►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 08/08/2023
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting visit https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
B
B
Welcome
to
today's
city
council
meeting
our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Zoom,
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whatever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
This
is
a
work
session
meeting
during
which
there
is
no
public
comment.
Please
join
us
tonight
during
our
7
PM
formal
meeting
to
share
your
comments.
We
of
course
welcome
your
feedback
Anytime
by
mail
to
P.O
box,
145,
-476,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
Utah,
84114.
B
B
We
will
now
begin
our
work
session.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
informational.
Updates
from
the
administration
at
the
table
today.
We'll
have
mayor
Mendenhall
is
the
whole
team
joining
us.
No
all
right,
so
I'm
seeing
Andrew
Johnston
joining
us
and
I
also
have
Tony
Milner
and
Michelle
Hoon
I.
Don't
have
your
name
on
here,
hi,
Katie,
Schnell,
so
wonderful
to
meet
you
and
excited
to
have
you
here.
C
Yes,
so
for
those
is
that
better
now
you
can
all
hear
me:
okay,
great
I'm,
Katie,
Schnell,
I'm,
Wesson's,
executive
assistant,
who's,
the
director
of
community
outreach
and
then
I'm.
Also
the
executive
assistant
to
Jennifer
Newell,
who
is
the
mayor's
senior
advisor
for
education
and
I,
also
manage
the
mayor's
office
Ace
fund.
C
We
have,
let's
see
I,
think
we
can
go
to.
Is
there
a
public
Landslide
first
perfect,
so
we
have
quite
a
few
updates
from
public
lands.
This
week,
first
up
is
regarding
Madsen
Park.
The
work
to
update
the
North
Temple
Boulevard
plan
to
keep
Madison
Park
in
place
continues
and
is
scheduled
for
the
Planning
Commission
on
August
9th,
with
Glendale
Regional
Park
public
lands
just
concluded
a
period
of
public
engagement
to
determine
how
the
public
would
like
to
see
pickleball
courts
incorporated
into
the
new
Glendale
park
site.
C
The
survey
closed
on
August,
6th
and
public
lands
will
be
compiling
an
engagement
report
that
will
be
posted
on
the
project
website
by
the
end
of
this
month.
Regarding
the
Liberty
Park
playground,
public
lands
is
asking
the
public
to
submit
a
drawing
of
their
ideal
playground
with
a
short
description
of
what
makes
their
playground
special.
C
You
can
check
out
information
on
that
contest
on
the
community
feedback
page
listed
on
our
original
slide
and
the
making
the
emerald
ribbon
project
is
identifying
assets
around
the
Jordan
River
by
asking
the
public
to
share
their
stories
or
favorite
places
around
the
Jordan
River.
This
will
inform
the
development
of
the
master
plan,
which
will
work
to
preserve,
restore
and
activate
the
Jordan
River.
There's
eight
focus
groups
regarding
different
subjects.
These
will
be
held
starting
tomorrow,
community
members
and
City
staff
with
subject
matter,
expertise
or
experience
have
been
invited
to
attend.
C
Donner
Park
will
have
City
staff,
doing
intercept
surveys
on
site
soon,
while
Allen
Park
is
also
looking
for
Community
input
on
what
the
future
of
the
park
will
look
like
and
they're
asking
the
community
to
go
to
their
website
to
give
their
feedback.
The
first
part
of
that
engagement
will
end
in
September,
but
there
will
be
future
opportunities
to
follow
and
the
mayor's
office
of
equity,
inclusion
and
public
lands
are
partnering
together
to
host
three
workshops:
one
on
August
24th,
one
on
September
21st
and
a
tentative
date
in
November.
C
E
C
They
continue
to
be
good
opportunities
for
the
community
to
engage
with
the
city
and
with
the
mayor's
office
and
I
know,
the
Liaisons
have
been
enjoying
getting
out
to
local
businesses,
parks
and
events
in
their
District.
So
you
can
see
those
listed
there
with
the
locations
dates
and
times,
and
those
are
also
listed
on
our
website.
The
community
outreach
section
of
the
mayor's
site
next
slide
great.
