►
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Today,
June
13,
we
have
our
RDA
meeting
I
want
to
welcome
everybody
to
the
meeting.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you're
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
through
soon
or
by
watching
the
city
council
agenda's,
page
Facebook,
YouTube
and
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you
will
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
We
begin
with
comments
to
the
board.
A
A
Thank
you
for
joining
us
tonight
or
this
afternoon
before
we
start
I
want
to
remind
everybody
about
the
rules
of
the
Quorum
which
are
in
place
to
ensure
our
meetings
move
along
well
and
to
help
everybody
feel
comfortable.
Sharing
their
comments.
A
copy
of
the
full
rules
of
the
Quorum
are
available
at
the
door
and
our
staff
will
post
them
post
the
link
in
the
zoom
chat.
A
If
you
would
like
to
comment
on
the
public
hearing
today,
we
are
accepting
comments
in
person
and
online
on
Zoom
Scotty
from
our
staff
will
moderate
our
Zoom
and
will
message
you
with
any
questions
about
your
registration
staff
is
handling
many
tasks.
So
please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
information
updates.
If
you
need
to
speak
with
our
staff,
please
select
Scott
corpany
from
the
list
of
participants.
A
If
you
need
to,
you
can
also
raise
your
hand
on
and
assume
to
indicate
that
you
need
someone
to
contact
you
Taylor
Hill
and
our
staff
will
be
calling.
Those
who
wish
to
comment
based
on
the
order
will
receive
the
names.
If
you
are
on
Zoom,
please
unmute
your
mic.
When
Taylor
calls
your
name,
we
will
now
open
our
general
comment
period.
Taylor,
please
start
with
our
first
comment.
A
Anybody
here
that
wants
to
address
the
RDA
board-
okay,
I
see
none.
Thank
you
we'll
moving
on
now
to
item
C1,
which
is
the
approval
of
a
minute
I,
need
a
motion.
A
I
have
a
motion
by
former
Dugan
and
a
second
by
Boardman
valdemoris
I'm,
going
to
call
the
question
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
any
opposed
that
motion
passes
unanimously
with
council
member
or
one
also
adding
his
eye
vote.
Now,
we're
moving
to
item
B2,
informational,
informational,
update,
accessory
dwelling
unit
assistance
program.
A
We
will
have
at
the
table
Donnie
walls,
the
RDA
director,
Austin
Taylor
project
manager,
Lauren
Parisi
senior
project
manager.
To
give
you
us
a
little
update
on
this.
D
E
So
since
then,
you
know
I'll
go
into
detailing
the
slides,
but
essentially
since
then
we
have
written
the
RFQ
if
it's
gone
through
multiple
revisions,
it's
now
in
the
hands
of
the
procurement
department
and
we're
back
here
today
to
ask
what
you
want
to
see
in
this
program.
If
you
have
new
ideas,
because
I
know
you've
gone
through
quite
a
process
of,
and
the
zoning
changes
for
adus
talking
about
adus,
researching
adus,
so
I'm
sure
you
have
a
lot
of
new
ideas
that
you'd
like
to
see
in
this
program.
E
E
E
E
If
you
look
at
the
zoning
map
on
the
right,
you'll
see
that
the
nine
line
project
area
which
encompasses
parts
of
popular
Grove
and
Glendale,
have
a
lot
of
single-family
zoning,
as
you
can
see
in
Liberty
walls,
area,
East,
Liberty
area,
Sugarhouse
area,
but
the
difference
here
is
that,
whereas
80s
are
being
built
generally
east
of
State
Street,
they
are
not
being
built
as
much
in
Poplar
Grove,
Glendale,
nine
line
project
area.
Let's
go
next.
E
E
So
since
we
last
talked
in
October,
you
all
have
passed
a
whole
set
of
Adu
zoning
code,
changes
that
greatly
permitted
the
construction
of
Adu.
So
the
issues
that
we
heard
about
before
are
essentially
gone
since
that
Adu
zoning
change,
and
so
this
still
still
construction
costs
and
financing
options
are
the
lingering
issues
and
we
hope
that
this
Adu
assistance
program
will
tackle
those
things.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
E
And
as
a
refresher
staff
has
done
quite
a
bit
of
exploration,
work
researching
what
we
want
to
see
in
this
program.
We've
interviewed
Builders
and
Architects
homeowners
that
have
built
adus.
We've
looked
at
different
programs
around
the
country,
we've
been
to
Poplar
Grove
and
Glendale
Community
Council
meetings
to
talk
to
them
about
this
program
and
get
their
ideas.
So
we've
been
Gathering
a
lot
of
ideas
in
preparation
for
releasing
this
RFQ.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
E
And
the
goals
these
are
listed
directly
in
the
RFQ
and
these
goals
we
came
up
with
after
discussing
this
with
you
all.
The
goals
of
this
program
are
to
increase
the
supply
of
naturally
affordable
rental
housing
to
increments
and
incrementally
increase
density
in
low
density,
neighborhoods,
to
provide
low
to
Modern
income,
homeowners
and
formerly
redlined
areas,
a
wealth
building
opportunity
and
to
increase
neighborhood
stability
and
investment.
E
These
program
preferences
are
also
listed
in
our
RFQ
at
this
time,
so
these
are
things
we
want
to
see
in
the
program,
a
component
of
financing
that
could
be
loans
or
grants.
