►
Description
This version is unlisted due to technical issues. Please see the full version here:
https://youtu.be/CgoAd8lrnWQ
Historic Landmarks Commission Meeting - September 02, 2021
https://www.slc.gov/historic-preservation/
https://www.slc.gov/boards/historic-landmark-commission-agendas-minutes/
A
A
B
B
The
applicant
also
owns
the
property
to
the
east
of
the
gas
station
site,
which
is
868
east.
It
currently
has
an
existing
detached
single
family
home
on
it,
which
is
going
to
remain
as
part
of
this
project,
but
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
construct
six
single-family
attached
units
on
a
town,
home
style
development.
B
B
And
this
is
a
vicinity
map
of
the
project
location.
I've
outlined
the
gas
station
property
in
yellow
cam.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
out
from
the
southeast
corner
of
the
intersection
of
amnest
streets
and
third
avenue,
so
staff
has
recommended
that
the
applicant
come
to
the
landmark
commission
to
gather
some
feedback
on
this
proposal,
especially
with
regard
to
the
pedestrian
engagement
along
third
avenue
and
at
the
corner
of
any
state,
so
just
to
go
over
the
project.
B
B
Farther
towards
the
east,
it's
a
simple
couple
steps
up
and
then,
as
you
move
to
the
west,
it's
a
longer
staircase,
but
each
one
of
those
units
does
have
a
street
level
patio
and
those
were
added
by
the
applicants.
In
response
to
staff's
comments
that
we
would
like
to
see
some
larger
sitting
animals
out
front,
which
are
more
typical
of
the
avenues
making
historic
districts.
B
So
in
addition
to
the
front,
porch
and
front
suit
area
for
the
westernmost
unit,
we
have
also
added
a
small
walkout
area
with
a
sunken
outdoor
patio,
as
well
as
this
small
seating
area
as
well,
in
an
attempt
to
further
engage
the
the
corner
at
wayne,
state
and
third
avenue,
and
to
create
the
sense
that
there
is
still
some
pedestrian
engagement
along
any
street.
Although
there
is
no
door
or
other
type
of
entry
on
this
face
of
the
building.
B
Again,
these
are
just
elevation
valleys.
These
are
the
rear
of
the
homes
which
will
be
accessed
by
the
drywall
in
the
back
of
the
property.
This
is
the
westernmost
unit.
Again,
you
can
see
the
small
sitting
area
along
the
end
streets
and
then
there's
the
sunk
in
the
outdoor
patio
here
and
then
this
is
the
easternmost
unit
units
you
can
see
at
the
very
small
street
up
there
and
then
the
ground
floor
patio
on
front
avenue.
B
So
this
is
the
end
of
staff's
short
introduction.
I
know
that
the
applicant
is
here
and
they
can
walk
through
the
history
of
the
projects
and
the
overall
changes
that
they've
made
to
be
designed
since
the
original
submittal,
and
then
staff
just
encouraged
the
applicant
to
come
before
the
runway
mission
to
gather
some
feedback,
with
particular
attention
to
pedestrian
engagement
on
street
and.
B
B
A
E
Everybody,
hopefully
you
can
hear
me
good
evening,
good,
to
see
everyone
again.
My
name
is
oren
and
my
partner,
marcus
robinson,
is
also
on
the
line
or
with
three
mark
investments
where
the
applicant,
as
well
as
the
property
owner.
We
also
have
our
lead
architect
on
the
call
today,
brian
with
blaylock
and
partners.
Unfortunately,
kevin
blaylock
was
unable
to
make
it,
but
he
says
hello
to
everybody.
Brian
will
walk
us
through
kind
of
our
proposal.
E
We're
really
excited
to
be
here
tonight,
kent
and
yes,
we
we
have
come
before
you
guys
before,
but
we
thought
we
made
some
really
good
progress
on
the
design
and,
as
caitlyn
mentioned,
we
recently
received
the
approval
from
city
council
for
the
rezone
of
the
property.
