►
Description
To view agendas and paperwork go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Start
this
meeting
so
Welcome
to
the
RDA
meeting.
It
is
Tuesday
December,
13th
2022
and
to
keep
everyone
healthy
and
safe.
We
continue
to
host
hybrid
RDA
meetings.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you're
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
city
council's
agenda,
page
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
more
comfortable
We
Begin.
A
Excuse
me
I,
want
to
mention
our
rules
of
the
Quorum
guidelines
to
help
our
meeting
progress
in
an
orderly
civil
efficient
way.
We
want
to
give
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
the
Quran
begin
the
moment.
From
from
the
moment
you
arrive
in
person
or
into
our
virtual
meeting.
They
are
the
a
board,
respects
All
Points
of
View,
and
we
welcome
you
insights,
please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling,
profanity
or
making
racial
slurs
of
sin
or
defamatory
remarks.
A
If
you
violate
this
rule,
your
line
will
be
muted
or
you
will
be
asked
to
stop
if
you
feel
you
need
to
use
profanity
or
disrespectful
remarks
to
express
your
point,
you're
welcome
to
email,
board
members
or
or
call
our
comment
line.
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
WebEx
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
a
rules
of
the
Quorum.
If
your
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
make
contact
with
you
to
gather
that
information.
Excuse
me.
A
A
I,
don't
know
where
I
left,
but
I'm
gonna
start
here.
If
your
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
make
contact
with
you
to
gather
that
information
for
those
joining
in
WebEx.
Please
monitor
your
chat
in
case.
We
try
to
reach
you.
Scott
korpani
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions
with
your
commenting.
Registration
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks.
A
Please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
changes
to
your
registration,
Taylor,
Hill
and
her
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
We
will
call
names
of
people
joining
on
WebEx
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak.
Taylor
will
announce
your
name
and
for
people
in
WebEx.
She
will
then
mute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
for
people
in
person.
A
A
C
Sure
I
move
that
we
approved
the
minute
meeting,
minutes
of
October
11
2022
and
October
18th
2022.
A
Second,
I
have
a
motion
by
board
member
Dugan
seconded
by
board
member
father.
I
am
going
to
roll
call,
but
first
is
there
any
discussion
seeing
none
I'm
going
to
rock
College,
starting
with
board
member
Petro?
Yes,
Dugan.
C
A
Fowler,
yes,
is
Wharton
or
Pui
or
Mano
available
online
nope
I,
don't
think
they
are
no
okay,
so
and
I'm
a
yes.
So
that
passes
four
to
three
and
three
being
absent.
A
We're
moving
on
to
item
two
or
the
a
audit
review
and
approval
for
fiscal
year
2122
and
the
board
will
review
and
consider
approval
of
the
fiscal
year
2020
122
another
that
shows
the
agency's
financial
conditions
as
of
June
30th
of
2022,
so
at
the
table
will
have
Danny
Walls,
Mary,
Beth,
Thompson,
Michael
son
and
then
Paul
skin.
E
No
I
was
going
to
introduce
Mary
Beth,
but
first
I
also
wanted
before
we
have
Mike
speak
I
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Mike
Burns
who's,
our
financial
analyst
within
the
finance
department,
who's
heavily
involved
in
the
audit,
I'm
sure,
I'm,
stealing
Mary
Beth's
Thunder
on
this,
but
from
RDA
staff
standpoint.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
we
acknowledge
his
effort
and
thank
him
for
all
the
work
he
does.
D
So
I
think
we'll
turn
over
the
audit
to
Mike
Mickelson.
The
audit
has
been
completed
and
finalized
I
think
you
all
have
received.
The
audit
I
think
I,
send
it
Sunday,
Saturday
Sunday
I,
don't
know
they're
all
blur.
So
if
you
haven't,
let
me
know-
and
we
can
forward
that
to
you.
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Mike
Mickelson.
F
Thank
you,
Mary
Beth.
Can
you
hear
me
wonderful
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
here
today,
even
remotely
I
apologize
for
not
being
there
impersonate
my
wife
two
hours
to
get
her
work
today
and
our
daughter
had
surgery
a
week
ago,
so
I'm
at
home
with
her,
although
she's
doing
very
well
now,
as
Danny
said,
we
appreciate
working
with
Mike
and
the
staff
at
the
RDA
on
the
audit.
F
For
the
most
part,
it
went
very
well.
We
are
a
little
bit
late
and
most
of
that
deals
with
implementing
a
new
accounting
standard
this
year.
That
just
took
us
a
little
bit
of
extra
time
to
do,
and
so
that's
the
reason
we're
a
little
bit
late
in
presenting
this
year.
Those
it
looks
like
the
share
option
for
me
is
grayed
out.
So
if
you'll
turn
to
page
two
in
the
financial
statements,
that
is
our
Auditor's
report.
F
If
you
were
to
play
this
down
next
to
last
year's,
you
would
see
that
the
format
is
different,
so
I
want
to
draw
some
or
point
out
some
specific
reasons.
Why
and
and
reason
for
the
changes
to
the
auditor's
report.
So
the
audit
standards
that
we
follow
have
changed
and
required
now
that
when
we
begin
our
opinion,
we
start
with
the
opinion,
so
the
opinion
used
to
be
at
the
end
of
our
report,
but
now
it's
at
the
very
beginning.
So
our
opinion
is
there.
F
The
next
section
deals
with
the
basis
for
our
opinion
and
talks
about
the
auditing
standards
that
were
required
to
follow,
and
those
are
generally
accepted,
auditing
standards
that
are
established
by
the
American
Institute
of
certified
public
accountants.
F
Okay,
the
next
section
deals
with
the
responsibilities
of
management
management
is
responsible
for
the
financial
statements
and
their
fair
presentation,
as
well
as
the
underlying
accounting
who
are
significant
in
individual
trading
factions.
The
second
paragraph
under
that
section
is
New.
Management
has
always
had
the
responsibility
to
evaluate
an
entity's
ability
to
continuously
going
concern,
but
with
the
change
to
the
audit
standards
and
the
change
to
our
report,
that
is
written
here
in
the
report
under
Management's
responsibilities.
