►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Formal Meeting - 09/05/2023
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting visit https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
I
am
councilmember.
Dan,
Dugan
and
I
will
be
conducting
this
this
meeting
today
and
welcome.
We
are
happy
to
have
you
here,
whether
in
person
or
on
Zoom
or
watching
on
one
of
our
live
feeds.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable,
since
we
have
a
larger
crowd
this
evening.
I
want
to
let
people
know,
there's
also
an
overflow
down
the
hall
in
the
Canon
room
in
room
335,
which
is
just
across
the
Center
stairways.
B
B
Thank
you
for
your
understanding
and
participation.
So
please
join
me
for
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
B
All
right
moving
on
welcome
into
public
meeting
rules.
Thank
you
again
for
everyone
to
join
us
tonight
before
we
move
through
the
agenda.
I
want
to
mention
and
remind
everyone
about
our
rules
at
the
Quorum
which
are
in
place
to
ensure
our
meetings
move
along
well
and
to
help
everyone
feel
comfortable.
Sharing
their
comments.
A
copy
of
the
full
rules
of
the
Quorum
are
available
at
the
door
and
our
staff
will
post
the
link
in
Zoom.
B
C
D
1-800-273-T-A-L-K-8255
to
be
connected
to
a
skilled,
trained
counselor
at
a
crisis
center
in
your
area,
anytime,
24,
7
and
whereas
Salt
Lake
City
values.
Those
who
work
daily
to
help
better
the
lives
of
others
through
their
professions
in
mental
health
care,
education,
emergency
services
and
many
more
now,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
and
mayor
of
Salt
Lake
City
recognize
the
month
of
September
2023
as
National
Suicide
Prevention
month
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
be
it
further
resolved.
B
Have
a
motion
from
councilman
the
second
from
councilman,
please
any
questions
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
aye
opposed
passage
unanimously,
seven
to
zero.
B
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
and
I
would
want
to
introduce
Elisa
Burnham.
B
Who's
here
tonight,
thank
you
very
much
for
joining
us
here.
Do
we
see
this
resolution
and
Elisa
do
you
have
any
serves
as
a
coordinator
of
the
suicide
prevention
program
at
Salt,
Lake
County?
Thank
you
for
being
here
today.
Would
you
like
to
say
a
few
words.
F
The
lights
on
gotcha
suicide
is
a
profound
and
Complex
public
health
issue
that
has
unfortunately
touched
many
of
our
lives,
just
like
with
any
other
health
concern.
It's
important
to
educate
ourselves
about
it,
whether
it's
taking
a
suicide
prevention,
training
or
learning
the
warning
signs
and
what
resources
are
available.
F
We
all
have
a
role
we
can
play
in
preventing
suicides
live
on
Utah
as
our
state
Suicide
Prevention
campaign,
and
everyone
can
visit
liveonutah.org
to
learn
about
what
you
can
do
to
help
save
a
life
establishing
Suicide
Prevention
as
a
priority
for
all
Salt
Lake
City
residents
is
a
positive
step
toward
empowering
the
community,
with
the
Knowledge
and
Skills
to
prevent
suicide,
a
step
towards
reducing
stigma
surrounding
mental
health
and,
ultimately,
a
step
towards
saving
lives.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
very
much
Lisa
and
thank
you
very
much
for
your
work.
I
appreciate
this,
especially
when
you
see
that
the
leading
cause
of
death
of
eight
to
24
year
olds
is
suicide.
It's
that's
sad
and
so
I
appreciate
your
work
and
we
all
need
to
just
make
sure
that
we
get
State,
better
educated
and
look
for
those
warning
signs,
so
we
can
alleviate
some
of
those
unneeded
necessary.
G
Like
to
say,
thank
you
so
much
for
bringing
this
up.
Thank
you
for
this
June
resolution,
but
also
for
the
people
that
are
listening
out
there.
We
do
have
a
chat
program
where
you
can
call
you
can
call
9-1-1
or
you
can
call
799
at
3
000
if
you're
having
a
mental
health
issue
for
you.
If
you're
thinking
of
suicide,
please
call
us,
please
call
our
police
department
and
we'll
be
able
to
send
you
social
workers
and
clinicians
that
can
help
you
with
the
issue
that
you're
having
at
that
time.
H
G
F
F
B
Moving
on
to
item
number
or
Item
B
the
public
hearings,
this
brings
us
the
council's
public
hearings.
If
you
would
like
to
make
a
comment
on
a
public
hearing
today,
we
are
accepting
comments
in
person
or
online
in
Zoom.
The
council
has
been
informed
of
accommodations
requests
during
the
public
comment
tonight
and
welcome
comments
from
all
constituents.
B
If
you
need
to
speak
with
our
staff,
please
select
isak
Canada
for
the
list
of
participants.
If
you
need
to,
you
can
also
raise
your
hand
in
Zoom
to
indicate
that
you
need
something
from
the
host
Taylor
Hill
on
our
staff
will
be
calling
those
who
wish
to
comment
based
on
the
order
we
received
the
names.
She
will
call
four
names
at
a
time.
If
you
are
in
person,
please
be
sure
to
return
to
room
326
this
room
to
make
your
comment.
If
you're
on
Zoom,
please
unmute
your
mic
when
Taylor
calls
your
name.
B
J
J
The
city
periodically
receives
and
applies
for
some
grants
and
they
help
to
pay
for
some
city
programs.
The
council
always
holds
a
public
hearing
for
each
of
the
grants
to
allow
the
council
and
public
and
opportunity
to
receive
additional
information.
And
tonight,
as
you
mentioned,
there
is
one
Grant,
the
summer
food
service
program
2023
for
youth
City
summer
programming.
M
B
Councilman
police,
second
for
council
member
pitro.
Any
questions
see
no
questions,
I'm,
not
sure.
If
this
mic
works,
Walter
say
aye
aye
opposed
hearing,
none
that
passes
unanimously
7-0.
B
N
So
this
is
a
public
hearing
about
a
proposal
to
create
the
form-based
mixed
use:
11
zoning
District,
formerly
known
as
the
fbun
3-
that
is
simply
a
change
in
the
name
there,
as
well
as
an
ordinance
that
would
amend
this
zoning
to
the
fleet
block,
which
is
approximately
located
between
800
and
900
South
and
300
and
400
West.
K
O
O
So
my
family
and
I
have
gone
there
a
couple
of
times
and
it's
just
super
important
I-
think
that
this
is
a
place
of
remembrance
to
those
who
have
lost
their
lives
to
police
brutality
and
violence,
and
some
of
these
people
we
all
know
Brianna
Taylor,
Bernardo,
palisios,
Ryan,
Outlaw
and
George
Floyd
among
many
others
and
I.
O
Think
many
community
members
who
have
lost
their
family
come
here
to
grieve
and
to
heal
and
people
who
may
have
not
lost
someone
they
know
but
whose
Community
is
targeted
can
also
come
here
and
heal
and
those
who
don't
have
anyone
who's
been
affected
by
police
brutality
can
come
here
and
learn
and
just
be
able
to
be
around
other
people.
I
think
it's
really
important
place.
So
that's
all
I
have
to
say
about
this
issue.
I
K
K
K
I
Thank
you
for
a
few
minutes
of
your
time
today.
I
know.
You've
you've
talked
about
this
about
the
fleet
block
many
times
in
this
zoning
as
well,
and
I've
reviewed
the
zoning
and
as
a
as
an
employee
of
century
Financial,
who
owns
the
1.25
Acres
on
the
fleet
block.
We
are
generally
supportive
of
the
new
form-based
Zone.
I
The
one
issue
we
have
is
related
is
related
between
the
zoning
and
how
you've
proposed
to
lay
out
the
fleet
block
So,
currently
the
side
yards
or
have
zero
setback
requirements
on
the
form-based
zoning.
So
the
way
you've
got
the
the
proposed
Fleet
block
layout
has
basically
three
Parcels
Plus,
the
part
and
our
partial,
the
1.25
Acres
on
the
corner
of
900,
South
and
400.
I
West
is
sort
of
left
out
of
that,
and
so,
if,
if
we
build
our
building
on
the
1.25
acres
and
the
proposed
building
next
to
us
to
the
east
on
the
one
acre
parcel,
that's
being
proposed
build
their
building,
then
if
neither
of
us
have
a
a
setback
requirement,
what
you've
created
is
essentially
two
buildings
back
to
back
next,
next
to
each
other,
without
any
kind
of
setbacks,
and
so
we'd
love
to
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
further
about
how
the
parcels
have
been
laid
out.
I
But
but
with
with
the
zero
setback
requirements
for
side
yards,
you
know
if
we
just
decide
to
build
a
building
and
the
person
on
the
one
acre
decides
to
build
a
building
and
you're
going
to
have
some
conflicts
between
the
two
properties.
B
Listen
Jared
right,
Northwest,
Quadrant,.
P
K
Q
Good
evening,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
tonight.
My
name
is
Levy
Woodruff
and
I
would
like
to
use
this
time
to
urge
the
council
and
the
administration
to
really
listen
to
the
families
of
those
people
who
are
memorialized
in
the
fleet
block
murals
and
to
make
decisions
about
this
property
based
on
what
the
families
and
the
community
want.
When
I
read
about
the
form-based
urban
neighborhood
Zone
I
worry
that
the
intent
is
to
build
more
unaffordable
apartments
and
boutique
stores
that
the
people
of
the
fleet
block
neighborhood
won't
be
able
to
use.
Q
This
neighborhood
deserves
a
true
Community
Center,
where
people
can
receive
services
to
help
with
food
security,
housing,
employment,
mental
health
and
other
essential
needs
just
as
important.
A
government
needs
the
trust
of
its
Community
to
function,
and
you
do
not
build
and
maintain
trust
by
asking
people's
opinion
and
then
seeming
to
ignore
it.
The
families
and
the
community
members
who
cherish
and
care
for
the
fleet
block
space
and
the
memory
of
those
who
are
honored
there
deserve
better
than
a
process
that
ignores
them.
Q
R
My
name
is
Tiffany
James
I'm
here
with
my
daughter,
Raven
James,
my
19
year
old
son,
Zane
James
was
unlawfully
killed
by
a
police
officer
in
2018.
R
R
Language
is
that
gets
passed
and
there
be
specific
requirements
of
the
developer
to
also
build
into
their
plans
a
community
center
that
fills
the
needs
of
the
community
that
they're
building
in
this
type
of
requirement
in
zoning
language
is
both
easily
done,
and
it
is
absolutely
imperative
because
it
maintains
the
Trust
In
The
City
by
the
community.
That's
been
bestowed
along
the
course
of
these
discussions.
R
It
doesn't
abandon
all
of
these
discussions.
It
doesn't
abandon
the
mission
and
the
messaging
that
is
embedded
in
those
murals.
The
city
supported
the
installation
of
police
shooting
victims
murals
at
Fleet
block
initially,
and
they
did
this
when
police
misconduct
was
getting
a
lot
of
national
attention.
R
R
K
S
Thank
you,
council
members.
First
of
all,
I
do
want
to
commend
the
city
on
trying
to
create
a
mixed-use
zoning
to
help
us
have
a
more
walkable
infrastructure
for
the
future
in
general,
I.
Look
at
the
fb11
and
I
worry
about
a
few
different
things.
On
the
mixed-use
nature,
with
retail
being
optional,
it's
going
to
possibly
create
a
scenario
where
people
still
need
cars,
clogging
our
traffic
ways
and
not
having
a
walkable,
City,
10,
20
or
30
years
from
now
and
I
hope.
