►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Formal Meeting - 11/10/2022
Description
To view agendas and paperwork go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
Thank
you
City.
It
is
Thursday
November,
10th
2022.
We
moved
our
typical
Tuesday
meeting
to
Thursday
so
that
everyone
could
participate
in
their
elections.
I
hope
everyone
voted.
That
was
eligible
too
I
will
read
our
opening
words.
Welcome
to
today's
meeting.
We
continue
to
host
hybrid
meetings
to
keep
everyone
safe
and
healthy.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you're
welcome
to
join
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
A
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whatever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
If
you
are
here
to
give
public
comment
and
are
wearing
a
mask,
feel
free
to
remove
it
once
you
get
called
to
address
the
Council
of
the
podium.
Thank
you
for
participating
today.
The
first
thing
on
our
agenda
is
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
So
please
stand
and
join
me
in
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
B
A
Thank
you
and
thank
you
again
for
joining
us
tonight.
If
you
would
like
to
give
public
comment
today,
we
are
accepting
comments
in
person
and
online
via
WebEx
before
we
begin
moving
through
our
agenda,
I
want
to
mention
and
review
our
rules
of
decorum.
The
city
council
has
always
had
guidelines
in
place
to
ensure
our
meetings
are
orderly,
civil
and
efficient.
The
guidelines
help
everyone
feel
comfortable,
sharing
their
comments
without
feeling
intimidated
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
decorum
take
effect.
The
moment
you
arrive.
A
We
respect
all
points
of
view
and
welcome.
New
insights,
please
be
respectful,
while
sharing
your
comments
avoid
yelling
using
profanity,
making
racial
slurs
or
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
If
you
violate
this
rule,
we
will
mute
your
line
or
ask
you
to
stop.
If
you
feel
you
need
to
use
such
a
language
to
express
your
opinions,
you
may
email,
council
members
or
leave
a
message
on
a
24-hour
comment
line.
Additionally,
staff
will
be
requesting
your
name
during
the
WebEx
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
decorum.
A
If
your
name
doesn't
comply,
our
staff
will
let
you
know
for
those
joining
on
WebEx.
Please
watch
your
chat
window
in
case
we
try
to
reach
you.
Isaac
canado
from
our
staff
will
be
moderating
the
WebEx
meeting
tonight
and
we'll
message
you
with
any
questions
about
your
registration
staff,
is
handling
many
tasks.
So
please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
information
updates.
A
A
Okay,
I
have
a
motion
from
councilmember
Dugan
and
a
second
from
council
member
Wharton.
Any
discussion
on
this
motion.
I
will
roll
call,
wait:
yeah,
I'll
roll
call,
Peter
wrestler.
D
E
A
I'm,
a
yes
that
passes
six
to
zero
with
councilmember
valdemaros
absent.
This
brings
us
to
item
A5,
which
is
a
joint
ceremonial
resolution
with
mayor
Mendenhall
declaring
November
20th
as
Chan
transgender
day
of
Remembrance
in
Salt
Lake
City
I'm,
going
to
turn
the
time
over
to
council
member
Chris
Wharton
to
read
our
resolution.
F
And
whereas
the
transgender
Community
has
been
particularly
hard
hit
by
the
continuing
effects
of
the
covid-19
pandemic.
And
whereas
since
2006
transgender
education,
Advocates
or
t
of
Utah
has
organized
a
vigil
in
Salt
Lake
City
every
year,
and
whereas
Salt
Lake,
City
values
the
lives
and
contributions
to
our
community
by
transgender
people
and
whereas
Salt
Lake
City
has
the
responsibility
to
promote
equality
and
prosperity
for
all
members
of
the
transgender
community
and
whereas
Salt
Lake
City
is
proud
to
stand
against
the
Discrimination
of
transgender
people.
F
Now,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
and
mayor
of
Salt
Lake
City
strongly
value
the
lives
and
contributions
of
transgender
people
honor.
Those
lives
that
have
been
lost
as
a
result
of
transphobic
violence
throughout
the
United
States
of
America
and
the
world,
and
formally
recognize
Saturday
November
20th
as
transgender
day
of
remembrance.
A
A
There,
a
second
I
have
a
motion
from
councilmember
Fowler.
Second
from
council
member
Wharton
I.
Will
any
discussion
on
this
motion?
I?
Will
roll
call
it
councilmember
Fowler?
Yes,
Bowie?
Yes,
Wharton,
yes,
Dugan,
yes,
Pete
wrestler,
yes
and
I'm
a
yes
that
passes
six
to
zero
with
council
member
valdemaros,
absent.
A
In
Salt,
Lake
City
we're
proud
to
stand
up
against
transphobic
violence,
and
we
thank
local
organizations
such
as
the
Utah,
Pride,
Center
or
transgender
transgender
education,
Advocates
T
of
Utah
and
others
who
work
tirelessly
to
support
and
protect,
protect.
Our
transgender
neighbors
I
see
that
Tanya
Hawkins
co-ceo
of
the
Utah
Pride
Center,
is
here
we'd
like
to
give
you
a
minute
to
speak.
If
you'd
like
to
say
anything.
Otherwise,
please
come
up
and
take
a
picture
at
least
right
photo.
G
H
C
F
Yes,
sorry
I
should
have
said
this
earlier
when
you
asked
for
comments,
but
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
we've
passed
this
resolution
a
couple
times
and
this
year
was
particularly
sad
because
between
the
time
that
we
were
drafting
the
resolution
and
circulating
it
for
approval,
we
had
to
amend
it
because
several
more
transgender
people
had
been
killed
so
and
I
didn't
know
that
yeah
just
want
to
acknowledge
that.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
All
right
so
that
now
brings
us
to
section
B
of
our
agenda.
That
is
the
public
hearings.
A
Taylor
Hill
on
our
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
We
will
call
names
of
people
on
WebEx
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
receive
comment
cards
if
you're
here
in
person,
you
want
to
make
a
comment
and
you
have
not
filled
out
a
comment
card.
I
think
they're
right
outside
the
door.
A
Once
we
open
public
comment,
Taylor
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
people
have
some
notice
and
are
able
to
prepare
to
speak
when
it's
your
turn
to
speak.
Taylor
will
announce
your
name
if
you're
on
WebEx,
your
line
will
unmute,
and
you
may
begin
if
you're
here
in
person,
please
step
up
to
the
podium
and
state
your
name
and
your
two
minute.
Timer
will
start
at
the
two
minute.
A
Mark
staff
will
announce
time
if
you
are
unable
to
finish
your
comment,
please
send
the
rest
via
email,
mail
or
by
calling
our
office.
Our
contact
information
is
available
in
the
meeting
room
and
in
the
WebEx
chat.
If
you
no
longer
wish
to
speak,
either
message
our
staff
or
when
staff
States,
your
name
just
let
us
know
you're
here
to
listen.
So
our
first
public
hearing
is
item.
B1
B1
is
a
rezone
at
8,
56,
West,
1300
South.
A
Before
we
begin
taking
comments,
I'll
turn
the
time
to
Brian
fullmore
Fulmer,
one
of
our
Council
staff
policy
analysts
to
give
us
a
short
introduction
to
this
item.
Brian
thank.
I
You
Mr
chair:
this
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
zoning
map
for
property
at
856
West
1300
South
from
its
current
R1
5000
single-family
residential
zoning
to
fbun2
or
form-based
Urban
neighborhood,
the
petitioner
stated
they
intend
to
construct
six
for
sale
townhomes
on
the
property.
An
existing
single-family
home
on
the
site
is
proposed
to
be
removed
as
part
of
the
development.
Thank
you.
A
L
And
it
looks
like
I
am
unable
to
mute
Tyler.
So
let
me
message
with
him:
quick.
A
We'll
skip
item
B1
for
now,
so
we'll
keep
that
public
hearing
open
for
a
few
more
minutes
and
we'll
go
to
item
B2
B2
is
a
resolution
for
our
digital
equipment
donation
program,
the
benefits,
analysis
and
recommendation
before
we
begin
taking
comments.
Sylvia
Richards,
another
Council
staff
policiano's,
who
is
online,
will
give
us
a
short
introduction,
go
ahead.
Sylvia
thank.
N
You
thank
you.
Mr
chair.
The
city
adopted
a
digital
equipment,
a
digital
Equity
policy
in
September
of
2020,
with
the
intent
to
bridge
the
technology
Gap
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
communities,
a
pilot
digital
equipment
donation
program
was
created
in
phase
two
of
the
program
is
proposing
to
donate
Surplus
computers
to
community
organizations
which
serve
families
and
individuals
with
digital
resource
needs.
This
public
hearing
is
being
held
in
connection
with
the
public
benefits
analysis
submitted
by
the
administration.
Thank
you.
K
L
A
C
A
We
have
a
motion
from
councilmember
Dugan,
a
second
from
council
member
Fowler.
Is
there
any
discussion
to
this
motion?
I'll
start
this
time
with
councilmember
Wharton?
Yes,
Pui,
yes,
Fowler,
yes,
Peter
eschler,
yes,
Dugan,
yes
and
I
am
a
yes,
so
that
passes
unanimously
with
councilmember
Father
morose
absence.
A
Okay,
so
and
there's
no
one
else
here
to
speak
to
item
B1,
that
is
the
thirteen
eight
fifty
six
West
1300
South
rezone
correct.
So
I
guess:
I'll!