F
To
emphasize
that
management
has
that
responsibility
and
has
fulfilled
that
responsibility
going
to
page
three,
the
auditor's
responsibilities
for
the
audit
of
the
financial
statements.
This
section
has
changed
as
well,
so
there
are
several
bullet
points
of
things
that
were
responsible
to
do
as
well
as
that
preceding
paragraph.
F
F
So,
as
I
said
at
the
beginning,
even
though
we
enjoy
working
very
much
with
Mike
and
the
RDA
staff
and
get
along
well,
we
still
have
to
have
some
professional
skepticism
that
there
could
be
pressures
or
something
in
their
lives
that
might
cause
maybe
a
breakdown
in
internal
control
or
a
temptation
to
circumvent
internal
control,
or
something
like
that.
So
we're
not
saying
there
is.
We
just
always
have
to
maintain
that
skepticism
that
that
could
be
the
case
so
that
we're
maintaining
our
professional
responsibilities.
F
Well
then,
the
required
supplementary
information
repair
section
refers
to
the
mdna
and
the
pension
schedules
at
the
back.
We
don't
provide
a
full
opinion
on
those,
but
we
have
done
some
limited
procedures
on
those
who
say
that
they're
fairly
stated
in
relation
to
financial
statements
and
they
are
required
by
the
gasby
in
the
accounting
standards
for
financial
statements.
F
Finally,
on
the
last
page
page
four,
we
talked
about
the
supplementary
information,
which
is
three
schedules
at
the
back,
which
is
some
information
by
different
fund.
That
RDA
works
on
different
project
area
rather
rather
than
fun,
and
we
offer
an
inhalation
opinion
on
that.
So
we've
done
limited
procedures
on
those
schedules
to
tie
them
out
to
the
financial
statements
statements
and
make
sure
that
they
agree
to
the
financial
statements
as
a
whole.
F
F
F
F
The
first
page
of
that
refers
to
this
the
responsibility
we
have
under
auditing
standards
that
we've
already
discussed
so
I'd
like
to
go
to
page
two
on
that
later,
the
top
of
that
letter
is
new
this
year,
so
the
accounting
standard
I
refer
I'm.
Sorry,
the
auditing
standard
that
I
referred
to
that
changed
the
auditor's
report
to
this
letter.
F
The
audit
standard
now
wants
us
to
communicate
to
you
since
you're,
charged
with
governance,
what
we
determine
to
be
the
significant
risk
so
you're,
aware
of
that,
so
into
closing
these
two
items:
they're,
not
new
risk
and
they're,
not
bad
risks
and
they're,
not
a
red
flag
or
anything.
But
these
are
the
things
that
we
decided
were
risky
in
this
audit,
and
so
we
planned
our
procedures
accordingly
to
address
these
risks.
F
Our
audit
standards
require
that
we
always
consider
management
override
of
internal
controls
as
a
risk,
and
so
that's
presumptively
mandatory
by
the
audit
standards,
and
so
we
do
and
design
procedures
to
address
that
risk
of
override
of
management
risk
to
management
override
of
controls.
One
of
those
tests
that
we
always
do
is
journal
entry
testing,
because
that's
one
of
the
areas.
We
feel
that
management
has
an
opportunity
to
override
those
controls
for
the
RDA,
with
the
volume
of
notes,
receivable
and
loans
that
it's
made
to
people.
F
The
valuation
of
those
loans
is
another
area
of
risk,
and
so
with
the
materiality
of
the
loans,
the
nature
of
the
transactions
there,
as
well
as
the
subjectivity
to
valuing
those
the
collectibility
of
those.
We
spend
a
good
chunk
of
time
on
the
the
notes,
receivable,
and
so
those
are
the
two
areas
that
we've
determined
to
be
significant
risks
in
the
audit,
the
significant
accounting
policies
it
mentions
there.
The
adoption
of
the
new
lease
standard,
significant
accounting
estimates,
are
the
same
as
they've
been
in
the
past.
F
The
net
pension
liability
is
an
actuarily
determined
liability
that
gets
allocated
to
the
City
by
Utah,
Retirement
Systems,
and
then
the
city
allocates
a
portion
to
the
RDA
for
the
RDA
employees
at
the
top
of
Page
Three.
On
that
letter,
the
allowance
for
doubtful
accounts
for
the
Home
Trust
or
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
is
a
significant
estimate
as
well,
so
that
it's
Management's
estimate
of
what's
collectible
versus.
F
A
Thank
you,
Michael
board
members.
It
the
floor
is
open
for
questions.
If
you
have
any
I,
don't
see
many
people
raising
their
hand.
I
do
have
questions
Michael
on
the.
So
when
you
said,
management
override
is
a
risk.
What
does
who's
the
management
in
this
case
and
and
I
and
I,
unfortunately,
was
able
to
the
full
report.
By
did
you
provide
some
solutions
for
it
so
to
minimize
that
risk.
F
That's
always
a
risk
in
in
any
audit.
We
gain
an
understanding
and
document
the
understanding
of
controls
in
our
work
papers.
In
our
opinion,
the
controls
were
sufficient,
so
we
did
not
make
any
additional
recommendations,
but
we
do
do
perform
design
and
perform
procedures
to
make
sure
that
that
risk
is
mitigated.
As
I
mentioned,
the
journal
entry
testing
is
one
of
those
now
I
think
you
asked
for
an
example
or
who
what
who
might
be
overriding
those
controls,
so
that
could
come
in
a
number
of
different
forms.
F
Being
a
large
organization
with
the
multiple
departments
I
mean
we
could
look
at
the
management
of
the
RDA
and
I'm,
not
calling
anybody
out
or
suggesting
this
happened
at
all.
But,
for
example,
Danny
is
the
executive
director
could
have
a
a
bias
or
something
he
wanted
to
show
in
the
financial
statements
and
ask
Mike
to
account
for
something
a
certain
way,
and
that
would
be
an
example
of
override
of
internal
controls.
