►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - May 12, 2021
Description
Salt Lake City Planning Commission Meeting - May 12, 2021
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
A
A
A
A
A
So
thank
you
all
for
coming
michaela.
Would
you
like
to
tell
people
again
about
how
to
access
the
meeting
if
they're,
watching
on
tv
or
in
some
other
way.
B
I'd
be
happy
to
marlene,
would
you
mind
sharing
that
screen
just
super
briefly
for
those
that
may
be
watching
from
home.
B
This
is
an
electronic
meeting.
Yep
perfectly.
You
can
join
the
link,
we're
going
to
take
this
screen
down
pretty
quickly,
but
you
can
visit
our
website
and
join
a
link.
Go
to
salt
lake
city
planning,
commission
may
12th
agenda
and
that's
slc.gov
public
meetings,
slash
planning,
commission
agendas
find
tonight's
agenda
and
that
link
is
right
there
as
soon
as
this
goes
down.
B
If
you
have
any
comments,
if
you,
if
you
need
to
leave
the
meeting,
but
you
want
to
leave
a
comment
for
the
record,
we
can
read
that
for
you
or
if
you
need
some
sort
of
assistance,
we
are
monitoring
our
email.
Please
send
an
email
to
planning
dot
comments
at
slcgov.com.
B
It
looks
like
we
have
a
number
of
attendees
on
tonight.
So
can
you
go
to
the
next
screen?
Please
marlene.
B
When
it
when
the
chair
opens
the
public
hearing,
and
you
would
like
to
speak,
I
I
will
be
looking
at
this
list
of
your
names
and
I
need
to
see
your
hand
up,
and
if
you
look
at
the
screen,
there's
a
tiny
little
red
box
with
a
hand.
Please
click
that
hand.
So
we
know
that
you
want
to
speak
to
that
matter
and
when
you're
done
speaking,
if
you
could
actually
put
your
hand
down,
that
would
also
be
helpful.
A
Thanks
makayla,
so
I'm
going
to
call
for
an
approval
of
the
minutes
for
april
28
2021..
A
B
A
B
A
Okay,
the
motion
passes
six
to
zero
and
now
for
the
report
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair,
I
have
nothing
to
report
amy
vice
chair
to
you.
Thank
you
and
the
report
of
the
director.
A
F
So,
thank
you.
This
is
a
proposal
for
a
planned
development
hold
on
just
one
second,
for
a
greenhouse
at
neighborhood
house
at
10,
50,
west
500,
south
you
can
see
the
property
and
the
proposed
location
of
the
greenhouse
on
the
aerial
photo.
Neighborhood
house
is
located
on
the
north
side
of
500
south,
it's
east
of
the
jordan
river
and
west
of
goshen
street.
The
site
is
approximately
five
and
a
half
acres
and
the
property,
and
the
surrounding
I'm
sorry
and
just
the
property
is
zone
institutional
and
the
surrounding
properties
are
primarily
zoned
residential.
F
The
proposal
is
for
a
20
by
48
foot,
960
square
feet,
total
greenhouse
with
a
height
of
approximately
17
feet.
The
plan
development
is
required
because
the
proposal
does
not
meet
the
required
corner
side
to
accept
back
that
the
greenhouse
is
set
back
as
far
as
the
principal
structure
on
the
site.
F
The
photograph
on
the
left
shows
the
location
of
the
proposed
greenhouse.
It
would
be
located
to
the
right
of
the
portion
of
the
building
that
has
brick
on
the
first
floor
and
in
front
of
the
portion
of
the
in
front
of
this
portion
of
the
building.
As
you
can
see
in
the
photo
on
the
right,
the
primary
access
to
neighborhood
house
is
from
the
two
entrances
that
face
200,
500,
south.
F
These
photos
show
the
adjacent
properties
the
photo
on
the
left
shows
the
house
to
the
north
and
the
proposed
greenhouse
would
be
set
back
approximately
nine
feet
further
from
the
front
facade
of
this
building
and
the
photo
on
the
right
shows.
The
houses
across
the
street
from
the
proposed
greenhouse
in
this
slide
on
the
left
is
the
site
plan
for
the
proposal.
The
greenhouse
is
shown
to
the
upper
right
and
the
principal
building
is
to
the
left.
F
On
this
slide.
The
top
image
is
the
goshen
street
elevation
and
shows
the
proposed
greenhouse
in
context
with
the
principal
structure.
You
can
see
that
it's
located
to
the
rear
of
the
front
portion
of
the
building
and
the
bottom
image
shows
the
500
south
elevation
and
the
location
of
the
proposed
greenhouse
to
the
east
of
the
principal
structure,
and
so
in
the
staff
report.
There
are
two
issues
that
were
identified.
The
first
is
compliance
with
adopted
master
plans
and
staff
finds.
F
The
second
issue
is
the
requested
modification
to
the
required
setback
and
prior
to
the
submittal
of
the
planned
development
application
staff
from
the
applicant
explored.
Several
alternatives,
including
one,
would
be
to
move
the
greenhouse
to
the
west,
which
was
not
preferred
because
it
would
block
sunlight
and
take
away
from
existing
program
spaces
and
a
second
was
to
construct
a
connection
from
the
principal
structure
to
the
greenhouse
making
it
a
part
of
the
principle
structure,
and
this
was
not
preferred
because
it
would
require
modifications
to
existing
doors
and
windows.
F
F
Two
of
those
emails
were
included
with
the
staff
report
and
one
was
in
the
dropbox,
folder
and
all
were
in
support
of
the
proposal
and
its
planning
staff's
recommendation
for
is
for
approval
with
the
conditions
included
in
the
staff
report,
and
that
includes
staff's
presentation.
Are
there
questions
for
staff
at
this.
F
Point
I
think
you
may
want
to
unmute
your
speaking.
A
I'm
sorry
does
the
applicant
wish
to
speak.
A
E
B
Jennifer,
yes,
I'm
so
sorry
this
to
interrupt
you.
This
is
michaela
from
planning.
I
just
gave
you
like
presenter
privileges.
Okay,
are
you
able
to
share
now.
E
All
right,
so
can
you
see
that,
yes,
we
can
great.
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
little
bit
of
a
background
on
neighborhood
house.
We've
been
around
for
a
long
time
since
1894
two
years
before
utah
was
even
a
state.
We
were
in
the
west
side
providing
services
to
families
who
were
striving
to
get
a
foothold
in
our
community.
E
We
still
continue
to
do
that
in
providing
daycare
for
children
and
adults
on
a
sliding
fee
scale
so
that
it
is
accessible
for
everyone.
We've
played
an
instrumental
role
also
in
helping
get
people
back
on
their
feet
after
the
coronavirus,
because
of
daycare
is
an
essential
piece
of
that
for
them
to
get
back
to
their
jobs
and
working
up
the
economic
ladder.
E
We
have
several
programs,
we
have
a
toddler
and
preschool
program,
starts
at
15
months
and
goes
up
to
school
age,
so
five
years
old,
where
we
get
children
ready
for
preschool
so
first
for
school,
I'm
sorry!
So
it's
an
accredited
preschool.
We
are
there
11
hours
a
day
so
that
we're
able
to
be
there
for
the
parent,
as
well
as
to
help
break
that
intergenerational
cycle
of
poverty,
by
providing
the
opportunities
to
these
kids
that
they
deserve
and
need
to
be
able
to
be
successful.
