts
are
com,
important
considerations
to
make
in
order
to
make
this
space
a
little
bit
more
enjoyable.
R
It
really
is
a
pleasure
to
share
this
with
you
today.
The
two
minute
vision,
video
on
the
website
briefly
provides
the
highlights
of
this
plan
describing
the
tree
filled,
urban
oasis
and
new
features
for
recreation,
gathering
and
relaxing
outdoors.
But
to
give
more
insight
into
the
thinking
of
this
plan,
we
start
by
sharing
the
points
of
inspiration
and
new
study
findings,
the
framework
for
the
design
thinking
our
physical
features
proposed,
and
this
vision
plan
and
also
other
aspects
about
the
overall
experience
support.
R
The
part
brings
together
findings
and
inspiration
from
a
variety
of
sources,
including
studying
past
improvements,
previous
public
input
plans
and
studies
of
the
park,
a
newly
completed
cultural
landscape
report
for
the
park
that
studies,
the
history
of
the
site.
It
provides
recommendations
for
how
to
maintain
the
integrity
and
interpret
the
history,
such
as
maintaining
it
as
an
open,
green
space
and
recognizing
it
has
been
both
refuge
open
to
everyone
and
a
place
for
gathering
and
activity.
R
R
Pioneer
park
should
be
the
heart
of
the
city,
a
commons
that
connects
people
to
our
urban
center,
a
model
for
urban
ecology.
A
green
space
responds
to
our
climate
challenges,
balancing
neighborhood
and
regional
needs,
a
park
that
supports
everyday
activities
and
active
lifestyles
while
being
a
signature
park
that
hosts
city-wide
events
welcoming
for
everyone,
an
inviting
space
for
all
abilities,
incomes,
age
genders
and
cultures.
R
R
The
multi-purpose
field,
the
newest
addition
to
pioneer
park,
will
remain
the
focus
of
the
southern
portion
of
the
park
with
other
sports
court
additions
flanking
it
with
public
comments,
so
heavily
focused
on
desiring
nature
in
the
park
and
also
community
gathering
spaces.
I'll
highlight
those
features.
First,
feedback
glean
from
the
community
engagement
showed
a
large
desire
for
these
passive
natural
elements,
taking
into
consideration
biodiversity
as
well
as
our
arid
climate.
R
The
new
park
will
add
enhanced
pockets
of
native
plants,
especially
along
the
garden
walk
and
tree
groves.
The
park
includes
a
series
of
garden
experiences
to
connect.
The
newly
planted
vegetation
will
be
ready
for
salt
lake
city's,
changing
temperatures
and
drought,
as
well
as
improved
ecological
systems
with
pollinator
plants
introduced.
R
The
signature
pavilion
will
be
a
new
iconic
feature
of
downtown,
so
imagine
a
stage
cafe:
restrooms
and
kiosks
for
the
salt
lake
city's
new
park
rangers
all
in
one
place.
These
are
the
types
of
amenities
in
downtown
town
parks
throughout
the
country,
proven
to
reduce
safety
concerns
and
promote
civic
life.
R
I'm
also
excited
to
share
the
source.
An
interactive,
miss
feature
will
anchor
the
plaza.
The
miss
will
provide
a
cooling
effect
on
a
hot
summer
day,
a
point
of
interest
and
also
is
mindful
of
utah's
arid
climate.
It's
one
reason
we
ruled
out
fountains
or
water
spray
features
that
were
highly
desired
by
the
public,
but
a
missed
feature
can
extend
into
other
seasons
as
a
visual
attraction,
with
sculptures,
beautiful
lights,
brightening,
cold
winter
nights.
R
The
downtown
farmers
market
is
a
well-loved
event
by
residents
and
visitors
alike.
So
it's
critical
that
successful
events
can
continue
in
and
near
the
park.
In
addition
to
consulting
with
the
downtown
alliance
and
the
farmers
market
several
times
to
refine
the
project,
concepts
to
incorporate
the
market's
needs
and
providing
additional
activation,
the
team
has
taken
great
care
to
not
inhibit
the
configuration
of
booths
for
the
market
and
other
events,
including
with
the
tree
placement.
R
R
R
Careful
selection
of
features
for
recreation
and
activity
is
imperative
to
the
part's
success,
to
not
waste
investment
on
features
that
won't
be
popular
popular
with
your
downtown
residents
and
workforce,
and
also
selection
of
those
that
meet
diverse
needs
and
encourage
a
balance
of
activity
and
places
for
relaxation.
Throughout
the
day.
R
This
selection
is
informed
by
local
recreation
trends
and
national
research
on
what
makes
for
compelling
and
welcoming
parks
that
draw
diverse
people
to
spend
time
there,
no
matter
what
season
or
time
of
day,
and
we
ask
people
widely
through
our
upholding
sessions
that
kat
mentioned
what
were
their
visions
and
dreams,
making
them
think
larger
than
what
they
have
today.
R
Lastly,
inclusion
safety
and
design
for
dignity
for
our
community
members
experiencing
homelessness
was
also
an
emphatic
request
from
public
input.
Improved
safety
and
maintenance
will
be
addressed
through
a
number
of
strategies,
including
the
park
ranger
station
and
restroom
design.
The
vision
is
inclusionary
rather
than
removing
excluding
people
or
creating
an
overbearing
security
preference
presence.
R
The
city
public
lands
department
has
been
coordinating
with
homeless
service
providers
to
vet
design
improvements
and
park
management.
With
this
goal
in
mind,
we
have
discussed
future
partnerships
that
encourage
a
message
of
encouraging
coexistence
in
the
park,
such
as
with
the
example
of
park,
volunteers
and
staffing.
A
community
cart
that
encourages
interactions
of
people
of
differing
backgrounds.
R
C
Good
afternoon,
everyone-
and
we
really
appreciate
your
time
today.
As
far
as
next
steps
are
concerned,
the
project
team
is
excited
to
be
sharing
the
vision
plan
now
and
looking
forward
to
reviewing
final
feedback
from
the
public
later
this
month.
Public
input
in
this
phase
asks
for
prioritization
by
groups
of
amenities.
We
think
make
sense
for
implementation.
Implementation
together
and
public
feedback
will
help
identify
the
priority
items
to
be
implemented
in
phase
one
and
based
on
available
funding.
C
As
mentioned
previously,
the
full
vision
plan,
cost
estimate
for
construction
is
currently
at
20
million
dollars.
We
have
currently
have
3.4
million
in
impact
fees
dedicated
to
the
project.
There
are
two
other
potential
funding
sources,
I'm
sure
everyone's
well
aware
of
there's
the
bond
the
community's
the
city's
community
reinvestment
bond.
C
There
is
also
the
pioneer
park
coalition's
request
to
the
state
for
an
additional
15
million
dollars
in
funding.
As
I
understand
that
there's
about
five
million
dollars
earmarked
in
that
request
for
physical
improvements
to
the
park,
the
public
survey
concluding
soon
will
give
us
a
view
of
the
public's
desires
for
prioritizing
phase
one
improvements.
C
C
E
Thanks
sean,
so
that's
our
presentation.
Hopefully,
we've
answered
all
your
questions,
but
we've
certainly
given
you
enough
time
here
to
ask
questions.
If
you
have
them,
we
appreciate
your
attention
and
the
time
that
you've
spent
listening
to
our
presentation
and
we're
just
so
happy
to
share
the
vision
plan
with
you
and
we'll
open
it
up
for
questions.
If
anybody
has
any.
P
Thank
you
for
that
amazing
presentation.
I
was
on
historic,
landmark,
commission.
The
last
time
we
attempted
to
do
something
to
this
park
and,
in
addition
to
serving
an
important
current
function,
it
also
has
a
long
storied
historic
presence,
just
creating
that
parabolic
walkway,
instead
of
the
concentric
squares
at
the
time,
was
a
big
deal
in
justifying
how
we
were
honoring.
The
historicity
of
this
place
this
design,
while
beautiful,
certainly
destroys
any
of
that
classical
concentric
square
concept.
P
The
formal
park
concept
that
was
presented
at
that
time
as
being
what
would
be
most
honoring
historically,
are
you
confident
in
your
ability
to
make
the
case
that
this
respects
the
historicity
and
then?
Secondly,
my
other
question
is
there?
Is
the
plan
for
the
passive
area
with
trees,
whereas
last
time
we
did
a
redesign
trees
were
actually
removed
in
the
parabolic
parkway
walkway
was
actually
put
in
to
mitigate
loitering
and
other
social
issues
that
happened
at
the
park.
E
Thanks
councilmember
for
your
questions,
I
I'm
wondering
if
kat
or
anna
want
to
answer
the
cultural
landscape
report,
questions
and
historic
landscape
question
to
start
with.
R
When
I
just
start
and
kat
you've
been
studying
it
quite
a
bit
lately
that
I'd
love
for
you
to
give
more
details
here,
but
one
thing
council,
member
that
we've
learned
the
study
was
just
commissioned
and
we'll
be
going
before
the
store.
Oh
cat.
You
might
need
to
correct
me
here
the
historic
landmark
commission
here
soon
to
review
that
report,
but
it
uncovered
a
lot
more
history
and
findings
that
were
incredibly
helpful
to
shape
this
plan.
R
So
we've
been
coordinating
with
that
group
conducting
that
study
and
and
to
understand
every
step
as
they
were
developing
it,
what
they
were
learning
what
their
findings
were,
that
might
influence
the
park
design.
So
that
is
definitely
a
large
consideration
in
this.
In
this
concept
is
how
well
those
align
cats?
You
want
to
elaborate
on
that
of
what
you've
read
in
that
late.
Their
very
latest
report.
B
Yeah
I'd
love
to
thank
you,
and
this
is
such
a
great
question.
We
have
been
working
with
a
consultant
to
develop
a
cultural
landscape
report
for
the
site,
with
the
intent
of
it
being
reviewed
by
historic
landmarks
prior
to
us,
going
to
the
commission
with
the
vision
plan.
So
we
actually
presented
earlier
this
month
to
the
cultural
landscape
report
to
the
historic
landmarks
commission
and
it
was
received
very
well.
They
had
a
couple
of
questions
and
so
yeah.
B
We
we
presented
that
in
the
context
of
coming
back
in
march
to
present
the
vision
plan
and
there
were
a
number
of
elements
of
the
park
that
were
really
highlighted
as
having
a
lot
of
historic
integrity
and
were
really
necessary
to
be
maintained
throughout
the
design
of
the
vision
plan.
B
And
so
this,
this
plan
kind
of
touches
on
those
elements
that
were
found
and
presented
in
the
cultural
landscape
report
kind
of
maintaining
the
pervious
surface
of
the
park
having
it
be
a
gathering
space,
maintaining
the
perimeter
tree
structure
of
the
park
and
then
kind
of
the
circulation
and
entrances
that
we
see
in
this
vision
plan
in
the
corners
and
the
mid-block
entrances
and
those
were
kind
of
the
main
things
addressed.
B
But
we
will
be
presenting
to
historic
landmarks
on
march
3rd
to
kind
of
more
specifically
outline
individual
elements
of
this
vision
plan
design
and
how
they
align
with
the
cultural
landscape
report.
B
P
At
that
time
we
had
talked
about
the
removal
of
trees
in
order
to
prevent
loitering
and
other
activities
at
the
park
that
particularly
the
neighbors
were
concerned
about
and
now
we're
talking
about,
putting
in
more
trees
again
after
that
movement,
and
I'm
just
wondering
what
are
their
mitigation
plans
or
are
we
still
concerned
about
those
same
activities
for
which
we
removed
trees.
E
Right
and-
and
I'm
going
to
let
anna
answer
this,
but
I
just
I
I'm
just
going
to
start
by
saying
you
know.
Trees
were
one
of
the
highly
requested
items
from
the
public,
and
this
plan
was
built
around
crime
prevention
through
environmental
design,
principles
of
sight
lines
so
having
sight
lines
through
the
park
so
that
people
can
see
into
the
area
and
folks
are
much
less
likely
to
commit
crimes
when
they
feel
like
they
can
be
seen
by
other
people,
which
is
probably
why
some
of
the
trees
were
taken
out.
E
R
There
has
been
some
progression
and
crime
prevention
through
environmental
design
practices,
and
one
of
those
is
recognizing
that
you
know.
Removal
of
of
all
trees
will
not
create
a
space
that
people
want
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
in
that
we
need
to
keep
some
of
that
in
order
to
attract
people
to
a
green
space
to
spend
time
outdoors,
and
then
that
will
create
more
eyes
as
well.
