►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 02/21/2023
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
Salt
Lake
City.
We
are
here
on
Tuesday
February
21st.
At
the
beginning
of
our
work
session.
Welcome
to
today's
city
council
meeting.
We
continue
to
post
hybrid
meetings
to
keep
everyone
healthy
and
safe.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable,
comfortable.
A
There's
a
work
session
meeting
during
which
there
to
this
right
now
is
a
work
session
meeting
during
which
there's
no
public
comment
but
join
us
tonight
at
7
pm
formal
meeting
to
share
your
comments
and
as
of
course,
we
always
welcome
your
feedback.
Anytime,
buy
mail
to
PO,
Box,
145476,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
Utah
84114,
or
by
email
at
council.com
or
via
our
24
hour
phone
comment
line.
A
801-535-7654
written
comments
we
receive
on
a
gender
related
topics
are
shared
with
council
members
and
posted
to
our
website.
Slcc
council.com
and
just
a
note
about
tonight's
formal
meeting.
We
are
still
planning
to
have
that
hybrid
but
encourage
anyone
who
doesn't
feel
safe
with
those
snow
to
tune
in
virtually
we'll
make
sure
that
the
virtual
option
is
robust
as
possible.
That's
true
right,
okay,
okay!
So
the
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
informational
updates
from
the
administration.
A
A
And
as
they're
getting
started,
hi
Ashley
I
love
your
shirt
as
as
they're
getting
ready.
Just
there
are
going
to
be
a
couple
things
that
move
around
in
order
today,
based
on
things
that
have
come
up,
go
ahead.
Ashley.
B
It's
all
me:
okay,
well
lovely
good
afternoon.
Everyone
happy
end
of
All-Star
Weekend
woohoo
I'm
here
to
give
some
Community
engagement
highlights
for
today.
Next
slide,
please,
okay,
as
always
community
members.
Please
please,
please
visit
slc.gov
forward,
slash
feedback
forward,
slash
for
all
things
regarding
Civic
engagement
and
community
outreach.
It
is
pretty
quiet
these
days
because
it
is
so
cold
outside
and
a
lot
of
our
community
outreach
and
Community
engagement
happen
during
a
very
warm
summer
times,
but
as
of
right
now,
next
slide.
B
Our
sustainability
office
is
running
the
resident
food
Equity
advisors
program.
It's
a
resident
leadership
and
engagement
initiative
focused
on
creating
an
equitable
Community
Food
system.
Thank
you.
The
advisors,
access
to
ask
the
sustainability
Department
to
launch
a
food
Equity
micro
grant.
That
program
is
up
and
running
and
still
accepting
individual
and
organizational
applications
through
March
6th
individuals
can
apply
for
Grants
of
250
to
support
home
food.
Productions
and
organizations
can
apply
for
up
to
five
thousand
dollars.
B
There
is
an
informational
workshop
at
day,
Riverside
Library
February
23rd
in
two
days
from
6
PM
to
7
30
p.m.
It
is
kid
friendly
to
provide
an
overview
and
answer
questions.
We
appreciate
help
sharing
the
grant.
So
please
let
your
neighbors
know
about
it.
Please
get
it
out
into
your
newsletters
and
visit
slc.gov
forward.
Slash
sustainability
forward,
slash
food
Equity
grant
for
more
information
from
the
mayor's
office.
B
This
Thursday,
the
24th
our
office
will
also
be
hosting
Proclamation
plus
Proclamation
plus,
is
you
know
an
effort
to
hopefully
get
more
of
our
constituents
and
Community
leaders
engaged
in
what
the
city
is
doing
and
making
sure
those
relationships
are
cyclical.
I
guess
you
could
say
we
host
something
called
the
Community
Council
quarterly
meeting
every
couple
of
months,
so
we
are
doing
the
same
thing
for
underrepresented
communities
when
they
have
a
holiday
or
Proclamation
by
hosting
a
larger
community-wide
meeting
afterwards.
B
This
next
one
will
be
at
Calvary
Baptist
Church
on
Thursday,
the
23rd
from
9
to
12.
and
then
lastly,
our
community
office
hours
are
still
going
strong.
I'm
excited
to
see
that
we
have
more
people
coming
to
find
them
as
they're
becoming
more
of
an
expectation
in
the
community.
We
have
one
we
have
a
couple
today,
actually
at
Roots
coffee
and
the
Patagonia
outlet,
and
then
we
also
have
two
more
on
the
23rd.
If
anyone
wants
to
be
updated
on
our
community
office
hours
going
forward,
we
also
have
a
plug
on
Instagram
going.
C
D
You
get
next
slide.
Oh
perfect,
you
can
see
the
numbers
for
last
week
at
the
Resource
Centers
and
the
Overflow
and
still
high
high
utilization
rate.
There
was
an
exception
to
a
saint
Vinnie's
downtown,
which
was
below
average
for
some
reason,
we're
still
trying
to
figure
out
why
that
was
over
the
weekend.
D
It
may
have
been
just
be
the
the
crowds
down
there
and
a
little
bit
deterrence,
but
the
good
news
with
this
I'll
say
again
is
that
the
coordinated
entry
process
and
the
coordination
between
the
facilities
and
the
transportation
is
working
well
to
get
people
where
they
need
to
be
every
night.
So
we'll
make
sure
that
we're
aware
of
that.
D
Second
part:
there
is
a
rapid
intervention
or
encampment
impact
mitigation
work
due
to
the
weather,
both
tonight
and
tomorrow,
they're
going
to
not
do
some
impact
mitigation
work
this
week
in
various
locations,
probably
follow
up
next
week
as
soon
as
possible.
Once
the
weather
sort
of
settles
down,
you
can
see
the
rapid
intervention
team
locations
have
increased
since
last
week,
more
Outreach
to
more
locations
and
then
the
next
resource
fairs
in
several
weeks
from
now
next
slide.
D
This
is
something
that
you
saw
last
week
in
a
different
format:
I
apologize
I
was
remote
last
week
and
it
didn't
look
as
good
as
it
should
have.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
saw
this
again
in
a
different
way.
This
is
the
Miami
model
or
sequential
intercept
what
you'll
see
here
are
essentially
six
different
intercept
levels
in
the
community,
and
this
is
a
national
concept.
D
These
are
things
that
are
probably
within
the
city's
purview
in
a
lot
of
ways.
Now,
if
you
go
to
intercept
two
you'll
see
that
that's
where
you'll
get
more
of
the
initial
detention
stuff
when
an
officer
intervenes
in
situation
and
they
need
to
take
them
to
the
jail,
for
instance.
For
some
reason,
there's
also
an
opportunity
there
to
divert
out
of
the
Criminal
Justice
System
into
other
services,
and
that
could
be
treatment,
services
in
the
jail,
but
also
Community
response
teams
pre-trial
Services,
which
handles
a
lot
of
releases
from
jail
early
on.
D
We
saw
in
Miami.
They
do
actually
assessments
immediately
upon
entering
to
jail
and,
if
they're,
in
need
of
mental
health
treatment,
particularly
divert
them
out
of
the
jail
immediately
to
another
facility
right,
if
you
see
number
three,
that's
where
your
specialty
courts
case
coordination
coordinators
in
those
courts,
Drug
Court
mental
health
court
veterans
court,
all
those
kind
of
things
and
as
we
have
a
Justice
Court
in
the
city,
this
is
also
a
place
where
the
city
could
have
some
some
say
and
do
some
work
in
this
this
realm.
D
D
How
do
we
follow
up
with
people
who
are
on
long-term
probation
and
parole
or
just
have
the
same
needs
they
had
when
they
went
in
homeless,
experiencing
homelessness,
experiencing
chronic
mental
illness
or
sudden
juice
issues,
physical
health
issues,
whatever
it
is,
and
the
intercept
five
is
that
longer
term
work?
That's
a
lot
of
County
Work,
particularly
treatment
providers,
but
also
it's
specialized
housing
and
this
Council
tools
taking
some
steps
to
try
and
help
fund
housing
that
would
fit
some
models
like
this
right.
D
I
think
Denver
Street
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
is
a
good
example
of
that
in
the
last
few
years
it
works
with
the
ACT
team.
It's
very
specific
housing
that
the
permanent
support
of
housing
by
definition,
but
is
geared
towards
a
population
that
would
otherwise
probably
cycle
in
and
out
of
treatment
in
our
jail
and
those
kind
of
things.
So
you
can
see
there's
a
lot
of
work
been
done,
the
last
10
years
by
the
county
and
a
lot
of
levels
and
the
city
working
with
them.
D
What
we're
looking
to
do
is
make
this
broader
to
scale
it
to
the
scale
we
need
in
this
County
now
and
to
add
places
where
we
have
gaps.
There
may
be
gaps
between
these
levels
of
intercept.
There
may
be
gaps
within
each
of
these,
where
we
don't
have
as
many
resources
in
certain
areas,
and
so
this
is
the
work
of
that
group
now
coming
together
to
work
on
this
model.
Another
update
on
that
group
is
that
the
county,
Justice
advisory
council
cjac,
is
going
to
be
taking
the
lead
on
this
work.
D
That's
a
good
sign
for
us
mayor
Mendenhall
has
been
recently
appointed
to
their
board
or
will
be
appointed
to
their
board.
Having
them
take
the
lead
is
a
good
starting
point
to
make
sure
there's
still
progress
going
forward
and
we're
not
going
alone.
We've
talked
about
that
multiple
times
before.
D
The
other
thing
about
this
to
remember
is
that
sometimes,
when
we
get
in
the
community
and
talking
about
some
of
the
issues
we're
seeing
on
our
streets
with
people
who
are
clearly
experiencing
mental
illness,
symptoms
crises,
substance
use
whatever
it
is,
and
oftentimes
we're
struggling
about,
do
we
leave
them?
Do
we
get
them
into
jail
or
just
into
treatment
right,
and
this
gives
a
good
example
of
how
we
have
to
have
a
lot
of
levels
and
a
lot
of
ways
to
catch
people
all
through
this
system.
D
So
as
simple
as
we
want
to
make
it
and
as
simple
as
we
need
it
to
be
for
the
public,
we
also
know
behind
the
scenes,
there's
a
lot
that
goes
into
this,
which
is
why
we're
taking
so
much
time
working
on
this,
and
we
can
talk
more
about
this
as
we
go
into
the
year.
But
I
want
to
start
again
and
our
repetition
helps
us
to
remember
stuff,
obviously
and
get
more
detail.
But
I
want
to
put
that
in
front
of
you
again
in
a
clear
way.
This
week,
I
have
one
more
update.
D
Probably
both
if
I
had
to
guess
at
this
point
council
member,
we
have
some
good
services
that
are
clearly
not
big
enough
and
Broad
enough.
But
we
also
know
there
are
some
gaps,
things
that
we've
seen
elsewhere,
that
could
probably
work
here
or
things
that
we
could
expand
here
in
a
slightly
different
way.
I'll
look
at
I'll
say,
intercept
one
with
the
unified
Police
Department
mental
health
unit
and
our
solid
City
social
workers.
D
We
know
there's
not
enough
of
those
right,
but
we
also
know
that
unified
may
be
looking
differently
in
times
to
come,
and
if
we
have
a
lot
of
individual
police
departments
to
work
through,
you
know
how
big
this
becomes.
Another
example
might
be
that
Miami
had
up
front
a
very
clear
memorandum
of
understanding
with
hospitals
to
provide
certain
psychiatric
services
within
seven
days
of
seeing
them.
That's
something
that
we
probably
don't
have
here
in
that
same
way
yet,
and
we
may
want
to
improve
that
or
increase
that
or
add
that
at
all.
F
F
They
just
had
a
more
robust
program
than
we
have
here
now
and
I
really
appreciate
the
outwork
that
we've
the
the
work
we've
been
doing
on
this
and
and
I'm
glad
that
we've
have
a
good
base
that
we
can
expand
on
without
having
to
reinvent
the
whole
wheel
so
kudos
to
the
whole
team
on
this
project.
Thank
you
very
much
sure.
D
Yeah,
we'll
keep
you
updated.
The
last
thing
Mr
chair
is
House.
Bill
499
came
out
the
end
of
last
week,
which
is
the
big
sort
of
Bill
on
homelessness
services
that
we've
been
anticipating
this
year.
It
takes
last
year
we
House
Bill
440,
which
laid
out
the
Overflow
process
about
how
to
find
overflow
beds
before
this
winter.
This
is
the
follow-up
to
that
bill
and
we
are
still
going
through
it
internally
in
the
city
and
also
with
the
league
of
cities
and
towns.
D
There's
a
meeting
tomorrow
with
the
league
and
various
City
members
and
we're
talking
with
Wayne
niederhauser
of
the
state
about
how
to
improve
that
process
and
also
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
resources
for
everybody
who
needs
it
going
into
next
year.
So
we'll
have
more
updates
on
that
coming
forward
very
quickly.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
so
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
two,
which
is
the
North
Point
small
area
plan,
just
to
give
a
little
preview
of
where
we're
headed
item
number
three,
which
was
originally
the
Glendale
Regional
Park
plan,
is
not
able
to
happen
today
due
to
a
staff
member's
family
emergency.
So
we
are
cutting
that
and
in
its
place,
we're
going
to
move
item
number
seven,
the
water
and
snowpack
report,
so
that
the
items
further
down
on
the
agenda
don't
have
to
be
moved
quite
as
much.
A
Hopefully
that
will
only
require
one
set
of
people
to
come
and
move
rather
than
everybody.
So
so
that's
where
we'll
we'll
head
after
this
but
go
ahead.
Sorry
at
the
table.
We
have
Nick
tarbert
Council
policy
on
us,
Chrissy
Gilmore
senior
planner
looks
like
Kelsey
Lindquist
is
available
and
then
Nick
Norris
planning
directors
at
the
table
as
well.
Nick.
Do
you
want
to
start
with
a
sure
introduction.
G
I'll
give
a
real
high
level
introduction,
so
Kelsey
has
all
the
fun
details
to
share
the
North
Point
small
area
plan
is
the
is
a
land
use
plan
for
the
area
located
between
the
Salt
Lake
City
International
Airport,
the
northern
boundary
of
the
city
along
and
along
the
2200
West
Corridor.
This
is
a
council
initiated
petition
in
2020.
The
council
allocated
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
update
this
small
area
plan
for
this
area
of
the
city.
With
that
outlet
Chrissy
take
over.
H
Great
thank
you
well
good
afternoon.
We
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
but
Nick
just
covered
the
project,
location
and
I,
but
I
did
want
to
throw
it
on
the
screen
for
context,
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
people
tuning
in
that
are
interested.
H
So
this
is
in
the
northwest
corner
of
the
city,
Bound
By,
the
Great
Salt
Lake
to
the
West
the
airport,
and
then
we
have
I-215
and
the
Jordan
River.
The
last
time
that
we
met
with
you
was
in
September.
It
was
the
end
of
September.
We
gave
a
briefing
that
was
right
before
the
Planning
Commission
public
Hearing
in
October.
H
Since
that
time
a
few
changes
have
been
made
to
the
plan
that
I
will
try
to
touch
on
as
we
go
through
the
presentation
and
bring
you
up
to
speed
on
those
so
next
slide
and
then
for
context.
Just
as
far
as
the
current
zoning
goes,
a
good
portion
of
the
area
is
zoned
business
park,
that
is
the
blue
BP
and
then
the
area
that's
in
Salt,
Lake
County
is
zoned.
Ag2
agriculture,
2
or
5
actually
I
think
that
or
two
and
then
we
have
Salt
Lake
City
property.
H
That
is
also
a
G2
at
the
very
bottom
of
the
project
area.
On
that
little
finger
is
light
manufacturing,
which
is
M1,
and
then
this
other
map
on
the
screen
you
can
see
is
the
existing
feature.
Land
use
map
from
the
current
North
Point
small
area
plan
that
shows
pretty
much
everything
west
of
2200
West
as
business
park,
and
then
you'll
see
this
area
on
the
east
side
as
ag2
or
ag5
all
right
next
slide
and
then
next
one
so
goals
of
the
plan.
This
has
really
turned
into
highlights
of
the
plan.
H
These
were
the
goals
that
the
council
directed
staff
to
consider
as
the
RFP
was
initiated,
and
these
include
things
like.
We
wanted
the
plan
to
recognize
the
intense
development
pressure
that
the
area
is
under
and
also
be
realistic
about
that
development
pressure.
The
plan
was
also
directed
to
identify
appropriate
land
use,
future
land
use
categories
and
development
characteristics
that
could
coexist
with
conflicting
land
uses,
such
as
the
existing
Agricultural
and
Residential
Properties,
and
also
already
approved
and
planned
light
manufacturing
properties.
H
H
So,
as
far
as
the
vision
map,
this
really
hasn't
changed
since
the
last
time
you
saw
this
map
But.
It
includes
four
land
use
categories.
We
have
natural
open
space,
which
is
that
green,
and
this
is
largely
wetlands,
and
then
it
goes
up
beyond
the
wetlands
to
that
darker
green,
to
try
and
attempt
to
connect
and
not
fragment
those
Wetland
areas.
Then
we
have
this
transitional
area,
and
that
is
that
area
largely
east
of
2200
West
that
we're
anticipating
is
going
to
transition
from
Agricultural
and
Residential
Properties
to
light
Manufacturing
in
the
future.
H
We
don't
see
any
new
Residential
Properties
being
approved
in
this
area
in
the
future.
Although
those
property
owners
have
indicated
that
they
do
wish
to
stay
in
the
area.
This,
this
particular
land
use
category
attempts
to
mitigate
those
existing
residences
from
the
impacts
of
new
development,
which
will
likely
be
light
Manufacturing,
and
then
we
have
this
business
park
and
Industrial
category,
which
is
the
gray
and
then
airport
properties,
and
these
are
properties
that
are
owned
by
the
airport
and
they've
indicated.
H
They
have
no
plans
to
develop
them
and
would
like
them
to
State
airport
owned
and
be
able
to
use
them
as
they
need
for
our
airport
infrastructure
next
slide.