C
These
are
August
events,
some
of
them
to
highlight,
for
you
are
this
weekend
we
have
craft
Lake,
City's,
DIY
Festival,
coming
up
next
Tuesday
at
the
Northwest
Rec
Center
is
the
next
Partners
In
the
Park
event,
and
then
the
Kensington
Street
Festival
is
later
this
month
on
August
19th
next
slide,
please
yep!
That
concludes
my
portion,
so
I'll
pass
it
over
to
Andrew.
Thank
you.
F
Thank
you,
council
members.
You
can
see
on
the
first
slide,
still
high
usage
rate
at
the
Resource
Centers.
The
second
piece
is
the
encampment
impact
mitigation
work
this
week
at
Liberty,
Park
I
know
councilman
Romano
had
an
event
this
week
past
week.
Excuse
me
regarding
Liberty
Park
and
some
of
the
issues
happening
there.
Parks
is
working
on
a
plan
that
we
can
share
with
you
shortly
about
a
bigger
discussion
about
what
will
happen
in
the
park
to
help
with
Safety
and
Security
issues,
and
also
dealing
with
unsheltered
homelessness.
There
64
heart
tracked
camps.
F
You
can
see
some
new
Outreach
engagements
in
seven
new
camps
and
then
site
rehabilitations
with
the
rapid
intervention
team.
Library
Square
is
a
location
for
the
resource,
fair,
this
Friday
and
then
kayak
Court
the
following
week
in
the
Jordan
River
again
next
slide,
and
you
can
see
some
of
this
I'll
explain
the
part
you
can't
see.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
you
were
aware
of
other
things
happening
in
the
system,
so
the
state
released
their
five-year
homeless
and
strategic
plan.
There's
a
link
here.
F
We
can
share
that
with
anybody
in
the
public
as
well.
It
lays
out
the
strategies
for
the
entire
State,
both
goals
and
how
to
get
there
a
lot
of
State
work
identified
in
that
model
and
then
the
next
one
down
is
the
Salt
Lake
Valley
coalition
to
end
homelessness,
our
local
entity.
Here
in
this
Valley,
they
are
working
on
a
strategic
plan
that
is
based
on
the
state
plan
with
some
local
Focus.
F
Obviously,
and
it
also
aligns
with
the
national
plan
that
the
Biden
Administration
has
put
forward,
including
funding,
including
there
and
then
this
week
on
Thursday,
the
Utah
homelessness
council
is
set
to
review
and
vote
on
the
winter
Services
plan.
That
was
worked
on
this
Summertime
by
the
com,
Council
of
governments
and
the
conference
of
Mayors
respectively,
and
so
that
you
can
see
the
details
of
that
meeting
there.
F
The
last
piece
is
outdoor
Resource,
Center
sanction
Camp
pilot
I,
keep
trying
to
find
the
right
name
for
this
and
I'm
still
struggling
with
it.
So
you'll
bear
with
us.
We
have
met
internally
multiple
times.
We
are
meeting
with
the
state
as
well
to
flesh
out
what
that
will
look
like
and
get
it
done
as
quickly
as
possible.
So
we
will
have
updates
for
you
shortly
as
well
on
that
any
questions.
B
G
G
If
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
I
can
tell
you
a
little
bit
more
about
our
participation
over
the
years.
We've
been
doing
something
with
them
since
2016
as
far
as
I
could
find
information,
and
then
so
we
are
partnering
with
Salt
Lake,
County
Office
of
new
Americans,
and
basically
we
plan
and
promote
events
all
over
the
county
and
get
together
to
promote
them
and
share
information.
G
Once
we
have
that
calendar,
we
will
be
putting
that
in
the
in
the
SLC
gov
website
and
and
this
year
we're
having
some
events
of
our
own.
So
that's
exciting.
We
will
have
a
welcoming,
walk
in
a
tree,
planting
and
dedication
schedule
for
the
14th,
so
we'll
do
welcome
you
walk
around
Washington,
Square
and
then
urban
forestry
has
will
be
picking
a
nice
tree
at
an
addition
to
the
forest
here.
