►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 09/20/2022
Description
To access agendas please go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
A
This
is
a
work
session
meeting
during
which
there
is
no
public
comment.
Please
join
us
tonight
during
our
7
PM
formal
meeting.
To
share
your
comments.
We
welcome
your
feedback
Anytime
by
mailing
us
at
P.O
box,
145
476,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
84114
emailing,
us
at
Council,
dot
comments
at
slcgov.com
or
24-hour
phone
comment
line.
801-535-7654.
A
B
Hey,
as
always,
I
think
we
sent
through
some
slides
earlier
today,
so
if
you
guys
could
pull
those
up
kick
off
with
the
covid-19
update
as
usual,
so
on
this
first
slide,
we've
got
an
update
that
now
cases
are
down
in
the
U.S
20
over
the
last
two
weeks,
which
is
an
improvement
from
last
week
and
that
cases
in
Utah
are
down
16
in
the
last
two
weeks.
We'll
move
on
to
the
next
slide.
B
I
left
the
info
in
here
about
vaccinations
that
we
went
over
last
week,
but
the
the
Highlight
is
that
they're
available
and
people
can
go
and
get
them.
You
can
get
them
along
with
your
flu
vaccination
and
if
you
have
questions
or
need
info
about
where
to
get
them,
you
can
visit
the
Salt
Lake
County
Health
Department's
website,
which
is
really
great
at
directing
you
there
so
next
slide.
B
This
is
from
the
county,
Health
Department's
dashboard.
So
as
of
this
week,
we
have
33
people
hospitalized
in
the
past
week,
which
is
the
same
as
the
data
from
last
week.
We
have
14
fewer
hospitalizations
than
last
week
and
we
have
27.4
percent
of
eligible
people
up
to
date
on
their
covet
vaccine,
so
making
Headway
next
slide.
B
You
can
see
here
that
we've
got
the
case
counts
over
time
for
the
past
three
months
and
we
kind
of
continue
that
downward
step
of
cases.
So
looking
pretty
good
and
improving
there
and
then
on
the
next
slide,
we
have
our
waste
Reclamation
facility
data,
which
continues
to
show
that
the
virus
is
present,
but
that
there
is
no
Trend.
So
that's
all
for
our
covet
updates
and
now
we'll
move
on
to
community
engagement.
B
Unless
anyone
has
any
coveted
questions,
Josh,
it's
so
for
Community
updates
engagement
highlights
are
kind
of
light
on
new
updates
for
this
week.
As
always,
we
direct
people
to
the
slc.gov
feedback,
which
is
regularly
updated
with
ways
to
engage
with
the
city
through
surveys
and
other
feedback
opportunities.
B
The
project
team
is
meeting
tonight
with
the
central
ninth
community
council
at
6
pm
to
discuss
the
construction
projects
and
other
updates
next
slide.
The
sustainability
Department
provides
an
update
on
their
resident
food
Equity
advisors
program.
They
continue
to
meet
monthly
during
their
meeting
this
month.
B
They
discussed
the
idea
of
healthy
Corner
markets
and
carts
program,
which
is
one
of
the
recommendations
outlined
in
the
2021
food
Equity
advisors
report.
The
group
was
joined
by
Salt
Lake,
City
Planning
and
economic
development,
listen
to
advisor
input,
answered
questions
and
provided
context
and
information
about
the
city's
processes
and
regulations
that
would
impact
a
healthy
small
markets
program.
The
equity
food
Equity
advisors
group
is
interested
in
the
idea
and
will
continue
to
discuss
and
consider
how
healthy
small
markets
connect
with
food
Equity
goals
throughout
the
remaining
meetings.
B
The
program
is
now
halfway
through
the
2022-23
food,
Equity
advisors
program
and
then
next
slide.
Finally,
we
have
our
upcoming
events
in
the
community
Groove
in
the
Grove
sponsored
by
popular
Grove
Community
Council,
this
Saturday
from
nine
to
from
11
to
5
at
the
in
front
of
the
pioneer
police
precinct
and
then
marmalade
jam
fest.
Also,
this
Saturday
at
4th,
West
and
fourth
North
I
think
that's
Saturday
and
Sunday
for
marmalade
jam,
fest
and
then
next
Wednesday,
additional
mayor's
Bike
To
Work
Day
from
17
South
River
Park
at
7
30
a.m.
B
That
day
and
some
other
events
coming
up
in
the
first
part
of
October
and
that
is
all
I
have
updates
for
Community
engagement.
B
B
And
you'll
see,
on
the
left
hand,
side
upcoming
schedule
for
next
month.
I
wanted
to
reiterate
that
with
folks
that
we
have,
as
long
as
the
weather
holds
we'll
continue
to
have
resource
Ferris
on
the
second
Friday
kayak
court
on
the
third
Friday
and
then
the
fourth
Friday
of
each
month.
The
Justice
Court
does
a
high
multiple
case,
docket
online,
and
so
the
Resource
Centers
actually
have
access
to
that
and
try
and
encourage
their
residents
to
participate.
B
If
they
have
a
large
number
of
of
cases,
there
was
a
kayak
Court
last
week
on
the
Jordan
River,
you
see
the
the
stats
there
with
11
defendants
and
17
cases
heard,
along
with
the
large
number
of
meals
served
by
the
food
Justice
coalition.
I
wanted
to
highlight
the
expungement
resources
that
are
available.
There's
a
presentation
made
to
the
Sully
Valley
Coalition
and
homelessness
core
function.
B
Group
last
week
on
these
resources,
we
have
a
link
here
to
the
County
website
that
has
a
number
of
other
connections
that
folks
can
look
up
a
really
valuable
resource,
particularly
with
the
state
legislation.
Legislative
change
this
year
with
automatic
expungement
options.
Rapid
intervention
is
in
numerous
locations,
but
last
night
on
Rio,
Grande
and
also
on
Fifth
West
downtown,
and
then
the
health
department
will
be
at
the
Jordan
River
Trail
this
coming
week
between
13th
and
17th.
South
will
be
the
focus
this
time
around.
C
Another
question:
I
I
was
talking
to
a
few
neighbors
this
last
week
about
this
area
and
I
appreciate
that
this
is
happening.
I
also
struggle
with
the
word
abayment
on
this
issue
and
I,
wonder
and
I
know.
This
is
not
a
word
that
we're
using
the
health
department.
Well,
we
are
using
it,
but
the
health
department
is
calling
them
like
that,
and
I
will
prefer
that
Army,
our
city
didn't
use
them.
C
We
Abate
plagues
mosquitoes
and
other
insects,
and
we
shouldn't
be
used
when
we're
talking
about
humans
and
I
hope
that
the
health
department,
the
Salt
Lake
County,
Health
Department,
we'll
change
this
I
feel
like
it
should
be
an
easy
thing
for
them
to
change,
but
I
do
appreciate
the
work.
I
was
talking
to
a
lot
of
Neighbors
on
Thursday
there.
C
We
walk
the
river
for
a
good
four
hours
to
to
see
about
the
issues
and
and
if
you,
if
the
administration
could
convey
this
message-
and
it
will
be
meaningful
to
this
issue-
is
very
charged
and
it's
very
emotionally
strong
hard
for
everybody.
So
I
think
it
will
mean
a
lot
to
all
of
us
to
stop
using.
That
word,
when
we're
talking
about
humans.
B
D
Good
afternoon
I
think
there
was
a
presentation,
but
if
not
I
can
just
speak
off
my
notes.
There
we
go
okay,
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
all
a
quick
drought
and
water
supply
update
next
slide.
Please.
D
D
So
first
I
wanted
to
do
a
little
bit
of
a
drought
and
climate
status,
and
we
have
a
couple
of
recent
images
taken
from
our
federal
sources
from
USDA
the
National
Weather
Service
on
the
U.S
drought
monitor
and
what
we
can.
What
we
see
here
is
most
of
the
area.
Most
areas
of
the
state
have
experienced
less
than
normal
precipitation
over
water
during
the
water
year.
So
far,
although
August
was
above
normal,
as
we
saw
through
this
active
monsoon
season,
100
of
the
state
is
in
drought.
D
D
We
also
have
seen
over
the
water
year
that
temperatures
in
Northern
Utah
are
two
to
four
degrees.
Above
normal,
we
look
at
at
the
next
coming
months.
We
have
some
predictive
models
through
our
various
federal
agencies
that
look
at
precipitation
predictions
and
temperature
predictions
and,
interestingly,
from
October,
November
and
December,
it
looks
like
we
have
an
equal
chance
of
precipitation.
What
that
means
is
we're
not
forecasting
below
normal
or
above
normal
precipitation,
so
we'll
keep
an
eye
on
that,
but
that's
actually
better
news
than
what
we
saw
last
year
at
this
time.
D
We
are
expecting
temperatures
to
be
above
normal
here
through
December
next
slide,
please
just
a
quick
report
on
the
status
of
Salt
Lake
City's
Water
Supplies.
As
you
are
likely
aware,
we
have
the
benefit
of
a
lot
of
different
types
of
Water
Resources.
We
have
surface
water
resources
that
comprise
about
90
percent
of
our
average
annual
water
supply
from
our
local
Canyon
streams
and
from
Deer
Creek
Reservoir
through
the
Provo
River
Project,
and
we
also
have
groundwater
resources
that
we
Implement
during
the
summer
time
to
help
meet
Peak
demands.
D
Our
Wasatch
Front
stream
flows
are
still
below
normal,
we'll
be
watching
snowpack
start
starting
to
accumulate,
hopefully
October
or
November
in
the
high
elevations
Deer
Creek
Reservoir
is
still
at
90
percent
allocation
amongst
all
of
the
Provo
River
Project
Partners,
which
is
good
and
is
currently
at
45
percent
of
capacity
as
of
September
18th,
which
we
would
expect
towards
the
end
of
the
water
Year,
and
that
leaves
capacity
for
runoff
during
the
springtime
from
snowpack
also
just
kind
of
new.
This
week
we
do.
D
We
are
experiencing
low
water
levels
on
Utah
Lake
Utah
Lake
is
a
source
of
water
that
Salt
Lake
City
uses
to
meet
our
irrigation
exchange
agreements,
starting
basically
to
the
South
part
of
the
valley,
all
the
way
up
to
the
Liberty
Park
area
and
Utah
Lake
water
levels
are
quite
low
and
will
start
impacting
the
Utah
Lake
water
users
in
which
we're
a
part
of
at
the
end
of
this
week.
So
we
won't
be
pumping
water
through
the
dam
during
by
September
23rd.
D
So
this
is
our
chart
of
water
demand
and
just
an
explanation
on
the
chart.
The
light
blue
line
on
the
top
is
water
demand
in
the
year
2000,
which
is
our
Benchmark
year
for
water
demand
and
a
year
in
which
we,
we
measure
all
types
of
conservation,
long-term
conservation
goals,
the
middle
line,
the
orange
line
on
the
chart
is
the
average
of
the
last
three
years.
D
So
that's
the
demand
from
2019,
2020
and
2021
and
then
the
solid
filled
blue
area
underneath
is
water
demand
during
this
calendar
year
to
date
on
the
y-axis
we
have
million
gallons
per
day.
The
bottom
is
zero
and
the
top
is
210
million
gallons
per
day
and
I
wanted
to
point
that
out,
because
you
can
see
in
the
year
2000
we
were
exceeding
210
million
gallons
of
water
delivered
per
day
during
the
peak
demand
season
in
the
summer.
D
The
current
currently,
what
we've
calculated
in
terms
of
conservation
through
September
18th,
is
2.9
billion
gallons
of
water,
which
is
a
very
large
number
and
that's
spread
over.
You
know:
364
000
people
over
141
square
mile
service
area.
That
includes
not
only
Salt
Lake
City,
but
some
of
our
neighboring
communities
to
the
South
along
the
east
bench
that
reflects
a
15
decrease
over
the
last
three
year
average.
So
we
have
exceeded
our
goals
set
forth
in
stage
two
of
the
water
shortage
contingency
plan
this
year.
D
We
anticipate
to
remain
in
stage
two
of
our
water
shortage.
Contingency
plan
will
continue
to
monitor
snowpack
accumulations
over
the
winter
and
runoff
in
the
spring.
Before
we
make
any
determinations
or
recommendations
regarding
water
shortage,
contingency
planning
and
then
finally,
the
last
slide
I
have
here.
This
is
just
information
on
our
water
conservation
program.
Efforts
in
2022
and
I
won't
read
through
that
list,
and
actually
it
looks
a
little
small
I'm.
Sorry
that
might
be
too
small
to
read.
D
But
you
know,
one
of
the
things
I
really
want
to
point
out
is
that
we
really
rely
on
our
partnership
with
the
public
to
conserve
water
and
Salt.
Lake
City,
along
with
other
water
providers
across
the
state,
worked
really
hard
this
year
to
engage
the
public
in
all
kinds
of
programs
and
all
kinds
of
communications
and
education
for
us.
You
know
we
had
some
new
programs
that
we
put
forward,
such
as
our
low
water
grass
seed
program.
We
increased
our
water
check
program
that
we
partner
with
Utah
State
University.
D
We
for
the
first
time,
conducted
water
audits
of
18,
commercial,
industrial
and
institutional
facilities
to
try
to
understand
better
how
water
is
used
in
those
sectors
and
we'll
take
that
information
and
learn
more
to
reach
out
to
our
CII
customers,
and
you
know,
continue
to
sell
rain
barrels
but
I
think
also,
in
addition
to
those
types
of
programs
and
the
incentive
programs.
We've
partnered
with
Central
Utah
Water
Conservancy
district
with.
We
also
saw
a
lot
of
news
stories.
D
I
would
say
daily
news
stories
about
Great,
Salt
Lake
and
about
water
issues
across
the
state
and
across
the
west,
and
all
of
that
combined
just
results
in
a
very,
very
high
level
of
public
engagement,
which
in
turn,
results
in
people
being
a
lot
more
concerned
and
aware
of
the
water
they
use
and
how
they
use
it.
So
I
think
this
summer
and
last
summer,
especially
that
water
ethic
in
our
community
has
really
increased
and
we've
seen
a
lot
of
great
feedback
from
our
constituents.
D
I'm
getting
word
from
other
water
providers
across
the
state
that
they're
also
seeing
some
pretty
astounding
conservation,
metrics
too.
So
I
also
think
that
you
know
Statewide
policy
and
Statewide
attention
to
this
has
been
really
really
great
for
the
community.
So
that's
my
update
and
report.
If
there's
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer.
A
E
So
when
we
look
at
the
graph
of
the
water
usage
over
years,
it
seems
like
the
winter
months
throughout
all
historically
I've
kind
of
stayed
at
the
same
level
and
then
about
April
is
when
it
becomes
Divergent.
Should
we
I'm,
assuming
there's,
probably
not
going
to
be
any
such
thing
as
conserving
enough
water
coming
up?
Should
we
be
expecting
strategies
to
start
moving
into
those
off
months
when
maybe
we're
a
little
less
Vigilant?
Now.
D
Yeah,
that's
that's
a
great
great
question,
so
what
you're,
seeing
in
the
winter
months
is,
is
Indoor
Water
use
so
that
Peak,
that
we're
seeing
from
about
April
through
the
end
of
September
is
really
associated
with
outdoor
use
and
you're.
D
Seeing
stable
use
across
across
the
system
related
to
indoor
use,
strategies
related
to
indoor
use
are
ongoing,
so
you
know
different
types
of
appliances
and
education
and
and
that
type
of
thing
one
thing
I'll
point
out
when
we
look
at
this
draft
at
this
graph-
is
that
when
you
use,
when
you
look
at
that
indoor
use
and
the
that
flat
area
in
the
winter
months,
keep
in
mind
that
our
population
has
grown
and
so
that
what
what
I
take
away
from
this
graph
too,
is
that
our
gallons
per
capita
per
day
have
decreased
and,
and
we
actually
have
the
numbers
for
how
those
have
decreased.
E
C
Laura,
thank
you
for
the
update.
This
is
it's
encouraging
that
we're
going
you
know
in
the
right
direction.
I
I
also
would
like
to
find
out
a
little
more
something.
I
was
asked
this
week
and
I
actually
witnessed.
We
finally
had
some
rain.
It
was
exciting
to
see
all
that
water
coming
down,
but
yeah
we
see
and
again.
This
is
obviously
a
matter
of
technology
and
cost,
and
you
know
figuring
this
out,
but
we
see
Parks
being
water
when
it's
raining
and
not
only
our
facilities.
C
Obviously,
private
people
are
doing
it
too
and
I
I
wonder
if
the
if
your
department
is
working
on
on
how
we
can
help
on
that
side,
to
see
how
we
can
update.
If
there
is
technology
for
this
I
mean
I,
know
and
I
have
technology
that
solves
this
problem
in
my
house
and
I,
wonder
if
that's
the
same
technology
that
needs
to
be
implemented
in
parks
and
whatnot.
D
Yeah,
yes
and
I
I
can't
really
speak
to
what
the
cost
would
be
for
some
of
our
larger
institutional
properties
to
convert
irrigation
systems
and
that
kind
of
thing.
But
there
is,
there
is
good
technology.
You
know
there
are
rain
sensors
on
irrigation
systems,
my
Department's
actually
working
on
a
ruby
bait
program
for
those
types
of
rain,
sensors
and
I.
Think
just
general
education
I
know
we
put
out
on
social
media
every
time
we
see
a
storm
coming
in
that
you
know,
rain
rain
is
on
sprinklers
off
there.
D
I
think
we
do
have
situations
where
we
also
have
properties
that
are
managed
by
property
management
companies
that
sometimes
might
not
be
local,
and
so
that's
something
that
Stephanie
do.
Our
water
conservation
manager
has
been
working
on
a
lot
too
in
terms
of
how
do
we
reach
out
to
some
of
these
property
managers
to
help
them
adjust
their
sprinkler
systems
and
their
their
watering
program
too?.
C
Specifically
about
our
Parks,
our
you
know,
you
guys
are
working
towards
updating
some
of
this
technology,
maybe
or
coming
up
with
a
proposal
for
maybe
a
budget
adjustment
or
or
something
else
like
that.
Yeah.
D
F
Hi
Laura
and
just
wondering
if
so
last
year
was
I.
Think
the
first
time
that
speaker,
the
legislature,
had
the
Great,
Salt,
Lake,
Summit
and
maybe
now
they've
had
the
second
one
but
are
have
there
been
any
policies
just
flying
in
to
the
airport
a
couple
times
and
seeing
how
bad
the
Great
Salt
Lake
is
receding.
Are
we
seeing
any
of
the
policies
that
have
been
changed
or
put
in
place
that
are
having
an
effect
yet
on
the
lake,
because
it
seems
like
it's
getting
worse
but
I?
E
F
And
is
there
anything
that
is
you
know
in
their
recent
or
in
the
near
future?
That
might
be
adding
to
that.
D
So
what
we
have
seen
in
terms
of
Statewide
policy
has
been
a
real
push
for
water
use,
efficiency
and
conservation
and
and
funding
to
do
so
so,
for
instance,
a
lot
of
funding
for
secondary
meters
for
or
for
water
meters
for
secondary
systems
that's
currently
being
implemented.
It
probably
takes
a
little
time
for
those
types
of
things
to
be
implemented
and
to
see
the
the
outcome
of
those
there's.
D
Also,
the
40
million
dollar
trust
fund
for
Great,
Salt
Lake,
that's
been
set
up
and
they
and
they
the
managers
of
that
trust,
fund.
Partnership
between
Audubon,
Society
and
The
Nature
Conservancy
have
been
selected,
and
so
their
role
is
to
find
ways
to
spend
that
money
to
improve
conditions
in
Great,
Salt
Lake
as
well.
Some
some
conversations
have
been
around
water,
Banking
and
ways
to
Shepherd
water.
So,
if
we're
conserving
this
water,
how
can
we
get
that
water
to
Great
Salt
Lake?
There
are
water
rights
implications
to
that
and
sometimes
infrastructure
implications.
D
So
there's
a
lot
happening
right
now
in
terms
of
implementing
a
lot
of
the
policies
that
were
put
into
place
after
last
year's
session.
So
I'm
hopeful
that
we'll
see
some
impact
of
that.
The
interim
committees
have
been
meeting
this
summer
as
well,
and
this
has
been
a
big
topic
of
discussion.
So
I
won't
be
surprised
to
see
some
additional
Statewide
policy,
either
refining
things
or
introducing
new
new
types
of
policies.
F
Okay
and
follow
up
to
that,
so
our
new
Water
Reclamation
facility
that's
being
built.
How
does
that
relate
to
doesn't
that
water
ultimately
end
up
in
Willard,
Bay
or
Farmington
Bay
right?
D
So
so
that's
an
important
part
of
Great,
Salt,
Lake
and
and
the
water
in
the
water
impacts.
There
are
pretty
significant,
so
we
treat
between
33
to
35
million
gallons
of
water
per
day
and
that
treated
effluent
is
then
conveyed
to
Farmington
Bay
in
our
long-term
water
supply
and
demand
planning.
D
A
large
portion
of
that
was
actually
slated
for
Wastewater
reuse
for
municipal
and
Industrial
purposes,
and
what
we're
seeing
with
with
conservation
is
very
positive
and
that
perhaps
leaves
a
different
kind
of
Wastewater
reuse
open
to
the
city
in
the
long
term,
and
that
would
be
reusing
that
Wastewater
to
keep
to
maintain
flows
to
Great,
Salt
Lake
and-
and
that
is
something
that
we're
working
on
strategizing
about.
There
are
some
water
rights,
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
with
water
rights.
F
D
They
don't
have
the
right
to
use
the
water
that
we
discharge
there
I
don't
know
if
there
are
diversions,
so
it
goes
through
the
Northwest
Canal
to
the
city
drain,
which
is
a
flood
control
facility
operated
by
Salt,
Lake
County
directly
to
Farmington,
Bay
and
I.