So
we've
worked
with
caitlyn,
john
and
others
at
planning
to
really
refine
and
bring
the
design
to
where
it
is.
Today
we
are
proud
of
the
project.
F
F
Sorry
in
the
last
hlc
work
session,
we
just
basically
reviewed
the
general
master
plan
of
introducing
six
town
homes
working
within
the
setbacks
of
rmu
35
and
really
just
our
desire
to
modulate
modulate
those
units.
So
we
kind
of
introduce
porches
and
and
break
down
the
scale
of
the
overall
development
and
make
it
more
conducive
to
the
narrow
lots
that
are
predominant
along
this
area.
F
So
I'm
going
to
share
our
3d
model
just
to
walk
through
an
insight
into
our
process.
I'll
show
you
kind
of
how
we've
we've
got
to
the
point
we're
at
so
this
is
just
an
initial
diagram
showing
the
buildable
volume
on
the
site.
So
essentially,
with
the
rmu
35
zone,
we
have
a
35
foot
max
building
height.
F
So
you
know
within
the
zoning
zoning
restrictions
we
would
really
be
able
to.
If
we
stepped
up
with
the
topography,
this
shows
kind
of
the
max
building
envelope
so
early
on
and
in
our
discussions
internally
and
with
planning
commission
and
all
the
powers
that
be
we,
we
decided
to
carve
this
development
into
the
ground
and
we
we
liked
that
because
it
started
to
reduce
the
scale,
particularly
ryan.
F
F
F
So
the
next
step
we
actually
took
that
scale
down
further
and
our
design
process
is
really
one
of
subtraction
and
kind
of
carving
a
way
to
create
individual
unit
and
make
these
read
as
individual
town
homes,
but
also
reduce
scale
and
volume.
That
was
a
one
of
the
comments
from
that
first
hlc
session.
So
the
next
kind
of
conceptual
step
was
introducing
this
idea
of
front
porch.
F
So
this
started
initially
just
as
kind
of
a
staircase
and
a
stoop
at
the
entry
and
then
introducing
openings
and
really
these
are
trying
to
be
sensitive
in
scale
but
bringing
in
daylight
and
again
just
exercising
some
restraint
we
didn't
want
to.
We
wanted
to
kind
of
have
this
be
a
background
building
of
sort.
F
So
this
is
kind
of
a
bigger
step
and
a
lot
to
unpack,
but
basically
this
is
showing
the
material
palette
that
we're
exploring.
So
this
is
brick
as
the
primary
material,
with
some
wood
accent
to
provide
some
warmth
architecturally,
and
then
there
is
some
smooth-based
stucco
plaster
that
we're
also
looking
at
as
well.
F
So
we
presented
this
particular
design
to
the
planning
commission
and,
as
caitlyn
indicated,
there
was
a
few
concerns,
the
main
one
being
these
stair
bulkheads.
We
fought
pretty
hard
to
keep
these
in
the
project
just
further.
You
know
the
comfort
and
ease
of
accessing
the
rooftop,
the
ability
to
bring
daylight
in,
but
there
isn't
an
exception
that
allows
for
them.
F
F
F
So
that
I
think
the
second
biggest
move,
or
probably
the
largest
move,
we
we
made
and
biggest
revision,
was
starting
to
try
to
wrap
the
aesthetic
along
third
ave
onto
n
street
and
to
make
this
feel
more
like
a
front
facade,
so
we
have
kind
of
two
front
faces
so
we've
also,
as
katelyn
indicated,
we've
carved
in
a
a
terraced
area
as
well.
It's
kind
of
in
that
great
area
and
one
thing
to
correct
is
we
actually
are
anticipating
a
doorway
access
onto
this
area?
F
A
C
C
This
is
really
really
helpful
to
see
your
rationale
and
I
I
don't
have
anything
to
say
to
change
this.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
great
project
there.
I
lived
across
the
street
for
a
couple
years
when
I
was
right
out
of
college
and
would
have
been
a
delight
to
look
out
on
something
like
this,
so
I
think
that
it's
well
done.