The
presence
of
more
diverse
people
to
the
park
is
a
key
ingredient
here.
R
Another
element
of
that
is
when
chris
is
mentioning
about
making
sure
that
it's
not
vegetation
that
causes
some
challenges
to
sight
lines
and
that
that's
one
of
the
things
about
having
a
tenant
in
the
space
of
this.
What
we're
proposing
for
the
pavilion
of
having
a
ranger
station
concessions
area,
where
you
have
someone,
potentially
there
many
more
hours
of
the
day
that
become
kind
of
that
presence
in
the
park.
R
Those
are
some
of
the
key
ingredients
that
we're
finding
in
urban
parks
now
make
a
difference
in
people
not
only
their
perception
of
feeling
safe,
but
also
in
reducing
activities
that
are
undesirable
and
with
that
the
thoughts
about
volunteers.
In
the
parks
and
other
activities
are
some
things,
we're
hoping
to
add
to
that.
H
Mr
chair,
I
have
just
a
couple
clarifi
clarifying
questions,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
understanding
the
history
of
the
project
and
where
we
go
next,
and
I
know
that
there
are
great
slides
in
there,
but
if
I
could
just
re
restate
it.
So
this
is
a
project
that
was
started
2021
and
it
was,
if
I'm
understanding
it
correctly,
it
was
initiated
by
parks
by
administration,
and
so
this
is,
and
the
consultant
was
hired,
there's
communion
was
engaged.
There's
this
plan
is
this
to
be
seen
as
a
master
plan.
H
Well,
first
of
all
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong
on
that,
I
don't,
I
don't,
remember
it
being
a
sort
of
a
council
initiated
plan,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
that
and
then
is
this
to
be
seen
as
a
master
plan,
or
is
this
like
the
actual
schematic
plan
that
would
be
intended
to
be
constructed?
Does
that
make
sense,
because
I
think
there's
a
big
difference
between
those
two
things
right
so
yeah.
E
H
We
agreeing
to
like
these
are
the
kinds
of
elements
and
the
kinds
of
parks.
I
know
that
we're
not
voting
on
this
right
now.
This
is
informational,
but
would
we
be
adopting
this
as
the
types
of
things
we
want
or
is
like
the
actual
plan
for
what's
going
to
get
built.
E
So
this
would
be
we
would
be
we're
looking
at
actually
implementing
these
items
depending
on
the
budget
and
what
we
have
available.
This
is
not
considered
a
master
plan.
It's
really
a
site
plan.
There's
been
lots
of
discussion
about
what's
a
master
plan,
what's
not
and
we'll
look
to
to
the
planning
division
and
the
mayor's
office
to
get
more
guidance
on
what
really
constitute
a
master
plan,
but
this
is
not
really
changing
the
way
this
park
functions
significantly.
E
I
mean
we're
adding
amenities,
but
still
there's
going
to
be
large
and
small
activities
that
happen
in
the
event
in
the
in
the
park,
and
so
there's
no
real
policy
change
that
would
make
it
into
more
of
a
master
plan,
it's
more
of
a
site
plan
and
the
amenities
that
we
are
looking
to
put
in
this
space
and-
and
yes
at
this
point,
we
are
fairly
confident
but
we're
still
taking
public
survey,
input
on
on
the
public's
interest
and
and
support
for
this,
for
the
amenities
that
have
been
proposed
and
the
way
it's
laid
out
and
and
from
there
once
we
feel
like
we
can
move
forward
with
the
public
input.
H
H
E
Additional
funding,
you
would
definitely
approve-
and
currently
we
do
have
some
funding
to
implement
in
this
park
for
new
services
in
pioneer
park.
It's
impact
fee
funding,
so
it
would
all
have
to
be
new
services.
You
certainly
would
vote
on
cip
projects
or
bond
projects
or
any
other
additional
funding
that
could
go
into
this
park.
E
H
I
appreciate
that
I
guess
the
reason
why
I'm
asking
is
this:
I
mean
the
slides
about
the
lack
of
access
to
park.
Space
for
downtown
residents
are
very
compelling
and
we
know
that
downtown
is
growing,
but
I
I
think
it's
worth
having
the
conversation
about.
Do
we
prioritize
improvements
to
an
existing
park
over
increasing
the
number
of
parks,
for
instance,
in
places
like
the
fleet
block,
which
is
also
an
underserved
part
of
the
city
for
park
space?
H
Does
investing
in
this
make
it
harder
for
us
to
create
significant
usable,
open,
green
space
on
the
fleet
block?
That
would
actually
be
a
benefit
to
the
granary
district,
and
so
those
are
I
mean
I
guess
that's
a
decision
I
would
want
to
be
able
to
make
in
context.
Not
just
is
this
an
important
awesome
thing
that
we
want
to
have
because,
of
course
it
is,
but
how
do
we
you
know
like
how
do
how
do
we
make
a
decision
as
to
do
we
improve
an
existing
thing?
H
Add
a
new
thing
or
improve
all
the
other
existing
things
that
need
improvement
in
the
city.
So
so
I
appreciate
this.
I
I
have
no
personally,
I
have
no
concerns
with
the
vision
plan
as
it's
been
presented,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
having
that
discussion
in
terms
of
this
is
a
big
investment.
So
where
do
we
want
to
put
that
parks
money
in
our
city?
Of
course
you
know
almond
park
and
everything
else
is
should
all
be
considered
in
context.
D
I
agree
with
you
and
I
I
think
I
agree
with
you
there
and
I
think
it's
very
compelling,
like
you
saw
like
you,
saw
that
really
central
city
doesn't
have
any
green
space
essentially
other
than
pioneer
park.
I
envision
pioneer
park
being
the
central
park
of
our
capital
city.
I
have
high
hopes
for
the
park.
I
think
we're
we
starting,
you
know
really
well.
I
also
think
that,
as
other
groups
are
lo,
you
know
are
trying
to
get
additional
funding.
That's
another
way
for
us
to
leverage.
D
You
know
where
we
put.
If
we
put
more
parks,
you
know
in
the
area
or
if
we
put
all
of
our
eggs
in
the
one
basket
which
is
pioneer
park,
but
that's
that's
a
good
thing
that
we're
seeing
right
now
that
there
is
there
are
other
groups
interested
in
in
the
park
and
investing
more
than
just
what
we
can
do
with
our
limited
resources.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
you
know
I
envisioned
this
park
as
the
rda
chair
as
well.
D
Looking
at
the
environment
of
station
center
and
the
closeness
to
it,
it
all
seems,
like
things,
are,
moving
in
the
right
direction
in
this
area
of
downtown
and
looking
at
the
olympics,
essentially
maybe
in
10
years.
This
could
be
something
that
we
could
be
working
on
now,
so
that
we
can
utilize
a
spark
for
that
as
well
for
for
such
an
event
that
is
so
beneficial
to
the
state
but
to
salt
lake
city.
So
thank
you
for
your
consideration
and
thank
you
to
the
staff.
I
think
this
is
great.
M
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
wanted
to
just
say
that
the
project
looks
amazing.
Now,
just
to
you
know,
to
just
follow
councilman
romano's
comments.
I
would
like
to
see
the
thing
and-
and
I
wanted
to
see
this
project
and
the
whole.
You
know
looking
at
everything
else,
because
we
also
have
you
know
the
administration
is
working
on
on
the
glendale
water
park
and
what
are
we
going
to
do
there
and
there
they
keep
talking
about
a
regional
park,
but
then
the
money
keeps
you
know.
M
Moving
on
that
regional
park
right
and
I
have
air
quotes
here
and-
and
I
also
want
to
understand-
you
know
a
little
bit
about
the
process
of
communicating
with
the
community
because
sometimes
we're
setting
up
the
expectations
high
and
I'm
reading
right
now,
a
few
articles
in
my
computer
about
the
administration.
M
You
know
telling
the
the
community
that
this
park
is
going
to
be
remodeled
and
showing
this
project,
and
this
is
amazing-
and
I
sup
you
know-
I'm
generally
supportive
of
it.
But
you
know
we
also
need
to
see
all
the
other
projects
we
need
to.
We
need
to
fund
and
it's
you
know
I
don't
want
the
the
neighbors
near
the
pioneer
park
and
you
know,
and
the
council
member
baltimore's
district
to
be
disappointed
when
we
say
well.
M
We
also
need
to
do
these
other
things
and
we
have
limited
amount
of
money
and
we
set
the
expectations
so
high.
So
I'm
I
would
like
clarification
about
how
we
communicate
also
with
the
minister,
with
with
the
press,
about
what
we
are
doing,
to
make
sure
that
this
body
has
not
their
hands
tied,
and
I
feel
sometimes
that
some
of
these
things
puts
us
in
a
corner
saying
you
have
to
approve
this
because
we
already
told
everybody-
and
I
don't
I'm
not
picking
you
know,
I'm
not
saying
anything.
M
I
just
hope
that
this
doesn't
come
up
as
as
rude,
and
I
forgive
me
if
it
does,
but
I
love
this
project
like
this.
This
is
amazing
thing
and
I
love
I
wish
we
can
do
it
and
I
hope
that
we
can
do
it.
You
have
an
ally
on
me
for
this,
but
I
think
that
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
clarifications
about
first,
how
we
communicate
with
with
with
the
community
about
this
and
second,
I
hope
that
we
also
are
looking
at
the
big
picture.
M
Maybe
the
bond
that
we're
going
to
be
doing
or
the
administration
wants
to
suggest
to
do
a
bond
about
parks
and
whatnot.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
I
have
one
question
about
the
funding
side
of
the
house,
so
we
have
the
housing
administration
working
with
the
state.
This
excuse
me
I'll
just
come
out
right
and
read
the
policy
questions
the
administration.
How
do
any
state
funding
might
integrate
into
this
park
funding?
A
E
Thanks
for
that
question,
you
know
at
this
time
there
is
the
state
funding
has
not
been
approved,
and
so
we
are
anxiously
waiting
to
hear
that.
We
are
super
appreciative
that
the
pioneer
park
coalition
is
seeking
additional
funding
from
the
state
and
if
it's
granted,
then
we'll
look
to
pioneer
park
coalition
for
a
business
plan
that
to
make
sure
that
we
maintain
public
access
and
we
reflect
those
guiding
principles
that
were
shared
and
we
will
work
with
them
to
try
to
figure
out
how
that
will
work
together
at
this
time.
E
We
are
not
we're
not
there
yet
we're
waiting
to
see
if
the
funding
comes
through
and
then
we
will
definitely
have
those
conversations
with
the
coalition
to
see
how
we
can
make
these
improvements
to
the
park.
A
F
Thank
you.
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
on
this.
F
First
is
I
didn't
see,
and
maybe
I
missed
it,
but
where
there
was
any
sort
of
talk
about
how
much
this
would
increase
the
maintenance
on
pioneer
park
and
where
that
is
being
considered,
because
this
looks
like
a
unicorn
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
continue
feeding
the
unicorn
if
it
happens,
so
I
I
would
be
curious
as
to
where
or
how
we've
thought
of
a
long-term
maintenance
funding
plan,
and
so
that's
question
number
one
and
question
number
two
is
that
we
know
that
there
were
some
funds
allocated.
F
I
believe,
used.
1.6
million.
Is
that
how
much
you
said:
3.6
million
3.6
million
right
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
use
that
3.6
million?
How
far
does
that
get
us?
I
mean
at
the
end
of
the
day,
this
plan
that
you've
created
for
us
is
over
20
million
right,
so
we'd
still
need
17
million
or
so
after
the
3.6
so
like
what,
if
that
doesn't
happen?
What?
If
what?
If
it
takes
years
for
that
to
happen
and
are
we
going
sort
of?
F
I
think
this
is
in
the
same
line
of
some
of
my
other
council
members
questions.
Is
you
know?
How
are
we
looking
at
this
holistically
and
as
a
city-wide
thing,
and
not
just
this,
this
unicorn
here,
but
all
of
the
unicorns
in
our
parks
right?
So
I
just
wonder
if
we
reallocate
that
3.6
million
to
a
different
park
until
we
know
that
we're
going
to
get
the
full
20
million
from
somewhere.
I
don't
know-
I
mean
just
throwing
things
out
there.
E
Okay,
lots
of
lots
of
thoughts
there.
Let
me
start
with
the
maintenance,
so
currently
public
land
staff
dedicate
about
80
hours
per
week
to
pioneer
park,
and
so
we
we
have
a
good
amount
of
time
that
we
spend
maintaining
the
park
right
now.
