►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Formal Meeting - 02/07/2023
Description
To view agendas and paperwork go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
On
this
February
7th
2023.,
we
continue
to
host
hybrid
meetings
to
keep
everyone,
health,
healthy
and
safe.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
If
you're
here,
to
give
a
public
comment
and
are
wearing
a
mask,
feel
free
to
remove
it
once
you
get
called
to
address
the
council
from
the
podium.
Thank
you
for
participating
today.
A
If
you
do
feel
uncomfortable
here
that
we
have
a
room
across
the
hallway
in
the
Overflow
room.
Also
thank
you
for
participating
today
and
please
join
me
in
saying
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
A
A
A
copy
of
the
full
rules
of
the
Quorum
are
available
at
the
door
and
our
staff
will
post
the
links
in
WebEx,
we'll
now
move
on
to
item
A4
and
the
council
tube
for
approval
of
the
work
session
meeting,
minutes
of
May
10th
or
excuse
May
11th
2021,
May,
18th,
2021,
May,
25th,
2021,
September,
13th,
2022,
September,
20th,
2022,
October,
18,
2022,
November,
22nd,
2022,
December,
6,
2022
and
December
13th
2022,
as
well
as
a
formal
meeting
minutes
of
September
20th
2022.
Mr.
A
C
C
A
The
council
also
consider
adopting
a
joint
ceremonial
resolution
with
mayor
Mendenhall
recognizing
February
as
black
history
months
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
I'm,
going
to
turn
the
time
over
to
councilmember
Fowler
to
read
the
resolution.
D
In
1970.
The
first
celebration
of
Black
History
Month
took
place
at
Kent
State
and
six
years
later,
in
1976
was
recognized
by
Gerald
Ford
or
President.
Gerald
Ford
urging
Americans
to
honor
the
two
often
neglected
accomplishments
of
black
Americans
in
every
area
of
endeavor
throughout
art,
history
and
whereas
contributions
by
black
Americans
have
influenced
all
facets
of
society,
from
culture
to
religion,
from
education
to
business
and
public
service
and
more
and
whereas
it
is
our
honor
to
acknowledge
and
celebrate
the
Heritage
perseverance
and
achievements
of
black
Americans
in
our
nation's
history.
D
We
acknowledge
their
struggle
as
an
American
struggle
and
at
its
core
reflects
upon
our
society
and
whereas,
while
we
celebrate
and
recognize
black
leaders,
inventors,
artists
musicians
and
creators
on
a
national
level
such
as
Dr
Martin,
Luther,
King,
Jr,
Rosa,
Parks,
George,
Washington,
Carver,
Jackie,
Robinson,
Billie,
Holiday
and
many
more,
we
also
acknowledge
those
locally
who
have
been
who
have
contributed
to
the
rich
history
of
our
community.
Here
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
Utah,
and
whereas
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
Utah.
We
have
many
Heroes
to
look
up
to
and
learn
from.
D
Be
it
further
resolved
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
and
mayor
of
Salt
Lake
City
remain
dedicated
to
dismantling
racial
inequity
while
advancing
equity
and
justice.
To
all,
be
it
further
result
that
Salt
Lake
City
is
committed
to
continuing
the
progress
made
throughout
black
history,
but
also
to
ensure
a
positive
black
future.
We
create
history
every
day
and
if
we
work
together
to
make
our
today
better
than
yesterday,
our
tomorrow
will
only
be
that
much
brighter,
be
it
further
resolved.
The
theme
for
Black
History
Month
2023
is
black
resistance.
F
A
C
G
A
Bowie
yes
and
I'm,
a
yes
that
passes
unanimously
7-0.
Thank
you
very
much
also
for
attending
this
meeting
today
and
I
want
to
introduce
Malaysia
Garfield,
who
is
here
with
us
to
receive
the
resolution.
Elijah
serves
as
the
Director
of
the
black
Cultural
Center
at
the
University
of
Utah.
Thank
you
for
being
with
us
today
and
if
you
want
to
come
up
and
say
a
few
words
and
then
we'll
take
a
picture.
H
Just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
so
much
for
the
proclamation.
We
really
appreciate
it,
but
also
thank
you
for
remembering
those
that
have
black
history
from
our
past,
but
also
our
present
and
our
future.
H
It's
for
you
all,
recognizing
this
month,
these
days
that
have
happening
during
this
month
for
us
to
pave
some
positive
ways
for
the
city
of
Salt,
Lake
City,
and
for
us
to
recognize
some
greatness
here
in
our
very
own
state
of
Utah.
So
thank
you
so
much.
I
J
Thank
you,
Mr
chair.
This
city
applies
for
and
receives
grants
which
help
to
support
and
fund
some
City
programs.
Each
Grant
application
is
reviewed
and
then
receives
a
public
hearing
which
gives
the
public
an
opportunity
to
comment
on
them
tonight.
There
are
seven
grants.
First
is
the
2023
North
Temple
economic,
revitalization,
action
plan,
transportation,
land
connections,
Grant,
which
would
fund
the
hiring
of
a
consultant
to
conduct
an
economic
needs,
revitalization
assessment
and
provide
a
strategy
to
address
the
needs
of
businesses
and
surrounding
neighborhoods.
The
study
area
is
North
between
I-15
and
I-215.
J
Second
is
the
surface
Transportation
program:
Grant
900
West
reconstruction,
North
Temple
to
600
North,
which
would
fund
the
Reconstruction
of
900
West
to
improve
deteriorated
pavement,
Mobility
to
I-15,
pedestrian
and
bicycle
safety,
connection
to
tracks,
bus
service
and
access
to
jobs
and
schools
in
the
downtown
area.
The
North
Temple
urban
center,
the
airport
and
the
University
of
Utah
third
is
the
East
downtown
Mobility
Hub
with
electric
bus
charging,
congestion
mitigation
and
air
quality
program
Grant,
which
would
fund
the
design
and
construction
of
a
hub
for
bus,
Rapid,
Transit
and
core
routes
serving
front
runner.
J
Sixth,
is
a
Salt
Lake
City
electric
vehicle
car
sharing
a
pilot
program
Grant
which
would
fund
affordable
housing
residents,
access
to
short-term
electric
vehicle
rentals
for
trips,
difficult
to
complete,
using
Transit
biking
or
walking
and
last
to
seventh?
Is
the
California
Avenue
Corridor,
study,
transportation
and
land
use
connection
program,
Grant,
which
would
fund
the
hiring
of
a
consultant
to
create
a
design,
cost
estimates
and
policy
recommendations
to
guide
future
improvements
for
California
Avenue
and
just
as
a
reminder,
these
are
items
that
the
city
has
applied
for.
A
B
A
C
A
L
This
public
hearing
is
a
required
step
before
land
could
be
exchanged
between
the
city
and
an
adjacent
private
property.
An
equal
amount
of
land
about
a
twentieth
of
an
acre
would
be
exchanged
between
the
two
parties.
The
Exchange
is
needed
to
complete
improvements
to
open
space,
including
lighting
landscaping
and
an
outdoor
classroom.