Okay,
but
I'm
not
saying
that
happened,
I'm
just
offering
an
example.
A
D
Board
member
of
Alda
Morris
I
think
what
they
do.
Is
they
test
for
this
dirt?
This
is
one
of
their
significant
tests.
That's
why
it
sits
on
your
board
letter
as
they
go
and
ensure
the
internal
controls
are
there
to
their
satisfaction
as
they
walk
through
the
audit.
It's
not
saying
that
we
have
that
in
place
where
Danny
could
override
the
financials,
because
he
couldn't
so
I'll
just
make
that
clear.
He
couldn't,
but
they
go
through
and
test
all
of
that
work
to
ensure
that
they
feel
comfortable.
D
That
management
cannot
go
in
and
override.
Okay,
I'll
I
mean
I'll.
Give
you
an
example
in
Prior
life.
Here's
a
really
good
example:
the
CFO
of
the
company
I,
worked
for
in
a
prior
life.
I've,
actually
patted
the
books
by
booking
a
receivable
number
that
did
not
directly
come
from
the
subsystem.
Receivable
number
that
would
have
been
an
audit
finding
under
Mike's
area
and
I
used
that
because
it
was
significant
to
me
when
I
found
out-
and
you
know
this
was
like
a
prior
life.
So
it
was.
D
You
know
100
years
ago
at
least,
but
that
would
have
been
a
finding
that
Mike
would
have
found
as
he
walked
through.
He
would
have
said.
Why
does
this
accounts
receivable
subsystem
not
directly
report
into
your
balance
sheet?
Why
are
you
just
putting
a
number
in
there
that
you
make
up?
They
did
it
so
that
their
books
would
look
better
and
so
that
it
appeared
that
they
were
collecting
their
receivables
in
actuality.
They
were
not.
A
You
for
the
thank
you
for
the
example.
I,
don't
have
any
other
questions,
I,
don't
see
any
more
questions,
so
we
appreciate
I
love
this.
Thank
you
for
all
the
work
that
you
do
and
there
are
the
A
and
keeping
the
books
as
they
are,
which
are
great.
Obviously,
so.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
You're.
A
All
right
we're
moving
on
to
this
is
a
short
meeting
by
the
way,
so
we're
going
to
go
to
item
number
three
and
it's
as
informational,
but
I
did
want
to
discuss
just
for
a
few
minutes.
We
don't
have
to
read
too
long
about.
H
H
C
A
Have
a
motion
by
remember,
father
and
seconded
by
board
member
Dugan
any
discussion
seeing
none
I'm
going
to
roll
call
this
Petro?
Yes
again,
yes,.
I
A
So
thank
you
for
that
audit
and
now
we're
going
to
item
number
three
and
it
was
I
was
just
would
like
to
you
know,
to
spend
a
little
time
to
talk
about
some
of
the
leadership
structures
that
we
have
as
RDA
and
Council,
and
the
council
chair
may
talk
about
this
at
another
time,
but
it
is
I've
been
involved
with
the
RDA
in
the
council
for
about
four
years
now
going
into
my
fifth
year
and
I
think
I've
kind
of
learned
some
things
that
that
I
would
would
like
to
bring
to
your
attention
guys
just
to
move
our
work
forward
and
also
Empower
council
members
that
might
not
be
in
leadership
positions
to
be
more
involved
in
certain
projects
or
project
areas
or
policy
changes.
A
A
Rda,
chair
Vice,
chair
and
Council,
chair,
RDA,
sorry,
Council,
chair
and
vice
chair
seems
to
be
a
little
bit
uninviting
to
some
of
us
that
might
not
be
in
leadership
positions,
but
want
to
be
more
involved
in
a
topic
that
we're
super
interested
in
or
a
topic
that
is
in
our
district,
and
we
would
like
to
be
definitely
more
involved
and
put
that
energy
that
maybe
other
council
members
are
not
really
interested
in
in
that
in
that
topic.
A
So
some
of
the
changes
that
are
proposed,
I
sent
I,
talked
to
I
think
to
all
of
you
about
it
last
week,
but
now
there's
an
official
memo
of
some
of
the
changes
that
I
would
like
to
discuss,
and
this
is
up
for
discussion.
We
can
pick
and
choose
we
can.
A
A
That
would
add
a
third
elected
official
to
a
chair
and
a
vice
chair
position.
So
it's
almost
like
a
alternate
Vice
chair
to
take
the
load
off,
maybe
to
the
RDA
to
the
chair
and
vice
chair,
a
lot
of
in
their
work
as
they
go
to
multiple,
multiple
meetings
and
it
I'm
sure
it's
it's
hard
to
to.
You
know
be
super
enthusiastic
about
every
topic
that
the
city
and
the
RDA
faces,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
the
proposals.
A
If
that's
something
that
you
guys
would
like
to
consider,
if
something
that
you
think
it
might
work
and
it
can
help
and
ease
the
work
of
the
chair
and
vice
chair
number
two,
it's
creative,
a
policy
that
allows
the
opportunity
to
you
know
for
us
elected
officials
to
Champion
a
project
Champion
lead.
A
However,
you
would
we
would
like
to
call
it,
but-
and
that
might
be
somebody
that's
not
in
a
leadership
position.
So
basically,
if
council
member
Mano
is
in
not
a
literary
position,
leadership
position
and
his
interest
is
in
the
district
five
project
that
yes,
passion
for
the
energy
and
the
desire
to
to
help
and
be
more
involved.
A
I
would
like
that
to
be
clear
that
he
might
be
able
to
do
that
without
thinking
that
he's
overstepping
the
chair
of
the
vice
chair
and
obviously
with
the
consent
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair,
that
he
might
be
able
to
I,
don't
know
work
on
the
State
Street
project
as
an
example.
A
So
those
are
the
things
that
I've
been
thinking
about
this
past
four
years,
that
it
hasn't
been
clear,
so
I
wanted
to
bring
it
to
our
attention
to
make
it
clear
in
the
record.
These
are
the
things
that
we
could
be
doing
from
now
on
so
I'm
opening
the
floor
to
this.