E
Some
of
these
new
features
would
probably
take
more
maintenance
funding,
for
example,
the
concessions
or
the
the
source
water
feature
would
likely
take
more
maintenance
funding.
We
haven't
calculated
that
it's
it's
just
so
early
in
the
process.
We
haven't
calculated
it
yet:
the
pickleball
courts,
the
basketball
courts,
the
playground,
we're
currently
maintaining
those
sites
or
similar
sites
to
those
in
the
park
right
now.
So
that
is,
I
I
feel
like.
E
We
wouldn't
be
asking
for
more
funding
to
cover
that,
and
we
would
have
to
calculate
that
and
one
of
the
things
that
this
plan
does.
Is
it
upgrades
a
lot
of
old
facilities
and
including
irrigation
and
the
playground
and
the
courts,
and
our
staff
takes
a
lot
of
time
to
maintain
older
facilities,
newer
facilities,
take
less
time
to
maintain
and
upgrade.
E
Let's
see,
I
was
going
to
remember
what
you
your
second
part
of
that
was
say
again.
Just
I
don't
know
if
you.
F
I
don't
know
if
you
necessarily
need
to
answer.
It
was
more
of
along
the
line
of
the
concerns
that
some
of
the
other
council
members
brought
up
of
where
that
3.6
million,
how
far
it's
going
to
go.
Knowing
we'd
need
another
17
million
to
complete
this
plan
and
wondering
where
that's
going
to
come
from
versus
kind
of
looking
at
all
of
this
very
holistically
and
if
there's
another
place
to
put
that
3.6
or
if
that's
something
we
should
consider
in
a
reallocation
while
we're
getting
more
of
the
majority
of
the
that
20
million.
F
So
so
we're
not
just
putting
three
million
in
and
then
saying
we're
buying
the
pony,
not
the
unicorn
or
anything.
E
Yeah,
the
3.44
million
is
in
impact
fees
and
impact
fees
can
be
spent
on
new
services
in
the
park,
and
so
impact
fees
could
not
be
used
for
some
of
these
projects
that
are
proposed
here.
It
would
have
to
come
from
different
funding.
It
could
come
from
the
state
funding,
it
could
come
from
general
fund,
it
could
come
from
a
bond
and
so
some
of
those
ideas
about
fleet
block
or
glendale
water
park
being
new
parks
are
all
impact
fee
eligible
and
and
as
well
as
ellen
park.
E
How
far
would
the
3.44
million
go?
I
don't
think
engineering
or
sean
wants
to
try
to
do
that
calculated
calculation
in
his
head
this
quickly,
but
you
know
you
can
consider
that
it
would
probably
be
a
small
portion,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
have
some
of
that
information
in
the
survey.
R
That's
available
online
right
now
we
are
asking
the
community
to
prioritize
what
they
would
like
to
see.
First,
so
we're
understanding.
What's
the
sort
of
urgent
need
or
most
useful
thing
to
have,
first
and
we've
grouped
things
together,
that
makes
sense
to
do
at
one
time
in
that
approach,
and
it's
not
that
those
come
down
to
that
exact
dollar
value,
we'll
be
figuring
that
out
when
we
do
the
phase
one
design,
but
at
least
we
have
some
direction.
R
R
All
at
once
and
and
you'll
see
that
I
I
I
wanted
to
kind
of
clarify
that
this
vision
plan
is
one
that
is
scaled
to
what
other
urban
parks
have,
and
you
problems
why
we
include
that
slide
about
what
are
people
spending
per
square
foot
on
their
urban
parks,
and
it
is
far
less
than
many
of
these
examples,
but
putting
you
in
in
alignment
with
what
is
expected,
what
the
expectations
are
for
the
type
of
activities
and
amenities
you
can
find
in
a
downtown.
R
So
we
did
try
and
scale
with
that
for
the
thought
for
your
downtown
park,
but
we
we.
We
want
that
thought
of
first
phase
and
knowledge
for
the
public
to
know
that
we
can't
we
don't
have
the
funds
to
do
it
all
at
once
to
be
clear,
but
we
certainly
would
seek
additional
funds
in
a
variety
of
sources
to
help
complete
this.
A
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
have
one
final
question:
if
we
need
to
meet
you
to
move
on
so
kristen
appreciate
very
much
kat
anna
on
the
presentation.
I
have
one
just
more
of
the
plan
here.
It's
a
beautiful
park,
but
we
have
three
avenues
around
it
that
are
like
the
mississippi
river
to
the
cross
and
have
we
have
we
planned
any
street
calming
ideas,
and
is
that
part
of
the
budget?
A
A
quick
answer
now,
but
just
think
of
that
we
need
to.
We
need
to
focus
in
on
some
of
the
street
calming
areas
if
you
want
to
get
to
a
nice
beautiful
park.
If
you
got
a
30
second
answer,
that'd
be
great
because
we
need
a
we
need
to
press
ons
because
we've
got
other
things
to
cover,
but
I
love
this
presentation.
I
look
forward
to
the
future
conversations
on
the
parks.
R
Yes,
you
see
some
street
crossings
that
are
proposed
here,
some
crosswalks
mid
block
and
other
ways
of
entering
the
site.
Those
are
in
the
cost
of
that
20
million
dollars
anticipated
as
well
as
a
transit,
stop
to
encourage
that
access
directly
onto
the
site
and
we've
been
coordinating
with
udot
for
their
state-controlled
streets.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
again
for
this
wonderful
presentation
have
a
great
evening.
K
Sorry,
just
one
thing:
if
it's
okay
with
the
count,
so
we
would.
K
This
would
be
an
example
of-
and
I
know
this
is
discussed
briefly,
but
that
that
definition
that
we're
trying
to
work
out
with
the
city
attorney's
office
and
with
the
administration
of
which
things
are
master
plans,
which
things
are
site
plans
and
that
type
of
a
thing,
something
that
is
spending
a
lot
of
money
over
a
long
period
of
time,
may
fall
into
the
category
that
the
council
would
want
to
weigh
in
on
in
terms
of
just
having
it
on
your
books
as
as
approved
the
the
plans
previously
on
pioneer
park.
K
At
least
one
of
them
was
brought
to
the
council
and
the
council
actually
declined.
They
approved
a
section
of
it,
but
not
not
the
rest
as
they
noted
so
it.
If
it's,
okay
with
you,
we
would
continue
to
check
with
the
attorney's
office
and
administration
on
this.
K
A
B
The
public
lands
department
is
planning
to
bring
the
general
plan
for
or
the
master
plan
for,
parks
and
open
space.
I
think
it's.
The
open
space
master
plan
is
what
they're
calling
it
it's
tentatively
scheduled
now
for
march
22nd.
I
realize
that
doesn't
resolve
all
the
problems,
but
it
resolves
one
of
them.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Allison
we'll
now
move
on
to
item
number
five,
the
budget
amendment
number
four
for
fiscal
year,
2021-22
follow-up
and
at
the
actual
table
this
evening
we
have
been
lucky
with
the
council
staff.
Mary
beth
is
on
our
screen
chief
financial
officer
ben.
It's
all
yours
great,
to
see
your
face
in
person.
S
The
item
for
consideration
today
is
e2
the
winter
overflow
shelter
now
most
of
the
items
in
the
budget
amendment
the
council
already
voted
on
in
november
and
december
this
item,
the
council
approved
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
police
overtime
related
to
incidents
at
the
shelter
and
in
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
There's
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
left
in
the
original
proposal.
S
The
council
took
a
unanimous
straw
poll
that
the
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
be
considered
for
community
activities
and
potentially
business
assistance
in
the
area
around
the
temporary
shelter
pending
future
discussions.
Now,
since
that
straw
poll
this
morning,
we
received
a
revised
transmittal
from
the
administration,
with
a
new
recommendation
for
half
of
those
remaining
funds.
S
S
C
C
Right
now,
shelter
the
homeless
is
the
one
that
is,
has
the
gap
of
600
000
for
their
lease
cost
security,
meals,
transportation,
staffing,
administration
and,
from
the
city
perspective,
based
on
the
restrictions
on
the
rescue
act,
funding
putting
a
contingent
into
this
request
that
it
could
only
be
used
on
the
leasing
costs
based
on
needing
that
motel
and
the
social
distancing
to
comply
with
covid
restrictions
for
that
funding.
That
makes
sense
and
shelter
the
homeless
agrees
to
that
as
well.
A
Thank
you
andrew
mary
beth.
Did
you
have
any
part
of
that
in
the
addition
to
add.
B
H
Mr
chair
I'll,
ask
a
question:
do
we
know
where
we
are
on
the
spend
down
of
the
400
000
that
was
allocated
for
police
overtime?
I
know
you
mentioned
that
briefly,
but
like
are
we
looking
at
spending
that
completely?
Are
we
looking
at
having
left
over
or
needing
more
in
terms
of
council-funded
police
overtime
for
this
site
and
doing
no.
C
Mr
chair,
I
don't
have
the
numbers
in
front
of
me
or
councilman.
Romano.
I
believe
I
would
anticipate
that
the
spend
down
is
not
going
as
quickly
as
would
be
anticipated
since
they've
covered
about
two-thirds
of
the
shifts
on
average
right
now,
but
that's
my
assumption
at
this
point.
We
can
get
some
actual
numbers
to
you.
I
think
fairly
quickly.
A
D
S
The
administration's
proposal
is
to
use
just
over
300
000,
it's
301
000
from
arpa
for
the
leasing
of
the
overflow
shelter.
That
would
be
the
vote
tonight.
If
the
council
supports.
S
D
Okay,
all
right
we're
favorite,
like
it's
february
15th,
and
this
ends
april
15th-
and
we
were
talking
about
this
in
like
december,
and
it
was
like
an
emergency
and
people
were
going
to
die
and
we
had
enough-
and
we
kind
of
figured
things
out
and
now
we're
back
at
this,
like
for
the
least
guys
come
on
yeah.
I'm.
K
P
Additionally,
while
citing
a
shelter
might
be
difficult
and
require
many
municipalities
coming
together,
understanding
that
it
takes
around
two
million
dollars
to
host
an
emergency
shelter,
which
is
something
we
have
to
do
annually,
is
not
something
you
have
to
wait
until
you
have
a
site
for,
and
it
is
all
around
malpractice
of
this,
of
handling
this
issue
to
not
have
these
funds
already
allocated
and
to
repeatedly
come
to
the
same
well
for
funding
as
a
non-profit
professional.
I
would
never
be
able
to
do
that.
A
J
J
I
just
had
a
a
question
about
if
we
are
getting
any
closer
to
deciding
what
we
would
use
the
funds
that
we
set
aside
for
to
assist
with
neighborhood
programs
and
businesses.
K
Economic
development
owed
us
a
document
with
a
proposal
and
they
have
given
us
that,
but
we
have
been
so
overwhelmed
with
the
legislative
things
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
focus
on
that.
So
they've
done
their
piece.
We
need
to
do
ours
and
then
get
that
to
you
and
it'll
be
entirely
at
your
discretion.
But
that's
coming
up.
J
A
J
A
Right-
and
we
did
make
the
decision
months
ago,
that
we
we
knew
this
600
000
was
sitting
out
there.
We
were
looking
for
the
funding,
so
that
was
always
been
out
there.
The
state
has
provided
the
300
000,
the
300
300
000
is
where
the
gap
is
so
we
did
have
to
have
that
discussion,
because
I
know
council,
member
mono
had
that
concern
for
that
three
six
hundred
thousand
dollars.
That's
why
we
put
it
aside
to
look
for
additional
funding
and
the
state
came
up
with
the
300
000
at
that
point
most
recently.
Q
Q
Q
A
S
Thanks,
mr
chair,
this
is
the
third
briefing
for
budget
amendment
number
six.
The
public
hearing
is
scheduled
for
tonight
and
potential
action
is
scheduled
for
march.
First,
at
the
last
briefing,
the
discussion
included
potentially
adding
some
of
the
requests
in
this
budget
amendment
for
new
full-time
employees
to
the
upcoming
annual
budget.
So
all
the
city's
competing
needs
can
be
considered
together
in
context,
so
first
I'll
walk
through
the
administration's
responses
to
the
council's
follow-up
questions,
and
then,
after
that
we
have
information
on
item
a8,
which
is
request
for
10
new
police
officers.
S
S
S
F
S
A
A
S
So
the
next
item
is
a3
biohive,
and
this
is
a
very
similar
situation.
The
city's
membership
expired
in
september
last
year.