You
guys
reconsider
that
as
a
whole
for
FB
11..
S
Now
is
Utah
we're
kind
of
known
nationally
as
a
joke
of
a
city
where
it's
a
place
you
go.
If
you
feel
Vermont
is
too
diverse
or
a
city
whose
diversity
is
cut
in
half
in
the
Jazz
are
in
an
away
game,
and
we
can
change
that
right.
Now,
we've
seen
the
comment
not
only
from
members
of
our
community
who
have
lost
people,
but
in
general,
the
minority
communities
in
the
area
who
see
this
as
an
important
part
of
the
community
and
important
part
of
the
history.
S
We
sit
here
having
a
recognized
Suicide
Prevention
awareness
month
at
the
beginning
of
this,
which
I'd
recommend
988
versus
a
273
talk
is
someone
who
knows
the
number.
Well,
it's
easier
to
dial
when
you're
dead
inside,
and
we
also
have
a
black
lives
matter,
mural
right
outside
by
creating
a
zoning
ordinance
that
allows
for
the
preservation
of
History.
This
city
will
be
able
to
show
that
it's
not
just
one
of
signals
or
virtue,
but
of
actual
virtues.
T
Hi
I'm
carico
I'm,
a
resident
of
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
I
have
a
lot
to
say
so
in
my
two
minutes,
I'm
going
to
start
with
it's
very
sad
when
marginalized
communities
are
ignored
by
the
city
council
and
the
mayor
repeatedly,
we
have
asked
for
years
to
keep
this
building
up.
I
understand
it's
not
in
your
best
interest
to
keep
it
up.
That
being
said,
you
promised
a
big
open
space
within
all
of
your
multi
family
units
that
you
want
to
build
along
with
your
boutiques
and
everything
going
in
there.
T
This
is
the
saddest
part
of
all.
You
do
not
care
for
the
people
of
Salt
Lake
nor
for
the
marginalized
families,
and
it
shows
so
please
reach
into
your
tiny
little
plastic
hearts
and
think
about
what's
best
for
the
community.
What
we've
asked
you
to
do
repeatedly
and
what
we
will
continue
to
ask
for
repeatedly.
The
murals
must
stay
in
one
form
or
another
hire
the
same
person
that
did
it
make
them,
so
they
can't
be
marred
up.
Make
an
open
space
make
it
family
friendly.
U
I
just
got
here,
thank
you
for
taking
my
comment.
I'm
actually
here
to
share
a
vision.
I
have
for
the
fleet
block
that
I
think
would
be
interesting
to
hear
with
respect
to
everyone
else's
input.
U
What
I
would
like
to
see
happen
is
to
create
something
that
would
be
an
attraction
actually
for
outside
people,
as
well
as
fitting
into
the
you
know
the
form
that
you
that
we
all
want
some
sort
of
open,
Green
Space,
some
sort
of
open,
shared
space.
That
is
interesting
and
my
vision
is
an
interesting
one.
The
original
founders
of
the
City
Georgia
Joseph
Smith
record
Brigham
Young.
They
had
originally
came
up
with
this
idea
called
the
plot
of
Zion.
Plaid
of
Zion
was
originally
a
residential
and
commercial
on
the
outside
green
space.
U
In
the
middle.
The
idea,
the
reason
our
blocks
are
so
big,
so
that
every
block
could
be
self-sustaining
in
their
Vision.
There
would
be
agriculture
in
the
middle
and
they
would
be
using
that
to
sustain
their
block.
I,
like
this
Vision
I,
think
it
fits
in
with
Modern
urban
ideas
of
open,
Green,
Space
of
mixed
use
of
walkable
cities.
I
think
it
fits
into
what
you're
trying
to
do
here
and
I
believe.
U
If
you
did
it
correctly,
it
would
actually
serve
also
as
a
living
and
breathing
Museum,
some
sort
of
a
gem
of
Salt
Lake.
You
might
say
that
would
display
this
original
Vision
and
that's
basically
what
I
wanted
to
share
today.
I
have
a
few
drafts
that
I
have
made
up.
U
That
I
could
share
if
you'd
like
to
see
them
and
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
Vision,
because
I
do
think
that
it
could
end
up
being
not
only
an
amazing
Community
Gathering
space,
a
place
for
you
know,
taking
into
account
all
of
the
things
that
that
block
is
being
known
for
the
police,
brutality,
murals
and
and
it's
become,
it
has
its
own
character
in
its
own
way.
Already
right,
but
I
feel
like
it
should
be
also,
maybe
an
attraction,
a
living
and
breathing
Museum.
Thank
you.
V
Good
evening
my
name
is
Elana
Raskin.
Thank
you
for
having
me
this
evening.
I,
don't
have
much
more
to
add
to
what's
already
been
said,
but
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
the
importance
of
truly
listening
to
the
families
of
the
people
who
are
up
on
the
murals.
That
should
be
the
number
one
first
and
foremost
priority
through
all
of
this.
V
The
people
that
I've
met
through
the
murals
and
the
work
that
I've
been
able
to
be
a
part
of
through
the
murals,
represent
the
very
best
of
Salt
Lake
City,
and
fill
my
heart
with
joy
and
pride.
Every
time
I
go
there
and
every
time
I
work
with
these
people
and
the
city's
response
over
and
over
again
honestly
represent
some
of
the
worst
of
what
I've
seen
in
Salt
Lake
City.
It's
clear
that
the
families
are
not
being
listened
to.
V
V
L
B
L
Zero,
you
may
have
a
point
of
privilege.
Yes
I,
you
know
the
something
that
I
I
came
out
to
mind
when
we
were
listening
to
the
the
comments
is
the,
and
it
reminded
me
about
the
dozens
of
meetings
that
we
had
had
in
public
about
this
same
issue
and
how
much,
for
example,
listening
to
remembering
some
of
the
things
that
councilmember
Romano
brought
him
to
the
table
about.
L
Let's
make
sure
that
this
project
even
impact
the
developers
and
The
Architects
that
we
are
involving
minority-owned,
Architects
and
and
developers
that
we
know
only
one
gigantic
company
will
take
over
this
project.
L
That
was
an
idea
from
council
member
Mano
from
council
member
Chris
Warren,
trying
to
remember
some
of
these
things,
trying
to
involve
some
make
a
space
for
non-profit
organizations
to
come
in
and
take
some
of
these
spaces
council
member
Victoria
Petro
to
try
to
make
sure
that
we
we
remember
about
the
victims
to
talk
about
the
communities,
impacted,
I,
I
it
just
dozens
of
meetings
about
this
in
public
recorded
you
can
find
them.
I
can
help
you
find
them.
There's
more
businesses,
another
one
that
you
you
brought
up.
L
Yes,
we
we
have
talked
about
income
levels
on
these
properties.
We
have
talked
about
all
of
this
and
we
have
still
lots
to
learn.
We
are
still
lots
to
evolve
and
to
improve,
but
this
conversation
didn't
start
here.
North
is
the
end
of
it
here,
but
this
city-
well,
we're
not
perfect,
is
listening
and
I.
Listen
so
carefully
to
the
administration's
work
on
reaching
out
to
the
community
spending
hundreds
of
hours
meeting
with
with
members
of
the
community
and
members
of
the
families.
Sometimes
too
I.
L
Remember
listening
to
those
reports
and
having
questions
here
about
that
I.
Yet
we're
never
going
to
fund
consensus
100
on
anything.
L
Let
me
tell
you:
I
have
a
neighbor
that
is
asking
me
for
a
street
light
and
I
have
another
neighbor
and
the
same
block
telling
me
to
take
off
the
street
lights,
and
this
is
a
much
more
complex
of
an
issue
to
be.
You
know:
I'm,
not
I,
don't
want
to
simplify
it,
but
they
work
done
here.
Well,
not
perfect
is
is
hard.
It
just
like
humbles
you,
because
we
have
done
so
much
to
to
make
this
project
perfect.
L
I
just
wanted
to
to
to
put
that
in
perspective,
because
there
is
a
lot
that
we
have
done
and
discuss
in
public
about
this
and
I
hope
that
we
can
help.
You
find
some
of
those
documents
and
meetings
that
are
recorded
and
on
the
record
and
I'm
sure
I
forgot,
half
of
it
and
messed
up
half
of
the
things
I
said,
but
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
in
there
after
that
vote.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
W
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair
good
evening,
an
organization
known
as
Iber
University
house
l3c
is
building
new
student
housing
at
434,
South
Mario
kopecki
drive
at
the
University
of
Utah
at
completion.
The
project
will
consist
of
four
buildings
with
465
apartment
style
units,
housing,
621
students,
the
administration
performed
a
public
benefit
analysis
to
assess
whether
the
city
should
waive
impact
and
permit
fees
as
well
as
provide
refunds
for
fees.
The
project
has
already
paid
the
amount
waived
or
refunded
would
total
just
over
2.4
million
dollars.
W
X
Y
Anna-Lysa
Wilson
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
ivory
University
house,
l3c
I
understood
that
staff
was
going
to
request
an
additional
study
session,
but
just
in
case
that
that
request
is
not
grounded.
I
wanted
to
hit
just
a
couple
items
one.
It
seemed
like
there
were
some
questions
in
the
last
study
session
about
the
entity
structure
and
given
the
dollars
involved.
I
want
to
be
completely
transparent
about
that.
Y
What
that
is,
and
the
packet
I
provided
I,
provided
the
definition
of
an
l3c
and
you'll
see
in
that
that
an
l3c,
just
like
a
non-profit,
is
required
to
have
a
charitable,
a
charitable
purpose.
Unfortunately,
an
l3c
does
not
have
the
benefit
of
being
tax-exempt,
so
why
would
we
ever
pick
this
entity
when
we
have
all
the
burdens
and
none
of
the
benefits
and
really
the
only
reason
is
so
that
Ivory
commercial
could
build
this
building
and
by
building
this
building
at
cost
without
charging
any
developer
fee?
Y
It
allowed
this
project
to
save
over
7.5
million
dollars
and
all
of
that
dollar
for
dollar
will
be
applied
to
student
scholarships.
That
is
the
only
reason
we're
all
dealing
with
this
wonky
structure.
I.
Also
want
to
be
completely
transparent
that
there
is
only
one
owner
of
ivory,
University
house
l3c
and
that's
a
trust.
That's
the
ivory,
University
House
trust
and
the
only
beneficiary
of
that
trust
is
a
501c3
I'm
called
The
Clark
and
Christine
Ivory
foundation.
Y
So
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear
with
the
council
that
no
individual
or
for
profit
entity
would
be
receiving
any
benefit
from
this
waiver
and
then
finally,
I
think
the
last
point
I
just
want
to
hit
quickly
is.
If
you
look
on
the
third
slide,
we
did
do
an
impact
analysis
by
waiving
these
funds.
That
does
not
mean
the
city
will
incur
these
funds.
In
fact,
our
position
is
this:
there
will
be
zero
impact
on
the
city.
Y
We
have
studies
that
show
University
students
do
not
use
Salt,
Lake,
City
Parks
and
that's
1.6
million
of
the
fee
and
for
the
rest,
as
you'll
see,
we
have
a
contract
with
the
University
of
Utah
to
provide
police
support.
We
will
not
increase
impacts
on
the
roads
and
the
state
of
the
art
building
will
will
have
its
own
fire
suppression.