We
want
to
see
landlord
training
and
tenant
screening.
We
want
to
see
the
ability
to
finance
and
construct
attached
and
detach
adus
cost
cutting
strategies
that
could
be
pre-approved
proved
plans.
E
It
could
be
modular
construction
where
maybe
we're
bulk
purchasing
adus
at
a
discount
for
installation
we'd
like
to
see
compliance
monitoring
if
the
adus
are
deed,
restricted
or
have
to
be
affordable,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
rents
are
actually
being
charged
correctly,
affordably
and
then
some
component
of
affordability-
and
this
is
both
a
legal
requirement
and
something
that
we'd
like
to
see
either
the
homeowner
themselves
is
a
low
to
moderate
income.
Homeowner
that
we're
helping
or
maybe
the
tenant
is
a
low-income
renter
that
we're
hoping
let's
go
next.
E
E
Maybe
we
could
have
utility
connection
subsidy,
whether
that's
a
grant
or
a
loan
they
they
asked
us
to
go
and
meet
with
homeowners
in
the
nine
line
area
which
we
did
and
they
also
pushed
for
owner
occupancy
requirement,
which
is
in
the
code
now
and
still
still
is,
and
then
they
pitched
the
idea
of
bulk
purchasing
modular
ads
for
cost
savings.
We've
got
the
next
slide
back
in
October.
This
is
the
feedback
that
you
gave
us,
so
you
gave
us.
You
told
us
you
would
support
a
low
to
zero
interest
loan
on
the
project.
E
As
a
refresher,
here's
here's
the
money
that
we're
looking
at
for
this
program
back
in
fiscal
year,
2022
the
board
set
aside
394
thousand
dollars
for
the
RDA
to
fund
this
program
in
April
of
this
year.
As
you
as
the
council
were
talking
about
the
Adu
code
changes
you
moved
to
set
aside
a
million
dollars
for
this
program
and
then
in
our
the
ad,
the
rda's
2024
budget,
we're
proposing
to
set
aside
another
400
000.
So
to
sum
it
all
up
we're
looking
at
about
1.8
million
dollars
that
could
be
dedicated
to
this
program.
E
Here's
the
process
that
we're
looking
at
the
next
steps
that
we're
taking
right
now.
So,
as
I
said,
we
have
an
RFQ,
that's
drafted,
ready
for
editing
after
you
guys
give
us
some
feedback
and
we
would
release
this
RFQ
as
soon
as
we
get
the
go-ahead.
Essentially
after
it's
out,
we
will
we'll
take
a
short
list
of
of
applicants
for
the
RFQ.
Then
this
ideally
will
have
maybe
some
Architects,
maybe
some
construction
contractors.
E
Other
groups
that
might
apply
could
be
groups
to
walk
homeowners
through
the
process
of
Permitting,
because
that's
also
a
challenging
process
so
again
we'll
release
that
RFQ
we'll
get
applications
from
those
groups
we'll
select,
who
we
think
are
the
most
qualified
from
those
applicants
to
go
on
to
an
RFP
round
which,
in
that
RFP
round
they'll,
come
up
with
a
program
proposal
and
then
at
that
point
we'll
select
our
program.
Partners
come
up
with
the
program
idea.
Come
back
to
you,
the
board
for
approval
of
that
program,
and
ideally
that's
in
Winter
of
this
year.
E
G
Ahead,
yeah
I
have
a
question
so
typically
I
mean
I,
guess
I'm
confused,
because
we
don't
have
like
a
development
site,
it's
potentially
anyone's
backyard.
So
what
is
this
team
that
is
being
selected
doing
if
they
want
to
if
the
homeowner
in
the
nine
line
area
or
somewhere
else
in
the
city,
whatever
the
boundaries
end
up
being
wants
to
take
advantage
of
the
program
they
have
to
use
the
team
that
we've
selected
in
order
to
design
and
build
and
finance
their
Adu.
E
Possibly
so
it's
very
open-ended
right
now
we're
we're
essentially
ideally
looking
to
create
a
One-Stop
shop
where
people
could
come
to
and
get
financing
architectural
help,
construction
help,
maybe
permitting
assistance,
and
so
yes,
if
we
do
get
a
good
pool
of
qualified
applicants
that
that
team
might
be,
you
know
fully
fleshed
One-Stop
shop
where
they,
they
use
a
certain
architect,
a
certain
construction
team.
E
H
Yeah
I
think
essentially
we're
looking
for
a
partner
to
help
us
flesh
out
those
details
and
in
our
RFQ
we
have
those
preferences
that
Austin
talked
about
of
things
that
we'd
like
this
program
to
explore,
and
so
it
could
be
like
Austin
just
mentioned,
like
just
the
financing
piece,
but
we're
looking
for
it
to
be
more
robust,
so
per
I
think
we
need.
We
just
need
this
partner
to
help
us
kind
of
fine-tune
the
details
of
if
it'll
be
a
One-Stop
shop.
G
H
And
I
think
we're
not
certain.
Yet
if
we're
selecting
all
of
the
pieces
like
we'd
like
the
submissions
to
explore
like
the
possibility
of
using
standardized
plans,
but
if
that's
not
I
definitely
could
see
someone
wanting
to
take,
make
it
more
of
their
own.
So
I
think
it's
just
something
that
we
want
the
submission
to
explore.
