►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - January 27, 2021
Description
Salt Lake City Planning Commission Meeting - January 27, 2021
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
A
A
B
C
A
A
A
A
E
E
A
G
A
G
G
H
G
A
I
I
If
you
can
see
this
slide,
that's
up
on
your
screen.
It's
good
to
write
down
this
the
website,
I'm
sorry,
the
the
the
email
address.
That's
at
the
bottom
planning
dot
comments
at
slcgov.com
if
at
any
time,
you're
having
difficulty
during
the
meeting
and
you'd
like
to
to
leave
us
some
comments
or
if
you'd
like
to
speak
at
the
meeting
but
are
having
a
hard
time
letting
us
know,
you
can
send
a
email
to
that
email
address
and
we
have
people
monitoring
that
email
address
for
those
of
you.
I
That
would
like
to
speak
when
the
your
item
is
up.
You
should
see
a
little
tiny
hand
on
your
screen
and
what
you
want
to
do
is
hit
that
hand,
and
that
knows
that
that
we
will
speak
or
pick
you
to
speak.
If
you're
on
the
attendee
list,
you
don't
have
the
ability
to
unmute
yourselves.
That
will
be
us.
That
will
will
do
that
and
that's
all
I
have.
A
J
J
J
J
The
side
street
is
called
canada,
caneta
court
and
it
is
a
private
street
or
not
a
public
street,
and
this
request
is
to
create
a
second
lot
from
the
one
that's
outlined
in
the
back
of
the
backyard
to
build
a
new
duplex.
It's
a
planned
development
to
create
a
new
lot.
That
does
not
front
a
public
street,
and
this
is
for
the
purposes
of
constructing
a
new
two-family
dwelling
or
a
duplex
that
would
front
and
face
kinetic
court
again.
J
J
J
J
J
J
There
are
no
parking
signs
posted
on
canada
court,
so
any
vehicles
parking
there
on
the
street
aren't
really
supposed
to
be
there,
but
it's
not
a
public
street.
Therefore,
there's
always
confusion
as
to
whether
or
not
city
police
could
enforce
the
civic
enforcement
can
enforcing
no
parking
restrictions
because
it's
a
private
street.
J
The
other
issue
raised
by
the
neighbors
is
the
ownership
of
canadian
court.
There
is
claim
that
it
is
owned
by
a
private
individual.
The
applicant
has
done
some
extensive
research
with
their
title
company
and
found
that
it
is
actually
not
owned
by
a
specific
individual
and
it's
not
owned
by
by
anybody.
J
Feel
that,
with
the
size
of
the
proposed
lot,
it
fits
in
with
the
existing
lots
that
are
the
existing
size
and
shape
of
the
lots
that
are
already
on
kinetic
court.
The
same
amount
of
parking
will
be
provided
as
long
as
residents
park
off
the
street.
Then
it
shouldn't
create
too
much
of
an
additional
impact.
Yes,
there
will
be
impact
with
additional
vehicles,
but
not
to
the
level
that
staff
felt
this
project
could
be
denied.
J
J
J
A
K
K
K
When
we
initially
looked
at
this
development
and
we've
looked
at
the
neighborhood
in
the
street,
we
did
notice
that
there
was
an
issue
with
the
on-street
parking,
as
casey
indicated
I
went
there
yesterday
took
a
few
pictures.
Some
of
the
existing
development
and
in
their
planning
just
did
not
account
for
any
off-street
parking.
Here's
one
structure
as
an
example
that
has
one
garage
and
one
parking
space
now
now
kinetic
core
itself.
K
K
So
here
here's
a
little
diagram
that
I
was
just
highlighting
some
items
from
the
site
site
plan.
We
have
the
one
car
parking
in
the
garages
parking
in
front
of
the
new
structure
and
then
the
intent
on
this.
This
actually
says
three
stalls,
but
our
intent
was
to
have
one
more
behind
it
with
a
transition
space
here.
K
So
we
would
have
these
parking
available
and
then
we
would
also
like
to
add
this
covered
bike
parking
which
would
help
to
encourage
any
residents
to
use
public
transit
and
be
able
to
have
have
a
place
to
put
an
e
or
a
bicycle
and
and
then
these
blue
circles,
our
intent
is
to
put
up
a
sign
that
says
no
parking.
We
have
a
contract
with
legacy
towing
that
they
will
come
and
help
us
enforce
this
and
any
any
issues
any
of
our
residents
that
park
on
the
street.