A
J
So
I,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
call
on
this
and
and
talking
about
this
and
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
it.
I
I
have
mixed
feelings
and
my
the
mixed
feeling
is
I
I.
Do
like
the
idea
of
having
cons
board
members
that
are
interested
in
a
specific
project
and
with
with
the
you
know,
quote
blessing
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair
to
to
be
some
sort
of
conduit
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
lose
attention.
J
Sometimes
it's
easy
to
lose
attention.
There's
so
many
things
coming
to
us
day
to
day
beyond
our
own
objectives
and
goals.
My
concern
with
adding
another
third
chair
is
that
we're
gonna
have
almost
a
simple
majority
in
almost
close
meetings,
meaning
that
you
know
a
very
close
group
of
people
could
also
have
the
power
almost
to
vote,
and
you
know
and
discuss
things
in
in
a
manner
that
might
not
be
transparent
to
the
public.
J
I
I
think
that
the
the
processes
it
is
right
now
is
transparent
enough.
We
all
have
a
chance
to
to
make
a
case
and
to
be
elected
to
be
elected
as
a
chair
as
a
vice
chair,
you
know,
council,
member
valdemora,
so
more
chair,
you've
been
two
years
as
a
chair
and
then
before
a
bike's
chair,
and
you
know
you
just
said
that
five
years.
J
My
concern
is
that
you
know
we
are
going
to
create
a
line
of
of
leadership
without
opening
it
up
for
everybody
to
to
have
a
chance
at
that
opportunity.
It
is
not
about
a
lack
of
leadership.
We
all
have
our
own
talents
and
our
own
expertise,
but
I
think
it
creates.
It
will
create
an
opportunity
for
some
Shenanigans
and
one
create
policies
for
the
council.
We
need
to
be
thinking
about
policies
that
are
not
above
us
because
I,
don't
believe
any
of
us
will
do
that,
but
maybe
a
future
Council.
J
You
know
when
we
may
not
be
there,
may
use
those
rules
against
against
against
the
citizens
of
Salt
Lake.
So
I
I
think
that
I
I
do
agree
that
I
think
having
a
structure
to
assign
specific
board
members
for
specific
projects.
I
think
that
is
fantastic,
I,
think
it's
great,
but
I.
Creating
a
second
by
share
means
that
almost
all
of
us
might
as
well.
J
All
of
us
we
buy
shares
right
like
what
what
is
the
purpose
of
having
a
chair
and
a
bike
chair
and
and
the
other
images
that
you
know
current
chairs
I'm.
You
know
eventually
future
current.
You
know
future
former
chairs
might
want
to
stay
in
some
sort
of
involved
in
leadership
but
by
by
jumping
into
a
second
a
second
Bachelor
position
which
I,
don't
think
is
appropriate,
but
so
those
are
my
thoughts.
Thank
you.
H
Chair
to
piggyback
a
little
bit
on
what
Alejandro
said,
if
we
were
to
do
this
in
RDA
to
create
a
third,
a
third
person
in
RDA
and
a
third
person
in
the
council,
let's
say
that's
six
people
in
leadership
and
one
not
if
we're
talking
about
exclusivity,
that
one
person
probably
feels
like
the
most
exclusive,
like
the
most
left
out
person
of
of
all
of
leadership
right
of
all
of
the
council
and
I
think
that
and
and
that
was
actually
something
councilmember
Wharton
or
board
member
Wharton
had
to
step
out.
H
But
that
was
something
he
brought
up
to
me
that
I
hadn't
thought
about,
and
so
I
wanted
to
voice.
That
of
really
if
this
is
making
sure
that
council
members
or
board
members
are
involved,
I
think
there
is
a
couple
of
things
that
we
can
do.
Besides
necessarily
changing
leadership
again,
I
agree
with
I
hadn't
thought
at
that
point
that
board
member
Pui
brought
up,
but
totally
agree
with.
H
That
I
mean
you
are
kind
of
looking
at
a
simple
majority
and
making
decisions
without
ever
telling
the
rest
of
the
council
members
that
you're
making
decisions-
and
that
could
happen
pretty
pretty
easily
actually
I.
Think
for
me,
is
some
of
the
things
because
board
chair
valdemoris.
H
You
did
call
and
I
appreciate
the
call
and
having
conversations
with
you-
and
it
did
make
me
think
about
like
what,
if
there's
a
different
structure
that
we
could
have,
and
one
of
the
things
that
board
member
Pooh
and
I
talked
about
is
because
I
was
in
your
same
same
shoes
right
I
did
chair
and
two
years
of
Vice
chair
of
the
RDA
is
maybe
having
the
chairperson
right
now,
it's
either
in
policy
or
written
somewhere
or
maybe
just
adopted
by,
because
we've
been
doing
it
I
don't
know.
H
The
answer
to
any
of
that
is
that
the
chairperson
is
two
years
and
maybe
the
to
create
more
of
this
sort
of
fluidity
and
inclusivity
and
still
having
some
consistency,
there's
a
lot
of
ease
there.
We
changed
the
the
RDA
board
chair
from
two
years
to
one
year.
H
That's
a
suggestion
that
that
council,
member
pooey
and
I
have
talked
about
I
I,
think
that
then
you're
not
you're
kind
of
allowing
other
people
to
be
involved
in
the
leadership
role
without
the
an
expectation
that
they
can't
because
of
that
two-year
rule
and
the
other
thing
I
I
agree
with
the
champion
thing
in
the
sense
that
I
feel
like
we
already
do.
A
lot
of
that
and
I
think
it's
a
lot
of
just
communication
amongst
ourselves
in
the
sense
that
I
don't
know.
H
If
you
all
remember
the
scooter
ordinance,
but
I
was
vice
chair
and
chair
when
all
of
that
was
happening
and
I,
one
thousand
percent
gave
it
to
you
and
Chris
affected
your
districts,
but
because
you
were
interested
in
it
and
I
I.