Don't
know
if
there
are
any
rights
off
of
those
systems,
but
those
would
not
be
Salt
Lake,
City's
rights,
okay,
yeah.
D
A
G
Good
afternoon
Mr
chair,
would
you
like
me
to
begin
sure.
G
So
the
this
item
is
a
proposed
ordinance
for
a
new
deferral
for
Emergency
Loan
program
repayments.
The
proposed
ordinance
would
further
defer
repayment
for
all
Emergency
Loan
program,
Loans
To
December,
31st
2024..
This
will
allow
additional
time
for
businesses
and
non-profits
to
stabilize
and
to
recover
from
the
effects
of
the
pandemic.
G
By
way
of
background
in
March
2020,
the
council
approved
an
Administration
initiative
to
offer
1
million
in
interest-free
loans
to
small
businesses.
They
targeted
restaurants
and
bars,
retail
stores
and
events
and
arts
organizations.
All
of
these
were
particularly
hard
hit
by
the
Public
Public
Health
protocols
in
the
early
days
of
the
pandemic,
and
most
of
these
were
small
businesses.
G
The
Alp
was
the
ELP.
The
Emergency
Loan
program
was
designed
by
by
the
Department
of
Economic
Development
to
be
quickly
available.
The
idea
was
to
fill
these
immediate
gaps,
Revenue
gaps
that
these
businesses
were
were
experiencing
until
federal
and
state
assistance
could
arrive.
The
loan
amounts
range
from
five
thousand
to
twenty
thousand
dollars
again
because
the
target
was
for
small
businesses.
G
The
council
funded
this
effort
by
allocating
one
million
from
for
the
economic
Loan
program.
I'm
sorry
Emergency
Loan
program
budget.
There
are
too
many
e's
and
L's
from
the
existing
economic
development
loan
fund,
the
edlf
so
for
consideration
today,
for
all
of
you
or
for
discussion
at
least,
is
the
question
of
a
blanket
deferment
for
all
loans
to
the
end
of
2024..
G
This
will
be
on
your
agenda
for
potential
action
on
October
4th
and
just
note
that
the
ordinance
that
you're
looking
at
today
would
not
authorize
converting
these
loans
to
Grants,
but
depending
on
the
extent
of
any
write-offs
or
other
changes
that
are
considered
in
2024.
The
effect
could
be
the
same,
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Roberta
and
Peter.
H
Thank
you
Nelson.
We
have
a
PowerPoint
I,
believe
council
members,
Good
To,
Be,
With,
You
Council
chair.
Thank
you
for
having
us
I'm,
going
to
jump
right
into
it
and
just
kind
of
go
off
of
what
Allison
already
mentioned.
I
know
a
few
of
the
council
members
weren't
here
when
the
program
was
created,
so
just
a
brief
overview
that
it
was
created
in
March,
2020
and
the
funds
were
distributed
in
April
2020..
H
We
knew
we
had
to
do
something
at
this
point:
learning
of
covid
and
the
impacts
of
it.
92
percent
of
our
businesses
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
are
considered
small
businesses.
So
we
wanted
to
do
what
we
could
to
support
the
community.
This
was
also
crucial
at
this
time
because
we
had
not
yet
heard
of
a
program
or
a
timeline
regarding
federal
assistance
which
actually
needed
us
to
step
in
even
more
as
Allison
mentioned,
the
program
targeted
the
restaurant
bar
retail
events
and
arts
industries
that
were
impacted
immediately
by
the
shutdowns
mandated
by
the
county.
H
At
this
point
as
well,
we
had
no
idea
how
long
these
shutdowns
would
last
and
recognize
that
amart
the
margins
for
a
lot
of
these
small
businesses
are
very
thin.
Thanks
to
the
quick
work
of
the
council
and
our
incredible
staff,
the
program
was
released
over
the
course
of
four
weeks
we
were
able
to
fund
fund
52
small
local
businesses,
25
percent
of
those
on
the
west
side.
H
H
Currently,
today,
the
the
we've
been
looking
into
here
in
Salt,
Lake
and
Nationwide
how
the
small
business
Community
is
doing
a
according
to
a
McKinsey
study.
These
targeted
industries
that
we
that
we
prioritized
in
our
Loan
program
are
are
mostly
not
expected
to
fully
recover
on
in
until
2024
or
as
late
as
2025..
This
is
due
to
low
Financial
resilience
in
these
in
these
industries
and
that
they
typically
operate
on
on
very
thin
margins.
H
These
same
Industries
are
Central
to
Salt,
Lake,
City's,
quality
of
life
and
urban
core
experience,
in
particular
in
the
Emergency
Loan
program.
We
know
that
67
percent
of
the
businesses
that
received
the
loan
came
from
food
food
service
and
drinking
places,
accommodations
or
Arts,
entertainment
and
Recreation.
H
Furthermore,
covet
brought
about
additional
back-end
challenges,
as
they've
all
heard
about
like
supply
chain
chain
supply
chain
challenges,
the
cost
of
inflation
that
keeps
rising
and
severe
labor
shortages,
all
add
to
this
burden
of
small
business
recovery
and
in
looking
into
all
ways
of
of
where
we
could
support
this
program.
H
The
department
had
looked
into
whether
arpa
would
would
apply
to
the
Emergency
Loan
program
and
we
found
out
that
debt
payment
is
not
an
eligible
Arc
arpa
use,
but
these
businesses
do
have
the
opportunity
now,
with
the
cities
program
and
potentially
County
state
or
other
Federal
programs
that
come
from
arpa
to
apply
for
these,
and
that
would
help
to
free
up
some
other
expenses
in
order
for
them
to
pay
off
this
debt
eventually
next
slide.
Please.
H
So
this
gets
us
to
our
policy
options
that
we're
in
the
transmittal
one
option
would
be.
Obviously
this
is
not
an
exhausted
list
and
it's
up
to
the
council,
but
we
we
have
four.
We
listed
four
policy
options
on
here
for
you
to
consider
the
loan
deferment
for
12
additional
months
until
January
1
of
2023,
as
noted
above
repayment,
was
set
to
begin
in
January,
2022
2022
and
the
loans
remain
pending
policy.
Direction
this
option
would
give
loan
recipients
additional
time
to
further
recover
the
economic
losses
to
their
business
policy.
H
Option
number
two:
is
loan
deferment
until
continue
to
defer
the
repayment
until
December
31st
2024..
This
deadline
is
in
alignment
with
the
American
Rescue
plan
act,
expenditures
deadline.
This
takes
into
consideration
that
small
businesses
could
seek
opportunities
from
arpa
funds
to
assist
with
financial
hardships
the
business
may
be
experiencing.
H
H
That
was
a
program
that
came
out
around
the
same
time
as
ours
a
little
bit
after
it
was
a
Bridge
Loan
program
and
those
the
governor's
office
of
Economic
Opportunity
has
converted
all
of
those
loans
into
a
grant.
This
would
relieve
the
businesses
of
having
to
pay
back
the
debt
as
they
continue
to
recover.
H
Should
this
option
be
approved,
please
note
that
a
public
benefit
analysis
for
each
of
the
52
individual
businesses
or
nonprofits
would
need
to
be
executed
prior
to
converting
any
of
those,
and
our
last
policy
option
is
to
convert
some
of
the
loans
into
grants
by
creating
a
set
of
guidelines
to
consider
for
that,
businesses
can
demonstrate
hardship
and
the
need
for
that
relief.
H
Should
this
option
be
approved,
a
public
benefit
analysis
for
each
individual
business.
Nonprofit
that
meets
the
guidelines
for
a
grant
would
need
to
be
executed.
In
order
to
relieve
the
business
nonprofit
of
repayment,
we
would
work
with
the
council
to
submit
these
guidelines
in
advance.
H
So
our
our
recommendation,
as
noted
in
the
transmittal,
is
that
this
the
city
wants
to
continue
to
support
our
small
business
Community.
One
way
to
do
this
is
to
delay
repayment
until
businesses
are
fully
recovered.
Our
department
would
work
with
our
partners
in
this
time.
During
this
time,
our
department
would
work
with
our
partners
in
the
International
Rescue
committee
to
assess
each
individual's
businesses,
ability
to
re
for
repayment
and
create
a
plan
that
works
for
the
businesses
by
the
end
of
2024..
H
H
So
with
that,
as
my
presentation,
so
I
would
love
to
take
any
questions.
I
Yeah,
did
you
say
the
International
Rescue
committee
would
be
evaluating
the
businesses
no.
H
So
we
have
a
small
business
contract
with
them
and
and
it's
just
a
regular
contract,
and
so
we
can
use
that
for
them
to
support
in
things
like
applying
for
applications
for
our
Loan
program,
marketing,
our
programs,
and
so
since
we
already
have
them
on
contract,
we
would
work
with
them
to
to
put
together
a
plan.
I
also
mentioned
in
the
transmittal
is
a
group.
We
work
with
regularly
It's
a
Small
Business
Development
Center
sbdc,
that's
funded
out
of
the
SBA.
That
does
a
lot
of
this
work
as
well.
I
Okay,
I
didn't
realize
that
they
were
doing
that
type
of
work,
yeah,
I,
guess
one
thought
is
I
know
this
program
is
very
important
for
a
lot
of
businesses.
One
of
my
thoughts
is
making
the
the
deferral
and
impossible
extension
more
of
an
opt-in
process
where,
if
companies
actually
needed
it
to
I,
know
that
some
loan
programs,
my
business,
received
some
from
the
state
and
some
of
those
just
got
automatically
forgiven
or
automatically
deferred.
H
That's
a
that's
a
great
suggestion.
We
have
always
offered
to
the
businesses
that
they
could
start
repayment,
but
that
is
I
guess
a
little
bit
different
in
their
communication
with
them.
We
could
certainly
give
an
opt-in
for
that.
A
E
Like
council,
member
mono
I
think
any
discussion
about
forgiveness
needs
to
be
very
nuanced
and
targeted,
and
because
this
money
came
from
a
Loan
Fund
that
we
anticipated
to
be
cyclical,
I
think
we
need
to
press
harder
on
this
for
repayment
than
others,
but
in
the
rare
case
where
maybe
forgiveness
or
complete
forgiveness
is
required.
Could
we
is
there
any
mechanism
by
which
we
could
ask
for
a
public
benefit?
So,
for
instance,
I
know.
H
I
think,
certainly
all
options
are
on
the
table.
As
we
talk
through
those
conversations.
I
know,
finance
and
attorney's
office
in
our
department
would
would
work
together
and
we're
happy
to
take
any
suggestions
on
that.
Absolutely
I
did
want
to
clarify
one
thing
and
I
apologize
if
I
didn't
get
to
Ellison
in
time
with
this,
but
the
funding
from
this
program
is
was
not
from
edlf.
It
was
actually
from
the
general
fund.
H
So
it's
not
part
of
it's
completely
separate
from
the
adlf
okay.
G
J
E
We
were
not
a
conduit
for
Relief
funds
in
this
case,
and
so
our
our
good
faith
efforts
to
our
constituents
is
to
recover
as
much
as
we
can,
but
you're
right.
The
Arts
Industries
in
particular
are
still
not
fully
recovered,
and
so
I
am
I
am
in
favor
of
some
additional
deferment
for
those
Industries
hardest
hit.
K
A
K
J
Mr
piggyback
off
of
council
member
Peter
escheler
in
the
staff
report
and
I
think
was
mentioned
by
Roberta,
is
that
if
we,
it
seems
like
any
of
the,
if
we
convert
anything
to
a
grant,
that
then
would
be
forgivable
to
your
point.
We'd
have
to
do
a
public
benefits,
analysis
and
I'm
sort
of
looking
at
Katie
back
there
from
the
perspective
shaking
her
her
head.
J
Yes,
so
to
that
point
that
that's
already
built
into
our
legal
system
of
having
to
say
before
we
before
we
just
forgive
all
this
money,
we
actually
have
to
do
a
public
benefits
analysis,
so
I
think
we
can
kind
of
almost
incorporate
some
of
the
the
proposed
options
from
the
Ed
of
three
and
four
I
mean
we
could
kind
of
incorporate
all
of
these
into.
You
know
a
muddy
mess
that
we
like
to
do
sometimes
up
here.
We
take
all
these
suggestions
and
make
them
into
something
that
that
comes
out.
J
F
K
You
I,
like
that
I
think
I
forgot
that
it
came
from
the
from
the
general
fund,
because
the
point
that
I
was
going
to
make
was:
maybe
we
make
it
attractive
to
to
some
of
the
borrowers
that
says:
hey
I
can
go
with
this.
If
you,
you
know
if
it's
a
public
benefit
and
if
you
guys
agree
to
that,
but
also
I'm
thinking,
if
he
had
been
in
a
dlf
fund,
it's
a
revolving
one.
K
It's
something
that
we
want
to
continue
so
that
we
want
to
land
get
some
of
those
interests,
so
we
can
lend
to
the
next
business
that
needs
it
so
and
I
hope
that
that's
what
so,
if
they.
So,
if
the
borrowers
understand
that,
like
we're
not
trying
to
get
the
money
back
from
them,
because
you
know
we're
a
bank
and
we
you
know,
we
will
try
to
help
somebody
else
as
well.
K
K
Something
like
that.
That
I
was
thinking.
If
you
know
if
this
wasn't
an
option,
if
it
was
from
the
edlf.
Ultimately
you
know
it's
a
million
dollars.
It's
it's
a
good
chunk
of
money,
but
at
the
same
time
you
know
we
went
through
a
pandemic
it.
It
was
tough
I
mean
worldwide
and
and
yeah.
Some
federal
agencies
have
forgiven
loans
and
I'm
one
of
the
recipients
as
well
like
like
Darren,
and
so
it's
been
super
helpful.
K
A
A
So,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
whole
presentation
and
and
the
discussion
here.
I'm
kind
of
I'm
in
agreement
with
the
the
deferring
the
loans
until
the
end
of
2024
and
I,
also
am
open
to
the
idea
of
some
relief
for
some.
But
that's
an
option
of
Last
Resort
not
of
an
option
of
First
Resort
I
would
rather
see
the
the
businesses
look
to
pay
off
the
loan
instead
of
try
to
find
ways
to
get
a
loan
to
get
a
grant.
Their
loan.
A
Forgiven,
thank
you
and
so
I
agree
that
there
should
be
an
option
over
the
public
benefit
of
courses.
Councilman,
Fowler
and
Pito
said,
but
I
want
that
as
the
last
resort,
not
the
first
Resort.
So
we
still
have
close
to
17
months
at
this
point,
so
let's
continue
on
and
helping
them
pay
off
their
loan
and
then
at
the
end,
if
they
need
some
forgiveness,
we'll
work
it
at
that
point.
K
K
J
J
So
we
should
probably
maybe
give
some
direction
and
make
a
decision
on
this
so
visit
sooner
rather
than
later.
So.
G
The
decision
on
whether
the
deferment
happens
or
not
could
be
done
as
soon
as
October
4th,
possibly
sooner,
but
the
the
broader
decision
of
what
happens
next
can
be
taken
later,
because
they'd
have
that
deferment
in
place
to
2024.
If
that's
what
the
council
opts.
K
Absolutely
Mr
chair
and
then
I'm
thinking,
maybe
another
way
to
make
it
attractive
for
some
of
those
I
can't
pay
back,
is
to
give
a
discount.
You
know
if
they
paid
before
2024,
so
maybe
that's
another
option
for
some
of
the
businesses.
I
would
like
to
pay
it
off
altogether
a
little
bit
earlier,
maybe
not
a
steep
discount,
but
a
little
bit
and
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
allowed,
but
we
need
to
make
it
attractive
also
for
people
to
pay
back.
G
Been
a
difficult
thing
in
the
city
before
the
housing
developers
are
particularly
interested
in
having
grants
on
this
same
basis,
and
so
they
would
like
to
have
a
loan
and
then
have
it
forgiven
administratively,
at
the
end
of
their
term,
and
the
council
has
stopped
that
as
far
as
I
understand-
and
there
are
all
kinds
of
programs
that
the
city
has
that
our
loans-
one
is,
you
know
home
repair
and
things
like
that,
and
those
people
probably
also
would
like
to
have
forgiveness.
G
So
it's
it's
a
tricky
situation
to
get
into,
especially
if
we're
accidentally
creating
expectations
among
this
group
by
going
out
and
assessing
their
businesses
to
see
if,
if
they
can
pay
or
not
so
I
would
just
urge
you
if,
if
it's
certainly
within
the
council's
prerogative,
to
convert
loans
to
Grants,
it
would
be
rare
to
do
that
with
general
fund
money.
G
That-
and
it
would
be
quite
the
public
benefits
process-
is
an
expensive
process.
So
I
mean
you
you
could
you
could
choose
to
do
that
or
you
could
also
say.
A
grant
is
a
grant
and
a
loan
is
a
loan,
because
the
other
thing
that
was
raised
a
few
weeks
ago
here
at
this
table
by
council
members
is
that
perhaps
more
people
would
have
applied
had
they
had
the
opportunity
to
consider
it
a
grant.
G
So
I,
don't
know
how
you
make
it
Equitable
for
the
people
who
didn't
apply.
So
those
are
just
some
considerations
as
you
weigh
this.
A
G
To
council
valdemaros's
point
about
a
potential
discount
yeah
I
do
want
to
stress
that
right
now
these
are
zero
interest
loans.
So
a
a
early
payment
with
interest
rates
as
they
are
now
would
be
helpful,
possibly
to
the
city
as
well,
so
it
may,
it
may
make
Financial
sense.
A
M
M
The
reason
that
we're
here
today
is
the
council
adopted
a
resolution
in
2020
asking
for
these
types
of
check-ins
so
that
they
could
have
input
along
the
way
so
that
their
input
can
be
included
early
in
the
process.
So
with
that,
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
Chrissy
to
go
through
the
slides
which
we
have
yeah.
N
Thank
you.
We
can
go
to
the
next,
the
next
slide,
so
this
process
started.
An
RFP
was
issued
in
January
2021
to
look
for
consultant
to
handle
this
Master
Plan
update
process
in
July
of
2021
Logan
Simpson
consulting
firm
was
hired
and
they
immediately
got
started
and
worked
with
City
staff.
By
doing
they
first
did
one-on-one
meetings
with
really
anyone
that
wanted
to
meet
with
them:
Property,
Owners
local
agencies
and
just
various
stakeholder
groups.
Additionally,
those
one-on-one
meetings
we've
met
with
numerous
Property
Owners
throughout
the
entire
process
whenever
they've
requested.
N
Two
pop-up
events
at
the
West
Point
community's
night
out
against
Crime
event,
and
then
an
open
house
was
held
in
May
of
2022
and
then
we
just
last
week
met
with
the
West
Point
Community
Council,
with
a
joint
open
house,
slash
presentation
for
the
community,
and
then
we
are
just
wrapping
up
our
draft
plan
presentation
time
period
where
now
we're
going
going
to
be
revising
the
draft
based
on
what
we
heard
from
the
public
over
the
last
few
months
and
then
from
you
today
and
we're
hoping
for
a
Planning
Commission
draft
ready
for
their
review
in
October.
N
So
as
far
as
the
study
area,
this
is
the
along
the
2200
West
Corridor.
It
goes
from
2100
North
approximately
to
about
3200
North
from
I-15
to
3200
West,
it's
along
the
southern
or
the
northern
edge
of
the
city,
and
you
can
see
from
that
map
on
the
with
the
blue
and
the
yellow
that
there's
quite
a
bit
of
Salt
Lake,
County's
unincorporated
property
in
the
project
area,
as
well
as
Salt,
Lake,
City
property.
N
So
as
far
as
context,
I
wanted
to
show
these
just
to
help
set
the
framework
that
a
large
portion
of
that
southern
edge
of
the
property
area
is
owned
by
the
airport
and
that
really
does
limit
the
development
potential
as
far
as
their
interest
in
developing
the
property.
So
you
have
quite
a
bit
of
airport
property
and
then
this
existing
future
land
use
map
is
from
the
2000
plan.
This
the
plan
was
updated
in
April
of
2000
and
that
update
was
largely
to
address
concerns
with
the
proximity
of
the
airport
and
those
agricultural
uses.
N
And
then
you
can
see
that
really
west
of
or
I
mean
east
of
2200
West
is
where
the
agricultural
land
is.
That
is
probably,
if
you
wanted
to
say
where
the
biggest
difference
with
this
new
draft
is,
is
that's
where
you're
going
to
see
the
biggest
difference
between
what's
on
the
books
and
then
what
this
new
draft
presents.
N
So
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide
so
as
far
as
the
plan
overview,
so
the
goals
of
the
plan
unsimilar
to
when
the
update
took
place
in
2000.
This
update
was,
is
in
response
to
some
significant
development
pressures
in
the
area.
There
was
a
annexation
petition
outside
of
the
project
area
to
the
north,
then
thought
of
the
idea
of
residential
that
triggered
some
some
thoughts
from
the
council
and
wanted
to
do
this
plan
update
to
address
that
as
long
as
a
lot
of
Reason
requests
along
that
2200
West
Corridor.
N
So
the
goals
of
the
planner
to
identify
future
land
uses
that
are
that
can
co-exist
with
new
development,
the
wildlife
area,
there's
sensitive
habitat
like
wetlands
and
Uplands
in
the
area
and
then
operations
of
the
airport.
It's
also
to
reduce
conflicts
between
agricultural
uses
and
the
wildlife
habitat
and
then
consider
things
like
water,
quality,
noise
and
air
as
new
development
comes
into
the
area.
It
also
does
look
at
the
future
Annex
annexation
potential
as
well
next
slide
So.
The
plan
sets
up
a
vision
map.
N
This
is
really
a
future
land
use
map,
but
we
are
calling
it
a
vision
map
for
this
plan.
You
can
see
this
green
area
is
protected,
open
space.
This
is
largely
Wetland
areas
that
aren't
anticipated
for
development,
also
some
buffers
along
the
Jordan
River.
