►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Formal Meeting - 03/01/2022
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting please use this link https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
While
the
masking
requirement
was
just
lifted,
we
are
still
balancing
the
safety
of
everyone
who
maybe
joined
us
in
person.
We
accept
the
situation
will
continue
to
evolve
and
we
will
continue
to
update
your
our
practices
and
guidelines
as
well.
For
now,
we
are
we're
not
requiring
masks
in
the
building,
but
we
do
ask
everyone
to
stay
social
distance
and
if
you
are
uncomfortable,
you
are
more
than
welcome
to
wearing
a
mask
and
but
if
you
are
coming
up
to
the
podium,
we
do
appreciate.
A
If
you
would
take
your
mask
off,
so
we
can
hear
you
better
able
to
hear
you
and
talk.
Our
staff
will
also
be
helping
with
seating
and
spacing
so
that
we
can
maintain
our
social
discipline.
Thank
you
very
much
I'll
move
on
to
item
number
two,
which
is
the
pledge
of
allegiance.
So
please
join
me
in
the
pledge
of
allegiance
and
we'll
stand
in
the
flag.
A
Before
we
begin
moving
through
the
our
agenda,
I
want
to
mention
and
review
our
rules
of
decorum.
These
are
guidelines
that
the
city
council
has
always
had
in
place
to
help
our
meetings,
progress
in
an
orderly
civil
efficient
way,
so
that
everyone
has
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
A
If
you
violate
this
rule,
your
line
will
be
muted
or
you'll,
be
asked
to
stop
if
you
feel
the
need
to
use
profanity
or
disrespectful
remarks
to
express
your
point,
you're
welcome
to
email,
council
members
or
call
our
comment
line.
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
webex
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
decorum.
If
your
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
make
contact
with
you
to
gather
that
information
from
you
for
those
joining
in
webex.
A
Please
monitor
your
chat
in
case.
We
try
to
reach
out
scott
corpeny
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
webex
portion
of
our
meeting
and
we'll
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
messages
or
any
questions
with
your
registration
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks.
So
please
limit
messaging
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
changes
to
your
registration.
A
A
C
A
D
E
F
G
Thank
you
for
having
me
this
is
always
both
a
delightful
and
a
painstaking
process.
As
a
council
member,
I
know,
as
a
former
council
member,
I
had
that
experience,
and
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
this
is
the
only
line
of
funding
that
comes
directly
to
cities,
and
it
was
actually
our
former
senator
orrin
hatch,
who
helped
create
cdbg.
So
thank
you,
senator
hatch,
for
making
a
connection
directly
to
cities.
G
Our
city
and
our
residents,
as
you
know,
are
facing
historic
challenges
from
the
kovit
19
pandemic:
housing,
affordability
and
increases
in
unsheltered
individuals.
So
these
funds
will
strategically
help
ease
those
challenges
and
really
make
our
city
a
better
place
for
all
to
live
in.
I'm
also
happy
to
announce
that
the
recommendations
you
are
seeing,
they
all
advance
the
city's
goals
that
are
listed
in
our
hud
2020
through
2024,
consolidated
plan
and
those
are
affordable,
housing,
homeless
services,
access
to
transportation,
building
a
resilient
community
and
behavioral
health.
G
I'm
also
happy
to
tell
you
that
some
of
the
recommendations
specifically
advance
the
goals
for
my
administration
for
2022,
which
you
know
we
released
in
january
early
february
with
our
slc
mayor
plan.com,
which
we
do
every
year.
One
of
those
is
a
new
project.
It's
called
the
icast
project
and
you'll
see
it
is
recommended
for
funding
under
cdbg
and
it's
a
new
zero
emissions
residential
rehabilitation
program
and
it
converts
54,
affordable
units
from
natural
gas
to
all
electricity.
G
It
improves
the
weatherization
of
54
units
and,
of
course
it
helps
improve
our
air
quality
as
a
city
there's
also
a
funding
recommendation
for
improvements
in
the
ballpark
community
and
that's
in
partnership
with
our
transportation
department.