Think
that
that
that
is
how
at
least
this
body
and
the
body
before
when
I
was
on
a
different
Council,
we're
very
good
at
if
there
was
something
that
interests
it's
I
mean
I
can
take,
for
example,
Fairmont
Park,
that's
my
champion
and
that's
my
thing
and
I.
H
Don't
know
that
I
don't
know
that
I
want
to
feel
like
I
have
to
ask
permission
to
be
involved
in
that
I
I
get
it,
but
maybe
and
again
this
is
something
Chris
brought
up,
and
some
sort
of
acting
for
him
right
now,
since
he
had
to
step
out,
is
suggesting
a
policy
that
if
a
project
is
being
discussed,
meaning
in
a
small
group
between
chair
Vice,
chair,
whether
it
be
RDA
or
Council
that
that
third
meeting
spot
be
first
invited
to
the
or
first
given
the
invitation
to
the
the
council
member,
whose
District
the
project
is
in
and
and
that
they
are
getting
the
updates
at
the
same
time
as
the
chair
Vice
chair
again,
both
whether
it
be
RDA
or
Council
and
I
I
think
that's
a
good
policy.
H
If
it
may
be
something
that,
for
example,
there's
an
a
project
that
is
going
on
in
Sugarhouse,
and
it
turns
out
that
I
mean
this
I
can't
imagine,
but
that
I'm
not
that
interested.
But
maybe
Dan
is
because
we
are
very
close
right.
And
so
maybe
it's
right
on
21st
and
although
it's
in
my
district,
it
probably
affects
his
constituents.
A
little
bit
more,
but
if
it
comes
to
me
and
I'm
like
no,
this
is
more
Dan.
H
Then
it
goes
there
and
and
to
include
that
third
person
and
I
think
a
lot
of
what
you
bring
up
board.
Chair
beltamoros
is
communication
amongst
each
other,
and
that's
a
lot
of
these
things
and
it's
something
you
and
I
talked
about
when
we
talked
before
is
really.
How
are
we
all
communicating
with
each
other
how's
leadership?
Communicating
are
there
maybe
some
better
policies
regarding
communication
rather
than
structure.
I
I
appreciate
councilmember's
our
board
members,
Pulliam
Fowler's
comments.
I
think
that
I
I
do
think
we're
already
kind
of
letting
Council
or
board
members
and
council
members
Champion
issues
that
they
care
about.
I
I
I'm,
not
necessarily
opposed
to
making
it
an
official
thing,
but
I
I
worry
that
if
we
make
it
this
official,
these
are
the
sponsors
of
the
of
this
ordinance
that
when
something
that
is
really
maybe
popular
among
the
constituents
happens
that
we
that
there
would
be
competition
to
become
the
sponsor
for
that.
And
then
it
would
just
become
a
political
tool
that
you
can
say.
Oh
I,
sponsored
that
you
know
20
mile
per
speed,
limit
thing
or
whatever
and
and
that
becomes
like
a
feather
in
your
cap
and
I-
don't
want
our
ordinances.
I
I
want
our
policies
to
be
decided
because
they're
good
policies,
not
because
they're
political
tools
for
us,
as
as
elected
officials,
I
I,
remember
one
thing
that
I
think
that
board
chair
Fowler
tried
to
do
but
I
think
that
covid
kind
of
made
it
difficult
but
was
having
I
think.
But
you
wouldn't
know
that
it
was
good
I.
Think
you
invited
every
council
member
to
come
to
chair
Vice
chair
on
a
rotating
basis.
I
I,
don't
know
I
think
because
it
turned
into
virtual
and
everything
else
happened
that
year
it
was
difficult
to
maybe
do
that,
but
I
liked
the
idea,
and
maybe
it
doesn't
have
to
be
the
full
chair
of
ice
chair
meeting.
Maybe
it's
like
you
know
you
every
so.
Every
fifth
week
you
are
invited
to
the
second
half
of
chair
Vice
chair
and
you
can
sit
there
and
discuss
your
initiatives
with
the
chair
and
vice
chair
and
Leadership
Council
of
Staff
leadership
at
that
and
I
I.
I
Think
that
may
be
a
better
way
to
get
more
people
involved
than
consolidating
it
into
three
people
that
really
make
all
the
decisions
and
then
the
other
four
don't
know
what's
going
on
and
I,
don't
know
if
there's
maybe
Lessons
Learned
From
that
trial
and
whatnot
that
could
be
incorporated,
but
I
I
wonder
if
that's
not
a
A,
Better
Way
by
the
time
you
know
I
do
think
it's
notable
that
by
the
time
six
of
seven
of
us
are
in
leadership.
Is
it
really
leadership
anymore?.
A
Those
comments,
I
I,
was
just
thinking
the
opposite
in
terms
of
the
three
simple
majority
I
I
was
I
was
thinking
well,
a
third
one.
Would,
with
this
wrap
that
two-person
decision
and
then
going
for
it
like
it,
would
be
like
the
the
third
perspective
that
might
not.
You
know
that
there
was.
That
might
be
like
no,
even
though
both
of
you
are
saying,
this
is
the
way
we're
going,
or
this
is
the
project
that
we're
going
to
prioritize
after
one
cook
comes.
Who
can
say,
hey?
J
J
I
mean
no
I
I,
actually
really
like
the
the
suggestion
from
or
member
Mano,
because
that
does
equalize
the
issue
right.
If
we're
talking
about
breaking
some
of
that
click-ish
and
to
be
fair,
I
mean
I.
I
was
the
vice
chair
of
the
RDA
I'm.
J
Still
there
I
share
of
the
RDA
for
a
few
more
days,
but
you
know
I,
don't
think
board
member
of
Alder
Morris
and
I
created
a
cliquish
by
any
chance
of
the
imagination,
I,
but
I,
but
I
do
like
the
idea
of
of
democratizing
or
opening
the
doors
a
little
more
and
having
a
rotating
basis
invitation
from
each
console
board
member
representing
in
each
area,
and
that
will
actually
give
an
opportunity
to
voice
their
projects
and
concerns
and
keep
a
tap
on
them
on
things.