G
The
urban
Forest
of
the
Washington
Square
and
we
will
dedicate
it
to
Salt,
Lake,
City's,
immigrant
and
Refugee
population
and
then
solid
Arts
Council.
They
have
a
show
that
will
be
part
of
the
celebration
as
well,
and
then
we
are
also
working
with
the
Salt
Lake
County
to
host
a
public
safety
event
for
Afghan
refugees,
and
that
is
through
a
grant
that
they
provided
next
slide
can
tell
you
a
little
bit
more
about
that
event.
H
Dear
council
member,
actually
we
have
a
lot
of
Afghan
Refugee
family
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
They
have
a
problem
in
the
local
law
and
also
in
the
culture.
We
have
some
cases
which
the
African
Refugee
family
just
follow
their
own
culture,
but
find
some
problem,
especially
legal
problem.
For
example,
we
had
Afghan
family
with
some
basic
culture.
They
have
so
the
police
got
them
and
asked
them
some
question
and
make
problem.
H
This
is
why
we
thought,
if
we
have
just
the
information
sharing
session
for
them
and
just
share
some
local
or
some
in
emergency
emergency
situation
like
fire
situation,
what
they
have
to
do,
I
believe
not
just
Afghan
family,
more
other
Refugee
family
have
same
problem.
We
just
want
to
start
with
the
Afghan
Refugee
family
and
share
some
basic
local
law
from
the
police
department
and
fire
department
and
to
help
them
increase
their
knowledgement
about
the
local
law
and
what
to
do
in
the
emergency
situation.
G
As
well
and
one
way
that
we
decided
to
help
or
to
get
the
city
employees
involved
is
to
ask
them
to
fill
out
this
postcard,
where
they
can
share
advice
or
or
any
welcoming
message
for
people
who
are
arriving
in
Salt
Lake,
just
to
feel
them
make
them
feel
welcome,
and
that
should
do
it.
Any
questions
can.
I
Are
we
I
know
the
county
when
they
created
this
apartment?
There's
no
department,
but
this
the
the
the
county
when
they
created
this
department
to
welcome
immigrants-
and
you
know
the
office
of
is
under
the
mayor's
office
in
the
county.
I,
don't
remember
the
name,
but
they
one
of
their
missions
is
to
encourage
people
to
vote.
Are
we
also
helping
on
that?
Because
it
will
be
very
important
for
us
to
encourage
those
residents
to
get
registered
if
they
can.
G
Yes,
so
of
fortunately
the
the
county
is
of
new
America
one,
so
he
has
reached
out
quite
a
bit
or
so
we're
working
collaboratively
so
not
to
I
guess
to
unite
forces,
because
it's
the
same
audience
as
the
same
community
and
we
are
having
an
event
for
welcoming
America,
where
we
will
help
One
People
apply
for
citizenship,
for
free
there's
about
60
000
folk
in
in
Utah
who
could
become
citizens,
but
for
one
reason
or
another.
They
don't
have.
G
B
Any
other
comments,
thank
you
both
so
much
have
a
great
day,
all
right
now
for
the
main
event,
Council
friends,
time
for
us
to
go
to
item
number
three,
our
CIP
projects
at
the
table.
We
have
Ben
ludke
I,
see
we
have
Mary
Beth
Thompson
in
the
room,
I'm
sure
we
will
make
her
get
up
a
few
times
during
this.
Anyone
else
joining
you
Ben
or
is
it
just
us.
E
E
If
it's
all
right,
I
thought
it'd
be
helpful
to
start
with
the
scenario
that
would
fund
the
council's
seven
priority
projects
that
were
identified
at
the
last
briefing.
There
are
also
a
few
pages
of
responses
to
your
Project
Specific
questions
that
we
could
go
through
if
time
allows,
but
I
thought
I'd
start
with
the
funding
scenario.
E
E
So
a
couple
things
about
the
scenario:
it
fully
spends
the
1.2
million
dollars
that
the
council
added
to
the
CIP
budget
above
what
was
recommended
in
the
mayor's
budget.