The
amount
to
cover
the
nine
months
from
september
to
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year
is
higher.
It's
37,
500
and
the
department
clarified.
This
was
originally
a
one-time
expense,
but
they
now
consider
it
an
ongoing
expense
that
should
be
added
to
the
annual
budget.
A
F
A
H
M
Mr
chair,
I
I
you
know,
I
was
learning
a
lot
about.
You
know
what
the
the
city
is
trying
to
do
with
this
and
and
their
focus
on
on
on
bringing
this.
M
You
know
the
biotech
biotechnology
and,
on
you
know,
the
competitive
advantage
we
have
here
in
utah
and
their
focus
on
trying
to
get
people
from
mostly
the
west
side
to
actually
learn
about
this
as
a
career
path
and
to
me
that
was
a
very
powerful
statement
and
a
very
powerful
mission,
and-
and
I
believe
that
we
having
a
seat
at
the
table
and
this
on
this
membership
will
mean
a
lot
to
a
lot
to
my
community.
M
So
you
know
you
know,
I
will
prefer
to
keep
that
seat
at
the
table,
and
I
know
that
it's
not
that
we
lose
the
seat
at
the
table
just
because
we're
not
funding
it,
but
I
think
it
means
a
lot
to
to
the
community
to
have
that
voice
and
we
are
putting
our
money
where
you
know
where
our
mouth
is.
So
I
would
prefer
that
we
do
support.
M
D
We're
looking
into
economic
development,
powerful
message
here
for
our
city
and
50
000
is
really
not
that
much
in
the
grand
scheme
of
things.
So
I
think
we
should
support
it.
S
Correct
it's
similar
to
swayzo,
swayzo
and
biohive
were
both
funded
mid-year
in
a
budget
amendment
using
federal
cares
dollars.
Economic
development
might
be
able
to
clarify
this.
My
understanding
is
a
difference.
Is
that
swayzo
provides
ongoing
services
right,
whereas
biohive
has
more
discreet.
Services
like
the
summit
happens
at
one
time.
It's
not
an
ongoing
service
and.
P
S
T
Absolutely
thank
you
so
much.
Those
are
great
questions
and,
of
course,
you
know
we
take
your
questions
seriously,
especially
when
we're
dealing
with
our
general
fund.
We
do
have
our
clark
cahoon
as
well,
who
can
answer
those
questions
specifically
to
buy
a
hive,
but
they
have
been
counting
on
these
dollars
just
to
let
you
know,
clark.
T
Maybe
he's
not.
My
understanding
is
that
this
is
a
non-profit
entity
and
basically
we're
working
side
by
side
with
them
as
well.
There
is
a
summit
coming
up
in
march
and
there
will
be
another
one
in
the
fall.
So
again
they
have
been
playing
on
our
support
for
them
to
continue
their
work
and,
furthermore,
as
council
men
mentioned
before,
they
are
working
very
hard
to
ensure
that
we
are
actually
getting
the
training
for
many
members
of
our
community.
K
One
of
the
things
I
want
to
point
out
is
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
get
the
departments
to
recognize
these
things
early
and
get
them
in
the
process
in
a
timely
manner.
So
this
expired
in
september,
so
that
means
september
or
august
or
july
it
could
have
been
brought
to
you
or
october
november
december
could
have
been
brought
to
you.
K
T
I
think
that's
an
excellent
point
and
this
actually
was
included
in
previous
budget
amendments,
but
they
were
pushed
back
to
now,
so
I
think
you're
absolutely
right
cindy
in
your
comments.
However,
we
had
come
to
the
table
before
now.
K
Okay,
it
did
never
come
to
the
council,
so
I
guess
then,
the
issue
is
at
a
different
level
of
the
administration,
but
the
point
is
the
administration
is
obligated
to
get
the
counsel.
The
information
in
a
timely
manner
and
the
departments
are
accountable
to
to
identify
the
needs
early
enough.
So
this.
K
T
K
T
F
Mr
chair,
I
just
can
clarify
on
that.
I'm
going
to
turn
to
ben
as
the
guru
of
the
budget
amendments,
and
so
this
may
have
come
up,
but
it
was
never
brought
in
front
of
the
council
on
a
previous
budget
amendment
is
that
right.
S
F
T
No
ben
is
correct
just
want
to
make
sure
that
nothing
is
misrepresented.
He's
correct
on
his
statement.
A
A
F
Sorry,
mr
chair,
I
know
we
have
other
things,
but
I
would
be
interested
a
little
bit
in
learning
a
little
bit
more
if
clark
can
give
just
a
quick
preview
of
not
preview,
because
I
know
a
little
bit
about
it,
but
just
a
very
quick
little
thing
about
this,
so
I
can
have
more
information
in
deciding
how
I
want
if
what
needs
to
happen
here
for
me.
Thank
you.
N
P
I
was
just
wondering
about
the
nature
of
the
organization,
I'm
much
more
familiar
with
swazo,
so
the
you
know,
the
prorating
of
the
funds
to
them
makes
sense
to
me,
but
I
was
wondering
about
you
know
what
what
sort
of
organization
it
is,
what
role
this
funding
plays
in
that
organization
in
order
to
prioritize
it
within
the
context
of
what
we're
being
asked.
N
Sure,
thank
you
so,
towards
the
beginning
of
mayor
mendenhall's
administration,
she
convened
the
life
science
industry
to
understand
a
little
bit
more
about
it
and
to
see
what
partnerships
could
be
formed
through
those
discussions.
N
It
became
really
apparent
that
one
of
the
things
that
was
lacking
was
the
inability
to
just
the
lack
of
coordination,
of
sharing
the
story
of
what
was
going
on
within
this
industry
and
the
momentum
that
it
had,
and
also
the
lack
of
connectivity
between
industry
and
education
partners,
so
between
the
messaging
and
between
that
additional
connectivity
within
the
industry,
which
is
really
deeply
rooted
within
the
city
from
the
university
of
utah,
their
commercialization
of
new
technologies,
their
graduates
that
they
turn
out.
N
So
the
biohype
is
really
an
answer
to
making
sure
that
we
tell
the
story
of
what's
going
on
what
the
opportunities
are
within
this
industry
and
the
way
the
administration
has
focused
its
energy
as
an
economic
development
strategy
is
to
create
these
public-private
partnerships
to
have
a
seat
at
the
table
with
other
partners
and
to
leverage
the
opportunity
to
make
those
connections
with
the
salt,
lake,
school
district
and
other
education
partners,
so
that
we
can
show
you
know
what
the
opportunities
are,
what
the,
what
the
the
the
jobs
and
the
careers
are
in
stem
education
related
fields,
because
there's
there's
this
ripe
opportunity
with
this
with
this
industry,
because
we
have
that
pipeline
because
we
have
high
wages,
it's
recession,
proof
compared
to
other
industries,
and
it's
actually
a
really
diverse
industry
in
and
of
itself
with
opportunities,
whether
it's
manufacturing
advanced
degrees
or
even
lab
technicians.
N
There's
so
many
entry
points
because
of
those
things
it's
unique
compared
to
other
industries,
and
so
the
biohype
answers
that
question
of
what
can
we
do
to
collaborate
with
other
organizations
throughout
the
city
at
the
state
level
at
the
local
level
and
make
sure
that
we
tell
that
story?
So
it's
workforce
development,
it's
stem
education
and
it's
branding
and
messaging
what
unique
opportunity
there
is
within
this
industry.
N
And
it's
great
that
the
city
has
a
seat
at
the
table
with
so
many
partners
to
be
able
to
bring
those
things
together,
and
it
is
a
unique
structure
with
the
biohive
board
with
having
mayor
mendenhall
sit
on
it
and
there's
just
a
lot
of
really
continued
in
in
in
great
partnerships
that
are
that
are
brewing
right
now,
because
of
so
many
people
coming
to
the
table
and
having
salt
lake
city
be
a
part
of
those
discussions.
M
Just
one
just
one
last
thing:
I
you
know
biotechnology
is,
you
know
one
of
the
fastest
growers
industry
in
our
state
and
we
have
probably
the
fastest
growing
in
the
nation.
So
there
is
a
huge
opportunity
here
and
I
I
don't
know
if
this
is
going
to
change
everything,
but
I
I'm
hoping
that
it
does
and
that
we
know
we
can
bring
this
all
these
different
kind
of
jobs
to
my
community.
I
think
that
would
make
a
big
deal.
F
S
The
administration
believes
that
the
greater
involvement
of
existing
employees,
given
their
skill,
sets
at
the
housing
stability
division
will
decrease,
wait
times.
It's
important
to
note,
though,
that
wait
times
are
significant.
We've
heard
comments
in
the
council
office.
Some
people
have
waited
multiple
years.
So
while
this
move
from
the
fire
department
to
housing,
stability
may
decrease
wait
times,
it's
not
going
to
be
a
change
from
waiting
a
couple
years
to
a
couple
months.
There
will
still
be
significant
wait
times.
S
The
administration
also
gave
an
update
that
they're
applying
for
state
funding
up
until
this
point,
it's
always
been
federal
funding
for
the
program.
The
state
funding
would
increase
the
number
of
single-family
homes
that
can
participate
and
it
might
expand
the
program
beyond
single-family
homes.
This
could
include
multi-family
and
potentially
commercial,
multi-family
and
commercial
are
larger
buildings,
so
the
seismic
improvements
are
much
more
expensive,
so
that
is
something
they're
pursuing.
It
has
not
been
awarded
yet.
S
The
other
update
is
the
council
was
looking
for
information
on
participants.
Where
are
they
located?
What
is
the
relative
participation
rate
between
different
neighborhoods
in
the
city?
Back
in
2019,
there
was
an
analysis
that
found
most
of
the
applicants
were
from
higher
and
middle
income
neighborhoods.
There
was
not
much
participation
from
lower
income
neighborhoods.
S
S
S
S
S
Oh,
thank
you.
Yes,
a6.
I
scrolled
too
far
a6
the
public
safety
building,
access,
control,
upgrade
and
support.
The
question
was:
is
there
a
deadline
either
from
the
state
or
the
federal
government,
in
order
to
provide
this
security
upgrade
to
stay
in
compliance
with
the
rules
that
make
it
a
secure
facility?
There
is
no
specific
deadline.
S
S
A
M
Thank
you,
mr
I
you
know
originally
when
we
started
talking
about
this
a
couple
weeks
ago.
We
were
you
know
to
council
member
fowler's
point
and
on
the
the
council
administration's
point
that
you
know
all
these
budget
of
amendments
you
know
are
making
it
to
a
major
amendment
instead
of
to
the
regular
budget
right
and
we
talked
about
like
well,
can
we
you
know
maybe
some
of
these
things?
Well,
I
guess
I
probably
talked
about
this.
M
I
don't
think
anybody
understood
what
I
was
trying
to
say
or
or
myself,
but
that
you
know
some
of
these
things
maybe
need
to
need
to
be
approved
because
there
are
grants,
and
there
are
that
you
know
they
have.
We
have
deadlines
for
it,
and
that
was
how
this
came
up
with
this
question
we
came
out
with
this
question.
Is:
is
this
needed
right
now?
Do
we
need
a
deadline
for
this
and
from
your
explanation
from
what
I
read
here
is
no,
we
don't
have
a
deadline
for
it.
M
We
need
it,
it
may
fail,
but
isn't
that
true
for,
like
you
know,
all
the
all
the
things
that
are,
we
know
we're
behind
and
I'm
not
saying
that
this
is
not
important.
I
think
there's
probably
as
important
as
everything
else,
but
can
we
wait
a
few
a
few
more
months?
You
know
like
three
months
or
something
to
start
the
budget
session
is,
is
the
ultimate
question
that
I
wanted
an
answer
for,
and
I
guess
it's
maybe
right.
M
Obviously
the
point
of
I
take
the
point
that
saying
we
need
the
time
we
need
to
the
money
now,
so
we
don't
have
to
delay
another
six
months,
but
I
guess
the
answer.
I
don't
know
if
there
is
an
answer
to
what
I'm
trying
to
say,
but
the
question
seems
to
be:
do
we
need
to
do
it
now?
Maybe
maybe
yes,
maybe
not.
Is
that
really
what
is
happening.
B
Can
I
get,
I
will
get
an
answer
to
that
to
council
members
question
soon.
So
please
give
me
just
a
second
and
I'll
get
your
answer
to
that
question.
Okay,.
S
M
It's
my
third
cup
of
coffee,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
be
aware
of
that.
So
so
I
I
you
know,
I
appreciate
the
administration
trying
and
finding
some
information
about
this.
