►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Formal Meeting - 12/06/22
Description
To view agendas and paperwork go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
Welcome
to
tonight's
formal
meeting,
we
continue
to
host
hybrid
meetings
to
keep
everyone
healthy
and
safe.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
Please
continue
to
join
us
whenever,
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable
and
let's
please
stand
for
the
pledge
allegiance.
A
Thank
you
and
welcome
to
the
public
meeting
rules.
Thank
you
again
for
everyone
for
joining
us
tonight.
If
you'd
like
to
give
public
comments
today,
we
are
accepting
comments
in
person
and
online
on
WebEx.
If
you're
wearing
a
mask
feel
free
to
remove
it
once
you
get
called
to
address
the
council
from
the
podium.
A
Thank
you
again
for
participating
today
before
we
begin
moving
through
the
our
agenda,
I
want
to
mention
and
review
our
rules
of
decorm.
The
city
council
has
always
had
guidelines
in
place
to
ensure
our
meetings
are
orderly,
civil
and
efficient.
The
guidelines
help
everyone
feel
comfortable,
sharing
their
comments
without
feeling
intimidated.
To
achieve
this,
our
rules
at
the
Quorum
take
effect.
The
moment
you
arrive.
We
respect
all
points
of
view
and
welcome.
New
insights,
please
be
respectful,
while
sharing
your
comments
avoid
yelling
using
profanity,
making
racial
slurs
or
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
A
If
you
violate
this
rule,
we
will
mute
your
line
or
you
will
or
will
ask
you
to
stop.
If
you
feel
the
need
to
use
such
language
to
express
your
opinions,
you
make
email,
accounts
members
or
leave
a
message
on
our
24
hour.
Comment
line.
Additionally,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
WebEx
registration
process
to
limit
disruptions.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
at
the
Quorum.
If
your
name
doesn't
apply
comply,
our
staff
will,
let
you
know,
and
for
the
for
those
joining
on
WebEx.
A
Isaac
Canada
from
our
staff
will
moderate
our
WebEx
and
we'll
message
you
with
any
questions
about
your
registration
staff
is
handling
many
tasks.
So
please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
information
updates.
If
you'd
like
to
send
a
comment,
please
feel
free
to
mail
us
a
PO,
Box
145,
476,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
84114
emailing,
us
at
Council
dot
comments
at
socgov.com
or
call
our
number
801-535-7654.
A
A
C
B
D
A
To
he
may
not
be
a
connected
at
this
time,
so
that
motion
passes
five
to
zero,
with
council
member
mono
and
Pietro
absent
we're
moving
on
to
9
B,
which
is
our
public
hearings.
We
will
not
begin
our
public
hearing
process.
Taylor,
Hill
and
her
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
We
will
call
names
on
of
people
on
WebEx
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards
once
we
open
the
public
comments.
A
Taylor
will
announce
three
names
at
a
time,
so
people
can
have
some
notice
to
prepare
to
speak
when
it's
your
turn
to
speak.
Tell
it
announce
your
name.
If
you
are
on
WebEx,
your
line
will
be
unmuted
and
you
may
begin
if
you
are
here
in
person,
please
step
up
to
the
podium
to
make
your
comments
once
Taylor
announces
your
name
to
begin
state,
your
name
and
your
two
minute
timer
will
start
the
two
minute
Mark.
A
The
staff
will
announce
time
if
you're
unable
to
finish
your
comments,
please
send
your
rest
of
it
via
email,
mail
or
call
our
office.
You
no
longer
wish
to
speak.
Please
either
message
our
staff
or
when
staff
States
your
name
just
let
us
know
that
you're
here
to
listen
and
our
first
public
hearing
item
B1
is
regards
of
the
rezone
master
plan
Amendment
and
Valley
vacation
at
1550,
South,
Main,
Street,
assemblage.
D
Thank
you
Mr
chair.
This
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
zoning
map
for
properties
of
15,
18,
15,
30,
1540
and
1645
South
Main
Street,
as
well
as
1515
South
Richard
street,
from
the
current
Corridor
commercial
district
and
r15000,
which
is
single
family
residential
designations
to
fbun2
or
form-based
Urban
neighborhood
District,
a
request
to
vacate
a
city-owned
alley
adjacent
to
the
properties
is
also
included,
should
be
noted.
D
C
E
Hello,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
we
can
hear
you.
Okay,
perfect,
yeah
I
was
having
some
issues
earlier.