H
As
far
as
design
standards
So,
the
plan
is
set
up
to
include
design
standards
for
each
of
those
land
use
categories,
so
General
design
standards
include
buffering
and
setbacks
from
existing
residential
uses,
wildlife
and
Wetland
habitat.
So
you
can
see,
there's
a
300
up
to
300
feet
buffer
from
designated
Wetlands.
H
We
have
canals
and
drains
at
75
feet
the
Jordan
River
at
100
feet,
which
that
is
the
existing
Buffalo,
already
we're
just
maintaining
that
buffer
of
100
feet
and
then
a
65-foot
buffer
from
existing
residential
uses,
so
that
you
can
see
this
chart
set
up
with
business
park
and
Industrial
land
use
and
then
transitional.
So
in
that
transitional
Zone.
Those
smaller
buffers
are
intended
for
development
that
comes
in
under
the
existing
zoning.
H
Then
we
also
have
a
maximum
building
Frontage
along
2200
West
of
either
400
feet
or
250
feet,
depending
on
which
land
use
category
you're
in
and
then
the
the
land
use
categories
go
from
things
like
standards
for
new
development.
These
include
grading
limitations,
standards
for
fencing
and
walls,
dark
sky
lighting,
there's
also
visual
design
standards.
An
example
of
those
is
100,
foot
length
of
uninterrupted
material
would
be
prohibited,
so
there
would
need
to
be
breaks
and
material
and
things
like
highly
reflective
glass
would
be
prohibited.
H
And
then
we
also
have
standards
for
natural
open
space
category,
and
these
are
largely
things
like
planting
water
trails
and
boardwalks,
and
then
storm
water
policies
like
making
sure
that
water
flowing
into
the
Great
Salt
Lake
is
not
obstructed.
H
And
then
implementation,
so
we
have
three
critical
implementation
path
items.
These
were
identified
to
be
the
most
important
ones
to
really
and
get
the
vision
of
the
plan
as
soon
as
possible.
So
the
first
one
is
looking
at
2900,
West
and
2200
West
Redevelopment
construction
and
looking
at
funding
tools
to
to
ensure
that
those
roads
are
up
to
the
vision
of
the
plan
and
up
to
the
standards
identified.
H
The
next
one
is
evaluate
the
feasibility
of
acquiring
city-owned,
open
space,
Sorry
type
on
that
this
identifies
Land
by
the
Jordan
River
and
then
Wetlands
adjacent
to
3200,
West
and
open
land
adjacent
to
3200
West
as
priority
areas
for
that
acquisition,
and
the
plan
also
has
a
tool
kit
that
I'll
talk
about
that
gives
various
strategies
for
this
action
item
like
purchase
of
development
rights,
among
other
things,
and
then
we
have
a
development
code
updates.
So
these
updates
include
just
general
development
code
Updates.
H
This
would
be
things
like
looking
at
landscaping
and
prohibiting
turf
grass
looking
at
minimum
lot
areas
in
the
M1
and
BP
zones
to
encourage
clustering
of
development
out
of
open
space
and
then
also
amending
our
lowland
Conservancy
overlay
Zone.
To
include
that
buffer
for
canals
and
drains
then
they
plan.
This
is
the
probably
the
biggest
change
from
the
last
time
you
saw.
The
plan
is
that
the
plan
now
recommends
a
North,
Point
specific
development
code,
and
this
really
came
about
when
we
met
with
the
Planning
Commission.
H
We
realized
that
we
had
a
list
of
changes
that
probably
weren't
appropriate
city-wide
in
the
M1
Zone,
and
they
really
were
specific
to
the
North
Point
area
and
the
North
Point
area
was
deserving
of
that
specific
code.
So
this
would
include
looking
at
ways
to
conserve.
One
of
the
biggest
parts
of
this
code
would
be
looking
at
incentive-based
tools
to
preserve
open,
open
space
so
that
maximum
building
front
building
Frontage
along
2200
West.
H
We
could
perhaps
reduce
that
Frontage
in
exchange
for
a
greater
open
space
preservation
and
looking
at
other
tools
like
clustering
and
then
I
think
that
is
it
for
those
three
critical
items.
So
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide
and
then
we
have
another
list
of
other
action
items.
These
include
require
a
local
area
utility
plan.
So
right
now,
utility
developers
are
required
to
provide
a
utility
plan,
but
it's
a
smaller
scope.
H
That
was
up
based
on
planning,
Planning
Commission
direction
to
300
feet.
But
then
we
also
modified
the
plan
to
say
that
we
should
look
at
a
development
framework
that
does
priority
Wetland
areas.
So
we
could,
if
a
wetland
doesn't
have
if
Wetland
is
very
high.
Priority
like
it
has
habitat,
like
nesting,
Birds,
just
different
types
of
things.
H
That
would
be
a
high
priority
Wetland
and
we
would
look
at
you
know
a
scale
and
the
higher
priority
Wetlands
would
get
that
300
foot
buffer
and
then
potentially
they
could
have
a
reduced
buffer
if
it's
determined
that
it's
not
as
high
a
priority
and
then
support
annexation
of
continued
contiguous
Parcels
in
the
project
area,
all
right
next
slide
and
then
the
third.
Probably.
These
are
the
last
last
major
change
from
the
last
time
you
saw.
H
The
plan
is
that
we
now
include
amend
the
major
streets
plan
in
the
draft,
so
there's
three
primarily
primary
primary
roads
that
have
been
changed
in
this
draft,
so
the
first
is
2900
West,
which
is
a
new
north.
South
collector
you're,
probably
familiar
with
this
road
from
the
Legacy
Business
Park.
Is
that
the
name
of
it
like
Legacy,
big
and
smart
subdivision?
So
that's
the
one
that
just
goes
north
to
south
down
through
the
project
area,
then
3200
West
was
was
changed
from
so
right.
H
Now
it's
listed
as
a
collector
Street
on
the
major
streets
plan
we've
downgraded
that
to
a
local
Street
and
also
highlighted
that
it
should
remain
unimproved,
which
means
unpaved
in
a
dirt
road
and
then
the
airport
road
connecting
to
2100
North.
So
I
included
this
image
on
the
map.
That
shows
you
can
kind
of
see
that
the
future
airport
plan
shows
that
the
runway
is
going
to
be
extended,
Beyond
2100
North,
so
that
road
needs
to
be
realigned
to
go
around
that
extension
of
the
airport,
all
right
next
slide
and
then
the
toolkit.
H
So
this
is
just
a
toolk
for
various
tools
that
the
council
can
consider
to
implement
these
measures
in
the
plan
and
it's
broken
up
into
different
preservation
tools.
So
regulatory
incentive
based
and
land
acquisition
tools,
and
then
we
also
have
Financial
tools
that
the
council
can
consider
next
slide.
H
E
E
It
was
primed
before
covid
and
then
suffered
from
the
inability
to
adapt,
quickly
and
kind
of
got
sidebarred
a
little
bit
and
now
we're
behind
the
eight
ball,
while
development
is
happening
out
here
there
are
some
of
my
constituents
sitting
here
who
have
passionately
assertively
and
kindly
communicated
with
me
the
urgencies
on
these
topics,
and
the
truth
is,
you
know
for
me:
I
care
about
environment,
but
people
are
the
reason
that
I'm
here
and
we
are
infringing
on
people,
and
this
plan
is
an
attempt
at
good
faith
development.
E
We
have
to
get
really
assertive,
though
right
now,
they're
already
before
I
even
got
here
was
an
approved,
a
million
square
foot
Warehouse
that's
going
to
be
put
in
out
there,
and
when
that
was
approved,
there
were
all
sorts
of
concessions.
For
instance,
they
were
not
going
to
be
going
up
and
down
21
22
West,
which
is
actually
a
Farm
Road.
If
you've
ever
been
out
to
cross
e
Ranch.
It's
that
small
Farm
Road
that
has
no
sidewalks,
no
gutters,
really
nothing
to
speak
for
it.
E
It's
it's
a
Farm,
Road
and
currently
they're
living
with
dust,
PM,
2.5,
sound
and
danger,
as
trucks
are
zooming
up
and
down.
We
have
documents
documentation
of
this
video
and
photo.
They
have
light
pollution
that
shouldn't
be
there
because
the
moment
we
allow
for
any
sort
of
permissiveness
in
this
area.
It
is
the
wild
west,
and
if
you
give
an
inch,
a
mile
is
taken.
E
I,
hate,
Business,
Park,
zoning
I.
Think
Business
Park
is
a
relic
of
a
time
where
we
didn't
have
exclusively
truck
served.
Warehouses
that
guarantee
idling
engines
in
Windows
that
didn't
guarantee
just
an
abject
increase
of
traffic
to
the
area
and
didn't
provide
any
well-paying
jobs.
I
would
love
to
see
the
business
park.
Zoning
abolished
much
to
the
Chagrin
of
some
of
my
constituents.
E
F
Dugan,
thank
you
and
thank
you,
councilman
pizza
for
that
description
of
2200
West,
and
this
is
a
great
start
to
a
plan,
but
I
have
a
lot
of
concerns
and
starting
with
the
just
awarding.
We
have
some
really
nice
words
in
here,
but
when
they
say
is
encouraged,
it's
should
be.
F
It
should
be
flexible
anytime.
We
use
that
word
in
a
development
world
they're
just
going
to
discount
it
because
they're
only
their
first
incentive
is
the
profit,
not
the
people
in
the
planet.
So
they're
always
going
to
be
able
to
find
ways
to
not
do
that,
because
it's
not
going
to
go
on
their
bottom
line
and
I've
been
saying
this
for
years
that
we
got
to
turn
that
Dynamic
around
and
start
taking
care
of
the
people
on
the
planet.
First
and
revenue
will
will
gain
from
that.
F
It
won't
be
subtracted
it'll
gain
if
we
take
care
of
those
people
on
the
planet.
First,
so,
on
the
same
vein
of
2200
West
I'm
worried
about
3200,
West
and
2900
West
on
the
3200
West,
you
know,
reading
through
the
Dynamics
here
it
says,
3200
is
going
to
stay
on
paid
right
undeveloped,
but
then
there's
one
page
34
of
the
implementation
plan.
That
says
it
is
anticipated.
F
3200
West
will
remain
unimproved
and
that
word
on
it,
it
is
anticipated
means
it's
going
to
be
paved
to
me
to
developer,
because
he's
he's
got
the
opening
there
all
right
and
it
should,
and
it
should
be,
development
should
be
prohibited
from
facing.
3200
West
should
be
that
again
is
open
game
for
them
to
want
to
develop
over
there
and
when
I,
look
at
the
maps
and
I
look
at
the
buffer
zones
and
everything
else,
I
really
think
anything
west
of
22
2900
should
be
undeveloped.
F
I
know,
there's
the
there's
a
Rudy
Canal
there
75
feet
on
either
side
of
the
canal
I'm
assuming
that
is
also
the
right
way.
It's
not
75
feet
total
it's
75
feet
on
both
sides
of
the
high
water
mark.
We
need
to
look
at
that.
So
there's
a
lot
of
words
in
here
that
I'm
concerned
with
that,
give
it
a
developer
an
opening
and
we
can't
close
the
door
after
it's
opened.
F
I,
like
the
you
know,
the
incentive-based
Financial
stuff
is
again
nice,
but
only
if
they're
going
to
make
a
lot
of
money
out
of
it,
and
so
the
the
it
needs
to
be
a
little
bit
more
stronger.
There
I
think
the
idea
of
land
swap
that's
that's
the
Dugan
term,
but
it's
probably
there's
more
technical
term.
F
There
transfer
development
rights
I
think
that
we
should
be
exploring
that
from
someone
in
the
Northwest
to
areas
that
are
already
being
developed
with
a
lot
of
infrastructure
already
developed
for
them
to
to
use
that
area,
and
it
might
behoove
the
city
and
it
might
be
the
area
to
also
do
that.
So
there's
a
number
of
other
things
here
about
the
building
facade,
again:
hey
we'll!
Let
you
have
a
bigger
building
facade.
If
you
give
us
a
little
land
over
here,
well
that
huge
long
building
facade
doesn't
really.
F
Limited
distribution,
land
distribution,
land
and
what
that
is,
every
warehouse
and
every
Factory
is
a
distribution
because
goods
come
in
and
goods
have
to
leave,
and
so
we
need
to
really
be
clear
on
that
definition
also
and
try
to
again
scale
it
back,
because
this
is
our
last
area
that
we
can
really
affect
positive
change,
because
it
has
such
an
impact
with
the
heartbeat
of
the
Great
Salt
Lake
of
water
going
in
and
out
and
the
the
ecological
concerns.
So
that's
my
pitching
is
short.
J
J
Can
you
speak
to
why,
whether
that
would
be
feasible
or
is
it?
Is
it
just
not
because
of
the
the
ownership
right,
the
private
ownership
rights
or.
K
So
I
think
it
probably
depends
on
the
extent
of
whatever
that
means
right.
Some
of
that
is
probably
land,
that's
outside
of
Salt
Lake
City,
and
so
it
would
require
Partnerships
with
those
other
government
entities,
whether
it's
Salt
Lake
County,
if
it
extends
further
into
Davis
County
other
cities
that
may
be
in
Davis
County,
so
I
think
we'd
have
to
understand
the
extent
of
that
to
understand
what
that
means
for
Salt
Lake
City.
F
J
Yeah
I,
don't
I,
don't
I!
Think
it's
more
of
a
concept
from
what
I
understand.
But
do
you
think
that
I
mean
there's
a
combination
of
owners
out
there,
some
some
of
it
Salt
Lake
City,
some
of
it's
the
county
and
some
of
it's
private
ownership
right
and
I'm,
just
wondering
if.
J
My
understanding
of
it
is
more
of
like
putting
together
like
a
conservation
plan
for
that
part
of
the
lake,
like
it's
maybe
similar
to
what
happened
over
on
the
other
side
on
the
northern
border
of
the
Inland
Port
boundary.
J
Do
you
think
like
what
would
that
undertaking
look
like?
Would
it
require
us
to
redo
the
work?
That's
already
been
done?
Would
it
require
land
swaps,
as
councilmember
Dugan
said,
All
the
Above.
K
Just
depends
on
what
the
outcome
of
whatever
that
process
is
that
process
and
the
area
west
of
the
airport
was
actually
led
by
the
property
owners.
So
they
came
to
the
city
with
a
proposal.
The
city
didn't
facilitate
that
or
so
it's
a
little
bit
different.
That's
my
recollection,
so
I
think
it
again.
It
just
really
depends
I
think.
The
other
reality
is
that
we
have
a
significant
piece
of
land.
K
That's
already
been
entitled
under
current
zoning
that
didn't
require
any
sort
of
other
change,
and
so
it's
hard
for
us
to
come
in
at
this
point.
In
fact,
it's
probably
illegal
for
us
to
come
in
and
change
that
entitlement
that
they're
developing
under,
and
so
that's
that
makes
that
part
challenging
and
that
gets
to
some
of
the
2900
West,
the
3200
West,
what
happens
between
those
streets?
K
J
Yeah,
you
know
I
I,
appreciate
that
and
I
think
that
answers
the
question.
I
also
want
to
I
had
a
question
about
just
air
quality.
J
That
I
know
that
previously
we've
discussed
a
lot
of
safety
concerns
about
residences
in
this
area
because
of
the
noise
from
the
airport.
Is
there
any
concern
about.
J
L
K
Some
distance,
so
that
is
a
reality.
I,
don't
think
that
it's
ever
been
to
my
knowledge
been
studied.
What
that
impact
is
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
our
airport,
but
other
airports
have
been
studied
where
there's
Pro,
where
there's
close
proximity
of
residential
and
I
believe
for
employees
too,
and
it
it
has
shown
higher
exposures
to
those
okay.
J
So
well,
let
me
just
like
put
it
to
you.
The
same
way
that
it
was
put
to
me
is:
why
is
it
safe
to
have
people
working
there
if
it's
not
safe,
to
have
people
living
there
from
a
air
quality
perspective?
I
can
explain
why
it's
different
for
noise,
but
I
don't
have
the
answer
right
now
about
why
it
about
air
quality.
So
if
you
can
speak
to
that,
that
would
help
me
answer
that
question.
I.
K
Think
it
comes
more
from
a
people
have
a
basically
a
right
for
some
reasonable
economic
return
on
their
property
and
that's
something
that's
enshrined
at
our
Constitution
that
we
have
to
follow
right,
and
so,
if
we're
going
to
limit
that,
we're
substantially
reduce
that
and
take
that
away.
The
city
is
going
to
be
on
the
hook
for
that
cost,
and
so
part
of
it
is
recognizing.
What
is
the
least
impactful
to
the
least
number
of
people
and
I.
K
Faced
with
that,
but
there's
also
internal
systems,
air
purifiers
and
things
like
that
that
can
help
offset
that
impact
when
they're
indoor
activities,
if
you're
outdoor
activities,
you're,
probably
not,
there's,
probably
not
a
great
way
to
limit
your
exposure
to
those
kinds
of
pollutants.
Thank
you.
M
No
so
I,
thank
you.
Mr
chair,
I
I've
been
learning
a
lot
about
this
and
talking
a
lot
with
councilmember
Petro
about
this
issue
and
and
well
I
still
don't
understand.
The
Decades
of
you
know
the
history
behind
this,
which
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
history
behind
this
part
of
the
part
of
town,
and
maybe
some
promises
that
you
know
happen
in
the
past
that
you
know
that
some
there
are
some
questions
about
what
those
promises
were.
M
What
I
understand
so
far
is.
Obviously
there
is
a
lot
of
private
owners
land
that
they
want
to
develop
and
a
lot
of
you
know
houses
individual
owners
that
are
selling
to
those
more
commercial
commercial.
M
Looking
the
forces,
so
the
question
for
me
is:
can
we
stop
that
without
looking
at
the
bigger
picture
and
the
bigger
picture
for
me
as
as
I
understand,
it
is
also
balancing
the
state,
the
state's
influence
on
zoning
and
what
that
could
affect
what
the
negative
impacts
of
of
that
could
couldn't
could
be
for
us,
and
it
wouldn't
be
the
first
time
that
it
wouldn't
be
the
first
time
the
interests
have
gone
on
the
you
know
we're
talking
about
these
things.