E
Additionally,
we
provide
a
youth
program
that
goes
from
kindergarten
up
through
sixth
grade.
This
is
year
round,
we're
here
all
the
time,
so
even
when
school's
out
of
session
we're
here
for
that
family
who
doesn't
get
those
breaks
from
work
and
need
somewhere
for
their
kids
to
be,
we
provide
stem.
We
provide
academic
support,
tutoring,
social,
emotional
and
really
just
work
to
give
them
the
opportunities
they
might
not
otherwise
have
access
to.
E
We
provide
adult
daycare
that
started
in
1978
when
that
started,
to
become
something
nationwide,
where
people
realize
that,
if
you're
caring
for
an
aging
or
disabled
adult
you
have
the
same
kind
of
barriers
that
you
do
when
you
are
caring
for
a
young
one
and
that
you
need
someone
or
for
them
to
be
during
the
day,
so
that
you
can
work,
you
can
make
ends
meet
and
you
can
work
without
disruptions
with
caregiving
and
then
just
recently
in
our
new
building.
E
So
what
we're
doing
with
this
garden
and
the
intergenerational
greenhouse
is
that
we
are
providing
programming,
that's
specifically
geared
and
intentionally
geared
towards
the
social,
emotional
development
of
our
children
and
the
engagement
of
our
adults
and
being
able
to
bring
them
together
in
a
gardening
setting
with
fresh
foods.
Helping
them
make
the
connection
between
where
their
food
comes.
E
From
also
doing
sensory
plants
that
help
stimulate
different
senses,
it's
all
a
therapeutic
approach
to
enhance
the
programming
that
we
already
provide
and
allow
our
populations
access
to
growing
their
own
food,
growing,
beautiful
things
and
having
a
sensory
therapeutic
experience,
not
only
just
with
their
peers
but
intergenerationally
between
children
and
adults.
This
is
our
new
facility,
and
this
is
part
of
that
expansion
that
we
have
this
vision
of
having
the
sensory
garden
and
the
greenhouse
and
then
ran
into
a
little
bit
of
difficulties,
not
quite
meeting
that
requirement
on
that
side.
E
So
that's
why
we're
asking
for
the
exception.
So
we
serve
543,
kids
and
adults
annually.
We
provide
93,
000
meals,
nutritious
meals
to
all
of
our
children
and
adults,
while
they're
in
our
care.
We
do
250
hours
of
stem,
so
science,
technology,
engineering
and
math
to
help
give
our
young
adults
a
chance
at
those
kinds
of
careers
as
they
grow.
We
serve
veterans
and
93
of
our
families
are
low
income
and
that's
just
not
at
the
low
income
cut
off.
E
That
goes
down
to
the
very
low
and
extremely
low
category
for
the
majority
of
our
clients.
So
being
able
to
bring
the
neighborhood
this
new
building
and
being
able
to
finish
it
by
doing
the
greenhouse
in
the
gardening,
we'll
be
able
to
bring
volunteers
in
to
do
different
groups
from
the
community
who
are
able
to
come
in
we'll
have
a
vegetable
and
fruit
garden.
We'll
have
the
sensory
garden
and
it'll
be
an
amazing
improvement
to
the
community,
to
our
neighborhood
and
to
the
programming
that
we're
able
to
provide
that.
We
do
so
through
fundraising.
E
So
there's
our
campus,
which
we're
very
proud
of
and
again
fundraise
the
money
to
get
that
built
and
we
were
able
to
add
all
of
these
different
enhanced
spaces,
one
of
which
is
the
intergenerational
greenhouse
from
century
garden,
which
we
hope
to
get
approval
for
so
that
we
can
move
forward
and
offer
this
space
to
our
community
and
to
our
clients.
E
We'll
have
horticulture
therapy
again
intergenerational
gardening
programs
that
will
emphasize
the
people
plant
connection
in
supporting
both
the
health,
wellness
and
environmental
stewardship
of
the
land.
A
From
commissioners,
if
not
thank
you
so
much
for
your
presentation.
That
was
very
helpful,
and
so
we
are
now
going
to
open
up
the
public
hearing.
A
D
Hello,
hello,
thank
you
for
listening
to
me
real
fast.
I
know
I
have
a
couple
minutes,
so
I'm
just
going
to
talk
real
fast.
I
talked
to
a
lot
of
my
neighbors
about
this.
I
live
on
goshen
street
and
I
gotta
tell
you
like
a
lot
of
people
in
this
neighborhood.
D
Don't
even
know
what
the
neighborhood
house
does,
and
so,
when
you
hear
this
talk
about
the
neighborhood
and
how
they're
supporting
the
neighborhood
people
don't
even
know
what
they're,
even
the
services
even
are,
and
no
one
in
this
neighborhood
has
actually
been
approached
and
talked
about
how
this
organization
can
even
do
things
like.
Also
this
construction
has
taken
two
years.
It's
created
a
huge
amount
of
traffic
on
the
street.
We've
had
animals
hit,
there's,
definitely
safety
issues.
D
There's
been
no
concern
whatsoever
about
cars,
speeding
up
and
down
this
road,
the
neighbor
of
the
house
on
the
north
side.
That's
where
that
greenhouse
is
going
to
go
those
people,
those
poor
people,
have
been
terrorized.
Last
two
years
with
just
constant
noise,
constant,
like
there
was
like
a
a
machine,
they
were
using
to
pound
like
the
foundation
and
it
was
like
shaking
all
these
old
houses
during
the
earthquake.
The
construction
company
had
people
on
scaffolding,
while
tremors
were
going
on,
there's
no
concern
for
those
workers.
D
There
has
been
just
one
thing
after
another
and,
like
I
think
that,
like
if
neighborhood
helps
really
want
real
support
from
this
neighborhood,
they
should
maybe,
if
you're
gonna
cause
a
lot
of
traffic
going
on
there.
Maybe
help
us
put
in
some
speed
bumps
in
this
road
to
keep
cars
from
speeding
up
and
down
the
road.
You
know
if,
if
you
want
us
to
feel
like
you're,
more
part
of
the
neighborhood
like
maybe
go
to
some
of
our
old
poor
neighbors
here
I
have
an
80
year
old
neighbor.
D
Maybe
he
could
use
some
help.
I
don't
know,
but
maybe
I
don't
know
what
you
guys
can
no
one
knows
what
you
guys
really
do,
but
that
that's
just
my
concerns
and
that's
after
talking
with
numerous
neighbors.
Thank
you.
A
E
Absolutely
so
we
actually
have
gone
out
and
talked
to
our
neighbors,
multiple,
I
would
say
three
times
or
four
times
during
this
process.
So
we
let
them
know
construction
was
going
to
be
starting.
We
gave
them
cards
to
say
who
to
call
if
there
were
any
problems,
so
they
could
call
directly
to
the
construction
company.
E
We
took
gift
baskets
out
to
them
around
christmas
time
to
thank
them
for
their
patience
with
this,
and
we
just
recently
went
and
talked
to
them
all
about
the
greenhouse,
and
we
talked
to
about
five
different
families
that
we
found
at
home
that
were
all
in
support
and
love.
What
we
do.