Look
for
a
motion
to
close
that.
E
I
mean
Mr,
chair,
I'm,
sorry,
I'm,
not
offended
I,
move
that
the
council
close
the
public
hearing
and
defer
action
to
a
future
council
meeting.
A
Second,
I
have
a
motion
from
councilmember
Fowler,
second
from
councilmember
Dugan.
Any
discussion
on
this
motion.
Seeing
none
I
will
roll
call
councilmember
Dugan?
Yes,
Peter
ashler,
yes,
Fowler,
yes,
Bowie,
yes,
Orton,
yes,
and
I
am
a
yes
that
passes
unanimously
with
council
member
valdemaros,
absent
okay.
That
brings
us
to
item
B3
and
I,
don't
think
anyone's
here
to
talk
to
that
one,
but
just
kidding
that
is
an
ordinance
rezone,
a
master
plan
Amendment
for
675
North,
F,
Street,
Capitol,
Park
Cottages,
the
petitioners
I
Redevelopment
before
we
begin
taking
public
comment.
A
O
This
proposal
would
amend
the
master
plan
designation
for
the
property
in
the
Avenues
Community
master
plan
from
very
low
density
to
low
density
and
rezone
the
property
from
fr3
12000
to
sr1.
The
request
is
intended
to
help
accommodate
a
request
from
Ivory
development
for
a
19
lot.
Single-Family
dwelling
development.
P
P
Good
evening,
I'm,
Linda,
Jean
and
I
would
like
to
speak
to
page
one
of
our
handout.
Ivory
has
four
requests
from
the
city
a
result
from
fr3
to
sr1,
an
amendment
to
The,
Avenues,
master
plan,
approval
of
a
plan,
development
and
finally
approval
of
a
plat
plan.
It
is
normal
practice
for
these
requests
to
be
considered
together
by
the
Planning
Commission
before
arriving
at
a
recommendation
regarding
the
rezone.
This
was
not
done
after
almost
three
years.
P
Ivory's
plat
plan
is
incomplete
and
non-conforming
members
of
the
Planning
Commission
themselves
questioned
this
process
asking
if
Ivory
had
presented
the
cart
before
the
horse.
The
result
cannot
be
considered
in
isolation
without
knowing
what
the
applicant
wishes
to
do
with
that
rezone.
If
granted,
this
application
must
be
evaluated
in
the
whole,
not
in
parts.
It
is.
P
The
combined
impact
of
a
radical
result
used
to
shrink
lot
sizes
by
almost
60
percent
a
plan
development
used
to
reduce
setbacks
such
that
not
a
single
lot,
conforms
with
Zone
requirements
and
a
flawed
plot
plan
that
obliterates
the
natural
terrain
that
render
this
proposed
development
so
objectionable
and
problematic.
We
ask
that
the
city
council
assessed
this
proposal
as
a
whole
and
believe,
if
you
do
so,
you
will
understand
why
the
Avenues
Community
is
nearly
unanimously
opposed
to
this
excessive
and
deeply
flawed
development.
P
R
Second
Ivory
seeks
to
utilize
the
Adu
ordinance
to
add
adus
to
14
of
these
newly
created
lots
and
asked
the
city
to
waive
the
honor
occupier
rule.
Third
Ivory
asked
for
a
plant
development
to
get
more
Lots
shrink
setbacks
further
and
build
non-compliant.
Retaining
walls
than
than
sr1
would
normally
allow
Ivory
could
have
built
11
homes
with
11
adus
on
this
lot
by
right
they
could
have
started
building
two
years
ago
and
saved
the
city
and
the
neighborhood
and
themselves
a
whole
lot
of
time
and
energy.
R
Another
big
gift
for
gifts.
Ivory
is
very
clever
in
their
marketing.
They
would
have
you
think
they
are
providing
a
big
increase
in
housing
as
recompense.
Let's
see,
19
minus
11
is
eight
more
Million,
Dollar
Plus
Homes.
That's
something
I'll
admit
it,
but
does
it
match
what
the
city
is
being
asked
to?
Grant,
ivory
and
14,
minus
11
is
three
additional
rental
units.
R
A
K
B
Good
evening
I'm
Charlie
Cannon
I
would
like
to
speak
to
Ivory's
flat
plan.
That's
page
three
of
our
handout.
Even
a
most
casual
glance
at
this
plan
will
show
you
how
much
more
crowded
this
development
is
not
just
compared
to
fr3
development,
but
also
compared
to
our
current
development
in
the
Avenues.
The
homes
that
Ivory
refers
to
as
Cottages
are
all
large
two-story
buildings
with
four
or
five
bedrooms
plus
three-car
garages.
B
B
S
S
S
Rezoning
can
have
substantial
impact
on
the
community,
the
environment
and,
as
in
this
case,
safety
with
regards
to
adjacent
neighborhoods
and
homes.
Very
careful
consideration
should
also
be
given
to
rezoning
in
our
environmentally
sensitive
Foothills,
also
adding
excess
density
to
Wildlife
Urban
interface
areas
at
high
risk
of
wildfire
Community
opinion
should
also
matter.
Residents
who
live
in
a
particular
neighborhood
tend
to
understand
the
complexities
far
better
than
those
with
only
a
casual
knowledge
of
the
neighborhood.
S
Beware
of
two
zealously
implementing
city-wide
policies
that
make
no
sense
in
a
particular
location.
One
size
does
not
fit
all
the
city
has,
in
the
past,
only
granted
a
rezone
request.
If
that
rezone
brings
substantial
public
benefit
in
the
terms
of
affordability,
sustainability,
walkability
and
the
generation
of
family-friendly
housing,
Ivory's
proposed
development
brings.
None
of
these
benefits.
S
T
Thank
you,
I'm
Paul,
McKinnon
I'm,
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
more
than
2
000,
forgotten
and
ignored
residents
of
the
Avenues
who
signed
a
petition
in
opposition
to
this
rezoning.
Specifically
I
would
like
to
speak
to
the
issue
of
affordable
housing
referenced
on
page
four.
A
few
weeks
ago,
I
listened
to
a
presentation
from
the
planning
division
advocating
an
affordable
housing
initiative
where
the
city
would
Grant
concessions
to
developers
in
exchange
for
the
creation
of
affordable
housing.
T
Ivory
asks
for
a
series
of
concessions,
far
greater
than
the
those
envisioned
by
the
affordable
housing
initiative,
but
heart
Ivory
creates
no
affordable
housing
in
early
2021
Ivory
told
us
that
the
units
with
adus
would
sell
for
in
excess
of
one
million
dollars,
presumably
more
like
1.5
million.
Today,
rentals
of
the
adus
will
be
at
Market
rates,
which
real
estate
agents
tell
us
would
be
in
the
1500
to
2
thousand
dollar
range.
T
The
five
custom
houses
on
F
Street,
on
Lots,
created
by
the
rezone,
will
likely
sell
in
the
two
million
dollar
range.
Does
this
sound
like
affordable
housing
to
you,
or
do
these
homes
cater
to
the
top
one
percent?
It's
very
easy
to
see
what
Ivory
gets,
but
what
does
the
city
get
from
all
the
concessions
demanded
by
Ivory
creation
of
the
14
adus
that
Ivory
promises
is
extremely
questionable,
besides,
which
adus
can
already
be
created
under
the
current
zoning.
Ivory's
application
does
nothing
to
help
with
the
city's
acute
shortage
of
affordable
housing.
U
U
The
development
is
1.1
miles
down
a
steep
grade
to
South,
Temple
and
1.8
miles
to
Harmons
or
the
City
Creek
Mall,
so
walking
or
cycling
up
and
down
is
totally
impractical
for
most
people.
The
closest
grocery
store
Smith's
located
on
East
Street
and
6th
Avenue.
The
Streets
between
13th
and
6th
Avenue
are
incredibly
steep.
It
is
not
at
all
feasible
to
walk
between
Smiths
and
Ivory's
development
with
heavy
grocery
bags
during
temperate
months,
let
alone
when
it
is
snowy
and
icy.
U
There
are
intermittent
sidewalks
between
11th
and
13th
Avenue,
which
makes
it
even
more
dangerous,
especially
in
the
winter
months.
There
is
no
real
public
transportation
to
speak
of
the
information
provided
in
Ivory's
application
is
incorrect.
The
bus
service
no
longer
comes
to
13th
Avenue
and
one
has
to
walk
a
third
of
a
mile
to
11th
Avenue
down
the
equivalent
of
10
flights
of
stairs
to
the
nearest
bus.
Stop
if
it
is
a
snowy
or
icy
day,
the
bus
does
not
go
above
Third
Avenue
for
safety
reasons.
U
All
of
these
considerations
lead
to
private
automobiles
being
the
only
practical
means
of
transportation,
with
all
of
the
attendant
environmental
problems.
The
current
zoning
of
fr3
is
far
more
appropriate
for
this
area.
There
is
insufficient
infrastructure
to
support
the
number
of
households
that
Ivory
is
proposing.
I
appreciate
your
time
and
thank
you
for
your
consideration.
A
V
Good
evening,
I'm
Dr
Nathan
Dean
I'm,
an
academic,
pulmonary
physician
at
Intermountain,
Medical
Center
and
the
University
of
Utah
I'm,
also
a
member
of
the
Utah
Physicians
for
a
healthy
environment
who
oppose
this
problematic
development.