M
You
know
every
week
with
legislation
that
is
happening
right
now,
with
private
interest
goal
to
the
state,
to
ask
them
to
allow
things
that
we
wouldn't
allow
and
and
ends
up
being
worse
than
what
we
would
have
allowed.
If
we
had,
you
know
if
we
met
somewhere
in
the
middle
I
know
that
that
is
not
a
happy
solution
for
those
that
want
to
preserve
this
land,
as
it
is
right
now,
but
I
am
trying
to
balance
all
of
these
things
and
they
are
very
real.
M
The
state
and
those
interests
are
very
powerful,
and
that
to
me
is
part
of
the
equation
is
I?
Don't
want
to
lose
hold
of
this
land
and
not
having
any
zoning
authority
over
this
land
that
will
allow
some
sort
of
some
level
of
control
and
learning
about
size.
You
know
size
of
their
warehouse
is
important
and
I
know
the
saying
the
warehouse
and
in
this
line
is
maybe
hard
for
some
some
neighbors,
but
that
is
something
that
we
can
negotiate
and
say.
M
Well,
we
allow
you
these
size
of
a
warehouse
which
means
not
getting
a
not
getting
a
fulfillment
facility,
which
is
ideal.
We
don't
want
fulfillment
facilities
and,
in
my
part
of
town
and
I'm
sure
you
know,
I
almost
speak
for
because
remember
Petro,
but
we
don't
want
them
in
your
area
as
well,
but
we
will
prefer
over
the
two
manufacturing
good
paying
jobs.
You
know
upper
mobility
and
whatnot
I,
so
that
is
what
I'm,
balancing
and
I
guess.
This
is
not
a
question.
It's
more
about
me
trying
to
put
this.
M
You
know
balancing
these
things
in
my
head
and
and
trying
to
look
up
for
the
for
water
on
the
lake
and
the
you
know
the
natural
Wildlife
that
is,
you
know
is
currently
there
and
I
I
really
understand
that
there
is
a
very
hard
decision
to
be
made
by
this
console,
but
understanding
that
the
the
powers
are
bigger
than
sometimes
ourselves,
and
there
are
I
mean
you
know.
Council
member
here
has
been
dealing
with
Inland
port,
for
you
know
since
day
one
are
traumatized
by
it.
M
I
don't
want
to
assume
that,
but
I'm
sure
that
that
was
traumatizing,
I've
already
traumatizing
myself
these
days
with
the
legislature
but
I
I
I
would
like
to
just
put
that
together,
because
I
think
it
is
important
part
of
the
equation
that
sometimes
we're
not
just
saying
out
loud.
Thank
you.
C
F
I
appreciate
all
the
comments
from
the
other
council
members
and
just
going
back
to
the
2200
West
Road
and
the
in
the
dust
and
the
dirt
and
everything
else
that's
going
on
there
now
I
mean
it's
by
right
because
they
have
the
the
property
rights
and
they
have
their
own.
The
Zoning
for
it
has
there
been
discussion
on
them,
maybe
putting
a
pause
on
their
development,
so
we
can
look
at
their
land
trust,
maybe
a
moratorium
on
some
up
zoning
or
some
building
out
there
is
that
feasibility
is
there.
F
K
Yeah,
so
we
we
can
do
things
to
try
to
work
with
them
to
minimize
their
impact
during
construction
activities,
and
we've
been
working
on
that
and
so
I
think.
One
thing
that's
helpful.
I
think
maybe
for
everybody
is
that
when
a
project
goes
into
the
permitting
phase,
it
is
not
under
the
oversight
of
the
planning
division,
it
becomes
the
Building
Services
Division
and
they
have
a
system
in
place
to
address
those
impacts.
K
If
there's
The
Fugitive
dust,
which
is
a
big
one
right
now
out
there,
that's
something
that
we
have
to
work
with
the
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
on
right,
because
they're,
the
ones
who
enforce
that,
and
so
we
we've
reached
out
to
them.
We've
reached
out
to
transportation
to
see
if
there's
other
options
as
far
as
vehicles
on
20
turn
west,
particularly
their
speed.
K
If
there's
a
temporary
speed
limit
reduction,
we
can
put
on
to
help
reduce
the
impact
from
those
from
those
trucks
recognizing
that
it
is
a
very
narrow
road
and
sometimes
those
trucks
when
they're
moving
to
the
side
to
pass
each
other
they're
technically
pulling
onto
private
property
in
some
situations,
and
so
those
are
things
that
we
are
trying
to
work
through.
It's
probably
going
to
entail
us
bringing
in
the
contractors
and
developer
and
property
owner
and
working
out
a
solution
there,
but
we're
working
on
doing
that.
K
F
I
appreciate
that,
because
I
would
definitely
appreciate
that
full
court
press
in
that
issue,
because
again
everything's
blown
East
and
so
they're
on
the
west
side
of
the
road,
they
don't
feel
any
of
the
Dust,
but
that
one
guy's
house
is
completely
dusted
now
so
appreciate
that
I
do
have
one
other
comment
back
to
councilman.
Please
comment
about
the
the
concern
of
the
the
state
and
land
rights.
I
I
do
believe
that
those
States
has
got
to
have
some
opening
in
their
Vision
about
preservation
of
sensitive
areas.
F
And,
yes,
we
may
be
concerned
about
some
the
states
doing
different
things
to
squelch
our
desires
to
conserve
and
save
the
the
ecological
balance
between
the
Great
Salt
Lake,
and
these
these
Wetlands,
but
I
gotta
believe
that
they
also
have
some
funding
that
they
could
possibly
use
for
the
preservation
of
Sutherland
and
I.
Don't
know
what
it
looks
like,
but
you
know
they
they
seem
to
want
to
save
the
Great
Salt
Lake
in
some
other
language
and
I
just
say
the
word
language.
Not
so
I'll
just
stop
right
there
yeah!
F
So,
let's
see
if
if
they
have
some
ideas
that
maybe
some
funding
that
we
could
use
to
leverage
the
conservation
desires,
we
have
on
the
in
the
area.
F
So
and
this
last
question,
can
you
explain
to
me
in
a
short
line,
the
shoreline
Heritage
area
preservation
plan,
whether
that
does
that
is
that
something
that
deals
with
this
area?
The
shoreline
preservation
plan,
so.
H
G
Chicken
said:
that's
the
other.
Next
sorry,
no
I
think
I
think
Nick.
You
talked
about
it
when
that
question
was
raised
earlier,
that
it
was
it's
from
an
outside
group.
There's
not
a
whole
lot
of
details
that
we
know
about
it.
We've
heard
there's
questions
being
raised,
but
at
this
point
there's
nothing
official
in
the
works
and
nothing
from
the
city.
E
Would
like
to
see
developer
agreements
for
anything,
that's
built
in
this
area
that
have
a
community
benefit
agreement
as
a
component
of
it.
That
would
include
potentially
an
escrow
fund.
Chris
souther's
house
has
actual
cracks
and
walls
because
of
the
force
of
these
speeding
trucks,
and
he
shouldn't
have
to
fix
that
by
himself.
That's,
not
okay!
These
are
historic
families
on
historic
plots
of
land,
and
while
they
are
grappling
with
the
hard
truth
that
change
is
coming
around
them,
they
should
not
incur
unreasonable
cost
and
inconvenience.
So
Anyone
Who
develops
out
here.
A
A
A
lot
of
that
is
already
Business
Park
zoning,
and
we
can
talk
about
whether
Business
Park
zoning
is
appropriate,
and
if
that
zoning
needs
to
change
or
things
like
that,
but
that's
already
existing
for
us
to
get
money
or
funds
or
Community
benefits
that
I
assume
would
be
considered
an
exection,
and
so
we
need
to
that
would
need
to
be
tied
to
not
that
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
that
means
like
what
all
what
all
these
ideas
means.
How
do
we
balance
these
things?
A
K
A
So
I
guess
my
question
is:
where
do
we
a
lot
of
things?
The
discussion
has
been
interesting
has
been
good,
but
I'm
I'm
not
sure
like.
If
I
were
sitting
on
that
table,
I
wouldn't
know
where
to
go
from.
C
K
Think
for
now
it
would
be
good
if
there's
any
sort
of
changes
or
anything
like
that.
You
want
to
see
to
the
plan
and
then
some
direction
and
I
don't
know
that
this
needs
to
come
now
or
until
after
a
public
hearing
on
this.
But
helping
us
understand
your
priorities
for
as
far
as
implementation
of
the
plan,
I.
E
Would
like
Business
Park
taken
out
completely
I
think
this
the
million
square
foot
Warehouse,
is
evidence
why
we
need
to
eliminate
that
and
then
I
would
like
those
buffers
increased
like
we
talked
about
and
I
would
like
32s
to
stay
unimproved
with
assertive
language.
A
A
K
You
know
the
under
under
state
code,
General
plan,
and
any
component
of
the
general
plan
is
a
guiding
document.
The
effect
I
think
this
might
be
the
exact
words,
the
effect
of
which
are
established
by
ordinance
so
depending
on
how
we
want
to
utilize.
This
specific
small
area
plan
is
really
up
to
the
council,
and
so,
if
there
are
things
that
we
want
to
be
more
strict
in
terms
of
language,
then
we
can
certainly
add
those
we
could
also
until
we
can
update
a
code.
We
can
add
something
that
I
mean.
K
A
Maybe
I
I'll
ask
a
more
specific
question
with
3200
West.
The
plan
says
that
it
should
stay
unimproved
if
the
language
is
not
yet
adequate
to
solve.
Councilman
Petro's
concerns.
Is
there
a
stronger
language
that
we
could
put
in
there
and
how
would
that
look
different
than
what
is
already
so
in
there.
H
I'll
jump
in
if
that's
okay,
so
one
thing
on
the
transportation
or
on
the
major
streets
plan.
You
know
we
originally
had
a
category
that
was
unimproved.
You
know,
unpaved
the
transportation
division
had
us
change
that
to
local
street
because
they
don't
have
a
category
for
that.
They're
categories
on
the
major
streets
plan.
Are
you
know,
arterial,
collector,
local
Street,
but
I
think
with
your
direction.
We
can
make
that
stronger,
and
you
know
add
that
category
and
yeah.
K
One
of
the
things
to
think
about
too
is
that
before,
even
though
it's
technically
already
an
established
public
road,
we
we
can
there
there's
a
provision
and
say
code
that
says:
public
roads
facilities,
buildings
Etc
essentially
have
to
conform
to
the
General
plan.
So
before
we
allocate
funds
in
the
future,
if
some
future
city
council
decided
or
Administration
decided,
maybe
we
need
to
pave
this
to
address
some
reason:
I,
don't
know
what
that
may
be.
K
C
K
C
F
So
I
think
councilman
P2
is
kind
of
hit
and
then
the
discussion
is
a
little
bit
more
Stronger
language,
as
I
mentioned
earlier
and
I'll
just
give
you
the
one
example
from
page
35
of
the
thing
of
the
implementation.
F
You
know
the
75-foot
buffer
on
some
Wetlands,
so
flexibility
of
a
wetland
buffer
through
incentive-based
tools,
basically
saying
hey,
we
we
have
the
incentive
that
we
could
buff
it
with,
could
be
reduced
with
another
incentive
and
I.
Really
don't
like
the
idea
of
the
buffers
ever
being
reduced
and
I've
I.
Almost
think
of
that,
as
you
know,
he
put
a
barbed
wire
fence
up.
It
says
you
can't
build
here
and
on
the
map.
F
I
know
it
shows
where
the
wetlands
are
and
the
buffers
are,
but
it'd
be
nice
to
be
clear
on
on
like
the
Rudy
canal
and
now
the
other
Jordan
River
and
the
other
areas
that
are
wetlands.
That
would
pretty
much
be
prohibited
from
building
on
and
that's
I'm,
assuming
that's
the
verbage,
but
I
don't
like
to
assume
that
it's
prohibited,
but
it
might
be
suggested
so.
H
I
can
update
the
vision
map
to
show
the
buffers
from
the
canals
in
the
Jordan
River.
The
wetlands
are
a
little
bit
harder
because
we
would
need
you
know
a
consultant
to
go
out
and
do
those
studies,
so
that
is
a
little
bit
more
flexible
and
that's
why
there's
a
footnote
in
there
that
talks
about
needing
you
know
those
to
be
actually
designated,
but
so
the
vision
math
is
flex
a
little
gray
on
the
Wetland
areas.
But
I
can
definitely
do
that.
That
hard
line
on
the
canals
drains
in
Georgian,
River
and.
F
Then,
just
avoiding
on
the
should
be
this
is
new
development
should
be
prohibited
from
facing
3200.
What
is
facing
is
that
10
feet
off
to
off
the
3200,
or
is
that
100
feet
off
3200
feet?
What
is
it,
what
is
facing
again
just
from
the
Layman
mean
on
on
the
3200
West,
it
says
no
development
facing
3200
to
me:
I,
don't
I,
don't
I,
don't
understand
the
definition
of
that.
So
I
would
like
to
be
clear
on
hey.
F
H
M
C
Chair:
let's
go
to
Nick
tarva,
real,
quick
and
then
councilmember.
K
K
So
the
zoning
that
is
already
Business
Park
is
mostly
already
entitled
right.
So,
regardless
of
what
we
do
to
change
that
zoning
they're
they're
they're
entitled
to
a
certain
development
under
that
what
their
subdivision
was
approved
for
so
that's
what
that
part,
our
our
hands
are
fairly
I
mean
they're
Lim.
Our
options
are
really
limited
for
future
zoning
rules
there.
K
That
doesn't
mean
that
we
can't
negotiate
with
a
property
owner
to
try
to
do
some
things,
whether
there's
some
land
swaps
or
something
else,
but
it
does
mean
that
we
can't
necessarily
apply
some
or
apply
zoning
rules
that
significantly
impact
what
they
were
entitled
to
under
their
subdivision
approval.
So
we
we're
going
to
be
somewhat
limited.
A
A
Would
that
not
be
like
a
similar
enough
level
of
development
rights,
just
changing
exactly
what
it
is
that
that
would
be
possible
for
us
to
consider
the
problem.
The.
K
Problem
is
we're
pulling
out
a
a
use
that
they
were
entitled
under
and
that
can
be
problematic.
Subdivision
laws
work
a
little
differently
than
than
zoning.
Is
that
you
know,
and
we
recognize
this-
we
did
enter
into
an
administrative
development
agreement
with
that
property
owner
to
ensure
things
like
2900
West
gets
built,
and
things
like
that
right
because
that's
what
we
felt
we
had
to
do
in
order
to
implement
that
subdivision,
and
so
we
had.
We
did
part
of
that.
We
did
have
to
recognize
that
they
had
a
certain
entitlement
right.
K
So
we'd
have
to
look
at
that.
That
doesn't
mean
that
we
can't
change
things
that
would
require
other
aspects
of
the
zoning
to
change,
but
just
like
what
we
would
do
with
a
single
family
Zone,
where
there
was
a
minimum
lot
size
of
12
000
square
feet,
and
then
we
came
out
and
in
some
City
down
the
road
said.
No,
we
want
minimum
lot
size
to
be
18
000
square
feet.
Those
entitled
lots
are
entitled
to
develop
right
and
so
that
that's
kind
of
that's
what
I
mean
when
I'm
talking
about
entitled.
A
A
C
M
Counselor,
that
was
actually
very
useful
for
me
that
last
those
last
three
minutes,
no,
no
other
ones
before
weren't.
They
were
so
the.
How
do
we?
How
do
we
have
official
designation
of
wetlands?
What
the
process
for
that
is.
H
Yeah
it's
a
process,
so
we
would
need
the
either
the
property
owner
would
need
a
consultant
or
if
we
decided
the
council
directed
us
to
do
a
more
comprehensive
Wetland
plan.
We
would
the
city
would
need
to
hire
consultant,
but
they
followed
the
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
protocol
and
they
have
you
know
I
could
find
it
in
the
plan,
but
there's
essentially
three
characteristics
of
wetlands.
You
know
have
to
do
with
water
and
I
can't
remember
off
the
top
of
my
head.
H
But
there
are,
you
know,
specific
characteristics
that
would
qualify
it
to
be
a
designated
Wetland.
Then
that
report
would
be
submitted.
Is
that
like
public
Salt,
Lake
City's
Department
of
Public
Utilities
to
review?
So
you
know
just
because
something
looks
like
a
wetland,
we
would
actually
need
that
study
to
be
done
to
determine
if
it
is
that's
why
that
Vision
map
is
a
little
bit
flexible.
We
we
took
the
state's
data,
which
hopefully
is
correct,
but
it
might
be
wrong.
That's
why
we
need
that
those
designations
to
be
done.
Do.
C
M
Go
ahead
yeah,
so,
if
that's
the
case,
I
would
definitely
would
like
to
I
mean
I
will
feel
more
comfortable
with
this.
This
setbacks.
If
this
is
required
and
I,
don't
know
if
you
know
I,
don't
know
if
this
the
council
prefer
to
do
this
or
we
put
it
on
the
developers
but
I.
This
study
is
for
sure
needs
to
happen.
Just
I
don't
want
us
to
make
a
mistake
on
this
on
this
boundary.
A
I
think
I
have
an
even
more
basic
question
related
to
Wetlands.
We
have
land
some
is
that
is
zoned
for
development
already.
Are
we
saying
that
we
could
go
and
do
a
study
and
say
well
this
land,
even
though
it's
the
developed
it's
zoned
as
business
park
right
now
it
meets
the
qualifications
and
the
standards
to
be
considered
a
wetland.
So
we
can
then
call
it
a
wetland
and
you
can
no
longer
develop
upon
it.
K
F
Us
yeah,
that's
that's
an
important
question,
because
this
is
important,
but
I
also
would
say
from
the
developer
standpoint.
You
know
you
you
build
on
a
Wetlands.
Your
cost
goes
through
the
roof
right
because
you're,
basically
building
on
we've,
someone
some
big
development
somewhere
recently
in
the
west,
built
on
an
area
that
was
really
hard
and
they
had
added
a
lot
of
extra
concrete
and
it
costs
what
three
times.