L
A
A
C
A
G
K
N
M
Perfect
hello
I
am
here
representing
the
solid
chapter
of
the
center
for
new
liberalism,
which
is
focused
on
pragmatic,
evidence-based
solutions
to
major
issues
facing
Society
such
as
the
under
supply
of
housing.
The
first
one
is
take
the
council
for
being
willing
to
consider
flexible
solutions
to
the
zoning
issue.
It's
obviously
a
bit
of
convoluted
one
due
to
the
on
the
slightly
less
than
legal
situation
that
happened
there.
M
However,
this
law
is
in
a
prime
location
to
support
more
than
a
mere
family
home
being
located
next
to
at
least
one
major
Street,
seventh
East.
The
city
needs
to
expand
flexibility
for
increased
housing
and
mixed
use
throughout
the
city.
Instead
of
letting
arbitrary
zoning
restrictions
limit
the
potential
of
our
limited
supply
of
land,
particularly
that
close
to
our
downtown
core,
more
efficient
use
of
our
limited
land,
particularly
that
near
public
transportation,
increases
our
ability
to
generate
housing,
jobs
and
services.
M
Fostering
growth
instead
of
mandating
stagnation
is
critical
for
both
current
residents,
as
well
as
those
future
residents,
whether
they
move
here
or
they
grow
up
here.
That,
unfortunately,
cannot
get
voice
their
opinions
or
vote,
but
I
urge
the
council
to
push
for
the
maximum
use
of
this
land,
whether
that
turns
into
increased
density
of
housing
or
a
business
that
is
willing
to
pay
to
use
that
land
for
some
profitable
Enterprise
that
provides
jobs
and
revenue
for
us.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
O
Colby
District
4
Resident,
the
Planning
Commission,
sent
you
a
unanimous
negative
recommendation
after
their
review
in
October
and
unanimous
public
opposition.
Please
accept
their
conclusion
and
vote
to
deny
this
zoning
change.
The
current
Zoning
for
this
property
is
correct.
The
southeast
blocks
to
the
ninth
and
9th
commercial
node
and
1300
South
are
all
zoned
residential.
According
to
the
area
master
plan
which
still
exists,
this
property
should
be
zoned
consistent
with
adjacent
uses.
This
corner
lot
context
is
quite
different
than
the
ones
to
the
north.
O
The
neighborhood
development
pattern
changes
to
primarily
residential
south
of
9th
South.
The
SNB
Zone
would
allow
other
commercial
uses
like
Medical,
Offices,
art
galleries
and
retail
shops.
It
could
result
in
the
loss
of
all
housing
on
this
property.
This
is
in
conflict
with
plant
Salt
Lake
in
the
area
master
plan
crafting
a
unique
one
lot.
Special
SMB
zone
is
Mal
Administration
and
the
owner
appreciates
historic
preservation.
So
that's
a
giveaway,
not
a
concession.
O
The
rationale
for
the
petition
is
the
current
owner
was
apparently
unaware
that
the
Victorian
house
was
broken
up
into
four
Apartments
without
proper
permits
or
zoning.
They
do
not
meet
fire
or
Life
Safety
standards.
If
the
city
wants
to
retain
some
of
these
illegal
units,
you
could
update
Citywide
non-conforming
unit
legalization
code
and
keep
the
residential
zoning.
A
development
agreement
is
the
wrong
tool
to
fix
this,
and
the
Planning
Commission
wisely
rejected
this
option.
The
owner
could
also
restore
the
house
to
the
legal
number
of
units,
like
our
neighbors
did
in
the
same
situation.
O
Property
owners
have
responsibilities,
not
just
limited
rights.
It
should
matter
that
the
owner
also
continues
to
defy
city
code
and
offer
short-term
rentals.
As
of
today,
why
they're
much
more
profitable
by
his
own
public
admission?
This
is
a
major
problem
in
Salt
Lake
City
and
contributes
to
the
housing
shortage.
How
will
City
officials
assure
that
short-term
rental
use
won't
continue
regardless
of
zoning?
The
track
record
to
date
is
not
reassuring.
O
P
P
I
thought
that
your
discussion
on
January
17th
involved
protecting
the
house
from
Demolition,
but
now
I
can't
find
that
in
your
packet,
virtually
everyone
wants
to
see
this
prominent
house
remain
on
the
corner.
The
rezone
to
a
commercial
Zone
will
drive
the
demolition
of
the
house
at
a
future
time.
You
have
to
protect
the
structure,
you
could
write
a
development
agreement
prohibiting
demolition
or
you
could
leave
the
zoning
R2.
You
need
to
think
about
the
public
outcry
if
this
building
is
demolished
by
any
Force
other
than
an
earthquake.
P
I
am
personally
appalled
at
the
amount
of
staff
time
dedicated
to
dealing
with
these
three
problems,
which
are
in
no
way
unique
to
this
property.
None
of
the
solutions
will
work
on
the
scale
and
scope
of
what
we
need
them
to
to
reclaim
housing
exploited
as
hotels
or
the
active
use
of
housing
which
doesn't
meet
code.
I
am
also
insulted
by
the
suggestion
that
a
coffee
shop
on
the
first
floor
would
be
fine.
No,
it
would
not.
We
can't
surrender
a
unit
of
housing
when
there
are
coffee
shops
within
two
blocks
in
all
directions.
P
F
Hi,
my
name
is
Christina
Robb
and
I
am
the
chair
of
the
East
Liberty
Park
Community
organization,
today
I'm
a
little
in
Paul
to
be
reading
this
letter
again,
given
that
this
property
owner
is
still
engaging
in
short-term
rentals,
but
this
is
how
this
is
what
it
comes
down
to
for
us.
This
letter
is
dated:
January
20th,
2023,
deer,
Salt,
Lake
City,
Council
Members.
We
are
writing
this
letter
in
reference
to
the
zoning
Amendment.
F
His
intentions
and
many
comprehensive
discussions
with
residents
living
at
Jason
area
as
well
as
Elco
board
members
elpco,
continues
to
support
the
petition
to
rezone
704
East
900
South
from
R2
to
SNB,
with
the
following
notes
and
considerations.
As
per
our
email
to
the
Planning
Commission
dated
June
27
2022,
one
elpcon
wants
a
stable
and
compliant
long-term
zoning
solution
for
704
East
to
retain
the
property
as
long
as
long-term
rental
housing
for
residents
of
the
city.
F
We
recognize
this
property
has
a
history
of
non-compliant
usage
with
its
zoning,
because
we
do
not
view
this
property's
history
of
non-compliance
as
a
sufficient
excuse
for
the
current
owner
to
continue
to
operate
without
legalizing
the
use
for
long-term
rentals.
We
want
to
resolve
all
issues
with
the
current
property
owner.
Through
this
admin
amendment
process.
We
want
704
East,
900
South
to
bees
exclusively
for
housing,
as
the
intents
stated,
by
the
property
owner
in
his
email
data,
or
to
help
code
dated
Thursday,
October
20th
and
not
for
commercial
or
retail
use.