Then
you
have
this
transitional
area.
This
area
is
really
where
most
of
the
residential
is
at
in
the
plant
area.
Right
now
there
aren't
a
ton
of
residents,
but
there
there
is
a
handful,
and
this
is
intended
to
well.
N
We
it's
been
made
very
clear
that
a
lot
of
those
residents
intend
to
stay.
This
plan
anticipates
that
no
new
residential
would
be
allowed
in
the
plan
area
and
that
slowly
the
area
would
transition
over
to
business
park
or
light
Manufacturing,
and
then
you
can
see
the
gray
is
a
business
Parker
Industrial.
N
So,
along
with
the
vision
map,
the
vision
map
has
those
three
categories.
Each
of
those
categories
has
corresponding
design
standards
and
those
design
standards
are
really
intended
to
allow
for
economic
feasibility
for
properties,
because
we
do
anticipate
that
development
pressure
and
that
new
development
will
be
coming
in
so
to
allow
the
economic
feasibility,
but
also
to
mitigate
from
that
development,
which
I
just
mentioned
so
the
design
standards
focus
on
things
like
a
100
foot
buffer
from
sensitive
wetlands
and
Uplands.
N
It
also
talks
about
buffers
from
canals
and
things
like
that:
a
maximum
building
Frontage
along
2200
West
of
400
feet
in
the
industrial
areas
and
then
250
feet
in
the
transitional
area.
It
also
talks
about
preserving
and
connecting
wetlands
and
Uplands
together
to
create
a
system.
It
suggests
code
updates
to
native
to
encourage
native
Landscaping
like
reducing
turf
grass
and
then
also
includes
storm
water
management
Falls,
and
then
it
allows
in
the
business
park
zone.
N
N
So
implementation
I
talked
about
a
lot
of
these
because
one
of
the
key
implementation
steps
is
to
adopt
those
develop.
Those
design,
standards
and
codify
them
additionally
be
reviewing
our
tables
of
permitted
and
conditional
uses
in
the
manufacturing
Zone
the
M1
Zone
to
make
sure
that
if
something
is
considered
hazardous,
it's
a
conditional
use
instead
of
a
pretty
limited
use.
N
This
was
very
big
from
our
public
involvement
and
from
our
steering
committee
as
a
priority,
and
so
the
plan,
the
chapter
after
this
includes
funding
tools
that
the
city
council,
you
could
consider
in
acquiring
these
sensitive
lands.
So,
besides
that,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
these
ones
are
considered
our
critical
path
forward.
But
then
there
are
additional
implementation
items.
N
One
of
them
is
3200
West,
which
is
the
very
Western
Road
on
the
property
that
would
be
removing
it
from
the
major
streets
plan
and
leaving
it
as
largely
undeveloped,
and
this
is
to
really
reduce
the
impacts
to
that
Wetland,
that
is
along
the
roadway
I
develop
environmental
impact
standards,
allowing
them
with
City
goals
and
policies.
I
mentioned
the
100
foot
buffer
between
wetlands
and
any
site
development
prepare
a
public
utility
plan
to
assess
future
service
needs.
N
Within
the
plan
area,
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide
and
then
just
as
far
as
next
steps,
so
like
I
talked
about
we've
been.
The
draft
plan
was
released
in
July
of
this
year,
so
we've
been
meeting
with
the
public
for
the
past
couple
months.
We
are
now
I'm
at
the
final
stage
of
that
review
and
refining
the
draft
plan
for
Planning
Commission
review.
You
should
see
that
new
draft
plan
out
within
the
next
couple
of
weeks
and
then
after
the
Planning
Commission
reviews,
which
we
are
hoping
for
at
the
end
of
October.
N
E
Thank
you.
I
want
to
start
off
by
thanking
the
planning
department,
notably
Nick,
Kelsey
and
Chrissy,
who
have
been
really
responsive
and
we
survived
a
significant
Community
engagement
together
last
week,
I
asked
for
this
not
to
be
a
written
update,
rather
an
in-person
update
with
you
all,
because
this
is
an
interesting
case.
We
have
some
constituents
who
have
been
living
in
ag:
2
lifestyle
they
actively
farm
and
sell
eggs.
They
are
highly
engaged.
It's
not
a
place
that
we
all
traffic
very
frequently
unless
you've
been
across
e
Ranch.
E
You
probably
haven't
had
occasion
to
go
out
there.
It's
probably
two,
maybe
three
dozen
homes
that
are
being
considered
but
they're,
absolutely
correct
that
the
pressures
on
this
area
are
what
they
are.
There
is
not
a
week
that
goes
by
that
I'm,
not
I,
don't
receive
another
meeting
request
from
another
commercial
developer,
with
another
vision
for
what
to
do
out
there.
E
The
land
owners
are
very
well
aware
that
they
can
have
say
over
what
goes
on
on
their
property
and
they're,
even
relatively
at
peace,
with
the
fact
that
we
are
losing
some
of
the
most
gorgeous
ecosystem.
We
will
ever
see
as
we
develop
this
and
we
will
not
in
our
lifetime
ever
recuperate.
It,
however
I,
would
like
us
to
be
highly
aware
of
this
unique
situation
for
these
constituents
and
to
encourage
High
responsiveness
to
them
and
whatever
protections
we
can
offer
them
as
a
city.
E
They
are
concerned
about
things
like
imminent
domain
and
while
that
might
seem
a
little
exaggerated
to
us,
these
are
families
with
history,
Utah
last
names
names
like
Bangerter
and
Hinckley.
These
are
families
that
move
to
this
Valley
and
did
the
hard
work
of
setting
it
up,
who
then
lost
value,
valuable
property
to
imminent
domain
when
the
airport
came
in.
E
Our
reason
for
all
of
us
to
be
concerned
number
two,
because
it's
going
to
be
a
significant
infrastructure
development
for
us
and
we
probably
don't
want
street
racing
up
in
the
Northwest
Quadrant
anymore
than
we
want
it
anywhere
else
in
our
city.
So
there's
probably
some
things
we
need
to
look
forward
to
with
development
and
number
three,
because
there's
a
constituent
Nuance.
Here
we
have
constituents
who
are
very
much
in
danger
of
losing
their
lifestyle.
E
At
this
point,
they've
assumed
a
really
really
defensive
posture
and
although
they
maintain
openness-
and
we
talk
to
them
as
we
go
through,
this
I
would
like
you
all
to
be
aware
of
how
drastic
this
change
is
and
how
much
these
constituents
stand
to,
maybe
not
to
lose.
There
are
other
things
they'll
gain,
but
they
will
they
stand
to
lose
a
lot.
So,
thank
you
all
for
sitting
through
the
presentation
and
giving
special
consideration
to
this
part
of
my
district
and
thank
you,
planning.
E
A
N
A
next
year,
Nick
and
Nick
Morris
and
Brian
Fulmer
Brian.
M
O
A
M
Here's
Nick
okay,
so,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
follow-up
briefing
on
three
housing
related
land
use
items,
the
shared
housing
and
I
guess.
This
will
be
the
order
that
the
if
it's
all
right,
if
we
go
through
shared
housing,
we'll
go
first
off
street
parking
and
then
RMF
30..
M
Although
each
of
these
topics
have
been
discussed
separately
in
the
past
they're
interrelated
due
to
their
impact
on
housing.
Therefore,
the
council
has
decided
to
consider
these
all
together
to
provide
better
context
of
the
issue.
Over
the
past
several
years,
there's
been
many
work
session
discussions
and
public
hearings.
M
However,
the
council
decided
not
to
take
action
after
each
of
those
respected.
Public
hearings
had
been
closed.
Then,
in
July
of
this
year
the
council
had
the
briefing
on
the
thriving
and
place
study
discussing
the
gentrification
and
displacement
in
the
city
in
this
presentation,
highlighted
the
severity
of
the
gentrification
and
displacement
and
the
need
to
address
it.
M
So
that's
why
this
was
brought
back
to
the
council
for
consideration
at
this
time.
So
again,
those
are
the
way.
The
order
in
which
we'll
go
with
shared
housing
off
street
parking,
then
RMF,
30
and
planning
staff
is
here,
they'll
give
a
quick
synopsis
of
each
of
those,
and
then
we
can.
The
council
can
ask
questions
and
have
the
discussion
in
that
order.
O
All
right,
I'm
going
to
start
and
kick
us
off
with
just
a
recap
of
the
shared
housing
proposal.
Next
slide,
please.
O
All
right
so
just
in
summary,
this
is
a
type
of
housing
where
generally
there's
sleeping
rooms
and
they
share
either
a
kitchen
and
or
a
bath.
It's
quite
a
bit
different
than
most
dwelling
units
as
they're
viewed
from
a
zoning
code
perspective.
O
O
This
proposal
expands
where
the
use
is
allowed
and
we
have
a
map
on
one
of
the
next
few
slides
that
will
show
that
the
regulations
limit
the
occupancy
to
two
people
per
room
us
to
avoid
some
overcrowding,
there's
a
minimum
communal
space.
So
these
are
shared
spaces
that
are
20
square
feet
per
sleeping
room.
That's
generally
assembled
has
one
space
or
multiple
spaces.
If
it's
a
multiple
storied
building,
they
tend
to
have
some
communal
space
on
on
each
floor,
accessible
rooms,
those
are
rooms
for
people
who
need
various
Mobility.
O
Aids
are
typically
on
the
ground
floor
and
our
code
says
that
they
should
be
on
the
ground
floor.
If
there's
a
need
for
more
accessible
rooms,
then
what
can
fit
on
the
ground
floor
then
they're
allowed
to
go
onto
the
upper
floors
also
requires
a
management
plan.
This
primarily
deals
with
property,
maintenance
and
management,
but
also
is
intended
to
reduce,
provide
a
way
for
Neighbors
to
have
a
contact
to
reduce
those
impacts
that
may
occur
next
slide.
O
So
the
the
details
of
where
it
is
currently,
we
allow
this
use
in
two
key
zoning
districts,
so
the
TSA
zones
and
then
the
fbun2
Zone,
actually
allows
us
as
well
right
now
as
permitted
uses
in
both
of
those
districts
so
along
the
North,
Temple
Corridor
and
along
400
South.
The
proposed
editions
include,
you
can
see
the
list
of
zoning
districts
there,
but
these
are
generally
our
mixed
use.
O
Districts
that
tend
to
have
a
mix
of
commercial
uses
are
close
to
jobs
close
to
services
and
generally
better
served
by
transit
than
other
zoning
districts
in
the
city.
Next
slide.
O
So
this
is
the
map.
Hopefully
you
can
see
it
well,
one
of
the
key
Provisions
that
that
we
were
looking
at
with
this,
even
though
it
looks
like
everything
is
concentrated.
Most
things
are
concentrated
in
the
general
downtown
area
and
then
along
some
of
our
our
major,
more
intense
commercial
districts.
I
think
the
important
thing
to
note
here
is
that
currently,
when
you
look
at
the
breakdown
of
Acres,
east
and
west
of
I-15,
most
of
the
land
where
this
use
is
currently
allowed
is,
is
west
of
I-15
If
This
Were,
to
be
adopted.
O
Most
of
the
land
will
actually
be
east
of
I-15.
A
big
chunk
of
that
is
adding
the
downtown
zones,
the
D1
through
D4
and
the
GMU
zones,
where
one
would
anticipate
this
type
of
use
to
occur,
but
our
zoning
currently
does
not
allow
it
next
slide,
so
why
we
just
and
to
rehash
on
the
on
the
why
it's
one
tool
in
the
housing
toolbox
this
this
type
of
housing,
is
often
used
as
people
transition
out
of
homelessness.
It's
also
used
his
market
rate.
O
There
is
a
growing
market
demand
for
this
type
of
Housing,
and
particularly
in
other
communities,
and
we've
had
a
very
similar
proposal
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
It
removes
the
zoning
barriers
associated
with
this
meaning
it
expands
where
it
can
go.
It
increases
housing
choice
for
for
people,
particularly
those
who
want
to
choose
this
housing,
no
one's
forced
into
it.
It
expands
housing
options
to
more
parts
of
the
city
and
expands
it.
O
One
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
is
that
there's
a-
and
this
question
has
been
asked-
a
lot
is
that
what
is
the
difference
between
a
boarding
house
and
a
shared
housing,
and
the
primary
difference
is
that
a
boarding
house
is
a
type
of
dwelling
and
it
retains
that
occupancy
for
a
minimum
of
30
days,
whereas
shared
housing,
because
it
has
it,
can
be
and
sometimes
needs
to
be
more
transitional
for
people.
It
allows
for
more
weekly
rental
types
of
things.
That's
the
primary
difference.
O
Boarding
houses
are
allowed
and
most
of
I
think
this,
the
lowest
zoning
District
it's
allowed
is
in
the
rmf-45,
but
it
also
is
allowed
in
most
of
the
districts
where
this
use
would
be
allowed
as
well,
and
then
I
put
a
link
up
here
for
those
that
hopefully
it's
long,
but
for
those
that
may
want
to
find
more
information
about
this
housing
type
and
how
it's
been
used,
and
that
is
all
I
have.
J
O
J
O
The
TSA
Zone
extends
up
to
about
900
East
and
that's
about
as
close
as
it
gets
the
rmf-45
Zone,
which
addresses
The
Boarding
House.
Those
are
typically
actually
found
closer
to
the
university
than
in
other
parts
of
the
city.
I
I
A
couple
years
ago,
I
had
indicated
that
I
wasn't
supportive
of
this,
because,
though
it
does
in
create
more
Geographic,
Equity
I
still
think
that
it
doesn't
create
enough
Geographic,
Equity,
so
I
at
the
time
indicate
that
I
was
in
support
of
this
and
I
have
since
hearing
the
thriving
in
place,
conversation
and
understanding
how
how
bad
we're
doing
with
housing
costs
and
how
and
then
also
understanding
more
about
permanent
Supportive,
Housing
I.
Think
it's,
though,
I
still
maintain
remain
concerned
about
the
geographic
Equity
of
this
map.
I
We're
looking
at
I
I
think
it's
worth
con
doing
now
and
then
hoping
to
fix
that
in
the
future.
So
I
am
I've
changed
my
position
on
that,
so
just
letting
everyone
know
and
I
hope
that
we
can
adopt
this
because
we
need
all.
As
Nick
said,
this
is
one
tool
in
the
toolbox.
We
need
all
the
tools
that
we
can
get.
F
F
I
guess
that
makes
me
think.
Well,
it's
we're
not
seeing
a
explosion
and
shared
housing
in
the
areas
where
it's
already
allowed.
F
Why?
Why
do
we
think
that
this
is
going
to
be
it's
going
to
open
up
a
lot
more
opportunity?
Do
you
think.
O
Right
so
so
the
primary
reason
for
that
is
that
anytime,
you
have
a
land
use,
that's
limited
to
a
small
geographic
area,
it's
competing
with
every
other
use
that
is
otherwise
allowed
in
that
and
right
now,
because
mostly
this
use
is
very
low
income
housing.
It
is
almost
always
going
to
lose
out
on
land
to
more
profitable
land
uses.
So
one
there
has
to
be
the
money
available
to
help
support
the
land
use,
but
but
two
there
has
to
be
a
place
for
that
land
used
to
go
and.
F
Okay
and
the
second
thing
is
I
I
read
a
lot
of
the
the
arguments
and
and
listen
to
opponents
of
shared
housing
that
I've
talked
about
how
it
commodifies
like
bathrooms
and
kitchens
and
and
over
time
I
guess
causes
those
to
be
like
added
features
or
instead
of
standard
features
like
a
kitchen
or
bathroom.
F
Is
there
any
I
mean
I
know
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
examples
of
of
shared
housing
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
and
in
Utah,
as
they
do,
maybe
in
other
cities,
as
far
as
you
know,
has
that,
like
borne
out
in
other
cities
that
it's
led
to
people
being
willing
to
not
accept
having
their
own
bathroom
or
things
like
that,
I
I
mean
I'm
just
interested
in
in
whether
that
argument
has
I
understand
it,
but
has
it
borne
out
in
other
cities,
I.
F
F
Okay
and
then
my
last
question
is:
does
anything
in
the
ordinance
or
any
of
the
changes
that
we're
doing
here
dictate
that
a
shared
housing,
and
so
some
shared
housing
has
like
private
bathrooms?
I
think
we've
talked
about
the
one
on
Bueno
Avenue
that
one
has
private
bathrooms.
It's
a
shared
kitchen.
F
Does
this
one
say
that
a
have
to
have
a
shared
bathroom
or
that
they
can't
have
a
shared
bathroom
or
is
it?
Is
it
up
to
the
developer
on?
What's
included
in
the
shared
part
of
shared
housing?
It.
O
F
You
thank
you,
so
why
shouldn't
we
say
at
a
minimum,
they
should
have
to
have
a
private
bathroom
per
room.
Why?
Why
do
you
think
we?
Why,
in
your
proposal,
you're
not
recommending
that
that
we
have
that
requirement?
Why
do
you
think
that
that's
better
so.
O
I
Customer
model,
so
just
to
clarify
I,
may
have
understood
this
wrong
and
I
want
to
clarify
for
the
record,
because
I
have
set
up
on
the
news.
I
thought
this
proposal
was
requiring
that
it
did
have
either
a
shared
either
a
private
kitchen
or
a
bathroom,
but
not
both
is
that
incorrect.
That's
incorrect.
I
I
I
always
understood
it
to
be
one
or
the
other,
but
not
both,
but
I
guess
I
was
just
wrong
on
that,
and
apologies
to
the
public
that
I
misinformed,
sorry
I
would
I
mean
I
would
like
to
consider
that
I
don't
know
if
it's
the
right
thing
to
do,
but
that
that's
always
where
my
brain
was
with
this.
So
since
now
I'm
learning
information
I
wanted
to
think
that
through
for
a
second
you.
O
Know
the
other
thing
to
think
about
too.
Is
that
because
I
mean
not
that
this
model
is
new
to
the
city
right
prior
to
1980,
we
had
about
a
thousand
units
of
shared
housing
and
sros
throughout
the
city.
We
now
have
less
than
30.,
and
if
you
do,
the
math
I
mean
I.
Think
you
can
see
why
we,
you
know
one
of
the
major
factors
in
why
we
have
people
without
a
place
to
live.
I.
Think
there's
a
good
correlation
there,
so
I
mean
you
could
look
at
something
like
that
and
I.
O
Don't
know
that
it
would
be
detrimental
at
this
point
to
to
the
likelihood
of
us
having
a
shared
housing
model.
So.
K
Thanks
I
I
think
it's
just
clarifying
questions
Nick,
so
I
transport
myself
to
dormitory
time
at
the
EU
when
I
used
to
live
there
a
long
time
ago.
So
we
had
it
was
like
an
apartment.
It
had
four
rooms,
one
shared
living
room
and
then
two
bathrooms,
no
kitchen,
and
it
was
only
one
person
per
per
room.
P
K
K
Q
O
K
O
You
know
that
would
be
an
option
to
to
put
some
kind
of
a
cap
number
of
sleeping
rooms
per
shared
kitchen
or
shared
bath.
If
that's
an
Avenue
and
like
I
said
these,
these
things
are
actually
really.
This
part
at
least
we're
at
the
point
where
those
are
really
easy
to
write
into
into
the
proposal.
K
Yes
on
site,
yes,
so
yes,
but
with
some
of
our
with
some
of
our
permanent
Supportive
Housing
that
we're
supposed
to
have
24-hour
maintenance.
Unfortunately,
due
to
funding
you
know,
they
can't
and
therefore
here's
a
city
coming
to
the
rescue.
Sometimes
you
know
for
the
negative
impact
in
the
neighborhood
so
that
those
are
my
worries
about
this.
C
Boy
there
was
Nick.
You
mentioned
that
land,
obviously
developers
will
choose
a
more
expensive
land,
they
would
choose
to.
You
know
maximize
their
profit,
and
this
might
not
be
the
the
option.
So
you
know
by
expanding
the
zoning
where
this
is
allowed,
we
might
be
able
to
see
more
of
this
happen
in
the
city.
To
that
point,
though,
I
feel
like
it's
it's
possibly
going
to
affect
the
west
side
or
we're
going
to
see
more
of
this
on
the
West
Side.
C
Since
the
west
side
is
arguably
some
of
the
cheapest
land
we
have
in
our
city.
So
that
means
that
we
might
see
more
of
this,
even
though
the
zoning
the
expansion
on
this
is
still
tours
downtown.
On
the
east
side,
we're
still
expanding
on
the
west
side.
C
So
that
means
that
we're
going
to
see
more
of
this
on
the
west
side
and
I
again,
I'm,
not
sure
this
isn't
necessarily
a
bad
thing,
but
when
we're
talking
about
Equity
I
feel
like
we
need
to
be
aware
of
that,
and
we
need
to
be
aware
that
you
know
if
you
know,
we
know
that
developers
want
to
maximize
their
profits
and
they're
going
to
find
cheap
land
to
do
this.
And
so
that's
something
to
to
to
note
again.
C
I
also
think
that
we
need
to
diversify
the
housing
stock
and
I
believe
that
a
heart
we
need
to
have
more
options
for
for
people
and
it's
hard
to
find
options
where
you
don't
have
to
buy
furniture
when
you
don't
have
to
you
know,
come
up
with
a
you
know,
with
a
a
Year's
worth
of
proving
and
that
you
work.
You
know
that
you
can
afford.
C
You
know
600
bucks
and
you
can
do
it
for
a
month
or
two
until
you
sort
of
stabilize
yourself,
so
I
think
that
this
benefits
to
this
type
of
housing.
I
also
thought
at
the
beginning
that
one
of
the
two
items
was
going
to
be
required.
I
again,
I,
don't
know
to
to
you
know:
I
feel
like
there
is
a
point
to
by
requiring
one
of
them.
You
make
it
the
housing
again
a
little
more
expensive
to
build.