So
this
is
important
that
we
understand
where
the
wetlands
are.
L
F
A
I
think
it's
important
the
it
sounds
like
from
planning
staff
that
there
are
two
options:
either
the
developer
can
initiate
that
or
the
city.
But
what
would
compel
the
developer
to
initiate
a
wetland
study
which
would
then
potentially
restrict
their
ability
or
make
more
difficult
their
ability
to
develop?
Why?
Why
would
they
do
that,
and
why
wouldn't
we
just
proactively,
have
to
do
that
if
we're
trying
to
protect
natural
environments
so.
H
As
it
is
now,
if
you,
if
there's
a
suspected
Wetland
on
your
property,
you
would
be
required
to
either
way
and
then,
if
this
plan
goes
through,
you
know
that
would
be
a
requirement
of
the
developer
if
they,
if
it's
that,
if
it's
shown
on
the
map
or
if
there's
a
suspicion
that
there's
a
wetland
on
their
property
required,
I
did
want
to
specify
that
the
plan
includes
designated
Wetlands,
which
are
those
Wetlands
under
the
Army
Corps
jurisdiction
like
I'm,
not
an
expert
in
this,
but
like
Waters
of
the
United
States
floodways
and
then
their
the
plan
also
includes
non-designated
Wetlands,
which
are
also
they
would
include
those
characters
as
well
they're,
just
not
under
that
Federal
designation.
H
A
Okay,
so
the
plan
that
we
are
looking
at
that
will
receive
public
comment
and
we
may
actually
adopt
in
the
next
few
weeks
is
currently
already
requiring
that
developers.
If
there's
a
suspected
Wetland
do
this
study
and
if
the
study
determines
that
it
is
in
fact
a
wetland,
they
must
remedy
that
situation
or
choose
not
to
develop
on
it.
It
might.
H
So
right
now
in
code,
there's
there's
no
requirement
for
buffers
from
Wetlands
it
would
they
would
just
purely
need
to
follow
the
federal
designation
so
whatever
they
are.
My
core
of
engineers
requires
for
mitigation
and
I'm
not
sure
what
those
things
are,
but
this
plan
would
set
up
those
buffers
and
the
you
know,
undevelopable
area,
this.
K
That
right,
we
can
work
with
the
attorney's
office
on
the
best
way
to
figure
that
out,
but
and
and
if,
if
it's
something
where
we
feel
like,
where
we
end
up
saying,
you
know
what
we
need
to
actually
adopt
something
into
the
code,
then
we
can
also
chart
that
path.
What
that
looks
like
to
do
that
as
quickly
and
effectively.
A
A
K
J
Actually
about
what
we
were
talking
about
before
on
the
the
rights
and
taking
away
a
right
that
exists
before,
is
this
why
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
adding
the
use
of
distribution
centers,
or
is
that
unrelated
I.
F
So
Mr
chair,
going
back
to
your
question
that
I
think
it'd
be
nice
to
have
some
more
answers
before
we
do.
Another
public
hearing
is
one
thought
because
we
haven't
had
any
public,
no
I
think
we're
going
to
have
that
one.
Do
we
have
one
here?
No,
no
we're
not!
We
haven't
had
one
we
haven't
had
any
public
hearings.
G
G
F
A
D
E
A
J
A
E
Want
to
thank
Nick
and
Chrissy,
they
have
shown
up
for,
like
the
last
18
months
with
me
in
random
places
and
in
predictable
places,
they've
heard
anger,
they've
heard
Hope
they've
heard
all
the
full
range
of
human
emotion
and
they've
done
so
with
Grace
and
dignity
and
been
just
amazing
ambassadors
for
the
city.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
I'll
Echo,
that
thank
you
that
thanks
all
right
that
ends
item
number
two:
we're
gonna
move
on
to
item
number,
seven
we're
jumping
ahead,
which
is
the
water
and
snowpack
report,
and
it
is
Laura
briefer.
The
director
of
our
Public
Utilities
Department,
that
is
I,
think
I
saw
her.
Oh
hi
Laura
is
here
with
us
to
deliver
this
report.
A
A
I
I
I
think
you
most
of
you
know:
Stephanie
Dewar,
she's,
our
water
conservation
manager,
so
she's
our
point
of
contact
and
principal
planner
and
implementer
of
the
city's
water
conservation
program,
and
then
we
also
have
Tamara
pru,
who
is
our
water
resources?
Manager?
Tamara's
role
is
multifaceted.
She
is
in
charge
of
administering
the
city's
water
rights
under
my
direction
and
that's
a
really
big
job
right
now
with
the
water
right
adjudication
that
we
have
been
working
on
since
about
2017.
I
she's,
also
involved
in
managing
and
directing
all
of
the
hydrology
elements
of
our
system.
So
she
has
stuff
that
have
all
of
the
measurement
devices
on
streams
and
intakes
and
treatment,
plant
outflows
and
everything
else,
so
she's
she's
in
charge
of
making
sure
that
all
of
that
information
is
transparent
and
put
together
it
pursuant
to
our
state
statutory
obligations
as
well
concerning
our
water
rights.
I
So
they
both
help
the
department
a
lot
in
many
aspects
of
our
Water
Resources
management.
I'll
also
say,
since
an
element
of
this
presentations
on
runoff
I
think
online.
We
have
Jesse
Stewart.
Our
deputy
director,
who
has
vast
knowledge
about
the
city's
infrastructure,
including
our
stormwater,
runoff
infrastructure
and
Scott.
Swanger
is
the
lead
on
the
operations
side
on
our
stormwater
system.
So
he
and
his
crew
are
responsible
for
making
sure
that
the
stormwater
system
is
maintained
so
that
it
adequately
captures
and
conveys
runoff.
A
I
A
I
And
just
you
know,
staff
here
from
different
divisions
of
our
department
and
so
you'll
see
just
we
all
have
to
work
together
this
time
of
year
in
a
really
integrated
way,
because
we
are
monitoring
for
our
drinking
water
supplies
and
we
are
also
monitoring
for
stormwater
runoff
and
managing
some
of
the
same
parts
of
the
system
to
meet
both
M's.
I
Okay,
so
next
slide.
Please.
I
So
this
is
just
a
reminder
of
Salt
Lake
City's
water
service
area.
So
this
we
serve
water
to
more
than
360
000
people
that
includes
all
of
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
large
portion,
portions
of
Mill,
Creek
holiday
and
Cottonwood
Heights.
The
Salt
Lake
City
portion
is
in
the
light,
blue
and
then
the
areas
we
serve
outside
of
our
city
is
in
that
kind
of
purple
color
to
the
South.
I
We
also
serve
small
portions
of
South,
Salt,
Lake,
Murray
and
Midvale,
and
this
was
really
a
result
of
Salt
Lake
City,
extending
our
water
service
lines.
You
know
100
years
ago,
or
so
to
help
to
help
make
sure
that
the
Salt
Lake
Valley
is
growing
and
developing.
At
the
time
anywhere.
We
extended
those
water
service
lines.
I
There
was
an
agreement
that
we
would
Annex
those
areas
into
the
city,
but
over
time
that
didn't
happen
and
it
was
unincorporated
Salt,
Lake,
County,
and
now
we
have
cities
that
actually
Incorporated
our
annexed
on
top
of
the
water
system
that
we
serve
to
them.
So
we
have
great
relationships
with
the
communities
we
serve
outside
of
our
city
too.
So
we
work
very
closely
with
particularly
milk
freak
holiday
in
Cottonwood,
Heights
and
Salt
Lake
County
we
also
serve,
are
charged
with
storm
water
management
and
sanitary
sewer
management,
and
that
is
very
specific.
I
Just
within
Salt
Lake
City's
boundaries
in
the
light
blue,
we
do
have
a
service
area
map
online
and
that
posting
of
that
map
actually
meets
current
constitutional
requirements
that
were
created
in
2020.
When
voters
passed
Constitutional
Amendment
D,
where
we
had
to
show
exactly
where
a
municipality
serves
water,
both
inside
and
outside
of
its
service
area.
I
So,
with
respect
to
water
supply,
there
are
a
number
of
components
that
we
review
when
we
are
trying
to
forecast
what
our
water
supply
Outlook
is
going
to
be
and
we're
still
relatively
early
right
now
in
terms
of
accumulations
of
snowpack.
Although
things
are
the
pictures
becoming
quite
clear
to
us
because
of
the
the
type
of
snowpack
we
have
right
now,
so
we
look
at
snowpack.
We
currently
have
above
average
snowpack
and
we're
not
anticipating
that
to
change.
We
are
in
a
persistent
drought.
I
We
also
look
at
soil,
moisture
levels
and
based
on
the
most
recent
Federal
soil,
moisture
Maps.
It
appears
that
our
soil
moisture
is
improved.
The
reason
why
that's
important
is
it
impacts.
The
efficiency
of
runoffs
or
more
water
runs
off
into
our
streams
and
reservoirs,
rather
than
getting
soaked
up
into
the
soil.
I
So
with
that
information
currently
we're
looking
at
a
high
probability
of
average
or
above
average,
Watershed
yields,
especially
from
our
surface
water
sources
in
the
Wasatch
mountains
and
then
those
surface
water
sources
that
affect
Deer,
Creek
Reservoir
and,
for
instance,
with
respect
to
the
the
Canyons,
the
city,
creek,
Parleys,
Canyon,
big
cotton
and
Little
Cottonwood
Canyons.
We
are
at
123
percent
to
193
percent
of
average
potential
average
forecasted
yield
for
those
local
Mount,
Wasatch
Mountain
watersheds.
So
that's
really
good
news.
I
We
do
have
another
month
prior
to
the
beginning
of
the
water
year.
To
still,
you
know,
observe
what
happens
with
our
snowpack
as
well.
Next
slide,
please.
A
I
I
Or
it
might
come
earlier
in
the
year
when
our
water
demand
is
less
or
you
know,
or
it
might,
you
know,
be
absorbed
into
the
groundwater
system.
So.
I
I
Sustain
our
use,
no
it's
it's
of
of
average
and
it's
say:
20
20
year
average.
I
A
it's
based
on
a
federal,
so
it's
the
National
Weather
Service
maintains
the
20-year
average
of
these
systems
based
on
hydrology
and
every
so
often
they
update
the
span
of
time
so
because
we're
such
an
old
Department,
if
you
were
looking,
if
you
were
looking
at
if
you're
looking
at
the
average,
not
us,
but
the
department
itself.
I
Us
now,
if
we
were
looking
at
average
average
conditions
10
years
ago,
average
would
have
had
a
little
bit
different
definition
because
it
was
based
on
a
on
a
wetter
period.
So
we're
looking
at
an
average
that
that
to
us
might
reflect
less
than
what
we
initially
started
like
our
40
or
50-year
plans.
But
it's
still
a
good
number.
So.
A
P
A
Okay,
yeah
thank.
O
C
E
I
Yeah
and
and
that's
actually
great
question-
they
are
good
questions
and
we
have
we're
in
year,
five
actually
of
a
climate
vulnerability
assessment
for
water
around
storm
water
because
of
weather
and
climate,
intensification,
hotter
temperatures,
more
intense
drought
or
more
intense
weather,
more
energy
in
the
system
period
and-
and
so
he
does
have.
Warming
has
an
impact
on
the
availability
of
water
from
from
a
number
of
with
with
a
number
of
factors
contributing
to
that,
and
it
also
has
an
impact
on
the
demand
of
water
too.
F
F
M
I
have
probably
something
that
will
somebody
done
for
two
guys,
but
so
run
off
a
storm
water,
so
some
of
the
water
we
wanted
to.
We
wanted
to
put
it
through
the
system
by
the
system.
That's
how
I
understand
it
is:
is
rooms
and
big
gigantic
buildings
that
clean
the
water
and
puts
it
in
pipes
and
send
this
to
the
city.
I
play
SimCity
a
lot
and
that's.
Q
M
I
Correct
and
the
way
that
our
water
system
works.
It's
it's
really
a
demand
based
diversion,
especially
with
the
the
the
local
streams,
so
our
water
treatment
plants,
just
they
take
the
quantity
of
water
from
this
directly
from
the
stream
to
meet
the
demand
on
the
system.
We're
also
not
the
only
water
right
holder
on
some
of
these
stream
systems,
and
you
know
so
we
can't
we
can't
divert
the
entirety
of
a
stream
or
we
want
to
in
order
to
meet
our
needs.
So
so.
M
My
question
goes
to
permeable
surfaces.
There's
many
cities
that
are
going
in
that
direction,
requiring
permeable
surfaces
for
parking
lots,
for
example.
Instead
of
just
putting
unpermeable,
you
know
concrete
or
Pavements
to
allow
some
of
the
water
to
go
through
it
underground,
instead
of
going
to
the
storm
system,
but
that's
sort
of
in
my
mind
and
then
my
SimCity
knowledge
of
water,
wouldn't
that
conflict
with
the
goal
of
sending
a
little
water
to
the
to
the
Jordan
River
ended
up
in
the
in
the
Salt
Lake.
I
We
yes,
so
it's
interesting
in
in
water
management.
We
are
meeting
a
whole
lot
of
different
purposes
all
at
once,
and
we're
constantly
trying
to
balance
them
with
respect
to
runoff.
We're
also
trying
to
manage
for
water
quality
and
infiltration
into
the
system,
and
one
of
the
impacts
of
a
lot
of
pavement
impermeable
surfaces
is
that
it
negatively
impacts
water
quality
and
so
having
a
chance
like
this
low
impact,
development,
impermeable
or
permeable
pavement
is
an
example
of
that.
I
M
I
It's
important
to
replenish
our
groundwater
aquifers
and
we're
still
trying
to
figure
out
the
link
between
groundwater,
shallow
groundwater
and
deep
groundwater
to
tributaries
of
the
Great
Salt
Lake
and
Great
Salt
Lake
itself.
Interesting.
I
Yeah,
it
is
and
I
this
slide
here
is
just
one
of
the
Creeks
one
of
the
streams
that
we
that
provide
us
water,
big,
Cottonwood,
Creek
and
I
just
wanted
to
show
you
I.
We
look
at
a
lot
of
data
when
we're
doing
our
forecasting
and
these
graphs
on
the
bottom
are
from
the
Colorado
Basin
River
forecast
Center,
and
they
are.
I
They
show
what
the
anticipated
water
supply,
From,
Any
Given
watershed
will
be,
and
then
they
compare
it
to
different
years
historic
years,
so
we
have
sort
of
an
index
of
well.
This
looks
like
2005,
or
this
looks
like
1983.,
and
this
is
a
big
Cottonwood
Creek
and
on
the
left
we
have
2022.
That
was
this
was
last
year
and
in
2022
the
final
numbers
for
the
annual
yield
was
about
20
700
acre
feet
from
Big
Cottonwood
Creek,
that
was
60
61
of
the
average
and
for
2023.
I
The
forecast
at
the
end
of
the
day,
is
for
about
49
000,
acre
feet
of
water
from
Big,
Cottonwood,
Creek
or
144
percent
of
average.
So
from
this
you
can
see
you
know
what
a
difference
a
year
makes.
This
is
a
really
good
thing
for
us
to
be
seeing
for
big
Cottonwood,
Creek
I
think
the
closest
water
year
on
there
is
2011.
I
and
there's
also
the
low
the
low
bar
the
the
lowest
green
line
on
the
graph
is
I
believe
1934,
and
that
was
a
really
really
dry
period.
That
actually
was
a
time
that
initiated
a
lot
of
additional
water
supply
planning
for
Salt
Lake,
City
yeah,
it
was,
it
was
yes,
Utah,
Lake
I
think
was
very
very
low
at
that
time.
I
I
What
I'm
hearing
I'm
pretty
excited
for
my
water
supply
standpoint,
but
you
also
see
the
difference
in
quantity,
and
this
is
why,
in
our
long-term
water
supply
and
demand
planning
that
we're
really
conservative
about
what
we,
what
we
assume
we're
going
to
receive
from
any
part
of
the
hydrologic
system,
because
you
can
have
such
very
variabilities
year
over
year
next
slide.
Please.
I
So
another
data
point
that
we
look
at
is
called
snow
water
equivalent
or
sui
is
what
we
call
it
and
that
really
just
determines
how
much
water
is
in
the
snow.
Snow
can
have
different
water
content
and
we're
fortunate
this
year
that
we
have
high
water
content
snow
on
the
map.
Here,
as
of
January
31st,
you
can
see
that
the
snowpack
threw
out
of
throughout
Utah
is
well
above
the
median
in
the
snow
water
equivalent.
That's
good
news
for
us!
I
So
we
also
look
closely
at
precipitation
and
temperature
with
outlooks
and
we
received
these
three
month:
seasonal
outlooks
from
various
federal
agencies.
This
is
from
the
National
Weather
Service
and
seasonal,
precipitation
and
temperature
factors
are
really
both
are
important
in
both
the
water
supply
and
the
demand
on
the
system.
These
factors,
also,
as
we
kind
of
talked
about
earlier,
affect
the
timing
and
volume
of
runoff
both
for
drinking
water
and
for
flood
control
purposes,
and
for
this
year
the
three-month
Outlook,
through
May
projects
equal
chances
for
above
or
below
normal
precipitation
and
temperature.
I
So
right
now
it's
not
really
telling
us
a
lot
if
it
was
clearly
skewed
in
One,
Direction
or
another.
That
would
give
us
more
information.
Typically
lower
temperatures
and
higher
precipitation
can
reduce
the
environmental
and
system
water
demand
in
the
early
spring,
but
fast
warming
on
the
system
can
increase
High,
runoff
and
flooding
Potential
from
runoff.
So
that's
that's
why
those
factors
are
important
and
did
you
have
something
to
add
on
the
temperature
piece
just.
O
The
the
idea
that
temperature
drives
demand
it
more
correctly
drives
need
because,
if
we
look
at
our
historical
water
use
patterns,
especially
in
the
last
several
years,
have
we've
been
contending
with
long-term
drought.