This
recommendation
helps
increase
the
safety
and
ada
accessibility
for
pedestrian
crossings
at
the
ballpark
track
station
along
13
south.
G
G
I
hope
that
our
public
weighs
in
on
these
issues
as
they
have
historically,
and
I
have
to
thank
our
resident
advisory
boards,
who
put
in
so
many
hours,
volunteering
and
scrutinizing
the
applications
and
measuring
them
against
what
our
plan
is
as
a
city
to
make
sure
that
they
not
only
comply
with
what
hud
has
directed
these
dollars
to
do,
but
they
advance
our
goals
as
a
city.
So
thank
you.
G
Thank
you
to
all
of
our
citizen
volunteers
who
brought
the
recommendations
to
me,
and
now
I
bring
them
to
you
also
to
our
our
city's
housing
stability
division
for
shepherding
this
annual
process
through
and
making
sure
that
we're
compliant
and
providing
guidance.
I
know
that
they're
ready
to
give
you
any
responses
that
you
might
have
about
why
the
recommendations
or
how
the
scoring
happened.
I
think
we
have
some
of
the
best
people
in
the
country
working
on
these
applications
on
our
behalf
as
salt
lake
city
employees,
so
take
advantage
of
their
great
minds
and
expertise.
G
A
F
It's
it's
quite
fulfilling
in
a
lot
of
ways
and
two
that
I
just
want
to
echo
what
the
mayor
said
of
having
input
from
our
community
members.
That
really
helps
us
understand
where
these
funds
need
to
go
outside
of
just
the
the
hard
work
and
recommendations
that
come
from
the
board
and
our
hand.
I
know
they
have
a
new
name
now
or
will
soon,
but
our
housing
division.
F
So
I'm
a
call
for
action
of
people
to
really
reach
out
to
each
of
us
about
some
of
these
programs
and
go
through
this,
because
we
really
do
take
this
seriously.
I
mean
take
everything
seriously,
but
this
is
one
of
those
very
direct
moments
that
I
appreciate
and
is
fulfilling.
So
thank
you
mayor.
D
A
Now
we
begin
our
public
hearing.
Taylor
hill
on
our
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
up.
For
those
who
wish
to
comment,
we
will
call
names
of
people
joining
on
webex
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
receive
comment
cards
once
we
open
the
public
comment.
Kayla
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
the
people
can
have
some
notice
and
be
prepared
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak,
taylor
will
announce
your
name
for
people
on
webex.
A
You
will
unmute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
for
people
in
person.
Please
step
up
to
the
podium
feel
free
to
remove
your
mask
to
make
your
comments
to
into
the
microphone
once
you
begin,
please
state
your
name
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
start
at
the
two
minute.
Mark
staff
will
announce
time
if
you
are
unable
to
finish
your
comments,
please
send
the
rest
of
your
comments
by
email
via
email,
mail
or
calling
our
office.
Your
contact
information
is
posted
in
the
meeting
room
or
in
the
webex
chat.
A
A
H
Great,
the
art
barn
is
a
city-owned
property
located
at
54
finch
lane.
It's
been
used
for
decades
as
the
administrative
headquarters
for
both
the
arts
council
and
the
arts
council
foundation,
housing,
arts,
council,
full-time
employees,
as
well
as
seasonal
and
part-time
employees,
and
providing
a
home
for
the
finch
lane,
art
gallery
and
exhibits.
H
H
A
Thank
you,
sylvia
and
taylor.
You
may
open
the
comments.
A
C
B
No,
you
don't
have
to
set
the
date
on
this
one!
Okay!
So
you,
if
you
because
this
is
a
small
item
and
you're
unanimous
on
it
and
you
haven't-
had
any
public
opposition.
You
could
choose
to
vote
on
it
tonight.
But
if,
but,
if
you
that
wasn't
your
choice,
then
it
would
go
on
unfinished
business
for
next
week.