Q
Thank
you,
I
wrote
this
letter
as
well
four
months
ago
and
I
thought
that
the
decision
had
been
made,
but
here
we
are
again
so
I'm
writing
in
opposition
to
the
proposed
rezoning
of
704
East
900
South
in
Salt,
Lake
City
I'm,
a
homeowner
just
a
few
doors
down
from
this
property.
I
am
highly
concerned
about
the
negative
impacts
this
rezoning
will
have
on
our
neighborhood.
One
of
my
greatest
concerns
is
a
potential
unexpected
consequences
that
could
occur
if
this
property
were
rezoned
to
officially
allow
nightly
Hotel
style
renters.
Q
The
owners
of
this
property
could
add
more
dwellings
or
potentially
tear
down
the
existing
unit,
opting
for
a
high
higher
density
option.
Those
who
live
in
our
neighborhood
know
the
challenges
we
already
experience
with
public
parking.
Many
of
our
homes
do
not
have
off-street
parking.
We
do
not
have
the
infrastructure
to
accommodate
greater
growth
on
our
already
crowded
streets,
I
have
already
experienced
a
loss
of
parking
due
to
the
influx
of
guests.
Staying
at
this
property
I
have
served
in
public
education
in
our
lovely
city
for
20
years.
Q
Over
the
past
four
years,
I
have
witnessed
a
huge
loss
in
our
student
population.
We
know
that
one
of
the
greatest
issues
our
community
members
are
facing
is
housing.
We
are
not
facing
a
short,
a
short
shortage
of
nightly
rentals,
but
we
are
facing
a
shortage
of
rental
options
in
our
neighborhoods.
We
are
at
a
time
when
supporting
our
fellow
neighbors
couldn't
be
more
critical
and
yet
you're,
considering
watering
down
our
community
with
nightly
rentals
prioritizing
profits
for
out-of-state
investors
over
those
of
us
who
live
and
work
in
this
neighborhood
is
dangerous.
R
Great
thank
you.
Thanks
for
for
taking
us
remotely
tonight,
I
I'm
also
a
resident
I'm
I'm
talking
from
around
the
corner
of
that
District
Five
residents
and
part
of
elpco.
R
My
concern
here,
I
I've,
spoken
about
this
in
the
past
concerning
projects
in
our
neighborhood,
where
again,
as
they
were
called
earlier,
wealthy
Real,
Estate
Investors
are
able
to
come
in,
buy
property
that
is
zoned
one
way,
knowing
that
that
they
will
be
able
to
sort
of
finagle
their
way
through
and
get
it
changed
over
the
existing
zoning
and
master
plan,
and
even
in
the
case
of
some
of
the
developments,
you
know
years-long
efforts
by
neighbors
to
try
to
get
these
get
the
zoning
consistent
and
try
to
make
it
work
as
a
neighborhood.
R
This
happened
with
The
Exchange
Place
project,
where
they
took
actually
the
only
affordable
housing
where
some
of
the
only
affordable
housing
on
the
street
and
were
able
to
railroad
through
or
I
will
call
it
that
able
to
get
a
zoning
change
approved
so
that
they
can
charge
build
more
luxury,
condo
rentals.
R
So
the
irony
of
this
sort
of
pretending
to
be
interested
in
affordable
housing
and
then
being
able
to
to
kind
of
push
this
through
over
the
neighborhood
over
the
zoning
and
master
plan
just
doesn't
make
sense
to
us
as
residents
and
neighbors,
where
we
have
trouble.
B
A
C
A
Mono
yes
and
I'm,
a
yes
that
passes
7-0
unanimously,
we'll
next
move
on
to
item
number
10,
which
is
an
ordinance
for
the
Rocky
Mountain
Power
rezone,
and
before
we
take
comments.
I
will
turn
the
time
over
back
over
to
Brian
Fulmer
who's
on
the
screen.
Council
staff
policy
analysts
to
give
a
short
intro.
G
Proposal
to
amend
the
zoning
map
for
the
parcel
at
1223,
West,
North,
Temple
and
portions
of
parcels
at
12,
19,
1275
and
1407
West
North
Temple
from
the
current
M1,
which
is
light
manufacturing
and
TSA
SPC
or
transit
station
area,
special
purpose
area,
core
zoning
districts
to
TSA
UCC
or
transit
station
area.
Urban
center
Corps
Rocky
Mountain
Power
owns
the
parcels,
the
total
approximately
5.5
Acres
of
the
100
acres,
the
company
owns
at
this
location.
Thank
you.
K
P
P
How
many
places
are
there
in
the
city
which
could
support
housing,
but
we've
never
considered
the
appropriateness
of
housing
there
before
ever?
I.
Don't
need
two
minutes
to
comment
on
this
application,
because
the
property
owner
has
vision
that
has
things
in
common
with
my
own,
because
the
Consultants
are
my
personal
Heroes
and
because
the
design
team
has
a
long
history
of
serving
Salt
Lake.
Well,
thanks
Rocky
Mountain
Power
for
hiring
locally.
P
S
Good
evening,
friends,
I'm
Soren
Simonson
I'm
here
this
evening
and
for
this
item
in
my
official
capacity
as
the
executive
director
of
the
Jordan
River
commission
I'm
here
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
rezoning
petition,
Rocky,
Mountain,
Power
and
Salt
Lake
City
are
both
one
of
many
organizations
that
are
partners
with
the
Jordan
River
commission
and
we're
so
excited
to
see
so
much
work.
Innovative
work
going
into
re-centering
the
river
as
the
center
of
community
and
culture.
S
We
have
thousands
of
years
of
human
history
of
the
river
being
just
that
the
center
of
community
and
culture
in
in
more
recent
times,
industry
and
other
things
have
not
treated
the
river
kindly,
and
we
hope
that
by
changing
the
zoning
and
allowing
for
Community
Development
in
a
really
thoughtful
way,
with
great
Urban
Design
that
it
will
once
again
become
the
center
of
community
and
culture.
There
are
some
shortcomings
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
You
may
know
this
as
you
look
at
Force,
South
and
North
Temple
and
development.
S
That's
happened
under
the
transit,
the
transit
stationary
zoning-
it's
not
always
creating
vibrant
places
and
place
making
really
needs
to
be
Central
to
this
Redevelopment
and
other
things
happening
around
it.
So
we
encourage
you
to
move
forward
with
rezoning,
but
also
do
some
really
thoughtful
work
around
a
vision.
There
is
no
master
plan
for
this
area
between
roughly
North
Temple
and
I-80
I.
S
Don't
think
years
ago,
when
Master
plans
were
developed,
that
people
contemplated
Rocky,
Mountain
Power,
going
away
they're
doing
a
wonderful
job
right
now,
Rocky
Mountain
Power
leading
an
effort
for
their
property,
but
we
also
think
that
there
needs
to
be
a
broader
vision
for
this
whole
area
between
North,
Temple
and
I-80.
To
think
about
how
this
is
really
knit
back
together
into
the
fabric
of
a
community
with
the
river
being
the
center
of
community
and
culture.
S
T
Count
good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
Nigel
swaby
and
I'm.