Our
communities
we
serve
have
done
an
exceptional
job,
reducing
their
water
use.
So
high
temperatures
don't
necessarily
equal
higher
demand,
but
they
equal
higher
pressure
on
our
environmental
systems
that
might
drive
demand.
I
I
So
here
I
wanted
to
talk
about
reservoirs.
I
The
photos
that
you
see
in
this
slide
are
mountaindale
or
little
Dell
reservoir
on
the
top
and
Deer
Creek
Reservoir
on
the
bottom
in
their
winter
finery,
and
we
use
reservoirs
to
store
water
to
help
us
through
drought
years
to
meet
annual
system
demands,
and
they
also
help
us
through
the
really
warm
parts
of
the
summer
when
runoff
decreases,
and
we
still
have
some
demand
that
we
need
to
make
up.
I
Deer
Creek
Reservoir
in
particular,
is
really
critical
for
Salt
Lake
City
and
provides
annually
somewhere
between
30
to
35
percent
of
our
water
supply,
and
it
really
helps
us
have
a
reliable
Supply.
During
year
over
year,
droughts,
we
participate
in
the
Deer
Creek
Reservoir,
along
with
one
and
a
half
million
people
from
Utah
County
and
Salt
Lake
County
through
our
membership
of
the
Metropolitan
water
district
of
Salt,
Lake
and
Sandy
and
I
know.
I
You've
had
Mike
DeVries
talk
a
lot
about
the
history
of
of
Metro,
but
that
that
is
that
water
is
actually
through
the
federal
Provo,
River
Project
and
the
Central
Utah
project.
One
thing
to
note
is
Deer
Creek
Reservoir.
We
have
a
there's,
a
project
that
needs
to
happen
on
that
Reservoir
to
repair
an
intake
structure.
That's
about
100
million
dollars.
I
F
I'm
sorry
I,
just
grew
back
to
the
little
Dell
is,
is
that
construction
completed.
I
Mountaindale
mountaindale
Reservoir
is
still
under
construction.
The
the
rehabilitation,
however,
if
we
have
to
start
impounding
water
in
there
we'll
we
will
be
able
to
do
that
so
water
conservation
is,
is
a
really
important
component
of
our
Water
Resource
Management
and
supply
and
demand
last
year,
our
communities
that
we
serve
conserved,
almost
3
billion
gallons
of
water
compared
to
the
three-year
rolling
average.
It's
really
necessary
for
the
long
term
in
order
to
stretch
our
long-term
water
supplies
and
also
during
short-term
water
shortage
situations
such
as
droughts,
which
we
hope
are
short-term.
I
So
we,
as
we
mentioned
before,
we're
going
to
need
multiple
years
of
the
winters
like
this.
In
order
for
us
to
exit
the
drought
status
in
our
region
and
then
because
of
that,
we'll
still
be
asking
the
communities
we
serve
to
conserve
water.
This
year
we
asked
them
to
conserve
water
every
year,
but
very
specific
to
the
drought
and
to
the
stages
within
our
water
shortage.
Conservative,
water
shortage
contingency
plan.
I
I
We
are
in
staged,
we
haven't,
because
because
we
were
so
successful
at
conservation
and
median
demands,
we've
stayed
in
stage
two.
We
haven't
had
to
move
to
more
Progressive
mandatory
stages
this
year,
we're
going
to
monitor
to
see
if
it
warrants
us
moving
back
into
stage
one
or
if
it's
something
where
we
want
to
stay
in
stage
two.
A
A
We
still
have
less
water
than
we
need.
If
I
yeah.
J
A
I
If
we
were
in
one
of
the
higher
stages
where
we
had
mandatory
restrictions,
then
we
might
consider
if,
if
conditions
improved
enough,
we
would
consider
moving
back
a
stage
and
just
because
mandatory
restrictions,
you
know
they
cause
some
hardship,
sometimes
and
cost
and
cost
for
sure
so
I
mean
there's
that,
but
but
from
the
water
supply
and
demand
planning
we're
really
careful
about
moving
from
stage
to
Stage.
I
I
You
know
an
anomaly
within
the
20-year
Mega
drought,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
still
doing
everything
we
can
to
conserve,
so
that
we
have
the
storage
capacity
available
if
we
have
additional
year-over-year
droughts-
and
we
also
have
Great
Salt
Lake
to
worry
about
right
now
too
and
Great
Salt
Lake
is
is
something
that
we
are
planning
on,
including
in
our
long-term
water
supply
and
demand
plans
as
well.
Okay,.
C
I
Slide,
please
I
think
this
is
my
last
slide
and
while
we
have
a
lot
of
snowpack,
I
know
you're
very
sad
to
know
that
we
will
not
be
kayaking
down.
State
Street,
like
this
East
High
School
student
did
in
1983.
In
this
picture,
we've
had
a
lot
of
improvements
since
to
this
to
the
storm
drain
system
and
to
the
impoundment
system.
That
really
helps
us
manage
large
runoff
events
from
snowpack,
but
we
have
been
Fielding
a
lot
of
calls
and
concerns
about
potential
flooding
this
year
because
of
spring
runoff
and
I
know.
I
Others
in
the
state
are
also
concerned
about
it
too,
because
Statewide
we
do
have
substantial
snowpack
since
1983
a
lot
of
instructor
infrastructure
improvements
have
been
put
into
place.
I
mentioned
little
Dell
Reservoir,
but
we
also
had
the
Folsom
pipeline
that
increased
capacity
on
City
Creek
and
some
additional
Pipeline
and
stormwater
conveyance
systems
down
near
Liberty,
Park
and
near
the
Jordan
River.
So
a
lot
of
work
has
has
gone
into
addressing
our
stormwater
system.
That
way,
we
also
coordinate
very
closely
with
Salt
Lake
County
flood
control.
I
They
are
responsible
for
the
the
streams
themselves,
and
so
we
work
really
closely
with
them
to
make
sure
that
greats
under
culverts
and
or
debris
in
the
streams
are
managed,
particularly
before
storm
events
or
before
big
runoff
events
and
then
system,
cleaning
and
maintenance.
That's
why
I
invited
Scott
swanger
of
our
operations
team
here,
because
his
team
really
has
a
systematic
approach
to
assessing
the
storm
water
system,
making
sure
it's
maintained,
making
sure
it's
cleaned
and
and
ready
for
runoff
events.
I
Scott's
team
has
also
filled
about
6
800
bags
of
sand
that
we
have
available
for
anyone
in
the
public
who
wants
to
pick
them
up.
I
think
we're
limiting
them
to
10
bags
right
now,
and
it's
just
more
of
a
precaution,
especially
if
you
have,
if
there's
a
history
of
flooding
on
a
property,
for
instance,
that
we
have
those
bags
available.
A
I
J
We
get
a
graphic
that
shows
what
the
percentage
of
water
users
are
like:
residential,
commercial,
agriculture,
yep.
A
Thank
you
so
much.
We
are
going
to
jump
back
to
item
number
four,
which
is
local
business
assistance.
Arpa
grant
Awards
I
understand
that.
Well,
so
we
have
at
the
table
Ben
lewd
key
Council
policy,
analyst.
A
S
A
T
I
talked
to
Ben
earlier,
and
I
am
the
one
that
may
have
some
conflict
of
interest
with
some
of
the
our
these
out
of
the
31
that
have
been
awarded
or
have
been
recommended
to
be
awarded.
I
might
have
to
recuse
myself
for
about
four
of
them.
T
If
I
have
my
account
right,
but
only
if
we
discuss
those
specifically
like
if
we
discuss
those
four
businesses
specifically,
then
I
will
recuse
myself
but
I
think
out
of
the
policy
about
how
we
distribute
arpa
funding,
I
think
I'm
eligible
to
have
that
conversation,
but
not
necessarily,
but
not
discussed,
directly,
not
discuss
those
four
businesses
specifically.
Does
that
make
sense
so
we're
talking
about
a
grant
and
how
we
distribute
the
funds
and
how
they
decided
and
the
the
scoring
all
the
stuff
and
I
can
discuss
that.
S
Thank
you
for
that
clarification,
I
appreciate
it
to
the
extent
you
were
talking
broadly
about
the
terms
of
the
grants.
That's
fine!
If
you
do
get
into
details
about
specific
applicants,
I
do
think.
You'll
need
to
recuse
yourself,
because,
if
you're
taking
from
one
applicant
to
give
to
another,
then
that
entire
conversation
probably
requires
recusal
so.
A
S
U
A
As
well,
okay,
thanks
and
so
council
members,
let's
keep
our
questions
and
discussion
very
high
level
and
then,
if
we
decide
we
need
to
get
into
specific
applications,
we
can
let
councilmember
Baltimore
I,
believe
councilmember
Petro,
who
is
gone
for
another
commitment
anyway
right
now,
but
has
also
a
conflict
that
she
mentioned.
So,
let's
make
sure
we're
talking
high
level
Intel.
A
P
A
note,
whichever
applications
are
moving
forward
with
funding
I'll
double
check
with
council
members
to
make
sure
that,
on
the
motion
sheet,
we'll
have
separate
votes
to
make
sure
that
you're
recused
on
the
final,
the
final
vote
council
members
may
remember.
Last
April,
you
approved
a
two
million
dollar
appropriation
for
one-time
money
from
arpa
for
local
business
assistance,
grants
to
be
managed
by
The
Economic
Development
Department.
P
The
council
also
the
same
night
last
April
enacted
an
ordinance
to
create
a
committee
to
review
the
applications
and
recommend
funding
to
you
and
the
mayor.
The
council
has
final
decision-making
Authority
on
the
amount
of
the
awards
and
to
which
recipients
there
were
157
applications
received
and
of
those
31
are
recommended
to
receive
Grant
Awards.
The
total
rewards
are
a
little
over
755
thousand
dollars.
P
P
P
P
P
A
couple
reminders:
the
maximum
possible
award
is
one
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
was
set
in
ordinance.
There
is
no
minimum
award,
but
the
council
could
establish
one.
The
council
has
established
minimum
awards
for
other
Grant
programs
such
as
HUD
grants
and
the
funds
must
be
spent
by
the
recipients
by
the
end
of
calendar
year.
2024..
That
deadline
is
also
set
in
city
ordinance.
P
V
Try
to
run
upstairs
with
Jake
we're
looking
forward
to
actually
present
this
information
to
all
of
you.
I
would
also
like
to
say
that
it
has
been
a
difficult
and
yet
very
rewarding
experience
for
us
to
work
to
have
work
with
can
and
their
team
Jack
Markman
and
Tony
Miller
and
Heather
Royal
I
think
this
has
been
a
really
good
experience
for
us
to
see
how
we
can
work
together
in
terms
of
different
departments.
Also,
we
have
worked
very
closely
together
with
our
finance
department.
V
Mary
Beth
and
her
team
have
been
very
supportive
in
guiding
us
to
ensure
that
we're
following
federal
guidelines
and
we're
ensuring
that
we're
doing
things
correctly
and
the
same
thing
with
the
attorney's
office.
Thank
you,
Katie
and
again
the
support
of
sarum
Toya
and
her
guidance.
V
Having
said
that,
I
think
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
share
with
you.
We
have
Kathy
Rigby
sitting
here
at
the
table,
she's
our
arpa
grant
program
manager
and
we
have
Jake
Maxwell
who
also,
besides
being
a
team
member
of
Economic
Development.
He
actually
is
the
chair
of
the
community
recovery
committee,
who
has
been
serving
they
have
been
serving
diligently.
V
They
have
been
committed.
These
are
individuals
who
actually
serve
on
other
boards
in
the
city
and
now
they're
serving
in
this
capacity.
I've
watched
their
meetings
and
their
deliverance
and
I
have
to
say:
I
am
well
by
the
level
of
fairness
and
commitment
that
they
have
with
us
with
our
small
business
Community,
as
they
have
reviewed
this
grants
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
the
time
for
Kathy
to
walk
you
through
the
program
and
then
Jake.
Thank
you.
W
Good
afternoon,
council
members,
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
tell
you
about
our
arpa
community
grant
program,
so
the
department
of
next
slide,
please.
So
the
department
of
economic
development
is
coming
for
you
today
with
a
two-part
request.
First,
we
are
asking
that
you
approve
the
community
recovery
committee's
recommended
list
of
31
applicants
to
receive
funding.
This
is
our
phase,
one
group,
one
list
of
applicants,
and
secondly,
we
are
asking
that
you
approve
distribution
of
the
arpa
community
Grant
funds
in
the
amount
of
755
718
dollars.
W
W
Next
slide,
please,
before
we
review
how
we
arrived
at
our
31
applicants,
we
wanted
to
review
the
background,
which
Ben
has
also
mentioned
here
today.
This
Council
established
by
ordinance
in
April
of
2022
the
community
grant
program
with
the
four
million
dollar
budget
to
be
administered
by
both
the
Department
of
Economic
Development
and
the
community
and
neighborhoods
Department,
each
of
us
with
a
two
million
dollar
budget.
The
council
also
established
that
Community
recovery
committee
or
CRC,
as
we
refer
to
them,
to
Aid
the
program
in
quickly
transparently
and
fairly,
deploying
the
funds
of
this
program.
W
So
we
began
our
process
with
arpa
federal
guidelines
to
determine
which
small
businesses
were
negatively
impacted
by
the
pandemic.
We
identified
the
following
four
funding
categories
available
to
help
small
business.
The
first
was,
of
course,
small
business
which
in
Salt
Lake
City,
is
defined
as
a
business
with
50,
full-time
employees
or
less,
and
we
included
non-profits
as
a
business
entity
themselves.
They
would
be
a
direct
beneficiary
looking
for
Revenue
replacement.
Only
second
was
travel,
tourism
and
Hospitality.
The
businesses
in
this
category
were
among
the
hardest
hit
by
the
pandemic.
W
W
The
fourth
funding
category
that
we
have
here
is
arts
and
small
business
recovery
programs.
These
are
submitted
by
non-profit
sub-recipients
and
will
pass
through
that
funding.
They
make
up
group
two
of
our
phase.
One
applicants:
all
four
of
these
categories
are
how
we
will
allocate
our
two
million
dollar
budget
and
just
for
comparison
on
the
right,
we've
identified
the
six
funding
categories
that
can
community
and
neighborhoods
plans
to
use
to
divide
up
their
two
million
dollar
budget
next
slide.
Please.
W
So
once
we
eligibility
was
determined,
the
Department
of
Economic
Development
created
a
program
that
prioritized
increased
equity
and
decreased
barriers
to
this
Economic
Opportunity.
We've
highlighted
a
couple
of
ways
in
which
we've
tried
to
do
that.
So
first,
we
allowed
applicants
two
opportunities
to
apply
our
phase.
One
application
period
happened
from
September
1st
to
the
30th.
W
They
are
the
subjects
of
this
transmittal
request.
Our
phase
two
application
window
will
open
sometime
in
March
or
April
we're
allowing
phase
one
applicants
that
are
unsuccessful
in
receiving
funding
to
apply
along
with
new
applicants
in
phase
two
we've
also
allowed
artists
and
home-based
businesses
to
apply.
This
was
particularly
important
for
independent
businesses
who
could
not
fund
a
brick
and
mortar
location
and
so
are
offering
their
products
and
services
from
their
home.
W
The
third
way
in
which
we've
tried
to
expand
our
goals
is
to
allow
small
businesses
to
be
reviewed
anonymously.
There
was
some
real
and
perceived
name
recognition
bias
that
many
members
of
the
community
mentioned,
and
so
we
wanted
applicants
to
know
that
that
each
applicant
would
be
reviewed
based
on
the
merits
of
their
application.
W
And,
finally,
we
provided
technical
assistance.
We
had
an
expanded
definition
of
technical
assistance
for
all
of
our
applicants
and
we
provided
some
high
and
low-tech
ways
in
which
they
could
receive
the
application
itself,
but
also
training
and
information
as
to
how
best
to
answer
the
questions
of
the
application
next
slide.
Please.
W
So
the
our
efforts
led
to
229
eligible
applications
being
received
32
of
these
applications
were
deemed
incomplete
for
failing
to
provide
additional
documentation
needed
to
review
their
application.
I
will
note
that
we
did
reach
out
to
these
applicants
to
give
them
a
second
opportunity
to
provide
the
information,
but
in
any
case
they
were
closed
as
incomplete,
but
will
be
given
an
opportunity
to
apply
again
in
phase
two.
W
The
subjects
of
this
request:
157
small
business
applications,
were
reviewed
and
scored
by
our
committee
and
finally,
we
do
have
40
applicants
that
are
part
of
the
Arts
and
small
business
recovery
programs
being
offered
by
non-profit
sub-recipients.
That
will
be
reviewed
once
can
completes
the
review
of
their
non-profit
sub-recipient
next
slide.
Please.
W
Under
Federal
Opera
guidelines,
applicants
are
categorized
into
are
categorized
in
two
ways
that
we
feel
it's
important
for
you
to
understand,
impacted
or
disproportionately
impacted
by
the
pandemic.
The
final
rule
allows
municipalities
to
expand
this
definition
as
suits
the
needs
of
their
community.
So,
for
example,
we're
listing
the
ways
in
which
Salt
Lake
City
has
defined
this.
The
federal
government
has
defined
businesses
in
the
travel,
tourism
and
Hospitality
sector
as
impacted
Salt.
W
W
So
this
leads
us
to
some
important
demographics.
We
wanted
to
share
with
you.
45
of
our
applicants
were
100
female
to
own
businesses.
51
of
our
applicants
are
100
owned
by
a
member
of
the
bipod
community,
so
out
of
229
eligible
applicants,
42
percent
are
disproportionately
impacted
next
slide.
Please.
W
We
also
wanted
you
to
see
that
there
is
an
equitable
distribution
between
the
four
funding
categories
that
we
mentioned
earlier.
So
61
of
the
applicants
came
from
an
artist
business.
55
applicants
were
listed
as
small
businesses.
77
applicants
came
from
the
travel,
tourism
and
Hospitality
sector
and,
as
we
mentioned
before,
we
have
yet
to
review
40
applicants
from
the
nonprofit
Community,
which
will
be
our
group
2,
which
is
the
second
half
of
our
phase.