I
am
speaking
on
sustainability
also
referenced
on
page
four,
but
actually
the
lack
thereof
with
Ivory's
proposal.
V
Ivory's
lot
contains
over
20
Majestic
Trees
close
to
100
years
old,
but
all
will
be
torn
out.
These
trees
have
survived
without
irrigation,
absorbing
carbon
dioxide,
providing
shade
and
habitat
for
owls
and
Hawks.
When
North
Point
and
Capitol
Park
were
develop.
The
city
mandated
that
mature
trees
be
mainly
preserved
with
a
well-designed
fr3
development.
Many
of
these
trees
could
also
be
preserved.
V
All
City,
police
state
All,
City
policy
statements
stress
that
density
be
added
to
walkable
sections
of
the
city
close
to
mass
transit
and
amenities.
Are
these
policy
statements
just
lip
service
assuming
two
cars
per
residence
Ivory's
proposed
development
will
add
an
additional
48
cars
over
a
normal
fr3
development
based
on
EPA
data.
These
additional
cars
will
generate
an
incremental
221
tons
of
carbon
dioxide
annually.
V
Ivory's
design
with
narrow,
driveways
accessing
multiple
garages
requires
extensive
shuttling,
generating
noxious
startup
pollution
and
then
short
trips
up
and
down
this
hilly
location
are
the
most
polluting,
thereby
worsening
Salt
Lake
City's,
already
unhealthy
air.
We
have
a
housing
shortage,
but
we
also
have
a
severe
air
quality
problem.
We
cannot
solve
one
problem
at
the
expense
of
the
other.
Ivory's
proposal
will
negatively
impact
our
children's
future
by
worsening
Avenues
and
Salt
Lake
City
air
quality
and
accelerating
climate
change.
Thank
you.
W
My
name
is
Larry
Perkins
I'm,
the
treasurer
of
the
Capital
Park
homeowners
association.
When
the
Capitol
Park
neighborhood
was
developed
in
the
1990s
Salt
Lake
City
was
unwilling
to
pay
for
the
roads
that
service
our
community,
so
they
are
paid
for
and
maintained
by
the
meridian
and
Capital
Park
homeowners
associations.
W
These
roads
were
designed
to
meet
the
needs
of
this
low
volume
community
and
are
approved
by
Salt
Lake
City
on
that
basis
for
the
10-year
period,
between
2005
and
2015,
the
Capitol
Park
and
home
and
Meridian
homeowners
association's
petitioned
the
city
to
take
over
responsibility
for
these
private
roads.
The
city
refused
to
do
that
on
the
basis
that
these
streets
are
too
narrow
and
do
not
meet
City
standards.
Now,
Ivory
Homes
asks
you
to
disregard
the
zoning
that
has
guided
development
of
this
neighborhood
for
the
last
35
years.
W
They
want
you
to
allow
the
only
access
to
the
to
their
28
interior
residences
to
be
via
our
private
roads.
Now
Ivory
does
have
an
easement
that
grants
access
to
Capital
Park
Avenue.
That
easement
was
initially
granted
by
a
member
of
the
LDS
church
to
the
LDS
church.
When
that
church
owned
this
parcel
that
Ivory
now
owns
the
easement
was
intended
to
access
a
church
parking
lot
that
would
have
incurred
only
limited
to
traffic
on
Sundays,
not
for
a
high
density
residential
development.
W
Under
the
terms
of
this
easement
Ivory
also
pays
only
a
pittance
for
the
cost
of
maintaining
a
small
portion
of
Capital
Park
Avenue,
but
Ivory
Homes
displays
no
conscience
about
overburdening
the
narrow
private
street
that
is
sustained
not
by
themselves
not
by
the
city,
but
by
me,
and
my
neighbors.
Approving
this
zoning
would
be
grossly
unfair
to
those
of
us
who
bore
the
financial
responsibility
for
creating
and
now
maintain
these
residential
streets.
Please
deny
this
zoning
application.
X
Thank
you
good
evening.
My
name
is
lon.
Jenkins
I
would
direct
your
attention
to
page
six
of
the
handout
as
it
discusses
the
impact
of
city-owned
land,
which
I
will
be
addressing
when
the
city
designed
the
public
Street
system
for
the
Avenue.
Is
it
wisely
granted
itself
a
wide
right-of-way
for
all
roads
that
serve
this
community?
The
roads
do
not
consume
all
of
the
right-of-way
such
that
there
is
typically
around
22
feet
of
city-owned
land
on
each
side
of
the
Avenue
streets.
X
The
city-owned
land
is
not
maintained
by
this
city
and
has
been
integrated
into
the
individual
property
such
that
it
is
indistinguishable
from
them.
The
presence
of
this
substantial
city-owned
land
increases
front
and
Corner
side
yard
setbacks
to
an
average
of
around
42
feet
compared
to
the
mostly
10
to
15
feet
for
Ivory's
development,
which,
as
you
can
see,
is
a
massive
difference.
X
The
planning
division's
measure
of
density
ignores
this
very
substantial
impact
of
city-owned
land,
which
effectively
increases
the
size
of
a
block
by
28
percent,
decreasing
density
by
the
same
amount.
The
city-owned
land
helps
give
the
Avenues
a
green,
Pleasant
and
and
leafy
appeal,
despite
having
relatively
small
5000
square
foot
lot
sizes
in
the
SR
Zone
average
development
lacks
any
substantial
City
on
land,
decreasing.
The
density
by
only
one
percent
from
10.3
units
to
10.2
units
per
acre.
X
The
impact
of
City
on
land
is
highly
significant
and
should
be
taken
into
account
in
considering
the
radical
change
from
fr3
to
sr1
zoning,
significantly
reducing
lot
sizes
where
there
is
no
compensating
city
land
to
buffer
the
intensity
of
these
formidable
structures
that
Ivory
proposes
to
build
city-owned
and
is
particularly
important
in
the
Avenues,
as
the
Avenues
has
much
smaller
block
sizes
than
the
rest
of
the
city.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Y
Good
evening
I'm
Dirk
Van
clavern,
an
18-year
resident
of
the
Avenues
Ivory,
refers
to
the
houses
they
wish
to
build
on
this
property,
as
Cottages
generally
defined
as
small
one-story
houses.
These
homes
are
not
Cottages
shown
on
the
handout.
Are
the
elevations
and
specifications
for
the
multi-generational
units
that
make
up
11
of
the
14
units
with
adus
the
five
Custom
Homes
on
F
Street
will
likely
be
larger.
Still,
as
you
can
see,
these
units
are
large
two-story
houses
with
five
bedrooms
and
three-car
garages,
not
cottages.
Y
Y
The
Avenues
is
eclectic
with
a
wide
range
of
building
styles
in
home
sizes.
However,
a
approximately
74
of
the
SR
zoned
block
section
Avenues
homes
are
small
single-story
houses
with
an
average
grade
size
of
around
1100
square
feet
about
a
third
of
the
size
of
the
House's
Ivory
proposes
where
larger
homes
exist.
These
are
generally
on
larger
Lots.
Y
H
The
planning
division
highlighted
three
blocks
on
10th
Avenue
as
being
comparable
to
Ivory's
development
in
terms
of
density,
as
measured
by
number
of
units
per
acre
as
discussed
earlier.
This
metric
takes
no
account
of
the
very
significant
amount
of
city-owned
land
that
borders
all
of
these
homes.
Nor
does
this
metric
consider
building
density
or
the
relative
size
of
the
homes,
nor
does
it
consider
setbacks
shown
on
page
8
or
photographs
of
all
the
homes
on
10th
Avenue
from
two
of
the
blocks
considered
comparable,
based
only
on
the
number
of
units
per
acre.
H
Do
these
homes
look
anything
like
those
proposed
by
Ivory.
Do
they
seem
comparable
to
you?
These
homes
are
very
typical
of
most
homes
in
the
SR
block
section
of
the
Avenues
shown
as
the
above
ground
square
footage
for
each
Home
taken
from
the
Salt
Lake
County
Assessor
database,
the
above
ground
square.
Footage
of
these
homes
averages
1060
square
feet
compared
with
377
square
feet
for
Ivory's
multi-gen
units
three
times
the
size.
H
These
homes
are
also
spaced
an
average
of
26
feet
apart
compared
to
mostly
10
feet
for
ivory.
Also,
as
you
look
at
these
homes,
you
can
see
the
very
considerable
amount
of
front
set
back
to
the
road.
Much
of
what
you
see
here
is
city-owned
land,
which
is
indistinguishable
from
the
lot
front.
Setbacks
to
the
road
here
average
42
feet
compared
to
mostly
10
feet
for
Ivory's
units
with
adus,
squeezing
fr3
sized
homes
onto
sr1
size
Lots,
with
minimal
setback,
does
not
make
a
compatible
or
attractive
development.
Thank
you.
Z
Good
evening,
I
would
like
to
address
Ivory's
proposed
abusive
use
of
retaining
walls,
as
shown
on
page
nine
of
the
handout
throughout
the
Avenues.
Individual
Lots
follow
the
Contour
of
the
hillside,
with
sufficient
space
between
buildings
to
manage
grade
Transitions
and
prevent
erosion
and
landslides
and
where
retaining
walls
are
generally
small.
Ivory's
five
Custom
Homes
on
F
Street
follow
this
pattern,
but
the
rest
of
Ivory's
proposed
development
ignores
the
established
pattern.