L
B
I
have
a
motion
from
councilman
pulley,
a
second
from
councilman
valder
moros,
any
discussion
inside
him,
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
aye
opposed
that
motion
passes
unanimously,
7-0
moving
on
to
item
B4
enormous
budget
amendment
number
one
for
fiscal
year
2023-24
before
taking
comments.
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
Ben
lutke
Council
staff
policy.
Analyst.
Z
There
are
10
proposed
items
in
budget
amendment
number
one
which
have
a
total
expenditure
of
over
14
million
dollars.
Some
of
the
largest
items
include
a
14
million
dollar
re-appropriation
for
new
vehicles,
because
manufacturers
were
not
accepting
orders
when
the
funding
was
originally
approved,
but
the
vehicles
are
still
needed.
Z
K
AA
Hi-
let's
see
so
on
2100
South,
not
to
debate
all
the
back
and
forth
about
the
project
there,
but
there's
some
details
that
I've
met
with
Transportation
about
that
would
be
really
nice
to
see
like
better
Crossing
at
Ninth
East,
some
other
better
Crossings
on
this
and
I
hope
that
you
will
provide
enough
funding
in
here,
so
that
so
that
transportation's
hands
aren't
tied
and
there's
a
little
bit
of
leeway
in
the
budget
to
do
some
of
the
nicer
things
and
add
some
things
like
this
and
that's
pretty
much
all
I
wanted
to
say
on.
AA
That
is
just
make
sure,
there's
enough
money
so
that
they're
not
stuck
with
not
the
not
the
greatest
outcome
for
this
project.
So
that's
it.
Thank
you.
B
G
B
C
Mr
chair
can
I
just
clarify
something
quickly
about
that
inclusion
of
item
A3.
C
P
P
Right
so-
and
we
talked
about
this
during
the
budget
amendment
work
session
earlier-
to
clarify
so
it
it
will
not
be
included
in
the
budget
amendment
unless
you
approve
the
public
benefits
analysis,
so
staff
will
Auto
will
will
automatically
adjust
the
budget
amendment
according
to
the
action
you
take
on.
The
public
benefits
analysis
right.
C
D
P
I
think
what
and
staff
has
been
brainstorming.
It
is
that
it's
a
little
unusual
that
it's
on
the
same
date
and
the
administration
transmitted
it
this
way
just
to
preserve
options
like
you
said,
so
what
we'll
likely
do
is
confirm
it
on
the
motion
sheet
that
consistent
with
your
action
earlier
in
the
evening.
The
same
is
true
for
the
Consolidated
fee
schedule:
item
hypothetically.
If
you
did
not
approve
those
Consolidated
fee
schedule,
changes
we'd,
remove
that
from
them.
Z
All
fees
charged
by
the
city
are
shown
on
the
Consolidated
fee
schedule,
along
with
the
authorizing
law.
This
amendment
is
to
separate
out
different
fees
for
closing
of
vehicle
travel,
Lane
versus
closing
a
portion
of
the
sidewalk.
The
adopted
version
of
the
Consolidated
fee
schedule
inadvertently
listed
the
same
amount
for
closing
a
sidewalk.
As
for
closing
a
vehicle
travel
Lane,
they
should
be
separate
amounts.
This
amendment
will
correct
and
separate
the
two
fees.
K
AA
So
I
don't
think,
there's
anything
wrong
with
separating
the
fees
for
closing
a
sidewalk
or
closing
a
lane
of
traffic.
AA
However,
Salt
Lake
City
has
a
really
bad
problem
throughout
the
city
of
contractors,
continually
violating
and
and
not
providing
space
for
pedestrians
to
walk
to
closing
off
or
putting
signs
in
the
middle
of
bike
Lanes
to,
for
example,
on
300
north
parking
in
the
bike
Lanes,
where
there's
a
construction
project-
or
you
know,
1300
East,
where
there's
continually
signs
placed
in
the
middle
of
the
bike
lane
leading
to
unsafe
conditions.
AA
There
are
countless
numbers
of
problems
downtown
where
sidewalks
get
closed,
with
no
alternative
no
place
for
people
with
disabilities
no
place
to
walk
safely
and
this.
While
this
isn't
necessarily
for
this
particular
Council
item,
I've
talked
with
Transportation.
They
don't
really
know
what
to
do,
and
yet
it
continues
to
be
a
problem
and
we,
as
Citizens
are
told
to
talk
with
enforcement,
but
nothing
happens
there,
and
so
can
the
council
please
act
upon
this,
so
that
if
the
fee
is
for
closing
a
sidewalk
that
perhaps
it's
tripled
or
quadrupled?
AA
If
they
don't
do
the
right
thing
and
same
goes
for
lane
closures,
because
the
contractors
have
basically
run
amok
and
there's
no
real
good
oversight,
there's
no
good
enforcement
mechanism
and
the
permitting
process
there
is
completely
broken
so,
and
this
ultimately
hurts
people
on
foot
and
people
on
bikes.
Thank
you.
D
B
B
D
The
study
should
include,
but
not
be
limited
to
the
following
possible
changes:
consolidating
of
R1
5000,
7000
and
12
000
into
one
zone,
reducing
the
minimum
lot
size,
removing
or
reducing
minimum
Frontage
easing
flag
lot
standards
and
allowing
single-family
attached
housing
in
all
zones.
I
further
move
that
we
initiate
a
separate
study
to
consider
zoning
map
amendments
along
collector
and
arterial
roads
to
a
louder,
allow
greater
residential
density
and
mixed
use
developments,
foreign.
B
In
work
at
this
time,
we'll
go
through
those
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
the
motion
on
the
actual
rezoning,
so
I
have
a
motion
from
council
member
mono,
which
is
an
optional
legislative
action.
Moving
forward
do
I
have
a
second
for
that
motion.
Second,
a
motion
for
councilman
mono,
a
second
from
councilman
Pietro.
Any
discussion
on
this
item
I'll
just
say
that
I
have
a
motion
at
the
end
of
this
basically
and
council.
Member
Morris
has
the
next
one
making
additional
legislative
intent
to
the
same
broad
category.
B
So
on
this
item
here,
I
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,.
C
I
bet
can
I
have
a
moment
of
personal
privilege.
Yes,
thank
you.
Mr,
chair
I,
just
want
to
speak
to
the
to
the
legislative
intent
that
we
just
adopted
on
two
things.
Two
things
I
want
to
note,
especially
for
residents
in
District
3,
that
this
is
our
recommended
changes
that
would
be
to
certain
areas
in
the
city,
but
that
it
the
historic
districts
that
still
exist.
Those
are
on
top
of
the
existing
zoning.
C
So
those
would
continue
to
be
the
same
that
they
are
so
there
was
no
need
to
include
that
in
this
motion,
because
it
doesn't
change
the
historic
districts.
I
also
want
to
speak
to
constituents
that
might
be
listening.
That
have
asked
me.
What
is
the
council's
strategy
and
philosophy
about
adding
density
because
they've
been
listening
to
our
discussions,
they've
been
following
us
and
and
that's
a
question
that
I've
gotten
frequently
the
majority
of
residents
recognize
that
we
need
more
housing
and
that
we're
running
out
of
land
on
which
to
build.
C
It
I
also
think
that
most
Salt
Lake
City
residents
recognize
that
the
situation
that
we're
in
now
is
the
result
of
historic
inequities
and
they
want
the
council
or
they
want
their
city
government
to
help
right
those
wrongs,
I,
don't
think
it's
the.
What
we've
been
doing
is
the
best
way
for
us
to
to
achieve
those
ends
to
approve
things
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
I
think
we
need
a
broader
perspective
and
a
more
transparent
organized
process.
C
If
we're
going
to
tackle
this
issue,
then
let's
do
it
in
a
way
that
actually
creates
an
equitable
outcome,
because
that's
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
in
all
of
these
conversations
and
I
ask
that
every
constituent,
especially
anyone,
that's
listening
from
District
3,
to
engage
with
us
thoughtfully
in
our
discussions
that
are
coming
up
along
the
way
about
these,
these
necessary
changes
and
in
adding
density.
So
thank
you
to
council
member
mono
for
suggesting
this
legislative
intent
and
I'm
glad
to
support
it
on
that
basis.
Thank
you.
AB
G
X
B
AC
B
So
I
understand
the
desires
of
this
study
and
I
I
kind
of
echo.
What
councilmember.
I
B
Was
also
saying
here
that
I
understand
the
the
desires
of
this,
but
I
feel
that
a
deeper
discussion
of
the
scope
of
the
study
is
necessary
prior
to
launching
it
growth
and
increased
density
deserves
a
thoughtful
and
thorough
discussion,
because
I'm
concerned
with
the
impact
of
growth
and
density
on
our
air
quality.
If
the
result
is
more
vehicles
on
the
streets,
housing
density
requires
nearby
grocery
stores,
daycares
local
establishments
to
take
the
car
off
the
street
and
establish
an
affordable
living
I'm
also
concerned
with
our
water.
B
If
our
usage
is
not
addressed,
the
Great
Salt,
Lake
I
should
say
Great
Salt
Lake
is
10
feet
lower
than
what
then
I
would
call
a
healthy
level.
Even
after
an
incredible
year,
it's
still
10
feet,
lower
and
I'm
concerned
that
the
infrastructure
costs
associated
with
growth
and
how
that's
going
to
impact
the
city.
B
So
in
these
concerns
back
to
California
Warriors
point
is
not
just
District
3
or
District
Six.
It's
not
specific
to
one
District,
but
in
the
entire
city
and
I
have
just
a
couple
suggestions,
but
I'm
gonna
make
that
motion
at
the
end
here.
So
that's
just
my
my
personal
privilege.
Thank
you.
G
This
is
my
suggestion
that
I
move
that
the
city
collaborate
with
a
county
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
how
city
and
county
ordinances
interact
pertaining
to
subdivision
processes
and
update
ordinances,
if
needed,
to
make
sure
both
are
consistent
and
I.
Further
move
that
we
asked
the
administration
to
identify,
Residential
Properties
that
are
non-conforming
lots
within
the
city
and
create
a
streamlined
process
to
legalize
them
and
recommend
to
the
council
budgetary
needs.
If
a
third
party
is
needed
to
help
accomplish
this,.
B
AD
To
me,
I
know:
I
need
nitpicky,
but
it's
become
really
apparent
tonight
and
today
in
discussions
that
our
zoning
in
general
is
not
keeping
up
and
is
actually
holding
us
back
in
a
lot
of
cases
from
doing
what
needs
to
be
done
for
the
city.
Our
constituents,
particularly
on
the
border
that
council,
member
Pui
and
I
share,
are
so
tired
of
lot
by
Lottery
zones.
AD
Can
we
put
a
caveat
in
here
that
says
if
this
takes
too
much
energy
away,
and
it
would
just
be
better
as
part
of
a
city-wide
rezone
or
a
re-comprehension
of
zoning?
What
I
don't
want
to
do
is
spend
18
months
doing
this
only
to
get
18
months
down
the
road
and
go.
We
should
have
done
this
as
part
of
a
larger
project
and
allocated
any
funding
Consulting
towards
this
larger
Pro.
Do
you
see
what
I'm
saying
it's?
It's
not
that
I
don't
want
this
done.
AD
G
Fact,
but
then
we
have
to
say
today
that
we're
going
to
allocate
funding
for
the
Citywide
recent
study,
because
until
we
until
we
get
there
for
as
we
decide
as
we
come
back
with
this,
this
non-conforming
lot
exists
today,
they've
existed
for
a
long
time,
it's
always
an
issue.