C
C
F
Substitute
motion
because
we
haven't
voted
yet
so
I'd
make
a
substitute
motion.
Sorry,
council,
member
peter
eschler,
it's
just
logistics.
I
would
actually
make
a
substitute
motion
to
suspend
the
rules
and
adopt
tonight.
C
A
Have
a
motion,
a
substitute
motion
to
close
a
public
hearing
and
move
to
adopt
tonight?
Yes,.
G
K
Budget
amendment
number
six
has
37
items:
they
total
23
million
dollars.
The
two
largest
items
are
a
seven
million
dollar
state
infrastructure,
bank
loan
and
5.8
million
dollars
in
new
federal
funding
for
emergency
rental
assistance.
I
Council
trailer
is
one
person
here
to
speak
to
this
item
and
that
is
victor
sivanek
and
victor.
You
are
now
unmuted.
F
A
D
A
There's
also
items
of
the
budget-
amendment
6
that
are
not
on
this
list
that
are
also
for
future
discussions.
So
this
is
really
a
partial
adoption
of
budget
amendment
6
listed
on
the
sheet.
J
C
C
A
So
the
motion
on
the
on
the
floor
is
for
closing
the
public
hearing
partially
adopt
the
list.
That's
on
that
on
shown
on
the
the
on
on
the
emotion
sheet.
A
F
A
C
C
Chair,
I
further
move
that
the
council
approve
item
a7
as
part
of
part
of
budget
amendment
number
six.
C
C
I'll
second,
it
and
reference
back
to,
I
would
like
to
find
a
way
to
replace
this
with
some
other
celebration,
but
recognizing
the
position
we're
in
this
year
I'll.
Second,
it.
A
C
No
I'm
saying
this
year.
I
think
that,
given
the
timeline
issues
that
lisa
schaefer
raced
with
us
last
time,
we're
kind
of
in
a
bind,
we
don't
have
other
options
for
this
year.
So
I
think
we
should
go
ahead
with
funding
the
fireworks
this
year
and
I
say
that,
based
on
the
fire
fire
department
saying
that
that
it's
their
perception
that
this
does
reduce
individual
use
of
fireworks.
But
I
think
we
should
move
away
from
having
fireworks
displays
and
that's
my
intention
as
well.
J
J
Report-
the
drought
report.
I
was
just
saying
that
we
were
presented
during
work
session.
It
feels
like
that
should
really
inform
this
decision
more
closely,
and
my
understanding
was
that
we
were
entitled
to
a
full
refund
or
we
didn't
have
to
pay
and
up
until
10
days
before
we
would
be
absolved
of
the
responsibility.
So
I
feel
like.
A
And
I
we
can
ask
ben,
but
I
think
I
remember
reading
that
the
drought
was
a
restriction
that
we
could
enforce.
That
on.
This
ben
would
probably
be
able
to
clarify
that,
but
there
was
a
notation
on
use
of
fireworks.
If
it's
in
drought
condition
abc,
we
could.
K
You
are
you're
correct,
mr
chair.
The
administration
indicated
that
the
fireworks
show
could
be
cancelled
if
the
drought
was
above
a
1.2
on
a
federal
severity
index
and
council
member
petro.
Eschler
is
also
correct
that
the
fireworks
show
would
need
to
be
cancelled,
10
days
in
advance
in
order
to
get
a
refund.
G
A
D
Yeah,
so
I
wanted
to
you
know,
give
it
another
another
try
to
to
my
fellow
council
members-
and
I
know
that
you
know
no
being
in
the
room,
makes
it
hard
for
me
to
to
see,
faces
and
understand
where
everybody
is
at
this,
but
I
still
believe
that
this
is
an
incongruent
expenditure
for
this
administration
and
this
city.
You
know
we
are
talking
about
air
quality
and
I
think
that's
you
know
it
is
a
very
important
thing.
While
you
know
just
fireworks
burn,
you
know
25
000
worth
of
fireworks,
burn
and
30
minutes.