The
funding
goes
to
all
seven
projects,
note
that
the
livable
streets
program
was
already
recommended
for
funding
and
this
would
add
additional
funding
to
it.
The
other
six
projects
the
council
identified
were
not
recommended
for
any
funding.
E
There
are
two
projects
which
are
combining
CIP
funding
with
funding
from
the
parks,
trails
and
open
space
Bond.
This
is
Project
number
22,
Richmond,
Park
playground
and
project
number
27,
the
North
Temple
arts
and
tourism.
District
improvements,
so
you'd
be
partially
funding
both
of
those
projects
with
CIP
and
then
the
first
issuance
of
the
parks.
Bond
would
have
additional
funding
for
eligible
components
of
both
of
those
projects.
E
E
There
are
also
two
projects
that
would
be
divided
into
phases,
so
project
number
21,
Rose,
Park,
Lane,
beautification,
Trail
and
safety
improvements.
This
is
the
thirty
thousand
dollars
for
two
driver
feedback.
Speed
signs
later
phases
of
that
would
return
to
the
council
in
CIP.
If
the
applicant
reapplies,
the
other
project
that
would
be
phased,
is
number
46.
E
E
The
oh
another
note
on
the
North
Temple
arts
and
tourism
District.
Since
it's
partially
funded
it
doesn't
have
specific
locations
or
specific
amenities
that
would
go
there.
It
has
these
broad
categories,
like
public
art,
pedestrian
safety,
traffic
calming
adding
some
Trees
and
Landscaping,
but
we
don't
have
cost
estimates
because
we
don't
have
specific
locations
where
those
amenities
would
go
so
the
current
amount.
E
There
are
two
projects
that
would
be
fully
funded
from
CIP
number,
23,
Sugarhouse,
safe
side
streets,
part:
two,
that's
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
construct
the
traffic
calming
improvements
that
were
designed
and
tested
in
part.
One
and
number
57
would
also
be
fully
funded.
The
enzyme
Peak
Nature
Park
improvements.
E
And
then
for
livable
streets,
the
traffic
calming
program
you're,
adding
under
the
scenario
adding
294
thousand
dollars
each
of
the
zones
that
are
identified
in
the
program.
They
have
a
cost
between
250
000
to
500
000.
It
depends
on
if
it's
a
large
or
a
smaller
zone.
So
this
additional
294
000
would
be
enough
to
do
an
additional,
smaller
Zone
in
the
program.
E
I
E
B
Have
we
done
so
I
did
the
calculations
and
Richmond
Park
would
be
getting
40
approximately
40
of
what
they
asked?
North
Temple
would
be
about
38
of
what
they
asked
and
then
the
West
Side
Foothill
Drive
would
be
about
34
of
what
was
asked.
Have
we
done
any
research
to
find
out
if
funding
at
those
levels
creates
any
sort
of
momentum,
like
is?
Is
there
a
third
of
the
West
Side,
the
West
Foothill
traffic,
calming
that
that
makes
sense
at
this
point
is:
is
this
us
kind
of
committing
ourselves
to
finishing
the
job?
J
B
Like
I
like
what
we're
doing
here
and
I
think
Chris
you're
responsible
for
a
lot
of
this
leg
work,
and
so
thank
you
for
attempting
to
spread
the
peanut
butter.
But
we
do
have
two
that
are
at
100
percent
and
then
three
that
are
lower
and
so,
while
I'm
not
trying
to
deprive
anyone
else
of
anything,
if
you
would
need
more
to
make
an
impact
like,
we
certainly
can
spread
the
peanut
butter
a
little
differently.
B
E
Also,
the
CIP
cost
overrun
account.
So
if
any
project
in
CIP
goes
a
little
bit
over
budget,
then
the
administration
can
pull
from
that
cost
overrun
account
without
coming
back
to
the
council
in
a
budget
amendment
which
is
a
longer
process,
and
at
that
point
the
bid
might
no
longer
hold
they'd
have
to
go
back
out
and
prices
could
go
up
again.
E
There's
not
a
commitment
or
like
an
implied
commitment
that
things
that
are
not
funded
would
come
back
and
receive
funding
in
the
future.