He
pits
the
neighborhoods
against
neighbor
about,
can
I
build
one
one
more
house
can
I,
not
the
planning
stuff
is
crumbling.
The
word
of
adjustment
us
look
at
how
many
resources
it's
taken.
I
know
from
experience
in
the
planning
division.
We
spend
so
much
time
in
this.
G
So
all
I'm,
asking
with
my
emotion,
is
let's
talk
to
the
county
which
people
can
go
to
the
county
and
just
you
know,
divide
a
property
without
telling
us
and
all
of
a
sudden
a
new
property
owner
has
three
lots
or
whatever,
and
then
let's
have
an
mou
with
them
to
say,
hey.
How
can
we
make
this
stop
or
come
up
with
a
solution
that
so
that
we
don't
create
more
work
for
our
planning
staff
and
two
I
know
we
have
so
many.
AD
If
we
can
I,
just
I,
just
I
suspect
it's
if
we
start
pulling
this
thread,
others
are
going
to
start
coming
with
it
and
I.
Just
don't
want
us
to
narrow
down
and
give
undue
attention
to
this
when
we
should
be
more
comprehensive,
so
as
long
as
that's
flagged
somewhere
in
our
Consciousness
and
comprehension
as
we're
moving
along
that,
if
we
start
pulling
on
this
thread,
and
others
start
coming
with
it-
that
it
might
be
time
for
us
to
start
thinking
more
globally
about
how
to
handle
this
I'd
like
us
to
stay
open
to
that.
C
C
But
I
just
disagree
that,
like
with
the
concept
of
the
worst
and
I'm
sorry,
if
I'm
like
lawyering
this
but
like
to
say
that
we're
legalizing
then
like
they
are
currently
legal
they're,
just
the
people
that
have
them
I
guess
want
to
change
what
the
law
is
that
applies,
and
that
to
me
is
is
just
the
same
side.
It's
just
the
other
side
of
the
same
coin,
so
I
I
support
the
first
part.
The
second
part
I,
don't
and
so.
For
that
reason,
I
would
I'm
voting
against
it.
C
G
C
Do
you
have
a
friendly
change?
Yeah
I
think.
Yes,
thank
you.
I
think.
The
the
first
part
is
fine
and
I.
Think
saying
that
for
me,
what
Victoria
said?
Excuse
me,
but
councilmember
Petro
said,
is
sort
of
answers.
The
second
part
we're
going
to
ask
for
is
a
more
holistic
View,
and
hopefully
most
of
these
Lots
will
be
captured
within
that
view,
and
so
to
me
that
kind
of
solves
the
second
part,
especially
if
we
just
this.
C
The
second
paragraph,
especially
if
we
include
the
first
paragraph
which
instruct
staff
is
part
of
the
process
in
motion,
one
to
also
coordinate
with
the
county,
to
make
sure
that
that
we're
preventing
this
from
continuing
to
happen
or
better
understanding
how
we
got
to
where
we
are
and
incorporate
that
into
the
same
study,
rather
than
have
a
separate
competing.
C
All
right,
yes,
so
my
friendly
Amendment
would
be
just
to
strike
the
second,
the
second
paragraph
and
to
just
vote
on
the.
B
I
B
Over
that
family
councilmano,
all
in
favor
of
the
friendly
Amendment
from
councilman
Warden
hi
hi
any
opposed.
Thank
you
interposed
that
motion
passes
unanimously
thanks.
AB
U
B
The
third
motion
and
this
kind
of
goes
council
member
of
pizza's
comment
there
earlier
that
this
is
a
complex
discussion
and
item
and
it
it
requires
some
thorough
and
thoughtful
discussions
across
the
board,
not
just
from
the
council
members,
but
also
from
the
community
and
making
sure
we
have
a
good
dialogue
here.
So
my
motion
is
that
I
move
that
we
include
in
this
solicitors
actions
that
we're
talking
about
here
in
the
last
two
motions
that
the
council
will
hold
a
work
session
with
the
administration
on
the
scope
of
the
study.
B
G
L
Do
you
have
some
thoughts
about
this
I?
Have
some
thoughts
about
this
Mr
chair,
I,
I?
Obviously,
I
don't
disagree
with
it
with
you
know
what
you're
trying
to
to
get
to
this
here,
which
is,
let's
make
sure
that
this
study
sort
of
lines
aligns
with
all
these
other
parts
of
this
that
we're
studying.
All
of
this
other
driving
is
in
place
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
work
with
that.
L
We
are
not
displacing
and
that
we
are
understanding
the
forces
of
this
place,
displacement
and
gentrification
I
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
the
future
land
and
water
policy,
because
we
don't
have
you
know
the
city
doesn't
own
these
studies
and
we're
not
currently,
as
far
as
I
understand
spearheading
studies
within
the
city.
That
gives
us
Direction
about
how
what
this
means
and
I
also
have
a
little
confusion
about
what
you
meant
by
public
transportation
needs
I
mean
I
I
mean
as
you.
L
You
know,
I've
been
pushing
on
Transportation
since
with
you
and
with
many
of
us
together,
but
we
don't
own
the
public
transportation
and
the
UTA,
and
you
know
the
legislature
will
tell
you
that
is
the
chicken
or
the
egg.
First,
why
do
you
need
the
demand?
Hence
we
are
paying
ourselves
with
City
funds
for
for
bus
lines
to
go
into
the
west
side
and
only
on
the
west
side,
but
to
the
west
side,
because
the
UTA
will
not
fund
them
themselves.
L
So
so
you
know
I'm
a
little
confused
about
how
this
caveats
might
actually
be
in
detriment
to
the
general
study,
which
is,
let's
study,
the
the
general
picture.
First,
I
I'm
I'm,
okay,
supporting
the
alignment
with
thriving
in
place
and
our
original
walkable
City,
because
I
do
agree
with
with
those
and
another
I
disagree
with
the
water
issues
and
land
issues
and
and
public
transportation.
But
I
I.
Also.
Don't
think
that
we
have
studies
that
I
could
refer
to
not
very.
B
Good
point-
and
my
my
thought
was
that
this
is
a
study.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
when
we're
looking
at
this
study,
we're
taking
a
holistic
look
on
on
the
impact,
because,
if
we're
going
to
be
a
walkable
City,
then
we
get
look
at.
We
need
to
look
at
the
public
transportation.
If
we're
going
to
be
a
walkable
City,
we
need
to
look
at
our
water
policy
yeah.
That
was
that
was.
That
was
a
vision
of
there.
L
L
I
I,
you
know,
you
know
when
you
yeah,
I,
I
sort
of
I,
I,
think
I,
understand
what
you
mean
and
when
you're
talking
about
water
policy
right,
single-family
homes
use
more
water
than
a
building
right.
Absolutely.
N
B
That
and
that's
also
about
the
whole
time
the
idea
of
growth
right
we're
growing
as
a
city,
but
our
water
is
really
not
growing.
So
how
do
we
make
sure
that
those
things
are
aligned
and
then
the
same
thing
with
the
infrastructure?
How
do
we
make
sure
that
we're
not
growing
so
much
and
then
all
the
Cal,
our
infrastructure
is
gonna,
can't
handle
it
and
it's
gonna
cost
us
more
money
or
the
water
use.
That's
that's.
Why
I'm
looking
at
the
holistic
bar
there,
okay,
yeah,
that's,
why
I
put
the
alignment
and
you're
right?
D
I
have
I
have
a
comment,
sure
the
motion,
I
I,
think
all
of
these
things
are
important
for
us
to
consider
with
any
changes
we
make
I'm
gonna
vote
no
on
this,
because
I
don't
want
to
have
I,
don't
I'm,
always
happy
to
have
a
work
session
and
discuss
zoning
issues.
You
know
that's
my
number
one
issue,
but
the
original
motion
that
we
pass
is
just
asking
staff
to
begin
studying
that.
D
So
at
some
point
we
can
have
a
work
session
to
discuss
that
and
at
that
point
I
think
we'll
we're
going
to
naturally
look
at
all
all
four
of
those
things
and
it's
not
I,
don't
know
of
another
time
when
we
have
done
a
work
session
before
we
have
any
information
from
staff,
so
I
for
me,
I
would
want
to
wait
until
staff
can
study
this
out,
bring
it
to
us
and
then
we
can
consider
those
things
within
within
that
I
would
be
okay
with
language
that
says
that,
just
as
councilmember
Voldemort
asked
that
we
add
the
issues
pertaining
to
the
subdivision
process
and
non-conforming
lots.
D
I
would
be
okay.
Adding
into
that
that
we
ask
staff
to
consider
those
four
things
as
they
do
their
study
to
bring
to
us
what
could
be
a
potential
ordinance
change
or
maybe
not.
Maybe
they
come
to
us
and
say
we're
not
going
to
recommend
anything.
That's
also
a
possible
outcome
of
this,
but
so
I
would
be
okay,
adding
language
that
says
staff.
D
D
Think
I
think
we
need
to
give
staff
time
to
study
it
before
I
I
mean
any
land
use
decision
has
to
go
through
the
whole
process
of
Staff
studies.
That
gives
a
recommendation
to
engage
with
the
community.
The
Planning
Commission
has
a
open
public
comment
period.
They
make
a
recommendation
and
then
we
do
the
same
thing
with
our
open
public
comment
period,
public
hearing
and
recommendation
and
so
I
don't
know.
D
D
Would
consider
adding
those
as
as
priorities
that
we
ask
staff
to
do
as
they're
studying
this,
but
I'm
not
sure
the
part
about
having
a
work
session
to
tell
them
to
look
at
those
things
is
necessary.
I
think
we
just
tell
them
right
now
to
look
at
those
things.
Okay,
they've
done
their
study.
They
come
back
with
that
information,
so.
B
D
Have
to
make
a
friendly
Amendment
I'll
suggest
a
friendly
Amendment
question.
The
amendment
would
be
that
the
motion
rings
I
move
that
we
include
in
the
legislative
action
that
the
staff
consider
the
following
four
things
as
they
conduct
their
study:
thriving
in
place,
future
land
and
water
policy,
public
transportation
and
walkable
communities.
I.
L
B
A
B
J
AE
H
B
That
that
passes
six
to
one
and
it.
G
B
I
believe,
thank
you
very
much
from
the
the
council
and
the
staff
for
for
and
and
the
city
for,
allowing
us
that
discussion
on
Mr
this
one
motion.
As
you
can
see,
zoning
and
the
city
is
due
to
our
hearts
and
it's
important
that
we
have
some
great
communication
and
great
dialogue
across
the
city
on
all
things.
We.
D
Appreciate
that
very
much
could
I
take
a
short
point
of
personal
privilege.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
my
colleagues
for
engaging
on
this
issue.
It
is
a
very
weird
strange
request
that
was
brought
to
us,
but
it
has
implications
for
the
entire
city
and
every
I
don't
know
that
there
were
very
many
council
members
that
were
on
the
same
page
and
for
us
to
find
some
level
of
consensus
on
what
be
able
to
pass.
Something
that
we
agree.
I
feel
like
is
a
really
big
step.
D
So
thank
you
specifically
councilman
Wharton,
who
I
think
you
and
I
were
on.
Maybe
the
opposite
ends
of
this
issue
to
begin
with,
and
it
was
a
conversation
with
you
that
got
us
to
find
something
that
we
overlapped
on
and
we're
able
to
work
together
on.