K
We
will
commit
to
enforce
towing
of
those
vehicles
and,
if
any
neighbors
see
any
vehicles
there,
if
they
contact
us,
we
will
enforce
this
and-
and
our
thought
is,
this
will
help
the
situation
with
the
neighborhood,
as
we
are
adding
additional
off-street
parking,
helping
with
the
enforceability
of
this
similar
to
what
casey
brought
up
in
terms
of
the
size.
The
size
of
our
lot
is
the
same
size
as
these
three
buildings
here,
but
we'll
only
have
two
structures
and
we're
leaving
one
of
these
space
a
lot.
K
K
I
think
this
will
help
to
encourage
our
residents
to
use
public
transportation
so
really
for
us
in
closing
we're
excited
about
the
development
and
and
we're
confident
with
our
development
and
with
the
careful
planning.
That's
been
put
into
this,
that
it
will
actually
improve
the
neighborhood
from
an
aesthetic
standpoint
and
also
help
set
a
good
foundation
for
addressing
any
parking
issues
on
connecticut.
K
B
J
Madam
chair,
this
is
casey
stewart
again.
Yes,
I
want
to
add
that
I
did
receive
some
public
comment
that
I
put
in
your
dropbox
folder.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
people
were
aware
of
those
one
set
of
comments
from
adidas
seed
who
lives
on
isabella
court,
which
was
just
up
from
the
court
and
from
a
property
owner
across
the
street
from
the
proposal
danella
idea
and
regard
regarding
questioning
the
ownership
of
the
street.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
people
were
aware
of
those.
A
I
I
L
L
So
I
I
just
don't
see
that
this
meets
the
purpose
statement
of
enabling
the
development
to
be
compatible
with
adjacent
and
nearby
land
developments.
It
certainly
meets
the
city's
stated
policy
of
increasing
density,
but
these
are
very
large
units.
They
are
not
accessory
dwelling
units
and
I
do
not
believe
that
the
the
demands
for
parking
can
be
met
by
the
in
the
enclosed
garage.
I
M
Awesome
so
I
I
spoke
with
casey
about
this
project
received
a
postcard
in
the
mail
had
no
knowledge
of
it.
Until
then,
I
I
want
to
go
back
to
what
the
developer
said
about
the
parking
issues
and
suggesting
a
towing
company
holy
cow
that
will
just
make
the
situation
a
thousand
times
worse.
So
parking
is
an
enormous
source
of
tension
on
this
block.
There
have
been
times
when
I've
walked
by
and
seen
the
police
intervening
between
neighbors,
because
neighbors
could
not
get
access
to
their
property.
M
M
There
are
no
sidewalks,
my
neighbor
shamie
who's
trying
to
get
on
this
call
and
can't
I
hope
she
can,
but
you
know
they-
people
drive
over
her
tiny
little
garden
in
the
front
of
her
house
all
the
time.
It's
it's.
It's
people
get
stuck
all
the
time
on
this
block,
and
this
proposal
will
just
make
that
a
thousand
times
worse
and
it's
really
the
the
added
parking
that
the
developer
shows
is
not
practical.
You
have
car
behind
car.
That's
that's!
You
know,
that's
not
really
a
workable
solution.
M
Also
the
little
add-on
of
bike
locks.
You
can't
lock
bikes
up
around
here,
they'll
get
stolen.
I
just
don't
see
these
actually
well,
and
I
wonder,
is
this
affordable
housing?
Probably
not,
but
it's
just
cramming
too
much
into
too
small
of
a
space.
Our
block
has
been
under
construction
for
the
last
really
seven
years,
and
we
have
that
like
this
is
the
last
little
space
you
could
develop.
Actually
we're
infilled
to
the
max
we've
lost
over
25
mature
trees.
M
M
The
other
thing
you
should
know
is
that
there's
no
on-street
parking
available
to
the
public
anywhere
on
this
entire
10-acre
block.
There's
no
parking
on
fist
south
there's
no
parking
on
the
other
streets
because
of
judge
memorial
high
school.
So
it's
all
permit
parking.
So
there's
really
there's
no
give
here.
So
one
compromise
is
for
them
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
propose
an
adu
like
cindy.
Cromer
was
talking
about
something
smaller.
A
M
I
Okay
on
you
know,
I'm
I'm
trying
to
it
show
me
I
unfortunately,
I'm
not
able.
I
see
you
on
the
list,
I'm
not
able
to
unmute
you.
I've
asked
casey
stewart
to
see
if
he
can
get
your
phone
number
and
maybe
we
can
try
to
call
you
and
I
can
put
you
on
speaker
phone
or
something,
but
in
the
meantime,
let's
go
with
rebecca
moore.