Z
Instead,
Ivory
proposes
a
design
with
paired
homes
and
driveways
on
each
side
of
the
road
that
requires
bulldozing
the
hillside
into
large
flat
multi-building
Terraces
Ivory's
design,
obliterates
the
natural
terrain
and
requires
a
proliferation
of
massive
retaining
walls.
Ivory's
proposes
over
1600
linear
feet
of
retaining
wall
with
most
being
13
to
17
feet
high
and
requires
a
variance
from
city
code
requirements
for
the
retaining
walls
structure,
none
of
which
has
been
approved
by
the
city
engineers
Ivory's
proposed
retaining
walls
are
not
reflective
of
the
neighborhood,
do
not
create
any
open
space
and
create
safety
hazards.
Z
Why?
Because
Ivory
makes
more
money.
Fr3
zoning
exists
for
a
reason.
It
recognizes
the
need
to
limit
housing
density
in
highly
sloped
Foothill
areas,
to
leave
Rome
for
great
transitions,
to
protect
land,
from
erosion
and
other
hand
hazards,
and
to
protect
the
residents
and
surrounding
neighborhoods.
We
urge
you
to
deny
Ivory
zoning
rezoning
request.
Thank
you.
AA
Good
evening
I'm
Joel,
Deaton
and
I'm,
chair
of
the
North
Point
HOA
management
committee,
I'll,
be
speaking
to
Pages,
10
and
11
of
the
handout
North
Point
has
49
homes,
sharing
a
415
feet
boundary
with
Ivory's
property.
North
Point
has
won
egress
and
Ingress
via
North
Point
Drive,
which
runs
the
length
of
the
northern
boundary
of
the
ivory
property.
North
Point
Drive
is
currently
supported
by
a
short
retaining
wall
up
to
five
feet
in
height
with
six
feet
of
railings
between
columns,
as
shown
on
the
left
side
photograph
on
page
10..
AA
The
right
side
illustration
shows
what
major
sections
of
this
boundary
would
look
like
under
Ivory's
flawed
grading
scheme
in
order
to
create
flat
building
Terraces
and
maximize
density,
Ivory
excavates
13
feet
of
land
below
and
directly
in
front
of
North
Point's
current
boundary
wall.
The
combined
height
of
these
walls,
Plus
North,
Point's,
current
boundary
wall
and
railing
combination
is
a
staggering
24
feet.
This
massive
retaining
structure
not
built
to
city
code,
is
shown
on
page
11.
Not
only
provides
a
hideous
backdrop
to
the
entire
development,
but
threatens
North
Point's.
AA
Only
Ingress
and
egress,
such
large
large
retaining
walls
are
vulnerable
to
collapse,
induced
by
bad
workmanship,
mudslides
and
even
minor
seismic
activity.
You
may
remember
the
collapse
of
the
retaining
wall
at
Judge,
Memorial
Stadium.
This
is
not
so
very
different
to
the
wall
proposed
by
Ivory.
Northpoint
cannot
risk
its
only
Ingress
and
egress
being
compromised
to
satisfy
Ivory's
design,
fire
for
increased
density
and
property
and
profit.
AA
AB
Good
evening
my
name
is
Bob.
Kinney
I,
too,
am
going
to
reference
a
few
pages
in
the
books
you
have
in
front
of
you.
I
would
like
you
to
take
a
close
look
at
the
units
shown
on
pages
13
and
14..
Page
13
shows
units
on
the
Northern
boundary
under
the
current
fr3
zoning.
The
rear
setback
would
be
a
minimum
of
35
feet
and
under
sr1
zoning
it
would
be
around
25
feet.
Ivory
asks
for
a
rear
setback
as
low
as
10
feet
into
that
10
feet.
AB
They
have
to
accommodate
a
multi-step
retaining
wall
that
supports
not
a
flower
bed
but
North
Point
Drive,
which
is
north
Point's
only
Ingress
and
egress.
If
built
to
city
code,
these
retaining
walls
will
not
fit
into
the
allotted
space.
Hence
Ivory
asks
for
the
variants,
no
backyards,
no
green
space
and
cars
passing
at
bedroom
window
height
just
a
few
feet
from
these
units
on
the
Northern
boundary.
This
is
an
appallingly
poor
design.
AB
AB
Here
we
have
a
15
foot
high
wall
to
the
north
and
a
17
foot
high
wall
to
the
east
five
feet
from
the
house
in
question.
This
house
will
have
no
views
other
than
a
retaining
wall
from
the
first
or
second
floor
windows
and
spacing
so
tight
that
it
will
be
difficult
to
walk
even
single
file
around
that
building.
AB
K
AC
Good
evening,
I
am
Cindy
van
claverin,
a
retired
educator
living
at
North.
Point
I
would
like
to
speak
about
child
safety
in
relation
to
Ivory's
tall,
retaining
walls,
as
shown
on
page
15..
Mr
Kinney
has
just
shown
you
that
Lot
Number
Nine
is
surrounded
both
by
a
15
foot,
retaining
wall
to
the
north
and
a
17
foot
retaining
wall
to
the
east.
This
illustration
of
the
eastern
wall,
drawn
to
scale
shows
how
horrendously
dangerous
these
tall,
retaining
walls
are
to
Children
an
adult
will
see
a
safety
barrier.
A
child
sees
something
to
climb
on.
AC
AC
These
tall
retaining
walls
are
a
result
of
adding
too
many
large
buildings
too
much
building
density
to
this
highly
sloped
lot.
This
is
a
design
that
does
not
allow
space
for
gradual
or
stepped
grade
transitions.
Please,
members
of
the
city
council,
I
implore.
You
do
not
allow
Ivory
Homes
to
construct
this
development
in
a
manner
that
so
clearly
puts
our
children
at
risk.
If
you
do
not
protect
children
from
this
danger,
no
one
else
will
thank
you.
AD
AD
The
Salt
Lake
fire
department
has
published
a
guide
to
fire
adapted
communities
that
calls
upon
you
to
use
zoning
proactively
in
Wildland
Urban
interfaces
to
decrease
the
risk
of
damage
from
future
wildfires,
but
making
this
zoning
change
would
instead
actually
increase
the
risk
of
damage
from
future
wildfires
North
Point
has
only
one
entrance,
an
exit
via
F
Street
when
North
Point
residents
are
trying
to
escape
a
wildfire
parking
on
both
sides
of
F
Street
by
guests
of
the
added
residents.
This
is
owning.
AD
If
the
council,
like
the
Planning
Commission,
ignores
the
fire
department
guide
and
refuses
to
consider
the
impact
of
this
zoning
change
on
the
Wildfire
safety
of
North
Point,
it
will
be
committing
gross
negligence
and
due
to
a
waiver
of
government
immunity,
the
city
could
be
liable
for
Wildfire
damage
to
North.
Point.
AE
Good
evening
my
name
is
Sherry
Daly
city
ordinances,
state
that
fr3
zoning
is
intended
for
the
majority
of
Foothills
areas.
Fr3
is
already
the
most
dense
of
the
city's
three
Foothill
zoning
designations.
Fr3
zoning
exists
in
Foothill
locations,
specifically
to
protect
against
Natural
hazards,
such
as
landslides,
floods
and
erosion.
This
zoning
also
restricts
density
in
Wildland,
Urban
interface
areas
to
provide
a
buffer
zone
for
wildlife
and
to
put
fewer
people
at
risk
from
fast-moving
wildfires
shown
on
page
17
of
your
handout
is
the
southern
section
of
Ivory's
development.
AE
Ivory
builds
so
much
Hardscape
that
a
large
unsightly
drainage
basin
is
required
and
placed
alongside
Capital
Park
Avenue.
Other
speakers
have
shown
you
that
the
Holmes
Ivory
proposes
are
at
least
two
times
the
norm
for
sr1
size
Lots.
Not
surprisingly,
Hardscape
at
54
percent
is
also
two
times
the
norm
for
either
an
sr1
or
an
fr3
development
causing
drainage
problems.
AE
Ivory
disingenuously
calls
this
drainage
basin
a
private
park
and,
in
the
plan,
development
application
uses
the
existence
of
this
park
to
justify
further
reductions
in
setbacks
and
increase
density,
which
caused
the
drainage
problems.
In
the
first
place
you
see
drainage
basins.
Nowhere
else
in
residential
development
in
the
Avenues,
the
very
existence
of
this
drainage
basin,
provides
a
graphic
illustration
of
just
how
inappropriate
Ivory's
building
density
is
in
order
to
maximize
building
square
footage
and
profit.
Ivory
puts
fr3
sized
houses
onto
sr1
size
Lots.
AE
AF
We
are
told,
however,
that
Ivory
has
already
made
such
huge
concessions
that
they
cannot
budge
an
inch
from
their
current
proposal.
This
property
would
ordinarily
be
developed
with
a
maximum
of
11
single-family
homes.
Ivory's
first
application
was
for
45
dwellings
under
fbun-1
Zone,
a
zone
that
only
exists
in
the
track's
corridors.
AF
AF
AF
AG
I
am
Jan
McKinnon
and
we'll
speak
on
behalf
of
the
thousands
of
avenues
residents
who
have
identified
this
project
as
a
meritless
gift
of
politically
powerful
developer.
This
development
does
nothing
to
advance
key
City
goals
of
affordability,
walkability
and
sustainability.