But
once
we
like
fine-tune
the
terms
of
the
program,
it
might
not
not
necessarily
include
that,
so
there
there
could
be
more
flexibility
for
the
homeowner.
A
Is
good
input
I
mean
in
my
my
learning
from
other
cities
on
this
programs.
A
standardization
on
on
on
on
these
programs
is
beneficial
because
it
saves
cost
in
architectural
designs
and
it
could
save
a
lot
of
you
know.
Added
costs
to
the
to
to
which,
at
the
end
is
a
a
barrier
to
come
up
with
your
own
Adu
I'm
sure
I
mean
if
there
is
a
concern,
but
that
you
know
if
a
homeowner
has
a
different
design
or
a
different.
A
You
know
style
or
whatever
I'm
sure
that
maybe
they
can
select
some
of
this
and
they
can
change
it.
But
in
in
our
conversations
previously
on
this,
we
were
talking
about
the
standardization
and
a
way
of
saving
cost
and
trying
to
come
up
with.
If
you
wish
a
flavor
list
and
said
okay
I
like
this
one,
and
it's
already
designed
it's
already
ready
to
go,
there
is
no
architectural
designs.
There
is
no
all
of
these
other
costs
that
they're
already
paid
once
if
you
wish,
but.
A
I
I
was
going
to
ask
that
like
have
you
do
we
have
any
examples
of
other
cities
that
they
have
this
One-Stop
shop,
that
it
works
for
them
and
that
we
can
plagiarize
so
that
we
don't
every
time
we
do
these
things.
My
My
worry
is
about
the
length
of
the
deployment
of
the
program
like
I,
get
what
you
guys
are
saying
but
I.
I
You
know,
I
don't
want
this
program
to
take
another
two
years,
because
we
have
a
plan
like
the
we
had
a
commitment
with
the
council
members
that
supported
this
idea
to
make
sure
that
we
invest
and
we
help
financially
and
see
if
we
can
get
a
lot
of
them
done
with.
You
know
the
caveat
that
in
two
or
three
years
we
are
revising
this
to
change
some
of
the
ordinance,
because
if,
if
nobody's
doing
this,
then
maybe
one
of
the
causes
is
that
owner
occupancy
requirement
that
we
left
here.
I
So
if
we,
if
this
takes
another
two
years
to
deploy,
then
we're
behind
on
the
commitment
that
I
had
made
with
the
ones
that
were
not.
You
know
excited
about
the
the
ordinance
you
know
were
behind
and
then
what
do
we
do
so
we're
not
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
if
there's
something
else
going
on
out
there
like
that
has
been
working
for
the
city,
then
maybe
that's
our
that's
our
Master.
I
That's
our
plan,
like
that's
our
sorry,
our
template
and
then
plug
it
in
to
whoever
hit
over
there
an
RFQ,
and
then,
if
that
you
know
whoever
comes
up
with,
if
just
the
bank
says
no
we're
just
nobody
else
shows
up,
and
just
the
bank
says
we're
just
going
to
do
the
money,
then
forget
it.
Let's
just
do
the
template
from
some
other
city
and
adapt
it
to
us.
So
we
can
get
this
going
and
let's
not
wait
any.
C
I
C
Discussion
I
appreciate
the
the
flow
and
I
also
kind
of
agree
with
councilman
or
Boardman
Romano's.
You
know
the
concern
on
I
see
the
the
One-Stop
shopping
being
kind
of
restrictive
in
in
nature,
and
maybe
that
will
we
can
flesh
that
out
in
the
RFQ
process.
C
C
A
You
I
I
had
a
quick
question
on
you
know.
Potentially
it
was
said
there
is
1.8
million
dollars.
Everything
goes
you
know
onto
plan
today,
but
to
to
land
on
this
and
assuming
that
it,
you
know
an
Adu
cost,
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
that's
18,
you
know
adus
are
we?
Will
this
process
allow
for
a
partial?
You
know
financing.
So
let's
say
you
know
a
homeowner.
You
know
potentially
has
Equity
enough
to
come
up
with
a
loan,
for
you
know,
half
of
that,
and
they
have
an
issue
coming
up
with.
The
rest.
A
You
know
is
that
something
that
it
could
be
allowed,
and
my
second
part
of
the
question
relates
to
equity
and
some
of
the
barriers
that
some
of
the
you
know,
members
of
the
community
in
my
face,
related
to,
for
example,
language,
right
and
understanding
the
the
community
of
the
West
side
and
the
nine
line,
and
maybe
no
understanding
the
lingo
or
the
process
and
how
all
of
these
barriers
between
what
a
city
is
and
the
community
itself.
A
So
I
I'm,
hoping
that
you
know
who
I
was
selecting
this
people
to
help
us
with
putting
this
program
together.
That
we
understand
that
there
is
a
lot
of
barriers
there
beyond
the
money.
The
money
is
a
big
one.
I
mean
there
seems
to
be
a
commitment
by
this
board
and
the
administration
to
make
sure
that
there
is
money
to
help
this
incentivize
this.
But
there
are
other
barriers
out
there.
E
Yeah
I
can
address
that
quickly
if
you
want
so
probably
the
key
partner
that
we
hope
will
apply
to
this
is
a
lending
partner.
We
know
you
know.
1.8
million
dollars
is
a
really
good
amount
of
money,
but
it
doesn't
go
too
far
in
construction,
we're
seeing
adu's
costing
between
100
and
250
000.