So
thank
you
for
for
having
that
conversation
and
for
being
willing
to
work
with
me
on
this
issue.
AD
B
B
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
comment.
All
in
favor
of
the
motion
all.
B
And
we
are
now
at
the
general
comment
portion
of
our
meeting
and
as
a
reminder
for
those
joining
on
Zoom
ESAT
canado
from
our
staff
will
moderate
our
zoom
and
we'll
message
you
with
any
questions
about
your
registration
staff
is
handling
many
tasks.
So
please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
informational
updates.
If
you
need,
if
you
do
need
to
speak
with
our
staff,
please
select
esak
canado
from
our
list
of
participants.
B
If
you
need
to
please
raise
your
hand
and
zoom
to
indicate
that
you
need
something
from
The.
Host
Taylor
Hill
on
her
staff
will
be
calling
those
who
wish
to
comment
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards.
She'll
call
four
names
at
a
time
and
if
you're
in
person,
please
make
sure
you
come
back
to
room
326
this
room
to
make
your
comments.
If
you're
on
Zoom,
please
unmute
your
mic
when
Taylor
calls
your
name.
AD
AD
AD
During
the
work
session,
I
was
pleased
to
present
the
requests
that
centered
the
constituents
who
live
out
there,
which
means
that
we
are
seeking
a
comprehensive
AG
zoning
throughout
anything
that
is
eligible
for
rezoning
things
that
are
already
entitled
like
the
business
park
on
the
Scannell
property
that
is
currently
home
to
a
1
million
square
foot.
Warehouse,
that's
not
up
for
grabs,
but
anything
that
is
up
for
grabs
will
be
zoned
AG
in
an
effort
to
buy
the
city
more
time.
There
is
no
intention
to
create
a
warehouse
District,
nor
was
there
ever.
AD
The
grasp
at
M1
was
a
an
attempt
to
avoid
the
horrors
that
have
resulted
from
Business
Park,
which
is
currently
what
my
neighbors
and
friends
who
live
out
there
are
dealing
with,
which
is
a
1
million
square
foot
Warehouse
that
blocks
their
view
of
sunsets
impedes
every
aspect
of
their
life
and
is
causing
a
development
scenario
that
is
causing
light
pollution,
sound
pollution
and
air
pollution
in
their
lives.
To
the
point
that
their
physical
and
mental
health
is
now
being
imperiled,
and
so
as
we're
asking
for
AG.
AD
The
plan
is
the
direct
result
of
me
and
staff
engaging
directly
with
the
constituents
who
live
there.
It
is
at
their
direction
that
I
have
presented
it
and
that
I've
asked
my
co-counselors
to
suggest
it,
and
so
as
you're,
making
your
comments.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
had
the
time
and
opportunity
to
use
your
words
in
two
minutes
most
effectively
and
not
ask
us
to
not
do
a
warehouse
District,
which
is
already
off
the
table.
Thank
you
all.
B
Back
to
the
the
agenda
items
here,
it's
two
minutes
is
a
two
minute
timer.
If
you're
unable
to
finish
your
comments,
you
can
send
us
the
rest,
your
comments
or
your
full
comments
via
email,
mail
or
call
us
our
office
and
also
just
the
rules
of
the
Chrome,
are
taking
effect.
Please
be
respectful,
while
sharing
your
comments,
because
the
council
also
respects
All
Points
of
View
and
welcomes
new
insights.
So
I
will
now
turn
the
time
over
to
Taylor
for
a
first
commenter.
AF
B
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
just
want
to
make
clarify
for
others
in
the
audience.
Yet
we're
normally
give
him
two
minutes,
but
88
laws
accommodations,
allow
him
up
to
four
minutes.
So
thank
you
very
much.
P
Then
Courtney
Taylor
I
guess
he
has
more
to
say-
is
that
correct,
okay
and
so
we'll
start
that
timer
over
again
sorry.
B
AF
So
please
I
want
to
be
able
to
leave
my
property
and
and
house
alone
and
not
be
required
to
have
that
tree
and
not
require
to
water
that
tree.
AF
D
A
B
D
K
AG
Thank
you.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you.
Okay.
First
of
all,
I
attended
the
oh
I
didn't
attend.
I
watched
the
the
work
session
today
and
I
really
appreciate
the
honesty
and
the
passion
with
which
the
North
Point
master
plan
was
discussed.
AG
There
seemed
to
emerge
a
little
bit
of
a
false
dichotomy
in
the
discussion
that
was
kind
of
concerning
pitting
people
against
the
environment
and
I,
just
like
to
remind
the
the
city
of
our
interconnectedness
of
you,
know:
interconnection
of
generations
and
species
and
resources-
and
you
know,
as
our
city
grows,
whether
we
want
it
to
or
not
it's
happening.
AG
The
City
might
consider
looking
to
a
recent
World
economic
Forum,
Insight
report,
January
2022
that
Maps
a
path
for
growing
cities
to
transform
their
relationships
to
Nature,
to
becoming
biodiverse
cities
by
2023,
and
these
would
be
cities
that
are
sustainable
and
strive
to
meet
the
needs
of
all
of
its
citizens,
and
this
is
something
I'd
be
happy
to
email.
You
in
fact,
I
already
have
so
look
forward
to
reading
it
in
your
email,
yeah.
So
just
a
reminder
of
our
interconnectedness
and
I.
Thank
you
for
all
your
work.
K
AH
Hi,
my
name
is
Dr
Brian
Manch,
president
of
Utah,
Physicians,
for
a
healthy
environment
and
I
am
just
modifying
my
comments
based
on
what
we
just
learned
about
have
what
happened
at
the
work
session.
AH
The
shrinking
of
the
Great
Salt
Lake
has
prompted
multiple
National
and
international
stories
in
the
last
year,
all
of
which
amounted
to
a
single,
a
significant
negative
PR
campaign
for
the
city
and
the
state
for
not
doing
enough
to
save
the
lake.
The
author
of
the
largest
piece
in
the
New
York
Times,
said
quote:
utahns
may
have
to
leave
if
the
lake
disappears.
AH
This
is
the
most
important
environmental
and
public
health
issue
in
the
state's
history
and
it
will
Define
our
future
beginning
tomorrow.
There
will
be
another
round
of
national
stories
about
a
new
chapter
on
this
issue:
another
round
of
bad
PR
for
Salt
Lake
City
on
the
state
for
not
taking
any
real
action
to
save
the
lake,
the
North
Point
master
plan.
AH
No
one
wants
Salt
Lake
City
in
2040
to
look
like
Pittsburgh
of
1940.
industrializing.
The
North
Point
will
create
a
dark,
dirty
and
ugly
place
to
live.
We
are
all
clearly
reaching
a
breaking
point
where
all
the
things
we
depend
on
for
a
decent
quality
of
life
on
the
Wasatch
Front
could
be
sacrificed
on
the
altar
developer
profiteering.
Thank
you.
X
Thank
you.
I'm
gonna
hold
this
I'm
kind
of
tall.
Thank
you.
Councilwoman
Petro
awesome,
giving
us
that
tingly
feeling
at
the
council
really
appreciate
it.
I
had
the
opportunity
to
hear
Ben,
Abbott,
Professor
Abbott
speak
last
week
and
I
strongly
encourage
everyone
to
listen
to
him.
You
know
he
has
a
PHD
in
Saline,
Lake,
ecology
and
Brian
alluded
to
you
know.
He
gave
Great
Salt
Lake
a
death
sentence
and
we
got
some
water
this
year.
Maybe
it's
not
five
years.
Maybe
it's
six
or
seven
and
his
advice
is.
X
We
all
need
to
do
everything
that
we
can
to
save
her
and
tonight.
For
me,
that's
coming
here
and
watching
this
great
council
at
work,
hubby
and
kids,
making
their
own
dinner.
Who
knows
for
the
council
I
feel
like
it's
aging,
The
Zone,
that's
great!
Is
there
a
wetland
zone,
I'm
ignorant,
I,
don't
know,
but
that's
what
we
need
right
now.
It
seems
like
around
the
Great
Salt
Lake
I'm,
going
to
use
the
rest
of
my
time
to
quote
the
wonderful
Terry
Tempest
Williams.
We
place
our
faith
in
our
Collective
capacity
to
mobilize
now.
K
AC
My
name
is
Katie
Pappas
and
I
live
in
District
3
area
plan
as
it
is
currently
written.
It
promotes
more
Construction
in
a
unique
rural
area
with
60
households
and
important
Wetland
and
wildlife
habitat.
This
was
never
the
right
place
for
this
type
of
development.
A
trip
to
the
Inland
Port
area
confirms
there
is
already
Warehouse
construction
far
exceeding
the
actual
needs.
AC
I
agree
with
the
mayor
that
North
Point
is
unique
and
planning
must
be
sensitive
to
the
rural
nature
of
the
area.
The
best
way
to
achieve
that
is
to
leave
the
zoning
area
to
leave
the
area's
owned
agricultural
as
it
currently
is.
M1
zoning
is
far
too
broad.
It
impedes
the
city's
ability
to
guide
appropriate
development
for
individual
areas.
AC
AC
You
can
always
build
something,
but
there
are
a
few
opportunities
to
set
aside
and
preserve
natural
areas
for
the
future.
This
is
not
choosing
between
helping
people
or
the
natural
environment.
We
are
all
part
of
the
same.
More
attention
needs
to
be
paid
to
the
impacts
of
ongoing
construction
on
the
health
and
well-being
of
residents.
Construction
is
no
longer
a
temporary
inconvenience.
It
is
an
ongoing
nightmare
24
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week
for
North
Point
residents.
Efforts
must
be
made
to
mitigate
damage
unless
an
impacts.
AC
AI
Hi,
my
name
is
Mary
Paul,
just
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
the
change
of
updates
and
I
agree
with
the
previous
commenters
hooray
hooray
for
at
least
the
AG
designation.
AI
Very
much
appreciated,
like
you
said
it
buys
time,
but
ultimately
it's
the
wrong
designation,
because
even
with
agricultural
development
that
could
still
have
you
know
horrific
Downstream
environmental
effects
on
this
very
precious
area
and
if
anything,
the
past
several
years
that
we've
been
through
with
drought
and
then
an
onslaught
of
beautiful,
wonderful
rain
and
snow
has
taught
us
the
critical
importance
of
exactly
what
the
Great
Salt
Lake
does
for
our
air
quality
and
our
water
supply,
and
it
is
not
a
critical
resource
to
be
toyed
with
our
very
survival,
is
at
stake.
AI
AI
This
is
not
what
they
signed
up
for,
and
I
actually
used
to
go
duck
hunting
out
there
with
my
dad
as
a
kid
and
it's
it
was
literally
the
most
beautiful
place
in
the
world
in
my
mind's
eye
and
that
deserves
to
be
preserved
and
continued
on
for
all
of
the
species
for
all
of
the
ecosystems
for
all
of
the
people.
AI
I
really
appreciate
listening
to
this
meeting
and
the
care
and
the
concern
that
you
have
expressed
for
these
other
developments
and
that
you
want
to
take
the
long,
Broad
View
and
do
things
right
please.
This
is
an
urgent
matter.
I
urge
you
to
consider
an
emergency
zoning
if
possible,
an
allocation
of
some
sorts
that
will
bias
the
proper
time
and
absolutely
halt
everything.
We
cannot
mess
this
up.