I
I
join
you
in
ruling
the
loss
of
your
bulkheads
because
accessing
a
roof
deck
through
a
through
a
hatch
is
not
going
to
be
all
that
appealing,
but
you
know
that's.
C
D
D
I
would
like
to
talk
about
the
roof
decks,
which
I
think
are
a
great
idea.
I
mean
corbus
got
it
right
100
years
ago,
and
it's
still
a
great
idea
and
the
landmarks
commission
may
have
the
ability
to
allow
increased
height
for
those
bulkheads.
I
that
may
be
something
to
chat
with
staff
about,
but
it
would
add
a
concern
that
in
particular
that
east
bulkhead
would
make
what
I
call
the
bambi
meets:
godzilla
28-foot
facade
to
that
historic
home.
D
I
would
like
to
end
with
one
primary
concern,
and
that
is
is
that
I
think
that
these
front
steps
and
decks
are
completely
apologetic
and
there's
just
tremendous
room
for
improvement
there
to
me.
There's
a
place
for
amazon
to
leave
a
package,
but
no
human
being
is
actually
going
to
sit
there
and
engage
with
their
their
neighbors
as
they
walk
by.
D
C
C
B
C
That
will
allow
public
interaction
with
with
your
your
personal
limits,
I
think,
is
a
very
good
point
that
david
and
babs
remarked
on
and
again,
as
david
said,
you
guys
are
good
architects.
I
think
you
can
probably
take
that
concept
and
develop
it
within
the
context
of
the
approach
you've
taken
so
far.
D
H
H
There's
these
these
porches
here
I
think
those
are
great,
and
you
know
I
like
the
style
of
garage
door
with
the
with
the
lights
in
it.
I
do
just
worry
about
the
flat
the
intended
flat
plaster.
I
don't
know
if
other
commissioners
have
experience
in
that
in
the
context
of
the
historic
landmark
commission,
but
we
just.
H
I
think
it
normal-
I
wouldn't
be
as
worried
about
it
in
like
a
normal
side
yard
condition,
but
since
this
is
so
close
to
the
corner,
I'm
just
in
street
view
right
now
like
and
the
the
house
to
the
south
that
four
plex
or
whatever
it
is,
is
set
back.
Pretty
far,
it
looks
like
it's
got
about
a
30-foot
front
yard,
so
you're
gonna,
as
you
drive
up
end
street
you're
gonna,
really
see
that
that's
gonna
be
like
your
primary
experience
of
this
building.
If
you're
going
north
through
the
avenues.
C
C
C
H
Well,
yeah,
I
think
that
wood
kind
of
slivers
a
good
move.
It
really
helps
break
it
up,
and
I
know
we
don't,
or
I've
heard
it
said
we
don't
really
consider
stuff
like
stucco
score
joints,
because
that's
more
of
a
kind
of
constructability
detail,
but
maybe
just
kind
of
laying
those
out
a
little
bit
in
the
drawings
would
help.
D
F
D
C
F
C
H
F
C
F
Okay,
yeah
we'll
look:
we've
we've
really
gone
back
and
forth
on
the
porches,
and
you
know
ultimately,
these
row
house
typologies.
You
know
these
are
a
little
over
20
feet,
wall-to-wall
from
kind
of
the
brick
to
the
wood
for
each
unit.
So
you
know
it
just
it
makes
for
it's
already
kind
of
a
tough
layout,
but
you
know:
we'd
have
to
eat
into
kind
of
this
kitchen
dining
area
to
introduce
a
larger
porch
up
up
at
that
door
level.
D
G
There
you
see
them
in
mexico,
you
see
them
in
europe,
they're,
just
like
a
long
white
box,
almost
and
they're
highly
efficient
and
they're
about
5,
000
bucks,
a
piece
and
you
put
them.
I
don't
know
three
and
three
or
four
of
them
in
there
and
then
you
don't
have
to
do
the
venting
and
you
don't
have
the
condenser,
but.