C
Hi
yeah
data
said
a
lot
of
what
I
was
going
to
say,
so
I
won't
repeat
that,
but
one
of
the
biggest
I
live
at
the
very
end
of
the
street
and
trying
to
of
course
trying
to
get
in
and
out
often
is
a
mess
where
I've
had
to
go
around
the
block
several
times
to
get
in.
But
my
one
of
my
biggest
concerns
is
emergency
vehicles
and,
of
course,
the
garbage
trucks.
C
It's
really
hard
for
them
to
get
down
there
in
the
first
place,
and
we've
had
a
couple
instances
where
an
emergency
vehicle
needed
to
get
down
the
street
and
couldn't
and
a
couple
of
us
on
the
end
of
the
street
are
older
and
maybe
in
need
of
that
emergency.
Of
course,
any
of
us
could
be
need
that
at
any
time,
but
if
the
emergency
vehicle
has
to
stay
out
on
the
street
and
then
run
in
you
know,
that's
that's
a
life-threatening
situation.
C
A
C
N
N
I
appreciate
that
roy
pointed
out
the
access
to
tracks
he
did
miss
one
additional
public
transit
access
as
well
on
900,
east
north
south
is
part
of
the
frequent
transit
bus
network
and
that's
accessible
through
a
pedestrian
walkway
that
it
looks
like
goes
down
the
hill
on
1000
east
and
that's
a
10
minute,
walk
from
this
location
as
well.
I
think
this
is
the
perfect
location
for
increased
density.
I
think
this
is
a
big
lot
again.
I
I
think
the
the
mean.
N
The
only
reason
we're
here
is
the
not
not
facing
the
public
street.
I
don't
think
that's.
I
don't
really
think
that's
a
barrier
given
how
big
this
lot
is.
The
houses
to
the
south
are
much
closer
together
and
this,
this
kind
of
has
basically
a
parking
lot
between
the
that
the
house
that
sits
currently
on
a
lot
and
the
house
of
the
south.
N
I
think
this
would
be
a
great
place
for
someone
who
works
at
you
to
live.
I
think
that
would
be
a
very
transit,
accessible,
potentially
even
walkable
commute,
I
believe
we
use
probably
less
than
a
30
minute
walk
from
the
slot.
I
think
this
is
very.
We
need
density
and
I
think
if
we
don't
split
lots
like
this
and
make
some
more
housing
and
we're
just
gonna
spiral
into
unaffordability-
and
this
is
gonna-
be
a
million
dollar
house
in
the
next
10
years.
N
I
C
C
Allowed
the
building
of
a
second
property
on
what
used
to
be
five
to
four
planet
accord
right
across
the
street
for
me
so
another.
I
think
it's
called
518
now
that
was
built
and
after
that
we've
had
about
10
or
12
cars
parked
on
the
street
right
in
front
of
me
that
block
access
to
garbage
trucks
and
recycling
and
those
things
as
well
as
our
regular
cars
coming
in
and
out,
and
I
often
see
people
fighting
on
the
road,
especially
now
that
I'm
working
from.
C
If
they're
not
they
turn
around
and
leave,
and
I
am
just
worried
that
at
some
point,
they're
going
to
tell
us
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
have
service
anymore,
just
like
the
street
next
to
us
that
dida
lives
on-
and
I
moved
here
in
2002
and
the
two
lots
in
front
of
me:
five,
eight
524
and
the
current
duplets
that
they're
thinking
of
developing
had
a
yard
about
as
big
as
mine,
and
they
allowed
that
524
to
build
518
and
they're.
Just
plain
too
many
people
on
the
street.
C
A
A
B
I
B
That's
an
it's
an
awful
idea.
It's
there
have
been,
and
certainly
altercations,
even
in
on
our
little
road
into
our
court,
and
I
just
don't
see
that
this
is
going
to
be
solved
by
because
what
I
understand
from
the
planning
document
is
that
there
will
not
be
an
increase
in
the
number
of
parking
spots
available,
but
there
will
be
two
more
families
moving
in.
A
F
K
Yes,
so
when,
when
we
started
this
proposal,
that's
when
we
learned
that
it
was
not
a
public
street
that
was
a
private
street.
So
then
our
next
natural
course
was
okay,
whose
street
is
it
and
we
we
did
some
extensive
title
search
with
cottonwood
title
searching
for
the
ownership
of
this,
and
they
found
abandonment
of
that
where
it
was
a
previously
city
property
and
one
of
the
neighbors
I
spoke
to.
There
are
no
no
parking
signs
along
the
street.
K
They
said
there
was
a
point
in
time
when
the
city
was
enforcing,
that
and
and
now
it's
a
private
street
that
is
unclaimed
there.