D
It's
not
necessarily
impactful
as
far
as
maybe
impactful
in
our
overall
air
quality.
I
think
it
is
a
symbol,
and
I
also
think
that
we
need
to
find
other
ways
of
celebrating,
and
I
know
that
this
is
this
timeline
might
be
too
short
to
find
out,
but
I
believe
that
you
know.
I
believe
that
this
administration
can
figure
it
out.
I
mean
I
have
never
met
so
many
talented
people
working
together
in
a
group
in
a
group,
so
we
live
in
a
desert.
D
D
So
sorry,
this
this
internet
sucks,
so
you
know,
I
think
that
we
need
to
our
cities
to
walk
the
talk,
and
you
know
last
time
I
attended
a
big
event
that
one
big
event
started
a
fire
and
you
know
I
also
talked
to
the
fire
chief
and
the
fire
chief
talked
about.
You
know
not
having
data
for
this.
You
know
and
if
the
administration
wants
to
minimize
the
use
of
fireworks,
maybe
we
should
allocate
this
money
for
educating
the
population
about
no
using
fireworks.
D
E
I
I
have,
I
have
a
question
and
I
asked
the
vice
chair,
but
we
don't
know
what.
If
we
had
a
celebration
lock
box
where
we
could
put
this
25
000
just
remain
there
not
do
the
fireworks,
and
this
is
maybe
an
amy
idea
that
we
had
and
then
use
the
25
000
for
this
year
and
for
next
year
towards
another
type
of
celebration
that
doesn't
include
fireworks.
E
A
So
you're
you're
looking
to
change
the
motion
to
make
a
different
motion.
A
C
C
I
also
feel
that
in
this
year
of
I
mean
hopefully
in
july,
it'll
still
be
safe
to
to
gather
and
to
celebrate,
and
I
would
hate
for
us
not
to
be
able
to
celebrate
the
fourth
of
july
in
our
city,
because
it
sounds
like
it
is
just
frankly
too
late
to
come
up
with
an
alternate
plan
for
this
year.
So
I
guess
weighing
all
of
the
concerns
about
fireworks,
with
the
the
need
that
I
feel
to
celebrate
with
my
community.
C
I
think
I
would
rather
keep
the
fireworks
show
for
this
year
and
then,
but
but
be
very
clear
that
that
we
want
a
different
type
of
celebration
in
2023,
whether
it
be
a
light
show
or
a
laser
show
or
drums
or
whatever
the
case
may
be,
that
can
can
can
help
us
celebrate
in
a
in
a
more
environment,
enviro,
environmentally
friendly
way.
B
Is
that
yes
and
others
may
need
to
chime
in
katie
in
particular,
but
we
need
to
answer
council
member
baltimore's
question
of
whether
that
it
could
be
a
substitute
motion
or
if
it
would
need
to
have
this
motion
voted
on
and
that
be
a
sec,
an
additional
motion.
B
If
this
fails
and
I'll
give
you
my
best
guess,
but
typically
in
the
council,
you
avoid
having
a
substitute,
be
the
opposite
of
what
the
main
motion
is,
and
so
it's
a
matter
of
interpretation
as
to
whether
this
is
the
opposite
of
that.
But
one
spends
the
money
on
fireworks
this
year.
The
other
spends
money
on
something
else
this
year.
E
B
F
I
think
I
think
we
need
to
clarify
the
parliamentary
question
here
and
that
is
do
we
need
to
vote
on
the
motion
that
was
at
the
beginning,
which
was
chris's
motion
to
fund
fireworks
this
year
and
or
excuse
me
darren's
motion
to
fund
fireworks
this
year
and
a
second
by
chris,
I
think,
tech
by
robert's
rules.
We
have
to
vote
on
that
because
the
substitution
is
right,
opposite
of
that
motion.
A
A
F
A
F
So
I
just
want
to
point
out
a
couple
of
things
for
me
on
this
bill
as
we
sit
here
and
struggle
with
where
to
spend
money,
and
I
recognize
that
we've
been
in
a
pandemic
for
two
years
and
we
want
to
get
out
and
celebrate.