Speaking
to
you
tonight
as
chair
of
the
Fair
Park
Community
Council
I
sent
an
email
a
little
bit
earlier
regarding
a
vote
that
our
community
council
had
on
this
rezone
when
it
was
before
Planning
Commission
were
fully
supported.
I
want
to
take
the
time
tonight
to
to
raise
a
couple
of
issues
that
the
community
is
is
concerned
about
and
I
I
would
Echo
Soren's
call
for
a
master
plan
in
the
area.
T
As
a
member
of
the
of
the
focus
group
for
this
project,
one
of
the
items
that
came
up
was
connectivity
between
North
Temple
and
200
South,
and
the
property
owners
pointed
out
that
they
have
railroad
tracks
going
through
the
Rocky
Mountain
Power
property.
This
is
an
amazing
opportunity
for
the
west
side
to
remove
the
rail
issues
that
we
have
by
building
a
bridge
between
North
Temple
and
200
South
over
that
rail
line.
The
last
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
that
our
community
really
wants
is
some
sort
of
retail
and
grocery
in
the
area.
T
C
B
A
G
M
Hello
again,
I
seem
to
have
good
luck
going
first,
once
again,
I'm
from
the
Salt
Lake
City
chapter
of
the
new
center
for
new
liberalism
and
I
will
reiterate
my
thanks
to
the
council
for
being
willing
to
push
for
more
flexibility
in
our
regulations.
They
restrict
our
housing
Supply
and
the
economic
potential
of
our
limited
land,
allowing
Adu
construction
with
fewer
restrictions,
permits
Property
Owners
the
opportunity
to
create
a
great
deal
of
potential
new
housing
and
engage
in
valuable
Commerce.
M
Anyone
who
cares
about
things
such
as
Equity
Justice
and
the
well-being
of
the
disadvantage
should
favor
lowering
the
regular
irregulatory
burdens
that
stand
in
the
way
of
cost
efficiently,
building
more
housing
to
meet
the
demand
of
current
and
future
residents.
I
urge
the
council
to
enact
the
least
amount
of
restrictions
possible
to
maximize
the
value
of
our
limited
land.
This
includes
eliminating
the
conditional
use,
parking
and
owner
occupancy
requirements
and
allowing
adus
as
large
as
any
given
lot
can
handle.
Thank
you
for
your
willingness
to
increase
our
City's
potential.
U
Hi
everyone,
my
name,
is
Casino
I'm,
the
executive
director
of
The
Nomad
Alliance,
a
non-profit
serving
the
chronically
unsheltered
in
Salt
Lake
County
I
want
to
thank
you
guys
for
pushing
forward
adus
and
limiting
some
of
the
restrictions,
we're
in
huge
favor
of
more
affordable
housing,
the
better
and
also
limiting
short-term
rentals.
So
those
can
be
used
for
long-term
housing
for
the
people.
U
25
people
spent
one
night
to
an
entire
year
living
in
in
small
homes
using
shared
bathrooms
and
kitchen
spaces
inside
outdoor
kitchen,
and
there
was
a
woman,
Megan
moan
who
died
about
a
year
ago
under
police
pressure,
and
she
and
her
on
her
third
month
in
she
realized
that
she
didn't
like
how
meth
made
her
feel
we
got
her
a
job
at
zest
and
she
was
able
to
keep
that
job
the
entire
time.
She
was
living
in
that
micro
house
in
Rose
Park.
U
It
created
stability
for
the
population
and
right
now
that
is
exactly
what
they
need.
Is
they
just
need
a
place
to
go?
We
can
reduce
some
of
the
restrictions
to
allow
communal
bathrooms
to
allow
communal
kitchen
spaces
for
yards
that
are
smaller.
We
can
have
smaller
micro
units
that
could
still
take
advantage
of
space
and
people's
charity
and
people's
desire
to
want
to
do
better
for
their
neighbor,
the
least
among
us.
So
I,
you
know
so
a
lot
of
the
adus
do
cost
a
lot
of
money.
U
K
N
Hi,
my
name
is
Adam
Cook
I
live
over
in
Glendale
in
council
member
Police
District.
N
N
I
feel
that
currently,
from
what
I
see
in
my
neighborhood,
we're
struggling
with
with
displacement
a
housing
shortage,
I
don't
need
to
impress
that
on
anyone
here,
but
we
see
a
lot
of
people,
for
instance
having
to
resort
to
living
in
vehicles
and
I
think
that
that
is
the
perfect
litmus
test.
That's
the
perfect
indicator
to
us
that
we
are
prioritizing
placing
cars
over
placing
people.
N
I.
Think
I
think
that
this
is
this
proposed
change
to
Adu
ordinances
is
a
really
crucial
acknowledgment
of
the
reality
on
the
ground.
People
are
either
being
forced
to
move
and
and
drive
a
long
way.
My
roommate,
who
I
I,
rent
the
other
room
in
my
house
to
was
driving
from
Grantsville
to
work
at
REI
every
day
and
that's
that's
You
Know
sample
size
of
one.
But
that
is
that's
not
abnormal.
That's
you
know
very
common.
N
We're
all
aware
of
that,
and
so
people
are
either
going
further
away
or
they
are
finding
finding
places
to
live,
and
you
know
you
can't
ban
someone
from
living
there
you
from
living
somewhere,
you
can
only
prevent
them
from
living
in
a
structure
that's
up
to
code,
otherwise
people
are
having
to
resort
to
gray
Market
housing
they're
in
laundry
rooms
they're
in
campers
in
their
friends
backyards
things
like
that,
it's
not
always
highly
visible,
so
I
think
this
is
a.
N
This
is
an
important
acknowledgment
of
the
reality
on
the
ground.
Also,
the
changes
to
square
footage
requirements
for
me:
I
live
in
an
800
square
foot
house
on
a
seven
thousand
square
foot
lot
and
there's
not
much
I
can
do
right
now.
C
Hi,
my
name
is
Josie
Fife
and
I
really
have
just
a
question,
and
that
is
I'd
like
to
know
when
you
are
going
to
vote
on
easing
the
size
restrictions
for
the
adus
right
now,
I'm
restricted
to
550
square
feet
and
I'd
like
to
just
go
a
little
bit
larger
than
that
I.
Have
my
brother
has
two
full-size
lots
that
back
onto
an
alley
off
street
parking,
so
I
just
wondered
if
that
might
happen
by
the
spring.
Thank
you.
V
Hey
thanks,
I
appreciate
it
I
think
it's
just
important
for
us
to
hear
from
residents.
Who've
been
waiting
for
this
for
the
last
three
years,
who
have
kind
of
looked
at
the
existing
10-foot
setbacks
on
a
50-foot
lot
and
we're
like
I,
can't
really
do
much
in
10
foot
like
can
we
shift
things
around
a
little
bit,
so
we
love
it.
V
I
appreciate
the
the
sort
of
streamlining
now
to
go
through
to
illuminate
the
conditional
use
permitting
I
really
appreciate
the
Planning
Commission
to
that's
looked
hard
at
this
who's
done
the
legwork
in
the
last
year
and
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
hear
from
the
residents
that
we're
encouraged
thanks
again.