One
application
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
my
colleague
Jake
for
the
next
two
slides.
R
Thank
you.
It's
good
to
be
here
to
represent
the
community
recovery
committee.
I'll
introduce
you
to
the
board,
so
you
kind
of
understand
the
mix
and
the
makeup.
We
had
two
members
of
the
racial
equity
and
policing,
commission,
Tanya,
Hawkins
and
Steve
and
Jordan
have
myself
Jake
Maxwell
from
the
economic
develop
economic
development
loan
fund
board.
We
have
two
from
the
Human
Rights
Commission
Jason
Wessel.
Next.
R
X
R
And
we
have
one
from
our
Salt
Lake
City
Arts
Council
board
Sarah
Longoria
and
put
Carson
from
our
business
Advisory
Board
next
slide,
please
so
over
the
course
of
10
review
meetings,
each
two
hours
in
length
the
board
used
the
time
to
cover
some
key
agenda
items.
The
first
is
to
review
and
discuss
our
submitted
applications,
our
applications
scoring
and
the
scoring
experience.
We
also
requested
clarification
about
applications
and
process
and
we
discussed
ways
to
improve
fairness
and
Equity.
So
over
the
course
of
20
hours
of
work.
W
Next
slide,
please
so
again,
the
Department
of
Economic
Development
would
like
to
ask
this
Council
to
approve
the
community
recovery
committee's
recommended
list
of
31
applicants
to
receive
the
funding
that
were
part
of
our
group,
one
phase
one
and
to
approve
distribution
of
the
arbor
Community
Grant
funds
in
the
amount
of
755
718
dollars
next
slide.
Please
we're
happy
to
take
any
questions.
If
the
council
has
any.
F
T
F
Appreciate
the
the
discussion
here
and
the
the
work
that
you've
done
on
these
applications
back
on
the
anonymous
side.
Is
it
like
the
name
district
and
the
address
is
anonymous
and
I
was
just
wondering
the
breakout
from
the
city
across
the
districts?
I,
guess
again,
you
have
to
apply
so
first
step.
Is
you
have
to
apply
so
how
that
breakdown
was
I'm,
glad
that
to
see
that
the
four
groups
were
relatively
those
are
the
applications
and
they're
relatively
evenly
split,
which
is
kind
of
nice
to
see
just
by
application.
V
W
I'm
happy
to
give
you
that,
so
out
of
the
all
of
the
applications,
we
receive
five
applicants
from
district
one.
We
receive
44
applicants
from
District
Two.
We
receive
22
applicants
from
District
three.
We
received
66
applicants
from
district
four
45
applicants
from
District
5
18
applicants
from
district
6
and
19
applicants
from
District
7.
W
Anonymous
side
of
the
house
I
appreciate
that
very
much
yeah
and
on
the
anonymous
side.
I
just
want
to
mention
that
our
software
that
we
use
Salesforce
automatically
generated
a
case
number
when
applicants
submit
in
an
application.
So
the
committee
only
saw
the
case
number.
We
redacted
any
information
that
gave
the
business
name
or
address,
but
everything
else
on
the
application
they
were
able
to
see.
F
And
okay
I
just
have
a
question
on
the
oh
attachment.
Three,
the
this
the
average
scoring
when
I
looked
through
the
the
top
31
like
31
31st,
had
average
score
of
76,
but
number
32
had
an
average
score
of
like
87
and
then
so.
I
was
just
wondering
how
they
broke
up
that
because
I
would
I
didn't
I.
Couldn't
yes,.
W
W
That's
an
actually
excellent
question,
because
what
happened
was
the
ordinance
states
that
we
wanted
you
that
the
council
wanted
Geographic
Equity?
W
The
way
that
that
was
interpreted
by
our
committee
was
to
Define
that,
as
at
least
one
applicant
from
each
district,
when
the
scores
shook
out
there
were
two
districts
that
didn't
have
an
applicant
that
Rose
to
the
level
of
all
the
other
applicants.
So
they
discussed
at
length
and
carved
out
two
spots.
So
there
was
at
least
one
applicant
from
district
one
which
fell
into
that
same
category
and
one
applicant
from
District
Six,
and
they
chose
the
highest
score
in
those
districts.
W
W
So
I'll
explain
that
so
a
little
further
down
in
the
list
you'll
see
three
applicants
that
scored
in
the
80s.
They
were
set
to
receive
funding,
but
Arbor
regulations.
W
Don't
allow
you
to
award
someone
funding
unless
they
have
proven
loss,
and
we
did
that
in
our
program
by
submitting
tax
returns
or
profit
and
loss
statements,
and
there
were
three
businesses
who
scored
really
highly
High
average
scores,
but
who
were
unable
to
prove
loss
and
so
that
funding
amount
would
have
been
zero
based
on
Arbor
regulations,
and
so
we
had
to
move
them
down,
because
there
was
nothing
we
could
award
them.
We
did
reach
out
to
them.
W
We
didn't
make
several
attempts
to
see
if
they
could
provide
anything
else
that
indicated
that
they
had
actually
suffered
a
loss
through
covid
and
they
couldn't.
They
are
eligible
to
apply
again
in
phase
two
if
they
have
updated
their
tax
returns
or
something
that
indicated
they
had
some
loss.
But
if
they
can't
show
loss,
we
can't
award
funding.
So
we
had
to
move
them
down
lower.
T
And
that
was
not
adult
that
was
not
anywhere
like
before
they
applied
in
the
application,
they
didn't
say:
hey
only
people
at
eligible
businesses,
if
they,
if
you
know,
if
you
had
had
a
loss,
if
you
didn't
have
a
loss,
then
don't
apply
because
we're
trying
to
help
the
ones
I
actually
did
have.
W
A
lot
of
these
businesses
are
used
to
using
projections
in
their
calculations,
and
so
they
wanted
to
identify
that
they
had
projected
income
at
much
higher
amounts
and
so
had
put
that
into
their
calculation
of
loss
that
they
that
they
were
impacted
by
through
covid.
But
we
can't
use
that
we
Define
loss
as
what
we
could
see
in
your
tax
return.
That
makes.
T
C
T
So
I
I
had
a
proposal
because
I
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
proposal,
but
I
would
like
to
this
at
least.
Understand
I
mean
I'm,
not
a
super
fun
like
the
the
funnest,
the
greatest
fan
of
the
sliding
scale,
because
the
differences
between
the
ask
and
what
they
didn't
get
it
makes
it
complicated
to
me
so
like
there
are.
There
are
some
applications
that
they
requested
fifty
thousand
dollars,
but
now
we're
giving
them
45
815,
you
know,
and
so
that
makes
it
confusing
to
me.
T
T
V
I
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
question
that
Jay
can
answer.
The
committee
went
through
an
incredible
analysis
and
thorough
discussion.
I
I
hear
where
you're
saying
and
council
member
well,
the
motos
I
think
in
their
thinking
for
what
I
heard
watching
their
committee
meetings
was.
They
were
trying
to
include
more
businesses
and
by
having
a
scale
that
allowed
them
to
do
that.
But
with
that
I'm
going
to
let
Jake
talk
about
it
because
I
think
he's
the
best
person
to
answer
that
question.
R
Yeah
I
was
hearing
two
questions
but
yeah,
but
the
first
to
your
first
question.
We
deliberated
for
well
into
overtime
in
our
two-hour
session
and
one
of
our
council
members
proposed
I'm
paying
for
paying
for
performance
on
the
application.
So
that's
that
correlating
score
and
then
then
becomes
the
percentage
of
of
Grant
funds
that
they
receive
and.
C
R
W
So
two
things
went
into
that.
If
we
had
only
awarded
the
the
amount
they
were
eligible
for,
we
would
have
only
awarded
27
applicants
funding,
and
so
we
were
able
to
get
that
much
that
many
more
applicants
from
27
to
31
because
of
the
sliding
scale
and
the
priority
for
this
committee.
As
I,
understood
from
the
the
weeks
of
discussion
that
they
had
reviewing
these
applications
was
to
give
as
many
businesses
as
much
money
as
they
could.
So
with
that
two-part
thinking
and
gold,
mind
goal
set
in
mind.
W
But
we
also
wanted
those
who
heard
about
it
later
to
not
feel
as
though
they
missed
out
and
also
the
applicants
who
applied,
who
maybe
weren't
successful
to
give
them
a
second
shot
at
maybe
refining
their
Grant
language
replying
to
questions.
There
were
different
factors
that
went
into
responding
to
this
application,
because
this
is
a
new
process
and
a
new
way
of
looking
at
things.
We
wanted
to
give
them
that
opportunity
again
to
improve-
and
you
know,
change
some
language,
perhaps
or
provide
more
details
and
have
a
second
shot
at
it.
T
And
to
add
to
that
last
sorry,
last
last
question.
So
to
that
it
seems
like
we
have
a
pool
of
applicants
that
didn't
get
it,
but
it's
Court
high
and
it
and
they
showed
that
they
had
they
could
prove
that
they
had
a
loss
I'm,
not
understanding
why
you
have
to
apply
again
for
the
same
pool
of
money.
I
understand
that
some
people
may
have
not
heard
about
this,
like
that,
that's
fair,
but
at
the
same
time
you
have
business
that
have
shown
loss
and
they
are
eligible.
T
But
now
we're
saying
no,
never
mind
how
to
apply
again
and
refine
your
application
and
see
if
you
can
convince
us
which
I
feel
like
they're,
already
convinced
us
that
they
had
a
loss
and
that
they
are
eligible
and
to
me
it
seems
a
little
unfair
that
they
have
to
reapply
when
we
could,
they
could
be
awarded
those
funds,
and
so
that's
what
I'm,
having
like
a
little
like
heartburn
this
like
if,
if
this
was
2020,
when
we
when
we
gave
when
we
funded
a
million
dollars,
we
took
it
out
of
them
or
the
emergency.
S
T
Emergency
out
of
the
I
think
it
was
general
fund
and-
and
the
mayor
was
very
gracious
to
you-
know-
do
that
and,
and
and
and
and
not
everybody
was
aware
and
pandemic
chaos.
Okay,
but
it's
it
seems,
like
the
city
has
been
very
proactive
in
saying
we
have
grants
for
this.
We
have
grants
for
that.
Like
so,
and
we
have
a
substantial
amount
of
applicants,
so
we
re
I
mean
apparently
the
work
did
get
out.
So
that's
what
I'm
feeling
like
it
might
be
unfair
for
those
that
did
everything
right.
C
T
Y
V
I
could
respond
and
also
make
sure
that
I'm
understanding
the
question
correctly
because
and
then
I
want
to
look
at
Kathy
and
Jack
as
well,
because
they
may
have
something
that
they
could
provide.
In
addition
to
my
comments,
I
think,
council,
member
valdomotos,
you
make
a
good
point
in
terms
of.
Why
is
it?
I
would
like
to
say
that
we
can
go
back
and
look
at
that
issue
and
come
back
with
you
to
you
with
an
answer,
a
better
answered.
Then
we
can
provide
you
today,
but
I
think
that's
worth
considering.
V
I
think
our
thing
has
always
been
to
ensure
that
individuals
or
business
entities,
whether
that's
a
small
business,
a
woman
on
by
Park
art
businesses
that
they
do
actually
hear
about
this
you're.
Absolutely
right.
We
will
continue
convincing
for
Num
for
phase
two
and,
at
the
same
time,
I
want
to
ensure
that
by
just
allowing
the
application
when
we're
being
Equitable
to
everyone
else
by
you
raise
an
excellent
point
and
unless
I
haven't
heard
of
something
that
maybe
the
the
committee
has
talked
about
in
our
meetings.
W
Yeah
there
there
is
actually
some
recommended,
so
there's
Lessons,
Learned,
obviously
anytime,
you
roll
out
something
new
and
part
of
what
the
committee's
TA
was
tasked
to
do
was
to
make
recommendations
for
improvement
of
the
program,
and
so
they
did
that
in
the
course
of
reviewing
these
applications,
and
they
saw
instances
in
the
application
where
they
wanted
more
detail
in
order
to
fairly
judge
a
business,
and
so
they've
asked
us
to
change
just
a
couple
of
the
questions
so
that
they
could
get
all
of
the
detail
that
they
felt
was
necessary
and
fairly
reviewing
the
applicants,
and
so
that
is
another
positive
of
having
a
phase
two
is
that
we
can
apply
Lessons
Learned,
improve
the
process
and
get
all
of
the
right
information
we
need
to
get
in
order
for
the
committee
to
make
an
equitable
decision.
W
It's
not
that
it's
extremely
burdensome
I
will
add
for
applicants
to
reapply.
We
aren't
making
them
re-submit
documents.
Unless
documents
were
the
problem
like
they
couldn't
provide
proof
of
loss,
and
so
it's
a
five
minute
application
and
there's
two
additional
questions.
W
Based
on
what
the
committee
has
recommended
that
we're
going
to
ask
them
to
fill
the
information,
but
it
also
gives
these
businesses
a
second
opportunity
to
guarantee
that
they're
going
to
get
the
funding
as
opposed
to
a
new
applicant
who
hasn't
had
the
benefit
of
having
gone
through
the
process
and
understanding.
One
of
the
requests
from
the
committee
is
that
this,
the
applicants
from
phase
one
be
required
to
take
the
technical
assistance,
help
that
we
offer
and
be
given
specific
feedback
as
to
why
their
application
scored,
70
or
80
as
opposed
to
a
hundred.
W
T
A
Guess
that's
a
question
and
we
kind
of
went
over
it
but
and
sorry
I,
know,
council,
member
who
you
have
a
question,
but
I
I
wasn't
quite
clear
on
the
answer
of
why
we're
we're
all
looking
at
that
average
score
column
and
saying:
okay?
Is
that
the
was
that,
like
the
bottom
line
that
you
that
they
considered,
but
it
seems
like
there
may
be
some
columns
that
were
considered
with
a
higher
weight
than
others
rather
than
just
a
straight
average?
Is
that
true
or
what
would
account
for
so
you?
A
W
A
A
So
I
think
we're
just
trying
to
understand
I
think
we're
all
looking
at
the
average
score
column,
and
my
guess
is
that
that
wasn't
the
like
only
thing
that
the
committee
looked
at,
but
I
am
we're
having
a
hard
time
understanding
what
what
caused
these
rankings
to
go
in
this
numerical
order,
if
not,
that
average
score
does.
That
is
that.
W
Q
W
W
Them
yes,
and
then
for
the
next
part
and
for
our
next,
so
that's
another
lesson
learned
I.
Ideally
we
would
have
eliminated
them
from
review.
We
were
trying
to
be
as
generous
as
possible
in
understanding
that,
and
we
gave
these
businesses
every
opportunity
to
provide
us
additional
information.
We
let
them
go
through
review
by
the
committee,
but
typically
we
would
have
eliminated
them
as
incomplete
or
disqualified
and
we
we
would
have
not
even
considered
them,
and
that
will
be
the
process
that
we
go
through
for
the.
M
Next
Mr
chair,
so
so
I
wanted
to
go
from
the
beginning.
I
think
this
is
useful
for
me
just
to
clarify
on
this
things,
so
the
so.
This
is
arpa
funds,
so
there
are
meant
to
be.
You
know
to
help
with
you
know
the
pandemic
or
the
effects
of
the
pandemic
and
trying
to
help
these
businesses,
so
they
need
to
prove
that
they
had
had
a
loss
related
to
the
pandemic.
So
what
is?
Funds
are
trying
to
bridge
is
some
of
those
missing
funds,
so
I,
actually
don't
dislike
to
have
a
second
ground.
M
I,
actually
think
that
is
the
right
approach.
I
think
that
there
is
more
information
that
we
learn
as
a
city,
but
also
the
world
will
get
out
and
will
more
businesses
I'm,
hoping
that
in
the
second
round
you
have
double
the
businesses
applying.
M
So
I
think
that
that
is
actually
the
right
approach
and
you
just
you
said
one
of
you
said
earlier-
that
it
wouldn't
it's
not
that
they're
going
to
have
to
submit
everything
and
start
from
scratch.
Again,
that's
still
correct
right
like
so.
Their
application
is
still
there,
so
they
might
have
to
fix
some
things
or
add
supplemental
information
to
be
able
to
make
it
to
the
second
round
which
I
think
it
is
adequate
and
it's
the
right
approach
to
distrib
distribute
funds
that
are
just
very
limited
to
us.
That's.
V
M
So
I
think
that
that
is
actually
the
right
approach
and
it's
the
most
I
don't
like
to
use
the
word
conservative,
but
is
the
conservative
the
right
way
to
use
funds
that
come
only
once
so
they
need
to
prove
loss.
They
need
to
meet
the
the
criteria
requested
by
our
city,
as
that,
so,
okay,
now
I
understand
what
all
of
all
of
our
part
was
now
my
question.
The
the
question
I
had
originally
the
original
English
Today
is
a
hard
language
to
speak.
I.
M
So
the
my
original
question
was
related
to
the
impact
that
this
businesses
have
in
the
city
and
if
there
is
a
way
of
quantifying
this
I
know
that
this
is
probably
for
a
ship
sale.
Like
you
know,
this
ship
has
sale
already
for
this
yeah
I
mean
it
probably
hasn't
shipped
it's
it's
not
done.
M
Since
you
know,
we
haven't
voted
on
it
yet,
but
but
in
the
future,
something
that
I'm
interested
in
and
I'm
not
sure
that
this
is
something
that
we
can
do
right
now,
but
I'm
interested
in
finding
out
what
this
business
is
impacting.
The
city
within
the
city
limits
and
I
know
that
I
don't
know
how
we're
going
to
find
that
and
I
don't
know
what
weight
we
do
on
that.
We
put
on
that,
but
I
was
interested
in
some
of
these
businesses
because
I
was
like.
Oh,
that
seems
like
an
interesting
business.
M
I
was
very
curious
about
what
they
did,
but
I
was
wondering:
do
they
service
two
or
three
people
here
within
the
city
limits
and
they
are
Servicing
more
people
outside
right
and
I?