I
just
think
that
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
on
fireworks
feels
rather
frivolous
to
me,
and
I
think,
when
we're
looking
at
in
this
same
budget
amendment
spending
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
on
the
swazo
group,
which
is
something
that
actually
has
dedicated.
F
Results
for
people
within
our
communities-
that's
spending
25
000
on
fireworks.
Just
really
like
is
sort
of.
Unfortunately,
just
this
thing
that's
gotten
under
me,
because
there's
so
many
other
places
that
we
could
spend
25
000
and
yes,
we
all
want
a
celebration
and
guess
what
we
can
all
figure
out
a
way
to
celebrate
within
our
communities-
and
I
I
mean,
let
alone
all
of
the
other
things
we've
talked
about
with
fireworks,
the
fire
danger
the
air
quality.
F
But
for
me
it's
sort
of
just
frivolous
and
and
seems
that
you
know
let's,
let's
spend
this
on
our
our
first
nations
that
spend
this
on
our
communities.
They're
struggling.
Let's
put
this
in
you
know,
our
arts
council
wants
extra
money.
So,
let's,
let's
figure
out,
let's
divert
this
to
to
the
arts,
council
and
say:
okay,
arts
council-
maybe
there's
a
way
to
put
this
into
a
permanent
celebration
where
there's
a
work
of
art
that
we
are
funding
by
this.
But
I
I
just
I'm
it
I.
F
I
can't
in
good
faith,
support
fireworks
when
again.
At
the
same
time,
we
we
just
like
the
only
money
we
dedicated
right
now,
recognizing
that
in
the
budget,
it's
going
to
come
back
to
us
again
to
the
swazo
centers
the
same
amount.
That's
I
mean
it
just.
It
seems
it
seems
silly
to
me,
but
yeah
and
with
that
said
my
piece.
Thank
you.
D
I
I
just
wanted
to
add
one
more
thing.
I
don't
want
the
first
emotion
to
feel
like
if
we
are
voting
down
fireworks,
it
means
that
we're
not
celebrating
anything.
I
mean,
I
think
there
is
ways
of
using
the
resources
for
celebration.
It
just
you
know.
I
just
don't
think
that's
the
fireworks
is
the
right
way.
Just
I
wanted
to
throw
that
there
out
there.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
Got
one
question
for
council
member
fowler
since
it's
the
sugar
house
park
is
in
her
district?
Have
we
heard
from
the
community
in
general
from
your
constituency?
We
want
the
fireworks
because
we
feel
like
it
helps
with
the
businesses
and
and
customers
to
come
to
their
businesses.
So
it's
essential
that
we
have
this
celebration
that
it's
historic
these.
F
F
B
F
J
One
more
clarifying
question
regarding
my
fixation:
ben
lidke
introduced
the
measure
for
drought.
That
would
would
qualify
us
as
not
being
safe
for
this.
Sorry,
I'm
not
it's
hard
for
me
on
the
water
stuff,
because
laura's
so
far
above
me
was
that
indicator
presented
to
us
as
a
state
that
we're
expected
to
be
in
this
summer.
K
A
C
A
C
A
F
A
A
J
D
F
Mr
chair
just
have
quick.
I
will
be
quick
because
I've
mentioned
this
before
it
is
not
that
I
don't
support
the
these
ftes
I
do.
I
don't
think
that
they
need
to
be
in
a
budget
amendment.
I
would
support
them
and
indicate
that
in
the
actual
budget,
when
it
come
when
we're
in
budget
session,
it's
my
only
discount.
D
A
A
A
This
is
number
b3
and
noting
for
the
public
record,
our
last
public
hearing
item
b3
has
been
rescheduled
due
to
public
information
not
being
available
well
enough
in
advance,
since
it
was
originally
scheduled.