A
lot
of
these
applications
would
need
to
reapply
for
CIP
and
go
through
the
same
open
and
competitive
process
with
all
the
other
competing
projects
in
the
next
cycle.
B
B
K
Not
I
just
wanted
to
mention
yeah
thanks
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
I
I
feel
like
I
could
support
this.
It
doesn't
entirely
get
to
my
overarching
policy
goal
of
getting
livable
streets
and
traffic
calming
to
be
less
politically
decided
and
more
decided
Based
on
data
and
what
parts
there's
actually
the
higher
need
for
and
and
I'm
interest
I'm
excited
for
when
we
can
have
that
discussion
with
Transportation
Division
and
figure
out
exactly
how
that
first
ranking
was
done.
How
often
we
should
update
it?
K
What
are
the
parameters
that
we
want
to
put
in,
but
I
would
like
to
continue
to
move
towards
where
it's,
not
the
council
through
a
political
process
deciding
which
neighborhoods
get
traffic
calming
and
it's
more
trained
staff
through
a
data
driven
process
deciding
which
neighborhood
getting
a
traffic
coming.
So
while
this
does
add
some
funding
to
the
general
liberal
Bush
program,
that
I
believe
does
that
or
is
our
best
chance
at
doing
that
it
does
still
have
two
that
are
sort
of
decided
by
us
to
get
those
funding
and
I.
I
Chair
I
mean
we
talked
about
this
last
time
and
and
last
time,
I
think
that's
something
that
I'm,
also
very
supportive
of
I
I
will
be.
Maybe
there
is
a
legislative
intent
on
this
that
in
the
category
of
traffic
coming
that
follows
that
follows
the
the
data
driven
approach
the
Administration
has
invested.
You
know
we
invested
as
a
city
money
to
develop
so
anytime
that
there
is
a
CIP
application.
I
It
involves
traffic
calming
that
we
follow
the
plan
and,
if
not,
it
gets
pushed
back
to
areas
that
actually
will
have
recognized
to
be
the
most
needed
ones.
So
I
will
be
supportive
of
that
to
include
it
there,
so
we
actually
set
the
expectations
correctly
for
when
we
open
CIP
again
later
this
year.
So
we
don't.
I
E
B
B
Okay,
then
you
just
are
that
skillful
at
your
job
that
you
silenced
six
out
of
the
seven
most
nitpicky
people
in
the
city.
What
way
to
go,
we
didn't
even
ask
Mary
Beth
to
get
up
once
I
feel
like
we're
failing
here
all
right.
Thank
you.
Ben
I,
think
I
think
you've
accomplished
and
thank
you.
Councilmember
Wharton
for
your
leadership
and
helping
to
get
some
of
those
things.
Navigated.
E
B
E
And
all
of
the
data
in
the
charts
and
the
visuals
is
from
2020
to
the
present,
so
we're
looking
at
about
three
years
of
this
program
and
again
it's
the
50
50
program,
where,
if
you're
a
residential
property
owner,
you
split
the
cost
equally
with
the
city.
This
is
different
than
the
proactive,
concrete
program
which
is
funded
in
CIP,
where
the
city
is
going
out
and
proactively.
Making
these
improvements
at
the
city's
full
cost
commercial
property
owners
pay
the
full
cost
of
replacing
and
fixing
the
concrete
in
front
of
their
properties.
E
So
in
this,
in
the
first
chart
it
has
by
Council
District
the
number
of
estimates
that
were
sent.
So
when
there
is
a
problem
with
the
concrete,
they
are
first
given
an
estimate.
This
is
what
we
think
it
would
cost
in
order
to
actually
fix
this,
and
then
next
to
that
is
the
column
jobs
completed
and
the
following
column
is
the
percent,
so
the
jobs
completed
as
a
percent.
The
total
number
of
estimates,
as
you
can
see,
the
the
highest
percentage
of
jobs
completed,
is
District
4,
which
is
at
50
percent.
E
B
Ben
is
there
any
way
to
determine
if
the
number
of
estimates
sent
I
don't
know,
because
we
we're
about?