So,
like
you
said,
if
we're
lending
construction
loans
ourselves
as
an
RDA,
maybe
like
80
percent
loan
to
cost
or
something
it's
not
going
to
go
very
far.
E
So
we
do
want
Banks,
other
lending
Partners
to
apply
to
help
us
and
then,
as
you're
talking
about
language
barriers,
we
do
have
in
the
RFQ
that
we'll
be
translating
things
to
Spanish
and
we're
looking
for
a
partner
that
that
understands
communities
there
if
I
could
adjust
your
points.
Councilmanos
so
keys
to
equity
in
Oakland
is
one
of
the
the
programs
that
we
we
really
like,
and
essentially
it's
a
model
where
they
have
a
One-Stop
shop.
E
They
have
a
project
manager
that
you,
the
homeowner
is
assigned
with
and
they
hold
your
hand
through
the
entire
process
of
finding
funding
to
build
your
Adu,
finding
the
architect
to
design
it.
Getting
the
building
permits
from
the
city
finding
the
contractor
and
then
even
Property
Management
afterwards,
it's
the
it's
the
best
program
that
we've
seen
it's
the
most
holistic
I
think
we'd
be
thrilled.
If
we
could
launch
something
like
that,
it's
all
going
to
depend
on
what
kind
of
partners
are
interested
in
working
with
us.
G
I
Mr,
chair,
I,
guess
my
initial
feedback
would
be
that
whatever
ends
up
happening.
If
there
is
this
option
for
a
One-Stop
shop,
that
may
be
applicable
to
a
lot
of
homeowners,
but
there's
a
lot
of
cases
where
a
standard
plan
won't
work
like
an
attic
conversion
or
a
basement
conversion,
or
even
an
addition.
G
Any
kind
of
attached
Adu
isn't
really
going
to
work
for
any
kind
of
standardized
plan
that
I
could
think
of
so
to
the
extent
that
we're
not
only
looking
at
like
alley
accessed
25
feet
by
100
feet
deep
Lots,
with
a
lot
of
space
in
the
backyard
we're
going
to
need
to
have
some
flexibility
in
that.
So
I
think
we.
G
What
my
hope
is
that
we
have
a
lot
of
resources,
but
that
the
homeowner
can
choose
whichever
resources
are
more
applicable
to
them
and
I
think
that
has
to
go
for
the
financing
tools
as
well.
So
in
some
cases
there
may
be
a
lot
of
equity
in
the
home
and
they
can
draw
against
that
and
then
they
only
need
a
little
bit
of
a
gap
to
to
finance
the
rest.
In
some
cases
they
may
have
no
equity.
G
But
that
would
be
like
they
have
zero
financing
in
that
case,
because
they're
giving
up
a
really
big
piece
of
value
in
terms
of
that
land
value
and
then
all
the
way
down
to
like
I
just
need
20
more
thousand
dollars.
Because
I
didn't
know,
my
sewer
utility
connection
was
going
to
be
this
complicated
and
I
have
lead
pipes,
I
have
to
remediate,
or
something
like
that.
G
So
I
think
what
to
me
would
be
the
most
effective
is
if
that
the
financing
tool
I,
think
the
financing
tool
is
the
most
important
piece
and
that
that
can
be
scalable
to
fit
as
many
different
situations
as
possible
from
I
have
zero
dollars,
but
I
do
have
this
property.
That
was
my
grandparents
house
and
I.
Have
a
lot
of
money.
I
just
need
a
little
extra
help
and
everything
in
between
and
then
the
standardized
finds
will
probably
be
helpful
for
a
lot
of
people,
even
people
that
don't
like,
then.
G
The
other
question
is
what
becomes
well.
What,
if
I
want
to
be
I
want
to
be
part,
I
want
to
use
the
standardized
plan.
That's
pre-approved
because
I
know
it's
faster,
but
I,
gonna
Finance
it
all
my
by
myself
and
I.
Don't
want
it
to
be
deed,
restricted,
affordable!
Do
we
allow
that
or
not
I
would
think
so
if
it's
already
there
and
ready
but
I,
think
those
are
the
questions
like
what
degree
of
support
kicks
into
where
we're
requiring
affordability
as
a
return,
because
I
don't
think
it
can
be
everything
right.
G
Like
a
fifteen
thousand
dollar
loan,
that's
repayable
in
five
years,
probably
wouldn't
that
would
be
too
big
of
an
ask
for
that
kind
of
a
a
degree
so
I
that
may
be
like
the
most
impossible
problem
to
solve,
but
I
think
it's
it
gets
to.
What
I
see
is
like
this
is
such
a
tailor
made
situation,
everyone's
personal
finances
and
their
lot
configuration
that
there's
only
so
much
standardization
that
would
be
applicable.
J
I
think
if
I
may,
director,
mono
I
think
you
just
pointed
out
a
lot
of
the
reasons
why
we
want
to
put
out
this
RFQ
to
have
someone
come
in
and
help
us
one
get
information
and
ideas
of
how
to
address
that,
and
then
two
those
issues
will
come
back
before
you
as
a
board.
As
far
as
developing
this
program,
I
mean
we
have
to
look
at.
We,
we,
as
an
agency,
are
doing
this
primarily
as
a
pilot
in
the
nine
line,
because
that's
a
requirement
of
our
interlocal
with
the
county.