The
design
concept
is
flawed
and
totally
alien
to
The
Avenues.
It
destroys
the
natural
terrain,
creating
multi-lot
Terraces,
requiring
tall
retaining
walls
that
Scar
the
hillside.
Ivory
would
even
like
to
build
the
retaining
walls
in
violation
of
the
city
code.
AG
Ivory
is
proposing
to
build
fr-3
size
houses
on
sr1
size
Lots,
something
that
most
every
neighborhood
would
oppose.
North
Point's
only
Ingress
and
egress
is
compromised
with
a
clear
cutting
of
all
the
trees.
There
will
be
a
huge
loss
of
wildlife
habitat.
This
location
is
a
Wildland
Urban
interface
area,
where
fire
authorities
have
called
for
proactive
land
use
planning
not
up.
Zoning
Ivory
is
asking
for
an
unprecedented
use
of
the
Adu
ordinance.
No
rezoning
is
required
of
80
use
are
the
objective.
AG
Is
it
common
for
residents
of
a
neighborhood
to
document
their
objections
with
thousands
of
written
submissions
to
planning
officials?
Does
the
approval
process
require
a
planning
division
to
do
more
than
simply
issue
a
report
with
which
summarily
dismisses
important
inputs
without
a
full
explanation?
Have
we
been
wasting
our
time
trying
to
work
within
a
process
that
invites
public
input
but
doesn't
feel
obligated
to
respect
it,
no
matter
how
well
prepared
how
well
documented
and
how
widely
shared
by
the
public?
AG
This
is
a
first
time
experiment
for
Ivory,
but
it
will
come
with
long-term,
daily
consequences
for
our
Avenues
neighborhood.
This
first
time,
experiment
is
poorly
conceived
and,
to
date,
has
been
inadequate,
inadequately
reviewed
by
the
city,
if
approved
as
a
proposed,
it
will
ultimately
fail
because
it
lacked
the
Curative
benefits
of
public
insights.
Please
vote
no
to
the
rezone.
Thank
you.
K
AH
Good
evening
my
name
is
Esther
snow
I'm,
a
resident
Poplar
Grove,
a
beautiful
Community
West
of
I-15.
My
comment
today
is
intended
to
shine
a
light
on
the
East-West
disparity
that
exists
in
our
city.
The
rezone
and
master
plan.
Amendment
application
by
Ivory
development
is
a
great
example
of
this
disparity.
Last
month,
the
city
council
voted
to
approve
the
rezoning
of
50
acres
in
acres
to
start
detosa
for
the
installation
of
a
homeless
Village
in
my
neighborhood.
AH
What
many
may
not
have
known
is
that
there
were
already
deeply
affordable
housing,
affordable
housing
and
affordable
land
for
developers
to
build
within
a
mile
of
Dosa
site.
Despite
all
the
pleading,
our
community
was
told
that
this
sort
of
housing
is
needed.
Heck
housing
in
general
is
needed
to
address
the
homeless
problem
and
lack
of
housing
in
Salt
Lake
City.
Additionally,
this
reason
was
followed
with
the
lease
agreement
between
the
city
and
Tulsa
for
one
dollars.
AH
One
dollar
per
year
today
we're
here
to
discuss
a
rezone
to
build
beautiful
cottages
at
market
rate,
with
the
caveat
that
some
of
the
structures
will
have
an
option
for
a
mother-in-law,
one
that
could
someday
provide
residual
income
to
those
opposing
this
rezone
I
understand
your
reason
for
wanting
to
protect
your
neighborhood
to
the
council.
I.
Ask
you
why
increasing
housing
is
only
acceptable
on
the
west
side
and
not
the
Avenues.
AH
The
argument
there
isn't
much
land
on
the
East
seems
Hollow
a
little
over
three
acres
has
been
acquired
by
Ivory
home
and
they
have
gone
over
and
Beyond
to
make
this
development
fit
incredibly
well
with
the
established
architecture
in
a
neighborhood.
If
the
opposition
is
against
rentals
I'd
point
out,
the
two
of
you
council
members
are
renters:
will
you
codify
economic
discrimination
discrimination
against
others
in
a
similar
situation?
It
appears
that
the
motivation
is
to
exclude
people
from
the
neighborhood.
AH
History
has
shown
the
power
and
wisdom
we
gain
by
connecting
with
those
outside
of
our
circles,
yet
we're
still
witnessing
redlining
and
other
forms
of
segregation
right
in
our
beloved
City
to
Ivory
Homes
and
any
other
developer.
Who
is
looking
to
put
in
this
much
effort
on
the
West
Side
know
that
you
have
allies
who
will
happily
receive
you.
Thank
you.
AI
Good
evening
my
name
is
Nigel
swaby
and
I've
been
working
as
a
consultant
on
this
project.
Since
the
beginning
of
2021.
I'd
like
to
address
two
issues
that
have
been
raised
regarding
the
public
benefit
of
this
project.
The
first
is
affordability,
we've
all
been
focusing
on
the
price
of
the
houses,
but
the
real
public
benefit
is
going
to
be
in
the
built-in
adus.
That's
what
we
need
to
focus
on
when
it
comes
to
affordability,
based
on
comparable
advertised
rents.
AI
We
think
these
units
will
rent
somewhere
between
15
to
1700
a
month
and
that's
something
that
one
of
the
other
commenters
already
made
that
makes
them
affordable
for
people
making
80
to
100
percent
of
the
area
median
income
in
Salt,
Lake
County.
It
also
places
additional
rental
units
in
a
neighborhood
where
there's
great
scarcity
unit
size
puts
a
natural
cap
on
the
rental
price,
so
there's
no
need
to
add
deed
restrictions
to
control
rents.
AI
There's
also
a
lot
of
discussion
about
walkability
and
there's
some
confusing
definitions
as
to
what
it
is
that
2018
development
standard
of
walkability
ties,
safety,
comfort
and
amenities
to
define
the
experience
as
it
stands.
Most
of
this
neighborhood
doesn't
meet
the
city
standard.
The
development
of
this
site,
with
the
proposed
amenities
will
make
it
safer
through
sidewalks,
comfortable
with
lighting
and
the
new
public
park.
The
park
that's
been
proposed
is
going
to
be
public
will
provide
an
amenity
the
entire
Community
can
enjoy.
AJ
Good
evening,
I'm
Dave,
Alderman
and
I'm
here,
representing
the
greater
Avenues
Community
Council,
positioned
to
maintain
the
current
fr-3
zoning
gacc
Prides
itself
on
being
an
active
and
informed
Community,
partly
due
to
our
monthly
newsletter
that
goes
to
every
address
in
our
area,
in
an
attempt
to
keep
everyone
informed
of
issues.
We
address
this
rezoning
issue
in
multiple
newsletters,
with
articles
from
planning
from
Ivory
and
from
those
opposed.
AJ
We
held
several
meetings
on
this
subject
with
input
from
all
parties
and
held
two
separate
votes
on
two
different
versions
of
the
plan,
because
we
could
not
meet
in
person
and
our
attendance
limits
on
Zoom
account
were
limited.
We
allowed
voting
by
email
in
addition
to
those
on
the
zoom
meeting.
The
first
vote
was
688
to
four
in
favor
of
the
current
zoning,
and
the
second
vote
was
one
thousand
two
hundred
forty
four
to
twenty
five
to
maintain
the
current
zoning.
AJ
As
you
heard
earlier,
there
was
also
a
separate
petition
that
was
generated
that
garnered
over
2
100
signatures
opposed.
Others
have
gone
into
many
of
the
different
issues
that
were
raised
so
I
won't
repeat
those,
but
I
do
want
to
express
one
concern.
The
master
plan
is
adopted
by
the
city,
go
through
an
extensive
process
with
input
from
the
communities
and
wide
public
participation
opportunities
when
I
was
first
elected
as
chair
of
the
gacc
I
asked
about
updating
the
mass
Avenues
master
plan
and
the
response
from
planning
at
that
time
was
it's
working.
AJ
So
why
redo
it
now?
The
Planning
Commission
has
stated.
The
master
plan
is
old,
therefore
Obsolete
and
should
be
ignored
to
arbitrarily
throw
out
these
plans
in
a
piecemeal
fashion
without
similar
Community
input
makes
a
mockery
of
the
entire
master
plan
process,
especially
when
the
community
has
registered
such
overwhelming
support
for
maintaining
the
existing
zoning
and
plans.
AJ
K
AK
I
live
a
couple
blocks
from
the
proposed
rezone
I
am
honestly
nervous
to
stand
up
here
in
front
of
my
community
and
say
that
I
support
this
reason.
We
have
a
city-wide
mandate
to
increase
our
housing
Supply.
We
are
not
talking
about
high
rises
or
even
town
homes.
Even
in
a
post-rezone
state
we
will
still
definitely
be
low
density
single-family
homes.
AK
Ultimately,
this
is
a
debate
over
a
handful
of
homes
in
a
privileged
Community.
It
pains
me
that
it
is
and
will
continue
to
take
up
your
time.
That
said,
I
would
love
to
see
an
affordable
housing
project
in
the
ABS
and
given
the
call
tonight
for
affordable
housing,
maybe
the
council
could
should
consider
a
higher
density,
affordable,
housing
community.
That
said
I
doubt
that
would
be
considered
acceptable
either.