J
A
C
Yeah
we
mentioned
that
same
thing
today
at
the
chair
Vice,
chair
about
why
we
have
two
years
and
why
not
go
one
year
so
I
think
that
I'd,
like
follow-on
conversation
there,
but
I,
think
one
thing
that
we
we
kind
of
touched
on
quite
a
bit.
Here
is
the
communication
beside
the
house
and
then
I
would
touch
and
I
would
add
to
that
just
see
how
much
time
you
have
in
energy
to
participate
in
other
meetings,
so
opening
them
up
is
always
welcome
and
always
there.
C
We
just
need
to
make
sure
that
we
continuously
push
that
the
communication
side
of
the
house
and
that's
your
invitation
to
come
to
a
meeting
is
open,
especially
if
it's
in
your
District,
you
should
be
the
first
person
to
yeah
so
I
like
that.
Those
ideas.
K
I
think
there's
also
a
really
important
leadership.
Cultivation
aspect
to
this,
which
the
suggestion
that
never
took
off
could
help
ameliorate
I
know
for
me.
Having
just
completed
my
first
year.
It
has
been
drinking
from
the
fire
hose
and
to
get
that
low
pressure.
Experience
could
really
help
us
continue
a
pipeline
of
leadership
cultivation
in
the
council.
That
will
be
important
as
we
continue
to
transition
and
face
really
difficult
things
as
our
city
grows.
A
H
You
real
quick
I
just
want
to
point
out
I
think
we
also
like
every
chair
every
Vice
chair
for
either
either
side
does
their
leadership
the
way
they
do
it
and
and
there's
value
in
allowing
that
to
happen
as
well.
The
what
Darren
brought
up
is
that
I
I
personally,
the
leadership,
the
the
retreat
thing
I
was
like
man
I,
don't
really
want
to
do
a
retreat.
H
We
were
about
to
head
into,
we
didn't
know,
kovid
was
coming
coming,
but
it
wasn't
my
thing
and
so
but
I
thought
it
was
more
important
to
have
one-on-ones
with
each
of
of
our
council
members,
and
we
tried
to
do
that
as
best
we
could
so
I
think
we
also
have
to
give
Credence
to
the
the
people
that
are
in
Sharon
Vice.
Chair
is
Alejandro
brought
up.
You
know
we
all
we
all
run.
H
We
all
get
voted,
we
all
it's
between
the
seven
of
us
and
we
see
it
and
and-
and
you
know,
there's
good,
bads
and
uglies
to
all
of
us
that
ever
happen
to
be
in
leadership,
and
so
you
know
I
in
some
ways,
I
sort
of
always
looked
at
my
role,
whether
it
be
the
RDA
chair
or
the
council
chair
as
I
set
the
agenda,
that's
about
as
much
power
as
I
feel
that
I
have,
but
realizing
that
that
that
may
look
like
I'm
prioritizing
something
but
I
I
would
hope
that,
as
if
anyone
comes
into
leadership
that
there's
that
Open
Door
of
communication-
that
is
something
is
really
really
really
important
to
somebody
and
the
one
power
I
have
as
chair
is
to
set
the
agenda.
H
Then
it
can
be
like.
Oh,
this
has
been
really
important
and
it's
been
talked
about
a
lot
of
times
and
now
we
need
a
decision
or
whatever
it
may
be,
that
I
put
it
on
an
agenda
and
I'm
not
like
blocking
it
off
of
that
and
so
I
think.
It's
also
important
to
remember,
as
we
look
at
this
like
what
we
each
think
of
our
role
as
being
in
leadership
and
and
where
we
are
there
and
not
to
diminish
it,
diminish.
H
A
Thank
you
comments,
I
think
what
my
takeaways
are,
that
there
is
an
interest
in
doing
the
one-year
chair
instead
of
the
two-year
as
RDA.
The
second
point,
the
takeaway
for
me
is
oralisa
I
liked
was
whoever
is
a
chair
in
the
vice
chair,
will
and
there's
an
item
coming
up
a
transmittal
or
something
or
as
you
decide
or
as
we
decide
the
the
agendas
or
the
priorities
or
whatever.
That
is
that
the
The
District
representative
will
be
invited
first
to
at
least
inform
a.
A
This
is
just
different
informational,
empowering
those
that
might
be
interested
to
lead
it
and
help
the
chair
and
vice
chair
or
with
their
consent
and
and
collaboration
with
the
chair
and
by
sharing
that
informing
the
rest
of
the
the
board
and
then
the
third
thing
that
Danny
and
I
and
Kara
talked
about
yesterday
in
the
chair
and
and
the
chair
and
vice
chair
meeting
was
you
know
they
are
willing
and
they
offer
to
give
us
the
the
priority
list
from
the
administration
side
early
in
the
year
and
then
on
and
the
pressures
that
they
think
their
work
and
Danny.
A
Correct
me
if
I'm,
wrong
and
and
the
priority
list
and
then
informing
the
board
here
are
the
things
earlier
in
the
year
not
later
like
earlier,
and
then
that
way
a
board
member
that
is
interested
in
championing
one
of
those
priorities
have
the
chance
to
to
say:
hey
I
would
like
to
to
take
on
on
this,
and
does
that
make
sense.
So
if
Danny
I
don't
know
says,
Granary
district
is
something
that
we
are
going
to
work
on,
and
these
are
the
five
things
that
I
I
would
I
would
like
to
see.
A
A
H
My
hands
raised
really
high,
like
I,
was
in
school,
considering
this
is
the
last
meeting
of
the
year
and
the
first
meeting
of
the
year
well
at
least
not
for
RDA.
So
well,
yes,
but
the
first
RDA
meeting
of
the
year
is
when
we
choose
leadership
and
change
things.
If
do
we
need
a
straw
pull
of
some
sort
to
look
at
this
two-year
versus
one
year
thing:
leadership
thing
I'm,
using
all
my
big
words,
Katie.
L
Board
members,
the
term
of
the
chair
and
vice
chair
is
set
forth
in
the
rda's
bylaws
and
it
would
require
an
amendment
to
the
bylaws.