We
actually
found
one
elderly
woman
who
didn't
know
what
we
do
and
we
told
her
about
the
services
and
that
she
could
actually
come
and
be
a
part
of
our
adult
day
services.
E
She
was
spanish
speaking
and,
of
course,
we
were
lucky
to
have
a
spanish
speaker
with
us
on
our
outreach,
because
we
recognize
the
diversity
of
languages
within
our
community
and
within
our
staff.
We
employ
a
large
group
of
latinos
and
spanish
speakers
so
that
we
were
prepared.
For
that
conversation.
E
We're
able
to
talk
to
her
in
her
language
and
invite
her
to
come
and
be
a
part
of
it.
So
I'm
sorry
if
justin
doesn't
feel
like
he's
been
included
in
that,
but
we
have
acts
absolutely
made
huge
outreach.
We
have
one
resident
who
lives
on
goshen,
she's
lived
there
for
20
years
and
she
actually
now
works
for
us.
She's
been
working
for
us
for
two
years
now
and
loves
neighborhood
house.
E
We
also
have
one
who's:
a
client
who's,
just
a
couple:
houses
off
of
goshen
and
south
their
clients,
so
they're
very
involved
and
the
majority
of
our
kids
come
from
the
84104
zip
code.
So
they
absolutely
are
in
our
community
and
we
are
in
fact
a
very
neighborhood
based
and
community
based
organization.
I'd
say
more
so
than
most.
So
I
don't
not
sure
where
he's
coming
up
with
that,
but
we'd
love
speed
bumps
too.
If
he
wants
to
get
speed,
bumps
we'd
love
to
talk
about
speed
bumps
but
yeah.
A
Thank
you.
Actually,
I
think
not
at
this
point.
We've
already
closed
the
public
hearing,
so
we've
heard
you
and-
and
I
think
that
the
commissioners
have
enough
to
go
on
to
make
the
decision
at
this
point,
so
I'm
going
to
bring
it
back
to
the
commission
for
further
discussion
or
emotion.
G
G
Yes
agreed,
so
I'm
ready
to
make
a
motion
unless
anyone
has
anything
else,
they
want
to
discuss.
G
And
thank
you
jennifer
for
your
presentation.
That
was
very
insightful
and
I
didn't
realize
this
service
was
available
in
salt
lake.
So
that's
great
to
know
so.
Based
on
the
information
on
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing,
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
approves
the
neighborhood
house
greenhouse
plant
development
pln
pgm,
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report.
A
C
D
Yes
and
I'd
like
to
say
it's
a
wonderful
organization,
20
years
ago,
my
son
was
part
of
your
girl
and
I'm
very
pleased
with
how
you
guys
have
grown
wonderful.
Thank
you.
G
A
D
A
2019-01170
and
we
have
chrissy
presenting
this
christie,
christina
gilmore.
F
F
F
In
september,
2020
rockworth
companies
received
design
review
approval
for
a
new
mixed-use
development
due
to
building
size
limits
in
the
cb
community
business
zoning
district
buildings
in
excess
of
7500
gross
square
feet
of
floor
area
on
the
first
floor
are
only
allowed
through
the
design
review
process.
The
applicant
also
requested
review
from
the
underlying
relief
from
the
underlying
zoning
district
height
to
provide
a
greater
variation
in
the
facade
design
and
to
account
for
the
slope
of
the
site.
F
The
applicant
submitted
building
plans
and
the
new
plans
show
some
modifications
to
the
structures
that
deviate
from
what
was
previously
approved
by
the
commission.
Some
minor
changes
can
be
approved
administratively
by
the
planning
director,
but
those
are
very
limited.
The
requested
modifications
are
not
considered
minor,
and
that
is
why
the
proposed
modification
is
before
the
commission.
F
The
first
modification
relates
to
the
footprint
of
the
north
building
and
there
are
two
buildings
in
north
and
south
building,
and
this
is
for
the
north
building
and
there
was
a
shift
to
accommodate
a
step
in
the
finished
grade
on
the
north.
Face
of
the
building.
The
location
of
this
stepping
grade
was
shifted
to
the
east.
To
avoid
conflict
with
electric
electrical
gear
on
the
adjacent
property,
I've
shown
the
shift
highlighted
in
yellow
on
your
screen,
so
you
can
see
that
it
just
went
slightly
to
the
east
on
the
bottom
image.
F
So
here
is
the
elevation
view,
which
is
a
little
bit
clearer.
You
can
see
that
the
inset
area
in
the
dark
brown
shifted
to
the
east,
as
well
as
the
step
in
grade.
This
change
caused
a
modification
in
the
layout
and
footprint
of
the
building.
It
also
caused
a
modification
to
the
internal
units
which
changed
the
window
layout,
as
well
as
the
gridded
pattern,
fell
off
or
was
removed.
Additionally,
this
added
a
rooftop
patio.
F
F
F
Windows
were
modified
to
coincide
with
internal
unit
changes
as
well
as
change
in
design
with
the
removal
of
window
grids.
Additional
balconies
and
doors
were
also
added.
Changes
to
the
west
elevation
include
a
reduction
and
shift
in
windows
to
accommodate
the
unit
layout
and
the
addition
of
the
second
entrance.
The
west
elevation
still
includes
the
ada
ramp
and
platforms
shown
on
the
above
image,
but
they
are
just
not
shown
on
the
bottom
right
image.
F
Changes
to
the
south
building,
which
is
building
one
largely
do
not
change
the
original
approval
and
are
more
modern
than
those
changes
on
building
two.
These
changes
include
the
removal
of
a
wood
trellis
at
level
two
to
comply
with
the
building
code,
which
doesn't
allow
structures
on
rooftops
that
are
occupied
some
light.
Fixture
changes
window
grids
were
eliminated.
F
F
So
the
modif,
the
modified
design,
incorporates
elements
to
emphasize
the
human
skills,
such
as
the
addition
of
balconies
building,
articulation
architectural
elements
and
maintains
transparency
at
the
ground
level.
The
building
massing
is
broken
up
into
smaller
components
and
is
designed
to
maintain
compatibility
with
surrounding
buildings,
some
of
which
are
smaller
in
scale.
The
building
to
north
elevation
of
now
steps
a
little
bit
more
than
it
did
before
and
includes
an
addition
of
a
new
outdoor
seating
area
which
is
more
compatible
with
the
height
of
the
neighboring
buildings
than
the
original
proposal.
F
B
D
Sarah,
I
think
I
don't
know
if
so
sarah
is
also
representing
I'm.
The
architect
did
the
the
drawings
that
you
just
reviewed
and
sarah
are
you
on?
She
is.
D
I
don't
know
that
we
necessarily
have
a
presentation.
I
think
chrissy
did
a
pretty
good
job.
The
the
packet
included
the
kind
of
a
more
detailed
list.
I
think
she
did
a
pretty
good
job
of
distilling.
All
that
information.
I
would
say
that
we're
very
much
in
conformance
with
what
was
approved
back
last
fall,
and
we
hope
you
agree.
A
B
E
A
D
H
A
C
I'm
just
going
to
make
a
general
comment
that
perhaps
I
am
blind
stupid
whatever
tonight,
but
I
I
I
don't
understand
exactly
what's
changing,
I
can't
really
visualize
it
from
what
we've
been
given
in
our
packet
and
until
I
really
really
understand
it
or
can
see
it,
I'm
not
inclined
to
support
it.