AK
We
also
have
we've
heard
about
public
transportation
being
too
far
away
and
the
greenhouse
gas
emissions
would
increase.
Those
cars
exist
regardless
of
this
project
and
at
an
average
pace.
A
third
of
a
mile
to
a
bus
is
a
less
than
10
minute.
Walk
I
would
bet
I'm.
Actually,
one
of
the
only
people
in
this
room
who
has
taken
that
particular
bus
in
the
last
month
several
times,
I
can
personally
attest
that
the
walk
from
that
project
to
the
site
is
very
reasonable.
AK
AL
Okay
hi,
my
name
is
Sabrina
Nielsen
I'm,
here
to
speak
in
opposition
to
the
rezoning
I
think
that
one
thing
that
has
unified,
The
Avenues
from
The
Humble
homes
to
the
very
nice
beautiful
homes
has
always
been
the
quality
and
the
fact
that
they
were
meant
to
last
for
Generations.
This
was
always
something
that
we
know
about
in
The
Avenues.
AL
There
are
countless
people
who
have
commented
online
saying
that
they
were
prom
almost
one
thing
and
then
given
something
else
of
lesser
quality,
can
we
trust
that
this
is
not
what
these
people
will
do
to
us
in
this
case
they
have.
They
can't
be
trusted
to
build
quality
things
these.
They
make
these
particle
board
homes
that
I
have
seen
going
up
all
over
Utah
and
particle
board
will
not.
Last,
we
are
allowing
people
to
build
homes
that
in
the
Heat
and
the
cold
and
the
widely
changing
temperatures
will
pull
themselves
apart.
AL
They
will
not
last,
they
will
become
a
problem
and
an
eyesore,
and
we
should
care
about
that
and
make
sure
that
we
ensure
the
quality
of
the
builds
in
a
very
seismic
area,
and
I
would
like
to
say
that
the
rents
that
the
they
quote
as
being
in
the
1700
range
are
just
not
accurate.
My
sister
just
recently
this
week
moved
and
it
had
to
search
for
a
place
to
live
in
The
Avenues
and
was
very,
very,
very
hard-pressed
to
find
anything
affordable.
They
will
be
in
excess
of
two
thousand
dollars
or
2200.
K
AL
AN
AN
AN
Secondly,
I'd
like
to
thank
those
who
have
spoken
this
evening.
I've
been
impressed
very
much
with
the
time
and
effort
they've
taken
the
review
of
the
ordinances
and
the
ivory
production
production
and
I've
been
very
impressed
with
the
detail
and
explanation
of
each
and
every
portion
of
the
ivory
presentation.
AN
Lastly,
may
I
just
make
a
couple
of
comments
on
traffic
there's
a
lot
of
traffic
in
the
morning
and
in
the
afternoon,
from
the
University
and
University
Hospital,
it
comes
up
on
to
11th.
Avenue
comes
across
and
either
goes
down,
B
Street
and
to
State
Street
and
then
up
and
off
on
their
way
to
Bountiful,
or
they
go
around
the
memory,
Grove,
Road
and
they're
on
their
way
to
Bountiful.
AN
G
AO
One
of
the
tenets
of
medicine
is
above
all,
to
do
no
harm
and
I
realize
you're,
not
perhaps
Physicians,
but
you
certainly
could
do
a
lot
of
harm
by
approving
the
the
ivory
application,
particularly
in
the
in
the
area
of
safety.
I
think
that's
been
well
covered
today.
F
Street
is
narrow.
The
number
of
cars
along
that
street
will
be
increased
if
the
ivory
proposal
is
approved
during
the
winter.
It's
very
difficult
both
to
leave
North
Point
skate
and
to
get
approach.
North
Point
on
F
Street
is
slick.
AO
AO
I
I
think
we're
talking
about
a
very
problematic
situation.
As
far
as
safety
is
concerned,
I'd
like
to
make
a
couple
of
observations
of
a
general
sense,
I'm
amazed
at
the
community
reaction
to
this
proposal
in
my
experiences
so
unusual
to
have
so
many
people
opposed
to
something.
There
must
be
a
reason.
I
I
think
we've
received
some
superficial
thoughts
of
what
that
might
be,
but
the
reasoning
to
me
seems
very
well
thought
out
and
well
presented
in
a
in
a
very
civil
way.
AO
AM
My
name
is
Courtney:
I
live
four
blocks
from
the
property,
and
I
am
an
anesthesiologist
at
LDS
Hospital.
It's
eight
blocks
from
the
property.
Thank
you
for
taking
public
comment
on
this
existential
question
for
our
city.
Does
Salt
Lake
City
want
to
be
one
of
the
most
beautiful
cities
in
the
world,
a
stunning
Urban
Citadel
nestled
among
mountains,
Meadows
and
wetlands
in
1987,
Mayor
de
paulus,
and
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
answered
that
question
with
the
resounding
yes,
this
master
plan
and
Zoning
has
served
Salt,
Lake
City
well
for
35
years.
AM
It
is
the
reason
Salt
Lake
City
is
so
spectacular,
don't
throw
away
all
the
hard
work
and
determination
of
our
predecessors.
I
have
lived
and
recreated
in
the
Avenues
for
23
years
and
I've
been
in
my
home
on
J
Street
for
15
years.
Please
don't
throw
away
my
life's
work.
Some
of
my
most
precious
precious
moments
of
the
past
years
have
been
watching
the
red-tailed
hawk
pair
fledged
their
young
in
the
Ponderosa
at
675
F
Street
this
summer
the
land
owner
removed
the
nest.
AM
It
is
so
sad
the
hawk
family
flying
around
wondering
where
to
have
their
babies.
Next
year,
hopefully,
you
all
saw
ksl5.
Last
week
a
juvenile
moose
was
roaming
on
H,
Street
and
5th
Avenue.
The
Moose
had
to
be
tranquilized
and
removed
by
our
friends
at
dwr.
But
how
spectacular
that
we
live
in
this
low
density,
neighborhood
buffered
by
low
density
development,
and
it
is
so
inviting
to
our
animal
friends
a
mother
dear
and
her
two
young
have
been
wandering
upper
J
Street
this
summer.
AM
Every
week
they
look
healthier
because
our
neighborhood
values
Wildlife
by
maintaining
low
and
very
low
density
development
downtown
we
are
seeing
skyscrapers
Galore,
that's
great.
The
lower
Avenues
has
plenty
of
low
density
zoning
in
1987.
Our
Visionary
leaders
saw
that
a
buffer
of
very
low
density
zoning
was
required
to
maintain
the
character
of
the
community,
and
it
has
who
are
we
to
ignore
their
vision
of
this
beautiful
city
and
its
nurtured
willy-nilly,
because
some
big
time
developer
wants.
AP
AQ
Hey
I'm,
Hillary,
Jacobs
and
I
live
in
Salt
Lake
City.
The
reported
goal
of
the
zoning
change
requested
by
Ivory
Homes
for
the
Avenues
development
is
to
increase
population
density
and
thus
available
housing
in
the
Avenues.
This
is
a
laudable
goal.
Moreover,
as
an
avenuese
resident
I
would
Embrace
zoning
changes
that
will
bring
an
increasingly
economically
diverse
Community.
AQ
AR
Good
evening
neighbors
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Nathan
Peters,
my
wife
and
I
currently
live
downtown,
but
have
always
loved
the
Avenues
and
have
envisioned
living
in
the
Avenues
long
term.
Part
of
the
reason
is
the
passion
that
people
have
for
their
neighborhood,
which
many
of
you
have
demonstrated
this
this
evening.
I'm
here
to
voice
support
for
Capital,
Park
Cottages
and
to
those
among
the
opposition.
AR
I'd
ask
you
to
consider
that
there
are
people
and
families
who
would
love
to
have
a
home
like
those
that
Ivory
is
seeking
to
develop,
and
surely
those
people
and
families
will
be
great
neighbors
to
you.
Perhaps
people
like
me
and
my
family,
my
wife
and
I
recently
relocated
her
widowed
mother
from
Las
Vegas
to
Salt
Lake
in
a
home
with
an
80.
You
would
be
perfect
for
us
to
help
have
her
close
by
while
giving
her
independence.
AR
We
wouldn't
expect
to
charge
her
rent,
but
it
would
be
a
great
benefit
to
us
for
child
care
purposes,
as
we
recently
welcomed
our
first
son
to
the
world
in
October.
A
great
majority
of
the
arguments
of
those
opposed
stay
in
contrary
to
sensible
housing
needs
and
goals
outlined
in
growing
Salt,
Lake
and
five-year
housing
plans.
We
have
to
acknowledge
that
land
use
and
housing
needs
change
and
have
changed
since
the
Avenues
master
plan
was
implemented
more
than
30
years
ago,
and
certainly
if
only
9
to
11
homes
are
built
here.
AR
It's
incredibly
unlikely
that
me,
unlike
many
potential
homeowners,
could
afford
the
associated
market
rate
again.
I
would
ask
everyone
to
appreciate
that
you
will
gain
great
Neighbors
in
this
community,
potentially
like
me,
and
my
family,
who
love
this
area
as
much
as
you
do,
in
line
with
the
planning
commission's
recommendation.
I
would
urge
the
council
to
approve
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
AS
Good
evening,
thank
you
for
your
service
council
members.
My
name
is
Sarah
van
Voris
and
I
live
in
the
lower
Avenues
I
was
born
and
raised
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
I'm.