I
also
think
that
it
will
still
expand
the
ability
of
creating
this
type
of
housing.
C
I
think
that
Equity
issue
is
important
to
be
aware
of,
and
I
also
think
that
this
type
of
housing
is
very
important
and
it
is
possibly
needed,
and
you
mentioned
that
there
was
a
thousand
in
the
80s,
a
thousand
units
in
the
80s,
and
they
were
in
this
in
the
old
allowed
over
the
current
in
this
in
the
zones
that
is
currently
allowed
correct
and
well
no.
O
So
over
time,
those
that
use
has
been
zoned
out
of
the
city.
Most
of
it
has
been
replaced
with
other
uses
right
as
the
land
becomes
more
profitable
for
other
things.
O
They
transition,
some
of
them
actually
transitioned
back
to
hotels,
most
were
demolished
and
replaced
with
new
development.
Yeah.
C
And
we
have
a
lot
of
people
living
in
motels
and
hotels
all
over
the
city
and
long-term
basis.
So
this
could
be
something
that
is
a
step
forward
for
many
of
them.
So
I
just
wanted
to
like
raise
the
issue
of
equity
and
I.
Also
I
didn't
know
as
well
that
it
will.
We
are
not
putting
any
requirement
necessarily
either
if
it's,
the
bathroom
or
the
kitchen,
which
will
be
shared.
A
F
Thanks
what
if
we
would
it
be
easy
to
make
a
change
that
said?
Okay,
if
you're
renovating
existing
structure,
especially
if
it's
a
historic
structure,
you
could
have
a
shared
bathroom,
but
if
you're
a
new
build,
you
need
to
have
one
bathroom
per
unit.
Would
that
be
hard
to
do?
No.
F
I
I
would
be
in
favor
of
that
for
new
builds
and
I
would
be
open
to
hearing
that
there
should
be
a
limit
into
like
how
many
people
could
use
a
kitchen,
but
I
don't
want
to
just
pick
a
random
example.
F
I
would
want
to
know
like
you
know.
Why
is
for
the
magic
number,
six
or
whatever,
because
it
seems
like
it
would
vary
based
on
development
like
if
you're
going
to
have
a
massive
kitchen
with
like
multiple
cooking
stations,
then
I,
don't
know
how
you
you
know
divide
that
up,
but
that
that
would
seem
to
be
more
reasonable
than
you
know
for
more
people
to
use
than
one
stove,
one
microwave
all
that
stuff,
but
the
bathrooms
I
think
I
would
like
it
to
be.
F
If,
if
it's
not
a
historic
structure
that
you
and
it's
a
new
build,
that
it
needs
to
have
one
bathroom
per
unit.
J
Thank
you
I,
like
this
ordinance
how
it
is
I
can,
but
in
listening
to
some
of
my
colleagues,
I
would
be
okay.
Looking
at
the
idea
that
that
council,
member
Wharton,
just
brought
up
I
would
remove
the
historic
part
of
it
because,
but
if
it's
a,
if
it's
a
new,
build
to
add
that
requirement,
because
I
can
see
this
being
used
in
in
buildings
that
we
wouldn't
consider
historic
and
then
going
down
that
whole
route
of
defining,
what
historic
looks
like
and
then
having
to
to
kind
of
add
some
more
Hoops
to
it.
J
Where
what
I
see
this
ordinance.
As
doing
as
to
what
you
said
earlier,
Nick
is
creating
another
tool
in
the
toolbox
and
to
your
point
that
you
sort
of
had
a
little
that
you
alluded
to
is
that
as
the
Prof
as
the
land
got
more
profitable
for
for
other
uses,
we
zoned
out
sros
and
I
mean
there
may
or
may
not
be
a
correlation
to
what
we
see
now
with
people
not
being
able
to
to
afford
shelter.
So
I,
look
at
this
in
a
in
a
way
of
I.
J
Don't
want
to
make
it
more
expensive
that
then
it
it
what
we
with
that
unintended
consequence
right
of
adding
more
and
more
requirements
such
that
now
it's
still
unaffordable
and
unattainable
for
people,
which
that
is
the
thing
we're
trying
not
to
do
right,
we're
trying
to
create
more
stock
and
so
to
me
not
that
I
want
to
make
it
the
easiest
thing,
because
I
also
just
really
don't
see
a
bunch
of
developers
being
like
this
is
what
we're
gonna
go.
Do
is
build
a
bunch
of
these
and
maybe
maybe
I'm
totally
wrong
on
that.
J
So
for
me,
it's
kind
of
let's
keep
this
as
Equitable
and-
and
they
hear
this
word
all
the
time
dignified
of
an
ordinance,
but
that
allows
people
to
actually
hopefully-
and
in
some
ways
it
can
be
a
younger
person
just
getting
out
of
college
that
is
used
to
the
dorm
life
and
can
be
like
oh
look.
I
can
afford
this,
but
not
be
in
a
dorm
or
whatever,
and
maybe
it's
somebody
transitioning
out
of
homelessness
or
in
from
one
place
to
another.
J
Maybe
it's
somebody
just
down
on
their
luck
that
lost
their
job
right
and
now
they
have
a
space
for
it,
and
so
I
think
there's
so
many
so
many
scenarios
where
this
can
be
the
right
tool
that
I
don't
want
to
put
so
many
hinders
hinder
so
many
roadblocks
on
it
that
then
it
becomes
something
that
is
again
unattainable,
so
I
I
would
be
okay,
sort
of
with
Chris's
suggestion
that
on
new
builds
we
require
either
one
or
the
other
or
a
bathroom
and
and
on
either
one
I
would
I
would
say
looking
into
that
cap
for
the
kitchen
and
or
if
we're
requiring
not
requiring
a
bathroom
in
every
unit,
then
what
is
that
kind
of
cap
for
people
per
utility?
J
If
you
will,
if
we
can
call
both
of
those
a
utility?
But
you
know:
I
we've
worked
on
this
a
lot
and
and
I've
seen
it
a
lot
and
I
think
that
expanding
it
really
into
these
different
zones
creates
what
we're
trying
to
do,
and
that
is
yet
more
housing
stock
and
more
Tools
in
our
toolbox
to
get
people
sheltered
in
all
different
scenarios
that
they
may
find
themselves
in.
I
I
appreciate
this
discussion.
First
of
all,
somebody
that
is
listening,
messaged
me
and
said
that
I
wasn't
entirely
crazy.
I
think
that
in
2019
or
2019
there
was
a
version
that
included
that
which
is
when
I
was
on
the
Planning
Commission.
So
that's
probably
a
very,
very
old
thing
that
I'm
still
thought
was
accurate.
I
I
I
would
probably
want
to
if
we're
going
to
go
the
route
of
saying
new
construction
or
some
amount
of
shared
housing
projects
need
to
have
private
bathrooms.
I
would
actually
probably
prefer
to
not
say
every
unit
needs
a
bathroom,
but
that
it
can
be
shared
by
no
more
than
four
residents
or
something
like
that,
and
if
it's
a
double
occupancy
room,
then
maybe
that's
only
two
rooms.
If
it's
a
single
occupancy
room,
it
may
be
four
rooms.
I
Maybe
so,
if
we
go
that
route
but
I
wouldn't
want
it
to
be
one
to
one
I
think
I
think
there's
probably
a
lot
of
efficiencies
that
could
be
gained
and
still
enough
privacy
and
I
I,
don't
know
if
dignity
is
or
is
not
the
right
word,
but
I
think
that
we
could
still
maintain
a
higher
standard
of
living
by
limiting
it's
a
four-ish
three
or
four
year,
four
units,
but
I,
don't
know
just.
A
Right
I
do
have
like
one
question
about
the
bathroom
and
I
was
just
reading
from
other
places
where
the
shower
facilities
would
be
locked
or
secure.
Is
that
part
of
ours,
or
is
that
just
part
of
it
I.
A
Can't
recall,
and
so
I
don't
remember
if
I
read
it
in
the
staff
report,
I
read
in
an
article
but
I
read
it
somewhere
about
the
the
bathroom
was
Secure
at
least
the
the
shower
facilities
was
Secure
yeah.
A
We
knew
that
part
and
I'm
I'm
open
to
the
suggestions
from
the
other
council
members
on
whether
it's
an
Adaptive
use
and
it's
allowed
to
have
shared
or
new
construction
where
it
needs
to
have
a
private
or
some
type
of
a
limited
use
or
co-use
facility
and
I
I
would
also
say
this
is
great
housing,
a
number
of
big
cities,
and
if
you
were
in
some
college
towns
in
the
California
area,
yes,
we
didn't
have
a
shared
housing,
but
we
had
a
number
of
students
living
in
some
small
places
because
you
couldn't
afford
it
and
I
I
know
a
lot
of
college.
A
Students
are
just
recently
graduated
college
students.
This
is
one
way
for
them
to
save
money,
so
they
actually
could
either
buy
a
car
or
buy
a
house,
and-
and
so
this
is
one
option
and
then
again,
I
agree
with
the.
This
is
one
more
toolbox
for
our
housing
crunch
that
we're
in
so
I
appreciate
all
the
effort
here
and
one
last
comment,
because
we
got
to
go
through
the
other
two
go
councilman
of
power.
J
Mr,
chair
I,
would
suggest
at
this
point
I
guess
this
would
sort
of
be
a
straw
poll,
so
I'd
like
to
get
this
ordinance
moving
again
instead
of
us
just
like
theorizing
about
every
all
the
things
so
I
would
ask
that
Maestro.
J
Pull
would
be
that
we
ask
staff
planning
staff
to
come
back
with
language
modifying
the
ordinance
with
both
option,
one
which
would
be
Chris's
what
I'm
calling
Chris's
option,
which
is
the
the
maybe
adaptive
reuse
versus
new
build
and
what
that
looks
like
and
then
option
two
which
I'm
calling
Darren's
option,
which
is
sort
of
capping
it
somewhere
for
us
to
discuss
at
a
future
date
so
that
we
could
maybe
actually
get
something
passed.
A
O
P
Q
Am
ready,
I'm.
O
Q
So
yeah
the
first
thing
we'll
look
at
that
with
that
is
just
a
quick
slide.
Looking
at
the
purpose
of
this,
and
and
as
has
been
mentioned,
this
is
another
tool
towards
affordable
housing
and
a
lot
of
other
objectives
and
goals
of
the
city.
Q
Most
every
single
week,
I
get
a
phone
call
from
a
developer
asking
when
this
ordinance
is
going
to
be
passed,
their
ANSI
for
it
they're
ready
for
it,
they're
excited
for
it.
It's
going
to
be
a
a
good
tool
for
them.
Parking
is
very
expensive
for
multi-family
housing.
This
is
going
to
offer
them
a
lot
more
flexibility.
Q
Q
So
throughout
the
work
sessions
there's
been
14
different
issues
that
were
raised,
consensus
was
reached
on
13
of
those
14
items
and
I
won't
go
through
them
entirely,
but
those
an
updated
transmittal
with
the
13
changes
was
sent
in
April
of
this
year's
reflecting
those
items
and
our
most
recent
discussion
when
you're
there
on
slide
four.
Our
most
recent
discussions
have
focused
on
the
last
the
kind
of
holdout
item,
which
was
the
council
had
asked
us
to
look
at
potential
Parking
Solutions
for
Lots
under
10
000
square
feet
additional
reductions.
Q
We
explored
three
different
options,
which
included
letting
those
lots
provide
Lots
between
five
thousand
and
ten
thousand
square
feet
to
provide
50
percent
of
required
parking
for
there
to
be
no
minimum
for
Lots
under
10
000
square
feet
or
just
to
leave
as
proposed
and
rely
on
reductions
elsewhere
in
the
ordinance
that
was
a
fairly
complex.
We
looked
at
a
number
of
scenarios
and
tried
to
figure
out
the
impacts
that
any
of
those
choices
would
have
and
it
turned
out.
There
were
just
far
too
many
variables
and
ended
up
being
quite
complicated.
Q
Through
it,
we
did
have
quite
a
bit
of
discussion
on
that
and
the
consensus
was
reached
that
we
should
just
leave
the
exemptions
as
is,
and
rely
on
reductions
elsewhere
in
the
code,
so
those
had
to
do
with
reductions
for
shared
parking,
proximity
to
Transit,
affordable
or
senior
housing,
carpool
and
car
share
valet
parking
and
submitting
a
parking
study.
So
those
were
kind
of
the
tools
that
were
already
in
place
and
running
through
some
of
the
scenarios.
There
was
quite
a
bit
of
reductions
available
for
those
particular
Lots
in
that
size.
So
next
slide.
Q
We'd
have
one
new
item
that
is
emerged
since
our
last
discussion
and
it
has
to
do
with
potential
exemptions
for
Police
substations
that
are
occupying
existing
buildings,
and
this
has
been
a
an
item
that
there's
been
some
potential.
Police
substations
looking
to
go
into
existing
buildings
and
with
the
emergency
vehicles
required
to
be
there.
Q
There
were
issues
with
potential
setbacks
and
open
space,
and
so
we're
looking
at
adding
a
line
in
exempting
Police
substations
with
in
existing
buildings
and
to
have
a
reduced
landscape
setback,
a
reduction
in
open
space
and
again
that
would
just
allow
those
emergency
vehicles
to
to
be
able
to
park
in
those
reduced
areas.
So.
Q
Q
Q
So
yeah
that
really
just
leaves
us
with.
If
there's
any
questions
or
discussion
on
these
items,
and
then
you
know
moving
to
the
next
step.
So
thank.
G
On
the
parking
in
that
public
public
area
that
we
were
just
talking
about
police,
one
of
the
questions
that
we
asked
of
Rachel
and
she's
going
to
get
an
answer
back,
I
haven't
seen
it
yet,
but
if
I
should
have
I
apologize,
but
the
question
of
whether
they're
going
to
to
fence
that
also
I
know
the
police
wanted
that,
but
hopefully
because
it's
in
the
line
of
sight
of
their
the
office
that
they
would
have
that
they
wouldn't
need
to
also
fence
it
in
that
in
that
area,
that's
intended
to
be
a
more
of
a
public
friendly
area.
O
A
Thank
you,
Nick
council
member
I.
Just
had
one
question.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
presentation
and
and
I.
Remember
all
the
discussions
about
the
different
you
know
requests
we
had
and
going
through
all
that
so
I
appreciate
the
the
effort
here
and
I
just
want
to
clarify
so
R1
R2,
RMF,
30
type,
zonings
and
adus
are
not
applicable
to
this
off
street
parking.
Amendment.
C
Mr,
chair,
I
I,
wanted
to
just
throw
a
thought
out
there
related
to
parking
again
my
crazy
thoughts,
the
there's
an
issue
that
was
raised
in
my
district
several
times
when
talking
to
some
of
my
neighbors
related
to
parking
structures
that
buildings
will
build
under
their.
C
You
know
their
buildings
and
landlords
charging
fees
to
park
in
those
structures
and
therefore,
basically
many
of
the
neighbors
choosing
not
to
do
that
or
to
save
money
for
obvious
reasons,
and
then
we
have
parking
structures
that
are
underutilized,
and
then
we
have
the
streets,
you
know
being
the
Overflow
for
this
parking
structures.
C
Basically,
for
obvious
reasons,
people
trying
to
save
money
so
I
that
to
me
is
an
interesting
question
and
I
don't
know
if
there
isn't
a
clear
solution
to
this,
but
you
know
I
I
understand
that
they
want
to
cancel
out
their
costs
to
build
this.
You
know
very
expensive
parking
structures
under
their
buildings,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
that
they
can.
C
Maybe
there
is
a
way
to
pencil
this
out
in
a
different
way
that
doesn't
impact
everybody
else,
and
that's
something
that
I'm
curious
and
if
there
is
a
very,
very
better
solution
or
if
some
other
jurisdiction
in
the
country
has
done,
and
something
like
this
I'll
look
into
this
because
I
we
are
allowing
them
to
sometimes
through
zoning,
not
in
every
case,
but
sometimes
we're
allowing
them
an
extra
floor
or
or
more
height.
Because
of
the
building
of
this.
C
You
know
these
structures,
but
then
they're
charging
the
neighbors,
the
fees
and
the
fees
sometimes
become
unaffordable,
so
the
public
benefit
in
there.
I
don't
know
if,
if
it,
if
it
pencils
out
for
everybody,
so
I
would
like
to
see
if
there
is
a
way
to
look
into
this
related
I
know
that
this
is
not
completely
related
to
the
topic,
but
I
when
we're
talking
about
parking
I
feel
like
I
need
to
throw
it
out
there.
O
Yeah
I
don't
know
if
you
want
us
to
respond
to
that,
but
that
that
occur,
that
what
you're,
describing
as
a
common
occurrence,
when
when
parking,
is
unbundled
from
the
cost
of
housing
and
it
while
it
is
a
a
way
to
reduce
housing
costs.
If
people
are
still
going
to
own
cars
are
going
to
still
find
a
place
to
park
them,
and
so
that's
I,
don't
know
that.
There's
a
zoning
solution
to
that.
O
F
Well,
your
answer
is
causing
me
to
rethink
my
question
but
yeah
I
guess
for
me:
it's
not
even
Street
by
Street
where
people
disagree
about
parking,
it's
like
household
by
household
or
maybe
even
individuals
within
the
household
that
feel.
You
know
that
we
have
way
too
much
parking
that
we're
way
too
permissive
and
that,
on
the
on
the
opposite
side,
that
there
is
no
that
there's
nowhere
to
park
and
we're-
and
it's
it's
you
know-
defies
logic-
to
have
less
than
one
style
per
unit
or
whatever
multiple
stalls
per
unit.
F
C
F
O
It
depends
on
what
that
issue
is
right.
The
biggest
thing
is
either
side
this,
the
the
single
biggest
thing
that
this
does
is
it
simplifies
our
code
and
it
makes
it
way
more
predictable,
predictable
about
what
can
happen
right
now.
Our
code
has
all
kinds
of
different
exceptions
and
transportation
demand
management,
things
that
just
don't
seem
to
achieve
what
they
were
intended
to
do
and
they're
very
confusing
and
complicated,
and
so
that's
the
primary
well,
not
the
primary,
but
one
of
the
primary
goals
of
this.
O
The
other
thing
that
it
does
is
it
aligns
parking
to
Transportation
options,
and
so,
when
you
are
closer
to
Transit
routes
and
closer
to
the
high
quality,
bicycle
infrastructure
and
mixed-use
districts,
then
there
is
going
to
be
less
likelihood
of
people
needing
to
own
a
car
and
some
will
choose
not
to
or
they
will
choose
to
own
one
instead
of
two
and
so
that's
the
goal,
because
we
know
that
we
can't
improve
our
air
without
changing
how
we
move-
and
that's
that
is
you
know,
the
air
quality
is
a
very
significant
reason
for
regulating
parking,
if
not
the
most
significant
reason
for
doing
so.
O
O
It
does
both,
and
so
in
those
places
where
it
is
where
right
now
parking
the
parking
regulations
either
don't
make,
are
stifling
the
desired
type
of
growth
or
negatively
impacting
Economic
Development.
O
You
can
look
at
like
restaurants,
for
example,
where
the
maximum
is
so
low
that
we've
had
a
number
of
people
want
to
open
restaurants
and
they've
chosen
not
to
because
they
can
provide
enough
parking
even
when
there's
new
construction.
So
it
does
it
kind
of
mixes
both
of
those
things
it
it
tries
to.
It
tries
to
strike
a
balance
between
those
regulations
that
were
overly
burdensome
and
barriers,
but,
while
also
creating
Avenues
to
promote
alternative.
F
And
I'm
glad
you
mentioned
that
because
that's
that's
my
last
question
I
mean
at
this
time
is
what
does
I
think
for
this
subject:
yeah.
Definitely
not
oh
yeah!
F
That
I
had
a
constituent
write
to
you
about
bike
parking
and
saying
that
that
we
should
normally
with
parking
we're
required
to
round
to
the
nearest
whole
number,
but
saying
that
it
should
be
rounded
up
for
bikes,
because
otherwise
it
could
be
zero,
would
making
it
be
round
up
for
bikes,
be
difficult
to
do,
and
would
that
create
inconsistency
with
the
with
other
parts
of
the
code.
I
think
that
was
your.
O
Concern,
no,
it
wouldn't
be.
It
wouldn't
be
difficult
to
do
it.
Basically,
in
the
bicycle
parking
requirement
section,
it
would
just
say
you
know:
fractions
of
a
of
a
number
shall
be
rounded
up.
Okay,
there's
a
general
statement
in
the
parking
chapter
that
does
say
we
rounded
the
nearest
whole
number,
but
it
you
can.
You
can
put
an
exception
for
bicycle
parking
in
there.
Okay,.
F
Well,
so
I
would
like
to
ask
I
guess
my
colleagues
that
for
bikes
that
we
round
up,
because
otherwise
they
could
round
down
and
have
zero
accommodations
for
biking.
I
Can
I
discuss
I?
How
long
will
that
take
because
we've
asked
for.
O
Thing,
it's
literally
adding
a
sentence:
there's
two
sections
I,
just
ordinance
that
would
be
modified
as
part
of
this
they're
all
within
something
that
the
council's
already
considering
changes
to
I.
Think
that
we
can
probably
put
right
that
get
it
to
the
attorney's
office
and
they
can
forward
it
on.
You
know
we'll
talk
to
them,
but
on
our
end
in
planning,
it's
I,
think
Eric
and
I,
and
and
our
zoning
administrator
Myra
Alima
can
probably
knock
that
out
in
in
very
short
order.
I
Okay,
yeah
I,
just
don't
want
to
delay
it
just
like
the
shared
housing.
I,
don't
delayed
anymore
and
I
know
first
to
well
I'll
make
my
comment
after
we
vote.
We
do
this
trouble.
A
I
Do
you
mind
if
I
make
one
quick
comment?