M
I
I
still
think
that
it
doesn't
match
with
the
values
of
our
of
the
city,
and
I
know
that
you
know
we
can
still
celebrate
and
I
will
you
know,
still
challenge
the
administration
of
finding
another
way
of
celebrating
or
if
you
know,
if,
if
fires
is
the
concern
here
and
you
know,
maybe
we
can
spend
this
money
and
educating
people
why
not
to
buy
fireworks.
I
think
that
is
more.
M
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
mr
chair
on
this
particular
item.
I
know
we're
not
necessarily
strap-holding,
nor
do
we
need
to
straw,
pull
all
of
the
items,
but
I
would
propose
a
straw
poll
on
this
so
that
when
it
comes
time
for
motion
sheet
making
ben
isn't
making
the
motion
sheet
like
62
seconds
before
we
have
to
make
the
motion,
so
I
would
propose
a
straw
poll
to
not
approve
this
particular
item
to
exclude
it
from
the
budget.
Amendment.
A
S
H
Can
I
make
a
comment
about
this
trouble
thanks?
I
get
the
concerns
about
air
quality
and
fire
safety
and
I
understand
why
that
is.
H
Why
councilmember
you
think
it's
a
the
wrong
message
for
us
to
share,
and
I
don't
disagree
with
that.
I
do
I
mean
the
fourth
of
july
is
an
important
holiday
in
our
country,
and
I
really
believe
in
celebrating
that
and
that's
kind
of
the
traditional
way.
I
love
your
idea
of
coming
up
with
new
ways
to
celebrate
the
4th
of
july
with
drone
shows,
or
I
think
you
had
a
few
other
ideas.
Laser
shows
or
something
like
that
they
could
have
a
similar
experience,
but
be
better
for
the
environment.
H
H
So
I
am
I'm
just
a
little
conflicted
about
that
for
the
nostalgia
reason
I
think,
and
because
it's
they're
important
holidays
and
I
think,
there's
a
reason
why
they're
national
holidays
and
they're
important
for
us
to
celebrate
so
but
absolutely
interested
in
what
the
next
phase
of
how
we
celebrate
the
fourth
of
july
could
be
in
our
country
and
how
we
can
make
that
better
for
the
environment.
M
Mr
chair,
I
I
you
know
and
as
a
as
an
immigrant,
you
know
I
I
I
appreciate
the
the
you
know.
I
there's
a
big,
you
know
celebration
for
me
too,
and
I
just
you
know.
I
think
that
you
know
we
could
do
a
little
better
than
than
that,
and
I
you
know
I
was
learning
about
you
know
just
neighborhoods
and
the
south
of
the
valley
that
they're
doing
drone
shows.
M
M
H
The
straw
poll
be
amended
to
say
we
leave
it
in
there
for
a
celebration
that
is
not
fireworks,
and
if
there
is
time
for
the
administration
to
come
up
with
an
idea
of
how
we
could
celebrate,
that
is
not
connected
to
fireworks.
I
mean
I'm
wondering
if
the
council
would
support
keeping
money
in
there
for
a
celebration
and
if
they
have
time
to
figure
out
how
to
do
it
in
an
environmentally
friendly
and
fire
safe
way.
Great,
if
not,
that
money
will
fall
back
to
the
general
fund
at
the
next
budget.
A
I
mean
realize
that
this
is
a
straw
poll,
so
it's
really
not
binding,
but
we
are
asking
the
administration
to
maybe
look
at
this
again,
whether
we
use
it
for
fireworks
or
not.
I
mean
we.
We
still
have
public
hearing
going
on
after
this,
so
right
now
we're
giving
the
administration
the
message
that
we
want
them
to
look
at
something
else
or
nothing,
but
we
want
them
to
look
at
other
ways
to
celebrate
and
I'm
kind
of
reading
the
minds
here
on
that
and
not
just
specifically
on
just
25
000
to
fireworks.
A
E
B
F
You,
mr
chair,
mr
chairman,
that
information.
I
would
then
propose
my
straw
poll
again
that
we
leave
this
out
if
this
is
about
fireworks
and
just
fireworks,
not
the
fourth
of
july
celebration,
not
the
24th
of
july
celebration,
but
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
fund
fireworks.
My
straw
poll
is
that
we
do
not
put
it
in
this
budget
amendment,
I'm
sure
we
can
earmark
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
somewhere
else
to
look
at
something,
but
that
would
be
my
straw
poll.
J
Up,
I'm
just
going
to
say
my
thinking
too,
is
that
I
think
we
just
go
forward
with
it
for
this
year,
but
I
do
want
to
not
do
this
long
term,
but
I
think
that
I
don't
really
have
enough
information
right
now.
I'm
literally
googling
like
how
much
a
drone
show
costs
according
to
dronegirl.com
it's
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
but
I.
A
Want
the
longer
distance,
so
we
have
we
have
this.
We
have
the
mo
the
straw
poll
on
the
floor.
Give
me
your
thumbs
up
if
you
approve
of
the
straw
poll
or
a
thumbs
down.
If
you
do
disapprove
of
the
stop
hole,
so
I
have
one
up
two
up
three
up
and
four
down
so
also,
I
have
sorry
councilmember
peter
wester
is
a
thumbs
up.
S
S
Without
going
into
the
weeds,
the
new
employees
would
perform
work,
they
would
be
city
employees,
but
they
would
perform
work
for
the
city
and
for
the
foundation
there
is
a
contract
between
the
foundation
and
the
city
that
sets
out
certain
services
and
programming
requirements,
and
so
some
of
the
employees
would
be
performing
work
under
that
contract
that
the
foundation
provides.
So
this
is
a
mix
of
programming
that
the
arts,
council
itself
provides
and
programming
that
is
put
out
to
an
rfp
and
then
the
responders
to
the
rfp
actually
provide
the
programming.
So
it's
both.
S
S
S
No
questions
on
that.
One,
no
questions
that
takes
us
to
b1.
This
is
the
request
for
using
176
000
in
one-time
funds
from
hud.
These
are
authorized
under
arpa,
but
they're
separate
from
the
85
million
that
the
city
received
also
from
arpa
for
fiscal
recovery.
S
So
this
is
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
for
helping
people
experiencing
homelessness.
Hud
said
that
the
city
must
develop
a
community
assessment
and
an
allocation
plan
before
it
can
access
these
funds.
The
council
would
also
have
to
approve
a
substantial
amendment
to
the
five-year
plan
that
governs
how
these
hud
grants
are
used
and
the
council
would
have
to
approve
the
budget
for
those
funds.
S
S
S
The
second
part
is
about
fifteen
thousand
dollars
that
could
be
used
to
reimburse
the
division
for
general
fund
dollars
that
were
encumbered
last
fiscal
year
for
a
consultant
contract.
So
this
would
be
using
the
grant
money
to
reimburse
general
fund
dollars
that
are
being
used
for
the
consultant
work
on
this
assessment
and
plan.
S
I
should
also
say
that
yeah,
that
was
a
lot
that
went
over.
K
Is
that
sort
of-
and
I
maybe
we
could
ask
mary
beth
to
address
this
because
usually,
if
you
are,
if
you've
encumbered
some
money
from
the
previous
year's
budget,
you
would
not
get
reimbursed
in
this
year
for
using
that
money,
because
that
money
would
have
otherwise
gone
to
fund
balance.
K
So
it's
not
quite
clear
to
me
whether
this
money
ought
to
be
reimbursed
to
the
department
or
the
division
or
whether
it
should,
if
they
just
swap
out
the
source
and
and
that
25
000
goes
into
general
fund
fund
balance
or
exactly
what
so
mary
beth
has
been
helping
us
check
on
some
of
these
questions.
Would
it
be
okay
to
ask
for
her
help
on
this?
K
B
Try
so
the
study
itself,
I
believe,
would
be
a
probably
a
reimbursement
to
the
city.
If
the
study
has
been
completed.
The
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
staff
is
over
an
eight
year
period,
which
means
that
you
could
do
one
of
two
things.
You
can
either
reduce
the
expenditure
in
the
general
fund
for
eighteen
thousand,
seven
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
per
year
over
the
next
eight
years,
or
you
could
receive
it
as
a
revenue
into
the
general
fund
helping
offset
those
expenditures.
K
K
It
might
be
more
correct
to
switch
out
the
funding
source
for
the
25
000
so
that
it's
the
arpa
money
and
not
not
that
general
fund,
that
they
were
just
basically
filling
a
gap
with
and
and
then
the
the
funding.
The
rest
of
the
funding
reduces
the
amount
of
general
fund
subsidy
to
those
department.
Employees
in
the
coming
eight
years
this
year
and
seven.
More
probably,
is
that.
B
S
S
S
So
the
question
was:
if
you
approved
this
grant
funding
and
you
used
the
cip
funding
as
a
match,
does
that
mean
you're
no
longer
going
to
build
the
two
trail
heads
that
we
were
expecting
in
cip?
That's
not
true,
you're,
still,
building
the
same
two
with
three
more
so
five
total,
and
this
ties
into
the
next
item,
which
would
be
a
council
added
item.
It's
to
take
the
cip
funding
from
august
re-scope
it
so
that
it
can
be
used
as
matching
funds
on
all
five
trail
heads,
not
just
the
two.
It
was
originally
approved
for.
J
I
guess
I'm
concerned
that
that
we
don't
know
whether
this
is
e4
going
to
relate
to
the
the
pause
that
was
placed
on
new
trail
construction
and
that
has
already
been
such
a
bumpy
road
when
we
said
that
we
were
going
to
do
a
pause
and
then
work
continued
and
then
we
said
no,
it's
for
real
this
time.
J
I
think
the
only
way
that
we
could
make
it
worse
is
if
we
get
this
wrong
and
it
is-
and
there
suddenly
are
our-
is
new
construction
or
construction
of
previous
trails
happening,
but
I
also
don't
want
to
say
no
to
grant
money,
that's
coming
from
the
state,
so
I
I
can't.
I
don't
feel
like
I
can
vote
on
this.
J
S
We
did
ask
the
department-
and
we
didn't
get
a
question
in
time
for
publishing.
Perhaps
one
option
is:
if
the
council
wanted
to
approve
this
funding
and
make
it
also
subject
to
the
annual
budget
contingency,
we
would
want
to
work
through
that
with
the
attorney's
office.
I'm
just
throwing
out
an
idea.
K
K
I
think
they're
like
at
least
five
now
about
the
the
outside
review
and
and
the
hold
and
those
sorts
of
things
ask
for
that
briefing
and
then
hold
these
funds
until
you
have
the
opportunity
to
get
a
full
understanding
of
what
it
is
they're
doing,
and
that
way
you
would
be
still
moving
ahead,
but
not
not
committing
to
something
that
could
create
a
problem
made
that
up
yeah.
J
No
love
it,
I'm
gonna
make
it
a
straw
poll
right
now.
F
Chair
is
there
a
timeline
on
accepting
the
grant,
because
I
fully
understand
where
council
member
wharton
is
coming
from
and
that
pause
so
that
we
have
that
community
engagement,
but
going
back
to
that,
I
don't
want
to
lose
the
money
either.
So
is
there
a
timeline
to
when
we
need
to
accept
the
grant
such
that
we
need
to
do
this
within
the
the
timeline
of
this
budget.
Amendment.
S
A
J
Out
that,
but
I
would
say
in
terms
of
a
straw
poll
that,
in
the
event
that
we
need
to
accept
these
grants,
you
know
a
time
is
of
the
essence
and
that
we
that
any
grant
money
be
restricted
from
any
new
trail
construction.
J
And
I
also
would
like
to
ask
the
administration
for
an
update
on
where
we
are
on
that
process,
both
the
having
the
independent
audit
and
what
the
feedback
has
been
from
the
public.
So
I
would
propose
that.
J
A
Questions
about
the
straw
poll
okay,
thumbs
up
if
you
are
in
favor
of
councilman
wharton
straw
poll,
and
that
is
unanimous
across
the
board.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
S
The
council
did
request
additional
information
about
the
staffing
and
the
different
alternative
response
models
that
the
city
either
currently
has
or
is
creating
or
is
planning
to
create.
S
S
S
S
S
F
S
The
other
thing
is,
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
the
council's
discussion
in
december,
where
you
asked
staff
to
work
with
the
administration
on
developing
an
infographic
to
summarize
on
one
page,
what
are
all
of
these
alternative
response
models?
So
we've
sent
information
to
the
administration
saying
we
think
these
are
the
key
information
such
as.