Don't
want
to
single
out
I,
don't
want
to
give
you
an
example
because
I
feel
like
it
will
be
inappropriate,
but
so
I
felt
like
I
would
like
to
know
if
this
businesses
do
a
lot
of
their
work
within
the
city
limits
just
because
not
not
because
it
I
don't
think
that's
a
disqualifying
thing,
but
I
think
I.
M
For
me,
it's
important
to
know
that
there
are
invested
in
this
city
and
that
are
trying
to
get.
You
know
this.
This
business
here
and
I
know
they're
located
in
our
city,
but
many
of
these
businesses
are
traveling.
You
know
they
have
food
trucks
or
they
have
catering
businesses.
So
I,
don't
know
how
you
quantify
that,
but
I
would
just
throw
that
out
there
as
I.
A
Thought
that's
an
interesting
concept
and
maybe
something
that
could
be
applied
more
broadly
to
Economic
Development,
just
like
prac,
like
programs,
because
just
because
a
city,
a
business
has
their
address
in
our
city,
doesn't
necessarily
mean
they're,
contributing
to
the
economic
development
of
this
specific
city
as
much
as
an
any
other
business
that
has
their
address
in
a
different
city,
for
instance,.
M
A
I'm
kind
of
hearing
from
you
is
like
okay,
how
many
you
have
15
employees
but
like
14
of
them
live
in
Utah
County
and
one
of
them
lives
in
Salt.
Lake
City.
Is
that
contributing
to
the
economical
State
as
opposed
to
a
business
that
has
10
employees
and
all
10
of
them
live
in
Salt,
Lake
City
or
has
this
many
of
their
customers
are
local,
but
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
know
how
to
do
that
either,
but
I
think
maybe
figuring
out
how
to
have
some
Metric.
A
That
says
what
is
the
Nexus
of
how
local
is
this,
because
if
it's
a
city,
that's
really
just
happens
to
have
their
address
here,
but
they're
they're
doing
business
all
over
the
state
or
the
country,
then
maybe
that's
more
appropriate
for
something
that,
like
the
federal
government
would
I
mean
there
were
funds.
Everyone
had
funds
for
covid
that
yeah,
so
it's
like.
How
can
we
use
ours
specifically
tailored
to
things
that
affect
our
city?
Am
I,
saying?
Yes,
that.
V
I
would
say
one
of
the
things
that
we
could
do
in
terms
of
that
issue
is
definitely
look
at
since
we're.
Looking
at
adding,
probably
two
more
questions.
We
can
definitely
come
up
with
something
that
would
work
that
would
be
fair
for
our
businesses.
I
also
want
to
say
that
arpa
is
extremely
complicated,
so
what
you've
been
through.
We
have
been
actually
looking
at
all
these
issues
for
the
last
year
and
in
as
much
as
it's
complex.
We
have
grabbed
this
all
these
federal
guidelines
and
ensuring
that
we're
following
them.
V
A
time
has
been
challenging
and
yet
I
would
also
say
that
the
other
thing
that
has
affected
some
of
this
discussion
has
been.
We
do
have
an
extremely
committed
Community
committee,
the
community
recovery
committee,
and
they
have
had
their
own
discussions
and
what
is
fair
and
what's
appropriate
and
wow
I
I,
honestly
and
I,
keep
saying
wow
and
I've
said
that
three
times
today,
but
I
think
it
reflects
the
fairness
of
their
delivery
on
how
they're.
Looking
at
this
almost
to
the
Other
Extreme,
you.
V
Yes,
I'm,
sorry,
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
convey
so
I
I
really
have
appreciated
them,
and
this
has
been
also
for
me
listening
to
your
thoughts
and
your
ideas,
it's
also
been
something
really
good
for
us,
because
our
goal
is
to
do
the
right
thing
for
the
businesses
and
to
ensure
that
we
get
this
money
out.
We
don't
have
all
the
answers,
but
we
definitely
want
to
do
it
right.
Z
A
Z
Thank
you
I.
Just
it's
not
really
a
question,
but
I
did
want
to
comment
on
there's
things
that
Anna
and
Alejandro
talked
about.
Just
if
we're
having
that
high
level
discussion,
I'm
I,
agree
with
council
member
baldomuros
I
think
the
work
has
been
done.
Everybody's
talked
about
it
and
how
how
diligent
the
committee
was
and
how
much
time
they
spent
going
over
these
applications
and
and
that
this
money
has
to
be
spent
by
the
by
the
end
of
2024.
Z
I.
Don't
I,
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
have
another
opportunity
to
have
grants
like
this,
but
I
think
we
have.
If
we
do,
we
can
put
the
Lessons
Learned
into
that
future
one,
but
I
would
rather
just
say:
let's
take
the
next
25
people
and
give
out
all
the
two
million
dollars.
If
we're
talking
about
actually
wanting
to
give
this
money
out,
then
let's,
let's
do
that.
Z
We
can
also
put
Lessons
Learned
towards
how
we
look
at
the
nonprofit
side
of
the
money,
but
I
feel
like
I,
feel
like
there's
this
weird
advantage
and
disadvantage
to
a
phase
two
for
both
the
people
that
didn't
get
funded
right
now
and
the
people
that
maybe
are
new
to
it,
and
so
it
feels
tug
about
fairness.
It
feels
a
little
unfair,
whereas
again
20
hours
for
this,
probably
20
plus
hours
for
this
ERC.
Oh.
V
F
I
I
appreciate
this
sliding
scale,
I
think
that's
a
good
option.
I
think
I,
like
the
way.
That's
doing
that,
because
someone
who
wants
fifty
thousand
dollars
and
a
low
scale
and
gets
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
someone
who
gets
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
and
that
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
a
two
thousand
dollar
difference,
I
mean
there's
a
big
difference,
so
I
think
I,
like
the
sliding
scale.
As
far
as
the
minimum
size
Grant
there's
a
question
about
that.
You
know
we
didn't
really
set
one
here,
your
lowest
one
was
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
I.
F
Don't
really
think
we
could
kind
of
set
one
anymore,
but
just
for
future
things,
but
I
appreciate
that
we
didn't
have
a
minimum
because
some
of
those
smaller
ones
who
only
need
a
thousand
dollars
that
could
be
the
leap
that
keeps
them
in
business.
Yes,
thank
you.
V
C
M
What
I
hope
that
we
are
that
this
is
done,
that
we
learn
on
the
next
phase.
If
there
is
one
is
that
we
do
more
Equity,
you
know
we
set
up
some
goals
about
finding
businesses
in
other
parts
of
the
of
the
city
that
we're
having
found
businesses.
I
mean
the
fact
that
we
are
funding.
11
businesses
or
you
know
the
proposal
is
funding
for
11
businesses
in
District
Five.
M
You
know
seven
in
District
Four,
but
only
one
in
district
one.
You
know
on
four.
Only
in
District
Two,
and
only
one
in
District
Six
I
mean
I
feel
like
there
is
an
equity
issue
here
that
we
could
readdress
and
I
think
having
a
second
round
will
allow
us.
If
those
applicants
are
not
pushed
back
in
the
line,
they
don't
have
to
do
the
work
again.
M
M
What
I
come
from
on
on
the
second
I
think
that
is
a
good
example
of
how
this
second
round
could
help
us
without
disadvantaging
those
businesses
that
apply,
but
they
need
a
little
help
to
get
through,
because
if
not,
why
do
we
create
it?
Why?
What
why
did
the
city
created
a
you
know
a
standardization
or
created
a
some
sort
of
rubric
to
this?
You
know
to
give
These
funds.
M
When
then
we're
not
going
to
follow
the
rubric
and
just
get
this,
you
know
just
give
the
money
to
everybody
without
addressing
some
of
the
issues
so
I
feel
like
we
need
to
give.
We
need
to
stick
to
the
to
this
plan
and
I
understand
the
other
side
too.
I,
actually,
don't
disagree
with
that
completely
I
I,
don't
at
all,
but
I
think
there
is
more
businesses
that
could
serve.
You
know
they
could
this
money
could
be
affecting?
A
Got
a
question
of
maybe
Ben
or
Cindy
or
Katie:
the
is
it
within
our
purview.
Is
the
council
to
say
just
put
two
million
dollars
out
to
whoever
scored
the
highest?
Could
we
do
that?
You
could
so
we
could
say
that
and-
and
the
arguments
may
be,
we
believe
the
process
that
was
done
and
I
know.
This
is
different
than
what
you're
saying
we
believe
the
process
that
was
done
was
good.
We
believe
the
application
that
the
word
did
get
out
enough
I
think
another
argument
could
be
you
all.
A
Your
time
is
very
valuable
and
so
are
the
volunteers
that
helped
score
all
of
these,
and
so
we
there's
no
lack
of
things.
We
need
you
all
to
be
doing
to
support
businesses
and
organizations,
so
if
we
were
to
just
put
it
all
out
the
door
now.
According
to
this,
what
feels
like
a
pretty
rigorous
process,
then
we
could
move
on
to
the
next
thing
that
we
need
you
to
do
with
the
equal.
With
these
Lessons
Learned
I
I
can
see.
A
Both
I
also
can
see
how
you
know
it's,
not
a
small
number
of
dollars.
It's
a
lot
of
money
and
for
certain
businesses
it
could
be
the
difference
between
staying
between
the
next
payroll
being
made
or
not.
A
And
so,
if
the
committee
who
we've
entrusted
with
this
and
I
I
want
to
say,
I,
think
I
really
like
how
we
chose
the
committee
and
I
think
the
makeup
of
the
committee
really
matched
what
Our
intention
was
for
who
we
wanted
to
be
like
in
able
to
decide
that.
So,
if
they're
saying
that,
we
don't
really
like
this
process,
I'm
putting
words
in
their
mouth.
But
what
I'm
hearing
is
like?
We
thought
the
process
was
good,
but
we
didn't
think
it
was
perfect
and
we
think
we
can
do
better
in
a
second
round.
F
We
can
decide
on
these
31,
get
them
out
the
door,
the
application
process
for
the
the
SEC
people
who
had
replied
the
first
time
as
Kathy
stated
five
minutes,
they've
already
done
the
app
they've
already
done
all
the
work,
so
I
don't
think
having
a
second
round
of
having
more
applicants,
maybe
back
to
because
my
police
discussions
about
the
equity
across
the
whole
board
and
the
anonymous
application
process
is
a
great
Avenue
to
go
through
we're,
not
really
delaying
the
extra
1.25
million
for
long
it's
going
to
be
done
relatively
quickly
and
we
can
move
that
move
forward
relatively
quickly,
because
the
the
committee
also
has
already
very
has
an
experience
in
reviewing
this.
F
A
W
Might
help
you
your
decision
either
way.
One
is
establish
an
application
portal,
so
applicants
had
a
login
they
created,
so
their
information
isn't
gone
it's
there
and
they
can
log
back
in
and
then
just
hit
submit
when
we
have
a
second
window
open
so
to
make
changes,
add
documents
that
they
might
have
been
missing,
whatever
the
case
would
be.
So
that's
why
I
mentioned
it's
a
five
minute
process.
W
The
other
piece
of
information
that
you
should
probably
be
aware
of
is
that,
because
we
anticipated
having
a
phase
two
we've
had
businesses
reach
out
to
us
saying:
I
need
this
program.
I'm
sorry,
I
missed
the
deadline.
I
didn't
know
this
applied
to
me.
How
do
I
apply?
We
have
a
list
of
30
applicants.
W
A
A
V
Yeah
and
we
give
them
a
30-day
window
period
to
ensure
that
we
touch
every
every
one
that
we
need
to
ensure
that
we
are
communicating
with
also
I.
Think
if
we're
going
to
do
canvassing
like
we
did
last
time,
we
literally
walked
in
the
neighborhoods
and
went
in
gave
paper
application
talked
to
people.
We
went
to
a
lot
of
the
districts
we'll
do
that
again,
but
I
also
want
to
offer
that
if,
if
you
decide
to
do
a
face
too,
we
would
love
to
give
you
some
information.
A
F
I
just
want
just
one
additional
comment
on
the
so
that
the
applicants
that
are
at
the
just
Mr
cut-
you
know
the
second
application
process.
They
could
tweak
their
application.
They
also
could
get
instead
of
scoring
79,
they
score
89
and
they
get
an
extra
10
on
top
of
what
they
want.
So
there's
there
is
a
bonus
for
that
that
second
process
for
some
of
them,
the
application
process.
M
I'm
just
I'm
just
throwing
that
out.
Okay,
my
worried
right
now
is:
if
we
don't
do
a
second
phase,
what
happens
with
those
30
businesses
a
certain
application,
or
they
have
interest
on
on
doing
this
and
I
I?
Think
that
we
I
will
like
to
stick
to
the
plan.
It
doesn't
hurt
those
businesses
they
didn't
get
at
this
time
by
hurting
I
mean
I,
know
that
waiting
a
few
months
it
might
still
hurt,
but
I
think
we
need
to
give
the
the
chance
to
all
of
those
new
businesses
and
those
applications
to
be
better.
M
T
C
T
T
Thank
you,
I
I,
I,
think
I'm
with
council
member
father
and
because
we
think
we've
been
through
this,
it
does
seem
a
little
unfair
that
you
have
a
lot
of
applicants
that
were
in
the
70s
that
that
have
proven
they
have.
They
have
lost.
Like
that's
the
main
thing:
hey
did
you
have
any
loss
because
of
the
pandemic.
T
If
the
answer
is
yes
and
you're
automatically
like
eligible
and
then
we
have
other
questions
and
and
now
and
then
but
the
community
didn't
love
the
questions
so
they're
like
we're
gonna,
you
know
rank
you
less
and
and
now
we're
saying
well,
if
you
it
we're
going
to
ask
you
two
more
questions
and
then
we're
also
opening
it
up
for
people
that
missed
that
line
for
God
wherein
didn't
I,
don't
know
the
application
the
the
program
didn't
get
to
them.
For
whatever
reason,
even
though
we've
been
substantial.
V
T
Did
and
now
we're
telling
these
people
like
well,
you
know
you
might
have
somebody
that
has
a
better
application
than
you.
We
might
like
their
explanation
better.
T
So
sorry,
for
you
know,
sorry
like
you
did
experience
lots
of,
but
we
don't.
We
don't
like
the
way
you
applied
or
what
you
said
in
your
application.
That's
my
that's
my
my
heartburn
here,
because
they've
done
the
work,
so
maybe
I
would
be.
I
will
be
happy
with
the
face
too
because
of
the
30
that
or
more
that
might
want
to
apply,
but
maybe
we
do
give
priority
to
the
ones
in
the
high
70s.
M
M
M
R
So
the
first
sticking
point
is
completeness:
some
people
just
simply
provided
a
very
brief
explanation,
so
they
scored
low
but
I
think
the
biggest
sticking
point
in
which
resulted
in
a
recommendation
for
changing
this
is
the
connection
to
covid.
A
lot
of
people
were
looking
forward
and
saying
you
know
we
anticipate
with
inflation
and
and
supply
chain
issues
that
we're
going
to
keep
filling
the
pain
of
covid,
and
it
was
the
narrative,
was
sort
of
looking
forward
and
not
really
addressing
what
happened
during
covid.
How
big
of
a
loss
was
there
and
describe?
R
A
A
W
That
wasn't
a
question
that
was
scored
unless
there
was
some
specific
information
given
in
that
that
related
back
to
covid,
so
the
committee
decided
in
a
totality
so
the
way
that
the
scores
actually
broke
down
is.
There
were
three
narrative
questions
that
dealt
with
how
a
business
was
impacted
by
covid
that
would
had
to
do
with
past
present
and
future.
So
how
did
they?
How
were
they
impacted
in
the
past?
At
the
time
the
pandemic
happened
and
the
closures
potentially
happened
to
their
business?
How
were
they
impacted?
W
Did
they
communicate
that
in
a
way
that
was,
you
know,
high
scoring
enough
for
the
committee?
The
second
weighted
score
was:
how
was
their
plan
for
now?
How
are
they
dealing
with
what
issues
remain
to
their
business
and
that's
a
narrative
as
well,
and
then
the
third
question
had
to
do
with
how,
based
on
what
they've
said,
how
does
that?
How
are
they
dealing
with
that
in
their
budget?
W
So
how
are
they
going
to
allocate
These
funds
to
help
them
to
make
them
whole
from
those
past
impacts,
and
so
those
were
60
of
the
scores
were
based
on
those
questions.
Now
some
businesses
were
not
great
at
describing
how
covet
affected
them,
so
they
may
have
said
in
the
introduction
of
the
business.
You
know
we're
an
entertainment
business
that
can't
be
open
during
coped.
You
know
the
we
were
impacted
in
their
description,
and
so
that
was
weighted
for
the
committee.
A
I
think
that
I
was
asking
a
different
question.
There
is
a
column
with
very
with
different
numbers
in
it
for
each
business.
How
did
that
number
get
assigned
to
that
business?
Was
it
each
individual,
Committee
Member
just
scored
it
and
it
was
averaged
and
that
that's
the
number
I'm
seeing
here
or
was
there
like
some
computer,
that
came
up
and
said
you
get
a
92.
like
how
did
the
number
get
onto
this
paper.
V
We
didn't
have
ai,
that's
for
sure,
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
looking
at
the
right
column,
so
we're
answering
correctly
because
I
don't
want
to.
Obviously
we
didn't
answer
the
right
question
so.
A
A
W
All
of
them
any
column,
okay,
so
basically
the
committee
had
there
were
three
main
questions
that
asked
that
were
the
highest
scored,
so
you
could
say
they
were
weighted,
the
most
that
was
the
the
narratives.
Then
they
had
a
bunch
of
questions
that
they
could
score
like
a
zero
or
a
five
like.
How
were?
How
did
the
business
adequately
explain
this,
and
so
they
could
score
those?
W
How
we
arrived
at
the
average
was
we
accumulated
a
total
of
a
hundred
points
based
on
all
of
the
questions
and
and
then
we
average
that,
based
on
how
many
committee
members
actually
scored
right,
because
we
didn't
some
committee,
members
were
recused
because
they
knew
the
business
they
could
suss
out
who
the
business
was,
and
so
the
average
was
different.