A
practicing
attorney
I
would
like
to
speak
to
the
legal
requirements
defined
in
the
purpose
statement
of
each
City's
zoning
ordinance,
Citywide
Master
plans
do
not
override
the
ordinances
which
Remain
the
governing
legal
document.
Ivory's
request
for
a
rezone
from
fr3
to
sr1
must
be
denied
if
the
city
is
going
to
comply
with
the
legal
requirements
stated
in
its
own
ordinances.
AS
The
purpose
statement
of
the
sr1
ordinance
states
that
quote
uses
are
intended
to
be
compatible
with
the
existing
scale
and
intensity
of
the
neighborhood.
The
ordinance
also
requires
that
new
development
must
quote
preserve
the
existing
character
of
the
neighborhood
The
house's
Ivory
proposes
are
of
a
size
and
character.
Far
more
typical
of
those
found
in
the
fr3
zone.
These
homes
are
at
least
two
times
the
square
footage
of
the
average
sr1
home
I
live
in
the
Lower
East
Avenues
on
P
Street
between
second
and
third
Avenue.
AS
AT
Thank
you,
council
members
for
having
me
again,
I
hope
to
be
brief.
I
just
wanted
to
take
an
opportunity,
because
last
time,
in
the
work
session,
several
council
members
had
some
points
that
they
brought
up
some
suggestions
and
some
metrics
and
key
considerations
that
I
wanted
to
touch
on.
I
won't
have
time
during
these
two
minutes,
but
I
did
submit
a
shorter
but
more
thorough
response
than
I'll
give.
AT
Today,
the
council
and
several
of
the
public
today
have
referenced
that
this
reasons
are
often
looked
at
in
terms
of
what
they
can
provide:
a
community
for
affordability,
sustainability,
walkability
and
historic
preservation,
while
none
of
these
or
Excuse
me,
while
some
of
these
may
not
be
completely
in
line
with
this
particular
project,
I'm
here
today,
to
tell
you
that
all
four
are
better
served
by
the
sr1a
Zone
than
they
would
be
by
the
fr3
quickly
in
terms
of
affordability
and
what
has
been
brought
up
much
by
the
public
is
that
the
fr3
would
allow
11
homes.
AT
The
sr18
would
allow
up
to
27
we're
providing
we're
saying
that
we
would
go
with
19..
The
fact
is,
these
homes
would
be
cheaper,
and
this
is
not
including
the
Adu
component,
which
is
our
major
affordability
component,
but
it's
not
related
exactly
to
the
rezone
in
terms
of
walkability.
This
is
the
one
where
it
really
doesn't
tie
in
However.
The
fact
is:
The
Avenues
are
walkable
they're
very
popular
with
Walkers
joggers,
Runners,
they're
close
to
City
Creek
Trails
walkability
is
not
just
flat.
AT
Walkability
can
mean
something
that's
comfortable
and
safe
to
walk
in
in
terms
of
historic
preservation.
Again,
this
does
not
include
historic
homes,
but,
as
it
has
been
brought
up
by
the
council,
there
are
historic
trees
here
in
either
case.
If
this
was
developed
under
fr3
or
sr1,
it
would
lead
to
the
removal
of
some
or
most
of
the
trees.
The
zoning
does
not
preserve
the
trees
right
now
and
then,
finally,
in
sustainability,
the
sustainable
the
sustainable
components
of
these
is
the
fact
that
compact
development
is
more
sustainable
than
the
large
lot
development.
AP
Thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
Drake
Tolliver
I
live
over
in
the
Avenues
and
I'm
a
Aerospace
instructional
engineer
for
Rolls-Royce
While.
Others
have
made
excellent
points
as
to
the
lack
of
value
for
affordability,
sustainability
and
increased
density.
I
just
want
to
speak
to
one
thing
that
significantly.
AP
Kind
of
shown
on
the
project
to
me
and
that
that
is
the
long-term
structural
requirements.
The
project,
specifically
with
the
retaining
walls
up
to
17
feet,
he's
retaining
walls
in
high
density.
Rural
residential
areas
with
significant
elevation
changes
have
significant
additional
requirements.
That
I
saw
not
addressed
in
the
Ivory
Homes
proposal.
AP
Without
additional
considerations
in
the
plan,
I've
seen
many
developers
build
these
types
of
of
structures
and
then
either
dissolve
or
remove
any
responsibility
for
maintenance
and
I.
Don't
want
to
see
that
happen
in
the
the
beautiful
environment
that
we
have
here
in
the
Avenues
and
therefore
I
endorse
declining
their
proposal.
Thank
you
very
much.
AU
Hello,
my
name
is
John
Kennedy
I'm,
a
retired
Third,
District,
Court,
judge
and
I
live
in
the
area
lived
there
about
15
years,
you've
heard
tonight,
A
Litany
of
reasons
why
this
should
not
be
approved.
AU
AV
Good
to
be
less
good
evening,
I'm
Janie
Mathis
I'm,
an
internal
medicine,
physician
I,
live
at
688,
F
Street,
which
is
right
across
the
street
from
Ivory's
development,
I
like
to
call
myself
a
nymphi
and
I
am
FY
instead
of
not
in
my
front
yard.
Instead
of
NIMBY
is
so
often
touted
by
Ivory
to
minimize
the
Avenues
resonance,
legitimate
input,
Ivory
ironic,
coming
from
Ivory
calling
us
numbies
who
makes
a
net
624
million
Revenue
in
2021..
We
are
simply
citizens
who
want
to
maintain
the
beauty
and
charm
of
our
neighborhood.
AV
We
bought
her
a
lot
in
2014
started
Construction
in
2015
through
numerous
city
regulations
and
permits
for
our
building.
We
were
required
to
have
a
completed
house
and
Landscape
architectural
plans
prior
to
any
construction,
we're
zoned
for
sr1a,
with
a
height
restriction
of
23
feet
and
45
foot
front
setback.
Our
lot
is
approximately
0.42
Acres.
We
requested
two
extra
feet
of
height
and
we
were
denied
by
the
city.
We
moved
two
feet
of
dirt
at
a
cost
of.
Sixty
thousand
Ivory
wants
sr1
zoning
to
have
28
foot
Heights.
Why
should
Ivory
be
granted
this
change?
AV
AV
What
reason
does
the
City,
Planning
and
the
city
council
have
to
approve
that
we
live
at
the
end
of
F
Street,
which
is
a
virtual
choke
point
for
any
kind
of
disaster
or
fire
evacuation
with
North
Point,
having
only
one
Ingress
in
egress
we
The
Avenues
residents
are
actually
The
Underdogs.
We
are
only
asking
that
Ivory
be
held
to
the
exactly
the
same
rules,
same
zoning,
same
regulations
that
we
were
held
to
protect
our
neighborhood
and
value
people
over
corporations
hold
Ivory
to
the
original
fr3
zoning.
AW
AW
This
whole
proposal
is
all
about
greed,
greed,
greed
from
Ivory
Homes
and
sounds
as
though,
if
it
gets
passed,
the
next
question
would
be
who's
taking
their
money
from
the
city
council.
Please
do
not
accept
this
proposal.
That's
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you.
A
Are
we
is
that,
is
that
the
end
of
the
comments,
sorry
I,
couldn't
hear.
Thank
you
for
those
who
made
comments.
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
F
Before
we
do
that,
Mr
chair
can
I
take
a
point
of
personal
privilege.
Go
ahead,
councilmember
Warden!
Thank
you.
So
this
property
is
on
a
slope
with
approximately
50
foot,
grade
change
from
the
highest
point
to
the
lowest
and
would
require
significant
retaining
walls
that
we've
heard
a
lot
about
the
most
concerning
points
separate,
the
only
Road
that's
in
and
out
of
the
existing
North
Point
Community,
a
retaining
role
higher
than
four
feet
with
Terraces
less
than
three
feet.
F
I
feel
would
be
unsafe
for
both
the
res
for
residents
on
both
sides.
Of
that
this
is
not
a
speculative
concern,
as
many
commenters
have
pointed
out,
just
a
few,
a
hundred
feet
from
this
exact
property.
On
this
exact
same
Road,
North,
Capitol
Boulevard,
the
retaining
walls
that
were
approved
by
Engineers
to
hold
the
back
of
the
backyards
of
several
single-family
homes
failed
and
that
Hazard
was
and
Hazard
created
by
that
was
that
these
backyards
Spilled
Out
onto
Capital
Park
Boulevard
in
this.
F
So
that
was
one
Hazard.
If
these
this
road
were
to
fail,
these
retaining
walls
were
to
fail.
It
would
be
a
road
sliding
into
someone's
home
or
a
brick
wall
sliding
into
someone's
home.
So
if
there
is
a
majority
of
on
the
council,
that
is
supportive
of
this
rezone
I
would
ask
that
we
at
least
consider
a
conditional
approval
that
would
require
all
retaining
walls
in
the
project
be
in
accordance
with
existing
city
code,
which
is
21A.
F
36.020,
B
and
I
would
ask
staff
to
to
work
on
that
in
between
now
and
the
next
meeting.
F
It
would
have
been
before
2017..
Okay.
Does
anyone
in
the
audience
know
exactly
when
that
happened?
The
capitol
Parker.