Does
it
reflect
accurately
the
rate
of
home
ownership
in
each
district?
Like
it's
easy
to
say?
Oh
there's
265
in
District
3.
That
must
be
a
reflection
of
like
people
being
aware
of
this
program
or
something,
but
does
it
correlate
with
home
ownership
or
any
other
factors
that
we're
aware
of
I.
F
E
J
J
Otherwise,
if
they
did
it
themselves,
I've
had
comp.
This
is
just
you
know:
people
talking
to
people,
say
nice
and
out
of
bid
and
the
bid
came
out
at
you
know:
half
the
price
of
the
city's
bid,
so
it
was
like
wait.
A
second
I
could
just
basically
pay
for
the
whole
thing
at
my
50,
but
when
the
city
submitted
the
bid,
it
was
2x
now
the
truth
probably
lies
in
somewhere
in
the
middle
there.
L
Let
me
take
a
take
us
up
in
the
admin
Administration
or
Ben
can
correct
me,
but
part
of
the
issue
historically
has
been
that
the
the
city
requires
the
use
of
bonded
contractors,
and
there
are
not
many,
but
it's
very
important
with
work
in
the
public
way
that
it
be
done
to
City
standard.
So
that's!
The
second
part
is
the
city
standard.
Most
of
the
time
when
you're
getting
a
bid
from
a
contractor
they're
bidding
it
out
a
lot
of
times
that
what
they
think
would
be
good.
L
It
isn't
done
to
City
standards,
and
so
that's
the
other
thing.
That
is
the
factor.
So
those
two
things
a
lot
of
times.
People
start
out
planning
to
do
their
own
sidewalk,
and
then
it
turns
out
that
that
doesn't
work
because
they
have
to
get
get
it
done
to
City
standards
and
then
the
cost
skyrockets
so
I
there
could
be
more
to
it
than
that.
That's
the
part
that
I
am
familiar
with
well.
B
Seems
like
a
really
blurry
line
to
me,
though,
like
we're
responsible
for
50
of
the
bill,
but
a
hundred
percent
of
the
snow
shoveling,
and
we
don't
set
the
standards
to
which
it
can
be
repaired
like
there
does
seem
to
be
a
little
bit
for
anyone
in
the
city
a
little
bit
of
an
incongruence
here
with
our
policy,
and
it
doesn't
really
set
well
with
me.
I
know
we
have
a
legislative
intent
around
reviewing
this.
L
The
Prim
was
established
so
that,
because
in
the
city
100
of
the
sidewalks
are
paid
by
theoretically
by
the
by
the
property
owner,
that's
a
budding.
So
that
was
a
requirement
when
the
subdivisions
were
put
in
so
typically,
the
city
program
has
not
gone
in
and
put
new
sidewalks
unless
it's
a
cdbg
area
or
a
safe
path
to
schools.
So
typically,
every
property
owner
is
responsible
for
their
first
sidewalk.
L
The
core
development
of
the
city
was
originally
based
in
in
having
sidewalks,
and
so
typically,
we
haven't
done
a
lot
of
funding
of,
except
on
a
cdbg
basis.
So
we
have
had
very
wealthy
people
come
to
the
city
to
say
that
they
would
like
sidewalk
put
in
at
100.
City
expense
in
the
city
has
said.
No.
That
was
an
original
requirement
of
the
subdivision,
so
the
50
50
program
was
established
to
help
reduce
the
cost
to
the
property
owners
and
only
available
for
residential
property,
but
I
might
have
old
information
in
these
guys.
D
M
B
D
I
L
E
J
I
think
that's
you
bring
up
a
great
question
about
the
equity
side
of
the
house.
So
you
know.
Maybe
there
is
a
possibility
of
looking
at
funding
at
different
income
levels,
different
parts
of
that,
because
you're
right
I
mean
it
could
be
an
expensive
undertaking,
especially
if
you
have
a
larger
sidewalk
that
needs
repair
and
you
can't
afford
it.
But
you'd
love
to
have
a
your
neighborhood.