J
So
that's
what
kind
of
started
us
down
this
path,
obviously
as
part
of
the
city
efforts
and
what
you
approved
as
a
council
and
now
with
additional
funding,
we're
looking
at
how
to
potentially
take
that
Citywide
but
I.
Think
as
we
do
that
we're
looking
at
what's
appropriate
for
what
we
need
in
the
nine
line
area.
How
does
that
change
when
we
start
looking
at
a
city-wide
program?
J
What
is
that
level
of
assistance
that
we
potentially
is
what
our
role
should
be
to
help
make
this
happen,
and
then
to
your
last
point
at
what
level
of
assistance
do
we
put
on
different
levels
of
conditions
and
requirements
and
I?
Think
that's
what
we're
hoping
to
bring
back
to
you
of
kind
of
like
this
Matrix
of
these
are
our
options.
If
we
invest
this
much
in
this
way
and
this
way,
then
this
is
what
we're
going
to
get
in
return.
J
So
that's
what
we're
hoping
to
get
out
there
and
kind
of
understand
what
this
program
can
be
look
at
examples
and
best
practices
and
then
come
back
to
you
as
a
board
and
say
this
is
what
we
think
we
recommend
our
role
as
an
agency
or
a
city
should
be
to
help
incentivize
these,
and
this
is
what
we
expect
in
return.
So.
E
Was
important
so
there's
one
more
quick,
we
talked
about
the
process
and
the
components
of
the
program.
There's
one
more
important
question:
we
want
to
ask
you
and
that's:
should
we
pilot
this
first
in
the
nine
line
project
area
and
then
expand
to
other
areas?
If
there's
not
enough
demand
there
or
you
know,
there's
demand
for
more
or
should
we
open
it
up
city-wide
and
when
we
ask
that
question
there's
something
to
think
about.
E
Also,
is
that
if
we're
using
RDA
money,
we
can
only
spend
money
on
housing,
that's
affordable
outside
of
RDA
project
areas,
so
we
can't
fund
market
rate
adus
outside
of
project
areas
unless
we're
using
other
City
funds
like
general
fund
money.
That
does
not
have
those
restrictions.
So
we'd
like
to
hear
your
thoughts.
J
Now,
if
I
can
jump
in
because
maybe
I'll
answer
I'll
just
add
that
I
think
what
you
are
proposing
right
now
is
a
board
and
city
council
with
the
funding
of
this
additional
million
I
think
that's
coming
from
funding
our
future
or
the
North
Temple,
so
that
would
not
carry
the
strict
requirements.
So
that
does
give
you
an
option
but
I
think
that
fills
in
what
what
Austin's
getting
at
is
that
policy
discussion
of
just
nine
line
to
start
or
do
you
want
us
to
go
out
city-wide
to
start
and
how
we
do
that
so.
H
I
I
Backstops,
no
well,
obviously,
I
want
city-wide,
you
know,
I,
don't
want
any
delay
because
again
I'm
serious
about
the
commitment
I
made
to
to
all
of
you
guys
that
you
know
so
I
would
like
cdy
just
to
get
it
going.
I
You
know,
learn
as
we
go,
but
if
the
other
members
are
like
no
just
do
a
low
income,
just
in
the
nine
and
sorry
yeah
affordable
in
the
line
line,
then
that's
fine,
but
it
delays
our
two
three
year,
commitment
to
look
at
it
and
if
it
worked
or
not
for
for
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
that
we
have
in
there
the
so
Citywide.
For
me,
one
thing
that
is
related
to
the
process.
I
I
think
and
I
hope
that
building
permits
is
listening
to
us
right
now
as
we
speak
and-
and
you
guys
have
regular
meetings
with
them,
because
the
last
thing
I
want
to
hear
is
that
well,
we
couldn't
make
it
because
building
permits
wasn't
ready
and
wasn't
really
understanding
what
this
program
was.
So
we
had
all
of
these
things
to
work
through
and
the
Kings
and
the
you
know.
I
I
You
know
that
are
not
the
what
the
the
not
the
letter
of
the
law
but
the
spirit
of
the
law
in
all
of
your
ordinances
and
things
that
we
have
to
do,
because
we
bumped
into
these
issues
a
lot
with
different
construction
projects
and
stuff
like
that
that
were
so
strict
that
then
we
can
move
things
forward,
and
this
is
something
that
it's
a
goal
of
the
city:
to
provide
affordable,
housing
and
or
additional
housing
units
in
this
way
through
adus.
I
So
if
you
haven't,
please
reach
out
to
them
and
get
that
like
conversation
going
hey,
how
are
you
from
your
end?
How
are
you
gonna
get
this
going
as
fast
as
possible
from
our
end,
this
is
what
we
need
to
do
and
from
engineering
perspectives
so
that
we
prevent
all
of
the
you
know
all
of
the
roadblocks
that
we
might
first
in
the
future.
Thanks
thanks.
E
C
C
What
we
find
out
from
the
the
pilot
program
so
I
think
maybe
going
city-wide
it
all
the
RFQ
still
says
you
know
it's
going
to
look
like
this
city-wide
I
think
it's
probably
give
us
a
better
picture
of
what
what
we
need
to
adjust
if
we
don't
after
the
pilot
program,
so
I'm
I'm
I
lean
more
towards
the
city-wide,
because
we've
only
had
104
years-
and
you
know
in
public
in
this
public
Grove
area,
we're
not
going
to
have
another
100
really
pop
up
just
automatically
just
because
we
give
them
a
little
extra
funding,
because
it's
still
expensive
up
proposal
that
they
need
to
come
up
with.