It
is
our
survival.
Thank
you.
M
Hi,
can
you
hear
me.
B
M
Hello,
okay,
great
so
my
name
is
Tessie.
King
I
live
in
District,
Seven
and
I
just
have
a
whole
lot
of
questions.
First
of
all,
what
what
is
the
development
that
we
are
looking
at?
Are
we
looking
at?
M
What
types
of
jobs
I
kind
of
have
this
feeling
that
we're
having
a
discussion
between
helping
people
who
need
jobs
and
pitting
that,
like
one
of
the
speakers,
mentioned
against
environmental
concerns
and
I'm
curious
about
why
we
have
come
to
the
point
where
we're
even
hitting
those
two
things
against
one
another
I'm
very
much
for
helping
people
get
better
jobs,
but
I'm
also
very
much
about
keeping
our
environment,
especially
at
this
time
when
we
are
in
the
midst
of
climate
change
and
I,
just
don't
quite
understand
how
we
can
possibly
look
at
the
Great,
Salt
Lake
and
say:
well,
you
know
it's
it'll,
be
here.
M
It's
fine!
It's
been
here
for
centuries
and
we're
in
a
climate
we're
we're
in
the
midst
of
the
climate
crisis,
so
I
just
don't
think
that
this
is
the
time
for
us
to
mess
around
with
the
wetlands
to
create
more
pollution
with
more
development.
It
seems
like
there
are
plenty
of
warehouses
throughout
the
Salt
Lake
Valley
that
sit
vacants
and
if
I
know,
councilwoman
Petro
eschler
says
this,
isn't
a
warehouse
development.
How
do
we
know
that
an
Agri
is
going
to
be
I
I?
M
K
AJ
Okay,
thank
you.
So
much
I'm
Marshall,
walk,
I
live
in
Salt
Lake
I
have
grandchildren
in
the
North
Point
Community
and
I
want
to
talk
about
a
public
health
catastrophe,
and
it's
going
to
happen.
AJ
AJ
They
went
ahead
and
built
it
on
a
mosquito
infested
land
which
they
knew
about
and
I
guess
they
figured
it
would
be
just
fit.
Well,
it's
not
fixed
and
it's
worse
than
it
ever.
It
was
a
billion
dollars
which
was
double
the
amount
taxpayers
planned
on.
It
was
two
years
late
and
now
what's
happening
is
12
miles
from
North
Point.
AJ
They
have
West
Nile
Virus.
They
have
also
had
cases
reported
at
the
prison.
There
have
been
cases
in
Syracuse
the
dead
birds
that
are
being
found
along
the
borders
of
the
north
part
of
Great
Salt
Lake
probably
have
West
Nile
virus
there.
This
targets
are
babies
and
our
children's
and
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
you've
got
little
tiny
coughlins
on
one
hand
and
you've
got
stopping
development
and
protecting
the
Great
Salt
Lake
West
Nile
Virus
there's
only
five
mosquito
repellents
that
are
okayed
by
the
CDC
and
they
all
cause
birth
defects.
AK
Stan
Holmes
Salt
Lake
City,
District
3,
and
my
comment
has
to
do
with
water
conservation.
Thank
you
for
working
with
Salt
Lake
City
public
utilities
on
the
saving.
My
water
4
campaign.
City
residents
should
be
encouraged
to
conserve
water.
Currently,
though,
hundreds
of
City
residents
could
face
a
fine
of
25
dollars
per
day
and
legal
action
for
xeriscaping
their
park,
strips
that's
under
a
flawed
City,
landscape,
ordinance,
21a.48
and
it's
still
flawed
revisioned
that
the
city
planners
are
sending
your
way
for
approval.
AK
Today,
I've
brought
you
copies
of
the
first
set
of
petitions,
petition
signatures
from
residents
across
all
seven
City
districts
who
are
calling
foul
on
the
current
ordinance
and
on
its
pending
revision.
Our
petition
reads:
we
the
undersigned
residents
of
Salt
Lake
City,
urge
our
city
council
to
reject
the
planning
divisions
proposed
revision
of
landscape
ordinance
21a48.
AK
That
would
require
us
to
plan
and
water
trees
in
our
Park
strips
and
maintain
at
least
38
percent
vegetation,
33
vegetation
in
park
streets
and
park
strips
and
yards
during
this
period
of
unprecedented
growth
and
extended
drought.
The
city
should
prioritize
water
conservation
residents
who
take
water
saving
initiatives
at
their
own
expense
should
be
praised
not
penalized,
as
the
proposed
zoning
revision
would
do.
AK
Please
reject
the
proposed
21a.48
revision
and
direct
city
planners
to
draft
a
proposal
that
prioritizes
water
conservation
better
aligns
with
the
urban
forestry
plan
and
incorporates
input
from
widely
noticed
public
hearings
in
all
seven
districts.
Thank
you
and
quote,
I
encourage
you
to
work
with
the
planning,
Division
and
Planning
Commission,
as
you
have
with
Public
Utilities.
You
might
also
ask
civil
enforcement
of
the
City
attorney
to
estimate
how
much
their
budgets
may
have
to
be
increased
if
the
current
or
revised
ordinance
is
enforced.
AK
I
have
and
I'll
give
these
to
council
member.
If.
B
AL
Thank
you,
I
am
Jan,
Ellen,
Burton
and
I
live
in
District,
Six
and
I
was
somewhat
confused
to
hear
that
the
North
Point
project
is
somewhat
halted
after
today's
meeting,
because
that
wasn't
my
impression
and
last
winter
I
thought.
Perhaps
that
would
happen
because
I
attended
the
public
hearing
and
and
if
it
was
decided
that
a
final
decision
regarding
zoning
would
be
made
by
Salt
Lake
City
after
more
extensive
planning,
but
I,
don't
know
of
any
extensive
planning.
That's
been
done
so
far
and
in
the
meantime
it
appears.
The
warehouses
have
proliferated.
AL
I,
don't
know
how
much
storage
is
necessary
for
Salt
Lake
City
in
its
Environ,
but
I
do
know
much
of
the
current
buildup
Warehouse
warehouses
remains
unoccupied.
I
would
think
that
maybe
90
or
so
of
the
current
warehouse
space
should
be
occupied
before
making
another
building.
Meanwhile,
the
people
living
along
North
Point
route,
as
has
been
said,
are
suffering
greatly.
AL
Pollution
will
certainly
increase
if
the
region
becomes
more
industrialized.
There
will
be
many
trucks
carrying
goods.
The
pollution
will
help
to
shrink
the
Great
Salt
Lake
and
the
small
amounts
of
money.
The
legislature
and
other
sources
have
contributed
to
save.
The
lake
will
be
wasted,
birds
and
wildlife
will
be
affected
as
the
Great
Salt
Lake
is
the
largest
Flyway
in
the
Western
Hemisphere.
The
Salt
Lake
City
want
to
be
known
for
bringing
down
an
ecosystem.
AL
When
frequently
stated
argument
for
building
more
warehouses
is
we
need
more
high-paying
jobs,
but
warehouses
are
not
high.
Paying
salaries
hover
around
the
poverty
line
residents
in
Salt
Lake
Valley
are
already
experiencing
a
reduction
in
their
lifespan
caused
by
pollution.
This
is
a
greater
problem,
of
course,
through
the
West
Side
residents,
but
the
problem
is
so
pervasive.
People
on
the
East
bench
affected,
as
well.
AL
I
haven't
heard
of
the
developer,
setting
up
a
fund
for
medical
treatment.
Thank.
E
K
AM
Good
evening
and
thank
you,
council
members
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
you
today,
my
name
is
Lauren.
Griffith
I
live
in
District
Four.
My
comments
are
to
just
generally
express
some
concerns.
I
have
about
the
vast
development
that's
happening
in
our
city
and
in
the
valley
and
share
with
you
a
little
bit
of
research
of
concerns,
I
have
about
pollution
and
air
quality.
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
removing
the
industrial
and
light
manufacturing
rezoning
from
the
North
Point
small
area
plan.
I
would
encourage
you
to
preserve
that
Wetland.
AM
Due
to
our
current
crisis.
We
live
in
a
valley
that
regularly
and
reliably
experiences
inversions,
and
we
need
to
be
very
cautious
about
emitting
more
pollution
here.
There's
a
bigger
question
in
you
know:
facing
societies
across
the
world
of
you
know
whether
we
prioritize
high
as
profits
or
people
and
I
appreciate
you.
You
know
listening
on
the
North
Point
area
plan
and
I
encourage
you
to
be
very
conscientious
of
allowing
more
development
and
pollution
in
North
Valley.
AM
Today,
you
discuss
the
huge
cost
of
suicide
in
our
state
and
the
importance
of
prioritizing
prevention,
John
Hopkins
University
evaluated
over
1500
case
of
suicide
in
Salt
Lake
Valley,
and
found
what
really
great
statistical
certainty
that
short-term
exposure
of
just
three
days
to
elevated
nitrogen
dioxide
levels
was
tied
to
a
40
increase
in
the
odds
of
death
by
Suicide.
Nitrogen
dioxide
is
something
that
is
emitted
by
the
burning
of
gas,
diesel
and
coal
and
will
be
greatly
increased
in
our
Valley.
AM
They
found
again
with
great
certainty
that
women
are
16
percent,
more
likely
to
suffer
a
sudden
miscarriage
with
nitrogen
dioxide
increase
of
only
10
parts
per
billion
over
a
seven
day,
average
Utah's
above
the
national
Target
for
infant
deaths
due
to
birth
defects,
pre-term
and
underweight
babies,
which
are
all
tied
to
pollution.
Exposure
developing
on
Wetlands
will
speed
the
light
shrinking
and
contribute
to
toxic
dust
pollution.
Dust
Blooms
from
the
lake
bed
were
measured
and
Incredibly
alarming
levels
of
arsenic,
LED
and
much
more
were
found.
These
chemicals
are
killers
that
will
make
our
Valley
uninhabitable.
AM
AN
Yes,
I
am
and
I've
been
here
all
day
as
you've
seen
me
earlier.
I
live
right
in
the
middle
of
the
North
Point
master
plan
that
you're
talking
about
and
I
have
lived
with
this
development.
That's
been
going
on
across
the
street
from
me,
since
January
8th
I
have
a
million
square
foot
cement
building
going
up
across
the
street
with
me,
nothing
we
can
do
about
it
now.
Rocky
Anderson
approved
it
many
years
ago.
I
didn't
remember
getting
a
notice
about
it,
but
it's
happened
since
it's
happened.
AN
I
have
to
go
outside
and
do
yard
work
with
a
mask
on
I
have
asthma
I
can't
deal
with
construction
24
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week
and
that's
what
they
let
them
do
24
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week
and
on
the
weekends
I
have
constant
noise.
I
have
videos
of
my
glasses
shattering
in
my
house
from
semis,
and
they
I
woke
up
in
the
morning
to
a
semi
sitting
on
my
property
in
the
front
of
my
house,
and
they
said
well,
we
didn't
know
what
to
do.
I
said.
AN
AN
Huge
construction
thing
and
Salt
Lake
City
is
in
charge
of
the
project
across
from
my
house.
Nobody's
out
there,
I've
called
Salt,
Lake
City
I,
don't
know
how
many
times
they
said
you
have
to
call
the
state
for
noise
pollution.
You
have
to
call
the
state
for
air
for
light
pollution
at
night.
All
night
long
I
have
construction
going
on
across
my
house.