M
Yes,
so
could
we
could
we
say
that
could
could
we
I
mean
I'm,
not
an
engineer
and
I,
don't
think
as
far
as
I
know,
none
of
us
are
and
I
also
want
to
believe
that
the
engineers
behind
this
project-
those
tasks
to
make
this
happen
and
drawing
these
walls,
will
over
engineer
using
this
word
many
times
over
engineer
the
current
plans
to
make
sure
that
they
are
safe,
I'm
sure
that
there
is
some
liability
if
these
walls
were
to
to
collapse
into
houses.
M
So
why
I
feel
like
we
are
getting
in
the
middle
of
the
of
the
of
the
planet
in
a
way
that
potentially
I
think
what
you're
trying
to
do
is
making
these
walls
wider.
So
there
is
less
houses
into
this
project
and
I
think
when
we're
talking
about
density.
This
is
a
very
low
dense
project,
so
I
have
struggles
to
believe
that
the
I
have
troubles
to
believe
that
they
is.
This
is
about
safety,
but
more
about
making
less
houses
in
this
property,
and
all
density
is
happening.
M
F
Well,
I
I.
Don't
really
anticipate
like
arguing.
This
I
have
a
number
of
concerns
with
the
project,
the
one
just
one
of
which
is
safety
and
I'm
being
very
genuine
when
I
raise
that
and
I.
Don't
think
that
you
know
all
of
you
that
are
on
this
that
serve
with
me
on
the
council,
know
me
and
know,
what's
in
my
heart
and
how
I
operate
and
I
wouldn't
bring
this
up
if
I
didn't
have
it
as
a
genuine
concern?
Can.
D
E
F
F
D
C
Will
just
make
one
discussion
on
this
I
understand
the
concern
other
of
the
retaining
walls
and
I
I,
understand
and
I
hear
your
point
on
the
request
to
make
sure
that
the
retain
walls
and
the
safety
of
the
the
building
in
engineering
goes
by
the
building
codes
and
the
city
codes.
So
I
agree
I
understand
that
portion
of
it
just
want
to
make
that
point
clear.
A
A
Sorry,
we
don't
it's
not
a
venue
for
that
kind
of
a
conversation,
but
the
motion
was
just
to
close
the
public
hearing.
No
action
has
been
taken
that
takes
us
to
section
c
of
our.
Let
me
double
check
section
c
of
our
agenda.
These
are
potential
action
items.
The
first
one
is
item
C1,
an
alley
vacation
at
approximately
925
South
1200
West.
A
A
J
A
A
A
I
actually
have
one
just
quick
thing,
I'd
like
to
say:
I
am
not
supportive
of
this,
not
because
I
don't
support
the
creation
of
the
tower
I
think
that
that
that's
needed
and
that
we
need
to
do
that.
I.
Just
am
not
supportive
of
it
being
a
stealth
Tower.
This
guy's
a
tree
as
I've
mentioned
in
previous
comments,
so
but
I
am
supportive
of
the
tower
being
I,
don't
want
to
get
in
the
way
of
the
necessary
infrastructure.
So
that's.
Are
we
at
the
discussion
point
right
now.
C
On
the
motion,
I
just
want
to
say
that
this,
these
stealth
towers
are
on
say,
public
land
for
safety
use
properties.
Thank
you.
G
A
M
Mr
chair,
yes,
I
would
like
to
move
the
council
adopt
a
resolution
approving
the
airport
master
plan
with
the
following
addition
to
the
resolution
to
amend
the
master
plan.
The
master
plan
will
include
an
amendment
as
appendix
to
the
document
with
the
following.
The
council
is
adding
these
priority
points
to
the
plan
and
it's
ongoing.
M
Capital
implementation,
the
airport
and
its
Partners
will
focus
design
and
practice
on
reducing
carbon
footprint
resulting
from
all
single
occupancy
vehicle
traffic
to
the
airport
and
the
airport,
and
its
Partners
will
focus
on
strategies
to
meet
the
needs
of
customers
who
experience
the
long
walk
as
a
higher
barrier
uneven
hardship,
including
those
who
don't
qualify
normally
for
accessibility,
accommodations,
I,
further
move
that
the
council
adopt
the
following
legislative.
Intents
related
to
the
adoption
of
the
airport
master
plan.
M
The
council
recommends
advancing
the
first
priority
through
jointly
convening
one
or
more
multi-porner
Transit
focused
meetings
or
public
meeting
briefings
in
collaboration
with
the
administration
and
key
Department.
The
administration
identifies
likely
the
department
of
airports,
the
department
of
sustainability
and
the
transportation
division
of
the
Department
of
community
and
neighborhoods
collaborate.
M
Neighborhoods
collaboration
is
also
likely
to
include
outside
Partners,
like
UTA
Utah,
Transit,
Authority,
Utah,
Department
of
Transportation
Airlines
and
Airport.
Vendors
topics
will
include
but
no
limited
to
encouraging,
facilitating
or
incentivizing
enhanced
transit
or
share
right
access
for
employees
who
work
or
at
the
Salt
Lake
City
who
work
at
the
Salt
Lake
City,
International
Airport,
and
these
collaboration
efforts
will
identify
policy
opportunities
to
address
air
quality
issues
through
Transit
and
carbon
reduction
measures.
C
A
AX
I'm
sorry
could
I
ask
a
clarification,
were
you
was
the
motion
to
put
that
into
the
appendix
or
or
was
it
to
put
it
into
the
master
plan.
M
That's
a
good
question,
so
I
think
it
belongs
in
the
master
plan.
Those
are
legislative
intents,
the
second
part,
but.
AX
AX
A
Okay,
I
guess
we're
now
to
section
D,
which
is
the
comment
section.
The
first
item
is
d.
One
questions
from
the
mayor
to
the
city
council.
Thank
you
mayor
for
being
here,
oh
to
the
mayor
to
the
mayor
from
the
city
council.
Well,
you
can
ask
us
questions
too.
If
you'd
like
does
anyone
have
questions
for
the
mayor.
A
Thank
you
always
for
being
here
and
being
part
of
our
meetings.
D2
is
comments
to
the
city
council.
These
are
comments
to
the
city
council
from
the
public,
so
we
are
now
at
the
comments
portion
of
our
agenda
and
we'll
hear
comments
on
General
topics
and
items
not
scheduled
for
hearing
tonight.
I
went
over
the
council's
rules
of
the
Quorum
earlier,
and
those
rules
apply
here
as
well.
A
I'll
read
them
again:
we
are
accepting
comments
in
person
online
via
WebEx
Isaac
canado
on
our
staff
is
monitoring
the
meeting
and
we'll
message
attendees
as
needed.
Taylor
Hill
and
our
staff
will
call
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
based
on
the
order
of
registration
received
or
receive
comment
cards
once
we
open
public
comment.
A
Taylor
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time
so
that
people
have
some
notice
and
can
prepare
to
speak
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak
for
people
on
WebEx,
she
will
unmute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
if
you
are
here
in
person,
please
step
to
the
podium
and
make
your
comment
once
Taylor
announces
your
name
to
begin.
Please
say
your
name
in
your
two
minute:
timer
we'll
start
at
the
two
minute:
Mark
the
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
A
If
you're
unable
to
finish
your
comment,
please
send
the
rest
via
email,
mail
or
call
our
office.
Our
contact
information
is
available
in
the
meeting
room
and
in
the
WebEx
chat.
If
you
no
longer
wish
to
speak,
please
either
message
our
staff
or
when
staff
States
your
name.
Let
us
know
that
you're
just
here
to
listen
and
with
that
Taylor.
Will
you
please
begin
with
our
first
general
comment.
L
K
Q
AX
A
Okay,
we'll
wait
for
just
a
minute
Taylor,
we'll
move
on
to
the
I
item
G.
Well,
we
see
if
there's
a
technical
error,
Mr.
A
A
Oh
I,
okay,
no
more
discussion
I
will
start
with
councilmember
Fowler.
Yes,
Pui,
yes,
Wharton,
yes,
councilman
Dugan,
yes,
Peter
ashler,.
P
A
AX
A
Not
okay
and
then
do.
AD
A
C
G
AY
And
once
the
war
had
concluded,
each
section
of
the
park
was
dedicated
to
a
different
country.
The
first
to
be
complete
was
dedicated
to
the
United
States.
The
second
was
the
Japanese
section
of
the
garden.
All
in
all,
more
than
25
nations
are
represented
at
the
peace
Gardens
today,
spanning
every
corner
of
the
globe,
from
Asia
South
and
Central,
America
and
Africa
to
Europe
Canada
and
the
Middle
East.
In
all
points
in
between
today,.
AH
AY
International
Peace
Garden
stand
as
a
symbol
of
the
inviting
spirit
of
Salt
Lake
City,
a
beautiful
way
to
illustrate
that
all
immigrants
and
refugees
are
welcome
here,
regardless
of
national
origin.
It's
also
a
reminder
that
those
who
came
to
Salt,
Lake
City,
would
find
a
home
here
and
at
the
peace
Gardens
find
a
place
that
felt
like
home
too.
AZ
As
an
ordained
minister,
it
is
my
Ministry
to
help
people
with
their
spiritual
lives.
I
need
to
see
signs
of
trouble
like
Matthews
signs
like
sudden
mood,
swings,
hyperactivity
and
erratic
sleep
patterns.
Things
I
should
have
picked
up
on
and
one
of
the
most
important
people
in
my
life,
my
own
daughter.
Fortunately,
someone
did.