C
So
that's
that's
one
thing
that
now
I
want
to
shift
my
question
to
my
next
question,
going
back
to
the
board
suggestions
and
it
took
me
a
second
had
to
go
read
through
it
again.
So
on
the
board
suggestions
and
even
read
through
last
night,
I
was
like
we
were
supporting
to
allowing
low
to
moderate
income
homeowners
to
participate
at
market
rate
rent.
C
But
then
the
two
bullets
down
it
says,
support
and
help
both
the
low
to
moderate
income,
homeowners
and
low-income
renters
through
the
program
with
possible
deed
restrictions
and
to
me
those
seems
to
be,
they
seem
to
conflict
and
I'm.
Just
I
guess
the
RFQ
can
kind
of
maybe
answer
that
question
one.
Is
that
we're
allowing
them
to
go
market
rate?
The
other
one
is
saying:
hey
we're
going
to
restrict
it.
Is
there
different
finances
for
those
two
different
units
and
how
would
that
work.
C
J
So
again,
if
we're
looking
at
wealth
building
or
just
increasing
density,
we
may
participate
at
a
different
level
than
if
we're
contributing
something
that
we
then
in
turn,
are
looking
for
deed
restriction
or
affordable
units,
so
that
to
be
part
of
that
Matrix
and
how
we
developed
the
program
of
what
we're
really
contributing
and
what
we're
getting
out
of
it.
So.
A
This
part
of
town
and
the
RDA,
having
done
quite
a
bit
about
reach
to
the
community,
about
this
being
the
99
the
pilot
program,
I
think
it
will
be,
it
will
be
perceived
as
this
ingenious.
If
all
the
sudden
we
say,
oh,
never
mind,
you
know,
the
pilot
program
will
be
Citywide.
A
I
just
want
to
caution.
You
know
that
it
might
not
look
very
good
since
we
already
reached
out
to
the
community
quite
a
bit
about
this,
so
I
I,
you
know
I
I,
believe
that
it
should
be
a
cdy
program,
I'm
hoping
that
we
get
there.
I
hope
that
we
learn
a
lot
from
this
first
pilot
program
on
the
nine
line,
but
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
not
setting
the
expectations
differently,
that
you
know
wrong
and
the
wrong
way.
A
So
to
me,
it
will
be
very
important
that
we
stay
with
the
program.
As
a
recommended
and
I
was
told
the
community
it
was
going
to
go,
and
then
we
extrapolate
and
learn
from
this,
and
then
we
will
move
on
to
probably
a
city-wide
program,
just
just
as
a
caution
from
what
I
can
perceive.
If
we
all
of
a
sudden
change
it.
A
I
The
only
issue
I
see
with
that
is
that,
like
I
said
again
like
we
for
the
ideal
change
or
ordinance
change,
we
made
commitments
and
if
we,
if
we're
just
going
to
look
at
the
nine
line
to
see
if
it
worked
or
not
I'm,
not
sure
if
that's
good
enough
to
to
look,
you
know
to
review
what
we
need
to
review
in
the
next
two
three
years
and
also
what
I
see
is
that
I
think
we
have
decided
that
the
RDA
will
do
a
lot
of
our
housing
projects
like
it's,
not
that
this
is
different
like
there's
just
adding
geographical
space
like
it's,
not
that
they're
doing
something
that
they
never
did,
that
they're
only
supposed
to
do
in
RDA
project
areas,
so
I
cannot
see
how
adding
just
more
geographic
area
will
disappoint
nine
nine
area,
people
I,
don't
know
I
cannot
see.
A
It
I
don't
know
I
I
see
what
you
mean:
I
I,
also
wanna.
Maybe
someone
can
clarify
this,
but
we've
been
talking
about
the
nine
line
being
as
a
pilot
program
before
we
started
talking
about
the
the
changes
on
the
ordinances
regarding
Ado.
So
this
was
a
conversation.
We've
been
having
for
a
little
while
ahead
of
the
conversation
of
the
the
audience
changes
that
we
made,
that
we
all
participated
on,
I
I,
don't
see
why
it
would.
A
K
K
I
would
I
I
agree
with
piloting
I
like
doing
things
in
informed
manner,
but
I'd
like
the
pilot
to
be
time
restricted,
because
my
Jordan
Meadows
and
West
Point
people
have
lots
absolutely
ready
for
this
and
I
think
there
would
be
a
desire
and
I
would
like
to
see
it
expanded
as
quickly
as
possible.
I
agree,
Mr.
J
Chair
if
I
may
I
think
your
comments
about
our
original
intention,
with
piloting
in
nine
line,
are
spot
on
I
think
as
we've
indicated,
that
was
a
function
of
our
agreement
with
the
county,
so
at
least
as
far
as
the
RDA
started
this
conversation
two
plus
years
ago,
as
a
function
of
that.
That's
where
we
started
and-
and
we
obviously
the
reason
we
asked
we-
we
want
board
input
on
whether
we
stick
to
just
nine
line
pilot
or
whether
we
go
city-wide
but
I.