But
that's,
maybe
just
me
not
really
getting
what's
happening
here.
C
You
know
chrissy,
I
honestly
from
the
from
the
renderings
in
the
packet.
I
don't
get
what's
changing
enough,
so
even
I
don't
even
know
what
to
ask
you
like
to
clarify
more,
I
just
for
me
visually.
Those
renderings
aren't
really
helping
me
understand
why
this
is
a
significant
change
that
warrants
it
to
come
before
us.
I
just
don't
understand
that
part
and
I
don't
think
there's
anything
that
you
did.
That
has
confused
me.
I
just
visually
cannot
really
get
this
and
why?
C
Why
is
it?
Why
is
it
substantial
if
it's
so
substantial
enough
to
come
back
to
us?
I
don't
think
I'm
seeing
the
reasoning
behind
that
with
the
renderings
that
are
in
the
packet.
So
I
just
think
for
me
that
it's
insufficient.
D
Amy
we
appreciate
that
comment
and
we
appreciate
chrissy's
review.
We
agree
with
you.
I
think
it's
just
a
code
trigger
that.
I
think
chrissy's
words
were,
the
changes
are
not
considered
minor.
I
think.
According
to
the
code,
we
certainly
consider
them
very
minor.
However,
the
code
is
as
it
is.
The
project
hasn't
changed
in
use,
massing,
building,
height
density,
it's
it's
the
same
project,
but
very,
very
minor
changes
that
are
just
the
result
of
full
design.
C
I
might
be
the
only
one
with
this
problem,
and
so
I
don't
want
to
make
you
go
through
and
really
explain
it
more.
If
the
other
commissioners
feel
good
about
it,
that's
then
it's
me
and
that's
fine,
so
I
would
like
to
hear
from
the
other
commissioners.
If
they
share
that
sentiment
and
if
they
don't,
then
we
can
wrap
it
up.
A
Well,
I
think
one
of
the
things
that's
important
to
notice.
This
is
happening
on
the
north
side
of
the
north
building
and-
and
so
this
is
probably
the
least
obvious
elevation
change
and
it's
mostly
a
change
that
has
to
do
with
shifting
where
the
building
steps
down.
A
So
I
don't
see
other
than
the
issue
I
just
raised
with
the
architect
about
the
muntins
changing
which
does
change
what
the
what
they
call
the
grid
on
the
windows,
which
are
those
little
glass
light
different
lights,
it's
hard
to
explain,
panes
of
glass
that
break
up
a
window.
A
That
is
a
that
is
that's
going
to
be
a
design
change.
Is
it
going
to
be
a
change
in
the
look
of
the
building,
but
I
don't
know
that
it's
it's
it's
important
enough.
A
You
can
see
it
on
page
four
better
than
you
can
see
it
elsewhere,
where
you
see
east
elevation
sort
of
before
and
the
in
the
west
elevation
assuming
the
west
elevation
before,
does
have
that
those
mountains
on
the
windows
and
then
and
it
doesn't
after
so
again
and
then
there's
some
minor
changes
to
the
way
the
the
actual
building
material
massing
is
arranged,
but
it
was
kind
of
arbitrary
to
begin
with.
So
I
don't
know-
and
it's
like
those
big
issues.
B
That's
a
sort
of
like
minor
type
of
alteration,
let's
say:
there's
some
sort
of
yellow,
textured,
brick
or
something
that
that
has
now
been
discontinued
and
an
architect
comes
back
and
shows
us
like
a
rose-colored,
yellow
brick.
We
could
administratively
approve
that
or
if
there's
like
a
fi,
a
small
fire
code
issue.
B
But
you
know
these
plans
are
approved
by
you
all.
We
can't
go
too
far
administratively
when
it
comes
to
like
massing-
and
you
know,
shifting
around
facades,
coupled
with
window
changes
and
other
big
design
review
items
they
have
to
to
build.
B
Essentially
what
you
approve
and
it's
sort
of
similar
to
the
landmark
commission.
There
might
be
like
a
shortening
of
a
balcony,
but
even
a
small
balcony.
We
might
have
to
take
back
to
the
landmark
commission
because
we
don't
have
the
authority
that
might
that,
might
that
would
bump
an
application
back
to
the
actual
body
that
approved
it.
I
hope
that
helps.
C
It
does
so
thank
you,
brenda
for
pointing
me
to
page
four.
I
actually
like
our
version
better,
and
so
I'm
I'm
wondering.
C
A
lot
better,
actually
I'm
wondering
I
mean
that's
the
problem,
I'm
having
is
all
of
these
other
massive
changes.
Are
they
making
any
substantial
difference
to
the
way
this
looks
like
it
is
on
page
four
or
I
was
moving
the
electrical
box
not
doing
anything
or
just
the
renderings?
Really
don't
hone
in
on
that.
C
For
me,
page
four
is
pretty
good,
so
I'm
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
break
up
the
parts
that
we're
like
yeah,
we're
okay
to
change,
that
no
we're
not
okay
to
change
this
or
if
it's
like
the
full
thing,
because
I
don't
I
don't
know-
I
I
feel
a
little
hesitant
on
this
one
just
because
I
really
am
not
sure
exactly
everything
that
I'm
approving
based
on
what
we
did
last
time
and
I
and
on
page
four
I
actually
really
do
prefer
our
original
version.
D
C
Imply
that
ryan
I
meant
to
apply,
I
didn't
understand
what
the
significance
part
was
and
michaela
mick
and
michaela
spelled
that
out.
For
me,
I
wasn't
trying
to
insinuate
that
I
didn't
feel
these
changes
were
were
were
big
or
small.
I
had
no
opinion
on
that
part.
I
just
I
wasn't
fully
understanding
exactly
what
was
triggering
it
to
come
here
is
what
my
point
was.
B
And
staff
analyzes
the
project
against
those
design
review
standards
once
again,
and
maybe
we
can,
we
can
talk
offline
if
we
have
a
sort
of
similar
project
to
see
how
we
can
go
point
by
point,
perhaps
you
I
mean
you
explained.
C
Michaela,
I
think
I
just
feel
muddied
on
this
one,
that's
all
just
because
it's
a
big
project,
I'm
just
really
trying
to
focus
in
on
what
exactly
are
we
changing
and
do
I
like
some
of
it?
Do
I
not
like
some
of
it
and
I'm
a
little
overwhelmed
with
the
different
parts,
to
really
really
understand
exactly
what
I
would
be
voting
on.
A
G
I'm
I'm
willing
to
make
a
motion.
I
understand
amy's
concerns,
but,
and
my
initial
reaction
was
that
they
were
required
by
the
code
that
were
not
significant
in
terms
of
the
overall
impact
of
the
project
and
the
issues
that
we
as
a
planning
commission
would
normally
analyze.
G
You
know
whether
they've
got
divided
light
or
not
divided
light
windows
is
an
aesthetic
choice,
but
I
don't
think
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
would
not
approve
a
project
because
of
their
window
pane
treatments
so,
based
on
the
analysis
and
findings
listed
in
the
staff
memo
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing,
we've
got.
The
planning
commission
approved
the
modifications
to
the
design
review,
approval,
petition,
tln
pcm.