I
would
invite
any
of
you
to
come
out
to
my
house
and
see
what
I
am
dealing
with
before
you
even
think
about
approving
a
master
plan.
AN
AO
I
will
speak
to
just
a
few
of
the
impacts
of
the
support.
I
speak
for
my
large
family
here
in
this
Valley
and
for
many
friends
and
for
all
the
beings
who
are
considered
voiceless
I
do
not
support
the
North
Point
small
area
master
plan.
I
do
not
want
the
air
quality
here,
worsened
I,
think
of
the
nearby
neighborhoods,
who
will
be
most
negatively
impacted
and
I.
Don't
want
that,
for
them,
the
vital
habitat
for
birds
and
wildlife
will
be
catastrophically
endured
and
I
don't
want
that.
AO
AP
AP
So
I
want
to
know,
do
you
have
property
for
you,
your
kids
and
your
grandkids,
because
that's
what
you're
going
to
need?
If
you
allow
any
of
this
to
continue
going,
if
you
let
this
move
forward,
what
will
we
all
do
either
way?
I
do
not
support
this
instruction
of
this
polluting
port
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time.
AQ
Hi
I'm
Gene
tabin
I'm,
actually
from
Park
City,
Utah
I
work
in
Salt,
Lake
and
I'm
talking
on
behalf
of
myself,
a
physician,
I
work
in
Salt,
Lake
and
I'm,
just
so
frightened
what
all
these
warehouses
and
the
loss
of
wetlands
and
the
Great
Salt
Lake
are
going
to
do
to
us
in
Utah
as
a
whole.
Thank
you.
If
you
have
stopped
the
North
Point
small
area
master
plan
for
having
warehouses,
I
really
think
this
land
needs
to
be
conserved.
I
know
some
of
it's
being
used
for
agriculture
now
and
I.
I,
don't
want
to.
AQ
You
know,
stop
anyone
who's
working
there
now,
but
I
think
in
the
end.
We
need
to
try
to
conserve
this
land,
because
even
agriculture
is
is
not
the
best
for
water.
You
know
for
saving
our
water,
something
like
with
the
Utah
open
lands.
My
original
Talk
was
on
why
warehouses
are
really
really
bad
for
this
undeveloped
land.
AQ
It's
gonna!
If,
if
that
continues
the
warehouses,
it's
going
to
lead
to
further
destruction,
obviously
of
the
Great
Salt
Lake
and
the
shores,
but
also
increase
air
pollution,
as
people
have
been
saying-
and
we
already
have
so
much
air
pollution,
the
warehouses
lead
to
trucks
that
are
serving
and
being
served
by
the
warehouses.
Water
noise,
as
somebody
said,
light
pollution,
traffic
congestion.
AQ
It
is
bad
for
the
Salt
Lake,
but
it's
also
bad
for
local
residents
and
the
community
that
live
there
and
it's
bad
for
the
people
of
Utah
outside
of
Salt
Lake,
because
what
affects
the
Great
Salt
Lake
in
this
area
affects
all
of
us.
In
Utah
and
Beyond.
We
already
have
over
16
000
acres
of
land
in
Salt,
Lake
City
that
are
zoned
for
warehouses.
We
need
to
protect
what
Wetlands
remain
warehouses
at
I.
Think
at
some
point
soon
are
going
to
be
run
by
robotics.
They
have
not
been
a
consistent
provider
of
strong
jobs.
AQ
What
you
know
they
are
short-term
profits
and
excuse
me,
but
we
just
need
to.
U
AQ
H
Thank
you.
I
am
yeah
adjusting
my
points
after
having
heard
that
the
North
Point
plan
no
longer
includes
plans
for
warehouses,
which
is
good
to
hear
I'll.
Try
not
to
repeat
so
many
things.
I've
already
heard
that
I
agree
with
I'll
just
want
to
ask:
why
are
we
building
on
any
wetlands
and
maybe
more
to
the
point?
How
do
we
not
do
that?
Where
is
that
path?
H
I
see
the
word
small
in
the
North
Point
small
area,
master
plan
and
I.
Don't
know
how
big
the
area
is
compared
to
the
totality
of
wetlands
and
pieces
of
the
Salt
Lake,
but
I
wonder,
are
we
voting
for
death
by
a
thousand
blows?
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
too
small
to
matter.
AR
So
I'm
here,
because
I
want
to
talk
about
the
North
Point
area
plan,
big,
surprise,
I
know,
but
I'm
not
really
going
to
add
anything
else
to
what's
been
said
because
I
don't
think
there
is
anything
to
add,
but
I
want
to
reiterate,
I
think
the
consequences
of
furthering
development,
not
just
in
North
Point
but
anywhere
else
around
the
Great
Salt
Lake,
we'll
have
catastrophic,
knock,
we'll
have
catastrophic
effects
that
will
affect
my
generation.
The
current
generation,
everybody
within
the
entire
state
and
I
think
that
pollution
is
completely
unfair.
AR
It
will
always
end
up
affecting
the
marginalized
people.
The
most
and
I
find
that
the
idea
that
we
would
continue
development
in
an
area
that
is
so
I
guess
struggling
is
just
mind-boggling.
It's
shameful
I
think.
If
we
were
to
develop
this
area
further
it
would,
it
would
be
awful,
it
would
be
awful.
The
ecological
effects
will
be
catastrophic.
The
socioeconomic
effects
will
be
catastrophic.
Everything
that
will
result
from
it
will
be
catastrophic
and
will
harm
everybody.
No
matter
who
you
are
so
that's
all
that
I
have
to
say.
Thank
you.
E
Okay,
my
name
is
Jason
Wessel
I
live
in
district
one,
but
I'm
here
in
my
capacity
at
a
vice
president
of
the
West
Side
Coalition
about
six
months
ago,
back
in
February,
our
board
held
a
vote
based
largely
on
the
Outreach
and
the
engagement
that
the
West
Point
Community,
Council
I
did
in
North
Point
on
this
topic,
and
we
voted
to
oppose
any
rezone.
E
I
came
down
to
it
was
going
to
radically
alter
the
character
of
North
Point,
and
the
residents
are
overwhelmingly
opposed
to
a
rezone
I'm
encouraged
to
hear
that
a
lot
of
those
issues
are
being
addressed
as
long
as
the
existing
Community
still
opposes
any
kind
of
rezone
we're
going
to
support
them
in
that
so
I'm
just
here
to
reiterate
the
West
Side
Coalition
of
poses
a
rezone
and
that
we
support
the
West
Point
Community
council's
position
on
the
topic.
Thank
you.
AS
That
information
did
not
prepare
me
for
Bachmann's
outstanding
performance.
As
a
member
of
the
commission,
some
of
you
know
me
well
enough
to
know
that
what
I
was
thinking
when
Charlie
Luke
told
me
she
worked
on
my
campaign,
but
I
became
a
fan
of
Maureen
Bachmann
I
am
grateful
for
her
years
of
service
doing
some
very
challenging
times.
AS
Bachmann
rarely
explained
her
votes,
but
I
had
a
sense
that
she
was
not
influenced
by
the
commissioner
sitting
next
to
her
or
the
most
strident
voice
on
the
commission
or
a
decision
that
she
made
before
even
attending
the
meeting.
She
was
consistently
unpretentious
well
prepared
and
deliberative
Maureen
Bachmann,
always
steady,
always
reasonable.
Always
respectful
of
the
public
is
not
going
to
be
replaced.
AT
Good
evening
I'm
a
resident
of
District,
Seven
and
well
people.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
and
such
and
I
agree
with
that.
But
the
real
heroes
are
our
veterans.
We
don't
have
meetings
like
this
in
a
room
here
in
America,
without
all
those
people
that
sacrifice
so
much
whenever
I
come
to
a
meeting
like
this
I
think
about
those
guys
walking
up
or
going
up
on
that
beach
in
Normandy.
So
they
should
be
remembered
at
all
these
meetings.
AT
Second,
shout
out
to
Jimmy
Buffett,
who
we
lost
this
weekend,
and
he
brought
a
lot
of
joy
to
people
in
Utah
and
in
his
appearances
in
Salt
Lake
City
third
I'd
like
to
welcome
councilwoman
young
to
the
council.
As
my
representative.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
your
email
on
the
render
refund
program
appreciate
that
also
sending
out
love
and
Good
Vibes
to
Amy
I
also
had
a
letter
in
the
Tribune
this
weekend
for
about
the
renter
refund
program.
AT
It
is
a
program
for
people
66
and
older
by
the
end
of
last
year
or
unmarried
widows
or
widowers,
who
were
married
to
their
spouse
when
they
passed
away.
If
they
are
renters
and
their
income
is
under
38
369
dollars,
they
can
get
money
from
the
state,
and
so,
if
you
go
up
to
YouTube,
don't
go
to
Google,
go
to
YouTube
and
search
Utah
circuit,
breaker
2023!
There's
a
lot
of
residents
in
this
area
that
can
use
that
assistance.
AT
Currently
Salt
Lake
County
residents
account
for
about
63
percent
of
the
recipients
on
that
right
now
and
then
I
did
come.
The
only
the
first
reason
I
came
was
to
talk
about
the
rezone
sounds
like
you
guys
working
on
that
do
anything
you
can
to
protect
the
birds,
the
air,
the
water,
the
health
of
the
lake,
because
what
the
legislature
did
to
us
was
the
most
agreed
just
screw
job,
maybe
in
the
history
of
Utah,
so
fight
it
as
much
as
you
can.
Thank
you.
AE
and
I
joined
the
board,
thinking
that
I
was
going
to
be
working
on
issues
related
to
our
largest
employer,
the
Utah
State
Prison,
but
instead
I
spent
all
that
time,
working
on
the
Inland
Port
issues,
but,
more
importantly,
for
our
local
area.
The
North
Point
plan
small
area
plan,
most
of
you
weren't
around
when
we
started
on
this
and
so
I
hope
that
you
spend
some
time
going
back
into
that
and
looking
at
the
history
of
this,
including
what
happened
20
years
ago,
history
has
to
take
away
repeating
itself.
AE
You
don't
want
to
keep
making
the
same
mistakes.
You
know
going
over
what
happened
in
North,
Salt,
Lake
and
and
Salt
Lake
County.
A
lot
of
the
same
issues
also
came
up
and
I
regret
to
say
that
the
concerns
that
were
raised
during
those
times
by
the
local
residents
have
all
come
true,
and
the
good
part
of
that
is
that
you
don't
have
to
to
decide
whether
the
issues
that
people
raise
today
are
are
actually
legitimate.
AE
AE
Did
not
take
advantage
of
that
opportunity
took
another
way
out
and
left
a
future
Council
to
deal
with
the
problem,
and
you
may
have
had
that
experience
yourself
with
previous
Council
people,
not
addressing
issues
in
a
forced,
right,
Manner
and
then
you're
trying
to
figure
it
out.
It
doesn't
need
to
happen
again.
So
with
the
one
thing
I
want
to
end
is
is
Dorothy.
B
AU
I,
don't
know
where
to
start
Margaritaville
and
I'm
sitting
here.
Thinking
about
Forrest,
Gump
and
dumb
is
as
dumb
does
and
different
things,
and
the
gloom
and
doom
and
the
young
guy
over
here
what
his
good
words
and
hopefulness
and,
depending
on
all
this,
the
older
people
to
do
the
right
thing
and
but
sometimes
I
wonder
if
we
know
what
the
right
thing
is,
and
we
spend
a
lot
of
time
arguing
about
what
the
right
thing
is
and
most
of
the
time
it's
pretty
obvious.