How
does
the
public
access
this
program?
What
are
the
hours
of
operation?
S
What
are
their
focus
areas
once
we
get
that
information
verified,
we'll
work
with
our
in-house
graphics
designer
to
create
the
infographic
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
you
with
that
information
as
a
tool
to
communicate
with
the
public
and
a
reminder,
because
the
number
of
programs,
I
think,
is
more
than
most
people
realize.
I
think
it's
at
seven
at
last
count.
S
S
There's
the
one
I
just
talked
about,
which
is
10
new
police
officers
in
this
budget
amendment
there's
the
one
we
talked
about
last
week,
which
is
one
new
police
officer
for
the
special
victims
unit
and
then
there's
a
third
request,
which
is
a
state
grant
asking
for
18
new
police
officers,
three
of
whom
would
be
sergeants
and
that
we
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
awarded.
Yet
it
is
asking
for
funding
from
the
state
homeless,
shelter,
cities
mitigation
grant.
S
So
it's
subject
to
the
legislature
approving
additional
funding
to
that
grant
and
then
the
city's
request
being
approved
either
in
whole
or
in
part.
So
those
three
would
be
29
new
police
officers.
So
you
could
have
a
briefing
specifically
about
that
and
the
broader
topic
of
diversifying
public
safety
response
options.
S
The
other
two
policy
questions
are,
if
you
think
this
request
would
be
better
evaluated
in
the
context
of
the
annual
budget.
Like
the
other
items
in
this
budget
amendment
asking
for
new
full-time
employees
and
then
the
last
question
is
if
the
administration
has
brought
these
proposals
to
the
racial
equity
and
policing
commission
for
their
review
and
feedback.
S
P
The
other
thing
this
might
be
better
for
chief
brown,
if
we
are
in
fact
hiring
10
new
officers
for
this
squad.
What
does
the
training
time
and
everything
look
like
this
is
a
three-year
process.
This
grant
this
capacity
building
grant
it
feels
like
it
would
take
at
least
18
months
to
two
years
for
this
squad
to
be
up
anywhere
close
to
the
capacity
that
we
would
be
asking
from
it.
So.
P
S
My
understanding
is
the
the
violent
crimes
unit
that
would
be
created.
Existing
officers
would
then
be
shifted
into
the
unit,
and
they
would
not
be
new
hires.
They
would
be
more
experienced
officers
so
that
they
can
get
the
unit
staffed
up
more
quickly
to
address
current
violent
crime.
That
then,
creates
vacancies
right.
P
M
Very
quickly,
I
would
like
to
ask
the
chief
for
clarification:
don't
we
have
funded
vacancies
in
the
police
department?
And
you
know
how
does
this
work
with
that?
Because
I
think
we've
been
funding
police
vacancies
and
you
know
I
don't
know
how
that
match
works
with
the
whole
overall
budget,
so
if
we're
already
paying
for
those,
wouldn't
this
be
budget
neutral.
Thank
you.
G
G
Again,
we're
going
to
talk
about
this
violent
criminal
apprehension
team
and
that
would
be
called
vcat.
That's
an
acronym
that
we've
assigned
to
that,
but
really
we're
talking
tonight
about
the
continuum
of
public
safety
services
that
we
want
to
offer
those
working
living
and
visiting
salt
lake
city.
So
chief
leeb
can
talk
about
the
chat
program
director,
kristen
reichert
can
talk
about
the
park
rangers
program.
G
This
would
be
a
specific
program
to
to
look
and
apprehend
violent
criminal
in
our
in
our
community
and
as
next
slide,
please
sorry
and
ben
kind
of
laid
it
out.
In
summary,
this
is
a
program
that
is
that
it
goes
through
the
cops
hiring
program
to
fund
two
ten
new
police
officers.
G
G
It
is
known
that
a
small
number
of
repeat
violent
offenders
are
responsible
for
a
lot
of
the
crime
in
our
city
and
identifying
and
apprehending
those
and
those
most
violent.
Offenders
can
have
a
significant
impact
on
crime
trends
and
the
quality
of
life
here
in
salt
lake
city
next
slide.
G
I
won't
go
too
much
into
this
benny
covered
most
of
this,
and
this
is
just
the
technical
aspect
of
the
grant
and
it
is
a
2020
cops
hiring
program.
We
do
have
five
years
to
to
enact
it
and
to
complete
this
grant
next
slide.
G
So
what
we'll
look
like
it'll
have
ten
officers,
one
sergeant
nine
detectives.
We
will.
We
will
make
two
intelligence-led
policing,
ilp
squads
to
specifically
address
again
violent
crime
patterns
and
repeat
violent
crime
offenders
here
in
salt
lake
city,
the
the
unit
will
be
housed
within
the
detective
investigative
unit
and
it'll
focus
and
be
led
through
intelligence-led
policing
strategies
and
performance
measures
that
come
out
of
our
compstat
model.
G
Violent
criminal
apprehension
team
will
focus
on
number
one
people
who
are
who
threaten
to
do
the
most
harm
and
danger
in
our
community.
I
want
to
point
out
a
few
weeks
ago.
Well,
maybe
a
week
and
a
few
days
ago,
a
council
member
that
we
had
a
case
that
fit
the
model
of
our
violent
crime
apprehension
team.
G
We
had
a
person
who
committed
a
violent
act
against
one
of
our
community
members,
leaving
her
with
critical
injuries,
the
suspect
fled
and
was
on
the
run
for
several
days
before
being
apprehended.
This
is
exactly
what
vcat
would
do.
This
is
the
model
and
approach
that
we
would
use.
We
would
have
dedicate
a
dedicated
team
using
intelligence,
driven
strategic
strategies
to
identify,
locate
and
safely
apprehend
violent
criminals
here
in
our
community
next
slide.
G
The
one
thing-
and
this
this
goes
back
to
to
council
member
essler's
question-
is
we:
it
is
a
balancing
act,
but
right
now,
when
we
have
these
type
of
crimes
that
occur
in
our
city,
we
have
to
we
pull
from
our
specialty
squads
like
your
bike
squads
to
go
after
these,
these
individuals
and
right
now
patrol
the
patrol
officers
and
the
detectives
they
do
not
have
the
staff
hours
and
the
time
to
apprehend
the
the
these
individuals.
G
So
this
this
is
where
we
get
that,
where
we
leverage
this
team
to
go
after
these
individuals.
But
what
I
want
to
point
out
what
v
cat
is
not
is
they
will
not?
This
is
not
a
team
that
would
be
used
for
low-level
enforcement
for
enforcement
of
minor
infractions
traffic
enforcement.
They
will
be
focused
on
the
violent
criminals
in
our
community,
those
who
are
committed,
those
that
commit
crimes
against
our
children,
our
loved
ones
and
complete
strangers
next
slide,
and
this
really
just
builds
upon
that
continuum
of
public
safety
service
council.
G
We
will
continue
to
support
our
correspondent
model
to
remove
barriers,
connect
people
to
services.
Our
cit
program
will
will
continue,
but
we
and
we
will
continue
to
develop
our
police
civilian
response
team
and
to
develop
our
call
diversion
program.
So
this
is
just
one
piece
of
this
whole
holistic
approach.
Public
safety.
H
Oh,
that's
a
quick
question,
mr
chair.
I
guess
the
question
that
councilmember
peter
wrestler
brought
up
of
this.
I
guess
I'm.
We
we've
had
vacancies
in
the
tens,
at
least
for
the
last
two
years.
H
So
how
would
approving
additional
ftes
actually
change
anything
if
we
can't
fill
up
the
vacancies
that
we
have
so
I
mean
I
think
adding
this
has
to,
and
I
know
in
a
couple
weeks
ago
you
talked
about
pay
and
how
we're
no
longer
the
top
of
the
state.
So
I
think
that
is.
This
is
another
one
of
those
like
do.
We
need
to
consider
this
in
context
of
if
we're
approving,
10
additional
ftes,
but
we
can't
even
hire
the
30
vacancies
that
we
have
right
now.
H
How
does
this
change
anything
and
will
approving
these
additional
10
fdes
sort
of
force
us
to
do
the
due
salary
increases
in
the
next
budget
budget
opening
which
we
may
need
to
do
anyway?
But
is
this
a
conversation
that
should
be
had
in
context,
and
I
realize
that
there
that
it's
a
grant,
but
I'm
like
wondering
how
we,
if
we
approve
the
grant
now
how
it
makes
any
difference,
because
we
can't
even
fill
the
I
think
what
37
at
the
last
time
you
gave
us
an
update.
G
Yeah
councilmember
great
question:
right
now
we
have
logistically.
We
have
30
officers
slated
to
start
in
our
may
academy
and
then
next
january,
when
we
have
another
academy,
we'll
have
another
30.,
so
we're
on
a
trajectory
to
fill
those
those
those
slots
it
just
takes
time.
It
just
takes
time
to
get
through
those
academy
and
and
then
going
back
to
council
member
pedro
esler's
question:
it's
a
balancing
act.
If
you
have
a
lot
of
violent
crime
and
you
have
a
group
of
individuals
that
are
committing
a
lot
of
that
crime.
G
If
you
can
take
dedicated
resources,
apprehend
them
get
them
off
the
street,
you
reduce
a
lot
of
crime.
So
it's
a
balancing
act.
So
we
would
like
to
take
these
individuals
get
that
started,
focus
on
that
violent
crime
and
then
backfill
those
10
additional
officers
through
the
academies
that
will
be
coming.
So
it
just
it's
just
a
matter
of
time
to
get
through
the
hiring
process
and
to
get
them
to
the
street.
M
You
know-
and
I
I
don't
want
to
put
the
chief
on
the
spot
here
but
yeah.
I
would
like
a
little
more
information
about
how
how
this
works
and
about
like
the
vacancies,
and
we
are
already
funding
some
of
those
vacancies-
could
could
that
sorry?
Could
that
funny
already
work
for
this
grant
and
you
know
so
I
I
appreciate
I
don't
want
to
again
to
put
the
chief
on
the
spot,
but
that
that
information
will
be
very
useful
for
me.
So
thank
you.
G
Thank
you,
councilmember
kuwait.
If
you'd
like
we
can,
we
can
get
a
written
response
back.
I
can
work
with
mary
beth
on.
There
is
attrition
savings.
There's
money
that
you
know
we
aren't
paying
for
those
30
36
right
now,
so
some
of
that
money
could
go
towards
funding
this
grant
our
portion
of
it,
but
as
we
continue
to
hire
and
fill
up,
those
ranks
that
that,
hopefully,
that
money
will
will
will
gradually
shrink
away,
and
we
won't
have
that
money,
but
we'll
have
our
department
full
of
police
officers.
A
H
Sorry
yeah,
I
I
guess
if
this
is
the
right,
strategic
public
safety
move
to
take
these
officers
that
are
currently,
I
assume
on
patrol
and
elevate
them
to
a
detective
role
where
they
can
do.
I
think
you
call
it
intelligence
based
policing,
why?
H
Why
is
it?
Why
is
it
necessary
for
us
to
have
this
grant
in
order
to
do
that?
Wouldn't
we
make
that
move
regardless
and
if
so,
isn't
it
something
that
we
could
discuss
in
what
three
months
when
we
discussed
the
budget
opening
to
the
to
the
point
that
we've
all
been
making
for
this
this
budget
amendment
is,
would
it
be
something
that
we
could
consider
in
the
context
of
every
other
need
that
the
police
department
has,
which
we
know
are
many.
G
That's
why
we'd
like
to
get
started
on
this
and
and
specifically
it's
a
goal
of
our
revised
crime
control
plan
to
focus
on
the
violent
crime
that
we're
seeing
that
we
we
saw
the
spike
in
last
year,
and
so
we
think
this
is
a
strategic
move
that
would
help
reduce
the
crime
and
also
it
would
it
would
it
would
leverage
our
officers
so
they
could
stay.
They
could
you
know,
stay
in
the
communities.
G
H
Does
that,
maybe
I
should
ask
the
question
a
different
way:
couldn't
we
accept
the
grant
you
could
if,
with
the
get
the
resources
that
we
have
right
now,
if
you
could,
you
could
make
the
determination
that
it's
the
best
strategy
to
elevate
these
patrol
officers
into
this
special
role
and
then
but
not
increase
the
number
of
ftds
in
the
police
department
until
the
upcoming
budget
discussion
in
june,
because
it'll
take
until
june
to
hire
10
more
officers
anyway,
so
at
any
rate
we're
taking
10
officers
off
the
street
to
put
them
in
the
special
unit,
and
I
will
totally
trust
you
if
you
say
that
that's
the
best
that
creates
the
best
safety
in
our
community.