D
A
Thank
you
maureen.
I
have
a
motion
from
adrian
in
a
second
from
maureen,
so
we
will
go
through
a
roll
call.
Maureen,
yes,
amy.
C
Yeah,
so
this
is
not
the
first
time
that
I
have
been
alone
and
it
probably
won't
be
the
last.
But
I
appreciate
everybody's
input
on
that.
But
tonight
I'm
gonna
vote.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you
passes
six
to
one.
Thank
you
all
and
now
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
three
on
our
agenda.
A
It
is
pln,
so
it's
two
actual
things:
pln
pcm,
2021-0029
and
plnpcm.
I
Okay,
good
evening,
everybody,
let
me
go
ahead
and
share
my
screen.
I
Okay,
this
is
a
request
from
chris
lee,
representing
the
property
owners,
see
tag
llc
and
grij
great
greenhaven
homes,
llc
to
amend
the
central
community
master
plan,
future
land
use
map
and
the
zoning
map
for
the
properties
located
at
203,
east
2100,
south
221,
east
2100,
south
and
1991
south
200
east.
I
The
request
would
amend
the
zoning
of
the
properties
from
rmf
45,
moderate,
high
density,
multifamily
residential
to
fbun2
forum
based
urban
neighborhood.
The
request
would
also
amend
the
central
community
master
plan.
Future
land
use
map
from
medium
high
residential
to
high
mixed
use.
I
The
applicants
intend
to
develop
the
three
parcels
into
a
mixed-use
multi-family
development.
The
applicant
is
currently
in
the
process
of
rehabilitating
the
old
georgia
apartments,
which
will
be
included
in
the
project
proposal.
Early
proposal.
Ideas
for
the
project
would
be
to
rehabilitate
the
old
georgia
apartments,
as
well
as
construct
new
mixed-use
residential
buildings.
On
the
subject
parcels,
although
no
specific
development
plans
have
been
submitted
to
the
planning
staff
staff
is
recommending,
the
commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
city
council
for
the
proposed
zoning
map
and
master
plan.
I
Amendment
subject:
properties
are
located
on
the
northeast
corner
of
200,
east
and
2100
south
on
the
border
of
salt
lake
city
and
the
city
of
south
salt
lake.
The
properties
in
the
surrounding
area
are
arizona
permit
primarily
for
residential
or
commercial
uses
to
the
north.
The
properties
are
zoned,
moderate,
high
density,
multi-family,
residential
and
single-family
residential
to
the
east.
I
I
The
top
left
photo
shows
the
old
georgia
apartments
currently
being
rehabilitated
on
the
top
right
photo
shows
the
property
from
the
corner
of
200,
east
and
2100
south
the
bottom
left
photo
shows
the
undeveloped
property
at
221,
east
and
the
bottom
right
photo
shows
the
current
house
in
1991
south
that
is
proposed
to
be
demolished.
I
These
are
some
photos
of
some
adjacent
properties.
The
top
left
photo
shows
some
commercial
uses
to
the
east.
The
top
right
photo
shows
a
commercial
office
building
on
the
southwest
corner
of
200,
east
and
2100.
South
bottom
left
photo
shows
the
county
high-rise
apartments
it's
hard
to
see,
but
in
the
back
there's
also
a
10
story.
I
I
Subject:
property
lies
within
the
central
community
master
plan
area.
The
request
aligns
with
many
policies
found
within
this
plan
plan
includes
several
goals
for
increasing
the
community's
residential
density
and
to
provide
a
variety
of
housing
options
that
are
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhoods
of
the
central
community.
I
I
The
purpose
of
the
request
is
to
allow
commercial
use
on
the
subject
properties.
The
introduction
of
commercial
use
could
impact
adjacent
properties.
However,
given
the
zoning
and
current
uses
of
many
of
the
surrounding
properties
and
negative
impact
to
the
area
is
not
expected,
building
design
was
also
considered
when
reviewing
the
request
to
amend
the
zoning
designation
from
rmf
45
to
fb
unit2.
I
I
I
It
is
important
to
note
also
that
the
fbun2
zone
has
a
similar
maximum
height
allowed.
As
the
current
rmf
45
zone,
the
rmf
45
allows
development
up
to
45
feet.
The
fbun2
zone
allows
development
up
to
50
feet.
However,
the
fbun2
zone
requires
a
step
back
for
buildings
that
exceed
a
height
of
30
feet.
They
must
be
stepped
back.
I
One
foot
for
every
foot
above
30
feet
that
that
building
goes
another
factor
that
was
considered
was
parking
for
multi-family
dwellings
in
the
rmf
45
zone,
they're
required
to
have
one
parking
space
per
one
bedroom
and
efficiency,
dwelling
units
and
two
parking
spaces
for
each
dwelling
unit
containing
two
or
more
bedrooms.
I
I
I
The
intention
would
be
to
retain
51
stalls
of
current
parking,
as
well
as
include
underground
parking
in
the
new
development
on
the
properties.
The
underground
parking
would
add,
approximately
55
to
65
parking
stalls,
bringing
the
total
number
of
stalls
to
106
to
116
stalls.
I
The
subject
properties
with
the
subject
property
lies
within
the
boundaries
of
the
liberty
wells
community
council.
Early
notification
was
sent
to
liberty
wells
community
council
chair
requesting
comments
for
the
proposal.
The
applicant,
as
well
as
planning
staff,
were
invited
to
attend
a
community
council
meeting
where
the
project
was
discussed.
A
C
C
Chris,
I
just
have
a
couple
questions.
One
is
when
we
talk
about
the
height-
and
it
says
a
maximum
of
50
feet.
Is
that
a
true
maximum,
or
can
they
go
higher
with
design
review.
I
C
Okay
and
then
I'm
curious
if
there
were
alternate
zones
that
would
allow
for
a
commercial
use
that
you
know
maybe
didn't,
have
a
zero
front
setback
or
no
parking
requirements.
I
So
zones
like
the
rmu
45
were
considered.
However,
the
applicant
wanted
to
do
the
fbu
end
zone
just
because
they
felt
it
would
be
a
better
fit
with
the
community
because
of
those
requirements
for
design
control
that
the
other
zones
don't
have
or
are
far
less
stringent
than
what
the
fb
zones
require.
H
H
H
I
So
essentially,
you're
going
it's
going
to
be
similar
to
that
of
a
mixed
use.
Let
me
see
if
I
still
have
the
ability
to.
I
Share
okay,
so
this
is
the
requirements
for
storefront
commercial
you'll
see
a
lot
of
it.
I
mean
kind
of
what
you
would
consider
your
typical
storefront
to
look
like
a
lot
of.
It
does
look
like
your
classic
vertical
mixed
use.
However,
you
probably
wouldn't
have
the
balconies
and
that
kind
of
thing.
H
H
Yes,
I'm
just
I'm
asking
these
questions
only
because
the
staff
report
leans
pretty
heavily
on
the
you
know
needing
to
expand
residential
stuff
and
that's
not
necessarily
a
fully
residential
zone,
and
my
my
second
question
I
want
to
ask
you
about-
was
it?
Why
does
the
master
plan
I
mean
looking
just
at
the
general
impact?