P
A
Plus
on
the
carbon
footprint
for
coming
to
tonight's
meeting,
still
Cindy
Cromer
former
mayor
Ralph
Becker
had
to
have
accessory
dwelling
units
for
his
sustainability
initiative
in
revising
the
zoning
ordinance.
That
is
where,
and
when
this
effort
started,
we
didn't
know
how
desperate
we
would
be
for
housing
within
two
Mayors
or
the
hardship
associated
with
displacement
as
I.
Look
back
at
the
staff
time
to
devoted
to
the
Adu
ordinance
and
the
number
of
housing
units
created.
P
There
is
no
logical
reason
to
connect
owner
occupancy
with
the
construction
of
an
Adu
on
the
site,
but
if
you
don't,
you
are
likely
to
force
Foster
more
short-term
rentals
than
housing
for
Salt
Lake
City's
residents.
Secondly,
you
have
spent
time
debating
the
conditional
use
process.
Well,
the
benefit
of
conditional
use
has
died
more
than
a
decade
ago,
with
the
adoption
of
ludma
by
the
state.
You
are
placating
constituents
and
accomplishing
nothing
whether
the
issue
is
the
homeless,
Resource,
Center
or
adus
by
conditional
use
process.
P
One
thing
is
very
clear
to
me:
you
need
to
address
the
loss
of
solar
access
for
all
housing.
Will
the
two-story
Adu,
with
a
footprint
of
a
thousand
square
feet,
block
the
light
to
the
neighbor's
solar
collectors?
Will
the
neighbors
still
have
a
view,
an
essential
component
of
the
value
of
their
property?
Will
the
neighbors
be
able
to
grow
vegetables
and
what
about
the
trees
which
are
being
removed
for
the
construction
of
the
Adu?
P
More
and
more
I
see
the
Adu
initiative
from
the
Becker
Administration
is
having
a
poor
return
in
investment
as
compromising
the
value
of
neighboring
properties
in
some
cases,
as
increasing
the
number
of
short-term
rentals
and
is
driving
the
removal
of
mature
trees.
In
short,
sustainability
has
to
be
examined
from
multiple
angles
and
in
the
case
of
adus,
the
city
has
failed
to
do
that.
Thank
you.
F
Hi
Christina
again
from
elpco
I'm
here
again
today,
to
talk
to
you
about
what's
important
to
the
Elko
board
that
I
touched
on
last
week,
which
is
a
safety
of
all
rentable
units
in
Elko.
F
F
This
is
overwhelming
for
our
board
members
and
we
don't
actually
like
being
the
people
who
have
to
enforce
on
our
neighbors
and
then
hang
out
why
the
city
does
not
have
enough
enforcement
agents
to
actually
help
us
out
with
the
process.
So
we're
asking
you
to
make
sure
that
renters
have
a
fair
deal
and
are
able
to
address
safety
issues
in
all
of
their
rentals
through
the
city
without
relying
on
neighbors
to
make
sure
that
their
living
situations
are
compliant
and
safe.
Thank
you.
S
I
am
speaking
on
this
item,
just
as
myself
I'm
an
enthusiastic
supporter
of
accessory
dwelling
units
and
I
want
to
speak
in
favor
of
these
changes.
I
was
in
your
place
a
few
years
ago
when
we
reinstituted
accessory
units,
although
in
a
very
limited
capacity
near
fixed
rail
Transit
stations,
it's
great
to
see
the
evolution.
S
Sometimes
I
wish
it
happened
faster,
but
things
moved
slowly
in
City,
Hall
I
both
benefited
from
living
accessory
unit
and
a
couple
times
in
my
life
and
have
an
accessory
unit
in
my
first
home
in
Sugarhouse,
and
they
were
great
ways
to
meet
our
needs
and
to
meet
the
needs
of
others.
As
we
were
expanding
our
our
household
footprint,
if
you
will
I,
might
offer
just
three
suggestions
for
consideration
that
I
think
may
be
valuable.
First
of
all,
I
urge
you
to
keep
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
for
accessory
units.
S
It's
something
I
feel
very
strongly
about
that.
You
need
that
at
that
present
landlord
to
be
there
to
ensure
that
absentee
landlordism
doesn't
become
a
problem.
I
would
ask
your
consideration
for
compatibility
issues,
I
think
many
people
that
are
concerned
about
accessory
units.
Often
that's
the
loss
of
character
of
a
community
and
and
compatibility
of
a
unit
with
the
original
structure
on
the
site,
I
think
can
be
pretty
significant
and
the
third,
the
third
one
is
to
just
kind
of
plus
one.
S
What
cassinia
said
earlier
I
know
you're
expanding
the
footprint
of
accessory
units
in
potentially
with
this
ordinance
we
also
need
micro
units
and
sometimes
incentivizing
small
units
that
can
really
meet
that
demand
for
affordable
housing.
I
would
say
most
of
the
accessory
units
in
the
city
right
now
are
not
terribly
affordable,
break
down
the
barriers,
including
some
of
the
financial
barriers.
I,
think
the
permitting
streamline
process
will
help
that,
but
also
look
at
your
fees
and
and
other
permitting
requirements
as
well.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
encourage
you
to
continue
moving
forward
with
this.
W
Thank
you,
I'm
a
resident
in
district
7
in
Salt,
Lake,
City,
I,
first
time
attending
a
city
council
meeting,
so
I
should
prep
my
comment
a
little
bit
better
next
time,
I
think
but
yeah
I'm,
a
homeowner
in
District
Seven
I,
like
the
idea
of
adus
I,
want
to
build
an
Adu
and
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
is
a
enormous
challenge
to
actually
kind
of
thinking
about
the
Practical
reality
of
building
an
Adu
right.
What,
if
you
move?
What,
if
you
have
a
family,
do
you
have
to
evict
a
tenant?
W
Do
you
have
to
you
know?
The
logistics
of
that
I
think
are
are
really
challenging.
I
understand,
there's
concerns
around
changing
neighborhood
character
and
increasing
density.
I.
Think
the
city
really
needs
density,
I
think
we
need
Transit.
You
know
walking
biking
infrastructure
to
deal
with
that
density.
I
think
that
this
is
an
environmental
justice
thing.
We
need
people
closer
to
play
and
work
so
that
they
aren't
taking
car
trips,
clogging
up
our
freeways.
I
think
you
know
this
is
I,
think
I'll.
W
You
know
we
all
sort
of
agree
on
the
fact
that
we
need
more
housing
in
this
city
and
I.
Think
the
if
you
look
at
this
sort
of
single
biggest
requirement,
that's
holding
back
the
additional
construction
that
they
to
use
in
the
city,
it's
the
owner,
occupancy
requirement,
and
so
keeping
that
in
makes
it
sort
of
hard
to
imagine
that
any
of
these
other
changes
of
setbacks
and
parking
are
going
to
do
sort
of
real
real
change
here.
So
I
I
encourage
you
to
to
remove
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
thanks.
X
Good
evening
also,
first
time
speaker
here,
my
name
is
Eric.
Valchis
I
am
a
homeowner
in
District,
Six,
Dan,
Duggan's,
district
and
I
work
in
housing,
research
and
a
lot
of
my
work
has
been
around
Adu
policy.