We
can
work
on
that
and
that
could
be
something
that
could
be
done
immediately
prior
to
voting
for
the
new
chair
and
vice
chair.
But
I
think
we
need
might
need
to
think
about
timing
on
that.
But
if
that's
your
direction,
we
could
is.
H
L
Because
the
chair
and
vice
chair
are
up
for
election
this
year,
they
could
be
elected
with
the
I
guess
the
acknowledgment
that
their
term
may
not
be
as
long
as
they
expected
when
they
ran
for
it.
I
think
you
all
would
would
want
to
put
something
in
the
record
about.
L
I
I
think
it
creates
a
my
one
caveat
is
I
think
it
creates
an
expectation
for
somebody
who
is
in
leadership
that
then
sort
of
the
their
role
gets
changed
part
way
through
their
term.
So
I
would
recommend
if
this
is
the
board's
intent
that
it
be
done
as
quickly
as
possible.
So
the
leadership
in
those
positions
know
the
time
that
they'll
be
serving.
H
M
Katie
I'm
just
thinking
of
a
situation
where,
if,
if
say
the
council
or
the
RDA
board
elected
someone
as
their
chair
and
then
in
July,
they
said.
Oh,
we
don't
like
that
chair
anymore.
We
want
to
remove
them,
I,
don't
think
we
have
a
mechanism
to
remove
them
so
which
is
fine,
but
what
I'm
wondering
is?
If
how
then
do
we
limit
them
to
one
year
instead
of
two,
when
the
office
they're
elected
to
is
a
two-year.
G
L
And
I
think
Allison
parks
and
I
can
do
some
creative
thinking
about
a
way
to
potentially
change
this
that
we've
we've
wanted
to
move
some
of
the
rda's
policies
and
rules
into
city
code
and
out
of
the
bylaws,
because
the
RDA,
it's
not
a
non-profit
entity.
That
really
requires
bylaws
in
the
typical
sense,
and
so
this
might
be
an
opportunity
for
us
to
think
creatively
about
that
and
make
that
change
with
your
consent.
Obviously,
prior
to
it.
H
From
sorry
Dan
from
maybe
a
direction
standpoint,
would
it
be
helpful
if
we
did
a
strap
well
to
see
where
everyone
is
on,
at
least
this,
without
making
any
changes.
But
then
we
know,
maybe
where
the
legal
team
needs
to
go
and
looking
at
it.
That.
H
C
A
Let
me
put
a
note
here
quote
on
it:
on
the
first
meeting
generation:
okay
I
have
a
question
maybe
to
Cindy
or
and
or
to
Katie,
about
this
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
call
it
policy
change
or
is
that
a
policy
that
we
agreed
upon
that
that
you
know
that
any
council
member
award
member
could
be
the
champion
of
a
project
if
the
chair
and
vice
chair
when
the
chair
and
vice
chair,
proposes
or
is
talking
about
an
agenda
or
a
project
for
that
year,
that
they
are
the
first
ones
to
be
notified
and
see
if
they
might
be
able
or
desire
to
be
part
of
it.
M
On
the
council
side,
we
would
put
it
in
your
policies.
I
don't
know,
Katie
would
have
to
address
whether
it
would
go
in
the
bylaws
of
RDA.
But
but
this
brings
me
to
something
like
what
Katie
was
suggesting
of
moving
some
things
from
bylaws
to
ordinance.
There
are
a
lot
of
things
where
the
RDA
does
it
one
way
and
then
there's
just
a
slightly
different
way
policy
wise
that
we
do
it
in
the
council
and
I.
M
Just
wonder
if
it
would
be
okay
with
you
if
we
could
work
with
the
mayor's
office
and
the
RDA
Administration
to
and
the
City
attorney
to
maybe
on
some
of
those
key
ones
that
get
confusing
a
lot
come
and
say
Here's.
M
What
the
council
policy
says:
here's
what
the
RDA
bylaws
say
do
they
do
you
like
one
more
than
the
other,
because
it
doesn't
matter
to
us
which
one
you
choose,
but
it
would
be
nice
if
we
could
get
a
little
more
uniformity
because
you're
the
same
people
and
we
have
a
struggle,
keeping
track
of
very
subtle
differences
in
the
policies.
A
And
I
know
we're,
like
you
know:
January
10th
is
our
next
RDA
meeting.
So
maybe
is
that
possible.
M
Too,
I
think
it's
probably
a
longer
term
project
that
we,
if
the
administration
agrees
to
work
with
us
on
that
we
could
come.
You
know,
maybe
in
batches
or
something
like
that,.
A
That's
for
changing
it
like
officially
to
see
if
we
have
to
qualify
it
or
not,
but
I'm,
hoping
that
this
meeting,
as
we
talked
in
the
open
and
discussed
that
it
is,
if
you
guys,
are
what
you
call
if
you
guys
are
comfortable
with
that.
It
is
something
that
we
can
move
forward
come
in
the
next
year.
So
for
those
that
are
not
in
leadership
and
they
are
interested
in
a
project
that
they
don't
feel
like
they're
overstepping,
that
they
kind
of
assume
that,
if
they're
interested
in
a
project
they
can
Champion
it.
M
Madam,
chair,
yeah,
sorry
Cindy
go
ahead,
no
I
just
was.
We
could
write
that
up
in
a
policy
format
like
we
would
do
on
the
council
side,
and
then
you
could
at
least
look
at
it
to
see.
If
it's
what
you
intended
and
from
there,
it
could
be
figured
out
what
to
do
next
with
it
yeah.
H
It
was
sort
of
thinking
of
it,
as
sort
of
as
as
How
We,
Do
legislative
intents
we're
kind
of
legislative
legislatively
intending
our
own
selves.
Yes,
it
made
all
those
words
up,
but
right
of
saying,
we've
talked
about
it.
It's
hard
when
we
are.
We
are
very
good
at
following
the
law
and
having
open
meetings
of
talking
about
all
these
different
things
that
don't
seem
to
fall
anywhere
in
agenda.