Mr
chair,
we
got
30
seconds,
okay,
I
I,
think
for
both
this
and
shared
housing,
the
those
dropples
that
we
took
if
it
turns
out
that
it's
going
to
take
several
months,
and
thank
you
for
going
on
that
wild
goose
chase.
That
I
put
you
on
with
the
five
to
ten
thousand
square
foot,
lots
and
I
apologize
that
you
had
to
do
all
that
work.
But
thank
you
for
looking
into
it
and
letting
me
know
it
wasn't
going
to
work.
I
But
if
any
of
the
things
that
we
talk
about
any
of
the
last
two
straw
polls
do
that
then
I
would
propose
that
we
just
adopt
them
as
is
and
make
those
changes
later.
So
hopefully
they'll
be
very
quick
and.
I
B
There
are
approximately
1030
Parcels
located
in
the
rmf-30
zoning
district,
and
the
majority
of
the
existing
rmf-30
properties
are
currently
utilized
as
single
family
homes.
Next
slide
for
reference,
the
provided
map
illustrates
the
distribution
of
multi-family
zoning
throughout
Salt,
Lake
City,
so
all
of
the
orange
Parcels
are
multi-family
next
slide.
B
Just
as
a
summary
of
the
RMF
30
amendments,
we
included
the
introduction
of
design
standards,
all
of
which
include
required
building
entrances
entry
features
durable
building
materials,
a
minimum
glass
percentage
on
those
primary
elevations,
as
well
as
limiting
the
size
of
blank
walls,
and
then
screening
of
utilities
we're
also
introducing
new
building
forms.
These
include
Cottage
developments,
sideways
oriented
row,
houses
and
tiny
homes
next
slide.
B
Through
this
process,
we
are
proposing
to
reduce
the
lot
area,
minimum
to
2
000
square
feet
for
a
single
family
dwelling
and
then
2
000
per
unit
for
a
two
family.
So
a
total
of
four
thousand
and
2000
for
multi-family,
we
defined
anything
more
than
three
so
three
units
or
more
as
multi-family,
so
that
would
be
a
minimum
of
six
thousand
to
start
a
multi-family
building
the
cottage
development
and
Tiny
Houses
would
require
a
1500
square
foot
feet
per
unit
next
slide.
B
Please
we're
also
introducing
the
removal
of
lot
width
minimums,
but
we
are
introducing
a
lot
width
maximum
of
110
feet
and
that's
to
discourage
land
banking
next
slide.
Please
we're
also
allowing
multiple
structures
on
a
single
property
without
a
plan
development
process
a
little
ahead.
Oh
sorry,
I
am
a
little
head.
B
Something
the
one
thing
I
wanted
to
note
and
reintroduce
was
the
preservation,
the
bonus
unit
for
preservation
of
structures,
so
the
way
that
we've
calculated
bonus
bonus
unit
is
one
bonus
unit
per
single
family
or
duplex,
and
then
two
bonus
units
per
multi-family
again.
That
multi-family
would
be
three
or
more
units,
and
that
concludes
my
very
quick
presentation
can
I
answer.
Any
questions
talk.
N
A
In
the
cottage
tiny
homes,
it's
450
square
foot
or
less
for
for
the
1500
square
feet
per
unit.
Yeah.
A
That's
okay:
we
can.
We
can
get
that
here
in
a
second
and
that
that
means
eight
eight
tiny
homes
per
multi-family
building
I'm,
looking
at
it
on
this
slide
reduction
of
minimum
lot
area,
so
you
say:
1500
square
feet
per
unit
for
cottage
tiny
homes
and
he
said
eight
units
Max
per
multi-family
building
and
six
per
row
house.
B
C
Quickly,
I
have
been
reading
about
this
for
a
while
and
learning
a
lot
about
this
and
I
think
this
is
very
needed
and
we
need
it
to
happen.
I
also
appreciate
the
the
retention
of
existing
structures
and
granting
that
I
know
someone
that
could
be
in
that
situation
and
I
think
that
it's
made
true
in
our
city
and
this
place
to
some
of
the
other
conversations
that
we've
been
hearing
about.
C
Is
there
an
overlay
that
Sean
will
be
named,
apparently
that
you
know
some
people
say
that
20
000
properties
are
will
be.
You
know
bulldoze,
which
is
not
true,
you
know,
but
this
will
create
another
tool
for
those
those
land.
You
know
owners
to
create
some
density,
but
at
the
same
time
keeping
the
front
row
the
the
historical,
historical
or
or
the
Historical
house,
or
the
the
old
house
in
the
front,
maybe
even
allowing
for
some
of
the
affordable
housing
that
is
already
there
to
stay
there.
J
J
So
do
you
guys
know
what
they
are
I
do.
Can
I
appreciate
the
incentive
to
preserve
the
already
existing
structure?
J
I,
don't
know
that
ins
I
maintain
that
that
that
is
my
main
concern
for
so
forward
this,
and
this
is
me
saying:
I
want
all
the
tools
in
the
toolbox
for
all
the
different
housing
stocks,
but
I
also
am
here
representing
the
people
that
elected
me
and
and
my
own
concerns
right,
so
I'm
just
gonna
throw
out
there
that
I
still
have
some
of
those
concerns.
I
appreciate
the
work
on
this
at
the
end
of
the
day.
I
do
want
to
have
a
vote
sooner
rather
than
later.
J
J
A
And
this
will
be
on
a
a
future
action
item.
Yes
in
a
in
a
couple
weeks
and
when
we
can
get
it
on
the
schedule.
M
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
And
now
we're
going
to
talk
I'm,
six
and
seven
regarding
the
other
side
Village
together,
the
first
one
is
on
reviewing
the
public
benefit
analysis
of
The
Other,
Side
village
pilot
project
at
1850,
West,
Indiana,
Avenue,
and
consider
a
resolution
to
authorize
the
lease
rate
and
term
follow-up
and
also
discuss
the
rezoning
to
facilitate
development
of
The,
Other
Side
village
at
1850,
West,
Indiana
Avenue
at
the
table,
We
Have,
Allison
and
Blake
and
Tammy
all
right
Allison.
It's
all
yours.
G
I
didn't
prepare
a
extensive
introduction,
but
I
did
my
understanding
is
that
this
time
is
mostly
for
the
council
to
try
to
figure
out
where
there's
consensus
on
what
the
council
is
interested
in.
Seeing
the
attorneys
include
in
the
development
agreement
and
the
ground
lease
for
this
property
for
the
pilot
project,
I
can
say
more
things
about
other
things.
If
you'd
like
Mr
chair
but
I,
think
you
summarized
the
issues.
A
K
Thank
you.
I
had
a
question
about
a
potential
development
agreement
in
the
rezone
for
for
us
for
retail
storefront,
in
tandem,
as
with
with
the
opening
of
the
of
the
village,
but
we
didn't
know
I,
don't
know
where
that
ended.
If
it
was
already
part
of
the
lease
agreement
that
was
already
in
right,
you
know
in
paper
we
didn't
have
to
worry
about
it,
or
was
it
appropriate
to
that
at
the
re-zone
portion
of
this
project,
with
a
development
agreement.
L
L
G
We've
asked,
and
the
reason
I
was
coming
up
is
because
we've
asked
the
attorney's
office
to
work
on
and
think
about.
Where
is
the
appropriate
place
to
put
the
various
ideas
that
the
council
has
discussed
and
so
they
haven't?
They
haven't
had
the
time
to
like
finalize
that
yet,
but
there's
the
document
of
the
development
agreement
which
to
Tammy's
point
is
one
kind
of
mechanism
to
memorialize
sort
of
the
expectations.
G
G
Essentially,
the
whole
laundry
list
of
everything
we've
heard
from
you
guys,
and
so
that's
one
thing
that
we
were
hoping
with
this
conversation
is
to
figure
out
of
that
of
those
things
that
came
up
last
week,
like
you
know
the
size
of
the
rezone
and
expectations
for
what's
in
the
ground
lease,
it
would
be
helpful
so
that
the
attorney's
office
can
get
some
guidance
about
which
things
the
council's
interested,
in
which
things
the
council
is
no
longer
interested
in
that
kind
of
thing.
Okay
and.
K
A
I
think
we've
kind
of
given
them
what
we
want,
because
I
would
agree
on
the
Bodega
or
if
you
want
to
call
a
small
grocery
store,
because
the
nearest
One.
C
A
Chair
you
know
I'm
looking
at
yes,
I
would
like
that
and
then,
when
I
spoke
to
the
The
Other
Side
village,
you
know
I
kind
of
reiterated
the
the
need
for
a
grocery
store
food
place
on
the
on
site,
because
the
nearest
one
is
all
close
to
a
mile
and
a
half
away.
So
I
think
we
had
that.
We
had
talked
about
the
the
thrift
shop.
We
talked
about
the
cookie
store,
so
all
that
was
in
part
of
that
development.
A
C
Thank
you,
sorry
for
interrupting
earlier
I
I
I
think
that
it's
important
to
not
be
wide
on
this
when
we're
talking
about
I,
prefer
that
we
are
talking
more
about.
You
know,
Bodega.
You
know
when
we're
talking
about
the
specifics
more
or
the
supermarket
small
Supermarket
than
storefront,
because
storefront
could
be
anything,
and
you
know
one
of
the
main
issues
in
the
in
the
area
and
I
heard
it.
C
You
know
from
many
many
neighbors
is
the
lack
of
you
know
the
food
desert
in
the
area
so
having
a
place
where
it
is
a
storefront,
but
a
specific
for
you
know
groceries.
So
a
small
small
groceries
is
important
to
the
area
and
I
think
it
will
be
a
very
good
symbol
and
I
know
that
this
was
debated
to
being
building
the
difference
in
the
later
stages.
But
we're
asking
to
be
built
in
the
earlier
stages
at
the
beginning,
and
you
know
and
I
feel
like
be
in
a
store.
C
They
could
be
selling
all
the
products
that
they're
making.
Even
the
cookies
I
mean
they
don't
have
to
be,
have
open
a
specific
store
for
cookies
when
they
have
a
grocery
store
themselves
in
there.
So
I
feel,
like
that's
very
important
to
me
and
to
many
in
the
community
and
there
if
this
project
is
going
to
happen,
I
feel
like
that's
something
that
needs
to
be
there
in
the
contract
with
with
the
with
the
village.
Thank
you,
chair.
K
I,
just
my
only
concern
so
I
I
agree
with
you
guys
and
I
and
I
wish.
We
can
see
a
supermarket
in
that
neighborhood
for
sure
because
they
they
need
it.
They
have
wanted
it
for
so
many
years.
K
But
I
don't
know
if,
in
the
future,
when
they
put
the
numbers
together
for
a
supermarket
Dosa
will
realize
that
maybe
the
purchasing
power
in
the
neighborhood
is
not
there
to
to
support
it
and
to
be
so
financially
sustainable
and
then
they
will
come
back
to
us
and
say
maybe
we
should
do
the
thrift
store
and
that's
all
we
can
do
because
we
cannot
afford
like
we.
I
Or
the
lease
couldn't
we
put
a
provision
that
it's
a
food,
some
sort
of
food
market
and
if
there's
a
thrift
store
and
there's
like
some
amount
of
food,
I
think
the
goal
is
that
people
in
this
neighborhood
don't
have
anywhere
to
buy
milk
or
eggs
or
like
really
basic
things.
And
so,
even
if
it
was
just
the
small
section
of
like
but
like
the
store
needs
to
be
open
to
public
and
sell
food.
L
In
the
agreement,
I
think
so
just
to
provide
some
information
on
discussions
at
the
Administration
has
recently
had
with
tosa.
They
have
agreed
to
do
a
small,
storefront
Bodega,
cookie
storefront.
That
would
be
a
limited
scale
right
now.
It
would
be
in
a
temporary
structure.
Is
what
they're
proposing
right
now
until
future
phases
are
constructed
and.
L
C
C
Can
you
build
it
earlier
with
some
of
the
temporary
structures
you
have,
so
we
have
a
smaller
Bodega,
so
you
know
they're
agreeing
to
that,
and
hopefully
it's
part
of
the
contract
negotiation
so
make
sure
that
it
is
already
in
writing.
That
will
be
very
important
to
me
and
to
the
community.
There
I'm
very
interrupted
right
now,
so
I
apologize.
K
L
I
think
about
a
larger
Supermarket
operated
by
a
third
party
is
contemplated
in
a
future
phase.
A
Thank
you
thank
you
and
just
clarify
on
the
security
question.
We
had
an
early
discussion
at
the
chair,
Vice
chair
and
whether
the
security
and
the
fencing
would
be
around
the
pilot
program.
A
I'm
gonna
say
eight
Acres
fencing
for
that
area
and
I
know:
there's
going
to
be
public
access
to
the
thrift
stores,
the
cookie
store,
the
grocery
store
that
will
have
Public
Access,
but
then
the
tiny
homes
would
have
security
around
them
and
the
fencing
would
be
around
that
that
perimeter,
but
just
that
perimeter
of
the
pilot
program.
Until
we
have,
we
see
the
viability
of
it
and
then
we
can
expand
it
at
that
point
is
that
is
that
how
you're
reading
it
and
is
that
how
other
council
members
are
reading
the
security
side?
A
Any
other
questions
on
the
public
benefits
side.
How
about
the
rezoning
side?
This
is
when
we
had
a
discussion,
whether
we
eight
Acres
28
Acres,
whatever
the
other
side
is.
I
Feel
how
I
did
previously
that
I'd,
like
it
to
be
a
smaller
amount
and
I
know
that
adds
additional
steps
in
the
future.
But
in
this
case,
I
I
would
like
those
additional
steps
so
that
it
gives
the
public
and
and
the
council,
whether
it
BS
or
future
Council
time
to
check
in
and
see
how
it
went,
how
the
first
the
pilot
project
went
so
I
I,
eight
acres
is
fine
or
the
10
acres.
That
was
discussed
last
time
in
order
to
allow
that
expansion
of
the
market
and
other
things
like
that.
A
We
have
the
the
map
of
the
slides.
G
Do
we
have
slides
on
the
other
side,
Village
project
from
the
last
discussion.
F
I
also
would
like
to
take
the
Bold
position
of
agreeing
with
myself
from
the
last
meeting
and
but
I
thought
we
talked
about
doing
okay.
Well,
let's
do
the
rezone
for
the
whole
phase
one,
but
still
require
check-ins
so
that
we
didn't
we
weren't
putting
the
burden
on
planning
staff.
Are
we
not
going.
J
A
F
So
no
it
was
that
I
understand
the
desire
to
want
to
have
check-ins,
but
I
don't
want
to
have
to
go
through
the
Planning
Commission
and
how
planning
staff
chain
make
changes
to
the
zoning.
So
I
would
be
in
favor
of
zoning.
The
whole
phase
one
as
requested,
and
then
we
will
require
check-ins
so
that
we
don't
have
to
reset
the
whole
zoning
process.
That's
what
I
would
like
to
have
happen
phase
one
the
26,
Acres
I,
don't
know
because
I
don't
have
the
map.
F
A
That's
28.5
Acres
yeah,
boot
ish,
the
bottom,
the
bottom
orange
bottom
Orange
Box
on
the
on
the
right
hand,
side
yeah,
that's.
J
J
I
would
I
mean
we
can
how
about
the
discussion.
My
suggestion
would
simply
be
maybe
ask,
since
we
are
still
hearing
public
comment
tonight,
right,
yep
and
different
I
mean
most
likely
going
to
or
or
continuing
hearings
that
when
it
becomes
time
if
we
haven't
well
when
it
comes
time
to
actually
take
a
vote,
I
would
just
ask
that
the
motion
sheet
include
both
options
and
and
we
vote
our
feelings.
K
C
C
C
J
A
Okay,
I'm
I
think
we
that's.
We
don't
need
to
take
a
straw
poll
on
that.
I
think
that
we,
because
we're
gonna,
have
it
discussion
on
public
discussion
later
on.
K
I
have
a
question
for
you
guys
on
the
maybe
maybe
Darren
and
I
had
talked
about
what's
actually
possible
to
be
built
on
on
this
piece
of
land,
I
mean
so
we're
thinking
in
the
future.
Okay.
So
if
we
ReSound
the
whole
thing,
what
else
could
happen
in
this
piece
of
property?
I
could
actually
like
houses,
not
tiny,
regular
size
houses
could
happen
here,
could
actual
a
building
or
anything.
O
Sitting
on
yeah,
so
you
do
have
in
the
packet
of
information
what
the
fbu
N2
Zone
allows.
Okay,
so
that's
step.
One
right.
Zoning
has
to
authorize
the
uses
and
then
there'd
have
to
be
some
sort
of
soil
analysis
for
anyone
to
get
a
building
permit
to
build
anything
and
that
either
requires
not
under
city
code,
but
under
state
and
federal
regulations.
That
would
either
require
a
mediation
of
that
property,
okay
or
limit
what
uses
could
go
there
based
on
that
and
that
could
potentially
I
guess
decide
within
that
zone.
What
could
happen?
O
L
O
L
K
Yeah
right:
okay,
okay,
thanks.
I
My
ultimate
goal
is
that
there
is
like
a
significant
way
for
the
public
and
the
council
to
check
in
at
a
time
five
or
ten
years
from
now,
so,
whether
that's
accomplished
through
a
shorter
lease
or
only
rezoning,
the
eight
Acres
or
some
other
check-in
that
has
been
discussed,
I
I,
wouldn't
want
it
to
just
be
like
a
legislative
intent
that
we
check
in
but
like
something
where
we
would
actually
require
the
future
Council
and
the
public
to
weigh
in
on
it.
So
I.
I
B
I
think
that
would
be
the
public
benefit
analysis
where
we
can
have
those
success.
Metrics
and
we've
been
contemplating
those
together
and
from
the
land
use
standpoint.
The
PBA
is
also
what
keeps
it
confined
to
the
eight
Acres
that
use
without
the
ability
to
expand
without
a
legislative
check-in.
So
there.
I
Would
be
another
public
benefit
analysis
before
the
second
phase
yeah,
and
would
that
Current
public
benefit
analysis?
Slash
lease
agreement
include
some
off-ramp
if
the
those
metrics
were
not
accomplished
or
like
not
accomplished
by
some
margin
that,
like
I
know,
we
talked
about
repossessing
the
land
and
like
buying
the
things
and
all
that
stuff,
like
is
that.
L
L
There
would
be
Provisions
in
the
the
ground
lease
or
the
restrictive
use
agreement
that
if
they
don't
meet
those
Provisions,
it
could
constitute
a
ground
lease
and
then
the
legal
documents
would
identify
how
to
resolve
those
or
how
to
deal
with
those.
So
we
would
have
the
ties
in
all
of
the
agreements
that
are
executed,
so
affordability,
if
there's
a
storefront
tenant
selection,
the
remediation
all
the
different
factors,
the
land
uses.
All
of
those
will
be
in
the
current
agreements.
I
I
K
But
the
way
I
see
it
is
what's
are
out.
So
basically,
if
this
project
is
not
successful
and
becomes
a
burden
into
the
neighborhood,
what's
our
out,
is
there
a
provision
in
the
lease
agreement
that
says,
if
you
don't
comply
with
X,
Y
and
Z,
or
if
X,
Y
and
Z
occurs,
which
is
a
burden
and
not
you
know
a
benefit
to
the
community,
then
you
breach
your
agreement
and
therefore
you
know
we
can
break
it
right
now
and
you
have
to
move
on
and
we
have
to
move
on.
Yeah.
L
We
could
have
an
attorney
weigh
in,
but
if
there
will
be
the
provisions
and
the
standards
and
the
requirements
that
must
be
met,
as
provided
through
the
legal
agreements
and
if
those
aren't
met
there
would
be
a
process
to
work
through
those
those
not
failures
but
not
meeting
those
standards
with
tosa.
And
if,
if
worst
case
scenario,
the
project
went
awry
and
it's
just
really
not
meeting
our
requirements
and
our
standards.
L
That
would
then
constitute
a
default
on
the
lease
and
then
last
time
we
talked
about
putting
a
right
to
purchase
the
Improvement
agreement
on
the
on
the
project
on
the
properties.
So
the
city
then
could
discuss.
I
would
imagine,
purchasing
the
improvements
from
tosa
and
then
taking
operation,
maybe
getting
a
replacement
operator
in
to
operate
the
project.
But
we
may
want
to
check
with
Katie
or
Kimberly
on
what
I
just
said.
Laughs.
H
G
A
junior
lawyer
too,
but
one
thing
that
I
would
add
is
there
may
be
defaults
or
breaches
that
are
so
significant
that
the
city
would
require
more
significant
action,
and
then
there
may
be
some
that
we
could
have
a
longer
cure
period
or
a
time
to
work
to
Better
Together
to
remedy
those
and
I.
G
Think
that's
part
of
this
prioritization
conversation
to
know
what
are
what
I
would
call
sort
of
the
the
deal
Killers
or
the
things
that
if
this
does
not
happen,
this
is
not
a
partnership
that
the
city
is
willing
to
continue
and
what
are
things
that
the
city
might
be
willing
to
continue
to
be
in
Partnership
and
cure
in
collaboration
with
this
operator.
So
that
might
be
a
good
way
of
framing
it.
As
you're
thinking
about
your
priorities,.
C
You
I
I,
guess
you
know
when
we
are
prioritizing
this
this
this
different
metrics
I
I
mean
it's
kind
of
complicated,
because
you
know
you
want.
You
want.
Obviously
one
of
the
issues
that
many
of
the
neighbors
will
have
brought
up.
Is
they
don't
want
an
HRC
type
situation
in
the
neighborhood?
So
how
do
you?
How
do
you
put
metrics
there
that
this
Village
is
now
creating?
You
know
this
array
in
the
area?
C
Maybe
it's
through
calls
of
service
from
the
police,
and
maybe
you
can
say
you
know
what
is
our
Baseline
right
now,
what
it
will
be?