Yeah
I
just
have
some
general
support
for
rezoning
in
a
way
that
allows
for
more
density
for
more
housing,
for
mixed
use.
That
will
maximize
the
potential
of
the
city,
and
so
is
someone
interested
in
the
city
growing
to
its
full
potential
over
time.
E
Don't
know
that
this
particular
issue
is
all
that
controversial
relative
to
other
rezoning
proposals,
but
I
feel
like
to
too
often
we
only
hear
the
negative
voices
and
not
people
who
just
generally
want
to
see
more
Economic,
Opportunity,
more
opportunity
for
homes
and
more
opportunity
for
us
to
take
advantage
of
the
you
know,
limited
property
that
we
have
just
physically
speaking.
So
thank
you
very
much.
F
Hey
thanks
so
much
so
I'm
a
neighbor
I
live
just
up
the
street
from
this
project
and
I.
Second,
a
lot
of
what
the
previous
speaker
was
saying.
I,
too,
am
in
support
of
affordable
housing.
Housing
for
our
city
I
do
differ,
however,
I'm
a
little
bit
worried
about
or
I'm
very
concerned
about
this
project
based
on
the
size
and
where
it's
located.
F
If
this
rezone
does
go
forth,
I
really
think
that
we
need
to
formalize
real
guidelines
around
having
green
space
and
then
having
specific
guidelines
tied
to
the
project
around
the
activated
ground
floor,
commercial
space.
That
I
think
that
the
current
developers
have
said
they're
going
to
do,
but
there's
no
binding
agreement
that
they're
actually
going
to
do
that.
That's
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you
so
much.
G
The
building
in
this
area
should
be
considered
for
redevelopment
No
No
taller
than
three
stories
with
front
doors
on
Main,
Street,
Stoops
and
yards
I
want
to
focus
on
the
last
comment:
Stoops
and
yards.
If
you
look
at
the
various
properties
on
the
west
side
of
Main
Street
from
1300
to
1700
South,
there
are
35
different
Parcels.
None
of
these
35
are
built
up
to
the
sidewalk
except
the
old
storefront
s,
1700
South
in
Maine.
G
All
recent
new
development
in
the
area
such
as
the
15
main
Townhomes
at
1499
South,
Main
Street,
and
the
Moda
on
Main
Townhomes
1570
South,
have
they've
all
complied
with
the
height
size
scale
and
setbacks
as
commercial
Corridor.
Zoning
required
they're
also
compatible
with
the
station
area
plan.
We've
appreciated.
G
H
Hi
there
I'm
Cindy
Cromer
I,
want
to
bring
two
issues
to
your
attention.
The
first
is
that
you
cannot
use
density
bonuses
to
promote
housing
for
lower
income
residents.
If
you
give
away
density
in
the
form
of
higher
density,
zoning,
the
filing
fee
for
a
rezone
is
less
than
trivial
compared
to
the
increased
value
of
the
land.
H
I
believe
there
are
two
issues
with
public
process.
In
this
request.
First,
a
substantial
number
of
residents
showed
up
at
the
Planning
Commission
hearing.
They
were
well
informed
and
articulate
their
input
was
relevant
both
to
a
zoning
change
and
then,
at
that
time
a
master
plan
Amendment
their
comments
were
ignored
and
the
commission
also
ignored
the
residents
near
the
rezoning
and
master
plan
Amendment
at
865
South
500
East.
Recently
it
is
not
Equitable
when
you're
talking
about
the
largest
investment
a
family
can
make
on
their
home
to
make
these
changes
without
considering
their
input.
H
This
afternoon,
I
sent
you
a
memo
regarding
development
agreements
and
a
need
to
address
potential
development
agreements
at
the
beginning
of
the
public
process.
I
was
admittedly
stunned
to
learn
that
during
the
pandemic,
the
state
legislature
made
changes
to
ludma,
which
are
friendly
to
a
better
public
process
from
planning
does
raise
the
possibility
of
a
development
agreement.
H
Without
any
specifics,
you
may
consider
a
development
agreement,
as
you
have
so
often
in
the
past,
one
is
certainly
necessary
with
the
fbu
in
two,
when
the
surrounding
zoning
is
not
form
based
and
has
been
in
place
for
27
years.
There
is
no
question
that
the
fbu2
is
a
blank
check
for
developers.