J
Think
one
thing
to
keep
in
mind
too,
is
when
we
first
presented
that
and
first
discussed
it
as
a
pilot
program.
We
were
only
talking
about
having
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
going
and
really
just
gathering
information.
I.
Think
you,
within
your
role
as
a
city
council
and
approving
the
zoning
change
you're,
going
to
possibly
see
now
a
lot
more
interest
in
doing
this
and
I
think.
J
To
that
extent,
we
may
want
to
stay
on
top
of
that,
and
not
necessarily
stick
to
just
the
pilot
program,
but
at
least
be
able
to
come
back
to
you
as
staff
and
provide
you
with
information
as
to
what
extent
the
rest
of
the
city.
We
may
play
a
role
and
what
our
financing
participation
could
be
and
what
terms
you
may
want,
as
a
council,
to
kind
of
be
able
to
help
encourage
that
development
happening
the
way
or
where
we
want
it
to
so.
J
E
G
Think
for
for
me,
it's
going
to
depend
on
what
the
I'm
going
to
call
it.
A
menu
of
tools
ends
up
looking
like
because
some
of
them
may
be
more
appropriate
for
a
specific
geographic
area
and
others
may
be
appropriate.
City-Wide
and
some
may
be
applicable
for
tax
increment
funding
from
the
nine
line
area
and
others
may
not
so
I
think
it
to
me.
It
kind
of
depends
on
what
we
get
I
guess.
A
Think
that
makes
sense
to
me
as
well.
Obviously,
I
share
my
concern
about
you
know
telling
the
community
that
this
was
going
to
stay
there
and
then
you
know
all
of
a
sudden
change
in
halfway
through
before
we
started,
but
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
come
up
with
a
little
more
details
and
learn
a
little
more
about
the
program
and
then
bring
it
up
to
this
board
and
have
that
discussion,
and
you
know
because
remember
Petro
mentioned
a
little-
an
actual
deadline
to
the
pilot
program.
A
A
K
We
looking
at
other
ways
to
mitigate
cost,
I
know.
At
one
point
we
had
said
we
would
investigate
if
it
was
possible,
instead
of
going
all
the
way
out
to
the
main
sewer
line.
If
we
could
hook
into
the
house,
sewer
line
and
I
know
that
that
was
represented
as
one
of
the
major
costs
in
this.
Are
we
looking
at
those
other
things
that
will
control
cost
as
well.
E
Yeah
and
that
that's
why
we
do
work
with
the
other
departments
on
this
as
far
as
we've
learned
and
Adu
does
have
the
ability
to
tap
directly
into
the
homes
utilities
to
save
costs.
That
way,
but
there
are
cases
when
Public
Utilities
won't
allow
it,
because
the
homes
utility
you
know,
maybe
the
sewer
line
is
bad.
The
water
line
is
bad,
so
they
have
to
just
build
a
new
one.
Anyways.
A
Okay,
I
think
we
live
past
the
time.
Let's
see
this
impressing
question.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
update.
I,
really
appreciate
everybody
on
the
discussion.
We're
moving
on
to
item
number
three
Redevelopment
agency
budget
for
fiscal
year.
2023
2024
follow-up
at
the
table
will
be
Jennifer
Bruno,
the
deputy
director
to
give
us
a
brief
introduction
or
a
long
introduction.
Oh
no.
L
Thanks
Mr
chair,
the
purpose
of
this
discussion
is
just
to
summarize
sort
of
where
the
council
landed
on
housing
items
as
they
relate
to
RDA
budget
in
the
staff
report.
You'll
see
that
the
four
items
that
are
covered
from
the
RDA
budget
are
the
notice
of
funding
availability.
L
Those
appear
in
the
general
fund
sanctioned
camping,
the
funding
for
sanctioned
camping
and
the
funding
for
switchpoint
Gap
financing
are
in
the
non-departmental
section
of
the
general
fund
and
then
funding
for
the
The
Loan
program
for
naturally
occurring.
Affordable
housing
appears
in
the
housing
fund,
which
is
a
separate
accounting
space
from
the
general
fund.
It
will
be
adopted
in
conjunction
with
the
city
budget
tonight,
so
we
provided
the
key
changes
document
that
you
guys
have
in
front
of
you.
L
The
changes
to
the
RDA
budget
that
was
proposed
by
the
mayor
are
highlighted
in
yellow
that
this
just
reflects
the
summary
that
I
just
gave,
and
so
I
don't
know.
If
you
had
any
questions
on
any
of
those.
A
It
was,
it
seems,
like
it's
going
to
be
a
brief
discussion.
Come
up
with
a
question
Vice,
chair,
I
assign
you
to
come
up
with
a
question.
I
L
The
maybe
I'll
say
it
in
a
different
way:
maybe
that'll
help,
so
the
items
that
were
changed
in
the
RDA
budget
that
you'll
see
highlighted
in
yellow,
are
funding
for
the
notice
of
funding
availability
funding
for
the
partnership
with
neighborworks
for
Equity
sharing,
Workforce
housing,
funding
for
the
Citywide
Adu
incentives
and
funding
for
the
partnership
with
Salt
Lake
County
for
adding
housing
to
the
Sunday
Anderson
Senior
Center.
Maybe
I
can
walk
through
sort
of
where
each
of
those
appears
the
let's
see,
starting
on
page
several
Pages
down
on
the
secondary
housing
fund.