What
is
it
comparable
with
a
normal
neighborhood
in
the
area?
Okay,
when
this
is
fully
functioning,
you
know
how
much
worse
it
is,
or
not
you
know,
and
to
to
to
to
measure
and
compare
and
contrast
to
say
you
know,
look
you
guys
are
creating
a
lot
of
calls
for
service
from
the
from
the
police.
This
is
a
breach
of
our
agreement.
C
We
need
to
work
on
that,
and
that
might
be
something
that
is
very
important
to
me.
Make
sure
that
that
the
community
is
protected
is
one
of
the
main
things,
and
also
so
also
to
be
fair,
though
much
like
the
hrcs
are
not
responsible
for
what
happens
in
the
street.
You
know
the
village,
arguably
wouldn't
be
necessarily
responsible
for
what
happens
in
the
street,
so
we
also
need
to
balance
all
of
this
out.
C
I
I,
her
reassurance
from
the
village
that
they
will
not.
You
know
from
the
people
that
they
don't
want
to
have
in
the
village
anymore.
They
will
not
just
let
them
out
right
there
that
they're
going
to
transport
them
to
other
facilities
or
connect
them
with
a
service
providers,
so
I
trust
that
that
is
part
of
the
the
agreement.
Still
in
there
to
me,
it's
important
that
we're
not
just
letting
people
you
know
disconnected
from
other
services
that
we
are
connecting
them,
so
I
I
feel
like
we
need
to
create
this
metrics.
B
Thanks,
that's
really
helpful.
We
they
did
agree
to
the
transportation
support.
We
also
have
the
Redwood
Road
Network
and
the
west
side
on
demand
to
assist
to
and
and
I
agree
with
your
your
feedback.
We
have
neighborhood
metrics.
That
will
be
a
part
of
agreement,
so
outside
of
kind
of
tenant
selection,
fair
housing
compliance.
We
also
have
agreed
upon
Community
amenity
components
with
the
bodega
and
storefronts
Public
Safety,
being
the
number
of
police
calls
and
also
code
enforcement,
so
number
of
Code
Enforcement
cases.
B
A
Thank
You
Blake,
so
it's
you
know:
we've
thrown
out
a
lot
of
stuff
with
some
different
priorities,
and
so
now
you
know
you
have
the
action
to
kind
of
gather
them
all
up,
make
them
into
a
document
that
we
can
actually
read
and
kind
of
digest,
and
then
we
can
actually
then
look
at
that
one
maybe
hit
it
one
more
time,
but
really,
then
that
is
what
we
were
going
to
be
approval
right
now,
we're
just
throwing
out
a
bunch
of
things
that
we
want
in
the
document.
A
A
K
Moving
moving
on
from
the
lease
talking
about
the
population
that
they
will
be
serving,
which
is
from
what
I
understand
mentally
ill
people
are
experiencing
calmness,
can
you
remind
me
of
who
the
provider
will
be?
Who
will
be
helping
these
folks
with
their
medication
or
appointments
or
the
caseworkers,
or
how
does
all
that
work
and
whoever
is
they're
Contracting
out
with?
Is
that
also
part
of
the
agreement?
Have
they
signed
off
on?
Yes,
we,
we
will
be
the
service
providers
for
tosa
at
this
Village,
and
this
is
what
we're
providing.
L
L
It's
it
says
that
tosa
needs
to
partner
with
service
providers
that
are
licensed
and
experienced
in
providing
the
services
that
they're
providing
and
those
service
providers
agreements
have
not
been
executed.
Yet
those
relationships
haven't
been
formalized,
but
they
do
have
letters
of
Interest
or
intent
from
various
service
providers.
Primarily
Valley.
Mental
health
I
believe,
is
the
the
oh
Valley
Behavioral
Health.
Sorry,
they
changed
their
name
and
Forestry
clinic
and
those
letters
of
intent
are
in
the
transmittal
on
the
PBA
and.
L
K
L
There
there
will
be
certain
requirements
that
the
administration
will
work
towards
before
we
execute
the
land
lease.
Those
are
also
identified
in
the
resolution
on
the
term
sheet
in
the
packet,
so
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
look
to
see
if
securing
and
formalizing
these
Partnerships
are
on
there
or
or
not,
but
once
the
council.
If
the
council
gives
approval
to
move
forward
with
the
discounted
land
lease,
we
will
continue
to
work
with
tosa
and
make
sure
that
certain
requirements
are
met
before
actually
executing
the
land.
L
K
That's
important
I
think,
is
you
know
the
population
that
they're
trying
to
help?
Is
it's
probably
a
tough
one
to
deal
with,
and
so
we
need
to
have
the
right
Partners
to
to
deal
with
this,
so
that
it's
successful
and-
and
you
know
it's
another
tool
in
the
toolbox-
dance
toolbox
on
on
solving
homelessness.
But
it's
also
I
mean
it
is
my
hope
that
it
is.
This
is
so
successful
that
it
can
be
replicated
in
other
communities
and
I.
Think
that's
one
of
those
goals
as
well.
K
You
know
they
want
to
be
successful
and
really
they
want
to
be
a
national
model.
You
know
because
they
truly
believe
that
this
could
work
and
I'm
helping
this
specific
group
of
people,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
all
are
at
the
same
level
and
the
same
level
of
commitment
with
the
right
providers
as
well.
So
thank
you.
G
One
of
the
questions
that
Katie
and
I
were
just
talking
about
is
whether
the
council
will
have
the
opportunity
to
see
the
documents
before
they
vote
on
the
zoning
or
on
the
public
benefit
analysis
or
whether
it
would
need
to
be
a
list
of
items
in
a
motion
sheet
or
exactly
what
the
options
are
for
that.
So
we
might
need
a
little
bit
of
clarification
on
that
and
I.
Think
Katie
can
provide
that.
G
Thank
you
very
much
Cindy,
because
these
documents
are
conditions
to
the
legislative
decisions
that
you're
making
on
the
public
benefits
analysis
and
on
the
rezone
and
because,
as
we've
discussed,
this
sort
of
waterfall
of
Remedies
is
very
important
to
the
council.
We
can
work
to
have
those
documents
drafted
for
you
to
review
prior
to
you
taking
action
that
I
need
to
talk
to
my
team
and
the
can
Team
about
the
timing
on
that
and
I.
G
A
G
G
A
L
Mr,
chair
and
Katie,
just
a
question
I
think
we've
contemplated
working
through
some
requirements,
including
making
sure
they
have
adequate
funds
to
move
forward
with
construction
and
finalizing
some
details,
so
I
would
I
would
hope
we
would
have
all
of
the
information
right
now
for
complete
docs.
But
if,
if
there
was
some
outstanding
information,
maybe
we
could
work
with
the
Council
on
that
and
note
note
specifically
what
we
would
work
towards
completing
before
actually
executing
the
documents
it.
G
Was
good,
I'll
just
jump
in
and
say
what
I'm
hearing
from
the
council
is
that
there
are
certain
sections
of
these
documents
that
are
very
important
to
the
council
and
they
have
to
do
with
the
must-haves
and
the
remedies
if
those
must-haves
are
not
achieved.
Some
of
the
other
sections
of
the
document
may
still
remain
in
draft
form
that
are
more
administrative
or
operational,
and
so
we
we
may
be
coming
to
you
saying
these
are.
These
are
what
we
would
like
you
to
focus
on
for
the
purposes
of
your
motions,
if
that
makes
sense,.
A
J
Just
real,
quick,
sorry
Tammy
you
mentioned
the
term
sheets
was
that
in
the
packet
because
they
looked
at
the
resolution
and
didn't
see
it
attached.
G
I
believe
it
is,
let
me
I
just
had
it
up.
Let
me
refer
you
to
that
page.
A
Hey
sorry,
sorry,
it
was
a
okay,
I.
Think
we're.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
discussion.
You
have
your
marching
orders
and
then
we'll
you'll
get
back
to
us
on
a
possible
date
when
we're
completed
there
so
appreciate
that.
Thank.
F
A
R
R
R
B
S
Awesome,
thank
you
all
right,
so
this
is
supposed
to
be
just
an
informative
discussion
around
sales
tax
so
feel
free
to
kind
of
stop
me
and
ask
questions
as
we
go
along.
A
lot
of
the
stuff
is
probably
not
a
huge
surprise.
Just
based
on
our
past
discussions
and
just
the
current
economic
environment
that
we're
in
the
actuals
that
you
see
are
the
revenue
that
you
see
is
the
actual
that
actuals
that
we
have
actually
received
in
Revenue.
S
So
this
is
Post
Distribution
from
the
the
revenue
that
is
received
from
the
The
Tax
Commission
and
then
sent
out
to
the
municipalities.
So
the
next
slide,
please
so,
and
hopefully
you
can
read
up
there.
So
basically,
this
is
just
an
actuals
versus
budgets.
Comparison
and
growth
is
synonymous
with
percentage
change,
so
basically
the
year
the
difference
between
the
current
year
and
the
previous
year,
divided
by
the
previous
year,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we
get
growth.
S
So,
as
you
can
kind
of
see,
you
know,
we've
increased
a
lot
the
last
two
years
with
actuals
and
with
budget
the
last
between
2020
and
2021.
We
increased
11
in
actuals
and
then
between
2022
and
2021,
we've
actually
increased
by
17.
That's
the
most
I've
ever
seen
year
with
my
tenure
at
the
city
and
then
also
you
can
also
see.
We've
increased
the
budget
for
this
current
fiscal
year
by
23
percent
and
that's
a
pretty
big
jump.
We've
never
increased
the
budget
that
large
as
well.
A
S
So
basically,
the
the
yellow,
the
percentages
within
the
yellow
are
just
the
Euro.
The
the
percentage
differences
between
budget,
the
previous
year's
budget
and.
S
Yeah
yeah
I
apologize
yeah,
so
yeah
it's
just
comparing
the
budget
with
the
previous
budget
and
then
the
actuals
are
kind
of
comparing
you
can
kind
of
see.
You
know
pretty
it's
a
it's.
A
pretty
large
increase.
We
kind
of
read
that
bottom
line.
You
know
between
2020
2016
2020
on
the
average
actuals
were
5.1
and
the
budget
average
growth
in
the
budget
was
5.6.
So
these
are
huge
jumps
and
there's.
You
know,
there's
many
factors
that
kind
of
have
to
go
that
have
to
do
with
that.
S
You
know
part
of
it
is
inflation.
You
know
part
of
it
is,
you
know
just
bouncing
back
from
from
covid
and
let's
see,
I
got
a
couple
other
things
on
my
list
here.
So.
S
So
yeah
I
mean
that's
kind
of
it.
I
guess
so.
Apologize
I
mean
you
go
to
the
next
slide
there,
so
so,
basically,
our
based
on
the
revenue
that
we
receive
the
majority
of
the
revenue,
Falls
Within
These,
six
sectors,
which
are
retail
trade,
wholesale
trade,
accommodation
and
Food,
Services,
manufacturing,
real
estate,
rental
and
leasing
and
the
information
sector.
S
So
and,
and
by
and
large
you
know,
retail
is
about
40
of
the
revenue
that
we
receive.
So
really,
if
you
wanted
to
dissect,
you
know
where's
the
revenue
coming
from
what
what
categories?
S
It's
these
three
or
these
six
sectors
and
by
far
it's
coming
from
retail
trade.
So
a
couple
things
so
the
different.
So
the
difference
in
the
categories
there.
So
the
diff
FY
is
just
the
difference
between
the
prior
year
and
then
the
year-over-year
percentage
change
is
just
the
growth
from
the
prior
year
and
then
there's
the
percentage
of
the
total
revenue
and
you
can
get
a
full
list
of
all
the
sectors
on
the
in
the
appendix
so
on
appendix
B.
S
On
the
last
slide
to
kind
of
get
a
full
list
of
all
the
breakdowns,
yeah.
A
B
S
Yeah,
it's
kind
of
hard
to
say:
I
mean
you
can
see
on
the
graph
so
on
the
on
the
bottom
part
of
the
graph.
You
know
we're
actually
a
little
bit
higher
now
when
it
come
well.
Let
me
see
a
combination
of
food
is
orange
yeah,
it's
it's
just
we're
just
barely
kind
of
getting
back
over
that
hump,
but
yeah
I
think
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
you
know
there
is
probably
a
lot
of
demand,
but
there's
not
a
lot
of
there's,
not
a
lot
of
workers
to
meet
that
demand.
S
S
So
another
kind
of
Big
Driver
that
I've
kind
of
been
keeping
track
of
is
the
the
count
of
businesses.
So
this
is
basically
account
of
the
different
account
numbers,
a
distinct
count
of
the
different
account
numbers
year
over
year.
So
and
really
I
mean
the
biggest
jump
has
been
in
the
retail
trade.
S
So
there's
far
more
retail
trade
businesses
that
have
popped
up,
especially
since
2019
and
I,
suspect
that
a
lot
of
these
have
to
do
with
online
sales,
because
back
between
about
2018
2019,
a
law
was
passed
to
start
charging
those
businesses
in
sales
tax.
So
that's
probably
that's
what
I
suspect
I'm
still
kind
of
looking
into
that
reasoning.
There
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
so
this
is
kind
of
where
kind
of.
S
Where
do
we
go
from
here
from
now
right
now,
so
we've
got
a
complete
year
of
actuals
so
from
July
to
June
again,
there's
a
two-month
lag
in
when
we
receive
actual
so
this
week,
we're
actually
going
to
be
getting
the
first
July
July's
Revenue
numbers
this
next
week.
So
this
basically,
what
this
model
is
based
on
it's.
S
This
is
a
basically
a
a
Time
series
model
that
was
ran
and
there's
three
different
models
that
I
run
and
basically
I
just
pick
the
one
that
is
trained
and
test
and
because
has
the
best
results
and
that's
kind
of
what
it
came
out
to
be,
and
it's
this
ETS
model
which
stands
for
air,
Trend
and
seasonality.
I
can
get
more
in
depth
on
how
they
how
the
models
actually
work.
But
basically
this
is
just
based
on
the
the
historical
data
that
we
have
on
hand.
S
So
it's
there
it's
not
taking
in
any
other
multiple
variables
outside
variables.
It's
just
based
on
the
data
that
we
have
in
the
history
and
the
trend
and
the
seasonality
of
that
data.
There's
no
there's
nothing
to
predict.
You
know
a
pandemic
or
a
recession
or
any
type
of
a
war
or
any
type
of
outside
factors,
so
that
does
play
into
our
decision
making
with
that.
S
If
you
see
that
little
black
Dash
that's
kind
of
where
the
budget
is
in
regards
to
this,
so
basically
this
is
just
a
range,
so
we're
kind
of
in
the
lower
end
we're
being
very
conservative,
I
guess
with
our
numbers
so
far,
so
we're
just
in
the
lower
end
con.
So
we're
really
confident
that
we're
not
going
to
go
lower
95
percent,
confident
that
we
won't
go
lower
than
the
red
and
we're
80
percent,
confident
that
we
wouldn't
go
lower
than
the
yellow,
the
top
of
the
yellow
line.
S
So
we're
kind
of
you
know
it's
really
hard
to
say
kind
of
going
into
the
future
kind
of
where,
where
we'll
end,
but
as
you
can
see,
there
is
a
possibility
that
we
can
receive
a
lot
of
Revenue
this
this
year.
So.
B
I
think
the
reason
that
Andrew
has
predict
has
predicted
this
with
the
low
80
confidence
level
is
because
of
everything
that's
going
on
right
now.
You
all
know
with
the
economy,
and
you
know,
interest
rates
going
up
and
inflation.
We
want
to
be
very
mindful
that
we
don't
go
to
the
you
know:
95
average
4
95
million
average
forecast,
because
this
is
a
historical
Trend
model
without
any
of
those
other
factors
that
play
into
it.
So
we
have
to
be
mindful
of
that.
S
Correct
so
there's
no
questions,
you
guys
can
jump
to
the
next
slide
and
then
I
got
kind
of
will
just
finish
finish
up.
You
know.
The
last
kind
of
bit
is
just
the
unexpected.
You
know
with
inflation,
that's
kind
of
played
a
lot.
Is
we
didn't
really
ins?
We
expected
inflation
to
increase,
but
we
didn't
expect
it
to
increase
this
fast.
S
So
that's
definitely
part
of
the
reason
why
we've
lagged
a
little
bit
behind
I
know.
If
you
looked
at
the
first
slide,
you
know
it
kind
of
looks.
We
dropped
the
budget
in
2021
when
in
actuality
the
actuals
came
out
ahead.
We
actually
increased
in
actuals
that
year,
so
we
are
kind
of
in
a
way
kind
of
just
playing
catch-up
and
just
trying
to
understand
kind
of
where,
where
we're
going
to
move
in
the
future.
So
yeah,
that's
pretty
much
it.
S
A
Yeah
Ben
back
to
you
on
budget
amendment
three.
R
R
It's
split
into
two
parts:
2.8
million
dollars
for
seven
new
Packer
vehicles
and
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
cover
cost
increases
for
another
six
of
these
vehicles.
Those
six
were
originally
ordered
last
fiscal
year,
but
the
manufacturer
has
told
the
city
the
costs
have
gone
up
since
then,
and
the
timeline
for
the
city
to
order
and
actually
receive
the
vehicles
is
over
a
year.
So,
even
though
we're
placing
the
order
now,
we
probably
won't
get
them
till
winter
of
2023..
R
The
vehicles
are
a
mix
of
Clean
Diesel
and
certified
Natural
Gas.
There
are
no
hybrid
options
currently
available.
There
are
some
all
electric
versions
available:
they're,
relatively
new
and
they're,
still
going
through
real
world
reliability,
testing
and
they're
quite
expensive,
but
the
sustainability
Department
hopes
to
come
back
in
a
future
budget
opening
when
they
have
higher
confidence
in
those
electric
options.
R
The
next
item
A2
this
is
the
Six
Million
Dollar
request
from
the
CIP
holding
account
for
deeply
affordable
housing
grants.
The
council
had
a
briefing
from
mayor,
Mendenhall
and
Andrew
Johnston
last
Tuesday
about
this
item,
and
the
motion
sheet
for
the
public
hearing
tonight
does
include
the
option
to
close
the
public
hearing
and
adopt
this
item.
If
you
are
interested.
J
Mr,
chair
and
I
just
want
to
clarify
something
just
because
it's
the
way
my
brain
works,
the
6
million
that's
being
proposed
comes
from
the
cap
that
the
council
allocated
and
is
just
one-time
funding
for
what
was
described
to
us
as
sort
of
some
Gap
financing
for
projects
that
may
need
some
help
that
qualify
for
whatever
sort
of
parameters
we're
putting
on
this
program.
You're.
R
J
R
R
It
would
be
helpful
for
staff
if
there
are
changes
that
the
council
wants
to
make.
If
you
wanted
to
decrease
the
two
and
a
half
million
dollar
maximum
award.
If
you
wanted
to
change
the
April
15th
2023
deadline
for
at
least
half
of
the
units
to
be
available
because
we
would
add
those
to
the
motion
sheet.
Otherwise
it
will
be
as
discussed.
R
R
So
item
A6,
it's
a
request
for
half
a
million
dollars
from
general
fund
balance
to
the
governmental
immunity
fund,
and
this
is
due
to
the
amount
of
actual
claims
that
have
been
paid
so
far
into
the
fiscal
year.
It's
higher
than
typical
at
this
point,
so
the
additional
funding
is
to
make
sure
that
there's
enough
in
the
fund
to
pay
out
potential
claims
based
on
historical
averages,
we
don't
actually
know
but
based
on
the
averages
more
is
likely
needed.
R
R
Is
it
an
analyst
analyst?
It
was
previously
in
the
finance
department
and
the
position
is
described
as
promoting
tenant
rights,
providing
mediation
and
legal
services
and
tracking
and
decreasing
evictions
in
the
city.
This
would
be
coordinated
with
the
attorney's
office
and
the
finance
department,
and
this
could
be
consistent
with
the
council's
recent
legislative
intent
to
have
a
tenant
Ombudsman
in
the
city.
R
A
couple
policy
questions.
If
the
council's
interested
you
could
ask
the
administration
to
clarify
whether
the
position
is
providing
new
city
services
or
if
these
are
existing
city
services
and
if
any
renter
in
the
city
would
have
access
to
them
or
if
certain
groups
could
be
prioritized.
R
Other
questions
are
how
renters
would
hear
about
these
services,
how
the
city's
justice
court
and
Third
District
Court
across
the
street,
how
the
position
would
coordinate
with
them
to
track
evictions,
sometimes
it's
most
effective
to
intervene
at
the
courthouse
before
the
case
has
already
proceeded
through
some
of
the
process,
as
well
as,
if
there'd
be
coordination
with
other
community
service
providers.
Since
there
are
several
organizations
providing
these
services,
but
they're
not
meeting
the
level
of
need
in
the
community,
eight.
A
C
J
Yeah
thanks
can
I
ask
a
question
Mr
chair.
Besides
all
of
those,
this
says
that
it
was
transferred
from
the
finance
department
to
the
mayor's
office.
So
did
we
have
a
position
similar
to
this
position
in
the
finance
office
or
we're
just
saying,
there's
an
FTE
we're
moving
it
and
we're
making
this
up.
As
I
mean
we
are
kind
of
making
it
up
which
I
appreciate,
because
these
are
all
the
things
that
I
I
was
curious
about
recently,
but
I'm
curious
of
the
FTE
transfer.
J
B
We
received
a
grant
I,
don't
know
five
years
ago,
I
think
five
years
ago,
pertaining
to
a
consumer
protection
analyst
that
individual
created
some
program,
material
pertaining
to
first
of
all,
tenants
and
then
seniors.
He
has
a
whole
plan
that
we
have
also
transferred
to
can
as
well.
So
we
we
transferred
to
the
mayor's
office
because
we
thought
well.