This
has
informed
my
personal
view
that
adus
are
good
for
homeowners,
in
that
they
can
house
family
members
act
as
a
place
for
them
to
age
in
place
or
create
a
rental
income
stream
for
them
to
stay
on
their
property.
It's
also
good
for
renters.
X
Part
of
my
research
that
I've
done
at
UC
Berkeley
is
evaluating
Adu
ordinances
and
looking
through
kind
of
the
rubric
of
that
research
against
this
policy.
This
is
a
very
strong
one
and
I
encourage
you
all
to
adopt
it.
The
one
exception
to
that
that
I'll
mention
is
the
owner
occupancy
requirement,
which
the
speaker
before
me
mentioned
will
help
limit
the
number
of
adus
built,
making
them
harder
to
finance
and
also
increasing
renter
instability,
which
we
know
is
a
problem
as
outlined
in
the
thriving
in
place
study.
X
T
Evening
again,
my
name
is
Nigel
swaby
and
I
am
speaking
in
support
of
the
Adu
ordinance,
I
I've,
read
through
the
canceled
notes
and
and
the
the
packet
and
notice
a
couple
of
things
that
I
I
want
to
bring
up.
First
of
all,
you
have
debated
vigorously
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
and
I
think
when
you're,
comparing
that
with
parking
in
terms
of
keeping
some
sort
of
control
on
on
getting
too
many
units
as
adus
I,
think
you
need
to
keep
the
owner
occupancy
requirement.
T
I
I
would
also
like
to
commend
the
council,
because
this
was
taken
on
in
2018
before
it
was
a
big
deal
across
the
state,
and
you
guys
have
really
been
the
leaders
in
the
state
on
as
a
municipality
on
adus,
and
this
is
version
2.0.
So,
let's,
let's
do
it
right.
T
This
second
thing
that
I
would
point
out
in
terms
of
being
a
barrier
are
the
fees
it
costs
the
same
amount
to
do
an
Adu,
whether
it's
300
square
feet
or
1200
square
feet,
as
it
does
a
full
single
family
home?
If
you
want
to
incentivize
units
to
be
billed
Let's,
reduce
those
fees
or
or
waive
them
in
certain
circumstances
and
then
I'm
forgetting
the
final
thing,
I
have
the
final
point
that
I
had
so
it
must
not
have
been
that
important.
T
But
thank
you
again
for
your
consideration
on
this
and,
let's,
let's
see
if
we
can
get
some
more
housing
stock.
Thank
you.
Y
Y
I
want
to
speak
specifically
in
support
of
this
policy
and
as
the
fact
that
we
view
this
as
just
the
first
step
in
a
series
of
next
steps
that
need
to
happen
to
incentivize
adus,
so
I'm
going
to
spend
most
of
my
time
talking
tonight
about
the
owner
occupancy
requirement,
because
we
view
that
as
the
next
impediment
to
adus
that
needs
to
be
eliminated
from
Salt
Lake
City's
code.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
this
is
only
the
beginning
and
and
the
stated
goals
of
Salt
Lake
City
around
equity
and
around
moderate
income.
Y
Housing
adus
are
either
a
critical
piece
of
that
or
they're
not,
and
if
we
believe
that
they
are,
then
we
need
to
eliminate
the
owner
occupancy
requirement.
The
reason
for
that
is
California,
which
arguably
has
the
most
developed
Adu
Market
in
the
entire
country,
eliminated
their
owner
occupancy
requirement
in
2020.
They
haven't
seen
A
Rush
of
investors
coming
in
to
buy
up
properties
and
build
adus.
Y
Instead,
they've
seen
an
increase
in
investor
owners
that
have
built
an
increase
in
adus,
so
in
fact,
between
2020
and
2021,
they
saw
40
increase
in
adus
and
I'm,
going
to
paraphrase
really
quickly
from
a
Brookings
institution
report
on
adus.
That
specifically
gets
to
the
issue
with
the
owner.
Occupancy
requirement.
Z
Folks,
I
wanted
to
thank
and
commend
the
council
for
approaching
this.
These
changes
to
the
Adu
laws
I
believe,
if,
if
there
is
consistency
in
in
preventing
these
units
from
becoming
used
as
short-term
rentals,
this
could
be
a
big
step
forward
for
the
city.
I
I
wanted
to
comment
on
a
few
things.
Z
Z
But
I
would
like
to
stress
that
we
would
need
standards
for
all
those
units.
They
would
all
need
safety
standards
and
have
have
certain
requirements.
We
don't
necessarily
want
people
living
in
an
unfurnished
unlighted.
You
know
units
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
those
standards
stay
stay
in
place
as
we
support
the
idea
of
micro
units
I'd
like
to
address
the
owner
occupancy.
It
sounds
like
the
goal
is
to
to
provide
a
community
where
people
can
be
proud
of
the
community.
They
live
in.
A
AA
A
AA
As
we
heard
on
previously,
the
ability
to
maintain
a
certain
standard
in
a
neighborhood
is
difficult.
If
you
don't
have
owner
occupancy
as
detailed
in
704
East
900
South
that
had
been
converted
to
a
multiple
unit
and
no
one
was
aware
of
it.
The
city
wasn't
aware
of
it.
How
would
that
be
any
different
in
these
situations?
AA
If
you
don't
have
someone
overseeing
the
units,
preferably
the
owner
of
the
house,
I,
am
also
interested
in.
Why
there
isn't
any
talk
about
many
garages
in
the
area
have
a
second
story
that
could
be
converted
very
easily
and
would
meet
the
standards
of
the
units
that
you're
talking
about
the
adus,
and
why
is
there
no
talk
about
that
I'd
like
that?
To
be
something
that's
considered,
and
that's
about
it
for
me,.
AB
AB
You
know
our
neighborhood
is,
is
an
older,
neighborhood
well
kept
and
cared
for
and
loved,
and
one
of
the
things
that's
really
glaring
is
that
we
we
don't
see
any
provision
at
all
for
the
homeowner
there's.
No,
that
maybe
has
been
impacted
by
a
17
or
24
foot
Adu
next
to
their
their
fence.
AB
That
doesn't
seem
right.
It
seems
there
should
be
some
sort
of
there
should
be
some
sort
of
standards
that
would
ensure
that
the
value
of
that
home,
where
the
Adu
is
placed
next
to
was
not
gone
down
and
I.
Think
that
that's
a
big
big
there's
just
no
provision
at
all
for
any
kind
of
mitigation
we've
seen
adus
go
up.
AB
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
parking
in
our
neighborhood
I,
think
a
5
000
square
foot
yard
and
a
provision
where
they
can
build.
You
know
three
feet
away
from
the
fence
and
and
be
as
high
as
24
feet.
AB
AC
AC
AC
There
was
no
provision
to
notify
me
when
I
talked
to
the
inspectors.
He
said
well
because,
because
it's
being
done
as
an
Adu,
we
didn't
have
to
notify.
You
I
think
there's
a
significant
problem
here:
it's
not
just
the
size
of
the
Lots.