There
is
an
individual
that
told
us
when
he
bought
his
home
on
the
street,
that
he
was
told
that
the
whole
street
came
with
his
home.
We
had
the
title
company
pull
up
the
deeds
to
his
home,
to
see
if
there
was
any
type
of
legal
description
or
right
of
way
included
with
those
deeds,
and
nothing
was
there
and
talking
with
that
individual.
K
K
A
J
This
is
casey
in
response
to
your
question
about
if
it
were
a
public
street
where
the
city
allowed
this
yeah,
it's
somewhat
hard
to
answer.
It
certainly
doesn't
meet
the
standards
for
a
public
street
and
width
and
improvements,
but
if
it
were,
if
it
were
a
public
right-of-way,
then
we
wouldn't
be
here
at
this
hearing,
because
they
would
meet
all
the
zoning
requirements.
It
would
front
a
public
street
and
they
would
just
go
for
a
permit
to
start
building
or
well
they
would
they
would
create
the
lot.
J
Right
and
one
of
those
standards
is
that
it's
from
the
public
street,
typically
on
an
infield
project
like
this.
It's
where
this
conditions
are
there
there's
a
little
more
scrutiny.
If
it
were
a
open
field
and
you
were
putting
in
new
streets,
then
they
would
all
be
designed
according
to
city
requirements,
but
the
city
would
probably
still
be
inclined
to
approve
this
because
it
meets
utility
requirements,
access
requirements
lot
size,
there's
nothing
really
substantial
to
deny
a
subdivision.
J
B
J
F
I
mean
I
know
this
body
has
required
and
other
I
mean
are
coming
through.
I
mean
even
the
staff
recommendations
that
other
kind
of
lots
that
didn't
face
a
public
street
that
there
was
some
sort
of
easement
or
access
for
all
these
lots
to
a
public
street.
This
clearly
has
it
on
the
private
street.
You
clearly
can
access
it,
but
then
there
will
be
a
legal
right
to
access
it.
B
No,
but
this
was
probably
it's
a
comment
in
this
part
of
town,
where
you
have
to
go
all
the
way
back
to
the
original
plot
and
chain
title
from
that
point
forward
to
figure
this
out
and
it
is
a
it
is
a
conundrum.
But
it's
it's
not
an
easy
question
to
answer
when
there's
no
clear
chain
of
title,
so
I
I
understand
the
predicament.
A
O
O
L
I
I
There
is
just
no
information
legal
descriptions
in
the
chain
of
title
anything
on
this
street
and
it's
a
it
is
a
pretty
common
thing
around
the
city.
We'll
point
out
that
I
believe
the
the
subject:
property
casey,
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
or
the
applicant
but
the
subject,
property
does
currently
access
connect
accord
for
parking,
so
they
have
and
I'm
getting
a
little
out
of
my
realm,
but
probably
can
show
that
they
have
some
defective
rights.
I
guess
to
the
use
of
connected
court
to
access
or
for
access.
I
J
And
to
follow
up
on
that,
the
information
that
I'm
referencing
is
the
the
city
maintains
a
a
private
streets,
inventory
document
and
that's
what
I'm
referring
to,
because
research
was
done
at
some
point.
So
paul
just
you
know,
I'm
looking
at
that
document
and
that
accords
on
there
isabella
cord
is
on
there.
A
A
K
A
Actually
I'm
asking
corey
is
you
know
you
have
a
three
bedroom
units
here
and
suppose
three
unrelated
people
occupy
those
bedrooms
and
you
have
three
cars.
Can
you
can
you
tell
the
tenants?
I'm
sorry,
the
first
guy
gets
the
parking
place
space
and
the
rest
of
you
do
not
get
a
parking
space.
Is
that
I
mean
that's
reasonable?
That's
not
discriminatory
right!
No.
K
A
K
K
E
B
O
O
G
This
is
nick,
I
think,
we're
we're
comfortable
with
enforcing
conditions
when
those
conditions
relate
to
qualifying
for
a
standard,
reducing
an
impact
etc.
So
the
only
thing
that
we
could
do,
though,
is
that
that
commission
would
only
apply
to
the
subject
properties
within
the
plan
development
and
not
the
other
properties.
B
G
B
O
O
B
F
K
K
A
B
E
A
C
A
B
E
A
A
H
H
H
H
H
H
Here's
a
basic
site
layout.
These
are
two
build,
or
there
are
two
buildings
intersected
by
a
mid-block
walkway.
The
buildings
will
have
an
amenity
deck
on
level.
Three
that
will
tie
the
two
buildings
together.
The
mid-block
walkway
will
connect
with
the
mid-block
walkway,
provided
with
the
alta
gateway
apartments,
which
are
just
north
of
this
proposal.