Consumer
protection
fits
nice
with
equity
and
diversity
and
then
they're
like
well.
B
J
I'm
also
wondering
that
is
great.
This
all
sounds
all
these
questions
sound
great
and
literally,
we
were
talking
about
it
the
other
day
how
we
need
public
defenders
for
tenants.
So
love
love
it
but
I'm.
Looking
at
this
from
a
budget
standpoint,
so
it
was
paid
for
our
from
a
grant,
but
now
it's
budgeted,
probably
I,
don't
imagine
that
the
grant
is
still
paying
for
it.
We
are
right
and
so
that
ft
is
already
budgeted
within
Finance,
which
now
will
just
be
budgeted
and
can
it.
R
The
next
item
is
in
section
e:
there
are
three
noteworthy
grants.
The
first
E1
is
over
36
million
dollars
from
a
Federal
grant
for
retrofitting,
the
City
Creek
Water
Treatment
Plant,
and
this
is
primarily
to
mitigate
seismic
and
flooding
hazards.
R
R
R
When
the
project
is
complete,
the
only
remaining
major
gap
for
parley's
trail
will
be
between
State
Street
and
300
West,
which
is
in
South
Salt
Lake.
The
city
did
work
with
the
city
of
South
Salt
Lake
on
the
local
link
study,
which
was
recently
completed,
and
it
has
recommendations
for
how
to
finish
that
last
Gap.
In
the
trail.
R
There
are
two
Council
added
items:
I
one
is
a
100
000
Grant
award
from
the
Utah
Department
of
Workforce
Services
to
continue
and
expand
the
know,
your
neighbor
program,
this
would
fund
a
volunteer
coordinator,
an
FTE
from
October
1st
through
September
30th
next
year,
so
this
would
increase
the
number
of
volunteer
coordinators
from
one
to
two
working
on
the
program.
R
The
program
it
connects
local
volunteers
with
refugees
to
facilitate
resettlement.
So
this
can
take
a
variety
of
forms
based
on
the
needs
of
the
refugee
family.
So
it
could
be
how
to
ride
tracks,
how
to
go
grocery
shopping,
how
to
apply
for
a
job
how
to
do
some
technical
skills
training
at
a
community
college.
It
can
be
a
variety
of
things.
R
The
program's
goal
is
to
recruit
and
onboard
at
least
30
volunteers
to
provide
these
aid
services
to
at
least
30
Refugee
families
and
I
think
we
have
Coletta
as
well
as
the
state
Refugee
Services
office
staff.
Here.
If
there
are
questions
on
the
program,
the
administration
is
requesting
a
straw
poll,
given
the
grant
Award
acceptance
deadline,
the
authorization
for
the
revenue
and
the
expenditure
wouldn't
happen
until
this
item
is
approved
in
the
budget,
though,.
J
J
I
think
it's
great
to
take
money.
I
just
want
to
point
out
what
Anna
and
I
have
talked
about
a
little
bit
in
Council
meetings.
Is
that
then
we
create
an
expectation
of
ongoing
ftes
with
not
ongoing
money
unless
we
get
more
grants.
So
there's
a
few
in
here
that
are
on
the
consent
agenda
that
also
do
the
same
thing:
creating
several
ftes
with
three
year
one
year,
four-year
money.
So
just
remembering
to
voice
that
right
with
that
I'm,
a
supportive
of
taking
money.
R
The
last
item
in
budget
amendment
3
is
I2
and
it's
a
housekeeping
follow-up
item.
You
may
remember
from
RDA
budget
amendment
number
one:
it's
one
million
dollars
of
parks,
impact
fees
for
the
marmalade
Plaza
project
and
there'll
be
a
corresponding
item
in
a
future
RDA
budget
amendment
to
put
return
to
the
revolving
Loan
Fund
and
the
Arctic
Court
infill
home.
The
money
that
you
approved
last
week
and
that's
everything.
I
have.
A
We're
moving
on
to
item
number
nine
ordinance
replacement
of
the
small
cell
Wireless
in
the
public
way
we
have
Sylvia
here
and
Kimberly
I
saw
Kimberly
there.
She
is
and
Mark.
B
Requested
by
the
council
and
the
design
standards
are
listed
on
page
one
of
the
staff
report
items
a
through
e
and
the
purpose
of
the
briefing
is
to
review
those
design
standards,
anti-identify
any
follow-up
items
or
questions
from
the
council.
There
are
two
policy
questions
listed
on
page
two
of
the
staff
report
and
there's
also
an
attachment
which
gives
the
administration's
implementation
guidelines
that
relate
to
the
small
cell
Wireless
facilities.
M
A
Thank
you,
Mark
I
mean
I
was
I
remember
this
is
some
like
day.
One
of
being
on
the
council
was
these
5G
polls
and
I
think
seems
like
wow
I
thought.
We'd
finish
this
thing
and
I
saw
this,
but
you've
kind
of
hit
everything
that
we've
asked
for
and
I
appreciate
that
very
much
because
we
do
some
number
of
polls,
the
unsightliness
of
the
other
polls-
and
this
has
gone
a
long
way.
So
I
very
much
appreciate
the
work
we've
done
here
and
I.
Don't
have
any.
J
Mr
chair
I,
do
just
want
to
say
thanks
for
all
the
hard
work,
especially
with
all
of
the
constraints
that
the
state
has
put
on
how
we
install
these
things
and
what
we
do
in
in
different
ways
and
so
I
think
navigating
and
threading
the
needle
with
the
partners
there
and
creating
those
relationships
so
that
we
can
address
the
concerns
in
a
way
that
makes
everyone
happy
or
is
at
least
as
happy
as
we
can
all
be.
Given
the
parameters
that
that
we
had
really
is
good
work
and
I.
A
So
I,
but
I
do
want
to
hit
just
number
two
question
number
two
from
the
policy
questions
on
the
enforcement
mechanism
what's
available
to
the
administration
if
they
are
not
abiding
by
the
design
standards
or
they
fail
to
or
the
penalties,
their
enforcement
of
that
absolutely.
M
One
of
the
things
that
we
have
kind
of
in
place
to
kind
of
mitigate
this
is
there
are
two
application
processes.
There's
a
pre-application
process
whereby
the
small
Wireless
providers
will
send
in
excuse
me
the
the
desired
locations
and
that
we
are
able
to
then
take
a
look
at
that
against
other
design
standards.
We
give
them
that
pre-approval
so
that
they
can
then
go
back
and
do
final
design
and
do
FCC
licensing
then
upon
the
actual,
formal
application
they
will
give
that
to
us
as
part
of
their
permit
application
that
they
submit.
M
F
So
this
is
a
topic
of
that
you
know
has
been
of
great
interest
to
me.
So
thank
you.
We
talked
when
we
had
this
briefing
prior
to
about
parts
of
the
aesthetic,
including
like
artistic
things,
for
the
designs
like
and
I'm,
assuming
that
that
is
covered
under
the
aesthetic
language.
M
Correct
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
and
that
we
can,
especially
in
historic
districts
or
things
of
that
nature,
where
we
want
to
maintain
the
look
of
what
the
neighborhood
is,
we
can
require
them
to
provide
polls
that
would
match
existing,
say,
fluted,
poles
or
streetlight
poles
in
various
districts,
so
that
it
will
blend
in
and
match
other
aesthetic
things
that
have
been
considered
are
the
Hideaway
green,
the
various
colors
that
could
help
it
blend
more
into
its
surrounding
natural
environment.
So
it's
not
as
much
of
much
of
a
stand
out
as.
F
Much
sure
well,
but
we
talked
about
like
in
some
places
where
they've
required
them
to
look
like
trees
and
they
don't
necessarily
look
like
trees,
but
then
there
was
an
example
that
we
gave
where
one
was
like
decorated
like
a
pencil
or
something.
So
this
would
allow
for
that.
So.
G
Came
up
with
a
potential
monopole,
which
is
a
really
large
cell,
tower,
that's
being
considered
Near
The,
Pioneer
Precinct,
and
they
had
requested.
G
J
F
J
B
F
Getting
confused
but
I
appreciate
what
your
answer
was
that
that
design
materials
and
things
like
that
that
we
can
be
more.
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
All
right
Mark
get
to
stay
right.
There
I'll
stay
seated
right,
Stacy,
Ron,
number,
10
advice
and
consent,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
engineer,
Mark
Stevens,
so
Mark
is
being
considered
as
an
appointment
to
the
Salt
Lake
City
engineer
as
the
Salt
Lake
City
engineer.
A
Him
about
just
tell
us
a
little
about
your
your
vision
and
some
of
the
issues
that
you
want
to
try
to
tackle
here.
Oh.
M
Well,
council
members:
it's
an
honor
to
sit
before
you
tonight
and
this
fine
city
of
Salt
Lake
that
we
find
ourselves
in.
It
is
the
past
two
and
a
half
years
since
I've
been
with
the
city.
K
Excited
that
you
want
to
do
this
in
this
position,
so
thanks
for
for
staying
with
us
and
I'm
excited
to
see
what
you
do
and
how
you,
you
know
how
you
direct
that
department.
So
absolutely.
J
Yeah
I'll
just
say:
congrats
and
I
meant
what
I
said
that
all
the
work
that
you
do
really
shows
the
caliber
of
of
your
work
in
and
of
itself
and
of
where
I
think
that
you
will
be
able
to
and
want
to
take
the
department
and
I
say
it
all
the
time
but
Salt
Lake
City
has
the
best
employees
of
any
City
in
the
entire
United
States,
and
anyone
can
fight
me
on
that,
but
I'm
right
and
it's
because
we
truly
I
believe
everyone
that
works
for
this
city
cares
about
it
as
much
as
all
seven
of
us.
J
M
You
very
much
I
one
of
the
things
I
always
say
to
my
staff-
is
that
you
know
they
are
truly
my
work
family
and
that
we
at
Salt
Lake
City,
is
a
work.
Family
and
I
look
forward
to
working
with
each
and
every
one
of
you
over
the
years.
A
T
N
G
P
A
Thank
you
for
joining
us
this
evening
and
thank
you
for
this
evening.
I
guess
it
is
evening
and
thank
you
for
volunteering
to
be
on
the
housing
advisory
appeals
board.
Tell
us
a
little
bit
about
why
you
want
to
be
on
the
board
and
maybe
a
little
bit
about
yourself
well
and
we'd,
love
to
see
your
your
Square.
B
I,
don't
know
why
I
can't
be
seen.
We've
had
we've
had
a
problem.
Trying
to
get
me
in
my
my
correct
pronunciation
of
my
name
is
Teressa.
B
But
I
go
by
tests,
so
it's
easier
I,
don't.
B
To
the
housing
housing
Advisory
Board
through
Montana
Porter,
who
is
the
manager
at
the
housing
authorities?
B
C
Thank
you
so
much
for
for
for
the
for
joining
allegedly
until
later
today,
but
thank
you.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
Tess
for
joining
us
this
evening.
You
have.
You
are
free
from
any
other
questions
from
the
the
council.
Members
you'll
be
on
this
evening's
consent
agenda.
You.
A
To
win
and
we'll
look
forward
to
to
your
work
on
the
board.
A
A
K
And
so
chair
I
moved
that
we
move
into
closed
session
for
the
reasons
just
stated
by
you.
A
F
A
Mono,
yes,
yes
and
I'm,
a
yes
that
passes
six
two
zero
with
council
member
Pedro
absent,
so
it
will
be
a
journey
from
the
work
session
meeting
at
this
time
and
we're
entering
closed
session
here
shortly
and
we'll
stay
on
this
link.
Webex.
A
A
A
B
P
Welcome
to
Capital
City
News
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
Salt
Lake
City
Government
I'm,
your
host
Brian
Young,
with
Salt
Lake
City
TV.
On
our
episode.
Today
we
have
an
interview
with
Sophia
Nicholas
who's,
the
sustainability
deputy
director
to
talk
about
the
solar,
Salt
Lake
City
program
for
our
history
minute.
We
talk
about
revenge
of
the
ninja
and
Infamous
film
shot
here
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
Before
we
get
to
those.
Let's
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update,
our
look
back
our
look
ahead
and,
of
course,
our
road
construction
update.
T
At
its
August
16th
meeting,
the
city
council
voted
to
add
an
85
million
dollar
general
obligation,
bond
for
parks
and
public
lands
projects
to
the
November
ballot,
and
they
also
approved
a
proposed
67.5
million
dollar
sales.
Tax
revenue
Bond
voters
in
Salt
Lake
will
decide
whether
to
approve
the
go
bond
which
is
key
to
implementing
the
reimagined
nature.
Public
lands
master
plan
only
the
Geo
Bond
will
be
on
the
November
ballot.
T
Salt
Lake
city,
mayor
Aaron,
Mendenhall,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
School,
District
staff
and
students,
UTA
staff
and
the
Salt
Lake
Education,
Foundation
celebrated
an
Innovative
new
program
that
will
give
free
Transit
passes
to
K-12
students
and
staff
in
Salt
Lake
City,
School
District.
This
is
an
equitable
collaboration
that
will
make
a
positive
difference
for
Salt
Lake
City
families,
as
well
as
our
community's
air
quality.
These.
B
H
B
T
Want
you
to
succeed,
the
passes
will
be
available
beginning
with
the
2022
through
2023
school
year
and
will
be
valid
on
UTA
bus
tracks.
The
s-line
streetcar
and
UTA
on
demand
in
Salt,
Lake,
City's,
hot
and
dry
climate
trees
need
to
have
supplemental
watering
to
survive.
It
is
the
responsibility
of
the
adjacent
property
owner
to
water
trees
in
the
park
strip.
Salt
Lake,
City
urban
forestry
provides
a
watering
bag
with
each
newly
planted
tree.
If
you
need
any
help
figuring
out
tree
watering
and
other
ways
to
help
with
water
conservation
visit.
T
The
city's
website
for
ideas,
Salt
Lake
City
has
begun
installing
20
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit
signs
throughout
the
city
marking
the
final
step
of
implementing
a
recently
adopted
ordinance
that
lowers
the
speed
limit
from
25
miles
per
hour
on
local
streets.
The
ordinance
impacts,
approximately
420
miles
or
70
percent
of
the
city's
public
streets.
T
T
You
may
have
noticed
that
Main
Street
resurfacing
has
been
going
on
for
the
past
few
weeks.
Prep
work
included,
crack
seal
and
inlays
and
Chip
seal
aggregate
has
now
been
put
down
to
prolong
the
life
of
the
road.
Once
the
seal
has
been
completed.
A
new
striping
pattern
is
put
on
top.
The
new
Street
design
includes
going
from
two
lanes
each
way
to
one
lane
each
way,
as
well
as
providing
designated
bike
Lanes
separate
from
street
parking.
T
This
project
will
not
only
make
the
road
last
longer,
but
also
will
allow
for
more
bikes
and
slower
traffic
to
easily
navigate
the
route.
Learn
more
at
the
life
on
state
bikeways
study
website,
200
South
Road
reconstruction
continues,
as
our
crews
move,
Westward,
you'll
notice,
new
bus
islands
and
curb
bull
bouts
around
900
East.
Our
crews
are
following
the
path
of
a
new
Dominion
gas
line
installation
the
cooperation
between
projects
has
been
great
to
see.
The
primary
amount
of
work
currently
is
between
400
and
500
East,
so
be
aware
and
Drive
slowly
through
construction
zones.
P
H
H
Org,
you
can
check
the
status
there.
We've
had
a
lot
of
interest
in
the
program
already,
but
we
will
be
keeping
the
registration,
the
interest
enrollment
form
open
until
September
second
or
until
we
reach
50,
confirmed
contracts.
So
on
that
website,
you
can
see
more
about
the
workshops
that
we
have
coming
up.
We
have
a
whole
list
of
frequently
asked
questions.
You
can
learn
about
solar.
You
can
learn
about
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
the
program
and
we
hope
you'll
check
it
out.
P
It's
time
now
for
the
history
minute
from
the
late
1960s
to
the
early
1990s
Canon
films
was
a
major
player
in
the
world's
low
budget,
action
movies
and
martial
arts
films
among
many
other
sorts
in
the
early
1980s.
They
set
their
sights
on
a
growing
interest
in
ninjas
and
released
enter
the
ninja
in
1981.
as
they
worked
to
put
together
a
sequel
they
realized
shooting
in
Los
Angeles
might
be
too
expensive.
P
The
Utah
film
commission
sprung
into
action
hoping
to
lure
Canon
films
to
use
the
state
as
a
cheaper
alternative,
offering
them
incentives
to
film
in
Salt
Lake
City.
They
assured
Canon
that
filming
of
Revenge
of
the
Ninja
would
not
require
location
fees,
permits
or
Union
deals,
Canon
leapt
at
the
chance
and
began
filming
across
the
city
and
above
it
an
elaborate
fight
scene
was
staged
at
the
old
Liberty
Park
playground,
and
for
two
weeks
the
deadly
finale
was
filmed.
P
Atop
The
American
Towers
Condominiums
at
44,
West,
Broadway,
film,
Crews
and
helicopters
circled
the
roof
of
the
building,
getting
the
shots
that
would
make
an
iconic
ninja
fight
revenge
of
the
Ninja
starred
show
kasugi
as
a
man
forced
to
leave
his
home
country
after
a
ninja
attack,
but
finds
himself
in
Salt
Lake
City,
embroiled
in
the
local
mob
and
Drug
trade
that
threatens
his
family.
Naturally,
he
strikes
out
for
revenge
against
these
dark
Forces.
The
film
was
highly
successful
for
Canon,
though
not
well
received
by
critics.
P
It
became
a
cult
hit
on
video
and,
despite
the
sweetheart
deal
from
the
film
commission,
Canon
did
not
make
Salt
Lake
City
their
second
home
foreign.
That's
it
for
another
installment
of
capital
city
news.
Remember.
The
best
way
to
stay
engaged
is
to
stay
informed.
You
can
do
that
by
following
us
on
social
media,
subscribing
to
us
on
YouTube
or
watching
us
on
channel
17.,
so
reporting
in
from
the
city
and
county
building,
I'm
Brian
Young.
P
Welcome
to
Capital
City
News
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
Salt
Lake
City
Government
I'm,
your
host
Brian
Young,
with
Salt
Lake
City
TV,
for
our
episode.
Today,
we
spoke
with
the
park
rangers
of
the
new
park
ranger
program.
Our
history
minute
is
about
the
bands,
the
monkeys,
but
before
we
get
to
those
we're
going
to
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update,
our
look
backs
some
Public
Safety
announcements
and
our
road
construction
update.
T
At
its
August
29th
meeting,
the
city
council
held
their
second
truth
and
Taxation
hearing,
as
required
by
state
law
for
the
new
budget.
They
then
adopted
the
final
rate
of
tax
levy
for
All
City
funds,
including
the
library
fund,
and
ratified
the
budget
adopted
by
the
council
in
June
2022,
to
learn
more
visit,
slc.gov
Council.
T
Uniformed
park
rangers
are
now
serving
visitors
to
Salt
Lake,
City's
parks
and
public
spaces
as
part
of
a
significant
new
program
designed
to
bolster
the
experience
of
visitors
to
the
city's
beautiful
outdoor
public
spaces.
Mayor
Mendenhall
joined
Council,
chair
Dan
Dugan
in
officially
introducing
the
new
park
rangers
to
the
public
at
the
International
Peace
Gardens.
T
Salt
Lake
city
mayor
Aaron
Mendenhall,
along
with
several
key
Partners,
celebrated
the
completion
of
the
new
Harrison
Community
Garden.
The
garden
is
located
at
700,
East,
Harrison
Avenue,
just
south
of
Liberty
Park,
as
the
latest
addition
to
Salt
Lake
City's
Green
City
Growers
program.
The
Harrison
Garden
is
run
by
the
non-profit,
Wasatch
Community
Gardens
and
provides
plots
for
as
many
as
50
gardeners
to
grow
vegetables.
T
T
Salt
Lake
City
has
begun
installing
20
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit
signs
throughout
the
city
marking
the
final
step
of
implementing
a
recently
adopted
ordinance
that
lowers
the
speed
limit
from
25
miles
per
hour
on
local
streets.
The
ordinance
impacts,
approximately
420
miles
or
70
percent
of
the
city's
public
streets.
T
T
Highland
Drive
and
1100
East
between
I-80
and
1700
South
is
scheduled
to
be
reconstructed
in
2023.
This
Corridor
into
Sugarhouse
is
in
dire
need
of
reconstruction
and
an
update.
You
can
look
at
highlandslc.org
to
get
more
information
on
the
new
roadway
design,
we'll
be
putting
in
a
multi-use
Path
Road
reconstruction
will
start
summer
of
2023
and
we're
coordinating
with
all
the
other
projects
in
the
area.
Both
private
and
public
2100
South
between
Yuma,
Street
and
1100
East
will
be
getting
a
new
sewer
line.
T
G
F
A
huge
variety
of
things
and
it
starts
by
getting
out
and
seeing
what
the
needs
are
on
the
park
that
day,
so
this
can
be
anywhere
as
simple
as
trash.
Pickup
answering
questions
about
the
park,
location,
education,
these
kinds
of
things
to
removing
invasive
species,
to
working
with
the
homeless
Community,
to
find
them
resources
through
the
VOA
or
the
heart
program,
really,
it's
kind
of
whatever
issues
that
arise
that
day
and
in
the
near
future.
Hopefully
more
programming
with
different
Community
groups.
G
B
F
Park
ranger
program
is
a
response
to
a
growing
Salt
Lake
city.
That
has
has
a
lot
of
diverse
different
issues,
and
that
means
that
we
need
a
lot
of
diverse
approaches
to
deal
with
modern
issues.
So
our
role
is
voluntary
compliance.
A
lot
of
the
stuff
that
happens
in
our
Parks
doesn't
need
law
enforcement
when
it
does,
we
can
reach
out
to
them
and
we
urge
people
in
our
parks
that,
if
something
is
an
emergency,
still
call
the
police
right.