It's
not
just
the
fact
that
you've
got
somebody
looking
into
your
backyard,
your
loss
of
privacy
and
so
forth.
AC
AC
A
AD
Awesome:
okay,
apologies
for
being
late.
My
name
is
Chris
magrill
I
live
at
1012,
Harvard
I
am
concerned
about
the
owner
occupancy
clause
and
not
enforcing
the
owner
occupancy
clause
in
my
neighborhood
of
East
Liberty
Park
I'm,
currently
facing
Speculator,
who
has
purchased
a
single
family
home,
which
he
will
demolish
to
produce
a
very
large
home
and
then
produce
an
Adu
that
will
be
larger
in
square
footage
than
most
of
the
houses
on
our
neighborhood.
AD
It
seems
a
little
bit
disingenuous
to
comp
claim
that
you
care
about
affordable
housing
when
you
flatten
a
modest
single-family
home
in
modest
single-family
neighborhoods
and
then
throw
in
a
what
will
in
effect,
be
a
1400
square
foot
garage
with
an
apartment
on
the
top
completely
out
of
character
with
the
neighborhood
and
the
person
doesn't
care
about
the
neighborhood.
He
lives
miles
away.
AD
A
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
making
comments,
I
appreciate
that
very
much
I'll
look
for
a
motion.
AE
Mr
trade
move
I
move
that
we
closed
the
public
hearing
into
for
Action
to
a
future
council
meeting.
Second,.
A
B
A
We
will
now
move
on
to
item
C
potential
action
items.
We
have
none
now
we're
moving
on
to
General
comments.
Oh
well
actually
comments
to
the
mayor,
Bill
Collins,
the
mayor.
Thank
you,
Rachel.
It's
always
great
to
have
you
here
and
now
Council
comments
for
the
city
council.
A
We
are
now
at
the
general
comment
portion
of
our
agenda.
If
you'd
like
to
give
a
public
comment
today,
we
are
accepting
comments
in
person
or
online
in
WebEx.
I
want
to
remind
everyone
about
our
rules
of
the
Quorum
which
apply
to
this
comments.
Section
he's
at
Canada
from
our
staff
will
moderate.
This
I
think
Taylor's
actually
moderating
this.
Not
at
this
time
and
we'll
message
you
for
any
questions
about
your
registration,
Taylor
Hill
will
be
also.
A
Staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
based
on
the
order
of
registration
increase
comments.
You
have
a
two-minute
Mark
host
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
If
you're
unable
to
finish
your
comments,
please
send
the
address
via
email
or
caller
office
Taylor.
You
can
begin
with
our
first
general
comment.
K
E
My
name
is
Dr
Maria,
gauler
and
I'm,
an
ecologist
with
20
years
of
experience,
hiking,
birding
and
photographing
life
in
the
Foothills
I'm
here
to
voice
my
concern
and
disappointment
with
the
current
Foothills
Trail
plan.
The
Foothills
is
an
important
ecological
area
that
supports
among
other
life
over
120
bird
species.
E
These
stretches
of
eroded
slopes
and
packed
Earth
also
have
no
flowers
or
grasses
degraded
habitat
like
this
loses
its
ecological
and
recreational
value
and
I
attended
with
environmental
and
trails
Consultants
hired
by
public
lands,
who
assess
and
revise
their
Trail
plan,
and
it
is
clear
that
ecological
concerns
are
not
being
taken
seriously.
This
ecosystem
will
take
many
years
to
recover
from
any
mistakes
made
during
Trail
construction
and
development,
and
I
worry
that
unless
ecological
impact
is
considered
now,
creation
of
the
planned
Trails
will
lead
to
additional
areas
devoid
of
Wildlife
and
wildflowers.
E
So
I
would
like
to
ask
the
city
council
to
First
ensure
that
the
swca,
the
environmental
Consultants
actually
do
the
ecological
work.
They
were
hired
to
do.
Second,
that
public
lands
and
SE
group
use
ecological
data,
which
includes
human
usage
data
to
develop
their
Trail
plan.
And,
finally,
the
city
council
maintains
oversight
to
ensure
ensure
Trail
development
is
done
properly.
AE
Thank
you.
I
want
to
comment
on
the
recent
report
that
the
city
spent
money
from
the
state
to
help
with
homelessness,
on
hiring
more
police
officers
and
associated
with
police
officers,
and
just
wonder
how
is
this
actually
helping
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness?
AE
You
know
I'd
love.
If
the
council
had
any
research
showing
that
funding
police
officers
helps
reduce
homelessness
because
as
far
as
I
know,
there
isn't
any
research
out
there
supporting
this
and
was
over
a
hundred
million
dollars
from
the
city
budget,
not
enough
for
the
police
to
do
what
they
claim
is
helping
and
so
I
just
want
to
know.
AE
Can
we
start
funding
things
that
actually
help
reduce
homelessness
rather
than
funding
a
group
that
is
constantly
causing
harm
to
people
experiencing
homelessness,
I
mean,
even
in
the
past
few
years,
we've
seen
how
police
interactions
with
people
experiencing
their
mental
health
issues
or
those
who
are
experiencing
homelessness,
we've
seen
them
dying
from
interactions
with
police
and
so
I
think
just
spending
more
and
more
money
on
them
is
clearly
not
helping
the
situation,
and
so
we
should
start
funding
actual
Solutions.
Thank
you.
U
He
I
asked
him
what
he
needed
and
he
said,
I
just
need
a
safe
place
to
go.
I
have
a
job.
I
can
make
money
on
my
own,
so
I'm
here
to
implore
you
guys
to
please
push
for
a
sanctioned
Campground
I've
been
talking
to
you
guys
for
years
about
this.
The
other
side
Village
is
still
years
behind
schedule.
There
is
a
shred
structure
bill
that
is
being
proposed
whenever
you
add
construction
to
the
mix,
it's
still
going
to
be
years
down
the
line
before
we're
actually
housing
people.
U
People
need
a
safe
place
to
go
to
stabilize
right
now
a
safe
place
for
their
things
for
themselves.
In
order
to
get
out
of
poverty
in
Missoula
in
the
first
six
months
of
their
sanctioned
Campground,
they
housed
more
people
in
permanent
Supportive
Housing
than
the
previous
two
years,
combined
as
a
social
service
provider,
it's
impossible
for
us
to
find
people
on
the
streets,
especially
after
abatements.
They
lose
their
phones
and
it's
really
hard
for
us
to
get
people
off
and
and
into
permanent
Supportive
Housing.
This
current
status
quo
does
not
work.
U
I've
also
sent
you
all
proposed
policy
changes
coding
changes
for
Santa,
Cruz
I
would
love
to
meet
with
you
guys
as
a
group
to
discuss
how
we
can
allow
people
to
park
in
religious
institutions
and
business
parking
lots.
Santa
Cruz
also
allows
one
tent
in
the
backyard
for
someone
to
be
safe
and
stable.
Thank
you.
F
Hey
I'm
back,
but
now
I'm
representing
myself
rather
than
Elko
and
I'm,
really
excited
to
speak
from
my
heart,
so
I
live
right
behind
East,
High
School
and
about
10
years
ago
we
started
an
organization
called
the
west
of
East
youth,
resilient
and
advocacy
project
in
which
we
advocate
for
your
youth
advocating
for
themselves
and
their
needs.