H
H
H
The
applicant
is
requesting
modification
for
the
following
items
through
the
design
review
process,
they're
proposing
to
use
fiber
cement,
siding
and
panels
primarily
on
the
upper
levels
as
well
as
middle
panels
on
portions
of
the
ground
level.
Facade,
fiber,
cement
and
metal
panels
are
not
listed
as
a
durable
material
in
the
gmu
zone,
but
would
be
considered
other
materials
that
can
be
allowed
through
the
design
review
process.
H
H
H
H
Staff
feels
that
the
proposal
generally
meets
design,
review
and
plan
development
standards
and
where
standards
are
not
being
met.
Modification
has
been
requested
through
the
design,
review
process
and
staff
is
recommending
that
the
planning
commission
approve
the
design,
review
and
plan
development
applications
subject
to
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff,
and
that
is
all
that
I
have.
H
P
Madam
chair,
thank
you
very
much.
It
looks
like
chris
has
made
me
the
presenter
here,
so
I
can
hopefully
share
a
couple
of
things.
I
will
be
fairly
brief.
First
off,
madam
chair
and
commissioners,
thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening.
I
appreciate
you
hearing
this
matter
as
a
salt
lake
city
resident.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
what
you
do
for
the
the
city
for
us
appreciate
your
service
with
me
tonight.
P
I
think
that
I'll
try
and
keep
my
marks
brief,
so
that
we
can
keep
the
shorting
or
the
meeting
short
as
well.
For
us,
this
site
is,
is
actually
really
exciting
and
a
big
part
of
that
is
the
central
warehouse.
This
is
an
incredible
incredibly
cool
building.
The
inside
of
it
is
cooler
than
the
outside.
P
The
inside
of
this
building
was
is
poured
in
place,
board
form
architectural,
concrete,
something
that
we
would
spend
tremendous
dollars
to
try
and
replicate
and
duplicate
today,
and
then,
as
chris
showed
you
in
the
photos,
most
of
the
surrounding
area
is
vacant
land.
So
what
we
wanted
to
do
is
figure
out
how
to
integrate
the
new
project
around
the
central
warehouse
and
really
allow
the
central
warehouse
to
be
the
focal
point
of
this
project.
P
From
that
perspective,
we
do
believe
it
contributes
to
this
neighborhood,
which
is
why
we
are
really
focusing
our
design
around
this
site.
A
couple
of
other
points
just
quickly
to
address,
and
then
I've
got
bj
lativir
of
dwell,
ready
to
present
anything
specific
or
answer
any
questions
currently,
as
you
can
see,
there's
an
existing
easement
for
that
public.
Right-Of-Way.
That's
way
over
here
toward
the
western
third
of
the
site,
we've
talked
to
staff,
we've
talked
to
those
who
we
need
to.
P
This
does
serve
as
an
ingress
egress
to
our
parking
garages
or
a
couple
of
the
ingress
egress
points
to
the
parking
garage.
So
as
you'll
see
here
for
us,
it
was
critical
to
figure
out
a
way
to
delineate
two
residents,
two
people
entering
the
garage
that
this
is
still
intended
to
be
a
more
of
a
pedestrian
scale,
pedestrian
space,
so
paving
patterns
lighting,
graphics
lighting,
underneath
the
bridge
that
exists
here.
P
P
Here
this
is
a
rendering,
so
the
leasing
office
on
one
side
of
that
some
of
the
clubhouse
common
area
amenity
space
on
the
other
side,
and
then
this
is
up
through
the
alta
depot
and
the
alta
gateway
buildings
as
you're.
Looking
back
north
toward
first
south
we've
been
through
the
zone,
we've
been
through.
The
staff
report
again
appreciate
what
chris
has
done.
P
As
you
can
see
the
faint
imagery
back
here,
but
I
think
chris
has
done
a
great
job
of
of
helping
us
understand
what
is
necessary
what's
required
and
how
we
can
make
certain
that
this
project
lives
well
on
this
block
it
it
supports,
as
as
chris
mentioned,
and
supports
initiatives
and
complies
with
downtown
area
plan,
the
master
plan,
the
the
growing
salt
lake
plan,
the
five-year
housing
plan.
So
we
are
we're
excited
about
this.
I
think
to
chris's
comment
where
we
have
proposed
the
alternate
materials.
P
It's
generally
up
on
the
third
through
seventh
floors,
so
it's
out
of
a
pedestrian
scale
and
its
materials
and
materiality
and
fenestration
that
have
been
approved
in
this
district
and
that
we
find
appropriate
for
this
district,
but
generally
down
at
that
second
level.