AU
You
just
do
nothing
and
just
sit
back
and
have
a
margarita
and
smile
a
little
bit
and
their
problems
will
take
care
of
themselves.
But
clima
hope
I
was
here
this
afternoon
when
Wayne
niederhauser
was
here
and
I
want
to.
Thank
you
for
some
of
the
questions
that
were
asked
and
some
of
the
real
sort
of
a
hint
of
a
redirection
by
some
of
the
questions.
AU
Because
years
ago,
when
I
started
addressing
the
homeless
issue,
I
always
had
confidence
in
the
city
council
ability
to
take
a
leadership
role
on
the
issue,
because
you
did
the
funding
for
the
city.
You
did
a
funding
for
some
different
things
in
the
city.
You
didn't
have
an
agenda
connected
to
the
problem
and
I
had
hopes
that
you
were
going
to
take
a
leadership
on
saw
with
the
issue.
AU
So
when
it
was
suggested
today
that
the
city
council
and
the
city,
not
the
county
and
not
the
state,
could
play
a
much
bigger
role
in
finding
solutions
to
this
problem.
I
was
ready
to
jump
up
and
cheer,
so
we'll
be
doing
what
we
can
to
cure,
encourage
you
to
take
a
bigger
and
bigger
role
and
when
you
go
to
approve
something
and
some
funding
and
some
financing
for
any
project
in
this
city,
I
would
ask
you
to
start
asking
First
Step,
maybe
have
a
margarita
and.
A
AA
Hi,
my
name
is
Dave
viltis
I
wanted
to
comment
on
a
few
things.
First
is
on
the
North
Point
area
plan.
Please
do
your
best
to
preserve
the
land.
What's
going
on
out.
There
is
a
tragedy.
AA
AA
Also
a
connector
Trail
through
the
Jordan
OHP
Park
would
be
helpful
as
part
of
this.
The
main
thing,
though,
that
I
wanted
to
comment
on
is
that
Salt,
Lake
City
is
shifted
to
Vision
zero,
but
there's
not
a
lot
of
evidence.
That's
going
on
and
part
of
that
is
because
of
the
disorganization
of
the
Departments
within
Salt
Lake.
So
this
is
directed
at
the
mayor.
AA
If
she's
still
here
and
the
council
is,
please
consolidate
streets,
engineering
and
transportation
into
one
Department
so
that
we
don't
have
streets
feuding
with
Transportation
about
who's,
going
to
restripe
a
roadway
when,
when
it's
repaved,
so,
for
example,
600
East,
the
bike
lane
is
still
not
fixed.
Two
years
later,
a
thousand
East
10th
East
by
first
South,
is
not
fixed
after
a
year.
AA
There
are
plenty
of
other
examples,
too,
and
lastly,
is
part
of
this:
you
did
the
20th
20
20
is
plenty
ordinance
to
reduce
speed
limits
on
residential
streets
to
20
miles
an
hour.
Please
follow
this
up
with
arterials
and
reduce
the
speed
there,
like
Seattle,
has
done
to
25
miles
an
hour
so
that
we
stop
being
addicted
to
speed
and
we
make
our
streets
safer
for
bicyclists
pedestrians
and
car
drivers,
but
Council,
please
do
something.
Please
don't
just
do
nothing.
Thank
you.
AV
Hi,
my
name
is
Mary
O'connell
I
live
on
Sunnyside
Avenue
across
from
Sunnyside
Park,
thanks
for
allowing
me
to
speak,
I
feel
sort
of
silly
bringing
up
my
concerns
to
you
with
all
of
the
comments
that
I've
been
hearing
tonight
about
the
North
Point
plan,
but
I
want
all
of
you
to
hear
our
concerns
before
the
University
of
Utah
bulldozes
their
plans
over
Sunnyside
Park
I
recently,
with
many
neighbors
form
the
friends
of
Sunnyside
Park.
AV
We
formed
this
very
important
Group
after
we
were
told
in
our
April
Yale
Crest
community
meeting
by
the
University
of
Utah's
community
communication
director
and
the
assistant
athletic
director
of
the
University's
plans
to
replace
the
existing
baseball
practice
field
with
their
new
home
stadium.
This
concerns
us
because
it
goes
against
the
2017
East
bench
master
plan
which
included
the
university,
and
they
stated
they
would
not
build
their
own
stadium
in
the
northwest
corner
of
Sunnyside
Park.
We're
worried
because
the
building
of
a
Collegiate
Stadium
would
require
them
buying
or
receiving
more
of
the
land.
AV
This
is
really
a
time-sensitive
matter
because
of
our
concerns.
We
are
asking
you
all
to
immediately
intervene
and
stop
any
current
or
future
actions,
processes,
plans
and
Designs
by
the
university
to
replace
the
existing
field
with
the
new,
bigger
Stadium,
Road
or
public
parking.
If
the
U
is
allowed
to
move
forward
with
their
plans,
it
will
encroach
and
have
detrimental
impacts
on
this
highly
used
public
park
used
by
the
residents
up
and
down
the
Wasatch
Front.
We.
D
B
B
B
K
S
You
for
hearing
me
again,
as
the
council
seems
to
be
looking
at
a
lot
of
different
changes
in
zoning
and
in
building
codes.
I.
F
S
To
hopefully
put
an
ear
worm
into
your
ears
as
you
look
forward
to
the
future
and
that's
in
regards
to
making
sure
that
we
have
a
habitable
City
right
now.
I
really
commend
the
week.
I
just
recently
did
with
the
EV
Readiness
program,
making
sure
there's
going
to
be
electric
vehicle
charging
stations
at
residential
locations.
S
One
of
the
things
that
we've
seen,
though,
in
electric
vehicle
communities,
is
that
there's
a
worry
about
long-term
impact
on
the
grid
and
that
people
need
to
also
be
charging
at
work
during
the
day
in
order
to
spread
out
the
electrical
usage
over
the
day.
So
I
would
hope
that
you
would
number
one
look
at
increasing
the
the
EV
Readiness
also
to
building
also
matching
that
with
the
city's
infrastructure.
S
Looking
at
changing
that,
possibly
both
to
a
higher
minimum
standard,
but
also
basing
it
on
perhaps
a
square
footage
of
a
dwelling
unit
for
other
things
that
are
going
to
be
electrified
in
the
future,
but
help
the
city
look
forward
to
20
or
30
years
down
in
the
future,
where
we
might
not
be
heating
our
homes
with
things
such
as
gas
and
that's
the
other
place
where
I
wanted
to
hopefully
put
in
your
room.
AW
Thank
you
good
evening.
I'll
try
and
be
a
little
dense
here
and
pack.
A
couple
of
comments
in
first
just
wearing
my
constituent
hat
I,
want
to
thank
you
for
your
work
on
the
Sugarhouse
business
district.
A
change
to
eliminate
drive-throughs
I
will
just
suggest
that
this
is
a
beginning,
not
an
end,
because
there
are
at
least
15
zoning
districts
in
what
we
commonly
call
the
Sugarhouse
business
district,
and
tonight
we've
only
taken
action
on
two
of
them.
AW
I
hope
that
there's
more
work
to
come
on
that,
but
we
applaud
your
work
in
that
direction.
Second
of
all,
I
want
to
I,
know
you're,
considering
the
rezone
for
the
fleet,
block
and
I
know.
There's
some
discussion
about
maybe
looking
at
some
comprehensive
zoning
changes.
City-Wide
I
will
suggest
that
zoning,
which
was
developed
a
century
ago,
was
really
a
20th
century
tool.
AW
The
solutions
that
we
have
offered
to
you,
which
do
frame
this
as
an
environmental
justice
issue,
you
I,
think,
are
a
much
more
practical,
appropriate
and
sensitive
solution
to
this
particular
neighborhood,
and
we
hope
to
give
it
a
serious
look.
If
there's
an
opportunity,
our
Coalition
would
love
to
come
and
present
these
in
a
formal
public
meeting,
so
others
have
the
benefit
of
hearing
what
we've
shared
with
many
of
you
individually
as
well.
If
there's
an
opportunity
for
that,
we
would
love
to
request
that
time
with
the
council.
Thank
you.
AX
AX
Please
include
the
following:
in
support
of
council
member
member
Petro's
proposal
from
today's
work
session:
Annex
unincorporated
agricultural
lands
as
Salt
Lake
City,
agricultural
zoned
land
that
could
benefit
from
transfer
of
purchase
of
development
rights,
conservation,
easements
and
our
other
zoning
that
would
conserve
the
Health
and
Welfare
of
local
residents
and
the
Watershed
language
that
acknowledges
the
and
integrates
the
Salt
Lake
County's
Shoreline
Heritage
area
and
applies
the
preservation
tools
identified
in
the
North
Point
small
area
plan
to
benefit
the
Health
and
Welfare
of
local
residents
and
the
Watershed.
AX
An
alternative
Vision
map
that
reflects
that
integration,
such
as
the
new
alternative
Vision
map,
our
Shoreline
Heritage
area
working
group,
provided
you
last
week
to
benefit
the
Health
and
Welfare
of
local
residents
and
Watershed.
And
you
see
there's
a
Common
Thread
here.
That
is
purposeful,
because
there
seemed
to
be
a
disconnect
that
it's
an
either
or
vice
versa,
environmental
issues
versus
environmental
justice.
And
they
really
speak
to
a
lot
of
this
common
objectives
and
in
the
I'm
out
of
time.
But
anyway,
that
was
the
main
point.
AY
AY
I'm
from
Ogden
Utah,
my
name
is
Jade
Cantwell
coming
down
tonight.
AY
I'm,
not
an
expert
I,
appreciate
everything
you
all
do
one
of
the
big
things
as
an
observer
and
a
long
time
resident
of
Utah
that
I
do
see.
I
used
to
have
my
best
friend
is
an
architect
and
so
I
understand
and
my
father's
a
construction,
carbon
Carpenter,
so
I
understand
a
little
bit
about
that.
AY
But
Utah
Ogden's
got
the
issue
with
the
Union
Station
and
they
want
to
do
multi-use
development
and
low-income
housing,
which
would
be
like
twelve
hundred
dollars
a
month
rent
you
know
and
then
up
in
Eden,
where
I
actually
live,
people
are
building
roads
on
their
own
land,
but
on
Wetlands
you
know,
and
then
we've
got
this
project
that
everybody's
talking
about
and
that
Fleet
block.
AY
There's
a
theme
here
and
I
agree
with
this
idea
that
these
piecemeal
zoning
and
approaching
it
that
way
in
one
hand,
is
good
because
you
have
attention
to
detail
for
that
specific
area.
But
anyway,
the
point
I'm
trying
to
make
is
that
there's
money
involved
developers
like
money,
and
we
also
need
to
think
about
the
history
and
the
land
and
the
people
that
occupy
that
area,
that's
being
developed
multi-use
for
their
purposes
and
their
needs
and
I
think
a
lot
of
times
that
gets
polluted
with
the
Developers.
AY
B
Thank
you
very
much.
Everyone
for
the
comments
tonight
appreciate
that
very
much
and
I
very
appreciate
the
decorum
and
the
way
the
the
meaning
went
along.
So
we
move
on
to
item.
We
have
no
new
business,
we
have
no
unfinished
business
onto
item
G
consent
and
we'll
look
for
a
motion
move
for
approval.