L
So
if
you
go
turn
several
Pages
half
of
the
funding
for
the
partnership
with
the
Sunday
Anderson
Senior
Center
is
funded
from
there
and
the
other
half
is
funded
from
the
primary
housing
fund
and
that's
just
a
function
of
where
funds
were
available.
Then,
if
you
keep
scrolling
down
to
the
West
Side
Community
initiative
and.
L
So,
though,
both
of
those
funds
had
line
items
for
Housing
Development
funding,
and
so,
instead
of
having
it
be
a
generic
Housing,
Development
funding
it's
for
a
specific
project
on
the
West
Side
Community
initiative.
This
was
not
taken
from
any
proposed
use.
The
the
West
Side
Community
initiative
is
contributing
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
towards
the
development
of
the
partnership
with
neighborworks
the
shared
Equity
Workforce
Housing
Development.
Then,
if
you
scroll
down
to
the
Housing
Development
Fund,
that's
where
most
of
the
you
know
adjustments
appear.
L
So
that's
reflecting
a
transfer
from
the
dormant
HUD
program
funds
into
the
RDA
so
that
the
RDA
can
use
those
in
the
nofa
and
it's
reflecting
that
the
funds
that
are
being
transferred
from
the
general
fund
from
funding
our
future,
which
are
the
2.59
million
and
the
1.7
million
from
the
North
Temple
Viaduct,
are
now
going
to
be
used
for
the
remainder
of
the
partnership
with
neighborworks
housing
for
shared
equity
and
the
city-wide
Adu
incentives
program.
F
So
the
funding
are
funding
our
future
transfer
from
Mars
Temple,
videx
and
transfer
from
in-home
dormant
program
income
funds.
L
Are
going
to
the
projects
that
are
listed
there
below
so
a
combination
of
a
notice
of
funding,
availability,
Adu
incentives
and
the
partnership
with
neighborworks.
L
It's
split
funding,
so
council
member
Pui
felt
and
I
think
the
council
supported
funding
part
of
it
from
the
West
Side
Community
initiative.
So
I
think
the
total
cost
is
2.3
million.
B
A
A
Know
housing
project
not
yet,
and
hopefully
it
never
works-
can
bring
this
home
for
us.
L
F
Okay
and
in
the
event
that
we
I
know
that
that
the
Sunday
Anderson
Branch
was
dependent
in
part
on
some
County
decisions.
F
If
that
doesn't
pan
out,
then
we
just
have
a
budget
amendment
to
put
that
3
million
back
into
where
it
was
suggested
before
or
some
other
option.
Yeah.
L
L
G
I
would
like
to
ask
for
an
update
at
some
point
about
the
Japan
Town
Street
reconstruction
and
how
because
I'm
realizing
next
year
is
not
even
going
to
show
up
on
the
list,
because
there's
not
even
going
to
be
anything
in
the
20
FY
24
budget,
so
there's
not
even
going
to
be
anything
to
compare
it
to
and
I.
Don't
want
us
to
forget
about
that
project.
So
what
can
we
like?
Where
are
those
conversations?
Do
we
need
to
have
Partnerships
with
other
departments
or
other
agencies?
G
F
F
L
And
actually
I
think
that,
because
the
RDA
and
can
were
able
to
work
together,
you've
actually
increased
your
funding
for
the
notice
of
funding
availability.
So,
in
the
when
the
mayor
recommended
her
budget,
those
funding,
our
future
dollars
were
recommended
to
be
the
main
source
of
funding
for
the
notice
of
funding
availability
because
can
identified
that
they
had
some
funds
that
were
expiring,
that
needed
to
be
spent
on
Housing
Development.
L
B
I'm
not
sure
if
you've
already
mentioned
this,
but
a
lot
of
what
what
facilitated
a
lot
of
this
was
the
dormant
funds
that
were
identified
within
the
can
department,
and
so
this
was
some
really
model
cooperation
between
the
two
departments.
Rda,
and
can
they
really
came
together
to
provide
all
kinds
of
ideas
and
options
and
I
think
it
resulted
in
more
efficiency
and
more
housing?
All
the
way
around
which
was
really
nice
to
see
and
I
think
everybody
was
excited
about
it
at
the
staff
level.
L
A
We
okay:
let's
move
on
to
item.
Thank
you
so
much
Jennifer
I
appreciate
it.
The
report
and
announcement
item
number
four
are
born.
An
announcement
from
the
executive
director
is
any.
It
seems
like
there
is
no
announcement
from
the
executive
director
I.
Well,
let's
move
on
to
item
number
five
report:
an
announcement
from
the
RDS
staff
no
report,
an
announcement
from
your
stuff
on
number
six
report
of
the
chairman
by
Chair
by
share
I,
would
like
to
just
add
a
little
note
to
thank
I.
A
Guess
everybody
that
works
on
the
budget
so
hard
to
make
this.
These
meetings
happen
the
amount
of
work
that
everybody
puts
to
to
give
us
the
information,
and
it's
it's
incredible.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
for
no
one
ever
sees
that
on
the
street
level,
but
the
work
that
you
put
makes
a
big
difference
to
make
to
make
our
lives
easier.
So,
thank
you
so
much
and
to
run
the
city
like
we're
doing
it.
So
it
is
a
big
deal.
Any
the
the
resistance
seem
to
be
any
written
briefings.