I
will
take
the
moment
to
check
with
taylor
to
see
whether
we
have
anyone
who
still
wishes
to
speak,
and
this
is
the
one
year
action
plan
for
community
development
block
grants.
Another
federal
grants
for
fiscal
year
22
to
23.
I
I
C
F
A
A
F
A
A
A
C
A
A
Now
we
are
at
the
general
comments
portion
of
our
agenda
for
comments
about
general
topics
and
items
that
were
not
just
scheduled
for
a
hearing
tonight
I
went
over
the
city
council
rules
of
decorum
earlier,
and
those
rules
apply
here
as
well.
A
A
If
you
need
to
coordinate
taylor
hill
on
our
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
based
on
the
order,
registration
or
receive
comment
cards
once
we
open
public
comment,
taylor
will
announce
three
names
on
the
list
so
that
people
have
some
time
notice
to
prepare
to
speak
when
it's
your
time
to
speak.
Taylor,
announce
your
name
for
the
people
in
webex.
She
will
unmute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
for
people
in
person.
Please,
step
up
to
the
podium
feel
free
to
remove
your
mask.
A
Make
your
comments
into
the
microphones
once
you
begin,
please
state
your
name
and
a
two
minute:
timer
will
start
at
the
two
minute
mark.
The
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
If
you
are
unable
to
finish
your
comments,
please
send
the
rest
of
your
comments
via
email,
mail
or
call
in
our
office.
A
I
Taylor,
when
you're
available
hear
me
there
you
are
thank
you.
Did
you
say
you
were
moving
on
to
mr
bunts?
My
webex
is
frozen,
so
I
can't
open
me
give
me
just
one
sec.
Thank
you,
council
chair.
I
do
want
to
share
that.
Mr
tom
bunts
is
the
appellant
in
the
cbia
22
downtown
board
of
equalization
hearing,
and
so
as
soon
as
taylor
is
able
to
pull
and
unmute
his
light.
He's
aware.
He'll
have
two
minutes
to
speak
to
the
issue.
I
Okay,
I
should
be
good
to
go
now
and
we
will
go
to
tom
tom.
You
are
unmuted.
M
Hello,
everyone
thank
you,
council
for
hearing
me:
apologies
for
not
making
the
working
session,
I'm
not
really
sure
what
happened
there,
but
anyway,
back
in
january,
we
submitted
a
request
for
the
equalization
board
and,
ultimately
the
council
to
consider
reducing
the
fee
with
respect
to
downtown
central
business
assessment.
I
represent
sk
heart
properties.
We
own
the
commercial
space
at
american
towers,
located
at
44,
west
300,
south
broadway
and,
as
I
said,
we
submitted
a
request
to
have
the
rate
reduced
and
I'll
just
quickly
go
over
my
rationale.
M
I've
submitted
everything
in
writing,
but
just
in
summary,
first
off
our
property
is
mostly
non-street-facing
office
space,
except
for
about
two
thousand
square
feet,
which
is
a
salon
that
does
face
the
street.
Given
our
office
and
salon.
Tenants
generally
vacate
the
property.
By
about
six
pm,
we
believe
our
business
only
marginally
benefits
from
the
central
business
improvement
assessment.
M
We
don't
own
bars,
restaurants
or
other
street
level,
businesses
that
might
benefit
from
night
festivities
and
other
night
and
weekend
related
activities
that
are
supported
by
the
assessment.
Secondly,
homelessness
has
negatively
affected
our
business.
It's
our
understanding
that
a
portion
of
the
assessment
provides
for
homeless
services.
M
However,
our
experience
is
that
the
the
homeless
in
the
area
is
not
being
addressed
and
that
the
homeless
folks
there
harass
the
business
owners
and
and
patrons
of
our
business,
and
just
you
know
in
summary,
those
are
the
the
main
points
behind
our
request
to
have
the
the
rate
reduced
with
respect
to
the
down
downtown
central
business
assessment.
M
It's
pretty
close
to,
I
think,
fifteen
thousand
dollars.