H
M
Maybe
I'm
just
admitting
guilty
feeling,
but
when
sometimes
when
council
members
come
to
us
as
staff,
we're
thinking
about
the
various
policies
where
the
chair
and
vice
chair
of
the
spokesperson
for
the
council
and
then
so,
if
another
member
say,
if
they're
meeting
with
a
group
to
negotiate
something,
and
then
another
council
member
sets
up
separate
meetings,
we're
always
sort
of
cautioning
saying
oh,
this
could
accidentally
end
up
to
be
negotiating
against
yourselves
and
that
sort
of
thing.
So
this
might
having
having
three
people
together.
M
Just
for
those
briefings
and
those
meetings
with
outside
groups
seems
like
it
would
work.
We
probably
would
need
some
help
with
you
guys
in
terms
of
the
other
policies
that
are
on
the
books
and
how
you
want
us
to
deal
with
those
so
that
we
don't
accidentally
be
come
a
even
bigger
barrier
than
we
are.
M
A
You
all
right
so
I
appreciate
everybody's
comments
and
discussion
I'm,
a
happy
that
we
were
able
to
talk
about
this
in
the
open
and
thank
you
for
the
time
and
thought
that
all
of
you
have
put
into
it.
We're
moving
on
to
item
number
four
of
our
agenda
and
that's
a
report
announcement
from
the
executive
director,
which
is
a
mayor
which
I
don't
see
her.
She
was
here
earlier
I'm
sure
she
had
something
else
to
do
and
then
to
item
number
five
report
and
announcements
from
RDA
staff,
so
Danny.
It's
all
yours
thank.
E
First,
we
would
like
to
welcome
three
new
staff
members
to
the
RDA,
unfortunately,
due
to
sickness-
and
we
turn
this
day
into
a
virtual
snow
day-
they're
not
here
in
person,
but
we
want
to
recognize
them
anyways,
because
you
will
start
seeing
them
as
part
of
what
I
think
has
been
started
to
be
called
the
RDA
flash
mob
behind
me.
So
project
manager,
McKenna
Holly,
has
come
to
us
from
Park
City's
planning
division
with
Municipal
nonprofit
experience.
E
We
have
project
coordinator,
Lucas
Goodrich,
who
has
been
with
the
Salt
Lake
chamber
since
2018,
most
recently
as
the
program
director
for
the
downtown
alliances,
cultural
Corps
program
in
the
blocks
and
then
project
coordinator,
Marcus,
Lee
who's
been
a
financial
analyst
with
the
Utah
Association
of
counties
and,
most
recently
with
Lewis
young
Robertson
Birmingham.
All
three
of
them
are
extremely
capable
and
started
hitting
the
ground
running.
E
E
Item
number
two
for
Staffing
is
to
recognize
director
talitha
day
and
the
maintenance
facility,
employee,
Daniel
Rivera,
with
the
Gallivan
Center,
both
of
them
this
week
hit
their
20
years
with
the
city,
so
I
certainly
wanted
to
recognize
them,
give
a
shout
out
and
tell
them
how
much
we
appreciate
their
effort
and
dedication,
especially
considering
Gallivan
turns
30
years
this
year.
They
certainly
have
been
there
for
a
long
portion
of
that
next
subject.
E
Project
areas
wanted
to
inform
the
the
board
that
the
County
council
tonight
will
hold
a
public
hearing
and
receive
comment
to
hopefully
vote
on
the
State
Street
project
area
approval.
Finally,
so
we're
thrilled
to
announce
that
we
don't
anticipate
any
issues
based
on
their
discussion
last
week
and
hope
to
have
that
approved
you
as
a
board
once
that
is
approved
by
the
county,
will
take
two
actions
on
that
number
one.
You
will
obviously
approve
that
interlocal
agreement
on
the
RDA
side
as
well,
and
then
you
will
also
approve
an
amended
budget
for
the
project
area.
E
You
technically
approved
a
draft
when
that
project
area
was
approved
and
then,
as
we
went
out
and
negotiated
the
interlocal
agreements
with
the
city,
the
county
and
the
school
district,
we
modified
those
budgets
to
reflect
what
their
actual
participation
is.
So
now
we
need
to
have
you
come
back
and
approve
just
that
final
formal
budget,
so
those
will
hopefully
come
to
you
in
the
next
month
or
so
for
approval.
E
But
we're
excited
to
have
that
project
area
approved,
excuse
me
and
completed,
and
then
the
developers
of
the
silos
on
Fifth
the
affordable
housing
project
there
have
notified
us
of
their
intent
to
release
the
2.36
million
in
funding
that
they
were
approved
as
part
of
last
year's
nofa
Unfortunately.
They
stated
that,
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
the
budget
for
the
project
no
longer
pencils
for
them,
it
makes
sense,
so
they
have
released
those
funds.
E
Rda
staff
will
include
those
funds
and
what
you
will
see
next
month
as
part
of
this
year's
notice
of
funding
availability,
and
that
will
be
added
to
the
total,
which
is
probably
good,
because
we
released
six
million
dollars
in
funds
got
18
million
in
requests.
So
a
little
extra
money
will
help
to
cut
that
up.
Yes,
please,
director.
I
H
E
A
H
And
do
we
still
have
sorry,
do
we
still
have
nofa
for
High
opportunity
areas?
Yes,.
A
E
That's
great,
thank
you,
appreciate
being
able
to
give
that
information
and
then
finally,
last
item,
we
have
delivered
hard
copies
of
our
2022
annual
report
to
all
of
you.
Hopefully
those
have
been
distributed.
E
We
do
a
much
more
limited
run
of
the
physical
copies,
but
we
do
have
a
digital
version
online.
So
if
there's
anyone
who
you
want
just
send
that
to
a
reference
to
that
is
available.
So
thank.
A
I
A
A
Is
later,
thank
you.
Can
we
do
this
during
the
break?
I'm?
Sorry,
thank
you.
Just
after
just
after
a
closed
session,
I
I
have
something
for
the
board
members
all
right.
So
I
have
motion
by
Council
by
board
member
Mano
seconded
by
board
member
Fowler
I'm
going
to
roll
call.
This
Petro,
yes,
Dugan.