It.
M
M
V
F
Ahead
froze
the
sharp
holds
I'm
I
I
propose
that
we
continue
with
we'll
look
at
this
one
on
March
7th
and
we
go
to
a
phase
two
shortly
after
that,
as
as
they
have
planned.
So
you
propose
that
we
accept
the
recommendations.
A
Discuss
yeah
go
ahead,
I'd
like
to
a
discussion
Point.
M
Yeah,
so
could
we,
instead
of
just
telling
them
to
prioritize
those
businesses
which
I
think
it
I
mean
I,
would
prefer
that
we
ask
you
to,
for
a
way
of
you
know,
give
us
an
answer
about
how
you're
going
to
deal
with
those
those
applications,
so
those
implications
that
were
not
funding.
I,
think
that
is
how
I
feel
comfortable
with
that
amendment.
M
I
just
don't
want
to
seem
unfair,
also
to
those
30
some,
but
I
also
noticing
that
we
are
concerned
about
those
people
that
didn't
get
funded,
and
we
want
to
address
that.
So
maybe
ask
you
guys
to
come
up
with
something
we.
T
A
A
So,
okay,
my
discussion
point
is
I
I,
think
if
it
were
just
me
in
a
box
saying,
what's
the
best
process,
I
would
agree
with
councilmember
valda
Morrison
councilmember
Fowler,
that,
yes,
this
is
a
lot
of
money,
but
we
should
just
get
it
out
the
door
and
move
on
to
the
next
thing,
and
these
and
the
process
seems
like
it
was
robust
enough.
My
the
only
reason
I'm
gonna
say:
yes,
let's
go
through
recommendations,
because
I
really
do
want
to
trust
the
committee
that
we
appointed
I
think
we
did
a.
A
We
were
deliberate
in
who
we
chose
for
this
committee
and
so
I
don't
want
to
take
what
they're
telling
us
they
would
like
and
and
change
that
so,
though,
out
of
principle,
I
think
that
just
like
I
would
prefer
to
just
move
the
money
out
and
get
them
helping
the
businesses
move
forward.
A
I
want
to
respect
what
those
committee
members
that
are
most
of
them
are
I
mean
a
couple
of
them
are
staff
members,
but
most
of
them
are
volunteers
that
are
spending
their
time
and
not
getting
paid
to
do
this
I
want
to
respect
what
they've
requested
so
I'm
gonna
go.
Yes,
it
will.
Other
council
members
show
their
feelings.
Z
Hey
I
would
rather,
if
we
wait
on
this
drop
hole
until
we
get
an
answer
to
our
question
like
we
don't
need
to
stop
hold
this
today,
because
there
is
this
pending
question
out
there
that
may
or
may
not
change
how
I
feel
about
the
proposal,
which.
A
Is
fine
Okay,
so
how
about
so
we
strap
hold
and
just
Amy
since
you're
councilman
Fowler
there
were
five
yeses
here.
Councilmember
Petro
is
not
present,
and
then
you
requested
that
we
hold
your
no
or
a
request
that
we
hold
straw
polls
are
not
binding,
so
maybe
we
do
requests
that
we
get
an
answer
to
that
on.
Tuesday
I
may
think.
Giving
taking
this
drop
hold
now
doesn't
mean
that's.
T
A
I
would
like
the
answer
to
that
on
March
7th
okay,
before
we
so
I,
guess
I'm,
requesting
that
this
gets
put
back
on
work
session.
So
we
can
hear
that
response
and
then
we'll
vote
that
night.
Does
that
sound
okay,
councilor
Fowler
and
everyone
else?
The
other
reason
why
I
think
that's
good
is
because
we've
been
missing
councilmember
Petron,
and
this
seems
like
something
that
would
be
important
to
her
as
well
and
so
I
think
having
just
another
chance
to
have
a
discussion
would
be
good.
Okay.
Does
that
sound?
Okay.
Z
A
A
All
right,
I
think
we're
good
on
this
item.
Then,
which
means
we're
done
with
item
four
and
we're
gonna
move
on
to
item
five
tentative
break
yeah.
V
A
We
are
what
time
is
it
right
now?
Thank.
J
A
A
All
border
Point-
okay,
great,
let's
just
do
those
so
that
we
do
not
have
to
make
the
three
board
appointees
wait
any
longer,
so
we're
moving
on
to
items
number,
eight,
nine
and
ten.
Those
are
board
appointees,
two
of
them
for
the
outs,
Arts
Council
and
one
for
the
transportation
Advisory
Board.
Let's
just
go
and
order
the
agenda
and
start
with
Jeff
Driggs,
who
is
being
recommended
by
the
mayor
for
appointment
to
the
Arts
Council,
is
that
you
Mr
Driggs
online?
Yes
great!
So
just
give
us
a
quick
introduction.
A
AA
Thank
you.
I
am
a
development
officer,
a
fundraiser
at
Westminster,
College
and
I've,
been
in
a
fundraising
professionally
in
higher
education.
My
entire
career
I
am
also
on
the
Board
of
Trustees
of
the
Off-Broadway
Theater,
which
for
25
years,
operated
in
downtown
Salt
Lake
City.
A
Okay,
go
Griffins!
Thank
you!
So
Jeff
you
do
not
need
to
come
to
our
formal
board
appointment,
but
your
your
official
confirmation
of
the
board
will
be
during
our
our
consent
agenda
tonight.
But
no
news
is
good
news
and
if
you
hear
nothing
assume
that
you
have
been
appointed,
thank
you
all.
A
The
next
is
Matthew
Coles
also
recommended
for
appointment
to
the
Arts
Council
Matthew.
Are
you
here
with
us
virtually
yes
Yes,
you
heard
the
instructions
or
do
you.
Y
Okay,
go
ahead,
just
like
say
thank
you
for
for
your
services
on
the
council,
I've
lived
in
Salt
Lake
City.
Almost
all
my
life
and
I've
operated
a
a
business
in
Salt
Lake
City
for
over
20
years.
We
do
design
and
web
development
and
it's
called
modelic.
Y
It
first
started
as
a
graphic
design,
business
called
Contact
design,
so
I'm
often
affiliated
with
with
artists
of
all
types
and
sometimes
they're
clients,
and
sometimes
there's
they
are
people
we
support
or
groups
that
we
support,
and
so
I
heard
that
we
had
no
representation
on
the
Arts
Council
board
from
District
Seven,
where
I
live
and
so
I
thought.
At
this
time.
In
my
life,
my
boys
have
both
graduated
from
college
and
I.
Y
Just
have
a
eight-year-old
former
Foster
son
that
stays
with
us,
so
I
have
some
time
to
give
back
and
hopefully
help
broaden
engagement
with
the
Arts
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
and
help
bolster
what
the
city
can
do
to
make
it
a
a
vibrant
part
of
our
Lives,
which
I
think
is
important
for
all
of
us
to
have
the
Arts
as
part
of
our
lives.
A
Much
all
right,
the
last
Board
of
pointy
is
Justice
marath
recommended
for
appointment
to
the
transportation
Advisory
Board
Justice.
Are
you
with
us.
A
Justice,
if
you're
able
to
hear
us
I
think
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
go
to
break
now,
if
you're,
since
we've
been
changing
the
time
up
on
you,
I
guess
at
any
point,
if
you're
here
we'll
go
to
your
your
appointment,
Mr.
A
At
the
worst
possible
time,
okay
Justice,
the
so
you're
you've
been
recommended
for
appointment
to
the
transportation.
Advisory
Board
just
give
us
a
brief
introduction
to
who
you
are
and
why
you're
interested
in
transportation
and
why
you're
willing
to
spend
your
free
time
with
the
city.
L
Yes,
so
I
am
an
associate
professor
of
psychology
at
Salt,
Lake
Community,
College
I
have
been
in
Utah
on
and
off
for
about
12
13
years
now,
I've
lived
in
Salt
Lake
for
most
of
that
time
and
I've
lived
in
Rose
Park
in
district,
one
which
I
hope
to
represent
for
about
seven
years
now.
L
I
am
interested
in
being
part
of
this
board
because
well
I
have
to
get
around
the
city
myself
and
I
use
all
forms
of
of
Transit
I
prefer
cycling
and
public
transit,
but
I
certainly
walk
and
drive
our
city
streets.
Also
I
do
have
some
experience
doing
this
I
was
on
the
Durango
Colorado's
Transit
Advisory
Board
way
back
in
about
2005
to
and
2006.,
and
so
when
I
found
out
that
we
needed
someone
to
represent
our
district
I
decided.
This
would
be
a
great
way
to
to
get
involved.
A
C
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
A
That
was
a
slightly
longer
break
but
deserved.
We
are
moving
on
to
item
number
six
on
our
agenda,
which
is
authorizing
the
execution
of
an
interlocal
agreement
in
order
to
transfer
a
mitz
vehicle
to
West,
Valley
and
Sylvia
Richards
Council
policy.
Analyst
is
online
to
give
us
an
introduction
to
this
item
and
then
I
don't
see
them.
Maybe
they're
online,
but
Michael
Fox
assistant,
chief
Administration
Gary
Carter,
captain
and
Jason
aldroid
City
Senior
attorney
are
theoretically
available.
AB
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
Fire
Department
received
two
mits
vehicles.
Mits
stands
for
mobile
interoperable
tactical
solution,
Vehicles,
which
are
used
in
emergencies
and
other
operations.
The
vehicles
were
owned
and
maintained
and
operated
by
the
city,
and
the
grant
funding
has
been
terminated
in
the
members
of
the
of
the
Grant
have
now
become
responsible
for
the
maintenance
of
those
vehicles
in
2012,
one
was
transferred
to
the
United
Fire
Authority.
AB
Their
proposal,
as
you
mentioned
before
the
council,
is
whether
the
council
would
authorize
the
execution
of
an
interlocal
agreement
to
transfer
the
the
second
vehicle
to
West,
Valley,
City
and
I'd
be
happy
to
turn
the
rest
of
the
time
over
for
questions
and
or
over
to
to
Jason
or
Captain
Carter.
If
you're
interested
in
making
comments
or
assistant
she.
Thank
you.
I.
A
X
I'd
be
happy
to
provide
just
a
little
bit.
This
is
a
case
where
we've
put
together
an
interlocal
agreement
with
West
Valley
City.
That
would
allow
us
to
transfer
this
mixed
vehicle
to
West
Valley
City.
They
would
take
over
the
maintenance
and
the
care
of
it.
It's
my
understanding
and
chief
Fox
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I,
don't
believe
that
the
city
is
actively
using
this
vehicle
in
any
way.
X
A
Great
Chief
Fox
cap,
yeah,
Chief
Fox.
AC
Yeah
Jason's
correct:
we
don't
use
the
vehicle,
we
just
basically
maintain
it
every
year
when
these
were
first
purchased,
they
were
bought
through
a
grant.
That
was
a
collaborative
Grant
with
Unified
Fire
Authority
and
with
West
Valley.
We
did
transfer
one
of
the
vehicles
to
Unified
Fire
Authority
in
2012,
and
we've
just
had
the
other
vehicle
in
our
Fleet.
Since
then,
West
Valley
would
like
to
take
possession
of
it
and
they
would
like
to
update
all
of
the
electronics
Electronics
on
board
and
move
it
to
a
Frontline
apparatus
for
them.
A
All
right,
maybe
I,
want
to
ask
a
question:
what
is
a
mobile,
interoperable
tactical
Solutions
vehicle,
and
what
does
that
do
so?.
AC
A
AC
West
Valley
does
want
to
update
the
equipment
on
there
and
use
it
in
their
Wildland
program.
Okay,.
A
Like
it
does
anything
else,
you
want
to
add
Chief,
fox
or
Jason.
C
A
Don't
believe
so,
okay
great,
so
that
is
not
an
item
that
needs
to
have
a
public
hearing
or
public
comment
period
or
public
yeah
public
hearing.
So
we
have
tentative
action
on
this
scheduled
for
the
next
meeting.
March,
7th
and
I
think
that
moves
us
over
to
reportive,
chair
and
vice
chair
I
do
have
I
just
wanted
to
my
announce.
I
have
an
announcement.
A
I
wanted
to
just
go
over
I've.
Had
a
lot
of
people
ask
questions
about
the
704
East
900
South
rezone
that
we're
voting
on
tonight,
so
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
the
way
that
I
understand
it,
because
I've
heard
things
from
constituents
and
other
council
members
Ben
I
wanted
to
just
make
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
as
to
what
we're
voting
on
in
our
work
session,
we
had
talked
to
the
property
owner
and
they
were
amenable
to
a
development
agreement
that
did
a
couple
of
things.
A
So
this
is
a
old
house,
but
it's
not
a
historically
designated
house.
It's
not
protected
in
any
way
right
now,
so
one
thing
we've
asked
is
that
they
would
enter
into
agreement
that
it
would
be
retained
for
the
next
50
years.
I
think
50
years
was
suggested
by
the
attorney's
office
as
like
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
for
a
building,
after
that,
it
may
be
cost
prohibitive
to
continue
to
maintain
it
or
I.
Think
that
was
the
suggestion,
but
the
development
agreement
would
make
it
protected.
It's
not
currently
protected.
It
could
be
torn
down.
A
There
was
a
suggestion
to
ask
the
property
owner
to
bring
the
building
into
Code
Compliance,
so
the
building
is
not
in
Code
Compliance.
It
is
there's
four
units.
It's
only
allowed
to
have
two.
The
four
four
units
that
were
created
to
my
understanding
were
done
outside
of
the
typical
process,
and
so
there
have
been
no
safety
inspections
on
that.
There
was
a
suggestion
by
some
by
I
think
the
public
and
council
members
to
require
them
to
be
brought
into
Code
Compliance.
Before
we
do.
A
The
rezone
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
isn't
possible,
because
the
building
department
cannot
give
a
building
permit
or
go
in
and
inspect
a
four
four
unit
dwelling
when
that
doesn't
meet
zoning.
So
there's
no
way
that
right
now
they
they
cannot
get
a
building
permit
to
make
their
build
their
units
in
compliance
unless
they
were
to
go
down
to
two
units.
A
So
we
would
be
asking
them
to
remove
two
units,
and
then
we
would
consider
allowing
them
to
add
those
two
units
back
in
so
I
think
the
decision
is
whether
or
not
we
want
two
units
or
four
units
there.
The
proposed
ordinance
would
also
require
that
these
be
used
for
long-term
leases,
not
short-term
rentals.
The
base
zoning
that
is
being
requested
would
allow
short-term
rentals,
but
the
property
owner.
A
N
The
proposed
Zoning
for
SNB
or
small
neighborhood
business
would
allow
a
bed
and
breakfast
to
be
operated
there,
provided
the
property
was
granted
Landmark
status
and
that
you
know
go
through
that
process.
Just
under
the
base
SMB
zoning,
it
would
not
allow
any
type
of
short-term
rental
unless
it
goes
through.
The
the
let.
A
T
If
that's
in
perpetuity,
like
you
said
so,
basically
he
let's
say
he
says
in
perpetuity
I'm
going
to
do
this
agreement,
but
he
sells
a
property.
A
new
property
owner
says:
Hey
There
is
economic
hardship
with
this
I
could
be
doing
short-term
rentals
I'm
going
to
challenge
that
decision.
That
was
made
previously.
What
are
the
what's
it
like
likelihood
of
the
challenge,
I
moving
forward
and
then
having
the
new
property
owner
actually
do
have
short-term
lists,
or
is
this
in
the
law
that
if
we
say
something
today
in
perpetratory,
then
it's
forever
and.
U
U
U
A
development
agreement
is
executed
by
the
administration,
so
a
future
council
could
not
compel
a
future
mayor
to
remove
that
development
agreement.
Could
it.
A
A
Okay,
so
yeah
that
would
be
forever
then
sounds
like
any
other
questions
on
that.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify,
because
I
think
there
were
some
some
questions
about
that.
So
I.
J
J
A
So
that
that
motion
okay,
so
the
agreement
would
be
that
they
would
maintain
a
minimum
of
four
dwelling
units,
correct,
okay
and
that's,
which
would
make
it
difficult
for
them
to
put
commercial
on
there,
which
may
be
beneficial
in
some
ways
or
may
not.
But
okay
depends
on
who
you
ask
exactly
yeah,
okay,
I
think
that's
clear
to
everybody
right.
Is
it
clear
to
everybody?
Thank
you,
okay,
thank
you
and
then
the
other
one
is
that
we
have
pulled
the
Adu
ordinance
from
action
tonight.
A
There
was
a
lot
of
interest
after
the
public
hearing
about
that.
Some
council
members
have
reconsidered
some
some
of
the
straw
polls
that
we
took
previously
so
we're
going
to
put
that
back
on
work
session
and
continue
to
discuss
that,
because.
U
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
staff
also
has
some
follow-up
work,
we're
doing
based
on
some
of
those
ideas
that
were
raised
to
with
the
administration
figure
out,
especially
the
attorney's
office,
figure
out
what
our
options
are.
So
staff
is
doing
some
work
in
the
meantime.
Also.
A
So,
if
you're
waiting
for
us
to
see
how
we're
going
to
vote
on
the
Adu
ordinance,
it's
not
going
to
happen
tonight.
Public
and
those
are
all
my
announcements.
Next
is
report
announcements
of
the
executive
director.
No
announcements
do
we
have
a
closed
session
tonight?
A
Okay,
so
counselors
I'm,
looking
for
a
motion
to
enter
into
closed
session
for
attorney
client
Privileges
and
to
discuss
the
purchase
exchange
or
at
least
a
real
property,
so.
T
A
I
have
a
motion
from
councilmember
Fowler.
Second
from
councilman
Morris,
any
discussion
I
will
roll
call
councilmember
Fowler?
Yes,
counselor
employee,
yes,
councilman
Wharton,
yes,
councilman
Petro,
yes,
councilman
Morris,
yes,
councilmember,
Dugan,
yes
and
I'm,
a
yes
that
passes
unanimously
and
we
will
enter
closed
session
and
we
will
not
come
back
to
work
session.
We
will
reconvene
at
7
pm
for
our
formal
session.