If,
if
I
have
that
right,
so
thank
you.
I
Okay
and
then
cindy
cromer,
cindy
you're,
unmuted.
H
Thank
you.
This
afternoon,
I
sent
you
comments
that
I
prepared
in
2013
and
2016
on
development
agreements
and
five
perils
associated
with
using
them
tonight.
I
want
to
talk
about
a
sixth
peril,
the
lack
of
transparency
associated
with
development
agreements.
I
did
not
clearly
identify
the
lack
of
transparency
and
development
agreements
until
your
work
session
on
february
15th.
H
What
I
observed
then,
was
the
transformation
of
a
negative
staff
report,
100
negative
public
comments
and
a
negative
recommendation
from
the
planning
commission
into
a
positive
recommendation
which
omitted
the
negative
public
comments
entirely
and
suggested
that
the
planning
commission
had
rushed
to
judgment.
This
transformation
occurred
by
a
development
agreement
worked
out
between
the
city
staff
and
the
acqui
and
the
applicant.
H
I
had
difficulty
during
the
work
session
figuring
out
what
had
transpired
regarding
the
application.
If
you
did
too,
then
you
understand
my
point
about
lack
of
transparency.
What
was
unfolding
was
precisely
the
opposite
of
what
anyone,
citizen
or
commissioner,
would
have
expected,
based
on
the
hearing
in
march
of
2021.
H
H
The
message
is
that
public
input
will
be
ignored
and
a
unanimous
recommendation
from
the
planning
commission
won't
receive
any
respect
either
a
property
owner
who
broke
the
zoning
rules
would
be
reinforced
by
getting
the
original
request.
Thank
you
for
sending
the
proposal
back
to
the
planning
commission.
I
hope
that
your
intent
was
to
have
the
public
hearing
reopened.
K
Hello,
I'm
here
today
to
request
that
a
new
train
quiet
zone
be
established
in
salt
lake
city
along
a
13
mile
long
line
of
track,
that's
located
on
the
west
side
of
the
city.
K
It's
my
hope
to
establish
this
quiet
zone
on
the
train,
tracks
that
run
just
east
of
redwood
road
and
north
of
200
south
in
this
area.
It's
a
frequent
occurrence
for
trains
to
sound
their
horns
as
they
enter
the
city
and
they
sound
them
for
long
periods
of
time
and
sometimes
very
late
at
night,
even
two
or
three
in
the
morning.
K
In
the
past,
there
have
been
some
distance
and
natural
obstacles
in
the
way
of
this
noise,
but
as
the
neighborhood
has
expanded,
more
houses
have
been
built
closer
to
the
tracks
and
there
are
many
houses
now
where
the
residents
have
to
hear
these
horns
on
almost
a
daily
basis.
I'm
especially
sympathetic
towards
some
neighbors
of
mine,
who
have
had
their
just
have
their
first
baby
and
whose
house
is
less
than
100
feet
away
from
the
railroad
track,
with
no
sound
barrier
between
their
bedroom
and
the
train.
K
A
N
I'm
here
to
express
disappointment
in
the
city
and
its
ability
to
get
things
finished
in
our
neighborhood
or
or
fixed.
We
have
problems
with
speeding.
I
can't
seem
to
get
anyone
to
help
me
out
with
speed
bumps
or
humps
and
other
safety
issues,
including
the
homeless
in
the
park.
If
I
go
to
liberty
park
across
town,
there's
no
camping
signs,
but
they're
freely
allowed
to
camp
and
have
fires
in
in
the
camps
in
the
parks
on
my
side
of
town.
N
The
amount
of
trash
that
is
built
up
I
took
pictures
this
morning
and
yesterday
is,
is
just
high
from
from
the
camps
and
it's
it's
a
huge
excuse.
Me
safety
issue,
it's
very
difficult
for
us
to
get
around
on
our
side
of
town
already
mingling,
back
and
forth
across
the
city,
just
to
go
to
places
that
are
safe
to
walk
in
neighborhoods,
it's
becoming
less
and
less
safe
to
just
walk
around
my
street.