Pedestrian
scale,
you're,
finding
the
glazing,
you're,
finding
concrete
brick,
something
that
harkens
back
to
the
warehouse
district,
that
this
block
once
was
bj.
If
there's
anything
that
you
think
I've
missed,
we
can
certainly
ask.
P
A
P
A
A
L
And
I
want
to
provide
some
context
about
how
I
see
this
proposal
fitting
in
with
some
others.
One
of
my
favorite
large
developments
is
the
violin
school
commons,
which
features
the
building
designed
by
slack
winburn
as
the
northwest
pipeline
building
subsequently
called
public
safety
building,
and
that
project
also
has
some
public
walkways
in
it,
and
the
historic
building
by
slackbend
is
featured.
L
Another
opportunity
that
I
want
to
highlight
is
the
rda
project
area
to
the
south,
one
where
there
is
a
historic
mattress
factory,
and
so
there
are
these
business
and
commercial
buildings
that
are
featured
in
new
projects
and
well,
I'm
jumping
the
gun
on
the
mattress
factory,
because
that
one
is
at
risk.
But
at
any
rate,
the
violin
school
commons
features
the
slack
win
burn
design.
L
This
one
will
feature
the
building
built
by
george
chandler,
and
I
did
ask
the
staff
to
put
in
your
dropbox
some
information
about
who
chandler
was
so
the
guy
that
built
this
building
was
a
business
person.
He
had
various
enterprises
in
bingham
and
he
set
up
two
banks
in
the
state
of
utah,
so
he
was
a
mover
and
shaker
and
he
built
a
very
solid
building
that
will
now
anchor
this
project
and
I'm
extremely
excited
about
this
and,
I
didn't
say
anything
negative
or
critical.
The
whole
time.
Thank
you.
N
I
I
think
that
this
is
one
of
those
zones,
that's
so
easy
to
mess
up,
as
we've
seen
at
evidence
by
like
the
hardware
district,
I'm
really
glad
that
there's
some
mixed
use
included
with
this.
I
know
that's
not
required
and
that's
kind
of
why
we've
seen
the
hardware
district
turn
into,
I
believe
a
couple
planning
commissions
ago.
I've
called
them
dorms
surrounding
parking
lots,
and
I
think
that
this
is
very
much
not
that
I
I
want
to
say
I
I
really
love
that
the
restaurant's
on
the
corner.
N
I
swear
if
you
guys
put
that
leasing
office
on
the
corner.
I
was
going
to
be
so
upset
about
this
and
I'm
glad
that
it's
not
on
the
corner.
With
that
being
said,
there
were
some
things
that
I
saw.
I
really
wish
the
historic
building
was
not
an
amenity
space.
I
really
wish
that
was
a
public
space,
maybe
like
repurposed
as
a
restaurant,
or
something
like
that,
something
like
squatters.
N
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
use
for
that
space
and
it
would
be
much
better
than
like
a
gym
or
whatever
your
plans
are
for
it.
At
the
same
time,
this
this
project
does
have
my
cardinal
sin
of
parking,
which
is
using
transportation
demand
strategies
to
increase
the
maximum
amount
of
parking
allowed.
N
I
I
A
I
I
I
do
have
one
point.
One
point
I'd
like
to
raise
to
see
if
any
of
the
commissioners
agree
with
with
my
assessment
of
this,
the
building
is
broken
up
into
two
masses,
which
we
like
a
lot,
but
because
of
the
the
deck,
I
don't
know
what
you
want
to
call
it.
What
do
you
call
it?
The
courtyard
that's
on
the
third
floor.
A
A
P
Okay,
I
can
we
can
get
bj
as
well.
We
certainly
wanted
to
be
mindful
of
that.
I
think
to
to
zachary's
point,
which
I
appreciate
and
I'm
happy
to
address
a
couple
of
his
questions
or
comments
as
well.
I
appreciate
that
he
as
well
as
cindy
and
michael,
would
come
out
and
share
their
thoughts.
We
always
want
individuals
to
be
engaged
in
the
process
with
us,
because
we
have
the
leasing
office
at
that
location
and
a
restaurant
at
the
other
end,
and
then
this
is
the
main
garage
entrance.
P
We
actually
felt
like
an
appropriate
spot
for
an
uber
or
lift
or
car
share
drop
off,
would
be
appropriate
right
here
in
this
area
and
so
creating
then
a
canopy.
That's
about
25
30
feet
deep,
felt
appropriate
without
blocking
the
entirety
of
this
alley
and
then
making
instead
of
a
canopy
or
two
canopies
that
don't
connect.