I
I
Just
for
those
parcels
and
then
a
couple
like
two
parcels
north
of
the
subject,
parcels
are
the
only
ones
that
are
zoned
for
that
type
of.
H
The
master
plan
is
medium
high,
residential
we're
changing
it
to
high
mixed
use.
Yes,
I
mean
because
to
me
it
doesn't
seem
like
the
zone.
Change
really
is
that
much
of
an
increase
to
go
to
a
high
pilot
intensity,
but
the
it
just
seems
like
a
big.
It
just
seems
like
fb.
You
and
2
fits
odd
to
me
and
that
go
into
that
piece.
But
I
guess,
if
you're
trying
to
get
rid
of
the
residential.
B
And
maybe
maybe
the
applicant
can
can
decide
because
over
the
or
can
speak
to
why
they
took
why
they
applied
for
fbun2.
Instead
of
you
know,
rmu
45
or
something
else,
because
I
know
that
on
21st
south
over
the
years
you
know
there's
been
a
lot
of
sort
of
spot
zoning.
I
guess,
if
you
will
and
master
plan
changes,
you
know
where
you
might
see
like
rmu
45,
not
generally
fbu
on
to
but
it'd
be
of
interest
to
ask
the
applicant
to
kind
of
share
with
us.
Yes,.
A
J
This
is
chris
lee
I
am
the
applicant
aaron,
who
is
the
owner
and
developer,
will
do
a
presentation
speak
a
little
bit
more
in
depth,
but
just
to
address
that
question,
why
fbun2,
rather
than
rmu-45
or
something
like
that?
One
of
the
major
things
that
we
are
shooting
for
is
density.
J
We
are
definitely
shooting
for
residential
building
in
that
location
and
with
the
fbu
n2
zoning.
It
allows
for
much
more
density
as
far
as
the
number
of
units
that
you
can
put
in
the
building,
so
that
is
one
of
the
things
that
we're
really
shooting
for,
and
we
also
felt
that
the
stringent
design
guidelines
and
the
required
step
backs
and
the
different
things
that
go.
There
would
also
be
better
for
the
existing
r1
5000
residential,
the
borders,
part
of
the
property
there.
F
K
Okay,
just
to
answer
some
of
the
questions,
real
quick,
so
chris
lee
is
exactly
right.
The
reason
why
we
went
for
the
this
fb
zone
was
specifically
because
of
density.
I
think
one
of
the
biggest
problems
that
we
have
in
the
city
is
affordable,
housing
and
with
I
I
just
I
took
a
walk
today
over
at
the
building
and
you're
going
to
see
some
of
my
videos,
so
my
presentation's
a
video.
K
Now
I'm
I'm
a
terrible
videographer
just
so
you
know
my
my
kids
are
wrestlers
and
I
record
their
little
matches
and
they
are
all
over
the
place.
So
just
if
you
get
dizzy
watching
my
little
thing,
I'm
sorry
but
I
took
a
walk
and
I
walked
over
to
the
s
line
to
time
it
and
it's
just
under
eight
minutes
from
the
corner
of
2100,
south
and
200
east,
to
get
to
the
s
line
station
on
300
east
there,
where
you
can
actually
board
the
train.
K
So
with
that,
I
think
one
of
the
major
things
that
we
wanted
with
that
density
is
being
able
to
add
more
units
so
that
people
can
use
the
mass
transit
and
make
it
more
of
a
walkable
community.
I
think
you'll
see
what
what
I'm
talking
about
when
we
go
through
that
and
that's
the
major
reason
why
we
went
for
this
loan,
this
zone
versus
the
rmu-45
chris
lee,
and
I
both
together.
We
talked
significantly
about
these,
both
both
of
the
zones,
our
mu,
45
and
also
this
fb
zone.
K
The
form
base
zone
is
is
much
better.
I
think
for
what
what
the
city
is
trying
to
create
and
it
has
created
in
in
the
sugar
health
area.
So
let
me
see
if
I
can,
let's
see,
share
my
screen
here.
K
B
I
have
you
as
the
presenter
just
one
moment.
Oh
that's
weird.
B
Yeah
says
that
you're,
the
presenter
aaron
I'm
gonna,
make
brenda
the
presenter
just
for
a
second
and
then
I'm
gonna
grab
the
ball.
H
Hey
michaela,
while
you're
figuring
this
out,
commissioner,
this
is
john.
I
just
wanted
to
mention
you
kind
of
mentioned
that
fba
was
kind
of
rare
in
this
neighborhood.
It's
we
should
remember.
It
is
a
new
zone,
so
we
haven't
used
it
that
much,
but
the
city
council
did
approve
a
zoning
map,
amendment
on
state
street
and
13th
south
with
the
same
zone
recently,
and
before
that,
we,
I
think
the
other
area
outside
of
central
9th
was
around
charlie
square.
So.
B
H
Let
me
see
here
so
there's
there's
two
places:
erin
one
would
be
at
the
top
right
you
can
hit
share
or
top
left
excuse
me.
You
should
be
able
to
click
on
my
screen.
The
other
area
would
be
down
where
you
can
unmute
and
mute
yourself.
There
should
be
a
mute,
start,
video
and
then
a
share
button.
There
is
your
chair
button,
grayed
out.
K
D
Hold
on:
let's
try
to
send
this.
D
K
I'll
just
speak,
just
I'll
just
speak
to
it
as
it
goes.
It's
just
a
little
short
video
to
kind
of
give
you
an
idea,
so
the
entire,
the
the
entirety
of
this
of
this
project
and
the
reason
why
we're
going
for
the
I'll
tell
you
when
to
start
it
chris
when
you're
ready,
but
the
the
reason
why
we're
going
for
this
fb
zone
is
because
of
wanting
to
it
allows
again
we're
actually
making
it
harder
for
us
to
design
a
product
for
the
neighborhood.
K
K
We
don't
ever
have
to
have
parking,
but
that's
not
really
realistic
when
people
want
to
go
shopping
there,
especially
when
you're
going
to
have
a
retail
component
on
the
main
on
the
on
the
ground
floor
level,
which
we
really
really
want,
and
then
you've
got
people
who
live
there,
we're
st
now
we're
becoming
more
and
more
of
a
walkable
city,
especially
with
our
mass
transit.
But
that's
still
something
that's
that
we
need
to
address
some
of
the
parking.
K
I'm
sure
you
guys
in
the
planning
commission
have
seen
some
of
the
projects
that
didn't
have
a
lot
of
parking.
It
becomes
an
issue
in
some
areas,
and
so
we
met.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
going
to
create
that
we're
open
to
also
different
recommendations
from
the
planning
commission
to
say
that
hey,
you
know
what
we're
okay
with
this
as
long
as
it
is
a
mixed
use
with
residential
focus,
you
know,
whatever
we
have
to
do
in
in
the
development
agreement,
to
ensure
that
we
get
the
residential
focus
on
that.
K
J
I
think
that
I've
got
it
ready
to
go,
I'm
pushing
play
right
now.
Let
me
know
if
you
guys
are
seeing
this.
J
Okay,
one
second,
I
thought
that
I
had,
but
let
me
do
that.
J
K
All
right,
okay,
so
here's
our
little
zoning
presentation
again
don't
make
fun
of
my
my
skills,
they're
terrible
so
anyway,
but
this
was
the
old
building
when
we
started.
