►
From YouTube: Planning Division Appeals Hearing for February 16, 2023
Description
Salt Lake City Planning Division Appeals Hearing for February 16, 2023
slc.gov
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
A
D
C
D
Does
lie
on
the
applicant
to
provide
the
the
evidence
necessary
to
to
show
that
that
the
variance
request
is
in
accordance
with
the
statutory
Provisions
laid
out
in
Salt
Lake
City
ordinance
on
variances
and
I
may
have
some
questions
along
the
way
as
well
and
then
I'll
give
solics.
If
anybody
from
Salt
Lake
City
wants
to
respond
or
provide
input.
D
B
D
C
C
C
So
in
order
to
gain
an
upstairs,
we
were
hoping
to
just
stack
ex
new
stairs
on
top
of
the
existing
stairs
to
access
bedrooms,
because
this
duplex
has
no
legal
egress
bedroom
and
we
would
really
like
to
have
good
light
proper
egress,
where
almost
every
home
in
the
whole
neighborhood
has
bedrooms
with
proper
egress
and
that's
you
know
the
inline
variance
is
used
to
be
granted
and
I
know.
That's
something!
C
C
So
we
felt
like
the
setback
on
the
North
side,
wasn't
really
hindering
anything
by
just
stacking
in
upstairs
over
the
existing
home
I
I
guess
we.
We
believe
that
our
request
is
reasonable.
We
don't
see
any
negative
complications
that
we
can
foresee,
but
of
course
we
realize
that
the
code
is
the
code
and
trying
to
find
a
unique.
C
You
know
that
we're
in
a
unique
situation
and
that
that
was
the
difficulty
for
us,
because
we
truly
believe
it
is
a
simple
solution
to
give
both
families,
not
just
the
single
family,
but
both
families
room
to
expand
and
have
proper
bedrooms.
So
in
a
nutshell,
that
is
really
kind
of
what
we're
looking
for.
D
C
D
C
D
D
D
C
A
C
C
D
B
B
The
lot
width
and
the
lot
size
is
not
unusual
for
the
the
zone
or
the
neighborhood.
Many
homes
on
the
same
street
and
in
the
zone
also
have
encourage
encroachments
into
that
side,
yard
setback
and
would
also
be
limited
to
do
a
vertical,
inline
Edition,
and
then
just
and
you
have
this
in
your
staff
report,
but
as
covered
in
the
staff
report.
B
You
know
there
are,
as
we
look
at
a
substantial
property
right
and
in
our
assessment
we
don't
believe
that
an
expansion
on
a
home
is
a
substantial
property
right,
and
that
is
a
self-imposed
hardship,
because
it's
a
desire
for
more
living
space
when,
when
that's,
we
just
don't
see
it
as
a
substantial
property
right,
I
did
want
to
address
the
Alley
part
as
well.
So
I
looked
into
the
alley
and
went
through
property
records,
and,
while
it
does,
you
know,
appear
by
the
naked
eye
to
be
a
public
alley.
B
D
D
C
Well,
yeah
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
for
all
the
work
everybody's
put
into
this
there's
been
a
lot
of
conversations
back
and
forth
and
just
kind
of
working
through
the
code
and
what's
reasonable
and
what's
against
the
work,
the
verbiage
so
I
mean
we
always
maintain
hopefulness,
but
we
fully
understand
what
and
respect
what
is
decided
today.
So
thanks
to
everyone.
B
D
I
think
candidly,
what
you
had
said
before,
when
they
used
to
have
the
inline
variance
option
under
the
under
the
code
that
that
was
kind
of
tailor-made
for
this
kind
of
situation.
With
with
that
God
we
are.
However,
you
want
to
put
it
stuck
with,
so
to
speak,
the
the
language
of
the
variance
standards
and,
as,
as
you
probably
know,
a
variance.
It
is
very
hard
to
meet
the
standards
of
of
a
variance
just
because
you
know
essentially
they
and
and
for
for
good
public
policy
reasons.
D
It's
clear
that
there
are
other
ways
of
of
accomplishing
this
and
it
is
not
considered
a
an
unnecessary
hardship
not
to
be
able
to
have
the
particular
design
that
that
that
you
want
now.
Having
said
all
of
this,
and
unfortunately,
it's
completely
meaningless
technically
under
the
law,
but
I
have
a
lot
of
sympathy
for
this
petitioner.
I
mean
I
mean
to
everybody
here.
D
B
D
So
I'd
encourage
you
to
look
for
other
other
options
and
there's
always
the
option
of
going
to
the
city
council
and
having
them
change
the
law.
That's
not
I
realize
that's,
not
easy
or
or
efficient
either,
but
that's
what
we're
we're
stuck
with,
and
that's
my
decision,
I
appreciate
everybody's
time
and
work
and
I'm
not
trying
to
minimize
the
the
work
and
the
effort
that
have
gone
into
this
and
the
hope
that
we
could
find
an
easy
solution.
Unfortunately,
the
variance
just
isn't
a
a
possibility.