There
is
no
question
that
a
development
agreement
could
make
this
project
less
bad,
but
the
process
hasn't
included
one,
and
the
argument
in
the
memo
is
that
you
cannot
add
one
now
without
sending
the
proposed
development
agreement
back
through
the
process.
H
I
Hello,
I'm
sash
Combs
I'm,
a
resident
kind
of
a
stone's
throw
away
in
front
of
the
City
Utilities
building.
That's
where
I
live
on
1531
South,
so
I'd
like
to
say
that
first
I
am
excited
to
hear
about
the
development
of
this
site.
I
support
the
the
alley
vacation
and
generally
the
rezoning
of
the
residential
lot
to
match
the
other
and
the
consolidation.
I
What
I
do
oppose,
however,
is
this
rezone
to
fbun2
I,
don't
think
it's
necessary,
and
my
first
issue
is
just
the
lack
of
the
the
requirement
for
setback
in
the
working
session.
A
couple
weeks
ago,
the
petitioner
used
the
term
Urban
wall
to
describe
this
rezoning
or
their
vision
for
this
site.
They've
also
showed
some
concepts
of
this.
This
Urban
wall
frankly
I
just
don't
think
that
remotely
fits
in
with
the
fabric
of
the
neighborhood
and
it's
absolutely
incompatible
with
the
recently
adopted
station
area
plan.
I
So
I
challenge
the
council
to
think
about
this
Urban
wall
or
or
in
that
setting
or
think
about
it
at
Ninth
and
9th
or
in
in
Sugarhouse.
Does
the
urban
wall
fit?
Is
it
make
it
walkable,
I
I,
don't
think
it
does
I
really
don't
think
it
does,
particularly
on
Kensington
or
Andrew
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
it's.
Those
two
streets
are
right
there
on
the
North
aspect
of
that.
I
The
second
point
is
just
the
Precedence.
This
sets.
This
is
the
first
kind
of
petition
post
ballpark
stationary
plan,
and
you
know
it's
contrary
to
that
plan
and
I.
Don't
understand
like
how
we
can
move
forward
with
that
if
the
CC
is
outdated.
Let's
update
that
we
got
to
get
this
right.
I,
don't
believe
these
guys
have
met
the
threshold
to
rezone
this
to
this
fbun2
they
can
do
what
they
need
to
do
in
the
commercial.
Corridor
is
wrong.
Let's
fix
that
thanks.
C
J
Hello,
council
members,
I'm
Amy,
J,
Hawkins
I'm,
chair
of
the
ballpark
Community
Council
I,
also
served
as
a
member
of
the
ballpark
station
area
plan,
bless
you
steering
committee
I'd
like
to
build
off
of
what
my
neighbors
have
said.
We
are
really
excited
about
the
possibility
of
Redevelopment
in
this
space,
but
I
want
to
reiterate
what
Jeff
and
the
ballpark
stationary
plan
have
to
say
about
the
value
of
Stoops
and
yards.
J
Oh,
my
gosh,
why
do
we
care
about
setbacks
because
of
how
little
green
space
we
have
in
ballpark,
except
for
the
ballpark
itself,
which
is
great,
but
you
have
to
pay
to
get
into
it.
Council
members
you've
been
briefed
on
drafts
of
Salt
Lake
City's
Urban
Forest
action
plan
data
in
that
plan
show
that
ballpark
consistently
ranks
in
the
city's
category.
With
the
lowest
percentage
of
tree
canopy
coverage
and
correspondingly
the
highest
surface
temperatures,
we
need
some
place
to
put
the
trees
to
put
up
an
equitable
tree
canopy.
We
need
some
setbacks.
J
We
also
know
that,
according
to
the
public
lands
needs
assessment,
ballpark
has
identified
as
a
high
need
area
with
2.8
Park
acres
per
thousand
people
compared
to
the
Citywide
level
of
3.5
Park
Acres.
Any
further
reduction
in
our
neighborhood
screen
space
would
not
serve
the
public
interest
front
and
side
yards
are
meaningful
parts
of
Green
Space.
Why
would
we
set
ourselves
up
by
eliminating
any
opportunities
to
put
in
trees
and
vegetation
and
potentially
reduce
ballpark's
Urban
heat
island
effect
without
being
contingent
on
a
site
plan
or
a
development
agreement?
J
K
Hi
everyone.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I'm
also
a
resident
in
the
ballpark
neighborhood
I
live
directly
across
from
the
proposed
site
and
I
would
just
like
to
follow
up
with
what
Amy
was
just
talking
about
with
some
research.