P
This
also
helped
with
overall
building
circulation,
multiple
points
of
ingress
and
egress
and
that
connectivity
bj,
if
you
think
I've
missed
anything,
I
see
you
on
now,
so
you
could
probably
opine,
but
I
think
those
were
the
two
main
points
as
to
why
we
we
did
make
that
deck
connect.
We
want
to
introduce
landscaping
on
it.
We
want
the
glass
railing
trying
to
minimize
it
to
the
the
best
that
we
can,
but
those
are
the
two
reasons
that
we
approached
it.
That
way.
E
Motion,
I
think,
in
my
case,
cindy
made
a
very
solid
argument.
I,
like
the
project,
looks
very
nice.
I
did
make
note
of
the
of
that
which
you
mentioned.
Let
them
share
about
the
terrace
little
terrace,
but
I
don't
think
it's
a
major
issue,
it's
above
ground
and
the
explanation
that
we
receive
from
the
applicant
seems
to
resolve
that
issue.
E
E
Yeah,
I
think
the
massing
of
it
in
3d,
I
get
the
elevation
that
looks
a
little
bit
monotonous,
but
I
think
the
3d
masking
is
is
actually
assembled
pretty.
Well,
I
you
know,
I
I
think
the
ground
level
is,
I
guess
my
way,
I'm
always
hesitant
when
you
see
a
lot
of
change
in
material
and
a
lot
of
monotonous
kind
of
repetitive
elements,
but
I
think
this
has
broken
up
fairly
well
for
me,
but
I
just
want
to
make
that
comment.
A
A
B
B
A
P
A
Q
Okay,
thank
you
good
evening.
So
this
is
a
petition
for
conditional
use
for
a
detached
adu
to
be
placed
in
the
rear
yard
of
the
existing
single-family
dwelling
lot
located
approximately
1792
south
and
2100
east.
The
subject
parcel
is
zoned.
R1,
7000,
single
family,
residential
and
staff
is
recommending
approval
with
conditions.
Q
Thank
you,
so
the
proposed
detached
adu
would
be
located
in
this
notch
off
of
the
rear
yard.
So
this
site
plan
is
flipped
a
little
bit
on
on
this
side.
You
can
see
that
north
is
facing
up
and
the
notch
is
to
the
south
and
then,
when
we
come
down
to
the
site,
planets
it's
flipped
a
little
bit,
so
the
entrance
will
face
north
towards
the
existing
detached
two-car
garage,
and
this
existing
single-family
dwelling
on
the
d80
would
be
approximately
650
square
feet
with
a
pitched
roof
and
is
approximately
17
feet
in
height.
Q
Q
Q
There
are
also
several
windows
on
the
rear,
right
and
left
facades
that
will
need
to
be
glazed
to
meet
the
requirements
because
they
are
within
10
feet
of
a
side
or
rear
property
line,
and
the
primary
building
material
is
vinyl,
siding
so
for
the
existing
or
for
the
site
photographs.
This
first
one
shows
the
primary
residence
on
the
subject
property
and
you
can
also
see
the
driveway
and
then
the
existing
two-car
garage
in
the
back.
Q
So
this
is
a
new
duplex,
that's
being
built
and
they
also
have
a
detached
garage.
The
adu
would
fit
just
behind
this
property.
So
if
you
can
imagine
here's
the
driveway
and
then
that
little
notch
is
just
behind
this
new,
this
new
duplex
and
garage
and
then
image
four
I'm
putting
on
here
to
show
the
street
parking
looking
south.
One
of
the
concerns
in
the
public
comments
was
with
street
parking
and
that
there
wasn't
enough,
so
this
photo
was
taken
on
a
weekday
at
noon
and
the
image
looking
north
didn't
show
any
cars.
Q
Q
So
during
the
public
engagement
process,
staff
received
two
comments
related
to
the
proposal.
One
of
them
was
concerned
with
the
proposal
and
described
issues
with
adus
in
general
and
then
specifically
street
parking
for
this
proposal
and
worries
about
2100,
east
congestion
and
then
staff
received
another
comment
that
was
worried
about
the
ability
to
keep
chickens
on
his
property,
which
neighbors
neighbors
the
site
and
staff
determined
that
this
adu.
Q
And
then,
following
the
publishing
of
the
staff
report,
we
received
an
additional
comment
that
discussed
concerns,
and
this
is
in
your
dropbox
account
that
discuss
concerns
with
tracking
and
enforcement
of
adus
and
how
how
they
are
tracked
and
enforced
upon.
If
something,
if
they're
not
meeting
the
obligations
of
the
staff
report
and
the
conditions
the
applicant
also
presented
at
a
sugar
house
community
council
meeting,
the
discussion
focused
mostly
on
parking.