H
K
Of
kind
of
circular
conversations,
no
no
well
actually
no
they're
great
questions.
The
I
think
what
we
need
is
to
find
out
exactly
what
the
deadline
is
and
exactly
when
the
city
received
the
grant.
It
did
get
a
negative
reception
from
the
council
at
one
point
previously,
so
it's
possible.
We
are
bumping
up
against
the
deadline.
So
what
was
it
march
2020
that
this
grant
was
advanced
as
a
possibility
to
the
city
or
2021?
K
That's
one
question
second,
is:
is
there
a
supplanting
problem
and
supplanting
is
when
you
take
grant
money
and
you
use
it
for
things
you
were
already
going
to
do,
and
so
I
I
would
guess
that
that
might
be
an
issue
here
and
then
you've
probably
already
told
us
this,
but
the
whole
dollar
amount
of
the
grant.
It's
probably
in
the
millions,
and
so
the
question
is:
do
we
want
to
get
if
we're
going
to
have
police
officers
in
addition
to
what
we
already
have
budgeted?
K
G
Mr
chair,
those
are
great
points
and
I
think
it's
a
follow-up.
I
I
do
believe
executive
director,
gus
jensen.
We
did
receive
that
early
2020.,
so
we're.
I
think,
we're
bumping
up
against
deadlines
on
that,
but
I
think
this
is.
We
would
be
glad
to
to
have
a
follow-up
and
get
you
the
the
answers.
A
more
detailed
answer
for
what
you're
asking
tonight
all
right.
Thank.
E
Thanks,
so
if
you
can
advance
to
the
next
slide,
please,
this
is
just
a
brief
overview
of
the
park
ranger
program
and
it
looks
like
our
little
logo
ended
up
in
the
middle
anyway.
E
They
are
serving
as
a
friendly
representative
for
the
city,
they're,
building
relationships
in
our
parks,
creating
community
and
assisting
park.
Visitors,
they'll,
support,
positive
use
of
downtown
parks,
natural
areas
and
help
in
activation
efforts
and
maintenance.
So
activation
efforts
would
be
like
providing
education
activities,
for
example,
that
could
be
something
like
teaching
kids
to
fly
fish
or
about
riparian
corridors.
E
Just
to
build
some
of
that
community
support
the
outreach
efforts
of
human
services
organizations,
because
they're
in
the
parks
they'll
be
talking
to
people
and
help
assist
those
people
who
are
in
need
of
support,
support
to
connect
them
with
those
services
and
to
promote
voluntary
compliance
by
educating
the
public
about
park
code
and
park
rules.
A
Any
further
discussions:
we
will
have
follow-up
on
this
because
we
have
some
great
questions
on
the
whole
funding
and
the
hiring
process,
because
it's
it
covers
multiple
years
and
it
crosses
multiple
budget
years
too.
The
hiring
process
in
the
training
process
so
great
questions,
great
discussion
on
that
portion
of
the
budget.
Amendment
then
back
to
you
is,
if
there's
anything
to
finish
up.
S
Those
are
all
the
items
in
the
budget
amendment
I
think
the
fire
chief
and
the
9-1-1
department
director
also
had
a
quick
slide.
Oh.
N
Good
evening
council
I'm
trying
to
get
my
camera
on
there
we
go.
I
think
I've
had
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
most
of
the
council
members
in
small
groups.
This
past
fall
about
chat,
but
I'll
give
you
a
quick
summary
because
there's
so
many
so
many
programs
going
on
right
now.
N
N
So
we
will
connect
the
individuals
to
answers.
The
information,
as
it
says
in
bullet
number
three
also
try
and
develop
a
plan,
a
long-term
plan
to
assist
our
patients,
the
idea
being
that
we
do
not
respond
to
the
same
individuals
over
and
over
again
in
a
system.
That's
really
not
designed
to
address
their
specific
problems,
whether
that
be
mental
health
or
substance,
abuse
or
some
form
of
ongoing
trauma,
chronic
trauma,
so
chat
is
not
designed
to
respond
to
violent
situations
or
any
situations
where
a
weapon
is
is
clearly
present.
N
So
in
those
cases,
obviously,
we
would
have
the
assistance
of
our
police
department,
sisters
and
brothers
on
that
side
of
the
hall.
So
we
have
been
allocated
currently
three
social
work
positions.
We
are
in
the
process
of
interviewing
those
individuals.
Right
now
we
we've
had
approximately
16
applicants
for
those
positions
that
includes
one
supervisor
and
two
social
workers
to
operate
in
the
field
or
to
do
a
response,
outreach
or
follow-up
with
these
patients.
N
D
D
You
know.
Police
department
calls
some
of
those
recurring
issues
that
are
not
violent,
but
our
people
are
suffering
out
there
and
we
see
in
the
streets,
especially
in
downtown
salt
lake
city.
So
I'm
excited
chief.
I've
told
you
this
before,
so
we'll
see
how
it
goes,
and
let
us
know
if
you
how
we
can
support
you
in
promoting
this
or
any
other
way.
Thanks.
O
Good
afternoon,
council
members,
it's
a
pleasure
to
be
with
you
again,
you
know,
911,
we
have
a
direct
role
in
all
of
these
programs.
Rather
it's
you
know
the
logistics
or
the
dispatching
piece.
I've
been
working
very
closely
with
chief
brown,
director,
riker
and
chief
leap
on
implementing
some
of
these.
The
one
that
we
are
you
know
most
actively
involved
in
at
the
moment,
though,
is
the
mobile
crisis
outreach
team.
I
am
caught
that
a
lot
of
you
are
familiar
with.
O
You
know
a
person
that
they
can
lean
on,
that's
been
in
their
place
and
that
really
you
know,
can
provide
a
high
level
of
care
for
them.
The
team
arrives
in
unmarked
vehicles
to
support
privacy.
They
strive
to
keep
those
that
they
serve
in
their
communities
in
our
direction
in
their
communities,
out
of
hospitals
and
out
of
detention
facilities,
their
their
goal
is,
you
know,
nobody
goes
to
jail.
O
Nobody
goes
to
the
hospital
if
it's
possible,
they
want
to
make
sure
that
they
stay
in
their
communities
where
they
can
get
the
help
and
support
that
they
need
slc
911.
We
work
closely
with
the
leadership
of
mcott
we're
meeting
at
this
point
on
a
monthly
basis,
and
we
develop
a
seamless
call
flow
with
them
to
ensure
that
we
can
meet
the
needs
of
our
callers
and
our
visitors
and
provide
mental
health
options
where
it's
more
appropriate
than
a
police
officer.
O
As
an
alternative
response,
you
know
to
the
call
for
help.
I
pulled
some
numbers
from
emcot
with
my
help
with
my
friends
over
there,
since
february
of
2021
dispatch
has
referred,
516
calls
to
mcat.
Our
actual
utilization
is
probably
much
higher
than
that.
They
only
track
the
calls
where
we
directly
refer
them,
though
there's
many
cases
where
law
enforcement
can
directly
refer
them,
and
so
that's
not
even
included
in
this
number
out
of
the
516
calls
that
we
were
able
to
divert
over
to
mccot.
O
O
230
234
calls
were
able
to
be
resolved
just
with
a
phone
call
with
a
crisis
support
professional.
These
are
people.
You
know
that
just
wanted
to
talk.
They
were
having
a
bad
day.
They
weren't
necessarily,
you
know
actively
considering
suicide
or
anything
like
that,
and
they
were
able
to
talk
to
them
and
get
the
issue
resolved
and
then
out
of
that,
232
calls
were
handled
by
a
direct
in-person
response
where
they
were
either
referred
to
a
higher
level
of
care,
or
they
were
able
to.
O
We
are
starting
a
pilot
program
sometime
later
this
year
after
the
first
of
july,
where
they
plan
on
having
a
counselor
come
in
to
dispatch
so
that
they
can
take
over
those
calls
up
front
without
having
to
wait
part
of
the
problem
with
our
call
flow
now
is
we
have
to
transfer
them
to
mcot
and
obviously,
if
somebody's
in
a
mental
health
crisis
at
the
moment,
a
long
hold
time
is
not
super
beneficial
to
that
situation.
O
So,
they're
going
to
experiment
with
having
somebody
come
over
sit
with
our
dispatchers
and
either
coach
them
through
these
calls,
or
actually
take
them
over
themselves
on
a
trial
basis
to
see
what
kind
of
results
they
have
and
if
they're
you
know
better
than
what
we
currently
are
experiencing.
So
with
that,
that's
my
presentation,
I'm
open
for
any
questions.
If
anybody
has
them.
F
F
This
is
like
exactly
what
I
envisioned
in
my
brain
a
few
years
ago
when
we
started
talking
about
alternative
response
models
and,
and
we've
done
so
much
work
and
u.s
departments
have
done
so
much
work
and
chief
brown
you've
done
so
much
work
as
well,
with
really
looking
at
between
the
audit
and
the
funding
sources
and
the
creativity
and
the
camaraderie
and
the
collaboration
between
all
of
it.
It
just
like
good
work,
and
these
numbers
are
pretty
incredible.
F
I
just
like.
We
still
have
a
lot
to
do,
but
I
certainly
appreciate
where,
where
we're
at
right
now
and
where
we're
going
and
and
where
the
vision
is
going.
So
thanks
to
all
four
of
you
chiefs
and
directors,
did
I
miss
anybody?
Nope,
okay,.
A
And
I
would
I
just
echo
what
councilmember
fowler
said.
G
A
Appreciate
all
this
effort
together
and
and
all
these
different
avenues
we're
taking
to
support
the
quality
of
life
of
our
residents.
I
appreciate
everything
you're
doing
without
any
other
further
questions
at
this
time.
A
S
So
I
I
believe,
that's
everything
for
budget
amendment.
Six
staff
will
follow
up
on
the
several
questions
that
we
heard
today.
G
A
I
think
we're
moving
on
to
did
you
have
anything
on
the
last
time.
D
I
had
a
question:
do
we
go
over
item
810,
which
is
the
allen
park
capital
improvement
project
request?
Did
we
talk
about
that
already?
We.
D
S
Budget
neutral,
it's
switching
to
different
funding
sources,
since
one
of
them
is
bond
funding
and
they
can't
use
it
on
the
the
activation
plan
for
allen
park,
and
so
they
want
to
use
cip
funding
for
the
plan
and
then
take
the
bond
funding
and
use
it
for
capital
improvements.
S
D
Great,
thank
you
ben.
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
because
we
had
a
this
discussion
about
pioneer
park
earlier
and
there
was
some
hesitation
but
with
allen
park.
I
wanted
to
know
that
we
didn't
have
that
much
hesitation
in
funding
it
when
the
seven
million
dollar
request
came
and
this
board,
I
mean
this
council
funded
it
and
we
don't
have
much
hesitation
with
this
capital
improvement
plan.
It's
an
east
side
park.
I
voted
for
this.
D
A
S
So
the
subcommittee
met
a
second
time
and
finished
reviewing
the
46
applications
for
the
redistricting
advisory
commission
and
listed
in
the
staff
report
are
the
nine
applicants.
The
subcommittee
is
recommending
for
the
full
council's
consideration,
and
this
is
one
representative
from
each
council
district
and
then
two
at-large
members,
so
the
council
could
approve
the
applicants
as
a
set
with
one
straw
poll
up
or
down
a
formal
vote
is
not
required.
This
is
an
informal
process
advising
the
council
and
then
the
the
subcommittee
asked
me
to
pass
along
that.
S
Their
overall
goal
was
having
diversity
represented
in
this
group
across
multiple
factors
and
some
examples
of
that.
There
are
five
women
and
four
men
they
span
over
six
decades
in
their
ages,
from
youngest
to
oldest
for
generational
diversity,
homeowners
and
renters
are
included
about
half
the
households
in
the
city
are
renters,
multiple
ethnicities
are
represented.
S
Members
of
the
lgbt
community
are
included,
there's
a
variety
of
professional
and
academic
backgrounds,
and
some
of
the
applicants
live
in
neighborhoods
that
are
likely
to
experience
boundary
changes.
This
includes
wasatch
hollow
the
central.
Ninth
business
district,
fair
park
and
the
guadalupe
neighborhoods
and
then
the
two
at-large
members.
S
One
of
the
at-large
members
is
from
the
west
side
district
2,
and
this
was
intentional
to
acknowledge
and
balance
historical
inequities,
as
well
as
recognize
district
2
as
the
only
district
that
lost
populations.