N
In
the
last
week
I
had
someone
cut,
I
stopped
someone
from
cutting
into
my
car
and
my
neighbors
ran
off
to
people
coming
into
their
yard
to
break
into
their
house,
that's
all
being
caught
on
camera.
N
So
from
this
point
last
thing
I
think,
I'd
like
to
say
is
the
other
issue.
This
is
really
big.
Is
the
corralling
of
all
of
these
people
and
issues
into
our
neighborhood
on
the
all
the
way
around
it,
where
it's
volunteers
of
america
trying
to
help
out
people
with
drug
addiction,
which
is
great,
but
it
it
it
creates
a
funnel
of,
creates
problems
in
our
neighborhood.
N
All
the
hotels
in
our
neighborhood
are
starting
to
be
filled
up
with
homeless
people
from
the
outskirts
of
neighborhood
and
the
riverbanks
are
filled
with
homeless
people
time
on
and
on
about
it.
Thank
you.
I
A
A
And
this
is
the
item
we
heard
from
the
property
owner.
Mr
bunts
earlier
wanted
to
appeal
the
assessment
and
we
gave
him
the
option
to
speak.
He
made
his
comment
at
that
point
and
if
there
are
some
questions
and
answers
that
we
have
on
this
ordinance,
which
is
the
assessment
of
the
central
business
improvement
area,.
C
Mr
I'll
ask
a
question:
I
I
just
want
to
know,
first
of
all,
if
it's
either
legal,
ethical
or
precedented
for
us
to
remove
one
specific
property
from
a
special
assessment
area.
I
L
The
answer
is
yes,
let
me
just
give
you
a
little
background.
The
can
you
hear
me
by
the
way.
A
L
And
secondly,
if
you
look
at
everyone
who's
in
the
district
or
the
specialist,
the
assessment
area,
no
one
is
supposed
to
have
a
disproportionate
amount
that
they're
having
to
bear
okay.
So
in
this
particular
saa
there
are
some
20
things
that
constitute
the
economic
promotion
activities
and
they've
been
in
your
documents,
but
it's
the
holiday
lighting,
the
banners,
the
publications,
newsletters,
special
events,
all
sorts
of
things
and
the
tricky
thing
about
this
one
is
not.
L
Every
property
is
going
to
be
equally
benefited
by
every
one
of
those
activities
depending
on
where
they
are
in
the
downtown
area
and
the
nature
of
their
property.
But
the
board
of
equalization
has
to
take
into
account.
Generally
speaking,
do
we
think
they're
benefited
enough
to
justify
the
amount
of
their
assessment
and
I
think
that's
what
they
base
their
decision
on
and
that's
what
he
is
appealing
he's
saying:
I'm
not
benefited
to
that
amount,
but
that's
the
call
you
have
to
make.
L
C
But
in
this
specific
case,
the
board
of
us
of
equalizers
has
determined
that
that
property
is
being
benefited
in
a
roughly
equal
amount
to
the
assessment.
So
the
recommendation
from
the
board
of
equalizers
or
the
determination
was
to
keep
the
assessment
on
that
property.
Is
that
my
understanding
that
all
correct,
correct.
C
Mr
chair,
I
move
that
we
adopt
the
ordinance
for
the
special
assessments
for
the
central
business
improvement
area
as
proposed.
F
A
A
A
C
Yes,
mr
chair,
I
think
we
need
to
pull
a
couple
items
from
that
right.
C
Just
setting
the
date.
I
think
two
items.
C
C
A
I
I
Sorry,
council,
member
romano,
the
adoption
was
the
art,
barn
public,
benefit
analysis.
During
the
work
session
it
was
discussed
that
the
special
event
permit
and
the
housing
sorry
that
the
special
event
permit
would
need
to
come
back
again
for
discussion,
but
that
you
were
agreeable
to
set
the
date
for
the
public
hearing
is
my
recollection.