Definitely
like
you
to
have
it
replaced
so
I
think
we
I
think
we
should
probably
explore
that
at
some
later
date,
I.
I
Mean
you
know,
this
is
an
issue
that
we've
seen
quite
a
bit
in
my
district
and
but
not
only
in
my
district,
but
I've
seen
it
a
lot
where
the
50
of
the
materials
was
still
a
lot
for
the
neighbor,
and
you
know
there
was
no
way
around
it
and
then
what
I
keep
hearing
from
the
neighbors
is.
You
know
I
walk
on
the
street
because
there
is
a
foot
lock.
You
know
a
foot
tall
high.
J
I
B
B
But
then
I
really
I
know
our
original
intention,
and
maybe
even
our
federal
mandate
is
not
Ada,
but
we
have
got
to
be
cognizant
that
our
neighbors,
who
find
themselves
Mobility
impaired,
are
highly
dependent
upon
us
to
allow
them
to
move
in
the
city,
and
we
have
to
have
some
kind
of
Mobility
focus
on
how
we
maintain
these.
That
maybe
goes
above
and
beyond
a
federalized
standard.
B
It's
I
mean
I
I
know
even
like
my
kids
just
ride
their
scooters
around
and
in
Rose
Park
we've
got
those
beautiful
historic
trees
that
are
just
pushing
it
up
and
I
have
had
more
skinned
knees,
and
you
know
thank
God,
no
traumatic,
brain
injuries.
Yeah,
you
know
where,
like
they
go
head
over
the
handlebars,
just
a
scooter,
I
can't
imagine
if
we
were
actually
relying
on
that
mode
to
get
us
something
what
it
would
be
like
trying
to
get
around
that
block
and.
J
B
M
Can
add
a
little
bit
of
clarification
for
the
difference
between
the
jobs
the
quotes
requested
and
the
jobs
completed
we
as
a
streets
division,
don't
turn
anyone
away,
so
whoever,
if
it
wasn't
completed
it
was
because
of
the
person
requesting
the
quote
decided
not
to
pursue
further.
Thank
you,
I.
Don't
think
we
track
why,
but
it
is
this.
We
never
turn
anyone
away.
Madam.
I
How
do
we
find
where
this
site
this
you
know
68
and
35?
How
is
it
through
City
staff,
or
is
it
through
the
app?
How
do
we
find
this
sidewalks
to
be
needing
so
what
this
this
is
telling
me
that
in
district
one
there
were
68
spots
sidewalk
spots,
whatever
you
would
call
them
that
needed
repair
14
of
those
kind
of
figs.
How?
How
did
we
find
out
about
those
so.
M
These
this
is
all
on
a
request
basis.
The
50
50
program
is
purely
request
based,
so
a
resident
or
a
property
owner
comes
to
the
city
and
says
hey
I
want
to
quote
I
would
like
you
to
come.
Look
at
my
sidewalk
for
the
repair.
So
that
means
that
68
people
came
and
requested
a
quote.
We
went
out
and
looked
and
then
14
of
them
said.
Yes,
please
come
back
and
fix
it,
so
it
wasn't
staff
actively
designating
areas.
It
was
residents
requesting
us
to
come
repair,
their
sidewalk.
I
Just
for
the
request
of
the
neighbor,
they
were
like
this
I
walk.
Is
you
know
I?
So
what
it
seems
to
me
is
that
it's
going
to
a
place
that
is
not
the
place
that
will
potentially
trigger
the
city
to
come,
reach
out
that
neighbor
and
say
hey
there.
We
have
a
50
50
program
here.
Can
you
can
we
split
the
cost
of
the
materials?
D
So
there's
there's
two
different
programs,
so
in
engineering
we
have,
we
have
kind
of
a
proactive,
worst
first
program
that
you
know
based
on
of
that.
That
card
we've
moved
that
sense
to
streets
because
it
is
really
a
maintenance
function,
but
that
is
continually
going
on
that
we
have
funding
for
that
to
proactively,
go
out
and
again
not
really
identity.
We
don't
know
specific
points,
but
we
know
block
faces
and
we
have
that
recorded
and
it's
ongoing
and
then
there's
the
50
50
program.