That
was
in
a
letter
that
we
submitted
to
the
Planning
Commission
but
I'm,
not
quite
sure
it
got
forward
to
the
city
council.
K
The
study
concludes
that
front
yards
act
as
important
semi-private
public
spaces,
where
people
enjoy
social
interactions,
identity
creation
and
the
development
of
a
sense
of
community.
Given
the
high
level
of
render
occupied
properties
in
the
ballpark
neighborhood
85
percent,
compared
to
15
percent
of
owner-occupied
properties
and
new
residents
moving
in
there
is
a
high
degree
of
Resident
turnover
forming
long-lasting
social
bonds
between
neighbors
can
be
challenging.
K
Providing
opportunities
to
develop
a
sense
of
community
is
very
important
to
invested
neighborhood
residents
and
no
way
do
we
want
to
endorse
reducing
the
physical
space
in
the
ballpark
neighborhood,
where
those
interactions
can
happen.
Thank
you
very
much,
and
I
am
also
so
in
support
of
development
of
this
property.
Thanks.
L
Hi,
my
name
is
Dave
eltus
just
had
a
couple
of
thoughts
on
this.
One
is
you're
doing
another
alley:
vacation
and
there's
no
Ally
master
plan
for
Salt,
Lake
City,
and
yet
you
keep
doing
this
over
and
over.
The
council
keeps
approving
these
sorts
of
things
and
the
Administration
has
no
plan.
They
had
some
sort
of
public
thing
a
year
or
so
ago,
with
making
a
big
deal
about
one
alley
and
activating
that
alley.
L
But
allies
are
really
important
to
allow
people
to
ride
their
bikes
or
walk
where
they're
not
on
streets
full
of
cars
and
so
you're
looking
at
vacating.
Yet
another
city-owned
alley
here
and
with
no
plan
no
forethought,
no,
no
way,
no
understanding
as
to
how
this
fits
in
the
bigger
picture,
and
this
particular
alley
it
may
be
worth
vacating.
It
may
not
be,
but
you
have
no
plan
and
no
criteria
for
why
you're
vacating
that
and
then
the
second
things
are
with
Main
Street
and
Kensington.
L
Main
Street
was
just
redone
with
a
road
diet,
new
bike
lanes
and
is
going
to
get
redone
again
in
the
not
too
distant
future.
When
the
city
has
enough
money
to
tear
up
the
street
and
put
new
sewers
in
and
such,
and
so
if
you're
talking
about
building
with
no
setbacks,
that's
going
to
hurt
the
walkability
and
bikeability
of
the
corridor
same
goes
for
the
Kensington
Street,
which
is
a
neighborhood
byway,
which
is
getting
redone
as
a
neighborhood
byway
and
this
borders
on
Kensington.
L
K
A
B
A
A
B
A
M
B
A
A
A
Taylor
Hill
honor
staff
can
we'll
call
out
names
for
those
who
wish
to
comment
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards,
and
once
we
open
public
comments,
Taylor
will
announce
three
names
at
the
time,
so
that
people
can
have
some
notice
to
prepare
for
speak
and
that's
a
two
and
I'm
not
going
to
read
the
rest
of
it
because
I
think
we've
just
went
over
that
so
Taylor
you
can
begin.
Our
first
General
comment.
L
Person
I
interviewed
about
this
said
that
they've
never
seen
so
much
blood
come
from
a
little
girl.
What
is
the
council
and
the
mayor
going
to
do
about
this
enough
when's
enough
enough?
When
is
One
More
Death
enough?
What
are
you
guys
going
to
do?
You
guys
ignored
the
complete
Street
on
100
south,
so
that
was
an
incredible
failure
by
both
the
mayor,
Transportation
Division,
and
this
Council
I'm
asking
you
to
read
the
email
I
sent
you
with
the
editorial
I
sent
you
to
adopt
Vision,
zero
vision.
L
We
don't
have
we.
We
have
a
traffic
calming
program
that
is
going
to
do
great
things,
but
it's
not
instituted.
Yet
we
had
this
happen
in
May
and
the
mayor
and
head
of
UDOT
instituted
a
task
force
called
kind
of
anemically.
The
Safe
Streets
task
force,
rename
that
Vision
zero
task
force,
fund
safety
measures,
and
please
do
something:
please
don't
sit
there
and
ignore
this.
We
can't
afford
to
do
this
anymore,
for
the
safety
of
everybody,
including
the
kids.
Thanks.