Q
A
G
G
My
name
is
wes
brown
and
my
wife
is
debbie
first,
I
would
like
to
thank
the
commission
for
their
time
and
consideration
of
this
conditional
use
permit
being
respectful
of
your
time.
I
will
be
brief.
Less
than
two
minutes
not
ten,
we
would
like
to
build
an
adu
for
the
following
four
reasons:
one
consistent
with
the
intent
of
the
adu
statute.
It
will
increase
the
availability
of
affordable
housing,
which
is
greatly
lacking
in
this
part
of
the
city.
Two.
G
It
is
the
highest
and
best
use
for
this
odd
extension
of
the
back
part
of
our
lot,
which
has
previously
had
little
purpose
three.
It
will
provide
much
needed
additional
income
as
a
long-term
rental
unit,
given
my
unanticipated
early
retirement
two
years
ago,
or
it
will
increase
the
value
of
our
property,
significantly
adding
additional
additional
security
to
our
financial
situation.
G
Regarding
the
impact
on
the
neighborhood,
I
have
three
points
one.
It
will
be
nearly
invisible
from
the
street
and
therefore
have
no
effect
on
the
appearance
of
the
neighborhood
two.
Even
with
the
adu,
there
will
be
off-street
paved
parking
for
up
to
10
vehicles
with
unimpeded
access.
The
two
spaces
shown
to
the
east
of
the
adu
three
additional
spaces
between
the
adu
and
the
garage
along
the
west
side,
two
spaces
in
the
garage
and
three
spaces
in
front
of
the
house.
In
the
second
lane
of
the
driveway.
G
Therefore,
there
will
be
zero
impact
on
street
parking,
except
potentially
for
brief
periods
during
construction,
and
also
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
there's
a
bus
stop
right
next
door
and
third,
I
submit
that
the
only
appreciable
impact
on
the
neighborhood
will
be
increased
property
values
as
a
rising
tide
lifts
all
ships.
Thank
you.
A
D
Thank
you
judy
short,
I'm
the
land
use
chair
for
the
sugar
house,
community
council.
We
notice
this
the
same
way.
We
do
other
projects
put
in
a
newsletter
and
flyers
on
the
porch.
We
had
the
applicant
at
the
land
use
committee.
You
already
heard
that,
and
we
had
some
of
the
neighbors
also
in
attendance.
D
D
However,
he
said
one
one
door
goes
upstairs.
One
door
goes
to
the
basement
with
a
shared
landing
right
inside
the
door
that
it's
not
in
fact
a
duplex,
even
though
it
has
a
smaller
kitchen
at
the
bottom.
He
explained
that
he
has
a
number
of
children
and
they
often
come
with
their
families
and
grandchildren,
and
it's
a
great
place
to
have
spillover
extra
kitchen
space.
D
If
the
ad
is
behind
that,
it
would
be
three
on
that
parcel,
not
realizing
that
that
parcel
belonged
to
mr
brown
and
not
to
1802
to
the
south.
So
I
think
we
got
all
that
cleared
up,
and
mr
brown
told
us
the
same
story
about
the
huge
driveway
and
there
would
be
no
parking
impact,
and
I
told
the
neighbors
that
if
there
was
they
could
go
talk
to
mr
brown.
I
N
All
right,
zachary,
dusal
speaking
in
favor
of
application.
I
I
want
to
express
apologies
to
the
landowner
for
all
of
the
comments
about
parking.
Apparently,
sugar
house
isn't
really
satisfied
unless
you
build
an
underground
parking
garage
on
your
car
under
your
property
but
like,
like
the
like,
the
presenter,
said:
there's
plenty
of
off
street
parking
on
this
lot.
This
this
lot
actually
has
a
a
closer
uta
bus
route
than
I
do,
and
I
live
downtown.
N
It's
a
10
minute,
10
minute
to
the
university
utah
10
minutes
to
downtown
sugar
house
with
15
minute
frequencies
peak
and
it's
less
than
a
two
minute
walk
outside
the
front
door
of
this
property.
My
only
regret
is
that
this
isn't
higher
density.
I
think
that
a
15-minute
bus
route
could
support
at
least
a
duplex,
in
addition
to
an
adu
and
there's
also
the
the
bike
lanes
that
are
on
2100
east.
B
Emotion
unless
there's
discussion,
I'm
willing
to
make
a
motion
go
ahead.
Adrian,
based
on
the
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing,
I
knew
that
the
planning
commission
approve
the
conditional
use
request,
bln
pcm
2020-0830,
as
proposed,
subject
to
complying
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report.