F
So
for
the
last
10
years
in
my
spare
time,
I
have
been
going
between
my
neighborhood,
which
is
directly
west
of
East,
High,
School
and
everything
west
of
us
to
help
young
people
advocate
for
their
safety
and
their
Futures.
We've
worked
with
a
bunch
of
different
non-profits
over
really
the
last
10
years,
but
I've
been
doing
this
for
20
years
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
I'm
really
excited
to
say
that
most
of
these
kids
are
focusing
on
improving
the
safety
in
their
own
neighborhoods,
and
a
lot
of
it
boils
down
to
housing
safety.
F
So
I'm
really
excited
that
y'all
are
taking
on
these
projects,
trying
to
make
the
place
or
the
world
a
better
place
for
them
to
live
and
again
I
I
hope
that
you
will
continue
to
think
about
safety
and
focus
on
enforcement
and
making
sure
that
these
kids
are
not
continuing
to
live
in
sewage
and
rat
infested
places
like
they
are
now,
as
you
are
doing
what
you
the
new
tasks
that
you
were
taking
on
again,
please
take
care
of
the
old
problems
first,
as
well
as
we
are
looking
towards
the
future
with
new
Solutions.
S
Thank
you,
since
I'm,
here,
I'm
going
to
do
something
this
evening
that
I
was
going
to
do
by
mail,
and
it
just
seems
much
more
personal
to
be
with
you.
We
just
received
back
from
the
printer
copies
of
the
updated
blueprint,
Jordan
River.
This
is
an
Endeavor,
that's
been
in
in
the
works
for
about
three
years.
S
It
replaces
the
original
blueprint
Jordan
River
that
was
completed
in
2008,
which
led
to
the
creation
of
the
Jordan
River
commission,
which
is
guiding
incredible
work
happening
around
the
Jordan
River
across
the
entire
River
Corridor,
and
extending
now
to
the
Watershed,
with
the
creation
of
watershed
councils
and
other
efforts
happening
around
the
Great
Salt
Lake
I
have
here
four
copies,
which
I'll
leave
for
Rachel
Otto
and
the
mayor's
office
to
distribute
among
the
administration.
I
also
brought
two
extra
copies,
because
I
love
for
councilwoman,
petro
and
council
member
poy
to
have
their
own
copy.
S
Since
the
Jordan
River
is
so
Central
to
your
communities.
We
want
to
make
sure
you
have
one
as
well.
I
will
be
reaching
out
to
you
in
the
coming
weeks
to
schedule
some
meetings
to
talk
about
some
really
critical
issues,
but
I
want
to
just
commend
you
there's
incredible
work
happening
from
the
opening,
almost
opening
soon
to
be
opening
of
The
Carriage
House
at
Fisher
Mansion,
the
85
million
dollar
Bond.
S
We
know
a
lot
of
those
funds
will
be
directed
to
projects
like
the
Glendale
Regional
Park,
the
the
backman
elementary
bridge
that
was
just
completed
in
the
in
the
green
space.
That's
being
envisioned
right
now
for
future
enhancement
and
was
the
the
land
exchange
on
your
agenda
earlier
this
evening
for
public
comment,
there's
so
many
positive
things
happening.
We
also
know
that
Salt
Lake
City
is
at
the
bottom
of
the
Watershed
and
things
that
are
happening.
S
50
miles
away,
have
an
impact
on
what's
Happening
Here
and
we're
working
to
bring
all
of
the
communities
together
and
there's
now
16
cities,
all
16
cities
that
touch
the
Jordan
River
participate
in
the
commission
and
it's
really
great
to
see
the
enthusiasm.
The
support
the
really
strong
and
United
effort
around
the
Jordan,
River
and
I
just
want
to
commend
you
for
your
efforts
and
I
encourage
you
to
not
use
the
blueprints
as
an
afterthought,
but
as
an
A,
Part
Of
Your
Arsenal,
to
support
your
work
around
the
Jordan
River.
AE
AF
Hello,
everyone.
Thank
you
for
your
time
here.
We
would
like
to
speak
positively
I'm
Billy
Palmer
I'm
from
the.
Let
me
get
that
back:
okay,
okay
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
Westside
Coalition.
We
want
to
speak
positively
about
the
ordinance
of
the
Rocky
Mountain
Powers
rezone.
AF
We
see
it
as
an
opportunity
and
a
unique
opportunity
to
provide
mixed
income
housing
and
much
needed
Economic
Development
along
the
North
Temple
Corridor,
and
urge
you
to
keep
in
mind
to
do
everything
you
can
to
advocate
for
development
that
will
fit
a
master
plan
that
revitalizes
the
business
nodes
we've
been
seeing
in
Decline
on
our
side
of
town
and
along
the
north
North
Temple
corridor,
and
hope
that
it
can
pair
well
with
other
opportunities
possible
in
the
area
that
are
being
proposed.
AF
K
A
AG
Wendy
Garvin
has
also
requested
to
speak.
If
you
will
take
another
comment,
Wendy.
A
Z
Costs
approximately
three
million
dollars
a
year
to
run
a
homeless
resource
shelter.
The
10
million
dollars
used
for
policing
would
have
been
enough
to
fund
three
shelters
for
a
year
which
would
have
gotten
all
of
the
currently
unhoused
tent
dwellers
off
the
street.
Getting
our
unsheltered
neighbors
off
the
street
would
reduce
petty
crime
associated
with
homelessness.
It
would
provide
for
actual
safer
housed
neighborhoods
but,
more
importantly
to
me,
it
would
reduce
the
violence
against
the
unsheltered
population.
Z
The
city
feels
victimized
by
state
policies.
I
would
like
to
remind
you.
You
have
recourse
to
sue
the
state
to
change
those
policies.
You
believe
Salt
Lake,
City,
shoulders,
disproportionate
expense,
related
to
hopelessness,
I
suggest
you
spend
the
millions
you
would
save
on
policing
by
housing
our
unfiltered
neighbors
and
use
that
money
to
support
our
unsheltered
population.
Z
Finally,
I
refer
to
you,
referring
to
the
letter
from
the
ACLU
indicating
that
you
are
violating
the
rights
of
the
unshiltered
population
with
violent
and
overly
police
debatements.
You
do
not
have
the
right
to
take
people's
survival
gear.
You
do
not
have
the
right
to
try
and
enforce
that
they
only
own
a
certain
amount
of
property,
and
you
cannot
take
down
temporary
structures
when
there
is
not
space
in
the
shelters.
I
urge
you
to
spend
money
on
shelter
and
not
more
policing.
A
D
I
almost
said
your
honor,
that's
where
I'm
at
right
now
here
we
go
Mr
chair
I
would
move
that
we
approved
the
consent
agenda.
However,
I
do
have
a
question
on
item
number
four,
since
we
bumped
that
item.
Do
we
need
to
change
any
of
the
dates
or
are
we
okay
going
forward
with
it
on
the
consent
agenda?
The.