That
is
their
job.
G
One
of
the
biggest
questions
that
we've
been
been
getting
from
the
public.
Are
you
know
what
is
the
difference
between
us
and
police
like?
Why
are
there
police
in
the
Parks
at
all
and
I
think
that's
a
really
great
question,
because
there
are
issues
that
sometimes
police
need
to
address
in
the
Parks,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
issues
that
don't
necessarily
need
a
police
force
present
for
like
some
of
the
social
dynamics
here
stuff
with
you
know,
people
at
the
dog
park
or
something
like
that
dogs
off
leash.
G
F
P
It's
time
again
to
take
a
look
back
at
the
history
of
Salt
Lake
City
in
1968.
The
monkeys
were
one
of
the
most
popular
musical
acts
in
the
world.
To
that
point,
all
of
their
albums
had
reached
number
one
in
the
United
States
and
their
hit
television
show
had
just
wrapped
up
airing
its
second
and
final
season.
They
set
their
sights
on
a
movie
and
conceived
of
head
a
satirical
Musical
Adventure
film,
though
most
of
the
film
would
be
shot
in
California.
A
concert.
P
Sequence
was
planned
to
be
shot
in
Salt
Lake
City
on
May
17
1968.,
the
monkeys
came
to
town,
visited
radio
stations
and
prepared
for
their
concert
originally
scheduled
to
be
shot
at
Lagoon.
Unfortunately,
technical
difficulties
caused
a
last-minute
venue
change
and
they
ended
up
in
the
Valley
Music
Hall
playing
to
4
000
screaming
fans,
even
though
another
5
000
were
still
lined
up
at
Lagoon.
The
monkeys
recorded
Mike
nesmith's
original
song,
Circle
Sky
there
on
the
stage
in
the
round,
and
they
played
it
numerous
times
for
the
cameras.
P
Then
the
monkeys
traveled
up
to
Lagoon
and
did
a
free
30-minute
show
for
everyone
waiting
there
to
see
them
in
the
first
place.
These
were
Tiny
shows
compared
to
what
they
were
accustomed
to
usually
filling
Arenas
of
10
000
fans
or
more.
As
for
the
Valley
Music
Hall,
it
suffered
fire
damage
in
the
70s
and
is
now
known
as
The
Bountiful
Regional
Center.
The
concert
version
of
circle
Sky
appeared
in
the
final
version
of
head,
though
the
film
ended
up
being
a
critical
failure
and
found
life
as
more
of
a
cult.
P
Obscurity,
that's
it
for
another
episode
of
capital
city
news.
Remember.
The
best
way
to
stay
engaged
is
to
stay
informed.
You
can
do
that
by
following
us
on
social
media,
at
slcgov,
subscribing
to
us
on
YouTube
or
watching
us
on
channel
17.,
so
reporting
in
from
Pioneer
Park
I'm,
Brian,
Young
foreign.
P
Welcome
to
Capital
City
News
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
Salt
Lake
City
Government
I'm,
your
host
Brian
Young,
with
Salt
Lake
City
TV.
For
our
episode.
This
week
we
spoke
with
rudiger
Mathis
about
Salt
Lake,
City's
housing,
SLC
plan.
Our
history
minute
is
about
the
history
of
waste
removal
in
the
city
before
we
get
to
those.
Let's
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update.
Our
look
backs
our
look
aheads
and
our
road
construction
update.
T
At
its
September
13th
meeting
the
city
council,
acting
as
the
RDA
approved
budget
amendment
1
for
fiscal
year
2223
and
discussed
a
new
tool
for
development
called
housing
and
Transit
reinvestment
Zone
acting
as
the
city
council
took
a
look
at
the
Ballpark
station
area
plan
passed
a
budget
amendment
for
deeply
affordable
housing
and
received
updates
on
ongoing
issues
to
learn
more
visit.
Slc.Gov
Council.
T
Salt
Lake
city
mayor
Aaron,
Mendenhall,
Salt,
Lake,
County,
mayor
Jenny,
Wilson,
state
of
Utah
homeless,
coordinator
Wayne,
niederhauser
and
Salt
Lake
City
Council,
chair
Dugan,
discussed
collaborative
efforts
for
winter
overflow
shelters
and
expanded
investments
in
permanent,
supportive
and
transitional
housing.
It's.
B
The
largest
single
year
increase
in
permanent
and
transitional
housing
in
the
city's
history.
We
are
making
this
happen,
not
one
of
us
all
of
us
together.
This
is
what
Cooperative
work
in
government
looks
like
and
we're
doing
it
through
shared
goals
through
major
investment
and
through
shared
responsibility.
T
T
T
Salt
Lake
City
has
begun
installing
20
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit
signs
throughout
the
city
marking
the
final
step
of
implementing
a
recently
adopted
ordinance
that
lowers
the
speed
limit
from
25
miles
per
hour
on
local
streets.
The
ordinance
impacts,
approximately
420
miles
or
70
percent
of
the
city's
public
streets.
T
P
T
East
and
westbound
traffic
on
300
West
is
reduced
to
one
way
in
each
Direction
at
1700
South
and
will
continue
for
another
week.
During
this
time.
The
traffic
signal
will
switch
to
a
flashing
red
to
Signal,
a
four-way
stop
to
avoid
delay
or
congestion.
Please
consider
1300
South
and
2100
South
as
alternate
routes,
no
impacts
to
North
and
southbound
travel
lanes
are
anticipated
during
this
time
and
remember
to
continue
to
support
the
small
local
businesses
along
300
West.
When
you
support
these
businesses,
take
a
photo
tag
us
and
use
hashtag
support.
T
Localslc22
this
month
is
your
last
chance
to
receive
a
Salt
Lake
City
flag
hat.
When
you
show
us
how
you
support
local,
the
sections
of
the
300
North
pedestrian
bridge
were
delivered
to
the
construction
site.
Crews
began
the
process
of
splicing
the
sections
together
in
preparation
for
the
bit.
Sorry
Crews
began
the
process
of
splicing
the
sections
together
in
preparation
for
the
bridge
placement,
which
took
place
on
September
18th
steel
work
also
continues
on
the
supporting
steel
beams
for
both
towers
and
constructing
steel,
stairs
and
Landings.
I
A
housing
plan
is
important
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
The
first
is,
it
is
a
state
required
plan
and
so
to
meet.
You
know
the
state's
requirements
we
do
have
to
have
one
in
place,
but
we
also
know
that
housing
is
a
huge
issue,
especially
right
now,
and
if
we
don't
have
a
plan,
then
it's
going
to
be
really
hard
to
make
things
better
for
people
right
now
we're
working
on
housing
SLC,
which
is
the
update
to
the
city's
five-year
housing
plan.
I
The
previous
plan
growing
SLC,
was
adopted
in
2018
and
it's
expiring
at
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year.
So
we
need
to
get
a
new
plan
in
place
for
that,
so
the
housing
plan
should
be
really
data
driven
right.
So
we're
asking
the
community
to
provide
input
in
this
early
stage
so
that
we
know
what
areas
we
should
be
focusing
on
what
types
of
policies
and
programs
we
should
be
implementing
so
that
over
the
next
five
years
we
can
work
on
getting
those
off
the
ground.
I
There
are
some
things
that
the
city
kind
of
already
does,
and
so
some
of
that
is
finding
out.
Should
we
keep
doing
these
things
or
should
we
try
to
grow
out
and
expand
them?
Should
we
try
to
create
new
ordinances
or
policies
that
will
help
facilitate
greater
affordability
in
the
city?
So
we
really
want
this
to
be
steered
by
the
public
and
we
really
want
everybody
to
be
involved.
I
So,
as
I
mentioned,
this
is
a
five-year
housing
plan,
so
this
will
govern
kind
of
the
city's
policy
on
housing
for
the
next
five
years.
So
now
really
is
the
time
to
be
involved.
If,
if
you,
if
people
have
opinions
or
thoughts
that
they
think
should
be
done,
now
is
the
time
to
do
that
because
we
haven't
drafted
anything.
Yet
we
don't
have
anything
on
paper
and
we're
sifting
through
all
that
information,
and
if
we
do
it
right
now,
the
next
five
years
will
help
us
get.
I
You
know
to
the
city
that
we
want,
and
then
you
know,
after
that,
the
next
five
year
plan
will
help
us
get
even
further
down
the
road.
So
now
is
a
really
critical
time.
If
we
go,
if
we
push
hard,
then
we
can
get
a
lot
done
yeah.
So
we
right
now.
We
really
want
to
drive
people
to
the
website
where
they
can
take
a
survey.
They
can
find
other
ways
to
get
involved.
I
There's
also
where
we
post
a
list
of
our
events
that
we're
hosting
we're
going
out
into
the
community,
and
we
invite
everybody
to
attend
any
of
the
events
that
we're
hosting
so
they
can
offer
their
feedback
there.
I
P
It's
time
again
to
take
a
look
back
into
Salt
Lake
City's
past,
with
our
history
minute
by
1892.
The
garbage
situation
in
Salt,
Lake
City
was
getting
out
of
control.
Many
residents
from
the
east
side
of
the
city
simply
hold
their
garbage
to
the
west
side
and
dumped
it
there
for
the
working-class
folks
to
deal
with,
but
in
September
of
that
year,
Salt
Lake,
City
Government
finally
established
two
garbage
districts,
one
inside
the
city
limits
to
eighth,
North
and
North.
P
The
reservation
line
in
the
East,
9th
South
to
the
South
and
as
far
as
10th
West
to
the
West,
the
other,
covering
all
the
territory
outside
of
those
areas
in
the
first
district.
The
city
would
be
responsible
for
paying
independently
licensed
scavengers
to
haul
the
refuse
and
collect
manure
and
other
scavengeable
materials
in
District
2.
Those
same
licensed
scavengers
would
be
paid
by
the
residents
and
business
owners
themselves.
P
P
Welcome
to
Capital
City
News
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
Salt
Lake
City
Government
I'm,
your
host
Brian
Young,
with
Salt
Lake
City
TV.
On
our
episode.
Today
we
have
an
interview
with
Sophia
Nicholas
who's,
the
sustainability
deputy
director
to
talk
about
the
solar,
Salt
Lake
City
program
for
our
history
minute.
We
talk
about
revenge
of
the
ninja
and
Infamous
film
shot
here
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
Before
we
get
to
those.
Let's
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update,
our
look
back
our
look
ahead
and,
of
course,
our
road
construction
update.
T
At
its
August
16th
meeting,
the
city
council
voted
to
add
an
85
million
dollar
general
obligation,
bond
for
parks
and
public
lands
projects
to
the
November
ballot,
and
they
also
approved
a
proposed
67.5
million
dollar
sales.
Tax
revenue
Bond
voters
in
Salt
Lake
will
decide
whether
to
approve
the
go
bond
which
is
key
to
implementing
the
reimagined
nature.
Public
lands
master
plan
only
the
Geo
Bond
will
be
on
the
November
ballot.
T
Salt
Lake
city,
mayor
Aaron,
Mendenhall,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
School,
District
staff
and
students,
UTA
staff
and
the
Salt
Lake
Education,
Foundation
celebrated
an
Innovative
new
program
that
will
give
free
Transit
passes
to
K-12
students
and
staff
in
Salt
Lake
City,
School
District.
This
is
an
equitable
collaboration
that
will
make
a
positive
difference
for
Salt
Lake
City
families,
as
well
as
our
community's
air
quality.
These
Transit
passes.
B
T
Succeed
the
passes
will
be
available
beginning
with
the
2022
through
2023
school
year
and
will
be
valid
on
UTA
bus
tracks.
The
s-line
streetcar
and
UTA
on
demand
in
Salt,
Lake,
City's,
hot
and
dry
climate
trees
need
to
have
supplemental
watering
to
survive.
It
is
the
responsibility
of
the
adjacent
property
owner
to
water
trees
in
the
park
strip.
Salt
Lake,
City
urban
forestry
provides
a
watering
bag
with
each
newly
planted
tree.
If
you
need
any
help
figuring
out
tree
watering
and
other
ways
to
help
with
water
conservation
visit.
T
The
city's
website
for
ideas,
Salt
Lake
City
has
begun
installing
20
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit
signs
throughout
the
city
marking
the
final
step
of
implementing
a
recently
adopted
ordinance
that
lowers
the
speed
limit
from
25
miles
per
hour
on
local
streets.
The
ordinance
impacts,
approximately
420
miles
or
70
percent
of
the
city's
public
streets.
Replacing
the
approximately
575
signs
from
25
miles
per
hour
to
20
miles
per
hour
will
continue
into
August
in
order
to
increase
safety
on
city
streets,
while
lowering
the
speed
limit
is
an
important
move.
T
You
may
have
noticed
that
Main
Street
resurfacing
has
been
going
on
for
the
past
few
weeks.
Prep
work
included,
crack
seal
and
inlays
and
Chip
seal
aggregate
has
now
been
put
down
to
prolong
the
life
of
the
road.
Once
the
seal
has
been
completed.
A
new
striping
pattern
is
put
on
top.
The
new
Street
design
includes
going
from
two
lanes
each
way
to
one
lane
each
way,
as
well
as
providing
designated
bike
Lanes
separate
from
street
parking.
T
This
project
will
not
only
make
the
road
last
longer,
but
also
will
allow
for
more
bikes
and
slower
traffic
to
easily
navigate
the
route.
Learn
more
at
the
life
on
state
bikeways
study
website,
200
South
Road
reconstruction
continues,
as
our
crews
move,
Westward,
you'll
notice,
new
bus
islands
and
curb
bull
bouts
around
900
East.
Our
crews
are
following
the
path
of
a
new
Dominion
gas
line
installation
the
cooperation
between
projects
has
been
great
to
see.
The
primary
amount
of
work
currently
is
between
400
and
500
East,
so
be
aware
and
Drive
slowly
through
construction
zones.
P
H
Programs
for
over
20
years,
we
have
some
ambitious
climate
goals,
including
including
helping
our
whole
Community
go
to
100
renewable
electricity
by
2030..
While
we've
been
focusing
on
the
utility
scale.
With
that
goal,
we
also
recognize
the
importance
of
rooftop
solar.
So
that's
the
solar
that
goes
on
your
your
homes.
H
We've
had
a
lot
of
interest
in
the
program
already,
but
we
will
be
keeping
the
registration,
the
interest
enrollment
form
open
until
until
September,
2nd
or
until
we
reach
50,
confirmed
contracts.
So
on
that
website,
you
can
see
more
about
the
workshops
that
we
have
coming
up.
We
have
a
whole
list
of
frequently
asked
questions.
You
can
learn
about
solar.
You
can
learn
about
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
the
program
and
we
hope
you'll
check
it
out.
P
It's
time
now
for
the
history
minute
from
the
late
1960s
to
the
early
1990s
Canon
films
was
a
major
player
in
the
world's
low
budget,
action
movies
and
martial
arts
films
among
many
other
sorts
in
the
early
1980s.
They
set
their
sights
on
a
growing
interest
in
ninjas
and
released
enter
the
ninja
in
1981
as
they
worked
to
put
together
a
sequel
they
realized
shooting
in
Los
Angeles
might
be
too
expensive.
P
The
Utah
film
commission
sprung
into
action
hoping
to
lure
Canon
films
to
use
the
state
as
a
cheaper
alternative,
offering
them
incentives
to
film
in
Salt
Lake
City.
They
assured
Canon
that
filming
of
Revenge
of
the
Ninja
would
not
require
location
fees,
permits
or
Union
deals,
Canon
leapt
at
the
chance
and
began
filming
across
the
city
and
above
it
an
elaborate
fight
scene
was
staged
at
the
old
Liberty
Park
playground,
and
for
two
weeks
the
deadly
finale
was
filmed.
P
H
P
Revenge
of
the
Ninja
starred
show
kasugi
as
a
man
forced
to
leave
his
home
country
after
a
ninja
attack,
but
finds
himself
in
Salt
Lake
City,
embroiled
in
the
local
mob
and
Drug
trade
that
threatens
his
family.
Naturally,
he
strikes
out
for
revenge
against
these
dark
Forces.
The
film
was
highly
successful
for
Canon,
though
not
well
received
by
critics.
It
became
a
cult
hit
on
video
and,
despite
the
sweetheart
deal
from
the
film
commission,
Canon
did
not
make
Salt
Lake
City
their
second
home
foreign.
That's
it
for
another
installment
of
capital
city
news.
Remember.
P
P
Welcome
to
Capital
City
News
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
Salt
Lake
City
Government
I'm,
your
host
Brian
Young,
with
Salt
Lake
City
TV,
for
our
episode.
Today,
we
spoke
with
the
park
rangers
of
the
new
park
ranger
program.
Our
history
minute
is
about
the
bands,
the
monkeys,
but
before
we
get
to
those
we're
going
to
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update,
our
look
backs
some
Public
Safety
announcements
and
our
road
construction
update.
T
At
its
August
29th
meeting,
the
city
council
held
their
second
truth
and
Taxation
hearing,
as
required
by
state
law
for
the
new
budget.
They
then
adopted
the
final
rate
of
tax
levy
for
All
City
funds,
including
the
library
fund,
and
ratified
the
budget
adopted
by
the
council
in
June
2022,
to
learn
more
visit,
slc.gov
Council.
T
Uniformed
park
rangers
are
now
serving
visitors
to
Salt
Lake,
City's
parks
and
public
spaces
as
part
of
a
significant
new
program
designed
to
bolster
the
experience
of
visitors
to
the
city's
beautiful
outdoor
public
spaces.
Mayor
Mendenhall
joined
Council,
chair
Dan
Dugan
in
officially
introducing
the
new
park
rangers
to
the
public
at
the
International
Peace
Gardens.
A
What
opportunity
for
the
city
to
engage
with
our
residents
on
a
more
friendly
welcoming
environment,
to.
T
Salt
Lake
city
mayor
Aaron
Mendenhall,
along
with
several
key
Partners,
celebrated
the
completion
of
the
new
Harrison
Community
Garden.
The
garden
is
located
at
700,
East,
Harrison
Avenue,
just
south
of
Liberty
Park,
as
the
latest
addition
to
Salt
Lake
City's
Green
City
Growers
program.
The
Harrison
Garden
is
run
by
the
non-profit,
Wasatch
Community
Gardens
and
provides
plots
for
as
many
as
50
gardeners
to
grow
vegetables.
T
T
Salt
Lake
City
has
begun
installing
20
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit
signs
throughout
the
city
marking
the
final
step
of
implementing
a
recently
adopted
ordinance
that
lowers
the
speed
limit
from
25
miles
per
hour
on
local
streets.
The
ordinance
impacts,
approximately
420
miles
or
70
percent
of
the
city's
public
streets.
T
T
Highland
Drive
and
1100
East
between
I-80
and
1700
South
is
scheduled
to
be
reconstructed
in
2023.
This
Corridor
into
Sugarhouse
is
in
dire
need
of
reconstruction
and
an
update.
You
can
look
at
highlandslc.org
to
get
more
information
on
the
new
roadway
design,
we'll
be
putting
in
a
multi-use
Path
Road
reconstruction
will
start
summer
of
2023
and
we're
coordinating
with
all
the
other
projects
in
the
area.
Both
private
and
public
2100
South
between
Yuma,
Street
and
1100
East
will
be
getting
a
new
sewer
line.
T
G
F
Possible,
it's
a
huge
variety
of
things
and
it
starts
by
getting
out
and
seeing
what
the
needs
are
on
the
park
that
day.
So
this
can
be
anywhere
as
simple
as
trash
pickup
answering
questions
about
the
park,
location,
education,
these
kinds
of
things
to
removing
invasive
species,
to
working
with
the
homeless
Community,
to
find
them
resources
through
the
VOA
or
the
heart
program,
really
it's
kind
of
whatever
issues
that
arise
that
day
and
in
the
near
future,
hopefully
more
programming
with
different
Community
groups.
We.
G
B
F
Park
ranger
program
is
a
response
to
a
growing
Salt
Lake
city.
That
has
a
lot
of
diverse
different
issues,
and
that
means
that
we
need
a
lot
of
diverse
approaches
to
deal
with
modern
issues.
So
our
role
is
voluntary
compliance.
A
lot
of
the
stuff
that
happens
in
our
Parks
doesn't
need
law
enforcement
when
it
does,
we
can
reach
out
to
them
and
we
urge
people
in
our
parks
that,
if
something
is
an
emergency,
still
call
the
police
right.
That
is
their
job.
G
One
of
the
biggest
questions
that
we've
been
getting
from
the
public
are
you
know
what
is
the
difference
between
us
and
police
like?
Why
are
there
police
in
the
Parks
at
all
and
I
think
that's
a
really
great
question,
because
there
are
issues
that
sometimes
police
need
to
address
in
the
Parks,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
issues
that
don't
necessarily
need
a
police
force
present
for
like
some
of
the
social
dynamics
here
stuff
with
you
know,
people
at
the
dog
park
or
something
like
that
dogs
off
leash.
G
F
P
It's
time
again
to
take
a
look
back
at
the
history
of
Salt
Lake
City
in
1968.
The
monkeys
were
one
of
the
most
popular
musical
acts
in
the
world.
To
that
point,
all
of
their
albums
had
reached
number
one
in
the
United
States
and
their
hit
television
show
had
just
wrapped
up
airing
its
second
and
final
season.
They
set
their
sights
on
a
movie
and
conceived
of
head
a
satirical
Musical
Adventure
film,
though
most
of
the
film
would
be
shot
in
California.
A
concert.
P
Sequence
was
planned
to
be
shot
in
Salt
Lake
City
on
May
17
1968.,
the
monkeys
came
to
town,
visited
radio
stations
and
prepared
for
their
concert
originally
scheduled
to
be
shot
at
Lagoon.
Unfortunately,
technical
difficulties
caused
a
last-minute
venue
change
and
they
ended
up
in
the
Valley
Music
Hall
playing.