As
you
guys
know,
this
project
has
been
an
issue
for
the
city
for
some
time,
and
so
you
saw
some
of
the
stuff
that
chris
earl
put
in
there.
This
is
my
walk
today
I
took
this
video
just
to
show
you
an
idea
of
where
we're
at
with
the
project.
K
Everything
in
those
45
units
is
being
redone,
so
we're
down
to
the
studs
all
new
electrical
plumbing
hvac
systems,
much
better
building
open
floor
plans,
so
it'll
be
a
much
better
place
for
people
to
live.
We
created
parking
in
in
these
in
the
little
in
these
parts
of
the
of
the
building
here
to
create
a
lot
more
spaces
for
parking,
and
so
you
see
this
building.
It's
set
back
significantly
from
200,
east
and
2100
south,
which
you're
going
to
see
this
corner.
K
So
that's
where
the
new
building
would
be
constructed,
we're
gonna
we're
gonna,
keep
the
existing
45
units
and
and
have
that
as
a
part
of
this
development,
those
aren't
going
away.
K
So
we're
not
demolishing
the
building
or
anything
like
that,
but
this
particular
corner
is
is
what
you're
going
to
see
where
we
want
the
development
and
we're
going
to
see
the
major
change
on
on
the
new
building
that
would
be
constructed
if
we
get
this
fb
to
zoning-
and
this
is
me
trying
to
talk
so
in
that
video
anyway,
so
you
can
see
we
have
if
we
build
this
correctly,
we're
going
to
have
plenty
of
parking
that
we
can
build
underneath
the
structure,
so
we
can
have
parking
that
goes
underneath
the
residential
essentially
would
be
covered
parking
for
the
people
that
would
be
visiting
the
retail
section
of
the
of
the
different
places
that
are
going
to
be
there
on
the
ground
floor
and
for
for
more
of
the
residents
there.
K
K
We
have
that
entire
lot
is
actually
really
deep,
so
we
can
put
parking
underneath
all
of
all
of
this
as
well.
That
alone
adds
a
good
20,
almost
30
spaces
when
it's
constructed
correctly,
and
so
as
we're
as
again
the
I
think
with
the
development.
When
we
look
at
the
from
a
design
standpoint,
it
really
is
the
focus
of
that
corner
of
21st,
south
and
second
east
is
doing
something
with
that.
That
creates
a
more
community
feel
something
like
this.
K
This
is
a
building
that
was
approved,
that
that
was
built
pause
it
right
here,
if
you
can
chris,
oh
yeah,
sorry,
okay,
the
those
two
renderings,
the
last
two
that
you
saw.
You
guys
have
seen
this
because
they
were
approved.
They
I
don't
know
if
they're
approved,
but
it's
part
of
the
granary
district.
This
particular
building
would
be
something
that
that's
in
washington
state.
K
That
would
give
you
a
good
idea
of
kind
of
what
we're
thinking.
So
you
have
the
retail
component
on
the
bottom,
which
creates
more
of
a
community,
feel
a
walkable
community
feel
with
the
different
retail
all
along
that
bottom,
with
the
corner
anchor
and
then
you've
got
residential
above
and
then
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
there.
K
This
one
here
is
a
similar.
These
two
are
similar
ones
that
were
renderings
that
were
done
by
bridge
capital
for
their
granary
project
that
is
being
built
now
very
similar
where
they'll
have
a
restaurant,
there
they'll
have
other
retail
and
then
and
then
residents
above
and
then
the
next
picture
there.
Something
like
that,
I
think,
what's
happening
with
21st
south,
is
all
that
all
the
developments
started
up
on
the
eastern
end
of
21st
south
and
is
now
coming
west.
K
But
when
you
look
at,
if
you
take
it
from
state
street
up,
you
have
right
there
on
the
west
in
salt
lake
city,
you've
got
the
county
building,
so
there's
not
going
to
be
any
other
development
there.
K
With
that
parking
lot
and
everything
else,
and
then
you
have
second
east
corner,
and
so
that
really
is
kind
of
a
gateway
to
the
rest
of
21st
south,
and
I
think,
as
the
development
from
the
west
end
of
21st,
south
and
the
east
end
of
21st
south
starts
to
merge
together
is
where
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
a
a
nice
cohesive
feel
between
the
two
of
the
developments
we
can
see
in
places
in
a
stuff
like
this
is
built
quite
a
bit
on
the
eastern
end
over
on
13th
and
21st,
and
that
kind
of
thing,
and
frankly,
with
the
last
project
that
we
just
saw
on
21st,
east
and
21st
south.
K
This
is
almost
identical
to
that,
with
the
exception
of
that,
I
believe
it
was
like
two-story
or
three-story
building,
but
anyhow
that
would
be
the
reason
why
we're
going
for
that
zone.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
start
making
that
cohesive,
look
and
also
allowing
for
the
density
in
in
the
neighborhood
and
so
that
we
can
meet
the
needs
of
of
the
populace.
A
Thank
you
and
your
time
is
up
actually
so,
okay,
even
giving
you
a
lot
of
extra
time
for
technical
difficulties,
so
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
ask
the
commission
if
they
have
any
questions
before
I
open
up
the
public
meeting
so.
K
G
K
Yeah,
so
the
the
intention
is,
we
all
I
control
so
there's
two
different
owners.
The
one
on
219
2100
south
will
be
working
together.
They'll
maintain
their
own
separate
lot,
but
I
have
the
corner
of
21st
south
and
second
east,
and
then
it
goes
all
the
way
over
to
the
other
lot,
which
is
1991
south
200
east,
and
that
lot
and
my
lot
will
be
combined.
Yes,.
A
B
B
D
No,
I'm
I'm
the
other
property
owner
aaron
referred
to,
so
I'm
obviously
in
support.
So
no
okay.
D
B
H
My
only
ques
I
mean
to
me
I'm
worried
a
little
about
commercial
encroachment
back
into
that
like
residential
neighborhood,
but
I
don't
know
how
you
I
mean.
I
know
this
cities
like
to
split
zone
lots.
It
seems
like
that
corner,
parcel
or
corner
area
seems
fine.
With
I
mean
the
result
is
probably
going
to
be
fine,
but
just
because
we're
redoing
a
zone
that
should
be
done
for
a
specific
project,
it
seems
like
I
don't
know.
H
If
there's
any
stats,
any
thoughts
or
feedback
on,
can
you
zone
just
the
corner
there
and
a
reason
I'm
just
a
corner,
so
they
can
do
more
density
and
that
what
they're
trying
to
do
there
in
that
corner
space,
but
then
not
the
part.
That
kind
of
goes
north
along
the
street.
H
I
mean
I,
I
think
that
the
commission
certainly
has
that
ability
to
make
that
as
a
recommendation
to
the
council,
that
you
would
only
want
to
see
a
portion
that
property
zone
that
way
another
route
potentially
would
be
to
put
conditions
on
that
on.
If
you
make
a
recommendation
for
fbo
and
2
on
the
whole
parcel,
but
then
place
conditions
on
what
can
be
constructed
there
in
the
future,
it's
not
always
our
favorite
way
to
plan,
but
it
seems
like
that
seems
to
be
challenging
from
a
future
ownership
and
development.
H
So
we
would.