So
it's
likely
to
have
boundary
changes
as
a
result
of
that.
The
other
at
large
member
is
from
district
4
which,
on
the
other
end
of
the
spectrum,
had
the
most
population
increase.
So
it
will
also
see
significant
boundary
changes,
and
I
don't
know
if
the
subcommittee
members
wanted
to
add
to
what
I
just
summarized.
I
just.
A
Want
to
say
that
I
appreciate
the
effort
that
the
subcommittee
did.
That
was
a
lot
of
extra
work.
I
mean
what
ben
just
rehashed
was
beautiful,
so
ben,
could
you
just
read
through
the
names
and
then
we
can
take
a
straw
poll
on,
but
I
I
do
want
to.
I
really
appreciate
the
subcommittee's
effort
on
this.
This
nice
work.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
I'm
thanking
this
group
of
nine
people
ahead
of
time
for
their
future
work
engaging
in
this
process.
Mr
chair
councilman,
please.
M
I
wanted
to
thank
also
the
other
applicants
for
the
you
know
putting
their
names
out
there.
It
was
an
amazing,
impressive
group
of
people.
I
hope
we
can
get
every
single
one
of
them
and
a
board
or
another
opportunity.
So
I
you
know.
I
hope
that
we
can,
you
know,
get
involved
if
they
are
not
already
on
the
board,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
for
all
the
putting
their
names
out
there
and
sending
all
that
information.
H
Mr
chair
I'll
propose
a
straw
poll,
but
for
before
I
do
that
kind
of
take
a
quick
moment
of
personal
privilege
and
just
say
absolutely
about
two
a
day
I
think
24
hours
before
the
applications
were
supposed
to
be
closed.
I
found
out
that
district
5
did
not
have
any
applicants,
so
I
frantically
sent
out
a
bunch
of
texts
to
people,
and
then
we
ended
up
with
the
most
applicants.
H
Several
of
them
were
people
that
I
that
I
personally
invited
to
apply.
So
thank
you
to
everyone
that
did
apply,
and
especially
those
that
did
apply
but
were
not
selected.
Thank
you
for
being
willing
to
participate
in
that
process.
So
with
that
I'll
make
a
straw
poll
that
we
support
the
subcommittee's
subcommittees.
A
Everybody
understand
this,
the
straw
poll
thumbs
up
for
approval
and
that's
unanimous.
Thank
you
very
much
and
and
again
thank
you
for
the
to
the
the
newly
informed
infor
looney
formed
the
district
advisory
commission.
Mr.
F
Church
boy,
terry,
real,
quick.
I
just
also
want
to
thank
ben
and
our
team
for
walking
quickly
getting
meetings
together
with
the
three
of
us
and
having
all
of
it
ready
and
it
made
it
was
a
very
as
there
was
time
con
in
it.
We
put
some
we
put
time
into
it,
but
it
was
easy
procedurally
because
of
the
work
that
our
staff
did
to
help
us,
and
also
thanks
to
other
council
members
who
gave
us
their
input.
F
We
also
want
to
say
that
we
really
did
rely
on
a
lot
of
what
your
input
was
as
well,
so
that
you
know
you
know
your
districts
better
than
probably
we
know
your
district
so
just
want
to
thank
everybody's
for
their
everybody,
for
their
participation
really
was
a
neat
process
to
go
through
and
saw
a
lot
of
people
that
we
definitely
need
to
get
involved
in
in
our
boards
here.
So
thank
you
to
all
of
you,
particularly
staff.
Thank
you.
A
And
thank
you
ben
for
that
presentation.
Briefing
all
right!
We'll
move
on
to
item
909,
we're
we're
moving
that
on
to
next
week,
item
number
board,
appointment,
public
utilities,
advisory
committee
and
on
the
screen.
A
O
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
can
hear
me.
Okay!
Is
that
correct,
fantastic?
Well,
a
few
years
ago
I
finished
my
phd
I'm
a
political
sociologist
by
training
in
education.
O
So
you
know,
public
policy
is
always
something
that
just
interests
me,
I'm
probably
other
than
lawyers,
somebody
that
actually
enjoys
reading
the
minutes
of
many
different
meetings
and
public
policy
just
for
fun,
and
I
was
speaking
with
one
of
my
friends,
marion
hubbard,
who
some
of
you
may
actually
know,
and
she
had
actually
mentioned
that
the
board
was
looking
for
a
potential
member
as
part
of
this
group,
and
I
did
a
little
bit
of
research
into
it
and
thought
it
would
be
really
interesting.
A
Hey
thank
you
very
much,
you're
you're
free
of
any
questions
which
is
good.
I
I
say
that
it's
funny,
sorry
that
didn't
come
off
right,
but
I
appreciate
the
engagement
and
I
you'll
be
on
our
consent
agenda
tonight
to
borrow
a
phrase
from
a
former
council
chair
of
wharton.
You
need
not
be
present
to
win,
but
you
always
are
welcome
to
the
formal
meeting
starting
at
seven
o'clock.
Q
A
A
T
T
So
with
that,
I
got
my
bachelor's
environmental
studies
bachelor
degree
in
monterey.
California,
and
my
capstone
project
was
working
with
local
schools
and
working
with
children
in
education
of
point
and
non-point
sources
of
pollution,
and
these
were
children
who
didn't
have
access
to
the
beach
or
any
they
weren't
knowledgeable
on
this
and
to
see
their
passion
grow
for
it,
the
more
they
were
educated
about
pollution
and
our
water
resources.
T
It
was
inspiring,
and
that
also
took
me
to
want
to
get
my
masters
in
environmental
engineering
and
water
systems,
so
I'm
currently
a
environmental
planner
at
aecom,
and
I
work
for
transportation
projects
and
water
projects
under
the
national
environmental
policy
act.
So
I
do
a
lot
of
documents
that
get
the
holistic
view
of
how
we're
impacting
the
environment
and
how
it
impacts
the
community,
and
I
think
the
biggest
passion
for
me
in
this
is
the
equality
and
the
environmental
justice,
because
it
is
so
important
and
especially
within
our
community.
F
F
I
when
I
first
came
on
the
council,
laura
brever
made
me
a
water
nerd,
and
so
I
I
feel
your
passion
and
get
it,
and
I
really
do
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
to
volunteer
and
spend
time
on
our
boards
and
help
us
make
the
right
decisions
as
we
continue
to
protect
not
just
our
water
but
all
of
our
environment
in
this
area,
and
it's,
I
think,
a
passion
for
the
majority
of
us,
if
not
all,
of
us
on
this
council.
So
thanks
for
taking
the
time,
I
really
appreciate
it.
A
Thank
you
councilmember,
fowler
and
catherine,
and
also
alexander.
Your
your
passion
is
wonderful
and
you
may
be
working
with
another
passionate
water
woman.
Can
I
call
you
that
director
briefer,
so
I'm
looking
forward.
A
So,
as
I
I
told
alexander
you're
on
our
consent
agenda
tonight,
you
need
not
be
present
to
win,
but
you
can
join
us
on
the
formal
meet
at
seven
o'clock.
But
thank
you
for
your
engagement
and
thank
you
for
your
passion
with
water.
Fully
appreciated
have
a
great
evening.
A
F
D
L
L
Welcome
to
capital
city
news,
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
salt
lake
city
government.
I'm
your
host
brian
young,
with
salt
lake
city
tv.
We
spoke
today
with
aaron
mendenhall
mayor
of
salt
lake
city,
about
her
state
of
the
city
address.
Our
history
minute
is
about
the
kkk
and
efforts
to
drive
them
from
salt
lake
city,
but
before
we
get
back
to
those,
let's
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update.
Our
look
back
and
our
look
ahead.
L
At
its
february
1st
meeting,
the
city
council
received
updates
from
the
mayor
about
the
ongoing
covit
19
pandemic,
and
issues
surrounding
homelessness
received
a
briefing
on
the
upcoming
redistricting
process.
They
also
discussed
budget
amendment
6,
looking
at
new
city
staff
and
additional
emergency
rental
assistance
funds
from
the
federal
government
and,
along
with
mayor
aaron
mendenhall,
they
adopted
a
ceremonial
resolution
to
mark
the
20th
anniversary
of
salt
lake
city's
olympic
winter
games
to
learn
more
visit.
Slc.Gov
council.
L
On
january
25th,
salt
lake
city,
mayor
erin,
mendenhall
addressed
a
television
audience
for
her
annual
state
of
the
city
address
from
affordable
housing,
solutions
to
homelessness
support
and
a
significant
reduction
in
crime.
Salt
lake
city
continues
to
forge
ahead
with
goals
that
will
build
on
mayor
mendenhall's,
overarching
priorities
of
harnessing
growth
of
the
city
for
the
good
of
all
residents,
protecting
the
environment,
creating
inclusive
and
equitable
opportunities
for
every
community
and
caring
and
supporting
the
city
family.
L
To
watch
the
full
speech
visit,
our
youtube
page
in
an
effort
led
by
mayor
aaron,
mendenhall
uta
fares
will
be
free
during
the
month
of
february.
Traditionally
february
is
a
very
challenging
month
for
air
quality
along
the
wasatch
front,
but
public
transit
is
part
of
the
solution
to
offset
the
pollution
and
help
improve
air
quality
in
the
valley.
Fares
will
be
free
in
february
across
uta's,
entire
service
area
on
all
uta
bus
and
rail
services,
including
front
runner,
ski
bus,
paratransit
service
park,
city,
slc,
connect
and
uta
on
demand.
L
R
B
We've
been
working
really
hard
as
a
city
and
I'm
incredibly
proud
of
both
the
the
residents
and
businesses
but
salt
lake
city
corporation
team
as
well,
and
there's
a
lot
to
look
forward
to.
We
talked
about
a
lot
about
air
quality
and
the
initiatives
kind
of
from
top,
but
the
climate
addressing
the
climate
through
carbon
reduction
and
greenhouse
gas
emission
reduction.
B
Talking
about
getting
100
net
renewable
energy
coming
into
the
city
for
every
salt
lake
city
customer
by
2030,
if
not
before,
we
also
talked
about
having
almost
a
hundred
percent
of
the
city's
renewable
energy
needs
being
met
by
this
time.
Next
year,
early
next
year
on
80
megawatt
solar
farm
that
we
just
broke
ground
on
a
few
months
ago,
we'll
be
up
and
running
all
the
way
marching
down
sort
of
to
your
backyards.
We're
working
on
expanding
public
transit.
B
We
made
a
big
reach
last
year
late
last
year
by
putting
a
ride,
share
program
with
uta
and
a
company
called
vi
where
you
can
get
picked
up,
sometimes
it'll
be
a
shared
ride
and
for
only
two
dollars
and
fifty
cents,
you
can
basically
get
cheaper
than
an
uber.
A
lift
but
the
same
kind
of
connectivity
to
our
public
transit
system
or
anywhere
else
in
the
service
area.
We're
going
to
keep
pushing
the
envelope
on
cleaning
our
air
in
every
way.
B
We
can
at
every
level
that
we
possibly
can
as
a
city
government,
and
one
last
thing
was
that
on
state
of
the
city
day,
we
also
announced
with
our
partners
the
free,
fair
february,
which
I
think
is
the
most
grand
experiment.
We've
ever
had
as
a
state
on
transit,
ridership
we've
never
had
a
month
of
fearless
transit,
we've
never
had
the
ski
bus
and
even
front
runner
included
in
it.
L
B
We
also
saw
a
reduction
in
crime
over
the
course
of
2021,
which
was
a
significant
swing
from
where
we
started.
It's
actually
a
32
point
reduction
in
crime
to
get
to
a
six
percent
overall
reduction,
and
this
was
after
a
dramatic
increase
throughout
2020
and
into
early
21
in
cities
really
across
the
country.
You're
going
to
continue,
I
hope,
to
see
our
numbers
of
crime
decrease,
call
response
times
decrease,
which
they've
been
doing
month
over
month.
For
several
months
now,
you're
going
to
see
salt
lake
city
police
department
be
fully
restaffed
by
this
summer.
B
A
lot
of
progress
happening.
It's
never
going
to
be
done
and
we're
up
for
the
fight
we're
up
for
the
conversation
of
asking.
How
do
we
do
it
better?
How
do
we
make
this
city
safer
for
both
our
officers
and
our
residents
and
that
we
need
you
as
a
part
of
that
conversation,
in
order
to
make
these
great
strides
forward.