M
And
so
the
the
first
program
that
JP
spoke
about
is
there's
no
cost
sharing
the
city
maintains
the
whole
cost
and
I
believe
that
some
of
those
reports
that
are
sent
in
through
the
app
are
added
to
that
list,
and
it's
you
know
evaluated
by
saying
we
have
this
much
funding
for
this
year.
These
are
the
ones
that
we've
identified.
These
are
the
ones
that
you
know.
Citizens
have
identified
in
the
residence
and
where
can
we?
How
far
can
the
money
go
and
which
ones
are
we
going
to
address?
M
I
I
I
think
that
this
is
fantastic
and
I,
but
I
think
that
income
levels
are
something
that
I'm
very
interested
in
and
seeing
if
it
is
ways
of
funding
funds
additional
funds
to
to
find
to
fix
some
more
more
sidewalks,
especially,
you
know
some
Asian
neighborhoods,
where
we
have
a
lot
of
learning
neighbors
that
you
know
need
the
sidewalks,
but
not
only
you
know
not
only
those
everybody
using
the
sidewalk.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
appreciate
this.
B
K
I
I
think
on
that
note.
I
would
be
supportive
of
exploring
some
type
of
graduated
income-based
percentage
system
where
it's
not
just
50
50
for
everybody
in
the
city,
but
it
depends
on
income
level
and
if
it's
verified
it
can
verify
a
certain
income
level,
then
we
would
support
a
higher
amount
for
the
the
materials.
K
E
I
M
L
O
Councilmember
young
I
was
to
say
and
follow
up.
Another
data
point
that
I'd
be
interested
in
is
probably
seeing
the
comprehensive
data
between
those
projects
that
are
funded
at
a
hundred
percent,
as
well
as
the
50
50,
and
then
to
see
that
breakdown
by
District
just
to
be
able
to
get
a
better
sense
of
kind
of
the
comprehensive
City
surfaces
within
that
space.
Just
to
kind
of
compare.
M
J
M
B
N
P
B
B
P
These
might
be
a
better
question
for
urban
forestry,
but
I
have
had
residents
in
my
district
on
the
west
side
that
are
saying
you
know.
They
know
that
the
larger
trees
are
are
worse
for
sidewalks,
but
that
asking
about
how
they
can
get
larger
trees
on
the
west
side
that
won't
cause
that
problem
for
sidewalks,
if
they're
like
planted
further
out
or
if
we
can
put
them
in
in
different
places,
where
they're
not
going
to
be
so
close.
M
D
E
There
was
one
other
Project
Specific
update
to
note.
This
is
Council,
had
asked
about
project
number
four,
the
transit
capital
for
frequent
Transit
routes.
It
is
recommended
for
partial
funding
at
1.1
million
dollars,
and
that
is
the
same
funding
level.
The
council
has
funded.
The
council
did
five
years
in
a
row
did
not
fund
last
year,
and
it's
now
proposed
to
resume
at
that
1.1
million
dollar
level.
E
E
There
is
some
money
secured
for
this
from
the
city
and
UTA
through
grants,
UTA
has
secured
1.4
million
dollars,
and
the
city
has
secured
2.1
million
dollars
from
a
Wasatch
Front
Regional
Council
Grant.
So
that's
three
and
a
half
million
total,
which
is
great,
but
the
total
cost
is
estimated
to
be
10
million
to
15
million
dollars.
So
this
would
be
a
major
project
on
the
North
Temple
Corridor.
It
would
need
additional
funding.
I.
J
E
Ask
for
yeah
often
with
capital
projects
of
this
size.
It
takes
multiple
years
to
assemble
the
funding
package
and
a
lot
of
it
comes
from
federal
and
state
sources,
but
the
city
often
is
on
the
hook
for
a
local
match
right,
so
this
year,
CIP
would
not
fund
that
local
match
and
there
would
likely
be
a
request
to
the
council
in
future
years
for
just
that,
but
we'll
ask
for
what
those
plans
are.
Wfrc
probably
has
this
and
they're
a
unified
Transportation
plan.