The
the
city
council
would
require
that
we
enter
into
a
development
agreement
in
order
to
do
that.
So
for
the
applicant
I
mean,
are
you
seeking
this?
Like
you
know,
fbun
zone
largely
just
for
that
corner
parcel,
or
is
it?
Do
you
care
about
that
northern
kind
of
two-thirds
of
the
lot
being
rezoned
or
not.
K
That
northern
that
northern
lot
being
rezoned,
so
the
rmf
45
zone,
doesn't
so
by
combining
those
parcels,
I'm
limited
on
what
I
can
do
based
upon
square
footage
requirements
of
a
lot.
So
that's
one
of
the
biggest
problems
with
rmf
zones
within
the
city,
which
is
why
the
city
is
going
through
trying
to
change
that
right.
K
K
Combining
it
it
would
be
a
better
solution
to
combine
it
and
say:
okay,
that
has
to
stay
residential,
so
we
can
build,
say
maybe
15
to
20
units
there,
but
it
needs
to
stay
residential
all
right
on
that
portion
on
the
north
and
side,
and
then
the
commercial
would
be
on
that
corner
and
then
the
residential,
above
with
the
development
agreement.
I
think
that's
a
that
would
be
more
appropriate
and
it
would
also
make
more
sense
because
it's
it's
a
difficult
balance
because
we're
dealing
with
and
that's
where,
I
think,
these
development
agreements.
K
I
know
it's
not
a
great
way
for
to
always
deal
with
zoning
rezoning
things,
but
it
does
come
into
play
with
odd
pieces
like
this,
where
you
have
this
trickle
effect,
where
it
obviously
makes
sense
to
have
that
zone
on
the
corner,
but
not
so
much
in
the
back
north
part
of
that
of
the
of
the
lot,
and
so
I
would
be
definitely
open
and
immediate
amenable
to
doing
something
like
that.
We.
H
We
have
lots
that
are
split
zoned.
I
mean
that
that
that
have
two
zones
on
them.
We
usually
we
usually
fix
that
problem
rather
than
create
it.
That's
my
but
I
I
I
some
real
hesitancy
with
the
way
that
this
transitions
into
an
existing
kind
of
residential
neighborhood,
with
with
increasing
both
available
commercial
and
not
just
you
know,
for
because
we're
rezoning
a
lot
not
just
for
a
project
right,
we're
deciding
whether
this
zone
is
appropriate
for
that
area
and
so,
even
with
a
development
agreement.
H
I
think
it's
helpful
but
like
it's
still,
I
think
it's
tied
to
a
title,
and
I
just
I
think
that
complicates
a
lot
from
going
forward.
I
mean
it's
so
much
cleaner
if
we
just
do
it
our
job
and
do
it
right,
which
is
zoning,
I
think
an
argument.
You
should
have
commercial
along
21st
south,
given
everything
else
that's
going
along
there
I
do
have
you
know,
I
will
say
it's
been
a
weird
deal
that
we've
been
allowing
commercial
and
different
up
zones
further
further
kind
of
without
really
a
plan.
It
seems
like
we
have.
H
We
should
have
nodes,
and
I
again
I
feel
like
this
node
between
second
east
and
arguably,
seventh
east
is
more
of
a
lower
intensity
residential
sort
of
area,
but
I
might
be
willing
to
give
you
the
fa.
H
You
know
the
the
form-based
zone
and
the
corner
just
to
kind
of
move
a
a
residential
project
forward,
because
it's
so
important
for
the
city
right
now,
but
I
do
have
hesitancy
about
stretching
that
zone
back
into
the
back
towards
the
north,
and
you
know,
and
if
you
leave
it
as
one
lot,
though,
what
you're
saying,
if
you
need
the
square
footage
on
the
lot,
even
if
it's
split
zone,
two
lots.
It
shouldn't
matter
to
you
because
we're
not
splitting
a
lot
we're
just.
The
lot
has
two
zones
on
it:
yeah.
D
I
got
a
question
for
you
matt,
don't
we
want
commercial,
that's
walkable
like
from
a
neighborhood.
Do
we
want
what
don't
we
want?
A
walkable
commercial
area
closer
to
neighborhoods.
H
Kind
of
neighborhood,
an
area
where
I
think
you
you
want
less
of
I
just
I
feel
you
you
have.
You
have
a
lot
of
walkable
area
right
around
there
and
I
would
agree
with
the
applicant
that
your
proximity
to
the
s
line
and
arguably
even
tracks
down
300
west
is
very
short.
You
know,
could
potentially
a
walk
or
a
bike,
or
you
know
a
short
bike
ride.
If
that's,
you
know,
need
be
or
easy
bus
trip
too.
H
J
A
J
I
would
just
also
add
that
we're
really
thinking
about
the
residential
area
there
I,
who
knows
what's
going
to
happen,
50
or
100
years
into
the
future,
but
we're
putting
a
lot
of
money
into
the
existing
building
right
now
to
renovate
it,
and
we
don't
see
that
changing
anytime
in
the
future,
but
even
if
it
does
with
the
fbun2
code
standards.
J
The
impacts
to
the
residential
buildings
on
that
side
would
probably
be
lessened
because
of
the
setbacks
that
have
to
happen
and
the
the
design
standards
that
are
in
the
fb
un2
code
compared
to
the
rml45
code.
And
we
feel
like
it's
actually
a
better
situation,
a
better
scenario
for
the
residential
people
that
are
already
there.
A
A
I
think
there's
only
a
very
small
risk
that
there
would
be
a
lot
of
commercial
back
in
there
and
you
do
have
something
across
the
street:
that's
not
a
single-family
residential
either
the
county
building
is
there
and
you
know,
there's
quite
a
node
of
things
going
on
there.
G
Agree
with
that
brenda
and
the
fact
that
they
are
renovating
those
those
properties.
I
realize
that's
not
like
a
true
land
use
consideration
for
us,
but
in
my
mind
that
alleviates
the
concern
of
large-scale
commercial
encroachment
directly
behind
what
is
a
residential
area
to
the
east.
So
if
the
you
know,
if
the
city
council
wants
to
require
a
planning,
no
a
development
agreement,
I
think
that
would
also
make
sense,
but
that's
up
to
them
to
decide.
So
I
would
be
at
this
point
in
favor
of
forwarding
a
positive
recommendation
from
the
planet's
mission.
A
Anyone
at
all
I'll
do
it
again:
okie
dokie
adrian.
G
All
right,
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
of
the
staff
report,
testimony
and
discussion
of
the
public
hearing.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
recommend
that
the
city
council
approve
the
proposed
zoning
map.
Amendment
file
pln
pcm
2021-0029,
where
the
property
is
located
at
203,
east
2100,
south
221,
east
2100,
south
and
1991
south
200
east
from
the
rmf
45
moderate,
high
density,
multi-family
residential
districts
to
the
fbun2
forum
based
urban
neighborhood
district
and
corresponding
master
plan
amendment
under
file
pln
pcm
2021-00104.
G
A
Okay,
that
was
a
a
motion
from
iran
and
a
second
from
john
said:
right:
okay,
maureen,
yes,
amy.
C
C
Use
of
land-
and
I
think
you
can
do
something
really
good
there.
So,
yes.
C
A
H
I'll
be
amy
this
time
and
say
no.